29.12.2014 Views

THE BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT REVIEW - The Academy of ...

THE BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT REVIEW - The Academy of ...

THE BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT REVIEW - The Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ISSN 2047-2854<br />

<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business & Retail Management<br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>BUSINESS</strong> &<br />

<strong>MANAGEMENT</strong> <strong>REVIEW</strong><br />

Volume 2, Number 2<br />

www.abrmr.com


Executive Board Members<br />

Dr P R Datta, Executive Chair<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor P R Banerjee, Head <strong>of</strong> Research & Development, ABRMR<br />

Dr B.R.Chakraborty, Operations<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Dixon, Review Editor<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Lothar Auchte, Review editor<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ogenyi Omar, Review-Editor<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gairik Das, Review Editor<br />

Dr Soumitra N.Deb, Review Editor<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Fon Sim Ong, Review Editor<br />

Editorial Advisory Board<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Dixon, Pr<strong>of</strong>. A. Jayakumar, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor N.P Makarkin, Dr. Sudaporn Sawmong, Dr. John<br />

Dung-Gwom, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Victor Braga, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Luiz Alberto Alves dos Santos<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Mariia Sheluntcova, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor N.D Gooskova, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor P R Banerjee, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Hayri<br />

Ulgen, Dr. Saumitra N. Deb, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Gairik Das, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor A.C Panday, Dr Nripendra Singh,<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Fon Sim Ong, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S. Rangnekar, Pr<strong>of</strong>. C. Michael Wernerheim, Pr<strong>of</strong>, srini Srinivasan<br />

Session Chairs<br />

Corporate Governance and Business Ethics<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sal AmirKhalkhali<br />

<strong>The</strong> Growth and Economic Development<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Marek Dziura<br />

HRM, Marketing and Information Technology<br />

Dr. P.R.Datta<br />

Ashru Bairagee-Project Manager & Research Fellow<br />

M Agalya-Research Executive<br />

i


Corporate Governance and Business Conference (CGBC)<br />

19-20 th July 2012<br />

Holiday Inn Boston-Somerville,<br />

30, Washington Street,<br />

Boston, MA, 02143, USA.<br />

Dear Conference Participants,<br />

It is my very great pleasure to welcome you to CGBC – Boston 2012. For some <strong>of</strong> you this will be<br />

your first visit to Boston and we trust that during your time with us you will gain fresh insights,<br />

engage in healthy discussions and forge new friendships in a spirit <strong>of</strong> academic enquiry. No one<br />

here present can be under any illusion that for many these are challenges times and the nature <strong>of</strong><br />

the global economy is such that it is beholden on academics to seek a broader understanding <strong>of</strong><br />

common themes and theories. <strong>The</strong> fall-out from the recent world economic crisis has been such<br />

that the issue <strong>of</strong> governance has moved centre stage. This 2 nd Boston conference on Corporate<br />

Governance and Business affords an opportunity to explore pressing issues in an international<br />

environment conducive to robust discussion and debate.<br />

I believe that we will all benefit from our engagement with the Conference and I trust that all<br />

concerned will have stimulating and intellectually enriching stay in Istanbul.<br />

With every good wish,<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor P. R. Banerjee<br />

Head <strong>of</strong> Research and Development<br />

<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business and Retail Management (ABRM)<br />

ii


Sr.<br />

No.<br />

Contents<br />

Agenda & Articles<br />

Corporate Governance and Business Conference (CGBC)<br />

19-20 th July 2012<br />

Articles<br />

Agenda for Corporate Governance & Business Conference<br />

1 Board Governance Development for Civil Society Organisation: A Strategy for Systems<br />

1<br />

Strengthening and Sustainability<br />

2 Are Singapore Boards Global 7<br />

3 Corporate Governance in the Value Based Management Concept 13<br />

4 Investors` Reaction to the Implementation <strong>of</strong> Corporate Governance Mechanisms -<br />

5 Corporate Governance in Public Sector Banks-Tapping the Bee Hive 21<br />

6 Financial Reporting Standards as a Tool in Order to Ensure Corporate Transparency: <strong>The</strong> 25<br />

Case <strong>of</strong> Turkey<br />

7 Boardroom Pay, Performance and Corporate Governance in Malaysia 27<br />

8 An Analysis <strong>of</strong> Performance Appraisal Systems <strong>of</strong> Merchantile bank Limited 52<br />

9 On the Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Quality Regulation: Some Empirical Results 53<br />

10 Compliance Versus Volatility <strong>of</strong> Performance in 2012, Corporate Influence in Bureaucratic<br />

Systems. Where Should the Focus for America lay Most<br />

59<br />

11 Exposing MBA Students to Corporate Governance 61<br />

12 Enterprise Restructuring in the Conditions <strong>of</strong> the Crisis and the Globalization Challenges.<br />

Based on the Experiences <strong>of</strong> the Polish Economy<br />

13 Corporate Governance and Performance <strong>of</strong> Commercial Banks in Nigeria 63<br />

14 Pr<strong>of</strong>it creation, intra and inter-generational Equity: Need for New Company Law 64<br />

15 <strong>The</strong> Publishing Scramble for Africa: A salutary tale <strong>of</strong> opportunity, bribery and censure 65<br />

16 A Panel Cointegration Approach to FDI and Growth in Africa: Evidences from ECOWAS,<br />

ECCAS, UMA, EAC and SADC Regions<br />

17 Technology Systems for Sustainable Development in Poland 78<br />

18 Risk in the Enterprise Value Creation 88<br />

19 Analysis <strong>of</strong> Causes and Consequences <strong>of</strong> the Global Economics Crisis –Poland`s Perspective 94<br />

Page<br />

20 <strong>The</strong> Disharmonies, Dilemmas and Effects <strong>of</strong> the Transformation <strong>of</strong> the Polish Economy 103<br />

21 Low Economic Awareness and Its Consequences: <strong>The</strong> Case <strong>of</strong> Turkey 112<br />

22 Ranking Indian States on Social Welfare & developmental Status in Globalisation Era using a<br />

MCDM Approach<br />

119<br />

23 Creating Consumer Based Brand Equity in Indian Sport Shoe Market 131<br />

24 A Conceptual Framework <strong>of</strong> Customer Retention Strategy (CRS) 139<br />

25 Reward or Penalty Inter-temporal Pricing <strong>of</strong> Decentralized Channel Supply Chain Under<br />

Asymmetric information Condition<br />

26 Succession Planning in Management Institutes: A critical Study 141<br />

27 Cultural Intelligence as Core Competency to Employability 142<br />

28 Opinion-Leading Role <strong>of</strong> Politically Aware Consumer 143<br />

62<br />

66<br />

140<br />

iii


Contents<br />

Agenda & Articles<br />

International Conference on Business & Economic Development (ICBED)<br />

23-24 th July 2012, Las Vegas, USA<br />

Sr.<br />

No.<br />

Articles<br />

Page<br />

Agenda for International Conference on Business & Economic Development<br />

1<br />

How Does Employee satisfaction Impact Information Flow during order fulfillment<br />

process<br />

151<br />

2<br />

An Exploration <strong>of</strong> Consumer Misbehaviours and their influences on Retail stores: An<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> Justice<br />

156<br />

3<br />

How Do Online Consumer Review Sentiments affect E-commerce Sales A Text Mining<br />

Analysis<br />

157<br />

4 Geographic Distribution <strong>of</strong> Population and Labor Force in Saudi Arabia 158<br />

5<br />

<strong>The</strong> Relationship Between Leadership and Learning Organisation: A Review <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Literature and Research Proposal<br />

168<br />

6 Relationship Marketing: Towards a Definition 174<br />

7 ERP System Implementation CSFs for Korean Organisations: A Delphi study 182<br />

8<br />

<strong>The</strong> Effects <strong>of</strong> Extrinsic Cues on the Relationship Between Brand Image and Purchasing<br />

Intention-Evidences from Chinese Exchabge Students` Perspective<br />

189<br />

9<br />

Employee Stock ownership and Employee Psychological ownership: <strong>The</strong> Moderating Role<br />

<strong>of</strong> Individual Characteristics<br />

190<br />

10 Adoption <strong>of</strong> Job Rotation as a Component <strong>of</strong> Staff Development in Polytechnics In Ghana 198<br />

11<br />

Water – <strong>The</strong> missing ingredient in real and sustained economic development<br />

209<br />

12<br />

Markets in Financial Instruments Europe Directive (MIFID): A Method <strong>of</strong> Controlling<br />

Ethical Banking<br />

210<br />

13<br />

Efficiency <strong>of</strong> EC Greenhouse Gas Abatement Measures and Firms in the European Union:<br />

Evidence from Plant Level Allocations and Surrendered Permits.<br />

220<br />

14 Corruption, Democracy and Tax Compliance: Cross-country Evidence 221<br />

15<br />

Are High Interest Loans a Debt Trap or Access to Credit Evidence from a Field<br />

Experiement <strong>of</strong> Payday Borrowers.<br />

231<br />

16<br />

<strong>The</strong> Expectations <strong>of</strong> Potential Acquirers <strong>of</strong> Real estate rights and decisions to Purchase<br />

property in times <strong>of</strong> Recesion<br />

232<br />

17<br />

<strong>The</strong> Role <strong>of</strong> Micro and Small Enterprise in Employment Opportunity and Poverty<br />

reduction in addis Ababa, Ethiopia: <strong>The</strong> Case <strong>of</strong> Addis ketema Sub City<br />

233<br />

18 Innovation Policy in Poland – Challenge for Intensive Growth 234<br />

19 Structural Changes and Development <strong>of</strong> the SME Sector in Poland after EU Membership 243<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

<strong>The</strong> Identification and Measurement <strong>of</strong> Financial Threats Vs the Causes <strong>of</strong> Insolvency in<br />

the period <strong>of</strong> Poland`s Economic Transformation<br />

Challenges <strong>of</strong> Sustainability and Urban Development in Nigeria: Reviewing the<br />

Millenium Development Goals<br />

Incentives to Encourage Social Environmental Responsible Corporate Actions:<br />

Willingness to pay for non-use value <strong>of</strong> Land-Case <strong>of</strong> Backpackers in Fiji<br />

255<br />

264<br />

265<br />

iv


Sr.<br />

No.<br />

Articles<br />

Page<br />

23<br />

Testing the Export-led Growth Hypothesis for Sub Saharan Africa Countries (SSA). A<br />

Panel Data Analysis<br />

24 Cross Country Analysis <strong>of</strong> GCC Economic Risk 267<br />

25 How to Transfer Knowledge to your work 278<br />

26 Enterprise Development under Globalisation and the New Economy Conditions 279<br />

27 Innovation in Enterprise Development Strategy 287<br />

28<br />

Research <strong>of</strong> Influencing Factors for Usage <strong>of</strong> Facebook Willingness-A case Study on<br />

College Students in the Tamsui Area<br />

29 Scientific Advance and Perceptions about the Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Democracy in MENA 306<br />

30 What Explains Innovative Outcomes at the Start Up Stage 320<br />

31 Does Vice Pay A Traditional Investigation <strong>of</strong> “Irresponsible” Investing 321<br />

266<br />

296<br />

v


Corporate Governance and Business Conference (CGBC)<br />

19-20 th July 2012<br />

Holiday Inn Boston-Somerville,<br />

30, Washington Street,<br />

Boston, MA, 02143, USA.<br />

SCHEDULE FOR <strong>THE</strong> CONFERENCE 2012<br />

Tuesday 17 th July, 2012, thru Wednesday 18 th July, 2012<br />

Arrival and Independent traveling days in Boston, USA<br />

Thursday, 19 th July, 2012<br />

8.00 AM -9.00AM Registration<br />

Thursday 19 th July, 2012<br />

9.00AM-9.15AM<br />

OPENING ADDRESS & WELCOME<br />

9.15AM-13.00 PM<br />

Track: Corporate Governance and Business Ethics<br />

Session Chair: Sal AmirKhalkhali<br />

I<br />

II<br />

III<br />

IV<br />

V<br />

Board Governance Development for Civil Society Organisation: A Strategy for Systems<br />

Strengthening and Sustainability<br />

Anisa Ari Amunega, Sandra Osanmer and Abubakar Kurfi, Management<br />

Sciences for Health, Nigeria<br />

Are Singapore Boards Global<br />

Shital Jhunjhunwala and R.K Mishra, Institute <strong>of</strong> Public Enterprise, India<br />

Corporate Governance in the Value Based Management Concept<br />

Tomasz Rojek, Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Investors` Reaction to the Implementation <strong>of</strong> Corporate Governance Mechanisms<br />

Nousheen Tariq Bhutta and Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah, International Islamic University,<br />

Islamabad, Pakistan<br />

Corporate Governance in Public Sector Banks-Tapping the Bee Hive<br />

Mridula Sahay and S. Shiva Kumar, Amrita School <strong>of</strong> Business, Amrita Nagar, India<br />

vi


VI<br />

VII<br />

VIII<br />

IX<br />

X<br />

XI<br />

XII<br />

XIII<br />

XIV<br />

Financial Reporting Standards as a Tool in Order to Ensure Corporate Transparency: <strong>The</strong> Case <strong>of</strong><br />

Turkey<br />

N. Ata Atabey, Department <strong>of</strong> Business Administration, Selcuk University, Turkey and<br />

Huseyin Cetin, Department <strong>of</strong> Tourism management, Necmettin Erbakan University,<br />

Turkey<br />

Boardroom Pay, Performance and Corporate Governance in Malaysia<br />

Puan Yatim, UKM-Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Business, University <strong>of</strong> Kebangsaan, Malaysia<br />

An Analysis <strong>of</strong> Performance Appraisal Systems <strong>of</strong> Merchantile bank Limited<br />

Sheikh Abdur Rahim, Daffodil International University, Bangladesh<br />

On the Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Quality Regulation: Some Empirical Results<br />

Sal AmirKhalkhali and Atul Dar, Saint Mary`s University, Halifax, Canada<br />

Compliance Versus Volatility <strong>of</strong> Performance in 2012, Corporate Influence in Bureaucratic<br />

Systems. Where Should the Focus for America lay Most<br />

David M Chapinski, School <strong>of</strong> Public Affairs and Administration, Rutgers University,<br />

Newark, USA<br />

Exposing MBA Students to Corporate Governance<br />

Patricia Miller Selvy, Bellarmine University, USA<br />

Enterprise Restructuring in the Conditions <strong>of</strong> the Crisis and the Globalization Challenges. Based<br />

on the Experiences <strong>of</strong> the Polish Economy<br />

Ryszard Borowiecki and Barbara Siuta-Tokarska Department <strong>of</strong> Economics and<br />

Organization <strong>of</strong> Enterprises, Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Corporate Governance and Performance <strong>of</strong> Commercial Banks in Nigeria<br />

Olagunju Adebayo and Oluwa Temitope Mariam, Redeemer`s University,<br />

Nigeria<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>it creation, intra and inter-generational Equity: Need for New Company Law<br />

Olawale Ajai, Lagos Business School, Pan African University, Lagos, Nigeria,<br />

13.00-14.00<br />

BREAK FOR LUNCH<br />

Thursday 19 th July 2012<br />

14.00 PM-14.25 PM<br />

Key Note Speaker<br />

Mark T Jones<br />

Mark is a fervent internationalist, who is widely travelled. He has had a distinguished career in<br />

education and currently serves as the Director <strong>of</strong> External Affairs for Park Royal College. In the<br />

year 2000 he initiated and oversaw a major humanitarian venture into war-torn Sierra Leone,<br />

and then spent two years in the Middle East where he worked in Jordan (2002 – 2004). He<br />

vii


writes and speaks on a variety <strong>of</strong> subjects ranging from corporate governance to women’s health<br />

in the developing world.<br />

As well as being an orator <strong>of</strong> distinction, Mark believes that it is essential that we articulate our<br />

convictions with passion; in this regard he is eager to help the voice <strong>of</strong> others to be heard. He is a<br />

Legislative Leadership Training specialist, as well as being an advisor on Diaspora community<br />

engagement. He is the Co-Founder & Executive Director <strong>of</strong> the Horn <strong>of</strong> Africa Business<br />

Association (HABA) as well as sitting on the Board <strong>of</strong> the Kitenge Africa Foundation (Uganda),<br />

the Advisory Committee <strong>of</strong> the Expertise Forum (A Think Tank Society focusing on the<br />

Sustainable Development <strong>of</strong> South Asian Countries) and being Chair <strong>of</strong> Trustees <strong>of</strong> Daughters <strong>of</strong><br />

Eve. In 1994 he was elected a Freeman <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> London, and is also a Fellow <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Chartered Management Institute.<br />

14.30 PM – 17.30<br />

Track: <strong>The</strong> Growth and Economic Development<br />

Session Chair: Pr<strong>of</strong>. Marek Dziura<br />

I<br />

A Panel Cointegration Approach to FDI and Growth in Africa: Evidences from ECOWAS,<br />

ECCAS, UMA, EAC and SADC Regions<br />

Rasheed Olajide Alao, Department <strong>of</strong> Economics, Adeyemi College <strong>of</strong> Education, Ondo,<br />

Nigeria<br />

II<br />

III<br />

IV<br />

VI<br />

VII<br />

VII<br />

Technology Systems for Sustainable Development in Poland<br />

Marek Dziura, Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Risk in the Enterprise Value Creation<br />

Andrzei Tomasz Jaki, Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> Causes and Consequences <strong>of</strong> the Global Economics Crisis –Poland`s Perspective<br />

Ryszard Borowiecki, Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

<strong>The</strong> Disharmonies, Dilemmas and Effects <strong>of</strong> the Transformation <strong>of</strong> the Polish Economy<br />

Jarosxaw Kagzmarek, Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Low Economic Awareness and Its Consequences: <strong>The</strong> Case <strong>of</strong> Turkey<br />

Murat Arici, Department <strong>of</strong> Philosophy, Konya N.E University, Turkey<br />

Ranking Indian States on Social Welfare & developmental Status in Globalisation Era using a<br />

MCDM Approach<br />

Ayan Chattopadhya, IISWBM (aafiliated to Calcutta University), Kolkata, India and<br />

Arpita Banerjee Chattopadhya, Budge-Budge College (affiliated to Calcutta University),<br />

India.<br />

17.35PM<br />

CLOSING SPEECH FOR <strong>THE</strong> 1 st DAY CONFERENCE<br />

viii


Friday 20 th July, 2012<br />

10.00AM-10.15AM<br />

OPENING ADDRESS FOR DAY 2<br />

10.15 AM -13.00 PM<br />

Track: HRM, Marketing and Information Technology<br />

Session Chair: Dr P R Datta<br />

I<br />

II<br />

III<br />

IV<br />

V<br />

VI<br />

Creating Consumer Based Brand Equity in Indian Sport Shoe Market<br />

Ravindar Reddy and Chandrajeet Kumar, School <strong>of</strong> Management, National Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Technology, Warangal, India<br />

A Conceptual Framework <strong>of</strong> Customer Retention Strategy (CRS)<br />

Palto Ranjan Datta, University <strong>of</strong> Hertfordshire, UK<br />

Reward or Penalty Inter-temporal Pricing <strong>of</strong> Decentralized Channel Supply Chain Under<br />

Asymmetric information Condition<br />

Weiping Liu, Department <strong>of</strong> Business Administration, Eastern Connecticut State<br />

University, USA<br />

Lindu Zhao, Southeast University, Nanjing, China<br />

Succession Planning in Management Institutes: A critical Study<br />

Priyanka Kulkarni and Arun Mokashi, MIT CoE, Centre for Management Studies and<br />

Research, Pune, India<br />

Cultural Intelligence as Core Competency to Employability<br />

Ruey-FaLIN, Nattawadee Korsakul and Nattharuja Korsakul, FengChia University,<br />

Taiwan<br />

Opinion-Leading Role <strong>of</strong> Politically Aware Consumer<br />

Mirza Ashfaq Ahmed, University <strong>of</strong> Gujrat, Pakistan and Suleman Aziz Lodhi<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> Management Sciences, Lahore Leads University, Pakistan<br />

13.00-14.00<br />

BREAK FOR LUNCH<br />

16.05 PM CLOSING SPEECH FOR <strong>THE</strong> CONFERENCE<br />

21 st April 2012<br />

<strong>The</strong>re will be no session or function scheduled for today. Please take this opportunity to<br />

explore Boston.<br />

ix


Board Governance Development for Civil Society Organizations:<br />

A Strategy for Systems Strengthening and Sustainability.<br />

Anisa Ari Amunega, Sandra Osanmor and Abubakar Kurfi<br />

PLAN -Health project, Management Sciences for Health, Abuja, Nigeria<br />

Keywords<br />

Board development, civil society organizations; sustainability, systems<br />

Abstract<br />

Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) in Nigeria play a critical role in transparency, accountability and<br />

responsiveness in the multi-sectoral approach to HIV/AIDS. CSO board members <strong>of</strong>ten lack knowledge <strong>of</strong> their roles<br />

and responsibilities and when they do fail to carry them out, which impacts negatively on organizational<br />

effectiveness. Management Sciences for Health (MSH), through the USAID-funded PLAN-Health Project in<br />

Nigeria, has developed an intervention to ensure strategic board governance programs promote transparency, social<br />

participation and accountability within Civil Society Organizations.<br />

Our strategy is rooted in a three stage process: defining roles and responsibilities; increasing knowledge and<br />

skills; and improving performance <strong>of</strong> board member’s roles and responsibilities. In the course <strong>of</strong> MSH PLAN-Health<br />

program implementation, organizations identified to receive technical support to strengthen their board were<br />

interviewed to ascertain the areas and level <strong>of</strong> support required. This resulted in a training programme to close<br />

identified governance gaps within these organizations.<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> thirty Board members were trained across two organizations. <strong>The</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> the training<br />

provided the opportunity for board members to start from the basic; vision, mission, and value statement which are<br />

the pillars <strong>of</strong> any organization. Members were also taken through various tools that will aid planning, scheduling<br />

and oversight in order to improve organizational performance.<br />

Capacity-building <strong>of</strong> Board members is a critical step to health systems strengthening and sustainability <strong>of</strong><br />

HIV Service Organizations in resource poor settings like Nigeria.<br />

Introduction<br />

Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa and was ranked third worst affected by<br />

HIV/AIDS in the world in 2003. Since the first case <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS in Nigeria was reported in 1986, there<br />

has been rapid increase in the total number <strong>of</strong> people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA). <strong>The</strong> national<br />

prevalence rose from 1.8% in 1991 to 5.8% in 2001 and reportedly declined to 5% in 2003 and 4.6% in 2008.<br />

Not only HIV but numerous other health indicators and outcomes have remained dramatically low in the<br />

country with the health related millennium development goals becoming obviously difficult and<br />

unrealistic to meet. <strong>The</strong> health sector in the country is characterized by the lack <strong>of</strong> stewardship;<br />

inadequate financing, weak health infrastructure and poor and ineffective coordination among all sectors<br />

in the nation’s health care system. In view <strong>of</strong> these challenges it is obvious that government alone cannot<br />

handle the complex task <strong>of</strong> providing affordable and qualitative health care to the populace, hence the<br />

need for the involvement <strong>of</strong> all stakeholders especially the civil society organizations.<br />

Civil society organizations denotes all those civil associations ; organizations, and networks that<br />

occupy the social space between governments and the families and the communities, this includes,<br />

community based organizations, faith based organizations and other channels <strong>of</strong> interactions like the<br />

traditional institutions that play a role in providing services to the populace such as private or voluntary<br />

unions, civic clubs, trade unions, gender clubs, cultural and religious groups, charities, social and sports<br />

clubs, cooperatives, environmental groups, pr<strong>of</strong>essional groups, consumer organizations and the media.<br />

Even though in Nigeria quantitative data on practically everything is difficult to come by, but there are<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

1


indications That the civil society movement is one <strong>of</strong> the fastest growing sectors in the country, however<br />

growth and evolution <strong>of</strong> the civil society organizations is more dependent on the flow <strong>of</strong> foreign aid than<br />

on interests in specific areas <strong>of</strong> national development 6 .<br />

Civil society organizations play a critical role in translating government’s policies into actions by<br />

bridging the gap between public policy formulation and utilization ; they also serve as a pathway for<br />

facilitating community mobilization and sensitization as well as ensuring social and political<br />

accountability in the delivery <strong>of</strong> health services. In the multi-sectoral response to HIV and AIDS in<br />

Nigeria, civil society organizations help mostly in supporting the local and grass root dimension to the<br />

response in the country, with many <strong>of</strong> the most innovative initiatives to address HIV/AIDS been<br />

designed and implemented by civil society groups with little or no external support 7 .<br />

<strong>The</strong> increasing role <strong>of</strong> HIV and AIDS to global morbidity and mortality has led to the huge outcry<br />

by people for involvement in the affairs <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS response globally and at national level. Civil society<br />

have been seen as a way <strong>of</strong> enforcing the bottom up pathway <strong>of</strong> health care provision where people will<br />

be responsible for taking the initiative to determine the type <strong>of</strong> health care they need which led the WHO<br />

to form the first civil society platform by the world health organization in 2001 8 . Civil society if rightfully<br />

engaged can be a veritable platform for bringing in more equity into health service provision bearing in<br />

mind that governments and international donor organizations have largely failed to reach the most<br />

vulnerable and hard to reach populations which is a major prerequisite in providing health care for all.<br />

HIV/AIDS has become a manageable chronic illness rather than the terminal illness it was<br />

perceived to be in the past, this is mainly due to increased availability <strong>of</strong> ART. It has therefore become<br />

necessary for such gains to be sustained as this is a very important determinant <strong>of</strong> patient outcome. Civil<br />

society is vital in ensuring that patients have the best in terms <strong>of</strong> care and support and overall service<br />

provision. Being a chronic illness with a lot <strong>of</strong> stigma still associated with it, HIV/AIDS has social and<br />

economic implications on patients on ART, even though the drug itself is free in most settings. It is<br />

important to get the perspectives <strong>of</strong> those accessing and taking the treatment to inform policy; and indeed<br />

also obtain the perspectives <strong>of</strong> those delivering and funding the treatment programs, civil society<br />

organizations can do just this and more.<br />

Efforts by non-governmental organizations have been criticized by numerous stakeholders as<br />

been non sustainable in view <strong>of</strong> dwindling global support for HIV and AIDS services. But these comments<br />

tend to assess the local approaches <strong>of</strong> civil society engagement in isolation from wider factors, such as the<br />

existence or absence <strong>of</strong> supportive national health policies that attempts to insulate the csos from this<br />

challenges 7 . <strong>The</strong> predominant challenges confronting civil society engagement in Nigeria are numerous;<br />

some <strong>of</strong> which include lack <strong>of</strong> coordination among them, weak or dwindling funds; inadequate human<br />

resources, exclusion <strong>of</strong> civil society from the decision making process at the national level and above all<br />

poor or deficient oversight by the members <strong>of</strong> the board <strong>of</strong> these organizations. <strong>The</strong> board is a sine qua<br />

non to the evolution, development and functionality <strong>of</strong> civil society organizations and is responsible for<br />

maintaining and making strategic decisions on the organizations objectives, policies and procedures as<br />

well as ensuring proper compliance with laid down rules and regulations for the overall success <strong>of</strong> the<br />

organization. Every nonpr<strong>of</strong>it organization needs a strong foundation <strong>of</strong> compliance and a broad<br />

organizational awareness <strong>of</strong> laws and regulations related to fundraising, Conflict <strong>of</strong> interest, financial<br />

accountability, human resources, lobbying, political advocacy and taxation. However, the information and<br />

concepts apply broadly to all types <strong>of</strong> nonpr<strong>of</strong>it boards. Because <strong>of</strong> the diversity by size and maturity <strong>of</strong><br />

different Organizations, each organization must determine whether or not an individual practice is<br />

appropriate for its current situation. Board members and employees become involved with a nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the organization’s public benefit mission. <strong>The</strong>refore the continued success <strong>of</strong> nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

organizations requires broad public support and confidence which is the specific remit <strong>of</strong> board members.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

2


<strong>The</strong> principles for good governance and ethical practice, which are designed to guide board<br />

members and staff leaders <strong>of</strong> every non -pr<strong>of</strong>it organization as they work to improve their own operations<br />

enables the board and staff leaders <strong>of</strong> every organization to examine these principles carefully and<br />

determine how best they should be applied to their own operations. Many organizations will find that<br />

they already follow—or go beyond—these principles. Others may wish to make changes in their current<br />

practices over time, and some may conclude that certain practices do not apply to their operations. <strong>The</strong><br />

purpose is to reinforce a common understanding <strong>of</strong> transparency, accountability, and good governance<br />

for the sector as a whole—not only to ensure ethical and trustworthy behavior, but equally important, to<br />

spotlight strong practices that contribute to the effectiveness, durability, and broad popular support for<br />

organizations <strong>of</strong> all kinds. Still, given the wide, necessary diversity <strong>of</strong> organizations, missions, and forms<br />

<strong>of</strong> activity that make up the nonpr<strong>of</strong>it community, it would be unwise, and in many cases impossible, to<br />

create a set <strong>of</strong> universal standards to be applied uniformly to every organization Instead, it is<br />

recommended that the following set <strong>of</strong> principles serve as a guideposts for every organization, adopting<br />

specific practices that best fit its particular size and organization’s purpose to evaluate their current<br />

standards.<br />

This study attempts to highlight those critical steps necessary for the designing and<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> a capacity building intervention for the board <strong>of</strong> civil society organizations in low<br />

income nations like Nigeria as designed by Management Sciences for Health, and how if rightly applied<br />

this process can lead to the strengthening <strong>of</strong> the systems <strong>of</strong> these organizations to effectively govern<br />

themselves and scale-up HIV service-delivery, improve country-ownership, and promote long-term<br />

sustainability.<br />

Methodology<br />

Numerous Board members were trained across various organizations providing HIV and AIDS services in<br />

Nigeria, with support from the USAID funded PLAN Health project that is being implemented by<br />

management sciences for health. Our intervention strategy was based on the assumption that Board<br />

members will progress through three major stages:<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> the stages:<br />

As an entry point, the governance team carries out a consultative visit to better understand the<br />

governance structure, in terms <strong>of</strong> composition and how the Board carries out its operations as well as the<br />

Boards mental models, this <strong>of</strong> course varies bearing in mind the different contexts and dynamics <strong>of</strong> these<br />

organizations. This is imperative to understand the internal and external factors affecting the governance<br />

systems.<br />

<strong>The</strong> second step is conducting an assessment using governance assessment tool. This is a tool<br />

which gives an in depth exposition <strong>of</strong> the gaps in the board composition and operations. Prior to this,<br />

there is an overall organizational assessment conducted using the Management Sciences for Health<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

3


Management and Organizational Sustainability Tool (MOST), this is a participatory assessment process<br />

for identifying an organization’s management needs and making concrete plans for improvement. <strong>The</strong><br />

MOST tool brings out the basic gaps at the periphery and actually identifies the organizational systems<br />

that needs to be strengthened, that is why the team has to go further in administering the Board<br />

governance assessment tool to illuminate specific gaps in governance practices.<br />

<strong>The</strong> third step is the design <strong>of</strong> intervention, basically the results from the assessment informs the<br />

design <strong>of</strong> intervention. This guides the team on what needs to be addressed, the area <strong>of</strong> focus for<br />

strengthening and what type <strong>of</strong> intervention will be appropriate. For some organizations, it could be just<br />

providing technical assistance in form <strong>of</strong> coaching and mentoring while for some it could be training in<br />

workshop setting or both. We could even go further in providing technical assistance in developing<br />

governance/guidance documents and support in governance enhancement plans. This stage <strong>of</strong> designing<br />

intervention is really critical because a whole lot <strong>of</strong> factors and determinants need to be considered for<br />

example, the Board composition, in terms <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> literacy, mental models, and priorities.<br />

Simultaneously, the variable the capacity building team wants to change is key.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fourth step is the actual implementation <strong>of</strong> the intervention depending on what is most<br />

appropriate for the organization. <strong>The</strong> team mostly utilized training in a workshop setting and makes it<br />

participatory and really interactive, with a shift from the traditional training program which places so<br />

much emphasis on theories, to a program designed specially to have a real life impact on the participants<br />

with an eye on the beneficiaries, that is the organization and the community at large. It involves learning,<br />

reflecting and practicing what they have learnt. Information from the first visit gives the facilitator some<br />

sort <strong>of</strong> internal connection to the standards and operations <strong>of</strong> the organization and helps in linking their<br />

mission, vision, values and goals to the training, and from experience, it has made the training climate<br />

relaxing and intriguing. . A Standard <strong>of</strong> ethics manual for Board operations was adapted and used during<br />

the trainings. This document is designed to support the effective functioning <strong>of</strong> non-pr<strong>of</strong>it boards by<br />

recommending specific best practices, which are designed to guide board members and staff leaders <strong>of</strong><br />

every non -pr<strong>of</strong>it organization as they work to improve their own operations, it also enables the board and<br />

staff leaders <strong>of</strong> every organization to examine these principles carefully and determine how best they<br />

should be applied to their own operations. At the end <strong>of</strong> the trainings, the Board develops an action plan<br />

or Board work plan to close identified governance gaps within the organizations .This forms the Board<br />

calendar that guides Board activities and timelines for a year or six months (also depends on what the<br />

organization wants).<br />

<strong>The</strong> fifth step is basically following up with the action plans developed and providing feedback<br />

on how responsive they are in its implementation. Technical assistance is provided to support the Board<br />

on areas that they might be facing challenges. This is a continuous process until the governance system is<br />

really functional, both financially and programmatically. At this point, they are left to sustain the<br />

intervention themselves. (<strong>The</strong> PLAN –Health Project calls this “weaning <strong>of</strong>f”)<br />

Board governance training methodology/process<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

4


Early Indicators <strong>of</strong> success<br />

An immediate result gotten from this intervention was an increase in knowledge and<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> their roles and responsibilities evidenced by improved governance cycle <strong>of</strong> the<br />

organization. <strong>The</strong> governance practices and processes improved evidenced by locally-led development <strong>of</strong><br />

Board policy manuals, fundraising policies, organizational plans and other governance documents. <strong>The</strong><br />

Boards were also able to rebrand the image <strong>of</strong> the organizations, developed and reviewed vision, mission<br />

and value statements and had documented delineations <strong>of</strong> roles and responsibilities. <strong>The</strong> latter fostered<br />

team vitality and cohesion which is essential for any form <strong>of</strong> progress in achieving the goals <strong>of</strong> the<br />

organization and having a real impact on the beneficiaries<br />

<strong>The</strong> overall systems <strong>of</strong> the organizations have also been affected, no doubt by the shift in mental<br />

models <strong>of</strong> the Board. Policies never used have been reviewed and usage encouraged and enforced with<br />

more coordinated way <strong>of</strong> carrying out activities with a focus on results. This has eventually to an<br />

improvement in the provision <strong>of</strong> comprehensive HIV and AIDS services to the communities.<br />

Discussions<br />

Our methodology towards strengthening Board governance for civil society organizations in<br />

Nigeria focuses on building accountability, transparency, ownership, community linkages/engagement,<br />

Board activism and leadership. <strong>The</strong> success <strong>of</strong> this methodology counters the other methodologies that<br />

focus on only governance or operation practices <strong>of</strong> Board. <strong>The</strong> PLAN-Health approach challenges nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

to consider alternative approaches to building organizational Board governance outside the<br />

traditional theoretical method <strong>of</strong> Board development to a more practical way that will have a huge and<br />

lasting impact on the Board, where creativity and problem solving practices is encouraged through a<br />

process <strong>of</strong> reflection and putting into practice what they have learnt towards achieving their overall<br />

organizational goals.<br />

From our experience board trainings with high dependency on theoretical means only serves as a<br />

quick fix as it is common to have re-occurring problems that perpetuate Board dysfunctions which is<br />

evidenced in poor team spirit, poor understanding <strong>of</strong> roles and responsibilities and ultimately poor Board<br />

performance. But our approach which hinges more on experiential method in the delivery <strong>of</strong> training<br />

allows members, who have not had the chance to work with other members to feel relaxed and open to<br />

share, learn, internalize and find ways to improve the boards operations and governance practices.<br />

Sadly, the state <strong>of</strong> the board governance development has not moved forward as have other areas<br />

<strong>of</strong> nonpr<strong>of</strong>it capacity building. Many boards still look to “board training” as the solution to its problems<br />

and far too many consultants continue to rely on outdated generic tools that go for the “quick fix,” rather<br />

than address underlying problems with the governance structure. <strong>The</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the boards we<br />

have worked with are such that it is difficult to clearly state their roles and responsibilities, this is evident<br />

in the operations <strong>of</strong> the Board as board members involve themselves in the day to day management <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice and the implementation <strong>of</strong> programs. It is therefore important for board trainings to be adapted to<br />

meet the peculiar gaps identified following the board assessment. MSH –PLAN-health designs its<br />

trainings to suit the needs <strong>of</strong> specific boards, which is not a quick fix method as board members a involve<br />

in identifying their challenges and pr<strong>of</strong>fering actionable steps to address them.<br />

Conclusion<br />

In financial constraint settings, it is essential for the leaders <strong>of</strong> non-pr<strong>of</strong>it organizations to govern<br />

and lead their organizations in ways that will continuously build the confidence and trust <strong>of</strong> its<br />

beneficiaries, staff, funders, community and stakeholders at large. This is imperative if such organizations<br />

would stand the test <strong>of</strong> time and provide sustainable interventions because invariably, development funds<br />

and partners will not always be there. <strong>The</strong>refore, Capacity-building <strong>of</strong> Board members is a critical step to<br />

health system strengthening and sustainability <strong>of</strong> HIV Service Organizations. <strong>The</strong> organizations we have<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

5


worked with demonstrated this as they effectively carry out their roles and responsibilities towards the<br />

board and the organization at large.<br />

Research limitations and directions for future research<br />

1. Even though the findings have shown that board development is critical to effective functioning <strong>of</strong><br />

civil society organizations; the challenge <strong>of</strong> organizations depending mostly on donor agencies to<br />

finance this kind <strong>of</strong> interventions makes it difficult to sustain.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> research is more <strong>of</strong> a description <strong>of</strong> the process and the early indicators <strong>of</strong> success for the board<br />

development <strong>of</strong> these organizations, there is need to carry out further research to track how this<br />

interventions have directly benefited the communities these organizations serve.<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> challenges <strong>of</strong> funding to scale up the provision <strong>of</strong> such support to other grass root community<br />

based organizations and faith based organizations working in all sectors <strong>of</strong> health care not just HIV<br />

and AIDS in view <strong>of</strong> the obvious gains arising from it.<br />

4. Civil society organizations do not exist in isolation as a result they are subject to the influence <strong>of</strong> all<br />

the factors affecting the health system <strong>of</strong> the nation. This may affect the nature and benefit <strong>of</strong> this<br />

kind <strong>of</strong> intervention<br />

References<br />

Federal Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health, Nigeria; National Situation Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Health Sector Response to HIV and<br />

AIDS in Nigeria; FMOH/NASCP 2005; 1-198.<br />

UNAIDS AIDS epidemic update: Global summary <strong>of</strong> the AIDS epidemic 2009<br />

World Health Organization, UNAIDS and UNICEF 2010. Towards Universal Access: Scaling up priority<br />

HIV/AIDS interventions in the health sector. 2010 Progress Report. World Health Organization, UNAIDS and<br />

UNICEF 2010<br />

Gladys M, D. Mukurazita H. Jackson A; A review <strong>of</strong> household and community responses to the HIV/AIDS<br />

epidemic in the rural areas <strong>of</strong> sub-Saharan Africa (UNAIDS: Geneva, 1999), available at http://<br />

www.unaids.org/publications/documents/economics/agriculture/una99e39.pdf, last accessed 2 June 2012.<br />

B Rau; Politics <strong>of</strong> Civil Society in Confronting HIV and AIDS; Journal <strong>of</strong> International Affairs; 82.2 ; 2006<br />

Greet P; Laura M; Mary A. T; Saly S M; S<strong>of</strong>ia G; Increasing Civil Society Participation in the National HIV<br />

Response: <strong>The</strong> Role <strong>of</strong> UNGASS Reporting; J Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome Volume 52, Supplement 2,<br />

December 1, 2009<br />

Abdulazeez Y, Ismail B, Institutional Responses and the People Living with HIV/AIDS in Nigeria: <strong>The</strong> Gaps in<br />

Sustainable Prevention, Mitigation, Care and Support; European Journal <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences – Volume 17, Number 3<br />

(2010)<br />

Action Aid Nigeria; Integrated HIV /AIDS , Tuberculosis and Malaria (ATM) response resource kit for civil<br />

society organizations in Nigeria; 2010<br />

Judy Transforming the works <strong>of</strong> the Boards; Moving toward community driven governance, December, 2005<br />

Principles and practices <strong>of</strong> non-pr<strong>of</strong>it excellence; A guide for non-pr<strong>of</strong>it Board members, managers and staff.<br />

Minnesota Council <strong>of</strong> non-pr<strong>of</strong>it, 2010<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

<strong>The</strong> authors wish to acknowledge all the staff <strong>of</strong> the Program to build Leadership and Accountability in the<br />

Nigerian Health sector (PLAN-Health), Management Sciences more specifically Barry Smith, who believed in me and<br />

generously shared insights , wisdom and materials gathered from vast experience working in various international<br />

Boards. I would also like to thank Ochanya Iyaji-Paul, a HIV/AIDS community care advisor, with the PROACT<br />

project who prodded me to document the work I carry out with the Board <strong>of</strong> organizations.<br />

Special gratitude goes to the Board and members <strong>of</strong> Gede foundation and Lawanti Community Development<br />

Foundation who were open to learning and created an enabling environment for this intervention.<br />

Source <strong>of</strong> Funding<br />

<strong>The</strong> intervention that gave rise to this article was supported by the United States Presidents’ Emergency Plan<br />

for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Program to build Leadership and Accountability in Nigeria’s Health System (PLAN-Health), Associate award<br />

No. 620-A-00-10-0009-00 under the Cooperative Agreement No. GPO-A-00-05-0024<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

6


Are Singapore Boards Global<br />

Shital Jhunjhunwala<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Public Enterprise, India<br />

&<br />

R.K. Mishra<br />

Director, Institute <strong>of</strong> Public Enterprise, India<br />

Keywords<br />

Regional Diversity, Board Diversity, International Directors.<br />

Abstract<br />

While there is a rising acceptance that to be effective boards should be diverse, study <strong>of</strong> diversity is mostly limited to<br />

race or gender. This paper examines regional diversity <strong>of</strong> corporate boards <strong>of</strong> Singapore. Singapore boards do not<br />

have global representation but are biased towards local directors. Need for relevant talent on board appears to be a<br />

major reason to appoint international directors. <strong>The</strong> study did not find a strong relationship between boards’<br />

globalization and its size.<br />

Research Need and Objective<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a growing belief that heterogeneous boards with wide range or skills, view points,<br />

experience and different ways <strong>of</strong> thinking will result in higher levels <strong>of</strong> boards’ productivity and<br />

effectiveness. Research in this respect has mainly focused on gender and race diversity suggesting that<br />

increase <strong>of</strong> women and minorities on boards improves their performance. Diversity goes beyond race and<br />

gender to encompass age, experience, ethnicity, lifestyle, culture, education, religion and many other<br />

facets that make each <strong>of</strong> us unique as individuals.<br />

In this paper we examine whether Singapore Boards are regionally diverse in terms <strong>of</strong> having<br />

global representation. People from different countries have different cultural and upbringing background.<br />

Further as businesses are now global, having a board that understands how different countries operate,<br />

their business environment and people is a necessity.<br />

Research Methodology<br />

To explore regional diversity in Singapore boards we asked the following research questions -<br />

1. Level <strong>of</strong> Global Representation<br />

2. Does talent and skill need increase regional diversity<br />

3. Impact <strong>of</strong> Board Size on Regional Diversity<br />

<strong>The</strong> sample consisted <strong>of</strong> 302 directors from 29 <strong>of</strong> the 30 Straits Times Index (STI) companies, the<br />

major index <strong>of</strong> Singapore for the year 2010. (Information on one company could not be obtained). Data<br />

was collected using Content analysis from annual reports and websites <strong>of</strong> the companies under study. <strong>The</strong><br />

country with which they spent the early years <strong>of</strong> life (referred to as country <strong>of</strong> origin or belonging<br />

henceforth) has been considered and not the country <strong>of</strong> residence or citizenship. <strong>The</strong>re country <strong>of</strong> origin<br />

has been estimated based on appearance, name, and early education. Country <strong>of</strong> 28 directors <strong>of</strong> the 302<br />

directors could not be identified making the final sample size <strong>of</strong> directors 274.<br />

Level <strong>of</strong> Global Representation<br />

As many as 24% <strong>of</strong> the boards have directors only from Singapore and more than ¾ had at list one<br />

international Director. (Figure 1) 55% <strong>of</strong> the 200 largest US companies have no non-US director 1 . At the<br />

same time 28% <strong>of</strong> the Singapore boards have directors representing 5 or more countries. Thus Singapore<br />

boards are more regionally disperse than US companies with some boards being more regionally diverse<br />

than others.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

7


Figure 1<br />

Regional Diversity <strong>of</strong> Boards<br />

NA<br />

10%<br />

6 Countries<br />

14%<br />

5 Countries<br />

14%<br />

4 Countries<br />

14%<br />

3 Countries<br />

10%<br />

2 Countries<br />

14%<br />

1 Country<br />

24%<br />

Figure 2<br />

Regional Dispersion<br />

0.7<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.5<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

Proportion <strong>of</strong> Directors<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

Local<br />

SEA & China & Singapore<br />

Other Asian Counties<br />

UK<br />

USA & Canada<br />

Europe<br />

Africa<br />

Australia & New Zeland<br />

South America<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

Singapore SEA & China Other Asian<br />

Counties<br />

UK USA & Canada Europe Africa Australia &<br />

New Zeland<br />

Region<br />

South America<br />

As expected more than 60% <strong>of</strong> the directors belong to Singapore. (Figure 2) With South East<br />

Asian countries being the number two with almost 13 % share. More than 1/3 <strong>of</strong> the directors were from<br />

other countries. Only 6% <strong>of</strong> US directors are non-US. Some <strong>of</strong> the companies listed on STI are based in<br />

other countries particularly Hong Kong, Malaysia & Indonesia. When comparing directors’ country to<br />

country <strong>of</strong> the company the share <strong>of</strong> directors being local increased by about 4% (64.6 % to 68.2%).<br />

Unmistakably companies prefer local directors to directors from foreign countries. More than 82% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

directors were from Asia. Another 13% were from USA or UK. Less than 5% come from other parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world. <strong>The</strong> study <strong>of</strong> US companies had shown the <strong>of</strong> the non- US directors about 50% were from UK or<br />

Canada, 20% from Europe (Germany, France and Netherlands) and another 8% from Australia all western<br />

countries with little representation from Asia.<br />

Gender inequality is obvious with female directors being restricted to Singaporeans. In case <strong>of</strong> male<br />

directors only 62 % <strong>of</strong> the directors were from Singapore.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

8


Table 1: Duration on Board<br />

Home<br />

Duration years Country Other Countries<br />

Average 7 6<br />

Maximum 44 22<br />

Less Than 1 year 13% 20%<br />

1-20 years 79% 76%<br />

More than 20 years 8% 5%<br />

Directors from home country had served on the board <strong>of</strong> the company longer than directors from<br />

others countries with the maximum duration being double. (Table 1) 7% more <strong>of</strong> the directors from other<br />

countries had been on the board for less than one year and 3% less had been serving the board for more<br />

than 20 years implying a bias in favour <strong>of</strong> directors from home country. It also suggests that globalization<br />

<strong>of</strong> Singapore Boards has gained prominence only in recent years.<br />

Figure 3<br />

Regional Represention by Status<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

2%<br />

0%<br />

2%<br />

2%<br />

13%<br />

9%<br />

0%<br />

8%<br />

12%<br />

8%<br />

2% 0%<br />

2%<br />

2%<br />

5%<br />

5%<br />

3%<br />

9%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

Executive<br />

Non-<br />

Executive<br />

Independent<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> Directors<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

28%<br />

12%<br />

60%<br />

72%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

Other Asian Counties<br />

Local<br />

SEA & China & Singapore<br />

UK<br />

USA & Canada<br />

Europe<br />

Africa<br />

Australia & New Zeland<br />

South America<br />

20%<br />

45%<br />

Singapore<br />

Other Asian Counties<br />

SEA & China<br />

UK<br />

10%<br />

USA & Canada<br />

Europe<br />

Africa<br />

Australia & New Zeland<br />

0%<br />

Executive Non-Executive Independent<br />

Status<br />

South America<br />

As almost 65% <strong>of</strong> the directors are from Singapore it is no surprise that 60% <strong>of</strong> non- executive and 72% <strong>of</strong><br />

independent directors were from Singapore. What appears unusual is that only 45% <strong>of</strong> the executives are<br />

from Singapore. Executive directors tend to be from the same country as the where the company is based.<br />

In fact 64% <strong>of</strong> the executive directors are <strong>of</strong> local origin. (Figure 3)<br />

Table 2: Status break up for regions<br />

Non-<br />

Region<br />

Executive Executive Independent<br />

Singapore 12% 20% 68%<br />

Local 16% 21% 63%<br />

SEA & China 37% 20% 43%<br />

SEA & China & Singapore<br />

16% 16% 68%<br />

Other Asian Counties 29% 36% 36%<br />

UK 29% 33% 38%<br />

USA & Canada 7% 33% 60%<br />

Europe 20% 0% 80%<br />

Africa 0% 0% 100%<br />

Australia & New Zealand 0% 0% 100%<br />

South America 100% 0% 0%<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

9


Of all the Singaporeans on boards 12% are executives, 20% non-executives and as much as 68%<br />

are independent directors. (Table 2) 35% <strong>of</strong> Asians directors (other than Singapore) were executive<br />

directors. This suggests that in selection <strong>of</strong> executive directors’ talent and ability to run the company gets<br />

more importance than country they belong to.<br />

Figure 4:<br />

Country <strong>of</strong> Chairman and CEO/MD<br />

Chairman<br />

CEO/MD<br />

UK, 10%<br />

SEA, 10%<br />

India, 0%<br />

HK/China,<br />

7%<br />

Others/NK<br />

, 0%<br />

Singapore,<br />

72%<br />

Others/N<br />

K, 18%<br />

UK, 4%<br />

SEA, 4%<br />

India, 7%<br />

HK/China,<br />

14%<br />

Singapore<br />

, 54%<br />

Singapore<br />

HK/China<br />

India<br />

SEA<br />

UK<br />

Others/NK<br />

When it came to selection <strong>of</strong> Chairman, Singaporeans were definitely the first preference (72%).<br />

In contrast about half the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) /Managing Director were not from Singapore.<br />

Table 3: Top Man: Local or Global<br />

Home Country Other Countries<br />

Chairperson 97% 3%<br />

CEO/MD 77% 23%<br />

*UK Chairpersons to Hong Kong based companies were considered as home Country as these<br />

companies were build and grew during the period HK was under the control <strong>of</strong> UK<br />

Is the top man from the home country With the exception <strong>of</strong> one company (Singtel) chairman<br />

was from the home country <strong>of</strong> the Company. CEO’s were slightly more broad-based with 23% being<br />

foreigners.<br />

Talent and Skill<br />

Companies are besieged with a huge talent gap that extends all the way up to the boardroom.<br />

Companies need talented, experienced and able directors who have the skills to meet new challenges and<br />

add immense value to the organization. <strong>The</strong> question arises that do companies widen their search to<br />

include international directors to fill this need.<br />

Figure 5<br />

Qualification vs Country<br />

45%<br />

44%<br />

40%<br />

35%<br />

30%<br />

34%<br />

25%<br />

27%<br />

23%<br />

20%<br />

21%<br />

18%<br />

15%<br />

14%<br />

10%<br />

5%<br />

9%<br />

3% 0%<br />

3% 4%<br />

0%<br />

Doctorate Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Post Graduate Graduates Civil Servants Diploma<br />

Qualification<br />

Home Country Other Countries<br />

*Only highest qualification considered<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

10


Comparison between directors from home and other countries show that international directors<br />

are given preference if they have higher qualifications. 5% and 11% more foreign directors were<br />

doctorates or post graduates respectively than local directors. 44% <strong>of</strong> the local directors were graduates<br />

against 27% <strong>of</strong> the foreign directors. (Figure 5)<br />

<strong>The</strong> experiences <strong>of</strong> directors are classified into four categories. First those directly related to<br />

business, say marine experience <strong>of</strong> a board member in companies doing marine business. Secondly,<br />

experience that is closely associated to the company’s business, for instance investment experience <strong>of</strong> a<br />

director in a banking company or a board member in a company in the resort business who is an architect<br />

is considered related experience. Third are Directors with functional experience like accounting,<br />

marketing and law. Finally those directors whose experience is unrelated have no obvious linking to the<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> company’s business.<br />

Figure 6<br />

Experience vs. Country<br />

40%<br />

35%<br />

30%<br />

25%<br />

20%<br />

15%<br />

10%<br />

37%<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

7%<br />

27%<br />

8%<br />

34%<br />

Direct<br />

Related<br />

Functional<br />

Nature <strong>of</strong> Experience<br />

40%<br />

31%<br />

Not Related<br />

16%<br />

Other Countries<br />

Home Country<br />

37% <strong>of</strong> international directors had experience directly related to the business <strong>of</strong> the company and<br />

40% had functional expertise. 10% less local board members had direct experience and almost double had<br />

experiences not related to the company activities. (Figure 6) Further all foreign CEO’s had significant<br />

expertise in the company’s business.<br />

An analysis <strong>of</strong> the age <strong>of</strong> board members suggests that directors from foreign countries are<br />

younger on an average by 3 years. 15% <strong>of</strong> local directors were more than 70 years old in contrast, only 6%<br />

international directors were more than 70 years old. 16% <strong>of</strong> international directors were young (less than<br />

50 years), double the local (8%) young directors. (Table 4)<br />

Table 4: Board Age<br />

Home<br />

Age<br />

Country Other Countries<br />

Minimum 43 39<br />

Maximum 82 74<br />

Range 39 35<br />

Average 60 57<br />

Less than 50 8% 16%<br />

50-69 years 77% 77%<br />

70 or more 15% 6%<br />

* based on 107 directors<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

11


Singapore companies are definitely including international directors to bring more talent and skill<br />

on board both in terms <strong>of</strong> qualification and experience. Younger international directors are being<br />

appointed who can help the board gear up to face challenges <strong>of</strong> the modern world.<br />

Board Size and Regional Diversity<br />

Table 5 shows no evident relationship between board size and regional diversity. <strong>The</strong> correlation<br />

between board size and number <strong>of</strong> countries was only 0.46. <strong>The</strong> regression equation formed was<br />

y =0.5x - 1.93 at .019 significance level<br />

Table 5: Board Size and level <strong>of</strong> Regional Diversity<br />

Board Country per Director Total<br />

Size


Corporate Governance in the Value Based Management Concept<br />

Tomasz Rojek<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Keywords<br />

Corporate governance, investor relations, value based management, enterprise stakeholders, agency<br />

theory<br />

Abstract<br />

Market economies <strong>of</strong> 21st century characterize with a distinct change in the priorities <strong>of</strong> business,<br />

expressing itself in implementing by enterprises strategies focused on the multiplication <strong>of</strong> wealth <strong>of</strong> their owners, as<br />

well as the common domination <strong>of</strong> so-called investor capitalism. <strong>The</strong> consequence is the occurrence <strong>of</strong> considerable<br />

dispersion <strong>of</strong> ownership, the isolation <strong>of</strong> the ownership function from the enterprise management function and<br />

dominating enterprise ownership structures by institutional investors. In these conditions, conflicts between the<br />

interests <strong>of</strong> owners and the interests <strong>of</strong> executives managing enterprises arise. All the more that the limitation <strong>of</strong><br />

exercising control function by the first ones is increased both by the dispersion <strong>of</strong> the titles <strong>of</strong> ownership and the very<br />

character <strong>of</strong> institutional owners on behalf <strong>of</strong> which hired managers perform ownership functions. Such a conflict,<br />

defined as the “agency problem”, primarily results from the diversification <strong>of</strong> the owners’ and the managers’ goals.<br />

In this situation it was necessary to search for instruments which could effectively integrate the goals <strong>of</strong> both <strong>of</strong> these<br />

groups and thus foster enterprise development, an increase in the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> its functioning and the<br />

maximization <strong>of</strong> its market value. In such conditions, the concept <strong>of</strong> value based management was born, the systems<br />

<strong>of</strong> active corporate governance began to be created, and the process <strong>of</strong> re-including “hired” managers in the circle <strong>of</strong><br />

the enterprise owners in order to create conditions motivating them to take decisions supporting the processes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

multiplication <strong>of</strong> enterprise market value was initiated.<br />

Thus, the paper will present the essence and the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the corporate governance system, its<br />

models and assumptions, as well as elements which are convergent and divergent with the value based management<br />

concept. In particular, attention will be paid to the fact that activities focused on creating value for the owners on the<br />

one hand enable to satisfy claims <strong>of</strong> all the interested enterprise stakeholders, and on the other hand allow to create its<br />

value.<br />

Introduction<br />

An era <strong>of</strong> so-called managerial capitalism, ongoing in the world economy, characterizes, among<br />

others, with a significant separation <strong>of</strong> the ownership function from the managerial function. Due to a<br />

clash among various groups <strong>of</strong> interest in an enterprise (the owners, the managers, the employees) and<br />

external entities, a conviction has established that the main aim <strong>of</strong> an enterprise is survival and<br />

development followed by the maximization <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it and value. An attempt to reconcile the mentioned<br />

three groups <strong>of</strong> interest in an enterprise requires the simultaneous implementation <strong>of</strong> economic and social<br />

tasks by it. In practice, it is extremely difficult. <strong>The</strong> multitude <strong>of</strong> these tasks seriously restricts efficient<br />

enterprise management, at the same time becoming a base for endless discussions on whose interests<br />

should be realized first.<br />

Enterprises which function according to this model have problems, among others, with making<br />

plans and settling results. In consequence, they may operate not effectively enough, which may bring<br />

negative universal social consequences as it may lead to the waste <strong>of</strong> resources and the slowdown <strong>of</strong> the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the national economy. Imposing the implementation <strong>of</strong> divergent goals on an enterprise,<br />

such as: manufacturing goals, goals connected with the multiplication <strong>of</strong> capital, educational, cultural,<br />

ecological goals, etc., is the reason for which enterprises, wanting to implement a lot <strong>of</strong> goals, in practice<br />

do not implement any <strong>of</strong> them well, and they do not implement many <strong>of</strong> them at all. Moreover, the<br />

multiplicity <strong>of</strong> goals creates serious barriers for efficient management, such as: an inability to create<br />

consistent and long-term strategic plans, blurring the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> measurement systems, and, what<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

13


follows, it brings about difficulties in building motivation systems. <strong>The</strong> questions: whose interests should<br />

be taken into consideration in the first place and how it is possible to reconcile conflicts within this scope<br />

are always a subject <strong>of</strong> heated debates. In practice, it is the bargaining power <strong>of</strong> a specific group connected<br />

with the enterprise that decides whose interest is the most important, <strong>of</strong>ten with harm or complete<br />

disregard for the interest <strong>of</strong> other groups.<br />

<strong>The</strong> biggest problems with establishing the hierarchy <strong>of</strong> goals concern primarily medium-sized<br />

and large enterprises in which the separation <strong>of</strong> ownership and managerial functions has occurred. In<br />

smaller enterprises, where owners very <strong>of</strong>ten also deal with management, at the same time performing<br />

ownership and managerial functions, the problems occur to a smaller extent. <strong>The</strong> question <strong>of</strong> defining the<br />

basic goal for the existence <strong>of</strong> the enterprise, and the balance <strong>of</strong> power <strong>of</strong> individual groups <strong>of</strong> interest<br />

depend on a corporate governance (CG) model adopted in a given enterprise, defined as an organization<br />

<strong>of</strong> relations among the owners, the management board and the employees in the process <strong>of</strong> exercising<br />

control over the enterprise. To be more specific, it is a system <strong>of</strong> assessing activities <strong>of</strong> the enterprise<br />

management bodies in the process <strong>of</strong> its value creation and the development for stakeholders, conditioned<br />

institutionally and customarily. Stimulating development and creating enterprise value, harmonizing<br />

interests <strong>of</strong> the parties involved in it, and ensuring investment attractiveness are considered the main<br />

objectives <strong>of</strong> CG. Thus, on the one hand, it enables effective ownership control, and on the other hand it<br />

creates a mechanism which integrates the goals <strong>of</strong> individual stakeholders <strong>of</strong> the enterprise.<br />

To a great extent, the CG tasks presented above are compatible with the assumptions <strong>of</strong> the value<br />

based management concept whose general model assumes the existence <strong>of</strong> balance between diverse goals<br />

<strong>of</strong> the individual groups <strong>of</strong> interest. Value based management, by its nature focused on the maximization<br />

<strong>of</strong> this value for the owners, does not mean that building strong loyalty bonds within its framework,<br />

which fosters gaining benefits from mutual cooperation with all the other stakeholders is less important.<br />

This fact is the reason for which the value based management concept is accepted by all entities <strong>of</strong> the<br />

enterprise’s environment, and is now considered a kind <strong>of</strong> a standard <strong>of</strong> strategic management <strong>of</strong> an<br />

organization, being one <strong>of</strong> the few management philosophies which, focusing on the implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

the enterprise owners’ goals, strives at its development and conduces the improvement <strong>of</strong> effectiveness,<br />

and at the same time creates benefits for other stakeholders.<br />

<strong>The</strong> essence and the models <strong>of</strong> corporate governance<br />

Corporate governance is a phenomenon which is currently common in the economic practice,<br />

consisting in ensuring balance between the interests <strong>of</strong> all the entities which are directly or indirectly<br />

involved in enterprise activity. Functioning <strong>of</strong> corporate governance may be discussed on two levels: a<br />

formal level and an informal one.<br />

<strong>The</strong> informal level is formed by cultural factors and national tradition influencing colloquial<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the corporate governance notion and the shape <strong>of</strong> its everyday practice.<br />

On the formal level, corporate governance is shaped by legal regulations. <strong>The</strong>y include<br />

regulations <strong>of</strong> commonly mandatory character, such as the Business Activity Act, civil law, the<br />

Accounting Act, as well as internal documents <strong>of</strong> an enterprise, such as the statute, and other acts<br />

regulating the activity <strong>of</strong> the enterprise bodies or the rules <strong>of</strong> good practice being in effect in the<br />

enterprise, including the suggestions <strong>of</strong> actions, in particular practical situations, and thus ordering<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> the enterprise bodies and their members.<br />

In various countries, various factors shape the formal and the informal level <strong>of</strong> corporate<br />

governance, giving shape to its mechanism and practice. <strong>The</strong> systematization <strong>of</strong> the differences mentioned<br />

above brought about the isolation <strong>of</strong> so-called national models <strong>of</strong> corporate governance defining the rules<br />

<strong>of</strong> the corporate governance organization in the groups <strong>of</strong> states in which there are significant similarities<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

14


etween the conditions <strong>of</strong> enterprise functioning (Lis/Sterniczuk 2005). In the literature on the subject, the<br />

following national models are distinguished:<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> German model. <strong>The</strong> assumptions <strong>of</strong> the German model were applied while designing the<br />

system <strong>of</strong> the corporate governance bodies in Germany, Holland, Switzerland, Sweden, Austria,<br />

Denmark, Norway and Finland, Central European countries and the Baltic states. Its elements are<br />

also present in the Polish corporate governance system. Corporate governance bodies in the<br />

German model consist <strong>of</strong> the Supervisory Board and the Management Board. <strong>The</strong> responsibility <strong>of</strong><br />

the Supervisory Board is to control the enterprise management, exercised in the shareholders’<br />

interests, and the protection <strong>of</strong> public interest. It seems that in the German model the interests <strong>of</strong><br />

the groups <strong>of</strong> owners are not protected to the same extent, e.g. the protection <strong>of</strong> minority<br />

shareholders’ interests is relatively weak.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> Latin model. <strong>The</strong> assumptions <strong>of</strong> the Latin model are present in the corporate governance<br />

systems <strong>of</strong> France, Italy, Spain and Belgium. It is estimated that the rules and the mechanisms <strong>of</strong><br />

corporate governance in these countries are relatively poorly developed. <strong>The</strong> Latin model allows<br />

two forms <strong>of</strong> the corporate governance body structure. <strong>The</strong> first one, in which there is a single<br />

organ <strong>of</strong> corporate governance, namely the Board <strong>of</strong> Directors, which is modeled on the British or<br />

American model. <strong>The</strong> other possibility is designing corporate governance body on the German<br />

model, namely dividing duties resulting from exercising corporate governance between two<br />

organs - the Management Board and the Supervisory Board. <strong>The</strong> decision about the choice <strong>of</strong><br />

structure belongs to the enterprise owners.<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> British model. <strong>The</strong> practice <strong>of</strong> corporate governance in the British model is based on the<br />

mechanisms <strong>of</strong> self-regulation which do not provide for a necessity <strong>of</strong> the external interference<br />

from the state in enforcing the rules <strong>of</strong> corporate governance.<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> American model. <strong>The</strong> basic value that the mechanisms <strong>of</strong> the American system <strong>of</strong> corporate<br />

governance are subject to is the transparency <strong>of</strong> information on the doings <strong>of</strong> an enterprise. <strong>The</strong><br />

corporate governance body whose task is to control the enterprise’s operations is the Board <strong>of</strong><br />

Directors which includes managing directors, that is executives, and external independent<br />

directors who represent shareholders.<br />

5. <strong>The</strong> Japanese model. In Japan, the corporate governance body is the Board <strong>of</strong> Directors appointed<br />

by shareholders. <strong>The</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Directors employs and controls the Management Board <strong>of</strong> the<br />

enterprise. <strong>The</strong> code <strong>of</strong> good practice is the basic document regulating the rules <strong>of</strong> corporate<br />

governance.<br />

It is estimated that the organization <strong>of</strong> corporate governance in the European countries is based on<br />

the assumptions <strong>of</strong> the German and Latin models. Moreover, it should be emphasized that the theoretical<br />

models mentioned above refer to the rules <strong>of</strong> the organization <strong>of</strong> corporate governance in all enterprises<br />

without differentiating their ownership status. On the basis <strong>of</strong> the general assumptions, characteristic for a<br />

given model, the states adopt specific solutions concerning the ownership supervision, sometimes<br />

different from the ones functioning in the private sector. At the same time, we must remember that the<br />

models presented above keep evolving and undergo deliberate reforms. Supporters <strong>of</strong> the reforms in<br />

corporate governance postulate that they should lead to the following beneficial model changes (Porter<br />

1997):<br />

1. An increase in the real ownership in economy by enabling owners to perform the function <strong>of</strong> a<br />

long-term, active role in companies;<br />

2. Better synchronization <strong>of</strong> the interests <strong>of</strong> shareholders, corporations, managers, workers and the<br />

society;<br />

3. Improvement in the quality <strong>of</strong> the information used while taking investment decisions;<br />

4. Enabling investors more effective supervision over the results <strong>of</strong> managers’ activities based on the<br />

criteria which are adequate for the enhancement <strong>of</strong> competitiveness;<br />

5. Ensuring greater accordance <strong>of</strong> internal management processes with the sources <strong>of</strong> enterprise<br />

competitive advantage.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

15


<strong>The</strong> origin and the role <strong>of</strong> corporate governance in an enterprise<br />

What underlies the emergence <strong>of</strong> the corporate governance concept is the agency theory,<br />

formulated and popularized in the American model. <strong>The</strong> agency (representation) relation occurs when<br />

one entity (a mandatary, a principal) employs another person (an agent) to act in its interest, at the same<br />

time delegating its authority to make decisions the consequences <strong>of</strong> which will relate to its property<br />

sphere. Its consequence, however, is moving away the principal from the forefront <strong>of</strong> activities with the<br />

simultaneously growing degree <strong>of</strong> the agent’s freedom. <strong>The</strong> separation <strong>of</strong> the principal from the main<br />

stream <strong>of</strong> events limits both the certainty <strong>of</strong> the realization <strong>of</strong> its interests, and the possibility to influence<br />

the agent.<br />

From the economic point <strong>of</strong> view, the principal - agent relation takes place between the<br />

shareholders and the managers <strong>of</strong> a public company: the shareholders entrust their capital with the<br />

managers and delegate their right to manage and administer it in their interest. <strong>The</strong> base for this<br />

“fiduciary” transfer <strong>of</strong> rights to dispose the capital is “the implicit contract” between the shareholders and<br />

the managers. By entrusting their capital with the managers, the shareholders expect that the latter will<br />

manage it in their interest, with due diligence and loyally to them. In other words, the managers are<br />

“agents” who manage somebody else’s capital, namely the capital <strong>of</strong> the shareholders who are their<br />

economic “principals”. On the grounds <strong>of</strong> this theory, a company is a legal fiction - an artifact enabling the<br />

accumulation <strong>of</strong> capital to implement specific economic ventures with the use <strong>of</strong> the existing<br />

specializations <strong>of</strong> the parties to the agency relation. Shareholders have capital at their disposal but they do<br />

not have time, knowledge or experience to use it effectively. <strong>The</strong>refore, they entrust it with pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

managers having adequate knowledge, skills and experience within this scope. In this way, the separation<br />

<strong>of</strong> ownership and control (management) over the company occurs. This separation enables economically<br />

effective “division <strong>of</strong> work” and the use <strong>of</strong> the specializations <strong>of</strong> the existing entities employed in the<br />

corporation, particularly the pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism <strong>of</strong> the managers and the financial abilities <strong>of</strong> the investors.<br />

However, the agency relation is also connected with a significant threat for the shareholders. Managers<br />

may use the authority they are given to fulfill their individual (private) aims which do not agree with the<br />

shareholders’ interests and aims as the economic owners <strong>of</strong> the company. Some significant problems <strong>of</strong><br />

the relations between the company shareholders and managers result from that, namely:<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> information asymmetry between principals (shareholders) and agents (managers,<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the Management Board) expresses itself in the advantage the managers have in the<br />

access to information on the company doings and in the limited ability <strong>of</strong> shareholders to verify<br />

reports prepared by the managers and to monitor their operations.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> the representative’s hidden action - the manager, acting as a rational homo<br />

oeconomicus, first <strong>of</strong> all strives at the maximization <strong>of</strong> his personal usefulness (the fulfillment <strong>of</strong> his<br />

individual interest) with the least possible amount <strong>of</strong> labour, trying to hide it from his<br />

“principals”. He may justify his failures with objective circumstances (e.g. unfavourable market<br />

situation). <strong>The</strong>re is also a danger <strong>of</strong> the opportunistic behaviour <strong>of</strong> the managers - opportunism<br />

prompts the agent to minimize his contribution (effort) and maximize his individual wealth and<br />

extra-financial benefits.<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> risk division, which is connected with different preferences <strong>of</strong> the principal and<br />

the agent. Shareholders have small block <strong>of</strong> shares in a large number <strong>of</strong> companies, risk<br />

diversification favours adopting a more open attitude to risky investment. On the other hand,<br />

managers engage all their time and skills (human capital) into one enterprise, hence, the<br />

unwillingness to undertake too risky ventures (aversion to risk), as well as the inclination to keep<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>it in the company creates balance reserves and limits the size <strong>of</strong> dividend to be paid to<br />

shareholders. <strong>The</strong> reason for that is that the payment <strong>of</strong> disposable resources decreases the scope<br />

<strong>of</strong> the power <strong>of</strong> managers in big enterprises, and keeping pr<strong>of</strong>it in the company makes them<br />

independent from the control <strong>of</strong> the capital market - by treasuring pr<strong>of</strong>it, the managers do not<br />

have to search for additional funds from shareholders. <strong>The</strong>n, the managers may allocate<br />

disposable funds to investment aiming at the “horizontal” extension <strong>of</strong> the company or the whole<br />

concern, e.g. the takeover <strong>of</strong> other companies or the acquisition <strong>of</strong> enterprises from other<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

16


industries whose reorganization or development requires further, considerable investment<br />

expenditure. However, such investment does not create additional shareholder value, and the<br />

motive underlying the managers’ decision to undertake it is <strong>of</strong>ten the strive at an increase in their<br />

power and significance in the business environment (so-called empire building).<br />

To sum up, the agency conflict between shareholders and managers boils down to the problems<br />

<strong>of</strong> threefold kind:<br />

Firstly, the problem <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> managers’ loyalty to the company and shareholders, expressing<br />

itself in a danger <strong>of</strong> overusing the managers’ direct influence on the company in order to<br />

maximize their individual interests at the expense <strong>of</strong> the shareholders’ interests.<br />

Secondly, the danger <strong>of</strong> not exercising due diligence when conducting the company business and<br />

using their information advantage in order to free themselves from responsibility for the<br />

economic failures <strong>of</strong> the company.<br />

Thirdly, various degree <strong>of</strong> aversion to risk which is characteristic for portfolio investors and<br />

managers, which results from various character <strong>of</strong> “contributions” brought into company by them<br />

and various possibilities <strong>of</strong> diversifying this risk.<br />

Apart from the mentioned conflicts between the owner and the manager, there are also other conflicts<br />

referring to all stakeholders, which jointly include:<br />

shareholders – contribute financial capital, they are interested in the maximum return on the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> the investment made (dividend, an increase in the share price),<br />

employees – contribute their work, time, skills; they are interested in remuneration, permanency<br />

<strong>of</strong> employment relationship, good conditions <strong>of</strong> work. Employees develop particular<br />

qualifications, specific for a given organization, counting that they will be able to use the acquired<br />

skills working in a given corporation. Passing to another firm <strong>of</strong>ten forces them to the repeated<br />

investment into the development necessary to perform different functions;<br />

managers - contribute knowledge, time, skills and other components <strong>of</strong> human capital,<br />

lenders - bring funds, expect regular remuneration in the form <strong>of</strong> interest,<br />

suppliers - provide services, sell necessary resources, they are interested in fruitful and long-term<br />

cooperation,<br />

insurers - <strong>of</strong>fer protection services, they are interested in stable and safe development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

enterprise, which translates into an increased value <strong>of</strong> insurance premiums (Pukaa 2011),<br />

local societies - ensure local infrastructure, expect the improvement in the quality <strong>of</strong> living,<br />

creating workplaces.<br />

Both the partners and the employees, as well as the company creditors, and the social environment in<br />

which the enterprise operates, are interested in the long-term development <strong>of</strong> the company, increasing its<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability and competitiveness, which enables to maintain permanent legal and economic relations with<br />

it and assures settling their claims against the company by it. However, due to a different character <strong>of</strong><br />

“contributions” made by them in the company (namely, the way in which they contribute to its economic<br />

success) and a different character <strong>of</strong> their claims for their assets, there may be situations in which the<br />

interests <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> stakeholders or certain categories <strong>of</strong> stakeholders may be in conflict with<br />

the interests <strong>of</strong> other entities connected with the company:<br />

employees, creditors, suppliers - are interested in keeping workplaces, payment <strong>of</strong> regular<br />

remuneration and possibly its raise. In the interest <strong>of</strong> these entities will be conducting cautious<br />

dividend policy, treasuring pr<strong>of</strong>it in the company, cautious asset valuation and creating balance<br />

reserves. <strong>The</strong>y will rather prefer the company’s engagement into ventures which are less risky but<br />

guarantee the settlement <strong>of</strong> the defined a priori claims against it. In extreme cases, the employees<br />

and the trade unions representing them, aiming at the maintenance <strong>of</strong> a high level <strong>of</strong> employment<br />

in the company may, however, impede or even prevent its necessary restructuring, which is<br />

related to the necessity <strong>of</strong> redundancies or reducing the employees’ remuneration.<br />

shareholders - are interested in obtaining return rate on investment in the company shares, either<br />

in the form <strong>of</strong> an increase in their stock price index or in the form <strong>of</strong> the payment <strong>of</strong> dividend;<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

17


conducting the company management policy by the management board whose aim will be to<br />

increase its shareholder value.<br />

To sum up, the rules and the instruments <strong>of</strong> corporate governance have been created and are applied<br />

to neutralize the conflicts mentioned above which occur between the stakeholders <strong>of</strong> an enterprise. Thus,<br />

the basic role <strong>of</strong> corporate governance is to build economic value cooperation between the stakeholders,<br />

which is to serve the interests <strong>of</strong> a corporation since it constitutes contribution towards its long-term<br />

success. <strong>The</strong> basic goals <strong>of</strong> the system <strong>of</strong> control and supervision over the corporation, the expression <strong>of</strong><br />

which are corporate governance rules, include:<br />

harmonizing interests <strong>of</strong> entities being the parties participating in the corporation functioning;<br />

provide the owners and the stakeholders with effective procedures and the institution <strong>of</strong><br />

monitoring the Management Board and correcting its mistakes,<br />

gradual increase in the enterprise value from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> the owners and other interested<br />

entities,<br />

creating investment attractiveness and ensuring the supply <strong>of</strong> funds enabling the enterprise<br />

development.<br />

Value based management versus corporate governance in the enterprise<br />

Value based management is considered a concept well conveying the need to define enterprise goals,<br />

and favouring the integration <strong>of</strong> managers’ and enterprise owners’ goals (Jaki 2008). It indicates a need to<br />

maximize value for all stakeholders owing to which it is regarded universal. It is also an element binding<br />

the enterprise strategy and the financial results achieved by it.<br />

Value based management is a philosophy <strong>of</strong> enterprise management according to which enterprise<br />

activity and management processes are focused on maximizing its value from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> the<br />

owners and the capital engaged by them (Szczepankowski 2007). <strong>The</strong> concept assumes taking such<br />

strategic, operating and investment decisions in the enterprise which will help to achieve its main goal,<br />

namely the growth <strong>of</strong> value. Enterprise value creation is nowadays one <strong>of</strong> the strategies <strong>of</strong> conducting<br />

business activity, and triggering adequate management processes is necessary to include it in the rules <strong>of</strong><br />

enterprise functioning. And although an increase in the enterprise value is not always equal to an increase<br />

in the owner value (they are not synonymous notions), ensuring an increase in the owner value usually<br />

also requires satisfying the needs <strong>of</strong> other interested groups, recipients, employees or contractors, for<br />

example, which at the same time leads to the growth <strong>of</strong> the enterprise value. Increasing the owner value<br />

as a goal <strong>of</strong> the enterprise activity is advantageous because achieving it means also the fulfillment <strong>of</strong> other<br />

goals set to the enterprise. <strong>The</strong>refore, this process may be perceived as a kind <strong>of</strong> a compromise between<br />

variously defined goals, reconciling even conflicting goals and giving the best result in the long term.<br />

Some theories <strong>of</strong> enterprise (managerial theories and agency theory, among others) emphasize the<br />

meaning <strong>of</strong> conflict <strong>of</strong> interests between the managers and the owners <strong>of</strong> an enterprise, which finally<br />

causes distortions <strong>of</strong> the goals implemented by the company. Enterprise value management puts a lot <strong>of</strong><br />

pressure on diluting or even eliminating this conflict. It is achieved owing to an adequate structure <strong>of</strong><br />

motivation systems, connecting the managers’ interest with the owners’ interest, and basing management<br />

on proper measures. Also the fact that the focus on increasing value in a long term is compliant with the<br />

postulate <strong>of</strong> balancing interests <strong>of</strong> all stakeholders is also helpful. Thus, aiming at creating the owner<br />

value may be regarded the leading goal <strong>of</strong> the enterprise, on the condition <strong>of</strong> understanding its essence by<br />

other stakeholders whose expectations may initially seem divergent. This initial divergence <strong>of</strong> interests <strong>of</strong><br />

individual groups being in a relationship with the enterprise must be always remembered. Consumers<br />

want low prices and high quality, employees want high salaries and good conditions <strong>of</strong> work, suppliers<br />

want low risk and high return rate, creditors want low risk and high interest rate, local community wants<br />

high environmental fees, donations to charity and numerous workplaces. <strong>The</strong> postulates <strong>of</strong> balancing<br />

interests <strong>of</strong> all the entities related to the enterprise <strong>of</strong>ten make it simpler for the managers to justify noneconomic<br />

diversification or excessive investing in the core activity being in the decline phase, since these<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

18


operations will be positively assessed by entities other than the owners (Rappaport 1999). However, there<br />

is an alternative approach to various groups <strong>of</strong> interest connected with the enterprise, convergent with the<br />

interests <strong>of</strong> the owners, compliant with the rule <strong>of</strong> competitiveness and the rules <strong>of</strong> conduct taking into<br />

consideration social responsibility. This approach assumes a necessity to maintain competitiveness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

enterprise if it is to serve the interests <strong>of</strong> all the entities linked to it. <strong>The</strong> fact that the fate <strong>of</strong> the enterprises<br />

in a long term depends on the financial relations with all the stakeholders is considered here. In order to<br />

satisfy their claims or expectations, the enterprise has to generate cash, maintaining a proper level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> activity.<br />

Focusing on financial flows in the long-term constitutes the content <strong>of</strong> the an increase in the enterprise<br />

value policy model. This value is also based on the sum <strong>of</strong> long-term surpluses <strong>of</strong> stakeholder value. It is<br />

not possible to create a long-term value at the same time ignoring all the interested stakeholders because<br />

value is created when an enterprise has some market share, loyal recipients and suppliers, motivated<br />

workforce, friendly local community, etc. It all translates into the value <strong>of</strong> financial flows. <strong>The</strong><br />

maximization <strong>of</strong> enterprise value causes also the growth <strong>of</strong> the wealth rate for the whole society. It is<br />

possible when the effects <strong>of</strong> enterprises’ activity (the recipient value) are on a higher level than the value<br />

<strong>of</strong> contributions (the supplier value). <strong>The</strong>refore it is true that without customer value we cannot talk about<br />

shareholder value. Thus, the source <strong>of</strong> long-term cash flows are satisfied recipients <strong>of</strong> goods and services.<br />

This satisfaction automatically translates into an increase in shareholder value. It is possible only when<br />

total earnings exceed total costs. Thus, the owners should have full information on what revenues and<br />

costs connected with the conducted activity are, since they incur the biggest capital risk<br />

(Copeland/Koller/Murrin 1997). <strong>The</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> the capital contributed by them is the measure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> enterprise operations. <strong>The</strong>refore, shareholder value is a bonus for them for earlier<br />

satisfaction <strong>of</strong> claims <strong>of</strong> all entities involved in the enterprise activity (suppliers, employees, creditors,<br />

local community, the state) and the incurred risk related to financing this activity. Thus, an increase in<br />

enterprise value reflects the growth <strong>of</strong> productivity and competitiveness from which all the groups linked<br />

to the enterprise, not only the owners benefit. That is why the necessity to maintain competitiveness<br />

should be recognized if it is to survive and serve the interests <strong>of</strong> all the entities related to it.<br />

<strong>The</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> an enterprise in the long run depends on financial relations with all the stakeholders.<br />

In order to meet the expectations reported by the entities connected with the enterprise, it has to generate<br />

adequately high level <strong>of</strong> effectiveness, which, in turn, requires value creation. <strong>The</strong>nce, an enterprise<br />

creating value gives benefits not only to its owners but it also raises the value <strong>of</strong> the claims <strong>of</strong> all the<br />

entities connected with it. To sum up, customer and his satisfaction is the source <strong>of</strong> creating enterprise<br />

value, whereas shareholder value is an additional value which stays after satisfying the claims <strong>of</strong><br />

employees, suppliers, local community, the state. Hence, we may assume that the focus on shareholder<br />

value means simultaneous satisfaction <strong>of</strong> all stakeholders’ claims. Value is a significant indicator <strong>of</strong><br />

results, and the owners are the only party for which the maximization <strong>of</strong> their own demands is<br />

synonymous to the maximization <strong>of</strong> expectations and claims <strong>of</strong> all the interested parties (Wroska 2001).<br />

Thus, on the one hand, activities focused on the shareholder value creation enable to meet the<br />

expectations <strong>of</strong> all stakeholders, whereas on the other hand they make it possible to create enterprise<br />

value. Here also lies the convergence <strong>of</strong> the enterprise value creation and the idea <strong>of</strong> corporate<br />

governance. <strong>The</strong> subjective concept aims at the permanent process <strong>of</strong> the enterprise value growth and at<br />

the same time reconciles the stakeholders’ expectations to it - at the same time inscribing in the canon <strong>of</strong><br />

the progressing ownership supervision.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Market economies <strong>of</strong> 21st century characterize with a distinct change in the priorities <strong>of</strong> business,<br />

expressing itself in implementing by enterprises strategies focused on the multiplication <strong>of</strong> wealth <strong>of</strong> their<br />

owners, as well as the common domination <strong>of</strong> so-called investor capitalism. <strong>The</strong> consequence is the<br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> considerable dispersion <strong>of</strong> ownership, the isolation <strong>of</strong> the ownership function from the<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

19


enterprise management function and dominating enterprise ownership structures by institutional<br />

investors. In these conditions, conflicts between the interests <strong>of</strong> owners and the interests <strong>of</strong> executives<br />

managing enterprises arise. All the more that the limitation <strong>of</strong> exercising control function by the first ones<br />

is increased both by the dispersion <strong>of</strong> the titles <strong>of</strong> ownership and the very character <strong>of</strong> institutional owners<br />

on behalf <strong>of</strong> which hired managers perform ownership functions. Such a conflict, defined as the “agency<br />

problem”, primarily results from the diversification <strong>of</strong> the owners’ and the managers’ goals. In this<br />

situation it was necessary to search for instruments which could effectively integrate the goals <strong>of</strong> both <strong>of</strong><br />

these groups and thus foster enterprise development, an increase in the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> its functioning<br />

and the maximization <strong>of</strong> its market value. In such conditions, the concept <strong>of</strong> value based management was<br />

born, the systems <strong>of</strong> active corporate governance began to be created, and the process <strong>of</strong> re-including<br />

“hired” managers in the circle <strong>of</strong> the enterprise owners in order to create conditions motivating them to<br />

take decisions supporting the processes <strong>of</strong> the multiplication <strong>of</strong> enterprise market value was initiated.<br />

Thus, the thesis that in the conditions <strong>of</strong> market economy, in enterprises focused on the growth <strong>of</strong><br />

value and at the same time possessing the separated ownership and managerial functions in their<br />

structure may be considered true, two concepts discussed in this article: value based management and<br />

corporate governance may and should be implemented simultaneously, they permeate each other, they<br />

complement each other and, by fulfilling their own goals, co-contribute synergically to enterprise<br />

development.<br />

References<br />

Copeland T., Koller T., Murrin J. (1997), Wycena: mierzenie i ksztatowanie wartoci firmy, WIG-Press,<br />

Warszawa.<br />

Jaki A. (2008), Wycena i ksztatowanie wartoci przedsibiorstwa, Wydawnictwo Wolters Kluwer, Kraków.<br />

Lis K.A., Sterniczuk H. (2005), Nadzór Korporacyjny, Wydawnictwo Oficyna Ekonomiczna, Kraków.<br />

Porter M. (1997), Capital Choices: Changing the Way America Invest in Industry, (in:) Studies in International<br />

Corporate Finance and Governance Systems. A Comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> U.S., Japan and Europe, edited by D.H. Chew,<br />

Oxford University Press, Oxford.<br />

Pukaa R. (2011), Potencja rynków ubezpieczeniowych krajów Europy Wschodniej, (in:) Ubezpieczenia<br />

gospodarcze i spoeczne. Wybrane zagadnienia ekonomiczne, Scientific supervision: W. Sukowska, Wydawnictwo<br />

Wolters Kluwer, Kraków.<br />

Rappaport A. (1999), Warto dla akcjonariuszy, WIG-Press, Warszawa.<br />

Szczepankowski P. (2007), Wycena i zarzdzanie wartoci przedsibiorstwa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN,<br />

Warszawa.<br />

Wroska E.M. (2001), Model przedsibiorstwa, system nadzoru korporacyjnego a tworzenie wartoci dla<br />

akcjonariuszy, (in:) Zarzdzanie wartoci przedsibiorstwa a struktura akcjonariatu, Collective work, <strong>The</strong> Univeristy<br />

<strong>of</strong> Gdansk– Warsaw School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Gdynia – Karskrona.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

