01.12.2014 Views

Non-HDL From A-to-Z

Non-HDL From A-to-Z

Non-HDL From A-to-Z

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Non</strong>-<strong>HDL</strong><br />

cholesterol as a<br />

therapeutic target<br />

By<br />

M.Wafaie Aboleineen,MD,FACC.


Residual Cardiovascular Risk in Major Statin Trials<br />

40<br />

Patients Experiencing<br />

Major CHD Events, %<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

28.0<br />

19.4<br />

15.9<br />

12.3<br />

13.2<br />

10.2<br />

11.8<br />

8.7<br />

Placebo<br />

Statin<br />

7.9<br />

5.5<br />

10.9<br />

6.8<br />

0<br />

4S 1 LIPID 2 CARE 3 HPS 4 WOSCOPS 5 AFCAPS/<br />

TexCAPS 6<br />

N 4444 9014 4159 20 536 6595 6605<br />

∆ LDL-C -35% -25% -28% -29% -26% -25%<br />

Secondary High Risk Primary<br />

1<br />

4S Group. Lancet. 1994;344:1383-1389.<br />

2<br />

LIPID Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1349-1357.<br />

3<br />

Sacks FM, et al. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1001-1009.<br />

4<br />

HPS Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2002;360:7-22.<br />

5<br />

Shepherd J, et al. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1301-1307<br />

6<br />

Downs JR, et al. JAMA. 1998;279:1615-1622.


In ACS, elevated levels of triglycerides TGs ≥150 mg/dL;<br />

predict risk even in those with LDL-C


Risk of CHD by TG Level<br />

The Framingham Heart Study (30-Year Follow-Up)<br />

Relative CHD Risk<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

Men<br />

Women<br />

N = 5127 patients<br />

with no his<strong>to</strong>ry of CHD<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400<br />

TG Level, mg/dL<br />

Univariate analysis of data from the Framingham Heart Study, including 5127 patients aged 30<br />

<strong>to</strong> 60 years without CHD, <strong>to</strong> determine the relationship between TGs and CHD.<br />

Reprinted from Castelli WP. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:3H-9H, with permission from Elsevier.


Association Between LDL-C, <strong>Non</strong>-<strong>HDL</strong>-C,<br />

TGs, <strong>HDL</strong>-C and CHD Risk<br />

Lipid Level<br />

LDL-C 1 Each 1%<br />

increase in LDL-C<br />

<strong>Non</strong>-<strong>HDL</strong>-C 2 Each 1%<br />

increase in <strong>Non</strong>-<strong>HDL</strong>-C<br />

CHD Risk<br />

1% increase in<br />

the risk of CHD in women and<br />

men<br />

1% increase in<br />

the risk of CHD in women and<br />

men<br />

TG 3<br />

Each 1 mmol/L<br />

(89 mg/dL)<br />

increase in TG<br />

37% increase in<br />

the risk of CVD in women and<br />

14% increased risk in men<br />

<strong>HDL</strong>-C 4<br />

Each 1 mg/dL<br />

increase in <strong>HDL</strong>-C<br />

2% decrease in CVD death in<br />

men and 3% decrease in CVD death in<br />

women<br />

1 Grundy S, et al. Circulation. 2004;110:227-239.<br />

2 Liu J, et al. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:1363-1368.<br />

3 Hokanson JE, et al. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1996;3:213-219.<br />

4 Gordon DJ, et al. Circulation. 1989;79:8-15.


<strong>Non</strong>-<strong>HDL</strong> Cholesterol<br />

(<strong>Non</strong>-<strong>HDL</strong> Chol. = TC - <strong>HDL</strong>)<br />

• sum of :<br />

• LDL, Lp(a), IDL, and VLDL<br />

• : All atherogenic apo B<br />

containing lipoproteins<br />

• Lipid Equivalent of “HbA1C”


Targets of Therapy<br />

Copyright ©2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Robinson, Restrictions may J. apply. G. JACC 2010


CHD Across Fifths of Usual Lipids or Apolipoproteins<br />

Copyright restrictions may apply. The Emerging Risk Fac<strong>to</strong>rs Collaboration, JAMA 2009.


