02.12.2014 Views

2 an introduction to cost terms and purposes - Pearson Learning ...

2 an introduction to cost terms and purposes - Pearson Learning ...

2 an introduction to cost terms and purposes - Pearson Learning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Because of permissions issues, some material (e.g., pho<strong>to</strong>graphs) has been removed from this chapter, though reference <strong>to</strong> it<br />

may occur in the text. The omitted content was intentionally deleted <strong>an</strong>d is not needed <strong>to</strong> meet the University's requirements for<br />

this course.<br />

CHAPTER<br />

2<br />

AN INTRODUCTION TO COST TERMS<br />

AND PURPOSES<br />

LEARNING OBJECTIVES<br />

1. Define <strong>an</strong>d illustrate a <strong>cost</strong> object<br />

2. Distinguish between direct <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d indirect<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s<br />

3. Explain variable <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d fixed <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

4. Interpret unit <strong>cost</strong>s cautiously<br />

5. Distinguish among m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing comp<strong>an</strong>ies,<br />

merch<strong>an</strong>dising comp<strong>an</strong>ies, <strong>an</strong>d service-sec<strong>to</strong>r<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>ies<br />

6. Describe the three categories of inven<strong>to</strong>ries<br />

commonly found in m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing comp<strong>an</strong>ies<br />

7. Distinguish inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s from period<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s<br />

8. Explain why product <strong>cost</strong>s are computed in<br />

different ways for different <strong>purposes</strong><br />

9. Describe a framework for <strong>cost</strong> accounting<br />

<strong>an</strong>d <strong>cost</strong> m<strong>an</strong>agement<br />

What does the word <strong>cost</strong> me<strong>an</strong> <strong>to</strong> you? Is it the price you pay for something<br />

of value? A cash outflow? Something that affects profitability? There are m<strong>an</strong>y different<br />

types of <strong>cost</strong>s, <strong>an</strong>d at different times, org<strong>an</strong>izations place more or less emphasis<br />

on them. When times are good, comp<strong>an</strong>ies often focus on selling as much as they c<strong>an</strong>, with <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

taking a backseat. But when times get <strong>to</strong>ugh, the emphasis usually shifts <strong>to</strong> <strong>cost</strong>s. Tennessee<br />

Products, a m<strong>an</strong>ufacturer of different types of speaker systems, is facing this unpleas<strong>an</strong>t situation.<br />

For the first time in its five-year his<strong>to</strong>ry, the comp<strong>an</strong>y has sustained a quarterly loss, <strong>an</strong>d it’s a signific<strong>an</strong>t<br />

one.<br />

Julia Morgenthal, CFO, is concerned that the comp<strong>an</strong>y’s success <strong>an</strong>d profitability up <strong>to</strong> this point<br />

has led <strong>to</strong> complacency among its m<strong>an</strong>agers in controlling operations. She has called in Jonath<strong>an</strong> Berg,<br />

the controller, <strong>to</strong> discuss the problem.<br />

Julia:<br />

Jonath<strong>an</strong>, with our most recent quarter’s dismal perform<strong>an</strong>ce, we need <strong>to</strong> examine<br />

every aspect of our operation. I’m afraid our success <strong>to</strong> this point has led <strong>to</strong> a lack of<br />

concern for m<strong>an</strong>aging <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

Jonath<strong>an</strong>: Agreed. What do you have in mind?<br />

Julia:<br />

I w<strong>an</strong>t <strong>to</strong> hold a short meeting for our m<strong>an</strong>agers <strong>to</strong> redirect our attention <strong>to</strong> <strong>cost</strong>s—<br />

you know, direct versus indirect, variable versus fixed, <strong>an</strong>d inven<strong>to</strong>riable versus product<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s. I w<strong>an</strong>t our m<strong>an</strong>agement team <strong>to</strong> deeply underst<strong>an</strong>d the distinctions among these<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s, so that we c<strong>an</strong> expect <strong>to</strong> turn this situation around.<br />

Jonath<strong>an</strong>: Sounds good. I think our m<strong>an</strong>agers have a better h<strong>an</strong>dle on direct <strong>cost</strong>s representing<br />

items such as materials <strong>an</strong>d labor that c<strong>an</strong> be easily identified with each of<br />

our products. But they may be more fuzzy about the other <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d how <strong>to</strong><br />

m<strong>an</strong>age them.<br />

Julia:<br />

Great. Put <strong>to</strong>gether a summary of <strong>cost</strong> terminology as it relates <strong>to</strong> our operations for<br />

our next m<strong>an</strong>agement meeting. I’ll make this review the basis of my discussion of<br />

returning <strong>to</strong> profitability this quarter.<br />

26<br />

NOT AVAILABLE FOR<br />

ELECTRONIC VIEWING<br />

As this conversation indicates, m<strong>an</strong>agers need <strong>to</strong> underst<strong>an</strong>d <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

in order <strong>to</strong> interpret <strong>an</strong>d act on accounting reports. Org<strong>an</strong>izations<br />

such as United Way, St<strong>an</strong>ford University Hospital, <strong>an</strong>d Nokia generate<br />

reports containing a variety of <strong>cost</strong> concepts <strong>an</strong>d <strong>terms</strong> that m<strong>an</strong>agers<br />

need <strong>to</strong> run their operations. M<strong>an</strong>agers who underst<strong>an</strong>d these<br />

concepts <strong>an</strong>d <strong>terms</strong> are best able <strong>to</strong> use the information provided <strong>an</strong>d<br />

c<strong>an</strong> avoid misusing it. A common underst<strong>an</strong>ding of <strong>cost</strong> concepts <strong>an</strong>d<br />

<strong>terms</strong> helps communication among m<strong>an</strong>agers <strong>an</strong>d m<strong>an</strong>agement<br />

account<strong>an</strong>ts. This chapter discusses <strong>cost</strong> concepts <strong>an</strong>d <strong>terms</strong> that are<br />

the basis of accounting information used for internal <strong>an</strong>d external<br />

reporting.<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Costs <strong>an</strong>d Cost Terminology<br />

Account<strong>an</strong>ts define <strong>cost</strong> as a resource sacrificed or forgone <strong>to</strong> achieve a specific objective.<br />

A <strong>cost</strong> (such as direct materials or advertising) is usually measured as the monetary<br />

amount that must be paid <strong>to</strong> acquire goods or services. An actual <strong>cost</strong> is the <strong>cost</strong> incurred<br />

(a his<strong>to</strong>rical or past <strong>cost</strong>), as distinguished from a budgeted <strong>cost</strong>, which is a predicted or<br />

forecasted <strong>cost</strong> (a future <strong>cost</strong>).<br />

To guide their decisions, m<strong>an</strong>agers w<strong>an</strong>t <strong>to</strong> know how much a particular thing (such<br />

as a product, machine, service, or process) <strong>cost</strong>s. We call this thing a <strong>cost</strong> object, which is<br />

<strong>an</strong>ything for which a measurement of <strong>cost</strong>s is desired. Exhibit 2-1 lists examples of different<br />

types of <strong>cost</strong> objects for which Procter & Gamble, the consumer-products comp<strong>an</strong>y,<br />

w<strong>an</strong>ts <strong>to</strong> know the <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

A <strong>cost</strong>ing system typically accounts for <strong>cost</strong>s in two basic stages: accumulation followed<br />

by assignment. Cost accumulation is the collection of <strong>cost</strong> data in some org<strong>an</strong>ized<br />

way by me<strong>an</strong>s of <strong>an</strong> accounting system. For example, a publishing comp<strong>an</strong>y that<br />

purchases rolls of paper for printing magazines collects (accumulates) the <strong>cost</strong>s of individual<br />

rolls used in <strong>an</strong>y one month <strong>to</strong> obtain the <strong>to</strong>tal monthly <strong>cost</strong> of paper. Beyond<br />

accumulating <strong>cost</strong>s, m<strong>an</strong>agers with the help of m<strong>an</strong>agement account<strong>an</strong>ts assign <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong><br />

designated <strong>cost</strong> objects (such as the different magazines the comp<strong>an</strong>y publishes) <strong>to</strong><br />

help them make strategic decisions (such as the pricing of different magazines <strong>an</strong>d<br />

which magazines <strong>to</strong> emphasize). M<strong>an</strong>agers also assign <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong> <strong>cost</strong> objects <strong>to</strong> implement<br />

strategy. For example, <strong>cost</strong>s assigned <strong>to</strong> a department aid in decision making<br />

about department efficiency. Costs assigned <strong>to</strong> cus<strong>to</strong>mers help m<strong>an</strong>agers underst<strong>an</strong>d<br />

the profit earned from different cus<strong>to</strong>mers <strong>an</strong>d help them make decisions about how <strong>to</strong><br />

allocate resources <strong>to</strong> support different cus<strong>to</strong>mers. Cost assignment is a general term<br />

that encompasses both (1) tracing accumulated <strong>cost</strong>s that have a direct relationship <strong>to</strong><br />

a <strong>cost</strong> object <strong>an</strong>d (2) allocating accumulated <strong>cost</strong>s that have <strong>an</strong> indirect relationship <strong>to</strong><br />

a <strong>cost</strong> object.<br />

Direct Costs <strong>an</strong>d Indirect Costs<br />

We now describe how <strong>cost</strong>s are classified as direct <strong>an</strong>d indirect <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d the methods<br />

used <strong>to</strong> assign these <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong> <strong>cost</strong> objects.<br />

Cost Tracing <strong>an</strong>d Cost Allocation<br />

■ Direct <strong>cost</strong>s of a <strong>cost</strong> object are related <strong>to</strong> the particular <strong>cost</strong> object <strong>an</strong>d c<strong>an</strong> be traced<br />

<strong>to</strong> it in <strong>an</strong> economically feasible (<strong>cost</strong>-effective) way. For example, the <strong>cost</strong> of c<strong>an</strong>s or<br />

bottles is a direct <strong>cost</strong> of Pepsi-Colas. The <strong>cost</strong> of the c<strong>an</strong>s or bottles c<strong>an</strong> be easily<br />

traced <strong>to</strong> or identified with the drink. The term <strong>cost</strong> tracing is used <strong>to</strong> describe the<br />

assignment of direct <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong> a particular <strong>cost</strong> object.<br />

■ Indirect <strong>cost</strong>s of a <strong>cost</strong> object are related <strong>to</strong> the particular <strong>cost</strong> object but c<strong>an</strong>not be<br />

traced <strong>to</strong> it in <strong>an</strong> economically feasible (<strong>cost</strong>-effective) way. For example, the salaries<br />

of supervisors who oversee production of the m<strong>an</strong>y different soft drink products bottled<br />

at a Pepsi pl<strong>an</strong>t are <strong>an</strong> indirect <strong>cost</strong> of Pepsi-Colas. Supervision <strong>cost</strong>s are related<br />

<strong>to</strong> the <strong>cost</strong> object (Pepsi-Colas) because supervision is necessary for m<strong>an</strong>aging the<br />

production <strong>an</strong>d sale of Pepsi-Colas. Supervision <strong>cost</strong>s are indirect <strong>cost</strong>s because<br />

supervisors also oversee the production of other products, such as 7-Up. Unlike the<br />

<strong>cost</strong> of c<strong>an</strong>s or bottles, it is impossible <strong>to</strong> trace supervision <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong> the Pepsi-Cola<br />

line. The term <strong>cost</strong> allocation is used <strong>to</strong> describe the assignment of indirect <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong><br />

a particular <strong>cost</strong> object.<br />

Exhibit 2-2 depicts direct <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d indirect <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d both forms of <strong>cost</strong> assignment—<br />

<strong>cost</strong> tracing <strong>an</strong>d <strong>cost</strong> allocation—using the example of Sports Illustrated magazine, which<br />

is published by Time Warner. The <strong>cost</strong> object is the Sports Illustrated magazine. The paper<br />

on which the magazine is printed is a direct <strong>cost</strong>. The <strong>cost</strong> of the paper c<strong>an</strong> be traced in a<br />

<strong>cost</strong>-effective way <strong>to</strong> Sports Illustrated magazine. Consider the <strong>cost</strong> of leasing the building<br />

An underst<strong>an</strong>ding of this<br />

chapter’s <strong>cost</strong> <strong>terms</strong> <strong>an</strong>d<br />

concepts provides the foundation<br />

for the remaining chapters.<br />

Study Tip: Go <strong>to</strong> www.<br />

prenhall.com/harris <strong>an</strong>d<br />

print Chapter 2 of the Student<br />

Guide. Use the Highlights (pp.<br />

9–12) <strong>to</strong> preview the chapter.<br />

In the definition of <strong>cost</strong>,<br />

“sacrificed” refers <strong>to</strong> a<br />

resource that is consumed—for<br />

example, a comp<strong>an</strong>y paying<br />

$3,000 <strong>to</strong> lease a warehouse.<br />

“Forgone” refers <strong>to</strong> giving up <strong>an</strong><br />

opportunity <strong>to</strong> use a resource—<br />

for example, after spending the<br />

$3,000 <strong>to</strong> lease a warehouse,<br />

the comp<strong>an</strong>y could not use that<br />

$3,000 for <strong>an</strong>other purpose.<br />

1<br />

Define <strong>an</strong>d illustrate a<br />

<strong>cost</strong> object<br />

. . . examples of <strong>cost</strong><br />

objects are products,<br />

services, activities,<br />

processes, parts of the<br />

org<strong>an</strong>ization, <strong>an</strong>d<br />

cus<strong>to</strong>mers<br />

In each of the following<br />

questions, the <strong>cost</strong> object<br />

is in italics: What selling price<br />

should be charged for a product?<br />

Which machine is the least<br />

expensive <strong>to</strong> operate?<br />

2<br />

Distinguish between<br />

direct <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

. . . <strong>cost</strong>s that are traced<br />

directly <strong>to</strong> the <strong>cost</strong> object<br />

<strong>an</strong>d indirect <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

. . . <strong>cost</strong>s that are allocated<br />

<strong>to</strong> the <strong>cost</strong> object<br />

Consider the audits performed<br />

by a public accounting<br />

firm. The firm traces<br />

direct professional labor <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

<strong>to</strong> each audit using time records.<br />

Indirect <strong>cost</strong>s, such as<br />

rent on the firm’s office space<br />

<strong>an</strong>d depreciation on its computers,<br />

c<strong>an</strong>not be traced <strong>to</strong> individual<br />

audits, so these <strong>cost</strong>s must<br />

be allocated <strong>to</strong> the audits.<br />

An Introduction <strong>to</strong> Cost Terms <strong>an</strong>d Purposes<br />

27<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


EXHIBIT 2-1<br />

Examples of Cost<br />

Objects at Procter<br />

& Gamble<br />

Cost Object<br />

Product<br />

Service<br />

Project<br />

Cus<strong>to</strong>mer<br />

Br<strong>an</strong>d category<br />

Activity<br />

Department<br />

Illustration<br />

Crest Tartar Control: Original Flavor <strong>to</strong>othpaste product<br />

Telephone hotline providing information <strong>an</strong>d assist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>to</strong> users of Pampers<br />

Diapers products<br />

R&D project on alternative scent-free formulations of Tide detergent products<br />

Safeway, the retailer, which purchases a broad r<strong>an</strong>ge of Procter & Gamble products<br />

Vidal Sassoon r<strong>an</strong>ge of hairstyle products<br />

Development <strong>an</strong>d updating Web site on the Internet or setting up machines for<br />

production<br />

Environmental, Health, <strong>an</strong>d Safety Department<br />

that houses the edi<strong>to</strong>rial staffs of magazines published by Time Warner, such as Time,<br />

People, <strong>an</strong>d Sports Illustrated. This leasing <strong>cost</strong> is <strong>an</strong> indirect <strong>cost</strong> of Sports Illustrated. The<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>y c<strong>an</strong> trace the lease amount paid <strong>to</strong> the building, but there is no separate lease<br />

agreement for the space used solely by the edi<strong>to</strong>rial staff of Sports Illustrated. Therefore, the<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>y c<strong>an</strong>not trace the lease <strong>cost</strong> <strong>to</strong> Sports Illustrated. Time Warner c<strong>an</strong>, however,<br />

allocate <strong>to</strong> Sports Illustrated a part of the lease <strong>cost</strong> of the building, for example, on the basis<br />

of <strong>an</strong> estimate of the relative percentage of the building’s <strong>to</strong>tal floor space occupied by the<br />

Sports Illustrated edi<strong>to</strong>rial staff.<br />

M<strong>an</strong>agers w<strong>an</strong>t <strong>to</strong> assign <strong>cost</strong>s accurately <strong>to</strong> <strong>cost</strong> objects. Inaccurate product <strong>cost</strong>s will<br />

mislead m<strong>an</strong>agers about the profitability of different products; as a result, m<strong>an</strong>agers<br />

might unknowingly promote unprofitable products while deemphasizing profitable<br />

products. Generally, m<strong>an</strong>agers are more confident about the accuracy of direct <strong>cost</strong>s of<br />

<strong>cost</strong> objects, such as the paper <strong>cost</strong> of Sports Illustrated magazine.<br />

Indirect <strong>cost</strong>s pose more problems. Consider the lease. Allocating the <strong>cost</strong> of the lease<br />

on the basis of the <strong>to</strong>tal floor space occupied by the staff of each magazine makes sense.<br />

This approach measures the building resources used by each magazine reasonably accurately.<br />

The more floor space a department occupies, the more lease <strong>cost</strong>s that should be<br />

assigned <strong>to</strong> it. This allocation assumes that the quality of the space (such as the layout <strong>an</strong>d<br />

the number of windows offering a good view) used by the different magazines is fairly<br />

similar. Accurately allocating other indirect <strong>cost</strong>s, such as the <strong>cost</strong> of Time Warner’s <strong>to</strong>p<br />

m<strong>an</strong>agement, <strong>to</strong> Sports Illustrated magazine is more difficult. Should these <strong>cost</strong>s be allocated<br />

on the basis of the size of the edi<strong>to</strong>rial staff? The number of magazines sold? Some<br />

other measure? It is not so clear how <strong>to</strong> measure the share of <strong>to</strong>p m<strong>an</strong>agement’s time used<br />

by each magazine. The Focus on Values <strong>an</strong>d Behaviors feature (p. 29) describes some<br />

additional issues m<strong>an</strong>agers might face when allocating <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

EXHIBIT 2-2<br />

Cost Assignment<br />

<strong>to</strong> a Cost Object<br />

TYPE OF COST<br />

Direct Costs<br />

Example: Paper on<br />

which Sports Illustrated<br />

magazine is printed<br />

COST ASSIGNMENT<br />

Cost Tracing<br />

COST OBJECT<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

28<br />

Indirect Costs<br />

Example: Lease <strong>cost</strong> for<br />

Time Warner building<br />

housing the edi<strong>to</strong>rs of<br />

Sports Illustrated, Time,<br />

People, <strong>an</strong>d other<br />

magazines<br />

Cost Allocation<br />

Example: Sports Illustrated<br />

magazine<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


F CUS ON VALUES AND BEHAVIORS<br />

OVERCHARGING THE U.S. GOVERNMENT<br />

Distinguishing direct <strong>cost</strong>s from indirect <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d deciding how<br />

<strong>to</strong> allocate indirect <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong> products requires m<strong>an</strong>agement<br />

account<strong>an</strong>ts <strong>to</strong> work closely with m<strong>an</strong>agers. Sometimes, however,<br />

m<strong>an</strong>agers may have a personal fin<strong>an</strong>cial incentive <strong>to</strong> propose<br />

a <strong>cost</strong> allocation method that will allocate fewer <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong><br />

some products <strong>an</strong>d higher <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong> others. For example, General<br />

Electric (GE), a <strong>to</strong>p Fortune 500 comp<strong>an</strong>y with multimillion-dollar<br />

government aerospace contracts, was found <strong>to</strong> have overcharged<br />

employee direct labor hours on projects. Top m<strong>an</strong>agement<br />

responded by developing the comp<strong>an</strong>y’s ethics <strong>an</strong>d<br />

integrity policy, which all employees must now sign when hired.<br />

In addition, the comp<strong>an</strong>y posts its policy publicly on the Web <strong>an</strong>d<br />

includes a section urging employees <strong>to</strong> be on the lookout for<br />

improper, incomplete, or unauthorized <strong>cost</strong> charging on contracts.<br />

Consider <strong>an</strong>other example. The U.S. Department of<br />

Defense (DoD) has contracts with private comp<strong>an</strong>ies such as<br />

Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, <strong>an</strong>d Boeing <strong>to</strong> supply<br />

military equipment such as fighter jets, submarines, <strong>an</strong>d t<strong>an</strong>ks.<br />

Through its own internal Defense Contract Audit Agency<br />

(DCAA), the DoD discovered that some of its equipment suppliers<br />

had overallocated indirect <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong> the DoD products<br />

<strong>an</strong>d underallocated indirect <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong> their other commercial<br />

products. The reason: The DoD paid suppliers on the basis of<br />

a <strong>cost</strong>-plus profit margin. The higher the <strong>cost</strong>s the supplier<br />

allocated <strong>to</strong> the DoD business, the higher the revenues the<br />

supplier earned. In a recent case, the DCAA, through its normal<br />

audit process, found that Hallibur<strong>to</strong>n KBR overcharged<br />

the U.S. government as much as $61 million for fuel sold <strong>to</strong><br />

Iraq as part of the government’s rebuilding contract.<br />

M<strong>an</strong>agement account<strong>an</strong>ts must always make careful <strong>an</strong>d<br />

professional judgments when choosing among alternative<br />

<strong>cost</strong>-allocation methods. The failure of the defense contrac<strong>to</strong>rs’<br />

m<strong>an</strong>agement account<strong>an</strong>ts <strong>to</strong> properly allocate <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong><br />

the DoD led <strong>to</strong> severe penalties <strong>an</strong>d fines for their comp<strong>an</strong>ies<br />

<strong>an</strong>d, in some cases, criminal prosecution.<br />

Sources: For Hallibur<strong>to</strong>n <strong>an</strong>d DCAA; Lawrence DiRita, Acting ASD (Public Affairs) Thursday, December 11, 2003; www.defenselink.mil/tr<strong>an</strong>scripts/2003/<br />

tr20031211-0985.html. For General Electric: www.ge.com/en/commitment/social/integrity/workwith_govt.htm.<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Fac<strong>to</strong>rs Affecting Direct/Indirect Cost Classifications<br />

Several fac<strong>to</strong>rs affect the classification of a <strong>cost</strong> as direct or indirect:<br />

■ The materiality of the <strong>cost</strong> in question. The smaller the amount of a <strong>cost</strong>—that is,<br />

the more immaterial the <strong>cost</strong> is—the less likely that it is economically feasible <strong>to</strong> trace<br />

that <strong>cost</strong> <strong>to</strong> a particular <strong>cost</strong> object. Consider a mail-order catalog comp<strong>an</strong>y like<br />

L<strong>an</strong>ds’ End. It would be economically feasible <strong>to</strong> trace the courier charge for delivering<br />

a package <strong>to</strong> <strong>an</strong> individual cus<strong>to</strong>mer as a direct <strong>cost</strong>. In contrast, the <strong>cost</strong> of the<br />

invoice paper included in the package would be classified as <strong>an</strong> indirect <strong>cost</strong>. Why?<br />

