Item 7.1 Att 4 (5) Ex A - Final_EACCS_Oct2010_Print - City of Dublin

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix E. Continued Table E-8. Impact/Mitigation Scoring for golden eagle in the EACCS study area. Golden eagle 5 4 3 2 1 0 Score Presence of golden eagle nest Yes -- -- -- -- No within 1.0-mile of site Land covers impacted/ Mitigated Grassland, Oak woodland Chaparral and scrub, ruderal Cultivated ag Rural residential, Conifer woodland -- All others Presence of ground squirrels Wind turbines within 0.5-mile of site On parcels with an approved management plan for this species. Total Score On site Within 0.25- mile of site > 0.25 but 1.0 mile -- -- No -- -- -- Yes On-site Yes -- -- -- No -- Note: The ratio of mitigation to impact depends on the location of the mitigation. The acres of mitigation for a given project would be determined using the ratios shown in Table 3-10. Habitat quality of the impact site and the mitigation site would be scored using this table. East Alameda County Conservation Strategy E-8 October 2010 ICF 00906.08
Appendix E. Continued Table E-9. Impact/Mitigation Scoring for burrowing owl in the EACCS study area. Burrowing owl 5 4 3 2 1 0 Score Nearest known burrowing owl nest location to the impact site (within last 3 years) Wind turbines within 0.5-mile of site Land covers impacted/ mitigated Presence of ground squirrels On-site Within 0.5- mile of site > 0.5 but < 2.0 miles -- > 2.0but miles > 7.5 miles No -- -- -- Yes On-site Grassland, ruderal On-site Cultivated ag Oak woodland Within 0.25- mile of site > 0.25 but 1.0 mile Rural residential -- All others -- -- Average height of grass on Less than 8- Greater than 9-24 inches -- 25-36 inches -- impacted area inches 36 inches On parcels with an approved management plan for this species. Yes -- -- -- No -- Total Score Note: The ratio of mitigation to impact depends on the location of the mitigation. The acres of mitigation for a given project would be determined using the ratios shown in Table 3-10. Habitat quality of the impact site and the mitigation site would be scored using this table. East Alameda County Conservation Strategy E-9 October 2010 ICF 00906.08
Page 1:
EACCS OCTOBER 2010 EAST ALAMEDA COU
Page 4 and 5:
ICF International. 2010. East Alame
Page 6 and 7:
2.3.5 Hydrology ...................
Page 8 and 9:
4.14 Conservation Zone 14 .........
Page 10 and 11:
Tables Appear at the end of chapter
Page 12 and 13:
Figures Appear at the end of chapte
Page 14 and 15:
Chapter 1 Introduction species as w
Page 16 and 17:
Chapter 1 Introduction • Set prio
Page 18 and 19:
Chapter 1 Introduction • Californ
Page 20 and 21:
Chapter 1 Introduction entirely wit
Page 22 and 23:
Chapter 1 Introduction • listed a
Page 24 and 25:
Chapter 1 Introduction USFWS and NM
Page 26 and 27:
Chapter 1 Introduction nonfederal l
Page 28 and 29:
Chapter 1 Introduction based planni
Page 30 and 31:
Chapter 1 Introduction nesting habi
Page 32 and 33:
Chapter 1 Introduction statement. P
Page 34 and 35:
Chapter 1 Introduction certificatio
Page 37 and 38:
Table11.SpeciesProposedforInclusion
Page 39:
Table11.Continued Page3of3
Page 43:
Proposed Project in EACCS study are
Page 46 and 47:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting 2.2
Page 48 and 49:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting pro
Page 50 and 51:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting san
Page 52 and 53:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting To
Page 54 and 55:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting Man
Page 56 and 57:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting Cal
Page 58 and 59:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting par
Page 60 and 61:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting Hil
Page 62 and 63:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting con
Page 64 and 65:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting Glo
Page 66 and 67:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting cha
Page 68 and 69:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting •
Page 70 and 71:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting A 1
Page 72 and 73:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting ass
Page 74 and 75:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting rec
Page 76 and 77:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting alo
Page 78 and 79:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting cov
Page 80 and 81:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting spe
Page 82 and 83:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting Dif
Page 84 and 85:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting •
Page 86 and 87:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting sou
Page 88 and 89:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting tre
Page 90 and 91:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting gra
Page 92 and 93:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting tai
Page 94 and 95:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting Ind
Page 96 and 97:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting spe
Page 98 and 99:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting Mix
Page 100 and 101:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting In
Page 102 and 103:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting dep
Page 104 and 105:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting Roa
Page 106 and 107:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting the