Fac<strong>to</strong>rs Contributing <strong>to</strong> Cardiometabolic Risk<br />

Brunzell, J. D. et al. JACC 2008<br />

Copyright ©2008 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Restrictions may apply.


Mechanisms of DM Dyslipidemia<br />

Fat Cells<br />

FFA<br />

Liver<br />

IR X<br />

Insulin<br />

13 www.drsarma.in


Mechanisms of DM Dyslipidemia<br />

Fat Cells<br />

FFA<br />

Liver<br />

IR X<br />

TG<br />

Apo B<br />

VLDL<br />

VLDL<br />

Insulin<br />

14 www.drsarma.in


Mechanisms of DM Dyslipidemia<br />

Fat Cells<br />

Liver<br />

FFA<br />

CE<br />

IR X<br />

TG<br />

Apo B<br />

VLDL<br />

VLDL<br />

(CETP)<br />

TG<br />

<strong>HDL</strong><br />

(hepatic<br />

lipase)<br />

Apo A-1<br />

Insulin<br />

Kidney<br />

15 www.drsarma.in


Mechanisms of DM Dyslipidemia<br />

Fat Cells<br />

FFA<br />

Liver<br />

CE<br />

IR X<br />

Insulin<br />

TG<br />

Apo B<br />

VLDL<br />

CE<br />

VLDL<br />

(CETP)<br />

LDL<br />

(CETP)<br />

TG<br />

TG<br />

(lipoprotein or hepatic lipase)<br />

16 www.drsarma.in<br />

<strong>HDL</strong><br />

SD<br />

LDL<br />

(hepatic<br />

lipase)<br />

Apo A-1<br />

Kidney


Drugs Affecting Lipoprotein Metabolism:<br />

Lipid Lowering Drugs<br />

Drug Class LDL–C <strong>HDL</strong>–C TG<br />

Statins 30-60% 4-10% 15-20%<br />

Bile Acid<br />

Binders<br />

18-25% 2-3% 10%<br />

Ezitimibe 18% 3% 3%<br />

Nicotinic<br />

Acid<br />

Fibrates 10%,<br />

May or not change<br />

15-30% 15-30% 20-30%<br />

6-12% 30-50%<br />

Fish Oil 5-10% 5% 35-45%


Change in Relative Risk of CHD Event<br />

Robinson, J. G. et al. JACC2009<br />

Copyright ©2009 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Restrictions may apply.


Specific Dyslipidemias:<br />

Elevated Triglycerides<br />

<strong>Non</strong>-<strong>HDL</strong> Cholesterol: Secondary Target<br />

• Primary target of therapy: LDL cholesterol<br />

• Achieve LDL goal before treating non-<strong>HDL</strong> cholesterol<br />

• Therapeutic approaches <strong>to</strong> elevated non-<strong>HDL</strong><br />

cholesterol<br />

– Intensify therapeutic lifestyle changes<br />

– Intensify LDL-lowering drug therapy<br />

– Nicotinic acid or fibrate therapy <strong>to</strong> lower VLDL


Lipid Management<br />

Recommendations<br />

I<br />

I<br />

IIa IIb III<br />

IIa IIb III<br />

If TG are 200-499 mg/dL, non-<strong>HDL</strong>-C should be < 130<br />

mg/dL<br />

Further reduction of non-<strong>HDL</strong> <strong>to</strong> < 100 mg/dL is<br />

reasonable<br />

Therapeutic options <strong>to</strong> reduce non-<strong>HDL</strong>-C:<br />

More intense LDL-C lowering therapy I (B) or<br />

Niacin (after LDL-C lowering therapy) IIa (B) or<br />

Fibrate (after LDL-C lowering therapy) IIa (B)<br />

I<br />

IIa IIb III<br />

If TG are > 500 mg/dL, therapeutic options <strong>to</strong><br />

prevent pancreatitis are fibrate or niacin before LDL<br />

lowering therapy; and treat LDL-C <strong>to</strong> goal after TGlowering<br />

