26.12.2014 Views

ACP 137

ACP 137

ACP 137

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

UNCLASSIFIED<br />

<strong>ACP</strong> <strong>137</strong><br />

417. Nations will normally only pass changes since the last update in the data file. To<br />

assure synchronization of the replicated DIT structure with the mastering nation, nations<br />

should send a complete refresh (full national DIT structure excluding high level DIT) to the<br />

replicating partners on an agreed schedule (see paragraph 462).<br />

418. SHA-1 shall be used for the data file hash. SHA-1 produces a 20-octet message<br />

digest from a source, in this case the data file. This digest will be relayed to the replication<br />

peer as a text-based representation of the hexadecimal digest value (i.e. 40 ASCII characters<br />

that represent digits 0 - 9 and characters A – F).<br />

DATA CONFIDENTIALITY<br />

419. The underlying network on which the email and military message is being transported<br />

will supply confidentiality of replicated data. There is no requirement for encryption beyond<br />

the underlying network.<br />

DATA ACCESS CONTROL<br />

420. It is assumed that all shared national DIT entries would be for unrestricted read<br />

access. Thus, there is no need for nations to include access control information in the data<br />

files.<br />

421. Receiving nations must ensure that users cannot modify the replicated DIT structure.<br />

How a nation protects replicated DIT entries from unauthorized modification is a national<br />

matter and outside the scope of this document.<br />

RECEIVED DATA CONTENT INTEGRITY<br />

422. As well as the presence of a hash checksum to ensure that the information has<br />

traversed the network without inadvertent changes, nations must ensure that the data file<br />

received contains valid information from the sending nation. Checking could include:<br />

a. Validation that the file does not contain entries associated with another nation’s<br />

DIT structure (e.g. UK entries in a US LDIF file). This may be achieved by checking<br />

the distinguished names (DNs) of all the entries in the LDIF file to verify correct<br />

placement of those entries in the sending nation’s DIT.<br />

b. Validation that the country code of the sending nation is contained within the<br />

RHS of all email addresses within the LDIF files they are receiving. It is unlikely<br />

that a similar check is required for X.400 addresses although this will depend on the<br />

messaging architecture.<br />

4-5<br />

UNCLASSIFIED<br />

Original

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!