Because although the <strong>cost</strong> of the paper c<strong>an</strong> be traced <strong>to</strong> each cus<strong>to</strong>mer, it is not <strong>cost</strong>effective<br />

<strong>to</strong> do so. The benefits of knowing that exactly, say, 0.5 cent worth of paper is<br />

included in each package do not exceed the data processing <strong>an</strong>d administrative <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

of tracing the <strong>cost</strong> <strong>to</strong> each package.<br />

■ Available information-gathering technology. Improvements in information-gathering<br />

technology make it possible <strong>to</strong> consider more <strong>an</strong>d more <strong>cost</strong>s as direct <strong>cost</strong>s. Bar<br />

codes, for example, allow m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing pl<strong>an</strong>ts <strong>to</strong> treat certain low-<strong>cost</strong> materials<br />

such as clips <strong>an</strong>d screws, which were previously classified as indirect <strong>cost</strong>s, as direct<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s of products. At Dell, component parts such as the computer chip <strong>an</strong>d the CD-<br />

ROM drive display a bar code that c<strong>an</strong> be sc<strong>an</strong>ned at every point in the production<br />

process. Bar codes c<strong>an</strong> be read in<strong>to</strong> a m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong> file by waving a “w<strong>an</strong>d” in<br />

the same quick <strong>an</strong>d efficient way supermarket checkout clerks enter the <strong>cost</strong> of each<br />

item purchased by a cus<strong>to</strong>mer.<br />

■ Design of operations. Classifying a <strong>cost</strong> as direct is easier if a comp<strong>an</strong>y’s facility (or<br />

some part of it) is used exclusively for a specific <strong>cost</strong> object, such as a specific product<br />

or a particular cus<strong>to</strong>mer. For example, the <strong>cost</strong> of the General Chemicals facility<br />

that is dedicated <strong>to</strong> m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing soda ash is a direct <strong>cost</strong> of soda ash.<br />

Be aware that a specific <strong>cost</strong> may be both a direct <strong>cost</strong> of one <strong>cost</strong> object <strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong><br />

indirect <strong>cost</strong> of <strong>an</strong>other <strong>cost</strong> object. That is, the direct/indirect classification depends on the<br />

choice of the <strong>cost</strong> object. For example, the salary of <strong>an</strong> Assembly Department supervisor<br />

at BMW is a direct <strong>cost</strong> if the <strong>cost</strong> object is the Assembly Department, but it is <strong>an</strong> indi-<br />

An Introduction <strong>to</strong> Cost Terms <strong>an</strong>d Purposes<br />

29<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


ect <strong>cost</strong> if the <strong>cost</strong> object is a product such as the BMW X5 sport-utility vehicle (SUV)<br />

because the Assembly Department assembles m<strong>an</strong>y different models. A useful rule of<br />

thumb is that the broader the definition of the <strong>cost</strong> object—the Assembly Department<br />

rather th<strong>an</strong> the X5 SUV—the higher the proportion of <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s that are direct <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

<strong>an</strong>d the more confidence m<strong>an</strong>agement has in the accuracy of the resulting <strong>cost</strong><br />

amounts.<br />

3<br />

Explain variable <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

<strong>an</strong>d fixed <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

. . . the two basic ways in<br />

which <strong>cost</strong>s behave<br />

The distinction between<br />

variable <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d fixed<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s is necessary <strong>to</strong> address<br />

key questions. For example,<br />

how much would m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s ch<strong>an</strong>ge if the output level<br />

increased by 5%?<br />

Cost-Behavior Patterns: Variable Costs <strong>an</strong>d Fixed Costs<br />

Costing systems record the <strong>cost</strong> of resources acquired, such as materials, labor, <strong>an</strong>d equipment,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d track how those resources are used <strong>to</strong> produce <strong>an</strong>d sell products or services.<br />

Recording the <strong>cost</strong>s of resources acquired <strong>an</strong>d used allows m<strong>an</strong>agers <strong>to</strong> see how <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

behave. Consider two basic types of <strong>cost</strong>-behavior patterns found in m<strong>an</strong>y accounting systems.<br />

A variable <strong>cost</strong> ch<strong>an</strong>ges in <strong>to</strong>tal in proportion <strong>to</strong> ch<strong>an</strong>ges in the related level of <strong>to</strong>tal<br />

activity or volume. A fixed <strong>cost</strong> remains unch<strong>an</strong>ged in <strong>to</strong>tal for a given time period,<br />

despite wide ch<strong>an</strong>ges in the related level of <strong>to</strong>tal activity or volume. Costs are defined as<br />

variable or fixed with respect <strong>to</strong> a specific activity <strong>an</strong>d for a given time period. The Global<br />

Surveys of Comp<strong>an</strong>y Practice on page 31 indicate that identifying a <strong>cost</strong> as variable or<br />

fixed helps in making m<strong>an</strong>y m<strong>an</strong>agement decisions. To illustrate these two basic types of<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s, consider <strong>cost</strong>s at the Spart<strong>an</strong>burg, South Carolina, pl<strong>an</strong>t of BMW.<br />

1. Variable Costs: If BMW buys a steering wheel at $60 for each of its BMW X5 vehicles,<br />

then the <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong> of steering wheels should be $60 times the number of vehicles<br />

produced, as the following table illustrates.<br />

Number of Variable Cost per Total Variable Cost<br />

X5s Produced Steering Wheel of Steering Wheels<br />

(1) (2) (3) = (1) × (2)<br />

1 $60 $ 60<br />

1,000 60 60,000<br />

3,000 60 180,000<br />

The steering wheel <strong>cost</strong> is <strong>an</strong> example of a variable <strong>cost</strong> because <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong> ch<strong>an</strong>ges in<br />

proportion <strong>to</strong> ch<strong>an</strong>ges in the number of vehicles produced. The <strong>cost</strong> per unit of a<br />

variable <strong>cost</strong> is the same. Focus on the table. It is precisely because the variable <strong>cost</strong><br />

per steering wheel in column 2 is the same that the <strong>to</strong>tal variable <strong>cost</strong> of steering<br />

wheels in column 3 ch<strong>an</strong>ges proportionately with the number of X5s produced in<br />

column 1. When considering how variable <strong>cost</strong>s behave, always focus on <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

Exhibit 2-3, P<strong>an</strong>el A, graphically illustrates the <strong>to</strong>tal variable <strong>cost</strong> of steering<br />

wheels. The <strong>cost</strong> is represented by a straight line that climbs from left <strong>to</strong> right. The<br />

phrases “strictly variable” <strong>an</strong>d “proportionately variable” are sometimes used <strong>to</strong><br />

describe the variable <strong>cost</strong> in P<strong>an</strong>el A.<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

30<br />

EXHIBIT 2-3<br />

Graphs of Variable<br />

<strong>an</strong>d Fixed Costs<br />

PANEL A: Variable Cost of Steering Wheels<br />

at $60 per BMW X5 Assembled<br />

Total Cost of Steering Wheels<br />

$200,000<br />

$150,000<br />

$100,000<br />

$50,000<br />

$0<br />

0<br />

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000<br />

X5s Assembled<br />

PANEL B: Fixed Leasing Costs of<br />

Spart<strong>an</strong>burg Pl<strong>an</strong>t (in millions)<br />

Total Leasing Costs<br />

$150<br />

$100<br />

$50<br />

$0<br />

0<br />

20,000 40,000<br />

X5s Assembled<br />

60,000<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


GLOBAL SURVEYS OF COMPANY PRACTICE<br />

Distinguishing Between Variable Costs <strong>an</strong>d Fixed Costs<br />

M<strong>an</strong>y chapters in this book illustrate the insights gained from distinguishing fixed <strong>cost</strong>s from variable <strong>cost</strong>s. A<br />

recent survey of m<strong>an</strong>agement accounting practice in the United States identified several <strong>to</strong>ols used by more<br />

th<strong>an</strong> 40% of respondents that rely on the distinction between fixed <strong>an</strong>d variable <strong>cost</strong>s. a<br />

Chapter(s) in the Book<br />

Pl<strong>an</strong>ning <strong>an</strong>d Budgeting Tools Discussing the Tool in Detail<br />

Budgeting <strong>an</strong>d vari<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>alysis 6, 7, <strong>an</strong>d 8<br />

Activity-based m<strong>an</strong>agement 5<br />

Capital budgeting 21<br />

Decision-Support Tools<br />

Profitability <strong>an</strong>d breakeven <strong>an</strong>alysis 3, 4, 5, 11, 12, <strong>an</strong>d 13<br />

Tr<strong>an</strong>sfer pricing 22<br />

Product-Costing Analysis Tools<br />

Traditional <strong>cost</strong>ing 4<br />

Overhead allocations 14, 15, <strong>an</strong>d 16<br />

Global surveys of comp<strong>an</strong>y practice provide additional evidence that a large percentage of firms use systems<br />

that distinguish fixed <strong>cost</strong>s from variable <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

New Zeal<strong>an</strong>d b = 84%<br />

United Kingdom b = 90%<br />

Es<strong>to</strong>nia c = 80%<br />

When comp<strong>an</strong>ies were asked <strong>to</strong> describe how they identify fixed <strong>an</strong>d variable <strong>cost</strong>s, “classification on a<br />

subjective basis based on m<strong>an</strong>agerial experience” <strong>an</strong>d “treating all overheads as fixed <strong>an</strong>d all direct <strong>cost</strong>s as<br />

variable” were selected as the two most popular methods used in the United Kingdom <strong>an</strong>d New Zeal<strong>an</strong>d.<br />

a A. Garg et al., “Roles <strong>an</strong>d Practices in M<strong>an</strong>agement Accounting Today.”<br />

b C. Guilding, D. Lamminmaki, <strong>an</strong>d C. Drury, “Budgeting <strong>an</strong>d St<strong>an</strong>dard Costing Practices in New Zeal<strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong>d the United<br />

Kingdom.”<br />

c T. Haldma, <strong>an</strong>d K. Lääts, “Contingencies Influencing the M<strong>an</strong>agement Accounting Practices of Es<strong>to</strong>ni<strong>an</strong> M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

Comp<strong>an</strong>ies.”<br />

Full citations are in Appendix A at the end of the book.<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Consider <strong>an</strong> example of a variable <strong>cost</strong> with respect <strong>to</strong> a different activity—the<br />

$20 hourly wage paid <strong>to</strong> each worker <strong>to</strong> set up machines at the Spart<strong>an</strong>burg pl<strong>an</strong>t.<br />

Setup labor <strong>cost</strong> is a variable <strong>cost</strong> with respect <strong>to</strong> setup hours because setup <strong>cost</strong><br />

ch<strong>an</strong>ges in <strong>to</strong>tal in proportion <strong>to</strong> the number of setup hours used.<br />

2. Fixed Costs: Suppose BMW incurs a <strong>to</strong>tal of $100,000,000 in leasing <strong>cost</strong>s per year<br />

for its Spart<strong>an</strong>burg pl<strong>an</strong>t. These <strong>cost</strong>s are unch<strong>an</strong>ged in <strong>to</strong>tal over a designated r<strong>an</strong>ge<br />

of the number of vehicles produced during a given time sp<strong>an</strong> (see Exhibit 2-3, P<strong>an</strong>el<br />

B). Fixed <strong>cost</strong>s become smaller <strong>an</strong>d smaller on a per unit basis as the number of<br />

vehicles assembled increases, as the following table shows.<br />

Annual Total Number of Fixed Leasing Cost<br />

Fixed Leasing Costs X5s Produced per X5<br />

(1) (2) (3) = (1) ÷ (2)<br />

$100,000,000 10,000 $10,000<br />

100,000,000 25,000 4,000<br />

100,000,000 50,000 2,000<br />

An Introduction <strong>to</strong> Cost Terms <strong>an</strong>d Purposes<br />

31<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


Again examine the table. It is precisely because <strong>to</strong>tal leasing <strong>cost</strong>s are fixed at<br />

$100,000,000 that fixed leasing <strong>cost</strong> per X5 decreases as the number of X5s produced<br />

increases; the same fixed <strong>cost</strong> is spread over a larger number of X5s. Do not<br />

be misled by the ch<strong>an</strong>ge in fixed <strong>cost</strong> per unit. When considering fixed <strong>cost</strong>s, always<br />

focus on <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s. Costs are fixed when <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s remain unch<strong>an</strong>ged despite signific<strong>an</strong>t<br />

ch<strong>an</strong>ges in the level of <strong>to</strong>tal activity or volume.<br />

Example: Suppose you<br />

make belts using leather<br />

that <strong>cost</strong>s $5/belt (a variable<br />

<strong>cost</strong>) in a workshop rented for<br />

$450/month (a fixed <strong>cost</strong>).<br />

Calculate <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d per<br />

unit <strong>cost</strong>s for 1 Belt <strong>an</strong>d 10 Belts:<br />

1 Belt 10 Belts<br />

Per Per<br />

Total Unit Total Unit<br />

Leather $ 5 $ 5 $ 50 $ 5<br />

Rent 450 450 450 45<br />

Total $455 $455 $500 $50<br />

Total VC vary with the number of<br />

belts produced (from $5 <strong>to</strong> $50<br />

as volume increases from 1 <strong>to</strong><br />

10 belts), but per unit VC are<br />

const<strong>an</strong>t at $5/belt (for both 1<br />

<strong>an</strong>d 10 belts). Total FC are const<strong>an</strong>t<br />

at $450 (for both 1 <strong>an</strong>d 10<br />

belts), but per unit FC vary with<br />

the number of belts produced<br />

(from $450 <strong>to</strong> $45 as volume<br />

increases from 1 <strong>to</strong> 10 belts).<br />

Therefore, <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong> per belt<br />

depends on the number of belts<br />

produced.<br />

Why are some <strong>cost</strong>s variable <strong>an</strong>d other <strong>cost</strong>s fixed? Recall that a <strong>cost</strong> is usually measured<br />

as the amount of money that must be paid <strong>to</strong> acquire goods <strong>an</strong>d services. Total <strong>cost</strong><br />

of steering wheels is a variable <strong>cost</strong> because BMW buys the steering wheels only when they<br />

are needed. As more X5s are produced, proportionately more steering wheels are acquired<br />

<strong>an</strong>d proportionately more <strong>cost</strong>s are incurred.<br />

Contrast the description of variable <strong>cost</strong>s with the $100,000,000 of fixed <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

incurred by BMW <strong>to</strong> lease its Spart<strong>an</strong>burg pl<strong>an</strong>t for a year. This pl<strong>an</strong>t capacity is<br />

acquired well before BMW uses it <strong>to</strong> produce X5s <strong>an</strong>d before BMW even knows how<br />

much of the capacity it will use. Suppose the pl<strong>an</strong>t has the capacity <strong>to</strong> produce 50,000<br />

X5s each year. If the dem<strong>an</strong>d is for only 45,000 X5s, there will be idle capacity. However,<br />

BMW must pay for the unused capacity. If dem<strong>an</strong>d is even lower, say only 40,000 X5s,<br />

pl<strong>an</strong>t leasing <strong>cost</strong>s will not ch<strong>an</strong>ge; they will continue <strong>to</strong> be $100,000,000. However,<br />

idle capacity will increase. Unlike variable <strong>cost</strong>s, fixed <strong>cost</strong>s pay for resources (such as<br />

for pl<strong>an</strong>t capacity) that c<strong>an</strong>not be quickly <strong>an</strong>d easily ch<strong>an</strong>ged <strong>to</strong> match the resources<br />

needed or used. Over time, m<strong>an</strong>agers c<strong>an</strong> take actions <strong>to</strong> reduce fixed <strong>cost</strong>s. For example,<br />

BMW may choose <strong>to</strong> sublease part of the pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong>to</strong> other comp<strong>an</strong>ies.<br />

Do not assume that individual <strong>cost</strong> items are inherently variable or fixed. Consider<br />

labor <strong>cost</strong>s. Labor <strong>cost</strong>s c<strong>an</strong> be purely variable with respect <strong>to</strong> units produced when workers<br />

are paid on a piece-unit (piece-rate) basis. Some garment workers are paid on a pershirt-sewed<br />

basis. In contrast, labor <strong>cost</strong>s at a pl<strong>an</strong>t in the coming year are sometimes<br />

appropriately classified as fixed. For inst<strong>an</strong>ce, a labor union agreement might set <strong>an</strong>nual<br />

salaries <strong>an</strong>d conditions, contain a no-layoff clause, <strong>an</strong>d severely restrict a comp<strong>an</strong>y’s flexibility<br />

<strong>to</strong> assign workers <strong>to</strong> <strong>an</strong>y other pl<strong>an</strong>t that has dem<strong>an</strong>d for labor. Jap<strong>an</strong>ese comp<strong>an</strong>ies<br />

have for a long time had a policy of lifetime employment for their workers. Although<br />

such a policy entails higher labor <strong>cost</strong>s, particularly in economic downturns, the benefits<br />

are increased loyalty <strong>an</strong>d dedication <strong>to</strong> the comp<strong>an</strong>y <strong>an</strong>d higher productivity. The<br />

Concepts in Action on page 33 describes how the Internet offers comp<strong>an</strong>ies the opportunity<br />

<strong>to</strong> convert fixed <strong>cost</strong>s of application software in<strong>to</strong> variable <strong>cost</strong>s by renting software<br />

applications on <strong>an</strong> as-needed basis.<br />

A particular <strong>cost</strong> item could be variable with respect <strong>to</strong> one level of activity <strong>an</strong>d fixed<br />

with respect <strong>to</strong> <strong>an</strong>other. Consider <strong>an</strong>nual registration <strong>an</strong>d license <strong>cost</strong>s for a fleet of pl<strong>an</strong>es<br />

owned by <strong>an</strong> airline comp<strong>an</strong>y. Registration <strong>an</strong>d license <strong>cost</strong>s would be a variable <strong>cost</strong> with<br />

respect <strong>to</strong> the number of pl<strong>an</strong>es owned. But registration <strong>an</strong>d license <strong>cost</strong>s for a particular<br />

pl<strong>an</strong>e are fixed with respect <strong>to</strong> the miles flown by that pl<strong>an</strong>e during a year.<br />

To focus on key concepts, we have classified the behavior of <strong>cost</strong>s as variable or fixed.<br />

Some <strong>cost</strong>s have both fixed <strong>an</strong>d variable elements <strong>an</strong>d are called mixed or semivariable<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s. For example, a comp<strong>an</strong>y’s telephone <strong>cost</strong>s may have a fixed monthly payment <strong>an</strong>d<br />

a charge per phone-minute used. We discuss mixed <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d techniques <strong>to</strong> separate out<br />

their fixed <strong>an</strong>d variable components in Chapter 10.<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

32<br />

Cost Drivers<br />

A <strong>cost</strong> driver is a variable, such as the level of activity or volume, that causally affects <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

over a given time sp<strong>an</strong>. That is, there is a cause-<strong>an</strong>d-effect relationship between a ch<strong>an</strong>ge<br />

in the level of activity or volume <strong>an</strong>d a ch<strong>an</strong>ge in the level of <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s. For example, if<br />

product-design <strong>cost</strong>s ch<strong>an</strong>ge with the number of parts in a product, the number of parts<br />

is a <strong>cost</strong> driver of product-design <strong>cost</strong>s. Similarly, miles driven is often a <strong>cost</strong> driver of distribution<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

The <strong>cost</strong> driver of a variable <strong>cost</strong> is the level of activity or volume whose ch<strong>an</strong>ge causes<br />

proportionate ch<strong>an</strong>ges in the variable <strong>cost</strong>. For example, the number of vehicles assembled<br />

is the <strong>cost</strong> driver of the <strong>cost</strong> of steering wheels. If setup workers are paid <strong>an</strong> hourly<br />

wage, the number of setup hours is the <strong>cost</strong> driver of (variable) setup <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


CONCEPTS IN ACTION<br />

How Application Service Providers (ASPs) Influence Cost<br />

Structures<br />

The growing complexity of applications software, coupled with the dem<strong>an</strong>d for<br />

information technology departments <strong>to</strong> operate in a le<strong>an</strong>er way, has caused<br />

m<strong>an</strong>y org<strong>an</strong>izations <strong>to</strong> turn <strong>to</strong> application service providers (ASPs). ASPs allow<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>ies <strong>to</strong> rent software online from service providers by accessing<br />

applications software from a remote server via a Web browser. Some<br />

NOT AVAILABLE FOR<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>ies prefer ASPs <strong>to</strong> buying software because they c<strong>an</strong> access the<br />

ELECTRONIC VIEWING<br />

applications <strong>an</strong>d features they need, on dem<strong>an</strong>d, from online providers while<br />

paying only for the time the software is used. As comp<strong>an</strong>ies further streamline<br />

information technology (IT) <strong>cost</strong>s, ASPs become a more attractive, less<br />

capital-intensive option. Zach Nelson, CEO of NetSuite, a leading ASP, recently<br />

<strong>to</strong>ld ASPnews.com, <strong>an</strong> online newsletter, that “Cus<strong>to</strong>mers don’t w<strong>an</strong>t <strong>to</strong> give all<br />

the money up front; they w<strong>an</strong>t <strong>to</strong> buy it for as much as they’re using, they w<strong>an</strong>t<br />

<strong>to</strong> buy it on a subscription.”<br />

Let’s think about what this development me<strong>an</strong>s. Consider application software,<br />

such as e-mail <strong>an</strong>d messaging, supply-chain <strong>an</strong>d procurement pl<strong>an</strong>ning,<br />

hum<strong>an</strong> resources m<strong>an</strong>agement, cus<strong>to</strong>mer-relationship m<strong>an</strong>agement, <strong>an</strong>d budgeting,<br />

required by a small- <strong>to</strong> medium-sized comp<strong>an</strong>y of 250 employees. What<br />

options does the comp<strong>an</strong>y have? It could (1) choose <strong>to</strong> build its own proprietary systems at a very high <strong>cost</strong>; or<br />

(2) purchase packaged software, recruit <strong>an</strong>d retain in-house IT resources <strong>to</strong> install <strong>an</strong>d maintain the software,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d build <strong>an</strong>d maintain the IT infrastructure necessary <strong>to</strong> support the applications. Both solutions entail high<br />

fixed <strong>cost</strong>s, so m<strong>an</strong>y small businesses choose not <strong>to</strong> au<strong>to</strong>mate basic processes such as fin<strong>an</strong>cial reporting <strong>an</strong>d<br />

hum<strong>an</strong> resources.<br />

ASPs such as Corio, Microsoft, Salesforce.com, Surebridge, <strong>an</strong>d USinternetworking design, develop, maintain,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d upgrade application packages <strong>an</strong>d then charge comp<strong>an</strong>ies a price for using each package. From the<br />

perspective of their cus<strong>to</strong>mers, ASPs convert the fixed <strong>cost</strong>s of applications software <strong>to</strong> variable <strong>cost</strong>s. If business<br />

declines, ASP cus<strong>to</strong>mers are not saddled with the fixed <strong>cost</strong>s of the applications software. Of course, if<br />

cus<strong>to</strong>mers use a lot of the applications software, they c<strong>an</strong> end up paying more overall th<strong>an</strong> they would have<br />

paid if they had developed the applications themselves.<br />

The nonfin<strong>an</strong>cial reasons why comp<strong>an</strong>ies may not use ASPs are concerns about (1) security of data sent<br />

over the Internet, (2) losing control over import<strong>an</strong>t applications, <strong>an</strong>d (3) lack of reliability of the network. (This is<br />

why ASPs offer service agreements that guar<strong>an</strong>tee 99.9% uptime.)<br />