therapy. Achieve non-<strong>HDL</strong>-C < 130 mg/dL,<br />

if possible


NCEP ATP III LDL-C and<br />

<strong>Non</strong>-<strong>HDL</strong>-C Goals<br />

Risk category<br />

CHD Risk Fac<strong>to</strong>rs or<br />

Equivalents<br />

LDL-C Goal<br />

(mg/dL)<br />

<strong>Non</strong>-<strong>HDL</strong>-C<br />

Goal (mg/dL)<br />

Very high<br />

High risk + recent acute coronary<br />

syndrome, diabetes, smoking,<br />

metabolic syndrome*<br />

< 70 < 100<br />

High<br />

CAD or risk equivalent<br />

< 100<br />

< 130<br />

(10-year risk > 20%)<br />

(optional < 70)<br />

Moderately high > 2 risk fac<strong>to</strong>rs +<br />

(10-year risk 10% <strong>to</strong> 20%)<br />

< 130 < 160<br />

Moderate > 2 risk fac<strong>to</strong>rs +<br />

(10-year risk < 10%)<br />

< 130 < 160<br />

Low 0 – 1 risk fac<strong>to</strong>r < 160 < 190<br />

NCEP ATP III Final Report. Circulation. 2002;108:3143-3421; Grundy, SM et al. Circulation. 2004;110:227-239


2007 NLA Safety Task Force<br />

Niacin/Statin Combination Therapy<br />

• Clinical evidence does not support a<br />

general myopathic effect of niacin either<br />

alone or in combination with statins<br />

• Niacin/Statin combination therapy improve<br />

all atherogenic lipid abnormalities, slows<br />

the progression and increases the<br />

regression of coronary atherosclerosis, and<br />

reduces residual CVD risk<br />

Guy<strong>to</strong>n JR et al. Am J Cardiol 2007;


Fibrate Mechanisms of Action<br />

Fibrate<br />

Fibrate<br />

↑LDL Particle Size<br />

↓Triglycerides<br />

↑<strong>HDL</strong> Synthesis<br />

PPARα<br />

↓Inflammation<br />

↑Reverse Cholesterol Transport


2007 NLA Safety Task Force<br />

Fibrate/ Statin Combination Therapy<br />

• Fibrate + statins are associated with<br />

increased risk for myopathy and<br />

rhabdomyolysis<br />

• Fenofibrate has much less potential for<br />

impairment of statin metabolism, and<br />

reduced reports of myopathy compared<br />

with gemfibrozil + statin.<br />

Guy<strong>to</strong>n JR et al. Am J Cardiol 2007


Efficacy of Fenofibrate and Omega-3<br />

Fatty Acids on High TG<br />

Efficacy Comparison in Patients with TG >500 mg/dL Relative<br />

Difference vs Placebo<br />

50%<br />

Omega-3<br />

50%<br />

Fenofibrate<br />

30%<br />

30%<br />

10%<br />

10%<br />

-10%<br />

-30%<br />

<strong>HDL</strong>-C<br />

Chol<br />

LDL-C<br />

-10%<br />

-30%<br />

<strong>HDL</strong>-C<br />

Chol<br />

LDL-C<br />

-50%<br />

VLDL-C<br />

-50%<br />

-70%<br />

TG<br />

-70%<br />

TG<br />

VLDL-C<br />

Harris WS et al. J Cardiovasc Risk 1997;4:385-391.<br />

Goldberg AC et al. Clin Ther 1989;11:69-83.


A<br />

Statin<br />

LDL > target<br />

Algorithm for LDL Therapy<br />

(Dose per LDL level)<br />

LDL < target<br />

<strong>Non</strong> <strong>HDL</strong> < target<br />

Moni<strong>to</strong>r<br />

LDL < target<br />

<strong>Non</strong> <strong>HDL</strong> >target<br />

Fish Oil<br />

Follow Pro<strong>to</strong>col B<br />

LDL > target<br />

Increase Statin<br />

LDL target<br />

LDL < target<br />

<strong>Non</strong> <strong>HDL</strong> > target<br />

Add Fenofibrate or Niacin<br />

LDL < target<br />

<strong>Non</strong> <strong>HDL</strong>< target<br />

Moni<strong>to</strong>r

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!