28.12.2014 Views

Range Rover Classic - Rackspace Hosting

Range Rover Classic - Rackspace Hosting

Range Rover Classic - Rackspace Hosting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Recently, the New York Times quoted Nicole<br />

Farhi, a French designer working in London.<br />

She owns a 1956 Mercedes 190 cabriolet and<br />

claims “no one else is allowed to drive it. Old<br />

cars only recognize one driver. You have to<br />

know how to coax it. I drive my Mercedes<br />

every day to my office off or Carnaby St., and<br />

always get a lot of thumbs-up.”<br />

Series Land <strong>Rover</strong> owners will recognize<br />

the validity of her statements. Even <strong>Range</strong><br />

<strong>Rover</strong> <strong>Classic</strong> and Discovery owners can find<br />

themselves having to give more detailed<br />

instructions than “make certain you put gas<br />

in it” when they loan out their <strong>Rover</strong>s. I have<br />

let others drive my two Series II-As, but never<br />

with enthusiasm or confidence. An offer to<br />

“take my car” is accompanied by a long list<br />

of starting, accelerating and stopping<br />

instructions that usually lead the recipient to<br />

say, “Never mind, I’ll walk.” Even in rain,<br />

snow and sleet! If they do summon up the<br />

courage to drive it, they watch me cringe with<br />

a discomforting combination of anguish and<br />

fright.<br />

When you do loan out the <strong>Rover</strong>, it will<br />

never drive as you predict. When you insist<br />

the clutch action is smooth, it will lurch. If<br />

you state it shifts easily, it will grind in every<br />

gear. <strong>Rover</strong>s recognize only one driver; any<br />

alternate driver will feel as though they’re still<br />

working on their Learners Permit. You really<br />

do need to know “how to coax it.”<br />

28<br />

BEHIND THESTEERING WHEEL<br />

By Jeffrey B. Aronson<br />

What is undeniable is that if you drive<br />

your Land <strong>Rover</strong> every day, you will get<br />

thumbs-up from a huge range of people, on<br />

Carnaby St. or Main St.<br />

_______ ________<br />

In the 1960’s, tweed flat cap sorts argued<br />

endlessly about “what is a sports car” Most<br />

agreed that agility, handling, great road feel,<br />

simplicity and functionality, were critical<br />

qualities. Physics would dictate that light<br />

weight would be important. That in turn<br />

meant a small engine of simple yet durable<br />

construction – you needed to be able to tune<br />

it easily when you took it to the track or to a<br />

rally on the weekends. The car would be<br />

small so it could remain light and nimble.<br />

Light weight also mitigated against much<br />

weather protection, thus the “hankie in the<br />

wind” tops common to MG’s, Triumphs and<br />

Austin-Healys.<br />

Driver involvement was also a crucial<br />

factor. No need to isolate the driver from the<br />

road underneath the car; he would want to<br />

feel every bump or dip. A short-throw manual<br />

transmission, correctly placed pedals,<br />

informative instrumentation, and hip-hugging<br />

seats would increase your involvement.<br />

Passenger comfort or convenience played<br />

only the smallest role- the Porche 912 of the<br />

‘70’s didn’t even offer an adjustment on the<br />

passenger’s seat.<br />

This debate arose after sports car manufacturers<br />

found their markets being devoured<br />

by cars that met consumer demands for comfort,<br />

speed, reliability, size and styling without<br />

the discomfort, noise and barebones feel of<br />

the classic sports car. Putting a 4-speed manual<br />

transmission or bucket seats in a Pontiac<br />

Tempest or a Ford Mustang did not make<br />

them sports cars, but it did jack up volume<br />

sales of those models. Most of the body panels,<br />

frames, engines and other components<br />

were shared with the family sedan counterparts<br />

of the same manufacturer. That kept<br />

costs low, making British cars- with a high<br />

pound/dollar exchange rate even more<br />

expensive in comparison.<br />

Welcome to the 21rst century when Land<br />

<strong>Rover</strong> finds that the highly adaptable, utilitarian,<br />

elemental Defender shares its platform<br />

with no other Land <strong>Rover</strong> product. It requires<br />

more labor time, paid for in those expensive<br />

British pounds, than its other Land <strong>Rover</strong><br />

cousins. Volume might be the answer except<br />

for the cost of manufacture and the inability<br />

for the current model to meet US legislative<br />

and regulatory standards.<br />

What’s providing volume sales for Land<br />

<strong>Rover</strong> are the <strong>Range</strong> <strong>Rover</strong> Sport, <strong>Range</strong><br />

<strong>Rover</strong>, LR3 and LR2. These vehicles are profitable<br />

for Land <strong>Rover</strong> [and Ford] but they<br />

create their own dilemmas for Land <strong>Rover</strong>.<br />

Some might become Land <strong>Rover</strong> enthusiasts,<br />

but honestly, a vehicle requiring a computer<br />

system to diagnose running problems is not<br />

going to be the first choice for remote fieldwork.<br />

They’re purchased by owners whose<br />

needs are for family transport, daily commuting,<br />

vacation trips and high speed highway<br />

driving. They are fascinating vehicles in terms<br />

of engineering and off-road orientation. The<br />

care and feeding of this new Land <strong>Rover</strong><br />

owner – who expect annual updates and<br />

enhancements – might just soak up Land<br />

<strong>Rover</strong>’s resources that otherwise might go to<br />

making the Defender available for the US<br />

market.<br />

How badly do Land <strong>Rover</strong> enthusiasts<br />

want a Defender back in the US The price<br />

asked for 1993 Defender 110’s and the ’93-<br />

’98 Defender 90’s tells us that both models’<br />

popularity remain enormous. Visually, the<br />

Defender never strayed far from the purposeful<br />

look of the Series I – III Land <strong>Rover</strong>s. In<br />

terms of engineering, the Defender stretched<br />

the extraordinary capabilities of the Series<br />

models even further. Our relatively low fuel<br />

prices meant that we received the exceptional<br />

3.5/3.9 liter <strong>Rover</strong> V-8, which gave the<br />

Defender the acceleration and highway speed<br />

necessary for living large in the USA. In the<br />

‘90’s, we bought every Defender brought in –<br />

the problem for Land <strong>Rover</strong> was that the<br />

annual total rarely exceeded 1,500. That’s not<br />

really enough volume to assure updates to<br />

meet regulatory changes.<br />

Ah, those darned regulations – like<br />

airbags, side curtains, and more. For example<br />

in April, 2007, the federal government<br />

announced that all new passenger vehicles

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!