20


Corporate Governance in Public Sector Banks-Tapping the Bee Hive<br />

Mridula Sahay<br />

Amrita School <strong>of</strong> Business, India<br />

S. Shiva Kumar<br />

Accountant General (C&RA), A.P., Hyderabad, India<br />

Keywords<br />

Globalization, business community, e-broking, corporate governance.<br />

Abstract<br />

Globalisation <strong>of</strong> the businesses has created many challenges in front <strong>of</strong> the corporates and they will not be<br />

able to sustain unless they over come such challenges. In today’s rapidly growing competitive business community,<br />

Corporate Governance provides broad parameters to face the challenges and helps for sustainable development.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the key factor <strong>of</strong> globalisation <strong>of</strong> trade, nationalized and co-operative Banks and banking system in India<br />

also got affected. In general, the banks in India are accountable for public savings and deposits. <strong>The</strong>y are heavily<br />

dependent on interest income and merely it can be believed that the income so realized by these banks consists <strong>of</strong> 80%<br />

from the interest earnings only unlike other private banks. Due to change in policies <strong>of</strong> Government from time to<br />

time and also reduction in interest rates, there is a large reduction <strong>of</strong> income earnings <strong>of</strong> these banks. This has leaded<br />

the management to rethink the functionality <strong>of</strong> these banks to raise their earnings. <strong>The</strong> present paper emphasizes the<br />

need to widen their scope so as to increase the earnings to sustain in the market by entering into the arena <strong>of</strong> online<br />

e-broking. This paper also aims to keep in view the limits <strong>of</strong> the governing board as well as certain objectives related<br />

to the implementation <strong>of</strong> corporate governance principles.<br />

Introduction<br />

Banks are the backbone <strong>of</strong> the country’s economy, providing capital for initiation/modernization<br />

<strong>of</strong> infrastructure, job creation and overall prosperity. Banks are also play a vital role in society, affecting<br />

not only spending by individual but also growth <strong>of</strong> industries. Banks are not only helpful in providing<br />

finances to the commercial enterprises but also facilitate the payments mechanism in the systems, even in<br />

difficult market conditions. <strong>The</strong> country’s growth is depending upon the financial position <strong>of</strong> the banks.<br />

As per Investment Information and Credit Rating Agency (ICRA), banks in India are largely reliant on<br />

interest income, which accounts for over 80% <strong>of</strong> their total income. For the last few years, the interest<br />

income <strong>of</strong> the public sector banks has declined because <strong>of</strong> various reasons. Further, the involvement <strong>of</strong><br />

government is evidently higher in banks because <strong>of</strong> the larger interests <strong>of</strong> the public. <strong>The</strong> remaining noninterest<br />

income comprises mainly from commission, brokerage and exchange transactions. More<br />

significantly, public sector banks have been losing market share in the areas <strong>of</strong> exchange, commission and<br />

brokerage to private sector banks over the last few years because <strong>of</strong> the following reasons:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the public sector banks do not have provision <strong>of</strong> online trading system to earn brokerage<br />

fee;<br />

<strong>The</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> growth in fee income is significantly higher for private sector banks;<br />

<strong>The</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> exchange and brokerage as a percentage <strong>of</strong> the total fee income is higher for the<br />

private banks;<br />

Highly, the better position <strong>of</strong> the private sector banks is due to their technology platforms with<br />

good corporate governance which provide customized solutions to customers.<br />

For the last 10 years, public mostly from urban cities are showing their high interest to invest in<br />

share market because, they feel it yields good returns compared to other kind <strong>of</strong> investments like bank<br />

fixed deposits, bonds, public provident fund (PPF), National Saving Certificate (NSC) etc. <strong>The</strong> Bombay<br />

Stock Exchange (BSE) and National Stock Exchange (NSE) are the major stock exchanges in India have<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

21


switched over to online trading system to increase efficiency and transparency. Due to this drastic<br />

change, the turn over also dramatically increased. <strong>The</strong> traded volumes in BSE and NSE for the last ten<br />

years are given as under:<br />

Table: Traded Value in BSE and NSE<br />

Year<br />

<strong>The</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> volume traded (in crores)<br />

BSE<br />

NSE<br />

2004 (2004-05) 365613.61 (887293.66)<br />

2005 (2005-06) 547922.44 (475523.48)<br />

2006 (2006-07) 701709.67 (219106.47)<br />

2007 (2007-08) 1160248.63 (282317.02)<br />

2008 (2008-09) 1694310.37 (335951.52)<br />

After the introduction <strong>of</strong> the online trading systems it is very easy to do online trading and only<br />

requirement is to have a demat account and trading account with a depository participant. Once the<br />

account is active trader can buy shares from BSE or NSE. For every buy or sell transaction one has to pay a<br />

brokerage to the broker normally ranges from 0.4% to 0.8%. Apart from the brokerage, many other<br />

charges like Service tax on the brokerage i.e. 12.25% for buy for sell and Securities Turnover Tax (.125%) is<br />

collected. Most <strong>of</strong> the private banks like ICICI and HDFC and brokerage houses viz. Sharekhan, Geojith<br />

Securities, India Bulls, Investment Online, Kotak Street, Motilal Oswal, 5 paisa etc. provides trading<br />

account and demat account with a view to generate income by means <strong>of</strong> brokerage. Where as, most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

public sector banks have ignored this area. As per the analysis, the brokerage fee income <strong>of</strong> private sector<br />

banks is very high than that <strong>of</strong> their counterpart public sector banks. <strong>The</strong> reason behind non-participation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the these public sector banks into the brokerage fee market or providing online trading accounts to its<br />

customers is also due to presumption <strong>of</strong> corporate scandals. Because <strong>of</strong> the fear <strong>of</strong> scams, these public<br />

sector banks and nationalized banks are losing their share <strong>of</strong> brokerage fee income to their counterparts.<br />

Now the time has come to diversify their income pr<strong>of</strong>ile and to take significant steps to earn brokerage<br />

income giving competitive to the private sector banks. Competition in the market not only brings the<br />

stability in governance with increase in efficiency <strong>of</strong> the banks but also increase the earnings.<br />

Corporate Governance<br />

Corporate Governance has become a hot topic for debate in all over the world in last ten years.<br />

With the globalization <strong>of</strong> the business and liberalization policy, the importance <strong>of</strong> Corporate Governance<br />

has also increased. Corporate Governance imposes certain controls with which the management can act in<br />

a smarter way to achieve a long term strategic goals to satisfy its stake holders, creditors, employees and<br />

customers.<br />

Corporate Governance is basically very important in two ways:<br />

(i) to facilitates the management by which companies are directed and controlled;<br />

(ii) to study many issues arising in controlling the organization and to monitor the outcomes whether<br />

they are in accordance with plans.<br />

Corporate Governance is definitely improves the bank viability and bank’s performance. Further,<br />

the weak governance <strong>of</strong> banks has negative impacts through the negative ramifications for economic<br />

development. Well governed banks not only contribute to financial stability but also more likely to<br />

allocate capital efficiently. <strong>The</strong> attention <strong>of</strong> these (public sector banks) banks are invited to increase the<br />

efficiency through a good corporate governance and also intention behind is to increase the pr<strong>of</strong>it ratio <strong>of</strong><br />

its share holders. In this paper, the author emphasizes the need <strong>of</strong> introduction/improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

corporate governance in the sector <strong>of</strong> online trading system to improve the banks functioning and also to<br />

avoid any corporate scandals/scams.<br />

Needless to say, for the public sector banks or for nationalized banks in India, these are challenging<br />

times and need for restoring customers confidence in the these banks. This literature in its wider suggests<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

22


a range <strong>of</strong> issues such as bringing confidence makes to increase the number <strong>of</strong> its stake holders, at the<br />

same time providing good service to these customers. Good governance can resolve the problems <strong>of</strong><br />

mismanagement and financial propriety. Corporate Governance, is therefore, ensures the performance <strong>of</strong><br />

the management, strategy and increases the confidence level <strong>of</strong> its customers. It is indeed needed to<br />

achieve a balance between the essential powers <strong>of</strong> the Board <strong>of</strong> Directors and their proper accountability.<br />

A pioneering report would also perhaps be in order to make a brief reference to its recommendations<br />

which are in the nature <strong>of</strong> guidelines relating to the Board <strong>of</strong> Directors role, reporting and control.<br />

High Degree <strong>of</strong> Oversight<br />

<strong>The</strong> following are the reasons which require to the banks to introduce online trading system in their<br />

banks for their customers.<br />

Firstly, the customers believed that their money is fully protected.<br />

Secondly, the customers expect transparency from the banks.<br />

Thirdly, share market is a volatile market, hence, customers expect that the banks should provide<br />

information about the day to day market transactions, so that they can take care <strong>of</strong>f.<br />

Selecting the right stock in the right sector at the right time is important for success in equities. Price<br />

<strong>of</strong> the stocks increases according to the growth <strong>of</strong> the company plus companies will give bonus and<br />

dividend at periodic intervals. Fourthly, customers are assured <strong>of</strong> the best research being provided<br />

for the investment decisions.<br />

Board Oversight<br />

Boards should adopt a “charter” which includes and describes the role and responsibilities <strong>of</strong><br />

Board management and determines high standard <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional conduct. Members should act on a<br />

fully informed basis, in good faith, with due diligence and interests <strong>of</strong> the Bank. <strong>The</strong> Board should be<br />

responsible for ensuring the Bank’s protection from illegal, abusive practices and approve the Bank’s<br />

strategic objectives and enforce clear lines <strong>of</strong> responsibility and accountability. <strong>The</strong> Board should ensure<br />

that risk control functions are clearly segregated from risk taking. <strong>The</strong> Board should be aware <strong>of</strong> the<br />

major aspects <strong>of</strong> the Bank’s operational risk management framework to be implemented by senior<br />

management in organization. Senior management should also have responsibility for developing policies,<br />

procedures for managing operational risk and should put in place contingency and business continuity<br />

plans to ensure that the losses in the event <strong>of</strong> severe business disruption should be minimized. <strong>The</strong> Board<br />

should set and periodically review the strategies and policies related to risk and address any new or<br />

previously uncontrolled risks, setting acceptable levels for banking risks.<br />

Whistle Blow<br />

A whistle blow policy encourages the staff to speak out the legitimate concerns about wrong<br />

doings when an employee or a group <strong>of</strong> employees are indulged in malpractices or wrongdoing within an<br />

organization. <strong>The</strong> good practices under the corporate governance should provide the whistle blowing to<br />

describe the wrong doings.<br />

Conclusion<br />

<strong>The</strong> corporate fraud, malpractices and wrongdoings can be detected or prevented by introducing<br />

technical management/risk management under the corporate governance. Further, the best practice<br />

under the corporate governance also improves the functioning <strong>of</strong> banks in providing online trading<br />

facility to their customers. With elements <strong>of</strong> good corporate governance, appropriate internal control<br />

systems, better risk management will definitely improves the business <strong>of</strong> public sector banks in the areas<br />

like facility <strong>of</strong> providing online trading to the customers and able to tackle with the challenges given by<br />

the private banks and convert them into expanding the business.<br />

References and Bibliography<br />

http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0198-342154/Corporate-governance-and-performance-<strong>of</strong>.html<br />

http://www.bseindia.com/about/st_key/volume<strong>of</strong>turnoverbusiness_tran_05.asp<br />

http://www.bseindia.com/about/st_key/volume<strong>of</strong>turnoverbusiness_tran_06.asp<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

23


http://www.bseindia.com/about/st_key/volume<strong>of</strong>turnoverbusiness_tran_07.asp<br />

http://www.bseindia.com/about/st_key/volume<strong>of</strong>turnoverbusiness_tran2008.asp<br />

http://www.bseindia.com/about/st_key/volume<strong>of</strong>turnoverbusiness_tran.asp<br />

http://www.financialexpress.com/printer/news/107338<br />

http://www.managementparadise.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-24913.html<br />

http://www.uabonline.org/extra_page.phppid=2<br />

Srinivasan, R., Strategic Management, the Indian Context, Third Edition (2008), Prentice-Hall <strong>of</strong> India Private Limited,<br />

New Delhi.<br />

www.icraratings.com<br />

www.icraindia.com<br />

http://www.nse-india.com/<br />

http://www.bseindia.com/about/st_key/volume<strong>of</strong>turnover_apr2004.asp<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

24


Financial Reporting Standards as a Tool in order to Ensure Corporate<br />

Transparency: <strong>The</strong> Case <strong>of</strong> Turkey<br />

N. Ata ATABEY<br />

Selçuk University, Konya-Turkey<br />

&<br />

Hüseyin ÇETN<br />

Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya-Turkey<br />

Keywords<br />

Corporate governance principles, public accountability, and transparency principle<br />

Abstract<br />

Transparency, which is one <strong>of</strong> the four major principles <strong>of</strong> governance, has gradually increased its<br />

importance recently. As it is known, the adoption <strong>of</strong> transparency on the corporate level is a principle need in order<br />

to preserve the rights <strong>of</strong> investors and to acquire social trust. Corporations are only able to increase their degree <strong>of</strong><br />

corporate transparency by adopting generally accepted principles on the international fields and some principles that<br />

serve as guide. One <strong>of</strong> the most institutionalized and important principles range <strong>of</strong> today at the international level is<br />

the set <strong>of</strong> International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). This circumstance proves the parallel interaction <strong>of</strong><br />

corporate transparency with accounting applications. As a matter <strong>of</strong> fact, it is believed that the presentation <strong>of</strong><br />

comparable, reliable and comprehensive financial reports could be achieved by the adoption <strong>of</strong> financial reporting<br />

standards which are accepted internationally. From this point <strong>of</strong> view, it is thought that the applications within the<br />

framework <strong>of</strong> IFRS are only providing presentable financial information for general purposes and these applications<br />

are lacking the ability to present additional information required by corporate transparency.<br />

For this reason, we have conducted a survey in those corporations listed on Istanbul Stock Exchange (ISE)<br />

100 index in Turkey. With this survey, we aim to determine how effectively the principle <strong>of</strong> public disclosure and<br />

transparency has been employed by the companies—the principle that is listed among the principles <strong>of</strong> corporate<br />

governance determined by the Capital Markets Board (CMB) <strong>of</strong> Turkey. Additionally, we aim to determine to what<br />

extent the employment <strong>of</strong> IFRS on transparency is affective and how much adequate the IFRS’s are.<br />

Introduction<br />

In the present day, business life that we witness at an extensive and fast process <strong>of</strong> change, the<br />

problems appeared in economical and social areas and international financial crises lived cast a shadow<br />

upon the reliability <strong>of</strong> financial information preparers (Atabey ve Ylmaz, 2005). In this process that the<br />

capital flow is at the most top level, the reliability <strong>of</strong> capital gradually increases its importance as much as<br />

its yield. Corporate governance is seen as a magic wand that enables to serve for the objective <strong>of</strong> a better<br />

company management and in this way, that companies are able to supply the resources they need, by<br />

confidence established, as much as it is for the solution <strong>of</strong> the financial crises lived in global scale<br />

<strong>The</strong> missingly and misleadingly projection <strong>of</strong> companies’ activities upon public opinion in the<br />

result <strong>of</strong> the financial scandals experienced has opened their legitimacy and reliability in the care <strong>of</strong> public<br />

opinion to question as an establishment; it has caused to lose confidence in capital markets. By the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> regaining the confidence lost, the understanding <strong>of</strong> corporate governance has been emerged as<br />

a solution against the problem, and countries, in global area, have published the application guides the<br />

corporate governance as it is appropriate for their own values and principles. As the common emphasis in<br />

the guides, it has been referred to financial reporting and transparent, accountable, true, upright,<br />

synchronic, and rapid information supply.<br />

Transparency, one <strong>of</strong> the basic objectives <strong>of</strong> corporate governance, is an indispensible element <strong>of</strong><br />

“corporate governance”, which is a popular concept <strong>of</strong> the recent times. Corporate governance, as a<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

25


similar <strong>of</strong> the revolutions done in the area <strong>of</strong> audit to gain an investor’s confidence and even, as its<br />

complement, increases its importance in financial markets, especially in recent years.<br />

Accounting standards are the mandatory rules in the process <strong>of</strong> producing and the production <strong>of</strong><br />

financial information for the interested. While accounting standards makes a big contribution to the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> accounting technique and its occupation, it puts key ways and techniques for problems,<br />

possibly will emerge, forward, besides (Atabey and et al., 2011: 38). Financial reporting/accounting<br />

standards makes a contribution to be supplied transparency by the rules that it brings for producing and<br />

reporting <strong>of</strong> information that indicates the real condition <strong>of</strong> managements.<br />

In this study; making a survey study on the companies in the ISE 100 index in Turkey, it is going<br />

to be determined, how effective international accounting/financial reporting standards are in the<br />

acquiring <strong>of</strong> transparency, and its inadequate sides, by putting the application level <strong>of</strong> the principles <strong>of</strong><br />

disclosure and transparency from the corporate governance principles <strong>of</strong> CMB forward.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Understanding <strong>of</strong> Corporate Governance: Its Importance, Merits, and Principles<br />

<strong>The</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> “corporate governance”, despite it is a concept discovered firstly in USA, are<br />

recently discussed and applied in the whole world. <strong>The</strong> perception <strong>of</strong> the concept <strong>of</strong> “corporate<br />

governance” has been come to fruition differently in various areas. <strong>The</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> “corporate<br />

governance”, however, is called widely as “governance <strong>of</strong> companies”.<br />

Many different establishments and researchers in the world have developed various definitions<br />

about the mentioned concept. It is possible to explain the main cause <strong>of</strong> these differences as the concept <strong>of</strong><br />

corporate governance, directly or indirectly, interests in scores <strong>of</strong> stakeholders like shareholders, board<br />

members, directors, and workers at the first, potential investors and ratings bureaus (Öztürk ve<br />

Demirgüner, 2005: 119).<br />

Corporate governance has been defined as ‘‘. . . the system by which companies are directed and<br />

managed’’ (ASX, 2003, p. 3). Many researchers suggest corporate governance mechanisms as the solution to<br />

agency problems (Eng and Mak, 2003; Shan, 2009) and as a means <strong>of</strong> mitigating management’s lack <strong>of</strong><br />

commitment which arises due to agency problems (Bergolf and Pajuste, 2005). <strong>The</strong>refore, corporate<br />

governance is primarily designed to include effective mechanisms to control and prevent self-interested<br />

managerial behavior.<br />

In this context, the developments that lead to increase the importance <strong>of</strong> corporate governance in<br />

modern economies are sorted as the Increasing Role <strong>of</strong> Private Sector, the Increasing International<br />

Economic Dependence, and the New Competitive Conditions in Which Partnerships Are. <strong>The</strong><br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> corporate governance, with the merits that it gains in both micro and macro scales, has<br />

been one <strong>of</strong> the main issues <strong>of</strong> the present day business world. Corporate governance applications are the<br />

key <strong>of</strong> a dynamic process that begins from the level <strong>of</strong> management and spills over into capital markets<br />

and in this way, affects the general <strong>of</strong> economy in positive direction. One <strong>of</strong> the key elements <strong>of</strong> increasing<br />

economical efficiency is corporate governance that includes a serial <strong>of</strong> relation among a management<br />

administration, boards <strong>of</strong> managements, shareholders and other sides that are directly stakeholder.<br />

Corporate governance puts the structure, which the aims <strong>of</strong> managements are determined, forwards at the<br />

same time and ascertains the instruments <strong>of</strong> reaching these aims and <strong>of</strong> performance audit (OECD,<br />

2010:11).<br />

Successful corporate governance applications in managements are seen as not only a good<br />

protector preventing wastage <strong>of</strong> resources but also an important element about the financial transparency,<br />

the controlling <strong>of</strong> partnership activities, the conscious <strong>of</strong> social responsibility, and the protection <strong>of</strong> ethic<br />

rules and investors that are wished in many countries. <strong>The</strong> OECD Principles <strong>of</strong> Corporate Governance are<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> corporate governance standards, which were developed by the OECD in co-operation with<br />

governments, international organizations, and businesses. According to the OECD (2004), the Principles<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

26


are intended to be used by policy makers for self-assessments and by other stakeholders such as:<br />

researchers, investors, analysts, and consultants. ‘‘<strong>The</strong> Principles generally represent a common basis that<br />

OECD member countries consider essential for the development <strong>of</strong> good governance practices.’’ (OECD,<br />

2004, p. 11). <strong>The</strong> framework contains the following four principles that were released in May 1999 and<br />

revised in 2004:<br />

Principles <strong>of</strong> Just and Equality<br />

Principle <strong>of</strong> Accountability<br />

Principle <strong>of</strong> Responsibility<br />

Principles <strong>of</strong> Disclosure and Transparency<br />

Principles <strong>of</strong> Disclosure and Transparency<br />

Transparency is the approach <strong>of</strong> making persons, managements, markets or governments<br />

responsible for their activities and policies. In this context, transparency, in terms <strong>of</strong> managements, can be<br />

defined as the disclosure <strong>of</strong> the whole information, intended for their assessment by (public opinion)<br />

(Florini, 1999).<br />

Shareholders and investors, in our day, want to reach reliable financial information at the stroke<br />

and easily. In the future, financial reporting will be synchronic, real-time and based on measuring. <strong>The</strong><br />

five elements <strong>of</strong> synchronic and real-time reporting are listed below (Anderson, 2002: 5):<br />

Constituting a reliable system<br />

Using all the ways necessary for the disclosure <strong>of</strong> financial information<br />

Disclosure all financial and nonfinancial information<br />

Corporal accountability, managerial responsibility and a strong risk management<br />

Transparent and permanent disclosure<br />

In this framework, in the disclosing <strong>of</strong> information about a company, in addition to the things<br />

predicted with legal regulations, it should be used also some disclosure instruments and ways as press<br />

bulletins, electronic data delivery channels, electronic post mails, mobile phone communications (WAP et<br />

cetera technologies) and meetings done with shareholders and potential investors and notifications done<br />

via media organizations or brochures or on internet website (SPK/CMB, 2005: 21).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Corporately Importance <strong>of</strong> Transparency<br />

In the process <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> corporate transparency, as the complement <strong>of</strong> the concept <strong>of</strong><br />

transparency, we meet with the concept <strong>of</strong> “disclosure”. Disclosure, appropriate for the principles <strong>of</strong><br />

corporate transparency, is the presentation <strong>of</strong> the financial information, which the regulatory<br />

establishments for capital markets make it obligatory, and <strong>of</strong> other financial and nonfinancial information<br />

apart from these information, by companies, clearly and openly, for the public (Poray, 2008: 23).<br />

Transparency plays a crucial role for the increasing <strong>of</strong> an investor’s confidence. With regard to a<br />

high investor’s confidence, it is an indispensible issue for the constituting and the developing <strong>of</strong> a strong<br />

capital market. Together with transparency and disclosure are <strong>of</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> a successful<br />

management, they have a close relationship with the directly accounting applications, besides (Akta ve<br />

Doanay, 2007: 3).<br />

<strong>The</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> disclosure crudely signifies the presentation <strong>of</strong> a plenty <strong>of</strong> information in different<br />

formats like balance sheet, income table or activity report, which are made by companies, to the public.<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> these information resources that we state and are generally obliged to be disclosed by regulations,<br />

the presentation <strong>of</strong> some information as press statements that companies willingly make and company<br />

reports or predicts about company that are disclosed via a website to the public is assessed within this<br />

context. In this point, it is beneficial to state that we use the concept <strong>of</strong> “willingly disclosure” in order to<br />

include all the disclosures done out <strong>of</strong> the obliged by various regulations. Whether it is obligatory or<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

27


willingly, all the developments acquired with disclosure applications will eventually help for the<br />

increasing <strong>of</strong> the total transparency (Deren, 2006: 66-67).<br />

<strong>The</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> disclosure in terms <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> capital markets can be summarized<br />

in like this manner (Poray, 2008: 25-26):<br />

Disclosure is a strong instrument for the protection <strong>of</strong> investors. It helps for drawing capital and<br />

increasing confidence for markets.<br />

Weak disclosure leads to unethical behaviors in capital markets and spoil market integrity. This<br />

condition damages not only companies but also economy as a whole, too.<br />

Inadequate and unclear information can increase capital cost, ruining the operating <strong>of</strong> capital market.<br />

Reliable and well-timed information increases decision makers’ confidence in a company’s body and it<br />

enables that they take successful decisions for company that affect on directly development and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itableness.<br />

<strong>The</strong> information disclosed, together with its directly effect that it makes on the stock certificate price <strong>of</strong><br />

company, also affects on the price indirectly, affecting on the data collecting initiatives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

decision makers out <strong>of</strong> company (stakeholders, investors and creditors) about company.<br />

As long as the quality and the quantity <strong>of</strong> the information disclosed increase, uncertainties about the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> company are removed.<br />

With a disclosure in a better quality, a company can draw longer-timed investors, and it enables to a<br />

more widely analysis, and the credibility and the level <strong>of</strong> accountability <strong>of</strong> management increase.<br />

`In this process, first <strong>of</strong> all; it should be made a decision whether the increasing <strong>of</strong> transparency will<br />

lead to increase economical benefit or not, and if it’s decided the increasing <strong>of</strong> transparency is necessary,<br />

then, it should be determined the obligations about which information will be disclosed and how these<br />

information will be disclosed by which institutions. As for in the last phase; regulatory policies and<br />

corporate infrastructure should be shaped according to the conditions <strong>of</strong> the concerned market, and in this<br />

context, it should be taken care that the all disclosure applications, including accounting policies, are<br />

developed as intended for the increasing <strong>of</strong> “Reliability” <strong>of</strong> information that is presented as a final aim<br />

(Vishwanath ve Kaufmann, 2010: 7).<br />

International Financial/Accounting Reporting Standards<br />

<strong>The</strong> worldwide integrity <strong>of</strong> money and capital markets bring with some difficulties. <strong>The</strong> primary<br />

<strong>of</strong> these difficulties is that accounting, which is stated as a management’s language, should be suitable for<br />

these markets. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), indeed, constitutes a common<br />

language for a management, bringing some close valuation and trial criterions among countries, in the<br />

accounting science (Örten and et al., 2007). <strong>The</strong> right to publication in Turkey <strong>of</strong> the International<br />

Financial Reporting Standards Set belongs to the Accounting Standards Board <strong>of</strong> Turkey in the framework<br />

<strong>of</strong> the agreement made with the Foundation <strong>of</strong> the International Accounting Standards Board. <strong>The</strong> Board<br />

publishes the mentioned set by the name <strong>of</strong> “the Accounting Standards <strong>of</strong> Turkey” as is compatible with<br />

the International Financial Reporting Standards.<br />

Accounting standards are the mandatory rules in the process <strong>of</strong> producing and the production <strong>of</strong><br />

financial information for the interested. In this context, it has determined some aims that can be<br />

summarized as the strengthening <strong>of</strong> transparency and accountability, the regulation and the audit <strong>of</strong><br />

financial markets according to the conditions <strong>of</strong> products and participants, and the increasing <strong>of</strong><br />

soundness and integrity in financial markets; from among them, by the objective <strong>of</strong> reaching the aim <strong>of</strong><br />

the strengthening <strong>of</strong> transparency and accountability, some precautions that are needed to be taken<br />

urgently have been listed as below (TMSK, 2009):<br />

<strong>The</strong> key organizations about global accounting standards should work on developing guidance and<br />

counseling about the evaluation <strong>of</strong> tangible assets, paying attention to evaluate illiquid and<br />

complicated assets, especially in the periods when financial problems are intense.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

28


Organizations, responsible for determining accounting standards, should improve their works<br />

about the deal with the weaknesses at the accounting and disclosure standards about the assets out<br />

<strong>of</strong> balance sheet.<br />

Regulatory institutions and organizations responsible for determining accounting standards<br />

should acquaint market participants a lot with complicated financial instruments.<br />

<strong>The</strong> key organizations concerned with global accounting standards, with the aim <strong>of</strong> constituting a<br />

single global standard set in a high quality, should work hard.<br />

Regulatory institutions, supervision establishments, and organizations responsible for determining<br />

accounting standards should work together on the base <strong>of</strong> continuity among themselves and in the<br />

private sector to develop high-quality accounting standards and to provide consistency in practice.<br />

Financial establishments, cohering with the best international practices, should make the developed<br />

risk notifications in their reporting and announce all the losses in a continuous manner. Regulatory<br />

establishments should try to provide that financial organizations reflect their financial statements<br />

(including the activities out <strong>of</strong> balance sheet) and the condition <strong>of</strong> company’s activities completely<br />

and rightly and at the right time and that these are coherently and regularly reported.<br />

Corporate Transparency In Terms <strong>of</strong> Accounting Standards<br />

Financial information that companies will disclose in the financial reporting/accounting standards, which<br />

draw reliable road maps to prepare and present financial information, have been limited as “financial<br />

statements having a general goal”. According to Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and<br />

Accounting Standards Board (ASB), the information acquired with financial reporting, by its very nature, is<br />

financial, and it is not necessary that nonfinancial information are presented in the financial statements or<br />

their appendixes. This information has special purpose, and the preparation and the presentation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

special information for personal users are not in the accounting standards. In the accounting standards,<br />

there are not any disclosures about the presentation <strong>of</strong> nonfinancial information (eg; intellectual capital,<br />

customer relations, innovation, corporate reputation etc.) that increases the value <strong>of</strong> company. Companies,<br />

because <strong>of</strong> their weaknesses in the accounting standards, have begun to develop models that include<br />

disclosures, which will be willingly done. Companies, thanks to these models, disclose also supporting<br />

information together with the financial reports based on accounting standards. Developments in these<br />

willingly disclosures have been welcomed by international capital markets. Because, it contributes to the<br />

decreasing <strong>of</strong> information asymmetry between stakeholders and company.<br />

In the Conceptual Framework published by FASB, the objective <strong>of</strong> the financial statements stated<br />

as “to provide information about the financial condition <strong>of</strong> a management, the results <strong>of</strong> its activity and the changes<br />

in its financial condition in the cause <strong>of</strong> various users benefit while taking decisions” clearly shows that<br />

information having a special goal excludes from the enclosure <strong>of</strong> standards. <strong>The</strong> financial statements<br />

prepared for this mentioned goal supply for common needs <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> users. Financial statements<br />

usually shows the effect <strong>of</strong> operations in the past, and they do not include nonfinancial information;<br />

because <strong>of</strong> these reasons, they do not provide for the complete <strong>of</strong> information that users will need while<br />

they take economical decisions.<br />

In the Conceptual Framework, it is stated that accounting standards are for the preparation and<br />

the presentation <strong>of</strong> the financial statements having a general goal, and the financial statements having a<br />

general goal are defined as “the financial statements which are prepared and presented annually and<br />

yearly at least and which are in the position <strong>of</strong> responding the common needs <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> user”.<br />

Besides, it is signed that the information in the financial statements having a general goal has to carry the<br />

characteristics like “comprehensibleness, suitability for need, reliability, and comparability”.<br />

In the Conceptual Framework, stating that some <strong>of</strong> users can feel the need additional information<br />

apart from the information in the financial statements; the reports containing these additional financial<br />

and nonfinancial information are called as “financial reports having a special goal”, and it is emphasized<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

29


that the financial reports having a special goal are out <strong>of</strong> the frame <strong>of</strong> the Conceptual Framework (Poroy<br />

Arsoy, 2008: 17).<br />

As a result, the importance <strong>of</strong> high-quality national accounting standards in terms <strong>of</strong> disclosure<br />

and transparency cannot be denied. <strong>The</strong>refore, in terms <strong>of</strong> accountancy and financial statement users, the<br />

organization and the activities <strong>of</strong> Accounting Standards Board <strong>of</strong> Turkey (ASBT) are an important step. While<br />

the Board manages the activities <strong>of</strong> developing the accounting standards, it will benefit from the standards<br />

that Accounting and Supervision Standards Board <strong>of</strong> Turkey (ASSBT) publishes and its standard drafts that<br />

have not transformed into a standard yet. ASSBT, with the works that it keeps on until today, has<br />

constituted a crucial infrastructure for the works that ASBT, which is equipped with some authorities, will<br />

make. ASSBT, with the works it has made until now, has made significant contributions to be arisen and<br />

improved a culture <strong>of</strong> accounting standards in Turkey. By the standards that it has published, it has taken<br />

an important position in the world <strong>of</strong> accounting in Turkey.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Aim, Method, and Extent <strong>of</strong> the Research<br />

By the increasing <strong>of</strong> global competition, the performance <strong>of</strong> corporate governance systems <strong>of</strong><br />

countries in the markets <strong>of</strong> finance and production has begun to be important. <strong>The</strong> providing for<br />

transparency is an important instrument that company’s accounts are followed in suitable for the<br />

interested regulations, companies stably keep their performances on, and they do not get into an<br />

unsuccessful condition. One <strong>of</strong> the most important elements in providing for transparency is to apply<br />

National and International Financial/Accounting Reporting standards. <strong>The</strong> objective <strong>of</strong> this Research is to<br />

put forward the application scale <strong>of</strong> the principles <strong>of</strong> disclosure and transparency <strong>of</strong> the corporate<br />

governance principles and the role <strong>of</strong> international accounting standards in providing for transparency, in<br />

the framework <strong>of</strong> corporate governance understanding, as based on empirical datum, in the public<br />

companies that get into the act in different geographies and in more various sectors in the country and<br />

that are listed by Istanbul Stock Exchange (ISE).<br />

In this Study, as the method <strong>of</strong> data gathering, it has been used survey technique. <strong>The</strong> method <strong>of</strong><br />

survey contains a general examination done on the overall target mass or on a sample that will be<br />

selected, when wanted to reach a general opinion about the ascertained target mass. While survey<br />

questions were prepared, it has been benefited from many different studies and survey applications and<br />

gotten the concerned people’s opinion.<br />

<strong>The</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> the research consists <strong>of</strong> the companies that are registered in ISE-100 index. <strong>The</strong><br />

public companies in ISE-100 index have a number <strong>of</strong> persons, groups, or organizations in which it is<br />

interested. This has an extremely reasonably cause. One <strong>of</strong> the two important indicators that are used in<br />

the evaluation <strong>of</strong> capital markets is market value and the other is the monetary equivalent <strong>of</strong> transaction<br />

size that companies, which trade at the market, constitutes. <strong>The</strong> companies trading at ISE-100 index<br />

consist <strong>of</strong> the companies that have the highest market value. In this way, the total <strong>of</strong> the market values <strong>of</strong><br />

the companies that trade at the ISE-100 index equals to about %90 <strong>of</strong> approximately 300 companies that<br />

trade at ISE. <strong>The</strong> monetary action that the mentioned 100 companies constitute in the market, similarly,<br />

reaches about %90 <strong>of</strong> all the managements. <strong>The</strong> survey, which was sent to all the companies in ISE-100<br />

index, has been responded by 79 companies. In surveys, generally, it has been 5 point likert scale. All the<br />

analyses have been made by computer, using SPSS 15 statistical packet program<br />

Demographical Information<br />

<strong>The</strong> nine questions in the survey form consist <strong>of</strong> the questions to put the basic characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

companies and workers participated in the survey forwards. In the definition <strong>of</strong> the participants’ pr<strong>of</strong>iles<br />

after determining, it has been tried to explain the information belonging to the participants, benefitting<br />

from frequency distribution. <strong>The</strong> evaluations for the companies and the participants in the framework <strong>of</strong><br />

the research have been treated below in company with modal projections by the goal <strong>of</strong> providing for<br />

easiness in perception together with the frequency distributions and the percentages <strong>of</strong> the responses<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

30


Table 1. Basic Statistical Information about Companies and Participants<br />

Duty in the Company F (%) Activity Subjects F (%)<br />

Member <strong>of</strong> Board 1 1,27 Production 47 59,49<br />

Accounting Director 17 21,52 Service 14 17,72<br />

Financial Director 12 15,19 Finance 12 15,19<br />

Other 49 62,03 Holding 6 7,59<br />

Total 79 100,00 Total 79 100,00<br />

Duty Term in the Company<br />

<strong>The</strong> Numbers <strong>of</strong> Workers in Companies<br />

1 6 7,59 1-1000 43 54,43<br />

2-5 41 51,90 1.001-5.000 22 27,85<br />

6-9 14 17,72 5.001-10.000 11 13,92<br />

more than 10 18 22,78 more than 10.001 3 3,80<br />

Total 79 100,00 Total 79 100,00<br />

<strong>The</strong> Level <strong>of</strong> Education<br />

Activity Duties<br />

High School 6 7,59 1- 5 year(s) 2 2,53<br />

Graduated 66 83,54 6-10 years 3 3,80<br />

Post Graduated 7 8,86 11-20 years 5 6,33<br />

Total 79 100,00 20 years and above 69 87,34<br />

Total 79 100,00<br />

Disclosure and Transparency<br />

In this section related to the principles <strong>of</strong> disclosure and transparency from the corporate<br />

governance principles <strong>of</strong> CMB are perceived by the companies listed in ISE-100 index and to the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> the issues in these principles is searched, for the participants in the survey, it has been<br />

asked 18 questions totally as “yes” and “no”.<br />

Table 2: Disclosure and Transparency<br />

Answers<br />

Disclosure and Transparency<br />

Yes No<br />

1) Has your company two managers who are responsible for notifications that will be done for<br />

disclosure and who have signing authority<br />

86,08 13,92<br />

2) Has a staff working in your department for relationships with shareholders especially charged<br />

with regarding and observing all sorts <strong>of</strong> matters related to disclosure<br />

92,41 7,59<br />

3) In pursuant <strong>of</strong> the principle <strong>of</strong> transparency, do the accounting policies applied and the results <strong>of</strong><br />

activities disclose truthfully<br />

93,67 6,33<br />

4) Does board <strong>of</strong> directors submit shareholders’ information and disclose in the general assembly<br />

after it prepares the alliance <strong>of</strong> principles that can be called as informing policy<br />

69,62 30,38<br />

5) Are the developments, which have a possibility to affect on the value <strong>of</strong> the capital market<br />

instruments <strong>of</strong> the company, disclosed, without passing the time, in the time determined by the 84,81 15,19<br />

regulations<br />

6) In case <strong>of</strong> an important change in the financial condition and/or in the activities <strong>of</strong> the company<br />

or in the conditions in which it’s waited that an important change emerges in a near future; save for 78,48 21,52<br />

the rules in the concerned regulations provided that, has it disclosure<br />

7) Do the changes and the developments, which occur about the disclosures <strong>of</strong> the company<br />

afterwards, continually disclose, updating<br />

83,54 16,46<br />

8) Is the policy <strong>of</strong> dividend distribution in the activity report And, does it disclose in the<br />

framework <strong>of</strong> informing policy<br />

78,48 21,52<br />

9) Has the company a web address 98,73 1,27<br />

10) Has the website <strong>of</strong> the company been prepared in English, besides 86,08 13,92<br />

11) Are the periodical financial statement and its footnotes prepared, grounding on the current<br />

regulations and the international accounting standards<br />

83,54 16,46<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

31


12)Does your company disclose all sorts <strong>of</strong> important information that can affect on the decisions <strong>of</strong><br />

shareholders and other stakeholders, not to be restricted with the disclosures that it has to make by 63,29 36,71<br />

the regulations<br />

13) Do board members, directors, and shareholders who have % 5 <strong>of</strong> the capital directly or<br />

indirectly disclose the operations that they have made on the capital market instruments <strong>of</strong> the 69,62 30,38<br />

company<br />

14) Are the periodical financial statement and the financial statement footnotes prepared and<br />

disclosed in a manner that will indicate the real financial condition <strong>of</strong> the company<br />

79,75 20,25<br />

15) Is your activity report prepared in a detail that will enable that public opinion can reach all sorts<br />

<strong>of</strong> information about the activities <strong>of</strong> the company<br />

77,22 21,52<br />

16) Is an independent auditing firm elected for five account periods at most in the permanent<br />

and/or special audits by the board <strong>of</strong> directors <strong>of</strong> the company<br />

69,62 30,38<br />

17) Do two account periods at least pass so that the company can sign a permanent and/or special<br />

audit agreement again with the same independent auditing firm<br />

62,03 37,97<br />

18) Do the independent audit firms and the audit employees deployed in these firms give<br />

consultancy service for your company<br />

50,63 49,37<br />

TOTAL 78,25 21,75<br />

In the table 2, when the section <strong>of</strong> disclosure and transparency is evaluated in general, %78,25 <strong>of</strong><br />

the survey participants, “Yes”; and %22,75 has given “No” answer.<br />

About the principles <strong>of</strong> disclosure and transparency, totally 27 questions have been asked under<br />

the two titles, and by these questions, it has been searched whether the subjects in the websites and the<br />

activity reports <strong>of</strong> the firms participating in the survey are suitable for the demanded in the Corporate<br />

Governance Principles <strong>of</strong> CMB, or not. <strong>The</strong>se 27 questions have been prepared as “Present”, “Absent” and<br />

“Partly Present”. <strong>The</strong> survey questions, the answers given and its percentages are at Table 3 and Table 4<br />

below.<br />

Table 3: <strong>The</strong> Subjects in the Website <strong>of</strong> the Company<br />

Partly<br />

Present Absent<br />

<strong>The</strong> Subjects in the Website <strong>of</strong> the Company<br />

Present Total<br />

(%)<br />

1) Commercial register information. 79,75 20,25 - 100,00<br />

2) Detailed information about privileged shares. 64,56 30,38 5,06 100,00<br />

3) Together with the date and the number <strong>of</strong> the commercial register gazettes in<br />

which changes are published, the final state <strong>of</strong> the company’s prime contract.<br />

68,35 24,05 7,59 100,00<br />

4) Material disclosures. 60,76 20,25 18,99 100,00<br />

5) Yearly activity report. 73,42 18,99 7,59 100,00<br />

6) Periodical financial statements and reports. 74,68 15,19 10,13 100,00<br />

7) Prospectus and public <strong>of</strong>fer circulars. 63,29 22,78 13,92 100,00<br />

8) <strong>The</strong> agendas <strong>of</strong> general assembly meetings, participants’ lists, and<br />

proceedings.<br />

67,09 26,58 6,33 100,00<br />

9) Mandatory information forms and similar forms that are prepared for<br />

50,63<br />

collecting takeovers or proxy solicitation.<br />

25,32 24,05 100,00<br />

10) <strong>The</strong> proceedings <strong>of</strong> the board’s important decisions that can affect on the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> the capital market instruments, and information demands that reach 49,37 30,38 20,25 100,00<br />

the company under the name <strong>of</strong> Frequency Asked Questions.<br />

11) Questions and denunciations, and the answers given for them. 49,37 24,05 26,58 100,00<br />

Total 63,75 23,48 12,77 100,00<br />

<strong>The</strong> matters, which are in the section <strong>of</strong> “Disclosure and Transparency” <strong>of</strong> the Corporate<br />

Governance Principles <strong>of</strong> CMB and which are demanded for being the website <strong>of</strong> company, have been<br />

asked the participants <strong>of</strong> the survey. <strong>The</strong> percentage indicators <strong>of</strong> the answers that the total 79 participants<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

32


gave for every question can been seen at the Table 3 above. According to it, when we look at the total line,<br />

for all the questions; % 63,75 <strong>of</strong> the participants has given the answer <strong>of</strong> “Present”; %23,48, “Absent”, and<br />

the rest %12,77 has responded it as “Partly Present”. In this point, the participants have answered the<br />

question in the first question about commercial register information as “Present” at most. %30,38 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

participants has responded the Question 10 as “Absent”<br />

Table 4: <strong>The</strong> Subjects in the Yearly Activity Report<br />

Partly<br />

Present Absent<br />

<strong>The</strong> Subjects in the Yearly Activity Report<br />

Present Total<br />

(%)<br />

1) <strong>The</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> activity. 100,00 - - 100,00<br />

2) Information about the sector and the place <strong>of</strong> the company in the sector. 92,41 1,27 6,33 100,00<br />

3) <strong>The</strong> analysis and the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the management about financial condition<br />

and results <strong>of</strong> activity; the accrual degree <strong>of</strong> the planned activities; the condition 78,48 13,92 7,59 100,00<br />

<strong>of</strong> the company against the determined strategic aims.<br />

4) <strong>The</strong> declaration <strong>of</strong> the board <strong>of</strong> directors about the internal control system<br />

55,70<br />

and whether this system regularly operates, or not.<br />

30,38 13,92 100,00<br />

5) <strong>The</strong> opinion <strong>of</strong> the independent audit firm about the internal control system<br />

48,10<br />

<strong>of</strong> the company.<br />

37,97 13,92 100,00<br />

6) <strong>The</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> the ratings bureau. 43,04 49,37 7,59 100,00<br />

7) A detailed explanation related to predictable risks about activities. 63,29 20,25 16,46 100,00<br />

8) <strong>The</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> operations in a significant amount that were done in the last<br />

one year with in-group companies and with other related persons and 69,62 22,78 7,59 100,00<br />

organizations.<br />

9) <strong>The</strong> changes in organization, capital, partnership structure and management<br />

75,95<br />

structure.<br />

17,72 6,33 100,00<br />

10) <strong>The</strong> statement <strong>of</strong> partnership structure that indicate the real person ultimate<br />

controlling shareholder/s <strong>of</strong> the company thereby cleaning indirect and mutual 56,96 39,24 3,80 100,00<br />

partnership relations.<br />

11) If available, the punishments taken because <strong>of</strong> the applications contrary to<br />

26,58<br />

the rules <strong>of</strong> regulations, and the explanation related to their justification.<br />

68,35 5,06 100,00<br />

12) <strong>The</strong> amendments <strong>of</strong> regulations that can significantly affect on company’s<br />

50,63<br />

activities.<br />

34,18 15,19 100,00<br />

13) Important suits sued against the company and their possibly results;<br />

warnings, admonitions, and administrative penalty fines that are done by 24,05 69,62 6,33 100,00<br />

public authorities, and et cetera information.<br />

14) Dividend policy; the justification if a dividend will not be done. 60,67 23,60 15,73 100,00<br />

15) Forward looking expectations about sales, efficiency, market share,<br />

endowment capacity, pr<strong>of</strong>itableness, debt/equity capital ratio et cetera matters.<br />

62,03 24,05 13,92 100,00<br />

16)<strong>The</strong> information <strong>of</strong> reaching the texts in which the function <strong>of</strong> general<br />

assemblies, the rights that shareholders have got and the foundations related to 62,03 21,52 16,46 100,00<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> these rights are explained.<br />

Total 60,60 29,59 9,81 100,00<br />

It has been determined the matters that have to be in the yearly activity report according to the<br />

Corporate Governance Principles <strong>of</strong> CMB. In the Table 4, when the answers related to the matters that<br />

have to be in the yearly activity report that the participants gave are assessed, the vast majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />

participants have given positive answers to the questions asked. As for %69.62 <strong>of</strong> the participants has<br />

given negative answer to the Question 13.<br />

Accounting Standards<br />

<strong>The</strong> complete <strong>of</strong> the participating to the question “Are the accounting standards used in your<br />

company” has given the answer “Yes”. In this first section, the questions with which they can meet about<br />

the application <strong>of</strong> accounting standards have been asked the participants in five clauses. As for in the next<br />

section, it has been asked the participants about the benefits <strong>of</strong> accounting standards.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

33


Table 5: Opinions on Accounting Standards<br />

OPINIONS<br />

Strongly Disagree<br />

Disagree<br />

Neither Agree<br />

Nor Disagree<br />

Agree<br />

Strongly<br />

Agree<br />

Total<br />

1) To use a common accounting language by IFRS provides that<br />

1,27% 2,53% 16,46% 68,35% 11,39% 100,00%<br />

investors take true decisions.<br />

2) IFRS, in the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the managements in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

financial analysis, increases the level <strong>of</strong> comparability with 0,00% 1,27% 11,39% 63,29% 24,05% 100,00%<br />

national and international managements.<br />

3) IFRS facilitates the listing <strong>of</strong> managements into international<br />

0,00% 0,00% 17,72% 64,56% 17,72% 100,00%<br />

capital markets.<br />

4) IFRS facilitates the comparability <strong>of</strong> time-periods in the<br />

0,00% 2,53% 21,52% 56,96% 18,99% 100,00%<br />

financial statements <strong>of</strong> managements.<br />

5) IFRS contributes to be taken investment decisions for<br />

0,00% 2,53% 20,25% 58,23% 18,99% 100,00%<br />

managements in a true way.<br />

6) IFRS gives confidence for the financial statement users to<br />

0,00% 1,27% 13,92% 56,96% 27,85% 100,00%<br />

financial reporting in a higher level.<br />

7) IFRS provides saving <strong>of</strong> time for managements by removing<br />

0,00% 7,59% 26,58% 48,10% 17,72% 100,00%<br />

to arrange a table more than one.<br />

8) IFRS positively affects on the level <strong>of</strong> reliability in financial<br />

0,00% 2,53% 22,78% 55,70% 18,99% 100,00%<br />

reporting, removing financial controversies in managements.<br />

9) IFRS positively affects on the quality level <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />

0,00% 2,53% 12,66% 56,96% 27,85% 100,00%<br />

applications (the order <strong>of</strong> registration and document).<br />

10) IFRS helps the facilitation <strong>of</strong> managements’ audit activities. 0,00% 1,27% 20,25% 54,43% 24,05% 100,00%<br />

11) IFRS increases the quality level <strong>of</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> financial<br />

0,00% 3,80% 15,19% 55,70% 25,32% 100,00%<br />

statements in managements.<br />

12)IFRS is necessary for an effective Corporate Governance 0,00% 3,80% 5,06% 63,29% 27,85% 100,00%<br />

Total 0,11% 2,64% 16,98% 58,54% 21,73% 100,00%<br />

According to these results, when it is examined the turnouts <strong>of</strong> the survey participants into the<br />

evaluations done;<br />

By IFRS, using a common accounting language, investors can take true decisions,<br />

By IFRS, in the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the managements in terms <strong>of</strong> financial analysis, it is provided the<br />

comparability with national and international managements and its increasing,<br />

By IFRS, the listing <strong>of</strong> managements into international capital markets is facilitated,<br />

By IFRS, the comparability <strong>of</strong> time-periods in the financial statements <strong>of</strong> managements is provided and<br />

facilitated,<br />

By IFRS, it is contributed to take investment decisions for managements in a true way,<br />

By IFRS, it is given confidence for the financial statement users to financial reporting in a higher level,<br />

By IFRS, it is provided saving <strong>of</strong> time for managements by removing to arrange a table more than one,<br />

By IFRS, removing financial controversies in managements, the level <strong>of</strong> reliability in financial reporting<br />

is affected positively,<br />

By IFRS, the quality level <strong>of</strong> accounting applications (the order <strong>of</strong> registration and document) is<br />

positively affected,<br />

By IFRS, it is helped for the facilitation <strong>of</strong> managements’ audit activities,<br />

By IFRS, it is increased the quality level <strong>of</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> financial statements in managements,<br />

It is thought that IFRS is necessary for an effective Corporate Governance.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

34


Conclusion and Evaluation<br />

30. In the globalized world, the countries, which want to benefit from all the possibilities <strong>of</strong> capital<br />

market and intend for attracting the long-term stabilized capital, should adhere to corporate governance<br />

principles. Today, the element competed in international area is to realize the harmony based on the<br />

volunteering foundation against corporate governance understanding and principles by the goal <strong>of</strong><br />

realizing to come near to the business system <strong>of</strong> the developing world. In the countries in which succeed<br />

in harmony with corporate governance understanding and principles, the risk levels <strong>of</strong> the companies<br />

decrease, the cost <strong>of</strong> capital goes down, and in international area, the companies have the competitive<br />

advantage.<br />

In 1999, common principles about corporate governance have been published by OECD, and it<br />

has republished in 2004 again, reviewing. <strong>The</strong>se are; justice and equality, disclosure and transparency,<br />

accountability and responsibility. OECD proposes that these principles, which it has published, are put<br />

into practice by every country as devoted to its own laws and regulations and to its cultural and<br />

economical structure, and it emphasizes on the contributions that corporate governance principles will<br />

provide for economic welfare <strong>of</strong> a country in case <strong>of</strong> its application by companies. <strong>The</strong> most important<br />

step taken for corporate governance in Turkey is the publication <strong>of</strong> Corporate Governance Principles <strong>of</strong><br />

CMB that was entered into force by the Board decision, dated July 4, 2003.<br />

Transparency, which is one <strong>of</strong> the four basic principles <strong>of</strong> corporate governance principles and which is<br />

defined as “the set <strong>of</strong> mechanisms that is based on corporate and market and that encourages the directors<br />

who look out for a company itself for taking decisions that will maximize the value <strong>of</strong> company for the<br />

shareholders <strong>of</strong> company” increases its importance, day by day, in national and international platforms.<br />

In this point, we see some issues are important that the providing <strong>of</strong> an adequate transparency for<br />

possession and management matters as financial and operational matters necessitates a good corporate<br />

governance system, capital markets operating effectually, and a good accounting information system.<br />

Besides, it is significant that which mechanisms can be used for providing transparency or what the<br />

corporate infrastructure, which will support to be reached the level <strong>of</strong> transparency that is wished, does<br />

include.<br />

Companies and accountants should obey international ethics rules and international standards<br />

about accountancy applications. <strong>The</strong>refore, director <strong>of</strong> accounting in companies should improve a quality<br />

standard program that contains all the ways <strong>of</strong> accounting activities, observing the activity and the<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> accounting action by both internal evaluations and the evaluations that suitable external<br />

evaluation firms will make. In this way, an accounting activity, which observes its own quality and<br />

periodically makes evaluations in a company, will be able to provide an objective guarantee for settling<br />

the understanding and applications <strong>of</strong> the corporate governance. In this way, an effective accounting<br />

information system together with an administrative staff whose primary and essential liability about<br />

corporate governance understanding is evident will support the elements <strong>of</strong> corporate governance<br />

elements.<br />

Bibliography<br />

Akta, Ramazan ve Doanay, Mete (8-9 Mart 2007). Accounting Standards, Corporate Governance and Turkey.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Balkan Countries’ 1st International Conference on Accounting and Auditing, Edirne-Türkiye.<br />

ANDERSON, A., (2002), “<strong>The</strong> Business Reporting Model <strong>of</strong> the Future and Real Time Information Flows”,<br />

AICPA, September 3.<br />

ASX (2003), ‘‘Corporate Governance Council principles <strong>of</strong> good corporate governance and best practice<br />

recommendations’’, Australian Stock Exchange, available at: www.asx.com.au<br />

Atabey ve Dierleri, M.Ata, Raif Parlakkaya ve Ali Alagöz (2011). Genel Muhasebe- Dönem Sonu lemleri, Atlas<br />

Kitabevi, Konya<br />

Atabey, M.Ata, Raif Parlakkaya ve Ali Alagöz (2004). Genel Muhasebe- Dönem Sonu lemleri, Atlas Kitabevi,<br />

Konya.33<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

35


Atabey, N.A., Ylmaz, B. ve Ay, M. (2005). Avrupa birligi’ne katlm sürecinde muhasebenin sosyal sorumluluk<br />

kavram açsndan “kurumsal yönetim”. IV. Orta Anadolu _sletmecilik Kongresi, TOBB Ekonomi ve Teknoloji<br />

Üniversitesi, Ankara.<br />

Bapnar, Ahmet, (2009), Türkiye’de ve Dünya’da Muhasebe Standartlarnn Oluumuna Genel Bak, Maliye<br />

Dergisi. http://212.174.133.188/calismalar/maliye_dergisi/yayinlar/md/md146/muhasesestandard%C4%B1.pdf<br />

Bergolf, E. and Pajuste, A. (2005), ‘‘What do firms disclose and why Enforcing corporate governance and<br />

transparency in Central and Eastern Europe’’, Oxford Review <strong>of</strong> Economic Policy, Vol. 21, pp. 178-97.<br />

Cadbury, S. A. 1992. Report <strong>of</strong> the Committee on the Financial Aspects <strong>of</strong> Corporate Governance, Financial<br />

Reporting Council, United Kingdom. Available from http://www.nccg.ru/en/site.xp/057053057124.html (Accessed<br />

on July 8, 2006).<br />

Deren, Selen (2006). Kurumsal Yönetim lkelerinin Bileeni Olarak Kamuyu Aydnlatma ve effaflk : Türk Sermaye<br />

Piyasalar. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü letme Ana Bilim Dal, Ankara.<br />

Eng, L. and Mak, Y.T. (2003), ‘‘Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure’’, Journal <strong>of</strong> Accounting and<br />

Public Policy, Vol. 22, pp. 325-45.<br />

FLORINI, Ann M. (1999), “Does the Invisible Hand Need a Transparency Glove <strong>The</strong> Politics <strong>of</strong><br />

Transparency”, Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, April 28–30, 1999,<br />

http://www.worldbank.org/research/abcde/washington_11/pdfs/florini.pdf., 15.10.2005<br />

OECD (2004), ‘‘OECD principles <strong>of</strong> corporate governance’’, available at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/<br />

18/31557724.pdf (accessed 24 April 2009).<br />

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2010). OECD Principles <strong>of</strong> Corporate<br />

Governance. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/18/31557724.pdf, e.t. 10.04.2010.<br />

Örten Remzi, Hasan Kaval ve Aydn Karapnar. (2007). Türkiye Muhasebe- Finansal Raporlama Standartlar, TMS-<br />

TFRS. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi, ISBN 978-9944-165-18-1, Önsöz.<br />

Öztürk, M. B. ve Demirgüne, K. (2005). Kurumsal Yönetim Bak Açsyla Entellektüel Sermaye”, TOBB<br />

Ekonomi ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi Orta Anadolu letmecilik Kongresi, Ankara.<br />

Pasl, Ali. (2004). Anonim Ortaklk Kurumsal Yönetimi (2.Bask). Ankara: Çaa Hukuk Vakf Yaynlar.<br />

Poray Arsoy, Aylin. (2008). Kurumsal effaflk ve Muhasebe Standartlar. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi ..B.F.<br />

Dergisi (C.X, S II), 2008.<br />

SPK, (2005), Kurumsal Yönetim lkeleri, ubat, s.21.<br />

TMSK (Türkiye Muhasebe Standartlar Kurulu). (2009), 2009 Faaliyet Raporu,<br />

http://www.tmsk.org.tr/dosyalar/2009_Faaliyet_Raporu.pdf, e.t. 21.07.2010<br />

TUSAD (Türk Sanayici ve adamlar Dernei). (2002). Kurumsal Yönetim En yi Uygulama Kodu: Yönetim<br />

Kurulunun Yaps ve leyii. Türk Sanayicileri ve adamlar Dernei, Yayn No. TÜSAD-T/2002-12/336.<br />

Vishwanath, Tara, Daniel Kaufmann. (2010). Towards Transparency in Finance and Governance. <strong>The</strong> World<br />

Bank, http://ssrn.com/abstract=258978<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

36


Boardroom Pay, Performance and Corporate Governance in Malaysia<br />

Puan Yatim<br />

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia<br />

Keywords:<br />

Director remuneration, board <strong>of</strong> directors, firm performance, compensation.<br />

Abstract<br />

This study examines the association among firm performance, corporate governance structures, and director<br />

remuneration <strong>of</strong> Malaysian listed firms. <strong>The</strong> study employs a cross-sectional analysis <strong>of</strong> 428 firms listed on the Bursa<br />

Malaysia for the financial year ending 2008. Bi-variate and multivariate analyses are used to test the relationships<br />

proposed in the hypotheses. <strong>The</strong> study finds a strong support for the associations between firm performance, CEO<br />

tenure, board size, board independence, and the existence <strong>of</strong> remuneration committee, and director remuneration.<br />

Specifically, the results show that director remuneration is positively and significantly related to a firm’s accounting<br />

performance (ROA), CEO tenure, board size, and the existence <strong>of</strong> remuneration committee. <strong>The</strong> study finds that<br />

director remuneration is negatively and significantly related to board independence. <strong>The</strong> study also documents no<br />

significant relationship between director remuneration and both CEO duality and insider ownership. With the<br />

exception <strong>of</strong> the relationship between director remuneration and insider ownership, CEO duality, and the existence<br />

<strong>of</strong> remuneration committee (H4, H6 and H7 respectively), all other hypotheses (H1, H2, H3, H5) are supported.<br />

Finally, consistent with prior research, the study also finds a positive and significant association between director<br />

remuneration and firm size and firm’s growth opportunity.<br />

Introduction<br />

Recent financial crisis has raised serious criticism particularly regarding corporate governance on<br />

executive compensation (Fahlenbrach and Stulz, 2011; Bebchuck et al., 2010; Kirkpatrick, 2009). It has been<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten argued that remuneration and incentive systems have played key role in influencing risk taking<br />

behaviors <strong>of</strong> managers. <strong>The</strong> positive link between compensation and risk has remained strong throughout<br />

recent events as evidenced by several recent empirical studies (e.g., Adams, 2012; Chesney et al., 2012;<br />

Bolton et al., 2011; Balachandran et al., 2010).<br />

Defining the structure <strong>of</strong> remuneration and incentive schemes is a key aspect <strong>of</strong> corporate<br />

governance and at the same time companies need flexibility to adjust remuneration structure and<br />

incentive schemes to suit their own circumstances. In recent years, the topic <strong>of</strong> executive remuneration has<br />

attracted considerable interest. Collapses <strong>of</strong> big corporations and financial institutions in recent years have<br />

heightened awareness <strong>of</strong> the issues arising from the way in which directors are paid. For more than a<br />

decade, executive remuneration has attracted unfavorable attention from practitioners, academics and<br />

media, who have focused on the large amounts received by executives, both in absolute terms and in<br />

comparison with the pay received by employees lower down the corporate hierarchy. Partly as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

this attention, the area has been subject to continued regulation, with government directives and<br />

voluntary codes focusing on the nature <strong>of</strong> boardroom pay disclosure.<br />

Improvement <strong>of</strong> corporate governance standards and disclosures has been at the forefront <strong>of</strong><br />

international debate in recent times, and remuneration or compensation <strong>of</strong> directors and executives is one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the key issues in this debate. In 2003, the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) reinforced the corporate<br />

governance principles and responded to community concerns with a policy change that has resulted in<br />

greater disclosure about CEO remuneration. Since May 2003, listed companies have been required to<br />

make fuller disclosure about the remuneration packages <strong>of</strong> newly appointed CEOs. Such disclosure now<br />

includes information about the components <strong>of</strong> the pay package which might govern the actions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

CEO and drive levels <strong>of</strong> performance. While in the United Kingdom, the Directors’ Remuneration Report<br />

Regulations were introduced in 2002 to further strengthen the powers <strong>of</strong> shareholders in relation to<br />

directors’ pay. <strong>The</strong> regulations increase the amount <strong>of</strong> information shareholders are given on director<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

37


emuneration, certain disclosures, as well as performance graphs. Shareholders also may vote in an<br />

advisory capacity to approve the directors’ remuneration report. <strong>The</strong> Combined Code on Corporate<br />

Governance (FRC, June 2006) also recommends that boards establish a remuneration committee to help<br />

the board design remuneration packages aligning to their interests with those <strong>of</strong> shareholders.<br />

In July 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States voted unanimously to<br />

revise the disclosure requirements for executive and director compensation, related-party transactions,<br />

director independence and other corporate governance matters. <strong>The</strong> rules require, among others, firms to<br />

disclose dollar amounts for salary, bonus, stock awards, option awards, non-stock incentives, pension<br />

plans and total compensation. <strong>The</strong> Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance recommends that director<br />

remuneration should be appreciable and should reflect the responsibility and commitment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

directors. In the case <strong>of</strong> executive director, remuneration should link rewards to corporate and individual<br />

performance while in the case <strong>of</strong> non-executive directors it should link rewards to experience and level <strong>of</strong><br />

responsibilities. <strong>The</strong> level <strong>of</strong> remuneration for the executive directors should be decided by the<br />

remuneration committee consisting wholly and mainly <strong>of</strong> non-executive directors. On the other hand,<br />

remuneration <strong>of</strong> the non-executive directors should be determined by the board as a whole. As part <strong>of</strong><br />

corporate governance best practice, listed firms are encouraged to establish a remuneration committee<br />

and explain director remuneration procedures. As stipulated in the Listing Requirements <strong>of</strong> Bursa<br />

Malaysia 2001, listed firms are also required to disclose the details <strong>of</strong> the remuneration <strong>of</strong> each director in<br />

its annual reports.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se regulatory changes have addressed the widespread contemporary criticisms <strong>of</strong> previous<br />

remuneration practices by seeking to make the pay determination process more transparent, more<br />

accountable, and less subject to influence <strong>of</strong> directors. Given the focus on remuneration practices and their<br />

relations to corporate governance, this study makes a timely contribution to the debate. This study is<br />

motivated by the desirability <strong>of</strong> documenting empirical evidence on the associations <strong>of</strong> corporate<br />

governance mechanisms and boardroom pay in Malaysian corporate landscape. This is particularly<br />

relevant given the attention by numerous stakeholders, such as regulators, shareholders, and employees<br />

on excessive director remuneration. This study can inform the debate surrounding optimal governance,<br />

board and remuneration practices.<br />

<strong>The</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to provide understanding <strong>of</strong> boardroom pay in Malaysia in several ways.<br />

Most studies have been concerned with the remuneration in developed economies such as the United<br />

States and the United Kingdom. This study looks at remunerations <strong>of</strong> corporate directors in Malaysia, a<br />

country with a similar form <strong>of</strong> corporate governance regime (as the recommendations and provisions <strong>of</strong><br />

the Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance derived from Greenbury Committee, Hampel Committee,<br />

Cadbury Committee, and Higgs Committee which led to the United Kingdom’s Combined Code on<br />

Corporate Governance today) as that <strong>of</strong> the United Kingdom. This study also draws upon a much wider<br />

range <strong>of</strong> firms including very large firms to smaller sized firms listed on the Bursa Malaysia. Unlike other<br />

studies, this study attempts to capture different dimensions <strong>of</strong> governance practices and ownership<br />

structure variables, and uses mandatory disclosed remuneration data in annual reports rather than data<br />

collected via surveys and interviews. In addition, this study also attempts to measure the extent to which<br />

the open and publicly disclosed existence <strong>of</strong> remuneration committees has spread in Malaysian<br />

boardrooms, and to describe the composition and effect <strong>of</strong> remuneration committees where they can be<br />

seen to exist.<br />

<strong>The</strong> main contributions <strong>of</strong> this study are tw<strong>of</strong>old. First, it provides estimates <strong>of</strong> the statistical links<br />

between boardroom pay, board control, and monitoring. Second, it provides Malaysian evidence on the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> corporate governance reforms in influencing boardroom pay. <strong>The</strong> analysis allows international<br />

comparison and evaluation <strong>of</strong> the robustness <strong>of</strong> other existing research. <strong>The</strong> remainder <strong>of</strong> this research<br />

proposal is structured as follows: <strong>The</strong> next section briefly reviews existing remuneration literature. Section<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

38


3 describes the research design. <strong>The</strong> expected empirical results are reported in the fourth section while in<br />

the final section conclusions are drawn and the implications <strong>of</strong> the study are discussed.<br />

Literature Review and Research Hypotheses<br />

Remuneration and Research Perspectives<br />

In reviewing the literature on compensation/remuneration, three main research perspectives<br />

emerge namely agency theory, organizational theory and CEO power, and structural differences in the<br />

national political economies.<br />

Agency theory takes a positive approach to the compensation issue. In other words, it addresses<br />

the question <strong>of</strong> how the interests <strong>of</strong> (more or less) absent and less informed owners can be aligned with<br />

that <strong>of</strong> powerful and sometimes opportunistic executives (Fama, 1980; Fama and Jensen, 1983). Within this<br />

perspective, a potential weak link between executive pay and firm performance is due to a lack <strong>of</strong><br />

correctly designed incentives. In order to reduce the conflict <strong>of</strong> interest between absent owners and<br />

insightful executives, the linkage <strong>of</strong> pay and company performance becomes a remedy. Agency theory<br />

suggests a number <strong>of</strong> indirect ways to alleviate agency costs. <strong>The</strong>se include internal governance structures<br />

such as smaller boards (Yermack, 1996), a higher degree <strong>of</strong> board independence (Rosenstein and Wyatt,<br />

1990) and CEO-part ownership (McConnell and Servaes, 1990). As a major explanation for executive<br />

compensation (e.g., Baker et al., 1988; Jensen and Murphy, 1990), agency theory has been challenged by the<br />

recent corporate compensation practices (Mintzberg, 2009; Blinder, 2009) and it has also been criticized for<br />

its inability to explain cross-country differences (Haubrich and Popova, 1998; Bruce et al., 2005; Filatotchev<br />

and Allcock, 2010).<br />

Organizational theorists have addressed some <strong>of</strong> the limitations <strong>of</strong> agency theory by examining<br />

executive remuneration as a political process, and thus taken a descriptive approach to the issue. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

scholars have focused particularly on CEO power and board in attempting to open the “black-box” <strong>of</strong><br />

what affects the executive remuneration decisions (Finkelstein, 1992; Boyd, 1994; Zajac and Westphal,<br />

1996; Elhagrasey et al., 1998 and 1999). One <strong>of</strong> the arguments presented is that CEOs are in a unique<br />

position to determine their own compensation, based on their ability to influence board behavior.<br />

Previous studies suggest a number <strong>of</strong> factors that potentially relate to CEO power. <strong>The</strong>se factors include<br />

CEO tenure, CEO ownership, board size, firm size, and board ownership (Elhagrasey et al., 1998 and<br />

1999).<br />

Structural differences in the national political economies suggest that executive remuneration<br />

needs to be understood in the context <strong>of</strong> specific legal, political, and regulatory systems. Previous research<br />

has identified systematic country differences in regards to corporate law, investor protection, and a firm’s<br />

financial performance (La Porta et al., 1997, 1998 and 1999). Moreover, the effects <strong>of</strong> different ownership<br />

structures are not consistent across countries (Gugler, 1999). Thus, the effect <strong>of</strong> agency cost and CEO<br />

power may be mediated by nation-specific factors, such as national culture and business norms, national<br />

tax incentives, and differences national legal structures. Variables such as the location <strong>of</strong> the headquarters<br />

and foreign board membership might also have an impact on the level <strong>of</strong> executive remuneration. <strong>The</strong><br />

existing corporate governance literature has largely dealt with an analysis <strong>of</strong> institutional arrangements in<br />

American, British, Australian, German and Japanese firms, with much less attention devoted to firms<br />

from emerging markets such as Malaysia and their executives and boards <strong>of</strong> directors. Sun et al., (2010)<br />

point out that executive remuneration research in Asia has not received attention from Western<br />

researchers and publications, making Asia a fertile ground for future research in executive remuneration.<br />

Amongst this corporate governance literature, a significant agenda focuses on executive<br />

performance and its link with firm performance. It is scarcely surprising that far less is known about<br />

executive pay in emerging markets such as Malaysia than in other developed countries. In Malaysia,<br />

findings <strong>of</strong> the paucity <strong>of</strong> prior studies on board remuneration have shown mixed results. For instance,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

39


Dogan and Smyth (2002) report that board remuneration are positively related to sales turnovers but<br />

negatively associated with ownership concentration for Malaysian listed firms over a period <strong>of</strong> 1989 to<br />

2000. Using a sample <strong>of</strong> 100 public-listed companies in Malaysia, Sim (2004) finds a weak but positive<br />

relationship between director remuneration and firm performance. Abdullah (2006) documents a negative<br />

and significant association between director remuneration and lagged pr<strong>of</strong>itability for distressed firms<br />

before the incorporation <strong>of</strong> the Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance into the Listing Requirements<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Exchange in 2001. Further, Abdullah (2006) also finds a negative relation between board<br />

independence, the extent <strong>of</strong> outside directors’ interests and director remuneration.<br />

Research Hypotheses<br />

From an agency theory perspective, the link between firm performance and directors’ pay should<br />

provide an important incentive mechanism for corporate success. However, research on the payperformance<br />

relationship has yielded inconsistent results. Existing empirical evidence using data from the<br />

United States shows a weak but significant positive relationship between pr<strong>of</strong>itability and CEO pay (e.g.,<br />

Jensen and Murphy, 1990; Murphy, 1999; Core et al., 1999). <strong>The</strong> positive pay-performance relationship<br />

confirms the role played by compensation in aligning managerial interests with those <strong>of</strong> the shareholders,<br />

hence reducing agency costs. Several studies, on the other hand, do not find a positive relationship. Core<br />

et al., (1999) report that excess CEO compensation has a negative association with subsequent stock<br />

returns as well as operating performance. Similarly, Brick et al., (2006) also find that there is a negative<br />

relationship between excess director compensation and firm performance. Several empirical studies from<br />

other countries consistently document that pay-performance relationship is positive. For instance, using<br />

Australian and Japanese data respectively, Merhebi et al., (2006) and Kato and Kubo (2006) both confirm<br />

the positive pay-performance relationship. On the other hand, both Firth et al., (1995) and Fernandes<br />

(2008) do not find any link between pay and performance for Norwegian and Portuguese firms<br />

respectively. Randoy and Nielsen (2002) find a positive and significant correlation between accounting<br />

performance and CEO compensation. However, when examined in a multivariate setting, the positive<br />

significance disappears. Based on the standard agency theory model that there is a positive link between<br />

firm performance and pay, the study therefore proposes the following hypothesis.<br />

Hypothesis 1: <strong>The</strong>re is a positive relationship between financial performance and director remuneration.<br />

Since salary negotiation is really a bargaining process, the directors’ relative bargaining power<br />

may come into play. That is, the more power, the greater the bargaining strength and higher potential<br />

remuneration. <strong>The</strong> CEO’s dominance <strong>of</strong> the board <strong>of</strong> directors in most firms has been widely recognized<br />

(e.g., Vance, 1983; Whisler, 1984; Lorsch, 1989; Crystal, 1991; Hermalin and Weisbach, 1998 and 2000;<br />

Bebchuck et al., 2002). Remuneration is one area in which CEOs exercise their power over the board. To<br />

the extent that boards concern themselves with executive remuneration, they may favor high<br />

remuneration because it enhances the status <strong>of</strong> directors (Finkelstein and Hambrick, 1988) and <strong>of</strong> the firm<br />

(Crystal, 1991). Outside directors, who more <strong>of</strong>ten than not are also CEOs <strong>of</strong> other firms (e.g., Booth and<br />

Deli, 1996; Brickley et al., 1999), benefit from board norms <strong>of</strong> supporting the CEO’s pay recommendation<br />

and from the linkage between CEO pay and director pay (Hallock, 1997; Cordeiro et al., 2000). Inside<br />

directors stand to benefit directly from higher executive remuneration because <strong>of</strong> the proportional scaling<br />

<strong>of</strong> remuneration across hierarchical levels (Lambert, et al., 1993; Conyon et al., 2001; Ezzamel and Watson,<br />

2002).<br />

<strong>The</strong> CEO’s control <strong>of</strong> director selection and boardroom pay helps explain the CEO’s influence<br />

over the board on executive remuneration, and provides additional insight on the CEO’s dominance <strong>of</strong><br />

the board in general. Empirical evidence relating CEO tenure in particular is somewhat mixed. Yermack<br />

(1995) finds that older CEOs and CEOs with longer tenure receive more option awards. Hill and Phan<br />

(1991) suggest that long tenure helps directors influence the board through the director selection process.<br />

Further, Hill and Phan (1991) contend that through increased tenure, directors may gain control over the<br />

pay setting process and in turn design remuneration schemes to his or her preference. In a similar vein,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

40


Brick et al., (2006) show that CEOs with longer tenure are rewarded with higher pay for possessing more<br />

valuable human capital. Finkelstein and Hambrick (1989) find a curve-linear relationship existing between<br />

CEO tenure and pay, while Hogan and McPheters (1980), O’Reilly et al., (1988) and Attaway (2000) find no<br />

relationship between these two variables. Consistent with the majority <strong>of</strong> empirical findings indicating a<br />

positive association between tenure and pay, this study hypothesizes the following:<br />

Hypothesis 2: <strong>The</strong>re is a positive relationship between CEO tenure and director remuneration.<br />

Prior studies show that larger boards are associated with ineffective monitoring (Core et al., 1999)<br />

and are negatively related to firm performance (Yermack, 1996; Dalton et al., 1999; Conyon and Peck,<br />

1998). Yermack (1996) finds that the pay-performance relationship for CEOs decreases with board size,<br />

suggesting that small boards give CEOs larger incentives and force them to bear more risks than do large<br />

boards. Holthausen and Larcker (1993a) argue that board size might influence directors’ pay, in particular<br />

that <strong>of</strong> the CEO. Other studies such as Holthausen and Larcker (1993b) and Core et al., (1999) specifically<br />

link the association between board size and compensation. Both studies find a positive association<br />

between board size and executive remuneration. Similarly, Coakley and Iliopoulou (2006) find that larger<br />

boards award CEOs significantly higher bonuses and salary post M&As for 100 completed bids in the UK<br />

over the 1998-2001 period. More recently, Ozkan (2011) documents a positive and significant association<br />

between CEO compensation and board size. He argues that coordination and communication problems<br />

associated with larger boards hinders board effectiveness, which might be revealed as higher<br />

compensation for CEOs as the number <strong>of</strong> board members increases. This study takes the view <strong>of</strong> the<br />

agency theory whereby larger boards perceived as weak governance and monitoring by the board <strong>of</strong><br />

directors. Jensen (1993) suggests that larger boards are easily controlled by the CEO and CEO may be able<br />

to “divide and rule”. Further, Pfeffer (1981) argues that inside board members are more loyal to CEOs and<br />

therefore CEOs are more likely to exert greater influence over them that over outside directors. <strong>The</strong><br />

agency view is also consistent with organizational behavioral studies which suggest that productivity<br />

decreases when work groups get too large (Latane et al., 1979; Hackman, 1990). If increased board size<br />

leads to less effective monitoring, director remuneration is expected to be positively associated with the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> directors on the board. Hence, Hypothesis 3 is stated as follows:<br />

Hypothesis 3: <strong>The</strong>re is a positive association between board size and director remuneration.<br />

Recently, ownership structure has been viewed as a determinant <strong>of</strong> remuneration. One <strong>of</strong> the<br />

arguments based on the grounds that directors can influence their own level <strong>of</strong> remuneration if they have<br />

some ownership <strong>of</strong> the firm. Allen (1981) examines CEO power by analyzing the family stock ownership<br />

<strong>of</strong> the CEO and other directors <strong>of</strong> the firm and he finds that executive remuneration is highest in<br />

management-controlled firms. Holderness and Sheehan (1988) provide similar evidence in which<br />

managers who are majority shareholders receive marginally higher salaries than other <strong>of</strong>ficers. Lambert et<br />

al., (1993) show that CEO compensation is lower when CEO’s ownership is higher and when there is an<br />

internal member on the board other than CEO who owns at least 5% <strong>of</strong> the shares. Finkelstein and<br />

Hambrick (1988) also find that executive remuneration is negatively related to CEO family holdings and<br />

CEO pay increases is more likely in management-controlled firms. McConaughy (2000) confirms the<br />

findings <strong>of</strong> Finkelstein and Hambrick (1988) where he shows that family CEOs’ compensation levels are<br />

lower and that they receive less incentive-based pay, confirming the family incentive alignment<br />

hypothesis. Similarly, Attaway (2000) finds a similar effect <strong>of</strong> managerial ownership on executive<br />

remuneration. Werner et al., (2005) report that ownership structure not only affects top management’s<br />

pay, but also the pay <strong>of</strong> all levels <strong>of</strong> employees. Overall, the impact <strong>of</strong> ownership structure on executive<br />

pay is unclear given the mixed nature <strong>of</strong> the empirical results. Following incentive-alignment hypothesis<br />

as suggested by McConaughy (2000) and Attaway (2000), this study predicts that managerial ownership,<br />

proxied by directors’ shareholdings is negatively associated with director remuneration. Hypothesis 4 is<br />

therefore stated as follows:<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

41


Hypothesis 4: <strong>The</strong>re is a negative association between directors’ shareholdings and director remuneration.<br />

Agency literature also suggests that board independence from management provides, among<br />

other things, effective monitoring and controlling <strong>of</strong> firm activities in reducing opportunistic managerial<br />

behaviors and expropriation <strong>of</strong> firm resources (Fama and Jensen, 1983a, b; Byrd and Hickman, 1992).<br />

Boards <strong>of</strong> directors not only perform oversight functions, they also play an important role in designing<br />

effective pay contract so that directors and management have an incentive to serve in the best interest <strong>of</strong><br />

shareholders (Jensen, 1993; Finkelstein and Hambrick, 1996; Daily et al., 1996; Conyon and Peck, 1998).<br />

Several studies have shown that board structure explains cross-sectional variation in compensation.<br />

Hallock (1997) finds that when board has directors with interlocking relations (i.e., the CEO <strong>of</strong> company X<br />

sits on the board <strong>of</strong> company Y, and the CEO <strong>of</strong> company Y sits on the board <strong>of</strong> company X),<br />

compensation to both CEOs is higher. Core et al., (1999) study the relationships among board composition,<br />

ownership structure, and CEO pay. <strong>The</strong>ir results suggest that firms with weaker governance (i.e., less<br />

independent board) tend to pay their CEOs more. This is consistent with the view that insider-dominated<br />

boards are likely to be more loyal to management, and the CEO can exert relatively more influence over<br />

inside directors as opposed to outside directors (Pfeffer, 1981; Zajac and Westphal, 1994). Brick et al.,<br />

(2006) report a relation between firm underperformance and excessive compensation between CEOs and<br />

directors, and interpret their findings as evidence <strong>of</strong> cronyism between CEOs and directors. Ryan and<br />

Wiggins (2004) find that independent directors have a bargaining advantage over the CEO, resulting in<br />

compensation more closely aligned with shareholders’ interests.<br />

A further independence issue relates to the ability <strong>of</strong> a board <strong>of</strong> directors to monitor when the<br />

firm has different individuals holding the positions <strong>of</strong> the board chair and the CEO. <strong>The</strong> literature and<br />

governance guidelines show that a board’s ability to perform its governance role is weakened when the<br />

CEO is also a board chair (Crystal, 1991; Rechner and Dalton, 1991; Jensen, 1993; the Cadbury Committee,<br />

1992; the Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance, 2000). Further, a number <strong>of</strong> empirical studies also<br />

suggest that agency problems are higher when the CEO is also board chair (Fama and Jensen, 1983a;<br />

Yermack, 1996). Core et al., (1999) and Cyert et al., (2002) both show that the level <strong>of</strong> CEO compensation is<br />

higher when the CEO is also board chair while Grinstein and Hribar (2004) find that the size <strong>of</strong> bonuses<br />

CEOs receive is higher when the CEO is also board chair. Since greater board independence results in<br />

compensation that is closely aligned with shareholders’ interests, hypotheses 5 and 6 state as follows:<br />

Hypothesis 5: <strong>The</strong>re is a negative association between the proportion <strong>of</strong> non-executive directors on boards and<br />

director remuneration.<br />

Hypothesis 6: <strong>The</strong>re is a negative association between the separation <strong>of</strong> the board chair and the CEO positions and<br />

director remuneration.<br />

Deliberation about and the determination <strong>of</strong> top management pay is <strong>of</strong>ten delegated to a<br />

subcommittee <strong>of</strong> the board <strong>of</strong> directors. This board sub-committee plays an important role because it must<br />

be concerned with setting and structuring pay packages that provides a viable mechanism for aligning the<br />

interests <strong>of</strong> managers and shareholders (Conyon et al., 1995; Ezzamel and Watson, 1997; Conyon and Peck,<br />

1998; Main and Johnston, 1993). <strong>The</strong> theoretical importance <strong>of</strong> a remuneration committee is clear. In its<br />

absence, there likely exists an opportunity for executives to award themselves pay raises and this may<br />

against the interest <strong>of</strong> the firm’s shareholders. Williamson (1985) remarks that the absence <strong>of</strong> an<br />

independent remuneration committee may be akin to an executive’s writing his employment contract<br />

with one hand and then signing it with the other. Main and Johnston (1993, p. 353) states that “there are<br />

strong theoretical reasons for expecting a board sub-committee such as the remuneration committee to<br />

exert an influence on top executive pay”. Main and Johnston (1993) find evidence that management pay is<br />

significantly higher in companies that establish remuneration committees. Given that the aim <strong>of</strong><br />

remuneration committee is to design suitable reward packages, its existence and effectiveness is likely to<br />

be related to its structure and membership. <strong>The</strong> members <strong>of</strong> a firm’s remuneration committee should be<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

42


independent director and are expected to act as objective decision makers who will ensure that<br />

compensation for executives and directors is set at appropriate levels (Bowen, 1994; Mangel and Singh,<br />

1993; Singh and Harianto, 1989). In addition to agency reasons mentioned above, recent corporate<br />

governance reforms (i.e., the Cadbury Committee, 1992; the Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance,<br />

2000) which require greater compensation disclosures leads this study to expect that the existence <strong>of</strong><br />

remuneration committee links to director compensation. This gives rise to the following hypothesis:<br />

Hypothesis 7: <strong>The</strong>re is a negative association between the existence the remuneration committee and director<br />

remuneration.<br />

Data and Research Method<br />

Sample and Data Collection<br />

<strong>The</strong> sample comprises 428 non-financial public listed companies in Malaysia whose annual<br />

reports are available in 2008. <strong>The</strong> firms in the sample are either listed on the Main Board or the Second<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> the Bursa Malaysia. Both financial and corporate governance variables are hand-collected from<br />

the published annual reports. In Malaysia, all listed companies are required to disclose details <strong>of</strong> director<br />

remuneration and provide remuneration bands in range <strong>of</strong> RM50000 (less or more). Director<br />

remuneration includes salaries, fees, and other benefits so it represents the total remuneration received by<br />

boards <strong>of</strong> directors.<br />

Measurement <strong>of</strong> Variables<br />

<strong>The</strong> dependent variable, total director remuneration in 2008, includes all major components <strong>of</strong><br />

both executive and non-executive director remuneration including salary, bonuses, fees, and benefits-inkind.<br />

It is noted that annual reports <strong>of</strong> Malaysian listed firms do not provide a consistent reporting <strong>of</strong><br />

separate components <strong>of</strong> director remuneration. In order to reduce heteroscedasticity, the natural log <strong>of</strong><br />

total director remuneration is used as the dependent variable.<br />

This study uses the return on assets (ROA) as a proxy for financial performance. CEO tenure is<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> years the current CEO (year 2008) has held the CEO position, while board size is the total<br />

number <strong>of</strong> directors on the board <strong>of</strong> directors. Inside directors’ ownership is the percentage <strong>of</strong> total equity<br />

held by inside directors at year end 2008. Two measures are used to measure board independence namely<br />

the proportion <strong>of</strong> non-executive directors on boards and a dummy variable <strong>of</strong> 1 if a firm separates the<br />

positions <strong>of</strong> board chair and the CEO, 0 if otherwise. <strong>The</strong> remuneration committee variable is defined as a<br />

dummy variable equals to 1 if a firm reports the existence <strong>of</strong> such a committee in its annual report and to 0<br />

otherwise.<br />

Control Variables<br />

<strong>The</strong> study includes several control variables that are likely to influence director remuneration.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se variables include firm size, leverage, and growth opportunities. <strong>The</strong> study also controls for industry<br />

differences in the demand for directorial talent or expertise. Prior studies have shown firm size generally<br />

reflects organizational complexity. Larger firms are likely to have larger number <strong>of</strong> directors on their<br />

boards and may pay higher director remuneration. Additionally, Jensen and Murphy (1990) also show<br />

that CEOs in larger firms receive greater levels <strong>of</strong> pay. This study measures firm size as the natural<br />

logarithm <strong>of</strong> the book value <strong>of</strong> total assets. Jensen (1989) argues that firms with high debt is likely to have<br />

less free cash flow, and thus are less likely to pay a high level <strong>of</strong> remuneration. Leverage is measured<br />

using the ratio <strong>of</strong> total liabilities to total assets at the end <strong>of</strong> 2008. Smith and Wyatt (1992) find that firms<br />

with a higher market to book ratio use more performance-based pay. A more recent study by Walker<br />

(2010) finds that high-growth firms pay their CEOs a greater proportion <strong>of</strong> performance-based pay. As a<br />

proxy for growth opportunities, the study uses the ratio <strong>of</strong> market value <strong>of</strong> equity to book-value <strong>of</strong> equity.<br />

Finally, industry effects are controlled for by means <strong>of</strong> sectors classified by both the Main and Second<br />

