Introduction to and Andy Ruina and Rudra Pratap

Introduction to
STATICS
and
DYNAMICS
Andy Ruina and Rudra Pratap
c Rudra Pratap and Andy Ruina, 1994-2008. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a
retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without
prior written permission of the authors.
This book is a pre-release version of a book in progress for Oxford University Press.
Acknowledgements. The following are amongst those who have helped with this book as editors, artists, tex programmers,
advisors, critics or suggestors and creators of content: William Adams, Alexa Barnes, Joseph Burns, Jason Cortell,
Gabor Domokos, Max Donelan, Thu Dong, Gail Fish, Mike Fox, John Gibson, Robert Ghrist, Saptarsi Haldar, Dave Heimstra,
Theresa Howley, Herbert Hui, Michael Marder, Elaina McCartney, Horst Nowacki, Kalpana Pratap, Richard Rand,
Dane Quinn, C.V. Radakrishnan, Phoebus Rosakis, Les Schaeffer, Ishan Sharma, David Shipman, Jill Startzell, Saskya van
Nouhuys, Tian Tang, Kim Turner and Bill Zobrist. We certify Arthur Ogawa, Ivan Dobrianov, and Stephen Hicks as TeX
geniuses. Mike Coleman worked extensively on the text, wrote many of the examples and homework problems and made
many figures. David Ho, R. Manjula and Abhay drew or improved most of the drawings. Credit for some of the homework
problems retrieved from Cornell archives is due to various Theoretical and Applied Mechanics faculty. Harry Soodak and
Martin Tiersten provided some problems from their incomplete book. Our on-again off-again editor Peter Gordon has been
supportive throughout. Many other friends, colleagues, relatives, students, and anonymous reviewers have also made helpful
suggestions.
Software we have used to prepare this book includes TEXshop (for L A TEX), Adobe Illustrator, GraphicsConverter and MAT-
LAB.

Brief Contents
Front tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
Brief Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Detailed Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Part I: Basics for Mechanics 22
1 What is mechanics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2 Vectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
3 FBDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
Part II: Statics 178
4 Statics of one object . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178
5 Trusses and frames . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246
6 Transmissions and mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308
7 Hydrostatics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360
8 Tension, shear and bending moment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376
Part III: Dynamics 396
9 Dynamics in 1D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 396
10 Particles in space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 514
11 Many particles in space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 562
12 Straight line motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 588
13 Circular motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 626
14 Planar motion of an object . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 734
15 Kinematics using time-varying basis vectors . . . . . . . . . . . . 820
16 Constrained particles and rigid objects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888
Appendices 956
A Units & Center of mass theorems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 956
Answers to some homework problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 976
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984
Back tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 989
1

Detailed Contents
Front tables
i
Summary of mechanics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
Some basic definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii
Brief Contents 1
Detailed Contents 2
Preface 10
General issues about content, level, organization and style, motivation,
how to study and the use of computers.
0.1 To the student (please read) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
0.2 A note on computation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Box: Informal computer commands . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Part I: Basics for Mechanics 22
1 What is mechanics 22
Mechanics can predict forces and motions by using the three pillars of the
subject: I. models of physical behavior, II. geometry, and III. the basic
mechanics balance laws. The laws of mechanics are informally summarized
in this introductory chapter. The extreme accuracy of Newtonian
mechanics is emphasized, despite relativity and quantum mechanics supposedly
having ‘overthrown’ seventeenth century physics. Various uses
of the word ‘model’ are described.
1.1 The three pillars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
1.2 Mechanics is wrong, why study it . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
1.3 The heirarchy of models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
2 Vectors 36
The key vectors for statics, namely relative position, force, and moment,
are used to motivate needed vector skills. Notational clarity is emphasized
because correct calculation is impossible without distinguishing
vectors from scalars. Vector addition is motivated by the need to add
forces and relative positions, dot products are motivated as the tool which
reduces vector equations to scalar equations, and cross products are motivated
as the formula which correctly calculates the heuristically motivated
quantities of moment and moment about an axis.
2

Chapter 0. Detailed Contents Detailed Contents 3
2.1 Notation and addition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Box 2.1 The scalars in mechanics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Box 2.2 The Vectors in Mechanics . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
2.2 The dot product of two vectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Box 2.3 ab cos ) a x b x C a y b y C a z b z . . . . . . . 61
2.3 Cross product and moment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Box 2.4 Cross product as a matrix multiply . . . . . . . . . 75
Box 2.5 The cross product is distributive over sums . . . . 76
2.4 Solving vector equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
Box 2.6 Vector triangles and the laws of sines and cosines . 88
Box 2.7 Existence, uniqueness, and geometry . . . . . . . 100
2.5 Equivalent force systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Box 2.8 means add . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
Box 2.9 Equivalent at one point ) equivalent at all points 108
Box 2.10 A “wrench” can represent any force system . . . 109
2.6 Center of mass and gravity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
Box 2.11 Like , the symbol also means add . . . . . . 115
Box 2.12 Each subsystem is like a particle . . . . . . . . . 119
Box 2.13 The COM of a triangle is at h=3 . . . . . . . . . 123
Problems for Chapter 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
3 FBDs 140
A free-body diagram is a sketch of the system to which you will apply the
laws of mechanics, and all the non-negligible external forces and couples
which act on it. The diagram indicates what material is in the system. The
diagram shows what is, and what is not, known about the forces. Generally
there is a force or moment component associated with any connection
that causes or prevents a motion. Conversely, there is no force or moment
component associated with motions that are freely allowed. Mechanics
reasoning entirely rests on free body diagrams. Many student errors in
problem solving are due to problems with their free body diagrams, so
we give tips about how to avoid various common free-body diagram mistakes.
3.1 Interactions, forces & partial FBDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
Vector notation for FBDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
Box 3.1 Free body diagram first, mechanics reasoning after 152
Box 3.2 Action and reaction on partial FBD’s . . . . . . . 154
3.2 Contact: Sliding, friction, and rolling . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
Box 3.3 A problem with the concept of static friction . . . . 165
Box 3.4 A critique of Coulomb friction . . . . . . . . . . . 170
Problems for Chapter 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174
Part II: Statics 178
4 Statics of one object 178
Equilibrium of one object is defined by the balance of forces and moments.
Force balance tells all for a particle. For an extended body mo-