Sources: T. Eisenm<strong>an</strong>n <strong>an</strong>d S. Pothen, Application Service Providers, Harvard Business School Note, 2001. R. Lavery, “The<br />

ABCs of ASPs,” Strategic Fin<strong>an</strong>ce, May 2001; D. Clark, “Renting Software Online: The Next Big Idea,” The Wall Street Journal,<br />

June 3, 2003, B1; T. Bajarin, “ASPs Gain Ground,” Asia Computer Weekly, July 21, 2003. K. Newcomb, “The Second Coming<br />

of ASPs?” ASPnews.com, May 5, 2004.<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Costs that are fixed in the short run have no <strong>cost</strong> driver in the short run but may have<br />

a <strong>cost</strong> driver in the long run. Consider the <strong>cost</strong>s of testing color printers at Hewlett-<br />

Packard. These <strong>cost</strong>s consist of Testing Department equipment <strong>an</strong>d staff <strong>cost</strong>s that are difficult<br />

<strong>to</strong> ch<strong>an</strong>ge <strong>an</strong>d, hence, are fixed in the short run with respect <strong>to</strong> ch<strong>an</strong>ges in the volume<br />

of production. In this case, volume of production is not a <strong>cost</strong> driver of testing <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

in the short run. But in the long run, Hewlett-Packard will increase or decrease the Testing<br />

Department’s equipment <strong>an</strong>d staff <strong>to</strong> the levels needed <strong>to</strong> support future production volumes.<br />

In the long run, volume of production is a <strong>cost</strong> driver of testing <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

Relev<strong>an</strong>t R<strong>an</strong>ge<br />

Relev<strong>an</strong>t r<strong>an</strong>ge is the b<strong>an</strong>d of normal activity level or volume in which there is a specific<br />

relationship between the level of activity or volume <strong>an</strong>d the <strong>cost</strong> in question. For example,<br />

a fixed <strong>cost</strong> is fixed only in relation <strong>to</strong> a given wide r<strong>an</strong>ge of <strong>to</strong>tal activity or volume (at which<br />

the comp<strong>an</strong>y is expected <strong>to</strong> operate) <strong>an</strong>d only for a given time sp<strong>an</strong> (usually a particular<br />

budget period). Consider Thomas Tr<strong>an</strong>sport Comp<strong>an</strong>y (TTC), which rents two refrigerated<br />

An Introduction <strong>to</strong> Cost Terms <strong>an</strong>d Purposes<br />

33<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


EXHIBIT 2-4<br />

$160,000<br />

Fixed-Cost Behavior<br />

at Thomas Tr<strong>an</strong>sport<br />

Comp<strong>an</strong>y<br />

Total Fixed Costs<br />

$120,000<br />

$80,000<br />

$40,000<br />

Relev<strong>an</strong>t<br />

R<strong>an</strong>ge<br />

in 2007<br />

$0<br />

120,000 240,000<br />

Miles of Hauling<br />

360,000<br />

trucks that carry agricultural produce <strong>to</strong> market. Each truck has <strong>an</strong>nual fixed rental <strong>cost</strong>s of<br />

$40,000. The maximum <strong>an</strong>nual usage of each truck is 120,000 miles. In the current year<br />

(2007), the predicted combined <strong>to</strong>tal hauling of the two trucks is 170,000 miles.<br />

Exhibit 2-4 shows how <strong>an</strong>nual fixed <strong>cost</strong>s behave at different levels of miles of hauling.<br />

Up <strong>to</strong> 120,000 miles, TTC c<strong>an</strong> operate with one truck; from 120,001 <strong>to</strong> 240,000 miles, it operates<br />

with two trucks; from 240,001 <strong>to</strong> 360,000 miles, it operates with three trucks. This pattern<br />

will continue as TTC adds trucks <strong>to</strong> its fleet <strong>to</strong> provide more miles of hauling. Given the<br />

predicted 170,000-mile usage for 2007, the r<strong>an</strong>ge from 120,001 <strong>to</strong> 240,000 miles hauled is<br />

the r<strong>an</strong>ge in which TTC expects <strong>to</strong> operate, resulting in fixed rental <strong>cost</strong>s of $80,000. Within<br />

this relev<strong>an</strong>t r<strong>an</strong>ge, ch<strong>an</strong>ges in miles hauled will not affect the <strong>an</strong>nual fixed <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

Fixed <strong>cost</strong>s may ch<strong>an</strong>ge from one year <strong>to</strong> the next. For example, if the <strong>to</strong>tal rental fees<br />

of the two refrigerated trucks is increased by $2,000 for 2008, the <strong>to</strong>tal level of fixed <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

will increase <strong>to</strong> $82,000 (all else remaining the same). If that increase occurs, <strong>to</strong>tal rental<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s will be fixed at this new level of $82,000 for 2008 for miles hauled in the 120,001<br />

<strong>to</strong> 240,000 r<strong>an</strong>ge.<br />

The basic assumption of the relev<strong>an</strong>t r<strong>an</strong>ge also applies <strong>to</strong> variable <strong>cost</strong>s. That is, outside<br />

the relev<strong>an</strong>t r<strong>an</strong>ge, variable <strong>cost</strong>s, such as direct materials, may not ch<strong>an</strong>ge proportionately<br />

with ch<strong>an</strong>ges in production volume. For example, above a certain volume, direct<br />

material <strong>cost</strong>s may increase at a lower rate because of price discounts on purchases greater<br />

th<strong>an</strong> a certain qu<strong>an</strong>tity.<br />

Relationships of Types of Costs<br />

We have introduced two major classifications of <strong>cost</strong>s: direct/indirect <strong>an</strong>d variable/fixed.<br />

Costs may simult<strong>an</strong>eously be:<br />

■ Direct <strong>an</strong>d variable<br />

■ Direct <strong>an</strong>d fixed<br />

■ Indirect <strong>an</strong>d variable<br />

■ Indirect <strong>an</strong>d fixed<br />

Exhibit 2-5 shows examples of <strong>cost</strong>s in each of these four <strong>cost</strong> classifications for the BMW X5.<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

34<br />

4<br />

Interpret unit <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

cautiously<br />

. . . for m<strong>an</strong>y decisions,<br />

m<strong>an</strong>agers should use <strong>to</strong>tal<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s, not unit <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

Total Costs <strong>an</strong>d Unit Costs<br />

The preceding section concentrated on the behavior patterns of <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s in relation <strong>to</strong><br />

activity or volume levels. We now consider unit <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

Unit Costs<br />

Generally, the decision maker should think in <strong>terms</strong> of <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s rather th<strong>an</strong> unit <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

In m<strong>an</strong>y decision contexts, however, calculating a unit <strong>cost</strong> is essential. Consider the<br />

chairm<strong>an</strong> of the social committee of a fraternity, who is trying <strong>to</strong> decide whether <strong>to</strong> hire<br />

a musical group for <strong>an</strong> upcoming party. He estimates the <strong>cost</strong> of hiring the group <strong>to</strong> be<br />

$1,000. This knowledge is helpful for the decision, but it is not enough.<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


Assignment of Costs <strong>to</strong> Cost Object<br />

EXHIBIT 2-5<br />

Cost-<br />

Behavior<br />

Pattern<br />

Variable Costs<br />

Fixed Costs<br />

Direct Costs<br />

• Cost object: BMW X5s<br />

produced<br />

Example: Tires used in<br />

assembly of<br />

au<strong>to</strong>mobile<br />

• Cost object: BMW X5s<br />

produced<br />

Example: Salary of<br />

supervisor on<br />

BMW X5<br />

assembly line<br />

Indirect Costs<br />

• Cost object: BMW X5s<br />

produced<br />

Example: Power <strong>cost</strong>s at<br />

Spart<strong>an</strong>burg pl<strong>an</strong>t.<br />

Power usage is<br />

metered only <strong>to</strong> the<br />

pl<strong>an</strong>t, where<br />

multiple products<br />

are assembled.<br />

• Cost object: BMW X5s<br />

produced<br />

Example: Annual lease <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

at Spart<strong>an</strong>burg<br />

pl<strong>an</strong>t. Lease is for<br />

whole pl<strong>an</strong>t, where<br />

multiple products<br />

are produced.<br />

Examples of<br />

Inven<strong>to</strong>riable Costs in<br />

Combinations of the<br />

Direct/Indirect <strong>an</strong>d<br />

Variable/Fixed Cost<br />

Classifications for a<br />

Car M<strong>an</strong>ufacturer<br />

Before a decision c<strong>an</strong> be reached, the chairm<strong>an</strong> must also predict the number of<br />

people who will attend. Without knowledge of both <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong> <strong>an</strong>d number of attendees,<br />

he c<strong>an</strong>not make <strong>an</strong> informed decision on a possible admission price <strong>to</strong> recover<br />

the <strong>cost</strong> of the party or even on whether <strong>to</strong> have a party at all. So he computes the unit<br />

<strong>cost</strong> by dividing the <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong> ($1,000) by the expected number of people who will<br />

attend. If 1,000 people attend, the unit <strong>cost</strong> is $1 per person; if 100 attend, the unit <strong>cost</strong><br />

soars <strong>to</strong> $10.<br />

Unless the <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong> is “unitized” (that is, averaged with respect <strong>to</strong> the level of activity<br />

or volume), the $1,000 <strong>cost</strong> is difficult <strong>to</strong> interpret. The unit <strong>cost</strong> combines the <strong>to</strong>tal<br />

<strong>cost</strong> <strong>an</strong>d the number of people in a h<strong>an</strong>dy, communicative way.<br />

Accounting systems typically report both <strong>to</strong>tal-<strong>cost</strong> amounts <strong>an</strong>d average-<strong>cost</strong>-perunit<br />

amounts. A unit <strong>cost</strong>, also called <strong>an</strong> average <strong>cost</strong>, is computed by dividing <strong>to</strong>tal<br />

<strong>cost</strong> by the number of units. The units might be expressed in various ways. Examples are<br />

au<strong>to</strong>mobiles assembled, packages delivered, or hours worked. Suppose that, in 2007, its<br />

first year of operations, $40,000,000 of m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s are incurred <strong>to</strong> produce<br />

500,000 speaker systems at the Memphis pl<strong>an</strong>t of Tennessee Products. Then the unit<br />

<strong>cost</strong> is $80:<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Total m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

Number of units m<strong>an</strong>ufactured<br />

$40,000,000<br />

= = $ 80 per unit<br />

500,<br />

000 units<br />

If 480,000 units are sold <strong>an</strong>d 20,000 units remain in ending inven<strong>to</strong>ry, the unit-<strong>cost</strong> concept<br />

helps in the determination of <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s in the income statement <strong>an</strong>d bal<strong>an</strong>ce sheet<br />

<strong>an</strong>d, hence, the fin<strong>an</strong>cial results reported by Tennessee Products <strong>to</strong> shareholders, b<strong>an</strong>ks,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d the government.<br />

Cost of goods sold in the income statement, 480,000 units × $80 per unit $38,400,000<br />

Ending inven<strong>to</strong>ry in the bal<strong>an</strong>ce sheet, 20,000 units × $80 per unit 1,600,000<br />

Total m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s of 500,000 units $40,000,000<br />

Unit <strong>cost</strong>s are found in all areas of the value chain—for example, unit <strong>cost</strong> of product<br />

design, of sales visits, <strong>an</strong>d of cus<strong>to</strong>mer-service calls. By summing unit <strong>cost</strong>s throughout<br />

the value chain, m<strong>an</strong>agers calculate the unit <strong>cost</strong> of the different products or services they<br />

deliver <strong>an</strong>d determine the profitability of each product or service. M<strong>an</strong>agers use this information,<br />

for example, <strong>to</strong> decide which products they should emphasize <strong>an</strong>d the prices they<br />

should charge.<br />

An Introduction <strong>to</strong> Cost Terms <strong>an</strong>d Purposes<br />

35<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


Study Tip: Practice is<br />

helpful if you w<strong>an</strong>t <strong>to</strong><br />

master <strong>cost</strong> accounting concepts<br />

<strong>an</strong>d techniques. To check<br />

your underst<strong>an</strong>ding of <strong>cost</strong><br />

behavior, see Featured Exercise<br />

1 (Student Guide, p. 12) <strong>an</strong>d<br />

Review Exercise 2 (p. 16). The<br />

fully explained solutions are on<br />

pages 12 <strong>an</strong>d 20, respectively.<br />

For m<strong>an</strong>y decisions, m<strong>an</strong>agers<br />

should use <strong>to</strong>tal<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s rather th<strong>an</strong> unit <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

because fixed <strong>cost</strong> per unit<br />

ch<strong>an</strong>ges when the related level<br />

of <strong>to</strong>tal volume ch<strong>an</strong>ges. Consequently,<br />

unit <strong>cost</strong>s should be<br />

interpreted with caution when<br />

they include a fixed-<strong>cost</strong> component.<br />

5<br />

Distinguish among<br />

m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>ies,<br />

merch<strong>an</strong>dising<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>ies, <strong>an</strong>d<br />

service-sec<strong>to</strong>r<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>ies<br />

. . . different types of<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>ies face different<br />

accounting issues<br />

Use Unit Costs Cautiously<br />

Although unit <strong>cost</strong>s are regularly used in fin<strong>an</strong>cial reports <strong>an</strong>d for making product mix<br />

<strong>an</strong>d pricing decisions, m<strong>an</strong>agers should think in <strong>terms</strong> of <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s rather th<strong>an</strong> unit <strong>cost</strong>s for<br />

m<strong>an</strong>y decisions. Consider the m<strong>an</strong>ager of the Memphis pl<strong>an</strong>t of Tennessee Products.<br />

Assume the $40,000,000 in <strong>cost</strong>s in 2007 consist of $10,000,000 of fixed <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d<br />

$30,000,000 of variable <strong>cost</strong>s (at $60 variable <strong>cost</strong> per speaker system produced).<br />

Suppose the <strong>to</strong>tal fixed <strong>cost</strong> <strong>an</strong>d the variable <strong>cost</strong> per speaker system in 2008 are expected<br />

<strong>to</strong> be unch<strong>an</strong>ged from 2007. The budgeted <strong>cost</strong>s for 2008 at different production levels,<br />

calculated on the basis of <strong>to</strong>tal variable <strong>cost</strong>s, <strong>to</strong>tal fixed <strong>cost</strong>s, <strong>an</strong>d <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s, are:<br />

Units Variable Cost Total Total Total Unit<br />

Produced per Unit Variable Costs Fixed Costs Costs Cost<br />

(1) (2) (3) = (1) × (2) (4) (5) = (3) + (4) (6) = (5) ÷ (1)<br />

100,000 $60 $ 6,000,000 $10,000,000 $16,000,000 $160.00<br />

200,000 $60 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $22,000,000 $110.00<br />

500,000 $60 $30,000,000 $10,000,000 $40,000,000 $ 80.00<br />

800,000 $60 $48,000,000 $10,000,000 $58,000,000 $ 72.50<br />

1,000,000 $60 $60,000,000 $10,000,000 $70,000,000 $ 70.00<br />

A pl<strong>an</strong>t m<strong>an</strong>ager who uses the 2007 unit <strong>cost</strong> of $80 per unit will underestimate<br />

actual <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s if 2008 output is below the 2007 level of 500,000 units. If actual volume<br />

is 200,000 units due <strong>to</strong>, say, the presence of a new competi<strong>to</strong>r, actual <strong>cost</strong>s would be<br />

$22,000,000. Using the unit <strong>cost</strong> of $80 times 200,000 units predicts $16,000,000, which<br />

underestimates the actual <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s by $6,000,000 ($22,000,000 − $16,000,000). The<br />

unit <strong>cost</strong> of $80 only applies when 500,000 units are produced. An overreli<strong>an</strong>ce on unit <strong>cost</strong><br />

in this situation could lead <strong>to</strong> insufficient cash being available <strong>to</strong> pay <strong>cost</strong>s if volume<br />

declines <strong>to</strong> 200,000 units. As this table indicates, for decision making, m<strong>an</strong>agers should<br />

think in <strong>terms</strong> of <strong>to</strong>tal variable <strong>cost</strong>s, <strong>to</strong>tal fixed <strong>cost</strong>s, <strong>an</strong>d <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s rather th<strong>an</strong> unit <strong>cost</strong>.<br />

We now discuss <strong>cost</strong> concepts used in different sec<strong>to</strong>rs of the economy.<br />

M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing-, Merch<strong>an</strong>dising-,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d Service-Sec<strong>to</strong>r Comp<strong>an</strong>ies<br />

We first define three different sec<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>an</strong>d provide examples of comp<strong>an</strong>ies in each sec<strong>to</strong>r.<br />

1. M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies purchase materials <strong>an</strong>d components <strong>an</strong>d convert<br />

them in<strong>to</strong> various finished goods. Examples are au<strong>to</strong>motive comp<strong>an</strong>ies, foodprocessing<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>ies, <strong>an</strong>d textile comp<strong>an</strong>ies.<br />

2. Merch<strong>an</strong>dising-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies purchase <strong>an</strong>d then sell t<strong>an</strong>gible products without<br />

ch<strong>an</strong>ging their basic form. This sec<strong>to</strong>r includes comp<strong>an</strong>ies engaged in retailing (such<br />

as books<strong>to</strong>res or department s<strong>to</strong>res), distribution, or wholesaling.<br />

3. Service-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies provide services (int<strong>an</strong>gible products)—for example,<br />

legal advice or audits—<strong>to</strong> their cus<strong>to</strong>mers. Examples are law firms, accounting firms,<br />

b<strong>an</strong>ks, mutual fund comp<strong>an</strong>ies, insur<strong>an</strong>ce comp<strong>an</strong>ies, tr<strong>an</strong>sportation comp<strong>an</strong>ies,<br />

advertising agencies, radio <strong>an</strong>d television stations, <strong>an</strong>d Internet-based comp<strong>an</strong>ies<br />

such as Internet service providers, travel agencies, <strong>an</strong>d brokerage firms.<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

36<br />

Fin<strong>an</strong>cial Statements, Inven<strong>to</strong>riable Costs,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d Period Costs<br />

The distinction between inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d period <strong>cost</strong>s, described later in this section,<br />

is necessary for fin<strong>an</strong>cial reporting in both the m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>an</strong>d merch<strong>an</strong>dising<br />

sec<strong>to</strong>rs of the economy. Service-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies provide only services or int<strong>an</strong>gible<br />

products. Because they do not hold inven<strong>to</strong>ries of t<strong>an</strong>gible products for sale, the concepts<br />

of inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d period <strong>cost</strong>s do not apply <strong>to</strong> service-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies. As background,<br />

we will first look at the different types of inven<strong>to</strong>ry that comp<strong>an</strong>ies hold <strong>an</strong>d<br />

some commonly used classifications of m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


Types of Inven<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies purchase materials <strong>an</strong>d components <strong>an</strong>d convert them<br />

in<strong>to</strong> various finished goods. These comp<strong>an</strong>ies typically have one or more of the following<br />

three types of inven<strong>to</strong>ry:<br />

1. Direct materials inven<strong>to</strong>ry. Direct materials in s<strong>to</strong>ck <strong>an</strong>d awaiting use in the m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

process (for example, computer chips <strong>an</strong>d components needed <strong>to</strong> m<strong>an</strong>ufacture<br />

cellular phones).<br />

2. Work-in-process inven<strong>to</strong>ry. Goods partially worked on but not yet completed (for<br />

example, cellular phones at various stages of completion in the m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

process). Also called work in progress.<br />

3. Finished goods inven<strong>to</strong>ry. Goods (for example, cellular phones) completed but not<br />

yet sold.<br />

Merch<strong>an</strong>dising-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies purchase t<strong>an</strong>gible products <strong>an</strong>d then sell them without<br />

ch<strong>an</strong>ging their basic form. They hold only one type of inven<strong>to</strong>ry, which is products in<br />

their original purchased form, called merch<strong>an</strong>dise inven<strong>to</strong>ry.<br />

6<br />

Describe the three<br />

categories of<br />

inven<strong>to</strong>ries commonly<br />

found in m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>ies<br />

. . . the categories are<br />

direct materials, work in<br />

process, <strong>an</strong>d finished goods<br />

Commonly Used Classifications of M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing Costs<br />

Three <strong>terms</strong> commonly used when describing m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s are direct material<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s, direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong>s, <strong>an</strong>d indirect m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

1. Direct material <strong>cost</strong>s are the acquisition <strong>cost</strong>s of all materials that eventually<br />

become part of the <strong>cost</strong> object (work in process <strong>an</strong>d then finished goods) <strong>an</strong>d that<br />

c<strong>an</strong> be traced <strong>to</strong> the <strong>cost</strong> object in <strong>an</strong> economically feasible way. Acquisition <strong>cost</strong>s of<br />

direct materials include freight-in (inward delivery) charges, sales taxes, <strong>an</strong>d cus<strong>to</strong>m<br />

duties. Examples of direct material <strong>cost</strong>s are the aluminum used <strong>to</strong> make Pepsi c<strong>an</strong>s<br />

<strong>an</strong>d the paper used <strong>to</strong> print Sports Illustrated.<br />

2. Direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong>s include the compensation of all m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

labor that c<strong>an</strong> be traced <strong>to</strong> the <strong>cost</strong> object (work in process <strong>an</strong>d then finished goods)<br />

in <strong>an</strong> economically feasible way. Examples include wages <strong>an</strong>d fringe benefits paid <strong>to</strong><br />

machine opera<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>an</strong>d assembly-line workers who convert direct materials purchased<br />

<strong>to</strong> finished goods.<br />

3. Indirect m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s are all m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s that are related <strong>to</strong> the <strong>cost</strong><br />

object (work in process <strong>an</strong>d then finished goods) but that c<strong>an</strong>not be traced <strong>to</strong> that <strong>cost</strong><br />

object in <strong>an</strong> economically feasible way. Examples include supplies, indirect materials<br />

such as lubric<strong>an</strong>ts, indirect m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor such as pl<strong>an</strong>t mainten<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>d cle<strong>an</strong>ing<br />

labor, pl<strong>an</strong>t rent, pl<strong>an</strong>t insur<strong>an</strong>ce, property taxes on the pl<strong>an</strong>t, pl<strong>an</strong>t depreciation,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d the compensation of pl<strong>an</strong>t m<strong>an</strong>agers. This <strong>cost</strong> category is also referred <strong>to</strong> as<br />

m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s or fac<strong>to</strong>ry overhead <strong>cost</strong>s. We use indirect m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s interch<strong>an</strong>geably in this book.<br />

We now describe the distinction between inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d period <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

This book uses the term<br />

direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

labor because labor used in<br />

other business functions of the<br />

value chain c<strong>an</strong> also be traced<br />

directly <strong>to</strong> <strong>cost</strong> objects. For<br />

example, in some cases salespersons’<br />

salaries c<strong>an</strong> be traced<br />

directly <strong>to</strong> specific cus<strong>to</strong>mers<br />

<strong>an</strong>d called direct marketing<br />

labor.<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Inven<strong>to</strong>riable Costs<br />

Inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s are all <strong>cost</strong>s of a product that are considered as assets in the bal<strong>an</strong>ce sheet<br />

when they are incurred <strong>an</strong>d that become <strong>cost</strong> of goods sold only when the product is sold. For<br />

m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies, all m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s are inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s. Consider<br />

again BMW <strong>an</strong>d its X5 SUV. Costs of direct materials issued <strong>to</strong> production (from direct material<br />

inven<strong>to</strong>ry), direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong>s, <strong>an</strong>d m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s create<br />

new assets, starting as work in process <strong>an</strong>d becoming finished goods (the X5s). Hence m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s are included in work-in-process inven<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>an</strong>d in finished goods inven<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

(they are “inven<strong>to</strong>ried”) <strong>to</strong> accumulate the <strong>cost</strong>s of creating these assets. When the X5s are<br />

sold, the <strong>cost</strong> of m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing them is matched against the revenues from the sale. The <strong>cost</strong><br />

of goods sold includes all m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s (direct materials, direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s) incurred <strong>to</strong> produce them. The X5s may be sold during a<br />

different accounting period th<strong>an</strong> the period in which they were m<strong>an</strong>ufactured. Thus, inven<strong>to</strong>rying<br />

m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s in the bal<strong>an</strong>ce sheet during the accounting period when goods<br />

are m<strong>an</strong>ufactured <strong>an</strong>d expensing the m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s when the goods are sold <strong>an</strong>d revenues<br />

are recognized in a later income statement achieves matching of revenues <strong>an</strong>d expenses.<br />

7<br />

Distinguish inven<strong>to</strong>riable<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s<br />

. . . assets when incurred,<br />

then <strong>cost</strong> of goods sold<br />

from period <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

. . . expenses of the period<br />

when incurred<br />

Inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s are<br />

assets because they<br />

have value as long as the comp<strong>an</strong>y<br />

owns them. When the<br />

inven<strong>to</strong>ry (finished goods) is<br />

sold, its <strong>cost</strong> is tr<strong>an</strong>sferred from<br />

the bal<strong>an</strong>ce sheet <strong>to</strong> the income<br />

statement as <strong>cost</strong> of goods sold.<br />

An Introduction <strong>to</strong> Cost Terms <strong>an</strong>d Purposes<br />

37<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


EXHIBIT 2-6<br />

Assignment of Costs <strong>to</strong> Cost Object<br />

Examples of Period<br />

Costs in Combinations<br />

of the Direct/Indirect<br />

<strong>an</strong>d Variable/Fixed<br />

Cost Classifications<br />

at a B<strong>an</strong>k<br />

Cost-<br />

Behavior<br />

Pattern<br />

Variable Costs<br />

Fixed Costs<br />

Direct Costs<br />

• Cost object: Number of<br />

mortgage lo<strong>an</strong>s<br />

Example: Fees paid <strong>to</strong><br />

property appraisal<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>y for each<br />

mortgage lo<strong>an</strong><br />

• Cost object: Number of<br />

mortgage<br />

lo<strong>an</strong>s<br />

Example: Salary paid <strong>to</strong><br />

executives in<br />

mortgage lo<strong>an</strong><br />

department <strong>to</strong><br />

develop new<br />

mortgage-lo<strong>an</strong><br />

products<br />

Indirect Costs<br />

• Cost object: Number of<br />

mortgage<br />

lo<strong>an</strong>s<br />

Example: Postage paid <strong>to</strong><br />

deliver mortgagelo<strong>an</strong><br />

documents<br />

<strong>to</strong> lawyers/<br />

homeowners<br />

• Cost object: Number of<br />

mortgage lo<strong>an</strong>s<br />

Example: Cost <strong>to</strong> the b<strong>an</strong>k<br />

of sponsoring<br />

<strong>an</strong>nual golf<br />

<strong>to</strong>urnament<br />

For merch<strong>an</strong>dising-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies such as Wal-Mart, inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s are the<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s of purchasing the goods that are resold in their same form. These <strong>cost</strong>s comprise the<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s of the goods themselves plus <strong>an</strong>y incoming freight, insur<strong>an</strong>ce, <strong>an</strong>d h<strong>an</strong>dling <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

for those goods. For service-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies, the absence of inven<strong>to</strong>ries me<strong>an</strong>s there are<br />

no inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

Period Costs<br />

Period <strong>cost</strong>s are all <strong>cost</strong>s in the income statement other th<strong>an</strong> <strong>cost</strong> of goods sold. Period<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s are treated as expenses of the accounting period in which they are incurred because<br />

they are expected <strong>to</strong> benefit revenues in that period <strong>an</strong>d are not expected <strong>to</strong> benefit revenues<br />

in future periods (because there is not sufficient evidence <strong>to</strong> conclude that such<br />

future benefit exists). Expensing these <strong>cost</strong>s in the period they are incurred matches<br />

expenses <strong>to</strong> revenues.<br />

For m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies, period <strong>cost</strong>s in the income statement are all<br />

nonm<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s (for example, design <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d distribution <strong>cost</strong>s). For merch<strong>an</strong>dising-sec<strong>to</strong>r<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>ies, period <strong>cost</strong>s in the income statement are all <strong>cost</strong>s not related <strong>to</strong><br />

the <strong>cost</strong> of goods purchased for resale. Examples of these period <strong>cost</strong>s are labor <strong>cost</strong>s of<br />

sales floor personnel <strong>an</strong>d advertising <strong>cost</strong>s. Because there are no inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s for<br />

service-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies, all their <strong>cost</strong>s in the income statement are period <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

Exhibit 2-5 showed examples of inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s in direct/indirect <strong>an</strong>d<br />

variable/fixed <strong>cost</strong> classifications. Exhibit 2-6 shows examples of period <strong>cost</strong>s in<br />

direct/indirect <strong>an</strong>d variable/fixed <strong>cost</strong> classifications at a b<strong>an</strong>k.<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

38<br />

Inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d<br />

period <strong>cost</strong>s flow through<br />

the income statement at a merch<strong>an</strong>dising<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>y <strong>an</strong>alogous<br />

<strong>to</strong> the flow of <strong>cost</strong>s at a m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>y. At a merch<strong>an</strong>dising<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>y, however,<br />

the flow of <strong>cost</strong>s is much simpler<br />

<strong>to</strong> underst<strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong>d track.<br />

After mastering this m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

example, you will have no<br />

difficulty with a merch<strong>an</strong>dising<br />

scenario.<br />

Illustrating the Flow of Inven<strong>to</strong>riable Costs<br />

<strong>an</strong>d Period Costs<br />

We illustrate the flow of inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d period <strong>cost</strong>s through the income statement<br />

for a m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing comp<strong>an</strong>y, for which the distinction between inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

<strong>an</strong>d period <strong>cost</strong>s is most detailed.<br />

M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing-Sec<strong>to</strong>r Example<br />

The income statement of a m<strong>an</strong>ufacturer, Cellular Products, is shown in Exhibit 2-7.<br />

Revenues of Cellular Products are (in thous<strong>an</strong>ds) $210,000. Revenues are inflows of<br />

assets (usually cash or accounts receivable) received for products or services provided <strong>to</strong><br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


EXHIBIT 2-7<br />

Income Statement <strong>an</strong>d<br />

Schedule of Cost of<br />

Goods M<strong>an</strong>ufactured of<br />

a M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing-Sec<strong>to</strong>r<br />

Comp<strong>an</strong>y, Cellular<br />

Products<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

cus<strong>to</strong>mers. Cost of goods sold for Cellular Products is computed as (see Exhibit 2-7,<br />

P<strong>an</strong>el A):<br />

Beginning inven<strong>to</strong>ry of finished goods, J<strong>an</strong>uary 1, 2007 $ 22,000<br />

+ Cost of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured in 2007 104,000<br />

− Ending inven<strong>to</strong>ry of finished goods, December 31, 2007 18,000<br />

= Cost of goods sold in 2007 $108,000<br />

Gross margin = Revenues − Cost of goods sold = $210,000 − $108,000 = $102,000<br />

Cost of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured refers <strong>to</strong> the <strong>cost</strong> of goods brought <strong>to</strong> completion,<br />

whether they were started before or during the current accounting period. Cellular Products<br />

calculates the <strong>cost</strong> of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured in three steps (see Exhibit 2-7, P<strong>an</strong>el B):<br />

Step 1: Cost of direct materials used (light blue shaded area)<br />

Beginning inven<strong>to</strong>ry of direct materials, J<strong>an</strong>uary 1, 2007 $11,000<br />

+ Purchases of direct materials in 2007 73,000<br />

− Ending inven<strong>to</strong>ry of direct materials, December 31, 2007 8,000<br />

= Direct materials used in 2007 $76,000<br />

Step 2: Total m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s incurred in 2007<br />

Total m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s refers <strong>to</strong> all direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

overhead <strong>cost</strong>s incurred during 2007 for all goods worked on during<br />

the year. Cellular Products classifies its m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s in<strong>to</strong> the three categories<br />

described earlier.<br />

(i) Direct materials used in 2007 (shaded light blue) $ 76,000<br />

(ii) Direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor in 2007 (shaded light green) 9,000<br />

(iii) M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s (shaded blue) 20,000<br />

Total m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s incurred in 2007 $105,000<br />

An Introduction <strong>to</strong> Cost Terms <strong>an</strong>d Purposes<br />

39<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


Step 3: Cost of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured in 2007<br />

The <strong>cost</strong> of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured during 2007 includes the <strong>cost</strong> of beginning<br />

work in process <strong>an</strong>d <strong>cost</strong>s incurred during the year. Also note that some of<br />

the m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s incurred during 2007 are held back as the <strong>cost</strong> of<br />

the ending work-in-process inven<strong>to</strong>ry. The <strong>cost</strong> of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured in<br />

2007 is calculated as (shaded teal):<br />

Beginning work-in-process inven<strong>to</strong>ry, J<strong>an</strong>uary 1, 2007 $ 6,000<br />

+ Total m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s incurred in 2007 105,000<br />

= Total m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong> account for 111,000<br />

− Ending work-in-process inven<strong>to</strong>ry, December 31, 2007 7,000<br />

= Cost of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured in 2007 $104,000<br />

Study Tip: To check<br />

your underst<strong>an</strong>ding of the<br />

income statement for m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>ies, see Featured<br />

Exercise 2, true–false statement<br />

8, <strong>an</strong>d multiple-choice question 7<br />

(Student Guide, beginning p.13).<br />

Fully explained solutions begin<br />

on p. 19.<br />

Exhibit 2-8 shows related general-ledger T-accounts for Cellular Products’ m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

<strong>cost</strong> flow. Note how the <strong>cost</strong> of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured ($104,000) is the <strong>cost</strong> of all<br />

goods completed during the accounting period. These <strong>cost</strong>s are all inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

Goods completed during the period are tr<strong>an</strong>sferred <strong>to</strong> finished goods inven<strong>to</strong>ry. These<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s become <strong>cost</strong> of goods sold in the accounting period when the goods are sold. Also<br />

note that the direct materials, direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor, <strong>an</strong>d m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s of the units in work-in-process inven<strong>to</strong>ry ($7,000) <strong>an</strong>d finished goods inven<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

($18,000) as of December 31, 2007, will appear as <strong>an</strong> asset in the bal<strong>an</strong>ce sheet. These<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s will become expenses next year, when these units are sold.<br />

The $70,000 comprising marketing <strong>cost</strong>s, distribution <strong>cost</strong>s, <strong>an</strong>d cus<strong>to</strong>mer-service<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s are period <strong>cost</strong>s of Cellular Products. These period <strong>cost</strong>s include, for example,<br />

salaries of salespersons, depreciation on computers <strong>an</strong>d other equipment used in marketing,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d the <strong>cost</strong> of leasing warehouse space for distribution. Operating income of<br />

Cellular Products is $32,000. Operating income is <strong>to</strong>tal revenues from operations<br />

minus <strong>cost</strong> of goods sold <strong>an</strong>d operating <strong>cost</strong>s (excluding interest expense <strong>an</strong>d income<br />

taxes).<br />

Newcomers <strong>to</strong> <strong>cost</strong> accounting frequently assume that indirect <strong>cost</strong>s such as rent, telephone,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d depreciation are always <strong>cost</strong>s of the period in which they are incurred <strong>an</strong>d are<br />

not associated with inven<strong>to</strong>ries. When these <strong>cost</strong>s are incurred in marketing or in corporate<br />

headquarters, they are period <strong>cost</strong>s. However, when these <strong>cost</strong>s are incurred in m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing,<br />

they are m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d are inven<strong>to</strong>riable.<br />

Recap of Inven<strong>to</strong>riable Costs <strong>an</strong>d Period Costs<br />

Exhibit 2-9 highlights the differences between inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d period <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

P<strong>an</strong>el A uses the m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing sec<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> illustrate these differences. The merch<strong>an</strong>dising<br />

sec<strong>to</strong>r is shown in P<strong>an</strong>el B. First study P<strong>an</strong>el A. The m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s of finished<br />

goods include direct materials, other direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s such as direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

labor, <strong>an</strong>d m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s such as supervision, production control,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d machine mainten<strong>an</strong>ce. All these <strong>cost</strong>s are inven<strong>to</strong>riable: They are assigned <strong>to</strong> workin-process<br />

inven<strong>to</strong>ry until the goods are completed <strong>an</strong>d then <strong>to</strong> finished goods inven<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

until the goods are sold. All nonm<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s, such as R&D, design, <strong>an</strong>d distribution<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s, are period <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

EXHIBIT 2-8<br />

General-Ledger T-Accounts for Cellular Products’ M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing Cost Flow<br />

Work-in-Process Inven<strong>to</strong>ry Finished Goods Inven<strong>to</strong>ry Cost of Goods Sold<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

40<br />

Bal. J<strong>an</strong>. 1, 2007 6,000 Cost of goods Bal. J<strong>an</strong>. 1, 2007 22,000 Cost of goods sold 108,000 108,000<br />

Direct materials used 76,000 m<strong>an</strong>ufactured 104,000 104,000<br />

Direct m<strong>an</strong>uf. labor 9,000 Bal. Dec. 31, 2007 18,000<br />

M<strong>an</strong>uf. overhead <strong>cost</strong>s 20,000<br />

Bal. Dec. 31, 2007 7,000<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


EXHIBIT 2-9<br />

PANEL A: M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing Comp<strong>an</strong>y<br />

Relationships of Inven<strong>to</strong>riable Costs <strong>an</strong>d Period Costs<br />

BALANCE SHEET<br />

INCOME STATEMENT<br />

Direct<br />

Materials<br />

Purchases<br />

Direct<br />

Materials<br />

Inven<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

Revenues<br />

Inven<strong>to</strong>riable<br />

Costs<br />

Other Direct<br />

M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

Costs<br />

M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

Overhead<br />

Costs a<br />

Work-in-<br />

Process<br />

Inven<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

Finished<br />

Goods<br />

Inven<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

when<br />

sales<br />

occur<br />

deduct<br />

Cost of<br />

Goods Sold<br />

(<strong>an</strong> expense)<br />

Equals Gross Margin<br />

deduct<br />

a Examples: Indirect m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor, pl<strong>an</strong>t supplies, insur<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>d<br />

depreciation on pl<strong>an</strong>t. (Note particularly that when insur<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>d<br />

depreciation relate <strong>to</strong> the m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing function, they are<br />

inven<strong>to</strong>riable, but when they relate <strong>to</strong> nonm<strong>an</strong>ufacturing business<br />

functions (for example, marketing <strong>an</strong>d distribution), they are not<br />

inven<strong>to</strong>riable.<br />

R&D Costs<br />

Design Costs<br />

Marketing Costs<br />

Distribution Costs<br />

Cus<strong>to</strong>mer-Service Costs<br />

Equals Operating Income<br />

Period<br />

Costs<br />

PANEL B: Merch<strong>an</strong>dising Comp<strong>an</strong>y (Retailer or Wholesaler)<br />

BALANCE SHEET<br />

INCOME STATEMENT<br />

Revenues<br />

Inven<strong>to</strong>riable<br />

Costs<br />

Merch<strong>an</strong>dise<br />

Purchases<br />

Merch<strong>an</strong>dise<br />

Inven<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

when<br />

sales<br />

occur<br />

deduct<br />

Cost of<br />

Goods Sold<br />

(<strong>an</strong> expense)<br />

Equals Gross Margin<br />

deduct<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Design Costs<br />

Purchasing Dept. Costs<br />

Marketing Costs<br />

Distribution Costs<br />

Cus<strong>to</strong>mer-Service Costs<br />

Equals Operating Income<br />

Now examine P<strong>an</strong>el B. A retailer or wholesaler buys goods for resale. The only inven<strong>to</strong>riable<br />

<strong>cost</strong> is the <strong>cost</strong> of merch<strong>an</strong>dise. (This corresponds <strong>to</strong> the <strong>cost</strong> of finished goods<br />

m<strong>an</strong>ufactured for a m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing comp<strong>an</strong>y.) Purchased goods are held as merch<strong>an</strong>dise<br />

inven<strong>to</strong>ry, the <strong>cost</strong> of which is shown as <strong>an</strong> asset in the bal<strong>an</strong>ce sheet. As the goods are<br />

sold, their <strong>cost</strong>s are shown in the income statement as <strong>cost</strong> of goods sold. A retailer or<br />

wholesaler also has a variety of marketing, distribution, <strong>an</strong>d cus<strong>to</strong>mer-service <strong>cost</strong>s, which<br />

are period <strong>cost</strong>s. In the income statement, period <strong>cost</strong>s are deducted from revenues without<br />

ever having been included as part of inven<strong>to</strong>ry.<br />

Period<br />

Costs<br />

An Introduction <strong>to</strong> Cost Terms <strong>an</strong>d Purposes<br />

41<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


Prime Costs <strong>an</strong>d Conversion Costs<br />

Two <strong>terms</strong> used <strong>to</strong> describe <strong>cost</strong> classifications in m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>ing systems are<br />

prime <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d conversion <strong>cost</strong>s. Prime <strong>cost</strong>s are all direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s. For<br />

Cellular Products,<br />

Prime <strong>cost</strong>s = Direct material <strong>cost</strong>s + Direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

= $ 76, 000 + $ 9, 000 = $ 85,<br />

000<br />

As we have already discussed, the greater the proportion of prime <strong>cost</strong>s in a comp<strong>an</strong>y’s<br />

<strong>cost</strong> structure, the more confident m<strong>an</strong>agers c<strong>an</strong> be about the accuracy of the <strong>cost</strong>s of<br />

products. As information-gathering technology improves, comp<strong>an</strong>ies c<strong>an</strong> add more <strong>an</strong>d<br />

more direct-<strong>cost</strong> categories. For example, power <strong>cost</strong>s might be metered in specific areas<br />

of a pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong>an</strong>d identified with specific products. In this case, prime <strong>cost</strong>s would include<br />

direct materials, direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor, <strong>an</strong>d direct metered power. Furthermore, if a<br />

production line were dedicated <strong>to</strong> the m<strong>an</strong>ufacture of a specific product, the depreciation<br />

on the production equipment would be a direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong> <strong>an</strong>d would be<br />

included in prime <strong>cost</strong>s. Computer software comp<strong>an</strong>ies often have a “purchased technology”<br />

direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong> item. This item, which represents payments <strong>to</strong> suppliers<br />

who develop software algorithms for a product, is also included in prime <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

Conversion <strong>cost</strong>s are all m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s other th<strong>an</strong> direct material <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

Conversion <strong>cost</strong>s represent all m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s incurred <strong>to</strong> convert direct materials<br />

in<strong>to</strong> finished goods. For Cellular Products,<br />

Conversion <strong>cost</strong>s = Direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong>s + M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

= $ 9, 000 + $ 20, 000 = $ 29,<br />

000<br />

Question: Do prime<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s + conversion <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

= <strong>to</strong>tal m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s?<br />

Answer: Only under the twopart<br />

classification: prime <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

= direct material <strong>cost</strong>s, <strong>an</strong>d conversion<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s = m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

overhead <strong>cost</strong>s (which include<br />

direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor).<br />

Under the three-part classification,<br />

direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor<br />

is both a prime <strong>cost</strong> <strong>an</strong>d a conversion<br />

<strong>cost</strong>, so the equation in<br />

the question would doublecount<br />

direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

labor.<br />

Note that direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong>s are a part of both prime <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d conversion<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

Some m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing operations such as computer-integrated m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing (CIM)<br />

pl<strong>an</strong>ts have very few workers. The workers’ roles are <strong>to</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>r the m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing process<br />

<strong>an</strong>d <strong>to</strong> maintain the equipment that produces multiple products. Costing systems in CIM<br />

pl<strong>an</strong>ts do not have a direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong> category because direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

labor <strong>cost</strong> is relatively small <strong>an</strong>d because it is difficult <strong>to</strong> trace this <strong>cost</strong> <strong>to</strong> products. In<br />

CIM pl<strong>an</strong>ts, the only prime <strong>cost</strong> is direct material <strong>cost</strong>s, <strong>an</strong>d conversion <strong>cost</strong>s consist only<br />

of m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

Measuring Costs Requires Judgment<br />

Measuring <strong>cost</strong>s requires judgment. That’s because there are alternative ways in which<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s c<strong>an</strong> be defined <strong>an</strong>d classified. Different comp<strong>an</strong>ies or sometimes even different subunits<br />

within the same comp<strong>an</strong>y may define <strong>an</strong>d classify <strong>cost</strong>s differently. Be careful <strong>to</strong><br />

define <strong>an</strong>d underst<strong>an</strong>d the ways <strong>cost</strong>s are measured in a comp<strong>an</strong>y or situation. We first<br />

illustrate this point with respect <strong>to</strong> labor <strong>cost</strong> measurement.<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

42<br />

Measuring Labor Costs<br />

Although m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong> classifications vary among comp<strong>an</strong>ies, most comp<strong>an</strong>ies<br />

have the following categories:<br />

■<br />

■<br />

Direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor (labor that c<strong>an</strong> be traced <strong>to</strong> individual products)<br />

M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead (examples of prominent labor components of m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

overhead follow):<br />

• Indirect labor (compensation)<br />

Forklift truck opera<strong>to</strong>rs (internal h<strong>an</strong>dling of materials)<br />

Pl<strong>an</strong>t j<strong>an</strong>i<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

Pl<strong>an</strong>t guards<br />

Rework labor (time spent by direct laborers redoing defective work)<br />

Overtime premium paid <strong>to</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>t workers (explained next)<br />

Idle time (explained next)<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


• M<strong>an</strong>agers’, department heads’, <strong>an</strong>d supervisors’ salaries<br />

• Payroll fringe <strong>cost</strong>s, for example, health care premiums <strong>an</strong>d pension <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