Boards <strong>of</strong> Bursa Malaysia. Table 1 describes the variables used in this study.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

43


Table 1: Description <strong>of</strong> variables used in the study<br />

Variables<br />

Description<br />

Total director remuneration<br />

<strong>The</strong> natural log <strong>of</strong> total director remuneration (salary, bonuses, fees and<br />

benefit-in-kind).<br />

Firm performance<br />

Return on assets (ROA) (Net Income/Total assets).<br />

CEO tenure<br />

<strong>The</strong> number <strong>of</strong> years the current CEO has held the CEO position.<br />

Board size<br />

<strong>The</strong> number <strong>of</strong> directors on the board <strong>of</strong> directors.<br />

Insider ownership<br />

<strong>The</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> total equity held by inside directors at year end.<br />

Board independence<br />

<strong>The</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> non-executive directors on the board <strong>of</strong> directors.<br />

CEO Duality<br />

A dummy variable <strong>of</strong> 1 if a firm separates the positions <strong>of</strong> board chair<br />

and the CEO, 0 if otherwise.<br />

Remuneration committee<br />

A dummy variable <strong>of</strong> 1 if a firm reports the existence <strong>of</strong> a remuneration<br />

committee in its annual report, 0 if otherwise.<br />

Leverage <strong>The</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> total liabilities to total assets at the end <strong>of</strong> 2008.<br />

Firm size<br />

<strong>The</strong> natural logarithm <strong>of</strong> the book value <strong>of</strong> total assets.<br />

Growth opportunity<br />

<strong>The</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> market value <strong>of</strong> equity to book-value <strong>of</strong> equity.<br />

Industry dummies<br />

A dummy variable <strong>of</strong> 1 if a firm is in industrial product sector, or in<br />

consumer product sector, or in construction sector, or in technology<br />

sector, or in trade and services sector, or in property sector, or in<br />

plantations sector, or in infrastructure companies sector, or in mining<br />

sector, or 0 if otherwise. Sectors are classified by Bursa Malaysia.<br />

Methodology<br />

A cross-sectional ordinary least square (OLS) regression model is used to test the hypotheses<br />

presented in Section 2. Drawing on previous research on corporate governance and remuneration, the<br />

following model is developed with a variety <strong>of</strong> independent variables.<br />

Director remuneration i = + 1 Firm Performance + 2 CEO Tenure + 3 Board Size + 4 Insider<br />

Ownership + 5 Board Independence + 6 CEO Duality + 7 Remuneration Committee + 8 Leverage + 9 Firm Size<br />

+ 10 Growth Opportunity + 11 Industry Dummies + e i<br />

Results<br />

Panel A: Continuous variables<br />

Variables Minimum Maximum Mean Standard Deviation Median<br />

Total Remuneration (ringgit) 73,000.00 81,981,000.00 2,892,030.03 5,507,313.96 1,769,000.00<br />

Firm Performance (ROA) (%) -1.3981 0.9832 0.0366 0.1232 0.0412<br />

CEO Tenure (years) 1.00 42.00 8.68 7.59 6.00<br />

Board size (number) 3.00 15.00 7.58 1.81 7.00<br />

Insider ownership (%) 0.00 66.40 11.18 14.94 3.85<br />

Board independence (%) 0.1667 1.0000 0.6276 0.1666 0.6250<br />

Leverage (%) 0.0011 7.7032 0.3656 0.5577 0.2832<br />

Firm Size (Total Assets) (ringgit) 58,017,000.0 38,458,561,000.00 1,591,123,986.00 4,268,777,955.00 485,935,000.00<br />

0<br />

Growth opportunity (%) -0.6019 8.9470 1.0167 0.8639 0.8218<br />

Panel B: Dichotomous variables<br />

Variables Yes % No %<br />

CEO Duality 358 83.6 70 16.4<br />

Remuneration committee 393 91.8 35 8.2<br />

Panel C: Industry Classifications<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> firms<br />

Constructions 35<br />

Hotels 5<br />

Industrial Products 114<br />

Infrastructure Companies 3<br />

Consumer Products 59<br />

Plantations 24<br />

Properties 71<br />

Technology 14<br />

Trade and Services 103<br />

Total 428<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

44


Descriptive statistics and correlations<br />

Table 2 provides descriptive statistics for the variables used in the study and Table 3 reports<br />

correlations. Panel A <strong>of</strong> Table 2 shows that total director remuneration ranges from RM73,000 to<br />

RM82,000,000 with an average <strong>of</strong> about RM3,000,000. <strong>The</strong> average number <strong>of</strong> years the current CEO<br />

serves on board is approximately 9 years with a minimum <strong>of</strong> 1 year and a maximum <strong>of</strong> 42 years. <strong>The</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> directors on Malaysian boards is between 3 and 15 with an average board size <strong>of</strong> 7 directors.<br />

<strong>The</strong> mean percentage <strong>of</strong> directors’ shareholding is about 11 percent. Sixty-three percent <strong>of</strong> overall board<br />

members are non-executive directors. <strong>The</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> firms in the sample separate the positions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

board chair and the CEO (about 84 percent <strong>of</strong> the firms practice dual leadership). <strong>The</strong>re are 393 firms in<br />

the sample have formally established a remuneration committee (92 percent <strong>of</strong> total firms in the sample).<br />

Just over 80 percent <strong>of</strong> the firms in the sample represent four major sectors classified by the Bursa<br />

Malaysia namely industrial products (114 firms), trade and services (103 firms), properties (71 firms) and<br />

consumer products (59 firms). <strong>The</strong> remaining firms in the sample are in sectors such as constructions,<br />

plantations, technology, hotels, and infrastructure.<br />

Table 2: Descriptive statistics (N=428 firms)<br />

Table 3 reports the correlation between the variables used in the study. As suggested by<br />

Hypothesis 1, the study finds a positive and significant correlation (0.273) between accounting firm<br />

performance (ROA) and director remuneration. Randoy and Nielsen (2002) also find similar correlation<br />

between ROA and CEO compensation for Norwegian and Swedish firms. Consistent with the prediction<br />

<strong>of</strong> Hypothesis 2, the correlation shown in Table 3 between CEO tenure and director remuneration is<br />

positive and significant (0.179). Randoy and Nielsen (2002), on the other hand, report that the correlation<br />

between CEO tenure and compensation is negative and significant while Finkelstein and Hambrick (1989)<br />

show no significant correlation between CEO tenure and total cash compensation. In line with Hypothesis<br />

3, the study finds a strong positive correlation (0.371) between board size and director remuneration.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a weak correlation between insider ownership and director compensation (-0.051). As suggested<br />

by Hypothesis 5, the study finds a negative and significant correlation (-0.219) between board<br />

independence and director remuneration, thus supports the view that greater board independence<br />

reduces CEO power and bargaining advantages <strong>of</strong> insider-dominated boards. <strong>The</strong> correlations between<br />

director remuneration, CEO duality and the existence <strong>of</strong> remuneration committee are weak (-0.026 and -<br />

0.016 respectively). <strong>The</strong> study also finds positive and significant correlations between director<br />

remuneration, firm size and growth opportunity (0.444 and 0.161 respectively).<br />

Table 3: Correlation matrix for the variables used in the study (N=428 firms)<br />

Variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11<br />

1 Total Remuneration 1.000 0.273 ** 0.179 ** 0.371 ** -0.051 -0.219 ** -0.026 -0.016 0.444 ** 0.000 0.161 **<br />

2 Firm Performance 1.000 0.071 0.107 * -0.063 -0.021 0.036 -0.061 0.127 ** 0.039 0.262 **<br />

3 CEO Tenures 1.000 0.122 * 0.063 -0.133 ** -0.068 -0.041 0.032 0.053 -0.092<br />

4 Board size 1.000 -0.021 -0.061 0.177 * -0.013 0.301 * -0.055 0.073<br />

5 Insider Ownership 1.000 -0.267 ** -0.034 0.118 ** -0.302 ** -0.028 -0.051<br />

6 Board Independence 1.000 0.161 ** 0.013 0.230 ** 0.027 -0.027<br />

7 CEO Duality 1.000 0.029 0.098 * 0.034 0.003<br />

8 Remuneration Committee 1.000 -0.162 ** 0.027 -0.027<br />

9 Firm Size 1.000 -0.011 0.058<br />

10 Leverage 1.000 -0.013<br />

11 Growth Opportunity 1.000<br />

**<br />

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).<br />

*<br />

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).<br />

Regression analysis<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

45


Table 4 presents multivariate regression results for director remuneration. <strong>The</strong> results in Table 4<br />

show the association between total director remuneration and both hypothesized and control variables<br />

derived from the extant literature as independent variables. <strong>The</strong> model is significant (p


emuneration. <strong>The</strong> negative relationship suggests that greater board independence provides effective<br />

oversight function, particularly on matters concerning designing pay contracts and packages. This finding<br />

confirms the view that independent directors have a bargaining advantage over the CEO, resulting in<br />

compensation closely aligned with shareholders’ interests (Core et al., 1999; Ryan and Wiggins, 2004). <strong>The</strong><br />

study also finds a weak support for Hypothesis 6, which predicts that director remuneration is negatively<br />

associated with the separation <strong>of</strong> board chair and CEO positions. <strong>The</strong> weak relationship between these<br />

two variables is likely due to the presence <strong>of</strong> higher number <strong>of</strong> independent directors on boards which<br />

could be used as a substitute monitoring mechanism in controlling level <strong>of</strong> boardroom pay.<br />

Finally, in contrast to the prediction <strong>of</strong> Hypothesis 7, the study finds a significant positive<br />

relationship (coefficient = 0.258; p


total remuneration can also be broken up into several components such as bonuses, benefit-in-kind,<br />

salaries, and pension benefits. Several studies from developed markets examine the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

remuneration committee which includes its composition and its independence from the CEO is likely to<br />

provide insights on how remuneration packages are designed and decided. Finally, there can be<br />

methodological extensions <strong>of</strong> the study. A stimulus equation framework to control for endogeneity<br />

problems commonly exist in corporate governance studies, a non-linear pay-performance relationship,<br />

and market-based performance measures may increase robustness <strong>of</strong> the study.<br />

References<br />

Abdullah, S. N. (2006), “Director remuneration, firm performance, and corporate governance in Malaysia<br />

among distressed companies”, Corporate Governance, Vol. 6 (2), pp. 162-174.<br />

Adams, R. B. (2012), “Governance and the financial crisis”, International Review <strong>of</strong> Finance, 12 (1), pp. 7-38.<br />

Allen, M. P. (1981), “Managerial power and tenure in the large corporations”, Social Forbes, 60, pp. 482-494.<br />

Anderson, R. C., and Bizjak, J. M. (2003), “An empirical examination <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> the CEO and the<br />

compensation committee in structuring executive pay”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Banking and Finance, 27, pp. 1323-1348.<br />

Attaway, M. (2000), “A study <strong>of</strong> the relationship between company performance and Executive<br />

remuneration”, American Business Review, Vol. 18 (January), pp. 77-85.<br />

Australian Stock Exchange (ASX), (2003), Principles <strong>of</strong> Good Corporate Governance Practice and Best Practice<br />

Recommendations, ASX Corporate Governance Council, March 2003.<br />

Baker, G. P., Jensen, M.C., and Murphy, K. J. (1988), “Compensation and Incentives: Practice and <strong>The</strong>ory”,<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Finance, Vol. 43, pp.593-616.<br />

Balachandran, S., Kogut, B., and Harnal, H. (2010), “<strong>The</strong> probability <strong>of</strong> default, excessive risk, and executive<br />

compensation: A study <strong>of</strong> financial services firms from 1995 to 2008”, Working paper, Columbia Business School.<br />

Bebchuck, L., Fried, J., and Walker, D. (2002), “Managerial power and rent extraction in the design <strong>of</strong><br />

executive compensation”, University <strong>of</strong> Chicago Law Review, 69, pp. 751-846.<br />

Bebchuck, L., Cohen, A., and Spamann, H. (2010), “<strong>The</strong> wages <strong>of</strong> failure:<br />

Executive compensation at Bear Stearns and Lehman 2000-2008”, Yale Journal <strong>of</strong> Regulation, 27, pp. 257-282.<br />

Blinder, A. S. (2009), “Crazy compensation and the crisis”, <strong>The</strong> Wall Street Journal, A15, May 28, 2009<br />

Bolton, P., Mehran, H., and Shapiro, J. (2011), “Executive compensation and risk-taking”, Staff Reports No.<br />

456, Federal Reserve Bank <strong>of</strong> New York.<br />

Booth, J. R., and Deli, D. N. (1996), “Factors affecting the number <strong>of</strong> outside directoships held by CEOs”,<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial Economics, 40, pp. 81-104.<br />

Bowen, W. G. (1994), Inside the boardroom, New York: Wiley.<br />

Boyd, B.K. (1994), “Board control and CEO compensation”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, pp.335-344.<br />

Brick, I., Palmon, O., and Wald, J. (2006), “CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance:<br />

Evidence <strong>of</strong> Cronyism”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Corporate Finance, 12, pp. 403-423.<br />

Brickley, J. A., Linck, J. S., and Coles, J. L. (1999), “What happens to CEOs after they retire New evidence on<br />

career concerns, horizon problems, and CEO incentives”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial Economics, 52, pp. 341-377.<br />

Bruce, A., Buck, T., and Main, B. G. M. (2005), “Top executive remuneration: A view from Europe”, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Management Studies, 42 (7), pp. 1493-1506.<br />

Bursa Malaysia, (2001), Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange (KLSE) Listing Requirements 2001, Kuala Lumpur,<br />

Malaysia.<br />

Byrd, J. W., and Hickman, K. A. (1992), “Do outside directors monitor managers Evidence from tender <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

bids”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial Economics, Vol. 32, pp. 195-221.<br />

Cadbury Committee Report, (1992), <strong>The</strong> Financial Aspects <strong>of</strong> Corporate Governance, London, Gee & Co.<br />

Coakley, J., and Iliopoulou, S. (2006), “Bidder CEO and other executive compensation in UK M&As”,<br />

European Financial Management, 12, pp. 609-631.<br />

Chesney, M., Stromberg, J., and Wagner, A. F. (2012), “Risk-taking incentives and losses in the financial<br />

crisis”, Working paper, Swiss Finance Institute, Switzerland.<br />

Conyon, M. J., Gregg, P., and Machin, S. (1995), “Taking care <strong>of</strong> business: Executive compensation in the<br />

UK”, Economic Journal, 105, pp. 704-715.<br />

Conyon, M. J., and Peck, S. I. (1998), “Board control, remuneration committees, and top management<br />

compensation”, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Management Journal, 41 (2), pp. 146-157.<br />

Conyon, M. J., Peck, S. I., and Sadler, G. V. (2001), “Corporate tournaments and executive compensation:<br />

Evidence from the UK”, Strategic Management Journal, 22, pp. 805-815.<br />

Cordeiro, J., Veliyath, R., Eramus, E. J., and Tax, M. (2000), “An empirical investigation <strong>of</strong> the determinants<br />

<strong>of</strong> outside director compensation”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 8 (3), pp. 268-279.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

48


Core, J., Holthausen, R., and Larcker, D. (1999), “Corporate governance, chief executive <strong>of</strong>ficer, and firm<br />

performance”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial Economics, 51, pp. 371-406.<br />

Crystal, G. S. (1991), In Search <strong>of</strong> Excess: <strong>The</strong> Overcompensation <strong>of</strong> American Executives., New York, W.W.<br />

Norton.<br />

Cyert, R., Kang, S. H., and Kumar, P. (2002), Corporate governance, takeovers, and top-management<br />

compensation: <strong>The</strong>ory and evidence”, Management Science, 48, pp. 453-469.<br />

Dogan, E., and Smyth, R. (2002), “Board remuneration, company performance and ownership concentration:<br />

Evidence from publicly listed Malaysian companies”, ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 19 (3), pp. 319-347.<br />

Elhagrasey, G. M., Harrison, J. R., and Bucholz, R. A. (1998/1999), “Power and pay: <strong>The</strong> politics <strong>of</strong> CEO<br />

compensation”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Management and Governance, Vol. 2, pp.309-332.<br />

Ezzamel, M., and Watson, R. (2002), “Pay comparability across and within UK boards: An empirical analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> the cash pay awards to CEOs and other board members”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Management Studies, 39 (2), pp. 207-232.<br />

Fama, E. F. (1980), “Agency problems and the theory <strong>of</strong> the firm”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Political Economy, Vol. 88, pp.<br />

288-307.<br />

Fama, E. F., and Jensen, M. (1983a), “Separation <strong>of</strong> ownership and control”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Law and Economics, Vol.<br />

26 (2), pp. 301-326.<br />

_____ (1983b), “Agency problems and residual claims”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Law and Economics, Vol. 26 (2), pp. 327-349.<br />

Fahlenbrach, R., and Stulz, R. M. (2011), “Bank CEO incentives and the credit risk”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial<br />

Economics, 99 (1), pp. 11-26.<br />

Fernandes, N. (2008), “Board composition and firm performance: <strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> “independent” board<br />

members”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Multinational Financial Management, 78, pp. 30-44.<br />

Filatotchev, I., and Allcock, D. (2010), “Corporate governance and executive remuneration: A contingency<br />

approach”, <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Management Perspectives, 24 (1), pp. 20-33.<br />

Finkelstein, S., and Hambrick, D.C. (1988), “Chief executive compensation: A synthesis and reconciliations”,<br />

Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 543-558.<br />

Finkelstein, S., and Hambrick, D. C. (1996), Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and their Effects on<br />

Organizations, St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.<br />

Finkelstein, S. (1992), “Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation”,<br />

<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Management Journal, Vol. 35, pp.505-538.<br />

Firth, M., Lohne, J.C., Ropstad, R., and Sjo, J. (1995), “Managerial compensation in Norway, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Multinational Financial Management, Vol. 5 (2/3), pp. 87-101.<br />

Grinstein, Y., and Hribar, P. (2004), CEO compensation and incentives: Evidence from M&A bonuses”,<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial Economics, 73, pp. 119-143.<br />

Gugler, K. (1999), “Corporate Governance and Economic Performance, Manuscript, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna.<br />

Hackman, J. R. (1990), Groups That Work (And Those That Do not) Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork, San<br />

Francisco: Jossey-Bass.<br />

Hallock, K. F. (1997), “Reciprocally interlocking boards <strong>of</strong> directors and executive compensation”, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 32, pp. 331-344.<br />

Haubrich, G. P., and Popova, I. (1998), “Executive compensation: A calibration approach”, Economic <strong>The</strong>ory,<br />

Vol. 12 (3), pp.561-581.<br />

Hermalin, B. H., and Weisbach, M. S. (1998), “Endogenously chosen boards <strong>of</strong> directors and their monitoring<br />

<strong>of</strong> the CEO”, American Economic Review, 88, pp. 96-118.<br />

Hermalin, B. E., and Weisbach, M. S. (2000), “Boards <strong>of</strong> directors as an endogenously determined institution:<br />

A survey <strong>of</strong> economic literature”, Working paper, University <strong>of</strong> California, Berkeley.<br />

Hill, C. W. L., and Phan, P. (1991), “CEO tenure as a determinant <strong>of</strong> CEO pay”, <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Management<br />

Journal, Vol. 34, pp. 707-717.<br />

Hogan, T. D., and McPheters, L. R. (1980), “Executive compensation: Performance versus personal<br />

characteristics”, Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 46, pp. 1060-1068.<br />

Holderness, C., and Sheehan, D. (1988), “<strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> majority shareholders in publicly held corporations: An<br />

explanatory analysis”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial Economics, 20, pp. 317-346.<br />

Holthausen, R. W., and Larcker, D. F. (1993a), “Boards <strong>of</strong> directors, ownership structure and CEO<br />

compensation”, Working paper, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania.<br />

Holthausen, R. W., and Larcker, D. F. (1993b), “Organizational structure and financial performance”,<br />

Working paper, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania.<br />

Jensen, M.C., and Murphy, K. J. (1990) “Performance pay and top-management incentives”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Political<br />

Economy, Vol. 98, pp. 225–264.<br />

Jensen, M. C. (1989), “Eclipse <strong>of</strong> the public corporation”, Harvard Business Review, 5, pp. 61-74.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

49


Jensen, M. C. (1993), “<strong>The</strong> modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure <strong>of</strong> internal control systems”,<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Finance, 48, pp. 831-880.<br />

Kato, T., and Kubo, K. (2006), “CEO compensation and firm performance in Japan: Evidence from new panel<br />

data on individual CEO pay”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Japanese and International Economies, 20, pp. 1-19.<br />

Kirkpatrick, G. (2009), “<strong>The</strong> corporate governance lessons from the financial crisis”, Financial Market Trends<br />

(OECD), 2009/1, pp. 1-13.<br />

Lambert, R. A., Larcker, D. F., and Weigelt, K. (1993), “<strong>The</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> organizational incentives”,<br />

Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38, pp.438-461.<br />

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. (1997), “Legal determinants <strong>of</strong> external finance”,<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Finance, Vol. 52, pp.1131-1150.<br />

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. (1998), “Law and finance”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Political<br />

Economy, Vol. 106, pp.1113-1155.<br />

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. (1999), “Corporate ownership around the world”, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Finance, Vol. 54, pp.471-517.<br />

Latane, B., Williams, K., and Harkins, S. (1979), “Many hands make light work: <strong>The</strong> causes and consequences<br />

<strong>of</strong> social loafing”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Personality and Social Psychology, 37, pp. 822-832.<br />

Lorsch, J. W. (1989 ), Pawns or Potentates: <strong>The</strong> Reality <strong>of</strong> America’s Corporate Boards, Boston, Harvard Business<br />

School Press.<br />

Main, B., and Johnston, J. (1993), “Remuneration committees and corporate governance”, Accounting and<br />

Business Research, 23, pp. 351-362.<br />

Mangel, R., and Singh, H. (1993), “Ownership structure, board relationships and CEO compensation in large<br />

US corporations”, Accounting and Business Research, 23, pp. 339-350.<br />

McConnell, J., and Servaes, H. (1990), “Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value”,<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial Economics, Vol. 27,pp.595-612.<br />

McConaughy, D. L. (2000), “Family CEO vs. Non-family CEOs in the family-controlled firm: An examination<br />

<strong>of</strong> the level and sensitivity <strong>of</strong> pay to performance”, Family Business Review, 13 (2), pp. 121-131.<br />

Merhebi, R., Pattenden, K., Swan, P.L., and Zhou, X. (2006), “Australian chief executive <strong>of</strong>ficer remuneration:<br />

pay and performance”, Accounting and Finance, Vol. 46, pp. 481-497.<br />

Mintzberg, H. (2009), “No more executive bonuses!”, Business Insight: MIT Sloan Managament Review/<strong>The</strong> Wall<br />

Street Journal, R3, R6, November 30, 2009.<br />

Murphy, K. J. (1999), “Executive compensation”, Handbook <strong>of</strong> Labor Economics 3B, pp. 2485–2563.<br />

O’Reilly, C. A., Main, B. G., and Crystal, G.S. (1988), “CEO Compensation as tournament and social<br />

comparison: A tail <strong>of</strong> two theories”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 33, pp. 257-274.<br />

Ozkan, N. (2011), “CEO compensation and firm performance: An empirical investigation <strong>of</strong> UK panel data”,<br />

European Financial Management, 17 (2), pp. 260-285.<br />

Pfeffer, J. (1981), Power in organizations, Marshfield, MA: Pitman. Randoy, T., and Nielsen, J. (2002),<br />

“Company performance, corporate governance, and CEO compensation in Norway and Sweden”, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Management and Governance, 6, pp. 57-81.<br />

Rechner, P. L., and Dalton, D. R. (1991), “CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal<br />

analysis”, Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp. 155-160.<br />

Rosenstein, S., and Wyatt, J. (1990), “Outside directors, board independence and shareholder wealth”, Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Financial Economics, Vol. 26,pp. 175-191.<br />

Ryan, H. E., and Wiggins, R. A. (2004), “Who is in whose pocket Director compensation, board<br />

independence, and barriers to effective monitoring”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial Economics, 73, pp. 497-524.<br />

Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), (2002), Public Law No. 107-204, Washington DC: GPO.<br />

Sim, C. (2004), “<strong>The</strong> determinations <strong>of</strong> director remuneration and corporate governance: <strong>The</strong> Malaysian<br />

evidence”, An MBA dissertation, University <strong>of</strong> Nottingham, Malaysia.<br />

Singh, H., and Harianto, F. (1989), Management board relationships, takeover risk and the adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

golden parachutes”, <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Management Journal, 32 (1), pp. 7-24.<br />

Smith, C. W., and Wyatt, R. L. (1992), “<strong>The</strong> investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend,<br />

and compensation policies”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial Economics, 32, pp. 263-292.<br />

Sun, S. L., Zhao, X., and Yang, H. (2010), “Executive compensation in Asia: A critical review and outlook”,<br />

Asia Pacific Journal <strong>of</strong> Management, 27, pp. 775-802.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Combined Code on Corporate Governance, (2006), Financial Reporting Council (FRC, June 2006)<br />

Vance, S.C. (1983), Corporate Leadership: Board <strong>of</strong> Directors and Strategy, New York, McGraw-Hill.<br />

Walker, J. (2010), “<strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> performance-based remuneration: High versus low-growth firms”, Australian<br />

Accounting Review, 20 (3), pp. 256-264.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

50


Werner, S., Tosi, H. L., and Gomez-Mejia, L. (2005), “Organizational governance and employee pay: How<br />

ownership structure affects the firm’s compensation strategy”, Strategic Management Journal, 26 (4), pp. 377-384.<br />

Whisler, T. L. (1984), <strong>The</strong> Rules <strong>of</strong> the Game: Inside the Corporate Board Room., Homewood, IL, Dow Jones-Irwin.<br />

Williamson, O. (1985), <strong>The</strong> Economic Institutions <strong>of</strong> Capitalism, New York: Free Press.<br />

Yermack, D. (1995), “Do corporations award CEO stock options effectively”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial Economics,<br />

39 (2-3), pp, 237-269.<br />

Yermack, D. (1996), “Higher market valuation <strong>of</strong> companies with a small board <strong>of</strong> directors”, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Financial Economics, Vol. 40 (2), pp. 185-211.<br />

Zajac, E. J., and Westphal, J. D. (1994), “<strong>The</strong> costs and benefits <strong>of</strong> managerial incentives and monitoring in<br />

large US corporations: When is more not better”, Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp. 121-142.<br />

Zajac, E.J., and Westphal, J. D. (1995), “Accounting for the Explanations <strong>of</strong> CEO Compensation: Substance<br />

and Symbolism”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, pp. 283–308.<br />

Zajac, E.J., and Westphal, J. D. (1996), “Directors’ reputation, CEO-Board power, and dynamics <strong>of</strong> board<br />

interlocks”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 41, pp.5017-529.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

51


An Analysis <strong>of</strong> Performance Appraisal System <strong>of</strong> Mercantile Bank<br />

Limited<br />

Sheikh Abdur Rahim<br />

Daffodil International University, Bangladesh<br />

Keywords<br />

Performance Appraisal, Employee Appraisal, Bank, Personal Bias, Effectiveness.<br />

Abstract<br />

Performance appraisal is the process <strong>of</strong> determining and communicating to an employee how he / she is<br />

performing on the job and ideally, establishing a plan <strong>of</strong> improvement. It is very much critical because it helps the<br />

managers to take the administrative decisions effectively relating to promotions, fringes, pay<strong>of</strong>fs and merit pay<br />

increases <strong>of</strong> the employees. So, performance appraisal is a must for all organizations. This paper aimed at critically<br />

evaluating the existing performance appraisal systems <strong>of</strong> Mercantile Bank Limited. For this reason, the researcher<br />

has reviewed existing literatures and collected relevant information from the bank. Finally, the researcher has<br />

provided some recommendations to overcome the problems involved with the existing performance appraisal system<br />

<strong>of</strong> Mercantile Bank Limited.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

52


On the Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Regulatory Policies: Some Empirical Results<br />

Sal Amir Khalkhali<br />

Saint Mary’s University, Canada<br />

Atul A. Dar<br />

Saint Mary’s University, Canada<br />

Keywords<br />

Regulation, Imperfect Competition, Regulatory Quality, Public Interest, Economic Performance.<br />

Abstract<br />

Regulation is a fact <strong>of</strong> life in almost all advanced economies, and the recent financial crisis in advanced economies has<br />

heightened interest in its economic impacts. Despite significant theoretical advances in the literature on regulation, not<br />

much is known about its macroeconomic implications. This paper seeks to address this issue empirically. To be more<br />

specific, this study attempts to contribute to existing studies by applying an empirical model to data on the seven most<br />

advanced economies over the 1996-2007 period. Our empirical results provide support for the view that the quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> regulation has a positive impact on growth in these industrialized countries. Nevertheless, the strength <strong>of</strong> that<br />

evidence varied across these economies.<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> efficiency <strong>of</strong> perfectly competitive markets are well established at the theoretical level. In a<br />

competitive market, a single firm has no market power or influence over the price. <strong>The</strong> firm would earn<br />

maximum normal pr<strong>of</strong>it and any excess pr<strong>of</strong>it would be transitory. In such a market, price is determined<br />

in the market and the quantity produced/sold would bring about both allocative and productive<br />

efficiency in an economy. In such markets, consumers also maximize satisfaction and there is no need for<br />

any government intervention or public policy. Nevertheless, this model <strong>of</strong> perfect competition is not<br />

generally applicable to most key industries which are mostly oligopolistic and large firms usually enjoy<br />

some significant degrees <strong>of</strong> market power. Accordingly, this would open the door for some government<br />

intervention in the form <strong>of</strong> regulation to limit market power, and/or to promote a more competitive<br />

environment for bringing about more efficient outcomes.<br />

<strong>The</strong> case for regulation has been well grounded in economic theory in the presence <strong>of</strong> distortions<br />

resulting from not only imperfect competition but also incomplete markets and externalities. However, it is<br />

also well known from the theory <strong>of</strong> second-best that the impact <strong>of</strong> regulation in <strong>of</strong>fsetting welfare reductions<br />

resulting from these distortions is not certain, even when regulators have full information and are guided by<br />

public interest. In other words, much also depends upon the specifics <strong>of</strong> the distortion and the<br />

appropriateness <strong>of</strong> the regulation. In addition, despite significant theoretical advances in the literature on<br />

regulation, not much is known about the macroeconomic implications. This paper attempts to address the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> regulatory quality on macroeconomic performance, usually measured by the rate <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

growth. To be more specific, this empirical study seeks to address the following question: are economies in<br />

which the institutional framework is more conducive to the formulation and implementation <strong>of</strong> effective<br />

regulatory policies also more likely to have better macroeconomic outcomes <strong>The</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> the paper is<br />

organized as follows. In the next two sections, we first review the literature and then discuss the data, the<br />

empirical model, and the estimation techniques. <strong>The</strong> last section contains a discussion <strong>of</strong> our empirical<br />

findings and some concluding remarks.<br />

A Brief Review <strong>of</strong> Literature<br />

<strong>The</strong> relation between institutional factors and macroeconomic performance has been studied from many<br />

angles. <strong>The</strong> institutional set-up is a key determinant <strong>of</strong> the type and quality <strong>of</strong> the regulatory framework,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

53


and <strong>of</strong> economic growth. However, the difficulty in measuring the quality <strong>of</strong> regulation has meant that not<br />

many studies have been able to empirically look at this issue, and those that have, have looked at more<br />

general governance indicators, and estimated their impact on various macroeconomic variables. Among<br />

others, one that has been explored at length is the relationship between governance and economic<br />

performance. See for instance Kauffman and Kraay (2002), Hall and Jones (1999), Olson, Sarna and Swamy<br />

(1998), and Barro (1997). According to the World Bank, “governance consists <strong>of</strong> the traditions and<br />

institutions by which authority in a country is exercised.” In recent years, it has been active in developing<br />

indicators <strong>of</strong> governance, and currently data on six such indicators are in the public domain. <strong>The</strong>se are:<br />

voice and accountability, political stability and absence <strong>of</strong> violence, government effectiveness, regulatory<br />

quality, rule <strong>of</strong> law, and control <strong>of</strong> corruption. <strong>The</strong> raw information that are inputs in measuring these<br />

governance indicators are drawn from a variety <strong>of</strong> national and international sources. See Kauffman, Kraay<br />

and Mastruzzi (2009) for details. According to World Bank publications, “regulatory quality reflects<br />

perceptions <strong>of</strong> the ability <strong>of</strong> the government to formulate and implement sound policies and regulations<br />

that permit and promote private sector development. <strong>The</strong> regulatory quality (RQ) indicator can be taken as<br />

the index that tries to measure the economic burden on business through quantitative regulations, price<br />

controls and other interventions, which can be taken as indicators <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> outcomes. This index is<br />

constructed such that higher scores (in the -2.5 to +2.5 range), indicate a better quality <strong>of</strong> regulation. In our<br />

study, we use the regulatory quality (RQ) index which clearly measures the quality and effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

regulation.<br />

In regard to economic growth, this study relies on a variant <strong>of</strong> the basic aggregate growth-accounting<br />

model developed by Solow (1956), with more generalized approaches incorporating theoretical insights<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered by endogenous growth theory. See, for instance, Barro (1991, 2000), Barro and Salai-i-Martin<br />

(1992), Jones (1995), and Mankiw, Romer and Weil (1992), AmirKhalkhali and Dar (2003). An important<br />

element <strong>of</strong> such studies is that economic growth is seen as depending not just on traditional variables like<br />

factor accumulation, but also upon various institutional factors. Typically, in such models, various<br />

variables reflecting institutional characteristics are included as affecting growth via their impact on total<br />

factor productivity or the “Solow” residual. In reality, there is no unique variable that can capture the<br />

multi-dimensional aspects <strong>of</strong> a country’s institutional structure; as a result, there are potentially many<br />

ways <strong>of</strong> studying the impact <strong>of</strong> institutions. In this study, we narrow the focus by looking at the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

the quality <strong>of</strong> regulation on economic growth in some most industrialized countries. <strong>The</strong> question <strong>of</strong> the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> regulation on economic performance is relevant on the grounds that there are differences in the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> regulation as well as the rate <strong>of</strong> economic growth among these advanced economies.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Data, the Empirical Model, and the Estimation Techniques<br />

<strong>The</strong> sample used in this study consists <strong>of</strong> data for seven industrialized countries which are members <strong>of</strong><br />

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD): Canada, France, Germany, Italy,<br />

Japan, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (USA). <strong>The</strong> data span the 1996-2007 interval and<br />

were obtained from various issues <strong>of</strong> Economic Outlook published by OECD and International Financial<br />

Statistics published by International Monetary Fund (IMF). We also use measures <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong><br />

regulation that are drawn from the governance indicators developed by the World Bank.<br />

Table 1 provides some important information about macroeconomic aggregates in these advanced<br />

economies. It presents averages for rates <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> output (GY), employment (GE), investment (GI),<br />

exports (GX), investment rate (IY), the size <strong>of</strong> government (GS) measured by government spending as<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP, the degree <strong>of</strong> openness (OPEN) measured bu the sum <strong>of</strong> exports and imports as<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP, public debt-to GDP-ratio (PD), and the regulatory quality index(RQ) during the 1996-<br />

2007 period. This table points to substantial variation in growth rates, averaged over this period for these<br />

economies. It can be seen that GY varies from above 3% for Canada and USA to below 1.6% for Germany,<br />

Italy and Japan. In the cases <strong>of</strong> employment and investment, Canada enjoyed the highest growth rates<br />

while Japan faced with negative growth rates. This is despite the fact that Japan enjoyed the highest<br />

investment to output ratio. This would raise some questions about effectiveness <strong>of</strong> relying only on the<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

54


size <strong>of</strong> this macro-aggregate in fostering growth. <strong>The</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> trade openness also varies from a high <strong>of</strong><br />

65-70% for Canada and Germany to a low <strong>of</strong> 23-24% for Japan and the USA. Another interesting point is<br />

that despite its relatively small government size (about 38%) Japan possessed the largest public debt-to<br />

GDP-ratio (about 122.2%). RQ also varies from a high <strong>of</strong> 1.77 for UK to a low <strong>of</strong> 0.86 for Japan. Table 2<br />

presents the bi-variate correlation coefficients between these macroeconomic aggregates in the pooled data<br />

<strong>of</strong> the G7 countries. <strong>The</strong>se reported correlations point to a positive and significant association between GY<br />

with GI, GE, GX and RQ. <strong>The</strong> growth rate is also negatively and significantly correlated to GS and PD.<br />

TABLE 1<br />

Average Annual Growth <strong>of</strong> Output (GY), Employment (GE), Investment (GI), Exports (GX); Investment-<br />

Output Ratio (IY), Government Size (GS), Openness (OPEN), Regulatory Quality Index(RQ), and Public<br />

Debt (PD) during the 1996-2007 period<br />

Countries GY GI GE GX IY GS OPEN PD RQ<br />

Canada 3.225 6.125 1.990 -3.192 20.62 41.80 70.61 63.54 1.447<br />

France 2.242 3.775 1.144 0.192 19.55 52.88 49.01 60.85 1.054<br />

Germany 1.575 1.325 0.436 0.775 19.27 47.25 65.57 33.17 1.439<br />

Italy 1.467 2.583 1.889 -4.258 20.52 48.54 49.90 107.67 0.897<br />

Japan 1.317 -0.250 -0.056 -1.458 24.88 37.99 23.96 122.17 0.865<br />

UK 2.942 5.058 1.069 -1.975 17.43 41.35 51.75 38.07 1.711<br />

USA 3.200 4.492 1.231 -1.758 19.76 35.57 24.62 61.70 1.529<br />

G7 2.281 3.301 1.100 -1.668 20.29 43.63 47.92 69.59 1.277<br />

TABLE 2<br />

Correlation Analysis<br />

Variables GY GI GE GX IY GS OPEN PD RQ<br />

GY 1<br />

GI 0.752* 1<br />

GE 0.468* 0.461* 1<br />

GX 0.223* -0.044 0.009 1<br />

IY -0.167 -0.164 -0.116 -0.111 1<br />

GS -0.310* -0.097 0.040 0.115 -0.279* 1<br />

OPEN 0.103 0.224* 0.305* 0.010 -0.418* 0.454* 1<br />

PD -0.217** -0.200** -0.030 -0.193** 0.519* -0.112 -0.427* 1<br />

RQ 0.501* 0.388* 0.100 0.003 -0.135 -0.355* 0.333* -0.613* 1<br />

*and ** indicates statistical significance at the 5% and 10% level, respectively.<br />

With regard to RQ, the table shows that RQ has a positive and significant association not only with<br />

economic growth, but also the growth rate <strong>of</strong> investment and the openness <strong>of</strong> the economy. <strong>The</strong> negative<br />

and significant correlations between RQ with GS and PD indicate that quality regulation would not imply<br />

bigger government in particular through more public borrowing.<br />

<strong>The</strong> empirical model employed in this study is a generalisation <strong>of</strong> the commonly-used growth-accounting<br />

model based on the concept <strong>of</strong> an aggregate production function. It is developed along the lines suggested<br />

in AmirKhalkhali & Dar (2003) and Dar & AmirKhalkhali (2003), and is an extension <strong>of</strong> both <strong>of</strong> those<br />

studies. We start a general growth accounting function where GY depends on GI, GE, and the rate <strong>of</strong> total<br />

factor productivity growth (GA), i.e., GY= f(GK, GL, GA). Generalizations <strong>of</strong> the model are usually<br />

generated by identifying measurable variables that capture the economic and/or political structure <strong>of</strong> a<br />

country, and which affect growth via total factor productivity.<br />

In this study, our generalization models total factor productivity as depending upon the rate <strong>of</strong> export<br />

growth (GX), the quality <strong>of</strong> regulation (RQ), and the public debt to GDP ratio (PD), as well as upon other<br />

unmeasured differences across countries. We assume that these variables affect total factor productivity<br />

growth and, by implication, economic growth via their impacts on the efficiency <strong>of</strong> resource use,<br />

innovative activity, the rate <strong>of</strong> technical progress, and/or the realisation <strong>of</strong> economies <strong>of</strong> scale.<br />

Accordingly, we can write:<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

55


GY it = 1 + 2 GK it + 3 GL it + 4 GX it + 5 PD it + 6 RQ it + u it (1)<br />

<strong>The</strong> subscripts i (i=1,2,...,n) and t (t=1,2,...,T) index the countries and time periods in the sample<br />

respectively. u it is the time and country specific random disturbance. 6 are impact<br />

coefficients. <strong>The</strong> theoretical literature generally points to a positive impact <strong>of</strong> GI, GE, and GX on growth,<br />

i.e., we expect . Nevertheless, there is uncertainty about the direction <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

PD and RQ on the rate <strong>of</strong> growth. This is because there are persuasive arguments for both negative<br />

impacts (through government inefficiency, the excess burden <strong>of</strong> taxation etc.) as well as positive impacts<br />

(through beneficial externalities, through the development <strong>of</strong> a legal, administrative, and economic<br />

infrastructure, and interventions to <strong>of</strong>fset market failures etc) on growth.<br />

A significant problem with a structural model such as (1) is the endogeneity <strong>of</strong> the explanatory variables.<br />

This means that a standard interpretation <strong>of</strong> the estimated parameters is problematic because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

correlation between explanatory variables and the error term. Further, in the above model, inter-country<br />

differences are assumed away by virtue <strong>of</strong> the assumption that all coefficients are the same across<br />

countries. This is a questionable assumption a priori; at least one that should be treated as a testable<br />

proposition. Following AmirKhalkhali and Dar (1993), we overcome both problems by adopting the more<br />

general random coefficients model which permits us to treat the fixed-coefficients assumption as a testable<br />

proposition. In addition, the random coefficients model can be seen as a refinement <strong>of</strong> the stochastic law<br />

relating economic growth to its main determinants [see Pratt and Schlaifer (1984, 1988)]. Accordingly, we<br />

develop and estimate the following model:<br />

<br />

Note that (2) is a varying coefficients model, and that the disturbance is not the joint effect <strong>of</strong> excluded<br />

variables; instead, it is the joint effect <strong>of</strong> the remainder <strong>of</strong> the excluded variables after the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

included variables has been factored out. For more details, see AmirKhalkhali and Dar (1993). Note also<br />

that whereas the included variables cannot be uncorrelated with every variable that affects GY, they can<br />

be uncorrelated with the remainder <strong>of</strong> every such variable, see Pratt and Schlaifer (1988). Thus, each <strong>of</strong><br />

our explanatory variables can be uncorrelated with u, and this regression model can be taken to represent<br />

the law relating GY to its determinants. <strong>The</strong> varying coefficients model represented by (2) also<br />

accommodates inter-country heterogeneity. In this study, these regression models are estimated using<br />

Swamy and Swamy-Mehta random generalized least squares (RGLS) estimators. For more details <strong>of</strong> the<br />

RGLS estimation methods, see Swamy (1970), Swamy and Mehta (1975), and Swamy and Tavlas (1995,<br />

2002).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Empirical Results<br />

Table 3 contains the results based on the pooled sample - that is, 7 countries over the 1996-2007 period,<br />

estimated using the Swamy RGLS technique. <strong>The</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> the random coefficients model can be tested<br />

using the Swamy’s g-statistic which follows a distribution, see Swamy (1970) for more details. Note<br />

first that the g-statistic is statistically significant at the 5% level, thereby vindicating the random<br />

coefficients model. <strong>The</strong> investment, employment, and export growth rates coefficients have the expected<br />

positive sign and are each statistically significant at the 5 percent level. <strong>The</strong> public debt coefficient is<br />

negative but not statistically significant. <strong>The</strong> regulatory quality coefficient has the positive sign and its<br />

contribution to growth is statistically significant. At the aggregate level, thus, the evidence does point to a<br />

significant role for regulation, as far as economic growth is concerned.<br />

TABLE 3<br />

Random Coefficients GLS: G7 Results<br />

Model : <br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

56


Countries <br />

G7 -1.101 0.189* 0.088 0.176* -0.002 2.028*<br />

g-statistic = 80.7*<br />

* indicates statistical significance at the 5% level.<br />

To assess whether and to what extent these aggregate results mask country-specific differences, we look at<br />

the country-wise estimates <strong>of</strong> the model, obtained using the<br />

TABLE 4<br />

Random Coefficients GLS: Country-specific Results<br />

Model : <br />

Countries <br />

Canada 1.787 0.167* 0.115 0.132* -0.033 1.599*<br />

France -3.049 0.091** 0.359* 0.137* 0.045** 3.124*<br />

Germany 2.984 0.243 0.008 0.176* -0.066** 0.957**<br />

Italy -3.380 0.191* 0.069 0.267* 0.067* 3.507*<br />

Japan 1.475 0.354* 0.197 0.245* -0.003 0.703<br />

UK -0.709 0.235* 0.008 0.237* -0.027 1.886*<br />

USA -1.809 0.040 0.269** 0.039 0.005 2.433*<br />

*and ** indicates statistical significance at the 5% and 10% level, respectively.<br />

Swamy-Mehta (1975) RGLS method. <strong>The</strong> country-specific estimates are reported in Table 4. <strong>The</strong><br />

investment growth rate has a positive impact on the growth performance <strong>of</strong> all countries. However, it is<br />

not statistically significant for USA and Germany. In the case <strong>of</strong> employment growth rate, the positive<br />

impact is statistically significant at 5-10% for USA and France. <strong>The</strong> export growth rate is also a significant<br />

contributor to growth performance for all countries except USA. In the case <strong>of</strong> public-debt-to-GDP ratio,<br />

the results are mixed. <strong>The</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> PD on growth is negative and statistically significant in the case <strong>of</strong><br />

Germany but PD contributes to growth in France and Italy. This may somewhat explain why Germany<br />

has been more sensitive to deficit spending than France. <strong>The</strong> regulatory quality coefficient has the<br />

positive sign and its contribution to growth is statistically significant at 5-10% for all countries except<br />

Japan. Thus, the evidence does again point to a significant impact <strong>of</strong> quality regulation on growth, in<br />

particular in France, Italy and the USA.<br />

Summary and Concluding Remarks<br />

In this paper, we attempted to investigate the impact <strong>of</strong> regulation quality on economic growth in a more<br />

general manner than in previous studies. To this end, we studied data from the seven most industrialized<br />

countries over the 1996-2007 interval. We also used the regulatory quality index developed by the World<br />

Bank. We developed the estimating model so that it more accurately represented the law relating the rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> economic growth to its determinants. <strong>The</strong> varying coefficients approach is particularly suited here<br />

since, as stressed by the political economy literature, institutional factors are likely to play a major role in<br />

explaining inter-country differences in growth rates, and a random coefficients treatment appears to be a<br />

more reliable way <strong>of</strong> taking these factors such as these into account than models that try to quantify them.<br />

Our results lend strong support to the random coefficients approach.<br />

Our overall results provide support for the view that the quality <strong>of</strong> regulation has a positive impact on<br />

growth in these seven advanced economies. In other words, countries in which the institutional<br />

framework is more conducive to the formulation and implementation <strong>of</strong> effective regulatory policies are<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

57


more likely to have better macroeconomic outcomes. Nevertheless, the strength <strong>of</strong> that evidence varied<br />

across the countries considered in this study. In particular, our empirical results suggest that quality<br />

regulation would be more effective in fostering economic growth in Italy, France, and the USA.<br />

References<br />

AmirKhalkhali, S. and A. Dar (2003), On Explaining the Differences in Economic Growth Rates in OECD<br />

Countries, Ekonomia, 2003, 6 (2): 147-59.<br />

AmirKhalkhali, S. and A. Dar (1993), Testing for Capital Mobility: A Random Coefficients Approach, Empirical<br />

Economics, 18, 523-541.<br />

Barro, R. J. (1991), Economic Growth in a Cross Section <strong>of</strong> Countries, Quarterly Journal <strong>of</strong> Economics, 106: 407-<br />

33.<br />

Barro, R. J. (1997), Determinants <strong>of</strong> Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study, Development<br />

Discussion Paper No. 579, Harvard Institute for International Development.<br />

Barro, R and X. Sala-i-Martin (1992), Convergence, Journal <strong>of</strong> Political Economy, 100: 223-51.<br />

Berggren, N. (2003), <strong>The</strong> Benefits <strong>of</strong> Economic Freedom: A Survey, <strong>The</strong> Independent Review, 8: 193-211.<br />

Dar, A. and S. AmirKhalkhali (2003), On the Impact <strong>of</strong> Trade Openness on Growth: Further Evidence from<br />

OECD Countries, Applied Economics, 2003, 35: 1761-66.<br />

de Haan, J. and J.E. Sturm (2000), On the Relationship Between Economic Freedom and Economic Growth,<br />

European Journal <strong>of</strong> Political Economy, 16(2): 215-41.<br />

Doucouliagos, H. and M. Ulubasoglu (2006), Democracy and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis, Working<br />

paper, School <strong>of</strong> Accounting, Economics and Finance, Deakin University, Australia.<br />

Hall, R.E. and C. Jones (1999), Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than<br />

Others Quarterly Journal <strong>of</strong> Economics, 114(1): 83-116.<br />

Jones, C.I. (1995), Time Series Tests <strong>of</strong> Endogenous Growth Models, Quarterly Journal <strong>of</strong> Economics, 110: 495-<br />

525.<br />

Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi (2009), Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate and Individual Governance<br />

Indicators, 1996-2008, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4978.<br />

Kauffman, D. and A. Kraay (2002), Growth Without Governance, mimeo, Washington DC: World Bank.<br />

Klein, P.G. and H. Luu (2003), Politics and Productivity, Economic Inquiry, 41(3): 433-47.<br />

Mankiw, N.D., P. Romer, and D. Weil (1992), A Contribution to the Empirics <strong>of</strong> Economic Growth, Quarterly<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Economics, 107: 407-37.<br />

Nelson, M.A. and R. D. Singh (1998), Democracy, Economic Freedom, Fiscal Policy, and Growth in LDCs: A<br />

Fresh Look, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 46(4): 677-96.<br />

Olson, M., N. Sarna and A.V. Swamy (1998), ‘Governance and Growth: A Simple Hypothesis Explaining Cross-<br />

Country Differences in Productivity, mimeo, Centre for Institutional Reform and the Informal Sector, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Maryland, USA.<br />

Pratt, J. W. and Schlaifer, R., “On the Nature and Discovery <strong>of</strong> Structure”, Journal <strong>of</strong> the American Statistical<br />

Association, March 1984, 9-33.<br />

Pratt, J. W. and Schlaifer, R., “On the Interpretation and Observation <strong>of</strong> Laws”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Econometrics,<br />

September 1988, 23-52.<br />

Scully, G.W. (2002), Economic Freedom, Government Policy and the Trade-Off between Equity and Economic<br />

Growth”, Public Choice, 113(1-2): 77-96.<br />

Solow, R.M. (1956), A Contribution to the <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Economic Growth," Quarterly Journal <strong>of</strong> Economics, 70: 65-<br />

94.<br />

Swamy, P.A.V.B., (l970), “Efficient Inference in a Random Coefficients Regression Model.” Econometrica 38,<br />

3ll-23.<br />

Swamy, P.A.V.B. and Mehta, J.S., (1975), “Bayesian and Non-Bayesian Analysis <strong>of</strong> Switching Regressions and<br />

<strong>of</strong> Random Coefficient Regression Models.” Journal <strong>of</strong> the American Statistical Association 70, 593-602.<br />

Swamy, P.A.V.B.and G.S. Tavlas, (1995), "Random Coefficient Models: <strong>The</strong>ory and Applications." Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Economic Surveys, 165-196.<br />

Swamy, P.A.V.B., and G.S. Tavlas, (2002), “Random Coefficient Models” in Companion to <strong>The</strong>oretical<br />

Econometrics, edited by B.H. Baltagi. asil Blackwell, 410-428.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

58


Compliance Versus Volatility <strong>of</strong> Performance in 2012.<br />

Corporate Influence in Bureaucratic Systems.<br />

Where should the focus for America lay most<br />

David M Chapinski<br />

Rutgers University- Newark Campus, USA<br />

Keywords<br />

Consumers, Ownership, Corporate Income, Volatile, Equity Finance, Highty Tech Firms.<br />

Extended Abstract:<br />

Information accumulates and organizing decisions become fixtures <strong>of</strong> fixed costs. And if consumers are<br />

naive, and especially if private media outlets serve the governing classes, then state media ownership can expose the<br />

public to less obstinate, more complete, and more accurate information than it could obtain with private ownership.<br />

We must remember that firms do form exchange relationships to gain access to specific resources, but exchange<br />

relationships also are important indicators <strong>of</strong> social status. <strong>The</strong> status <strong>of</strong> a firm means the prestige <strong>of</strong> a firm. More<br />

specifically, perceived External Prestige (PEP) I believe is important for the discussion <strong>of</strong> internal versus external<br />

followed by pride in belonging.<br />

<strong>The</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> status varies across contexts.<br />

Corporate income is highly volatile. With that being said, labor costs exist in these divisions between “us”<br />

and “them” associated arena. <strong>The</strong>se are associated with sweeping differences in day-to-day experiences, and these<br />

vast differences make it difficult to appreciate what life is like on the other side <strong>of</strong> such a divide. Faced with effective<br />

differences, it is such an easy and popular contrivance for privileged firms and powerful people to attribute problems,<br />

disappointment and despondency in those <strong>of</strong> lower status to characteristics such powerful people are certain separate<br />

“their kind” from such lower-statuses individuals.<br />

Equity finance for one, has several advantages over debt for young high-tech firms. For both internal and<br />

external equity finance, shareholders share in upside returns, there are no collateral exigencies, and additional equity<br />

does not deepen problems associated with financial distress. In addition, internal equity finance does not create<br />

adverse selection problems. Internal and external equity finance are not perfect elixirs, however. In sum, if a given<br />

type <strong>of</strong> prestigious affiliate serves primarily a certifying function, then multiples <strong>of</strong> this type will have diminishing<br />

positive effects on investors' assessments <strong>of</strong> firm value. Thus, the picture that emerges when prestigious affiliates are<br />

viewed as providing substantive resources, rather than just certification is very different: Instead <strong>of</strong> providing largely<br />

redundant signals <strong>of</strong> an IPO firm's quality, multiple prestigious affiliates provide generally additive benefits, where<br />

“more is better.”<br />

I believe that firms acquire valuable resources from their collaborative-competitive relationships and<br />

strengthen their co-operative capabilities (Gnyawali & Madhavan, 2001).<br />

Firms that have advantageous network positions—that is, those with a large number <strong>of</strong> connections and are<br />

therefore highly central, and those having nonredundant ties and are therefore pr<strong>of</strong>oundly structurally<br />

autonomous—gain several such benefits from their co-operative network and become more competitively aggressive.<br />

Simply put, differential access to network resources leads to resource imbalances between the firms and therefore to<br />

differences in co-operative behavior. Analyzing data on the cooperative network structure, for example, patterns <strong>of</strong><br />

collaborative linkages among competing firms in global industries and competitive behavior <strong>of</strong> firms, we are able to<br />

learn that firms occupying more central positions in the network means foregoing more competitive actions.<br />

Similarly, firms with higher levels <strong>of</strong> structural autonomy undertake more diverse competitive actions. I will make<br />

the case that firms with high market diversity seem to draw more benefits from their central and structurally<br />

uncontrolled positions in the co-opetitive network. Overall, I will show that the utility <strong>of</strong> the network perspective in<br />

studying coopetition generates interesting possibilities for future research. Three implications are especially<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

59


noteworthy: First, firms vary in systematic ways in their ability to extract competitive benefits from their coopetitive<br />

networks. Second, firms that achieve superior network positions in a co-opetitive network are better able to<br />

develop their competitive capabilities through a network <strong>of</strong> ties and increase competitive advantage. Third, coopetitive<br />

relationships possess unique structural and competitive characteristics and therefore deserve serious<br />

scholarly attention.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

60


Exposing MBA Students to Corporate Governance<br />

Keywords<br />

Teaching, Pedagogy, Corporate Governance<br />

Patricia Miller Selvy<br />

Bellarmine University, USA<br />

Abstract<br />

Many MBA programs are <strong>of</strong>fering graduate courses in corporate governance. In fact the Association to Advance<br />

Collegiate Schools <strong>of</strong> Business (AACSB) and other accrediting bodies encourage exposure to this area <strong>of</strong> study.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re does not seem to be much literature on a “best practices approach” or much similarity to the structure or<br />

design <strong>of</strong> the various courses in Corporate Governance. This paper looks at the pedagogy used to teach a graduate<br />

level elective course in corporate governance at a small Catholic Liberal Arts University. <strong>The</strong> focus <strong>of</strong> the course is<br />

to provide the student with a basic understanding <strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> corporate governance, both its regulatory past and<br />

present, as well as the various theories that surround corporate governance and information on the key stakeholders<br />

and leaders <strong>of</strong> the firm and current issues facing them today. <strong>The</strong> course is taught using a case driven, team based<br />

approach. <strong>The</strong> ultimate outcome <strong>of</strong> the course is to provide the student with the tools necessary to identify and<br />

discuss the issues faced by corporate leaders and board members, while encouraging these students to become ethical<br />

participants in corporate governance. <strong>The</strong> ultimate questions posed by this paper are: What are the topics that must<br />

be taught ; What pedagogy is best for presenting the topics surrounding corporate governance; and How do we<br />

help these future leaders to value the ethics and principles necessary to change the actual and perceived corporate<br />

governance culture.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

61


Enterprise Restructuring in the Conditions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Crisis and the Globalization Challenges. Based on<br />

the Experiences <strong>of</strong> the Polish Economy<br />

Ryszard Borowiecki<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Keywords<br />

Globalization, New Economy, economic crisis, restructuring<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>The</strong> 21 st century is the arena <strong>of</strong> extremely dynamic and turbulent changes we have become not only witnesses but<br />

also participants <strong>of</strong>. <strong>The</strong>y keep bringing newer and newer challenges for the functioning <strong>of</strong> the economies <strong>of</strong><br />

individual countries and their regions, and the behaviours <strong>of</strong> enterprises - the basic elements <strong>of</strong> the subjective triad <strong>of</strong><br />

each economy. Thus, the paper attempts to outline the background, causes and consequences <strong>of</strong> the changes in the<br />

bahaviour <strong>of</strong> contemporary enterprises, and justifies the necessity <strong>of</strong> the system reconstruction and the<br />

modernization <strong>of</strong> their structures in the face <strong>of</strong> crisis situations, the globalization challenges and the requirements <strong>of</strong><br />

the New Economy.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

62


Corporate Governance and Performance <strong>of</strong><br />

Commercial Banks in Nigeria<br />

Olagunju Adebayo<br />

Redeemer’s University, Mowe, Ogun State, Nigeria<br />

Oluwa Temitope Mariam<br />

Redeemer’s University, Mowe, Ogun State, Nigeria<br />

Keywords<br />

Corporate Governance, Pr<strong>of</strong>itability and Performance.<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>The</strong> study was designed to investigate corporate governance and performance <strong>of</strong> commercial banks in Nigeria. Data<br />

used for this work were collected from both primary and secondary sources. <strong>The</strong> relevant data collected were analyzed<br />

and tested using simple percentages, tables and bar-charts.<strong>The</strong> three hypotheses formulated were tested using<br />

correlation co-efficient ). <strong>The</strong> result <strong>of</strong> the analysis revealed that there are significant relationships between<br />

corporate governance and pr<strong>of</strong>itability ,dividend per share and the return on equity <strong>of</strong> commercial banks and the<br />

disclosure <strong>of</strong> the financial report within the organization are adequate and in accordance with acceptable codes and<br />

that Corporate governance is designed to reduce inefficiency, improve performance and to save the operational fraud<br />

in commercial banks. Based on these findings, <strong>The</strong> study concluded that corporate governance has increased the<br />

overall performance <strong>of</strong> commercial banks in Nigeria. Finally, the study recommends that in order to safeguard<br />

against possible abuse <strong>of</strong> the concept <strong>of</strong> corporate governance; the Central Bank <strong>of</strong> Nigeria and other regulatory<br />

authorities should check all manner <strong>of</strong> abuses that may arise which may not be in the interest <strong>of</strong> shareholders and the<br />

general public; to generate more pr<strong>of</strong>it, the bank need a good regulatory environment that will enable them to expand<br />

their scope <strong>of</strong> businesses but strictly within the financial service industry and that the government should provide<br />

necessary infrastructure in order to reduce the cost <strong>of</strong> doing business.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

63


Pr<strong>of</strong>it creation, intra and inter-generational Equity:<br />

Need for New Company Law<br />

Olawale Ajai<br />

Lagos Business School, Pan African University, Lagos, Nigeria,<br />

Keywords<br />

Corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its, CSR/corporate sustainability, sustainability accounting, generational equity, IFRS<br />

environmental standards, intra/inter -generational shareholders equity.<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>The</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its in company management is as old as the joint stock company but remains ever topical and<br />

somewhat controversial. Accountants have one measure for pr<strong>of</strong>it and economists another measure, whilst some<br />

others want to do away with the whole idea <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it entirely in order to ensure social responsibility by companies.<br />

<strong>The</strong> theory <strong>of</strong> sustainability calls into question the existing theory <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its, apparently based on subsidization and<br />

negative externalities, as a result <strong>of</strong> failure to factor into company accounts their true environmental costs. Not only<br />

does the principle <strong>of</strong> sustainability seem to give validation to stakeholder rights in corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its but it also calls<br />

into question the current theories <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it creation and distributional equity based on shareholder theory, as well as<br />

the existing company law. This paper examines the relevant issues and argues that new legal rules on corporate<br />

accounting and pr<strong>of</strong>its reflecting generational equity, rather than voluntary compliance, are imperative for good<br />

corporate governance and sustainable development.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

64


<strong>The</strong> Publishing Scramble for Africa<br />

A salutary tale <strong>of</strong> opportunity, bribery and censure<br />

Mark T Jones<br />

Park Royal College, London, UK<br />

Keywords<br />

Education, literacy, publishing, demographics, development, bribery, management, World Bank<br />

Abstract<br />

Education is a life transforming process, one that has a pivotal role to play in human development.<br />

August universities, many <strong>of</strong> whom were founded by religious figures or institutions have sought to place<br />

themselves on a higher plain, seemingly largely removed from the secular. Such ‘groves <strong>of</strong> academe’ may<br />

wish to see themselves as very different entities, but there is no escaping the fact that they are engaged in<br />

business and commerce, and as such are subject to human frailty, as well as the vicissitudes <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

cycles. Eminent publishing houses such as Macmillan and the Oxford University Press (OUP) are required<br />

to maximise returns and it is for this reason that they have endeavoured to break into new and frontier<br />

markets. By trading on a scholarly pedigree and the English Language such publishers have see much <strong>of</strong><br />

Africa as virgin territory and have set about penetrating it with enthusiasm. <strong>The</strong> ardour with which these<br />

publishers have sought to woo Anglophone Africa has resulted in a willingness to forego normal best<br />

practise which has called into question their methods and integrity. <strong>The</strong> result has been a welter <strong>of</strong><br />

criticism and censure, with the World Bank wading in to punish these errant suitors. Now processes and<br />

procedures are in the spotlight, and the work has begun to re-establish credibility, brand name and trust.<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> Chinese have a proverb that says: “A book is a garden in the pocket”. Education is universally<br />

prized, and furthermore a valuable ‘industry’ in its own right. In 2007 the British Council calculated that<br />

the direct value <strong>of</strong> international students alone to the UK economy (including fees and <strong>of</strong>f-campus spend)<br />

was nearly £8.5 billion per annum – a figure certain to have risen since. Educational suppliers are eager to<br />

exploit new markets and in recent years have turned to Africa in the hope <strong>of</strong> seeing their pr<strong>of</strong>its grow.<br />

With the population <strong>of</strong> much <strong>of</strong> Africa set to rise, and more and more <strong>of</strong> the Continent’s governments<br />

committed to providing free or subsidized primary education, competition has become fierce for<br />

potentially lucrative contracts to become the chief suppliers <strong>of</strong> core text for institutions <strong>of</strong>fering primary,<br />

secondary and tertiary education. Kenya is just one example, in 2003 it abolished all fees in state run<br />

primary schools in order to enable the children <strong>of</strong> poorer families to be better able to access rudimentary<br />

education. In the wake <strong>of</strong> such announcements various international publishing houses have been eager<br />

to capitalise on such a golden opportunity, but in so doing, some over-zealous, and in some cases<br />

unethical conduct has resulted in a number <strong>of</strong> leading publishing houses being accused <strong>of</strong> bribery and<br />

corruption, something which has the potential to tarnish the reputations <strong>of</strong> world renowned companies.<br />

Recent events concerning wholly-owned subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> the Oxford University Press (OUP) have caused<br />

shock ways in the publishing world, along with a degree <strong>of</strong> schadenfreude amongst its rivals. Unethical<br />

business dealings in the world <strong>of</strong> education highlight the need for robust management processes and<br />

increased vigilance. One <strong>of</strong> the redeeming features <strong>of</strong> the OUP bribery scandal has been the willingness <strong>of</strong><br />

the world’s largest university press to hold up its hands and declare – Mea Culpa.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

65


A Panel Cointegration Approach to Foreign Direct Investment and<br />

Growth in Africa: Evidences from ECOWAS, ECCAS, EAC and SADC<br />

Blocs<br />

Rasheed O. Alao<br />

Adeyemi College <strong>of</strong> Education, Ondo, Nigeria.<br />

Keywords<br />

Africa, Foreign Direct Investment, Growth, Panel Cointegration.<br />

Abstract<br />

A plethora <strong>of</strong> studies have unwrapped the inflows <strong>of</strong> foreign direct investments (FDI) to Africa from developed<br />

world. Many receiving countries especially the Less Developed Countries (LDCs) woo FDI simply because it serves<br />

as a catalyst <strong>of</strong> economic growth and as a propellant to economic development. This study explores FDI inflows to<br />

the African Regional Economic Communities (RECs) vis-à-vis economic growth spanning three decades. Applying<br />

panel cointegration technique over the period <strong>of</strong> 1980-2010, the study found that GDPGRT, FDI, GFCF, OEXR and<br />

EXPORTS were cointegrated. With respect to the availability <strong>of</strong> data for the observation <strong>of</strong> thirty (30) years,<br />

fourteen selected sample countries from the African RECs which include Economic Community <strong>of</strong> West African<br />

States (ECOWAS), Economic Community <strong>of</strong> Central African States (ECCAS), East African Community (EAC) and<br />

the Southern African Development Community (SADC) blocs. From cointegrating results, the null hypothesis <strong>of</strong><br />

no cointegration is rejected by panels Rho, PP and ADF tests within dimensions while panels Rho, PP and ADF also<br />

rejects the null hypothesis <strong>of</strong> no cointegration between dimensions. However, only panel v test fails to rejects the<br />

hypothesis <strong>of</strong> no cointegration. <strong>The</strong> cointegration equation estimation results unwrapped that high level <strong>of</strong> FDI<br />

generates high level <strong>of</strong> GDP growth in Africa and statistically significant at 5 percent level.<br />

Introduction<br />

Many countries especially the Less Developed Countries, LDCs woo capital imports <strong>of</strong> Foreign<br />

Direct Investments (referred to as FDI henceforth) simply because it serves as a catalyst for economic<br />

growth and as a propellant to economic development. Direct inflows <strong>of</strong> investment through the New<br />

Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD), Organization Economic Community Development<br />

(OECD) and Official Development Assistance (ODA) to Africa has the attraction <strong>of</strong> huge investment to<br />

Africa since most <strong>of</strong> the sub-Sahara African countries independence. Herzer and Nunnenkamp (2012)<br />

submits that the empirical literature on the effects <strong>of</strong> FDI has focused almost exclusively on the benefits<br />

that host economies may reap in terms <strong>of</strong> higher growth and wages. While this literature “seems to have<br />

run out <strong>of</strong> steam,” the effects <strong>of</strong> FDI on important dimensions <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> life such as health<br />

conditions are among the wide array <strong>of</strong> neglected issues (Blonigen and O’Fallon 2011: 4). <strong>The</strong> importance<br />

<strong>of</strong> FDI is envisioned in the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) as it is perceived as a key<br />

resource for the translation <strong>of</strong> the vision <strong>of</strong> NEPAD for growth and development into reality (Ajayi, 2006,<br />

p. 1). Ajayi (2006, p. 1) further stresses that Africa needs a substantial inflows <strong>of</strong> external resources in<br />

order to fill the saving and foreign exchange gaps and leapfrog itself to sustainable growth level in order<br />

to eliminate its current level <strong>of</strong> poverty. FDI is a key driver <strong>of</strong> international economic integration. With the<br />

right policy framework, FDI can provide financial stability, promote economic development and enhance<br />

the well being <strong>of</strong> societies (OECD, 2008). According to OECD (2008), FDI is a key element in this rapidly<br />

evolving international economic integration, also referred to as globalisation. FDI provides a means for<br />

creating direct, stable and long-lasting links between economies’’. FDI encourages and brings<br />

technological know-how between economies; serve a vehicle for local enterprise development, raises<br />

efficiency and competiveness <strong>of</strong> both the recipient (“host”) and the investing (“home”) economy. It also<br />

provides an opportunity for the host economy to promote products and improves international marketing<br />

activities. Since the Asian crisis, the call for an accelerated pace <strong>of</strong> opening up to FDI has intensified in the<br />

belief that this will bring not only more stable capital inflows but also greater technological know-how,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

66


higher-paying jobs, entrepreneurial and workplace skills, and new export opportunities (Prasad et al.,<br />

2003; Ajayi, 2006). Taking a glance at the Millennium Declaration <strong>of</strong> 8 September 2000, UN Genaral<br />

Assembly submits that:<br />

We [the United Nations General assembly] resolve to halve by the year 2015, the proportion <strong>of</strong>the World’s<br />

people whose income is less than one dollar a day. We also resolve to take specialmeasures to address the challenges <strong>of</strong><br />

poverty eradication and sustainable development inAfrica, including debt cancellation, improved market access,<br />

enhanced <strong>of</strong>ficial Development assistance and increased flows <strong>of</strong> Foreign Direct Investment as well as transfer <strong>of</strong><br />

technology.<br />

From this submission, Ajayi (2006) opines and as point out by Asiedu (2004 p. 371) that an<br />

“increase in technological transfer and FDI to Africa will help the continent achieve its Millennium<br />

Development Goal (MDG) <strong>of</strong> reducing poverty rates by half by 2015”. <strong>The</strong> objective <strong>of</strong> this study is to<br />

examine panel cointegration <strong>of</strong> growth and FDI flows to Africa. <strong>The</strong> remainder <strong>of</strong> this paper is organized<br />

as follows: Section two reviews the literature. Section 3 present empirical analysis, featuring model, data<br />

mining and preliminary diagnostics while section 4 present concluding remarks and recommendation.<br />

Literature Review<br />

Definition <strong>of</strong> FDI<br />

OECD (2008) defines FDI as “a category <strong>of</strong> cross-border investment made by a resident in one<br />

economy (the direct investor) with the objective <strong>of</strong> establishing a lasting interest in an enterprise (the direct<br />

investment enterprise) that is resident in an economy other than that <strong>of</strong> the direct investor. <strong>The</strong> motivation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the direct investor is a strategic long-term relationship with the direct investment enterprise to ensure a<br />

significant degree <strong>of</strong> influence by the (former) in the management <strong>of</strong> the (latter).” UNCTAD (2003, p. 231)<br />

also defines FDI as ‘‘an investment involving a long-term relationship and reflecting a lasting interest and<br />

control by a resident entity in one economy ([the] foreign direct investor or parent enterprise) in an<br />

enterprise resident in an economy other than that <strong>of</strong> the foreign direct investor….’’. In the same parlance,<br />

Ayanwale’s study (World Bank, 1996) also defines FDI is an investment made to acquire a lasting<br />

management interest (normally 10% <strong>of</strong> voting stock) in a business enterprise operating in a country other<br />

than that <strong>of</strong> the investor defined according to residency.<br />

Previous studies<br />

<strong>The</strong> building blocks <strong>of</strong> panel cointegration analysis can be traced to the works <strong>of</strong> the panel<br />

cointegrationist, Peter Pedroni in Pedroni (1993, 1995, 1996a,b, 1997a,b, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2004 and 2007).<br />

Contrary to the conventional Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) Dickey and Fuller (1981) and Phillips and<br />

Perron (PP), Phillips and Perron (1988) unit root tests which is widely used to see the stationarity <strong>of</strong> time<br />

series variables, applications <strong>of</strong> panel unit root methods, as put by pedroni (1999) have included Bernard<br />

and Jones (1996), Coakley and Fuertes (1997), Evans and Karras (1996), Frankel and Rose (1996), Lee,<br />

Pesaran and Smith (1997), MacDonald (1996), O'Connell (1998), Oh (1996), Papell (1997), Wei and Parsley<br />

(1995), and Wu (1996). Pedroni (1999) however stated that many empirical questions involve multivariate<br />

relationships and a researcher is keen to know whether or not a particular set <strong>of</strong> variables is cointegrated.<br />

Other applications <strong>of</strong> the panel cointegration tests developed in Pedroni (1995,1997a) for the case with<br />

heterogeneous cointegrating vectors, as suggested by Pedroni (1999) have included, among others, Butler<br />

and Dueker (1999), Canzoneri, Cumby and Diba (1996), Chinn (1997), Chinn and Johnston (1996), Neusser<br />

and Kugler (1998), Obstfeld and Taylor (1996), Ong and Maxim (1997), Pedroni (1996b), and Taylor (1996).<br />

Stream <strong>of</strong> empirical studies on FDI flows to Africa are presented below in tabular form.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

67


Table 1: Findings/Results on the FDI flows to Africa and Asia<br />

Researche<br />

r/s<br />

Target Sample<br />

Countries<br />

Observ<br />

ations<br />

Source <strong>of</strong> Data<br />

1 Ayanwale FDI and Nigeria 1970- CBN Statistical<br />

(2007) Growth<br />

2002 Bulletin (VY), WDI<br />

(2004) & IFS (2005).<br />

2 Ayadi Causality Nigeria 1980- <strong>The</strong> Economics<br />

(2009) tests <strong>of</strong><br />

2007 Intelligence Unit,<br />

growth and<br />

Country data<br />

FDI<br />

3 Onu and Causality Nigeria 1986- CBN Annual Reports<br />

Njiforti tests <strong>of</strong><br />

2007 and statement <strong>of</strong><br />

(2010) growth and<br />

Accounts, World<br />

Bank Report and<br />

FDI<br />

others<br />

4 Eregha FDI inflows<br />

1970-<br />

(2011)<br />

2008<br />

5 Udo and<br />

Obiora<br />

(2006)<br />

6 Lumbila<br />

(2005)<br />

versus<br />

domestic<br />

investments<br />

Cause-effect<br />

relation<br />

between FDI<br />

and growth<br />

What makes<br />

FDI works<br />

10<br />

ECOWAS<br />

countries<br />

5 WAMZ<br />

Countries<br />

47 SSA<br />

Countries<br />

1980-<br />

2002<br />

1980-<br />

2000<br />

Secondary data: UN<br />

Statistics online and<br />

WDI (2009)<br />

World Bank Database<br />

for Africa (2005) and<br />

WDI (2004)<br />

World Bank’s WDI,<br />

2003<br />

Findings/Results<br />

FDI in Nigeria contributes to<br />

economic growth.<br />

FDI has not contributed<br />

significantly to output growth in<br />

Nigeria.<br />

FDI did not Granger cause<br />

GDP; rather, GDP Granger<br />

cause FDI. Thus GDP stimulates<br />

FDI.<br />

FDI crowd out domestic<br />

investment in the ECOWAS.<br />

No evidence <strong>of</strong> a two-way<br />

causal relationship between FDI<br />

and eco-growth.<br />

Analysis shows that FDI exerts<br />

a positive impact on growth in<br />

Africa<br />

7 Macias<br />

and<br />

Massa<br />

(2009)<br />

Long-run<br />

relation<br />

between ecogrowth<br />

and<br />

private<br />

capital<br />

inflows<br />

27 SSA<br />

Countries<br />

1980-<br />

2007<br />

World Bank's Global<br />

Development<br />

Finance (2008)<br />

Results show that FDI and<br />

cross-border bank lending exert<br />

a significant and positive<br />

impact on sub-Saharan Africa’s<br />

growth.<br />

8 Seetanah<br />

and<br />

Khadaroo<br />

(2007)<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> FDI<br />

on growth<br />

39 SSA<br />

countries<br />

1980-<br />

2000<br />

World Bank’s WDI<br />

(2001) and ADI<br />

(2002)<br />

Results show that FDI has a<br />

positive and significant effect on<br />

the level <strong>of</strong> economic growth<br />

9 Akinlo<br />

(2004)<br />

10 Olayiwola<br />

and<br />

Okodua<br />

(2009)<br />

11 Herzer<br />

and<br />

Nunnenk<br />

amp<br />

(2012)<br />

Examines<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> FDI<br />

on economic<br />

growth<br />

Long-run<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> FDI<br />

on health in<br />

developed<br />

countries<br />

Nigeria 1970-<br />

2001<br />

export has a positive and<br />

statistically significant effect on<br />

growth<br />

Nigeria Empirical evidence from<br />

available data failed to support<br />

the<br />

export-led growth hypothesis in<br />

Nigeria<br />

14<br />

Countries<br />

.<br />

Causality test<br />

on FDI, Non-<br />

Oil export<br />

and Growth<br />

1970-<br />

2009<br />

World Development<br />

Indicators, WDI<br />

(2009)<br />

FDI has, in general, a negative<br />

effect on health in developed<br />

economies<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

68


Researche<br />

r/s<br />

12 Khan and<br />

Khan<br />

(2011)<br />

Target<br />

Empirical<br />

relationship<br />

between<br />

industry -<br />

specific FDI<br />

and output<br />

Sample Observ<br />

Countries ations<br />

Pakistan 1981-<br />

2008<br />

Source <strong>of</strong> Data<br />

State Bank <strong>of</strong><br />

Pakistan.<br />

Findings/Results<br />

FDI causes growth in the<br />

primary and<br />

services sectors, while growth<br />

causes FDI in the<br />

manufacturing sector<br />

13 Ousseini,<br />

Hu and<br />

Aboubacar<br />

(2011)<br />

Niger 1961-<br />

2010<br />

14 Stevans<br />

(2011)<br />

<strong>The</strong> study<br />

examines the<br />

relationship<br />

between<br />

variables and<br />

their effect on<br />

eco-growth<br />

Africa,<br />

Asia, and<br />

Latin<br />

America<br />

1990-<br />

2007<br />

World Development<br />

Indicators, WDI<br />

<strong>The</strong> result posits that economic<br />

factors internal to a country that<br />

have the most influence on<br />

real GDP over the long term.<br />

15 Pradhan<br />

(2009)<br />

Relationship<br />

between FDI<br />

and economic<br />

growth in the<br />

five ASEAN<br />

countries<br />

5 Asian<br />

countries.<br />

1970-<br />

2007<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is bidirectional causality<br />

between FDI and eco-growth<br />

both at the panel level as well as<br />

individual country level except<br />

Malaysia<br />

Source: Compiled by the author<br />

A stream <strong>of</strong> works was done on FDI and growth across Africa with unidirectional or bidirectional<br />

causality. From ECOWAS, Akinlo (2004) and Ayanwale (2007) reports that FDI in Nigeria contributes to<br />

economic growth while the determinants <strong>of</strong> FDI in Nigeria are market size, infrastructure development<br />

and stable macroeconomic policy. On contradictory results, Ayadi (2009) posits that FDI has not<br />

contributed significantly to output growth in Nigeria and the fact that FDI exerts beneficial impact on<br />

growth leading to greater markets…found unrealistic in Nigeria. In the same parlance, Herzer and<br />

Nunnenkamp (2012) posits that FDI has, in general, a negative effect on health in developed economies.<br />

To Onu and Njiforti (2010), FDI did not Granger cause GDP; rather, GDP Granger cause FDI. Thus GDP<br />

stimulates FDI and also notes that there was a unidirectional relationship between FDI and GDP. This<br />

paper follows Akinlo (2004), Ayanwale (2007), Pradhan (2009), Razafimahefa and Hamori (2005) and<br />

Herzer and Nunnenkamp (2012) that FDI induce GDP growth while this paper departs to increase<br />

variables and observations.<br />

Empirical Analyses<br />

Methodology, Variable Selection and Data Mining<br />

<strong>The</strong> research econometric method comes in three fold. First, this research employs Im, Pesaran,<br />

and Shin (2003) and Levin et al. (2002) for testing the stationarity <strong>of</strong> the variables and also determines the<br />

order <strong>of</strong> integration <strong>of</strong> the individual series. Second, if the variables were integrated <strong>of</strong> order 1(1), then one<br />

will test for cointegration using approaches and suggestions <strong>of</strong> Kao (1999), Pedroni (1999) and and<br />

Pedroni (2001). Third, the estimation <strong>of</strong> long run coefficients wraps it up. Data for foreign direct<br />

investment, FDI (net inflows, percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP), GDP growth (annual percentage), gross fixed capital<br />

formation, GFCF (percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP), Official exchange rate, OEXR (LCU per US$, period average) and<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

69


exports <strong>of</strong> goods and services (percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP) was mined from two databases <strong>of</strong> the World<br />

Development Indicators and Global Development Finance (2011) and United Nations Statistics Data, 2011,<br />

(Nt=434). <strong>The</strong> data mined covers 1980-2010 for fourteen African countries <strong>of</strong> ECOWAS, ECCAS, EAC and<br />

SADC blocs (see Table 5). <strong>The</strong> research employs Eviews 7.1 statistical s<strong>of</strong>tware for econometric<br />

physiology.<br />

Table 1: African Economic Blocs and Countries<br />

ECOWAS ECCAS EAC SADC<br />

Cote D'Ivoire Gabon Kenya Botswana<br />

Nigeria Sudan Lesotho<br />

Senegal<br />

Mauritius<br />

S/ Leone Mozambique<br />

South Africa<br />

Swaziland<br />

Zambia<br />

Panel Unit Root Test<br />

<strong>The</strong> conventional Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) Dickey and Fuller (1981) and Phillips and<br />

Perron (PP), Phillips and Perron (1988) unit root test is widely used to see the stationarity <strong>of</strong> time series<br />

variables. But these techniques are not highly powered to cater for panel unit root test especially in<br />

rejecting the null hypothesis <strong>of</strong> time series stationarity. Panel unit root tests are usually tested using<br />

common root, individual root or Hadri for level, first and second differences (Eviews 7.1). From Table 2,<br />

both OEXR and EXPORTS variables are stationary at LD under LLC and IPS while others are stationary at<br />

FD on 1(1).<br />

Null Hypothesis: Unit Root<br />

(assumes common unit root<br />

process)<br />

Table 2: Panel Unit Root Test Results<br />

Null Hypothesis: Unit Root (assumes<br />

individual unit root process)<br />

Series Levin, Lin and Chu t (LLC) Im, Pesaran, and Shin t (IPS)<br />

LD FD LD FD Conclusion<br />

FDI -0.76176 -9.02786* -3.78178 -15.3558* 1(1)<br />

GDPGRT -5.49092 -14.1873* -7.68593 -19.3492* 1(1)<br />

GFCF -5.49092 -10.6053* -5.23113 -16.5152* 1(1)<br />

OEXR 0.35074 -7.59957* 3.18895* -8.41346* 1(1)<br />

EXPORTS -0.32617** -6.70087* -1.53024*** -9.80533* 1(1)<br />

*, ** and *** indicates significant at the 1 percent, 5 percent and 10 percent level respectively<br />

LD: Level Data, FD: First Difference<br />

According to Eviews 7.1, common root tests comprise two: 1. Levin, Lin and Chu (LLC) and 2.<br />

Breitung while individual root tests comprise three: 1. Im, Pesanran and Shin (IPS), 2. Fisher – ADF and 3.<br />

Fisher – PP, in summary. <strong>The</strong> LLC assumes homogeneity in the dynamics <strong>of</strong> the autoregressive<br />

coefficients for all panel numbers, while IPS assumes for heterogeneity in these dynamics. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is<br />

otherwise called as heterogeneous panel unit root tests. According to Pradhan (2009), LLC proposes a<br />

panel-based augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test with a panel setting and restricts to keep it identical<br />

across cross-sectional regions. <strong>The</strong> model only allows for heterogeneity in the intercept as presented in<br />

equation (1)<br />

pi<br />

Yi,t = i + Yi,t-I + j Yi,t-j + it …………………………………….(1)<br />

j=1<br />

where Yi,t is a series for panel member countries i (t =1,2,3,…N) over period<br />

t( t = 1,2,3,..T), while pi stands for number <strong>of</strong> lags in the ADF regression and it is the error term.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

70


Panel Cointegration Test<br />

After stationarity test with first difference, the series may become stationary and might have<br />

linear combination that are stationary without being differenced and such series usually termed<br />

cointegrated (Granger, 1988; Pradhan, 2009). After obtaining integration <strong>of</strong> order one, 1(1) what next is to<br />

use panel cointegration technique based on Pedroni (1999) residual cointegration tests. This techniques<br />

allows for fixed and time effects as followed Basu, et al (2003) and Khan and Khan (2011). <strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong><br />

the cointegration tests are reported in Table 3. It is glaringly clear from the cointegrating results (Table 3)<br />

that the null hypothesis <strong>of</strong> no cointegration is rejected by panels Rho, PP and ADF tests within dimensions<br />

while panels Rho, PP and ADF also rejects the null hypothesis <strong>of</strong> no cointegration between dimensions.<br />

However, only panel v test fails to rejects the hypothesis <strong>of</strong> no cointegration.<br />

Table 3: Results <strong>of</strong> Pedroni's Panel Cointegration Tests between<br />

GDPGRT, FDI, GFCF, OEXR and EXPORTS<br />

Pedroni Residual Cointegration Test<br />

Alternative hypothesis: common AR coefs. (within-dimension)<br />

Alternative hypothesis: individual AR coefs. (between-dimension)<br />

Test Statistics Statistic Probability Weighted Probility<br />

Statistic<br />

Panel v-Statistic -1.586507 0.9437 -1.427749 0.9233<br />

Panel rho-Statistic -2.209328 0.0136** -1.983268 0.0237**<br />

Panel PP-Statistic -6.890367 0.0000* -7.811462 0.0000*<br />

Panel ADF-<br />

Statistic -2.212904 0.0135** -3.363762 0.0004*<br />

Statistic Probability<br />

Group rho-<br />

Statistic -1.868609 0.0308**<br />

Group PP-Statistic -12.94975 0.0000*<br />

Group ADF-<br />

Statistic -2.923189 0.0017*<br />

Notes: Null hypothesis: no cointegration; * and ** indicates significant at the 1 percent, 5 percent level<br />

respectively.<br />

Source: Author's Computation<br />

<strong>The</strong> estimated cointegration equation takes this form in equation (2):<br />

Yit = i0 + i1X i1t + i2Xi2t + i3X i3t + ………..+ ikXikt + it ……………………..(2)<br />

<strong>The</strong> equation can be transformed to<br />

it = Yit – (i0 + i1X i1t + i2X i2t + i3X i3t + ………..+ ikXikt) ……………………(3)<br />

While the cointegration vector is<br />

[1- i0 - i1 - i2 - i3 ………..- ik] ………………………………………………(4)<br />

<strong>The</strong> new developed panel cointegration tests by Pedroni (2004; 1999) provide a technique that<br />

allows for using panel data and thereby overcoming the problem <strong>of</strong> small samples. Peter Pedroni suggests<br />

two types <strong>of</strong> test to know the existence <strong>of</strong> heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> cointegration vector. <strong>The</strong> first is within-<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

71


dimension approach (panel test) while the second is between-dimension approach (group test). <strong>The</strong> first,<br />

panel test comprises four statistics: panels v, , PP and ADF. <strong>The</strong>se four statistics pool the autoregressive<br />

coefficients across different members for the unit root tests on the estimated residuals (Pradhan, 2009).<br />

<strong>The</strong> second, group test includes three statistics: , PP and ADF. As cited by Pradhan (2009), Pedroni (1999)<br />

presents the following seven (7) panel cointegration statistics as follows.<br />

Seven Panel Cointegration Statistics<br />

1. Panel v-statistic:<br />

2. Pan -statistic:<br />

l =<br />

3. Panel t-statistic:<br />

(Non-parametric)<br />

4. Panel t– statistic:<br />

(parametric)<br />

2 2 <br />

3 2<br />

3 2 ˆ<br />

2 2 <br />

ˆ <br />

ˆ<br />

. <br />

N T<br />

T N Z T N L11<br />

it it 1<br />

……………………..(5)<br />

VN T<br />

i1<br />

t 1<br />

<br />

1<br />

ˆ2<br />

2 <br />

ˆ <br />

ˆ<br />

, 1<br />

<br />

N T<br />

N T<br />

2<br />

N Z T N L<br />

PN<br />

T<br />

11i<br />

it1<br />

L ˆ<br />

i<br />

ˆ<br />

it<br />

ˆ<br />

11 1<br />

<br />

it<br />

i<br />

i1<br />

t1<br />

t1 t1<br />

T <br />

Z<br />

tN , T<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1<br />

….(6)<br />

0.5<br />

2 ˆ2<br />

2 <br />

ˆ <br />

N T<br />

N T<br />

2<br />

L ˆ<br />

11i<br />

it1<br />

L<br />

i<br />

<br />

it<br />

ˆ<br />

ˆ ˆ<br />

11 1<br />

<br />

it<br />

i<br />

<br />

i1<br />

t1<br />

t1 t1<br />

* ˆ* 2 ˆ<br />

2<br />

,<br />

<br />

N T<br />

ZtN<br />

T<br />

S L11<br />

i<br />

i1<br />

t 1<br />

~<br />

5. Group p-statistic: 1 2<br />

1<br />

Z PN ˆ , T<br />

<br />

* 2<br />

it1<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

0.5<br />

N<br />

T<br />

<br />

i1 t1<br />

Lˆ<br />

2<br />

* *<br />

ˆ ˆ<br />

11i<br />

it 1<br />

it<br />

………(7)<br />

N T<br />

1<br />

T<br />

TN <br />

1 <br />

2<br />

2<br />

TN ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ <br />

<br />

<br />

i1 t1<br />

it1<br />

<br />

<br />

t1<br />

it1<br />

……………..(8)<br />

.………..(9)<br />

it<br />

i<br />

6. Group t-Statistic:<br />

(Non-parametric)<br />

N<br />

N T<br />

0.5<br />

T<br />

<br />

2 <br />

ZtN N <br />

ˆ <br />

<br />

2 ˆ ˆ<br />

it 1<br />

ˆ<br />

it 1<br />

ˆ<br />

it<br />

<br />

i<br />

i1<br />

t1<br />

t1<br />

1 / 2 ~ 1/<br />

2<br />

, T<br />

………(10)<br />

7. Group t-Statistic:<br />

(parametric)<br />

N<br />

1/<br />

2<br />

Zˆ<br />

*<br />

tN , T<br />

N T<br />

1/<br />

2<br />

T<br />

1/<br />

2 ˆ *2 *2 <br />

* *<br />

N S ˆ ˆ ˆ<br />

i<br />

ei,<br />

t1<br />

ei,<br />

t<br />

1<br />

ei,<br />

t<br />

…………..(11)<br />

i1 t1<br />

t1<br />

<br />

<br />

where:<br />

ˆ 1<br />

<br />

ki<br />

<br />

2<br />

2 2 2<br />

2<br />

<br />

i 1<br />

<br />

ˆ i,<br />

t ˆ, t s,<br />

sˆ<br />

ˆ<br />

i<br />

ˆ<br />

i,<br />

t'<br />

<br />

i<br />

sˆ<br />

i<br />

2 ˆ i,<br />

<br />

N , T<br />

<br />

T s1<br />

ki1<br />

ts1<br />

<br />

*2<br />

*2 *2<br />

sˆ i<br />

ˆ <br />

i,<br />

t,<br />

sN<br />

T<br />

<br />

eˆ<br />

S<br />

<br />

<br />

T<br />

1<br />

T<br />

T<br />

t1<br />

1<br />

N<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

72<br />

~<br />

N<br />

i1<br />

Lˆ<br />

ˆ ………(12)<br />

T<br />

1 ~ N<br />

T<br />

ki<br />

1 *2<br />

sˆ<br />

, i<br />

,<br />

<br />

T<br />

s <br />

Lˆ<br />

2 1 2 2<br />

ˆ<br />

11 i<br />

<br />

i,<br />

t<br />

1<br />

ˆ i,<br />

t ˆ i,<br />

t s ………….(13)<br />

t t1<br />

N i1<br />

T t1 T s1<br />

ki1ts1<br />

*<br />

and where the residuals ˆ i,<br />

t,<br />

ˆ ,<br />

and ˆ i<br />

t are obtained from the following regressions:<br />

i t<br />

,<br />

Ki<br />

M<br />

*<br />

i t<br />

yiei ˆ ˆ<br />

,<br />

, t 1<br />

ˆ i,<br />

t,<br />

ei ˆ , t yiei ˆ ˆ , t 1yi<br />

ˆ , kei<br />

ˆ , t k ˆ i,<br />

t<br />

, yi,<br />

t bmi<br />

ˆ x,<br />

i,<br />

t ˆ i,<br />

k1 m1<br />

2<br />

11i<br />

2<br />

i<br />

t …..(14)<br />

Equations (5-11) were estimated, results <strong>of</strong> which were reported in Table 3. From Table 3 results, one can<br />

deduce that panels Rho, PP and ADF are reliable tests <strong>of</strong> cointegration which corroborates the notion <strong>of</strong><br />

Maeso-Fernandez, et al (2006) who submits that panels Rho, PP are more reliable tests <strong>of</strong> cointegration.