4 Chapter 0. Detailed Contents Detailed Contents
ment balance is also used. There are special shortcuts for bodies with
exactly two or exactly three forces acting. If friction forces are relevant
the possibility of motion needs to be taken into account. Many real-world
problems are not statically determinate and thus only yield partial solutions,
or full solutions with extra assumptions.
4.1 Static equilibrium of a particle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180
Box 4.1 Existence and uniqueness . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184
Box 4.2 The simplification of dynamics to statics . . . . . . 186
4.2 Equilibrium of one object . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192
Box 4.3 Two-force bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
Box 4.4 Three-force bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198
Box 4.5 Moment balance about 3 points is sufficient in 2D . 199
4.3 Equilibrium with frictional contact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
Box 4.6 Wheels and two force bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . 208
4.4 Internal forces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
4.5 3D statics of one part . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224
Problems for Chapter 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233
5 Trusses and frames 246
Here we consider collections of parts assembled so as to hold something
up or hold something in place. Emphasis is on trusses, assemblies of
bars connected by pins at their ends. Trusses are analyzed by drawing
free body diagrams of the pins or of bigger parts of the truss (method
of sections). Frameworks built with other than two-force bodies are also
analyzed by drawing free body diagrams of parts. Structures can be rigid
or not and redundant or not, as can be determined by the collection of
equilibrium equations.
5.1 Method of joints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248
5.2 The method of sections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260
5.3 Solving trusses on a computer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267
5.4 Frames . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 277
Box 5.1 The ‘method of bars and pins’ for trusses . . . . . 280
5.5 3D trusses and advanced truss concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . 287
Box 5.2 Stuctural rigidity and geometric congruence . . . 293
Box 5.3 Rigidity, redundancy, linear algebra and maps . . 294
Problems for Chapter 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302
6 Transmissions and mechanisms 308
Some collections of solid parts are assembled so as to cause force or
torque in one place given a different force or torque in another. These
include levers, gear boxes, presses, pliers, clippers, chain drives, and
crank-drives. Besides solid parts connected by pins, a few specialpurpose
parts are commonly used, including springs and gears. Tricks
for amplifying force are usually based on principals idealized by pulleys,
levers, wedges and toggles. Force-analysis of transmissions and
mechanisms is done by drawing free body diagrams of the parts, writing
equilibrium equations for these, and solving the equations for desired
unknowns.

Chapter 0. Detailed Contents Detailed Contents 5
6.1 Springs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310
Box 6.1 ‘Zero-length’ springs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311
Box 6.2 A puzzle with two springs and three ropes. . . . . . 318
Box 6.3 How stiff a spring is a solid rod . . . . . . . . . . 319
Box 6.4 Stiffer but weaker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319
Box 6.5 2D geometry of spring stretch . . . . . . . . . . . 321
6.2 Force amplification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330
6.3 Mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340
Box 6.6 Shears with gears . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 344
Problems for Chapter 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351
7 Hydrostatics 360
Hydrostatics concerns the equivalent force and moment due to distributed
pressure on a surface from a still fluid. Pressure increases with depth.
With constant pressure the equivalent force has magnitude = pressure
times area, acting at the centroid. For linearly-varying pressure on a
rectangular plate the equivalent force is the average pressure times the
area acting 2/3 of the way down. The net force acting on a totally submerged
object in a constant density fluid is the displace weight acting at
the centroid.
7.1 Fluid pressure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361
Box 7.1 Adding forces to derive Archimedes’ principle . . . 364
Box 7.2 Pressure depends on position but not on orientation 365
Problems for Chapter 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373
8 Tension, shear and bending moment 376
The ‘internal forces’ tension, shear and bending moment can vary from
point to point in long narrow objects. Here we introduce the notion of
graphing this variation and noting the features of these graphs.
8.1 Arbitrary cuts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377
Problems for Chapter 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 393
Part III: Dynamics 396
9 Dynamics in 1D 396
The scalar equation F D ma introduces the concepts of motion and time
derivatives to mechanics. In particular the equations of dynamics are
seen to reduce to ordinary differential equations, the simplest of which
have memorable analytic solutions. The harder differential equations
need be solved on a computer. We explore various concepts and applications
involving momentum, power, work, kinetic and potential energies,
oscillations, collisions and multi-particle systems.
9.1 Force and motion in 1D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 398
Box 9.1 What do the terms in F D ma mean . . . . . . . 403
Box 9.2 Solutions of the simplest ODEs . . . . . . . . . . . 408
Box 9.3 D’Alembert’s mechanics: beginners beware . . . . 411
9.2 Energy methods in 1D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 418