(explained later)<br />

All m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor compensation other th<strong>an</strong> for direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor, m<strong>an</strong>agers’<br />

salaries, department heads’ salaries, <strong>an</strong>d supervisors’ salaries is usually classified as<br />

indirect labor <strong>cost</strong>s, a major component of m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead. The indirect labor<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s are commonly divided in<strong>to</strong> m<strong>an</strong>y subclassifications <strong>to</strong> retain information on different<br />

categories of indirect labor. For example, the wages of forklift truck opera<strong>to</strong>rs generally<br />

are not commingled with j<strong>an</strong>i<strong>to</strong>rs’ wages, although both are regarded as indirect<br />

labor <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

M<strong>an</strong>agers’ salaries usually are not classified as indirect labor <strong>cost</strong>s. Instead, the<br />

compensation of supervisors, department heads, <strong>an</strong>d all others who are regarded as<br />

m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing m<strong>an</strong>agement is placed in a separate classification of m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

overhead.<br />

Overtime Premium <strong>an</strong>d Idle Time<br />

The purpose of classifying <strong>cost</strong>s in detail is <strong>to</strong> associate <strong>an</strong> individual <strong>cost</strong> with a specific<br />

cause or reason for why it was incurred. Two classes of indirect labor—overtime premium<br />

<strong>an</strong>d idle time—need special mention. Overtime premium is the wage rate paid <strong>to</strong> workers<br />

(for both direct labor <strong>an</strong>d indirect labor) in excess of their straight-time wage rates.<br />

Overtime premium is usually considered <strong>to</strong> be a part of indirect <strong>cost</strong>s or overhead.<br />

Consider <strong>an</strong> example from the service sec<strong>to</strong>r. George Flexner does home repairs for Sears<br />

Appli<strong>an</strong>ce Services. He is paid $20 per hour for straight-time <strong>an</strong>d $30 per hour (time <strong>an</strong>d<br />

a half) for overtime. His overtime premium is $10 per overtime hour. If he works 44 hours,<br />

including 4 overtime hours, in one week, his gross compensation would be classified as<br />

follows:<br />

Direct service labor: 44 hours × $20 per hour $880<br />

Overtime premium: 4 hours × $10 per hour 40<br />

Total compensation for 44 hours $920<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

In this example, why is the overtime premium of direct labor usually considered <strong>an</strong> overhead<br />

<strong>cost</strong> rather th<strong>an</strong> a direct <strong>cost</strong>? After all, it c<strong>an</strong> be traced <strong>to</strong> specific repair jobs. Overtime<br />

premium is generally not considered a direct charge because the scheduling of repair jobs<br />

is usually either r<strong>an</strong>dom or in accord<strong>an</strong>ce with minimizing overall travel time. For example,<br />

assume that jobs 1 through 5 are scheduled <strong>to</strong> be completed on a specific workday of<br />

10 hours, including 2 overtime hours. Each job (service call) requires 2 hours. Should the<br />

job scheduled during hours 9 <strong>an</strong>d 10 be assigned the overtime premium? Or should the<br />

premium be prorated over all five jobs? Prorating the overtime premium does not “penalize”—add<br />

<strong>to</strong> the <strong>cost</strong> of—a particular batch of work solely because it happened <strong>to</strong> be<br />

worked on during the overtime hours. Instead, the overtime premium is considered <strong>to</strong> be attributable<br />

<strong>to</strong> the heavy overall volume of work. Its <strong>cost</strong> is regarded as part of service overhead, which is<br />

borne by all repair jobs.<br />

Sometimes overtime is not r<strong>an</strong>dom. For example, a cus<strong>to</strong>mer dem<strong>an</strong>ding a “rush job”<br />

may clearly be the sole source of overtime. In such inst<strong>an</strong>ces, the overtime premium is<br />

regarded as a direct <strong>cost</strong> of that job.<br />

Another subclassification of indirect labor is the idle time of both direct <strong>an</strong>d indirect<br />

m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing or service labor. Idle time is wages paid for unproductive time caused by<br />

lack of orders, machine breakdowns, material shortages, poor scheduling, <strong>an</strong>d the like.<br />

For example, if the Sears repair truck broke down for 3 hours, Flexner’s earnings would be<br />

classified as follows:<br />

Direct service labor: 41 hours × $20/hour $820<br />

Idle time (service overhead): 3 hours × $20/hour 60<br />

Overtime premium (service overhead): 4 hours × $10/hour 40<br />

Total earnings for 44 hours $920<br />

Clearly, the idle time is not related <strong>to</strong> a particular job, nor, as we have already discussed, is<br />

the overtime premium. Both overtime premium <strong>an</strong>d idle time are considered overhead <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

An Introduction <strong>to</strong> Cost Terms <strong>an</strong>d Purposes<br />

43<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


Benefits of Defining Accounting Terms<br />

M<strong>an</strong>agers, account<strong>an</strong>ts, suppliers, <strong>an</strong>d others will avoid m<strong>an</strong>y problems if they thoroughly<br />

underst<strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong>d agree on the classifications <strong>an</strong>d me<strong>an</strong>ings of the <strong>cost</strong> <strong>terms</strong> introduced<br />

in this chapter <strong>an</strong>d later in this book.<br />

Consider the classification of m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor payroll fringe <strong>cost</strong>s (for example,<br />

employer payments for employee benefits such as Social Security, life insur<strong>an</strong>ce, health<br />

insur<strong>an</strong>ce, <strong>an</strong>d pensions). Some comp<strong>an</strong>ies classify these <strong>cost</strong>s as m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s. In other comp<strong>an</strong>ies, the fringe benefits related <strong>to</strong> direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

labor are treated as <strong>an</strong> additional direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong>. Consider, for example,<br />

a direct laborer, such as a lathe opera<strong>to</strong>r, whose gross wages are computed on the<br />

basis of a stated wage rate of $20 <strong>an</strong> hour <strong>an</strong>d fringe benefits <strong>to</strong>taling, say, $5 per hour.<br />

Some comp<strong>an</strong>ies classify the $20 as direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong> <strong>an</strong>d the $5 as m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

overhead <strong>cost</strong>. Other comp<strong>an</strong>ies classify the entire $25 as direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

labor <strong>cost</strong>. The latter approach is preferable because the stated wage <strong>an</strong>d the<br />

fringe benefit <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong>gether are a fundamental part of acquiring direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

labor services.<br />

Caution: In every situation, pinpoint clearly what direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor<br />

includes <strong>an</strong>d what direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor excludes. Achieving clarity may prevent<br />

disputes regarding <strong>cost</strong>-reimbursement contracts, income tax payments, <strong>an</strong>d labor<br />

union matters. Consider that some countries such as Costa Rica <strong>an</strong>d Mauritius offer subst<strong>an</strong>tial<br />

income tax savings <strong>to</strong> comp<strong>an</strong>ies that locate pl<strong>an</strong>ts within their borders. In some<br />

cases, <strong>to</strong> qualify for the tax benefits, the direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong>s of the pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />

must at least equal a specified percentage of the <strong>to</strong>tal m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s. Disputes<br />

have arisen regarding how <strong>to</strong> calculate the direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor percentage for<br />

qualifying for such tax benefits. For inst<strong>an</strong>ce, are payroll fringe benefits on direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

labor part of direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong>s, or are they part of m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

overhead? Depending on how comp<strong>an</strong>ies classify <strong>cost</strong>s, you c<strong>an</strong> see how they<br />

may show direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor as different percentages of <strong>to</strong>tal m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s. Consider a comp<strong>an</strong>y with $5 million of payroll fringe <strong>cost</strong>s (figures are assumed,<br />

in millions):<br />

Classification A<br />

Classification B<br />

Costs Percentage Costs Percentage<br />

Direct materials $ 40 40% Direct materials $ 40 40%<br />

Direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor 20 20 Direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor 25 25<br />

M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead 40 40 M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead 35 35<br />

Total m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s $100 100% Total m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s $100 100%<br />

Classification A assumes payroll fringe <strong>cost</strong>s are part of m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

In contrast, classification B assumes payroll fringe <strong>cost</strong>s are part of direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

labor <strong>cost</strong>s. If a country set the minimum percentage of direct labor <strong>cost</strong>s at 25%, the<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>y would receive a tax break using classification B, but no tax break using classification<br />

A. In addition <strong>to</strong> fringe benefits, other debated items are compensation for<br />

training time, idle time, vacations, sick leave, <strong>an</strong>d overtime premium. To prevent disputes,<br />

contracts <strong>an</strong>d laws should be as specific as possible regarding definitions <strong>an</strong>d<br />

measurements.<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

44<br />

8<br />

Explain why product<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s are computed in<br />

different ways for<br />

different <strong>purposes</strong><br />

. . . examples are pricing<br />

<strong>an</strong>d product-mix decisions,<br />

government contracts, <strong>an</strong>d<br />

fin<strong>an</strong>cial statements<br />

Different Me<strong>an</strong>ings of Product Costs<br />

M<strong>an</strong>y <strong>cost</strong> <strong>terms</strong> found in practice have ambiguous me<strong>an</strong>ings. Consider the term product<br />

<strong>cost</strong>. A product <strong>cost</strong> is the sum of the <strong>cost</strong>s assigned <strong>to</strong> a product for a specific purpose.<br />

Different <strong>purposes</strong> c<strong>an</strong> result in different measures of product <strong>cost</strong>, as the brackets on the<br />

value chain in Exhibit 2-10 illustrate:<br />

■<br />

Pricing <strong>an</strong>d product-mix decisions. For the <strong>purposes</strong> of making decisions about<br />

pricing <strong>an</strong>d which products provide the most profits, the m<strong>an</strong>ager is interested in the<br />

overall (<strong>to</strong>tal) profitability of different products <strong>an</strong>d, consequently, assigns <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

incurred in all business functions of the value chain <strong>to</strong> the different products.<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


EXHIBIT 2-10<br />

Different Product Costs<br />

for Different Purposes<br />

Research <strong>an</strong>d<br />

Development<br />

Costs<br />

Design<br />

Costs<br />

Production<br />

Costs<br />

Marketing<br />

Costs<br />

Distribution<br />

Costs<br />

Cus<strong>to</strong>mer-<br />

Service<br />

Costs<br />

Product Cost<br />

for Fin<strong>an</strong>cial<br />

Statements<br />

(inven<strong>to</strong>riable<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s)<br />

Product Cost for Reimbursement<br />

Under Government Contracts<br />

Product Cost for Pricing <strong>an</strong>d Product-Mix Decisions<br />

■ Contracting with government agencies. Government contracts often reimburse<br />

contrac<strong>to</strong>rs on the basis of the “<strong>cost</strong> of a product” plus a prespecified margin of<br />

profit. Because of the <strong>cost</strong>-plus profit margin nature of the contract, government<br />

agencies provide detailed guidelines on the <strong>cost</strong> items they will allow <strong>an</strong>d disallow<br />

when calculating the <strong>cost</strong> of a product. For example, some government agencies<br />

explicitly exclude marketing, distribution, <strong>an</strong>d cus<strong>to</strong>mer-service <strong>cost</strong>s from the product<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s that qualify for reimbursement, <strong>an</strong>d they may only partially reimburse R&D<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s. These agencies w<strong>an</strong>t <strong>to</strong> reimburse contrac<strong>to</strong>rs for only those <strong>cost</strong>s most closely<br />

related <strong>to</strong> delivering products under the contract. The second bracket in Exhibit 2-10<br />

shows how the product-<strong>cost</strong> calculations for a specific contract may allow for all<br />

design <strong>an</strong>d production <strong>cost</strong>s but only part of R&D <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

■ Preparing fin<strong>an</strong>cial statements for external reporting under GAAP. Under GAAP,<br />

only m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s c<strong>an</strong> be assigned <strong>to</strong> inven<strong>to</strong>ries in the fin<strong>an</strong>cial statements.<br />

For <strong>purposes</strong> of calculating inven<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>cost</strong>s, product <strong>cost</strong>s include only inven<strong>to</strong>riable<br />

(m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing) <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

Exhibit 2-10 illustrates how product-<strong>cost</strong> measures r<strong>an</strong>ge from a narrow set of <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

for fin<strong>an</strong>cial statements—a set that includes only inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s—<strong>to</strong> a broader set of<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s for reimbursement under a government contract <strong>to</strong> a still broader set of <strong>cost</strong>s for<br />

pricing <strong>an</strong>d product-mix decisions.<br />

This section focused on how different <strong>purposes</strong> result in the inclusion of different<br />

<strong>cost</strong> items of the value chain of business functions when product <strong>cost</strong>s are calculated. The<br />

same caution about the need <strong>to</strong> be clear <strong>an</strong>d precise about <strong>cost</strong> concepts <strong>an</strong>d their measurement<br />

applies <strong>to</strong> each <strong>cost</strong> classification introduced in this chapter. Exhibit 2-11 summarizes<br />

the key <strong>cost</strong> classifications. The next section describes how the basic concepts<br />

introduced in this chapter lead <strong>to</strong> a framework for underst<strong>an</strong>ding <strong>cost</strong> accounting <strong>an</strong>d<br />

<strong>cost</strong> m<strong>an</strong>agement that c<strong>an</strong> then be applied <strong>to</strong> the study of m<strong>an</strong>y <strong>to</strong>pics, such as strategy<br />

evaluation, quality, <strong>an</strong>d investment decisions.<br />

Generally, inven<strong>to</strong>riable<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s are called product<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s in fin<strong>an</strong>cial accounting<br />

courses.<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

1. Business function 3. Cost behavior pattern in relation <strong>to</strong> ch<strong>an</strong>ges in<br />

a. Research <strong>an</strong>d development the level of activity or volume<br />

b. Design of products, services, or processes a. Variable <strong>cost</strong><br />

c. Production b. Fixed <strong>cost</strong><br />

d. Marketing 4. Aggregate or average<br />

e. Distribution a. Total <strong>cost</strong><br />

f. Cus<strong>to</strong>mer service b. Unit <strong>cost</strong><br />

2. Assignment <strong>to</strong> a <strong>cost</strong> object 5. Assets or expenses<br />

a. Direct <strong>cost</strong> a. Inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong><br />

b. Indirect <strong>cost</strong> b Period <strong>cost</strong><br />

Example: Numbers<br />

help illustrate the concepts<br />

in Exhibit 2-10. Using<br />

assumed numbers, the inven<strong>to</strong>riable<br />

<strong>cost</strong> of a testing device is<br />

$100 per unit, the device’s <strong>cost</strong><br />

for reimbursement under a government<br />

contract is $180, <strong>an</strong>d<br />

the device’s <strong>cost</strong> from throughout<br />

the value chain for a pricing<br />

decision is $300 per unit.<br />

Study Tip: To review<br />

import<strong>an</strong>t <strong>terms</strong> <strong>an</strong>d concepts<br />

in Chapters 1 <strong>an</strong>d 2, work<br />

the crossword puzzle in the<br />

Student Guide (p. 18). The solution<br />

is on p. 22.<br />

EXHIBIT 2-11<br />

Alternative<br />

Classifications of<br />

Costs<br />

An Introduction <strong>to</strong> Cost Terms <strong>an</strong>d Purposes<br />

45<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


9<br />

Describe a framework for<br />

<strong>cost</strong> accounting <strong>an</strong>d<br />

<strong>cost</strong> m<strong>an</strong>agement<br />

. . . three features that help<br />

m<strong>an</strong>agers make decisions<br />

A Framework for Cost Accounting<br />

<strong>an</strong>d Cost M<strong>an</strong>agement<br />

Three features of <strong>cost</strong> accounting <strong>an</strong>d <strong>cost</strong> m<strong>an</strong>agement across a wide r<strong>an</strong>ge of applications<br />

are:<br />

1. Calculating the <strong>cost</strong> of products, services, <strong>an</strong>d other <strong>cost</strong> objects<br />

2. Obtaining information for pl<strong>an</strong>ning <strong>an</strong>d control <strong>an</strong>d perform<strong>an</strong>ce evaluation<br />

3. Analyzing the relev<strong>an</strong>t information for making decisions<br />

We develop these ideas in Chapters 3 through 12. The ideas also form the foundation for<br />

the study of various <strong>to</strong>pics later in the book.<br />

Calculating the Cost of Products, Services, <strong>an</strong>d Other Cost Objects We have already seen<br />

the different <strong>purposes</strong> <strong>an</strong>d measures of product <strong>cost</strong>s. Whatever the purpose, the <strong>cost</strong>ing<br />

system traces direct <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d allocates indirect <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong> products. Chapters 4 <strong>an</strong>d<br />

5 describe systems, such as activity-based <strong>cost</strong>ing systems, used <strong>to</strong> calculate <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

<strong>an</strong>d unit <strong>cost</strong>s of products <strong>an</strong>d services. They also discuss how m<strong>an</strong>agers use this information<br />

<strong>to</strong> formulate strategy <strong>an</strong>d make pricing, product mix, <strong>an</strong>d <strong>cost</strong>-m<strong>an</strong>agement<br />

decisions.<br />

Obtaining Information for Pl<strong>an</strong>ning <strong>an</strong>d Control <strong>an</strong>d Perform<strong>an</strong>ce Evaluation Budgeting is the<br />

most commonly used <strong>to</strong>ol for pl<strong>an</strong>ning <strong>an</strong>d control. A budget forces m<strong>an</strong>agers <strong>to</strong> look<br />

ahead, <strong>to</strong> tr<strong>an</strong>slate strategy in<strong>to</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>s, <strong>to</strong> coordinate <strong>an</strong>d communicate within the org<strong>an</strong>ization,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d <strong>to</strong> provide a benchmark for evaluating perform<strong>an</strong>ce. Budgeting often plays<br />

a major role in affecting behavior <strong>an</strong>d decisions because m<strong>an</strong>agers strive <strong>to</strong> meet budget<br />

targets. Chapter 6 describes budgeting systems.<br />

At the end of a reporting period, m<strong>an</strong>agers compare actual results <strong>to</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>ned perform<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />

The m<strong>an</strong>ager’s tasks are <strong>to</strong> underst<strong>an</strong>d why differences (called vari<strong>an</strong>ces) between<br />

actual <strong>an</strong>d pl<strong>an</strong>ned perform<strong>an</strong>ces arise <strong>an</strong>d <strong>to</strong> use the information provided by these vari<strong>an</strong>ces<br />

as feedback <strong>to</strong> promote learning <strong>an</strong>d future improvement. M<strong>an</strong>agers also use vari<strong>an</strong>ces<br />

as well as nonfin<strong>an</strong>cial measures, such as defect rates <strong>an</strong>d cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction ratings,<br />

<strong>to</strong> control <strong>an</strong>d evaluate the perform<strong>an</strong>ce of various departments, divisions, <strong>an</strong>d<br />

m<strong>an</strong>agers. Chapters 7 <strong>an</strong>d 8 discuss vari<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>alysis. Chapter 9 describes pl<strong>an</strong>ning, control,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d inven<strong>to</strong>ry-<strong>cost</strong>ing issues relating <strong>to</strong> capacity. Chapters 6, 7, 8, <strong>an</strong>d 9 focus on the<br />

m<strong>an</strong>agement account<strong>an</strong>t’s role in implementing strategy.<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

46<br />

Analyzing the Relev<strong>an</strong>t Information for Making Decisions When making decisions about<br />

strategy design <strong>an</strong>d strategy implementation, m<strong>an</strong>agers must underst<strong>an</strong>d which revenues<br />

<strong>an</strong>d <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong> consider <strong>an</strong>d which ones <strong>to</strong> ignore. M<strong>an</strong>agement account<strong>an</strong>ts help m<strong>an</strong>agers<br />

identify what information is relev<strong>an</strong>t <strong>an</strong>d what information is irrelev<strong>an</strong>t. Consider a<br />

decision about whether <strong>to</strong> buy a product from <strong>an</strong> outside vendor or <strong>to</strong> make it in-house.<br />

The <strong>cost</strong>ing system indicates that it <strong>cost</strong>s $25 per unit <strong>to</strong> make the product in-house. A<br />

vendor offers the product for $22 per unit. At first gl<strong>an</strong>ce, it seems it will <strong>cost</strong> less for the<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>y <strong>to</strong> buy the product rather th<strong>an</strong> make it. However, suppose that, of the $25 <strong>to</strong><br />

make the product in-house, $5 consists of pl<strong>an</strong>t lease <strong>cost</strong>s that the comp<strong>an</strong>y will have<br />

<strong>to</strong> pay whether the product is made or bought. Under this condition, it will <strong>cost</strong> less <strong>to</strong><br />

make the product th<strong>an</strong> <strong>to</strong> buy it. That’s because making the product only <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong> additional<br />

$20 per unit ($25 − $5), compared with <strong>an</strong> additional $22 per unit if it is bought.<br />

The $5 per unit of lease <strong>cost</strong> is irrelev<strong>an</strong>t <strong>to</strong> the decision because it will be incurred<br />

whether the product is made or bought. Analyzing relev<strong>an</strong>t information is a key aspect<br />

of making decisions.<br />

When making strategic decisions about which products <strong>to</strong> produce, m<strong>an</strong>agers<br />

must know how revenues <strong>an</strong>d <strong>cost</strong>s vary with ch<strong>an</strong>ges in output levels. For this purpose,<br />

m<strong>an</strong>agers need <strong>to</strong> distinguish fixed <strong>cost</strong>s from variable <strong>cost</strong>s. Chapter 3 <strong>an</strong>alyzes<br />

how operating income ch<strong>an</strong>ges with ch<strong>an</strong>ges in output levels <strong>an</strong>d how m<strong>an</strong>agers use<br />

this information <strong>to</strong> make decisions such as how much <strong>to</strong> spend on advertising.<br />

Chapter 10 describes methods <strong>to</strong> estimate the fixed <strong>an</strong>d variable components of <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


Chapter 11 applies the concept of relev<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>to</strong> making decisions in m<strong>an</strong>y different situations<br />

<strong>an</strong>d describes methods m<strong>an</strong>agers use <strong>to</strong> maximize income given the resource<br />

constraints that they face. Chapter 12 describes how m<strong>an</strong>agement account<strong>an</strong>ts help<br />

m<strong>an</strong>agers determine prices <strong>an</strong>d m<strong>an</strong>age <strong>cost</strong>s across the value chain <strong>an</strong>d over a product’s<br />

life cycle.<br />

Later chapters in the book discuss <strong>to</strong>pics such as strategy evaluation, cus<strong>to</strong>mer<br />

profitability, quality, just-in-time systems, investment decisions, tr<strong>an</strong>sfer pricing, <strong>an</strong>d<br />

perform<strong>an</strong>ce evaluation. Each of these <strong>to</strong>pics invariably has product <strong>cost</strong>ing, pl<strong>an</strong>ning<br />

<strong>an</strong>d control, <strong>an</strong>d decision-making perspectives. A comm<strong>an</strong>d of the first 12 chapters is<br />

helpful <strong>to</strong> master these <strong>to</strong>pics. For example, Chapter 13 on strategy describes the bal<strong>an</strong>ced<br />

scorecard, a set of fin<strong>an</strong>cial <strong>an</strong>d nonfin<strong>an</strong>cial measures used <strong>to</strong> implement strategy<br />

that builds on the pl<strong>an</strong>ning <strong>an</strong>d control functions. The section on strategic <strong>an</strong>alysis<br />

of operating income builds on ideas of product <strong>cost</strong>ing <strong>an</strong>d vari<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>alysis. The<br />

section on downsizing <strong>an</strong>d m<strong>an</strong>aging capacity builds on ideas of relev<strong>an</strong>t revenues<br />

<strong>an</strong>d relev<strong>an</strong>t <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