Against this background, this paper is statistically backed up to conclude that cointegration existed<br />

between GDPGRT, FDI, GFCF, OEXR and EXPORTS.<br />

Model Specification<br />

<strong>The</strong> study employs the panel cointegration test as suggested by Pedroni (1999;2001; 2004) and<br />

also followed by Hamori and Razafimahefa (2005), Pradhan (2009), Khan and Khan (2011), Stevans (2011)<br />

, Nunnenkamp and Hezer (2012) and supported by Kao (1999). <strong>The</strong> panel test starts by with the following<br />

time series panel regression <strong>of</strong> equation (12).<br />

pi<br />

Yit = i + jixjit + it ………………………………………………….(12)<br />

j=1<br />

i = 1,2,3,….14<br />

t = 1,2,3,….30<br />

where both Yit and all the variables in xit are nonstationary and integrated <strong>of</strong> order one 1(1). Yit is<br />

the dependable variable GDPGRT and xit contains the explanatory variables FDI, GFCF, OEXR and<br />

EXPORTS. <strong>The</strong> intercepts are assumed to be heterogeneous, the coefficient vector, , is homogeneous<br />

across cross-sectional units (or countries) without trend terms and it is the error term. <strong>The</strong> parameters <strong>of</strong><br />

equation (12) cannot be estimated by the OLS method since all variables are in order one.<br />

Following equation (12), the technique starts by estimating the following equation as specified in equation<br />

(13).<br />

GDPGRTit = 0 + 1FDIit + 2GFCFit + 3OEXRit + 4EXPORTSit + it ………..(13)<br />

where 0 are country specific-fixed effects, 1, 2, 3, 4 are cointegrating vectors, it are country<br />

specific time trends. GDPGRTit is a measure <strong>of</strong> the growth <strong>of</strong> the country i in year t, and FDIit stands for<br />

foreign direct investment in country i at time t while GFCFit, OEXRit, and EXPORTSit are gross fixed<br />

capital formation, <strong>of</strong>ficial exchange rate and exports in country i at time t respectively. Following the<br />

previous literature, the study proxy growth with GDP growth (annual percentage), while FDI variable<br />

proxy by Foreign Direct Investments, net inflows (percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP). This study, contrary to Herzer and<br />

Nunnenkamp (2012)’s work on health and FDI use Growth and FDI. <strong>The</strong> study use equation (13) which<br />

assumes a long-run multivariate relationship between GDP growth rate movements and movements in<br />

FDI, GFCF, OEXR and EXPORTS (relative to GDPGRT). Necessary conditions for this assumption to hold<br />

are that the individual time series for both growth and the FDI variable are nonstationary or integrated<br />

and that GDPGRTit, FDIit, GFCFit, OEXRit, and EXPORTSit form a cointegrating vectors as corroborates<br />

by Herzer and Nunnenkamp (2012). <strong>The</strong> results cointegration equation estimation is presented in Table 4.<br />

From the table one can deduce that gross domestic product's growth has positive effect on FDI and<br />

statistically significant at .05 level. <strong>The</strong> GDP growth also has positive impact other variables.<br />

Table 4: Cointegrating Equation Estimation Results<br />

Dependent Variable: GDPGRT<br />

Method: Panel Least Squares<br />

Sample: 1980 2010<br />

Periods included: 31<br />

Cross-sections included: 14<br />

Total panel (balanced) observations: 420<br />

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.<br />

FDI<br />

GFCF<br />

OEXR<br />

EXPORTS<br />

0.114700<br />

0.069270<br />

0.000393<br />

0.050900<br />

0.055079<br />

0.015319<br />

0.000277<br />

6.403890<br />

2.082449**<br />

4.521733*<br />

1.415665***<br />

0.007948*<br />

0.0379<br />

0.0000<br />

0.1576<br />

0.0000<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

73


R-squared<br />

Adjusted R-squared<br />

S.E. <strong>of</strong> regression<br />

Sum squared resid<br />

Log likelihood<br />

Durbin-Watson stat<br />

0.071528<br />

0.065050<br />

4.747879<br />

9693.212<br />

-1289.851<br />

1.380000<br />

*, ** and *** indicates significance at .01, .05 and .1 level<br />

Source: Authors' Computation<br />

Mean dependent var<br />

S.D. dependent var<br />

Akaike info criterion<br />

Schwarz criterion<br />

Hannan-Quinn criter.<br />

3.564135<br />

4.910270<br />

5.962447<br />

5.999986<br />

5.977265<br />

A regression containing all the variables <strong>of</strong> a cointegrating vector has a stationary error term, it,<br />

implying that no relevant integrated variables are omitted; any omitted nonstationary variable that is part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the cointegrating vector would enter the error term, thereby producing nonstationary residuals and<br />

thus leading to a failure to detect cointegration (Herzer and Nunnenkamp (2012)). Thus, an important<br />

implication <strong>of</strong> finding cointegration is that no relevant integrated variables are omitted in the<br />

cointegrating regression. Cointegration estimators are therefore robust to the omission <strong>of</strong> nonstationary<br />

variables that do not form part <strong>of</strong> the cointegrating relationship (Pedroni (2007); Herzer and<br />

Nunnenkamp (2012)).<br />

Empirical Results and Discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> panel cointegration test are reported in Table 2. Each <strong>of</strong> these variables is nonstationary<br />

but they are cointegrated at order one, 1(1). <strong>The</strong> null hypothesis <strong>of</strong> no cointegration is mostly<br />

rejected at the .01 significant levels. <strong>The</strong> estimation <strong>of</strong> cointegration results are presented in Table 4. <strong>The</strong><br />

explanatory variables <strong>of</strong> foreign direct investments, gross fixed capital formation, <strong>of</strong>ficial exchange rates<br />

and exports are statistically significant at .01 S.L.<br />

Conclusion and recommendation<br />

Conclusion<br />

<strong>The</strong> research explores relationship between Gross Domestic Product growth rate (GDPGRT) and<br />

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) along with Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF), Official Exchange Rate<br />

(OEXR) and Exports <strong>of</strong> Goods and Services (EXPORTS) in ECOWAS, ECCAS, EAC and SADC blocs over<br />

the periods <strong>of</strong> 1980-2010. From cointegrating results, Table 3 reported that the null hypothesis <strong>of</strong> no<br />

cointegration is rejected by panels Rho, PP and ADF tests within dimensions while panels Rho, PP and<br />

ADF also rejects the null hypothesis <strong>of</strong> no cointegration between dimensions. However, only panel v test<br />

fails to rejects the hypothesis <strong>of</strong> no cointegration. Using panel cointegration, it suggests the following<br />

findings.<br />

1. From results the study concludes that FDI inflows have, in general, a positive effect on the Africa’s<br />

blocs. <strong>The</strong>re is a general consensus on the past works that FDI inflows play vital roles in the<br />

economic growth <strong>of</strong> host countries. Those inferences, conclusions and perceptions are in full<br />

support by this paper.<br />

2. All the variables used are integrated <strong>of</strong> order one for the fourteen countries, namely…<br />

3. Pedroni's panel cointegration test confirms the existence <strong>of</strong> long run equilibrium relation between<br />

the variables.<br />

4. Applying Pedroni's panel cointegration test, the results confirms the presence <strong>of</strong> cointegration<br />

between the variables.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

74


Recommendation<br />

<strong>The</strong> following recommendations were made.<br />

1. As high level <strong>of</strong> GDP growth generate high level <strong>of</strong> FDI and vice versa due to straightforwardness<br />

<strong>of</strong> policy implication, various government and authorities concerned need to maintain policy<br />

consistence.<br />

2. To attract more FDI, the economic blocs need a sustainable economic growth in their respective<br />

economies.<br />

3. Insecurity discourages influx <strong>of</strong> FDI to Less Developed Countries as foreign investors would not<br />

like to invest in an unsecured environment. African blocs especially ECOWAS, EAC and ECCAS<br />

regions need to guarantee security in their regions so as to attract FDI inflows. Attacking oil<br />

installations and kidnapping by the Niger Delta militants in the South-Eastern Nigeria, bombings<br />

and killings across the Northern Nigeria and Al-Qaeda attacks in Ethiopia and Kenya in Eastern<br />

Africa has seriously prevented influx <strong>of</strong> foreign investors to the west, central and eastern Africa.<br />

According to the results, FDI has positive impact on GDP growth in the sampled countries,<br />

therefore African Union (AU) in collaboration with American and European countries need to assist<br />

Africa solve her security challenges so as to allow the continuity <strong>of</strong> FDI inflows to the continent.<br />

4. Governments also need to provide a conducive environment for investors. Power availability or<br />

factor is next to insecurity. Interruptible power supply drives <strong>of</strong>f investors as cost <strong>of</strong> generating<br />

alternate power for productivity is always exorbitant.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

This research paper was supported by a grant from the Federal Government <strong>of</strong> Nigeria's Tertiary<br />

Education Trust Fund (TETFund) 2010/2011 Conference Attendance Intervention. Following the usual<br />

disclaimer, the findings, opinions and recommendation <strong>of</strong> the paper are those <strong>of</strong> the author, however, and<br />

do not necessarily reflect the views <strong>of</strong> the TETFund or its management.<br />

<strong>The</strong> author is highly indebted to Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Adeyemi Idowu, Provost, Adeyemi College <strong>of</strong><br />

Education, Ondo, Nigeria for his critical cum perspicacious commentaries, thoughtful suggestions and<br />

valuable research assistance.<br />

<strong>The</strong> author also appreciates his model and mentor, the Igboho-born Nigerian Educationist<br />

extraordinaire, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor ‘Dibu Ojerinde, OON, Registrar/CEO, Joint Admissions and Matriculation<br />

Board (JAMB), Abuja for his non-stop support. 'Dibu Ojerinde, a Pr<strong>of</strong>essor who has scored many firsts;<br />

first Nigerian Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Tests and Measurement, 1986; first Director, Monitoring and Evaluation,<br />

National Primary Education Commission (NPEC), 1990-1991; first Director/Consultant, Centre for<br />

Educational Measurement (CEM), Federal Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education, 1991-1992; first Registrar/CEO,<br />

National Board for Educational Measurement (NBEM), 1992-1999 and the first Registrar/CEO, National<br />

Examinations Council (NECO), 1999-2007. <strong>The</strong> firsts scorer has nurtured the author's life to enviable<br />

heights and helped him to mature through greater TRUST.<br />

References<br />

Ajayi, S.I. (2006). FDI and Economic Development in Africa, paper presented at the ADB/AERC International<br />

Conference on Accelerating Africa’s Development Five years into the Twenty-First Century, Tunis, Tunisia Nov. 22-<br />

24.<br />

Akinlo, A. (2004). Foreign Direct Investment and Growth in Nigeria: An Empirical Investigation. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Policy Modeling, 26: 627-639.<br />

Alao, R.O. (2010). Impoverishing Africa: <strong>The</strong> Alternative <strong>The</strong>rapy to the World Bank and IMF Economic<br />

Medicine, European Journal <strong>of</strong> Scientific Research, (EJSR), 47(4), 531-543.<br />

Asiedu, E. (2004). <strong>The</strong> Determinants <strong>of</strong> Employment <strong>of</strong> Affiliates <strong>of</strong> US Multinational Enterprises in Africa”.<br />

Development Policy Review, 22 (4), 371-379.<br />

Ayanwale, A.B. (2007). FDI and Economic Growth: Evidence from Nigeria, AERC Research Paper 165, African<br />

Economic Research Consortium, Nairobi, April.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

75


Basu, P., C. Chakraborty and D. Reagle (2003). Liberalisation, FDI, and Growth in Developing Countries: A<br />

Panel Cointegration Approach. Economic Enquiry 41, 510-516.<br />

Blonigen, B. and C. O’Fallon ( 2011). Foreign firms and local communities. NBER Working Paper 17282,<br />

Cambridge, MA.<br />

Bernard, A. and C. Jones (1996). Productivity across Industries and Countries; Time Series <strong>The</strong>ory and<br />

Evidence, Review <strong>of</strong> Economic Statistics, 78, 135-146.<br />

Butler, A. and M. Dueker (1999). Does Foreign Innovation Affect Domestic Wage Inequality, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

International Economics, 47, 61-89.<br />

Canzoneri, M., Cumby, R. and B. Diba (1996). Relative Labor Productivity and the Real Exchange Rate in the<br />

Long Run: Evidence for a Panel <strong>of</strong> OECD Countries, NBERWorking Paper No. 5676.<br />

Chinn, M. (1997). Sectoral Productivity, Government Spending and Real Exchange Rates: Empirical Evidence<br />

for OECD Countries, NBERWorking Paper No. 6017.<br />

Chinn, M. and L. Johnston (1996). Real Exchange Rate Levels, Productivity and Demand Shocks: Evidence<br />

from a Panel <strong>of</strong> 14 Countries, NBER Working Paper No. 5709.<br />

Coakley, J. and A. Fuertes (1997). New Panel Unit Root Tests <strong>of</strong> PPP, Economics Letters, 57, 17-22.<br />

Engle R. and C. Granger (1987) Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing,<br />

Econometrica, 55, 251-76.<br />

Evans, P. and G. Karras (1996). Convergence Revisited, Journal <strong>of</strong> Monetary Economics, 37, 249-265.<br />

Eviews 7.1 (2011). Statistical Forecasting S<strong>of</strong>tware Package developed by Quantitative Micro S<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />

Eregha, P.B. (2011). <strong>The</strong> Dynamic Linkages Between Foreign Direct Investment and Domestic Investment in<br />

ECOWAS Countries: A Panel Cointegration Analysis’, a paper presented at the 2011 Conference <strong>of</strong> the Centre for the<br />

Study <strong>of</strong> African Economies, Oxford University, Oxford, UK between 20th-22 nd March.<br />

Frankel, J. and A. Rose (1996). A Panel Project on Purchasing Power Parity: Mean Reversion within and<br />

between Countries, Journal <strong>of</strong> International Economics, 40, 209-224.<br />

Hamori, S. and I. Razafimahefa (2005). An Empirical Analysis <strong>of</strong> FDI Competitiveness in Sub- Saharan Africa<br />

and Developing Countries, Economics Bulletin 6(20), 1-8.<br />

Herzer, D. and P. Nunnenkamp (2012). FDI and Health in Developed Economies: A Panel Cointegration<br />

Analysis, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel Working Paper No. 1756.<br />

Im, K.S., M.H. Pesaran and Y. Shin (2003). Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Econometrics, 115, 53-74.<br />

Kao, C. (1999). Spurious Regressions and Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Econometrics 90, 1-44.<br />

Kao, C. and M. Chiang (2000). On the estimation and inference <strong>of</strong> a cointegrated regression in panel data,<br />

Advances in Econometrics, 15, 179-222.<br />

Levin, A., C.F. Lin, and C. Chu (2002). Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Econometrics, 108, 1-24.<br />

Lee, K., Pesaran, H. and Smith, R. (1997). Growth and Convergence in a Multi-Country Empirical Stochastic<br />

Solow Growth Model', Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Econometrics, 12, 357-392.<br />

Levin, A. and Lin, C. (1993). Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> California, San Diego Discussion Paper, December.<br />

MacDonald, R. (1996). Panel Unit Root Tests and Real Exchange Rates, Economics Letters, 50, 7-11.<br />

Lumbila, K.N. (2005). What Makes FDI Work A Panel Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Growth Effect <strong>of</strong> FDI in Africa, Africa<br />

Region Working Paper Series No. 80.<br />

Neusser, K. and M. Kugler (1998). Manufacturing Growth and Financial Development: Evidence from OECD<br />

Countries, Review <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics, 80, 638-646.<br />

Nunnenkamp, P. (2002). To What Extent Can Foreign Direct Investment Help Achieve International<br />

Development Goals, Kiel Institute for World Economies, Kiel Working Paper No. 1128.<br />

Obstfeld M. and A. Taylor (1996). International Capital-Market Integration over the Long Run: <strong>The</strong> Great<br />

Depression as a Watershed', manuscript, U.C. Berkeley.<br />

O'Connell, P. (1998). <strong>The</strong> Overvaluation <strong>of</strong> Purchasing Power Parity, Journal <strong>of</strong> International Economics, 44, 1-19.<br />

OECD (2008). Benchmark Definition <strong>of</strong> Foreign Direct Investment, 4th ed.<br />

World Bank (1996). World Debt Tables: External Finance for Developing Countries, Vol. 1(Analysis and Summary<br />

Tables). Washington, D.C.: <strong>The</strong> World Bank.<br />

Oh, K. (1996). Purchasing Power Parity and Unit Root Tests Using Panel Data, Journal <strong>of</strong> International Money<br />

and Finance, 15, 405-418.<br />

Ong, S. E. and C. Maxim (1997). A Heterogeneous Panel Cointegration-Error Correction Approach to Modeling<br />

Commercial Mortgage Backed Security Prices, Journal <strong>of</strong> Property Finance, 8, 317-335.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

76


Papell, D. (1997). Searching for Stationarity: Purchasing Power Parity under the Current Float, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

International Economics, 43, 313-332.<br />

Pedroni, P. (1993). Panel Cointegration, Chapter 2 in Panel Cointegration, Endogenous Growth and Business<br />

Cycles in Open Economies, Columbia University Dissertation, UMI Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan.<br />

Pedroni, P. (1995). Panel Cointegration; Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties <strong>of</strong> Pooled Time Series Tests,<br />

with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis', Indiana University Working Papers in Economics, No. 95-013, June.<br />

Pedroni, P. (1996a). Fully Modified OLS for Heterogeneous Cointegrated Panels and the Case <strong>of</strong> Purchasing<br />

Power Parity', Indiana University Working Papers in Economics, No. 96-020, June.<br />

Pedroni, P. (1996b). Endogenous Growth, Human Capital, and Cointegration for Multi-Country Panels,<br />

Working Paper, Indiana University, November.<br />

Pedroni, P. (1997a). Panel Cointegration; Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties <strong>of</strong> Pooled Time Series Tests,<br />

with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis: New Results', Working Paper, Indiana University, April.<br />

Pedroni, P. (1997b). On the Role <strong>of</strong> Cross Sectional Dependency in Dynamic Panel Unit Root and Panel<br />

Cointegration Exchange Rate Studies', Working Paper, Indiana University, November.<br />

Pedroni, P. (1998). Testing for Convergence to Common Steady States in Nonstationary Heterogeneous Panels',<br />

Working Paper, Indiana University, November.<br />

Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panel with Multiple Regressors.<br />

Oxford Bulletin <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics , 16, 653-670.<br />

Pedroni, P. (2001). Purchasing Power Parity in Cointegrated Panels, <strong>The</strong> Review <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics,<br />

83(4), 727-731.<br />

Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties <strong>of</strong> Pooled Time Series Test<br />

with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis: New Results. Econometric <strong>The</strong>ory, 20, 597-627.<br />

Pedroni, P. (2007). Social Capital, Barriers to Production and Capital Shares: Implications for the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

parameter heterogeneity from a nonstationary panel approach, Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Econometrics 22, 429-451.<br />

Pradhan, R.P. (2009). <strong>The</strong> FDI – Led Growth Hypothesis in ASEAN 5 Countries: Evidence from Cointegrated<br />

Panel Analysis. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Business and Management, 4(12).<br />

Prasad, E. et al (2003). Effects <strong>of</strong> financial globalization on developing countries; some empirical evidence, IMF<br />

Occasional Paper 220.Washington, Dc: International Monetary Fund.<br />

Seetanah, B. and A.J. Khadaroo (2007). Foreign Direct Investment and Growth: New Evidences from Sub-<br />

Sahara African countries, www.csae.ox.ac.uk/conferences/2007.<br />

Stevans, K.L. (2011). Correlates <strong>of</strong> Economic Growth in Developing Countries: A Panel Cointegration<br />

Approach, SelectedWorks. Available at: http://works.bepress/lonniekstevans/9.<br />

Taylor, A. (1996). International Capital Mobility in History: Purchasing Power Parity in the Long-Run,<br />

NBERWorking Paper No. 5742.<br />

Udo, E.A. and I.K. Obiora (2006). Determinants <strong>of</strong> Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in the<br />

West African Monetary Zone: A System Equations Approach.<br />

UNCTAD (2003). World Investment Report, New York;<br />

Geneva (http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/wir2003_en.pdf).<br />

Wei, S. and D. Parsley (1995). Purchasing Power Dis-Parity during the Floating Rate Period: Exchange Rate<br />

Volatility, Trade Barriers and Other Culprits, NBER Working Paper No. 50-32.<br />

Wu, Y. (1996). Are Real Exchange Rates Nonstationary Evidence from a Panel- Data Test, Journal <strong>of</strong> Money<br />

Credit and Banking, 28, 54-63.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

77


Technology Systems for Sustainable Development in Poland<br />

Marek Dziura<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Keywords<br />

Technology, science and technology policy, foresight, sustainable development<br />

Abstract<br />

In Poland technology foresight activities play an important role in targeting science and technology towards present<br />

and future societal needs. This paper describes a recent technology foresight study, explicitly meant to re-align<br />

technological development with the long-term goal <strong>of</strong> achieving sustainable development. <strong>The</strong> foresight was meant –<br />

and is actually used – to develop a policy strategy for stimulating those technological systems that might radically<br />

increase the efficiency <strong>of</strong> products, processes and services.<br />

Technology foresight is regarded as the most upstream element <strong>of</strong> the technology development process. It<br />

provides inputs for the formulation <strong>of</strong> technology policies and strategies that guide the development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

technological infrastructure. In addition, technology foresight provides support to innovation, and incentives and<br />

assistance to enterprises in the domain <strong>of</strong> technology management and technology transfer, leading to enhanced<br />

competitiveness and growth.<br />

<strong>The</strong> technology foresight initiative also provides suitable methodologies to promote sustainable and<br />

innovative development, fostering economic, environmental and social benefits at national and regional levels. Its<br />

outcomes are policies and programmes that deal with innovation, industrial growth and competitiveness.<br />

Introduction<br />

Science and technology policy should be <strong>of</strong> the most dynamic policy domains in Poland. <strong>The</strong><br />

strong political interest in science and technology reflects a wide recognition <strong>of</strong> the relevance <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />

research and technological development in relation to industrial competitiveness and societal problems. In<br />

preparing for the challenges our country faces in the 21st Century, research and development are<br />

regarded as vital, whether they concern ageing, transportation and mobility issues or sustainable<br />

development.<br />

Technology Foresight<br />

Although the importance <strong>of</strong> science and technology is recognised, it is far from evident that<br />

scientific research and technological development are attuned to societal needs. Traditionally, science and<br />

technology policy in most industrialised countries focused mainly on the supply side <strong>of</strong> the innovation<br />

process, hardly taking the societal needs into account. However, during the last five years, stimulated<br />

forcefully by the government reports on technology foresight (2006, introduced by the Polish Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Science and Higher Education for 2007-2008), the focus <strong>of</strong> Polish science and technology policy is to<br />

strengthen the interaction between the supply <strong>of</strong> and demand for knowledge. <strong>The</strong> Polish government has<br />

attempted to gain an understanding <strong>of</strong> the possibilities technology presents to reduce current<br />

technological problems. <strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> that program were presented in 2009.<br />

Evidently there are a large number <strong>of</strong> technological options that could contribute to economic growth and<br />

ecological sustainability. However, encouraging technological development is no guarantee <strong>of</strong><br />

environmental improvement. For example, new technology can lead to new forms <strong>of</strong> pollution. In other<br />

words: technology implies threats as well as opportunities. A policy on technology from the viewpoint <strong>of</strong><br />

sustainable development should serve to strengthen the opportunities where possible and mitigate any<br />

threats.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

78


<strong>The</strong> representatives <strong>of</strong> the Polish ministries commissioned all organizations to perform a<br />

technology foresight study that was explicitly meant to re-align technological development with the longterm<br />

goal <strong>of</strong> achieving sustainable development. <strong>The</strong> objective <strong>of</strong> this foresight was to find handles for<br />

policy aiming to selectively stimulate technological systems, with the intention <strong>of</strong> increasing the<br />

environmental efficiency <strong>of</strong> products, processes and activities.<br />

<strong>The</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> “environmental efficiency” is a key concept in Polish environmental policy. It<br />

refers to a societal development in which economic growth, an increase in competitive strengths and<br />

employment goes hand in hand with a decrease in the pressure on the environment and the use <strong>of</strong> nonrenewable<br />

raw materials. Technological development is regarded as one <strong>of</strong> the key elements in realising<br />

radical improvements in environmental efficiency.<br />

This environment-oriented foresight studies focuses on a period <strong>of</strong> 10 years for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

including more radical innovations within the scope <strong>of</strong> study. One important notion is that it is<br />

meaningful to obtain an understanding <strong>of</strong> the environmental effects <strong>of</strong> new technological systems in<br />

advance <strong>of</strong> the implementation. <strong>The</strong> opportunity to intervene early on in the development trajectory may<br />

have greater effect on the eventual technology. Also it seems better to identify potential undesired side<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> new technologies, in order to prevent them from occurring.<br />

Methodology<br />

A Systems Approach<br />

An important new element in this technology foresight study is that we did not focus on separate<br />

technologies, but took a systems approach to technological development. Also, we combined a<br />

broadlybased inventory <strong>of</strong> the technological supply with an analysis <strong>of</strong> dynamism in society's demand.<br />

This technological foresight study takes a very wide field into consideration. It is impossible to<br />

describe the technological developments in detail. And more importantly, a detailed analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

technological components would overlook the relation between these components: it is only in<br />

combination that they perform their specific function (transportation, communication). <strong>The</strong>refore, the<br />

study focuses on the identification and analysis <strong>of</strong> developments at system level. <strong>The</strong> notion <strong>of</strong><br />

“technological system” was introduced for the combination <strong>of</strong> technical means and the human skills and<br />

knowledge to make these means perform a specific, societal function.<br />

<strong>The</strong> study focuses on technological systems which might possibly be used in Poland over the next 10<br />

years. When assessing the environmental relevance <strong>of</strong> these systems we made a distinction in terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sphere <strong>of</strong> application for which they are developed. We chose a breakdown into societal functions. This,<br />

far more than a classification into branches <strong>of</strong> industry, provided us with the opportunity to do justice to<br />

the social dynamism over the next few decades. <strong>The</strong>se functions will not change quickly; the way in which<br />

these functions are fulfilled will.<br />

<strong>The</strong> term “societal function” is seen in the broad sense. It covers the function fulfilment for the<br />

end consumer, as well as for the industrial suppliers. <strong>The</strong> different functions are based on Michael Porter's<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten-used categories <strong>of</strong> economic goods and services. In analogy with Porter's classification, a distinction<br />

is made between:<br />

- generic functions that feed all the other functions, such as the supply <strong>of</strong> energy and (raw) materials.<br />

- intermediate functions that create the essential conditions for all other functions, such as movement<br />

(transport and infrastructure), communication and business services.<br />

- end-use functions that fulfil the needs <strong>of</strong> the consumer, namely: nourishment; housing, care and<br />

recreation.<br />

If we focus on innovation processes at the system level, we should distinguish between<br />

innovation taken one step at a time and radical innovation. Step-by-step innovation is based on existing<br />

systems; radical innovation <strong>of</strong>ten focuses on new systems to replace existing ones. We make a distinction<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

79


here between three ideal kinds <strong>of</strong> innovation: optimisation, redesign and function innovation <strong>of</strong><br />

technological systems.<br />

Optimisation focuses on improving existing products, processes or infrastructure. <strong>The</strong> main<br />

concern here is to modify systems which already have a commercial use. In this type <strong>of</strong> improvement, the<br />

system concept is not essentially modified but the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the system is increased by making slight<br />

modifications only.<br />

In the second kind <strong>of</strong> innovation, redesign, the actual design <strong>of</strong> existing products, processes or<br />

infrastructure is partly changed. Specific features <strong>of</strong> the system are changed, for instance by choosing to<br />

use materials that can be made suitable for reuse in the disposal stage. In redesign, the system concept<br />

remains largely unchanged.<br />

More far-reaching improvements can be achieved by departing from the system concept and by<br />

developing new systems which perform the same function better. This can result in a radical change as to<br />

how the function is fulfilled. This kind <strong>of</strong> innovation is called function-oriented innovation or in short:<br />

function innovation.<br />

Optimisation, redesign and function innovation are indicative <strong>of</strong> ideal types within a continuum.<br />

<strong>The</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> freedom in this continuum becomes progressively higher. Whereas for optimisation the<br />

system concept is in essence still a given factor, for function innovation only the system’s function is<br />

important. In many cases, function innovation is linked with shifts in the associated socio-economic<br />

system. This is because new parties enter the market and established market positions come under<br />

pressure. In addition to the required R&D effort, it is because <strong>of</strong> this socio-economic dimension that<br />

function innovations need considerably more time to be realised than optimisation <strong>of</strong> existing systems.<br />

This distinction also shows that the difference between these different kinds <strong>of</strong> innovation is<br />

important from the viewpoint <strong>of</strong> the environment. Improving existing systems can lead to substantial<br />

improvements in efficiency, but at some point, the existing concept becomes fully developed and the<br />

ceiling will have been reached in terms <strong>of</strong> environmental efficiency. Only by changing the design, or by<br />

introducing a completely new system concept would it become possible to break through this ceiling. In<br />

the long run a greater leap in efficiency may be expected from the development <strong>of</strong> new systems than from<br />

optimising existing ones. How great that leap will be obviously depends on the system and the function.<br />

It only gives a general indication in this respect.<br />

Ways <strong>of</strong> implementation<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> methodology, two ways were followed in the environmental technology foresight<br />

systems:<br />

- mapping out the technological developments that could lead to a significant change in environmental<br />

impact in the next 10 years (positive, or negative).<br />

- investigating the main societal driving forces which are decisive for the resulting developments.<br />

First an overview was compiled <strong>of</strong> all the currently known technological developments which<br />

over the next 10 years could lead to a substantial reduction in today's environmental problems or,<br />

conversely, to the advent <strong>of</strong> new environmental problems. This overview was based on the findings <strong>of</strong><br />

numerous technology foresight studies describing future trends and expectations in a wide variety <strong>of</strong><br />

technological fields.<br />

Subsequently, a systematic assessment was made <strong>of</strong> the potential consequences <strong>of</strong> adopting new<br />

or upgraded technological systems in terms <strong>of</strong> changes in environmental efficiency (both positive and<br />

negative) in relation to the dominant systems in the year 2005. Extent <strong>of</strong> changes in the consumption <strong>of</strong><br />

energy, scarce raw materials and in the release <strong>of</strong> emissions and waste were analysed when making this<br />

assessment. Also the use <strong>of</strong> space was taken into account. All changes were assessed on the basis <strong>of</strong> unit <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

80


output (product or service), implying that any potential developments in production volume or amount <strong>of</strong><br />

consumption were not taken into account. Nor were behavioural changes, which could either increase or<br />

neutralise the environmental pay-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> improvements in environmental efficiency taken into<br />

consideration when carrying out this assessment.<br />

<strong>The</strong> second route consisted <strong>of</strong> a scenario analysis <strong>of</strong> the main societal driving forces and obstacles<br />

that are decisive for the rate and direction <strong>of</strong> technological development, and thus determine how fast<br />

new technological systems penetrate the market. On the one hand, the specific features <strong>of</strong> the systems<br />

themselves, such as the technological barriers that need to be overcome before a system becomes ripe for<br />

the market, were taken into consideration. On the other hand, the driving forces and obstacles <strong>of</strong> a<br />

cultural, social and economic nature were also analysed. Among other things this relates to the pace <strong>of</strong><br />

economic growth, the interaction between the societal demand and the technological supply, society's<br />

acceptance <strong>of</strong> technological innovation and the price we are prepared to pay for resolving collective<br />

problems. <strong>The</strong>se analyses were based on future scenarios drawn up by the Polish Ministry <strong>of</strong> Economy<br />

and the Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Environment (see Table 1). <strong>The</strong> resulting information on driving forces and<br />

obstacles was used to identify handles for policy.<br />

Table 1. Relevant differences between the potential scenarios for Poland<br />

Balanced growth European Renaissance Global shift<br />

dominant market perspective is coordination<br />

perspective<br />

forming <strong>of</strong> trade blocs<br />

trade liberalisation<br />

- dominant market perspective is<br />

balanced perspective<br />

- open market correction<br />

- strong economic growth<br />

- strong growth in labour and capital<br />

resources productivity (A,K) and<br />

material productivity (M)<br />

- ample willingness to change<br />

- substantial R&D<br />

- strong technological<br />

ynamism<br />

- global awareness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

environment<br />

- high level <strong>of</strong> energy saving<br />

Source: based on Weterings et al, (1997).<br />

strong economic growth<br />

strong growth in material<br />

productivity (M) and extra stimuli<br />

for economic infrastructure (G)<br />

less call for innovation<br />

substantial R&D<br />

less strong technological<br />

dynamism<br />

- European awareness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

environment<br />

- energy saving<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

81<br />

dominant market perspective is open<br />

market perspective<br />

economic growth lags behind<br />

growth in labour and capital resources<br />

productivity (A,K)<br />

conservative, more <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

little R&D<br />

innovation coming to a halt, duplication<br />

local awareness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

environment<br />

very little saving <strong>of</strong> energy<br />

Results<br />

Clusters <strong>of</strong> technological systems<br />

<strong>The</strong> inventory <strong>of</strong> the technological systems that could lead to a substantial change <strong>of</strong> the<br />

environmental impact over the next 10 years resulted in a technological systems. <strong>The</strong>se systems can be<br />

categorised in five major clusters:<br />

- energy systems, including systems based on coal gasification, solar energy, wind energy, biomass,<br />

hydrogen, nuclear fusion, nuclear fission and innovations in energy distribution (for both local and<br />

mobile supplies).<br />

- new (raw) materials, particularly biological raw materials, composites and new colour systems.<br />

- production systems, geared towards optimising industrial production (including the metal industry,<br />

synthetic materials production industry, food processing industry) and agricultural production.<br />

- information and communication systems, relating mainly to the application <strong>of</strong> information and<br />

communication technology in the industrial and service sectors, as well as in the domestic environment.<br />

- transport systems, a cluster <strong>of</strong> innovative systems for the transportation <strong>of</strong> people and goods (e.g. superaircraft,<br />

new trains, hybrid transport and underground pipeline transport). In these innovations, the<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> new or improved modalities is inevitably coupled with changes in the transport<br />

infrastructure.


Technological innovation and environmental efficiency<br />

Technological innovation leads predominantly to an improvement in the environmental efficiency<br />

<strong>of</strong> products, processes and activities. Some technological systems can be expected to result in an<br />

improvement in environmental efficiency. Of these we can expect a positive contribution in the form <strong>of</strong>:<br />

- substitution: substitution <strong>of</strong> oil, gas and coal by renewable energy sources, including the utilisation <strong>of</strong><br />

energy systems based on biomass, solar and wind energy.<br />

- energy saving: a reduction in energy consumption per unit <strong>of</strong> output that can be expected in the majority<br />

<strong>of</strong> industrial production systems.<br />

- a reduction in combustion emissions (CO2, SOx and NOx) and (waste) clinkers inherent in the utilisation<br />

<strong>of</strong> oil, gas and coal.<br />

- dematerialization: a reduction in the input <strong>of</strong> scarce materials (metals, groundwater and tap water) per<br />

unit <strong>of</strong> output that can be expected from industrial production systems on the basis <strong>of</strong> closing the cycle.<br />

- waste reduction: a reduction <strong>of</strong> hazardous and non-hazardous waste per unit <strong>of</strong> output, particularly<br />

through using the majority <strong>of</strong> the production systems investigated.<br />

Considerable saving on energy consumption and the use <strong>of</strong> materials, as well as a substantial<br />

reduction in emissions and waste can be achieved by optimising the technological systems <strong>of</strong> today.<br />

About 50% <strong>of</strong> all systems are in this category. Even larger efficiency improvements can be realised either<br />

by radically changing the design <strong>of</strong> contemporary technological systems or by developing new systems to<br />

take over the functions <strong>of</strong> existing systems in a completely new way. Only few identified systems are in<br />

this category.<br />

Innovations vs. adverse impacts<br />

<strong>The</strong> findings <strong>of</strong> the technology foresight also stress that technological innovation is no guarantee<br />

<strong>of</strong> environmental improvement. This is evident in these technological systems. <strong>The</strong>se, in addition to the<br />

positive effects, also can be expected to result in adverse effects on the environmental efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

products, processes and activities. <strong>The</strong>y relate mainly to:<br />

- a potential increase in the consumption <strong>of</strong> oil, gas and/or coal and the resulting combustion emissions<br />

and (waste) clinkers, for instance through the introduction <strong>of</strong> supersonic aircraft.<br />

- a potential increase in waste and the utilisation <strong>of</strong> scarce raw materials (especially metals) which could<br />

result from implementing the information and communication systems investigated.<br />

- a potential increase <strong>of</strong> emissions linked with intensive farming (mainly manure and crop protection<br />

agents) resulting from the cultivation <strong>of</strong> agricultural crops to be used as biological raw material for the<br />

energy supply and agricultural chemistry, etc.<br />

- the possible generation <strong>of</strong> new, complex waste streams which are at present difficult to process, for<br />

instance from using metallic-matrix-composites and nuclear fission.<br />

It is important that the detection <strong>of</strong> these potential effects in this technology foresight study is<br />

followed up by more specific initiatives focusing on identifying preventive solutions in the design stage.<br />

In addition to these adverse consequences, a number <strong>of</strong> technological systems could shift existing<br />

environmental problems onto the use <strong>of</strong> space. It concerns particularly those systems for the functions <strong>of</strong><br />

supplying energy and (raw) materials and the function <strong>of</strong> movement. One concrete example in this<br />

respect is the substitution <strong>of</strong> oil by biomass in energy supply and in the chemical industry. Clearly, the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> agricultural crops demands that physical space is available. Another example is in the field<br />

<strong>of</strong> transportation. Some <strong>of</strong> the new systems for the environmentally-efficient transport <strong>of</strong> persons and<br />

goods require the construction <strong>of</strong> infrastructural facilities and, hence, additional physical space.<br />

Throughout Europe, but particularly in Poland, physical space <strong>of</strong> good quality is rapidly becoming a<br />

scarce resource. It is urgent that these shifts onto physical space be investigated further.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

82


Driving forces and obstacles<br />

<strong>The</strong> observation that the majority <strong>of</strong> environmentally-relevant systems examined here contribute<br />

in a positive sense towards environmental efficiency may not lead to the expectation that technological<br />

innovation will lead, in due course, to the automatic solving <strong>of</strong> all environmental problems. Such a<br />

conclusion would overlook any possible adverse effects <strong>of</strong> several technological systems. Moreover, it<br />

does not go without saying that the environmentally efficient systems will automatically break though<br />

into society.<br />

How quickly a new system reaches the market expansion stage, and how extensive that expansion<br />

is before the market reaches saturation point, depends on a number <strong>of</strong> driving forces and obstacles which<br />

accelerate or hinder market development. Such driving forces and obstacles are found in the<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong>:<br />

- the technological system itself (technical features, unwelcome characteristics).<br />

- the market parties that develop and market the system (the supply side).<br />

- the market parties that can use the system (the demand side).<br />

- current governmental policy (infrastructure, regulations).<br />

It is the actual characteristics <strong>of</strong> a technological system that conceal the scientific and technological<br />

obstacles or thresholds that will need to be overcome before the system can be realised. <strong>The</strong> size <strong>of</strong> these<br />

obstacles determines how much money will be required for research and development in order to get a<br />

new system ready for commercial production. It is obvious that research and development will still<br />

continue, leading to updated variations <strong>of</strong> the system (which also will be marketed eventually).<br />

How quickly a new system reaches the expansion stage, and how extensive that expansion is<br />

before the market reaches saturation point, depends on driving forces and obstacles <strong>of</strong> a cultural, social<br />

and economic nature. Among other things this relates to the economic dynamism: the rate <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

growth, the level <strong>of</strong> prosperity and the interaction between demand pull and technology push. <strong>The</strong> social<br />

and cultural dynamism <strong>of</strong> society is expressed in society’s acceptance <strong>of</strong> technological innovation and the<br />

price people are prepared to pay to resolve societal problems.<br />

For each <strong>of</strong> the five clusters <strong>of</strong> technological systems mentioned above, an analysis was made <strong>of</strong><br />

the main societal trends and driving forces stimulating or hampering the process <strong>of</strong> innovation and<br />

diffusion. When assessing the technological environmentally-relevant systems in three contrasting future<br />

scenarios we can observe that the development and use <strong>of</strong> environmentally-relevant technological<br />

systems was just as dependent on societal trends (the demand side) as on the continued augmentation <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge (the supply side).<br />

Especially the price <strong>of</strong> energy and the willingness <strong>of</strong> society to change its habits are apparently <strong>of</strong><br />

crucial significance. <strong>The</strong> price <strong>of</strong> oil, gas and coal is evidently the main obstacle standing in the way <strong>of</strong><br />

environmentally-efficient technological systems. This applies not only with regard to innovations in the<br />

field <strong>of</strong> energy supplies, but also to innovations in industrial production systems and transport systems.<br />

From foresight towards policy<br />

<strong>The</strong> government is brought into contact with new technological systems at an early stage via<br />

standardisation, product regulations and other instruments which set a framework for the workings <strong>of</strong><br />

market mechanisms. In addition to this regulatory role, the government also fulfils a role in developing<br />

both the supply (R&D investments, subsidies) and the demand (price measures, subsidies, the<br />

government as a demand party).<br />

As we found in Polish foresight (and the other studies), the price <strong>of</strong> fossil energy carriers is evidently by<br />

far the most significant obstacle to the development and breakthrough <strong>of</strong> environmentally-efficient<br />

technological systems. This applies not only with regard to innovations in the energy supply, but also to<br />

innovations in industrial production systems and transport systems. In theory, a price increase on fossil<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

83


energy carriers (e.g. by introducing an energy tax) would make a positive contribution to environmentoriented<br />

technological innovation. In connection with energy systems, industrial production systems and<br />

transport systems, we recommend investigating which forms are conceivable and what potential<br />

consequences can be expected from government measures which focus on lowering this price barrier.<br />

However, it is not only the energy price that <strong>of</strong>fers a handle for the selective stimulation <strong>of</strong><br />

environmentally-efficient systems. <strong>The</strong> most important driving forces for the breakthrough <strong>of</strong><br />

environmentally-efficient systems are: a high level <strong>of</strong> economical dynamism (supply) and an articulated<br />

societal demand for (environmentally) efficient systems (demand). This environment-oriented technology<br />

foresight study shows that the government could additionally promote the breakthrough <strong>of</strong> more<br />

environmentally-efficient systems by:<br />

1. Encouraging the supply dynamism <strong>of</strong> technology development, for instance by initiating<br />

dialogues with the parties involved, stimulation <strong>of</strong> combined public and private R&D<br />

investments and by facilitating knowledge transfer between companies.<br />

2. Encouraging a selective articulation <strong>of</strong> the demand, for instance by the government taking action<br />

as the pro-active party on the market, and by introducing price measures which selectively lower<br />

the threshold for introducing new systems.<br />

1. Direct government control, geared towards intervening in the development <strong>of</strong> technological<br />

systems which could lead to adverse environmental effects, for instance by means <strong>of</strong><br />

environmental regulations which impose more stringent requirements on existing systems, plus a<br />

selective policy on the introduction <strong>of</strong> new systems.<br />

2. Although it might be tempting to focus on selective incentives policy, it is important not to limit<br />

those incentives to too great an extent to a few technological options. A substantial contribution<br />

towards the aim <strong>of</strong> achieving sustainable development can especially be expected from a policy<br />

that stimulates the supply dynamism and the demand articulation, in combination with<br />

monitoring both the direction and pace <strong>of</strong> environmentally-relevant technological innovation.<br />

An important policy issue is also how to cope with the substantial lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge regarding the<br />

economical, societal and environmental impact <strong>of</strong> new technologies. It is impossible to identify and assess<br />

all relevant developments over a period <strong>of</strong> 10 years from now, the time horizon <strong>of</strong> this foresight study.<br />

Indeed, the result <strong>of</strong> this technology foresight draws attention to the considerable lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />

on the impact <strong>of</strong> new technologies. Especially in the field <strong>of</strong> information and communication technology,<br />

the speed <strong>of</strong> technological development is so fast that all the potential uses are yet unknown. This is more<br />

important, since the continuing penetration <strong>of</strong> information and communication technology is a significant<br />

trend in all future scenarios. <strong>The</strong>se ICT systems may contribute to substantial changes in all social<br />

functions. <strong>The</strong> further growth <strong>of</strong> products and services based on information and communication<br />

technology is expected to expand enormously. Considerable impact is expected on industrial production<br />

and business services. <strong>The</strong> added value <strong>of</strong> the provision <strong>of</strong> services vis-à-vis physical production gradually<br />

becomes more important. <strong>The</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice environment shrinks to the dimension <strong>of</strong> the individual: all white<br />

collar workers are provided with portable data and communication equipment. In addition a large growth<br />

in the market for virtual amusement can be expected. Citizens are entertained by new services such as<br />

virtual travel in both time and space, experiencing these new opportunities as a substitute for the need for<br />

physical movement. An extra stimulus to develop information and communication systems may arise<br />

from investments in a European traffic and transport infrastructure.<br />

So far, research into information and communication technology applications has been mainly supply<br />

driven. Little can be said as to how the information and communication technology revolution will<br />

influence other functions over the next few decades, or the associated substitution effects. Nor are the<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

84


direct environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> the revolutionary growth in information and communication technology<br />

undisputed. On the one hand we may expect that the penetration <strong>of</strong> information and communication<br />

technology will lead to an increase in the use <strong>of</strong> energy and scarce raw materials in connection with the<br />

production and use <strong>of</strong> information and communication technology hardware. On the other hand,<br />

miniaturisation will raise the energy and material efficiency <strong>of</strong> the equipment. While some people expect<br />

that information and communication systems will reverse the current growth in the use <strong>of</strong> paper and<br />

transport movements, others point out that the opposite is quite conceivable.<br />

<strong>The</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> insight into the potential environmental effects <strong>of</strong> information and communication<br />

systems has become acute since it is widely expected that these systems will penetrate strongly into<br />

society over the next few decades. A deeper foresight study into the potential environmental effects <strong>of</strong><br />

information and communication systems in the different areas <strong>of</strong> application is needed. Such a study<br />

should provide a greater understanding <strong>of</strong> the conditions that underlie these effects, as well as insight into<br />

any preventive measures that can be taken.<br />

<strong>The</strong> findings <strong>of</strong> the environmental technology foresight have given new impulses to policy<br />

development in Poland. For instance, in the governmental studies on environment and economy, several<br />

technological systems were described as “inspiring imaginary projects”. In the recent strategies (National<br />

Development Strategy 2007-2015 and the National Strategy <strong>of</strong> Regional Development 2007-2013) the<br />

systems approach has found a pr<strong>of</strong>ound place in the policy on environmental technology. <strong>The</strong> findings<br />

also gave rise to enhance the budget for an existing research programme on economy, ecology and<br />

technology. New policy instruments, such as task forces and a first mover facility were announced. Also a<br />

decision has been taken for a study to explore the possibilities <strong>of</strong> ICT for a sustainable economy. <strong>The</strong> basic<br />

notion <strong>of</strong> these policy instruments is that changes in technological systems go hand in hand with changes<br />

in socio-economic systems. <strong>The</strong> instruments are used to create incentives in the socio-economic system<br />

that support the actual implementation <strong>of</strong> new technological systems.<br />

A direct follow-up <strong>of</strong> the studies (foresight and strategies) were more detailed studies, with the<br />

objective to define more specific policy action plans for technological systems. Dialogue is a key<br />

characteristic in the follow-up. <strong>The</strong> results form a basis on which a dialogue between key actors from both<br />

research and industry can be started. <strong>The</strong> objective is to establish a shared vision <strong>of</strong> how to direct the<br />

technological development towards a sustainable economy. Dialogue is to be started with policy makers<br />

from all relevant Polish ministries and with key actors from relevant Polish research organisations and<br />

stakeholders from industry.<br />

This last element, the active participation <strong>of</strong> relevant stakeholders, is directly related to the<br />

experiences with technology foresight and technology policy in Poland. Polish policy makers pay more<br />

and more attention to the innovation system itself: the institutions, the level and dynamic nature <strong>of</strong> their<br />

cooperation, their positioning in (inter)national networks. New networks are identified, combining<br />

relevant research organisations, industries and stakeholders, in order to identify and develop new options<br />

in collaboration. <strong>The</strong> most recent example is the start and continuation <strong>of</strong> the National Development<br />

Strategy 2007-2015 (NSR). This initiative has the objective to bring together different stakeholders around<br />

sustainable technological development. Here also technological systems are the focus. <strong>The</strong> NSR, together<br />

with the relevant actors, identifies new sustainable technological systems. <strong>The</strong> NSR also stimulates and<br />

facilitates research around the driving forces and barriers relevant to technological and institutional<br />

breakthroughs.<br />

Conclusions<br />

<strong>The</strong> main conclusion <strong>of</strong> the technology foresight study (especially in their ecological aspects) is<br />

that technology <strong>of</strong>fers opportunities for sustainable development. But alignment <strong>of</strong> technological<br />

developments with sustainability is necessary. Secondary effects like shifting the burden from<br />

environment to space should be countered. Also more attention is needed for system innovations. <strong>The</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

85


government is an important player on different levels (regulation, stakeholder) and should start the<br />

dialogue with relevant parties. <strong>The</strong> system approach and societal needs <strong>of</strong>fer a useful conceptual<br />

framework to bring parties together. <strong>The</strong> technology foresight study could form a basis for this dialogue.<br />

References<br />

Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., Rickne, A. (2009), Analyzing the functional dynamics <strong>of</strong><br />

technological innovation systems: A scheme <strong>of</strong> analysis, Research Policy, 37(3).<br />

Berkhout, F., A. Smith and A. Stirling (2004) ‘Technological regimes, transition contexts and the environment’,<br />

in B. Elzen, F. Geels and K. Green (eds.), System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: <strong>The</strong>ory, Evidence and<br />

Policy (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar)<br />

Budinger T.F., Budinger M.D. (2006), Ethics <strong>of</strong> emerging technologies: scientific facts and moral challenges,<br />

John Wiley & Sons.<br />

Cagnin C., Keenan M., Johnston R. (2008), Future-Oriented Technology Analysis: Strategic Intelligence for an<br />

Innovative Economy, Springer.<br />

Czaplicka-Kolarz K., Stanczyk K., Kapusta K. (2008), Technology foresight for a vision <strong>of</strong> energy sector<br />

development in Poland till 2030. Delphi survey as an element <strong>of</strong> technology foresighting, Gówny Instytut Górnictwa<br />

(Central Mining Institute), Poland<br />

Geels, F.W. (2005) Technological Transitions, A co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis, Cheltenham, UK:<br />

Edward Elgar.<br />

Georghiou L. (1986), Post-innovation performance: technological development and competition, Macmillan.<br />

Georghiou, L., J.S. Metcalfe, M. Gibbons, T. Ray and J. Evans (1986) Post-Innovation Performance: Technological<br />

Development and Competition, MacMillan.<br />

Georghiou L., et al. (2008), <strong>The</strong> handbook <strong>of</strong> technology foresight: concepts and practice, Edward Elgar<br />

Publishing.<br />

Gijutsuch K., Gijutsu K., Kenkyjo S. (1993), Future technology in Japan: toward the year 2020, Institute for<br />

Future Technology, Japan.<br />

Grin, J. and A. Grunwald (eds.), (2000) Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in the 21 st Century Society.<br />

Towards a Repertoire for Technology assessment (Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.<br />

Grin, J. and R. Weterings (2005) ‘Reflexive monitoring <strong>of</strong> projects for system innovations:nature, competences<br />

and learning context.’ Paper presented at session ‘Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development’, 6th Open<br />

Meeting <strong>of</strong> the Human Dimensions <strong>of</strong> Global Environmental Change Research Community, Bonn, 9-13 oktober 2005.<br />

Hekkert, M.P. , Suurs, R.A.A., Negro, S.O., Kuhlmann, S., Smits, R.E.H.M. (2007) Functions <strong>of</strong> innovation<br />

systems: A new approach for analysing technological change, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 74(4).<br />

Hjorth L.S., Eichler B.A., Khan A.S. (2007), Technology and society: issues for the 21st century and beyond,<br />

Prentice Hall.<br />

Irvine J., Martin B.R. (1984), Foresight in science: picking the winners, F. Pinter.<br />

Jacobsson, S. and Bergek, A. (2004): Transforming the energy sector: the evolution <strong>of</strong> technological systems in<br />

renewable energy technology, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 13, No. 5.<br />

Johnston R., Gummett P. (1979), Directing Technology: Policies for Promotion and Control, Taylor & Francis.<br />

Kemp, R., and L. Soete (1992) ‘<strong>The</strong> Greening <strong>of</strong> Technological Progress: An Evolutionary Perspective’, Futures<br />

24(5).<br />

Kemp, R., Ian Miles, Keith Smith et al. (1994) Technology and the Transition to Environmental Stability.<br />

Continuity and Change in Complex Technology Systems, final report from project "Technological Paradigms and<br />

Energy Technologies" for SEER research programme <strong>of</strong> the CEC (DG XII).<br />

Kemp, R. (1994) ‘Technology and the Transition to Environmental Sustainability. <strong>The</strong> Problem <strong>of</strong> Technological<br />

Regime Shifts’, Futures 26.10.<br />

Kemp, R., D. Loorbach and J. Rotmans (2007) Transition management as a model for managing processes <strong>of</strong> coevolution,<br />

<strong>The</strong> International Journal <strong>of</strong> Sustainable Development and World Ecology (special issue on (co)-<br />

evolutionary approach to sustainable development) 14: 78-91.<br />

Kemp, R. (2008) Sustainable technologies do not exist! Key note paper for DIME conference in Bordeaux, 11-13<br />

September, 2008.<br />

Kemp R. (2009), Eco-innovation and transitions, Paper for journal Economia delle fonti di energia e<br />

dell'ambiente (Energy and Environment Economics and Policy) Special Issue on Heterodox Environmental<br />

Economics, UNU-MERIT, ICIS, DRIFT, <strong>The</strong> Netherlands, r.kemp@merit.unimaas.nl<br />

Loorbach, D. (2007) Transition management. New mode <strong>of</strong> governance for sustainable development.<br />

International Books, Utrecht, <strong>The</strong> Netherlands.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

86


Markard, J., and Truffer, B. (2008) Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards<br />

an integrated framework, Research Policy, 37(4).<br />

Meadowcr<strong>of</strong>t, J. (2005) ‘Environmental political economy, technological transitions and the state’, New<br />

Political Economy, 10.<br />

National Development Strategy 2007-2015 (NSR), Council <strong>of</strong> Ministers, Poland, Dec. 30, 2008.<br />

National Strategy <strong>of</strong> Regional Development 2007-2013 (NSRR), Ministry <strong>of</strong> Regional Development, Poland,<br />

Sep. 6, 2005.<br />

Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. (2008), <strong>The</strong> Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the<br />

Dynamics <strong>of</strong> Innovation, Oxford University Press.<br />

OECD (2011), Public Research Institutions: Mapping Sector Trends, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation<br />

and Development, Paris.<br />

Standage T. (2005), <strong>The</strong> Future <strong>of</strong> Technology, John Wiley & Sons.<br />

Porter M.E. (1990), <strong>The</strong> competitive advantage <strong>of</strong> nations. <strong>The</strong> Macmillan Press Ltd.,<br />

Rohrbeck R. (2010), Corporate Foresight: Towards a Maturity Model for the Future Orientation <strong>of</strong> a Firm,<br />

Springer.<br />

Rosenberg, N. (1982) Inside the Black Box. Technology and Economics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.<br />

Schmandt, J., and C.H. Ward (eds.) (2000) Sustainable development: <strong>The</strong> challenge <strong>of</strong> transition Cambridge<br />

University Press.<br />

Schuurman E. (1980), Technology and the future: a philosophical challenge, Wedge Publishing Foundation.<br />

Smith, A., Stirling, A. and Berkhout, F. (2005), '<strong>The</strong> governance <strong>of</strong> sustainable sociotechnical transitions',<br />

Research Policy, 34.<br />

Spaargaren, G. (2003) ‘Sustainable Consumption: A theoretical and environmental policy perspective’, Society<br />

and Natural Resources, 16.<br />

Teich A.H. (2003), Technology and the future, Wadsworth/Thomson.<br />

Weaver, P., L. Jansen, G. van Grootveld, E. van Spiegel and P. Vergragt (2000) Sustainable Technology<br />

Development, Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.<br />

Weterings, R. et al. (1997) 81 mogelijkheden Technologie voor duurzame ontwikkeling. Publicatiereeks<br />

Milieustrategie Ministerie van VROM: 97288/a/5-97, 81 options. Technology for Sustainable Development, report for<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Housing, Physical Planning and the Environment.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

87


Risk in the Enterprise Value Creation<br />

Andrzei Tomasz Jaki<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Keywords<br />

Value based management, enterprise risk management, global economic crisis.<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>The</strong> global economic crisis which started in 2008 drew attention <strong>of</strong> executives to a significant role <strong>of</strong> risk as<br />

a factor determining the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> enterprise value creation. Risk is immanently inscribed into every decisionmaking<br />

process being an inherent attribute <strong>of</strong> the functioning <strong>of</strong> a contemporary enterprise. At the same time, it has<br />

revealed numerous weaknesses <strong>of</strong> the value management concept which, starting from 1980s, has been treated as an<br />

effective and efficient tool <strong>of</strong> enterprise value creation. Thus, the main aim <strong>of</strong> this article is the presentation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

scope and the areas <strong>of</strong> the influence <strong>of</strong> risk on the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> value management concept alongside the depiction<br />

<strong>of</strong> risk determined problems connected with its implementation and the use in the enterprise’s operations. <strong>The</strong><br />

contents <strong>of</strong> the paper includes considerations referring to problems linked to each other, such as: risk as a factor <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pro-value management triad, risk in the process <strong>of</strong> the VBM system implementation and risk as a base <strong>of</strong> the critique<br />

<strong>of</strong> the VBM concept in the face <strong>of</strong> experiences <strong>of</strong> the global economic crisis.<br />

Introduction<br />

Value management concept, created and developed since 1980s, showed new possibilities in the<br />

search for solutions stimulating the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> enterprise value creation. It has also become a base for<br />

formulating a new strategy focused on enterprise value creation as an effective investment <strong>of</strong> its owners,<br />

and a generator <strong>of</strong> benefits for other stakeholders. At the same time, the global economic crisis has become<br />

a fundamental strategic challenge to contemporary enterprises. It has drawn attention to a significant role<br />

<strong>of</strong> risk as a factor determining the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the enterprise value creation since risk is immanently<br />

inscribed into every decision-making process being an inherent attribute <strong>of</strong> the functioning <strong>of</strong> a<br />

contemporary enterprise. Thus, the basic aim <strong>of</strong> this article is to present the scope and the areas <strong>of</strong> the<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> risk on the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the value management concept and to show risk determined<br />

problems connected with its implementation and the use in the enterprise operations.<br />

Pro-value management triad<br />

<strong>The</strong> efficiency and the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> pro-value enterprise management is directly dependent on<br />

the ability to use key determinants shaping enterprise value. Depending on the degree <strong>of</strong> minuteness and<br />

the scope <strong>of</strong> influence on the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> value creation, these determinants may be divided into three<br />

groups (Black, Wright & Bachman 1998):<br />

strategic factors, including such macro-factors as: pr<strong>of</strong>itability, risk and growth;<br />

financial factors, including such value drivers, indicated by A. Rappaport, as: sales and their<br />

dynamics, investment in fixed assets and current assets, operational pr<strong>of</strong>it margin, capital cost<br />

and the income tax rate (Rappaport 1986);<br />

<br />

<br />

operational factors, which are specific for every enterprise and result from both internal and<br />

external conditions <strong>of</strong> conducting activity by them.<br />

Strategic macroeconomic factors and the dependencies undergoing between them form at the<br />

same time so-called pro-value management triad, as shown in Fig. 1.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

88


Fig. 1. Pro-value management triad<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>itability<br />

Growth<br />

Risk<br />

Source: Schierenbeck & Lister (2002).<br />

While analyzing dependencies between individually mentioned macro-factors in the context <strong>of</strong> their<br />

impact on the enterprise management growth, the role <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itability should be stressed in the first place<br />

as a medium <strong>of</strong> enterprise value. When striving at the growth <strong>of</strong> effectiveness, it is necessary to correlate it<br />

closely with the shaping <strong>of</strong> risk level accompanying enterprise functioning. <strong>The</strong> multiplication <strong>of</strong> the<br />

enterprise value occurs when the rate <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itability growth precedes the rate <strong>of</strong> risk growth. Otherwise,<br />

the destruction <strong>of</strong> enterprise value will occur (Schierenbeck & Lister 2002). Thus, maintaining balance<br />

between the risk taken and an increase in the enterprise value is becoming vital, which requires<br />

connecting closely the value management concept with the concept <strong>of</strong> enterprise risk management (ERM)<br />

(Krysiak 2011).<br />

<strong>The</strong> third <strong>of</strong> the mentioned macro-factors – enterprise’s growth – is the factor securing its value<br />

creation. Thus, it cannot be treated as an independent goal <strong>of</strong> an enterprise, since by itself it does not<br />

automatically bring about enterprise value, but only creates conditions for its occurrence. Within the<br />

framework <strong>of</strong> pro-value focused management, the growth <strong>of</strong> an enterprise is the consequence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

strategic planning process directed at the maximization <strong>of</strong> enterprise value. Thus, for example,<br />

undertaking investment by an enterprise, constituting the internal growth <strong>of</strong> the enterprise will contribute<br />

to the increase in the enterprise’s value only when its pr<strong>of</strong>itability will be higher than the cost <strong>of</strong> the<br />

capital financing it (Rappaport 1986).<br />

<strong>The</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the management system based on the triad <strong>of</strong> three macro-factors supported by<br />

financial and operational micro-factors requires at the same time creating a new comprehensive concept <strong>of</strong><br />

management focused on the growth <strong>of</strong> enterprise value. At the same time, the idea <strong>of</strong> creating enterprise<br />

value as a foundation for formulating a separate management concept is relatively new. It appeared only<br />

in 1980s in the United States when a term which is common today, „Value Based Management (VBM)” was<br />

created by N. Kurland, known mainly as an initiator <strong>of</strong> employee stockholder structure <strong>of</strong> ESOP type<br />

(Employee Stock Ownership Plan), and a propagator <strong>of</strong> the concept <strong>of</strong> economic justice by expanding the<br />

ownership <strong>of</strong> capital (Brohawn, Hardiman, Kurland & Simon 2010). In the initial intention, the term was<br />

to refer to the management system directed at delivering value for a wide circle <strong>of</strong> enterprise<br />

shareholders, particularly owners, employees and customers, by being guided by fundamental rules <strong>of</strong><br />

economic and social justice. Broad propagation <strong>of</strong> the mentioned term in the sphere <strong>of</strong> American business<br />

was the reason for which since the end <strong>of</strong> 1980s it is exclusively associated with and used in the context <strong>of</strong><br />

the multiplication <strong>of</strong> enterprise market value and its owners’ wealth, and its original meaning refers now<br />

to the “Justice - Based Management” concept as a concept <strong>of</strong> management based on the idea <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

and social justice (Brohawn, Hardiman, Kurland & Simon 2010). <strong>The</strong> development and the propagation <strong>of</strong><br />

VBM in economic practice as a new management concept falls on 1990s, when the concept reached<br />

Western Europe (Olsen 2003).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

89


VBM system and the risk <strong>of</strong> its implementation<br />

<strong>The</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> value management implies the need for focusing all <strong>of</strong> the enterprise’s resources<br />

around the implementation <strong>of</strong> the management strategy determined by the criterion <strong>of</strong> its value<br />

maximization since value creation takes place on all levels and in all organizational units <strong>of</strong> an enterprise.<br />

Thus, the implementation <strong>of</strong> all functions <strong>of</strong> management should be subordinate to this goal, from<br />

planning and organizing, through motivating, up to the control <strong>of</strong> the achieved effects <strong>of</strong> the management<br />

(Woniak-Sobczak 2005). <strong>The</strong>refore, it requires a comprehensive approach through the creation <strong>of</strong><br />

structured system structure <strong>of</strong> management directed at the multiplication <strong>of</strong> enterprise value. Due to it,<br />

the value based management system (the VBM system) has the key significance for the effective<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> value focused strategy. In this situation, negative consequences <strong>of</strong> the occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

principal-agent problem for the enterprise and its owners, resulting from the separation <strong>of</strong> the ownership<br />

from management, are the reason for which VBM system is expected first <strong>of</strong> all to give to the process <strong>of</strong><br />

enterprise management qualities similar to ownership management, with which the enterprise owners, by<br />

means <strong>of</strong> available instruments, exert influence on its functioning and the implementation <strong>of</strong> the assumed<br />

goals. <strong>The</strong>refore, the implementation <strong>of</strong> such a system is assumed to create conditions in which managers<br />

think and act like owners (Olsen 2002).<br />

<strong>The</strong> result <strong>of</strong> considering the assumptions mentioned is a framework structure <strong>of</strong> value based<br />

management, which is shown in Fig. 2.<br />

Fig. 2. <strong>The</strong> framework structure <strong>of</strong> value based management system<br />

Strategic goal<br />

Creating enterprise value<br />

Strategy<br />

Value focused strategy<br />

Management processes<br />

operational decisions<br />

internal structure<br />

relations with shareholders<br />

organizational culture<br />

Management functions<br />

Source: own study.<br />

planning<br />

organizing<br />

motivating<br />

control<br />

<strong>The</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> the VBM system leads to a significant redefinition <strong>of</strong> enterprise goals,<br />

transformation <strong>of</strong> its internal structure, renewal <strong>of</strong> strategic and operational processes, as well as the<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> changes in the scope <strong>of</strong> the practices <strong>of</strong> human resources management. In consequence, we<br />

deal here with the versatile and multi-directional change in the organization <strong>of</strong> enterprise activity<br />

(Starovic, Cooper & Davis 2004). At the same time, effective implementation <strong>of</strong> such an advanced change<br />

in the whole management system is connected with specific risk. Experiences gained from the practice <strong>of</strong><br />

creating and implementing VBM systems by well-established world consulting companies enable to<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

90


indicate fundamental obstacles, from which the risk <strong>of</strong> implementing the new philosophy <strong>of</strong> management<br />

and decreasing the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> management systems based on it arises. <strong>The</strong> obstacles, together with<br />

the explanation <strong>of</strong> the scope <strong>of</strong> their potential negative impact are presented in Table 1.<br />

Table 1. Common obstacles to successful VBM implementation<br />

Lp. Obstacles Comments<br />

1. Failing to define the objectives<br />

clearly<br />

Efficient implementation <strong>of</strong> the concept requires understanding what is the<br />

multiplication <strong>of</strong> shareholder value is in its essence and what benefits can it bring both<br />

on the level <strong>of</strong> operational units’ employees and their management staff, and on the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the enterprise board <strong>of</strong> directors.<br />

2. Making value management an<br />

enterprise planning or finance<br />

initiative<br />

3. Treating value management as a<br />

project rather than a process<br />

4. Omitting the analysis at the<br />

operational level<br />

<strong>The</strong> success <strong>of</strong> the concept requires both the support from the owners and the board <strong>of</strong><br />

directors, as well as understanding its essence<br />

and benefits coming from it by operational managers.<br />

Reorientation <strong>of</strong> an enterprise to a new management concept does not take place<br />

overnight, in addition to understanding its essence it is necessary to make real changes<br />

systematically.<br />

Value management is too <strong>of</strong>ten treated as a tool referring only to the top management<br />

levels while in fact value is created on the operational level. Effective value creation<br />

requires proper correlation <strong>of</strong> operational skills with experiences <strong>of</strong> the managers <strong>of</strong> top<br />

management levels.<br />

5. Fixation with the metrics None <strong>of</strong> the indicators reflecting short-term effects <strong>of</strong> value creation can be treated only<br />

as an objective reflection <strong>of</strong> the enterprise value multiplication process since the value<br />

results first <strong>of</strong> all from investors’ expectations concerning shaping <strong>of</strong> the return rate.<br />

Thus, it is necessary to properly link short-term indicators with the summary effect <strong>of</strong><br />

value creation reflected in the form <strong>of</strong> changes in the enterprise market value.<br />

6. Leading the process with an<br />

information systems „white<br />

elephant”<br />

Source: Smith (2009).<br />

Managers <strong>of</strong> various levels receive plenty information and reports. With no proper<br />

ordering <strong>of</strong> them in accordance with set priorities it makes problems appear, both with<br />

the proper use <strong>of</strong> the possessed information and with defining information needs.<br />

Implementation <strong>of</strong> the value management system in the enterprise aims at involving all its resources<br />

and concentrating all efforts on effective value creation. It is the reason for which with the implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> such a system, the enterprise gains a number <strong>of</strong> various, direct and indirect benefits. At the same time,<br />

some negative effects may also appear, resulting both from the existing shortcomings <strong>of</strong> the VBM concept<br />

itself and the enterprise management system based on it, and from the potential threats related to<br />

objective difficulties in the scope <strong>of</strong> efficient and effective reorienting the enterprise management system,<br />

which is presented in Table 2.<br />

Table 2. Advantages and disadvantages associated with the VBM implementation in an enterprise<br />

Advantages<br />

Disadvantages<br />

provides a common language in the internal and external different forms <strong>of</strong> VBM and methods <strong>of</strong> management complicate task<br />

communication<br />

relatively disappointing at the subordinate business level because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

powerful comparative tool<br />

difficulty <strong>of</strong> forecasting value<br />

useful for resource allocation – better discrimination managerial costs <strong>of</strong> VBM implementation<br />

between value creating and value destroying investment the degree <strong>of</strong> complexity in the calculation was a limitation<br />

positive effect on financial performance – achieved difficult to translate the financial measures into operating customer<br />

through reductions in capital base<br />

measures<br />

powerful strategic tool<br />

technical measurement difficulties – for example at the cost <strong>of</strong> capital,<br />

very useful tool to help management focus upon value especially cost <strong>of</strong> equity<br />

drivers<br />

effective value creation by getting more accountability<br />

for discrete business units<br />

Source: Starovic, Cooper & Davis (2004).<br />

Risk as a base <strong>of</strong> VBM concept critique - experiences <strong>of</strong> the global economic crisis<br />

Risk connected with the implementation <strong>of</strong> the value management concept and potential risks<br />

which may be related to it and which are stressed at that occasion have also become a base for its critique<br />

referring both to the idea itself and to the conditionings <strong>of</strong> implementing pro-value focused management,<br />

as well as the measurement tools used in it and the assessment <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> creating enterprise<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

91


value. When depicting various weaknesses <strong>of</strong> the value management concept, the problem is linked to the<br />

following conditionings which accompanied its development (Kasiewicz 2009):<br />

an influence <strong>of</strong> the processes <strong>of</strong> the progressing globalization, implying multi-directional changes<br />

within the functioning and development <strong>of</strong> markets and entities operating in them,<br />

aggressiveness <strong>of</strong> motivation systems being a key component <strong>of</strong> the value management system,<br />

no integration between the value management concept and the risk management concept in the<br />

enterprise.<br />

Thus, the value management concept is mentioned today as one <strong>of</strong> causes <strong>of</strong> the global economic<br />

crisis. At the same time, however, it should be stressed that it is not about the idea <strong>of</strong> value management<br />

itself but rather about the way <strong>of</strong> using this concept in the economic practice (Kasiewicz 2009).<br />

An important premise for the formation and conceptualization <strong>of</strong> value management was the need to<br />

search for tools integrating the goals <strong>of</strong> owners and the goals <strong>of</strong> executives managing enterprises, which<br />

in the conditions <strong>of</strong> the division <strong>of</strong> ownership and management brings a number <strong>of</strong> negative<br />

consequences for the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> creating enterprise value defined as the “agency problem”. Provalue<br />

motivation systems created within this scope have been based on the need for a long-term<br />

correlation <strong>of</strong> the interests <strong>of</strong> the mentioned two groups <strong>of</strong> the enterprise stakeholders. In order to do that,<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> various programmes <strong>of</strong> direct motivation, connected with the managers’ participation in the<br />

enterprise ownership, and indirect motivation, assuming the use <strong>of</strong> partial indicators <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness<br />

<strong>of</strong> value creation as a base for the assessment <strong>of</strong> management effects, have been developed and used. An<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> practical experiences within this scope, including experiences resulting from direct and<br />

indirect causes <strong>of</strong> the present economic crisis, indicates the existence <strong>of</strong> a phenomenon <strong>of</strong> asymmetry <strong>of</strong><br />

owners’ and managers’ risk. <strong>The</strong> mentioned asymmetry is particularly noticeable in case <strong>of</strong> indirect<br />

motivation systems, thus, in the situation <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> managers’ participation in the enterprise<br />

ownership. An enterprise owners, from naturally always incur a risk <strong>of</strong> losing invested capital. Managers’<br />

risk comes down here only to the loss <strong>of</strong> bonus in case <strong>of</strong> negative effects <strong>of</strong> value creation, in an extreme<br />

case also the loss <strong>of</strong> a job. Moreover, basing the motivation system only on the use <strong>of</strong> partial accounting,<br />

financial and/or market indicators <strong>of</strong> effectiveness has brought a danger <strong>of</strong> creating a false picture <strong>of</strong> the<br />

financial condition <strong>of</strong> the enterprise - fictitious effectiveness - not translating into real, permanent effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> value creation. Falsifying the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> enterprise value creation assessed on the basis <strong>of</strong> partial<br />

indicators is particularly important in case <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> possibility to verify its value directly by the<br />

capital market mechanism.<br />

<strong>The</strong> owners’ and managers’ risk asymmetry scale, although undoubtedly to a smaller extent, is also<br />

noticeable in direct motivation programmes, especially in the ones in which there is no necessity to invest<br />

equity by managers. Depending on the applied motivation programme, managers’ risk may be related to:<br />

no bonus gratification in the situation <strong>of</strong> unpr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> the stock purchase option<br />

implementation<br />

the loss <strong>of</strong> value <strong>of</strong> the invested capital as a result <strong>of</strong> the drop in share prices,<br />

incurring financial risk related to financing stock purchase with borrowed capital in case <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Leverage Buy-Out programme,<br />

the loss <strong>of</strong> a job.<br />

<strong>The</strong> enterprise owners’ risk in direct motivation is sometimes also connected with applying<br />

creative accounting by managers to use most <strong>of</strong>ten a short-lasting but non-durable increase in the<br />

enterprise value which aims at proving high effectiveness <strong>of</strong> management. In order to limit this kind <strong>of</strong><br />

risk, various institutional solutions are used, integrated into direct motivation programmes, for example<br />

in the form <strong>of</strong> periodical inability to dispose <strong>of</strong> shares gained as remuneration for the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

management, which at the same time prevents deriving benefits on account <strong>of</strong> short-term growth <strong>of</strong> their<br />

value as a result <strong>of</strong> manipulating the results <strong>of</strong> the enterprise performance.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

92


Experiences <strong>of</strong> recent years, related to the occurrence <strong>of</strong> asymmetry between the risk <strong>of</strong> the<br />

enterprise owners and the risk <strong>of</strong> executives managing it, have also resulted in proposals <strong>of</strong> introducing<br />

further changes in pro-value motivation systems in the form <strong>of</strong> rewarding managers for the growth <strong>of</strong> the<br />

enterprise value with the simultaneous punishing them for its reducing (Szablewski 2009).<br />

In the context <strong>of</strong> the discussed negative effects related to the development <strong>of</strong> the value<br />

management concept, it should be noticed that problems or potential risks connected with this were <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

stressed before on the basis <strong>of</strong> the analysis <strong>of</strong> practical experiences resulting from the implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

the mentioned concept. At the same time, however, drawbacks <strong>of</strong> the value management concept could<br />

not intrinsically generate or stimulate the current crisis since its sources lie in the system mechanism <strong>of</strong><br />

generating imbalance on the market and the formation <strong>of</strong> a gap between the real and the financial sphere<br />

which was fostered by processes <strong>of</strong> the progressing globalization and the accompanying liberalization and<br />

deregulation <strong>of</strong> markets (Kasiewicz 2009). In this way, globalization is becoming a process conducing the<br />

spread <strong>of</strong> crisis situations in the international dimension.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Negative consequences <strong>of</strong> the influence <strong>of</strong> risk on the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> enterprise value creation<br />

have revealed flaws <strong>of</strong> the value management concept and potential risks it brings . It has become a<br />

premise to search for solutions eliminating weaknesses <strong>of</strong> the concept and negative consequences <strong>of</strong> the<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> risk on the process <strong>of</strong> enterprise value creation. Value Focused Restructuring and Value<br />

Controlling (Jaki 2012), among others, are becoming useful instruments within this scope. <strong>The</strong>y create<br />

opportunities both in monitoring the process <strong>of</strong> enterprise value creation and in the search for managerial<br />

solutions limiting negative impact <strong>of</strong> risk on the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> pro-value management.<br />

References<br />

Black A., Wright P. & Bachman J.E. (1998), In Search <strong>of</strong> Shareholder Value: Managing the Drives <strong>of</strong><br />

Performance, Pitman Publishing, London.<br />

Brohawn D.K., Hardiman S.F., Kurland N. & Simon T.J. (2010), Justice-Based Management: A Framework for<br />

Equity and Efficiency in the Workplace - http://www.cesj.org/vbm/articles-vbm/cwp-vbm.htm [2/2/2010].<br />

Jaki A. (2012), Value Focused Restructuring – A New Approach Facing the Global Economic Crisis, “<strong>The</strong><br />

Business & Management Review”, vol. 2, no. 1.<br />

Kasiewicz S. (2009), Koncepcja zarzdzania wartoci jako ródo kryzysu finansowego, “Finansowanie<br />

Nieruchomoci“, vol. 20.<br />

Krysiak Z. (2011), Warto ryzyka, “Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsibiorstwie”, vol. 2.<br />

Olsen E. (2002), New Directions in Value Management, <strong>The</strong> Boston Consulting Group, Inc., Boston.<br />

Olsen E. (2003), Rethinking Value-Based Management, “Handbook <strong>of</strong> Business Strategy”, vol. 4.<br />

Rappaport A. (1986), Creating Shareholder Value. <strong>The</strong> New Standard for Business Performance, Free Press,<br />

New York.<br />

Schierenbeck H. & Lister M. (2002), Value Controlling. Grundlagen Wertorientierter Unternehmensführung,<br />

R. Oldenbourg Verlag, München-Wien.<br />

Smith P. (2009), Shareholder Value Implementation: Turning Promise into Reality, L.E.K. Consulting LLC -<br />

http://www.lek.com/UserFiles/File/svi-14.pdf - [2/18/2009].<br />

Starovic D., Cooper S. & Davis M. (2004), Maximising Shareholder Value. Achieving clarity in decisionmaking,<br />

CIMA, London.<br />

Szablewski A. (2009), Nowe paradygmaty, migracja kapitau i wiatowy system pieniny, “Zeszyty<br />

Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczeciskiego“ vol. 578 – “Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia“ vol. 24, Uniwersytet<br />

Szczeciski, Szczecin.<br />

Woniak-Sobczak B. (2005), Funkcje kapitau w strategicznym zarzdzaniu przedsibiorstwem, AE in<br />

Katowice, Katowice.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

93


Analysis <strong>of</strong> Causes and Consequences <strong>of</strong> the Global<br />

Economic Crisis – Poland’s Perspective<br />

RyszardBorowiecki<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Barbara Siuta-Tokarska<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Keywords<br />

Global economic crisis, globalization, causes, consequences, perspectives<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>The</strong> publication presents selected views and opinions <strong>of</strong> economists on the direct causes <strong>of</strong> the global crisis<br />

outbreak. It also shows opinions and views comprising the wholeness <strong>of</strong> the systematic and structural conditions<br />

which led to it in the progressing globalization process, including the accelerated financialization, the development <strong>of</strong><br />

finance and the separation <strong>of</strong> finance from the real economy sphere. At the same time, perspectives and opportunities<br />

to limit the consequences <strong>of</strong> the global crisis are indicated, considering the economy <strong>of</strong> Poland.<br />

With reference to Poland, the paper also presents changes related to the global crisis in the real economy.<br />

Moreover, it emphasizes that the delayed consequences <strong>of</strong> the crisis in Poland were an effect <strong>of</strong>, among others, not<br />

fully developed financial market in comparison with the western countries, and also traditional attitude <strong>of</strong> banks<br />

which have not developed derivatives, securitization and other tools <strong>of</strong> financial engineering to a greater extent.<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> global economic crisis which began in 2007 in US directly or indirectly affected almost all<br />

countries <strong>of</strong> the world and has been still continuing, bringing the global uncertainty <strong>of</strong> tomorrow as far as<br />

the living conditions <strong>of</strong> about seven billion world population are concerned. Thus, restraining the crisis<br />

and limiting its most negative and critical results for the whole economy requires a global look to<br />

recognize the causes and effects <strong>of</strong> this crisis and to discuss possibilities to find the proper way out <strong>of</strong> it in<br />

such difficult and complex conditions <strong>of</strong> the functioning <strong>of</strong> national economies, including the economy <strong>of</strong><br />

Poland, as well as the whole world economy. Such a look is attempted in this publication.<br />

<strong>The</strong> intensification <strong>of</strong> the globalization processes as a factor favouring the occurrence<br />

<strong>of</strong> crises<br />

Globalization is a multi-level, multi-dimensional phenomenon and at the same time a<br />

phenomenon happening in all spheres <strong>of</strong> life, whereas the processes related to it lead to the<br />

standardization <strong>of</strong> the image <strong>of</strong> the world as a homogenous wholeness within the framework <strong>of</strong> which<br />

there is linkage between economic elements and the common consumption culture (Borowiecki, Siuta-<br />

Tokarska 2012). In the historical and literary representation, specific stages <strong>of</strong> the globalization process are<br />

indicated with the arbitrary choice <strong>of</strong> their duration. Thus, according to W. Wosiska, the four-stage<br />

progression <strong>of</strong> globalization started as early as the antiquity, from the formation <strong>of</strong> the first political<br />

powers, whereas the period following the Second World War, marking a new political order <strong>of</strong> the world,<br />

is the last stage. On the other hand, in the three-stage globalization process by C. Prestowitz, stage one<br />

included the years 1425 - 1947, marked by the colonization times and a gradual decrease in the role <strong>of</strong><br />

China and India in the world economy from 75% to about 8%, stage two are the years 1947 - 2000 when a<br />

new political system was created after World War II, and stage three, counted from 2000, which still lasts,<br />

and characterizes with intense development <strong>of</strong> state-<strong>of</strong>-art information and communication technologies,<br />

progressing deregulation and liberalization and the economic development <strong>of</strong> China and India.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