6 Chapter 0. Detailed Contents Detailed Contents
Box 9.4 Particle models for the energetics of locomotion . . 429
9.3 Vibrations: mass, spring and dashpot . . . . . . . . . . . . . 436
Box 9.5 A cos.t/ C B sin.t/ D R cos.t / . . . . . 441
Box 9.6 Solution of the damped-oscillator equations . . . . 447
9.4 Coupled motions in 1D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 461
Box 9.7 Normal modes: the math and the recipe . . . . . . 468
9.5 Collisions in 1D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 476
Box 9.8 When equal rods collide the vibrations disappear . 481
9.6 Advanced: forcing & resonance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 485
Box 9.9 A Loudspeaker cone is a forced oscillator. . . . . . 490
Box 9.10 Solution of the forced oscillator equation . . . . . 492
Box 9.11 The vocabulary of forced oscillations . . . . . . . 493
Problems for Chapter 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 501
10 Particles in space 514
This chapter is about the vector equation F
* D m * a for one particle.
Concepts and applications include ballistics and planetary motion. The
differential equations of motion are set-up in cartesian coordinates and
integrated either numerically, or for special simple cases, by hand. Constraints,
forces from ropes, rods, chains floors, rails and guides that can
only be found once one knows the acceleration, are not considered.
Box 10.1 Newton’s laws in Newtonian reference frames . . 516
10.1 Dynamics of a particle in space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 517
Box 10.2 The derivative of a vector depends on frame . . . 524
10.2 Momentum and energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 533
Box 10.3 Conservative forces and non-conservative forces 539
Box 10.4 Particle theorems for momenta and energy . . . . 541
10.3 Central-force motion and celestial mechanics . . . . . . . . . 545
Problems for Chapter 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 555
11 Many particles in space 562
This more advanced chapter concerns the motion of two or more particles
in space. We will use * F D m * a for each particle. We will use Cartesian
coordinates only. The start is the set up of “two-body” type problems
which are easily generalized to 3 or more particles. The first section concerns
smooth motions due to forces from gravity, springs, smoothly applied
forces and friction. The second section concerns the sudden change
in velocities when impulsive forces are applied.
11.1 Coupled particle motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 564
11.2 particle collisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 572
Box 11.1 Effective mass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 574
Box 11.2 Energetics of collisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 575
Box 11.3 Coefficient of generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 578
Box 11.4 A particle collision model of running . . . . . . . 579
Problems for Chapter 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 584
12 Straight line motion 588

Chapter 0. Detailed Contents Detailed Contents 7
Here is an introduction to kinematic constraint in its simplest context,
systems that are constrained to move without rotation in a straight line.
In one dimension pulley problems provide the main example. Two and
three dimensional problems are covered, such as finding structural support
forces in accelerating vehicles and the slowing or incipient capsize
of a braking car or bicycle. Angular momentum balance is introduced as
a needed tool but without the complexities of rotatioinal kinematics.
12.1 1D motion and pulleys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 590
12.2 1D motion w/ 2D & 3D forces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 601
Box 12.1 Calculation of * H =C
and P *
H=C . . . . . . . . . . . 603
Problems for Chapter 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 614
13 Circular motion 626
After movement on straight-lines the second important special case of
motion is rotation on a circular path. Polar coordinates and base vectors
are introduced in this simplest possible context. The key new idea is that
not just coordinates, but base vectors, can change with time. The primary
applications are pendulums, gear trains, and rotationally accelerating
motors or brakes.
13.1 Circular motion kinematics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 628
Box 13.1 The motion quantities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 632
13.2 Dynamics of particle circular motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . 639
Box 13.2 Other derivations of the pendulum equation . . . 643
13.3 2D rigid-object rotation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 650
Box 13.3 Rotation is uniquely defined for a rigid object (2D) 651
13.4 2D rigid-object angular velocity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 658
Box 13.4 The fixed Newtonian reference frame F . . . . . 659
Box 13.5 Plato on spinning in circles as motion (or not) . . 660
Box 13.6 Acceleration of a point, using * ! . . . . . . . . . 661
Box 13.7 Angular velocity * ! and the rotation matrix ŒR . 664
13.5 Polar moment of inertia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 670
Box 13.9 Some examples of 2-D Moment of Inertia . . . . 674
Box 13.8 The perpendicular and parallel axis theorems . . 676
13.6 Dynamics of rigid-object planar circular motion . . . . . . . 681
Box 13.10 Angular momentum and power . . . . . . . . . 685
Problems for Chapter 13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 712
14 Planar motion of an object 734
The main goal here is to generate equations of motion for general planar
motion of a (planar) rigid object that may roll, slide or be in free flight.
Multi-object systems are also considered so long as they do not involve
other kinematic constraints between the bodies. Features of the solution
that can be obtained from analysis are discussed, as are numerical solutions.
14.1 Rigid object kinematics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 736
14.2 Mechanics of a rigid-object . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 752
Box 14.1 2-D mechanics makes sense in a 3-D world . . . 758
Box 14.2 The center-of-mass theorems for 2-D rigid bodies 759

8 Chapter 0. Detailed Contents Detailed Contents
Box 14.3 The work of a moving force and of a couple . . . 760
Box 14.4 The vector triple product * A ¢ . * B ¢ * C / . . . . . 761
14.3 Kinematics of rolling and sliding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 767
Box 14.5 The Sturmey-Archer hub . . . . . . . . . . . . . 770
14.4 Mechanics of contact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 780
14.5 Collisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 798
15 Kinematics using time-varying basis vectors 820
Here is a second take on the kinematics of particle motion but now using
base vectors which change with time. The discussion of polar coordinates
started in Chapter 13 is completed here. Path coordinates, where one
base vector is parellel to the velocity and the others orthogonal to that,
are introduced. The challenging topic of kinematics of relative motion
is in two stages: first using rotating base vectors connected to a moving
rigid object and then using the more abstract notation associated with
frame-dependent differentiation and the famous “five term acceleration
formula.”
15.1 Polar coordinates and path coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . 821
15.2 Rotating frames and their base vectors . . . . . . . . . . . . 836
Box 15.1 The P * Q formula . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845
15.3 General formulas for * v and * a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850
Box 15.2 Moving frames and polar coordinates . . . . . . 856
15.4 Kinematics of 2-D mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 862
15.5 Advanced kinematics of planar motion . . . . . . . . . . . . 875
Box 15.3 Skates, wheels and non-holonomic constraints . . 877
16 Constrained particles and rigid objects 888
The dynamics of particles and rigid bodies is studied using the relativemotion
kinematics ideas from chapter 15. This is the capstone chapter
for a two-dimensional dynamics course. After this chapter a good student
should be able to navigate through and use most of the skills in the
concept map inside the back cover.
16.1 Mechanics of a constrained particle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 890
Box 16.1 Some brachistochrone curiosities . . . . . . . . . 896
16.2 One-degree-of-freedom 2-D mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . 912
Box 16.2 Ideal constraints and workless constraints . . . . 913
Box 16.3 1 DOF systems oscillate at E P minima . . . . . . 918
16.3 Multi-degree-of-freedom 2-D mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . 926
Appendices 956
A Units & Center of mass theorems 956
Some things that are important, but don’t fit in the flow of a homeworkdriven
course.
First, issues related to units and dimensions, most importantly that a
quantity is the product of a number and a unit. Thus units are part of a
calculation. Some simple advice follows: a) balance units, b) carry units
and c) check units. Rules for changing units also follow.