PROBLEM FOR SELF-STUDY<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Foxwood Comp<strong>an</strong>y is a metal- <strong>an</strong>d woodcutting m<strong>an</strong>ufacturer, selling products <strong>to</strong> the home construction<br />

market. Consider the following data for 2007:<br />

S<strong>an</strong>dpaper $ 2,000<br />

Materials-h<strong>an</strong>dling <strong>cost</strong>s 70,000<br />

Lubric<strong>an</strong>ts <strong>an</strong>d cool<strong>an</strong>ts 5,000<br />

Miscell<strong>an</strong>eous indirect m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor 40,000<br />

Direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor 300,000<br />

Direct materials inven<strong>to</strong>ry, J<strong>an</strong>. 1, 2007 40,000<br />

Direct materials inven<strong>to</strong>ry, Dec. 31, 2007 50,000<br />

Finished goods inven<strong>to</strong>ry, J<strong>an</strong>. 1, 2007 100,000<br />

Finished goods inven<strong>to</strong>ry, Dec. 31, 2007 150,000<br />

Work in process inven<strong>to</strong>ry, J<strong>an</strong>. 1, 2007 10,000<br />

Work in process inven<strong>to</strong>ry, Dec. 31, 2007 14,000<br />

Pl<strong>an</strong>t-leasing <strong>cost</strong>s 54,000<br />

Depreciation—pl<strong>an</strong>t equipment 36,000<br />

Property taxes on pl<strong>an</strong>t equipment 4,000<br />

Fire insur<strong>an</strong>ce on pl<strong>an</strong>t equipment 3,000<br />

Direct materials purchased 460,000<br />

Revenues 1,360,000<br />

Marketing promotions 60,000<br />

Marketing salaries 100,000<br />

Distribution <strong>cost</strong>s 70,000<br />

Cus<strong>to</strong>mer-service <strong>cost</strong>s 100,000<br />

Required<br />

1. Prepare <strong>an</strong> income statement with a separate supporting schedule of <strong>cost</strong> of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured.<br />

For all m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing items, classify <strong>cost</strong>s as direct <strong>cost</strong>s or indirect <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d indicate by<br />

V or F whether each is basically a variable <strong>cost</strong> or a fixed <strong>cost</strong> (when the <strong>cost</strong> object is a product<br />

unit). If in doubt, decide on the basis of whether the <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong> will ch<strong>an</strong>ge subst<strong>an</strong>tially<br />

over a wide r<strong>an</strong>ge of units produced.<br />

2. Suppose that both the direct material <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d the pl<strong>an</strong>t-leasing <strong>cost</strong>s are for the production<br />

of 900,000 units. What is the direct material <strong>cost</strong> of each unit produced? What is the pl<strong>an</strong>tleasing<br />

<strong>cost</strong> per unit? Assume the pl<strong>an</strong>t-leasing <strong>cost</strong> is a fixed <strong>cost</strong>.<br />

3. Suppose Foxwood Comp<strong>an</strong>y m<strong>an</strong>ufactures 1,000,000 units next year. Repeat the computation<br />

in requirement 2 for direct materials <strong>an</strong>d pl<strong>an</strong>t-leasing <strong>cost</strong>s. Assume the implied <strong>cost</strong>-behavior<br />

patterns persist.<br />

4. As a m<strong>an</strong>agement consult<strong>an</strong>t, explain concisely <strong>to</strong> the comp<strong>an</strong>y president why the unit <strong>cost</strong> for<br />

direct materials did not ch<strong>an</strong>ge in requirements 2 <strong>an</strong>d 3 but the unit <strong>cost</strong> for pl<strong>an</strong>t-leasing <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

did ch<strong>an</strong>ge.<br />

47<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


SOLUTION<br />

1. Foxwood Comp<strong>an</strong>y<br />

Income Statement<br />

For the Year Ended December 31, 2007<br />

Revenues $1,360,000<br />

Cost of goods sold:<br />

Beginning finished goods, J<strong>an</strong>uary 1, 2007 $ 100,000<br />

Cost of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured (see schedule below) 960,000<br />

Cost of goods available for sale 1,060,000<br />

Deduct ending finished goods, December 31, 2007 150,000 910,000<br />

Gross margin (or gross profit) 450,000<br />

Operating <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

Marketing promotions 60,000<br />

Marketing salaries 100,000<br />

Distribution <strong>cost</strong>s 70,000<br />

Cus<strong>to</strong>mer-service <strong>cost</strong>s 100,000 330,000<br />

Operating income $ 120,000<br />

Foxwood Comp<strong>an</strong>y<br />

Schedule of Cost of Goods M<strong>an</strong>ufactured<br />

For the Year Ended December 31, 2007<br />

Direct materials:<br />

Beginning inven<strong>to</strong>ry, J<strong>an</strong>uary 1, 2007 $ 40,000<br />

Purchases of direct materials 460,000<br />

Cost of direct materials available for use 500,000<br />

Ending inven<strong>to</strong>ry, December 31, 2007 50,000<br />

Direct materials used<br />

450,000 (V)<br />

Direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor<br />

300,000 (V)<br />

M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s:<br />

S<strong>an</strong>dpaper<br />

$ 2,000 (V)<br />

Materials-h<strong>an</strong>dling <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

70,000 (V)<br />

Lubric<strong>an</strong>ts <strong>an</strong>d cool<strong>an</strong>ts<br />

5,000 (V)<br />

Miscell<strong>an</strong>eous indirect m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor<br />

40,000 (V)<br />

Pl<strong>an</strong>t-leasing <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

54,000 (F)<br />

Depreciation—pl<strong>an</strong>t equipment<br />

36,000 (F)<br />

Property taxes on pl<strong>an</strong>t equipment<br />

4,000 (F)<br />

Fire insur<strong>an</strong>ce on pl<strong>an</strong>t equipment 3,000 (F) 214,000<br />

M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s incurred during 2007 964,000<br />

Beginning work in process, J<strong>an</strong>uary 1, 2007 10,000<br />

Total m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong> account for 974,000<br />

Ending work in process, December 31, 2007 14,000<br />

Cost of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured (<strong>to</strong> Income Statement) $ 960,000<br />

2.<br />

Direct material unit <strong>cost</strong> = Direct materials used ÷ Units produced<br />

= $ 450, 000 ÷ 900, 000 units = $ 0.<br />

50 per unit<br />

Pl<strong>an</strong>t-leasing unit <strong>cost</strong> = Pl<strong>an</strong>t-leasing <strong>cost</strong>s ÷ Units produced<br />

= $ 54, 000 ÷ 900, 000 units = $ 0.<br />

06 per unit<br />

48<br />

3. The direct material <strong>cost</strong>s are variable, so they would increase in <strong>to</strong>tal from $450,000 <strong>to</strong><br />

$500,000 (1,000,000 units × $0.50 per unit). However, their unit <strong>cost</strong> would be unaffected:<br />

$500,000 ÷ 1,000,000 units = $0.50 per unit.<br />

In contrast, the pl<strong>an</strong>t-leasing <strong>cost</strong>s of $54,000 are fixed, so they would not increase in <strong>to</strong>tal.<br />

However, the pl<strong>an</strong>t-leasing <strong>cost</strong> per unit would decline from $0.060 <strong>to</strong> $0.054: $54,000 ÷<br />

1,000,000 units = $0.054 per unit.<br />

4. The expl<strong>an</strong>ation would begin with the <strong>an</strong>swer <strong>to</strong> requirement 3. As a consult<strong>an</strong>t, you<br />

should stress that the unitizing (averaging) of <strong>cost</strong>s that have different behavior patterns<br />

c<strong>an</strong> be misleading. A common error is <strong>to</strong> assume that a <strong>to</strong>tal unit <strong>cost</strong>, which is often a sum<br />

of variable unit <strong>cost</strong> <strong>an</strong>d fixed unit <strong>cost</strong>, is <strong>an</strong> indica<strong>to</strong>r that <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s ch<strong>an</strong>ge in proportion<br />

<strong>to</strong> ch<strong>an</strong>ges in production levels. The next chapter demonstrates the necessity for distinguishing<br />

between <strong>cost</strong>-behavior patterns. You must be wary, especially about average<br />

fixed <strong>cost</strong> per unit. Too often, unit fixed <strong>cost</strong> is erroneously regarded as being indistinguishable<br />

from unit variable <strong>cost</strong>.<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


DECISION POINTS<br />

The following question-<strong>an</strong>d-<strong>an</strong>swer format summarizes the chapter’s learning objectives. Each decision<br />

presents a key question related <strong>to</strong> a learning objective. The guidelines are the <strong>an</strong>swer <strong>to</strong> that question.<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Decision<br />

Guidelines<br />

1. How do m<strong>an</strong>agers choose a A <strong>cost</strong> object is <strong>an</strong>ything for which a separate measurement of <strong>cost</strong> is needed. Examples<br />

<strong>cost</strong> object?<br />

include a product, a service, a project, a cus<strong>to</strong>mer, a br<strong>an</strong>d category, <strong>an</strong> activity, <strong>an</strong>d a<br />

department.<br />

2. How do m<strong>an</strong>agers decide whether A direct <strong>cost</strong> is <strong>an</strong>y <strong>cost</strong> that is related <strong>to</strong> a particular <strong>cost</strong> object <strong>an</strong>d c<strong>an</strong> be traced <strong>to</strong> that<br />

a <strong>cost</strong> is a direct or <strong>an</strong> indirect <strong>cost</strong>? <strong>cost</strong> object in <strong>an</strong> economically feasible way. Indirect <strong>cost</strong>s are related <strong>to</strong> the particular <strong>cost</strong><br />

object but c<strong>an</strong>not be traced <strong>to</strong> it in <strong>an</strong> economically feasible way. The same <strong>cost</strong> c<strong>an</strong> be<br />

direct for one <strong>cost</strong> object <strong>an</strong>d indirect for other <strong>cost</strong> objects. This book uses <strong>cost</strong> tracing <strong>to</strong><br />

describe the assignment of direct <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong> a <strong>cost</strong> object <strong>an</strong>d <strong>cost</strong> allocation <strong>to</strong> describe the<br />

assignment of indirect <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong> a <strong>cost</strong> object.<br />

3. How do m<strong>an</strong>agers decide whether A variable <strong>cost</strong> ch<strong>an</strong>ges in <strong>to</strong>tal in proportion <strong>to</strong> ch<strong>an</strong>ges in the related level of <strong>to</strong>tal activity<br />

a <strong>cost</strong> is a variable or a fixed <strong>cost</strong>? or volume. A fixed <strong>cost</strong> remains unch<strong>an</strong>ged in <strong>to</strong>tal for a given time period despite wide<br />

ch<strong>an</strong>ges in the related level of <strong>to</strong>tal activity or volume.<br />

4. How should <strong>cost</strong>s be estimated? In general, focus on <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s, not unit <strong>cost</strong>s. When making <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong> estimates, think of<br />

variable <strong>cost</strong>s as <strong>an</strong> amount per unit <strong>an</strong>d fixed <strong>cost</strong>s as a <strong>to</strong>tal amount. The unit<br />

<strong>cost</strong> of a <strong>cost</strong> object should be interpreted cautiously when it includes a fixed-<strong>cost</strong><br />

component.<br />

5. How do you distinguish among M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies purchase materials <strong>an</strong>d components <strong>an</strong>d convert them<br />

m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing-, merch<strong>an</strong>dising-, in<strong>to</strong> finished goods. Merch<strong>an</strong>dising-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies purchase <strong>an</strong>d then sell t<strong>an</strong>gible<br />

<strong>an</strong>d service-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies? products without ch<strong>an</strong>ging their basic form. Service-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies provide services<br />

(int<strong>an</strong>gible products) <strong>to</strong> their cus<strong>to</strong>mers.<br />

6. How do m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing comp<strong>an</strong>ies The three categories of inven<strong>to</strong>ries found in m<strong>an</strong>y m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing comp<strong>an</strong>ies depict stages<br />

categorize inven<strong>to</strong>ries?<br />

in the conversion process: direct materials, work in process, <strong>an</strong>d finished goods.<br />

7. Which <strong>cost</strong>s are initially treated as Inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s are all <strong>cost</strong>s of a product that are regarded as <strong>an</strong> asset in the<br />

assets for external reporting, <strong>an</strong>d accounting period when they are incurred <strong>an</strong>d then become <strong>cost</strong> of goods sold in the<br />

which <strong>cost</strong>s are expensed as they accounting period when the product is sold. Period <strong>cost</strong>s are expensed in the accounting<br />

are incurred?<br />

period in which they are incurred <strong>an</strong>d are all of the <strong>cost</strong>s in <strong>an</strong> income statement other th<strong>an</strong><br />

<strong>cost</strong> of goods sold.<br />

8. How do m<strong>an</strong>agers assign <strong>cost</strong>s M<strong>an</strong>agers c<strong>an</strong> assign different <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong> the same <strong>cost</strong> object depending on the purpose.<br />

<strong>to</strong> <strong>cost</strong> objects?<br />

For example, for the external reporting purpose in a m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing comp<strong>an</strong>y, the inven<strong>to</strong>riable<br />

<strong>cost</strong> of a product includes only m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s. In contrast, <strong>cost</strong>s from all business<br />

functions of the value chain often are assigned <strong>to</strong> a product for pricing <strong>an</strong>d product-mix<br />

decisions.<br />

9. What are the features of <strong>cost</strong> Three features of <strong>cost</strong> accounting <strong>an</strong>d <strong>cost</strong> m<strong>an</strong>agement are (a) calculating the <strong>cost</strong> of<br />

accounting <strong>an</strong>d <strong>cost</strong> m<strong>an</strong>agement? products, services, <strong>an</strong>d other <strong>cost</strong> objects; (b) obtaining information for pl<strong>an</strong>ning <strong>an</strong>d<br />

control <strong>an</strong>d perform<strong>an</strong>ce evaluation; <strong>an</strong>d (c) <strong>an</strong>alyzing the relev<strong>an</strong>t information for making<br />

decisions.<br />

TERMS TO LEARN<br />

This chapter contains more basic <strong>terms</strong> th<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>y other in this book. Do not proceed before you check<br />

your underst<strong>an</strong>ding of the following <strong>terms</strong>. Both the chapter <strong>an</strong>d the Glossary at the end of the book contain<br />

definitions.<br />

actual <strong>cost</strong> (p. 27)<br />

average <strong>cost</strong> (p. 35)<br />

budgeted <strong>cost</strong> (p. 27)<br />

conversion <strong>cost</strong>s (p. 42)<br />

<strong>cost</strong> (p. 27)<br />

<strong>cost</strong> accumulation (p. 27)<br />

<strong>cost</strong> allocation (p. 27)<br />

<strong>cost</strong> assignment (p. 27)<br />

<strong>cost</strong> driver (p. 32)<br />

<strong>cost</strong> object (p. 27)<br />

<strong>cost</strong> of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured (p. 39)<br />

<strong>cost</strong> tracing (p. 27)<br />

direct <strong>cost</strong>s of a <strong>cost</strong> object (p. 27)<br />

direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong>s (p. 37)<br />

direct material <strong>cost</strong>s (p. 37)<br />

An Introduction <strong>to</strong> Cost Terms <strong>an</strong>d Purposes<br />

49<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


direct materials inven<strong>to</strong>ry (p. 37)<br />

fac<strong>to</strong>ry overhead <strong>cost</strong>s (p. 37)<br />

finished-goods inven<strong>to</strong>ry (p. 37)<br />

fixed <strong>cost</strong> (p. 30)<br />

idle time (p. 43)<br />

indirect <strong>cost</strong>s of a <strong>cost</strong> object (p. 27)<br />

indirect m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s (p. 37)<br />

inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s (p. 37)<br />

m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s (p. 37)<br />

m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies (p. 36)<br />

merch<strong>an</strong>dising-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies (p. 36)<br />

operating income (p. 40)<br />

overtime premium (p. 43)<br />

period <strong>cost</strong>s (p. 38)<br />

prime <strong>cost</strong>s (p. 42)<br />

product <strong>cost</strong> (p. 44)<br />

relev<strong>an</strong>t r<strong>an</strong>ge (p. 33)<br />

revenues (p. 38)<br />

service-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies (p. 36)<br />

unit <strong>cost</strong> (p. 35)<br />

variable <strong>cost</strong> (p. 30)<br />

work-in-process inven<strong>to</strong>ry (p. 37)<br />

work in progress (p. 37)<br />

Prentice Hall Grade Assist (PHGA)<br />

Your professor may ask you <strong>to</strong> complete selected exercises <strong>an</strong>d problems in Prentice Hall<br />

Grade Assist (PHGA). PHGA is <strong>an</strong> online <strong>to</strong>ol that c<strong>an</strong> help you master the chapter’s <strong>to</strong>pics.<br />

It provides you with multiple variations of exercises <strong>an</strong>d problems designated by the PHGA<br />

icon. You c<strong>an</strong> rework these exercises <strong>an</strong>d problems—each time with new data—as m<strong>an</strong>y<br />

times as you need. You also receive immediate feedback <strong>an</strong>d grading.<br />

ASSIGNMENT MATERIAL<br />

Questions<br />

2-1 Define <strong>cost</strong> object <strong>an</strong>d give three examples.<br />

2-2 Define direct <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d indirect <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

2-3 Why do m<strong>an</strong>agers consider direct <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong> be more accurate th<strong>an</strong> indirect <strong>cost</strong>s?<br />

2-4 Name three fac<strong>to</strong>rs that will affect the classification of a <strong>cost</strong> as direct or indirect.<br />

2-5 Define variable <strong>cost</strong> <strong>an</strong>d fixed <strong>cost</strong>. Give <strong>an</strong> example of each.<br />

2-6 What is a <strong>cost</strong> driver? Give one example.<br />

2-7 What is the relev<strong>an</strong>t r<strong>an</strong>ge? What role does the relev<strong>an</strong>t-r<strong>an</strong>ge concept play in explaining how<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s behave?<br />

2-8 Explain why unit <strong>cost</strong>s must often be interpreted with caution.<br />

2-9 Describe how m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing-, merch<strong>an</strong>dising-, <strong>an</strong>d service-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies differ from<br />

each other.<br />

2-10 What are three different types of inven<strong>to</strong>ry that m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing comp<strong>an</strong>ies hold?<br />

2-11 Distinguish between inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d period <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

2-12 Do service-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies have inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s? Explain.<br />

2-13 Define the following: direct material <strong>cost</strong>s, direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing-labor <strong>cost</strong>s, m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

overhead <strong>cost</strong>s, prime <strong>cost</strong>s, <strong>an</strong>d conversion <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

2-14 Describe the overtime-premium <strong>an</strong>d idle-time categories of indirect labor.<br />

2-15 Define product <strong>cost</strong>. Describe three different <strong>purposes</strong> for computing product <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

Exercises<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

50<br />

2-16 Computing <strong>an</strong>d interpreting m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing unit <strong>cost</strong>s. Minnesota Office Products (MOP) produces<br />

three different paper products at its Vaasa lumber pl<strong>an</strong>t: Supreme, Deluxe, <strong>an</strong>d Regular. Each product has<br />

its own dedicated production line at the pl<strong>an</strong>t. It currently uses the following three-part classification for its<br />

m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s: direct materials, direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor, <strong>an</strong>d m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s. Total<br />

m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s of the pl<strong>an</strong>t in July 2007 are $150 million ($20 million of which are fixed). This<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal amount is allocated <strong>to</strong> each product line on the basis of the direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong>s of each<br />

line. Summary data (in millions) for July 2007 are as follows:<br />

Supreme Deluxe Regular<br />

Direct material <strong>cost</strong>s $84 $54 $62<br />

Direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong>s $14 $28 $ 8<br />

M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s $42 $84 $24<br />

Units produced 80 120 100<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


1. Compute the m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong> per unit for each product produced in July 2007.<br />

2. Suppose that in August 2007, production was 120 million units of Supreme, 160 million units of Deluxe,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d 180 million units of Regular. Why might the July 2007 information on m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong> per unit be<br />

misleading when predicting <strong>to</strong>tal m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s in August 2007?<br />

Required<br />

2-17 Direct <strong>an</strong>d indirect <strong>cost</strong>s, effect of ch<strong>an</strong>ging the classification of a <strong>cost</strong> item (continuation of 2-16).<br />

MOP hires Judy Shore, a <strong>cost</strong> consult<strong>an</strong>t, who discovers that each production line has multiple energy<br />

meters, so it is economically feasible <strong>to</strong> trace $90 million of energy <strong>cost</strong>s directly <strong>to</strong> the three product lines.<br />

The remaining $60 million of m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s of the pl<strong>an</strong>t (including the $20 million of fixed<br />

<strong>cost</strong>s) are allocated <strong>to</strong> each product on the basis of the direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong>s of each line. She<br />

reports the following revised numbers for July 2007:<br />

If you w<strong>an</strong>t <strong>to</strong> use Excel <strong>to</strong> solve this exercise, go <strong>to</strong> the Excel Lab at www.prenhall.com/horngren/<br />

<strong>cost</strong>12e <strong>an</strong>d download the template for Exercise 2-17.<br />

1. Why might MOP’s m<strong>an</strong>agers prefer energy <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>to</strong> be a direct <strong>cost</strong> rather th<strong>an</strong> a m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead<br />

<strong>cost</strong>?<br />

2. Compute the m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong> per unit for each product line after the <strong>cost</strong> <strong>an</strong>alysis has been performed<br />

by Judy Shore.<br />

3. Comment on the <strong>cost</strong> per unit for each product line before <strong>an</strong>d after Shore’s <strong>an</strong>alysis.<br />

Required<br />

2-18 Classification of <strong>cost</strong>s, service sec<strong>to</strong>r. Consumer Focus is a marketing research firm that org<strong>an</strong>izes<br />

focus groups for consumer-product comp<strong>an</strong>ies. Each focus group has eight individuals who are paid $50<br />

per session <strong>to</strong> provide comments on new products. These focus groups meet in hotels <strong>an</strong>d are led by a<br />

trained, independent, marketing specialist hired by Consumer Focus. Each specialist is paid a fixed retainer<br />

<strong>to</strong> conduct a minimum number of sessions <strong>an</strong>d a per session fee of $2,000. A Consumer Focus staff member<br />

attends each session <strong>to</strong> ensure that all the logistical aspects run smoothly.<br />

Classify each of the following <strong>cost</strong> items as:<br />

a. Direct or indirect (D or I) <strong>cost</strong>s with respect <strong>to</strong> each individual focus group.<br />

b. Variable or fixed (V or F) <strong>cost</strong>s with respect <strong>to</strong> how the <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s of Consumer Focus ch<strong>an</strong>ge as the<br />

number of focus groups conducted ch<strong>an</strong>ges. (If in doubt, select on the basis of whether the <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

will ch<strong>an</strong>ge subst<strong>an</strong>tially if there is a large ch<strong>an</strong>ge in the number of groups conducted.)<br />

You will have two <strong>an</strong>swers (D or I; V or F) for each of the following items:<br />