94


By the end <strong>of</strong> 20 th century and at the beginning <strong>of</strong> 21 st century we can observe the following changes,<br />

phenomena and tendencies in the world, among others:<br />

an overall increase in the world’s population (especially in less developed countries) from 2.52<br />

billion people in 1950 (1.71billion in less developed countries) to 6.45 billion in 2005 (5.2 billion)<br />

and 6.97 billion in 2011 (5.7 billion) (Population Challenges... 2005; World Population 2010, http),<br />

enormous pollution <strong>of</strong> the environment related to its excessive exploitation, including water, soil,<br />

air pollution, and its consequences for people and the environment („Pollution is likely toaffect over<br />

a billion people around the world, with millions poisoned and killed each year. <strong>The</strong> World Health<br />

Organization estimates that 25 percent <strong>of</strong> all deaths in the developing world are directly<br />

attributable to environmental factor” (Environment and Health in Developing Countries 2009).<br />

Some researchers estimate that exposure to pollution causes 40 percent <strong>of</strong> deaths annually<br />

(Pimentel et al. 2007; Top ten toxic Pollution Problems 2011, http)),<br />

in 1992 the CO 2 emissions in the world were 22399312kt, and then they were increasing, reaching in<br />

2008 the amount <strong>of</strong> 32082583kt (Climate Change. World Bank Statistics), that is an increase by over<br />

43% (according to the data for 1996 concerning the global emissions <strong>of</strong> greenhouse gases - 1.2 billion<br />

people living in developed countries emitted 64% <strong>of</strong> them, which gives 3 t/person, whereas the<br />

remaining part <strong>of</strong> the emissions fell on 4.4 billion people living in developing countries, which gives<br />

an index <strong>of</strong> 0.5 t/person) (Przyszo. Scenariuszezmian, http),<br />

“Every day, 2 million tons <strong>of</strong> sewage and industrial and agricultural waste are discharged into the<br />

world’s water. <strong>The</strong> UN estimates that the amount <strong>of</strong> wastewater produced annually is about 1,500<br />

km 3 , six times more water than exists in all the rivers <strong>of</strong> the world”(Ross 2010).<br />

a rapid increase in trade turnovers. <strong>The</strong> world trade has grown 5 times in real terms since 1980 to<br />

2005 and its share <strong>of</strong> the world GDP has risen from 36% to 55% (Schiffers, http). Merchandise trade<br />

in the low- and middle-income countries rose from 31% <strong>of</strong> GDP in 1993 to 57% in 2008 and about<br />

40% in 2009(WDP 2012),<br />

an increased share <strong>of</strong> FDI in the world economy - flows increasing from 0.5% <strong>of</strong> GDP in 1980 to 4%<br />

in 2007, followed by a decline during the global economic crisis (WDR 2012). Global FDI inflow rose<br />

from 1,472 billion dollars on average in 2005-2007 to 1,744 billion dollars in 2008, and then fell to the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> 1,244 billion dollars in 2010 (Akram et al. 2011),<br />

in 1970 less than a third <strong>of</strong> FDI related to the export <strong>of</strong> services – today that risen to half and it is<br />

expected to rise even further, making intellectual capital the most important commodity on world<br />

markets(Intriligator2003),<br />

diversification in current account balances between emerging and developed economies (from the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> about -100 billion dollars in 1996 to about + 600 billion dollars in 2006 for emerging<br />

economies, and from the value <strong>of</strong> about +20 billion dollars in 1996 to about-700 billion dollars in<br />

2006 for developed economies (Schiffers, http)),<br />

“volume <strong>of</strong> goods, services and investments is transferring the national borders very rapidly.<br />

Nowadays, approximately USD 1.5 billion <strong>of</strong> foreign exchange transactions are taking place daily.<br />

Statistics show that approximately USD 8.9 trillion <strong>of</strong> goods are transacted across borders and USD<br />

2.10 trillion <strong>of</strong> services are provided across the borders”(Akram et al. 2011),<br />

an increase in the number <strong>of</strong> operations and the value <strong>of</strong> international financial turnovers (total<br />

cross-border financial assets have more than doubled - from 58% <strong>of</strong> global GDP in 1990 to 131% in<br />

2004),<br />

increased global insecurity: job insecurity, lack <strong>of</strong> social protection, food insecurity and fear <strong>of</strong><br />

terrorism(Torres 2001; Scheve, Slaughter 2002; Debrah, Smith 2002; Globalization, growth and<br />

poverty... 2002),<br />

the growth <strong>of</strong> global migration in the world from 154 million people in 1990 to 175 in<br />

2000(International migration and development Report 2006) and to 214 million in 2010 (namely by<br />

22.3% in relation to 2000 and about 40% in comparison with 1990) (<strong>The</strong> Age and Sex <strong>of</strong> Migrants<br />

2011),<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

95


ise in the number <strong>of</strong> unemployed people worldwide from 157.3 million in 1995 to 191.8 million in<br />

2005, namely by 22% over ten years (including men, from 92.7mln to 112,9 million, and among<br />

women from 64.7million to 78.9 million) (Akram et al. 2011),<br />

a change in the structure within the scope <strong>of</strong> the kinds <strong>of</strong> employment <strong>of</strong> both men and women. An<br />

increase in the share <strong>of</strong> people employed in services in the years 1987-2007 in the population <strong>of</strong><br />

women from 63% to 70%, and among men from 45% to 51%, but in developing countries a<br />

simultaneous increase in the share <strong>of</strong> employment in industry is observed, from 6% to 7% in total<br />

female employment and from 10% to 13% in total male employment to the benefit <strong>of</strong> a decrease in<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> people employed in agriculture (WDR 2012),<br />

child employment: it is estimated that in 2004 as many as 1,566.3 million children were employed in<br />

various kinds <strong>of</strong> jobs worldwide, including 128.4 million in hazardous work, and in 2008 their<br />

number went up to 1586.3 million, including 115.3 million in hazardous work (Dialo et al. 2010),<br />

distinct increase in inequality (international inequalities increased significantly between 1820 and<br />

1910, remained stable from 1910 to 1960 and grew again from 1960 to 1992(Bourguignon,<br />

Morrisson 2002). Also in the years 2006-2007, in comparison with 1990s, the growth <strong>of</strong> inequality<br />

was marked(Global Wage Report 2008; Inequality in Asia, Key Indicators 2007). At present,<br />

practically no convergence is observed, or even the occurrence <strong>of</strong> divergence or polarization <strong>of</strong><br />

incomes worldwide “with the rapid-growth economies joining the rich nations, but with the poor<br />

nations slipping even further behind”(Intriligator 2003)),<br />

At the same time, the attention should be paid to changes concerning:<br />

a distinct increase in the number <strong>of</strong> people having access to modern technologies <strong>of</strong> communications<br />

systems. In 1998 only 20% <strong>of</strong> people in developed countries had a cell phone and by 2009 these<br />

shares had climbed to 100%, in developing countries in the same period from about 1% to about<br />

57%; internet access and use in high-income countries increased from 12% <strong>of</strong> the population in 1998<br />

to 64% in 2009 and in developing countries from near 0% in 1998 to 17.5% in 2009 (WDR 2012),<br />

the growth <strong>of</strong> the share <strong>of</strong> IT service sector in GDP from about 2% in the years 1999 -2000 to about 5%<br />

in the years 2005-2006(Schiffers, http),<br />

It is worth observing that the greatest benefits from globalization basically invariably fall on highlydeveloped<br />

countries whose share in the global GDP is in the range <strong>of</strong> 70% - 80% <strong>of</strong> the world level, the<br />

inflow <strong>of</strong> FDI around 75-80%, or the inflows <strong>of</strong> total portfolio investment in the range <strong>of</strong> 85 - 90%(<strong>The</strong><br />

social dimension <strong>of</strong> globalization 2004).<br />

On presenting the above changes in the world economy, which result from the globalization<br />

processes, we can claim that globalization may be discussed on the one hand as a positive phenomenon,<br />

assuming that it leads to the civilization progress and an increase in the welfare <strong>of</strong> societies. To some<br />

extent, the development <strong>of</strong> modern technologies, characteristic for the end <strong>of</strong> 20 th century and the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> 21 st century, fosters the fulfillment <strong>of</strong> this assumption. Moreover, alongside globalization and<br />

its manifestations the following are observed: greater opportunities to access capital, a bigger market <strong>of</strong><br />

operations, bigger opportunities for the effectiveness and the scale <strong>of</strong> activity, extension <strong>of</strong> product <strong>of</strong>fer,<br />

broader and easier access to information, an increase in performance, a possibility <strong>of</strong> internationalization,<br />

or a possibility <strong>of</strong> better allocation <strong>of</strong> assets (Siuta-Tokarska 2010).<br />

On the other hand, however, we could indicate a lot <strong>of</strong> very negative aspects <strong>of</strong> the globalization<br />

process. Globalization <strong>of</strong> the turn <strong>of</strong> 20th and 21st century is great acceleration <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong><br />

changes in the world economy and the threat <strong>of</strong> a global ecological crisis related to the aggressive use <strong>of</strong><br />

the resources <strong>of</strong> the earth and nature. It may lead to the destruction <strong>of</strong> our civilization and planet due to<br />

the overexploitation <strong>of</strong> forests, air pollution, soil and water pollution with waste and numerous<br />

destructive activities <strong>of</strong> the man.<br />

Regardless <strong>of</strong> the ecological crisis in the economic aspect, one <strong>of</strong> the basic problems concerning<br />

globalization is a possibility <strong>of</strong> the spread <strong>of</strong> local economic fluctuations, recession, or crises to other<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

96


countries, regions or the world. As M.D. Intriligator <strong>of</strong> MilkenInstitute pointed out as early as in 2003, it is<br />

not just a theoretical possibility but a fact, and as an example, he mentions a crisis in Thailand in 1997<br />

which spread to other Southern Asian Economies, and even to South Korea with delayed effects in Russia.<br />

<strong>The</strong> global economic crisis started in 2007 in the USA is another example <strong>of</strong> influencing changes from the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> one country to the rest <strong>of</strong> the world, as well as the impact <strong>of</strong> global conditions on.<br />

Global economic crisis - identifying its nature<br />

<strong>The</strong> literature on the subject observes the division into three basic kinds <strong>of</strong> views on the nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

present crisis (Geografiapolskiegokryzysu 2009):<br />

1) a dominating view, based on so-called market fundamentalism, which emphasizes the natural<br />

character <strong>of</strong> crises in economy, as well as their cyclicity, assuming that the market should regulate<br />

itself, and the crisis will have a refreshing effect, enabling a change in the economic structures;<br />

2) a view pointing out that although long-term cycles <strong>of</strong> market economy repeat with great regularity,<br />

each <strong>of</strong> them has different causes and effects and each leads serious social and political changes;<br />

3) a view stressing the qualitative difference between the present crisis and the previous ones and<br />

pointing out that the present crisis concerns first <strong>of</strong> all relations between the state and financial<br />

institutions, not the financial sphere itself, and it is connected with long-lasting decomposition <strong>of</strong><br />

the social structure related to the organization <strong>of</strong> the society, globalization, global imbalance, etc.<br />

Taking the above views into consideration, however, it seems that the roots <strong>of</strong> the crisis reach a bit<br />

deeper than only the financial sphere which may be regarded the direct cause <strong>of</strong> the crisis. As W.<br />

Szymaski points out, the systematic roots <strong>of</strong> the crisis include (Szymaski 2009):<br />

1) difficulties on the way <strong>of</strong> transition from the national to the global economy,<br />

2) limiting coordination activities,<br />

3) the lack <strong>of</strong> political globalization with an increase in the conflict <strong>of</strong> interests,<br />

4) limiting democracy and social control over economy,<br />

5) system provisional state, spontaneity, and the growth <strong>of</strong> particularisms,<br />

6) overusing other “accelerators” by capitalism.<br />

With reference to the indicated systematic items, it seems advisable to draw attention to certain<br />

analytical observations within this scope (Szymaski 2009):<br />

re 1) A distinct differentiation should be made between economy in crisis and economy in other periods<br />

(recovery, boom). <strong>The</strong>re is a theory related to it, a theory <strong>of</strong> stimulating economy in the crisis by<br />

influencing demand with unconventional methods. In comparison with the crisis <strong>of</strong> 1930s when there<br />

were difficulties with learning how to function efficiently within the national economy, the crisis is an<br />

expression <strong>of</strong> failure to cope within the global economy.<br />

re 2) Alongside the liberalization <strong>of</strong> capital and commodity flows and the development <strong>of</strong><br />

investment funds, transnational corporations, a supranational economic zone is developing more and<br />

more, which does not underlie control and coordination activities <strong>of</strong> the states, which in consequence<br />

contributes to the loss <strong>of</strong> sovereignty <strong>of</strong> the states, particularly in the spheres where the state politics<br />

comes into conflict with the interest <strong>of</strong> capital. On the other hand, capital flows in mainly where there are<br />

possibilities to reduce costs, including low taxes. As a result, the competition <strong>of</strong> states, regions and cities is<br />

forced to encourage foreign capital. This kind <strong>of</strong> competition has shaped the globalization rule <strong>of</strong><br />

equalizing downwards within the scope <strong>of</strong> state regulations, taxes and social benefits (Szymaski 2009).<br />

re 3) An increase in imbalance between the growing forces <strong>of</strong> the micro-economic interest (the<br />

interests <strong>of</strong> enterprises) and the weakening forces <strong>of</strong> the macro-economic and macro-social interest leads<br />

to parting from the rules which serve sustainable development to improve social welfare. In consequence,<br />

it <strong>of</strong>ten leads to “passing costs on to employees, natural environment, the society or to weaker partners”,<br />

and in “the situation <strong>of</strong> subordinating the state to the requirements <strong>of</strong> capital, it is in practice possible to<br />

fulfill the interest <strong>of</strong> capital with the hands <strong>of</strong> the state”(Szymaski 2009).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

97


e 4) In general, we can claim that with the impairment <strong>of</strong> the power <strong>of</strong> the state, when its<br />

economic sovereignty is limited, also democracy is limited, since not only functions <strong>of</strong> the state are<br />

reduced, but also the functions <strong>of</strong> democracy are.<br />

re 5) <strong>The</strong> globalization process has brought about a collapse <strong>of</strong> the hitherto prevailing order in the<br />

world in which nation states were a pillar. A hybrid system has been formed, connecting nation states<br />

with activities in the supranational sphere, where there is no control and coordination system. Thus, such<br />

a system, where conflicting interests occur, leads to “chaos, conflict, instability, and crisis<br />

situations”(Szymaski 2009).<br />

re 6) Some economists express a view that the crisis is a consequence <strong>of</strong> “the enforced process <strong>of</strong><br />

searching for new sources <strong>of</strong> development and new bases <strong>of</strong> dynamics by capitalism”(Szymaski 2009). In<br />

the previous historical periods, conditions for the expansion <strong>of</strong> demand were seen in colonialism and<br />

territorial expansion connected with it, which gave colonial economies a chance for a long economic<br />

advantage. Alongside the spreading globalization and more and more common access to external markets<br />

(with no bigger restrictions), this advantage was gradually withering on the vine. However, it is worth<br />

emphasizing that with regard to restricted goods, also in today’s world intensified activities (political,<br />

economic, or even military ones) are observed <strong>of</strong> some countries in the areas possessing desired natural<br />

resources. Moreover, an attitude to a consumer’s needs has changed, superseding autonomic initiatives to<br />

the benefit <strong>of</strong> introducing advertising to a great scale, thus making changes in the system <strong>of</strong> social values.<br />

Today, this is not a consumer who shows what his needs are, but the needs are created by producers. In<br />

the literature, challenging the market sovereignty <strong>of</strong> the consumer via passing to so-called “active<br />

manipulation” is defined as “the main accelerator <strong>of</strong> capitalism” over the last 50 years. Particularly<br />

dangerous here is an infantile consumerization <strong>of</strong> children related to serious moral consequences for the<br />

totality <strong>of</strong> people. As examples <strong>of</strong> other “accelerators <strong>of</strong> capitalism”, the following may be mentioned:<br />

using financial innovations for the dynamic development <strong>of</strong> credits, easy crediting - taking high credits<br />

has become a normal way <strong>of</strong> building one’s own capital (Szymaski 2009).<br />

Regardless <strong>of</strong> the systematic causes <strong>of</strong> the present economic crisis as shown above, also structural<br />

causes are observed, and they refer to (Szymaski 2009):<br />

instability and separation <strong>of</strong> the financial sphere from the real one,<br />

increasing global trade and payment imbalance with the simultaneous weakening <strong>of</strong> the ability<br />

<strong>of</strong> the market to return to the state <strong>of</strong> balance in many spheres,<br />

polarization <strong>of</strong> incomes and perturbations in the consumption and investment demand,<br />

changes in ownership structure and the emancipation <strong>of</strong><br />

managers.<br />

<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> the remaining causes <strong>of</strong> the global crisis, being a<br />

kind <strong>of</strong> complementation <strong>of</strong> the already presented ones, we could indicate the following ones<br />

(Orowski 2009):<br />

demographic changes, including in particular the fast process <strong>of</strong> ageing <strong>of</strong> the societies in<br />

highly developed countries,<br />

very rapid development <strong>of</strong> financial markets over the last 25 years,<br />

inability to make correct evaluation <strong>of</strong> risk, especially within the scope <strong>of</strong> derivatives,<br />

a wave <strong>of</strong> irrational optimism, enabling to assess the chances for the development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

market too optimistically,<br />

no common sense approach in valuating assets, particularly real estate by financial institutions,<br />

including the lack <strong>of</strong> ownership supervision and improper, basically only motivation and<br />

salary system to remunerate management boards,<br />

mistakes <strong>of</strong> the economic policy especially in US.<br />

Selected consequences <strong>of</strong> the global economic crisis in the world and in Poland seen<br />

so far<br />

Numerous scientific publications devoted to the issue <strong>of</strong> the global economic crisis, as well as<br />

statistical publications by, for example, the World Bank or the International Monetary Fund, have<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

98


analyzed and assessed quite in detail the consequences related to the economic crisis, both in the real<br />

sphere and in the financial sector. Due to the above, this paper shows only the ones which seem crucial.<br />

Among serious effects <strong>of</strong> the global economic crisis, we should consider in particular the worsening<br />

trust to the issuer <strong>of</strong> the world currency, which is American dollar (high exchange rate <strong>of</strong> dollar against<br />

other currencies during the crisis deepens the global imbalance - trade deficit and US debt - and it also<br />

establishes the crisis), and the collapse <strong>of</strong> the banking and financial system. Moreover, we should also take<br />

into consideration the fact that although the crisis started in the US as early as in 2007, still in 2008<br />

American financial institutions granted so-called toxic loans to the amount <strong>of</strong> USD 700 billion, assuming<br />

falsely that the prices <strong>of</strong> houses would be rising and the funds created by banks with the use <strong>of</strong> so-called<br />

CDO instruments transformed substandard debts into instruments with investment rating (Maecki 2008).<br />

By creating special funds and adopting derivative instruments with credits <strong>of</strong> sufficient quality, banks<br />

could not reveal that in balances and omit legal regulations concerning capital requirements and<br />

borrowers’ credibility. Due to that, the range <strong>of</strong> infection in the whole banking system was increasing<br />

(Szymaski 2009). This kind <strong>of</strong> infection was spreading and as a result <strong>of</strong> the chronic crisis <strong>of</strong> liquidity on<br />

international markets, the situation <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> customers’ trust to banks passed from banks to other<br />

banks (Szymaski 2009).<br />

Another serious threat to individual economies were speculation activities during the crisis with<br />

reference to national currencies and stock exchanges. “Financialization <strong>of</strong> economy over the last twenty<br />

something years is a derivative…<strong>of</strong> the freedom <strong>of</strong> capital flows, the development <strong>of</strong> investment funds<br />

and new financial instruments” (Szymaski 2009). In the times <strong>of</strong> the collapse <strong>of</strong> finance, relations<br />

between the real sphere <strong>of</strong> economy and the financial sphere are definitely intensifying, and the observed<br />

“evaporation <strong>of</strong> tens billion dollars from stock exchanges and stock markets impinges not only upon the<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> impoverishment <strong>of</strong> numerous entities and people but also on their ability to meet previously<br />

undertaken obligations”(Szymaski 2009). It is estimated that about 40 trillion dollars „evaporated”<br />

during the crisis, which gives nearly 60% <strong>of</strong> the world product, and in consequence had to “shake the<br />

foundations” <strong>of</strong> the whole global economy (Szymaski 2009). On the other hand, with regard to so-called<br />

toxic assets, it is estimated that “cleaning” banks may last several or even several dozen years. Thus, it is a<br />

very serious problem and finding a solution to it is extremely important from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> the<br />

future <strong>of</strong> the whole financial system and in this situation it seems necessary to make verification and<br />

changes in the mandatory law in order to limit such activities in the future.<br />

Moreover, among the consequences <strong>of</strong> the crisis to the global scale, the following should be indicated:<br />

changes in the level <strong>of</strong> reserves in the emerging and developing economies with a growing<br />

tendency,<br />

an increase in the public debt. According to the 2010 data, the global value <strong>of</strong> public debts in the<br />

world was about USD 40 trillion, and during the crisis there was acceleration <strong>of</strong> this rate,<br />

according to the forecasts, this value may be over USD 46 trillion in 2012 (<strong>The</strong> Global Debt Clock,<br />

http). In the ratio representation, the world’s public and private debt exceeds 300 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />

(Smick 2011),<br />

a necessity to finance financial institutions from public means,<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> government spending, among others to education and health care,<br />

decreasing the dynamics <strong>of</strong> GDP, related to a drop in demand and consumption and investment<br />

expenditure,<br />

an increase in unemployment also related to the bankruptcy <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> business entities,<br />

return migrations and lowering the value <strong>of</strong> flows from migrants,<br />

impoverishment <strong>of</strong> societies (according to the World Bank data, it was estimated that because <strong>of</strong><br />

the crisis, in 2010 additional 64 million people worldwide could live in abject poverty, namely for<br />

less than USD 1.25per day.<br />

With reference to the economy <strong>of</strong> Poland, it should be stressed that due to the system transformations<br />

begun in 1989, the economy has becomemuch more linked to the economy <strong>of</strong> the Western European<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

99


countries, and Poland’s accession to the European Union in 2004 united this process even more. <strong>The</strong><br />

development <strong>of</strong> the financial market and the stock exchange in Poland is particularly connected with the<br />

changes in the Central and Eastern Europe (e.g. partial consolidation <strong>of</strong> the stock exchange in Ljubljana<br />

and Budapest via the stock exchange in Vienna) but also global conditionings. <strong>The</strong>refore, it seems that<br />

careful watching changes in this area, in fact, influencing the whole economy, is particularly important.<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> Poland, in connection with the economic crisis, the following have been observed, among<br />

others:<br />

a decrease in the level <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>ficial monetary reserves by about USD 4.6 billion in the period<br />

between July 2008 - January 2009,<br />

lowering the value <strong>of</strong> the balance <strong>of</strong> financial account in the years 2008 - 2009 by around EUR 4.4<br />

billion in comparison with 2007,<br />

undertaking forced intervention on the currency market as a result <strong>of</strong> dangerous speculation<br />

operations related to Polish zloty in the second half <strong>of</strong> 2008,<br />

a drop in the dynamics <strong>of</strong> GDP and the individual consumption in the years 2008-2009,<br />

worsening dynamics <strong>of</strong> investment expenditure in the second half <strong>of</strong> 2008 and in 2009,<br />

the dynamics <strong>of</strong> exports in 2009 in comparison with 2008 was only 80%,<br />

an increase in unemployment from 9.5% in 2008 to 12.5% in 2011,<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> non-financial enterprises’ liabilities in the years 2006-2009: long-term<br />

liabilities by 44.6%, short-term liabilities by 30.8%,<br />

an increase in bankruptcies <strong>of</strong> enterprises by 60% in 2009 in comparison with 2008 (Siuta-<br />

Tokarska 2011),<br />

an increase in the public debt by 48% in the years 2006 - 2010, foreign debt by 85% in the same<br />

period.<br />

Possibilities and ways out <strong>of</strong> the crisis according to economists<br />

It is assessed that the scale <strong>of</strong> disturbances in the world economy which has occurred over the past<br />

quarter <strong>of</strong> the century include not only disturbances in the financial sphere but also in other spheres,<br />

namely: moral, mental, institutional, and first <strong>of</strong> all market sphere. <strong>The</strong> disturbances have exceeded all<br />

acceptable limits and evoked the global economic crisis.<br />

According to W.M.Orowski, taking into consideration changes that have undergone in the<br />

contemporary world, it is possible, however, to:<br />

“restore the ethics <strong>of</strong> the financial sector”, since banks should be institutions <strong>of</strong> public trust,<br />

strengthen the corporate governance in financial institutions,<br />

in order to recover the situation <strong>of</strong> banks, lead to so-called deleveraging on the level <strong>of</strong> individual<br />

financial institutions (avoiding the phenomenon <strong>of</strong> excessive leveraging),<br />

cause the strengthening <strong>of</strong> risk management instruments and developing more perfect methods <strong>of</strong><br />

asset valuation and risk assessment,<br />

cause an increase in the transparency <strong>of</strong> the financial market within the scope <strong>of</strong> regulation policy,<br />

including warning about the risk <strong>of</strong> taking advantage <strong>of</strong> risky derivatives, or even to introduce<br />

the prohibition <strong>of</strong> using them,<br />

introduce effective and appropriate regulatory standards concerning the improvement <strong>of</strong> safety <strong>of</strong><br />

the banking sector with the cooperation <strong>of</strong> governments and central banks in the world,<br />

make necessary changes in the economic policy as the rules <strong>of</strong> the policy conducted so far by<br />

central banks and governments which shaped in the second half <strong>of</strong> 20th century do not conform<br />

present conditions and challenges. <strong>The</strong> task <strong>of</strong> the fiscal policy is first <strong>of</strong> all not to allow an<br />

increase in the global imbalance.<br />

According to W. Szymaski, in comparison with many crises from the past, the current crisis<br />

characterizes with much deeper collapse, comprising almost the whole world, and first <strong>of</strong> all it has<br />

basically different conditionings. This crisis is fully mobile over borders, not only with capital but also<br />

with demand, and the restoration <strong>of</strong> this demand may not be easy. First, some savings must be gathered<br />

in order to pay back at least part <strong>of</strong> the consumption on credit. Moreover, it will be necessary to suffer tax<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

100


consequences resulting from the activeness <strong>of</strong> governments in their struggleagainst the crisis, regardless<br />

<strong>of</strong> inflation consequences concerning the activeness shown in the anti-deflation activity (particularly in the<br />

developed countries).<br />

In the context <strong>of</strong> considerations on the possibilities to overcome the crisis it seems extremely<br />

important to discuss the systematic and structural causes <strong>of</strong> the crisis, both in the economic and ecological<br />

sphere. However, to make the possibilities real, “the character <strong>of</strong> economics as a science <strong>of</strong> management<br />

would have to undergo a change, and in consequence management itself should be changed”<br />

understanding economics as a science which deals with how “the man, an enterprise, the state deal with<br />

the rarity <strong>of</strong> factors in the situation when they have multi-dimensional applications to satisfy needs best”<br />

(Smick 2011).<br />

It seems that a partnership agreement between US and China is necessary within the scope <strong>of</strong><br />

sustainability <strong>of</strong> the world economy, regardless <strong>of</strong> other actions undertaken to combat the economic -<br />

ecological crisis(Smick 2011). In the four scenarios <strong>of</strong> overcoming the crisis adopted by W.Szymaski,<br />

namely the deflation collapse scenario, stagflation, so-called lost decade, or fast passing to growth - all <strong>of</strong><br />

them show a long and difficult road to overcome the crisis, and overcoming the crisis itself is undoubtedly<br />

complex and first <strong>of</strong> all requires reorientation <strong>of</strong> two partners <strong>of</strong> the world economy towards the growth<br />

<strong>of</strong> consumption expenditure into infrastructure on the part <strong>of</strong> China and the growth <strong>of</strong> savings on the part<br />

<strong>of</strong> US.<br />

Independently <strong>of</strong> a long-term and difficult way out <strong>of</strong> the economic crisis - the ecological crisis is a<br />

serious problem because it is related to irreversible changes in the natural goods, constituting the struggle<br />

for the perspectives for future generations, and even for the whole human civilization. It should be<br />

stressed that at present “the level <strong>of</strong> absorbing natural resources and the threat related to warming and<br />

irreversible changes in the ecosystem are dramatic”(Szymaski 2009).<br />

As far as Poland is concerned, it is assessed that the quality <strong>of</strong> the functioning <strong>of</strong> the state during the<br />

crisis shows a regression towards the needs resulting from the changeable and more and more complex<br />

global environment. Deficiencies concern, among others, the personnel <strong>of</strong> „high-class civil servants” and<br />

an effective system <strong>of</strong> taking advantage <strong>of</strong> experts (Szymaski 2009). It is worth stressing that in Poland<br />

the effects <strong>of</strong> the crisis revealed late which mainly resulted from the fact that Poland is a country with not<br />

too big exports and relatively big share <strong>of</strong> internal demand, and there is no so-called narrow<br />

specialization. Moreover, the banks in Poland have not developed derivatives, securitization and other<br />

tools <strong>of</strong> financial engineering to a greater scale, which influenced the state <strong>of</strong> “infecting” their assets (it<br />

was lower than in cases where such instruments were used more frequently).<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, it seems advisable to pay attention to opportunities for the development <strong>of</strong> the economy <strong>of</strong><br />

Poland not only based on the inflow <strong>of</strong> foreign capital (as it has been the case so far) which concentrates<br />

mainly on the section <strong>of</strong> low and average-low technique anyway, but on internal capital, with the skilful<br />

use <strong>of</strong> the European Union funds for the modernization <strong>of</strong> the economy and the development <strong>of</strong> exports.<br />

Only the implementation <strong>of</strong> long-term planning may contribute to changes in the structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

economy leading to the growth <strong>of</strong> its competitiveness and innovativeness with the maintenance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rules <strong>of</strong> sustainable development.<br />

References<br />

Akram M. Faheem M.A., Bin Dost M.K., Abdullah I.(2011), Globalization and its Impact on the World<br />

Economic Development, International Journal <strong>of</strong> Business and Social Science, Vol.2, No.23.<br />

Borowiecki R., Siuta-Tokarska B. (2012), Wyzwania i dylematy spoeczno-gospodarcze Polski w procesie<br />

transformacji, TNOiK, Toru.<br />

Bourguignon F., Morrisson Ch. (2002), Inequality among world citizens: 1820-1992, American Economic<br />

Review vol.92, No.4.<br />

Climate Change. World Bank Statistics, http://data.worldbank.org/topic/climate-change<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

101


Debrah Y.A., Smith I.G. (2002), Globalization, employment and the workplace: Diverse impact, Routledge,<br />

London and New York.<br />

Dialo Y., Hagemann F., Etienne A., Gurbuzer Y., Mehran F. (2010), Global Child Labour Development,<br />

Measuring Trends from 2004 to 2008, International Labour Office, Geneva.<br />

Environment and Health in Developing Countries (2009), World Health Organization, Health and<br />

Environmental Linkages Initiative, UNEP, http://www.who.int/heli/risks/ehindevcoun/en/index.html.<br />

Geografia polskiego kryzysu – kryzys peryferii czy peryferia kryzysu, pod red. G.Gorzelaka (2009),<br />

Stowarzyszenie Regional Studies Association – Sekcja Polska, Warszawa.<br />

Global Wage Report 2008/2009, Minimum wages and collective bargaining: Towards Policy Coherence (2008),<br />

International Labour Office, Geneva.<br />

Globalization, growth and poverty: Building an inclusive world economy (2002), Policy Research Report,<br />

Oxford University Press, World Bank, New York- Washington.<br />

Inequality in Asia, Key Indicators 2007,Highlights, (2007), Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong.<br />

International migration and development Report on the Secretary-General (2006), United Nations A -60/871.<br />

Intriligator M.D. (2003), Globalization <strong>of</strong> the world economy: potential benefits and costs and a new<br />

assessment, Milken Institute, No. 33.<br />

Orowski W.M. (2009), Dziesi przyczyn kryzysu i ich analiza [in:] Globalny kryzys finansowy i jego<br />

konsekwencje w opiniach ekonomistów polskich, ed. J.Szambelaczyk, Zwizek Banków Polskich, Warszawa.<br />

Pimentel, D. et al. (2007), Ecology <strong>of</strong> Increasing Diseases: Population Growth and Environmental Degradation,<br />

Human Ecology 35.6.<br />

Population Challenges and Development Goals (2005), Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New<br />

York.<br />

Przyszo. Scenariusze zmian. Czy moemy przewidzie przyszo, Instytut Meteorologii i Gospodarki<br />

Wodnej, Pastwowy Instytut Badawczy,<br />

http://www.imgw.pl/index.phpoption=com_content&view=article&id=248&Itemid=282.<br />

Ross N. (2010), World water quality facts and statistics, World Water Day 2010, Pacific Institute.<br />

Scheve K.F., Slaughter M.J. (2002), Economic insecurity and the globalization <strong>of</strong> production, NBER, Working<br />

Paper No.9339, Cambridge, MA, National Bureau <strong>of</strong> Economic Research.<br />

Schiffers S., Globalisation shakes the world, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6279679.stm<br />

Siuta-Tokarska B. (2010), Characteristic Aspects <strong>of</strong> the Influence <strong>of</strong> Globalization Processes on the Economy<br />

and Enterprises Activity in Poland [in:] Enterprise in the Face <strong>of</strong> Challenges <strong>of</strong> the 21 st Century Economy, edited by<br />

R.Borowiecki, TNOiK, Toru.<br />

Siuta-Tokarska B. (2011), Zarzdzanie organizacj w czasie kryzysu – badania empiryczne przedsibiorstw w<br />

Polsce w dobie globalnego kryzysu ekonomicznego z pocztku XXI wieku, Wydzia Zarzdzania Uniwersytet<br />

Warszawski, Problemy Zarzdzania vol 9 nr 1 (31).<br />

Szymaski W., Kryzys globalny, pierwsze przyblienie (2009), Difin, Warszawa.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Age and Sex <strong>of</strong> Migrants 2011, United Nations, Department <strong>of</strong> Economic and Social Affairs,<br />

http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/2011Migration_Chart/wallchart_2011.pdf<br />

<strong>The</strong> social dimension <strong>of</strong> globalization: A review <strong>of</strong> the literature (2004), International Labour Review, vol.143,<br />

No.1-2.<br />

Top ten toxic Pollution Problems 2011, http://www.worstpolluted.org/pollution-facts-2009.html<br />

Torres R. (2001), Towards a socially sustainable world economy: An analysis <strong>of</strong> the social pillars <strong>of</strong><br />

globalization, ILO, Geneva.<br />

World Development Report (WDR) 2012, Gender Equality and Development (2011), World Bank, Washington.<br />

World Population 2010, United Nations, http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Other-Information/wall-chart.htm<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

102


<strong>The</strong> Disharmonies, Dilemmas and Effects <strong>of</strong> the Transformation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Polish Economy<br />

Jarosaw Kaczmarek<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Keywords<br />

Systemic transformation, transition economy, liberalization, privatization<br />

Abstract<br />

A systemic transformation is designed to remove direct links between the state as a regulator and business<br />

entities which function in the real economy. <strong>The</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> the transformation process is conditioned by the<br />

democratic principles <strong>of</strong> law–making and pluralistic institutional structures. <strong>The</strong> transformation process is composed<br />

<strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> mutually linked reforms the success <strong>of</strong> which is dependent on the condition <strong>of</strong> stability.<br />

It seems impossible to create a target vision for a new economic system and the ultimate institutional order.<br />

However, there is a general concept which sets directions for changes.<br />

In the context <strong>of</strong> a systemic transformation an economic model describes the relations between the<br />

undertaken measures and expected outcomes, while the manner in which a model is disseminated takes the form <strong>of</strong> a<br />

strategy. <strong>The</strong> dilemmas, disharmonies and doubts related to the decision–making process in the course <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

transformations result from the incoherence <strong>of</strong> driving factors and inadequate structural dynamics.<br />

Poland’s systemic transformation started more than 20 years ago, and one <strong>of</strong> the major questions that may<br />

arise is whether this process has been completed. <strong>The</strong> question related to the alleged end <strong>of</strong> the transformation process<br />

leads to some general commentaries with regard to the actual course <strong>of</strong> this process in the general context <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

transformations. <strong>The</strong> paper aims to present some views and conclusions concerning this issue.<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> Polish systemic transformation started at the turn <strong>of</strong> the 1980s and the 1990s. It is a subject <strong>of</strong><br />

a number <strong>of</strong> research studies, constituting a wide platform for exploration based on the multi–aspect, i.e.<br />

holistic, understanding <strong>of</strong> an economy and its processes. Special attention given to economic issues does<br />

not imply that it is the only dimension <strong>of</strong> this process. A major role is also played by social, political and<br />

defense–related changes which affect the course <strong>of</strong> the transformation process.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are qualitative differences between an economic transformation and changes referred to as<br />

economic reforms. What results from a transformation process is the foundation <strong>of</strong> an economic system –<br />

not only the scope or manner <strong>of</strong> self–regulation and management. An economic transformation comprises<br />

overall changes in economic regulation resulting from the implementation <strong>of</strong> a new economic system. In<br />

the case <strong>of</strong> Poland, it is a transformation from a monocentric to a polycentric system.<br />

<strong>The</strong> essence and components <strong>of</strong> a systemic transformation<br />

A transformation process is aimed to eliminate direct links between the state as a regulator and<br />

business entities functioning in the real economy, leading to deregulation. This process is accompanied by<br />

the creation and development <strong>of</strong> markets, and the comprehensive character <strong>of</strong> transformation changes<br />

necessitates dealing with such issues as deflation, demonopolization, denationalization, restructuring as<br />

well as the establishment <strong>of</strong> new economic institutions (Fischer, Gelb 1991).<br />

A systemic transformation comprises economic and systemic changes. <strong>The</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

transformation process is conditioned by introducing democratic law–making procedures and pluralistic<br />

institutional structures (Nasiowski 1995). <strong>The</strong>y provide proper conditions for breakthrough changes in<br />

ownership and legal and institutional structures as well as for introducing regulatory free market<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

103


mechanisms. <strong>The</strong> significance <strong>of</strong> such conditions should be stressed – it is hardly possible to build a free<br />

market system within the legal and institutional framework <strong>of</strong> a monocentric system.<br />

<strong>The</strong> most frequently cited components <strong>of</strong> an economic transformation include the following<br />

(Dewatripoont, Roland 1996):<br />

macroeconomic stabilization,<br />

microeconomic liberalization,<br />

institutional restructuring along with privatization.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se elements are interlinked and they constitute, according to L. Balcerowicz, a set <strong>of</strong> reforms<br />

(Åslund, Dbrowski 2008), with stability being a prerequisite for further reforms (Csaba 1995). However, a<br />

threat appears – stabilization efforts, price liberalization, devaluation and rising costs <strong>of</strong> money have a<br />

destabilising effect on the economy (Koodko 1991).<br />

A systemic transformation, apart from the democratization <strong>of</strong> life and citizens’ freedoms, leads to<br />

changes in attitudes and human behaviour. Following the initial phase <strong>of</strong> the state’s active engagement, it<br />

comprises a set <strong>of</strong> unmanageable processes which are independent <strong>of</strong> state policies (Batowski, Miszewski<br />

2006). This factor differentiates it from en economic transformation which is characterised by a strong<br />

involvement on the part <strong>of</strong> the state. It is also stressed that a shift towards a free market economy (en<br />

economic transformation) is a prerequisite for maintaining a democracy (Islam, Mandelbaum 1993) and<br />

that a free market economy cannot function effectively in longer periods <strong>of</strong> time in non–democratic<br />

systems (Jakóbik 2000).<br />

<strong>The</strong> target form <strong>of</strong> an economic system, and transformation models<br />

Creating a target vision for a new economic system is significant in the context <strong>of</strong> setting the<br />

objectives <strong>of</strong> an economic transformation and identifying the manner <strong>of</strong> introducing changes. It seems,<br />

however, that the development <strong>of</strong> a final institutional order is not possible. It is only possible to create a<br />

concept which sets general directions (Sadowski 2005). It is not possible to anticipate, or programme on an<br />

a priori basis, all the factors that impact the transformation process in the course <strong>of</strong> time. Knowledge about<br />

a free market economy, its types, nature, characteristics and evolution should, without a doubt, facilitate<br />

the process <strong>of</strong> making the right choices in the period <strong>of</strong> transformation. Such choices, however, are<br />

strongly affected by non–economic factors, which is confirmed, for example, by state intervention in the<br />

economy.<br />

Three groups <strong>of</strong> conditions can be identified in the analysis <strong>of</strong> an economic transformation<br />

(Balcerowicz 1997):<br />

initial economic, social and political conditions<br />

external conditions and events<br />

economic policies<br />

Initial conditions and external factors, unlike economic policies, cannot be consciously affected by<br />

human activities. <strong>The</strong> scope and impact <strong>of</strong> such activities is dependent on economic, social and political<br />

factors. Consequently, a “complex network <strong>of</strong> mutual impacts” occurs, which is characterised by a certain<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> randomness.<br />

<strong>The</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> the economic transformation process and an analysis <strong>of</strong> its stages, sequence and pace<br />

<strong>of</strong> changes can be outlined at 3 levels (Wilkin 1995):<br />

relations between an economy, politics and social awareness<br />

breakthrough changes in the structure <strong>of</strong> an economic system<br />

changes in the internal elements <strong>of</strong> the structure.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

104


A broad area <strong>of</strong> problems related to transformations and different views held by many authors can be<br />

presented in a synthetic way from the perspective <strong>of</strong> changes in the Polish economy. As a result, a model<br />

<strong>of</strong> changes can be developed.<br />

Figure 1. Differentiation criteria and transformation models<br />

Source: own study based on ukrowska (ed., 2010).<br />

Generally, the term economic model describes different forms <strong>of</strong> relations in an economic system.<br />

<strong>The</strong> principles <strong>of</strong> developing economic models are frequently regarded by many authors to be the<br />

equivalent <strong>of</strong> economic theories, and R. Gilpin even states that a model, when it explains certain events, is<br />

based on economic theory (Gilpin 2001). M. Gärtner, on the other hand, refers to a model as a simplified<br />

picture <strong>of</strong> reality for the needs <strong>of</strong> analyses and recipients which does not describe all its aspects (Gärtner<br />

1997).<br />

From the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> a systemic transformation, a model is a description <strong>of</strong> relations between<br />

the undertaken measures and expected results. <strong>The</strong> way in which the adopted model is disseminated<br />

takes the form <strong>of</strong> a strategy. Transformation models are classified in literatures on the basis <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong><br />

criteria: duration, dynamics <strong>of</strong> changes, types <strong>of</strong> applied solutions and the degree <strong>of</strong> institutionalization<br />

(see Fig. 1).<br />

Transformation dilemmas and strategies<br />

Two reasons can be identified for the dilemmas, disharmonies and decision–making doubts<br />

which occur in the course <strong>of</strong> an economic transformation: the inconsistency <strong>of</strong> driving forces and<br />

inadequate structural dynamics (M. Batowski and M. Miszewski 2006). <strong>The</strong> first one indicates the state<br />

and its economic policy as a major stimulant <strong>of</strong> the transformation process. <strong>The</strong> other reason refers to<br />

different paces <strong>of</strong> economic and systemic transformations as well as the contradiction between their<br />

objectives. <strong>The</strong> conducted analysis also gives attention to a view which totally rejects state economic<br />

policy programmes as the ones which are implemented against the principle <strong>of</strong> the organic development<br />

<strong>of</strong> structures and institutions as part <strong>of</strong> the spontaneous order which is characteristic <strong>of</strong> self–forming<br />

capitalism (von Hayek 1987).<br />

<strong>The</strong> basic dilemma is posed by the degree <strong>of</strong> state intervention in the economy. <strong>The</strong> debate is<br />

marked by two conflicting views: one indicates the necessity <strong>of</strong> state intervention in a modern free market<br />

economy, while the other one states that the institutional systems <strong>of</strong> world advanced economies evolve<br />

towards reducing state intervention. <strong>The</strong> subsequent events in the global economy can be viewed as<br />

supporting both views.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

105


<strong>The</strong> state’s activities in the period <strong>of</strong> transformation should be regulatory in character, focused on<br />

setting standards and establishing institutions. In the initial phase <strong>of</strong> the process the state should also<br />

eliminate the adverse effects <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> activities carried out by fully developed and institutionalised<br />

market structures. <strong>The</strong> necessity <strong>of</strong> state intervention is also related to adaptive economic programmes as<br />

well as increased innovativeness and competitiveness. Such views, however, are rejected in the context <strong>of</strong><br />

a negative assessment <strong>of</strong> the state’s undertakings in the form <strong>of</strong> direct and vertical interference with the<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> business entities and the structures <strong>of</strong> the particular markets (Lipowski 2002).<br />

Another issue is the selection <strong>of</strong> a strategy for achieving the main objectives <strong>of</strong> the transformation<br />

process: should a radical approach be adopted (the so called “shock therapy”) or a strategy <strong>of</strong> evolution<br />

(“gradual” changes) <strong>The</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> the radical method, which originates from the school <strong>of</strong> monetarism<br />

and new classical economics (Roland, 2000), leads to quick effects in terms <strong>of</strong> stabilization, but it should<br />

not be applied in restructuring programmes when market and privatization infrastructure is not available.<br />

Moreover, the radical approach leads to a number <strong>of</strong> threats, especially rising unemployment rates and<br />

salary pressure (Blanchard 1997). <strong>The</strong> gradual approach, in turn, which originates from the institutional<br />

approach, may reduce the pace <strong>of</strong> changes and lead to the situation in which a programme <strong>of</strong> reforms<br />

reaches a stalemate (Belka, Trzeciakowski 1997). In addition to that, this approach may lead to a more<br />

significant role played by the state in an economy (Åslund 2002). <strong>The</strong>refore, J. Kornai proposes dividing<br />

transformation strategies into limited development strategies and strategies <strong>of</strong> accelerated privatization<br />

(Kornai 1991).<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> economists believe that the quality <strong>of</strong> transformation changes can be measured by<br />

the degree <strong>of</strong> privatising the public sector and the autonomous development <strong>of</strong> the private sector.<br />

Privatization, then, is recognised as a key factor <strong>of</strong> transformation (Fisher, Gelb 1991). A privatization<br />

process causes much controversy over such issues as the objectives it should achieve, applied and<br />

preferred privatization methods, the actually adopted methods or the scope <strong>of</strong> the entire process. In this<br />

context it is worth referring to M. Friedman’s statement according to which it is a mistake to regard<br />

privatization as the main objective <strong>of</strong> transformation –greater significance should be attributed to a rule <strong>of</strong><br />

law, i.e. the creation <strong>of</strong> institutions (Fukuyama 2005).<br />

Another dilemma <strong>of</strong> the transformation process refers to the degree <strong>of</strong> the opening up <strong>of</strong> an<br />

economy. <strong>The</strong> question is not whether an economy should be opened up, but how this process should be<br />

implemented. Some other dilemmas include the problem <strong>of</strong> external debt, setting priorities with regard to<br />

export–oriented or counter–inflation policies as well as the relations between stabilising policies, economic<br />

growth and unemployment rates. Another significant issue to be considered is the social cost <strong>of</strong><br />

transformation: unemployment, social impoverishment, the crisis <strong>of</strong> social services, and social pathologies<br />

(Sadowski 2005). <strong>The</strong> final issue refers to integration with the European Union – structural convergence<br />

and overcoming the existing barriers. In conclusion, there are a number <strong>of</strong> economic policy options which<br />

consider the above dilemmas and disharmonies.<br />

<strong>The</strong> end <strong>of</strong> the systemic transformation – or just one <strong>of</strong> its phases<br />

<strong>The</strong> Polish transformation started more than 20 years ago, and one <strong>of</strong> the fundamental questions<br />

is whether the process has been completed. <strong>The</strong> term transformation itself, indicating continuous changes,<br />

causes much controversy among many authors. Some <strong>of</strong> them refer to the term transition, commonly used<br />

in foreign literatures (Gros, Steinherr 2004), suggesting that the transformation process may be completed.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> significant events in the period <strong>of</strong> the last few years can be treated as the cornerstones<br />

marking the particular stages <strong>of</strong> the process. <strong>The</strong> year 2004, a turning point marking Poland’s accession to<br />

the EU, can justify the view held by many economists that the transformation process came to an end. It<br />

implies the development <strong>of</strong> an economic system in which economic policies are transformed into an<br />

exogenous factor which only regulates the dynamics <strong>of</strong> the system (Filar 1993).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

106


Another possibility is the abandoning <strong>of</strong> transformation policies, which leads to the situation in<br />

which the transformation process is not completed (Winiecki 1991). In the context <strong>of</strong> differentiating<br />

between the economic and systemic transformation some authors claim that the systemic transformation<br />

is far from being completed due to slower changes in social attitudes, beliefs and behaviours.<br />

Z. Sadowski’s position is quite clear – the transformation has not come to an end, it is just the first<br />

stage <strong>of</strong> the process that has been completed (Sadowski 2005). This view is justified by the fact that the<br />

main objectives <strong>of</strong> the process have not been achieved: the modernization <strong>of</strong> economic structures and<br />

privatization. <strong>The</strong> first phase <strong>of</strong> the transformation process implemented the solutions which do not meet<br />

the requirements <strong>of</strong> the contemporary economy – the industrial civilization is being replaced by a<br />

civilization based on information and a knowledge–based economy. Hence the need for further structural<br />

changes, supported by the state’s active engagement, leading to the development <strong>of</strong> a post–capitalist<br />

economy in which knowledge is the most important means <strong>of</strong> production (Drucker 1994).<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> the systemic transformation<br />

<strong>The</strong> controversy over the completion <strong>of</strong> the Polish transformation raises the question concerning a<br />

general assessment <strong>of</strong> this process with special attention given to the major area <strong>of</strong> the analysis – an<br />

economic transformation. As regards ownership changes, the effects <strong>of</strong> the Polish transformation are<br />

generally viewed as positive. However, a number <strong>of</strong> large companies and industries have not been<br />

privatised due to the decisions to introduce a different pace <strong>of</strong> this process for the particular sectors. It has<br />

a major impact on the economy as a result <strong>of</strong> cooperation links between industries (e.g. mining, energy<br />

generation and railways). A positive assessment should be given to selecting privatization methods, while<br />

some doubts can be raised with regard to the grass–roots character <strong>of</strong> the process and the<br />

individualization <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> projects as well as legal restrictions imposed on privatization methods.<br />

Most controversial opinions relate to ESOP programmes (Employee Stock Ownership Plan), while the<br />

mass privatization programmes (National Investment Funds) are regarded to have been a complete<br />

failure.<br />

<strong>The</strong> on–going debate concerning the scope <strong>of</strong> the transformation ”shock” at the initial stage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

process does not overshadow a positive assessment <strong>of</strong> stabilising policies. <strong>The</strong> overcoming <strong>of</strong> a<br />

destructive impact <strong>of</strong> high inflation rates and the full convertibility <strong>of</strong> the national currency (avoiding a<br />

monetary crisis) can be regarded to be successful undertakings. As regards regulation policies, a positive<br />

assessment is given to the fact that the National Bank <strong>of</strong> Poland managed to avoid direct state<br />

intervention. However, an assessment <strong>of</strong> the entirety <strong>of</strong> antimonopolistic policies suggests that progress in<br />

this area is not satisfactory, and some cases are recorded <strong>of</strong> resuming the practice <strong>of</strong> politicising the<br />

economy. EU policies result in the state’s increasing assistance <strong>of</strong>fered to small and medium enterprises,<br />

which are regarded to be more responsive to the changing market. However, some critics claim that it has<br />

an adverse impact on the economic freedom due to the preferential treatment given to the sector. <strong>The</strong><br />

infrastructure <strong>of</strong> the capital market is well developed in terms <strong>of</strong> the operating institutions as well as the<br />

available instruments. On the other hand, the state fails to formulate clear directives with regard to its<br />

ownership policies, which play a significant role in the context <strong>of</strong> the privatization process.<br />

<strong>The</strong> above classification <strong>of</strong> the components <strong>of</strong> economic transformation (macroeconomic<br />

stabilization, microeconomic liberalization and institutional restructuring along with privatization) can be<br />

a basis for carrying out a quantitative assessment <strong>of</strong> the transformation process. A useful tool for<br />

analysing macroeconomic stabilization is the concept <strong>of</strong> ”the stabilization pentagon” model which<br />

describes the following indicators: GDP growth rate, CPI (Consumer Price Index), unemployment rates,<br />

the budget balance to GDP ratio, and the current account balance (Pitek [in:] Jarmoowicz, Szarzec, eds.,<br />

2011). <strong>The</strong> measurements <strong>of</strong> the surface <strong>of</strong> the pentagon for the particular years represent the effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />

transformation process (time axis). Overall, the period <strong>of</strong> unfavourable conditions at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the<br />

process in 1994–1998 is followed by considerable improvements; deteriorating indicators prevail until as<br />

late as 2004, followed again by improved economic ratios.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

107


Figure 2. <strong>The</strong> surface <strong>of</strong> the ”stabilization pentagon”, GDP growth and unemployment rates in Poland in<br />

1990–2011<br />

0.5<br />

0.45<br />

0.4<br />

0.35<br />

0.3<br />

0.25<br />

0.2<br />

1990<br />

1991<br />

1992<br />

1993<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

Area <strong>of</strong> the ”stabilization pentagon”<br />

Unemployment rate<br />

Pace <strong>of</strong> GDP changes<br />

25%<br />

20%<br />

15%<br />

10%<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

-5%<br />

-10%<br />

-15%<br />

Inflation<br />

rate<br />

2011<br />

1991<br />

Unemploy<br />

ment rate<br />

Central<br />

budget<br />

account<br />

Pace <strong>of</strong><br />

GDP<br />

changes<br />

Current<br />

account<br />

balance<br />

Source: own study based on figures from:<br />

<strong>The</strong> Yearbook <strong>of</strong> the Central Statistical Office, Warszawa (for the years 1990–2010, respectively),<br />

GDP estimated figures for 2011: www.stat.gov.pl [11.03.2012]; Pitek [in:] Jarmoowicz, Szarzec, (eds.)<br />

(2011).<br />

<strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> liberalization and privatization<br />

Liberalization–related changes can be assessed on the basis <strong>of</strong> the ratios developed and published<br />

by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD 2010). <strong>The</strong>y include indicators related<br />

to governance and corporate reforms, price liberalization, Forex and trade liberalization and competition<br />

policies. It can be concluded that the fundamental and positive changes occurred before 1994, while their<br />

dynamics declined considerably in later periods. <strong>The</strong> best assessments were given to Forex and trade<br />

liberalizaton (1998), while competitiveness and governance and corporate reform indexes are at lower<br />

levels, recording higher values in the period <strong>of</strong> the last decade.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

108


Figure 3. Transformation indicators – liberalization and privatization in Poland in 1989–2010<br />

Source: own study based on: Transition Report. Recovery and Reform, (EBRD 1990–2010), www.ebrd.com<br />

[11.03.2011].<br />

Note: indicators for economically advanced countries are at the level <strong>of</strong> 4.3.<br />

According to EBRD’s assessment <strong>of</strong> small–scale privatization (the sales or transfer <strong>of</strong> state–owned<br />

small companies and their assets) and large–scale privatization, a steady and considerable increase in the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> indicators is recorded in 1990–1996; in later periods the indicators remain unchanged with the<br />

exception <strong>of</strong> higher assessments <strong>of</strong> large–scale privatization in 2010. From the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> national<br />

accounts, the effect <strong>of</strong> privatization is the share <strong>of</strong> the private sector in creating value added – it rises from<br />

nearly 30% in 1990 to more than 70% in 2010. Privatization comprises two trends: transformation–related<br />

privatization and an independent development <strong>of</strong> the private sector; it is estimated that the former trend<br />

accounts for merely 30% <strong>of</strong> value added created by the private sector. <strong>The</strong> private and public sector came<br />

to the same level in terms <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> employees as early as in 1991; in terms <strong>of</strong> value added creation<br />

– in 1993, while in terms <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> fixed assets – as late as in 2000.<br />

Transformation vs economic growth – conclusions<br />

<strong>The</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> the transformation process on economic growth is the final element <strong>of</strong> the<br />

presented assessment <strong>of</strong> Poland’s economic transformation. <strong>The</strong> course <strong>of</strong> the process included the<br />

previously defined factors: macroeconomic stabilization, progressing market reforms and institutional<br />

changes, privatization and initial conditions. Most authors regard the impact <strong>of</strong> macroeconomic<br />

stabilization to be a clearly positive factor (Fisher, Sahay, Vegh 1996). However, the initial stage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

process is marked by a decrease in economic growth (Fidmuc 2001), which results from the economics <strong>of</strong><br />

disorganization (Blanchard 1996). A positive assessment is given to market reforms as well as small–scale<br />

privatization (Radulescu, Barlow 2005). Moreover, breakthrough reforms lead to increased economic<br />

growth (Åslund, Boone, Johnson 1996). <strong>The</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> large–scale privatization, on the other hand, causes<br />

much controversy. K. Staehr claims that it has a negative impact both on short– and long–term economic<br />

growth (Staehr 2003). Other authors believe that large–scale privatization may have a positive impact<br />

depending on the way in which the process is implemented (Megginson, Netter 2001). Institutional<br />

changes are generally regarded to have a positive impact on economic growth (Grogan, Moers 2001) if<br />

accompanied by effective management, efficient operations and adherence to ownership rights (Brunetti,<br />

Kisunko, Weder 1997). As indicated by B. Heybey and P. Murrell, the impact <strong>of</strong> the initial conditions on<br />

the transformation process is commonly assessed as having a negative impact on economic growth, which<br />

decreases, however, in the course <strong>of</strong> time (Heybey, Murrell 1999).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

109


<strong>The</strong> verification <strong>of</strong> the hypothesis on a significant impact <strong>of</strong> the discussed factors on economic growth,<br />

based on the LSDV regression (Least Squares Dummy Variable), leads to the following conclusions<br />

(Pitek, Kukuka [in:] Jarmoowicz, Szarzec eds. 2011):<br />

macroeconomic stabilization – positive impact,<br />

small–scale privatization – positive and significant impact,<br />

large–scale privatization – negative and significant impact,<br />

institutional changes – generally positive impact,<br />

initial conditions – negative and significant impact.<br />

Overall, the above conclusions are consistent with the previously presented views held by other<br />

authors, and they present a picture <strong>of</strong> changes and positive effects for the Polish transition economy.<br />

References:<br />

Åslund A. (2002), Building Capitalism. <strong>The</strong> Transformation <strong>of</strong> the Former Soviet Bloc, Cambridge University<br />

Press, Cambridge.<br />

Åslund A., Boone P., Johnson S. (1996), How to Stabilize: Lesson from Post–Communist Countries,<br />

“Brookings Papers on Economic Activity”, vol. 1.<br />

Balcerowicz L. (1997), Socjalizm, kapitalizm, transformacja. Szkice z przeomu epok, Wydawnictwo<br />

Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.<br />

Balcerowicz L., Institutional Systems and Economic Growth, [in:] Åslund A., Dbrowski M. (eds.) (2008),<br />

Challenges <strong>of</strong> Globalization. Imbalances and Growth, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington.<br />

Batowski M., Miszewski M. (2006), Transformacja gospodarcza w Polsce, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN,<br />

Warszawa.<br />

Belka M., Trzeciakowski W. (eds.) (1997), Dynamika transformacji polskiej gospodarki, vol. I, Poltext,<br />

Warszawa 1997.<br />

Blanchard O. (1996), Assessment <strong>of</strong> the Economic Transition in Central and Eastern Europe – <strong>The</strong>oretical<br />

Aspects <strong>of</strong> Transition, “American Economic Review”, vol. 2.<br />

Blanchard O. (1997), <strong>The</strong> Economics <strong>of</strong> Post–Communist Transition, Clarendon Press, Oxford.<br />

Brunetti A., Kisunko G., Weder B. (1997), Institutions in Transition. Reliability <strong>of</strong> Rules and Economic<br />

Performance in Former Socialist Countries, “Working Paper”, vol. 1809.<br />

Csaba L. (1995), <strong>The</strong> Capitalist Revolution in Eastern Europe. A Contribution to the Economic <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong><br />

Systemic Change, E. Elgar Publishing, Aldershot.<br />

Dewatripoont M., Roland G. (1996), Transition as a Process <strong>of</strong> Large–scale Institutional Change, “Economics<br />

<strong>of</strong> Transition”, vol. 4<br />

Drucker P.F. (1994), Post–Capitalist Society, Harper Collins Publishers, New York.<br />

Fidmuc J. (2001), Forecasting Growth in Transition Economies: A Reassessment, ZEI, Bonn.<br />

Filar D., Ekonomiczno–spoeczna transformacja – prawidowoci czy same wyjtki, [in:] Hockuba Z. (ed.)<br />

(1993), Ekonomia wobec zagadnie transformacji, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Warszawa.<br />

Fischer S., Gelb A.H. (1991), Problemy reformy gospodarki socjalistycznej, „Ekonomista”, vol. 2 and 3.<br />

Fisher S., Gelb A.H. (1991), <strong>The</strong> Process <strong>of</strong> Socialist Economic Transformation, “Journal <strong>of</strong> Economic<br />

Perspectives”, vol. 4.<br />

Fisher S., Sahay R., Vegh C.A. (1996), Stabilization and Growth in Transition Economies: the Early<br />

Experience, “Journal <strong>of</strong> Economic Perspectives”, vol. 2.<br />

Fukuyama F. (2005), Budowanie pastwa. Wadza i ad midzynarodowy w XXI w., Rebis, Pozna.<br />

Gärtner M. (1997), A Primer In European Macroeconomics, Prentice Hall, London.<br />

Gilpin R. (2001), Global Political Economy, Understanding the International Economic Order, Princeton.<br />

Grogan L., Moers L. (2001), Growth Empirics with Institutional Measures for Transition Countries,<br />

“Economic Systems’, vol. 25.<br />

Gros D., Steinherr A. (2004), Economic transition in Central and Eastern Europe: planting the seed,<br />

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.<br />

Hayek von F. (1987), Konstytucja wolnoci, Wers, Warszawa–Wrocaw.<br />

Heybey B., Murrell P. (1999), <strong>The</strong> Relationship between Economic Growth and the Speed <strong>of</strong> Liberalization<br />

during Transition, “Journal <strong>of</strong> Policy Reform”, vol. 3.<br />

Islam W., Mandelbaum M. (eds.) (1993), Making Markets. Economic Transformation in Eastern Europe and<br />

the Post–Soviet States, Council on Foreign Relations Press, New York.<br />

Jakóbik W. (2000), Zmiana systemowa a struktura gospodarki w Polsce, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN,<br />

Warszawa.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

110


Koodko G.K. (ed.) (1991), Polityka finansowa, stabilizacja, transformacja, Instytut Finansów, Warszawa.<br />

Kornai J. (1991), Droga do wolnej gospodarki, Fundacja Polska Praca, Warszawa.<br />

Lipowski A. (2002), Ekonomiczna zawodno pastwa – krytyczna analiza ujcia antyetatystycznego,<br />

„Ekonomista”, vol. 2.<br />

Megginson W.L., Netter J.M. (2001), From State To Market: A Survey <strong>of</strong> Empirical Studies on Privatization,<br />

“Journal <strong>of</strong> Economic Literature”, vol. 6.<br />

Nasiowski M. (ed.) (1995), Transformacja systemowa w Polsce, Key text, Warszawa.<br />

Pitek D., Kukuka A., Transformacja a wzrost gospodarczy – konkluzje, [in:] Jarmoowicz W., Szarzec K.<br />

(eds.) (2011), Liberalne przesanki polskiej transformacji, PWE, Warszawa.<br />

Pitek D., Stabilizowanie i liberalizowanie gospodarki polskiej w warunkach transformacji, [in:] Jarmoowicz<br />

W., Szarzec K. (eds.) (2011), Liberalne przesanki polskiej transformacji, PWE, Warszawa.<br />

Radulescu R., Barlow D. (2005), <strong>The</strong> Sequencing <strong>of</strong> Reform in Transition Economies, “Journal <strong>of</strong> Comparative<br />

Economics”, vol. 33.<br />

Roland G. (2000), Transition and Economics. Politics, Markets and Firms, MIT Press, London.<br />

Sadowski Z. (2005), Transformacja i rozwój. Wybór prac, Wydawnictwo PTE, Warszawa.<br />

Staehr K. (2003), Reforms and Economic Growth in Transition Economies: Complementarity, Sequencing and<br />

Speed, Discussion Papers”, vol. 1.<br />

Wilkin J. (1995), Jaki kapitalizm, jaka Polska, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.<br />

Winiecki W. (1991), Nauka dla Polski z reform. Zbyt wolna zmiana systemu, „Gospodarka Narodowa”, vol.<br />

3.<br />

ukrowska K. (ed.) (2010), Transformacja systemowa w Polsce, SGH, Warszawa.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

111


Low Economic Awareness:<br />

A Philosophical Study <strong>of</strong> Economic Behaviors in Turkey<br />

Murat ARICI<br />

Konya Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey<br />

Keywords<br />

Economic awareness, low economic awareness, economic behaviors.<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>The</strong> chief purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper is to attract attention to a target fact that the public’s economic awareness in<br />

Turkey is too low (both in terms <strong>of</strong> consumptive and non-consumptive practices) and to examine its reasons and<br />

adverse consequences. To achieve such a goal, I initially explain what is meant by the term “economic awareness” in<br />

the introduction. After that, I determine and analyze the indicators for the public’s low economic awareness in the<br />

first section. <strong>The</strong>se are the lack <strong>of</strong> conscious selective behavior, the lack <strong>of</strong> reactive attitude, and the lack <strong>of</strong> judicial<br />

action. In the second section, I present three serious consequences <strong>of</strong> the low economic awareness in question: (1)<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> it, the individuals living in Turkey suffer dramatically from unfair economic applications <strong>of</strong> both<br />

governmental institutions and private sector enterprises. (2) This socio-economic fact in question provides excuses<br />

for public and private corporations not to abide by the principles <strong>of</strong> corporate governance, thus blocking their own<br />

improvement. (3) And as a result <strong>of</strong> these two, the overall development <strong>of</strong> Turkey—both in terms <strong>of</strong> its economy and<br />

social justice—is negatively affected. Finally, in the third section, I attempt to reveal the major reasons for the<br />

public’s low awareness. <strong>The</strong>se are negative effects <strong>of</strong> some cultural factors such as religious beliefs and traditions, the<br />

state centric educational system, structural defects <strong>of</strong> the political system, state practices insensitive to rights,<br />

capital-dependant mass media, and inadequate workings <strong>of</strong> non-governmental organizations.<br />

Introduction<br />

Economists have spent a lot <strong>of</strong> time and energy pondering as to how an overall economic system<br />

can and should develop locally and globally. A great many aspects <strong>of</strong> economic systems have been<br />

studied well in the course <strong>of</strong> such a purpose, but little have been done in order to understand how<br />

individuals’ economic awareness affect and is affected by the whole economic system <strong>of</strong> a country. It is<br />

obvious that a constant interaction takes place between the two. If most <strong>of</strong> the individuals are<br />

economically well aware and thus are conscious consumers <strong>of</strong> goods and services provided in a country,<br />

those individuals, one way or another, shape the whole economic system <strong>of</strong> the country. But in turn, if<br />

most <strong>of</strong> them are economically unaware individuals, there will be no positive force on the economic<br />

system to develop in favor <strong>of</strong> individuals, though the system may surely develop in favor <strong>of</strong> capital<br />

owners and decision makers in politics.<br />

One can think about the interaction the other way around. <strong>The</strong> very economic system <strong>of</strong> a country<br />

could be a chief cause determining the level <strong>of</strong> economic awareness individuals enjoy. An individual is<br />

economically aware or unaware, it may be claimed, because the structural mechanism governing the<br />

economy in that country encourages or discourages the individual to be so.<br />

Let us first state what we mean by the term “economic awareness.” In general, an individual has<br />

economic awareness only if she consciously attempts to know what kind <strong>of</strong> economic events happening<br />

around her; ask questions about causes for those economic events; deliberately try to foresee positive and<br />

negative effects <strong>of</strong> those economic events upon herself and other individuals; and is well aware <strong>of</strong> her<br />

extant rights against unfair economic applications conducted either by governmental or private sector<br />

institutions.<br />

Based on the above understanding, we can express the target fact that this paper is focused on:<br />

<strong>The</strong> economic awareness <strong>of</strong> individuals living in Turkey is too low, and the negative consequences <strong>of</strong> this<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

112


fact is so severe that ignoring it would be rather irresponsible for any intellectual mind spending energy<br />

in studying multi-faced economic development <strong>of</strong> Turkey. To repeat it again:<br />

<strong>The</strong> Target Fact: <strong>The</strong> economic awareness <strong>of</strong> the public in Turkey is too low meaning that most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

people are unaware <strong>of</strong> the economic events occurring in the country, the causes and reasons for those<br />

events, the possible consequences <strong>of</strong> those events, and their own economic rights against the negative<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> economic applications.<br />

Evidence for the Low Economic Awareness<br />

`One may initially question whether there is any solid indicator for the public’s low economic<br />

awareness in question. Indeed there are a lot, and the examples are clearly enough to conclude in favor <strong>of</strong><br />

the target fact above. I will organize the examples into three groups. When they act economically, most <strong>of</strong><br />

people living in Turkey fail to appreciate three basic features that an ideal citizen should possess. In the<br />

economic sense, they lack (i) conscious selective behavior, (ii) reactive attitude, and (iii) judicial action.<br />

(i) <strong>The</strong> Lack <strong>of</strong> Conscious Selective Behavior<br />

Before 2005, the public <strong>of</strong> Turkey had suffered from the high rate <strong>of</strong> inflation for a long time. As a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> this, people in general could not and still cannot get rid <strong>of</strong> some related habits. <strong>The</strong>y still see it<br />

quite normal, for example, to pay for some goods or services more money than those deserve thinking<br />

that perhaps the prices <strong>of</strong> all those goods and services in the same category increased all together without<br />

their knowledge. To give another example, most consumers in Turkey tend to buy the expensive one even<br />

if the qualities <strong>of</strong> two different goods are exactly the same, and most <strong>of</strong> the time the consumers know<br />

about this. One may think that there must be some underlying socio-cultural reasons for such a seemingly<br />

implausible consumer behavior. Indeed there are, such as those related to gaining a socio-economic<br />

identity, achieving social prestige, not-having faith in the honesty <strong>of</strong> the buyer who sells the cheap one etc.<br />

But here the more important reason for the consumer’s behavior <strong>of</strong> such kind should not be disregarded.<br />

<strong>The</strong> consumer behaves in such a way because she does not think about the consequences <strong>of</strong> her<br />

behavior— consequences for both herself and the public in general. In another sense, she do not select<br />

consciously when she consumes.<br />

Another bad habit <strong>of</strong> most consumers in Turkey is to ignore bad treatment <strong>of</strong> buyers and service<br />

providers both in private companies and governmental institutions. Unfortunately it is sometimes<br />

observed in Turkey to be ignored, be treated rudely, or even be reprimanded when a consumer attempts<br />

to receive a goods or service in places such as restaurants, cafes, hotels, banks, post <strong>of</strong>fices, municipality<br />

buildings and other governmental institutions. Perhaps this happens not only in Turkey but also happens<br />

in a lot <strong>of</strong> developing and even sometimes developed countries. But what I draw attention to is not the<br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> such bad treatments, but rather the consumers’ reactions to such treatments. While<br />

consumers in developed countries consciously notice such treatments and punish the buyers and service<br />

providers by not preferring them again, most consumers in Turkey forget about previous bad treatments<br />

and attempts to buy goods and services from the same places. It is because the public in general do not<br />

consider important the pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism neither in private companies nor in governmental institutions.<br />

We can generalize this non-conscious selective behavior into the followings. In terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

qualities and prices <strong>of</strong> goods and services, most consumers in Turkey:<br />

• do not select goods and services consciously,<br />

• do not select sellers and service providers consciously,<br />

• do not attach importance to the pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism,<br />

• do not check up warranty rules and return conditions.<br />

(ii) <strong>The</strong> Lack <strong>of</strong> Reactive Attitude<br />

<strong>The</strong> Current government in Turkey put her signature under a lot <strong>of</strong> great achievements in<br />

economy. <strong>The</strong> gross domestic product <strong>of</strong> Turkey has increased more than three times it was since the<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

113


uling Justice and Development Party came in to power in 2002. Latest export figures show that Turkey<br />

has quadrupled its exportation since 2002. <strong>The</strong> gross national income per capita has been reached to more<br />

than $ 10,000 while it was around $ 3000 ten years ago. <strong>The</strong> inflation rate decreased from 29.7% to 6.4%<br />

during the last decade. Yet the country has moved forward little when it comes to some severe socioeconomic<br />

problems such as the injustice <strong>of</strong> taxation, the unfair distribution <strong>of</strong> income, and the nondeveloped<br />

rights <strong>of</strong> individuals and consumers against state agencies and private sector enterprises.<br />

To give examples <strong>of</strong> such socio-economic problems, consider the case <strong>of</strong> unjust taxation. <strong>The</strong> rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> indirect taxes to total tax incomes has increased to 68% in 2010 while it was 55% in 1999, which makes<br />

Turkey the champion <strong>of</strong> the highest rate <strong>of</strong> indirect taxation. Likewise, the rate <strong>of</strong> direct taxes to total tax<br />

incomes has decreased to 32% while it was 45% in 1999. Moreover, in 2010 the rate <strong>of</strong> tax incomes cut<br />

from salaries <strong>of</strong> employees (including bottom-wage earners) to total tax incomes was 66% while the tax<br />

incomes received from self-employed people such as bankers, dealers <strong>of</strong> gold, building contractors,<br />

doctors, pharmacists etc. was merely 1.77% <strong>of</strong> total income tax, which clearly shows the severity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

situation. This obviously means that low-incomers and middle-income individuals have ended up paying<br />

proportionately more and more income taxes than the rich ones do during the last decade. And this is<br />

quite opposed to what is expected from a rapidly developing country like Turkey whose experience <strong>of</strong><br />

civilization in the history goes beyond even that <strong>of</strong> many developed countries.<br />

Take the case <strong>of</strong> unfair distribution <strong>of</strong> income. Although there can be given no solid indicator <strong>of</strong><br />

such an economic and perhaps universally valid fact, the above considerations <strong>of</strong> unjust taxations have<br />

already given significant clues <strong>of</strong> unfair income distribution. Besides, some comparisons <strong>of</strong> current<br />

salaries <strong>of</strong> different occupational clusters will be enough to enjoy the fact in question. A primary school<br />

graduate working as a department chief in a municipality is paid with a %50 higher monthly salary than<br />

an assistant pr<strong>of</strong>essor with Ph.D. degree working at a university. Likewise, a university graduate teacher<br />

working at a high school is salaried only with a %14 higher salary than a primary school graduate janitor<br />

working at the same school.<br />

In addition to these governmental applications, there can be found a lot <strong>of</strong> other cases in which<br />

economic rights <strong>of</strong> individuals and consumers are blatantly overridden by private sector enterprises. That<br />

the producers and service providers do not present the needed information on the products and the<br />

necessary details about services due to the lack <strong>of</strong> required laws or auditing; that the written warranty<br />

rules and return conditions on the products are violated by the sellers against the benefit <strong>of</strong> consumers;<br />

that the deception in trade is not fully audited by the state and so on can be counted among those.<br />

Oddly enough, the public in Turkey do not show any significant reaction to such applications.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are some consumer associations who sometimes react to these applications, but their press<br />

announcements explaining these unjust implementations can only find tiny places on the mass media,<br />

thus receives little attention from the public. Besides, no one can see any manifest social movement or<br />

protest demonstration against such state practices. This is why we can drive the conclusion that most <strong>of</strong><br />

the individuals living in Turkey do not have any reactive economic attitude against such governmental<br />

practices that corrupt the social justice in a deeper way.<br />

(iii) <strong>The</strong> Lack <strong>of</strong> Judicial Action<br />

As a social habit, Turkish individuals have always been unwilling to take legal action against the<br />

injustice especially the ones conducted by state institutions or the powerful. In section 4, we will examine<br />

some socio-cultural reasons behind this habit, but for now let me state the surface reasons for such a lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> judicial action. One reason is about (a) bureaucratic difficulties. Most people are discouraged to seek<br />

their rights at the court because <strong>of</strong> heavy bureaucratic processes. This unwillingness is especially more<br />

common among less-educated people from rural regions. Surely, as both a cause and effect <strong>of</strong> these<br />

difficulties, the ignorance <strong>of</strong> procedural processes is also very common among people. Another<br />

discouragement is related to (b) slow working structure <strong>of</strong> judicial system. Albeit there have been<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

114


significant progresses recently on this issue, still there are legal cases which have not been concluded in<br />

decades. One another reason for why most individuals refrain from applying to court concerns (c)<br />

expensive costs <strong>of</strong> litigation. This may be divided into court fees and attorney fees. Both types <strong>of</strong> fees are<br />

much higher than low-incomers can really pay. Even middle income individuals sometimes cannot afford<br />

the fees in question. <strong>The</strong> final and the most important reason why most people are unwilling to take<br />

judicial proceedings is that (d) they unfortunately do not have a strong faith in regaining their rights by<br />

way <strong>of</strong> going to court. This disbelief in judicial system in fact explains one <strong>of</strong> the severest causes for the<br />

asymmetric development <strong>of</strong> Turkey. In other words, the macro-economic development does not match<br />

any equivalent progresses in social justice chiefly because <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> a fully and truly functioning<br />

judicial system.<br />

Consequences <strong>of</strong> the Low Economic Awareness<br />

Examining all consequences, in detail, <strong>of</strong> the public’s low economic awareness in Turkey is surely<br />

beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> this paper. But at least we can organize the major consequences succinctly under<br />

three main headings as follows.<br />

Consequence 1:<br />

<strong>The</strong> foremost consequence constitutes the chief concern <strong>of</strong> this paper. Individuals with low and<br />

middle income in Turkey severely suffer from unfair economic applications conducted by both decision makers in<br />

politics and administrations <strong>of</strong> private corporations. Here the economic suffering is tw<strong>of</strong>old: from the<br />

governmental institutions and private sector enterprises. On the first horn, Individuals, in many cases,<br />

have to pay a great many kinds <strong>of</strong> unfair taxes, charges, fees and fines implemented by the key decision<br />

makers <strong>of</strong> governmental institutions. Since individuals are not used to show any significant reactions to<br />

and judicial action against these undeserved economic applications because <strong>of</strong> their low economic<br />

awareness, politicians never feel any force to take measurements to prevent this economic suffering. On<br />

the second horn, consumers in Turkey suffer from high prices for undeserved goods, low quality services,<br />

bad treatment from sellers and service providers, unknown warranty rules and return conditions and so<br />

on. Since consumers do not present any selective economic behavior or take judicial action, private sector<br />

enterprises, likewise, never face any pressure to increase the standards <strong>of</strong> their business quality for the<br />

benefits <strong>of</strong> consumers.<br />

Consequence 2<br />

Due to the public’s low economic awareness in Turkey, economic institutions particularly private<br />

sector enterprises cannot develop themselves in terms <strong>of</strong> corporate governance. <strong>The</strong> cause-effect relationship is<br />

obvious here. When people are economically harmed and do not exhibit any selective economic behavior,<br />

reactive attitude, and judicial action, neither the state-owned institutions nor public sector corporations<br />

will have significant reasons to advance the quality <strong>of</strong> their corporate governance, thus they will not be<br />

able to increase their overall economic value. It is because these institutions and corporations hardly abide<br />

by the principles <strong>of</strong> corporate governance, which have been determined by international standards such<br />

as justice and equality, public disclosure and transparency, accountability, and administrative<br />

responsibility. If economic institutions and corporations do not develop themselves in the sense <strong>of</strong> these<br />

principles, it is obvious that the whole economic system <strong>of</strong> the country will be affected from this.<br />

Consequence 3<br />

Based on the above two, the general consequence, over the long run, <strong>of</strong> the public’s low economic<br />

awareness is apparent: the overall development <strong>of</strong> Turkey—both in terms <strong>of</strong> its economy and social justice—is<br />

negatively affected. To elucidate this, we can specify the followings. (a) Decision makers in politics do not<br />

pay any mind to improve the rights <strong>of</strong> consumers and individuals. (b) Producers and service providers do<br />

not feel any need to increase the quality <strong>of</strong> goods and services; they rather care to increase their pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

only. (c) Positive values promoted by the standards accepted internationally in the field <strong>of</strong> economy do<br />

not find a chance to become the rising values in the society. (d) As the citizens <strong>of</strong> a rapidly developing<br />

country, individuals in Turkey cannot unfortunately enjoy the most urgent need: social justice.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

115


Reasons for the Low Economic Awareness<br />

So far, we have been investigating into the details <strong>of</strong> the public’s low economic awareness in<br />

Turkey and its adverse economic consequences. While doing this, I have already hinted on several<br />

underlying causes for such low awareness. One may here rightly wonder about why people living in<br />

Turkey behave like that or lack conscious selective behavior, reactive attitude, and judicial action. This is<br />

quite worth asking, since any measurements to overcome the adverse economic consequences we have<br />

examined above will have to require a detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> the reasons reached albeit those reasons are<br />

very difficult to analyze due to their complexity and inter-relatedness. Even so, we can at least attempt to<br />

point out several <strong>of</strong> those reasons by categorizing them into some chief headings <strong>of</strong> social aspects such as<br />

cultural, educational, political and so on.<br />

Cultural Reasons<br />

Cultural reasons vary in kind. In my opinion, the most significant one results from the<br />

interpretation <strong>of</strong> religious values. In the context <strong>of</strong> religious beliefs, particularly <strong>of</strong> those <strong>of</strong> Islamic faith,<br />

the majority <strong>of</strong> the public do not seem to believe in the value <strong>of</strong> having economic awareness. That is to<br />

say, they do not attach the required importance to practices such as conscious selection on material things,<br />

reaction to unjust applications, seeking their rights at the court etc. Here, the chief ground for this<br />

economic behavior must be this: Most <strong>of</strong> devoted people believe that any unjust applications will<br />

ultimately be punished fully and hence the deserved but belated justice will be restored properly in the<br />

afterworld. But this means devaluing the worldly life while still living in the world. Any solution to this<br />

ill-formed point <strong>of</strong> view, it seems, lies within a truer interpretation <strong>of</strong> religious beliefs.<br />

<strong>The</strong> case is not very different in another context: the context <strong>of</strong> settled traditions. People in Turkey<br />

traditionally do not consider the judicial struggle as a social duty particularly when the resulting economic<br />

value is too low. What is worse is that when it is about only a small sum, those who attempt to seek their<br />

rights legally are usually sniffed at by the rest <strong>of</strong> the public. It is very common in Turkey to hear the<br />

words “Let it go/Drop it/It does not worth it” when it comes to a man’s going after his small amount <strong>of</strong><br />

money that he had to pay because <strong>of</strong> some unjust economic application. I believe the cure for this<br />

unhealthy traditional pressure can be found only by re-shaping the relevant elements <strong>of</strong> the educational<br />

system, which is in fact not very difficult to implement in a country <strong>of</strong> rapid changes in every area <strong>of</strong><br />

social structure.<br />

Educational Reasons<br />

It is true that intermediate and high school students in Turkey still takes a class <strong>of</strong> Turkish civics<br />

which had been taught by a military <strong>of</strong>ficer until recently. Ironically, in such a class, students even learn<br />

the details <strong>of</strong> military ranks but are never taught how to seek their rights by legitimate ways. <strong>The</strong> Turkish<br />

education system is still state centric. It would be too naïve to expect from an education system like that <strong>of</strong><br />

Turkey to promote individuals’ rights and to implement a curriculum in order to increase public’s<br />

awareness <strong>of</strong> several kinds including the economic one. Given that most <strong>of</strong> the problems against public’s<br />

awareness <strong>of</strong> their rights originate in the education system, and there have been only little studies <strong>of</strong> the<br />

issue around the world (Otter 1991; and Jopper and Bendelow 1993), serious measurements in this field<br />

are obviously an urgent due. Among what has to be done may be counted designing courses and<br />

seminars at all level <strong>of</strong> education such as <strong>of</strong> individual’s rights, human rights, economic awareness,<br />

conscious consumption, individual-state relationship and so on.<br />

Political Reasons<br />

<strong>The</strong> current political system in Turkey has been established in 1982 just two years after the<br />

Turkish army made a military coup in 1980. <strong>The</strong> constitution <strong>of</strong> the republic <strong>of</strong> Turkey has never gone<br />

through a major change since then, except perhaps the constitutional amendment accepted in the<br />

referendum in 2010. Likewise, the political parties act has remained the same for decades, and it has still<br />

its structural defects. As a result <strong>of</strong> these defects, parliamentary candidates are not elected by the relevant<br />

local public. No properly functioning political channels that should exist in any ideal political system<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

116


takes place between the public and the statesmen in Turkey. Hence, the candidates are determined by the<br />

sole leaders <strong>of</strong> political parties. Consequently, members <strong>of</strong> the parliament do not truly consider<br />

themselves as the real representatives <strong>of</strong> the public. Those elected in such a way, it seems obvious, do not<br />

put themselves in a position <strong>of</strong> protecting the citizens’ rights, let alone giving account to their electors. <strong>The</strong><br />

lack <strong>of</strong> properly functioning political channels between the political representatives and the public<br />

prevents individuals from increasing their awareness <strong>of</strong> several types including the economic one. A true<br />

resolution to this defective political system is nothing but to replace the political parties act with one that<br />

centralizes individuals’ rights more than it does the interest <strong>of</strong> the powerful.<br />

Insensitive State Practices<br />

Although there has been a considerable amount <strong>of</strong> progress in removing the militaristic influence<br />

on the political system in Turkey during the last decade, still some past habits continue to affect political<br />

leaders’ way <strong>of</strong> thinking. As a result, some state practices override or ignore individuals’ rights and even<br />

sometimes basic human rights on the grounds that the citizens are still implicitly expected to show a<br />

traditional obedience to the state and public/private corporations. Since political leaders themselves grow<br />

up in a culture <strong>of</strong> obedience, they do not take political decisions to promote bringing up individuals who<br />

seek their rights in every legal way.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se reasons mentioned so far are not the only causes for the public’s low awareness in question.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are others that are interrelated to the ones above, such as inadequate workings <strong>of</strong> nongovernmental<br />

organizations and the capital-dependant mass media. As we have mentioned before, nongovernmental<br />

organizations in Turkey do not function effectively due to their political and economic tie to<br />

capital owners and political powers. Similarly, the mass media institutions are not influential enough to<br />

improve the public’s economic awareness due to their dependence on the capital and governmental<br />

powers.<br />

Summary<br />

To summarize what we have been examining so far, Turkey’s economy has made a lot <strong>of</strong><br />

progresses during the last decade. But in spite <strong>of</strong> all those progresses, some chronic and obstinate<br />

problems <strong>of</strong> socio-economic issues such as unjust taxation, unfair distribution <strong>of</strong> income, underdeveloped<br />

rights <strong>of</strong> consumers and individuals against governmental institutions and private sector enterprises have<br />

neither been solved nor attempted to be solved. <strong>The</strong>re may be several ways <strong>of</strong> accounting for this<br />

situation, but the chief reason, as I see it and have focused on along the paper, is the public’s low<br />

economic awareness. As we examined it, one’s having low economic awareness means one’s lacking three<br />

kinds <strong>of</strong> socio-economic duties: conscious selective behavior, reactive attitude, and judicial action. Most <strong>of</strong><br />

the individuals in Turkey lack these social duties. <strong>The</strong>y do not select goods and services consciously; do<br />

not show enough reaction to unjust economic applications by the governmental institutions and private<br />

sector enterprises; and avoids taking legal actions when their economic rights are overridden. <strong>The</strong> chief<br />

consequences <strong>of</strong> this low awareness are threefold: Individuals living in Turkey are economically harmed<br />

by both public and private institutions. Both state and private sector corporations cannot develop in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> corporate governance due to their unwillingness to comply with internationally determined principles.<br />