Chapter 0. Detailed Contents Detailed Contents 9
Second, the center of mass allows simplifications for expressions for
momentum, angular momentum, and kinetic energy. Furthermore, the
energy equations for systems of particles provide foreshadowing for the
first law of thermodynamics.
A.1 Units and dimensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 957
Box A.1 Examples of advised and ill-advised use of units . 963
Box A.2 Improvement to the old handbook approach . . . . 964
Box A.3 Force, Weight and English Units . . . . . . . . . . 966
A.2 Theorems for Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967
Box A.4 Velocity and acceleration of the center-of-mass . . 967
Box A.5 Simplifying H * =C
using the center of mass . . . . . 970
*
Box A.6 Relation between d H
dt =C
and H * =C
. . . . . . . . . 972
Box A.7 Using H * *
=O
and P H=O to find H * *
=C
and P H=C . . . . . 973
Box A.8 System momentum balance from * F D m * a . . . . . 974
Box A.9 Rigid-object simplifications . . . . . . . . . . . . 975
Answers to some homework problems 976
Index 984
Back tables 989
Momenta and energy formulas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 989
* v and
* a by various methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 990
Moment of inertia: general facts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 991
Moment of inertia: example objects . . . . . . . . . . . . . 992
Concept map for Dynamics problems . . . . . . . . . . . . 993

10 Chapter 0. Preface Preface
Preface
General issues about content, level, organization and style, motivation, how
to study and the use of computers.
This is an engineering statics and dynamics text intended as both an introduction
and as a reference. It is aimed primarily at middle-level engineering
students. The book emphasizes use of vectors, free-body diagrams, momentum
and energy balance and computation. Intuitive approaches are discussed
throughout.
Prerequisite and co-requisite skills.
some skills.
We assume some students start with
Freshman calcululus. Readers are assumed to have facility with the
basic geometry, algebra, trigonometry, differentiation and integration
used in elementary calculus. Some of these topics are briefly reviewed
in this book, but not as ab initio tutorials.
This books shows how to set-up algebraic and differential equations for computer
solution using a pseudo-language easily translated into any common
computer language or package.
We assume the student knows or is learning a computer language or
package in which they can solve sets of linear algebraic equations,
make plots and numerically integrate simple ordinary differential equations.
Many students will have had exposure to other useful subjects detailed foreknowledge
of which this book does not assume.
Completion of freshman physics may help but is not needed.
Vector topics, especially dot and cross products, are introduced here
from scratch in the context of mechanics.
A background in linear algebra wouldn’t hurt, but the reduction of linear
equations to matrix form is taught here. A key fact from linear
algebra, also presented here, is that linear algebraic equations are generally
amenable to simple computer solution.
A course in differential equations would also add context. But the basic
concepts of differential equations are presented here as needed.

Chapter 0. Preface Preface 11
Organization
Mechanics could be subdivided into statics vs dynamics, particle vs rigid object
vs many objects (‘multi-object’), and 1 vs 2 vs 3 spatial dimensions (1D,
2D & 3D). Thus a mechanics table of contents might have one chunk of text
for each of the 2 ¢ 3 ¢ 3 D 18 combinations:
I. Statics
II. Dynamics
A. particle
£ 1D, 2D, 3D
B. rigid object
£ 1D, 2D, 3D
C. many objects
£ 1D, 2D, 3D
A. particle
£ 1D, 2D, 3D
B. rigid object
£ 1D, 2D, 3D
C. many objects
£ 1D, 2D, 3D
However, these 2 ¢ 3 ¢ 3 D 18 chunks vary greatly in difficulty; 1D statics
is low-level high school material and 3D multi-object dynamics is difficult
graduate material. Further, the chunks use various overlapping concepts and
skills. So it is not sensible to organize a book into 18 corresponding chapters.
Nonetheless, some vestiges of the scheme above are used in all books, and
the general flow of this book is from the bottom back left corner of the box in
the figure, towards the diagonal opposite. The details of the organization, as
visible in the annotated table of contents on the previous pages, has evolved
through trial and error, review and revision, and many semesters of student
testing.
The first eight chapters cover the basics of statics and the rest of the book
covers the basics of engineering dynamics. Relatively harder topics, which
might be skipped in quicker or less-advanced courses, are identifiable by
chapter, section or subsection titles like “three-dimensional” or “advanced”.
many
bodies
one
body
particle
static
dynamic
complexity
of objects
1D
how much
inertia
2D
number of
spatial
dimensions
3D
Coverage for courses. The sections have been divided so that the homework
problems selected from one section are usually about half of a typical
weekly homework assignment. The theory and examples from one section
might be adequately covered in about one lecture, plus or minus.
A leisurely one semester statics course, or a more fast-paced halfsemester
prelude to strength of materials should use chapters 1-8, excluding
topics of less interest. A typical one semester dynamics course will cover
most of of chapters 9-16, reviewing chapters 1-3 at the start. A lower-level
one-semester statics and dynamics course can cover the less advanced parts
of chapters 1-6 and 9-14. An advanced full-year statics and dynamics course
could cover most of the book. That is, the statics portion of the book fits
easily in a semester and the whole of the dynamics portion in a bit more than
a semester. Chapters 15-16 can also be used as a start for a second advanced
dynamics course. A student who has learned the statics part of this book is
well-prepared for using statics in engineering practice, for learning Strength
of Materials and for going on to Dynamics. A student who has learned the
dynamics portion is well prepared to go on to learn Vibrations, Systems Dy-