Cost Item D or I V or F<br />

Required<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

A. Payment <strong>to</strong> individuals in each focus group <strong>to</strong> provide<br />

comments on new products<br />

B. Annual subscription of Consumer Focus <strong>to</strong> Consumer Reports<br />

magazine<br />

C. Phone calls made by Consumer Focus staff member <strong>to</strong> confirm<br />

individuals will attend a focus group session (Records of<br />

individual calls are not kept.)<br />

D. Retainer paid <strong>to</strong> focus group leader <strong>to</strong> conduct 20 focus groups<br />

per year on new medical products<br />

E. Meals provided <strong>to</strong> particip<strong>an</strong>ts in each focus group<br />

F. Lease payment by Consumer Focus for corporate office<br />

G. Cost of tapes used <strong>to</strong> record comments made by individuals in<br />

a focus group session (These tapes are sent <strong>to</strong> the comp<strong>an</strong>y<br />

whose products are being tested.)<br />

H. Gasoline <strong>cost</strong>s of Consumer Focus staff for comp<strong>an</strong>y-owned<br />

vehicles (staff members submit monthly bills with no mileage<br />

breakdowns.)<br />

2-19 Classification of <strong>cost</strong>s, merch<strong>an</strong>dising sec<strong>to</strong>r. Home Entertainment Center (HEC) operates a large<br />

s<strong>to</strong>re in S<strong>an</strong> Fr<strong>an</strong>cisco. The s<strong>to</strong>re has both a video section <strong>an</strong>d a music (compact disks <strong>an</strong>d tapes) section.<br />

HEC reports revenues for the video section separately from the music section.<br />

Classify each of the following <strong>cost</strong> items as:<br />

a. Direct or indirect (D or I) <strong>cost</strong>s with respect <strong>to</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal number of videos sold.<br />

Required<br />

An Introduction <strong>to</strong> Cost Terms <strong>an</strong>d Purposes<br />

51<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


. Variable or fixed (V or F) <strong>cost</strong>s with respect <strong>to</strong> how the <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s of the video section ch<strong>an</strong>ge as the<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal number of videos sold ch<strong>an</strong>ges. (If in doubt, select on the basis of whether the <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s will<br />

ch<strong>an</strong>ge subst<strong>an</strong>tially if there is a large ch<strong>an</strong>ge in the <strong>to</strong>tal number of videos sold.)<br />

You will have two <strong>an</strong>swers (D or I; V or F) for each of the following items:<br />

Cost Item D or I V or F<br />

A. Annual retainer paid <strong>to</strong> a video distribu<strong>to</strong>r<br />

B. Electricity <strong>cost</strong>s of HEC s<strong>to</strong>re (single bill covers entire s<strong>to</strong>re)<br />

C. Costs of videos purchased for sale <strong>to</strong> cus<strong>to</strong>mers<br />

D. Subscription <strong>to</strong> Video Trends magazine<br />

E. Leasing of computer software used for fin<strong>an</strong>cial budgeting at<br />

HEC s<strong>to</strong>re<br />

F. Cost of popcorn provided free <strong>to</strong> all cus<strong>to</strong>mers of HEC<br />

G. Earthquake insur<strong>an</strong>ce policy for HEC s<strong>to</strong>re<br />

H. Freight-in <strong>cost</strong>s of videos purchased by HEC<br />

Required<br />

2-20 Classification of <strong>cost</strong>s, m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing sec<strong>to</strong>r. The Fremont, California, pl<strong>an</strong>t of New United Mo<strong>to</strong>r<br />

M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing, Inc. (NUMMI), a joint venture of General Mo<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>an</strong>d Toyota, assembles two types of cars<br />

(Corollas <strong>an</strong>d Geo Prisms). Separate assembly lines are used for each type of car.<br />

Classify each of the following <strong>cost</strong> items as:<br />

a. Direct or indirect (D or I) <strong>cost</strong>s with respect <strong>to</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal number of cars of each type assembled (Corolla<br />

or Geo Prism).<br />

b. Variable or fixed (V or F) <strong>cost</strong>s with respect <strong>to</strong> how the <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s of the pl<strong>an</strong>t ch<strong>an</strong>ge as the <strong>to</strong>tal number<br />

of cars of each type assembled ch<strong>an</strong>ges. (If in doubt, select on the basis of whether the <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

will ch<strong>an</strong>ge subst<strong>an</strong>tially if there is a large ch<strong>an</strong>ge in the <strong>to</strong>tal number of cars of each type assembled.)<br />

You will have two <strong>an</strong>swers (D or I; V or F) for each of the following items:<br />

Cost Item D or I V or F<br />

A. Cost of tires used on Geo Prisms<br />

B. Salary of public relations m<strong>an</strong>ager for NUMMI pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />

C. Annual awards dinner for Corolla suppliers<br />

D. Salary of engineer who moni<strong>to</strong>rs design ch<strong>an</strong>ges on Geo Prism<br />

E. Freight <strong>cost</strong>s of Corolla engines shipped from Toyota City, Jap<strong>an</strong>,<br />

<strong>to</strong> Fremont, California<br />

F. Electricity <strong>cost</strong>s for NUMMI pl<strong>an</strong>t (single bill covers entire pl<strong>an</strong>t)<br />

G. Wages paid <strong>to</strong> temporary assembly-line workers hired in periods<br />

of high production (paid on hourly basis)<br />

H. Annual fire-insur<strong>an</strong>ce policy <strong>cost</strong> for NUMMI pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />

Required<br />

2-21 Variable <strong>cost</strong>s, fixed <strong>cost</strong>s, <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s. Ana Compo is getting ready <strong>to</strong> open a small restaur<strong>an</strong>t. She<br />

is on a tight budget <strong>an</strong>d must choose between the following long-dist<strong>an</strong>ce phone pl<strong>an</strong>s:<br />

Pl<strong>an</strong> A: Pay 10 cents per minute of long-dist<strong>an</strong>ce calling.<br />

Pl<strong>an</strong> B: Pay a fixed monthly fee of $18 for up <strong>to</strong> 300 long-dist<strong>an</strong>ce minutes, <strong>an</strong>d<br />

6 cents per minute thereafter (if she uses fewer th<strong>an</strong> 300 minutes in <strong>an</strong>y<br />

month, she still pays $18 for the month).<br />

Pl<strong>an</strong> C: Pay a fixed monthly fee of $24 for up <strong>to</strong> 480 long-dist<strong>an</strong>ce minutes <strong>an</strong>d<br />

5 cents per minute thereafter (if she uses fewer th<strong>an</strong> 480 minutes, she still<br />

pays $24 for the month).<br />

1. Draw a graph of the <strong>to</strong>tal monthly <strong>cost</strong>s of the three pl<strong>an</strong>s for different levels of monthly long-dist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

calling.<br />

2. Which pl<strong>an</strong> should Compo choose if she expects <strong>to</strong> make 100 minutes of long-dist<strong>an</strong>ce calls? 200 minutes?<br />

500 minutes?<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

52<br />

2-22 Variable <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d fixed <strong>cost</strong>s. Consolidated Minerals (CM) owns the rights <strong>to</strong> extract minerals<br />

from beach s<strong>an</strong>ds on Fraser Isl<strong>an</strong>d. CM has <strong>cost</strong>s in three areas:<br />

a. Payment <strong>to</strong> a mining subcontrac<strong>to</strong>r who charges $80 per <strong>to</strong>n of beach s<strong>an</strong>d mined <strong>an</strong>d returned <strong>to</strong><br />

the beach (after being processed on the mainl<strong>an</strong>d <strong>to</strong> extract three minerals: ilmenite, rutile, <strong>an</strong>d<br />

zircon).<br />

b. Payment of a government mining <strong>an</strong>d environmental tax of $50 per <strong>to</strong>n of beach s<strong>an</strong>d mined.<br />

c. Payment <strong>to</strong> a barge opera<strong>to</strong>r. This opera<strong>to</strong>r charges $150,000 per month <strong>to</strong> tr<strong>an</strong>sport each batch of<br />

beach s<strong>an</strong>d—up <strong>to</strong> 100 <strong>to</strong>ns per batch per day—<strong>to</strong> the mainl<strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong>d then return <strong>to</strong> Fraser Isl<strong>an</strong>d (that<br />

is, 0 <strong>to</strong> 100 <strong>to</strong>ns per day = $150,000 per month; 101 <strong>to</strong> 200 <strong>to</strong>ns per day = $300,000 per month, <strong>an</strong>d so on).<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


Each barge operates 25 days per month. The $150,000 monthly charge must be paid even if fewer th<strong>an</strong><br />

100 <strong>to</strong>ns are tr<strong>an</strong>sported on <strong>an</strong>y day <strong>an</strong>d even if CM requires fewer th<strong>an</strong> 25 days of barge tr<strong>an</strong>sportation<br />

in that month.<br />

CM is currently mining 180 <strong>to</strong>ns of beach s<strong>an</strong>ds per day for 25 days per month.<br />

1. What is the variable <strong>cost</strong> per <strong>to</strong>n of beach s<strong>an</strong>d mined? What is the fixed <strong>cost</strong> <strong>to</strong> CM per month?<br />

2. Plot a graph of the variable <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong>other graph of the fixed <strong>cost</strong>s of CM. Your graphs should be<br />

similar <strong>to</strong> Exhibit 2-3, P<strong>an</strong>el A (p. 30), <strong>an</strong>d Exhibit 2-4 (p. 34). Is the concept of relev<strong>an</strong>t r<strong>an</strong>ge applicable<br />

<strong>to</strong> your graphs? Explain.<br />

3. What is the unit <strong>cost</strong> per <strong>to</strong>n of beach s<strong>an</strong>d mined (a) if 180 <strong>to</strong>ns are mined each day <strong>an</strong>d (b) if 220 <strong>to</strong>ns<br />

are mined each day? Explain the difference in the unit-<strong>cost</strong> figures.<br />

Required<br />

2-23 Cost drivers <strong>an</strong>d the value chain. A Johnson & Johnson <strong>an</strong>alyst is preparing a presentation on <strong>cost</strong><br />

drivers at one of its pharmaceutical drug subsidiaries. Unfortunately, both the list of its business functions<br />

<strong>an</strong>d the accomp<strong>an</strong>ying list of representative <strong>cost</strong> drivers are accidentally r<strong>an</strong>domized. The two lists now on<br />

the computer screen are:<br />

Business Function<br />

Representative Cost Driver<br />

A. Production 1. Minutes of TV advertising time on 60 Minutes<br />

B. Research <strong>an</strong>d development 2. Number of calls <strong>to</strong> <strong>to</strong>ll-free cus<strong>to</strong>mer telephone line<br />

C. Marketing 3. Hours the Tylenol packaging line is in operation<br />

D. Distribution 4. Number of packages shipped<br />

E. Design of products/processes 5. Hours spent designing tamper-proof bottles<br />

F. Cus<strong>to</strong>mer service 6. Number of patents filed with U.S. Patent Office<br />

1. Match each business function with its representative <strong>cost</strong> driver.<br />

2. Give a second example of a <strong>cost</strong> driver for each business function of Johnson & Johnson’s pharmaceutical<br />

drug subsidiary.<br />

Required<br />

2-24 Cost drivers <strong>an</strong>d functions. The list of representative <strong>cost</strong> drivers in the right column of this table<br />

are r<strong>an</strong>domized with respect <strong>to</strong> the list of functions in the left column. That is, they do not match.<br />

Function<br />

Representative Cost Driver<br />

1. Accounting A. Number of invoices sent<br />

2. Personnel B. Number of purchase orders<br />

3. Data processing C. Number of research scientists<br />

4. Research <strong>an</strong>d development D. Hours of computer processing unit (CPU)<br />

5. Purchasing E. Number of new hires<br />

6. Billing F. Number of tr<strong>an</strong>sactions processed<br />

1. Match each function with its representative <strong>cost</strong> driver.<br />

2. Give a second example of a <strong>cost</strong> driver for each function.<br />

Required<br />

2-25 Total <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d unit <strong>cost</strong>s. A student association has hired a b<strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong>d a caterer for a graduation<br />

party. The b<strong>an</strong>d will charge a fixed fee of $1,000 for <strong>an</strong> evening of music, <strong>an</strong>d the caterer will charge a fixed<br />

fee of $500 for the party setup <strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong> additional $10 per person who attends. Snacks <strong>an</strong>d soft drinks will be<br />

provided by the caterer for the duration of the party. Students attending the party will pay $5 each at the<br />

door.<br />

1. Draw a graph depicting the fixed <strong>cost</strong>, the variable <strong>cost</strong>, <strong>an</strong>d the <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong> <strong>to</strong> the student association<br />

for different attend<strong>an</strong>ce levels.<br />

2. Suppose 100 people attend the party. What will be the <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong> <strong>to</strong> the student association? What will<br />

be the <strong>cost</strong> per person?<br />

3. Suppose 500 people attend the party. What will be the <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong> <strong>to</strong> the student association <strong>an</strong>d the <strong>cost</strong><br />

per attendee?<br />

4. Draw a graph depicting the <strong>cost</strong> per attendee for different attend<strong>an</strong>ce levels. As president of the student<br />

association, you w<strong>an</strong>t <strong>to</strong> request a gr<strong>an</strong>t <strong>to</strong> cover some of the party <strong>cost</strong>s. Will you use the per<br />

attendee <strong>cost</strong> numbers <strong>to</strong> make your case? Why or why not?<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

2-26 Total <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d unit <strong>cost</strong>s. Sus<strong>an</strong> W<strong>an</strong>g is a well-known software engineer. Her specialty is writing<br />

software code used in maintaining the security of credit-card information. W<strong>an</strong>g is approached by<br />

the Electronic Commerce Group (ECG). They offer <strong>to</strong> pay her $100,000 for the right <strong>to</strong> use her code<br />

under license in their e.procurement software package. W<strong>an</strong>g rejects this offer because it provides her<br />

with no upside if the e.procurement package is a runaway success. Both parties eventually agree <strong>to</strong> a contract<br />

in which ECG pays W<strong>an</strong>g a flat fee of $100,000 for the right <strong>to</strong> use her code in up <strong>to</strong> 10,000 packages. If<br />

e.procurement sells more th<strong>an</strong> 10,000 packages, W<strong>an</strong>g receives <strong>an</strong> additional $8 for each package sold<br />

beyond the 10,000 level.<br />

Required<br />

An Introduction <strong>to</strong> Cost Terms <strong>an</strong>d Purposes<br />

53<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


Required<br />

1. What is the unit <strong>cost</strong> <strong>to</strong> ECG of W<strong>an</strong>g’s software code included in its e.procurement package if it sells<br />

(a) 2,000 packages, (b) 6,000 packages, (c) 10,000 packages, <strong>an</strong>d (d) 20,000 packages? Comment on the<br />

results.<br />

2. To predict ECG’s <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong> of using W<strong>an</strong>g’s software code in e.procurement, which unit <strong>cost</strong> (if <strong>an</strong>y) of<br />

(a) <strong>to</strong> (d) in requirement 1 would you recommend ECG use? Explain.<br />

2-27 Inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s versus period <strong>cost</strong>s. Each of the following <strong>cost</strong> items pertains <strong>to</strong> one of these<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>ies: General Electric (a m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>y), Safeway (a merch<strong>an</strong>dising-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>y),<br />

<strong>an</strong>d Google (a service-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>y):<br />

a. Perrier mineral water purchased by Safeway for sale <strong>to</strong> its cus<strong>to</strong>mers<br />

b. Electricity used <strong>to</strong> provide lighting for assembly-line workers at a General Electric refrigera<strong>to</strong>r-assembly<br />

pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />

c. Depreciation on Google’s computer equipment used <strong>to</strong> update direc<strong>to</strong>ries of Web sites<br />

d. Electricity used <strong>to</strong> provide lighting for Safeway’s s<strong>to</strong>re aisles<br />

e. Depreciation on General Electric’s computer equipment used for quality testing of refrigera<strong>to</strong>r components<br />

during the assembly process<br />

f. Salaries of Safeway’s marketing personnel pl<strong>an</strong>ning local-newspaper advertising campaigns<br />

g. Perrier mineral water purchased by Google for consumption by its software engineers<br />

h. Salaries of Google’s marketing personnel selling b<strong>an</strong>ner advertising<br />

Required<br />

1. Distinguish between m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing-sec<strong>to</strong>r, merch<strong>an</strong>dising-sec<strong>to</strong>r, <strong>an</strong>d service-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>ies.<br />

2. Distinguish between inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d period <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

3. Classify each of the <strong>cost</strong> items (a–h) as <strong>an</strong> inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong> or a period <strong>cost</strong>. Explain your<br />

<strong>an</strong>swers.<br />

Problems<br />

2-28 Flow of Inven<strong>to</strong>riable Costs. Hofstra Plastics’ selected data for August 2007 are presented here<br />

(in millions):<br />

Direct materials inven<strong>to</strong>ry 8/1/2007 $ 90<br />

Direct materials purchased 360<br />

Direct materials used 375<br />

Total m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead 480<br />

Variable m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead 250<br />

Total m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s 1,600<br />

Work-in-process inven<strong>to</strong>ry 8/1/2007 200<br />

Cost of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured 1,650<br />

Finished goods inven<strong>to</strong>ry 8/1/2007 125<br />

Cost of goods sold 1,700<br />

Required<br />

Calculate the following <strong>cost</strong>s:<br />

1. Direct materials inven<strong>to</strong>ry 8/31/2007<br />

2. Fixed m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s for August<br />

3. Direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong>s for August<br />

4. Work-in-process inven<strong>to</strong>ry 8/31/2007<br />

5. Goods available for sale in August<br />

6. Finished goods inven<strong>to</strong>ry 8/31/2007<br />

2-29 Computing <strong>cost</strong> of goods purchased <strong>an</strong>d <strong>cost</strong> of goods sold. The following data are for Marvin<br />

Department S<strong>to</strong>re. The account bal<strong>an</strong>ces (in thous<strong>an</strong>ds) are for 2007.<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

54<br />

Required<br />

Marketing, distribution, <strong>an</strong>d cus<strong>to</strong>mer-service <strong>cost</strong>s $ 37,000<br />

Merch<strong>an</strong>dise inven<strong>to</strong>ry, J<strong>an</strong>uary 1, 2007 27,000<br />

Utilities 17,000<br />

General <strong>an</strong>d administrative <strong>cost</strong>s 43,000<br />

Merch<strong>an</strong>dise inven<strong>to</strong>ry, December 31, 2007 34,000<br />

Purchases 155,000<br />

Miscell<strong>an</strong>eous <strong>cost</strong>s 4,000<br />

Tr<strong>an</strong>sportation-in 7,000<br />

Purchase returns <strong>an</strong>d allow<strong>an</strong>ces 4,000<br />

Purchase discounts 6,000<br />

Compute (a) the <strong>cost</strong> of goods purchased <strong>an</strong>d (b) the <strong>cost</strong> of goods sold.<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


2-30 Cost of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured. Consider the following account bal<strong>an</strong>ces (in thous<strong>an</strong>ds) for the<br />

C<strong>an</strong>seco Comp<strong>an</strong>y:<br />

If you w<strong>an</strong>t <strong>to</strong> use Excel <strong>to</strong> solve this problem, go <strong>to</strong> the Excel Lab at www.prenhall.com/horngren/<br />

<strong>cost</strong>12e <strong>an</strong>d download the template for Exhibit 2-7.<br />

1. Prepare a schedule for the <strong>cost</strong> of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured for 2007.<br />

2. Revenues for 2007 were $300 million. Prepare the income statement for 2007.<br />

Required<br />

2-31 Income statement <strong>an</strong>d schedule of <strong>cost</strong> of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured. The Howell Corporation has the<br />

following account bal<strong>an</strong>ces (in millions):<br />

For Specific Date For Year 2007<br />

Direct materials, J<strong>an</strong>. 1, 2007 $15 Purchases of direct materials $325<br />

Work in process, J<strong>an</strong>. 1, 2007 10 Direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor 100<br />

Finished goods, J<strong>an</strong>. 1, 2007 70 Depreciation—pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong>an</strong>d<br />

Direct materials, Dec. 31, 2007 20 equipment 80<br />

Work in process, Dec. 31, 2007 5 Pl<strong>an</strong>t supervisory salaries 5<br />

Finished goods, Dec. 31, 2007 55 Miscell<strong>an</strong>eous pl<strong>an</strong>t overhead 35<br />

Revenues 950<br />

Marketing, distribution, <strong>an</strong>d<br />

cus<strong>to</strong>mer-service <strong>cost</strong>s 240<br />

Pl<strong>an</strong>t supplies used 10<br />

Pl<strong>an</strong>t utilities 30<br />

Indirect m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor 60<br />

Prepare <strong>an</strong> income statement <strong>an</strong>d a supporting schedule of <strong>cost</strong> of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured for the year ended<br />

December 31, 2007. (For additional questions regarding these facts, see the next problem.)<br />

Required<br />

2-32 Interpretation of statements (continuation of 2-31).<br />

1. How would the <strong>an</strong>swer <strong>to</strong> Problem 2-31 be modified if you were asked for a schedule of <strong>cost</strong> of goods<br />

m<strong>an</strong>ufactured <strong>an</strong>d sold instead of a schedule of <strong>cost</strong> of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured? Be specific.<br />

2. Would the sales m<strong>an</strong>ager’s salary (included in marketing, distribution, <strong>an</strong>d cus<strong>to</strong>mer-service <strong>cost</strong>s) be<br />

accounted for <strong>an</strong>y differently if the Howell Corporation were a merch<strong>an</strong>dising-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>y instead<br />

of a m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing-sec<strong>to</strong>r comp<strong>an</strong>y? Using the flow of m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s outlined in Exhibit 2-8<br />

(p. 40), describe how the wages of <strong>an</strong> assembler in the pl<strong>an</strong>t would be accounted for in this m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>y.<br />

3. Pl<strong>an</strong>t supervisory salaries are usually regarded as m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s. When might some<br />

of these <strong>cost</strong>s be regarded as direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s? Give <strong>an</strong> example.<br />

4. Suppose that both the direct materials used <strong>an</strong>d the pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong>an</strong>d equipment depreciation are related <strong>to</strong><br />

the m<strong>an</strong>ufacture of 1 million units of product. What is the unit <strong>cost</strong> for the direct materials assigned <strong>to</strong><br />

those units? What is the unit <strong>cost</strong> for pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong>an</strong>d equipment depreciation? Assume that yearly pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong>an</strong>d<br />

equipment depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis.<br />

5. Assume that the implied <strong>cost</strong>-behavior patterns in requirement 4 persist. That is, direct material <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

behave as a variable <strong>cost</strong>, <strong>an</strong>d pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong>an</strong>d equipment depreciation behaves as a fixed <strong>cost</strong>. Repeat the<br />

computations in requirement 4, assuming that the <strong>cost</strong>s are being predicted for the m<strong>an</strong>ufacture of 1.2<br />

million units of product. How would the <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s be affected?<br />

6. As a m<strong>an</strong>agement account<strong>an</strong>t, explain concisely <strong>to</strong> the president why the unit <strong>cost</strong>s differed in requirements<br />

4 <strong>an</strong>d 5.<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Required<br />

An Introduction <strong>to</strong> Cost Terms <strong>an</strong>d Purposes<br />

55<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


2-33 Income statement <strong>an</strong>d schedule of <strong>cost</strong> of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured. The following items (in millions)<br />

pertain <strong>to</strong> Ch<strong>an</strong> Corporation:<br />

For Specific Date For Year 2007<br />

Required<br />

Required<br />

Work in process, J<strong>an</strong>. 1, 2007 $10 Pl<strong>an</strong>t utilities $ 5<br />

