23.12.2014 Views

IFRS - there's nowhere to hide - Grant Thornton

IFRS - there's nowhere to hide - Grant Thornton

IFRS - there's nowhere to hide - Grant Thornton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4<br />

Volume 2. November 2005<br />

Selling a business<br />

Have you considered the tax implications<br />

Corporate law should therefore be simple, accessible and not<br />

impede the activities of the small business sec<strong>to</strong>r.<br />

Even the less sophisticated businessman should be empowered<br />

<strong>to</strong> establish a company in a fairly simple and inexpensive<br />

manner, without having <strong>to</strong> go through unnecessary red tape,<br />

onerous reporting requirements and cumbersome registration<br />

processes.<br />

These are the two objectives on which we should hang our<br />

corporate law hat. Once this is in place, it becomes easy <strong>to</strong><br />

answer the questions. Thus:<br />

Should all companies be subjected <strong>to</strong> an audit<br />

Not necessarily, but if stakeholders require an audit, they should<br />

have the option <strong>to</strong> have one done. If the public interest is at<br />

stake (that is, external stakeholders are involved), an audit is a<br />

must.<br />

Do smaller companies only need an accounting officer's<br />

report<br />

Only if an accounting officer's report adds value; if not, don't<br />

even do that. However, again, if public interest is at stake or<br />

stakeholders require assurance, an accounting officer's report<br />

will not be enough; an audit must be done.<br />

Should close corporations be abolished<br />

The question should, rather, be: Does the Close Corporations Act<br />

meet its defined objectives, or is it complicating the issue; what is the<br />

difference between a close corporation and a private company<br />

If this difference is purely arbitrary and superficial, the Close<br />

Corporation Act is an obstacle rather than an aid, and should be<br />

abolished.<br />

By Justin Liebenberg, Senior Tax Manager, Johannesburg<br />

The radical changes in tax legislation over the past couple of years<br />

have had an impact on traditionally straightforward business<br />

transactions. In the past you could have sold a business with<br />

relatively minor tax consequences but <strong>to</strong>day, by ignoring the impact<br />

of Capital Gains Tax (CGT) and amendments <strong>to</strong> the Secondary Tax<br />

on Companies (STC) the effect of legislation on these transactions<br />

can be costly.<br />

In this article we highlight some of the pitfalls when selling your<br />

business, focusing specifically on the different tax consequences<br />

between selling the shares in a company and selling the business<br />

of a company.<br />

The use of a case study will best demonstrate the issues. For<br />

this purpose, assume the following facts:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

you own shares in the company, which were valued at<br />

R10m on 1 Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2001 (the commencement date of<br />

CGT)<br />

the purchaser is willing <strong>to</strong> pay a purchase<br />

price of R20m<br />

the net asset value of the business is<br />

R5m at 1 Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2001<br />

the net asset value at date of sale is<br />

unchanged at R5m<br />

the goodwill at 1 Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2001 is<br />

valued at R5m<br />

(R10m - R5m)<br />

the goodwill at the date of<br />

sale is R15m (R20m - R5m)<br />

Must every company comply with International Financial<br />

Reporting Standards (<strong>IFRS</strong>) including small companies<br />

Yes if it enhances the credibility of our market. But no for<br />

small companies that do not operate at a higher, public interest<br />

level where <strong>IFRS</strong> is an operational obstacle.<br />

Ultimately, public interest should dictate. In this context, the<br />

notion of a public interest company is important.<br />

Public interest companies should be subjected <strong>to</strong> the highest<br />

standards, including accounting, auditing and corporate<br />

governance, reporting requirements and other checks and<br />

balances.<br />

The challenge however, is <strong>to</strong> accurately set the parameters so<br />

that the appropriate companies with external public interest are<br />

included in this definition.<br />

Justin Liebenberg

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!