12 Chapter 0. Preface Preface
namics or more advanced Multi-object Dynamics.
Organization and formatting
Each subject is covered in various ways.
Every section starts with descriptive text and short examples motivating
and describing the theory;
More detailed explanations of the theory are in boxes interspersed in
the text. For example, one box explains the common derivation of angular
momentum balance from * F D m * a (page 974), one explains the
genius of the wheel (page 208), and another connects * ! based kinematics
to Oe r and Oe based kinematics (page 856);
Sample problems (marked with a gray border) at the end of each section
show how to do homework-like calculations. These set an example
by their consistent use of free-body diagrams, systematic application
of basic principles, vector notation, units, and checks against both intuition
and special cases;
Homework problems at the end of each chapter give students a chance
to practice mechanics calculations. The first problems for each section
build a student’s confidence with the basic ideas. The problems are
ranked in approximate order of difficulty, with theoretical problems
coming later. Problems marked with a * have an answer at the back
of the book;
Reference tables on the inside covers and end pages concisely summarize
much of the content in the book. These tables can save students
the time of hunting for formulas and definitions.
Notation
Clear vector notation helps students do problems. One common class of
student errors comes from copying a textbook’s printed bold vector F the
same way as a plain-text scalar F . We reduce this error by use a redundant
vector notation, a bold and harpooned F * .
As for all authors and teachers concerned with motion in two and three
dimensions we have struggled with the tradeoffs between a precise notation
and a simple notation. Perfectly precise notations are complex and intimidating.
Simple notations are ambiguous and hide key information. Our attempt
at clarity without too-much clutter is summarized in the box on page 40.
1 For example, we use angular
momentum balance (appropriately
expressed) with respect to any possiblyaccelerating
point, not just points
selected from an arcane list.
Relation to other mechanics books
The bulk of the content of this book can be found in other places including
freshman physics texts, other engineering texts, and hundreds of classics.
Nonetheless this book is in some ways different in organization and approach.
It also uses some important but not well-enough known concepts 1 .
Mastery of freshman physics (e.g., from Halliday, Resnick & Walker, Tipler,

Chapter 0. Preface Preface 13
or Serway) would encompass some of this book’s contents. However, after
freshman physics students often have only a vague notion of what mechanics
is, and how it can be used. For example many students leave freshman
physics with the sense that a free-body diagram (or ‘force diagram’) is a
vague conceptual picture with arrows for various forces and motions drawn
on it this way and that. Even the freshman-text illustrations sometimes do not
make clear which force is acting on which object. Also, because freshman
physics tends to avoid use of college math, many students leave freshman
physics with little sense of how to use vectors or calculus to solve mechanics
problems. This book aims to lead students who may start with these fuzzy
freshman-physics notions into a world of precise, yet still intuitive, mechanics.
Various statics and dynamics textbooks cover much of the same material
as this one. These textbooks have modern applications, ample samples, lots
of pictures, and lots of homework problems. Many are excellent in some
ways. Most of today’s engineering professors learned from one of these
books. Nonetheless we wrote this book hoping to do still better. Some of
our goals include
showing the unity of the subject,
presenting a complete description of the subject,
clear notation in figures and equations,
integration of the applicability of computers,
consistent use of units throughout,
introduction of various insights into how things work,
a friendly writing style.
Between about 1689 and 1960 hundreds of books were written with titles
like Statics, Engineering mechanics, Dynamics, Machines, Mechanisms,
Kinematics, or Elementary physics. Many thoughtfully cover most of the
material here and sometimes much more. But none are good modern textbooks;
they lack an appropriate pace, style and organization; they are too
reliant on geometry skills and not enough on vectors and numerics; and they
don’t have enough modern applications, samples calculations, illustrations,
or homework problems. But much good mechanics can be found only in
these older books 2 . If you love mechanics you will enjoy pondering ideas
in some of these books.
What do you think
We have tried to make it as easy as possible for you to learn basic mechanics
from this book. We present truth as we know it and as we think it is effectively
communicated. Nonetheless we have surely made some technical and
strategic errors. Please let us know your thoughts so that we can improve
future editions.
Rudra Pratap, pratap@mecheng.iisc.ernet.in
Andy Ruina,
ruina@cornell.edu
2 Here are three good and universally
respected classics:
J.P. Den Hartog’s Mechanics originally
published in 1948 but still
available as an inexpensive reprint (well
written and insightful);
J.L. Synge and B.A. Griffith, Principles
of Mechanics through page 408. Originally
published in 1942, reprinted in
1959 (good pedagogy but dry); and
E.J. Routh’s, Dynamics of a System
of rigid bodies, Vol 1 (the
“elementary” part through chapter 7.
Originally published in 1905, but
reprinted in 1960). Routh also has 5
other idea- packed statics and dynamics
books. Routh shared college graduation
honors with the now-more-famous
physicist James Clerk Maxwell.

