26.12.2014 Views

download in PDF format - ISO 26000, an estimation

download in PDF format - ISO 26000, an estimation

download in PDF format - ISO 26000, an estimation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Assum<strong>in</strong>g a three years development time the revised version would be published <strong>in</strong> 2020 as<br />

<strong>ISO</strong> <strong>26000</strong>:2020.<br />

8 Conclusion<br />

When <strong>ISO</strong> national member bodies will be asked - supposedly <strong>in</strong> October 2013 - for their op<strong>in</strong>ion on<br />

<strong>ISO</strong> <strong>26000</strong>:2010 they have the follow<strong>in</strong>g options to <strong>an</strong>swer: withdraw, revise/amend, confirm,<br />

confirm it with correction of errors, absta<strong>in</strong>, <strong>an</strong>d absta<strong>in</strong> with survey replies. Whatever option will be<br />

discussed, it is recommended to take <strong>in</strong>to account, that<br />

1. <strong>ISO</strong> <strong>26000</strong>:2010 is quite a good achievement, for the time be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

2. The real net time for hav<strong>in</strong>g ga<strong>in</strong>ed experiences <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>ISO</strong> <strong>26000</strong> counts so far from spr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

2011 (after tr<strong>an</strong>slation <strong>in</strong>to national l<strong>an</strong>guages <strong>an</strong>d publication as national st<strong>an</strong>dards) to the<br />

middle of 2013, that is surely not more th<strong>an</strong> two years <strong>an</strong>d three quarters<br />

3. Open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>ISO</strong> <strong>26000</strong>:2010 for revision will cause considerable costs by all <strong>in</strong>volved, quickly<br />

exceed<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>an</strong>y millions of USD; striv<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>in</strong>cremental improvements would not seem to<br />

justify such costs<br />

4. If <strong>ISO</strong> <strong>26000</strong>:2010 would be judged to need a major improvement, its revision should be<br />

based on the systematic evaluation of at least 5 years of practical experiences made by all<br />

sectors, <strong>an</strong>d on the outcome of a research project on a “Globally Agreed Set of Societal<br />

Values ”<br />

5. A revision should also f<strong>in</strong>d a new pric<strong>in</strong>g so that <strong>ISO</strong> would demonstrate that its Central<br />

Secretariat <strong>an</strong>d <strong>ISO</strong> national member bodies don’t publish societal st<strong>an</strong>dards to ga<strong>in</strong> net<br />

profit.<br />

Summary: It seems reasonable to leave <strong>ISO</strong> <strong>26000</strong>:2010 for the time be<strong>in</strong>g unch<strong>an</strong>ged <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

ga<strong>in</strong> more practical experience <strong>an</strong>d to develop a revised <strong>ISO</strong> <strong>26000</strong>:20xx on the basis of that<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased experience <strong>an</strong>d the outcome of a research project on “Globally Agreed Set of Societal<br />

Values ”.<br />

page 17 of 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!