And the overall economic development <strong>of</strong> Turkey in the long run is negatively affected. As to the reasons<br />

for the public’s low economic awareness, they vary in type. Negative elements <strong>of</strong> cultural factors, the state<br />

centric educational system, and structural defects <strong>of</strong> the political organization are the chief ones. Other<br />

reasons such as state practices insensitive to individual rights, inadequate workings <strong>of</strong> non-governmental<br />

organizations, and capital-dependant mass media are also influential and interrelated to those.<br />

Any effective measurements that must be taken to increase the economic awareness <strong>of</strong> the public<br />

lie in a careful analysis <strong>of</strong> these reasons. <strong>The</strong> strategy to follow seems simple: Carefully pin down all the<br />

reasons that constitute the ground for the individuals not to be economically conscious citizens. Analyze<br />

them meticulously. Take steps to eliminate either the reasons themselves or the negative effects <strong>of</strong> those<br />

on the individuals’ economic awareness. With the help <strong>of</strong> the human nature to seek his or her benefit<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

117


constantly, the steps taken in this way will surely reshape the whole point <strong>of</strong> view individuals possess in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> economic awareness. Over the long term, the new increased awareness will most likely yield<br />

more conscious individuals and consumers. Thus, the public will ultimately enjoy the social justice at least<br />

to a notable extent.<br />

References<br />

Açkgöz, enay (2009). “Türkiye’de Vergi Gelirleri, Vergi Yaps ve ktisadi Büyüme likisi: 1968-2006” [<strong>The</strong><br />

Tax Incomes, Structure <strong>of</strong> Taxation and <strong>The</strong>ir Relation to Economic Growth]. Ekonomik Yaklam 68:91-113.<br />

Jopper, D. and R. Bendelow (1993). “Consumerism: <strong>The</strong> Public’s Awareness <strong>of</strong> their Rights.” European Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Marketing 13 (3):113-25.<br />

Kanl, Murat (2007). Dolayl Vergiler ve Kayt D Ekonomi [Indirect Taxes and Unrecorded Economy]. Master’s<br />

thesis submitted to Marmara University, Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences, Department <strong>of</strong> Finance, stanbul.<br />

Koç, A. Fuat and M. Fatih Dal (2007). “Vergi Yükü Daglm ve Vergi Adaleti” [<strong>The</strong> Distribution <strong>of</strong> Tax<br />

Burden and Tax Justice]. Vergi Raporu Dergisi 88 (Jan):38.<br />

Otter, Dorron (1991). “Economic Awareness and Higher Education: An Outline <strong>of</strong> the Background to and<br />

Proposed Work <strong>of</strong> the Economic Awareness Programme at the University <strong>of</strong> Durham.” Education + Training 33 (6):9-<br />

13.<br />

Sin, Sevil (1996). “Türkiye’de Vergi Adaleti Açsndan Dolayl Vergiler.” Master’s <strong>The</strong>sis submitted to Uludag<br />

University, Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences.<br />

Susam, N. and N. Oktayer (2007), Türkiye Ekonomisinde Genel Bütçe Vergi Gelirleri içinde Dolaysz ve<br />

Dolayl Vergiler (1995-2005), [Direct and Indirect Taxes in General Budget Tax Incomes in Turkey’s Economy]. ktisadi<br />

ve dari Bilimler Dergisi 21 (2).<br />

Ylmaz, G. Akgül (2006). “Türkiye’de Gelir Vergisi Tarifesinde Meydana Gelen Deiikliklerin<br />

Vergilendirmede Adalet lkesi Bakmndan Deerlendirilmesi” [An Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the Changes in Income Tax Scale in<br />

Turkey in terms <strong>of</strong> Justice Principle in Taxation] Marmara Üniversitesi ..B.F. Dergisi 21 (1).<br />

T.C. Gelir daresi Bakanl [Revenue Administration Department <strong>of</strong> Turkey]. www.gib.gov.tr<br />

Türkiye statistik Kurumu [Turkish Statistical Institute]. www.tuik.gov.tr<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

118


Ranking Indian States on Social Welfare & Developmental Status in<br />

Globalization Era using a MCDM Approach<br />

Ayan Chattopadhyay<br />

IISWBM (Affiliated to Calcutta University) and Research Scholar, India<br />

Arpita Banerjee Chattopadhyay<br />

Budge-Budge College (Affiliated to Calcutta University), India<br />

Keywords<br />

MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making), TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal<br />

Solution), Shannon’s Weight, Social Welfare and Development.<br />

Abstract<br />

Social Welfare & Development have since ages been a matter <strong>of</strong> serious concern worldwide. While the<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> development has been interpreted and explained by many in different ways; however development <strong>of</strong> a<br />

state is now being evaluated more in terms <strong>of</strong> the welfare status <strong>of</strong> the population apart from just the financial or<br />

economic prosperity. Of the various determinants <strong>of</strong> societal welfare, the researchers have considered the most crucial<br />

ones that include Education, Basic Living Infrastructure, Economic Status, Awareness and Exposure, Child Crime,<br />

Crime Status, Women Status, Public Protection and Health & Medical Status. <strong>The</strong> ensuing research study aims to<br />

study the relative position <strong>of</strong> the Indian States on the basis <strong>of</strong> social welfare & development status and also rank the<br />

Indian States. Rank evaluation has been done using a quantitative approach that includes 80 variables that the<br />

researchers consider to be most important parameters influencing social welfare & development. <strong>The</strong> quantitative<br />

approach involves analysis and then arriving at a conclusion in a MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making)<br />

environment. Of the different MCDM approaches, TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal<br />

Solution) has been deployed and Secondary data forms the basis <strong>of</strong> this study.<br />

Introduction<br />

It would not be an exaggeration to depict the contemporary global scenario as predominantly<br />

capitalist. This is because even if some command economies are surviving they are more or less thriving<br />

on their linkages to the global capitalist market. India is no exception. In the year 1991 Indian National<br />

Congress came to power with a nominal majority and crumbling economy with serious balance <strong>of</strong><br />

payment crisis and acute dearth <strong>of</strong> foreign exchange. Urgent measures had to be taken to pull out the<br />

country from this dwindling economy. This crisis management effort ultimately culminated into the<br />

policy <strong>of</strong> liberalization – connecting with global economy. Series <strong>of</strong> reforms and readjustment measures<br />

were undertaken to comply with the requirements imposed by the Bretton Woods Institutions like IMF,<br />

WTO which included structural adjustments, deregulation, and initiation <strong>of</strong> privatization, tax reforms,<br />

and inflation controlling measures. <strong>The</strong> open market policy was undertaken as the panacea for all kind <strong>of</strong><br />

chronic economic crisis. This was the time when Indian Economy came closure to the Global market<br />

without much protective measures and leaving its import substituting industrialization model behind and<br />

adopting instead a more market friendly “trade led growth” strategy. Lots <strong>of</strong> attention is being paid on<br />

mechanism that could catch FDI as the age <strong>of</strong> impediments characterized by high tariff, and overvalued<br />

exchange rate, import control, industrial licensing is over. <strong>The</strong> prophets <strong>of</strong> the globalized economy<br />

assured that everything would be fine as long as competition is set free and there are few regularity fixes.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y emphatically opined that globalized market will automatically reward those who are efficient and<br />

eliminate the unworthy ones. But not all are so ecstatic about this glorified image <strong>of</strong> globalization. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

are constantly reminding us about the mixed record <strong>of</strong> globalization that meticulously camouflages the<br />

dark spots like lay<strong>of</strong>fs, drainage <strong>of</strong> indigenous social, economic and intellectual resources; shrinking <strong>of</strong><br />

public welfare initiatives, increasing asymmetric income distribution, inflating socio economic<br />

inequalities, perennial debt crisis, dependence on developed economies, lack <strong>of</strong> basic social services etc.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

119


<strong>The</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> globalization measures development mostly from the economic perspective. It<br />

takes into account only the output variables like GDP, the extent <strong>of</strong> foreign reserves, debt ratio, exports<br />

and productivity. In most <strong>of</strong> the literatures economic growth and progress is considered as coterminous<br />

with social development. So economic considerations are thought to be the most crucial and single prerequisite<br />

for development. Other indicators <strong>of</strong> social development are left relatively unnoticed. Though<br />

we must acknowledge that effect <strong>of</strong> globalization can be traced most prominently in economic sphere;<br />

however it must not be considered that other denominators <strong>of</strong> social development are mere consequences<br />

<strong>of</strong> this broader process. Rather, independent emphasis should be given to these denominators. It is<br />

precisely because from 1980 onwards scholars like Amartya Sen, Mahbub Ul Haq, Paul Streeten and<br />

others argued that income measurement cannot be a sole denominator <strong>of</strong> welfare or development <strong>of</strong> a<br />

society. In fact in UN Development program adopted this basic criticism <strong>of</strong> income measurement and<br />

presented a more comprehensive concept <strong>of</strong> human development. <strong>The</strong> report defined human<br />

development as a process <strong>of</strong> enlarging people’s choices. Now the attention has concentrated around three<br />

essential areas: the opportunity to lead a long and health life, the opportunity to acquire knowledge and<br />

the opportunity to have access to resources needed for a decent standard <strong>of</strong> living. Later some more<br />

denominators <strong>of</strong> development have been added that includes considerations like political freedom and<br />

human rights, human development for women as well as for men, environmental and other aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

sustainability and themes regarding citizen’s participation and opportunities to effect the political<br />

decision in society. <strong>The</strong> radical shift in the attitude towards development brings the notion <strong>of</strong> human<br />

welfare at the focal point.<br />

20 years have gone by since the process <strong>of</strong> globalization was initiated in India. Since 1991, India<br />

has witnessed a considerable FDI flow and a host <strong>of</strong> MNCs have started their operations in India. During<br />

the same time a host <strong>of</strong> developmental activities have also been initiated. It is worthwhile to mention that<br />

while some Indian states are enjoying the fruits <strong>of</strong> globalization, others are relatively slow in catching up<br />

with globalization. While the economic development in the Indian states have seen a growth in most<br />

cases, the overall social welfare and development status <strong>of</strong> the Indian states is still a matter <strong>of</strong> concern and<br />

debate; especially in states where impact <strong>of</strong> globalization is very high. <strong>The</strong> researchers felt that state wise<br />

progress needs monitoring not just against the economic or other individual parameters but amongst a<br />

host <strong>of</strong> parameters that influence <strong>of</strong> social welfare and development in Indian states i.e. the researchers<br />

aimed at studying the social welfare and development status <strong>of</strong> Indian states in a multi-criteria decision<br />

making environment and rank them.<br />

Review <strong>of</strong> Literature<br />

Pattanaik, Anjali and Badu Kanak, Manjari. (2003) made an independent study on Population<br />

explosion and media to elicit the information level and attitude <strong>of</strong> adolescents concerning population<br />

growth and role <strong>of</strong> media pertaining to population growth and policy. For the purpose <strong>of</strong> the study,<br />

samples from both urban and rural areas were selected from Ganjam district, Orissa. It was revealed that<br />

youngsters <strong>of</strong> the community were quite aware about the problem <strong>of</strong> population explosion and had<br />

positive attitude toward population policy. <strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> media in this respect was found very strong as all<br />

had been in touch with various types <strong>of</strong> media. Results proved that all the independent variables (family<br />

size, education <strong>of</strong> parents, and income <strong>of</strong> parents, mass media, and flow <strong>of</strong> information) had strongly<br />

influenced the awareness and attitude <strong>of</strong> the samples pertaining to population explosion. It was<br />

recommended that population education should be incorporated in the school and college curriculum.<br />

Palanithurai, G. (2004) made an independent study on the role <strong>of</strong> the community in achieving<br />

social development through the Panchayats. This study Panchayats and communities in family welfare<br />

was carried out in 10 Gram Panchayats <strong>of</strong> Dindigul district <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu with support <strong>of</strong> the Population<br />

Foundation <strong>of</strong> India. <strong>The</strong> objectives <strong>of</strong> the study were to improve the quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> people by ensuring<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> appropriate community process; to enable the community to set achievable development<br />

goals in the areas <strong>of</strong> school enrolment, literacy, immunization, pre- and post natal care, family welfare,<br />

nutrition, sanitation, child care; to assist communities to develop their agenda <strong>of</strong> development; and to give<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

120


the required pr<strong>of</strong>essional assistance to the community in its efforts to achieve these objectives. Study<br />

found that eligible children who did not go to school in the 10 Panchayats were in two digits in the year<br />

1999-2000, but it reduced to single digit in the third year. It was found that family planning methods were<br />

mostly used by women, and people were sensitized about the age <strong>of</strong> marriage for men and women; school<br />

going children were sensitized about good health practices such as trimming nails, washing hands before<br />

meals, and using toilets in schools; SHG women were sensitized about environmental sanitation that<br />

helped to keep the villages clean. <strong>The</strong> study also found that all Gram Panchayats had conducted health<br />

camps with the assistance <strong>of</strong> the Health Department. It was suggested that this kind <strong>of</strong> experience and<br />

exposure can be replicated in other Gram Panchayats in order to bring about social change and impact on<br />

social development issues.<br />

Debotosh Sinha (2005) in his work on Problem <strong>of</strong> elderly abuse: some reflections and implications<br />

for social work practice have perceived old age as a problem in India. In urban areas, older persons feel<br />

isolated and insecure. Modernization and industrialization have created a rupture in the traditional<br />

Indian society. <strong>The</strong> objectives <strong>of</strong> the study were to investigate the problem <strong>of</strong> elderly abuse; formulate an<br />

appropriate response; and see how social work interventions could be effective in dealing with such<br />

problems. <strong>The</strong> study highlights that about 80% <strong>of</strong> the elderly population in India lives in rural areas, and<br />

30% elderly are below the poverty line. When the elderly are isolated from society or from social<br />

networks, they are not permitted to come into the mainstream society. It was found that abuse was cyclic<br />

in nature. <strong>The</strong> present generation felt that older people were unproductive and treated them as a burden.<br />

<strong>The</strong> paper suggests that people and caregivers should be sensitized about the security <strong>of</strong> elderly persons;<br />

elderly individuals should not be left alone for long periods <strong>of</strong> time; family members should have close<br />

ties with their ageing relatives or friends; and communities should consider providing direct assistance to<br />

care giving families.<br />

Gujarat Institute <strong>of</strong> Development Research, GIDR (2005) made a study on Infrastructure &<br />

Growth in Regional Context: Indian States since the 1980s. <strong>The</strong> study tries to analyse the crucial role <strong>of</strong><br />

infrastructure in promoting regional development. <strong>The</strong> study exclusively considers certain important<br />

physical infrastructure, namely transportation, power, telecommunications, irrigation, drinking water and<br />

sanitation. <strong>The</strong> study highlights that states like Maharashtra, Gujarat, Haryana and Kerala have been in<br />

the forefront <strong>of</strong> Development promoting this crucial component - infrastructure. <strong>The</strong> states with least<br />

progress were Madhya Pradesh, Assam, Bihar and Orissa; and the level <strong>of</strong> development reflects the<br />

inability <strong>of</strong> these states to mobilize resources for financing state highways. <strong>The</strong> study also highlights that<br />

from 1980-2001, all the four selected infrastructure variables, namely density <strong>of</strong> national highways (NH),<br />

density <strong>of</strong> rail routes (Rail), irrigation intensity (Irr), per capita consumption <strong>of</strong> electricity (Ele), and<br />

teledensity (Tel) had grown in importance in impacting state per capita income.<br />

A study on Indian Social Development was done by Council for Social Development (2008). In<br />

India development projects in the last 60 years are estimated to have displaced roughly 60 million people,<br />

most <strong>of</strong> whom have never been properly resettled. <strong>The</strong> present study examined the social impact <strong>of</strong> a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> current industrial projects in India in the context <strong>of</strong> massive unresolved displacement problems<br />

suffered by the people. It was found that in Andhra Pradesh the proportion <strong>of</strong> landless rose from 10.9% to<br />

36.5% in 2001 and in Assam from 15.56% to 24.38% in 2006. <strong>The</strong> report also showed Social Development<br />

for rural and urban areas in 2005. 35 parameters were mapped in the study and additive rule for rank<br />

determination was used to arrive at the final result. Among the rural areas Kerala (72.57) had top rank<br />

during 2005 followed by Himachal Pradesh (62.90). <strong>The</strong> next high ranking states were Jammu and<br />

Kashmir (61.13), Tamil Nadu (58.27) and Punjab (57.41). Orissa (32.98), Rajasthan (31.87), Chhattisgarh<br />

(29.21), M.P. (27.84), U.P. (26.21), Jharkhand (18.83) and Bihar (18.29) had aggregate index value below the<br />

national average (33.97). In the case <strong>of</strong> urban areas, during 2005, Himachal Pradesh (72.90) was at the top<br />

followed by Kerala (67.49), Jammu and Kashmir (62.77), Punjab (56.36) and Tamil Nadu (53.26).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

121


Research conducted so far covers theoretical as well as empirical works covering both microscopic<br />

and macroscopic aspects <strong>of</strong> the subject. State ranking on social development have been found out at 2005<br />

base with limited parameters being considered. Also, the study assumes that in a multi criteria decision<br />

making environment, all selected parameters have equal weightage which in real life scenario is not<br />

feasible. In other words, the relative social welfare and developmental status in the Indian States has been<br />

found to be missing especially in a multi – criteria environment where parameters have varying weights<br />

or relative importance in influencing social welfare & development and the same has been identified as<br />

the gap by the researchers.<br />

Objective<br />

To rank and compare the relative position <strong>of</strong> Indian States basis their social welfare and<br />

development status using TOPSIS, a Multi Criteria Decision Making approach.<br />

Methodology<br />

<strong>The</strong> normal approach to compare the relative positions (here Indian States) is to find out the<br />

relative ranks. Ranking can be done using additive rule which includes evaluating each state against<br />

individual parameters considered and then selecting the best values in order. State ranks against<br />

individual parameters are then added to arrive at the total rank score. <strong>The</strong> lower the total rank score, the<br />

higher is the overall ranking for that state. This method, being a popular has a major limitation in<br />

considering equal weightage <strong>of</strong> all parameters. In reality all parameters cannot have equal importance and<br />

result obtained from this method cannot be considered as the best solution. Thus, this method needs<br />

modification by incorporation <strong>of</strong> the relative weight <strong>of</strong> the parameters in the overall rank determination<br />

when studied amidst a lot <strong>of</strong> parameters i.e. in a multi criteria decision making environment. <strong>The</strong> MCDM<br />

(Multi Criteria Decision Making) Approach is considered as a better alternative in assessing the ranking <strong>of</strong><br />

Indian States in terms <strong>of</strong> assessing the social welfare and developmental status. Within the MCDM<br />

approach, data <strong>of</strong> input parameters are first classified as positive or negative. A parameter is considered<br />

as positive if increase in its value enhances or improves the welfare and development. Hence, negative<br />

parameters are those which suppress such scope. For example, Literacy Rate is considered as positive<br />

while Drop outs from School as negative. <strong>The</strong> absolute values <strong>of</strong> the parameters are then subjected to<br />

statistical normalization to annul the effect <strong>of</strong> disparate units followed by weight determination using<br />

Shannon’s method before finally applying the MCDM approach for rank determination. Within this<br />

study, 9 input parameters (Key Consideration Set) have been considered and each input parameter is<br />

indicated by a set <strong>of</strong> variables called indicator variables. A total <strong>of</strong> 80 indicator variables have been chosen<br />

which according to the researchers represent as the strongest indicators <strong>of</strong> social welfare and development.<br />

<strong>The</strong> input parameters include Education, Basic Living Infrastructure, Economic Status, Awareness and<br />

Exposure, Child Crime, Crime Status, Women Status, Public Protection and Health & Medical Status.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

122


<strong>The</strong> 80 indicator variables chosen are shown in Exhibit 1.<br />

Key Consideration<br />

Set for Social<br />

Development<br />

Indicator Variables<br />

Key Consideration<br />

Set for Social<br />

Development<br />

Indicator Variables<br />

Education<br />

Basic Living Infra<br />

Economic Status<br />

Awareness &<br />

Exposure<br />

Child<br />

Crime<br />

1 Literacy Rate (%) 41 % <strong>of</strong> Total Cognizable Crimes to All India Cognizable Crimes<br />

2 Universities (incl. deemed & Inst. Of National Importance) 42 Rate <strong>of</strong> Total Cognizable Crimes (per '000)<br />

3 Research Institutions 43 Rate <strong>of</strong> Murder (per '000)<br />

4 Arts, Science & Commerce Colleges 44 Rate <strong>of</strong> Rape (per '000)<br />

5 Engg., Tech. & Arch. Colleges 45 Rate <strong>of</strong> Kidnapping & Abduction (per '000)<br />

6 Medical Colleges (Allo, Ayur, Homeo, Nursing, Pharma) 46 Rate <strong>of</strong> Kidnapping & Abduction <strong>of</strong> Women & Girls (per '000)<br />

7 Teacher Training Colleges 47 Rate <strong>of</strong> Dacoity (per '000)<br />

8 Teacher Training Schools 48 Rate <strong>of</strong> Robbery (per '000)<br />

9 Other Colleges (Law, MBA, MCA/ IT, Agri.) 49 Incidence <strong>of</strong> Highway Robbery<br />

10 Polytech. Inst. 50 Rate <strong>of</strong> Burglary (per '000)<br />

11 Primary Schools 51 Rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong>ft (per '000)<br />

12 High Schools 52 Rate <strong>of</strong> Riot (per '000)<br />

13 Pupil Teacher Ratio (Primary School) 53 Incidence <strong>of</strong> Cyber Crime<br />

14 Pupil Teacher Ratio (High School) 54 Total Crimes in Railways<br />

15 Dropout Rates in Primary School (I - V) 55 Rate <strong>of</strong> Dowry Deaths (per '000)<br />

16 Dropout Rates in High School (VIII - X) 56 Rate <strong>of</strong> Molestation (per '000)<br />

17 % <strong>of</strong> Trained Teachers in High Schools 57 Rate <strong>of</strong> Harassment (per '000)<br />

18 Per Capita Expenditure on Education & Training 58 Rate <strong>of</strong> Cruelty by Husband & Relatives (per '000)<br />

19 % <strong>of</strong> Expenditure on Education & Training 59 Female to 1000 Males<br />

20 Households having Safe Drinking Water facility 60 Contribution <strong>of</strong> Crime Rate against Women to All India Total<br />

21 % <strong>of</strong> Households having Electricity 61 Mean Age at Effective Marriage <strong>of</strong> Females (yrs)<br />

22 % <strong>of</strong> Households having bathroom facility at home 62 Media Exposure - Female %<br />

23 House holds with Permanent Structure 63 % <strong>of</strong> Cases Pending for Investigation (under IPC) to All India Total cases<br />

24 Households with Semi Permanent Structure 64 Strength <strong>of</strong> Civil Police per 1000 population<br />

25 Consumption <strong>of</strong> Energy by Ultimate Consumers (GWH) 65 Strength <strong>of</strong> Armed Police per 1000 population<br />

26 Employment Status in Organized Sector ('000) 66 Institutional Births (%)<br />

27 Total No. <strong>of</strong> Workers 67 Anemia Amongst Pregnant Women (%)<br />

28 Total Number <strong>of</strong> Non - Workers 68 Anemia Amongst Adolescent Girls (%)<br />

29 Per Capita Income 69 % <strong>of</strong> Children as Under Nourished<br />

30 Per Capita Net SDP 70 % <strong>of</strong> Children having Iron Deficiency<br />

31 Population below Poverty Line (%) 71 Doctors (per 1 lac population)<br />

32 % <strong>of</strong> Population participated in last lok sabha 72 Hospitals (per 1 lac population)<br />

33 Media Exposure 73 Vaccination Coverage<br />

34 TV Ownership 74 Low BMI Males (%)<br />

35 HIV awareness (males%) 75 Low BMI Females (%)<br />

36 HIV awareness (females%) 76 Infant Mortality Rates (per 1000 live births)<br />

37 Contribution <strong>of</strong> Crime Rate against Children to All India Total 77 Primary Health Centers (per 1 lac population)<br />

38 Rate <strong>of</strong> Narcotic drug & Psychotropic substance cases 78 Nurses (per 1 lac population)<br />

39 Juvenile Delinquency (Incedence <strong>of</strong> different cases in all) 79 Life Expectancy at Birth<br />

40 % <strong>of</strong> Juvenile Delinquency Cases Pending to All India Total cases 80 Health Exp. as a % <strong>of</strong> Total Expenditure<br />

Crime Status<br />

Women Ststus<br />

Public<br />

Protection<br />

Health & Medical Status<br />

Exhibit - 1<br />

<strong>The</strong> MCDM Approach<br />

In a usual MCDM environment, there are a number <strong>of</strong> alternatives to be assessed on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

their preference order. <strong>The</strong>re are many MCDM techniques available (Hwant and YOON, 1981, Zeleny<br />

1983 and Yoon and Hwang 1995) among which the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal<br />

solution (TOPSIS) proposed by Yoon (1980) and Hwang and Yoon (1981) is a very effective and realistic<br />

one. <strong>The</strong> basic principle employed by TOPSIS is that the best alternative should have the shortest distance<br />

from the ideal alternative, which is both intuitive and important. <strong>The</strong> TOPSIS method is presented below<br />

<strong>The</strong> MCDM environment: Suppose there are all together K alternatives to be assessed and the<br />

best alternative is to be selected. Let the alternatives be denoted by S 1, ………S K. there are also N criteria<br />

identified to assess the alternatives, which are denoted by C 1, ….C N. <strong>The</strong> k-th alternative’s value on the n-<br />

th criteria is obtained as x kn, and the same is written as:<br />

S k = (x k1, ……., x kN), 1,……,K, and C n = (x 1n, ……, x kn), n = 1, ……,N.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ideal solution: It is both intuitive and feasible to compare each alternative with an “ideal<br />

alternative” to solve the assessment or decision making problem. TOPSIS adopts an intuitive approach to<br />

the construction <strong>of</strong> the best and worst alternative and calls them the ideal and the negative-ideal<br />

alternatives or solutions. <strong>The</strong> ideal alternative S +, is formed by taking all the best values attained on each<br />

criterion by some alternatives, and can be explicitly denoted by:<br />

S + = (x +1, ….., x +N) = [min {x k1}, …., min {x kM}, max {x km + 1},……., max {x kN}].<br />

and the negative-ideal alternative S -, comprises <strong>of</strong> all the worst criterion values attained by some<br />

alternatives, and is denoted by<br />

S - = (x -1, ….., x -N) = [max {x k1}, …., max {x kM}, min {x km + 1},……., min {x kN}].<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

123


<strong>The</strong> TOPSIS Procedure: With the above notation and explanation, the<br />

TOPSIS procedure for assessing the ranking can be described as follows:<br />

Firstly we normalize the n-th criterion vector C n into TC n:<br />

TC C || C || ( x / || C ||,....., x / || C ||) ( t ,......, t ), n 1,....,<br />

,<br />

where ||C n|| =<br />

n<br />

n<br />

/<br />

n 1n<br />

n<br />

kn n 1n<br />

kn<br />

N<br />

K<br />

2<br />

( x kn<br />

) is the Euclidean length or norm <strong>of</strong> C n, so the new criterion vectors have the<br />

k 1<br />

same unit length and are thus unit free and directly comparable. Under the new criterion values, the k-th<br />

alternative, S k, and the ideal and negative ideal solutions S + and S - , are transformed to TS k, TS + and TS -,<br />

respectively:<br />

TS k = (t k1,…..,t kN) = (x k1/||C 1,…., x kN/||C 1||), k=1,….,K,<br />

TS += (t +1,….., t +N) = (x +1/||C 1||,…..,x +N /||C N||,<br />

TS - = (t -1,….., t - N) = (x -1/||C 1||,…..,x – N /||C N||,<br />

<br />

from TS + are defined:<br />

d(<br />

S , S<br />

k<br />

Next the distances <strong>of</strong> S k and x + as the weighted Euclidean distance <strong>of</strong> TS k<br />

<br />

) ||<br />

w ( TS<br />

k<br />

TS<br />

<br />

) || <br />

N<br />

<br />

n1<br />

[ W ( t<br />

n<br />

kn<br />

t<br />

1]<br />

2<br />

=<br />

N<br />

= <br />

n1<br />

[ W ( x<br />

n<br />

kn<br />

x<br />

n<br />

/ || C<br />

N<br />

[<br />

2<br />

2<br />

n<br />

( xkn<br />

min{ x<br />

jn})<br />

|| Cn<br />

||] [ Wn<br />

( xkn<br />

max{ x<br />

jn})/<br />

|| Cn<br />

||]<br />

j<br />

j<br />

nM<br />

1<br />

k = 1,…..,K,<br />

W <br />

where “ ” is vector product operator and w is an N-dimensional weight vector whose elements represent<br />

the relative importance <strong>of</strong> the N criteria. Similarly, the distance <strong>of</strong> S k from S - is defined as the weighted<br />

Euclidean distance <strong>of</strong> TS k from TS - and the same is represented as:<br />

d(<br />

S , S ) ||<br />

w<br />

( TS<br />

k<br />

<br />

k<br />

TS<br />

<br />

) || <br />

N<br />

<br />

n1<br />

[ W ( t<br />

n<br />

kn<br />

t<br />

]<br />

n<br />

2<br />

n<br />

2<br />

||<br />

N<br />

<br />

n1<br />

[ W ( x<br />

n<br />

kn<br />

x<br />

n<br />

/ || C<br />

n<br />

||)<br />

2<br />

M<br />

= <br />

2<br />

[ Wn<br />

( xkn<br />

max{ x<br />

jn})<br />

|| Cn<br />

||] <br />

n1<br />

k = 1,……,K,<br />

j<br />

N<br />

nM<br />

1<br />

[ W ( x<br />

n<br />

kn<br />

min{ x<br />

j<br />

jn<br />

}/ || C<br />

n<br />

||]<br />

2<br />

<br />

Finally the K alternatives are ranked according to the preference order by<br />

their relative closeness to the ideal alternative S + which for the k-th alternative is defined as:<br />

r(S k, S +) = d(S k, S +)/[d(S k, S +) + d(S k, S -)], k = 1,…..,K<br />

<strong>The</strong> assessment criterion <strong>of</strong> TOPSIS is that the smaller the value <strong>of</strong> r(S k, S +) which ranges between 0<br />

and 1, the more preferred is the alternative S k.<br />

Choice <strong>of</strong> weights: A reasonably good approach to obtain internal importance weights is to use the<br />

entropy concept. It is a criterion for the amount <strong>of</strong> information (or uncertainty) represented by a discrete<br />

probability distribution, p 1, …..p k and this measure <strong>of</strong> information was given by Shannon and Weaver<br />

k<br />

(1947) as E( p1 ,...., pk<br />

) k<br />

pk1n(<br />

pk)<br />

where k=1/1n(K) is a positive constant which guarantees<br />

k1<br />

that 0 E(p 1,……,p k) 1. it is noted that the larger the E(p 1,……,p k) value, the smaller the variations<br />

among the p k’s and that 0 entropy means maximum information and 1 minimum information. For the n-<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

124


th criterion vector C n in an MCDM environment, let X n = x 1n + …+ x Kn be the total value <strong>of</strong> the criterion. If<br />

we view the normalized values p kn = x kn / X n for k = 1, ….,K as the “probability distribution” <strong>of</strong> C n on the<br />

K alternatives, the entropy <strong>of</strong> C n may be defined as:<br />

K<br />

K<br />

E(C n) = - ø k pk1n(<br />

pk<br />

) k(<br />

xkn<br />

/ X<br />

n<br />

)1b<br />

( xkn<br />

/ X<br />

n<br />

), n 1,...... N,<br />

and define the weights as<br />

k1 k1<br />

w<br />

n<br />

N<br />

<br />

( 1<br />

E(<br />

C )) / (1 E(<br />

C )), n 1,...., N .<br />

n<br />

j1<br />

Findings & Analysis<br />

<strong>The</strong> values <strong>of</strong> 80 indicator variables have been initially plotted for each state as shown in Exhibits<br />

2, 3, 4 & 5. Since these variables have varying units it is essential to annul the effect <strong>of</strong> varying units. To<br />

annul the effect <strong>of</strong> these varying units, the next step involved is the Statistical Normalization. Normalized<br />

values <strong>of</strong> all variables for the states are shown in Appendix. Since in reality all parameters cannot have<br />

equal weights, relative weight <strong>of</strong> indicator variables is calculated using Shannon’s Method as shown in<br />

Exhibit 6. <strong>The</strong> distance from Normalized Ideal and Normalized Negative Ideal is next calculated (as<br />

shown in Appendix) before finally calculating the rank <strong>of</strong> the Indian States.<br />

j<br />

Literacy<br />

Rate (%)<br />

Universities<br />

(incl. deemed<br />

& Inst. Of<br />

National<br />

Importance)<br />

Research<br />

Institutio<br />

ns<br />

Arts, Science &<br />

Commerce<br />

Colleges<br />

Engg.,<br />

Tech. &<br />

Arch.<br />

Colleges<br />

Medical<br />

Colleges<br />

(Allo,<br />

Ayur,<br />

Homeo,<br />

Teacher<br />

Training<br />

Colleges<br />

Teacher<br />

Training<br />

Schools<br />

Other<br />

Colleges<br />

Polytech. Primary<br />

(Law,<br />

Inst. Schools<br />

MBA,<br />

MCA/ IT,<br />

High<br />

Schools<br />

Pupil<br />

Teacher<br />

Ratio<br />

(Primary<br />

School)<br />

Pupil<br />

Teacher<br />

Ratio<br />

(High<br />

School)<br />

Dropout<br />

Rates in<br />

Primary<br />

School (I -<br />

V)<br />

Dropout<br />

Rates in<br />

High<br />

School<br />

(VIII - X)<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Trained<br />

Teachers<br />

in High<br />

Schools<br />

Per Capita<br />

Expenditu<br />

re on<br />

Education<br />

&<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Expenditur<br />

e on<br />

Education<br />

& Training<br />

C 1 C 2 C 3 C 4 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 C 10 C 11 C 12 C 13 C 14 C 15 C 16 C 17 C 18 C 19 C 20<br />

Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive Negative Negative Negative Negative Positive Positive Positive Negative<br />

ANDHRA PRADESH 68 25 5 1,340 261 53 92 25 93 140 61,680 14,342 25 33 32 64 95 606 14 15.77<br />

ARUNACHAL PRADESH 67 1 3 10 1 1 2 0 1 1 1,371 136 23 31 47 71 66 1,540 11 17.6<br />

ASSAM 73 16 0 317 3 7 40 1 21 8 30,068 4,629 15 24 50 75 29 1,109 20 19.7<br />

BIHAR 64 19 11 743 7 23 15 70 63 13 39,347 2,944 19 28 52 83 96 488 25 41.4<br />

CHATTISH GARH 71 5 0 213 2 2 1 13 32 10 33,595 1,231 32 25 10 64 62 796 22 40.9<br />

DELHI 74 17 1 63 16 15 10 21 56 25 2,463 504 61 30 0 47 100 1,132 28 14.7<br />

GOA 87 1 0 23 4 7 2 1 7 5 1,003 364 13 21 2 41 88 2,619 18 13.8<br />

GUJRAT 79 20 17 507 44 57 115 214 177 52 16,385 5,260 40 35 35 59 99 856 19 16.8<br />

HARYANA 77 9 0 166 69 8 36 37 35 33 11,800 3,382 26 27 5 33 97 894 17 14<br />

HIMACHAL PRADESH 84 7 2 89 3 7 23 12 24 6 11,178 1,373 29 20 8 0 98 1,739 20 10<br />

JAMMU & K 69 9 0 50 4 6 127 14 34 12 12,049 965 19 17 37 52 66 1,000 13 5.4<br />

JHARKHAND 68 8 1 117 5 8 9 27 8 10 16,572 1,068 24 20 52 78 100 620 21 40.3<br />

KARNATAKA 76 27 1 930 120 172 68 133 214 179 26,645 9,462 14 47 16 59 100 880 19 25<br />

KERALA 94 9 1 186 66 40 21 184 82 56 6,827 3,093 15 15 0 7 99 1,210 21 15<br />

MADHYA PRADESH 71 21 0 760 60 28 21 25 209 44 96,737 4,246 45 16 10 65 79 577 19 38.3<br />

MAHARASTRA 83 42 54 1,208 177 116 157 303 128 163 41,669 14,391 26 42 7 54 99 1,161 23 30.7<br />

MANIPUR 80 2 0 58 1 1 3 1 1 1 2,552 588 9 23 31 43 40 1,149 19 17.3<br />

MEGHALAYA 76 1 0 54 0 0 2 7 0 1 5,851 631 9 16 50 79 36 1,243 19 18.5<br />

MIZORAM 92 1 0 26 0 0 2 2 1 2 1,481 445 24 12 50 67 29 2,569 16 12.6<br />

NAGALAND 80 1 0 37 0 0 1 1 18 3 1,520 336 13 35 43 67 27 1,282 15 19<br />

ORISSA 74 15 0 700 37 30 13 65 102 17 45,700 7,141 17 31 39 64 100 562 16 46.4<br />

PUNJAB 77 10 0 212 27 49 24 26 51 19 13,352 2,283 24 29 24 44 99 952 13 8.4<br />

RAJASTAN 67 25 5 611 39 24 54 46 113 17 55,942 6,756 29 24 57 74 94 707 21 22.1<br />

SIKKIM 82 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 684 111 43 18 49 82 51 2,928 9 20.1<br />

TAMIL NADU 80 41 1 445 222 97 43 82 184 202 33,470 5,004 16 33 1 55 100 859 19 22.5<br />

TRIPURA 88 1 0 14 1 1 1 2 5 1 1,776 409 24 25 43 73 39 1,699 26 18.9<br />

UTTAR PRADESH 70 40 10 1,009 69 34 121 70 702 81 129,976 5,205 48 45 12 44 97 503 19 32.8<br />

UTTARANCHAL 80 10 11 86 2 1 1 9 28 18 14,663 773 38 29 11 43 100 1,418 21 39.6<br />

WEST BENGAL 77 26 11 374 54 19 66 58 33 40 50,397 4,399 30 50 44 78 85 663 19 24.7<br />

Populatio<br />

n below<br />

Poverty<br />

Line (%)<br />

Exhibit - 2<br />

Househol<br />

ds having<br />

Safe<br />

Drinking<br />

Water<br />

facility<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Househol<br />

ds having<br />

Electricity<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Househol<br />

ds having<br />

bathroom<br />

facility at<br />

home<br />

House<br />

holds<br />

with<br />

Permane<br />

nt<br />

Structure<br />

Househol<br />

ds with<br />

Semi<br />

Permane<br />

nt<br />

Structure<br />

Consumpt<br />

ion <strong>of</strong><br />

Energy by<br />

Ultimate<br />

Consumer<br />

s (GWH)<br />

Employm<br />

ent Status<br />

in<br />

Organized<br />

Sector<br />

('000)<br />

Total No. <strong>of</strong><br />

Workers<br />

Total Number<br />

<strong>of</strong> Non -<br />

Workers<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Population<br />

participated<br />

in last lok<br />

sabha<br />

Media<br />

Exposure<br />

TV<br />

Ownership<br />

HIV<br />

awarenes<br />

s<br />

(males%)<br />

HIV<br />

awarenes<br />

s<br />

(females<br />

%)<br />

% <strong>of</strong> Total<br />

Cognizabl<br />

e Crimes<br />

to All<br />

India<br />

Cognizabl<br />

e Crimes<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Total<br />

Cognizabl<br />

e Crimes<br />

(per '000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Murder<br />

(per '000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Rape (per<br />

'000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Kidnappin<br />

g &<br />

Abductio<br />

n (per<br />

'000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Kidnappin<br />

g &<br />

Abductio<br />

n <strong>of</strong><br />

Women &<br />

Girls (per<br />

'000)<br />

C 21 C 22 C 23 C 24 C 25 C 26 C 27 C 28 C 29 C 30 C 31 C 32 C 33 C 34 C 35 C 36 C 37 C 38 C 39 C 40<br />

Positive Positive Positive Positive Negative Positive Positive Positive Negative Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative<br />

ANDHRA PRADESH 80.1 67.17 19.91 9220878 3589493 39,829 2027.9 34,893,859 41,316,148 49.45 86.0 52.6 93 74 8.5 216.6 2.9 1.4 2.4 1.8<br />

ARUNACHAL PRADESH 77.5 54.69 11.24 43363 38025 161 40.6 482,902 615,066 36.12 68.0 41.3 75 66 0.1 193.6 4.8 4.8 5.1 2.3<br />

ASSAM 58.5 24.9 7.21 971530 1543491 2,203 1382 9,538,591 17,116,937 38.95 69.0 34.3 75 53 2.6 181.2 4.3 5.3 8.9 6.9<br />

BIHAR 86.6 10.25 4.81 5695671 3570471 4,022 495.1 27,974,606 55,023,903 57.77 56.0 18.2 70 35 5.8 128.4 3.3 1 3.4 2.1<br />

CHATTISH GARH 70.5 53.1 6.19 1053912 2988548 8,788 339 9,679,871 11,153,932 25.78 60.0 33.4 67 41 2.4 212.6 4.5 4 1.2 0.9<br />

DELHI 97.2 92.86 35.51 2341874 123154 13,423 831.2 4,545,234 9,305,273 34.32 84.9 68.3 80 57 2.4 282.6 3.1 2.6 14.3 9.3<br />

GOA 70.1 93.57 33.26 195040 78620 2,141 126.9 522,855 824,813 38.7 92.5 77.5 92 83 0.1 177.7 3.1 2.8 2.0 1.3<br />

GUJRAT 84.1 80.4 25.28 6300314 2848727 37,092 1677.4 21,255,521 29,415,496 28.94 77.5 53 80 49 5.4 200.5 1.8 0.8 2.3 2<br />

HARYANA 86.1 82.89 25.79 2322039 997122 15,426 639.9 8,377,466 12,767,098 11.24 72.5 50.3 87 60 2.7 231.9 3.9 2.5 3.8 2.7<br />

HIMACHAL PRADESH 88.6 94.81 17.70 800664 404334 3,569 313.3 2,992,461 3,085,439 65 83.0 63.4 92 79 0.6 200.9 1.9 2.8 2.3 1.8<br />

JAMMU & K 65.2 80.66 22.83 853408 498983 4,189 226.8 3,753,815 6,389,885 38.03 84.5 62.9 88 61 1 170.2 1.8 1.8 6.8 6.4<br />

JHARKHAND 42.6 34.3 7.55 1526946 2804608 9,348 788.4 10,109,030 16,836,799 35.72 48.0 28.1 53 29 1.8 122.6 5.4 2.4 2.7 1.7<br />

KARNATAKA 84.6 78.55 29.44 5613007 3645185 25,702 1911.6 23,534,791 29,315,771 40.15 83.5 53.6 85 66 6.3 230.3 2.9 0.9 1.5 0.7<br />

KERALA 23.4 70.24 31.06 4493814 1424375 10,190 1128.9 10,283,887 21,557,487 47.9 93.5 67.7 99 95 5.6 341.5 1 1.6 0.7 0.5<br />

MADHYA PRADESH 68.4 69.98 12.14 4536975 6088468 19,371 1054.8 25,793,519 34,554,504 76.36 60.5 35 68 45 9.8 293 3.4 4.2 1.5 1.2<br />

MAHARASTRA 79.8 77.49 30.56 11021426 6552768 58,732 2704.5 41,173,351 55,705,276 32.89 82.0 58.8 87 82 9.4 183.6 2.4 1.4 1.2 0.9<br />

MANIPUR 37 60.04 5.22 33491 219548 188 79.1 945,213 1,221,575 67.57 92.5 47.8 99 99 0.1 106.8 4.9 1.2 6 3.6<br />

MEGHALAYA 39 42.74 16.83 93389 157122 725 68.9 970,146 1,348,676 27.74 64.0 41.4 63 57 0.1 95 5 4.3 2.2 1<br />

MIZORAM 36 69.63 25.63 85288 41171 135 43.6 467,159 421,414 29.24 89.0 48.3 96 94 0.1 205.5 3.1 8.3 0.9 0<br />

NAGALAND 46.5 63.6 18.71 54089 167413 145 64.7 847,796 1,142,240 43.68 68.5 37.9 91 81 0 47.6 2.1 1 2.3 0.4<br />

ORISSA 64.2 26.91 5.26 2170796 1968196 8,104 765.5 14,276,488 22,528,172 17.1 67.5 28.9 73 62 2.6 137.9 3.1 2.5 2.3 2<br />

PUNJAB 97.6 91.91 34.77 3672451 378145 24,261 832.7 9,127,474 15,231,525 42.71 87.0 78.2 92 70 1.7 131.7 3.2 1.9 2.6 1.9<br />

RAJASTAN 68.2 54.69 16.19 6066447 1955190 18,014 1200.2 23,766,655 32,740,533 26.09 60.0 35.6 52 37 7.9 252.2 2.1 2.3 4.3 3.5<br />

SIKKIM 70.7 77.76 18.18 39493 48418 209 44.7 263,043 277,808 45.5 75.0 55.8 89 75 0 110.8 3.1 3 1 1<br />

TAMIL NADU 85.6 78.18 19.94 8295106 2572029 44,516 2271.4 27,878,282 34,527,397 41.83 91.0 53.1 98 94 8.2 260.3 2.1 0.9 2 1.7<br />

TRIPURA 52.5 41.84 5.61 65726 303523 371 143.3 1,159,561 2,039,642 47.66 78.0 46.7 89 73 0.3 153.8 3.7 5.3 3.4 2.6<br />

UTTAR PRADESH 87.8 31.9 14.36 13752000 6600491 30,374 2086 53,983,824 112,214,097 27.13 64.0 34 74 40 8.1 88.4 2.3 0.9 3.1 2.6<br />

UTTARANCHAL 86.7 60.32 19.38 1369656 104615 3,497 241.5 3,134,036 5,355,313 31.23 78.0 61 90 79 0.4 90.9 2 1.1 2.8 2.5<br />

WEST BENGAL 88.5 37.45 11.81 6353785 5855648 20,957 1889.2 29,481,690 50,694,507 46.29 69.0 37 74 50 5.3 126.7 2.3 2.6 3.1 2.5<br />

Exhibit - 3<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

125


Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Dacoity<br />

(per '000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Robbery<br />

(per '000)<br />

Incidence<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

Highway<br />

Robbery<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Burglary<br />

(per '000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong>ft (per<br />

'000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Riot (per<br />

'000)<br />

Incidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> Cyber<br />

Crime<br />

Total<br />

Crimes in<br />

Railways<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Dowry<br />

Deaths<br />

(per '000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Molestati<br />

on (per<br />

'000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Harassme<br />

nt (per<br />

'000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Cruelty by<br />

Husband<br />

&<br />

Relatives<br />

(per '000)<br />

C 41 C 42 C 43 C 44 C 45 C 46 C 47 C 48 C 49 C 50 C 51 C 52 C 53 C 54 C 55 C 56 C 57 C 58 C 59 C 60<br />

Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Positive Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative<br />

ANDHRA PRADESH 0.1 0.7 115 9.3 29.6 2.7 30 993 0.7 6.2 4.2 13.6 978 12.5 18.7 7.1 0.4 1208 5.09 7.3<br />

ARUNACHAL PRADESH 1.6 4.5 5 16.5 31.2 4.3 1 0 0 4.8 0.5 1.1 901 0.1 20.7 0.1 2.3 112 0.47 0.1<br />

ASSAM 0.8 2.2 60 10.3 21 5.9 2 272 0.6 4.4 0 14.4 932 4.8 21.7 0.2 0.6 546 2.3 8.9<br />

BIHAR 0.7 1.7 827 3.7 15.9 8.9 0 2076 1.4 0.8 0 2.6 921 4.3 19 4.2 0.3 935 3.94 12.4<br />

CHATTISH GARH 0.6 2.3 115 16.5 24 4 4 291 0.5 6.6 0.6 3.7 990 2 19.9 5.5 1.5 2860 12.06 0.6<br />

DELHI 0.2 2.9 10.0 9.7 122.2 0.3 5 926 0.8 3.1 0.7 7.2 821 2.1 22 11.7 1.7 452 1.91 5.9<br />

GOA 0.2 1.8 3.0 17.4 50.7 0.3 8 0 0.2 2.2 0.6 1.2 960 0.1 19.8 0.4 2.1 60 0.25 0.4<br />

GUJRAT 0.4 2.5 60 7.8 34.2 2.7 20 1259 0 1.3 0.2 9.6 921 3.9 20.3 4 0.1 1428 6.02 2.4<br />

HARYANA 0.6 2.8 113 16.8 53.3 4.8 0 1139 1.2 1.9 2.5 10.8 861 2.6 20.1 1.5 3.6 959 4.04 1.8<br />

HIMACHAL PRADESH 0.1 0.3 1 11.8 12.4 8.9 6 4 0 4.8 0.6 4.3 970 0.5 22 0.9 7.1 127 0.54 0.3<br />

JAMMU & K 0 0.5 1 12.1 20.4 11.4 0 27 0.1 7.5 2.9 1.5 900 1.3 23.2 0.1 2.3 8 0.03 1.1<br />

JHARKHAND 1.3 2.6 360 4.6 25.3 7.6 0 546 1 0.9 0.3 2.3 941 1.5 19.2 0.2 0.4 686 2.89 4.3<br />

KARNATAKA 0.5 3.1 92 11.4 35.4 10.8 97 488 0.5 3.8 0.1 5.5 964 3.9 19.8 1.3 0.4 227 0.96 7.9<br />

KERALA 0.3 2.4 30 10.3 16.1 23.3 64 214 0.1 7.3 1.1 11.6 1,058 3.9 22.9 2.4 1.9 441 1.86 3.1<br />

MADHYA PRADESH 0.2 3.2 300 15 32.8 3.4 16 2006 1.2 8.9 1 5.6 920 7.8 20.5 19.2 1.1 4535 19.12 1.5<br />

MAHARASTRA 0.7 3 314 14.6 46.9 7.4 53 3389 0.3 2.9 1 7.1 922 7.4 20.1 12 1.3 4623 19.49 12.5<br />

MANIPUR 0 0.1 0 2.5 14.8 1.8 1 0 39 2 0 0.9 978 0.1 20.4 0.3 0.6 0 0 1.4<br />

MEGHALAYA 2.5 2.6 29 5.7 21.1 0.7 0 0 0 2.8 0 0.9 975 0.1 19.9 0.3 0.7 82 0.35 0.8<br />

MIZORAM 0.2 0.4 3 38.3 76.4 0.1 0 0 0 6.1 0.1 0.4 938 0.1 21 0.1 9.7 19 0.08 0<br />

NAGALAND 0.4 4.1 34 3.7 15.6 0.2 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 909 0 19.9 0 4.3 11 0.05 0.1<br />

ORISSA 0.9 3.7 420 7.3 17.6 4.2 2 624 0.9 6.7 0.5 5.1 972 4 20.5 0.8 0.2 381 1.61 4.5<br />

PUNJAB 0.1 0.6 25 9.3 20.8 0 28 306 0.5 1.2 0.1 3.9 874 1.3 21.5 3 16.4 135 0.57 2.5<br />

RAJASTAN 0.1 1.3 77 8 33.5 1.7 27 972 0.7 3.8 0 15.7 922 8.5 19.9 5.8 1.6 1819 7.67 0.9<br />

SIKKIM 0 0.7 0 15.4 10.3 6.5 0 0 0 1.7 0 1 875 0 21 0.2 0.7 56 0.24 0.1<br />

TAMIL NADU 0.1 1.7 84 6.3 23.4 3.6 18 450 0.3 1.9 0.7 2.2 986 3 21.8 2.6 2.6 1362 5.74 7.2<br />

TRIPURA 0.2 2.2 1 6.5 11.6 5 0 0 0.8 10.8 0.1 22.8 950 0.7 20.4 0.7 1.5 42 0.18 0.1<br />

UTTAR PRADESH 0.2 1.2 891 2.7 14.9 2.2 14 2153 1.1 1.4 1.3 4.4 898 11.4 19.8 12.7 7.3 313 1.32 2.3<br />

UTTARANCHAL 0.4 1.8 75 3.7 16.5 4.8 7 0 1 1.2 2.6 3.7 964 0.6 20.2 0.1 4 152 0.64 0.2<br />

WEST BENGAL 0.2 0.8 81 0.4 19.2 7.5 13 1028 0.6 2.2 0.1 18.1 934 11.4 19.7 2 0.6 135 0.57 9<br />

Exhibit - 4<br />

Female<br />

per 1000<br />

Males<br />

Contributi<br />

on <strong>of</strong><br />

Crime<br />

Rate<br />

against<br />

Women<br />

to All<br />

India<br />

Total<br />

Mean Age<br />

at<br />

Effective<br />

Marriage<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

Females<br />

(yrs)<br />

Contributi<br />

on <strong>of</strong><br />

Crime<br />

Rate<br />

against<br />

Children<br />

to All<br />

India<br />

Total<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Narcotic<br />

drug &<br />

Psychotro<br />

pic<br />

substance<br />

cases<br />

Juvenile<br />

Delinque<br />

ncy<br />

(Incedenc<br />

e <strong>of</strong><br />

different<br />

cases in<br />

all)<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Juvenile<br />

Delinque<br />

ncy Cases<br />

Pending<br />

to All<br />

India<br />

Total<br />

cases<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Cases<br />

Pending<br />

for<br />

Investigat<br />

ion<br />

(under<br />

IPC) to All<br />

India<br />

Strength<br />

<strong>of</strong> Civil<br />

Police per<br />

1000<br />

populatio<br />

n<br />

Strength<br />

<strong>of</strong> Armed<br />

Police per<br />

1000<br />

populatio<br />

n<br />

Institutio<br />

nal Births<br />

(%)<br />

Anemia<br />

Amongst<br />

Pregnant<br />

Women<br />

(%)<br />

Anemia<br />

Amongst<br />

Adolesce<br />

nt Girls<br />

(%)<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Children<br />

as Under<br />

Nourishe<br />

d<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Children<br />

having<br />

Iron<br />

Deficienc<br />

y<br />

Doctors<br />

(per 1 lac<br />

populatio<br />

n)<br />

Hospitals<br />

(per 1 lac<br />

populatio<br />

n)<br />

Vaccinati<br />

Low BMI<br />

on<br />

Males (%)<br />

Coverage<br />

Low BMI<br />

Females<br />

(%)<br />

Infant<br />

Mortality<br />

Rates (per<br />

1000 live<br />

births)<br />

Primary<br />

Health<br />

Centers<br />

(per 1 lac<br />

populatio<br />

n)<br />

Nurses<br />

(per 1 lac<br />

populatio<br />

n)<br />

Life<br />

Expectanc<br />

y at Birth<br />

Health<br />

Exp. as a<br />

% <strong>of</strong> Total<br />

Expenditu<br />

re<br />

Per Capita<br />

Income<br />

Per Capita<br />

Net SDP<br />

Media<br />

Exposure -<br />

Female %<br />

C 61 C 62 C 63 C 64 C 65 C 66 C 67 C 68 C 69 C 70 C 71 C 72 C 73 C 74 C 75 C 76 C 77 C 78 C 79 C 80<br />

Positive Positive Positive Negative Negative Negative Negative Positive Positive Positive Negative Negative Negative Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive<br />

ANDHRA PRADESH 1.10 0.16 43 2.1 23.6 42.3 38.7 73.29 5.45 74 24.8 30.8 66 2.52 133.42 64.4 3.53 51,025 26,211 79<br />

ARUNACHAL PRADESH 2.48 2.77 26 7.8 40.3 32.2 42.9 45.6 23.86 28 13.6 15.5 44 7.51 62.4 67 4.45 51,644 23,788 64<br />

ASSAM 0.90 0.76 21 0.4 0.2 12.6 23.6 53.72 1.01 32 33.4 36.5 76 2.64 33.29 58.9 3.06 27,197 18,598 61<br />

BIHAR 1.12 0.29 15.8 2.2 27.6 54.6 46.6 38.65 0.4 33 28.7 43 67 2.97 10.65 61.6 3.24 16,119 7,875 41<br />

CHATTISH GARH 0.75 0.46 16 5.1 48.3 47.4 55.5 31.2 0.16 47 31.8 41 32 3.57 61.4 58 3.74 38,059 20,151 52<br />

DELHI 3.48 0.37 49 1.3 28.7 35.3 48 152.31 4.04 69 28.1 33 32 0.85 166.72 63.5 2.78 95,943 61,676 65<br />

GOA 2.79 0.45 93 0 10.8 30 24.9 127.85 8.1 79 116.8 20.5 44 3.49 166.08 64 3.27 132,719 70,112 92<br />

GUJRAT 0.80 0.20 36.3 5.1 39 46 51.7 63.67 4.99 56 28.2 32.3 64 3.17 137.59 64.1 3.05 63,961 34,157 71<br />

HARYANA 0.49 0.08 24.8 3.3 40.2 35.6 54.1 5.03 0.37 65 26.8 27.8 67 2.68 63.41 66.2 2.59 78,781 38,832 67<br />

HIMACHAL PRADESH 0.78 0.33 24.3 4 31 36.4 47.7 62.22 1.33 67 19.8 24.3 60 5.54 96.81 67 5.08 50,365 33,805 79<br />

JAMMU & K 9.21 3.64 54 2.6 10.1 20.3 27.9 29.6 0.42 67 19.9 21.3 50 4.4 49.3 64 4.78 30,582 19,730 82<br />

JHARKHAND 1.18 0.48 19 1.3 24.2 52.2 40.9 36.9 0.42 35 33.4 42.6 66 2.89 61.6 64 3.65 30,719 19,066 39<br />

KARNATAKA 1.07 0.16 49 0.9 14.8 44.8 34 109.29 0.55 55 25.5 31.4 57 4.83 146.36 65.3 3.49 50,676 27,291 77<br />

KERALA 1.11 0.09 97.1 0 2.2 35.8 10.2 91.87 13.92 75 11.9 12.5 14 4.03 185.65 74 4.71 59,179 30,668 90<br />

MADHYA PRADESH 2.19 0.84 16.4 3.4 33.2 55.4 50.2 29.75 0.16 54 36.3 40.1 88 3.73 142.95 58 3.39 27,250 15,647 53<br />

MAHARASTRA 1.48 0.12 48.6 1.8 29.4 47.7 50.2 79.97 3.56 59 24.9 32.6 48 3.19 106.3 67.2 3.51 74,027 37,081 76<br />

MANIPUR 4.31 5.40 43 1.2 9.4 34.9 34.9 59.4 0.78 59 12.2 13.9 23 3.67 88.9 66 3.72 28,531 20,326 90<br />

MEGHALAYA 1.99 1.41 30 1.5 0.7 15.2 24.1 61.2 0.3 33 8 13.7 58 4.55 87.7 63 5.23 46,601 23,420 60<br />

MIZORAM 3.27 6.76 65 1.1 21 21.4 30.5 55.55 1.24 72 6 15.3 23 13.01 164.91 71 3.96 45,982 22,417 87<br />

NAGALAND 2.07 1.60 12 4 21.4 9.7 39.4 58.4 0.85 21 10.8 15.9 16 2.62 89.5 63.5 4.68 21,434 20,998 62<br />

ORISSA 0.28 0.14 14.1 3.8 27.2 42.8 40.9 38.27 0.74 52 32.1 40.5 96 4.35 105.26 59.6 3.9 33,226 17,299 61<br />

PUNJAB 1.77 0.65 12.8 2.9 33.9 40 50.2 129.66 0.9 60 12 13.5 52 3.02 152.45 69.4 3.1 62,153 34,929 84<br />

RAJASTAN 0.87 0.18 8.1 3.3 21.9 58.1 39.7 34.87 0.2 27 33.8 33.6 79 3.86 44.79 62 3.94 34,189 17,863 46<br />

SIKKIM 3.26 2.66 49 0.8 19.3 30.2 42.7 56.3 0.37 70 7.2 9.6 49 4.97 67.8 59 2.56 48,937 26,412 73<br />

TAMIL NADU 1.04 0.19 64.7 1.9 17.7 38.3 30.6 102.26 0.65 81 18.5 23.5 51 4.09 166.95 66.2 4.2 62,499 29,958 88<br />

TRIPURA 2.63 3.57 49 1 8.5 29.7 17.8 11.52 0.84 50 38.3 35.1 41 2.2 15.5 65 3.79 35,799 24,706 74<br />

UTTAR PRADESH 0.57 0.17 8 3.4 28.8 55.3 47.1 0.11 0.05 23 32.7 34.1 83 0.01 0.04 61 4.49 23,132 13,262 52<br />

UTTARANCHAL 1.13 0.41 36 3.2 28.6 52.6 36.6 59.89 0.04 60 21.8 25.7 83 0.01 78.4 60 4.34 55,877 24,585 73<br />

WEST BENGAL 0.68 0.24 35.8 3.7 18 44.9 30.7 61.75 0.51 64 31.6 37.7 51 2.2 53.94 64.9 0.93 41,469 25,223 63<br />

Exhibit - 5<br />

<strong>The</strong> weight <strong>of</strong> all indicator variables mapped has been calculated using Shannon’s Weight and the<br />

same is shown in Exhibit 6. Rate <strong>of</strong> Dowry Deaths; Research Institutions; Hospitals; Incidence <strong>of</strong> Cyber<br />

Crime; Engineering, Tech. & Arch. Colleges; Incidence <strong>of</strong> Highway Robbery; Juvenile Delinquency;<br />

Colleges; Teacher Training Schools & Colleges; Crime Rate against Children; Medical Colleges;<br />

Polytechnic. Inst.; Rate <strong>of</strong> Harassment; Strength <strong>of</strong> Armed Police; Total Crimes in Railways and Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Narcotic drug & Psychotropic substance cases have been found to be the 15 most important variables<br />

affecting social welfare and development in India.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

126


INDICATOR VARIABLES<br />

Shannon's<br />

Weight.<br />

INDICATOR VARIABLES<br />

Shannon's<br />

Weight.<br />

Literacy Rate (%) 0.016 Rate <strong>of</strong> Rape (per '000) 0.655<br />

Universities (incl. deemed & Inst. Of National Importance) 1.325 Rate <strong>of</strong> Kidnapping & Abduction (per '000) 0.871<br />

Research Institutions 4.478 Rate <strong>of</strong> Kidnapping & Abduction <strong>of</strong> Women & Girls (per '000) 1.016<br />

Arts, Science & Commerce Colleges 1.892 Rate <strong>of</strong> Dacoity (per '000) 1.761<br />

Engg., Tech. & Arch. Colleges 3.035 Rate <strong>of</strong> Robbery (per '000) 0.652<br />

Medical Colleges (Allo, Ayur, Homeo, Nursing, Pharma) 2.605 Incidence <strong>of</strong> Highway Robbery 3.015<br />

Teacher Training Colleges 2.212 Rate <strong>of</strong> Burglary (per '000) 0.724<br />

Teacher Training Schools 2.621 Total Crimes in Railways 2.494<br />

Other Colleges (Law, MBA, MCA/ IT, Agri.) 2.664 Rate <strong>of</strong> Dowry Deaths (per '000) 6.761<br />

Polytech. Inst. 2.593 Rate <strong>of</strong> Molestation (per '000) 0.813<br />

Primary Schools 1.867 Rate <strong>of</strong> Harassment (per '000) 2.575<br />

High Schools 1.768 Rate <strong>of</strong> Cruelty by Husband & Relatives (per '000) 1.388<br />

Pupil Teacher Ratio (Primary School) 0.360 Female per 1000 Males 0.004<br />

Pupil Teacher Ratio (High School) 0.201 Contribution <strong>of</strong> Crime Rate against Women to All India Total 1.886<br />

Dropout Rates in Primary School (I - V) 1.001 Mean Age at Effective Marriage <strong>of</strong> Females (yrs) 0.005<br />

Dropout Rates in High School (VIII - X) 0.288 Contribution <strong>of</strong> Crime Rate against Children to All India Total 2.616<br />

% <strong>of</strong> Trained Teachers in High Schools 0.223 Rate <strong>of</strong> Narcotic drug & Psychotropic substance cases 2.010<br />

Per Capita Expenditure on Education & Training 0.423 Juvenile Delinquency (Incedence <strong>of</strong> different cases in all) 2.752<br />

% <strong>of</strong> Expenditure on Education & Training 0.085 % <strong>of</strong> Juvenile Delinquency Cases Pending to All India Total cases 2.751<br />

Population below Poverty Line (%) 0.381 % <strong>of</strong> Cases Pending for Investigation (under IPC) to All India Total cases 1.941<br />

Households having Safe Drinking Water facility 0.152 Strength <strong>of</strong> Civil Police per 1000 population 1.017<br />

% <strong>of</strong> Households having Electricity 0.255 Strength <strong>of</strong> Armed Police per 1000 population 2.502<br />

% <strong>of</strong> Households having bathroom facility at home 0.484 Institutional Births (%) 0.629<br />

House holds with Permanent Structure 1.914 Anemia Amongst Pregnant Women (%) 0.837<br />

Households with Semi Permanent Structure 1.904 Anemia Amongst Adolescent Girls (%) 0.591<br />

Consumption <strong>of</strong> Energy by Ultimate Consumers (GWH) 1.965 % <strong>of</strong> Children as Under Nourished 0.223<br />

Employment Status in Organized Sector ('000) 1.435 % <strong>of</strong> Children having Iron Deficiency 0.161<br />

Total No. <strong>of</strong> Workers 1.739 Doctors (per 1 lac population) 0.634<br />

Total Number <strong>of</strong> Non - Workers 1.872 Hospitals (per 1 lac population) 3.486<br />

% <strong>of</strong> Population participated in last lok sabha 0.215 Vaccination Coverage 0.195<br />

Media Exposure 0.045 Low BMI Males (%) 0.663<br />

TV Ownership 0.162 Low BMI Females (%) 0.253<br />

HIV awareness (males%) 0.044 Infant Mortality Rates (per 1000 live births) 0.276<br />

HIV awareness (females%) 0.152 Primary Health Centers (per 1 lac population) 0.639<br />

% <strong>of</strong> Total Cognizable Crimes to All India Cognizable Crimes 1.734 Nurses (per 1 lac population) 0.593<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> Total Cognizable Crimes (per '000) 0.254 Life Expectancy at Birth 0.006<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> Murder (per '000) 0.214 Health Exp. as a % <strong>of</strong> Total Expenditure 0.108<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong>ft (per '000) 0.717 Per Capita Income 0.366<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> Riot (per '000) 1.342 Per Capita Net SDP 0.323<br />

Incidence <strong>of</strong> Cyber Crime 3.093 Media Exposure - Female % 0.079<br />

Exhibit - 6<br />

STATES<br />

Rank Table<br />

Relative Closeness<br />

Value<br />

TOPSIS<br />

RANK<br />

MAHARASTRA 0.35978160 1<br />

GUJRAT 0.38111846 2<br />

TAMIL NADU 0.40595578 3<br />

ARUNACHAL PRADESH 0.41315305 4<br />

ANDHRA PRADESH 0.41644543 5<br />

KARNATAKA 0.41872947 6<br />

KERALA 0.42109128 7<br />

UTTAR PRADESH 0.42530225 8<br />

WEST BENGAL 0.42609100 9<br />

GOA 0.43744068 10<br />

MIZORAM 0.44093943 11<br />

SIKKIM 0.44176901 12<br />

JAMMU & K 0.44193706 13<br />

UTTARANCHAL 0.44248823 14<br />

RAJASTAN 0.44350226 15<br />

HIMACHAL PRADESH 0.44485216 16<br />

NAGALAND 0.44585348 17<br />

ORISSA 0.44639955 18<br />

PUNJAB 0.44806323 19<br />

TRIPURA 0.44854088 20<br />

MEGHALAYA 0.45082405 21<br />

DELHI 0.45099977 22<br />

ASSAM 0.45245613 23<br />

BIHAR 0.45603213 24<br />

HARYANA 0.45857572 25<br />

JHARKHAND 0.45967534 26<br />

CHATTISH GARH 0.46808061 27<br />

MADHYA PRADESH 0.48048565 28<br />

MANIPUR 0.63287276 29<br />

Exhibit - 7<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

127


Conclusion<br />

<strong>The</strong> ensuing research study reveals that Maharashtra is the state with highest social welfare &<br />

development followed by Gujarat and Tamil Nadu respectively. This indicates that in these states, the<br />

overall well being <strong>of</strong> people have increased and improved along with economic development in the<br />

globalization era. Looking at the top 10 developed states in India on social welfare and development<br />

aspect, it is to be noted that 4 states are from South India, 3 from West India, 2 from East India and 1 from<br />

North India. Again looking at the bottom 10 states, it is noted that 2 are from North India, 2 from Central<br />

India, 2 from East India and 4 from North East. It must be noted that there are states where economic<br />

development and industrialization has rapidly progressed in the era <strong>of</strong> globalization but the welfare<br />

status <strong>of</strong> people in such states is still a matter <strong>of</strong> concern as found out from the ensuing research. Such<br />

states include Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Delhi, Punjab, Rajasthan & Uttaranchal. It may thus be<br />

interpreted that the positive impact <strong>of</strong> globalization might have led to overall economic prosperity in<br />

certain states, but social welfare development has not happened as desired. <strong>The</strong> researchers opine that the<br />

economic outcome <strong>of</strong> globalization should not be considered by the nation as a measure or yardstick <strong>of</strong><br />

development as development <strong>of</strong> society actually depends on factors beyond economic or industrial output.<br />

Limitation & Directions <strong>of</strong> Future Research<br />

<strong>The</strong> present work like most other researches is not self content in every respect. <strong>The</strong> observable limitations<br />

may highlight inclusion <strong>of</strong> more parameters. Also the research is based on secondary data and there is a<br />

scope to do primary research to capture the real time facts. <strong>The</strong> research can be extended to split research<br />

works on specific areas like education, crime, women status, economic development etc.<br />

References<br />

11 th Plan Targets – Health & Nutrition, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health, GOI.<br />

Census <strong>of</strong> India 2011, GOI.<br />

Crime in India, 2009, National Crime Records Bureau, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs, GOI.<br />

Emerging Trends in Healthcare, 2011, ASSOCHAM – KPMG Report.<br />

Estimates <strong>of</strong> Maternal Mortality Ratios in India and its States, Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Medical Research, 2003, Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Health & Family Welfare, GOI.<br />

Gujarat Institute <strong>of</strong> Development Research Report, Ahmedabad. (2005). Infrastructure and growth in a Regional context:<br />

Indian states since the 1980s. pp 21.<br />

Hwang, C.L., & Yoon, K. (1997). Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods & Application. New York: Springer –<br />

Verlag.<br />

India Social Development Report. (2008). Council for Social Development, New Delhi. pp 311.<br />

National Crime Records Bureau Report, 2009, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs, GOI.<br />

National Health Pr<strong>of</strong>ile Report, 2009, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health, GOI.<br />

Nutritional Status <strong>of</strong> Children and Prevalence <strong>of</strong> Anemia among children, adolescent girls and pregnant women,<br />

2006, International Institute for Population Sciences (Deemed University) and Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health and Family Welfare,<br />

GOI.<br />

Palanithurai, G. (2004). Panchayats and Communities in Family welfare. Social Welfare, 51(7), pp 22-30.<br />

Pattanaik, A. & Badu Kanak, M. (2003). Population Explosion and Media. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Population Education, (20),<br />

pp 36-47.<br />

Selected Educational Statistics, 2005, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Human Resource Development, GOI.<br />

Sinha, D. (2005). Problem <strong>of</strong> Elderly Abuse: Some reflections and implications for social work practice. Perspectives in<br />

Social Work. 20(3), pp 31-37.<br />

SRS Bulletin, June 2011, Registrar General <strong>of</strong> India.<br />

SRS Bulletin, October 2008, Registrar General <strong>of</strong> India.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

128


Appendix<br />

Normalized Value <strong>of</strong> parameters<br />

Literacy<br />

Rate (%)<br />

Universitie<br />

s (incl.<br />

deemed &<br />

Inst. Of<br />

National<br />

Importanc<br />

e)<br />

Research<br />

Institution<br />

s<br />

Arts,<br />

Science &<br />

Commerce<br />

Colleges<br />

Engg.,<br />

Tech. &<br />

Arch.<br />

Colleges<br />

Medical<br />

Colleges<br />

(Allo,<br />

Ayur,<br />

Homeo,<br />

Nursing,<br />

Pharma)<br />

Teacher<br />

Training<br />

Colleges<br />

Teacher<br />

Training<br />

Schools<br />

Other<br />

Colleges<br />

(Law,<br />

MBA,<br />

MCA/ IT,<br />

Agri.)<br />

Polytech.<br />

Inst.<br />

Primary<br />

Schools<br />

High<br />

Schools<br />

Pupil<br />

Teacher<br />

Ratio<br />

(Primary<br />

School)<br />

Pupil<br />

Teacher<br />

Ratio<br />

(High<br />

School)<br />

Dropout<br />

Rates in<br />

Primary<br />

School (I -<br />

V)<br />

Dropout<br />

Rates in<br />

High<br />

School<br />

(VIII - X)<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Trained<br />

Teachers<br />

in High<br />

Schools<br />

Per Capita<br />

Expenditur<br />

e on<br />

Education<br />

& Training<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Expenditur<br />

e on<br />

Education<br />

& Training<br />

Norm.C1 Norm.C2 Norm.C3 Norm.C4 Norm.C5 Norm.C6 Norm.C7 Norm.C8 Norm.C9 Norm.C10 Norm.C11 Norm.C12 Norm.C13 Norm.C14 Norm.C15 Norm.C16 Norm.C17 Norm.C18 Norm.C19 Norm.C20<br />

ANDHRA PRADESH 0.163 0.247 0.082 0.473 0.600 0.204 0.296 0.053 0.110 0.376 0.286 0.513 0.162 0.210 0.174 0.195 0.214 0.085 0.139 0.116<br />

ARUNACHAL PRADESH 0.161 0.010 0.049 0.004 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.000 0.001 0.003 0.006 0.005 0.149 0.197 0.255 0.217 0.148 0.217 0.111 0.129<br />

ASSAM 0.176 0.158 0.000 0.112 0.007 0.027 0.129 0.002 0.025 0.021 0.140 0.166 0.097 0.152 0.271 0.229 0.065 0.156 0.192 0.144<br />

BIHAR 0.154 0.188 0.180 0.262 0.016 0.089 0.048 0.149 0.074 0.035 0.183 0.105 0.123 0.178 0.282 0.254 0.216 0.069 0.242 0.303<br />

CHATTISH GARH 0.171 0.049 0.000 0.075 0.005 0.008 0.003 0.028 0.038 0.027 0.156 0.044 0.208 0.159 0.054 0.195 0.139 0.112 0.215 0.300<br />

DELHI 0.178 0.168 0.016 0.022 0.037 0.058 0.032 0.045 0.066 0.067 0.011 0.018 0.396 0.190 0.000 0.144 0.225 0.159 0.272 0.108<br />

GOA 0.211 0.010 0.000 0.008 0.009 0.027 0.006 0.002 0.008 0.013 0.005 0.013 0.084 0.133 0.013 0.125 0.198 0.368 0.178 0.101<br />

GUJRAT 0.191 0.197 0.278 0.179 0.101 0.220 0.370 0.456 0.209 0.140 0.076 0.188 0.259 0.222 0.190 0.180 0.223 0.120 0.184 0.123<br />

HARYANA 0.185 0.089 0.000 0.059 0.159 0.031 0.116 0.079 0.041 0.089 0.055 0.121 0.169 0.171 0.027 0.101 0.218 0.126 0.167 0.103<br />

HIMACHAL PRADESH 0.202 0.069 0.033 0.031 0.007 0.027 0.074 0.026 0.028 0.016 0.052 0.049 0.188 0.127 0.043 0.000 0.220 0.245 0.189 0.073<br />

JAMMU & K 0.166 0.089 0.000 0.018 0.009 0.023 0.409 0.030 0.040 0.032 0.056 0.035 0.123 0.108 0.201 0.159 0.148 0.141 0.126 0.040<br />

JHARKHAND 0.163 0.079 0.016 0.041 0.011 0.031 0.029 0.057 0.009 0.027 0.077 0.038 0.156 0.127 0.282 0.238 0.225 0.087 0.202 0.295<br />

KARNATAKA 0.182 0.266 0.016 0.328 0.276 0.663 0.219 0.283 0.252 0.481 0.124 0.339 0.091 0.298 0.087 0.180 0.225 0.124 0.189 0.183<br />

KERALA 0.226 0.089 0.016 0.066 0.152 0.154 0.068 0.392 0.097 0.150 0.032 0.111 0.097 0.095 0.000 0.021 0.223 0.170 0.203 0.110<br />

MADHYA PRADESH 0.170 0.207 0.000 0.268 0.138 0.108 0.068 0.053 0.247 0.118 0.449 0.152 0.292 0.102 0.054 0.199 0.178 0.081 0.188 0.281<br />

MAHARASTRA 0.200 0.415 0.883 0.426 0.407 0.447 0.506 0.645 0.151 0.438 0.193 0.515 0.169 0.267 0.038 0.165 0.223 0.163 0.219 0.225<br />

MANIPUR 0.192 0.020 0.000 0.020 0.002 0.004 0.010 0.002 0.001 0.003 0.012 0.021 0.058 0.146 0.168 0.131 0.090 0.162 0.189 0.127<br />

MEGHALAYA 0.182 0.010 0.000 0.019 0.000 0.000 0.006 0.015 0.000 0.003 0.027 0.023 0.058 0.102 0.271 0.241 0.081 0.175 0.179 0.136<br />

MIZORAM 0.221 0.010 0.000 0.009 0.000 0.000 0.006 0.004 0.001 0.005 0.007 0.016 0.156 0.076 0.271 0.205 0.065 0.361 0.155 0.092<br />

NAGALAND 0.193 0.010 0.000 0.013 0.000 0.000 0.003 0.002 0.021 0.008 0.007 0.012 0.084 0.222 0.233 0.205 0.061 0.180 0.141 0.139<br />

ORISSA 0.177 0.148 0.000 0.247 0.085 0.116 0.042 0.138 0.120 0.046 0.212 0.256 0.110 0.197 0.212 0.195 0.225 0.079 0.151 0.340<br />

PUNJAB 0.185 0.099 0.000 0.075 0.062 0.189 0.077 0.055 0.060 0.051 0.062 0.082 0.156 0.184 0.130 0.134 0.223 0.134 0.128 0.062<br />

RAJASTAN 0.162 0.247 0.082 0.216 0.090 0.092 0.174 0.098 0.133 0.046 0.260 0.242 0.188 0.152 0.309 0.226 0.211 0.099 0.204 0.162<br />

SIKKIM 0.198 0.020 0.016 0.001 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.002 0.001 0.005 0.003 0.004 0.279 0.114 0.266 0.250 0.115 0.412 0.089 0.147<br />

TAMIL NADU 0.193 0.405 0.016 0.157 0.510 0.374 0.139 0.175 0.217 0.543 0.155 0.179 0.104 0.210 0.005 0.168 0.225 0.121 0.186 0.165<br />

TRIPURA 0.212 0.010 0.000 0.005 0.002 0.004 0.003 0.004 0.006 0.003 0.008 0.015 0.156 0.159 0.233 0.223 0.088 0.239 0.248 0.138<br />

UTTAR PRADESH 0.168 0.395 0.164 0.356 0.159 0.131 0.390 0.149 0.828 0.218 0.603 0.186 0.311 0.286 0.065 0.134 0.218 0.071 0.188 0.240<br />

UTTARANCHAL 0.192 0.099 0.180 0.030 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.019 0.033 0.048 0.068 0.028 0.246 0.184 0.060 0.131 0.225 0.199 0.203 0.290<br />

WEST BENGAL 0.186 0.257 0.180 0.132 0.124 0.073 0.213 0.124 0.039 0.107 0.234 0.157 0.195 0.317 0.239 0.238 0.191 0.093 0.182 0.181<br />

Population<br />

below<br />

Poverty<br />

Line (%)<br />

Household<br />

s having<br />

Safe<br />

Drinking<br />

Water<br />

facility<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Household<br />

s having<br />

Electricity<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Household<br />

s having<br />

bathroom<br />

facility at<br />

home<br />

House<br />

holds with<br />

Permanent<br />

Structure<br />

Household<br />

s with<br />

Semi<br />

Permanent<br />

Structure<br />

Consumpti<br />

on <strong>of</strong><br />

Energy by<br />

Ultimate<br />

Consumers<br />

(GWH)<br />

Employme<br />

nt Status<br />

in<br />

Organized<br />

Sector<br />

('000)<br />

Total<br />

Total No. Number <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Workers Non -<br />

Workers<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Population<br />

participate<br />

d in last<br />

lok sabha<br />

Media<br />

Exposure<br />

TV<br />

Ownership<br />

HIV<br />

awareness<br />

(males%)<br />

Norm.C21 Norm.C22 Norm.C23 Norm.C24 Norm.C25 Norm.C26 Norm.C27 Norm.C28 Norm.C29 Norm.C30 Norm.C31 Norm.C32 Norm.C33 Norm.C34 Norm.C35 Norm.C36 Norm.C37 Norm.C38 Norm.C39 Norm.C40<br />

ANDHRA PRADESH 0.205 0.189 0.179 0.343 0.231 0.356 0.319 0.328 0.237 0.218 0.209 0.193 0.209 0.203 0.332 0.211 0.164 0.083 0.103 0.109<br />

ARUNACHAL PRADESH 0.198 0.154 0.101 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.159 0.165 0.151 0.168 0.181 0.004 0.188 0.272 0.285 0.220 0.139<br />

ASSAM 0.150 0.070 0.065 0.036 0.099 0.020 0.218 0.090 0.098 0.172 0.168 0.126 0.168 0.145 0.102 0.176 0.244 0.315 0.384 0.416<br />

BIHAR 0.222 0.029 0.043 0.212 0.229 0.036 0.078 0.263 0.315 0.255 0.136 0.067 0.157 0.096 0.227 0.125 0.187 0.059 0.147 0.127<br />

CHATTISH GARH 0.180 0.149 0.056 0.039 0.192 0.079 0.053 0.091 0.064 0.114 0.146 0.122 0.150 0.112 0.094 0.207 0.255 0.238 0.052 0.054<br />

DELHI 0.249 0.261 0.319 0.087 0.008 0.120 0.131 0.043 0.053 0.151 0.207 0.250 0.180 0.156 0.094 0.275 0.176 0.155 0.616 0.561<br />

GOA 0.179 0.263 0.299 0.007 0.005 0.019 0.020 0.005 0.005 0.171 0.225 0.284 0.206 0.227 0.004 0.173 0.176 0.166 0.086 0.078<br />

GUJRAT 0.215 0.226 0.227 0.234 0.183 0.331 0.264 0.200 0.169 0.128 0.189 0.194 0.180 0.134 0.211 0.195 0.102 0.048 0.099 0.121<br />

HARYANA 0.220 0.233 0.232 0.086 0.064 0.138 0.101 0.079 0.073 0.050 0.176 0.184 0.195 0.164 0.106 0.225 0.221 0.149 0.164 0.163<br />

HIMACHAL PRADESH 0.227 0.266 0.159 0.030 0.026 0.032 0.049 0.028 0.018 0.286 0.202 0.233 0.206 0.216 0.023 0.195 0.108 0.166 0.099 0.109<br />

JAMMU & K 0.167 0.226 0.205 0.032 0.032 0.037 0.036 0.035 0.037 0.168 0.206 0.231 0.197 0.167 0.039 0.165 0.102 0.107 0.293 0.386<br />

JHARKHAND 0.109 0.096 0.068 0.057 0.180 0.084 0.124 0.095 0.097 0.157 0.117 0.103 0.119 0.079 0.070 0.119 0.306 0.143 0.116 0.103<br />

KARNATAKA 0.217 0.221 0.264 0.209 0.234 0.230 0.301 0.221 0.168 0.177 0.203 0.197 0.191 0.181 0.246 0.224 0.164 0.053 0.065 0.042<br />

KERALA 0.060 0.197 0.279 0.167 0.092 0.091 0.178 0.097 0.124 0.211 0.228 0.248 0.222 0.260 0.219 0.332 0.057 0.095 0.030 0.030<br />

MADHYA PRADESH 0.175 0.196 0.109 0.169 0.391 0.173 0.166 0.243 0.198 0.336 0.147 0.128 0.153 0.123 0.383 0.285 0.193 0.250 0.065 0.072<br />

MAHARASTRA 0.204 0.218 0.274 0.410 0.421 0.525 0.426 0.387 0.319 0.145 0.200 0.216 0.195 0.225 0.368 0.178 0.136 0.083 0.052 0.054<br />

MANIPUR 0.095 0.169 0.047 0.001 0.014 0.002 0.012 0.009 0.007 0.298 0.225 0.175 0.222 0.271 0.004 0.104 0.278 0.071 0.259 0.217<br />

MEGHALAYA 0.100 0.120 0.151 0.003 0.010 0.006 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.122 0.156 0.152 0.141 0.156 0.004 0.092 0.283 0.256 0.095 0.060<br />

MIZORAM 0.092 0.195 0.230 0.003 0.003 0.001 0.007 0.004 0.002 0.129 0.217 0.177 0.215 0.257 0.004 0.200 0.176 0.493 0.039 0.000<br />

NAGALAND 0.119 0.179 0.168 0.002 0.011 0.001 0.010 0.008 0.007 0.192 0.167 0.139 0.204 0.222 0.000 0.046 0.119 0.059 0.099 0.024<br />

ORISSA 0.164 0.076 0.047 0.081 0.126 0.072 0.121 0.134 0.129 0.075 0.164 0.106 0.164 0.170 0.102 0.134 0.176 0.149 0.099 0.121<br />

PUNJAB 0.250 0.258 0.312 0.137 0.024 0.217 0.131 0.086 0.087 0.188 0.212 0.287 0.206 0.192 0.066 0.128 0.181 0.113 0.112 0.115<br />

RAJASTAN 0.175 0.154 0.145 0.226 0.126 0.161 0.189 0.224 0.188 0.115 0.146 0.131 0.117 0.101 0.309 0.245 0.119 0.137 0.185 0.211<br />

SIKKIM 0.181 0.218 0.163 0.001 0.003 0.002 0.007 0.002 0.002 0.200 0.182 0.205 0.200 0.205 0.000 0.108 0.176 0.178 0.043 0.060<br />

TAMIL NADU 0.219 0.219 0.179 0.309 0.165 0.398 0.358 0.262 0.198 0.184 0.221 0.195 0.220 0.257 0.321 0.253 0.119 0.053 0.086 0.103<br />

TRIPURA 0.134 0.117 0.050 0.002 0.020 0.003 0.023 0.011 0.012 0.210 0.190 0.171 0.200 0.200 0.012 0.149 0.210 0.315 0.147 0.157<br />

UTTAR PRADESH 0.225 0.090 0.129 0.512 0.424 0.271 0.328 0.508 0.643 0.120 0.156 0.125 0.166 0.110 0.317 0.086 0.130 0.053 0.134 0.157<br />

UTTARANCHAL 0.222 0.169 0.174 0.051 0.007 0.031 0.038 0.029 0.031 0.138 0.190 0.224 0.202 0.216 0.016 0.088 0.113 0.065 0.121 0.151<br />

WEST BENGAL 0.227 0.105 0.106 0.236 0.376 0.187 0.297 0.277 0.291 0.204 0.168 0.136 0.166 0.137 0.207 0.123 0.130 0.155 0.134 0.151<br />