14 Chapter 0. Preface 0.1. To the student (please read)
0.1 To the student (please read)
Nature’s rules are so strict that, to the extent that you know the rules, you can
make reliable predictions about how Nature, the set of all things, behave. In
particular, most objects of concern to engineers obediently follow a subset of
Nature’s rules called the laws of Newtonian mechanics. So, if you learn the
laws of mechanics, as this book should help you to do, you will be able to
make quantitative predictions about how things stand, move, and fall. And
you will gain intuition about the mechanics part of Nature’s rules.
How to use this book
Here is some general guidance.
1 “Exams are harder than homework.”
Some struggling students say “I
can do the homework problems. I just
can’t do the exams. Exams are harder
and trickier.” These students may be
fooling themselves. Most exams are not
trickier than the homework. And when
we have checked, many students who
got through homework with help, can’t
do simplified versions of those same
problems when they have no help.
Check your own understanding
Most likely you want a decent grade by successfully getting through the
homework assignements and exams. You will naturally get help by looking
at examples and samples in the text or lecture notes, by looking up formulas
in the front and back covers of this book, and by asking questions of friends,
teaching assistants and professors. What good are books, notes, classmates
or teachers if they don’t help you do the homework All the examples and
sample problems in this book, for example, are just for this purpose.
But watch out. Too-much use of help from books, notes and people can
lead to self deception 1 . After you have got through a problem using such
help you should, at least sometimes, check that you have actually learned to
solve the problem.
To see if you have learned to do a problem, do it again, justifying each
step, without looking up even one small (‘oh, I almost knew that’) thing.
If you can’t do this, you gain two learning opportunities. First, you can learn
the missing skill or idea. But more deeply, by getting stuck after you have
been able to get through with help, you can learn things about your learning
process. Often the real source of difficulty isn’t a key formula or fact, but
something more subtle. Some useful more subtle ideas might be explained
in the general text discussions.
Read the parts that are at your level
You might be science and math school-smart, mechanically inclined, or are
especially motivated to learn mechanics. Or you might be reluctantly taking
this class to fulfil a requirement. In either case this book is meant for you.
The sections start with generally accessible introductory material and include
simple examples. The early sample problems in each section are also easy.
But we also have discussions of the theory and other more advanced applications
and asides to challenge more motivated students. If you are a nerd,

Chapter 0. Preface 0.1. To the student (please read) 15
please be patient with the slow introductions and the calculations that go line
by line without skipping steps. On the other hand, if you are just trying to
get through this course you need not stop and admire every side discussion
about history or theory.
Calculation strategies and skills
We try to demonstrate a systematic approach to solving problems. But its
impossible to reduce all mechanics problem solutions to one clear recipe (despite
the generally applicable recipe on the inside back cover). If a precise
recipe existed then someone could write a computer program that followed
it, and we would not have written this textbook. Your mind could be freed
from mechanics problem solutions like a calculator frees you from the tedium
of long division. But there is an art to solving mechanics problems and
understanding their solutions. This applies to homework problems and also
engineering design problems. Art and human insight, as opposed to precise
algorithm or recipe, is what makes engineering require humans and not just
computers 2 . We will try to teach you some of this art. For starters, here are
some tips.
Understand the question
It is tempting to start writing equations and quoting principles when you first
see a problem. However, it is usually worth a few minutes (and sometimes
a few hours) to try to get an intuitive sense of a problem before jumping to
equations. Before you draw any sketches or write equations, think: does the
problem make sense What information has been given What are you trying
to find Is what you are trying to find determined by what is given What
physical laws make the problem solvable What extra information do you
think you need What information have you been given that you don’t need
You should first get a general sense of the problem to steer you through the
technical details.
Some students find they can read every line of sample problems yet cannot
do test problems, or, later on, cannot do applied design work effectively.
This failing may come from following details without spending time, thinking
and gaining an overall sense of the problems.
Think through your solution strategy
For problem solutions you read, like those in this book, someone had to think
about the order of work. You also have to think about the order of your work.
You will find some tips in the text and samples. But it is your job to own the
material, to learn how to think about it your own way, to become an expert in
your own style, and to do the work in the way that makes things most clear
to you and your readers.
2 Computers can do dynamics. To be
honest, this book presents some methods
which computers can handle. Once
a problem has been reduced to a precise
mechanical model a computer code
could take over. Say a finite-element
program or a rigid-body dynamics program.
But you will do better at mechanics,
even with a computers help, if
you can do simple mechanics problems
without a computer.
Analogy with long-division. Since
about 1975 division by a 3 (or more)
digit number is done by calculators,
not pencil-and-paper long-division. But
competence at division without a calculator,
at least at division by one digit
numbers, allows one to quickly catch
calculator-entry errors. And knowledge
about division (that, for example, its inverse
multiplication, or that division by
zero is bad) is useful. And such knowledge
comes better by practice with numbers
manipulated in one’s head and on
paper than just on a calculator. Similarly
it is useful to know mechanicsproblem
methods well, even if some of
those problems can be solved with by a
computer package.

16 Chapter 0. Preface 0.1. To the student (please read)
3 A tree analogy. Energy gets stored
in the roots of a tree. It gets there from
the trunk. The branches feed the trunk,
the twigs feed the branches, and the
leaves feed the twigs with energy from
the sun. But the flow goes the opposite
way, from the leaves on down to the
roots. But if you try to invent a tree by
starting at the leaves with no knowledge
of the root you could easily get lost and
connect leaves to electric wires or gas
pipes — all nonsense. There’s no point
in connecting the leaves to anything until
you have a sense of the whole tree.
The order of calculation is often backwards from the order of
thinking
When working out how to solve a problem you often start with general principles,
then look at terms you need to know. If these are not given, you think
how to figure those from other terms and so on. On the other hand, when you
go to calculate an answer you have to start with the information given and
work your way backwards into the equation which has your answer 3 . To
find the net worth of a corporation you add the value of the various divisions.
To get the value of a division you add up the values of the factories. For each
factory you add up the value of the pieces of machinery. But to get an actual
corporate value you have to start by evaluating the pieces of machinery
in each factory and working back up from the known towards the answer.
Beware that
When you read the minimal write-up of a calculation, especially an
algorithmic recipe or computer program, you often are reading in the
inverse order of the thinking that went in to generating the solution.
Of course real problem solving goes both ways. You think about what you
need in order to calculate what you want. But you also think about what you
can calculate easily from what is given plainly to you. You reach from the
broad towards the details. And you work with known details towards answers
of any kind, wanted or not. And you thus hunt out, building from details and
simultaneously reaching back from the goal, a route leading all the way from
the details to the goal.
Look for equations containing unkowns, not for formulas that
evaluate unknowns
In elementary science and math we often learn formulas like
V D LW H; d D 1 2 at 2 ; and x D b ¦ p b 2 4ac
2a
to find V; d; or x. So it is common wishful thinking for newcomers to hope
for a formula that generates the sought unknown in terms of given quantities.
Rather, you should
Find relations that contain variables of interest; don’t worry about
whether they are on the right or left side of an equation. Don’t worry
about whether the variables are alone or isolated.
Most often, you will not know a formula where the thing you want is on the
left and everything given is on the right. You will have, say,
V D LW H when you want to find W from V; L; and H ,

