May - High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
May - High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
May - High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2All] Sanjay Kumar Singh V. St<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> U.P. and another 57<br />
Castes and Scheduled Tribes are dealt with<br />
under Article 341. It has been observed by<br />
Hon’ble Supreme <strong>Court</strong>,” wh<strong>at</strong> is important to<br />
notice is th<strong>at</strong> the castes or tribes have to be<br />
specified in rel<strong>at</strong>ion to a given st<strong>at</strong>e or Union<br />
Territory. Th<strong>at</strong> means a given caste or tribe<br />
can be a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled<br />
Tribe in rel<strong>at</strong>ion to the St<strong>at</strong>e or Union<br />
Territory for which it is specified”. After th<strong>at</strong><br />
the Hon’ble Supreme <strong>Court</strong> has gone on to<br />
consider the relevant provisions with which<br />
the grievances rel<strong>at</strong>ed to in the petition before<br />
the apex court. In para-4 <strong>of</strong> the judgement, the<br />
circulars which were issued by the<br />
Maharashtra Government have been dealt<br />
with. Applicability <strong>of</strong> the Government orders<br />
issued by Maharashtra Government were<br />
found not to be <strong>at</strong>tracted to the migrants who<br />
came to settle in Maharashtra after 1950.<br />
Admittedly, the challenge before the apex<br />
court in the aforesaid case or the Action<br />
Committee (Supra) was to the aforesaid<br />
Government orders by such persons who<br />
claimed to be migrants <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra after<br />
the constitution came into being. On the<br />
aforesaid factual background, after referring<br />
to the aforesaid decision in M. Chandra’s<br />
case, which was a constitution bench decision<br />
their Lordships hold as under;<br />
“We may add th<strong>at</strong> consider<strong>at</strong>ions for<br />
specifying a particular caste or tribe or class<br />
for inclusion in the list <strong>of</strong> Scheduled<br />
Castes/Schedule Tribes or backward classes in<br />
a given St<strong>at</strong>e would depend on the n<strong>at</strong>ure and<br />
extent <strong>of</strong> disadvantages and social hardships<br />
suffered by th<strong>at</strong> caste, tribe or class in th<strong>at</strong><br />
St<strong>at</strong>e which may be totally non est in another<br />
St<strong>at</strong>e to which persons belonging there to may<br />
migr<strong>at</strong>e. Coincidentally in may be th<strong>at</strong> a caste<br />
or tribe bearing the same nomencl<strong>at</strong>ure is<br />
specified in two St<strong>at</strong>es but the consider<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
on the basis <strong>of</strong> which they have been specified<br />
may be totally different. So also the degree <strong>of</strong><br />
disadvantages <strong>of</strong> various elements which<br />
constitute the input for specific<strong>at</strong>ion may also<br />
be totally different. Therefore, merely because<br />
a given caste is specified in St<strong>at</strong>e a as a<br />
Scheduled Caste does not a necessarily mean<br />
th<strong>at</strong> if there be another caste bearing the same<br />
nomencl<strong>at</strong>ure in another St<strong>at</strong>e the person<br />
belonging to the former would be entitled to<br />
the rights, privileges and benefits admissible<br />
to a member <strong>of</strong> the Scheduled Caste <strong>of</strong> the<br />
l<strong>at</strong>ter St<strong>at</strong>e” for the purpose <strong>of</strong> this<br />
constitution”. This is an aspect which has to<br />
be kept in mind and which was very much in<br />
the minds <strong>of</strong> the constitution makers as is<br />
evident from the choice <strong>of</strong> language <strong>of</strong><br />
Articles 341 and 342 <strong>of</strong> the Constitution.”<br />
15. In the concluding paragraph, their<br />
Lordships in the apex court made a distinction<br />
with regard to certain classes <strong>of</strong> candid<strong>at</strong>e<br />
th<strong>at</strong>,” All these decisions were considered by<br />
the Constitution Bench which agreed with the<br />
l<strong>at</strong>ter view. It upheld the view expressed in<br />
the communic<strong>at</strong>ion d<strong>at</strong>ed 22.2.1985 and<br />
neg<strong>at</strong>ived the challenge <strong>of</strong> the petitioner th<strong>at</strong><br />
the said view was ultra wires Articles<br />
14,15,16 or 21 .it, however, observed th<strong>at</strong> in<br />
the facts and circumstances <strong>of</strong> the case and<br />
having regard to the fact th<strong>at</strong> the petitioner<br />
student’s career was involved it directed the<br />
authorities to consider whether the petitioner<br />
was a Goudi’ and if yes, the institution may<br />
consider if he can be allowed to complete his<br />
studies in the institution. However, on the<br />
Constitution this court was clear in its view<br />
th<strong>at</strong> legally speaking he was not entitled to<br />
admission in the Scheduled Tribe quota”.<br />
16. As st<strong>at</strong>ed above, the petitioner’s<br />
consistent plea in this writ petition th<strong>at</strong><br />
migr<strong>at</strong>ion had taken place before the<br />
constitution was enforced and consequently<br />
the castes certific<strong>at</strong>e was applied for by the<br />
petitioner from the Nagaland Government<br />
which was duly issued. Once, this was so<br />
done, he applied for a certific<strong>at</strong>e under<br />
Section 9 <strong>of</strong> the aforesaid Act. The certific<strong>at</strong>e<br />
having been granted by the St<strong>at</strong>e Government<br />
to the effect th<strong>at</strong> the petitioner was a<br />
Scheduled Tribe candid<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Nagaland, it<br />
was permissible for the petitioner to apply for