Direct materials, Dec. 31, 2007 5 Indirect m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor 20<br />

Finished goods, Dec. 31, 2007 12 Depreciation—pl<strong>an</strong>t<br />

Accounts payable, Dec. 31, 2007 20 <strong>an</strong>d equipment 9<br />

Revenues 350<br />

Accounts receivable, J<strong>an</strong>. 1, 2007 50 Miscell<strong>an</strong>eous m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

Work in process, Dec. 31, 2007 2 overhead 10<br />

Finished goods, J<strong>an</strong>. 1, 2007 40 Marketing, distribution, <strong>an</strong>d<br />

cus<strong>to</strong>mer-service <strong>cost</strong>s 90<br />

Accounts receivable, Dec. 31, 2007 30 Direct materials purchased 80<br />

Accounts payable, J<strong>an</strong>. 1, 2007 40 Direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor 40<br />

Direct materials, J<strong>an</strong>. 1, 2007 30 Pl<strong>an</strong>t supplies used 6<br />

Property taxes on pl<strong>an</strong>t 1<br />

Ch<strong>an</strong>’s m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>ing system uses a three-part classification of direct materials, direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

labor, <strong>an</strong>d m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

Prepare <strong>an</strong> income statement <strong>an</strong>d a supporting schedule of <strong>cost</strong> of goods m<strong>an</strong>ufactured. (For additional<br />

questions regarding these facts, see the next problem.)<br />

2-34 Terminology, interpretation of statements (continuation of 2-33).<br />

1. Calculate <strong>to</strong>tal prime <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d <strong>to</strong>tal conversion <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

2. Compute <strong>to</strong>tal inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d period <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

3. Design <strong>cost</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d R&D <strong>cost</strong>s are not considered product <strong>cost</strong>s for fin<strong>an</strong>cial statement <strong>purposes</strong>. When<br />

might some of these <strong>cost</strong>s be regarded as product <strong>cost</strong>s? Give <strong>an</strong> example.<br />

4. Suppose that both the direct materials used <strong>an</strong>d the depreciation on pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong>an</strong>d equipment are related<br />

<strong>to</strong> the m<strong>an</strong>ufacture of 1 million units of product. Determine the unit <strong>cost</strong> for the direct materials<br />

assigned <strong>to</strong> those units <strong>an</strong>d the unit <strong>cost</strong> for depreciation on pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong>an</strong>d equipment. Assume that yearly<br />

depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis.<br />

5. Assume that the implied <strong>cost</strong>-behavior patterns in requirement 4 persist. That is, direct material <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

behave as a variable <strong>cost</strong> <strong>an</strong>d depreciation on pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong>an</strong>d equipment behaves as a fixed <strong>cost</strong>. Repeat<br />

the computations in requirement 4, assuming that the <strong>cost</strong>s are being predicted for the m<strong>an</strong>ufacture of<br />

1.5 million units of product. Determine the effect on <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>s.<br />

6. Assume that depreciation on the equipment (but not the pl<strong>an</strong>t) is computed based on the number of<br />

units produced because the equipment deteriorates with units produced. The depreciation rate on<br />

equipment is $4 per unit. Calculate the depreciation on equipment assuming (a) 1 million units of product<br />

are produced <strong>an</strong>d (b) 1.5 million units of product are produced.<br />

2-35 Overtime premium. I<strong>an</strong> Blacklaw <strong>an</strong>d Gwen Benson are sales representatives for EMI, which<br />

installs <strong>an</strong>d maintains music systems in office buildings, eleva<strong>to</strong>rs, <strong>an</strong>d other public areas. Sales representatives<br />

receive a base salary <strong>an</strong>d a bonus of 10% of the actual gross margins on the orders they sell.<br />

The direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor straight-time rate is $20 per hour, <strong>an</strong>d the overtime rate is 50% higher. In<br />

<strong>cost</strong>ing each order, indirect m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor <strong>cost</strong>s are assigned at a rate of 200% of direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

labor <strong>cost</strong> (excluding overtime premium). If overtime labor is used, whenever possible, it is charged<br />

<strong>to</strong> the rush order that caused the overtime. If overtime is caused by overall heavy production volume, not<br />

<strong>an</strong>y particular rush order, it is allocated equally <strong>to</strong> all orders being worked on.<br />

During J<strong>an</strong>uary <strong>an</strong>d February 2006, Blacklaw <strong>an</strong>d Benson sold <strong>an</strong>d delivered one system each <strong>to</strong> Westec<br />

<strong>an</strong>d Pinnacle, respectively. Each order required 2,000 direct labor hours, for a <strong>to</strong>tal of 4,000 labor hours. Of<br />

these hours, 2,000 hours were overtime hours.<br />

The following Excel spreadsheet summarizes the revenues <strong>an</strong>d the <strong>cost</strong>s other th<strong>an</strong> overtime <strong>cost</strong>s for<br />

each cus<strong>to</strong>mer under different assumptions about which cus<strong>to</strong>mer caused the rush order.<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

56<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


If you w<strong>an</strong>t <strong>to</strong> use Excel <strong>to</strong> solve this problem, go <strong>to</strong> the Excel Lab at www.prenhall.com/horngren/<br />

<strong>cost</strong>12e <strong>an</strong>d download the template for Problem 2-35.<br />

1. Calculate the gross margin on each order if only Westec was a rush order.<br />

2. Calculate the gross margin on each order if only Pinnacle was a rush order.<br />

3. Calculate the gross margin on each order if neither of the two orders were rush orders.<br />

4. Why do you think that Gary Shaw, EMI operations m<strong>an</strong>ager, is very particular about how overtime is<br />

tracked?<br />

Required<br />

2-36 Fire loss, computing inven<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>cost</strong>s. A distraught employee, F<strong>an</strong>g W. Arson, put a <strong>to</strong>rch <strong>to</strong> a m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

pl<strong>an</strong>t on a blustery February 26. The resulting blaze destroyed the pl<strong>an</strong>t <strong>an</strong>d its contents.<br />

Fortunately, certain accounting records were kept in <strong>an</strong>other building. They reveal the following for the<br />

period from J<strong>an</strong>uary 1, 2007, <strong>to</strong> February 26, 2007:<br />

Direct materials purchased $160,000<br />

Work in process, 1/1/2007 $34,000<br />

Direct materials, 1/1/2007 $16,000<br />

Finished goods, 1/1/2007 $30,000<br />

M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

40% of conversion <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

Revenues $500,000<br />

Direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor $180,000<br />

Prime <strong>cost</strong>s $294,000<br />

Gross margin percentage based on revenues 20%<br />

Cost of goods available for sale $450,000<br />

The loss is fully covered by insur<strong>an</strong>ce. The insur<strong>an</strong>ce comp<strong>an</strong>y w<strong>an</strong>ts <strong>to</strong> know the his<strong>to</strong>rical <strong>cost</strong> of the<br />

inven<strong>to</strong>ries as a basis for negotiating a settlement, although the settlement is actually <strong>to</strong> be based on<br />

replacement <strong>cost</strong>, not his<strong>to</strong>rical <strong>cost</strong>.<br />

Calculate the <strong>cost</strong> of:<br />

1. Finished goods inven<strong>to</strong>ry, 2/26/2007<br />

2. Work-in-process inven<strong>to</strong>ry, 2/26/2007<br />

3. Direct materials inven<strong>to</strong>ry, 2/26/2007<br />

Required<br />

2-37 Comprehensive problem on unit <strong>cost</strong>s, product <strong>cost</strong>s. Tampa Office Equipment m<strong>an</strong>ufactures <strong>an</strong>d<br />

sells metal shelving. It beg<strong>an</strong> operations on J<strong>an</strong>uary 1, 2007. Costs incurred for 2007 are as follows (V st<strong>an</strong>ds<br />

for variable; F st<strong>an</strong>ds for fixed):<br />

Direct materials used<br />

$140,000 V<br />

Direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing-labor <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

30,000 V<br />

Pl<strong>an</strong>t energy <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

5,000 V<br />

Indirect m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing-labor <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

10,000 V<br />

Indirect m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing-labor <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

16,000 F<br />

Other indirect m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

8,000 V<br />

Other indirect m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

24,000 F<br />

Marketing, distribution, <strong>an</strong>d cus<strong>to</strong>mer-service <strong>cost</strong>s 122,850 V<br />

Marketing, distribution, <strong>an</strong>d cus<strong>to</strong>mer-service <strong>cost</strong>s 40,000 F<br />

Administrative <strong>cost</strong>s<br />

50,000 F<br />

Variable m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s are variable with respect <strong>to</strong> units produced. Variable marketing, distribution,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d cus<strong>to</strong>mer-service <strong>cost</strong>s are variable with respect <strong>to</strong> units sold.<br />

Inven<strong>to</strong>ry data are:<br />

Beginning:<br />

Ending:<br />

J<strong>an</strong>uary 1, 2007 December 31, 2007<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Direct materials 0 lb. 2,000 lbs.<br />

Work in process 0 units 0 units<br />

Finished goods 0 units ? units<br />

Production in 2007 was 100,000 units. Two pounds of direct materials are used <strong>to</strong> make one unit of finished<br />

product.<br />

Revenues in 2007 were $436,800. The selling price per unit <strong>an</strong>d the purchase price per pound of direct<br />

materials were stable throughout the year. The comp<strong>an</strong>y’s ending inven<strong>to</strong>ry of finished goods is carried<br />

at the average unit m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing <strong>cost</strong>s for 2007. Finished-goods inven<strong>to</strong>ry at December 31, 2007, was<br />

$20,970.<br />

1. Calculate direct materials inven<strong>to</strong>ry, <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong>, December 31, 2007.<br />

2. Calculate finished-goods inven<strong>to</strong>ry, <strong>to</strong>tal units, December 31, 2007.<br />

3. Calculate selling price in 2007.<br />

4. Calculate operating income for 2007.<br />

Required<br />

An Introduction <strong>to</strong> Cost Terms <strong>an</strong>d Purposes<br />

57<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


Required<br />

2-38 Cost <strong>an</strong>alysis, litigation risk, ethics. Forever Young (FY) is a division of a large cosmetics comp<strong>an</strong>y.<br />

It formulates <strong>an</strong>d sells creams <strong>an</strong>d lotions for <strong>to</strong>ning <strong>an</strong>d tightening facial skin. FY’s scientists have<br />

developed Enh<strong>an</strong>ce, a drug that must be injected by a doc<strong>to</strong>r <strong>an</strong>d lasts for two <strong>to</strong> three months. Patients<br />

are not likely <strong>to</strong> be price-sensitive <strong>an</strong>d therefore would be willing <strong>to</strong> pay the doc<strong>to</strong>r $300 per treatment.<br />

Sam Nash, Enh<strong>an</strong>ce’s VP of marketing, has found a subcontrac<strong>to</strong>r who will produce Enh<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>to</strong> FY’s exacting<br />

st<strong>an</strong>dards for $100 per treatment. FY pl<strong>an</strong>s <strong>to</strong> mark up each dose by 20% <strong>an</strong>d sell it <strong>to</strong> physici<strong>an</strong>s for $120.<br />

Amy Keely, the CEO, feels that Enh<strong>an</strong>ce is a thoroughly researched wonder drug <strong>an</strong>d at these prices, it will be<br />

popular with doc<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>an</strong>d their patients <strong>an</strong>d will reverse the sagging division fortunes. Nash, who had previously<br />

been controller of FY, points out that the litigation risk from Enh<strong>an</strong>ce is greater th<strong>an</strong> from FY’s other products.<br />

He estimates that the potential litigation <strong>cost</strong> amounts <strong>to</strong> $110 per treatment. He suggests that they fac<strong>to</strong>r<br />

that <strong>cost</strong> in<strong>to</strong> the upcoming presentation on Enh<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>to</strong> the board of direc<strong>to</strong>rs, but Keely forbids it.<br />

1. Why might Amy Keely prevent Sam Nash from including the <strong>cost</strong> of potential litigation in the presentation<br />

of Enh<strong>an</strong>ce’s economics <strong>an</strong>d pricing?<br />

2. If FY set prices by adding 20% <strong>to</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>cost</strong> <strong>an</strong>d the litigation <strong>cost</strong> were included, how much would<br />

FY charge doc<strong>to</strong>rs for a single shot of Enh<strong>an</strong>ce? How would that affect doc<strong>to</strong>rs’ gross margins? How<br />

might this price affect the promotion of Enh<strong>an</strong>ce?<br />

3. Nash discovers that FY may be able <strong>to</strong> purchase insur<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>to</strong> reduce its own litigation risk on Enh<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />

If FY w<strong>an</strong>ts doc<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> enjoy a minimum gross margin of 40% <strong>an</strong>d FY itself has a firm 20%-markup policy,<br />

what is the maximum per treatment litigation <strong>cost</strong> it would be willing <strong>to</strong> pay?<br />

4. Keely tells Nash <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>p worrying about a “mythical litigation issue” <strong>an</strong>d get back <strong>to</strong> work on making<br />

Enh<strong>an</strong>ce a blockbuster treatment of choice. What should Nash do now?<br />

Collaborative <strong>Learning</strong> Problem<br />

2-39 Finding unknown amounts. An audi<strong>to</strong>r for the Internal Revenue Service is trying <strong>to</strong> reconstruct<br />

some partially destroyed records of two taxpayers. For each of the cases in the accomp<strong>an</strong>ying list, find the<br />

unknowns designated by the letters A through D.<br />

Case 1 Case 2<br />

(in thous<strong>an</strong>ds)<br />

Accounts receivable, 12/31 $ 6,000 $ 2,100<br />

Cost of goods sold A 20,000<br />

Accounts payable, 1/1 3,000 1,700<br />

Accounts payable, 12/31 1,800 1,500<br />

Finished goods inven<strong>to</strong>ry, 12/31 B 5,300<br />

Gross margin 11,300 C<br />

Work in process inven<strong>to</strong>ry, 1/1 0 800<br />

Work in process inven<strong>to</strong>ry, 12/31 0 3,000<br />

Finished goods inven<strong>to</strong>ry, 1/1 4,000 4,000<br />

Direct materials used 8,000 12,000<br />

Direct m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing labor 3,000 5,000<br />

M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing overhead <strong>cost</strong>s 7,000 D<br />

Purchases of direct materials 9,000 7,000<br />

Revenues 32,000 31,800<br />

Accounts receivable, 1/1 2,000 1,400<br />

Get Connected: Cost Accounting in the News<br />

Go <strong>to</strong> www.prenhall.com/horngren/<strong>cost</strong>12e for additional online exercise(s) that explore issues affecting the<br />

accounting world <strong>to</strong>day. These exercises offer you the opportunity <strong>to</strong> <strong>an</strong>alyze <strong>an</strong>d reflect on how <strong>cost</strong><br />

accounting helps m<strong>an</strong>agers <strong>to</strong> make better decisions <strong>an</strong>d h<strong>an</strong>dle the challenges of strategic pl<strong>an</strong>ning <strong>an</strong>d<br />

implementation.<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

Video Case<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

58<br />

THREE DOG BAKERY: Underst<strong>an</strong>ding Cost Terms<br />

“Going <strong>to</strong> the dogs” has been good for Mark Beckloff <strong>an</strong>d D<strong>an</strong><br />

Dye. Back in 1989, they founded the first bakery just for fourlegged<br />

c<strong>an</strong>ine friends with little more th<strong>an</strong> the desire <strong>to</strong> satisfy<br />

the finicky palate of their beloved 114-pound, deaf Great D<strong>an</strong>e,<br />

Gracie. The small venture has grown from a single s<strong>to</strong>re in<br />

down<strong>to</strong>wn K<strong>an</strong>sas City <strong>to</strong> more th<strong>an</strong> 40 locations worldwide,<br />

including Jap<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>d Korea. Their dog treats are made from<br />

wholesome ingredients such as flour, eggs, carrots, spinach,<br />

ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.


ISBN: 0-536-53243-5<br />

pe<strong>an</strong>ut butter, <strong>an</strong>d carob, <strong>an</strong>d have clever names such as<br />

Rollovers, Pup Tarts, Scottie Biscottis, <strong>an</strong>d Great D<strong>an</strong>ish. Some<br />

treats are even frosted with honey-yogurt icings <strong>an</strong>d decorated<br />

with colorful, edible flourishes. Special-occasion carrot or<br />

carob cakes c<strong>an</strong> be personalized by <strong>an</strong> in-s<strong>to</strong>re pastry chef. The<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>y regularly updates its 100+ product line <strong>to</strong> entice doglovers<br />

everywhere back <strong>to</strong> the s<strong>to</strong>res again <strong>an</strong>d again. Selling<br />

prices r<strong>an</strong>ge from a few cents for a small biscuit <strong>to</strong> more th<strong>an</strong><br />

$20 for a special-order cake.<br />

Three Dog Bakery has <strong>an</strong> 80,000-square-foot warehouse in<br />

K<strong>an</strong>sas City, containing m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing, distribution, <strong>an</strong>d corporate<br />

offices, that prepares 70% of the goods sold. Except<br />

for slow summer months, the m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing operation runs<br />

24 hours a day, 7 days a week, producing baked biscuits <strong>an</strong>d<br />

carob-dipped items that c<strong>an</strong> pack <strong>an</strong>d ship well. There is one<br />

main assembly line with stations for mixing ingredients, mech<strong>an</strong>ized<br />

cutting of shapes, extruding doughnut-shaped biscuits,<br />

placing biscuits on baking sheets, baking in ovens, cooling,<br />

carob-dipping (for selected biscuits), h<strong>an</strong>d-packing in<strong>to</strong> trays<br />

or containers, shrink-wrapping, <strong>an</strong>d boxing. Most trays hold 12<br />

specialty biscuits that are h<strong>an</strong>d-packed. A conveyer belt is<br />

used for au<strong>to</strong>mated packing of small biscuits in<strong>to</strong> 7-ounce tubs.<br />

Employees are cross-trained <strong>to</strong> perform multiple assembly-line<br />

functions <strong>an</strong>d c<strong>an</strong> work on every type of product produced at<br />

the pl<strong>an</strong>t.<br />

For the remaining 30% of finished goods, each s<strong>to</strong>re has a specially<br />

outfitted kitchen used for preparing cakes, brownies, tarts,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d other delicate or frosted items. Prepackaged mixes created<br />

back at the production facility are used <strong>to</strong> assure consistent quality<br />

across all s<strong>to</strong>res. The retail outlets also sell nonfood products<br />

such as bowls, leashes, books, mugs, <strong>an</strong>d T-shirts. Some s<strong>to</strong>res<br />

even host “yappie hours” <strong>an</strong>d in-s<strong>to</strong>re birthday parties for dog<br />

socialization. Cus<strong>to</strong>mers don’t have <strong>to</strong> visit a Three Dog Bakery <strong>to</strong><br />

enjoy the treats, however. The comp<strong>an</strong>y has a whimsical Web site<br />

at www.threedog.com that is home <strong>to</strong> the “dogalog” (well, it c<strong>an</strong>’t<br />

be called a “cat-alog,” c<strong>an</strong> it?). The site features all kinds of treats<br />

available for immediate shipping <strong>an</strong>d accounts for 10% of the comp<strong>an</strong>y’s<br />

business now. In addition <strong>to</strong> its retail <strong>an</strong>d e-commerce<br />

ch<strong>an</strong>nels, Three Dog Bakery places heavy emphasis on its<br />

exp<strong>an</strong>ding wholesale business. The products were originally<br />

offered through national chains, such as PetsMart <strong>an</strong>d Target, but<br />

are now finding success with high-end grocery s<strong>to</strong>res that have<br />

lost much of their pet business <strong>to</strong> “big box” specialty pet s<strong>to</strong>res<br />

<strong>an</strong>d w<strong>an</strong>t a higher-end quality product <strong>to</strong> offer their shoppers.<br />

Even Wal-Mart c<strong>an</strong>’t ignore the appeal of Three Dog Bakery products.<br />

Dog lovers c<strong>an</strong> find Lick ’n Crunch Cookies on the shelves<br />

there.<br />

Annual revenues exceed $20 million for this privately held<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>y. As for the pet market itself, there are more th<strong>an</strong> 60<br />

million pet dogs in the United States alone, with nearly every<br />

owner buying <strong>an</strong>ywhere from one <strong>to</strong> five packages of treats<br />

per month. Two-thirds of pet owners give their pets gifts, more<br />

th<strong>an</strong> half give Christmas presents, <strong>an</strong>d 25% give birthday gifts.<br />

Pet owners spend in excess of $20 billion each year in <strong>an</strong><br />

industry that includes <strong>an</strong>imal products, food, <strong>an</strong>d services.<br />

Owners who spend more th<strong>an</strong> $300 per year on their dogs tend<br />

<strong>to</strong> be younger, more affluent, married, <strong>an</strong>d have no children.<br />

Q U E S T I O N S<br />

1. To what <strong>cost</strong> objects could Three Dog Bakery trace its <strong>cost</strong>s?<br />

2. Classify the following <strong>cost</strong> items as direct (D) or indirect (I),<br />

<strong>an</strong>d fixed (F) or variable (V) with respect <strong>to</strong> the production<br />

department (you will have two <strong>an</strong>swers for each item—D<br />

or I; F or V):<br />

Cost Item D or I F or V<br />

a. Salary of the production department<br />

m<strong>an</strong>ager who oversees m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

b. Salaries of founders D<strong>an</strong> Dye <strong>an</strong>d<br />

Mark Beckloff<br />

c. Cardboard trays used <strong>to</strong> package sets<br />

of 12 specialty biscuits<br />

d. Salary of the Web graphics designer<br />

who prepares the online dogalog<br />

illustrations <strong>an</strong>d layout<br />

e. Annual mainten<strong>an</strong>ce service agreement<br />

for the conveyer belt<br />

f. Wages paid <strong>to</strong> assembly line workers<br />

who mix Scottie Biscotti ingredients<br />

in batches<br />

g. Utilities (water, electricity, waste) for<br />

the entire K<strong>an</strong>sas City warehouse<br />

h. Cost of flour, eggs, <strong>an</strong>d honey-yogurt<br />

icing for the Pup Tarts<br />

3. What sec<strong>to</strong>rs—m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing, merch<strong>an</strong>dising, or service—does<br />

Three Dog Bakery operate in? Why are they<br />

classified this way?<br />

4. When Wal-Mart purchases Lick ’n Crunch Cookies for sale<br />

in its s<strong>to</strong>res, is the purchase considered a period <strong>cost</strong> or <strong>an</strong><br />

inven<strong>to</strong>riable <strong>cost</strong>? Why? What <strong>cost</strong>s c<strong>an</strong> Wal-Mart<br />

include as part of the purchase <strong>cost</strong>?<br />

An Introduction <strong>to</strong> Cost Terms <strong>an</strong>d Purposes<br />

59<br />

Cost Accounting: A M<strong>an</strong>agerial Emphasis, Twelfth Edition, by Charles T. Horngren, Srik<strong>an</strong>t M. Datar, <strong>an</strong>d George Foster.<br />

Copyright © 2006 by <strong>Pearson</strong> Education, Inc. Published by Prentice Hall.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!