Backspace CE C
Chapter 0. Preface 0.1. To the student (please read) 17
d D 1 2 at 2 when you want to find t from a and d, and
ax 2 C bx C c D 0 when you want to find x from a; b; and c.
Once you have got this far the only problem is math 4 . Here are two tricks
of the mind
1) You know a math and computer genius. She is helpful but doesn’t
know any mechanics. Make your first task writing things down so she
could finish up for you. She doesn’t want to help Then realize that
finishing up without her is a separate job for you. You will do this later
when you wear your math-genius cap.
2) Be an egotist. Pretend you are omniscient and know everything. Then
write down true statements about those things; equations that contain
terms that omniscient-you already know: “If I knew x; y and z the
following equation would be true.” Then relax your ego a bit. Count
equations and unknowns to see if you, or at least your math genius
friend, could solve for the things you previously pretended to know.
4 For this and other courses, you
should be good at solving math problems
with your pencil and with a computer.
But you should distinguish between
the task of setting up a math problem
and the solving of the problem.
The solving often takes the bulk of the
time and paper, but it’s not where your
thoughts should start. The material that
is new for you in this book is largely
about setting up, rather than solving, the
math problems that arrise in mechanics.
Vectors and free-body diagrams
In the toolbox of someone who can solve lots of mechanics problems are two
well-worn tools:
A vector calculator that always keeps vectors and scalars distinct, and
A reliable and clear free-body diagram drawing tool.
Because many of the terms in mechanics equations are vectors, the ability to
do vector calculations is essential. Because the concept of an isolated system
is at the core of mechanics, every mechanics practitioner needs the ability to
draw a good free-body diagram. The second and third chapters will help you
build your own set of these two most-important tools.
Outside the books
Guarantee: If you learn to do clear correct vector algebra and to draw
good free-body diagrams you will do well at mechanics. (Assuming, of
course, that you don’t totally stop studying then and there.)
Statics
Engineering
254
Math
The books
Thinking outside the books
We do mechanics because we like mechanics. We hope you will too. It’s fun
to puzzle out how things work. Its satisfying to do calculations that make
realistic predictions. Mechanics is interesting in its own right and it feels
good to take pride in new skills. We wrote this book because we want to help
you learn the subject if you are interested, and get through it if you must.
But we don’t know a straightforward path through your resources (say a path
with 4 straight segments) that really gets you to deeper understanding.
Filename:tfigure-outsidethebooks
Dynamics
Figure 0.1: Thinking outside of the
books. A famous puzzle asks: using
4 contiguous straightline segments connect
all 9 dots that are in a square 3 ¢ 3
array. The only solution has segments
extending outside the “box” of 9 points.
Hence the expression “thinking outside
of the box”.

18 Chapter 0. Preface 0.2. A note on computation
We do know that you need to think outside of the confines of your usual
study resources. Like when you are relaxed, away from the pressures of
books, notes, pencils or paper, say when you are walking, showering or lying
down. These are the places where you naturally work out life problems, but
they are good places to work out mechanics problems too.
Having an animated mechanics discussion with friends is also good. You
should enjoy your inner nerd socially. Are your friends turned off by techtalk
There are billions of people out there, you should be able to find one or
two that like to talk shop.
0.2 A note on computation
Mechanics is a physical subject. The concepts in mechanics do not depend
on computers. But mechanics is also a quantitative subject; relevant amounts
(of length, mass, force, moment, time, etc) are described with numbers, and
relations are described using equations and formulas. Computers are very
good with numbers and formulas. Thus the modern practice of engineering
mechanics uses computers. The most-needed computer skills for mechanics
are:
solution of simultaneous linear algebraic equations,
plotting, and
numerical solution of ODEs (Ordinary Differential Equations).
More basically, an engineer also needs the ability to routinely evaluate standard
functions (x 3 , cos 1 , etc.), to enter and manipulate lists and arrays of
numbers, and to write short programs.
Classical languages, applied packages, and simulators
Programming in standard languages such as Fortran, Basic, Pascal, C++, or
Java probably take too much time to use in solving simple mechanics problems.
Thus an engineer needs to learn to use one or another widely available
computational package (e.g., MATLAB, O-MATRIX, SCI-LAB, OC-
TAVE, MAPLE, MATHEMATICA, MATHCAD, TKSOLVER, LABVIEW,
etc). We assume that students have learned, or are learning such a package.
Although none of the homework here depends on such, we also encourage
you to play with packaged mechanics simulators (e.g., INVENTOR,
WORKING MODEL, ADAMS, DADS, ODE, etc) for testing and building
your intuition.
How we explain computation in this book.
Solving a mechanics problem involves
1. Reducing a physical problem to a well posed mathematical problem;
2. Solving the math problem using some combination of pencil and paper
and numerical computation; and

