01.12.2014 Views

2006-7 annual report - Nature Conservation Foundation

2006-7 annual report - Nature Conservation Foundation

2006-7 annual report - Nature Conservation Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

start of the breeding season (February-March). It appears<br />

that Wreathed hornbills are not resident or are<br />

present in very low numbers during the winter months<br />

with only 13 sightings between October and January<br />

(non-breeding season), while in the breeding season<br />

(February to May) there were more sightings (25). Encounter<br />

rates were low in the months of October and<br />

November, with no Wreathed hornbills seen in December-January.<br />

Wreathed hornbills re-appeared in the<br />

area again at the commencement of the breeding season<br />

in February. Wreathed Hornbills appear to be seminomadic<br />

and move into higher areas during periods of<br />

fruit scarcity. Great Hornbill abundance does not vary<br />

seasonally and they are resident throughout the year in<br />

lowland forests.<br />

Establishing baselines: long-term monitoring of threatened wildlife with local communities in<br />

two important protected areas in Arunachal Pradesh, north-east India<br />

The monitoring of wildlife populations is an important<br />

component of a wildlife conservation program. In the<br />

Namdapha National Park, the single largest threat is<br />

hunting by humans: therefore our efforts focused on<br />

establishing the impacts of hunting on wildlife populations.<br />

We targeted species known to be most affected by<br />

hunting —terrestrial mammals and large birds (pheasants<br />

and hornbills)—for monitoring. We aim to use this<br />

research to assess our community-based conservation<br />

initiatives: we expect that a reduction in hunting within<br />

Namdapha National Park will result in recovery of animal<br />

populations. The current estimates will serve as a<br />

baseline for future comparisons. We also monitor similar<br />

faunal groups in Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary in order<br />

to make spatial comparisons between two of the most<br />

important PAs in Arunachal Pradesh.<br />

We set up a wildlife monitoring system with<br />

trained local villagers (tribal ex-hunters) at Pakke WLS<br />

and Namdapha NP, two important Protected Areas in<br />

Arunachal Pradesh that are both tiger reserves. Camera<br />

trapping to record species richness and relative abundance<br />

for species threatened by hunting was established.<br />

For the first time systematic monitoring protocols using<br />

camera traps have been used in Protected Areas in<br />

North-east India. Seven field staff (4 in Namdapha, 3 in<br />

Pakke) from local communities (tribal ex-hunters) have<br />

been trained and assist in the field monitoring effort. In<br />

addition, 2 graduate students, 1 volunteer, and 8 other<br />

tribal youth were involved in the 3 month field monitoring<br />

effort in Namdapha this year.<br />

Wildlife monitoring in Pakke WLS & TR<br />

Trail monitoring in Pakke WLS<br />

A total of 11 trails were marked and walked an average<br />

of 8 times with 182 km walked between 2004 and<br />

<strong>2006</strong> in which 18 species were observed, including four<br />

ungulate species, three primate species, four squirrel<br />

species, three pheasant and three hornbill species. The<br />

encounter rates are summarized in Table 1.<br />

Camera trap surveys in Pakke WLS<br />

The number of mammal species in key faunal groups is<br />

<strong>report</strong>ed to be 45, while through our surveys, direct and<br />

indirect evidence for 34 were recorded. In Pakke, pilot<br />

camera trap surveys were conducted sporadically between<br />

Dec 2005 and May <strong>2006</strong> and September - October<br />

<strong>2006</strong> with a total trapping effort of 231 trap nights<br />

that resulted in photo captures for 14 larger mammal<br />

species.<br />

Wildlife monitoring in Namdapha NP & TR<br />

The number of large mammal species in key faunal<br />

groups is <strong>report</strong>ed to be 56 in Namdapha. We recorded<br />

21 of these on camera traps, while 27 others were recorded<br />

by other methods or reliable evidence. No direct<br />

or indirect recent evidence could be found for 8 species.<br />

Although no evidence for tiger and elephant presence<br />

was found in winter <strong>2006</strong>-07, we include them as still<br />

present based on indirect evidence seen in 2004-06.<br />

In the first year (winter 2005-06) with 10 camera<br />

trap units, we had a limited sampling effort of 364 trap<br />

nights at Namdapha. In winter <strong>2006</strong>-07, a large-scale<br />

camera trapping survey was carried out in the 1,985<br />

km 2 Namdapha National Park. Our intensive study area<br />

of 1200 km 2 encompassed the moist evergreen forests<br />

below 2000 m of the park. A uniform grid (3 x 3 km)<br />

was imposed on a map of the area. Of the 130 grids covering<br />

the study area, a random selection of 80 grids was<br />

made. With only 16 km of motorable road, all field work<br />

was carried out on foot. Given logistic difficulties in the<br />

hilly terrain, limitations of time, manpower and equipment,<br />

sampling was carried out between October <strong>2006</strong><br />

<strong>annual</strong><br />

<strong>report</strong><br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!