01.12.2014 Views

2006-7 annual report - Nature Conservation Foundation

2006-7 annual report - Nature Conservation Foundation

2006-7 annual report - Nature Conservation Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ter survey in Namdapha. In contrast, Pakke WLS where<br />

there is less hunting and better protection, tiger signs<br />

(pugmarks, scats) are commonly encountered. In addition,<br />

there were no detections of large herbivore species<br />

such as Asian elephant, gaur or serow.<br />

We obtained an average of 23 mammal pictures<br />

per 100 days in Namdapha. Barking deer was the<br />

most abundant, followed by Stump-tailed macaque and<br />

Himalayan crestless porcupine based on camera trapping<br />

records in Namdapha. With the exception of Indian<br />

muntjac and some smaller mammals, encounter rates<br />

of the target species were far lower at Namdapha compared<br />

to <strong>report</strong>s from other sites in south-east Asia,<br />

while several larger species were not recorded at all in<br />

Namdapha.<br />

Trail walks, and systematic line transects are<br />

used in many places to estimate animal densities. In<br />

Namdapha National Park, however, over 23 trails totalling<br />

an effort of roughly 42 km between 2005 and<br />

2007, there was just one sighting of a terrestrial mammal:<br />

barking deer was seen once and its calls were<br />

heard on four occasions. The species encountered during<br />

transects were arboreal mammals – four species<br />

of squirrels and five species of primates (hoolock gibbon,<br />

capped langur, Assamese macaque, stump-tailed<br />

macaque and rhesus macaque) –hornbills, pheasants<br />

and partridges. Due to very low numbers of sightings of<br />

species, we summarize and <strong>report</strong> the encounter rates<br />

(no. per km) of species groups (Table 3).<br />

Pilot surveys in Namdapha from 2004-2005 and<br />

prior work (only 17 detections in 740 km walked) suggested<br />

that standard methods for density estimation of<br />

ungulate species could not be used because of poor detectability<br />

and low abundance of ungulates. The pellet<br />

and track survey also established very low abundance<br />

of ungulates in Namdapha. Five species of large ungulates<br />

were detected in pellet and track plots, however,<br />

only 35 pellet groups were detected in 22 of 387 plots.<br />

While barking deer tracks were detected in 100% of the<br />

sampled grids, sambar tracks were detected in 81% of<br />

grids, wild pig in 50% of grids, gaur in 18% of grids and<br />

serow in 5% of grids.<br />

We chose the occupancy framework for generating<br />

baselines of ungulate species that are targeted by<br />

hunting for long-term monitoring of changes in occupancy<br />

of ungulates in response to reduction in hunting<br />

pressures. Occupancy analyses using pellet data and<br />

covariate data on habitat and disturbance variables,<br />

indicated that occupancy estimates were high for Indian<br />

muntjac Muntiacus muntjak (1) and sambar Cervus<br />

unicolor (0.8) and they seem to be unaffected by disturbance.<br />

Occupancy estimates of gaur Bos gaurus (0.24)<br />

and wild pig Sus scrofa (0.45) were low and they were<br />

negatively affected by disturbance. The occupancy estimates<br />

of all three large species that are important prey<br />

of the tiger are low in comparison to a better protected<br />

site in south-east Asia. Results indicate that even occupancy<br />

models may have limited applicability in tracking<br />

positive changes in the status of species (such as sambar<br />

and barking deer) that are not abundant, yet are<br />

widespread. Population estimation methods need to be<br />

developed for terrestrial mammals that can be used to<br />

track changes in population status.<br />

We have mobilized the community in taking a<br />

stand against hunting and effecting changes in hunting<br />

levels. We also record instances of hunting activity<br />

and evidences of hunting in Namdapha through direct<br />

evidence or information from local project staff and<br />

the community. Although hunting levels have declined<br />

among the community, there are still instances of hunting<br />

inside the Namdapha NP by a few from the community,<br />

other tribes and outsiders coming in from neighbouring<br />

Myanmar. We have suggested ways to involve<br />

and employ the community in park protection to local<br />

and national forest protection authorities.<br />

Table 3. Encounter rates of faunal groups in Namdapha NP.<br />

Species group Detections (encounter rate, no./km) Sightings (encounter rate, no./km)<br />

Primates 28 (0.67) 19 (0.45)<br />

Ungulates 4 (0.01) 1 (0.02)<br />

Squirrels 14 (0.33) 15 (0.36)<br />

Hornbills 13 (0.31) 7 (0.17)<br />

Pheasants and partridges 7 (0.17) 5 (0.12)<br />

18<br />

<strong>annual</strong><br />

<strong>report</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!