Chapter 0. Preface 0.2. A note on computation 19
3. Giving physical interpretation of the mathematical solution.
This book is primarily about setup (a) and interpretation (c), which are rather
the same, no matter what method is used to solve the equations. If a problem
requires computation, the exact computer commands vary from package to
package. And we don’t know which one you are using. So in this book
we express our computer calculations using an informal pseudo computer
language. For reference, typical commands are summarized on page 21.
Required computer skills
Here, in a little more detail, are the primary computer skills you need.
Linear algebraic equations. Many mechanics problems are statics or
‘instantaneous mechanics’ problems. These problems involve trying
to find some forces or accelerations at a given configuration of a system.
These problems can generally be reduced to the solution of linear
algebraic equations of this general type: solve
3 x C 4 y D 8
7 x C p 2 y D 3:5
for x and y. In practice the number of variables and equations can
be quite large. Some computer packages will let you enter equations
almost as written above. In our pseudo language we would write:
set = { 3*x + 4*y = 8
-7*x + sqrt(2)*y = 3.5 }
solve set for x and y
Other packages may require you to set up your equations in matrix form
3 p 4 x 8
D or Az D b
7 2 y 3:5
„ ƒ‚ …
A
„ƒ‚…
z
„ ƒ‚ …
b
which in computer-speak might look something like this:
A = [ 3 4
-7 sqrt(2) ]
b = [ 8 3.5 ]’
solve A*z=b for z
where A is a 2 ¢ 2 matrix, b is a column of 2 numbers (the ’ indicates
that the row of numbers b should be transposed into a column), and
the two elements of z are x and y. For systems of two equations, like
above, a computer is hardly needed. But for systems of three equations
pencil and paper work is sometimes error prone. Given the tedium,
the propensity for error, and the availability of electronic alternatives,
pencil and paper solution of four or more equations is an anachronism.
Plotting. In order to see how a result depends on a parameter, or to see
how a quantity varies with position or time, it is useful to see a plot.
Any plot based on more than a few data points or a complex formula is

20 Chapter 0. Preface 0.2. A note on computation
far more easily drawn using a computer than by hand. Most often you
can organize your data into a set of .x; y/ pairs stored in an x list and a
corresponding y list. A simple computer command will then plot x vs
y. The pseudo-code below, for example, plots a circle using 100 points
npoints = [0 1 2 3 ... 100]
theta = npoints * 2 * pi / 100
x = cos(theta)
y = sin(theta)
plot y vs x
where npoints is the list of numbers from 1 to 100, theta is a list
of 100 numbers evenly spaced between 0 and 2 and x and y are lists
of 100 corresponding x; y coordinate points on a circle.
ODEs The result of using the laws of dynamics is often a set of differential
equations which need to be solved. A simple example would be:
Find x at t D 5 given that dx
dt
D x and that at t D 0, x D 1.
The solution to this problem can be found easily enough by hand to
be x.5/ D e 5 . But often the differential equations are just too hard for
pencil and paper solution. Fortunately the numerical solution of ordinary
differential equations (ODEs) is already programmed into scientific
and engineering computer packages. The simple problem above
is solved with computer code equivalent to these informal commands:
ODES = { xdot = x }
ICS = { xzero = 1 }
solve ODES with ICS until t=5
which will yield a list of values for paired values for t and x the last of
which will be t D 5 and x close to e 5 148:4.

Chapter 0. Preface 0.2. A note on computation 21
Examples of informal computer commands
In this book computer commands are given informally using commands
that are not as strict as any real computer package. You will
need to translate the informal commands below into commands your
package understands. This reference table uses mathematical ideas
which you may or may not know before you read this book, but these
are introduced in the text when needed.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
x=7 Set the variable x to 7.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
omega=13 Set ! to 13.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
u=[1 0 -1 0]
Define u and v to be the lists
v=[2 3 4 pi]
shown.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
t= [.1 .2 .3 ... 5] Set t to the list of 50 numbers
implied by the expression.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
y=v(3)
sets y to the third value of v (in
this case 4).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A=[1 2 3 6.9
Set A to the array shown.
5 0 1 12 ]
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
z= A(2,3) Set z to the element of A in the
second row and third column.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
w=[3
Define w to be a column vector.
4
2
5]
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
w = [3 4 2 5]’
Same as above. ’ means
transpose.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
u+v
Vector addition. In this case the
result is Œ3 3 3 .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
u*v
Element by element
multiplication, in this case
Œ2 0 4 0 .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
sum(w)
Add the elements of w, in this
case 14.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
cos(w)
Make a new list, each element of
which is the cosine of the
corresponding element of Œw .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
mag(u)
The square root of the sum of the
squares of the elements in Œu , in
this case 1.41421...
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
u dot v
The vector dot product of
component lists Œu and Œv , (we
could also write sum(A*B).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C cross D
The vector cross product of C
*
and D, * assuming the three
element component lists for ŒC
and ŒD have been defined.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A matmult w
Use the rules of matrix
multiplication to multiply ŒA
and Œw .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
eqset = f3x + 2y = 6 Define ‘eqset’ to stand for the set
6x + 7y = 8g of 2 equations in braces.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
solve eqset
Solve the equations in ‘eqset’ for
for x and y x and y.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
solve Ax=b for x Solve the matrix equation
ŒA Œx D Œb for the list of
numbers x. This assumes A and
b have already been defined.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
for i = 1 to N
Execute the commands ‘such and
such and such such’ N times, the first time with
end
i D 1, the second with i D 2, etc
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
plot y vs x
Assuming x and y are two lists
of numbers of the same length,
plot the y values vs the x values.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
solve ODEs
Assuming a set of ODEs and ICs
with ICs
until t=5
have been defined, use numerical
integration to solve them and
evaluate the result at t D 5.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
With an informality consistent with what is written above, other
commands are introduced as needed.