Page 108 and 109:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting Qua
Page 110 and 111:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting sei
Page 112 and 113:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting No
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting non
Page 118 and 119:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting It
Page 120 and 121:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting sub
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Chapter 2 Environmental Setting pre
Page 126 and 127:
Table21.SimplifiedLandUsePlanningDe
Page 128 and 129:
Tb a le21.SimplifiedLandUsePlanning
Page 131 and 132:
Table23.ComparisonofEastAlamedaCoun
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Table24.LandCoverTypesandtheirExten
Page 137:
Bethany Reservoir P Patterson Run A
Page 141:
San Joaquin County Bethany Reservoi
Page 145:
Bethany Reservoir Alameda County Sa
Page 149:
Upper Kellogg Creek Brushy Creek Sa
Page 153:
Corral Hollow Creek Old River §¨
Page 156 and 157:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy goa
Page 158 and 159:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy det
Page 160 and 161:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy app
Page 162 and 163:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy 3.4
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy enh
Page 168 and 169:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy Obj
Page 170 and 171:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy req
Page 172 and 173:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy •
Page 174 and 175:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy com
Page 176 and 177:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy rec
Page 178 and 179:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy Spe
Page 180 and 181:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy If
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy pro
Page 186 and 187:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy coa
Page 188 and 189:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy non
Page 190 and 191:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy Thr
Page 192 and 193:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy the
Page 194 and 195:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy are
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy Mit
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy wer
Page 204 and 205:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy Pro
Page 206 and 207:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy res
Page 208 and 209:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy tig
Page 210 and 211:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy Mit
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy Con
Page 218 and 219:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy sit
Page 220 and 221:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy Obj
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy Con
Page 226 and 227:
Chapter 3 Conservation Strategy hab
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 235:
Table32.G e MeasurestoReduceEffect
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Table33.Continued Page4of5 •
Page 243:
Table 3-4. Standardized Mitigation
Page 247:
Page 251:
Page 255:
Page 259:
Page 263:
Gold Creek Alameda Creek Pe Patters
Page 267:
Gold Creek Alameda Creek Patterson
Page 271:
i OLD RIVER §¨¦ 680 CZ3 Dublin C
Page 275:
R i OLD Alameda County Santa Clara
Page 279:
i OLD RIVER §¨¦ 680 CZ3 CH Unit
Page 283:
R i OLD Alameda County Santa Clara
Page 287:
R OLD Ri ver ld O Arroyo Mocho Cree
Page 290 and 291:
Chapter 4 Conservation Zones 4.9 Co
Page 292 and 293:
Chapter 4 Conservation Zones 4.1.2
Page 294 and 295:
Chapter 4 Conservation Zones disjun
Page 296 and 297:
Chapter 4 Conservation Zones connec
Page 298 and 299:
Chapter 4 Conservation Zones • Pr
Page 300 and 301:
Chapter 4 Conservation Zones critic
Page 302 and 303:
Chapter 4 Conservation Zones as 9%
Page 304 and 305:
Chapter 4 Conservation Zones made u
Page 306 and 307:
Chapter 4 Conservation Zones 8). CZ
Page 308 and 309:
Chapter 4 Conservation Zones Protec
Page 310 and 311:
Chapter 4 Conservation Zones 4.10.2
Page 312 and 313:
Chapter 4 Conservation Zones the so
Page 314 and 315:
Chapter 4 Conservation Zones of bre
Page 316 and 317:
Chapter 4 Conservation Zones southw
Page 318 and 319:
Chapter 4 Conservation Zones for th
Page 320 and 321:
Chapter 4 Conservation Zones entire
Page 322 and 323:
Chapter 4 Conservation Zones partic
Page 324 and 325:
Chapter 4 Conservation Zones Antoni
Page 326 and 327:
Page 328 and 329:
Page 331:
Table 4-1. Natural land cover prote
Page 335:
Page 339:
Page 343:
Page 347:
Page 351:
Table 4-11. Natural land cover prot
Page 355:
Page 359:
Page 363:
Page 367:
Table419a.Modeledsuitablehabitat(ac
Page 371:
Table419c.Modeledsuitablehabitat(ac
Page 375:
Table419e.Modeledsuitablehabitat(ac
Page 379 and 380:
Chapter 5 Conservation Strategy Imp
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Chapter 6 Literature Cited Table of
Page 411 and 412:
Beedy, E. C. and W. J. Hamilton III
Page 413 and 414:
City of Livermore. 2004. General Pl
Page 415 and 416:
Fellers, G. and P. Kleeman. 2007. C
Page 417 and 418:
Heady, H. F. 1988. Valley grassland
Page 419 and 420:
Keeler-Wolf, T., K. Lewis, and C. R
Page 421 and 422:
Love, M. 2001. Stonybrook Creek fis
Page 423 and 424:
Questa Engineering Corporation. 199
Page 425 and 426:
Smith, J. J. 1998. Steelhead and ot
Page 427 and 428:
———. 1997. Endangered and thr
Page 429:
Wentworth, C.M., S.E. Graham, R.J.