HIV<br />

awareness<br />

(females%)<br />

% <strong>of</strong> Total<br />

Cognizable<br />

Crimes to<br />

All India<br />

Cognizable<br />

Crimes<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Total<br />

Cognizable<br />

Crimes<br />

(per '000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Murder<br />

(per '000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Rape (per<br />

'000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Kidnappin<br />

g &<br />

Abduction<br />

(per '000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Kidnappin<br />

g &<br />

Abduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> Women<br />

& Girls<br />

(per '000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Dacoity<br />

(per '000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Robbery<br />

(per '000)<br />

Incidence<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

Highway<br />

Robbery<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Burglary<br />

(per '000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong>ft (per<br />

'000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Riot (per<br />

'000)<br />

Incidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> Cyber<br />

Crime<br />

Total<br />

Crimes in<br />

Railways<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Dowry<br />

Deaths<br />

(per '000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Molestatio<br />

n (per<br />

'000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Harassme<br />

nt (per<br />

'000)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Cruelty by<br />

Husband<br />

&<br />

Relatives<br />

(per '000)<br />

Female per<br />

1000<br />

Males<br />

Contributi<br />

on <strong>of</strong><br />

Crime Rate<br />

against<br />

Women to<br />

All India<br />

Total<br />

Mean Age<br />

at<br />

Effective<br />

Marriage<br />

<strong>of</strong> Females<br />

(yrs)<br />

Contributi<br />

on <strong>of</strong><br />

Crime Rate<br />

against<br />

Children to<br />

All India<br />

Total<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Narcotic<br />

drug &<br />

Psychotro<br />

pic<br />

substance<br />

cases<br />

Juvenile<br />

Delinquen<br />

cy<br />

(Incedence<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

different<br />

cases in<br />

all)<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Juvenile<br />

Delinquen<br />

cy Cases<br />

Pending to<br />

All India<br />

Norm.C41 Norm.C42 Norm.C43 Norm.C44 Norm.C45 Norm.C46 Norm.C47 Norm.C48 Norm.C49 Norm.C50 Norm.C51 Norm.C52 Norm.C53 Norm.C54 Norm.C55 Norm.C56 Norm.C57 Norm.C58 Norm.C59 Norm.C60<br />

ANDHRA PRADESH 0.026 0.056 0.080 0.138 0.146 0.073 0.211 0.174 0.018 0.249 0.615 0.295 0.194 0.460 0.169 0.226 0.017 0.153 0.153 0.267<br />

ARUNACHAL PRADESH 0.416 0.362 0.003 0.245 0.154 0.116 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.193 0.073 0.024 0.179 0.004 0.187 0.003 0.098 0.014 0.014 0.004<br />

ASSAM 0.208 0.177 0.042 0.153 0.104 0.160 0.014 0.048 0.015 0.176 0.000 0.312 0.185 0.177 0.196 0.006 0.025 0.069 0.069 0.325<br />

BIHAR 0.182 0.137 0.577 0.055 0.079 0.241 0.000 0.364 0.036 0.032 0.000 0.056 0.183 0.158 0.171 0.133 0.013 0.119 0.119 0.453<br />

CHATTISH GARH 0.156 0.185 0.080 0.245 0.119 0.108 0.028 0.051 0.013 0.265 0.088 0.080 0.196 0.074 0.180 0.175 0.064 0.363 0.363 0.022<br />

DELHI 0.052 0.234 0.007 0.144 0.604 0.008 0.035 0.162 0.020 0.124 0.102 0.156 0.163 0.077 0.199 0.372 0.072 0.057 0.057 0.216<br />

GOA 0.052 0.145 0.002 0.258 0.251 0.008 0.056 0.000 0.005 0.088 0.088 0.026 0.190 0.004 0.179 0.013 0.089 0.008 0.008 0.015<br />

GUJRAT 0.104 0.201 0.042 0.116 0.169 0.073 0.140 0.220 0.000 0.052 0.029 0.208 0.183 0.144 0.183 0.127 0.004 0.181 0.181 0.088<br />

HARYANA 0.156 0.225 0.079 0.249 0.264 0.130 0.000 0.199 0.031 0.076 0.366 0.234 0.171 0.096 0.181 0.048 0.153 0.122 0.122 0.066<br />

HIMACHAL PRADESH 0.026 0.024 0.001 0.175 0.061 0.241 0.042 0.001 0.000 0.193 0.088 0.093 0.192 0.018 0.199 0.029 0.301 0.016 0.016 0.011<br />

JAMMU & K 0.000 0.040 0.001 0.180 0.101 0.308 0.000 0.005 0.003 0.301 0.424 0.033 0.178 0.048 0.209 0.003 0.098 0.001 0.001 0.040<br />

JHARKHAND 0.338 0.209 0.251 0.068 0.125 0.205 0.000 0.096 0.026 0.036 0.044 0.050 0.187 0.055 0.173 0.006 0.017 0.087 0.087 0.157<br />

KARNATAKA 0.130 0.250 0.064 0.169 0.175 0.292 0.681 0.085 0.013 0.152 0.015 0.119 0.191 0.144 0.179 0.041 0.017 0.029 0.029 0.289<br />

KERALA 0.078 0.193 0.021 0.153 0.080 0.630 0.450 0.037 0.003 0.293 0.161 0.252 0.210 0.144 0.207 0.076 0.081 0.056 0.056 0.113<br />

MADHYA PRADESH 0.052 0.258 0.209 0.223 0.162 0.092 0.112 0.351 0.031 0.357 0.146 0.121 0.182 0.287 0.185 0.610 0.047 0.575 0.575 0.055<br />

MAHARASTRA 0.182 0.242 0.219 0.217 0.232 0.200 0.372 0.593 0.008 0.116 0.146 0.154 0.183 0.272 0.181 0.381 0.055 0.586 0.586 0.457<br />

MANIPUR 0.000 0.008 0.000 0.037 0.073 0.049 0.007 0.000 0.996 0.080 0.000 0.020 0.194 0.004 0.184 0.010 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.051<br />

MEGHALAYA 0.650 0.209 0.020 0.085 0.104 0.019 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.112 0.000 0.020 0.193 0.004 0.180 0.010 0.030 0.010 0.011 0.029<br />

MIZORAM 0.052 0.032 0.002 0.569 0.378 0.003 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.245 0.015 0.009 0.186 0.004 0.190 0.003 0.412 0.002 0.002 0.000<br />

NAGALAND 0.104 0.330 0.024 0.055 0.077 0.005 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.000 0.000 0.180 0.000 0.180 0.000 0.183 0.001 0.002 0.004<br />

ORISSA 0.234 0.298 0.293 0.108 0.087 0.114 0.014 0.109 0.023 0.269 0.073 0.111 0.193 0.147 0.185 0.025 0.008 0.048 0.048 0.164<br />

PUNJAB 0.026 0.048 0.017 0.138 0.103 0.000 0.197 0.054 0.013 0.048 0.015 0.085 0.173 0.048 0.194 0.095 0.696 0.017 0.017 0.091<br />

RAJASTAN 0.026 0.105 0.054 0.119 0.166 0.046 0.190 0.170 0.018 0.152 0.000 0.341 0.183 0.313 0.180 0.184 0.068 0.231 0.231 0.033<br />

SIKKIM 0.000 0.056 0.000 0.229 0.051 0.176 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.068 0.000 0.022 0.173 0.000 0.190 0.006 0.030 0.007 0.007 0.004<br />

TAMIL NADU 0.026 0.137 0.059 0.094 0.116 0.097 0.126 0.079 0.008 0.076 0.102 0.048 0.195 0.110 0.197 0.083 0.110 0.173 0.173 0.263<br />

TRIPURA 0.052 0.177 0.001 0.097 0.057 0.135 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.433 0.015 0.495 0.188 0.026 0.184 0.022 0.064 0.005 0.005 0.004<br />

UTTAR PRADESH 0.052 0.097 0.621 0.040 0.074 0.059 0.098 0.377 0.028 0.056 0.190 0.095 0.178 0.420 0.179 0.403 0.310 0.040 0.040 0.084<br />

UTTARANCHAL 0.104 0.145 0.052 0.055 0.082 0.130 0.049 0.000 0.026 0.048 0.380 0.080 0.191 0.022 0.182 0.003 0.170 0.019 0.019 0.007<br />

WEST BENGAL 0.052 0.064 0.056 0.006 0.095 0.203 0.091 0.180 0.015 0.088 0.015 0.393 0.185 0.420 0.178 0.064 0.025 0.017 0.017 0.329<br />

Total cases<br />

% <strong>of</strong> Cases<br />

Pending<br />

for<br />

Investigati<br />

on (under<br />

IPC) to All<br />

India Total<br />

cases<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

129


Strength Strength<br />

Anemia<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Anemia % <strong>of</strong><br />

Doctors Hospitals<br />

<strong>of</strong> Civil <strong>of</strong> Armed Institution Amongst<br />

Children<br />

Vaccinatio<br />

Amongst Children as<br />

(per 1 lac (per 1 lac<br />

Low BMI<br />

Police per Police per al Births Pregnant<br />

having<br />

n<br />

Adolescen Under<br />

population population<br />

Males (%)<br />

1000 1000 (%) Women<br />

Iron<br />

Coverage<br />

t Girls (%) Nourished<br />

)<br />

)<br />

population population<br />

(%)<br />

Deficiency<br />

Low BMI<br />

Females<br />

(%)<br />

Primary<br />

Infant<br />

Health<br />

Health Nurses<br />

Mortality<br />

Life Exp. as a %<br />

Media<br />

Centers (per 1 lac<br />

Per Capita Per Capita<br />

Rates (per<br />

Expectanc <strong>of</strong> Total<br />

Exposure -<br />

(per 1 lac population<br />

Income Net SDP<br />

1000 live<br />

y at Birth Expenditur<br />

Female %<br />

population )<br />

births)<br />

e<br />

)<br />

Norm.C61 Norm.C62 Norm.C63 Norm.C64 Norm.C65 Norm.C66 Norm.C67 Norm.C68 Norm.C69 Norm.C70 Norm.C71 Norm.C72 Norm.C73 Norm.C74 Norm.C75 Norm.C76 Norm.C77 Norm.C78 Norm.C79 Norm.C80<br />

ANDHRA PRADESH 0.080 0.015 0.185 0.128 0.170 0.196 0.180 0.193 0.179 0.242 0.140 0.195 0.210 0.108 0.230 0.186 0.173 0.174 0.162 0.208<br />

ARUNACHAL PRADESH 0.180 0.250 0.112 0.474 0.290 0.149 0.199 0.120 0.786 0.092 0.077 0.098 0.140 0.321 0.107 0.194 0.218 0.176 0.147 0.168<br />

ASSAM 0.065 0.069 0.090 0.024 0.001 0.058 0.110 0.141 0.033 0.105 0.188 0.231 0.242 0.113 0.057 0.170 0.150 0.093 0.115 0.161<br />

BIHAR 0.081 0.026 0.068 0.134 0.199 0.253 0.217 0.102 0.013 0.108 0.162 0.272 0.213 0.127 0.018 0.178 0.158 0.055 0.049 0.108<br />

CHATTISH GARH 0.054 0.041 0.069 0.310 0.348 0.219 0.258 0.082 0.005 0.154 0.179 0.259 0.102 0.153 0.106 0.168 0.183 0.130 0.125 0.137<br />

DELHI 0.253 0.033 0.211 0.079 0.207 0.163 0.223 0.401 0.133 0.226 0.159 0.209 0.102 0.036 0.287 0.184 0.136 0.327 0.382 0.171<br />

GOA 0.203 0.041 0.400 0.000 0.078 0.139 0.116 0.336 0.267 0.258 0.659 0.130 0.140 0.149 0.286 0.185 0.160 0.452 0.435 0.242<br />

GUJRAT 0.058 0.018 0.156 0.310 0.281 0.213 0.240 0.167 0.164 0.183 0.159 0.204 0.203 0.135 0.237 0.185 0.149 0.218 0.212 0.187<br />

HARYANA 0.036 0.007 0.107 0.201 0.290 0.165 0.251 0.013 0.012 0.212 0.151 0.176 0.213 0.115 0.109 0.192 0.127 0.268 0.241 0.176<br />

HIMACHAL PRADESH 0.057 0.030 0.105 0.243 0.223 0.168 0.222 0.164 0.044 0.219 0.112 0.154 0.191 0.237 0.167 0.194 0.248 0.172 0.210 0.208<br />

JAMMU & K 0.670 0.328 0.232 0.158 0.073 0.094 0.130 0.078 0.014 0.219 0.112 0.135 0.159 0.188 0.085 0.185 0.234 0.104 0.122 0.216<br />

JHARKHAND 0.086 0.043 0.082 0.079 0.174 0.241 0.190 0.097 0.014 0.114 0.188 0.269 0.210 0.123 0.106 0.185 0.178 0.105 0.118 0.103<br />

KARNATAKA 0.078 0.014 0.211 0.055 0.107 0.207 0.158 0.287 0.018 0.180 0.144 0.199 0.181 0.206 0.252 0.189 0.171 0.173 0.169 0.203<br />

KERALA 0.080 0.008 0.418 0.000 0.016 0.166 0.047 0.242 0.458 0.245 0.067 0.079 0.045 0.172 0.320 0.214 0.230 0.202 0.190 0.237<br />

MADHYA PRADESH 0.159 0.076 0.071 0.207 0.239 0.256 0.233 0.078 0.005 0.176 0.205 0.254 0.280 0.159 0.246 0.168 0.166 0.093 0.097 0.140<br />

MAHARASTRA 0.108 0.011 0.209 0.109 0.212 0.221 0.233 0.210 0.117 0.193 0.140 0.206 0.153 0.136 0.183 0.194 0.172 0.252 0.230 0.200<br />

MANIPUR 0.314 0.486 0.185 0.073 0.068 0.161 0.162 0.156 0.026 0.193 0.069 0.088 0.073 0.157 0.153 0.191 0.182 0.097 0.126 0.237<br />

MEGHALAYA 0.144 0.127 0.129 0.091 0.005 0.070 0.112 0.161 0.010 0.108 0.045 0.087 0.184 0.194 0.151 0.182 0.256 0.159 0.145 0.158<br />

MIZORAM 0.238 0.609 0.280 0.067 0.151 0.099 0.142 0.146 0.041 0.235 0.034 0.097 0.073 0.556 0.284 0.205 0.194 0.157 0.139 0.229<br />

NAGALAND 0.151 0.144 0.052 0.243 0.154 0.045 0.183 0.154 0.028 0.069 0.061 0.101 0.051 0.112 0.154 0.184 0.229 0.073 0.130 0.163<br />

ORISSA 0.020 0.012 0.061 0.231 0.196 0.198 0.190 0.101 0.024 0.170 0.181 0.256 0.305 0.186 0.181 0.172 0.191 0.113 0.107 0.161<br />

PUNJAB 0.129 0.059 0.055 0.176 0.244 0.185 0.233 0.341 0.030 0.196 0.068 0.085 0.165 0.129 0.263 0.201 0.152 0.212 0.217 0.221<br />

RAJASTAN 0.063 0.016 0.035 0.201 0.158 0.269 0.184 0.092 0.007 0.088 0.191 0.213 0.251 0.165 0.077 0.179 0.193 0.116 0.111 0.121<br />

SIKKIM 0.237 0.240 0.211 0.049 0.139 0.140 0.198 0.148 0.012 0.229 0.041 0.061 0.156 0.212 0.117 0.171 0.125 0.167 0.164 0.192<br />

TAMIL NADU 0.076 0.017 0.279 0.116 0.127 0.177 0.142 0.269 0.021 0.265 0.104 0.149 0.162 0.175 0.288 0.192 0.205 0.213 0.186 0.232<br />

TRIPURA 0.191 0.321 0.211 0.061 0.061 0.137 0.083 0.030 0.028 0.163 0.216 0.222 0.130 0.094 0.027 0.188 0.185 0.122 0.153 0.195<br />

UTTAR PRADESH 0.042 0.015 0.034 0.207 0.207 0.256 0.219 0.000 0.002 0.075 0.184 0.216 0.264 0.000 0.000 0.177 0.220 0.079 0.082 0.137<br />

UTTARANCHAL 0.082 0.037 0.155 0.195 0.206 0.243 0.170 0.157 0.001 0.196 0.123 0.163 0.264 0.000 0.135 0.174 0.212 0.190 0.152 0.192<br />

WEST BENGAL 0.049 0.021 0.154 0.225 0.130 0.208 0.143 0.162 0.017 0.209 0.178 0.238 0.162 0.094 0.093 0.188 0.045 0.141 0.156 0.166<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

130


Creating Consumer Based Brand Equity in<br />

Indian Sport Shoe Market<br />

M.Ravindar Reddy<br />

National Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology – Warangal, India.<br />

Chandrajeet Kumar<br />

National Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology – Warangal, India.<br />

Keywords<br />

Brand equity, dimensions <strong>of</strong> brand equity, promotional activities, sports shoes.<br />

Abstract<br />

Along with Indian sportswear sector fast growth, the competition <strong>of</strong> sports market is fierily and fragmented due to<br />

numerous brands vying for consumer attention. This project is using sports shoes as example to understand and<br />

comprehend the effects promotional activities and dimensions brand equity on consumer based brand equity creating<br />

in Indian sportswear market. This study mainly focuses on exploring the relationship between brand equity and<br />

promotional activities by using <strong>of</strong> the dimensions <strong>of</strong> brand equity using Correlation, Multiple regression, ANOVAs<br />

and Post-hoc test. <strong>The</strong> results show that, four dimensions <strong>of</strong> brand equity (brand awareness, brand association,<br />

perceived quality and brand loyalty) have significant effects on brand equity; store image have positive influence on<br />

brand equity dimensions, whereas celebrity endorsement have not influence on brand equity dimensions.<br />

Introduction<br />

Along with a rapidly growing economy, rising incomes and an enormous population, India has<br />

been appreciated as one <strong>of</strong> the most attractive consumer markets in the world. Meanwhile, with a<br />

growing interest in sports among its consumers, India is viewed its sportswear marketing rapidly<br />

promising. Brand equity is one <strong>of</strong> the most important concepts in marketing science, and it has wellrecognized<br />

as one <strong>of</strong> the most valuable intangible assets by most firms. Recently, the competition <strong>of</strong><br />

sportswear market is shifting from price to brand building, particularly, the branding and product image<br />

are becoming increasingly significant to Indian customer (<strong>The</strong> economist, 2009). Brand equity is<br />

incremental utility and value endowed to a product or service by its brand name.<br />

If the sportswear marketers or firms could better understand the importance <strong>of</strong> brand equity, and<br />

then they would better gain competitive advantage, loyal their customers.<br />

Literature review<br />

Rong Huang and Emine Sarigöllü (2011) examine the relation between brand awareness and<br />

market outcome and explore the relation between brand awareness and brand equity. <strong>The</strong> study also<br />

investigates the effects <strong>of</strong> marketing mix elements on brand awareness. Results reveal consumers' brand<br />

usage experiences contribute to brand awareness, implying experience precedes awareness in some<br />

contexts. Carmen Camarero, Mar´a Jose´ Garrido and Eva Vicente (2010) aim to explore determinants <strong>of</strong><br />

brand equity for cultural activities from the perspective <strong>of</strong> internal as well as external visitors. <strong>The</strong>ir<br />

analysis advocates four elements for brand equity in artistic and cultural activities (loyalty, brand image,<br />

perceived quality and brand values) and assesses them for the case <strong>of</strong> an itinerant art exhibition staged<br />

over the past twenty years in a region <strong>of</strong> Spain. Findings suggest that external visitors attach greater<br />

importance to brand image as a determinant <strong>of</strong> value than do internal visitors, whereas for the latter<br />

brand values are the main source <strong>of</strong> value.<br />

Pierre Valette-Florence and et al. (2009) assess the relative impact <strong>of</strong> a long-term brand<br />

management instrument (brand personality) and a short-term marketing mix instrument (sales<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

131


promotions) on brand equity formation. In line with research that identifies varying consumer responses<br />

to promotional deals, this study posits that the relative impact <strong>of</strong> the two elements varies across consumer<br />

groups. Three homogeneous consumer groups differ according to the relative impact <strong>of</strong> brand personality<br />

and consumer promotions on brand equity, following an application <strong>of</strong> a finite mixture partial least<br />

squares procedure. Kyung Hoon Kim et al. (2008) study brand equity in hospital marketing. <strong>The</strong>y identify<br />

five factors that influence the creation <strong>of</strong> brand equity through successful customer relationships: trust,<br />

customer satisfaction, relationship commitment, brand loyalty, and brand awareness. An empirical test <strong>of</strong><br />

the relationships among these factors suggests that hospitals can be successful in creating image and<br />

positive brand equity if they can manage their customer relationships well.<br />

Eva Martínez, Teresa Montaner and José M. Pina (2009) propose and estimate a theoretical model,<br />

using the structural equation methodology. <strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> the estimation indicate that the attitude towards<br />

the extension influences brand image and that this attitude is a consequence <strong>of</strong> the initial brand beliefs<br />

and the coherence <strong>of</strong> the new product. A multi sample analysis also reveals that favouring the<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> extensions through adequate advertising constitutes an efficient way <strong>of</strong> protecting brand<br />

image.Jana M. Hawley in 2009 used Aaker’s well-known conceptual framework <strong>of</strong> brand equity, this<br />

study employed structural equation modelling to investigate the causal relationships among the four<br />

dimensions <strong>of</strong> brand equity and overall brand equity in the sportswear industry. This research is confined<br />

to particular region <strong>of</strong> Chinese market. This model is not supported to measure the performance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

brand.<br />

Borgran jin sun in 1996 research on brand plays a important role in service company. <strong>The</strong>y used<br />

Aaker’s 4 dimension <strong>of</strong> brand equity (brand loyalty, perceived quality, brand association and brand<br />

awareness). <strong>The</strong> limitation <strong>of</strong> this research is that the score which the calculated by using ANOVA is less.<br />

So we can say that it is difficult to make a customer loyal in the hotel business. Xiao tong in December<br />

2006 research on creating brand equity on clothing market in china using the tool by Aaker’s model. <strong>The</strong><br />

primary goal <strong>of</strong> this project is to examine Chinese customer’s attitudes toward imported clothing brands<br />

and their marketing strategies. <strong>The</strong> drawback <strong>of</strong> this research examines only the effect <strong>of</strong> individual<br />

marketing decision variables and does not investigate the interactions among them. Since marketing<br />

strategies are interactive by nature, celebrity endorsement could interact with advertising, promotion<br />

could interact with distribution, target marketing could interact with commercial event sponsorship, price<br />

could interact with price promotion, and so on. This study uses perceptual, not actual, measures <strong>of</strong><br />

marketing efforts. It would be meaningful from a managerial perspective to use hard marketing data from<br />

secondary sources, such as scanner data and published survey reports from the firms that are marketing<br />

the focal brands.<br />

Ruchan Kayaman and Huseyin Arasli aim to explore interrelations <strong>of</strong> the four brand equity<br />

components; brand awareness, brand loyalty, perceived quality and brand image in hotel industry and<br />

improve the conceptualization <strong>of</strong> customer-based hotel brand equity. <strong>The</strong> study has some limitations.<br />

First <strong>of</strong> all, the study is limited to only five-star hotels. based on the empirical results <strong>of</strong> the path analysis<br />

was that <strong>of</strong> the components <strong>of</strong> perceived quality as suggested by Parasuramanet al. (1988), assurance was<br />

found to have no direct relationship with any component <strong>of</strong> customer-based brand equity. As explained<br />

in the discussion section, this might show that this 5 component models <strong>of</strong> perceived quality is not<br />

applicable to the five-star hotels.<br />

This research has examined the relationship between brand equity and promotional activities by<br />

using <strong>of</strong> the dimensions <strong>of</strong> brand equity.<br />

H1. All Brand equity dimension (Brand awareness, Brand association, Perceived quality, Brand Loyalty)<br />

has a significant positive effect on consumer-based brand equity (brand equity).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

132


H2. All promotional activity (Advertisement, Word <strong>of</strong> mouth, Celebrity Endorsement, Sales promotion,<br />

Store image and Event sponsorship) has a significant positive effect on brand awareness.<br />

Research methodology<br />

This chapter describes the research design utilised. Specifically, the chapter describes the sample<br />

<strong>of</strong> the study by reflecting on the biographical data <strong>of</strong> the respondents, the measuring instrument used and<br />

issues pertaining to its validity and reliability, the procedure followed to gather the data, the hypotheses<br />

and the statistical techniques used to analyse the data.<br />

A brand is defined as a name, term, sign, symbol or design, or a combination <strong>of</strong> them which is<br />

intended to identify the goods and services <strong>of</strong> one seller or group <strong>of</strong> sellers and to differentiate them from<br />

those <strong>of</strong> competitors (Kotler, 1997).<br />

Table 1<br />

Chronbach alpha values computed for each variables.<br />

Variables<br />

Chronbach alpha values<br />

Brand equity .756<br />

Brand awareness .843<br />

Brand association .831<br />

Perceived quality .789<br />

Brand loyalty .722<br />

Advertisement .878<br />

Word <strong>of</strong> mouth .851<br />

Celebrity endorsement .897<br />

Sales promotion .893<br />

Store image .893<br />

Event sponsorship .904<br />

<strong>The</strong> reliability test are carried out to measure the internal consistency <strong>of</strong> the variables.<br />

Chronbach’s (1951) coefficient alpha measures the extent to which the scale items cohere with each other.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Chronbach alphas for different variable are shown in the Table 2. A high value <strong>of</strong> alpha is <strong>of</strong>ten used<br />

as evidence that the items measure underlying constructs. <strong>The</strong> variables which <strong>of</strong>fer alpha value less than<br />

.5 are discarded as these variables are less reliable.<br />

Sample<br />

<strong>The</strong> main objective <strong>of</strong> this research is to examine the relationship between brand equity and<br />

promotional activities by using <strong>of</strong> the dimensions <strong>of</strong> brand equity. A structured questionnaire includes<br />

three parts. First part contains the general questions related to the overall brand equity. Second part on<br />

brand equity dimensions. Third part involves all promotional activity. <strong>The</strong> questionnaire is administered<br />

to Warangal dist. Of A.P. Total sample comprised <strong>of</strong> 160 completed questionnaires and 30 were<br />

incomplete which are excluded from research sample. Ages are categorized into different group as shown<br />

in the below table 3.<br />

Respondents Age Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

Table No 2<br />

Age groups No. <strong>of</strong> respondents Percentage<br />

Less than or equal to 20 26 16<br />

Between 21-25 67 54<br />

Between 26-35 44 35<br />

Between 36-40 15 10<br />

Above 40 8 5<br />

Total 160 100<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

133


Gender<br />

Respondents Gender Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

Table no 3<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

respondents<br />

Percentage<br />

Male 110 69<br />

Female 50 31<br />

Total 1600 100<br />

<strong>The</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> male and female respondents is 69 and 31 respectively. Different age categories are<br />

chosen from different generations. Maximum respondents belong to the Generation Y (21–25 years).<br />

Analysis and discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong> first Correlation test is conducted to understand whether there exists any relation between Brand<br />

equity dimension and promotional activity. Results are shown in Table 5.<br />

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

134


This means that there is a strong relationship between your two variables. This means that<br />

changes in one variable are strongly correlated with changes in the second variable. If we see Pearson’s r<br />

is 913,.927,.882,.982 respectively. This number is very close to 1. For this reason we can conclude that there<br />

is a strong relationship between advertisement and (Brand awareness, BA, PQ & BL respectively).If we<br />

see other promotional activity with brand equity dimension the value <strong>of</strong> Pearson’s r is between .898 and<br />

.989, which is close to 1.So we can conclude that there is a strong relationship or effect on each other.<br />

Multiple regression analysis (structural model and hypothesis testing)<br />

Regression analysis in this study is used to determine whether the independent variables explain<br />

a will be significant variations in the dependent variable and whether a relationship exists. If p0.05, that<br />

means the hypothesis is supported and can be used to make predictions, however, if P >0.05, it means the<br />

hypothesis is rejected.<br />

Table 5: Conclusion <strong>of</strong> structural model<br />

Hypothesis Sig. Conclusion<br />

H1a. Brand awareness- brand equity .742 NOT SUPPORTED<br />

H1b. Brand association- brand equity .083 NOT SUPPORTED<br />

H1c. Perceived quality-brand equity .796 NOT SUPPORTED<br />

H1d. Brand loyalty-brand equity .000 SUPPORTED<br />

H2a. Advertising- brand awareness .000 SUPPORTED<br />

H2b. Advertising- brand association .404 NOT SUPPORTED<br />

H2c. Advertising- perceived quality .024 SUPPORTED<br />

H2d. Advertising -brand loyalty .001 SUPPORTED<br />

H3a. Word <strong>of</strong> Mouth- brand awareness .837 NOT SUPPORTED<br />

H3b. Word <strong>of</strong> Mouth- brand association .826 NOT SUPPORTED<br />

H3c. Word <strong>of</strong> Mouth- perceived quality .706 NOT SUPPORTED<br />

H4a. Celebrity endorsement -brand awareness .837 NOT SUPPORTED<br />

H4b. Celebrity endorsement -brand association .037 SUPPORTED<br />

H4c. Celebrity endorsement -perceived quality .044 SUPPORTED<br />

H4d. Celebrity endorsement -brand loyalty .146 NOT SUPPORTED<br />

H5a. Sales promotion -brand awareness .001 SUPPORTED<br />

H5b. Sales promotion -brand association .482 NOT SUPPORTED<br />

H5c. Sales promotion -perceived quality .966 NOT SUPPORTED<br />

H5d. Sales promotion -brand loyalty .173 NOT SUPPORTED<br />

H6a. Store image -brand awareness .000 SUPPORTED<br />

H6b. Store image- brand association .002 SUPPORTED<br />

H6c. Store image- perceived quality .000 SUPPORTED<br />

H6d. Store image -brand loyalty .010 SUPPORTED<br />

H7a. Event sponsorship- brand awareness .001 SUPPORTED<br />

H7b. Event sponsorship -brand association .010 SUPPORTED<br />

H7c. Event sponsorship -perceived quality .315 NOT SUPPORTED<br />

H7d. Event sponsorship -brand loyalty .000 SUPPORTED<br />

Within this finding, we suggest that marketers or brand managers should put their efforts on<br />

perceived quality, brand association and brand loyalty since these 3 dimensions have high significance in<br />

brand equity building. <strong>The</strong> effective promotional activities such as advertising, word <strong>of</strong> mouth, sales<br />

promotion, store image and event sponsorship that would be helped in building high perceived quality,<br />

brand association and brand loyalty for a brand. Especially, building a positive store image can also<br />

reduce Indian consumer’s uncertainty, increasing trustworthy and raising customer’s satisfaction.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

135


ANOVAs Analysis:<br />

If we see the table we can say that Perceived quality between age group has a significant<br />

difference (>.05). But this table is unable to recognize that which factor have significant difference in the<br />

age so we go for further analysis. Post Hoc test tells us which age is making difference.<br />

Brand Between Groups<br />

awareness<br />

Sum <strong>of</strong> Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />

1.965 3 .655 1.353 .260<br />

Within Groups 71.163 147 .484<br />

Total 73.127 150<br />

Brand Between Groups 1.302 3 .434 .992 .398<br />

association<br />

Within Groups 64.286 147 .437<br />

Total 65.588 150<br />

Perceived Between Groups 3.578 3 1.193 3.120 .028<br />

quality<br />

Within Groups 56.196 147 .382<br />

Total 59.775 150<br />

Brand Between Groups 2.320 3 .773 1.934 .127<br />

loyalty<br />

Within Groups 58.796 147 .400<br />

Total 61.116 150<br />

Post Hoc Tests:<br />

Researchers have solved this problem by conducting post hoc tests. <strong>The</strong>se tests are used when he have<br />

found statistical significance between conditions but when we don’t know where the significant<br />

differences are. <strong>The</strong>se tests are not used when the results <strong>of</strong> a 1-Way between Subjects ANOVA are not<br />

significant because there is no need. But when we do find a statistically significant result, when the Sig.<br />

value is less than .05, we need to use these tests.<br />

Gowels<br />

Howells<br />

G<br />

Multiple Comparisons<br />

Dependent<br />

Variable (I) age (J) age Mean Difference (I-J) Std. Error Sig.<br />

95% Confidence Interval<br />

Lower Bound Upper Bound<br />

awarness 16-20 year 21-25 years .33861 .17988 .262 -.1580 .8353<br />

26-35 years .18156 .19222 .781 -.3413 .7044<br />

36-40 years .12868 .26835 .961 -.7581 1.0154<br />

21-25 years 16-20 year -.33861 .17988 .262 -.8353 .1580<br />

26-35 years -.15705 .12818 .612 -.4918 .1777<br />

36-40 years -.20994 .22692 .795 -1.1548 .7349<br />

26-35 years 16-20 year -.18156 .19222 .781 -.7044 .3413<br />

21-25 years .15705 .12818 .612 -.1777 .4918<br />

36-40 years -.05288 .23682 .996 -.9628 .8571<br />

36-40 years 16-20 year -.12868 .26835 .961 -1.0154 .7581<br />

21-25 years .20994 .22692 .795 -.7349 1.1548<br />

26-35 years .05288 .23682 .996 -.8571 .9628<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

136


Brand<br />

association<br />

Perceived<br />

Quality<br />

Brand<br />

loyalty<br />

16-20 year 21-25 years .28167 .14887 .254 -.1248 .6882<br />

26-35 years .19514 .16124 .625 -.2393 .6295<br />

36-40 years .02206 .33990 1.000 -1.3502 1.3943<br />

21-25 years 16-20 year -.28167 .14887 .254 -.6882 .1248<br />

26-35 years -.08654 .12256 .894 -.4065 .2334<br />

36-40 years -.25962 .32334 .850 -1.7120 1.1928<br />

26-35 years 16-20 year -.19514 .16124 .625 -.6295 .2393<br />

21-25 years .08654 .12256 .894 -.2334 .4065<br />

36-40 years -.17308 .32922 .948 -1.5909 1.2448<br />

36-40 years 16-20 year -.02206 .33990 1.000 -1.3943 1.3502<br />

21-25 years .25962 .32334 .850 -1.1928 1.7120<br />

26-35 years .17308 .32922 .948 -1.2448 1.5909<br />

16-20 year 21-25 years .36180 * .12533 .031 .0255 .6981<br />

26-35 years .16148 .12654 .583 -.1782 .5012<br />

36-40 years -.29044 .23505 .638 -1.2078 .6269<br />

21-25 years 16-20 year -.36180 * .12533 .031 -.6981 -.0255<br />

26-35 years -.20032 .11120 .278 -.4900 .0894<br />

36-40 years -.65224 .22716 .145 -1.5960 .2915<br />

26-35 years 16-20 year -.16148 .12654 .583 -.5012 .1782<br />

21-25 years .20032 .11120 .278 -.0894 .4900<br />

36-40 years -.45192 .22783 .330 -1.3929 .4890<br />

36-40 years 16-20 year .29044 .23505 .638 -.6269 1.2078<br />

21-25 years .65224 .22716 .145 -.2915 1.5960<br />

26-35 years .45192 .22783 .330 -.4890 1.3929<br />

16-20 year 21-25 years -.10841 .12485 .821 -.4458 .2290<br />

26-35 years .16403 .13979 .647 -.2089 .5370<br />

36-40 years -.03309 .37339 1.000 -1.6651 1.5990<br />

21-25 years 16-20 year .10841 .12485 .821 -.2290 .4458<br />

26-35 years .27244 .11872 .106 -.0376 .5825<br />

36-40 years .07532 .36603 .996 -1.6027 1.7533<br />

26-35 years 16-20 year -.16403 .13979 .647 -.5370 .2089<br />

21-25 years -.27244 .11872 .106 -.5825 .0376<br />

36-40 years -.19712 .37139 .946 -1.8401 1.4459<br />

36-40 years 16-20 year .03309 .37339 1.000 -1.5990 1.6651<br />

21-25 years -.07532 .36603 .996 -1.7533 1.6027<br />

26-35 years .19712 .37139 .946 -1.4459 1.8401<br />

*. <strong>The</strong> mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

137


<strong>The</strong> Gowells howells post-hoc tests are also conducted for all the four dimensions <strong>of</strong> brand equity<br />

in table 8.<strong>The</strong> post-hoc results for ‘Uncertainty’’ show that there is a difference between 21-25 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />

(p=.031; significant at .05 level).<br />

Managerial implications:<br />

<strong>The</strong> hypotheses stated in the beginning have been validated through different statistical test. <strong>The</strong><br />

research objective was to examine the relationship between brand equity and promotional activities by<br />

using <strong>of</strong> the dimensions <strong>of</strong> brand equity. In brand equity we have seen that customer is loyal towards<br />

product and service. <strong>The</strong>re is some difference in the perceived quality <strong>of</strong> product between age group (20-<br />

25) . Building a positive store image can also reduce Indian consumer’s uncertainty, increasing<br />

trustworthy and raising customer’s satisfaction. As a result <strong>of</strong> study companies should target on sales<br />

promotion and event sponsorships.<br />

References:<br />

Aaker, D. A. (1991) Managing Brand Equity. <strong>The</strong> Free Press, New York.<br />

Aaker, D. A. (1986) Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California Management Review,<br />

Vol.38, No. 3, Pg 102.<br />

Arbnor, I and Bjerke, B., (1997) Methodology for creating business knowledge. Sage Publications, 2nd ed.<br />

Burrell, G. and Morgan, G., (1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: elements <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sociology <strong>of</strong> corporate life, London: Heinemann.<br />

Chen, C, F. and Tseng, W, S. (2010) Exploring customer-based airline brand equity: evidence from Taiwan.<br />

Transportation Journal, Vol. 49, Pg.29 (11).<br />

Cobb-Walgren CJ, Beal C, Donthu N. (1995) Brand equity, brand preference, and purchase intent. J<br />

Advertising; 24(3):25 ±40.<br />

Cornelius, B., Natter, M., and Faure, C.(2010). How storefront displays influence retail store image. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Retailing and Customer Services. Vol.17 Pg. 143-151.<br />

De Bruyn, A., and Lilien, G. (2008). A mulit-stage model <strong>of</strong> word <strong>of</strong> mouth influence through viral marketing.<br />

International Journal <strong>of</strong> Research in Marketing, Vol. 25, Iss. 3, Pg 151-163.<br />

Delvecchio, D., Henard, D, H., and Freling, T, H. (2006). <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> sales promotion on post-promotion brand<br />

preference: A meta-analysis. Journal <strong>of</strong> Retailing. 82, 203-213.<br />

Erenkol, A, D. and Duygun, A. (2010) Customers perceived brand equity and a research on the customers <strong>of</strong><br />

Bellona which is a Turkish furniture brand, <strong>The</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong> American <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business, Vol.16, No. 1.<br />

Faircloth, J, B., Capella, L, M., and Alford, B, L. (2001) <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> brand attitude and brand image on brand<br />

equity. Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing <strong>The</strong>ory and Practice, Vol. 9, Iss. 3, Pg, 61.<br />

Javalgi, R, G., Traylor, M, B., Gross, A, C., and Lampman, E.(1994). Awareness <strong>of</strong> sponsorship and corporate<br />

image: An empirical investigation. Journal <strong>of</strong> Advertising. Vol.23, Iss. 4, Pg. 47.<br />

Keller, K.L. (1993) Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Marketing, Vol.57, No. 1, Pg 1-22.<br />

Keller, K.L. (2002) Strategic brand management: building, measuring, and Management brand equity, 2nd ed.,<br />

Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ.<br />

Kotler, P. and Keller, K, L. (2006) Marketing management. 12th edition, Pearson education,Inc., Upper saddle<br />

river, New Jersey.<br />

Hao, L., Gao, C., and Liu, Z. (2007) Customer-based brand equity and improvement strategy for mobile phone<br />

brands: Foreign versus local in the Chinese market. International Management Review. Vol. 3, Iss. 3; pg. 76, 9 pgs<br />

Lim, B, C., and Chung, M, Y. (2011) <strong>The</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> word-<strong>of</strong>–mouth communication on attribute evaluation.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Business Research. 64, 18-23.<br />

Malhotra, N.K. and Birks, D.F. (2006) Marketing research: An applied Approach. Updated 2nd European<br />

edition. FT Prentice Hall. Financial times.<br />

McCracken, G. (1989) Who is the Celebrity Endorser Cultural Foundations <strong>of</strong> the Endorsement Process. <strong>The</strong><br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Consumer Research, Vol. 16, No. 3<br />

Martineau, P. (1958). <strong>The</strong> personality <strong>of</strong> the retail store, Harvard Bus. Rev. 36.<br />

Wang, H., Wei, Y., and Yu, C. (2008) Global brand equity model: customer-based with product-market<br />

outcome approaches. Journal <strong>of</strong> Product Management,17/5,305-316.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

138


A Conceptual Framework <strong>of</strong> Customer Retention Strategy (CRS)<br />

Palto Ranjan Datta<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Hertfordshire, UK<br />

Keywords<br />

Retail Industry, consumer-oriented demand, trust, bond, commitment, customer loyalty, customer<br />

retention.<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>The</strong> retail industry is huge and dynamic, an industry in which change is a constant phenomenon.<br />

Over the last few decades in both Europe and North America one has seen the emergence <strong>of</strong> supermarkets<br />

as the dominant retail form. This is due to the fact that consumers’ behaviour has changed and shifted<br />

towards convenience, high quality produce and provision <strong>of</strong> customer care. Customers also demand<br />

greater choice and would appear to place even greater emphasis on value for money. Flexible payment<br />

methods and sophisticated channels <strong>of</strong> distribution have also played their part. <strong>The</strong>se factors combined<br />

with the growth <strong>of</strong> the car owning middle class enjoying economic stability have also fuelled its growth.<br />

To cope with consumer demands retailers are constantly reshaping their business strategies and striving<br />

to <strong>of</strong>fer the right products and services both to meet existing needs and to anticipate and stimulate future<br />

demand.<br />

Several consumer-oriented factors have contributed to challenges in the field <strong>of</strong> grocery food retailing.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se include fluctuations in the economy, changes in consumers’ demographic characteristics and life<br />

style eating habits, the search for a convenient way to shop providing wide varieties <strong>of</strong> assorted and<br />

branded products, quality <strong>of</strong> products together with a steady increase in the number <strong>of</strong> car owners in<br />

urban areas. Relationship Marketing is the biggest paradigmatic shift in marketing theory and practice in<br />

recent decades. Customer retention has received considerable attention and has become a prime issue for<br />

organisations desiring to stay in business, maximise pr<strong>of</strong>its or to build and sustain competitive advantage.<br />

This current study critically examine the relevant literature to set the theoretical foundation on<br />

relationship marketing. By reviewing current literature various constructs <strong>of</strong> relationship marketing in<br />

relation to customer retention were identified, examined and discussed. A conceptual framework <strong>of</strong><br />

Customer Retention Strategy (CRS) was developed and established the hypotheses which are to be<br />

empirically tested. <strong>The</strong> conceptual framework will establish the association <strong>of</strong> various relationships<br />

marketing (RM) constructs with customer retention. <strong>The</strong> model integrates the concept <strong>of</strong> bonds, service<br />

quality and components <strong>of</strong> relational quality (Trust, commitment & satisfaction) into one relationship<br />

model to show the relationship between these five constructs and customer loyalty and finally the<br />

independent variable <strong>of</strong> customer retention.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

139


Reward-or-Penalty Inter-temporal Pricing <strong>of</strong> a Decentralized Channel<br />

Supply Chain under Asymmetric Information Condition<br />

Weiping Liu<br />

Eastern Connecticut State University, USA<br />

Lindu Zhao<br />

Southeast University, Nanjing, China<br />

Keywords<br />

Decentralized channel supply chain, asymmetric information, inter-temporal pricing, coordination<br />

mechanism, reward-or-penalty, sales efforts.<br />

Abstract<br />

In a decentralized channel supply chain, manufacturer <strong>of</strong>ten wants retailer to exert more sales efforts to increase the<br />

sale quantity. However, sales efforts are usually private information. <strong>The</strong>refore, asymmetric information regularly<br />

exists between manufacturers and retailers. To improve the financial efficiency <strong>of</strong> the whole channel supply chain,<br />

reward-or-penalty inter-temporal pricing is proposed as a coordination mechanism. This mechanism allows<br />

manufacturer to take actions such as sharing costs <strong>of</strong> the retailers’ sale efforts, subsidize retailers’ markdown and<br />

passing the savings <strong>of</strong> production cost to the retailer to reward retailers who exert more sales efforts while penalizing<br />

those who do not. In return, manufacturer also benefit from the inter-temporal pricing.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

140


Succession Planning in Management Institutes: A Critical Study<br />

Priyanka Kulkarni<br />

MIT Coe, Centre for Management Studies and Research, Pune, India<br />

&<br />

Arun Mokashi,<br />

MIT Coe, Centre for Management Studies and Research, Pune, India<br />

Keywords<br />

Succession planning, Management institutes, Business organizations, Management practice, Efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

management institute.<br />

Abstract<br />

Succession planning is an important issue which many organizations deal with. Management institutes, where the<br />

future managers are made; teach the students succession planning and its importance. But their teachings are based<br />

on theoretical concepts and they have to depend upon the industry for the experts who would share their experiences<br />

with the students on how they implemented succession planning effectively and how it helped in improving the<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> the organization. Succession planning is the search for the future leader. When the management<br />

institutes are also business organizations operating in a business environment and facing challenges like competition<br />

and attrition, all the practices that are applicable for making other organizations successful, should also be applicable<br />

to a management institute. So don’t the management institutes need leaders for being successful Is this<br />

management practice not applicable to management institutes also <strong>The</strong> researchers through this paper will try to<br />

find out whether the technique <strong>of</strong> succession planning can be adapted by the management institutes. And if it can be,<br />

how and what will be the impact on the efficiency <strong>of</strong> management institute<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

141


Cultural Intelligence as Core Competency to Employability<br />

Ruey-Fa LIN<br />

FengChia University, Taiwan.<br />

Nattawadee Korsakul<br />

FengChia University, Taiwan.<br />

Nattharuja Korsakul<br />

FengChia University, Taiwan.<br />

Keywords<br />

University, Corporate Social Responsibility, Cultural Intelligence, Hierarchical Regression, Service<br />

Learning<br />

Abstract<br />

Cultural Intelligence (CQ) has been regarded as an important role in cultivating intellectual, human, psychological,<br />

and social capital development investing for the future employability in multinational and globalized corporate.<br />

Pursuing the necessary and desired human resources using human, intellectual, and social capitals, the fully English<br />

taught courses become popular in the recent years amongst universities in higher education as the highly achieved<br />

goals. For local and foreign and different studying abroad students, cross-cultural understanding plays a critical and<br />

crucial competency to adjustment and management. <strong>The</strong> empirical study was conducted and employed students in<br />

bachelor programs <strong>of</strong> international business administration and international trading as well as other students in<br />

business schools and other competency-based departments. This study aimed to clarify the various understanding<br />

and competency differences between fully and partially English taught programs/divisions with general competencybased<br />

training department courses.<br />

For those students taught by English as a foreign language amongst pr<strong>of</strong>essionals may be supposed to have<br />

a higher importance understanding and accessible capability. Compared with their s<strong>of</strong>t skills training simultaneously<br />

stressed by the university awarded teaching excellence for successive four years, extracurricular activities, leadership<br />

training, general liberal art and civility education, intern/practicum, part-time workers, and voluntary services are<br />

used to enhance the supportive/supplementary service learning types. Hierarchical multiple regression and<br />

multivariate analysis <strong>of</strong> variance using statistical data analyzed with SPSS were conducted from randomly selected<br />

at stratified department/division/program level.<br />

<strong>The</strong> results are desired to give a clear map for developing cross-cultural leadership and management<br />

guideline as further learning basis.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

142


Opinion-Leading Role <strong>of</strong> Politically Aware Consumers<br />

Mirza Ashfaq Ahmed<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Gujrat, Pakistan<br />

&<br />

Suleman Aziz Lodhi<br />

Lahore Leads University, Pakistan<br />

Keywords<br />

Political Socialization Process, Opinion Leader, Voting Behavior, Community Agents, Pakistan.<br />

Abstract<br />

In the political system, voters belong to diverse nature <strong>of</strong> communities and their voting intentions are the outcome <strong>of</strong><br />

their participation in the social networks and learning from community’s socialization process. Where, social agents<br />

play very significant and influential contribution in shaping the community’s overall voting behavior through an<br />

ongoing process. <strong>The</strong>se social agents influence and being influenced by the community members during this process.<br />

This research begins to address the influential contribution <strong>of</strong> community, opinion leader and individual voter in<br />

community’s overall voting decisions by conceptualizing a model. This model is empirically evaluated by surveying<br />

and collecting 550 valid responses from registered voters <strong>of</strong> selected constituency. A carefully designed questionnaire<br />

was used as the measurement instrument to collect the empirical data from the sample. <strong>The</strong> structural equation<br />

modeling technique was employed to analyze the possible relationship between the different constructs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

conceptualized model. <strong>The</strong> study concludes that social agents have major contribution in shaping the attitude <strong>of</strong> the<br />

voters towards a particular political party. This is due to the reason that electorates’ behaviors in the community are<br />

highly vulnerable to the knowledge and information coming from different fronts. Where, opinion leaders play very<br />

important role in convincing and wining the voters for a particular political party through provision <strong>of</strong> relevant<br />

information, brand advocacy and powerful word-<strong>of</strong>-mouth within their electoral communities.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

143


International Conference on Business & Economic Development (ICBED)<br />

23-24 th July 2012<br />

Planet Hollywood Resort & Casino<br />

3667 Las Vegas Boulevard<br />

South Las Vegas, NV 89109, USA.<br />

Conference Programme & Proceedings<br />

Method - Integrity - Camaraderi<br />

144


International Conference on Business & Economic Development (ICBED)<br />

23-24 th July 2012<br />

Planet Hollywood Resort & Casino<br />

3667 Las Vegas Boulevard<br />

South Las Vegas, NV 89109, USA.<br />

Dear Conference Participants,<br />

It gives me great pleasure to welcome you all here in Las Vegas. Given the glamour all around, the<br />

conference theme <strong>of</strong> ‘International Conference on Business and Economic Development’ immediately becomes<br />

revealing - the dichotomy that exists between developing and the developed world. For development to take place at<br />

a more rapid pace, it is the quality <strong>of</strong> response to challenges that matter. In line with the theory developed by Porter ,<br />

moving forward, to start with, from a factor driven stage to investment driven stage , and then to the stage <strong>of</strong><br />

innovation , is , mostly a function <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> resources employed , management included. <strong>The</strong> developing<br />

countries are experiencing it. Where the quality <strong>of</strong> response is high via resource quality, both at individual<br />

(entrepreneurship) and govt. level, the gradient <strong>of</strong> production becomes visibly steeper. All this requires reforms at all<br />

levels - economic, social and political. Successful implementation <strong>of</strong> reforms is thus <strong>of</strong> strategic importance for the<br />

developing world.<br />

If we look at the DCs, the same scenario again. America is in a less advantaged shape today - we all know. It<br />

might have been more awful had not the Republican policy making body earlier gone for the supply side<br />

rationalisation. All said and done, Britain would have been in a much poorer shape to day had it not been for the<br />

conservative govt. to restructure the economy during Thatcher’s time.<br />

Development efforts will thus take different colour depending on at what stage a country is in. <strong>The</strong> present<br />

conference is the right platform to reflect on all these and other related issues and possibly areas <strong>of</strong> consensus will<br />

emerge on apparently conflicting development issues thereby making the event invigorating.<br />

I extend my very best wishes to you all<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor P. R. Banerjee<br />

Head <strong>of</strong> Research and Development<br />

<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business & Retail Management (ABRM)<br />

145


International Conference on Business & Economic Development (ICBED)<br />

23-24 th July 2012<br />

Planet Hollywood Resort & Casino<br />

3667 Las Vegas Boulevard<br />

South Las Vegas, NV 89109, USA.<br />

SCHEDULE FOR <strong>THE</strong> CONFERENCE 2012<br />

Saturday 21 st July , 2012, thru Sunday 22 nd July, 2012<br />

Arrival and Independent traveling days in Las Vegas, USA<br />

MONDAY 23 rd July, 2012<br />

8.00 AM -9.00AM Registration<br />

Monday 23 rd July, 2012<br />

9.00AM-9.15AM<br />

OPENING ADDRESS & WELCOME<br />

9.15AM-13.00 PM (Tea and c<strong>of</strong>fee Break: 11.00-11.15)<br />

Track: HRM, Marketing and Information Technology<br />

Session Chair: Dr P R Datta<br />

I<br />

II<br />

How Does Employee satisfaction Impact Information Flow during order fulfillment process<br />

Yen-Ting Tim Lin and Wen-Hui Mico Yang, Hsiuping University <strong>of</strong> Science and<br />

Technology, Taiwan; Cho-Pu Vincent Lin, St. John`s University, Taiwan<br />

An Exploration <strong>of</strong> Consumer Misbehaviours and their influences on Retail stores: An Application<br />

<strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> Justice<br />

Jungki Lee, Korea University, Sejong, South Korea<br />

III<br />

IV<br />

How Do Online Consumer Review Sentiments affect E-commerce Sales A Text Mining<br />

Analysis<br />

Wenyu Do, Xiaojun Quan, and Wenyin Liu, College <strong>of</strong> Business, City University <strong>of</strong><br />

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.<br />

Geographic Distribution <strong>of</strong> Population and Labor Force in Saudi Arabia<br />

Majed Sultan Abu Ashwan, College <strong>of</strong> Arts, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi<br />

Arabia<br />

146


V<br />

VI<br />

VII<br />

VIII<br />

IX<br />

X<br />

<strong>The</strong> Relationship Between Leadership and Learning Organisation: A Review <strong>of</strong> the Literature and<br />

Research Proposal<br />

Bojana Milic, Ljubica Dudjak and Leposava Grubic-Nesic, University <strong>of</strong> Novi Sad,<br />

Serbia<br />

Relationship Marketing: Towards a Definition<br />

Palto Ranjan Datta, University <strong>of</strong> Hertfordshire, UK and Ashru Bairagee, <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Business and Retail Management, UK<br />

ERP System Implementation CSFs for Korean Organisations: A Delphi study<br />

Yeong Real Kim, Chungbuk National University, Korea<br />

<strong>The</strong> Effects <strong>of</strong> Extrinsic Cues on the Relationship Between Brand Image and Purchasing<br />

Intention-Evidences from Chinese Exchabge Students` Perspective<br />

Luke Hsiao, Ming Chi Hsiao and jen-Ting Sun, College <strong>of</strong> Management, I-Shou<br />

University, Taiwan<br />

Employee Stock ownership and Employee Psychological ownership: <strong>The</strong> Moderating<br />

Role <strong>of</strong> Individual Characteristics<br />

Ann Lin, Chang Gung Institute <strong>of</strong> technology, Taiwan<br />

Adoption <strong>of</strong> Job Rotation as a Component <strong>of</strong> Staff Development in Polytechnics In Ghana<br />

Patience Kwakyewa Asirifi, K<strong>of</strong>oridua Polytechnic, K<strong>of</strong>oridua, Ghana<br />

13.00-14.00<br />

BREAK FOR LUNCH<br />

Monday 23 rd July 2012, 2012<br />

14.00 PM-14.25PM<br />

Key Note Speaker<br />

Mark T Jones<br />

Mark is a fervent internationalist, who is widely travelled. He has had a distinguished career in<br />

education and currently serves as the Director <strong>of</strong> External Affairs for Park Royal College. In the<br />

year 2000 he initiated and oversaw a major humanitarian venture into war-torn Sierra Leone,<br />

and then spent two years in the Middle East where he worked in Jordan (2002 – 2004). He<br />

writes and speaks on a variety <strong>of</strong> subjects ranging from corporate governance to women’s health<br />

in the developing world.<br />

As well as being an orator <strong>of</strong> distinction, Mark believes that it is essential that we articulate our<br />

convictions with passion; in this regard he is eager to help the voice <strong>of</strong> others to be heard. He is a<br />

Legislative Leadership Training specialist, as well as being an advisor on Diaspora community<br />

engagement. He is the Co-Founder & Executive Director <strong>of</strong> the Horn <strong>of</strong> Africa Business<br />

Association (HABA) as well as sitting on the Board <strong>of</strong> the Kitenge Africa Foundation (Uganda),<br />

the Advisory Committee <strong>of</strong> the Expertise Forum (A Think Tank Society focusing on the<br />

Sustainable Development <strong>of</strong> South Asian Countries) and being Chair <strong>of</strong> Trustees <strong>of</strong> Daughters <strong>of</strong><br />

147


Eve. In 1994 he was elected a Freeman <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> London, and is also a Fellow <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Chartered Management Institute.<br />

14.30 PM – 17.30 (Tea and C<strong>of</strong>fee Break: 16.00-16.15)<br />

Track: Finance, Accounting and Organisational Structure<br />

Session Chair: Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Teymur Rahmani<br />

I<br />

II<br />

III<br />

IV<br />

V<br />

Markets in Financial Instruments Europe Directive (MIFID): A Method <strong>of</strong> Controlling Ethical<br />

Banking<br />

Amaia Jone Betzuen Alvarez, University <strong>of</strong> Basque, Spain<br />

Efficiency <strong>of</strong> EC Greenhouse Gas Abatement Measures and Firms in the European<br />

Union: Evidence from Plant Level Allocations and Surrendered Permits.<br />

A. Gregoriou and Jerome. V. Healy, University <strong>of</strong> Hull Business School, UK<br />

Corruption, Democracy and Tax Compliance: Cross-country Evidence<br />

Teymur Rahmani and Saman Falahi, University Tehran, Iran<br />

Are High Interest Loans a Debt Trap or Access to Credit Evidence from a Field Experiement <strong>of</strong><br />

Payday Borrowers.<br />

Marc Anthony Fusaro, Arkansas Tech University, USA and Patricia J. Cirillo, Cypress<br />

Research Group, USA<br />

<strong>The</strong> Expectations <strong>of</strong> Potential Acquirers <strong>of</strong> Real estate rights and decisions to Purchase property<br />

in times <strong>of</strong> Recesion<br />

Darja Kobal Grum, Department <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> Ljublijana, Slovenia and<br />

Bojan Grum, European Law faculty in Nova Gorcia, Slovenia<br />

17.35PM<br />

CLOSING SPEECH FOR <strong>THE</strong> 1 st DAY CONFERENCE<br />

Tuesday 24 th July, 2012<br />

9.30AM-9.45AM<br />

OPENING ADDRESS FOR DAY 2<br />

9.45AM -13.00PM (Tea and c<strong>of</strong>fee Break: 11.00-11.15)<br />

Track: <strong>The</strong> Growth and Economic Development<br />

Session Chair: Marek Dziura<br />

I<br />

<strong>The</strong> Role <strong>of</strong> Micro and Small Enterprise in Employment Opportunity and Poverty reduction in<br />

addis Ababa, Ethiopia: <strong>The</strong> Case <strong>of</strong> Addis ketema Sub City<br />

Moges Teshome, Wageningen University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia<br />

148


II<br />

III<br />

IV<br />

V<br />

VI<br />

VII<br />

VIII<br />

Innovation Policy in Poland – Challenge for Intensive Growth<br />

Marek Dziura, Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Structural Changes and Development <strong>of</strong> the SME Sector in Poland after EU Membership<br />

Ryszard Borowiecki and Barbara Siuta-Tokarska, Cracow University <strong>of</strong><br />

Economics, Poland<br />

<strong>The</strong> Identification and Measurement <strong>of</strong> Financial Threats Vs the Causes <strong>of</strong> Insolvency in the<br />

period <strong>of</strong> Poland`s Economic Transformation<br />

Jaroslaw Kaczmarek, Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Challenges <strong>of</strong> Sustainability and Urban Development in Nigeria: Reviewing the Millenium<br />

Development Goals<br />

Owobu Gladys Ann, Department <strong>of</strong> Urban and Regional Planning, Esan South east<br />

LGA, Edo State, Nigeria<br />

Incentives to Encourage Social Environmental Responsible Corporate Actions: Willingness to pay<br />

for non-use value <strong>of</strong> Land-Case <strong>of</strong> Backpackers in Fiji<br />

Filipo Tokalau, School <strong>of</strong> Economics, University <strong>of</strong> South Pacific Suva, Fiji island<br />

Testing the Export-led Growth Hypothesis for Sub Saharan Africa Countries(SSA). A Panel Data<br />

Analysis<br />

Francis Atsu and Samuel Adams, Ghana Institute <strong>of</strong> Management and Public<br />

Administration (GIMPA), ACCRA, Ghana<br />

Cross Country Analysis <strong>of</strong> GCC Economic Risk<br />

Hassan Mounir El-Sady, Gulf University for Science and Technology, Kuwait, and<br />

Vasilya Sultanova, Australian College <strong>of</strong> Kuwait, Kuwait<br />

13.00-14.00<br />

BREAK FOR LUNCH<br />

Tuesday, 24 th July 2012<br />

14.00 PM-14.25PM<br />

14.30 PM – 17.30 (Tea and C<strong>of</strong>fee Break: 16.00-16.15)<br />

Track: Miscellaneous<br />

Session Chair: Mark Thomas Jones<br />

I<br />

II<br />

How to Transfer Knowledge to your work<br />

Wen-Hui Mico Yang and Yen-Ting Tim Lin, Hsiuping University <strong>of</strong> Science and<br />

Technology, Taiwan and Cho-Pu Vincent Lin, St. John`s University, Taiwan<br />

Enterprise Development under Globalisation and the New Economy Conditions<br />

149


Andrzej Jaki, Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

III<br />

IV<br />

V<br />

VI<br />

VII<br />

Innovation in Enterprise Development Strategy<br />

Tomasz Rojeck, Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Research <strong>of</strong> Influencing Factors for Usage <strong>of</strong> Facebook Willingness-A case Study on College<br />

Students in the Tamsui Area<br />

Cho-Pu Vincent Lin, St. John`s Iniversity, Taiwan, Yen-Ting Lin and Wen-Hui Mico<br />

yang, Hsiuping University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Taiwan<br />

Scientific Advance and Perceptions about the Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Democracy in MENA<br />

Hoda Abd El Hamid Ali, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt<br />

What Explains Innovative Outcomes at the Start Up Stage<br />

Masatoshi Kato, School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, Japan, Hiroyuki<br />

Okamuro, Hitotshubashi University, Japan and Yuji Honjo, Chuo University, Japan<br />

Does Vice Pay A Traditional Investigation <strong>of</strong> “Irresponsible” Investing<br />

Greg M. Richey, California State University, San Bernardino, USA<br />

17.05 PM CLOSING SPEECH FOR <strong>THE</strong> CONFERENCE<br />

25 th July 2012<br />

<strong>The</strong>re will be no session or function scheduled for today. Please take this opportunity to<br />

explore Las Vegas<br />

150


How does Employee Satisfaction Impact Information<br />

Flow during Order Fulfillment Process<br />

Yen-Ting Tim Lin<br />

Hsiuping University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Taiwan<br />

Wen-Hui Mico Yang<br />

Hsiuping University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Taiwan<br />

Cho-Pu Vincent Lin<br />

St. John's University, Taiwan<br />

Keywords<br />

Employee satisfaction, information flow, order procurement process<br />

Abstract<br />

Employees are the internal customers <strong>of</strong> the business, because, if they are satisfied with the current<br />

working environment, they will be willing to cooperate with the management to accomplish organizational goals.<br />

Employee satisfaction with training stems from the fact that employees gain confidence in producing high-quality<br />

services, perceive potentials for career advancement and appreciate their companies’ investment in them. <strong>The</strong>refore,<br />

the present study explores how employee satisfaction may influence information flow during order fulfillment<br />

process in Taiwanese electronics companies.<br />

<strong>The</strong> present study is assumed that employee satisfaction has a positive relationship with information flow<br />

in order fulfillment. It features a significant relationship between information flow and employee satisfaction.<br />

Furthermore, the result shows that salary, promotion opportunities and nature <strong>of</strong> job all positively affect quality <strong>of</strong><br />

information flow.<br />

Overall, the finding <strong>of</strong> a positive correlation between employee satisfaction and the quality <strong>of</strong> information<br />

flow has important implications on efforts to improve the quality <strong>of</strong> order fulfillment in Taiwan’s electronics<br />

industry.<br />

Introduction<br />

Order fulfillment actually serves as a spanning capability that, when utilized in a strategic<br />

manner, creates significant potentials for a competitive advantage (Davis-Sramek, Mentzer, & Stank,<br />

2008). However, logistic service quality is not the only factor that may influence the order-fulfillment<br />

process. Based on Vaidyanathan and Devaraj’s (2008) findings, the timeliness <strong>of</strong> order fulfillment has<br />

more impact than accuracy <strong>of</strong> order fulfillment. <strong>The</strong>y suggested information quality be used as a resource<br />

to bring forth quality fulfillment capability.<br />

<strong>The</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> employee factors, such as job satisfaction, loyalty, organizational<br />

commitment, and their impact on operational performance, has been largely neglected by the<br />

management (Yee, Yeung, & Cheng, 2008). <strong>The</strong>refore, Yee et al. (2008) proposed a research model to study<br />

the impact <strong>of</strong> employee satisfaction on quality and pr<strong>of</strong>itability. Although employee satisfaction belongs<br />

to organizational behavior and psychology, Ukko, Tenhunena, and Rantanen (2007) were convinced that<br />

employee attributes are an essential factor <strong>of</strong> operational efficiency.<br />

Literature Review<br />

Employee Satisfaction<br />

Employees are the internal customers <strong>of</strong> the business, because, if they are satisfied with the<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

151


current working environment, they will be willing to cooperate with the management to accomplish<br />

organizational goals (Chen, Yang, Shiau, & Wang, 2006). Employees with high levels <strong>of</strong> extraversion<br />

reported a greater intention <strong>of</strong> remaining when perceiving their work environment as having a high level<br />

<strong>of</strong> social rewards but a low level <strong>of</strong> procedural fairness (Burnett, Williamson, & Bartol, 2009). Jun, Cai, and<br />

Shin (2006) mentioned that employee satisfaction with training stems from the fact that employees gain<br />

confidence in producing high-quality services, perceive potentials for career advancement and appreciate<br />

their companies’ investment in them. To Silvestro (2002), employee satisfaction is critical to service<br />

organizations’ ability to respond effectively to customer needs while driving down costs through reduced<br />

recruitment and training expenditure and enhanced cost efficiency accruing from skilled workers’<br />

superior performance.<br />

Information Flow<br />

<strong>The</strong> ability to manage and track the flow <strong>of</strong> relevant information across supply-chain members<br />

has been greatly enhanced (Kulp, Lee, & Ofek, 2004). <strong>The</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> information exchanges in a<br />

partnership hinges on the quality <strong>of</strong> information sharing and “the level <strong>of</strong> information quality and<br />

participation” (Heikkila, 2002). Wade and Hulland’s (2004) reported that resources <strong>of</strong> information systems<br />

may take on many <strong>of</strong> the attributes <strong>of</strong> dynamic capabilities and, thus, may be particularly useful to<br />

companies operating in rapidly changing environments or facing long-term competiveness issues by<br />

helping them develop, add, integrate and release other key resources over time. Kulp et al. (2004)<br />

mentioned that information sharing may help the companies generate products and services that better<br />

match the needs <strong>of</strong> end customers. According to Shang and Marlow (2005), an information-based<br />

capability comprises information sharing and information technologies, which improve distribution<br />

performance, facilitate logistic integration and contribute to supply chain success.<br />

Research Methodology<br />

In order to find solutions to the managerial dilemmas identified in the introduction and<br />

literature review, a research question were developed:<br />

Research Question: What employee satisfaction factors will influence information flow in order<br />

fulfillment process<br />

To answer this question, the present study adopts a quantitative approach to verifying the<br />

current situations in the electronics industry. On the basis <strong>of</strong> the research question, a hypothesis was<br />

formulated:<br />

Employee satisfaction will be positively related to quality <strong>of</strong> information flow.<br />

Figure 1 illustrates a model that shows hypothesis along with the variables imbedded in it.<br />

<strong>The</strong> population <strong>of</strong> present study consists <strong>of</strong> the companies in Taiwan’s electronics industry.<br />

According to Taiwan Stock Exchange, there are 344 such companies. Given the definition <strong>of</strong> order<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

152


fulfillment, the respondents for the present study should have had direct contact with customers and a<br />

personal involvement with the company’s business operation. For this reason, the present survey targeted<br />

the employees in sales departments.<br />

According to a list from Taiwan Stock Exchange, companies were contacted and inquired about<br />

their willingness to participate in the survey. Questionnaires were then distributed, either by mail or<br />

online. <strong>The</strong> questionnaire eventually adopted consisted employee satisfaction and information flow.<br />

Employee satisfaction: For the measurement <strong>of</strong> employee satisfaction, Yee et al. (2008)<br />

formulated a number <strong>of</strong> questions, such as “We are satisfied with the salary <strong>of</strong> this company,” “We are<br />

satisfied with the promotion opportunities at this company,” and “We are satisfied with the job nature <strong>of</strong><br />

this company.” <strong>The</strong>se same questions were adopted in the present study.<br />

Information flow: Vaidyanathan and Devaraj (2008) used statements such as “I believe our<br />

company’s online catalog information is adequate,” “I believe our company’s online requisitioning<br />

processes are effective” to measure quality <strong>of</strong> information flow. In present study, these same items were<br />

used to measure quality <strong>of</strong> information flow.<br />

Data Analysis<br />

<strong>The</strong> following section presents the empirical verification <strong>of</strong> the causal relationship between<br />

employee satisfaction and information flow. <strong>The</strong> structural equation model was used as a statistical<br />

method for this testing. <strong>The</strong> observed and latent variables are described in the following.<br />

Observed Variables: ES 1 (Salary), ES 2 (Promotion opportunities), ES 3 (Nature <strong>of</strong> job); IF 1 (Online<br />

information), IF 2 (Online order procedures), IF 3 (Accuracy <strong>of</strong> order fulfillment), IF 4 (Timeliness <strong>of</strong> order<br />

fulfillment).<br />

Latent variables: Employee satisfaction, quality <strong>of</strong> information flow.<br />

<strong>The</strong> standardized regression weights in Table 1 range from 0.610 to 0.945. All <strong>of</strong> these weights are below<br />

1.0. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is clear that no <strong>of</strong>fending estimates had occurred in Model<br />

Table 1. Standardized Regression Weights.<br />

Estimate<br />

Information flow Employee satisfaction .746<br />

ES 1 ES .915<br />

ES 2 ES .945<br />

ES 3 ES .708<br />

IF 4 IF .730<br />

IF 3 IF .610<br />

IF 2 IF .637<br />

IF 1 IF .712<br />

Note: Estimate = Standardized coefficients<br />

Figure 2 is a graphical representation <strong>of</strong> the model. <strong>The</strong> indices <strong>of</strong> this model are chi-square divided by<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> freedom = 2.770, GFI = 0.970, CFI = 0.983, and RMSEA = 0.077. All <strong>of</strong> these indices have met the<br />

index value recommended by researchers (Kline, 1998; Byrane, 2001; Wu, 2009; Tabei, 2006).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

153


Table 2 shows a positive and significant relationship between employee satisfaction and quality <strong>of</strong><br />

information flow. <strong>The</strong> three observed variables (salary, promotion opportunities, nature <strong>of</strong> job) are<br />

positively influenced by employee satisfaction.<br />

Furthermore, the four observed variables (online information, online order procedures, accuracy <strong>of</strong> order<br />

fulfillment, timeliness <strong>of</strong> order fulfillment) are positively influenced by information flow.<br />

Table 3 indicates that two relationship errors, e5 and e6, should be created. <strong>The</strong> relationship is significant.<br />

Table 3. Covariance.<br />

Estimate S.E. C.R. P<br />

e5 e6 1.308 .178 7.348 ***<br />

Note: Estimate = Unstandardized coefficients; S.E. = Standard error;<br />

C.R. = Critical ratio; P = Significance: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001<br />

As shown in Figure 2, ES 1 (Salary), ES 2 (Promotion opportunities) and ES 3 (Nature <strong>of</strong> job) positively<br />

affect information flow. Hypothesis, that employee satisfaction will be positively related to quality <strong>of</strong><br />

information flow, was support by the data. This model assumes a positive relationship between employee<br />

satisfaction and quality <strong>of</strong> information flow.<br />

Discussions<br />

In Figure 2, the standardized regression weight is 0.75 between employee satisfaction and information<br />

flow. <strong>The</strong> standardized regression weight is significantly high between these two groups. Hence, this<br />

result suggests that the information flow is a function <strong>of</strong> satisfied employees (Yee et al., 2008). <strong>The</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

154


following paragraph displays the detail standardized regression weights for employee satisfaction and<br />

information flow.<br />

<strong>The</strong> standardized regression weight <strong>of</strong> IF 1 (Online information) is 0.71; for IF 2 (online order procedures)<br />

it is 0.64. <strong>The</strong> weights for IF 3 (Accuracy <strong>of</strong> order fulfillment) and IF 4 (Timeliness <strong>of</strong> order fulfillment) are<br />

0.61 and 0.73, respectively. <strong>The</strong> standardized regression weight <strong>of</strong> ES 1 (Salary) is 0.91 while those <strong>of</strong> ES 2<br />

(Promotion opportunities) and ES 3 (Nature <strong>of</strong> job) are 0.94 and 0.71, respectively. Because the standard<br />

regression weights <strong>of</strong> salary and promotion opportunities are high, these two variables had to be fulfilled<br />

first in order for them to exert a strong effect on information flow.<br />

<strong>The</strong> coefficient weight between IF2 (Online order procedures) and IF3 (Accuracy <strong>of</strong> Order fulfillment) is<br />

significantly high (0.65). Bienstock, Mentzer and Bird (1997) defined order procedure as the efficiency and<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the procedures followed by a supplier. This result supports the posited relationship<br />

between order procedures and order-fulfillment accuracy.<br />

References<br />

Bienstock, C. C., Mentzer, J. T., & Bird, M. M. (1997). Measuring physical distribution service quality.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Marketing Science, 25(1), 31-44.<br />

Burnett, M. F., Williamson, I. O., & Bartol, K. M. (2009). <strong>The</strong> moderating effect <strong>of</strong> personality on employees’<br />

reactions to procedural fairness and outcome favorability. Journal <strong>of</strong> Business and Psychology, 24(4), 469-484<br />

Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and<br />

programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.<br />

Chen, S. H., Yang, C. C., Shiau, J. Y., & Wang, H. H. (2006). <strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> an employee satisfaction<br />

model for higher education. <strong>The</strong> TQM Magazine, 18(5), 484-500.<br />

Davis-Sramek, B., Mentzer, J. T., & Stank, T. P. (2008). Creating consumer durable retailer customer loyalty<br />

through order fulfillment service operations. Journal <strong>of</strong> Operations Management, 26, 781-797.<br />

Heikkila, J. (2002). From supply to demand chain management: efficiency and customer satisfaction.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Operations Management, 20, 747-767.<br />

Jun, M., Cai, S., & Shin, H. (2006). TQM practice in Maquiladora: Antecedents <strong>of</strong> employee satisfaction and<br />

loyalty. Journal <strong>of</strong> Operations Management, 24, 791-812.<br />

Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice <strong>of</strong> structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.<br />

Kulp, S. C., Lee, H. L., & Ofek, E. (2004). Manufacturer benefits from information integration with retail<br />

customers. Management Science, 50, 431-444.<br />

Shang, K. C., & Marlow, P. B. (2005). Logistics capability and performance in Taiwan’s major<br />

manufacturing firms. Transportation Research, Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 41, 217-234.<br />

Silvestro, R. (2002). Dispelling the modern myth: Employee satisfaction and loyalty drive service<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Operations and Production Management, 22, 30-49.<br />

Tabei, A. (2006). <strong>The</strong> handbook <strong>of</strong> AMOS for using variance-covariance analysis. Taipei: Ting-Mao<br />

Publishing.<br />

Ukko, J., Tenhunena, J., & Rantanen, H. (2007). Performance measurement impacts on management and<br />

leadership: Perspectives <strong>of</strong> management and employees. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Production Economics, 110, 39-51.<br />

Vaidyanathan, G., & Devaraj, S. (2008). <strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> quality in e-procurement performance: An empirical<br />

analysis. Journal <strong>of</strong> Operations Management, 26, 407-425.<br />

Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). <strong>The</strong> resource-based view and information system research: Review,<br />

extension and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, 28, 107-138.<br />

Wu, M. L. (2009). SPSS operation and application: <strong>The</strong> practice <strong>of</strong> quantitative analysis <strong>of</strong> questionnaire<br />

data. Taipei: Wu-Nan Book Co., Ltd.<br />

Yee, R. W. Y., Yeung, A. C. L., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2008). <strong>The</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> employee satisfaction on quality and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability in high-contact service industries. Journal <strong>of</strong> Operations Management, 26, 651-668.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

155


An Exploration <strong>of</strong> Consumer Misbehaviors and their Influences on<br />

Retail Stores: An Application <strong>of</strong> the <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Justice<br />

Jungki Lee<br />

Korea University at Sejong, South Korea<br />

Keywords<br />

Consumer misbehavior, theory <strong>of</strong> justice, distributive misbehaviors, procedural misbehaviors,<br />

interactional misbehaviors<br />

Abstract<br />

This study applies a new perspective to the study <strong>of</strong> consumer misbehaviors and investigates the<br />

consequences <strong>of</strong> them at retail stores. By adopting the theory <strong>of</strong> justice, the study conceptualizes consumer<br />

misbehaviors as a dysfunctional type <strong>of</strong> consumer behavior aimed at obtaining unfair or unjust benefits during<br />

shopping, and classifies consumer misbehaviors into three types; distributive misbehaviors, procedural misbehaviors,<br />

and interactional misbehaviors. Distributive misbehaviors include shoplifting, financial fraud, and other outcomeoriented<br />

dysfunctional consumer behaviors where the allocation <strong>of</strong> benefits is not distributed fairly but unduly<br />

unfavorable to the seller. Procedural misbehaviors, exemplified by jumping queues, cheating for personal<br />

convenience, willful disobedience <strong>of</strong> rules and so on, are founded upon the buyers’ motives for selfish procedural<br />

convenience. Finally, interactional misbehaviors include verbal abuse, physical abuse, using threats, and other<br />

consumer’s unfair interpersonal treatment <strong>of</strong> the seller. <strong>The</strong> study, by using 9 hypotheses, examined the extent <strong>of</strong><br />

each type <strong>of</strong> consumer misbehaviors and its influences on store employees, other customers in the store, and overall<br />

store atmosphere. For the data collection, a survey research was conducted from 235 retail employees who worked for<br />

department store, general store, convenience store, or discount store. Seven <strong>of</strong> the nine hypotheses were either fully<br />

or partially supported, indicating the significant negative influences made by consumer misbehaviors on store<br />

employees, other customers, and overall store atmosphere. Managerial implications and future research directions are<br />

provided.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

156


How do online consumer review sentiments affect e-commerce sales A<br />

Text-Mining Analysis<br />

Wenyu Dou, Wenyin Liu and Xiaojun Quan<br />

City University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, China<br />

Keywords<br />

Word-<strong>of</strong>-mouth communication, e-commerce, consumer sentiment, service attributes.<br />

Abstract<br />

Word-<strong>of</strong>-mouth (WOM) communications are considered to be key drivers for e-commerce sales. Yet majority <strong>of</strong><br />

existing studies in this area rely on numerical ratings provided by customers, ignoring the rich details <strong>of</strong> consumer<br />

sentiment (e.g., happy vs. exhilarated) contained in the review texts. This study aims to fill this void. Specifically, we<br />

developed a new text-mining methodology that can extract and represent consumer sentiments in reviews in an<br />

iterative manner. We start by identifying key dimensions in consumer reviews. Next, we rate the sentiment level <strong>of</strong><br />

each specific review according to a pre-developed coding sheet. On the basis <strong>of</strong> a text mining process, we develop<br />

consumer sentiment scores on key service attributes.<br />

Finally, we ran an econometric analysis on the impact <strong>of</strong> review sentiment scores on sales. <strong>The</strong> model was tested<br />

using data from a travel service provider in China and obtained preliminary support. Implications for the e-<br />

commerce industry and WOM research are discussed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

157


Geographic Distribution <strong>of</strong> Population and<br />

Labor Force in Saudi Arabia<br />

Majed Sultan Abu Ashwan<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Arts, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia<br />

Keywords<br />

Geographic distribution, labor force, growth <strong>of</strong> population, expatriates, population redistribution<br />

Abstract<br />

Saudi Arabia, the largest country in the Middle East is going through changes on its demographic front;<br />

not only on growth but also on geographic distribution. Increasing urbanization, geographic mobility and<br />

immigration are national concerns requiring concerted efforts.<br />

This paper examines (a) regional distribution <strong>of</strong> population (b) region wise growth <strong>of</strong> population during<br />

1974-2010 (c) proportional growth and distribution <strong>of</strong> expatriates at various regions <strong>of</strong> the Kingdom and (d) labor<br />

force pattern.<br />

This paper is based on the National Censuses carried out in the Kingdom on four different periods namely,<br />

1974, 1992, 2004 and 2010.<br />

Population <strong>of</strong> the Kingdom is largely concentrated in regions namely, Riyadh, Makkah and Eastern<br />

Region, where three metropolises – Riyadh, Jeddah and Dammam – are located. Labor force pattern is based on the<br />

development dimension <strong>of</strong> the area. This urban pressure creates hurdles on development planning in terms <strong>of</strong> basic<br />

infrastructure. And so, with industrial and commercial development, population redistribution will be <strong>of</strong> priority.<br />

Introduction<br />

Population distribution in Saudi Arabia is uneven both on regional and urban scales (Arab News,<br />

2012; Makki, 2008). This distribution created phenomenal growth <strong>of</strong> urban centres through concentration<br />

<strong>of</strong> Government and private investments (Collemore, 2003). Thus, the primate cities grew alarmingly,<br />

which increased demand for public services such as piped water, electricity, sewage and telephone.<br />

Growth <strong>of</strong> secondary cities needs encouragement at this juncture (Khraif, 2007), in order to redistribute<br />

the population.<br />

Geographic regions namely Riyadh – the capital; Makkah – the holy city and Eastern region –<br />

industrial corridor had expanded in terms <strong>of</strong> population size during the last four decades (Ashwan et al.,<br />

2012; Arab News, 2012). As a result, the infrastructure <strong>of</strong> utility services upgraded; there by promoting<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> life style. This modernization increased expatriate labor force paving way for tremendous<br />

changes in living arrangement, regional balance and distribution <strong>of</strong> population and thus the national<br />

economy (Khraif, 2007).<br />

<strong>The</strong> discovery <strong>of</strong> oil revenues opened up the employment sector creating openings for foreign<br />

labor to fulfill demands from various economic sectors – primary, secondary and tertiary. <strong>The</strong> expansion<br />

<strong>of</strong> economic and labor sector facilitated rural to urban migration <strong>of</strong> natives. Urbanization and<br />

modernization created inequity and regional differences that affected economy and labor force (Ashwan,<br />

1990).<br />

Inmigrations – mobility <strong>of</strong> native population from one region to another especially rural to urban<br />

gained momentum (Makki, 2008) for purposes <strong>of</strong> employment, better living arrangements, commercial<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

158


and industrial activities and quality <strong>of</strong> life (Khraif, 2000; Khraif, 1994).<br />

This uneven distribution <strong>of</strong> population in the Kingdom favoring metropolises and small towns due to<br />

urbanization create hurdles (Collemore, 2003) on public utility services (Salam and Mouselhy, 2012).<br />

Objectives<br />

This paper is prepared in this context <strong>of</strong> increasing disparity among various regions, which affect<br />

economic integration <strong>of</strong> the Kingdom. A close look at population – both native and expatriate - at various<br />

geographic regions and its relation with labor force participation are made here.<br />

Methodology<br />

Data pertaining to various censuses in the Kingdom is utilized in this paper. Censuses in Saudi Arabia<br />

were held during 1962/63 (incomplete); 1974 (complete but not reliable): 1992, 2004 and 2010.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

As the 1962/63 census was incomplete, it was not analyzed. Census <strong>of</strong> 1974 was not utilized much as it is<br />

not reliable. <strong>The</strong> other census data were utilized to the maximum extent in this analysis. Labor force<br />

details were made available only in 2004 census. Results are discussed under three heads (a) geographic<br />

distribution (b) labor force participation and (c) correlation between expatriate population and labor force<br />

pattern.<br />

Distribution <strong>of</strong> Population<br />

Census <strong>of</strong> 1974 gave Makkah as the largest region in terms <strong>of</strong> population size (26.2%) – both<br />

native (23.5%) and expatriate (46.2%) – followed by Riaydh (18.7%; 18.8%; 18.2%), Eastern Region (11.3%;<br />

11.3%; 11.2%) and Aseer (10.1%; 10.9%; 4.0%) in that order. Riyadh region experienced a large growth in<br />

population. By 1992, it population reached near to that <strong>of</strong> Makkah, proportionately. <strong>The</strong>se three regions<br />

(Riyadh, Makah and Eastern Region) took a share <strong>of</strong> 64.2 percent <strong>of</strong> population (59.35% <strong>of</strong> natives and<br />

77.2% <strong>of</strong> expatriates), as per 1992 census. <strong>The</strong> corresponding proportions during 2004 and 2010 were 64.5<br />

(59.7% in case <strong>of</strong> natives and 77.3% in case <strong>of</strong> expatriates) and 65.6 (60.5% <strong>of</strong> natives and 77.0 % <strong>of</strong><br />

expatriates); showing the pace <strong>of</strong> urbanization. Not only the proportional distribution <strong>of</strong> native<br />

population but also the expatriate population grew in these regions. Regional variations are indicative <strong>of</strong><br />

urbanization, employment and demographic processes (Arab News, 2012).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

159


Table 1 Proportional distribution <strong>of</strong> population by regions – Census years<br />