Page 433 and 434:
Appendix A. Wildlife Species Consid
Page 435 and 436:
Appendix A. Continued Page 3 of 7 S
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439:
Page 443 and 444:
Appendix B. Plant Species Considere
Page 445 and 446:
Appendix B. Continued Page 3 of 5 S
Page 447:
Appendix B. Continued Page 5 of 5 S
Page 451 and 452:
Appendix C Glossary Definitions of
Page 453 and 454:
Appendix C Glossary the environment
Page 455 and 456:
Appendix C Glossary Critical habita
Page 457 and 458:
Appendix C Glossary Farming. Narrow
Page 459 and 460:
Appendix C Glossary applicant of a
Page 461 and 462:
Appendix C Glossary Mitigation, U.S
Page 463 and 464:
Appendix C Glossary Project descrip
Page 465:
Appendix C Glossary Threatened spec
Page 469 and 470:
Appendix D Species Accounts Table o
Page 471 and 472:
Appendix D Species Accounts annual
Page 473 and 474:
Appendix D Species Accounts Threats
Page 475 and 476:
Appendix D Species Accounts Species
Page 477 and 478:
Appendix D Species Accounts Modeled
Page 479 and 480:
Appendix D Species Accounts Livermo
Page 481 and 482:
Appendix D Species Accounts vernal
Page 483 and 484:
Appendix D Species Accounts Vernal
Page 485 and 486:
Appendix D Species Accounts Recolon
Page 487 and 488:
Appendix D Species Accounts Because
Page 489 and 490:
Appendix D Species Accounts Califor
Page 491 and 492:
Appendix D Species Accounts et al.
Page 493 and 494:
Appendix D Species Accounts Califor
Page 495 and 496:
Appendix D Species Accounts Model R
Page 497 and 498:
Appendix D Species Accounts Garter
Page 499 and 500:
Appendix D Species Accounts Alameda
Page 501 and 502:
Appendix D Species Accounts Fire su
Page 503 and 504:
Appendix D Species Accounts of 0.25
Page 505 and 506:
Appendix D Species Accounts Golden
Page 507 and 508:
Page 509 and 510:
Appendix D Species Accounts Results
Page 511 and 512:
Page 513 and 514: Appendix D Species Accounts Burrowi
Page 515 and 516: Appendix D Species Accounts America
Page 517 and 518: Appendix D Species Accounts Modeled
Page 519 and 520: Appendix D Species Accounts layers
Page 521: §¨¦ 680 Dublin §¨¦ 580 Alamed
Page 525: §¨¦ 680 CZ3 Dublin §¨¦ 580 §
Page 541: R i OLD Alameda County Santa Clara
Page 557 and 558: Appendix E. Focal Species Impact/Mi
Page 559 and 560: Appendix E. Continued Table E-3. Im
Page 561 and 562: Appendix E. Continued Table E-5. Im
Page 563: Appendix E. Continued Table E-7. Im
Page 567 and 568: Appendix E. Continued Table E-11. I
Page 573: Appendix E. Continued Table E-17. I
Page 579 and 580: PLEASE NOTE: The following Conserva
Page 581 and 582: A final, approved copy of the [inse
Page 583 and 584: except for [insert specific excepti
Page 585 and 586: without waiting for the period prov
Page 587 and 588: incurred as a result of, this Conse
Page 589 and 590: 11. Merger. The doctrine of merger
Page 591 and 592: Conservation Easement. If a court o
Page 593 and 594: (5) The term "Hazardous Materials"
Page 595: [Delete this page if CDFG will not
Page 601: USING THIS OUTLINE This outline has
Page 605: Prepared by: Name Address Phone App
Page 609 and 610: TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page 611 and 612: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (Optional) The aut
Page 613 and 614: 4) The plan provides an overview of
Page 615 and 616:
These subjects may be combined into
Page 617 and 618:
III. HABITAT AND SPECIES DESCRIPTIO
Page 619 and 620:
IV. MANAGEMENT GOALS AND ENVIRONMEN
Page 621 and 622:
Additionally, the USFWS may have fu
Page 623 and 624:
3) operations and maintenance tasks
Page 625 and 626:
Biological Element: Coastal and Val
Page 627 and 628:
The following examples of goals and
Page 629 and 630:
The following table is provided as
Page 633 and 634:
Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office
Page 635 and 636:
ii. Qualified under CA Civil Code
Page 637 and 638:
automatically extended for at least
Page 639:
i. Be held by a qualified, Service-
Page 643 and 644:
Water Quality Objectives for Use in
Page 645 and 646:
The following tables summarize goal
show all

Item 7.1 Att 4 (5) Ex A - Final_EACCS_Oct2010_Print - City of Dublin

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?