Regions<br />

Total<br />

1974 1992 2004 2010<br />

Total<br />

Al Riyadh<br />

Makka Al Mokarramah<br />

Al Madinah Al<br />

Monawarah<br />

Al Qaseem<br />

Eastern Region<br />

Aseer<br />

Tabouk<br />

Hail<br />

Northern Borders<br />

Jazan<br />

Najran<br />

Al Baha<br />

Al Jouf<br />

Total<br />

18.7<br />

26.2<br />

7.7<br />

4.8<br />

11.3<br />

10.1<br />

2.9<br />

3.9<br />

1.9<br />

6.1<br />

2.1<br />

2.8<br />

1.5<br />

100.<br />

0<br />

22.6<br />

26.4<br />

6.4<br />

4.4<br />

15.2<br />

7.9<br />

2.9<br />

2.4<br />

1.4<br />

5.1<br />

1.8<br />

2.0<br />

1.6<br />

100.<br />

0<br />

24.1<br />

25.6<br />

6.7<br />

4.5<br />

14.8<br />

7.4<br />

3.1<br />

2.3<br />

1.2<br />

5.2<br />

1.9<br />

1.7<br />

1.6<br />

100.<br />

0<br />

25.0<br />

25.5<br />

6.6<br />

4.5<br />

15.1<br />

7.1<br />

2.9<br />

2.2<br />

1.2<br />

5.0<br />

1.9<br />

1.5<br />

1.6<br />

100.<br />

0<br />

Natives<br />

Al Riyadh<br />

Makka Al Mokarramah<br />

Al Madinah Al<br />

Monawarah<br />

Al Qaseem<br />

Eastern Region<br />

Aseer<br />

Tabouk<br />

Hail<br />

Northern Borders<br />

Jazan<br />

Najran<br />

Al Baha<br />

Al Jouf<br />

Total<br />

Expatriate<br />

Al Riyadh<br />

Makka Al Mokarramah<br />

Al Madinah Al<br />

Monawarah<br />

Al Qaseem<br />

Eastern Region<br />

Aseer<br />

Tabouk<br />

Hail<br />

Northern Borders<br />

Jazan<br />

Najran<br />

Al Baha<br />

Al Jouf<br />

Total<br />

18.8<br />

23.5<br />

8.0<br />

5.2<br />

11.3<br />

10.9<br />

3.1<br />

4.4<br />

2.1<br />

5.8<br />

2.2<br />

3.0<br />

1.6<br />

100.<br />

0<br />

18.2<br />

46.2<br />

5.2<br />

1.7<br />

11.2<br />

4.0<br />

1.2<br />

0.6<br />

0.7<br />

7.9<br />

1.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.7<br />

100.<br />

0<br />

21.2<br />

22.6<br />

6.8<br />

5.0<br />

15.5<br />

9.3<br />

3.3<br />

2.8<br />

1.5<br />

6.0<br />

2.0<br />

2.4<br />

1.8<br />

100.<br />

0<br />

26.3<br />

36.4<br />

5.3<br />

3.0<br />

14.5<br />

4.1<br />

1.8<br />

1.4<br />

1.1<br />

2.8<br />

1.3<br />

0.9<br />

1.0<br />

100.<br />

0<br />

22.5<br />

21.7<br />

6.9<br />

4.9<br />

15.5<br />

8.7<br />

3.6<br />

2.7<br />

1.5<br />

6.0<br />

2.1<br />

2.0<br />

1.9<br />

100.<br />

0<br />

28.2<br />

36.0<br />

6.0<br />

3.2<br />

13.1<br />

4.1<br />

1.6<br />

1.2<br />

0.7<br />

3.1<br />

1.2<br />

0.8<br />

0.9<br />

100.<br />

0<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

160<br />

23.0<br />

22.0<br />

6.7<br />

5.0<br />

15.5<br />

8.5<br />

3.5<br />

2.6<br />

1.4<br />

5.9<br />

2.2<br />

1.9<br />

1.9<br />

100.<br />

0<br />

29.4<br />

33.2<br />

6.1<br />

3.4<br />

14.4<br />

3.8<br />

1.5<br />

1.3<br />

0.6<br />

3.1<br />

1.2<br />

0.8<br />

1.1<br />

100.<br />

0


Over the census years population grew from 6 million (1974) to 27 million (2010); a growth <strong>of</strong> 303<br />

percentage. Growth during the period <strong>of</strong> 1974-1992 was 15.2 percentage; 1992-2004 was 33.8 percentage<br />

while the same for 2004-2010 was 19.7 percentage. Annual growth rate showed a hike during 2004-2010<br />

as compared to the previous census period.<br />

Table 2 Population by regions – Census Years<br />

Regions 1974 1992 2004 2010<br />

Total<br />

Al Riyadh<br />

Makka Al Mokarramah<br />

Al Madinah Al Monawarah<br />

Al Qaseem<br />

Eastern Region<br />

Aseer<br />

Tabouk<br />

Hail<br />

Northern Borders<br />

Jazan<br />

Najran<br />

Al Baha<br />

Al Jouf<br />

Total<br />

Native<br />

Al Riyadh<br />

Makka Al Mokarramah<br />

Al Madinah Al Monawarah<br />

Al Qaseem<br />

Eastern Region<br />

Aseer<br />

Tabouk<br />

Hail<br />

Northern Borders<br />

Jazan<br />

Najran<br />

Al Baha<br />

Al Jouf<br />

Total<br />

Expatriate<br />

Al Riyadh<br />

Makka Al Mokarramah<br />

Al Madinah Al Monawarah<br />

Al Qaseem<br />

Eastern Region<br />

Aseer<br />

Tabouk<br />

Hail<br />

Northern Borders<br />

Jazan<br />

Najran<br />

Al Baha<br />

Al Jouf<br />

Total<br />

1259145<br />

1760216<br />

516636<br />

324543<br />

762037<br />

678679<br />

194539<br />

265216<br />

127582<br />

408334<br />

144097<br />

185851<br />

99591<br />

6726466<br />

1115252<br />

1394934<br />

475457<br />

311230<br />

673113<br />

647068<br />

182112<br />

260127<br />

121997<br />

345706<br />

130105<br />

180824<br />

94436<br />

5935361<br />

143893<br />

365282<br />

41179<br />

13313<br />

88924<br />

31611<br />

9427<br />

5089<br />

5585<br />

62628<br />

13992<br />

5027<br />

5155<br />

791105<br />

3834986<br />

4467670<br />

1084947<br />

750979<br />

2575820<br />

1340168<br />

486134<br />

411284<br />

229060<br />

865961<br />

300994<br />

332157<br />

268228<br />

16948388<br />

2613915<br />

2781075<br />

837695<br />

610566<br />

1902108<br />

1150089<br />

401917<br />

346177<br />

178610<br />

733968<br />

240581<br />

289946<br />

223406<br />

12310053<br />

1221071<br />

1686595<br />

247252<br />

140413<br />

673712<br />

190079<br />

84217<br />

65107<br />

50450<br />

131993<br />

60413<br />

42211<br />

44822<br />

4638335<br />

5458273<br />

5797184<br />

1512724<br />

1015972<br />

3360031<br />

1687939<br />

691716<br />

526882<br />

279971<br />

1187587<br />

420345<br />

377900<br />

361738<br />

22678262<br />

3725557<br />

3584628<br />

1144271<br />

817271<br />

2555502<br />

1434842<br />

594271<br />

451747<br />

239834<br />

994025<br />

349041<br />

328317<br />

308034<br />

16527340<br />

1732716<br />

2212556<br />

368453<br />

198701<br />

804529<br />

253097<br />

97445<br />

75135<br />

40137<br />

193562<br />

71304<br />

49583<br />

53704<br />

6150922<br />

6777146<br />

6915006<br />

1777933<br />

1215858<br />

4105780<br />

1913392<br />

791535<br />

597144<br />

320524<br />

1365110<br />

505652<br />

411888<br />

440009<br />

27136977<br />

4296745<br />

4116065<br />

1262512<br />

928491<br />

2891115<br />

1590847<br />

661153<br />

487204<br />

268177<br />

1105095<br />

402424<br />

348636<br />

349112<br />

18707576<br />

2480401<br />

2798941<br />

515421<br />

287367<br />

1214665<br />

322545<br />

130382<br />

109940<br />

52347<br />

260015<br />

103228<br />

63252<br />

90897<br />

8429401<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

161


Regions <strong>of</strong> Riyadh, Makah, Al Qaseem, Eastern Region, Northern Border, Najran and Jouf reported a hike<br />

in annual growth rate. Tabouk reported a reduction in annual growth rate. During 1992-2004, native<br />

Saudi grew in numbers; higher in Riyadh, Tabouk, Najran and Jouf. But during 2004-2010, expatriate<br />

population grew in all regions. <strong>The</strong>se high growth rate and increased population density has implications<br />

on business and financial sectors as large populations are captive consumer market that pressurizes<br />

housing, health care, education, transport and environmental sectors (Arab News, 2009; Vizian, 2009).<br />

Table 3 Annual growth rate <strong>of</strong> population by regions – Census years<br />

Regions<br />

Annual<br />

growth<br />

rate<br />

74-92<br />

Annual<br />

growth<br />

rate<br />

(92-04)<br />

Annual<br />

growth<br />

rate<br />

(04-10)<br />

Percentage<br />

growth<br />

(74-92)<br />

Total<br />

Al Riyadh<br />

Makka Al<br />

Mokarramah<br />

Al Madinah Al<br />

Monawarah<br />

Al Qaseem<br />

Eastern Region<br />

Aseer<br />

Tabouk<br />

Hail<br />

Northern Borders<br />

Jazan<br />

Najran<br />

Al Baha<br />

Al Jouf<br />

Total<br />

Native<br />

Al Riyadh<br />

Makka Al<br />

Mokarramah<br />

Al Madinah Al<br />

Monawarah<br />

Al Qaseem<br />

Eastern Region<br />

Aseer<br />

Tabouk<br />

Hail<br />

Northern Borders<br />

Jazan<br />

Najran<br />

Al Baha<br />

Al Jouf<br />

Total<br />

6.0<br />

5.0<br />

4.0<br />

4.5<br />

6.6<br />

3.7<br />

4.9<br />

2.4<br />

3.2<br />

4.0<br />

4.0<br />

3.1<br />

5.3<br />

5.0<br />

4.9<br />

3.7<br />

3.1<br />

3.6<br />

5.6<br />

3.1<br />

4.2<br />

1.5<br />

2.1<br />

4.1<br />

3.3<br />

2.5<br />

4.6<br />

3.9<br />

3.0<br />

2.2<br />

2.8<br />

2.5<br />

2.2<br />

1.9<br />

3.0<br />

2.1<br />

1.7<br />

2.6<br />

2.8<br />

1.1<br />

2.5<br />

2.4<br />

3.0<br />

2.1<br />

2.6<br />

2.4<br />

2.5<br />

1.9<br />

3.3<br />

2.2<br />

2.5<br />

2.5<br />

3.1<br />

1.0<br />

2.7<br />

2.5<br />

3.9<br />

3.1<br />

2.9<br />

3.2<br />

3.6<br />

2.2<br />

2.4<br />

2.2<br />

2.4<br />

2.5<br />

3.3<br />

1.5<br />

3.5<br />

3.2<br />

2.5<br />

2.5<br />

1.8<br />

2.3<br />

2.2<br />

1.8<br />

1.9<br />

1.3<br />

2.0<br />

1.9<br />

2.5<br />

1.1<br />

2.2<br />

2.2<br />

204.6<br />

153.8<br />

110.0<br />

131.4<br />

238.0<br />

97.5<br />

149.9<br />

55.1<br />

79.5<br />

112.1<br />

108.9<br />

78.7<br />

169.3<br />

152.0<br />

134.4<br />

99.4<br />

76.2<br />

96.2<br />

182.6<br />

77.7<br />

117.1<br />

33.1<br />

46.4<br />

112.3<br />

84.9<br />

60.3<br />

136.6<br />

107.4<br />

Percentage<br />

growth<br />

(92-04)<br />

42.3<br />

29.8<br />

39.4<br />

35.3<br />

30.4<br />

25.9<br />

42.3<br />

28.1<br />

22.2<br />

37.1<br />

39.7<br />

13.8<br />

34.9<br />

33.8<br />

42.5<br />

28.9<br />

36.6<br />

33.9<br />

34.4<br />

24.8<br />

47.9<br />

30.5<br />

34.3<br />

35.4<br />

45.1<br />

13.2<br />

37.9<br />

34.3<br />

Percentage<br />

growth<br />

(04-10)<br />

24.2<br />

19.3<br />

17.5<br />

19.7<br />

22.2<br />

13.4<br />

14.4<br />

13.3<br />

14.5<br />

14.9<br />

20.3<br />

90.0<br />

21.6<br />

19.7<br />

15.3<br />

14.8<br />

10.3<br />

13.6<br />

13.1<br />

10.9<br />

11.3<br />

7.8<br />

11.8<br />

11.2<br />

15.3<br />

6.2<br />

13.3<br />

13.2<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

162


Expatriate<br />

Al Riyadh<br />

Makka Al<br />

Mokarramah<br />

Al Madinah Al<br />

Monawarah<br />

Al Qaseem<br />

Eastern Region<br />

Aseer<br />

Tabouk<br />

Hail<br />

Northern Borders<br />

Jazan<br />

Najran<br />

Al Baha<br />

Al Jouf<br />

Total<br />

11.5<br />

8.2<br />

9.6<br />

12.7<br />

10.9<br />

9.7<br />

11.8<br />

13.7<br />

11.8<br />

4.0<br />

7.9<br />

11.4<br />

11.6<br />

9.5<br />

2.9<br />

2.3<br />

3.3<br />

2.9<br />

1.5<br />

2.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.2<br />

-1.9<br />

3.2<br />

1.4<br />

1.4<br />

1.5<br />

2.4<br />

6.4<br />

4.2<br />

6.0<br />

6.6<br />

7.3<br />

4.3<br />

5.2<br />

6.8<br />

4.7<br />

5.3<br />

6.6<br />

4.3<br />

9.4<br />

5.6<br />

748.6<br />

361.7<br />

500.4<br />

954.7<br />

657.6<br />

501.3<br />

793.4<br />

1179.4<br />

803.3<br />

110.8<br />

331.8<br />

739.7<br />

769.5<br />

486.3<br />

41.9<br />

31.2<br />

49.0<br />

41.5<br />

19.4<br />

33.2<br />

15.7<br />

15.4<br />

-20.4<br />

46.6<br />

18.0<br />

17.5<br />

19.8<br />

32.6<br />

43.2<br />

26.5<br />

39.9<br />

44.6<br />

51.0<br />

27.4<br />

33.8<br />

46.3<br />

30.4<br />

34.3<br />

44.8<br />

27.6<br />

69.3<br />

37.0<br />

This uneven distribution <strong>of</strong> population across geographic areas was reflected in the ratio <strong>of</strong> expatriate to<br />

native population – a national concern. <strong>The</strong> ratio registered an increase with census years (Saudi Gazette,<br />

2010). <strong>The</strong> national population spatial distribution policies meet their objectives and create prudent<br />

balancing <strong>of</strong> financing (AlKhalifeh, 1993).<br />

Table 4 Expatriates per every 1000 nationals by regions<br />

Regions<br />

Census<br />

1974 1992 2004 2010 Percent<br />

Increase<br />

(74-92)<br />

Al Riyadh<br />

Makka Al Mokarramah<br />

Al Madinah Al<br />

Monawarah<br />

Al Qaseem<br />

Eastern Region<br />

Aseer<br />

Tabouk<br />

Hail<br />

Northern Borders<br />

Jazan<br />

Najran<br />

Al Baha<br />

Al Jouf<br />

Total<br />

129<br />

262<br />

87<br />

43<br />

132<br />

49<br />

51<br />

20<br />

46<br />

181<br />

108<br />

28<br />

55<br />

133<br />

467<br />

606<br />

295<br />

230<br />

354<br />

165<br />

210<br />

188<br />

282<br />

180<br />

251<br />

146<br />

201<br />

377<br />

465<br />

617<br />

322<br />

243<br />

315<br />

176<br />

164<br />

166<br />

167<br />

195<br />

204<br />

151<br />

174<br />

372<br />

577<br />

680<br />

408<br />

309<br />

420<br />

203<br />

197<br />

226<br />

195<br />

235<br />

257<br />

181<br />

260<br />

451<br />

262.1<br />

131.6<br />

240.8<br />

437.6<br />

168.1<br />

238.3<br />

311.5<br />

861.4<br />

517.0<br />

-0.7<br />

133.5<br />

423.7<br />

267.5<br />

182.7<br />

Percent<br />

Increase<br />

(92-04)<br />

-0.4<br />

1.8<br />

9.1<br />

5.7<br />

-11.1<br />

6.7<br />

-21.7<br />

-11.6<br />

-40.8<br />

8.3<br />

-18.6<br />

3.7<br />

-13.1<br />

-1.2<br />

Percent<br />

increas<br />

e<br />

(04-10)<br />

24.1<br />

10.2<br />

26.8<br />

27.3<br />

33.5<br />

14.9<br />

20.3<br />

35.7<br />

16.6<br />

20.8<br />

25.6<br />

20.1<br />

49.3<br />

21.1<br />

Labor Force<br />

More than one-third <strong>of</strong> the native population (38.9%), as a whole, was into the labor force; <strong>of</strong> which male<br />

participation rate was nearly 5 times that <strong>of</strong> females. A highest level <strong>of</strong> participation was observed in<br />

Tabouk (42.9%) followed by Eastern Region (41.8%) and Riaydh (41.4%) in that order. Aljouf (15.4%), Al<br />

Qaseem (14.9%) and Riyadh (14.7%) regions had higher percent <strong>of</strong> females in labor force. <strong>The</strong> current<br />

high proportion <strong>of</strong> population in urban area indicates the population labor force interrelationship (Sly<br />

and Serow, 1993).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

163


Table 5 Labor force participation rate <strong>of</strong> native population (15 year and above) – 2004 (Percentage)<br />

Region Male Female Total<br />

Al Riyadh<br />

Makka Al Mokarramah<br />

Al Madinah Al Monawarah<br />

Al Qaseem<br />

Eastern Region<br />

Aseer<br />

Tabouk<br />

Hail<br />

Northern Borders<br />

Jazan<br />

Najran<br />

Al Baha<br />

Al Jouf<br />

Total<br />

66.2<br />

64.1<br />

62.2<br />

58.9<br />

68.1<br />

58.8<br />

71.2<br />

57.8<br />

63.5<br />

59.2<br />

66.9<br />

57.5<br />

59.0<br />

64.1<br />

14.7<br />

13.2<br />

11.6<br />

14.9<br />

13.1<br />

12.0<br />

11.8<br />

13.3<br />

12.7<br />

11.5<br />

10.5<br />

12.7<br />

15.4<br />

13.2<br />

41.4<br />

38.8<br />

36.6<br />

36.9<br />

41.8<br />

34.5<br />

42.9<br />

34.8<br />

38.2<br />

34.5<br />

38.4<br />

33.0<br />

37.6<br />

38.9<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> the 3,860,783 natives aged 15 years and above in labor force, only 3,298,179 were main workers; the<br />

rest were marginal workers. Of the main workers, 2.8 percent were employers, 3.5 percent were self<br />

employed while the rest 93.6 percent were paid/unpaid workers. <strong>The</strong>re were a higher percent <strong>of</strong><br />

employers in Al Qaseem followed by Makkah and Madina regions in that order. It was males, who were<br />

employers in all regions. <strong>The</strong> paid/unpaid workers were the largest category with more than 90 percent<br />

in all the regions.<br />

Table 6 Main workers by their employment level (15 years and above) - 2004<br />

Self<br />

Employer employed<br />

Region<br />

Male<br />

Al Riyadh<br />

Makkah Al Mokarramah<br />

Al Madinah Al<br />

Monawarah<br />

Al Qaseem<br />

Eastern Region<br />

Aseer<br />

Tabouk<br />

Hail<br />

Northern Borders<br />

Jazan<br />

Najran<br />

Al Baha<br />

Al Jouf<br />

Total<br />

Female<br />

Al Riyadh<br />

Makka Al Mokarramah<br />

Al Madinah Al<br />

Monawarah<br />

Al Qaseem<br />

Eastern Region<br />

Aseer<br />

3.2<br />

4.3<br />

3.4<br />

5.1<br />

3.1<br />

1.9<br />

1.4<br />

2.7<br />

1.9<br />

1.5<br />

2.7<br />

3.0<br />

2.1<br />

3.2<br />

0.4<br />

0.8<br />

0.3<br />

0.3<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.2<br />

2.3<br />

5.0<br />

5.7<br />

5.3<br />

3.9<br />

4.4<br />

2.0<br />

5.1<br />

3.2<br />

6.8<br />

5.4<br />

3.3<br />

3.1<br />

4.0<br />

0.3<br />

0.5<br />

0.3<br />

0.4<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.1<br />

1.7<br />

Paid/unpai<br />

d worker<br />

94.5<br />

90.8<br />

90.9<br />

89.6<br />

93.0<br />

93.7<br />

96.6<br />

92.1<br />

95.0<br />

91.7<br />

91.9<br />

93.8<br />

94.8<br />

92.7<br />

99.2<br />

98.7<br />

99.4<br />

99.3<br />

99.2<br />

99.4<br />

99.7<br />

98.1<br />

Total<br />

704128<br />

644389<br />

174038<br />

125320<br />

493723<br />

210097<br />

108169<br />

65468<br />

36790<br />

135207<br />

55089<br />

47335<br />

43146<br />

2842899<br />

120214<br />

103852<br />

27320<br />

26375<br />

65813<br />

34758<br />

12343<br />

12314<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

164


Tabouk<br />

Hail<br />

Northern Borders<br />

Jazan<br />

Najran<br />

Al Baha<br />

Al Jouf<br />

Total<br />

0.3<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.5<br />

0.3<br />

0.3<br />

0.3<br />

0.4<br />

99.5<br />

99.2<br />

99.5<br />

99.5<br />

99.6<br />

99.1<br />

5551<br />

20602<br />

7212<br />

9512<br />

9414<br />

455280<br />

Total<br />

Al Riyadh<br />

Makka Al Mokarramah<br />

Al Madinah Al<br />

Monawarah<br />

Al Qaseem<br />

Eastern Region<br />

Aseer<br />

Tabouk<br />

Hail<br />

Northern Borders<br />

Jazan<br />

Najran<br />

Al Baha<br />

Al Jouf<br />

Total<br />

2.8<br />

3.8<br />

3.0<br />

4.2<br />

2.8<br />

1.7<br />

1.3<br />

2.3<br />

1.7<br />

1.3<br />

2.4<br />

2.5<br />

1.8<br />

2.8<br />

2.0<br />

4.3<br />

5.0<br />

4.5<br />

3.5<br />

3.8<br />

1.8<br />

4.6<br />

2.8<br />

6.0<br />

4.8<br />

2.8<br />

2.6<br />

3.5<br />

95.2<br />

91.9<br />

92.0<br />

91.3<br />

93.8<br />

94.5<br />

96.9<br />

93.1<br />

95.6<br />

92.7<br />

92.8<br />

94.7<br />

95.6<br />

93.6<br />

824342<br />

748241<br />

201358<br />

151695<br />

559536<br />

244855<br />

120512<br />

77782<br />

42341<br />

155809<br />

62301<br />

56847<br />

52560<br />

3298179<br />

<strong>The</strong> main occupation <strong>of</strong> native population were divided into management (Directors and managers);<br />

specialists, technicians, clerical, sales, service, traditional (agriculture, husbandry, fishing and hunting);<br />

industrial and supporting. Higher proportion <strong>of</strong> people was technicians, clerical, specialists and service<br />

workers.<br />

Table 7 Main workers by their main occupation (15 years and above) - 2004<br />

Region<br />

Al Riyadh<br />

Makka Al<br />

Mokarramah<br />

Al Madinah Al<br />

Monawarah<br />

Al Qaseem<br />

Eastern Region<br />

Aseer<br />

Tabouk<br />

Hail<br />

Northern Borders<br />

Jazan<br />

Najran<br />

Al Baha<br />

Al Jouf<br />

Total<br />

Man<br />

agem<br />

ent<br />

11.5<br />

11.0<br />

8.8<br />

9.8<br />

9.8<br />

8.8<br />

9.6<br />

8.2<br />

8.4<br />

6.9<br />

8.9<br />

8.2<br />

8.4<br />

10.1<br />

Spe<br />

ciali<br />

sts<br />

14.7<br />

13.5<br />

12.0<br />

12.3<br />

12.6<br />

11.9<br />

10.1<br />

10.7<br />

10.2<br />

10.1<br />

10.0<br />

13.0<br />

11.8<br />

12.9<br />

Tec<br />

hni<br />

cian<br />

s<br />

20.8<br />

22.4<br />

24.9<br />

28.5<br />

19.5<br />

25.9<br />

19.6<br />

29.0<br />

24.7<br />

28.7<br />

22.6<br />

31.3<br />

29.2<br />

22.9<br />

Cl<br />

eri<br />

ca<br />

l<br />

20<br />

.8<br />

17<br />

.9<br />

16<br />

.3<br />

16<br />

.5<br />

17<br />

.4<br />

16<br />

.1<br />

18<br />

.4<br />

16<br />

.4<br />

Sale<br />

s<br />

6.3<br />

7.0<br />

6.5<br />

6.2<br />

7.2<br />

6.0<br />

7.6<br />

5.1<br />

6.2<br />

7.2<br />

9.3<br />

4.7<br />

5.3<br />

6.7<br />

Se<br />

rv<br />

ice<br />

10<br />

.7<br />

11<br />

.6<br />

12<br />

.4<br />

11<br />

.0<br />

11<br />

.6<br />

11<br />

.6<br />

11<br />

.4<br />

12<br />

.8<br />

Tra<br />

diti<br />

ona<br />

l<br />

4.1<br />

4.9<br />

5.5<br />

5.4<br />

4.6<br />

7.7<br />

7.8<br />

8.0<br />

8.1<br />

9.2<br />

6.4<br />

5.0<br />

5.7<br />

0.6<br />

Ind<br />

ustr<br />

ial<br />

3.8<br />

3.5<br />

4.2<br />

2.7<br />

6.4<br />

4.4<br />

6.4<br />

3.1<br />

5.1<br />

4.0<br />

4.9<br />

2.6<br />

3.5<br />

4.3<br />

Sup<br />

port<br />

ing<br />

7.1<br />

8.0<br />

9.4<br />

7.7<br />

10.9<br />

7.6<br />

9.0<br />

6.7<br />

8.3<br />

7.4<br />

9.3<br />

7.1<br />

7.0<br />

8.3<br />

Total<br />

82434<br />

2<br />

74824<br />

1<br />

20135<br />

8<br />

15169<br />

5<br />

55953<br />

6<br />

24485<br />

5<br />

12051<br />

2<br />

77782<br />

42341<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

165


16<br />

.9<br />

13<br />

.8<br />

16<br />

.6<br />

15<br />

.1<br />

17<br />

.6<br />

18<br />

.0<br />

12<br />

.0<br />

12<br />

.8<br />

11<br />

.9<br />

13<br />

.0<br />

11<br />

.6<br />

11<br />

.5<br />

15580<br />

9<br />

62301<br />

56847<br />

52560<br />

32981<br />

79<br />

Relation between labor force and expatriate population<br />

Expatriate population increased not only in metropolitan regions but also in other regions. <strong>The</strong><br />

employment oriented immigrations have a bearing on labor force participation <strong>of</strong> native population that<br />

they have a perfect positive correlation (r=1.0; p


and Social Commission for Western Asia (Ed.), Population Spatial Distribution. Amman ESCWA.<br />

Arab News. 2012. Riyadh most populous Saudi city: Makkah most populous province. Arab News Daily<br />

dated Feb. 25.<br />

Arab News. 2009. <strong>The</strong> economic impact <strong>of</strong> rapid populations growth in Saudi Arabia. Arab News Daily<br />

dated Feb.26.<br />

Ashwan M.A.A, Salam, A.A. and Mouselhy, M.A. 2012. Population Growth and Distribution in Saudi<br />

Arabia. Paper presented at 3 rd Conference <strong>of</strong> International Journal <strong>of</strong> Arts and Science, Boston, during 27-31 May.<br />

Ashwan M.S.S. 1990. <strong>The</strong> population growth <strong>of</strong> Riyadh city in Saudi Arabia. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Durham, UK. Department <strong>of</strong> Geography, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences.<br />

Collemore, Y. 2003. Saudi Arabia faces population pressures. Washington DC. Population Reference Bureau.<br />

May 3.<br />

Khraif, R.M. 1994. Residential mobility in the city <strong>of</strong> Riyadh: A study <strong>of</strong> its directions, reasons and<br />

characteristics. Occasional paper published by the Saudi Geographical Society. Riyadh, King Saud University.<br />

Khraif, R.M. 2000. <strong>The</strong> labor force in Saudi Arabia: Spatial dimensions and socioeconomic and demographic<br />

characteristics. Occasional paper refereed and published by Saudi Geographical Society Riyadh, King Saud<br />

University.<br />

Khraif, R. 2007. Urbanization and Growth <strong>of</strong> Cities in Saudi Arabia. Kuwait: Kuwaiti Geographical Society.<br />

Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Saudi Arabia. 2004. Population and Housing Census 1425 H (2004). Riyadh, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Economics and<br />

Planning.<br />

Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Saudi Arabia. 1992. Comparison between Population and Housing Census 1394 and 1413 (H).<br />

Riyadh, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Economics and Planning.<br />

Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Saudi Arabia. 1996. Housing and human settlements in the Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Saudi Arabia. Report to<br />

be submitted to United Nations Conference on Human Settlements "Habitat II", Istanbul, Turkey. Riyadh Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Public Works and Housing Central Department <strong>of</strong> Statistics.<br />

Library <strong>of</strong> congress. 2006. Country Pr<strong>of</strong>ile Saudi Arabia. Federal Research Division.<br />

Makki, M. 2008. Regional and urban planning size weights in Saudi Arabia 1962-1974. Geo Journal 13 (2):<br />

111-118.<br />

Salam, A.A. and Mouselhy, M.A. 2012. Dynamics <strong>of</strong> Saudi Arabian Population: Analysis through four<br />

censuses – 1974, 1992, 2004 and 2010. Riyadh. Center for Population Studies.<br />

Saudi Gazette. 2010. Census shows Saudi Arabia’s population at more than 27 million. Saudi Gazette Daily<br />

dated, Nov. 24.<br />

Sly, D.F. and Serow, W.J. 1993. Population redistribution in the context <strong>of</strong> rapid population growth: the<br />

urbanization <strong>of</strong> the ESCWA region 1950-2000. In United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia<br />

(Ed.), Population Spatial Distribution. Amman ESCWA.<br />

Vizian, L.T. 2009. <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> urban observations as a tool for localizing urban and social policy. United<br />

Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

167


<strong>The</strong> Relationship between Leadership and Learning Organization: A<br />

Review <strong>of</strong> the Literature and Research Proposal<br />

Bojana Milic, Ljubica Dudjak & Leposava Grubic-Nesic<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Novi Sad, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Technical Sciences, Serbia<br />

Keywords<br />

Learning organization, organizational learning, authentic leadership<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>The</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> the learning organization has received substantial attention in the academic literature since<br />

the learning processes have been emphasized as a source <strong>of</strong> competitive advantage.<br />

Among the many factors that influence the development <strong>of</strong> learning organization leadership is emphasized<br />

as a key factor. Despite the importance that leadership has in this process, relationship between learning organization<br />

and leadership has been relatively understudied<br />

This paper aims to contribute to the learning organizations and leadership fields by proposing a research on<br />

how authentic leadership influence characteristics <strong>of</strong> the learning organization at the individual, group and<br />

organizational levels. In order to examine this relationship, authors propose employing <strong>of</strong> the Dimension <strong>of</strong> Learning<br />

Organization Questionnaire (DLOQ) instrument along with Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ). This<br />

approach provides research propositions that have not been considered previously.<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> present business world is characterized by constant and rapid changes in the global economy<br />

which have lead to the emergence <strong>of</strong> a new organizational form known as Learning Organization.<br />

Learning organizations are designed to enable people and organizations to be adaptive to the<br />

environment and responsive to change. <strong>The</strong> transformation <strong>of</strong> organizational systems to reflect “processes<br />

<strong>of</strong> learning, behavior change, and performance improvement” (Slater and Narver, 1995, pp. 63 – 64) has<br />

become an organizational imperative as the survival <strong>of</strong> the organization is at stake. According to the<br />

theorists, the capacity to learn faster than competitors may be the only sustainable competitive advantage<br />

in unstable environments (De Gus, 1988; Stata, 1989). Today, it is almost impossible to find an industry<br />

that is not in a state <strong>of</strong> dynamic change requiring organizations to focus on continuous learning activities.<br />

Among the many factors that influence the development <strong>of</strong> learning organization leadership is<br />

emphasized as the key factor (Senge 1990, Bass 2000, Prewitt 2003, Sadler 2003). Leadership and<br />

organizational learning are both fundamental to effective organizational functioning (Berson et al., 2006).<br />

Despite the importance that leadership has in this process, relationship between learning organization and<br />

leadership has been relatively understudied.<br />

In this paper, authors address gap in the literature by interrelating authentic leadership theory and<br />

theory <strong>of</strong> the learning organization. Explicitly, paper addresses the question: What is the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

management leadership style (authentic) on characteristics <strong>of</strong> the learning organization Building on<br />

current theories <strong>of</strong> authentic leadership (Walumbwa, Avolio, Gardner, Wernsing, & Peterson 2008) and on<br />

learning organization concept as articulated by Watkins and Marsick (1993, 1999), authors develop a<br />

theoretical model to address this research question.<br />

Authors have aim to contribute to the learning organization and leadership fields by linking two<br />

developed streams <strong>of</strong> research that have not been connected previously.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

168


Defining learning organization<br />

In order to obtain and sustain competitive advantage organizations must enhance their learning<br />

capability and must be able to learn better and faster from their successes and failures, from within and<br />

from outside (Marquardt, 2002). Learning has now been recognized as an important element <strong>of</strong><br />

organizational change and the ability <strong>of</strong> individuals and organizations to learn becomes the only source <strong>of</strong><br />

success.<br />

This had led to the emergence <strong>of</strong> learning organization whose foundation lies in the belief that<br />

learning and change are closely interrelated. Developing into learning organization means transforming<br />

from a traditional organization to one which values people and emphasizes on learning to improve<br />

performance.<br />

Organizational learning can be defined as ‘’a dynamic process <strong>of</strong> creation, acquisition and<br />

integration <strong>of</strong> knowledge aimed at the development <strong>of</strong> resources and capabilities that contribute to better<br />

organizational performance” (Lopez, Peon & Ordas, 2005, p.228). Organizational learning is a process that<br />

aims to create a learning organization.<br />

<strong>The</strong> most remarkable definition <strong>of</strong> the learning organization term was given in publication ‘’<strong>The</strong><br />

Fifth Discipline’’ by Peter Senge (1990). According to Senge (1990) learning organization is an organization<br />

where people continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire, where new and<br />

expansive patterns <strong>of</strong> thinking are nurtured, where collective aspiration is set free, and where people are<br />

continually learning how to learn together. Watkins and Marsick (1993) define the learning organization<br />

as one that is characterized by continuous learning for continuous organizational improvement, and by<br />

the capacity to transform itself. Although there are different approaches and perspectives for defining and<br />

conceptualizing learning organization, all views directed to the one that in the long–run organizational<br />

performance is measured by long-term survival and growth <strong>of</strong> the firm.<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper Watkins and Marsick’s (1996) conceptualization <strong>of</strong> the learning<br />

organization was used. <strong>The</strong>y proposed an integrated model for a learning organization, as presented in<br />

the Figure 1.<br />

Figure 1: Conceptual Framework <strong>of</strong> the Dimension <strong>of</strong> Learning Organization (Yang, Watkins & Marsick,<br />

2004)<br />

Watkins and Marsick developed the Dimension <strong>of</strong> Learning Organization Questionnaire (DLOQ) to<br />

identify the learning activities in organizations. <strong>The</strong> instrument has been widely employed to determine<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

169


the characteristics <strong>of</strong> a learning organization (Marsick & Watkins 2003). It is organized into seven sections<br />

addressing individual level, team level, and organization level learning:<br />

1. Create continuous learning opportunities – learning process is inscribed in the work, so that people<br />

can learn in the course <strong>of</strong> their work (on the job learning). Opportunities for continuous education<br />

and growth are provided.<br />

2. Promote inquiry and dialogue – people gain productive reasoning skills to express their opinions;<br />

they have the ability to listen and research into the views <strong>of</strong> others; the culture <strong>of</strong> the organization<br />

supports questioning, experimentation and provides a feedback.<br />

3. Encourage collaboration and team learning – work is done through the use <strong>of</strong> employees’ groups;<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the groups can become familiar with different ways <strong>of</strong> thinking, it is expected from<br />

the groups to learn and work together; organizational culture supports collaboration and rewards<br />

it.<br />

4. Create systems to capture and share learning – systems for sharing learning are created and used in<br />

the work, and employees have free access to accumulated knowledge.<br />

5. Empower people toward a collective vision – people are involved in creating and implementing a<br />

shared vision; the responsibility for its implementation rests with those who are involved in<br />

decision-making process; people are motivated to learn to truly fulfill their obligations.<br />

6. Connect the organization to its environment – allows people to see the effects <strong>of</strong> their work from the<br />

perspective <strong>of</strong> the organization; people can use information from environmental organizations<br />

and adapt his work; the organization is linked to external communities.<br />

7. Provide strategic leadership for learning – Leaders shape, improve and support learning; leaders use<br />

learning strategically to achieve better business results.<br />

Generally, the first three dimensions relate to individual and collaborative learning, the next two<br />

concern leadership and the last two are structural in nature.<br />

In some research DLOQ has been linked with some other aspects <strong>of</strong> management literature including<br />

leadership, organizational commitment, organizational creativity, job satisfaction, learning transfer, and<br />

so on (e.g. Hernandez 2000, Lim 2003, Joo 2007). However, DLOQ has not been related to the concept <strong>of</strong><br />

authentic leadership previously.<br />

Authentic leadership<br />

<strong>The</strong> past decade has seen a dramatic increase in scholarly interest in the topic <strong>of</strong> a new type <strong>of</strong><br />

genuine and values-based leadership named authentic leadership.<br />

According to Walumbwa, Avolio, Gardner, Wernsing, and Peterson (2008), authentic leadership<br />

can be represented as a construct composed <strong>of</strong> four related dimensions:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

internalized moral perspective,<br />

self-awareness,<br />

relational transparency, and<br />

balanced processing.<br />

Self-awareness refers to how <strong>of</strong>ten the leader demonstrates that he or she is aware <strong>of</strong> his or her<br />

impact on other people. Relational transparency involves promoting trust through disclosures that<br />

include openly sharing information and expressions <strong>of</strong> leaders' true thoughts and feelings. Internalized<br />

moral perspective refers to leader behaviors that are guided by internal moral standards and values as<br />

opposed to those behaviors being based on external forces such as peers, organizational and societal<br />

pressures. Finally, balanced processing involves objectively analyzing all relevant information before<br />

coming up with a ‘fair’ decision. Leaders who exhibit balanced processing solicit views from others<br />

indicating the willingness to challenge their deeply held positions before coming to a decision.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

170


Walumbwa, Avolio, Gardner, Wernsing and Peterson (2008) proposed a Authentic Leadership<br />

Questionnaire (ALQ) as a instrument for the assessment <strong>of</strong> this four-factor construct.<br />

<strong>The</strong> literature on the learning organization and organizational learning consistently cannot be<br />

complete without its leadership, which identifies appropriate organizational conditions in order to create<br />

the possibility <strong>of</strong> ongoing learning (Watkins and Marsick, 1993). Authors’ main idea in this paper is to<br />

outline the concept <strong>of</strong> authentic leadership as a leadership style that could have a key role in the<br />

development and maintenance <strong>of</strong> the learning organization.<br />

Leadership and learning organization<br />

Leadership plays an essential role in organizational learning process and the development <strong>of</strong><br />

learning organization (Johnson 1998, Senge 1990, Fiol & Lyles 1985). First, by providing the contextual<br />

support in the organization, leaders obtain the needed resources for learning to occur through exploration<br />

and exploitation. Second, leaders are critical to the integration <strong>of</strong> learning across group and organizational<br />

levels. Leaders enable and enhance this integration by providing a foundation <strong>of</strong> shared understandings<br />

<strong>of</strong> needs and purpose at different levels <strong>of</strong> the organization. Throughout the learning process, leaders<br />

provide the guidance necessary to cross organizational boundaries and integrate what is learned. And<br />

third, leaders are important in institutionalizing learning by integrating new and existing knowledge in<br />

the organization's policies and practices. Because <strong>of</strong> their central role in an organization and their ability<br />

to span boundaries across levels, not much learning in an organization could take place without leaders<br />

providing guidance, support, and institutionalization.<br />

<strong>The</strong> empirical evidence generally supports assertions that transformational leadership carries the<br />

values necessary to create a successful learning organization. Aragon-Correa, Garcia-Morales and<br />

Cordon-Pozo (2005) used data from 408 large Spanish firms and found that transformational leadership<br />

facilitates the organizational members’ ability to create and use knowledge. Similarly, a study <strong>of</strong> 202<br />

Spanish companies established a strong and positive impact <strong>of</strong> support leadership on learning in<br />

organizations (Llorens Montes 2005). Jung, Chow and Wu (2003) in their study used a sample <strong>of</strong> 32<br />

Taiwanese companies and found that transformational leadership was positively related to organizational<br />

innovation and that this relationship was partially mediated by empowerment and an innovationsupporting<br />

organizational climate. <strong>The</strong> study in the Israeli non-pr<strong>of</strong>it sector showed that transformational<br />

leadership has a significant positive direct effect on organizational learning (Kurland & Hertz-Lazarowitz<br />

2006).<br />

While clear theoretical and empirical arguments for the influence <strong>of</strong> transformational leadership<br />

on organizational learning exist, the role <strong>of</strong> authentic leadership remained unexamined. According to<br />

Gardner, Cogliser, Davis and Dickes (2011) review <strong>of</strong> the literature concerning the authentic leadership<br />

there are some research (Walumbwa, Luthans, Avey, & Oke 2009, Walumbwa et al. 2008) that finds effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> authentic leadership on important work attitudes, behaviors and organizational outcomes. However,<br />

there is no empirical evidence about the influence <strong>of</strong> authentic leadership on the characteristic <strong>of</strong> learning<br />

organization.<br />

In order to examine influence <strong>of</strong> authentic leadership on characteristics <strong>of</strong> the learning<br />

organization, at the individual, group and organizational levels, authors propose employing <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Dimension <strong>of</strong> Learning Organization Questionnaire (DLOQ) (Marscik & Watkins 2003) along with<br />

Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ) (Walumbwa, Avolio, Gardner, Wernsing & Peterson 2008).<br />

Combining four dimensions <strong>of</strong> authentic leadership (internalized moral perspective, self-awareness,<br />

relational transparency, and balanced processing) and seven dimensions <strong>of</strong> the learning organization<br />

(continuous learning, inquiry and dialogue, collaboration and team learning, empower people, create<br />

systems, connect the organization, and strategic leadership) it is possible to discover correlations among<br />

them that are statistically significant. By linking these two instruments researchers could provided a new<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

171


insight on learning organization and leadership that has not been considered previously.<br />

Discussions and conclusions<br />

<strong>The</strong> transformation from traditional organizations, that relied on rules and regulations, to<br />

learning organizations requires a leader who can help cope with the changes in the environment as well as<br />

motivate the followers to work in collaboration towards the achievement <strong>of</strong> collective as well as<br />

individual goals. In most previous studies authors suggested that transformational leadership carry the<br />

values necessary to create a successful learning organization. This paper aimed to highlighting the value<br />

<strong>of</strong> authentic leadership as a leadership style that could have a key role in the development and<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> the learning organization. By this approach authors provided a new perspective on<br />

learning organization and leadership that has not been considered previously.<br />

References<br />

Aragon-Correa, A.J., Garcia-Morales, V.J. & Cordon-Pozo, E. (2005). Leadership and organizational learning's<br />

role on innovation and performance: Lessons from Spain. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(3), 349-359.<br />

Bass, B. M. (2000). <strong>The</strong> Future <strong>of</strong> Leadership in Learning Organizations. Journal <strong>of</strong> Leadership & Organizational<br />

Studies, 7(3), 18-40.<br />

Berson, Y., Nemanich, L.A., Waldman, D.A., Galvin, B.M. & Keller, R.T. (2006). Leadership and<br />

organizational learning: A multiple levels perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 577–594.<br />

De Geus, A.P. (1988). Planning as learning. Harvard Business Review, 66( 2), 70-4.<br />

Gardner, W.L., Cogliser, C.C., Davis, K.M. & Dickens, M.P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review <strong>of</strong> the<br />

literature and research agenda. <strong>The</strong> Leadership Quarterly, 22, 1120-1145.<br />

Fiol, C.M. & Lyles, M.A. (1985). Organizational learning. <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Management Review, 10(4), 803–813.<br />

Hernandez, M. (2000). <strong>The</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> the dimensions <strong>of</strong> the learning organization on the transfer <strong>of</strong> tacit knowledge<br />

process and performance improvement within private manufacturing firms in Colombia. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Georgia, 2000).<br />

Johnson, J.R. (1998). Embracing change: a leadership model for the learning organization. International Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Training and Development, 2(2), 141-150.<br />

Joo, B. (2007). <strong>The</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> contextual and personal characteristics on employee creativity in Korean firms.<br />

Retrieved from the ProQuest Digital Dissertations (AAT 263468).<br />

Jung, D. I., Chow, C. & Wu, A. (2003). <strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> transformational leadership in enhancing organizational<br />

innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. <strong>The</strong> Leadership Quarterly, 14, 525544.<br />

Kurland, H. & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2006). Organizational Learning as a Function <strong>of</strong> Leadership Style and<br />

Vision, in: Stashevsky S. (ed.): Work Values and Behavior, Shreveport, LA: International Society for Work and<br />

Organizational Values, 621-630.<br />

Lim, T. (2003). Relationships among organizational commitment, learning organization culture, and job satisfaction in<br />

one Korean private organization. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota, 2003.<br />

Lopez, S.P., Peon, J.M.M. & Ordas, C.J.V. (2005). Human resource practices, organizational learning and<br />

business performance. Human Resource Development International, 8(2), 147–164.<br />

Llorens Montes, F.J. (ed.) (2005): Influence <strong>of</strong> support leadership and teamwork cohesion on organizational<br />

learning, innovation and performance: An empirical examination. Technovation, 25, 1159-1172.<br />

Marsick, V. & Watkins, K. (2003). Demonstrating the value <strong>of</strong> an organization’s learning culture: <strong>The</strong><br />

dimension <strong>of</strong> the learning organization questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 132-151.<br />

Marquardt, M. (2002). Building the learning organization: mastering the five elements for corporate learning. Palo<br />

Alto, CA: Davies-Black.<br />

Prewitt, V. (2003). Leadership development for learning organizations. Leadership and Organization<br />

Development Journal, 24(2), 58-61.<br />

Sadler, P. (2003). Leadership. London: Kogan-Page.<br />

Senge, P.M. (1990). <strong>The</strong> Fifth Discipline: <strong>The</strong> Art and Practice <strong>of</strong> the Learning Organization. London: Random<br />

House.<br />

Slater, S.F. & Narver, J.C. (1995). Market orientation and learning organization. Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing, 59, 63-74.<br />

Stata, R. (1989). Organizational learning: the key to management innovation. Sloan Management Review, 30(3),<br />

63-74.<br />

Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S. & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership:<br />

Development and validation <strong>of</strong> a theory-based measure. Journal <strong>of</strong> Management, 34, 89–126.<br />

Watkins, K. E. & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science <strong>of</strong><br />

systemic change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

172


Watkins, K.E. & Marsick, V.J. (1996). In Action: Creating the Learning Organization, American Society for<br />

Training and Development, Alexandria, VA.<br />

Watkins, K.E. & Marsick, V.J. (1999). Dimensions <strong>of</strong> the Learning Organization Questionnaire, San Francisco, CA:<br />

Jossey-Bass.<br />

Yang, B., Watkins, K. & Marsick, V. (2004). <strong>The</strong> construct <strong>of</strong> the learning organization: Dimensions,<br />

measurement, and validation. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(1), 31-55.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

173


Relationship Marketing: Towards a Definition<br />

Dr P.R.Datta<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Hertfordshire, UK<br />

Ashru Bairagee<br />

<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business & Retail Management, UK<br />

Keywords<br />

Customer Relationship Marketing (CRM), Customer loyalty, Communication, Commitment, CSR,<br />

Customer retention<br />

Abstract<br />

Relationship Marketing has emerged in business and academia over the past three decade as a new<br />

marketing school <strong>of</strong> thought which aims at building a long lasting bonded relationship with customers by<br />

identifying, anticipating and satisfying customer needs and wants pr<strong>of</strong>itably. <strong>The</strong> ultimate goal is to build trusted,<br />

committed, satisfied and informed long term partner through continuous value creation. Thus increasing customer<br />

loyalty and retention.<br />

It is the view <strong>of</strong> the researcher that CRM as an idea is still evolving. Although it was developed as a major<br />

source <strong>of</strong> attain organizational objectives (e.g. Pr<strong>of</strong>it maximization etc) through the marketing route, the focus has<br />

now transcended to a holistic approach involving the organizational functions collectively. Having said that, the<br />

researcher also consends that `communication` plays a vital role in building relational and transactional exchanges.<br />

Organisations these days have to be sensitive enough to what the customer thinks about them as an entity, rather<br />

than just the products. <strong>The</strong> contention here is, therefore, CRM should be aligned with an organization`s<br />

communication strategy.<br />

This paper examines the nature <strong>of</strong> Customer Relationship Marketing (CRM), its definitions in various<br />

business contexts, based on which a holistic definition <strong>of</strong> CRM is established.<br />

Introduction<br />

Although CRM as a concept has been a part <strong>of</strong> business and marketing literature over the last<br />

three decades, interestingly there is still much debate as to what CRM actually is (Nevin, 1995; Parvatiyar<br />

& Sheth, 2001). Indeed, by looking at the various schools <strong>of</strong> thought in Relationship Marketing and the<br />

associated literature it is very clear that, no universally accepted specific definition <strong>of</strong> the concept has<br />

emerged as yet. Egan (2004),when he suggests that Relationship marketing is not easy to define. <strong>The</strong><br />

concept is very wide which consists <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> activities and therefore it may have different meaning to<br />

different organizations (Palmer, 1994).<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the Relationship Marketing themes <strong>of</strong>fer narrow marketing functional perspectives while<br />

others are broad (Nevin, 1995). Narrow version <strong>of</strong> CRM would include:<br />

database marketing (Peppers and Rogers, 1995; Bickert, 1992);<br />

electronic marketing (Blattber and Deighton, 1991)<br />

Pre and After marketing (Vavra, 1992)<br />

Internal marketing (Berry and Parasuraman, 1991)<br />

Business alliances (Seth and Parvitiyar, 1992)<br />

Service marketing (Berry, 1983; Crosby et al, 1990)<br />

Parvatiyar and Sheth (2000) stated that Relationship Marketing has become rather ambiguous within<br />

the marketing literature. Various authors have listed a range <strong>of</strong> selected definitions. Harker (1999) listed<br />

26 definitions while Dann & Dann (2001) have identified from the literature 50 various definitions. While,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

174


the scope <strong>of</strong> the thesis does not allow discussion <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> these definitions in detail, nevertheless, the most<br />

commonly used definitions are discussed below in order to identify the one(s) most suited to this thesis.<br />

<strong>The</strong> following section discusses these definitions found in relevant literature and the table summarises<br />

these definitions as indentify, the context and main themes.<br />

Evolution <strong>of</strong> Relationship Marketing: Concepts & definition<br />

Berry (1983) was the first who uses the term relationship marketing in the services sector. Since<br />

then, over the last three decades, a considerable volume <strong>of</strong> literature, conference papers, working paper<br />

series in this area have been published, it includes: Crosby and Stephens (1987), Crosby et al. (1990),<br />

Parasuramam et al. (1988), Reichheld and Sasser (1990), Moorman et al. (1990), Christopher et al. (1991),<br />

Gronroos (1994), Rust and Zahorik (1994), Morgan and Hunt (1994), Anderson et al. (1994), Heskett et al.<br />

(1994), Sheth and Parvatiyar (1995, 2000), Gummesson (1996, 1998), Seth (1996), Hennig-Thurau and Klee<br />

(1997) Sheth et al. (1999), Sivdas and Baker-Prewit (2000), Rao and Perry (2002), Hennig-Thurau et al.<br />

(2002), Wang et al. (2004), Palmer et al. (2005), and others.<br />

From a service perspective point <strong>of</strong> view Berry (1983) defined Relationship Marketing is a<br />

strategy to attract, maintain, and enhance customer relationship’, which is fully supported by Berry and<br />

Parasuraman (1991) and defined as Relationship Marketing concerns attracting, developing and retaining<br />

customer relationship’. Now it can be seen that Relationship Marketing not only enhances customer<br />

relationships but also retains that relationship, which indicates a long-term phenomenon. Although the<br />

definition pioneered by Berry (1983) is classical in nature and look very comprehensive but it does not say<br />

much about the purpose <strong>of</strong> the relationship, nor it include the various stakeholders group involving in<br />

relationship. However, in later definition with Parasuraman (1991) it made clear that the purpose <strong>of</strong> the<br />

relationship to retain customer. But <strong>of</strong> course all types <strong>of</strong> customers, although it is understandable as<br />

different organizations generate different levels <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it and therefore to build and maintain relationships<br />

with key or pr<strong>of</strong>itable customers (Carson et al, 2004).<br />

Morgan and Hunt (1994), state: Relationship Marketing refers to all marketing activities directed<br />

towards establishing, developing and maintaining successful relational exchanges’. It is so comprehensive<br />

that it encompasses all marketing activities, but so comprehensive that it may lose some <strong>of</strong> the details <strong>of</strong><br />

the picture and it says nothing about the nature <strong>of</strong> the relational exchange (Rao and Perry, 2002). <strong>The</strong><br />

boundaries <strong>of</strong> relational exchanges between buyers and sellers were set by the traditional view <strong>of</strong><br />

transactional exchange/cost (Heide, 1994). Indeed most <strong>of</strong> the scholars see relational exchanges opposite<br />

<strong>of</strong> transactional exchanges (Gummesson, 1996). According to Rao and Perry (2002) the duration <strong>of</strong><br />

exchange relationships is core element in distinguishing the two. Gundlach and Murphy (1993) defined<br />

transactional exchange as a single, short term exchange with a distinctive beginning and ending. In<br />

contrast, relational exchange is longer in duration, reflecting an ongoing process (Dwyer et al, 1987) and<br />

participants engage social exchange and involves important personal and noneconomic satisfactions<br />

derived, and relational exchange transpires over time in which each transaction must be viewed in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> its history and its anticipated future (Macneil, 1980). According to Day and Wensley, 1983) relational<br />

exchange contributes to product differentiation and creates barriers to switching. However, the definition<br />

has some broader scope which includes the concept <strong>of</strong> relational exchanges to cover the process <strong>of</strong> all<br />

types <strong>of</strong> relationships. Morgan and Hunt (1994) identified ten forms <strong>of</strong> relationship marketing between<br />

focal firm and its relational exchanges in supplier, lateral, buyer and internal partnerships which<br />

constitutes Internal partnership: Business units, employees, functional department; Buyer partnership:<br />

intermediate customers, ultimate customers; Lateral partnership: Government, non-pr<strong>of</strong>it organizations,<br />

competitors and Suppliers partnership: services suppliers and good suppliers. Peterson (1995) also<br />

attacked Morgan and Hunt`s (1994) definition as error <strong>of</strong> commission and stated that if “their definition is<br />

true, the relationship marketing and marketing are redundant terms”.<br />

However, Gronroos (1994) has given a holistic view <strong>of</strong> RM from a network perspective as<br />

Relationship Marketing (RM) is to identify and establish, maintain, enhance, and when necessary<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

175


terminate relationships with customers and other stakeholders, at a pr<strong>of</strong>it, so that the objectives <strong>of</strong> all<br />

parties involved are met, and that this is done by a mutual exchange and fulfilment <strong>of</strong> promises’.<br />

Fulfilment <strong>of</strong> promises seems to be an important and integral element <strong>of</strong> relationship marketing approach<br />

(Calonius, 1988) and according to him giving promises is not only the responsibilities <strong>of</strong> marketing, but<br />

persuading customers as passive counterparts on the market place to act in a given way and in keeping<br />

promises and this view fully supported by Reichheld and Sasser, 1990) when they stated that fulfilling<br />

promises is paramount important as means <strong>of</strong> achieving customer satisfaction, retention and long term<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability.<br />

Gronroos (1996) also stresses the importance <strong>of</strong> relationship marketing for organisational survival<br />

in today’s business environment. An important aspects <strong>of</strong> Gronroos (1994) and Morgan and Hunt`s (1994)<br />

definition is that they all recognize the process aspects <strong>of</strong> relationship development & maintenance.<br />

Although marketing is to identify, anticipate and satisfy customer’s needs and wants but the true purpose<br />

<strong>of</strong> marketing is to build and maintain strong relationships between the company and the customers.<br />

Developing and maintaining satisfactory customer relationships can help to reduce perceived risk, reduce<br />

transaction costs, increase customer loyalty and customer retention and thus impact on organisational<br />

performance. For a buyer – seller relationship it is very important and widely accepted that a company<br />

should have customer orientation rather than sales orientation (Gronroos, 1995). <strong>The</strong>re are number <strong>of</strong><br />

studies have demonstrated that seller relationship with customers can help to create loyalty and retention<br />

(see Hunt, 1997; Mattesson, 1997; Morgan & Hunt, 1994; Reichheld & Sasser, 1990; Rust & Zahorik, 1993).<br />

Shani and Chalasani (1990) viewed relationship marketing as an integral effort <strong>of</strong> organization<br />

and defined relationship marketing as “to identify, maintain and build up a network with individual<br />

customers and to continuously strengthen the network for the mutual benefit <strong>of</strong> both sides, through<br />

interactive, individualized and value added contacts over a long period <strong>of</strong> time.” Although this definition<br />

differs somewhat from the definition given by Gronroos (1994) they both indicate that relationship<br />

marketing focuses on the individual customer-seller relationship and relationship is longitudinal in nature<br />

where both parties are benefitted and customer retention is the core focus <strong>of</strong> relationship marketing.<br />

Nevertheless, Gummesson (1995) saw Relationship Marketing as relationships, network and<br />

interaction’. In 2002 Gummesson <strong>of</strong>fers yet another definition <strong>of</strong> relationship marketing. According to<br />

him, relationship marketing is marketing based on networks and interaction with customers that<br />

recognizes that marketing is embedded in the total management <strong>of</strong> the networks <strong>of</strong> the selling<br />

organization, the market and the society with a long term perspective. Prior to the 1990s most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

European marketing scholars focused on network marketing as one <strong>of</strong> the effective means to increase<br />

organisational pr<strong>of</strong>it. Although both concepts roots are the same as building relationship between sellers<br />

and buyers, but they do not overlap and interact (Mattesson, 1997). Sheth and Parvatiyar (1995) viewed<br />

Relationship Marketing as attempts to involve and integrate customers, suppliers and other<br />

infrastructural patterns into firm developmental and marketing activities’. An ultimate goal <strong>of</strong><br />

relationship marketing in today’s cluttered environment where shoppers’ behaviour is affected by various<br />

macro environmental forces, is to secure customer loyalty and hence their retention. Sheth (1996)<br />

suggested that the domain <strong>of</strong> relationship marketing should be limited to only those cooperative and<br />

collaborative marketing actions that are focused on serving the needs <strong>of</strong> customers.<br />

Lancaster et al (2001) defined relationship marketing as all <strong>of</strong> the activities an organisation can use<br />

to build, maintain and develop customer relations. It has received considerable attention in recent year as<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the very important value creation methods between buyer and seller through the exchange process.<br />

Such value is paramount in maximising both parties’ satisfaction. But it is also important to understand<br />

that to create such value relationship marketing requires a building <strong>of</strong> trust between the company and its<br />

customers. <strong>The</strong> main objectives <strong>of</strong> relationship marketing are to build customer loyalty, thereby leading to<br />

customer retention (Lancaster et al, 2001).<br />

Yet another version <strong>of</strong> RM definition is given by (Shani and Chalasani (1992) as “an integrated<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

176


effort to identify, maintain and build up a network with individual customers and to continuously<br />

strengthen the network for the mutual benefits <strong>of</strong> both sides, through interactive, individualized and<br />

value added contacts over a long period <strong>of</strong> time”. Parvatiyar & Seth (2001) have taken the core notion <strong>of</strong><br />

customer selectivity to define the concept. Several research studies have shown that not all customers are<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itable for the organization (Storbacka, 2000). <strong>The</strong>refore organization should segment and target their<br />

customers accordingly.<br />

After extensive review <strong>of</strong> the literature Harker (1999) identified 26 definitions (see above also)<br />

which has been analysed, synthesized and later develop own version <strong>of</strong> his definition <strong>of</strong> relationship<br />

marketing which integrates the various definitions and creates a comprehensive approach to RM as<br />

“Relationship Marketing occurs when an organization engaged in proactively creating, developing and<br />

maintaining committed, interactive and pr<strong>of</strong>itable exchanges with selected customers or partners over<br />

time.” It is holistic in nature and placed emphasis on the purpose and benefits <strong>of</strong> relationship marketing.<br />

Relationship is possible when parties are proactive and committed and the process is interactive.<br />

However, it supports the argument <strong>of</strong> Carson et al (2004) that RM should be directed to selected and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itable customers. It also includes the word `partners` which implies RM can refer to many<br />

stakeholders in addition to customers (Rao and Perry, 2002).<br />

Thus various authors have defined relationship marketing in several different ways and the<br />

subject has been part <strong>of</strong> studies to understand the collaborative behaviour that exists between buyers and<br />

sellers. Payne (2000) asserts that CRM is concerned with “the creation, development and enhancement <strong>of</strong><br />

individualized customer relationships with carefully targeted customers and customer groups resulting in<br />

maximizing their total customer life-time value” while Berger (1998) <strong>of</strong>fers a divergent view <strong>of</strong> the subject<br />

<strong>of</strong> relationship marketing. Berger (1998) defined relationship marketing as proactively creating,<br />

developing and maintaining committed and interactive exchanges with selected customers that is<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itable. <strong>The</strong> keywords <strong>of</strong> this definition compares with that <strong>of</strong> Heide (1994): maintaining and<br />

developing. Thus, relationship marketing is about ensuring that relationships with customers is not one<strong>of</strong>f<br />

but collaborations that expands lifetimes <strong>of</strong> the company and the customer, too. Parvatiyar and Sheth<br />

(1994) view relationship marketing as an orientation “that seeks to develop close interactions with selected<br />

customers, suppliers, and competitors for value creation through cooperative and collaborative efforts”.<br />

Morgan and Hunt (1994) broaden this definition by stating, “Relationship marketing refers to all<br />

marketing activities directed towards establishing, developing, and maintaining, successful relational<br />

exchanges”. Morgan and Hunt proceed to categorize the marketing activities into four broad partnerships:<br />

supplier, buyer, internal, and lateral. Doyle (1995) <strong>of</strong>fers a general framework for relationship marketing<br />

identifying a series <strong>of</strong> dyadic relationships between the firm’s central core and types <strong>of</strong> network partners,<br />

namely, internal, external, supplier, and customer. Peck, Payne, Christopher, and Clark (1999) propose the<br />

six markets model (after several rounds <strong>of</strong> revision) with customer markets as the focal point and other<br />

markets, namely, supplier and alliance markets, internal markets, referral markets, influence markets, and<br />

recruitment markets, all revolving around the customer markets.<br />

Relationship Marketing: Towards a new definition<br />

It can be said that although the above definitions differ somewhat, they all indicate that the core<br />

theme <strong>of</strong> CRM and relationship marketing perspectives revolves around its focus on individual buyerseller<br />

relationships, that these relationships are longitudinal in nature, and that both parties benefit in the<br />

relationship established. In short, from a firm’s perspective, relationship marketing concepts can be<br />

viewed as a distinct organizational culture/value that puts the buyer-seller relationship at the centre <strong>of</strong><br />

the firm’s strategic or operational thinking.<br />

It is the view <strong>of</strong> the researcher that CRM as an idea is still evolving. Although it was developed as<br />

a major means to help an organisational attain its objectives (eg. Pr<strong>of</strong>it maximization etc) through the<br />

marketing route, the focus has now transcended to a holistic approach involving the organizational<br />

functions collectively. This has well been reflected in the writings <strong>of</strong> Gronroos over the years, and also<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

177


Morgan and Hunt, Gummesson, Lancaster and Harket amongst others. Having said that, the researcher<br />

also acknowledges that `communication` plays a vital role in building relational and transactional<br />

exchanges. Organisations these days have to be sensitive enough to what the customer thinks about them<br />

as an entity, rather than just the products. Customers will hesitate to be supportive <strong>of</strong> those organization<br />

without any involvement in community affairs as reflected in the vitally important concept <strong>of</strong> corporate<br />

social responsibility (CSR), and CSR is now a crucial sub function <strong>of</strong> communication, because it boosts<br />

company`s image and reputation. Morgan et al (2006) also pointed out the importance <strong>of</strong> CSR in<br />

relationship marketing. According to them customers will engage in relationship only with those<br />

organizations are socially responsible (Morgan et al, 2006, p-76). Indeed, this is reflected in corporate<br />

advocacy <strong>of</strong> many reputed organizations for example Micros<strong>of</strong>t. <strong>The</strong> contention here is, therefore, CRM<br />

should be aligned with an organization`s communication strategy.<br />

Further, the researcher contents that it would be difficult to universalize CRM because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

intrusion <strong>of</strong> `culture` through the backdoor. CRM would, therefore, lead to be influenced by geographical<br />

segmentation <strong>of</strong> markets; and even within a market by consideration <strong>of</strong> ethnocentricity, which by itself, is<br />

culture oriented. CRM, accordingly, has to be culture, demography and lifestyle supportive too, for it to<br />

be an effective mechanism to increase organizational productivity. <strong>The</strong> inclusion <strong>of</strong> these variables further<br />

implies that CRM has to be an on-going process with the renewal, removal and addition <strong>of</strong> data built in. A<br />

one <strong>of</strong>f concise might yield disappointing results because the prediction power <strong>of</strong> the package is not being<br />

put to test, nor is it being given the opportunity to show its strength having a pro-active capability in<br />

customer retention and creation, through either relational or transactional avenues.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, the proposed definition by the researchers is given below. This definition combined<br />

most <strong>of</strong> the key elements discussed above and based on Gronroos (1994, 1996) definition <strong>of</strong> relationship<br />

marketing.<br />

“Relationship Marketing is a holistic approach involving the organizational functions collectively to<br />

identify, establish, maintain and enhance long term mutual relationships with key customers and various<br />

stakeholders involved in relational exchanges. This would naturally involve continuous communication, interaction<br />

and networking in a trustworthy environment to create superior value for the organization, key customers and<br />

stakeholders.”<br />

Conclusion<br />

Although there are various definitions can be identified in the literature and all these definitions<br />

differ somewhat. However, they all indicate that the core principles <strong>of</strong> relationship marketing are to<br />

enhance buyer-seller relationship which is longitudinal in nature and both parties are mutually benefited.<br />

This long lasting relationship cannot be built without the strong commitment from both parties and<br />

communication plays a vital role in building relational and transactional exchanges between parties. <strong>The</strong><br />

current definitions identified in the literature lack some <strong>of</strong> the core elements. Thus this proposed<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> CRM combined most <strong>of</strong> the key elements.<br />

References<br />

Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., and Lehmann, D. R (1994), ‘Customer satisfaction, market Share and pr<strong>of</strong>itability:<br />

Findings from Sweden’, Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing, Vol. 58, July, pp. 53-66.<br />

Berry, L. L. (1983), ‘Relationship Marketing’, in Berry, L. L et al. (Eds), Emerging<br />

Perspectives <strong>of</strong> Service Marketing, American Marketing Association, Chicago.<br />

Berry, L. L and Parasuraman, A. Q. (1991), Marketing Services, New York, <strong>The</strong> Free Press.<br />

Christopher, M., Payne, A. and Ballantyne, D (1991), Relationship Marketing, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.<br />

Crosby, L. A., and Stephens, N. (1987), ‘Effects <strong>of</strong> Relationship Marketing on Satisfaction, Retention and Prices in the<br />

Life Insurance Industry’, Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing Research, 24 Nov.<br />

Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., and Cowles, D. (1990), Relationship quality in service selling: An interpersonal influence<br />

perspective. Journal <strong>of</strong> marketing, 54.<br />

Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P.H., and Oh,S (1987). "Developing buyer-seller relationship." <strong>The</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing 51(2):<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

178


11-27.<br />

Gronroos, C. (1994), From marketing mix to relationship marketing.’ Management Decision, Vol. 32; number 1, pp.4-<br />

20.<br />

Gronroos, C. (1995), ‘<strong>The</strong> Rebirth <strong>of</strong> Modern Marketing- Six Propositions about Relationship Marketing’, Working<br />

Paper 307, Swedish School <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration, Helsinki.<br />

Gronroos, C. (1996), ‘Relationship Marketing Logic’, Asia-Australia Marketing Journal, Vol. 4.<br />

Gummesson, E. (1995), ‘Relationsmarknadsforing: Fron 4 p till 30 R’ (Relationship Marketing: From 4Ps to 30 Rs.),<br />

Malmo, Liber-Hermods.<br />

Gummesson, E. (1998), Towards a theoretical framework <strong>of</strong> Relationship Marketing, International Conference on<br />

Relationship Marketing: Development, Management and Government.<br />

Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, Kevin, P. and Gremler, Dwayne D. (2002), Understanding Relationship Marketing<br />

Outcomes: An integration <strong>of</strong> Relational Benefits and Relationship Quality.’ Journal <strong>of</strong> Service Research, 4:<br />

230-247.<br />

Henning-Thurau, T., and Klee, A. (1997), ‘<strong>The</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> Customer satisfaction and Relationship Quality on Customer<br />

Retention: A Critical Reassessment and Model Development’. Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 18(8),<br />

December.<br />

Heskett, J. L, Jones, T. O., Loveman, G. W., Sasser, W. E., and Schlesinger, L. A (1994), ‘Putting the Service-pr<strong>of</strong>it chain<br />

to work` Harvard Business Review, March/April, pp. 164-74.<br />

Mattesson, Lars-Gunnar (1997), ‘Relationship Marketing and the Markets-as-Networks Approach’ - A competitive<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> two evolving streams <strong>of</strong> research, Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing Management, Vol. 13, pp. 447-461.<br />

Morgan, R. M. and Hunt, S. D (1994), <strong>The</strong> Commitment-trust theory <strong>of</strong> relationship marketing.’ Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing<br />

58, July: 20-38.<br />

Palmer, A. (2000), Co-operation and competition: A Darwinian Synthesis <strong>of</strong> Relationship Marketing.’ European<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing, 34(6): 687-704.<br />

Palmer, A., Adam, L., and Joelle Vanhamme (2005), ‘Relationship Marketing: Schools <strong>of</strong> thought and future research<br />

directions’. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Volume 23, Number 3.<br />

Parasuraman, A., Zeithml, V. A., and Berry, L. L. (1988), `SERVAQUAL: A multiple item scale for measuring customer<br />

perceptions <strong>of</strong> service quality’, Journal <strong>of</strong> Retailing 64(1).<br />

Parvatiyar, A., and Sheth, J, N (2001). "Customer Relationship Management: Emerging Practice, Process, and<br />

Discipline." Journal <strong>of</strong> Economic and Social Research 3(2): 1-34<br />

Rao, Sally and Perry, Chad (2002), ‘Thinking about relationship marketing: Where are we now’ Journal <strong>of</strong> Business<br />

and Industrial Marketing. Vol. 17 Number 7.<br />

Reichheld, F. F and Sasser, W. E.(1990), ‘Zero defections: Quality comes to services’, Harvard Business Review,<br />

September-October, pp.105-11.<br />

Rust, R. T. and Zahorik, A. J. (1993), ‘Customer satisfaction, Customer Retention and Market Share’, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Retailing, 69, pp.193-215.<br />

Sheth, Jagdish, N., Mittal, Banwari and Newman, Bruce I. (1999), Customer Behaviour: Customer Behaviour and<br />

Beyond, Orlando, Florida, <strong>The</strong> Dryden Press.<br />

Sheth, J. N and Parvatiyar, A. (1995), ‘<strong>The</strong> Evolution <strong>of</strong> Relationship Marketing’, International Business Review, Vol.<br />

4, No. 4, pp. 52-64.<br />

Sheth, J. N and Parvatiyar, A. (2000), ‘Evolving Relationship Marketing into a Discipline’. Working paper Series,<br />

Emroy University.<br />

Sheth J. N. (1996), Relationship Marketing: Frameworks and Concepts, International Conference on Relationship<br />

Marketing: Development, Management and Government.<br />

Sivadas, E., and Baker-Prewitt, J. L. (2000), ‘An Examination <strong>of</strong> the relationship between service quality, customer<br />

satisfaction and store loyalty’, International Journal <strong>of</strong> Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 28, No. 2,<br />

pp.73-92.<br />

Wang, Y., Lo, H. P., Chi, R. and Yang, Y. (2004), ‘An integrated framework for customer value and customer<br />

relationship-management performance: A customer based perspective from China’, Managing Service<br />

Quality, Vol. 14, No. 2/3, pp. 169-182.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

179


Table: Definition <strong>of</strong> CRM, contexts and authors<br />

YEAR AUTHOR(S) Context DEFINITION<br />

1983 Berry Service Relationship Marketing is attracting,<br />

maintaining and in multi service<br />

organisations enhancing customer<br />

relationships.<br />

1985 Jackson Industrial marketing Marketing oriented toward strong,<br />

perspective<br />

lasting relationships with individual<br />

accounts<br />

1987 Dwyer, Schurr and<br />

Oh<br />

B2B and B2C<br />

Relationship Marketing refers to all<br />

marketing activities directed toward<br />

establishing, developing and<br />

maintaining successful relationships<br />

1990 Gronroos Valid in all context Marketing is to establish, maintain and<br />

enhance relationships with customers<br />

and other partners, at a pr<strong>of</strong>it, so that<br />

the objectives <strong>of</strong> the parties involved are<br />

met. This is achieved by a mutual<br />

exchange and fulfilment <strong>of</strong> promises<br />

1991 Berry and<br />

Service perspective Attracting, developing & retaining<br />

Parasuraman<br />

customer relationships.<br />

1992 Shani and<br />

Chalasani<br />

An integrated effort to identify,<br />

maintain and build up a network with<br />

individual customers and to<br />

continuously strengthen the network for<br />

the mutual benefit <strong>of</strong> both sides,<br />

through interactive, individualised and<br />

value added contacts over a long period<br />

<strong>of</strong> time.<br />

1992 Bickert Database marketing CRM is a database marketing focusing<br />

the promotional aspects <strong>of</strong> marketing<br />

linked to database efforts<br />

1994 Gummesson Network Relationship Marketing is marketing<br />

seen as relationships, networks and<br />

interaction.<br />

1994 Gronroos All context Identify and establish, maintain and<br />

enhance and when necessary also<br />

terminate relationships with customers<br />

and other stakeholders at a pr<strong>of</strong>it, so<br />

that the objectives <strong>of</strong> all parties involved<br />

are met. This is done by mutual<br />

exchange & fulfilment <strong>of</strong> promises.<br />

1995 Sheth and<br />

Parvatiyar<br />

Attempts to involve and integrate<br />

customers, suppliers, and other<br />

infrastuctural partners into a firm`s<br />

developmental and marketing activities.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

180


1996 Gronroos Network perspective To identify and establish, maintain and<br />

enhance relationships with customers<br />

and other stakeholders at a pr<strong>of</strong>it so that<br />

the objectives <strong>of</strong> the partners interests<br />

are met, and this is achieved by a<br />

mutual exchange and fulfilment <strong>of</strong><br />

promises<br />

2001 Parvatiyar A &<br />

Jagdish N. Seth<br />

CRM: Emergence<br />

practice, process &<br />

discipline<br />

Customer Relationship Management is a<br />

comprehensive strategy and process <strong>of</strong><br />

acquiring, retaining and partnering with<br />

selective customers to create superior<br />

value for the company and the<br />

customer. It involves the integration <strong>of</strong><br />

marketing, sales, customer service, and<br />

the supply-chain functions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

organisation to achieve greater<br />

efficiencies and effectiveness in<br />

delivering customer value.<br />

2002 Kim and Cha A series <strong>of</strong> marketing activities that<br />

attract, maintain & enhance customer<br />

relationships for the benefit <strong>of</strong> both<br />

sides, emphasizing retaining existing<br />

customers.<br />

2008 Singh and<br />

Srivastava<br />

Network<br />

2009 Shirshendu, G et al A critical evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

research stream<br />

Relationship Marketing can be defined<br />

as an strategic marketing approach<br />

which is oriented towards attaining<br />

long-term pr<strong>of</strong>itability and value<br />

creation by interactions and mutual<br />

exchange among customers suppliers<br />

and other stakeholders.<br />

<strong>The</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> relationship marketing is to<br />

have long term positive effects on the<br />

business with optimum resource<br />

utilization through constant interaction,<br />

extensive networking and cooperation<br />

among all members (employees,<br />

customers, suppliers, business partners<br />

etc) with proper commitment to create<br />

superior value for all stakeholders in a<br />

trustworthy environment.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

181


ERP System Implementation CSFs For Korean Organizations:<br />

A Delphi Study<br />

Yeong Real Kim<br />

Chungbuk National University, South Korea<br />

Keywords:<br />

ERP, CSF, Delphi study, Korea, Implementation<br />

Abstract<br />

This study focused on the factors that are critical to Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system<br />

implementation success. This study employed a Delphi panel to explore the characteristics <strong>of</strong> ERP project success.<br />

<strong>The</strong> expert panel was comprised <strong>of</strong> executives from Korean organizations who had participated in and were<br />

experienced with ERP implementation projects. <strong>The</strong> two round Delphi study found the importance <strong>of</strong> senior<br />

management involvement/top management support in project. Additionally, the study found that the same Critical<br />

Success Factors(CSFs) existing in large-sized Korean organizations are also applicable to small or mid-sized Korean<br />

organizations.<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> market for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) s<strong>of</strong>tware has grown dramatically since 1990.<br />

ERP is defined as an integrated, multi-dimensional system that encompasses all functions <strong>of</strong> an<br />

organization, including planning, control, and global optimization <strong>of</strong> the supply chain using state <strong>of</strong> the<br />

art information technology tools (Jarrar, Almudimigh, and Zairi, 2000). <strong>The</strong>re are many reasons provided<br />

in the literature for the popularity and adoption <strong>of</strong> ERP. Davenport (1998) argued that some executives<br />

implement ERP to inject discipline in their organizations and eliminate redundant data and costly legacy<br />

code maintenance expenses. Allen, Kern, and Havenhand (2002) added that ERP is implemented by<br />

organizations to increase decision-making speed, to improve the control <strong>of</strong> operations and costs, and to<br />

improve enterprise wide information dissemination.<br />

This study focused on the factors that are critical to ERP implementation success. <strong>The</strong> expert<br />

panel was comprised <strong>of</strong> executives from Korean organizations who had participated in and were<br />

experienced with ERP implementation projects. Specifically, the expert panel was assembled to review a<br />

list <strong>of</strong> ERP implementation critical success factors(CSFs) that were developed by the researcher. <strong>The</strong><br />

expert panel was asked to add additional critical ERP success factors to the list if necessary, and then rank<br />

them in order <strong>of</strong> importance. Through subsequent rounds <strong>of</strong> the study, the expert panel was asked to<br />

refine the list and their ranking based on feedback from other members <strong>of</strong> the expert panel. Last, they<br />

were asked to distinguish between factors for small or mid-sized organizations(under $200 million in<br />

annual revenues) and large organizations($200 million and greater in annual revenues). This study<br />

addressed the following questions.<br />

a) What are the specific ERP implementation critical success factors that lead to implementation<br />

success for Korean large-sized Organizations<br />

b) Are there differences in ERP implementation critical success factors between small or mid-sized<br />

Korean organizations and large Korean organizations<br />

Critical Success Factors (CSFs)<br />

<strong>The</strong> literature shows lots <strong>of</strong> information that addresses ERP implementation CSFs. In order to<br />

analyze ERP implementation CSFs, the researcher undertook an analysis <strong>of</strong> 30 distinct sources and located<br />

22 different CSFs raised by the authors <strong>of</strong> literature reviewed. <strong>The</strong> literature review conducted <strong>of</strong> ERP<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

182


project CSFs across 30 sources listed 22 project success factors. <strong>The</strong> 10 most frequently mentioned CSFs<br />

across all implementation categories are listed in .<br />

Table 1<br />

Critical Success Factors Appearing in Literature<br />

_____________________________________________________________________<br />

Rank Critical Success Factors % <strong>of</strong> Mentions<br />

_____________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Senior Management Support/Involvement 82<br />

2. Skilled/Empowered Project Team 75<br />

3. Commitment to Change Management 68<br />

4. Commit to Business Process Reengineering 66<br />

5. Effective Project Communication 59<br />

6. Develop a Detailed Project Plan 47<br />

7. Strong Project Management 46<br />

8. Effective Knowledge Transfer to End Users 42<br />

9. Develop Clear Vision, Objectives and Mission 34<br />

10. Engage Effective External Resources 34<br />

______________________________________________________________________<br />

In Table 1, critical success factors are rank listed by the percentage <strong>of</strong> mentions they appeared in the<br />

literature reviewed.<br />

Research Design Strategy<br />

<strong>The</strong> Delphi method was chosen as the underlying research methodology employed for this study.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Delphi method is a qualitative research tool that seeks the opinions <strong>of</strong> an expert panel concerning the<br />

relevant research questions. <strong>The</strong> ERP industry is a relatively young industry that came to prominence in<br />

the early 1990s. Fowles (1978) posited that the testimony <strong>of</strong> experts, as under the Delphi method, is<br />

particularly applicable in fields that have not yet developed their own scientific laws. Fowles (1978) listed<br />

the following Delphi steps as critical: (a) panel selection, (b) first round Delphi questionnaire<br />

development, (c) questionnaire piloting, (d) forwarding the first round questionnaires, and (e) collection<br />

and analysis <strong>of</strong> first round questionnaire results. Subsequent study rounds continued by following steps<br />

(d) and (e) until the survey results stabilized.<br />

<strong>The</strong> study was conducted over a number <strong>of</strong> weeks with the use <strong>of</strong> iterative questionnaire rounds.<br />

<strong>The</strong> questionnaire process was administered through the use <strong>of</strong> Internet-based, web survey tool. If<br />

participants did not have Internet access to complete the survey, they were given the option to hand<br />

complete and submit surveys via mail. <strong>The</strong> survey questionnaires in this study consisted <strong>of</strong> a<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> closed-ended and open-ended questions. Delphi participants were asked to rank order<br />

ERP critical success factors so that a group composite ranked list could be determined. Both open and<br />

closed ended question responses were accumulated and collated by the researcher and returned in later,<br />

iterative rounds to the Delphi panel. Based on the information provided, the participants were asked to<br />

revisit responses after reviewing the responses and, reviewing the responses and comments <strong>of</strong> other panel<br />

members.<br />

4. Presentation and Analysis <strong>of</strong> Data<br />

4-1. Round One Survey Process<br />

Round One survey was forwarded to 20 survey participants via an e-mail cover letter and a link<br />

to the web-based survey. After a two-week period, 16 completed surveys were returned, yielding 80 %<br />

response rate. Multiple reminder messages were sent to the survey participants to encourage a higher<br />

response rate. <strong>The</strong> survey was constructed not only to gain information regarding the principal questions<br />

<strong>of</strong> this research, but to also compile demographic data about the survey participants. Round one survey<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

183


participants consisted <strong>of</strong> two chief information <strong>of</strong>ficers, 10 vice-presidents <strong>of</strong> information technology<br />

department, 10 directors <strong>of</strong> business information service department. All survey participants had<br />

participated in at least one ERP implementation.<br />

Round one survey explored the survey participants' opinions as to ERP implementation critical<br />

success factors. <strong>The</strong> researcher provided the survey participants with an alphabetized list <strong>of</strong> 10 ERP<br />

implementation critical success factors as shown in . <strong>The</strong> survey instrument was posed as<br />

follows:<br />

<strong>The</strong> following items are some examples (list in alphabetical order) <strong>of</strong> possible ERP<br />

implementation critical success factors. Please add any additional factors that you believe are critical to<br />

ERP implementation success.<br />

a) Commitment to business process reengineering<br />

b) Commitment to change management<br />

c) Development <strong>of</strong> a clear vision, objectives and mission<br />

d) Development <strong>of</strong> a detailed project plan<br />

e) Effective knowledge transfer to end users<br />

f) Effective project communication<br />

g) Involvement <strong>of</strong> effective external resources<br />

h) Involvement <strong>of</strong> senior management/top management support<br />

i) Use <strong>of</strong> a skilled/dedicated/empowered project team<br />

j) Use <strong>of</strong> strong project management skills<br />

<strong>The</strong> survey participants were asked to add additional ERP implementation critical success factors<br />

per their experiences. As a result, the survey participants who responded suggested additional 18 ERP<br />

implementation critical success factors to consider. Next the survey participants were asked to select 10<br />

ERP implementation critical success factors from the list <strong>of</strong> possible 28 success factors. <strong>The</strong> survey<br />

instrument was posed as follows:<br />

Please review the previous list (both the items provided you and those you added) and compile a<br />

consolidated list <strong>of</strong> the top 10 ERP implementation critical success factors. <strong>The</strong> ERP implementation<br />

critical success factors should be ranked from most important to least important.<br />

Table 2 lists the ERP implementation critical success factors as selected by the survey participants.<br />

Table 2<br />

ERP Implementation Critical Success Factors (CSFs)<br />

__________________________________________________________________________<br />

ERP CSFs Total %(*)<br />

__________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Involvement <strong>of</strong> Senior Management/Top Management Support 14 87.5<br />

2. Use <strong>of</strong> a skilled/empowered project team 12 75.0<br />

3. Commitment to business process reengineering 10 62.5<br />

4. Effective project communication 10 62.5<br />

5. Commitment to change management 9 56.3<br />

6. Involvement <strong>of</strong> effective external resources 8 50.0<br />

7. Development <strong>of</strong> a clear vision, objectives and mission 8 50.0<br />

8. Use <strong>of</strong> strong project management skills 6 37.5<br />

9. Effective knowledge transfer to end-users 6 37.5<br />

10. Development <strong>of</strong> a detailed project plan 5 31.3<br />

___________________________________________________________________________<br />

(*) % represents the frequency that critical success factor was mentioned by a survey participant.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

184


<strong>The</strong> additional series <strong>of</strong> questions in the Round One survey pertained to ERP implementation<br />

critical success factors in small or mid-sized organizations. Small or mid-sized organizations became<br />

important new targets in the marketing <strong>of</strong> ERP s<strong>of</strong>tware. (Small or Mid-sized organizations were defined<br />

as organizations with annual revenues <strong>of</strong> less than $200 million.) <strong>The</strong> justification behind the inclusion <strong>of</strong><br />

these questions in the Round One survey was to determine if the survey participants would identify<br />

different ERP implementation critical success factors if they knew that the implementing organization was<br />

categorized as a small or mid- sized organization. <strong>The</strong> researcher referred the Delphi participants back to<br />

the ranked list <strong>of</strong> ERP implementation critical success factors formulated previously. <strong>The</strong> Delphi<br />

participants were permitted to add new critical success factors, if necessary, when answering the<br />

following question:<br />

Many larger organizations (annual sales greater than $200 million) have already implemented<br />

ERP and increasingly s<strong>of</strong>tware vendors are focusing on selling to small or mid-sized organizations<br />

(annual sales <strong>of</strong> less than $200 million). When focusing exclusively on small or mid-sized organizations,<br />

please rank ERP implementation critical success factors from most important to least important.<br />

Detailed analysis (as shown in ) <strong>of</strong> the responses showed that seven different ERP<br />

implementation success factors were listed as the most important critical success factors by the survey<br />

participants.<br />

Table 3<br />

ERP Implementation CSFs in Small or Mid-Sized Organizations<br />

___________________________________________________________________________<br />

ERP CSFs Total %<br />

___________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Involvement <strong>of</strong> senior management/Top management support 13 81.3<br />

2. Use <strong>of</strong> a skilled/empowered project team 12 75.0<br />

3. Effective project communication 12 75.0<br />

4. Development <strong>of</strong> a clear vision, objectives and mission 10 62.5<br />

5. Commitment to business process reengineering 10 62.5<br />

6. Effective knowledge transfer to end-users 9 56.3<br />

7. Use <strong>of</strong> strong project management skills 9 56.3<br />

8. Involvement <strong>of</strong> effective external resources 8 50.0<br />

9. Commitment to change management 7 43.8<br />

10. Development <strong>of</strong> a detailed project plan 6 37.5<br />

___________________________________________________________________________<br />

In fact, the same ten ERP implementation critical success factors were listed by the participants,<br />

although in a different order, in both large-sized organizations and in small or mid-sized organizations. It<br />

appears that the survey participants did not see many differences in ERP implementation critical success<br />

factors in small or mid-sized versus large-sized organizations.<br />

At the conclusion <strong>of</strong> the Round One survey process, the researcher compiled the results and<br />

provided the data back to the survey participants. To ensure the anonymity <strong>of</strong> the Delphi process, all<br />

participants were assigned letters <strong>of</strong> the alphabet (instead <strong>of</strong> using their names) for use as their responses<br />

were being compiled. To ensure the integrity <strong>of</strong> the survey, the respondents' exact answers were<br />

provided in the feedback documents with no editing.<br />

Round Two Survey Process<br />

Round Two surveys were forwarded to the 16 survey participants <strong>of</strong> the Round One survey. After a<br />

two-week period and several follow-up e-mails to the survey participants to encourage a higher response<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

185


ate, 14 responses to the Round Two survey were received. This response yielded an 87.5% Round Two<br />

response rate. represents the Round Two responses. Again, the survey participants identified<br />

the importance <strong>of</strong> the involvement <strong>of</strong> senior management/Top management support. In Round Two,<br />

100% <strong>of</strong> the survey participants listed this factor as an important ERP implementation critical success<br />

factor.<br />

Table 4<br />

Round Two ERP Implementation Critical Success Factors (CSFs)<br />

____________________________________________________________________________<br />

ERP CSFs Total %<br />

____________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Involvement <strong>of</strong> senior management/Top management support 14 100.0<br />

2. Use <strong>of</strong> a skilled/empowered project team 12 85.7<br />

3. Commitment to business process reengineering 12 85.7<br />

4. Effective project communication 11 78.6<br />

5. Effective knowledge transfer to end-users 10 71.4<br />

6. Development <strong>of</strong> a clear vision, objectives and mission 10 71.4<br />

7. Commitment to change management 9 64.3<br />

8. User involvement and scope control 9 64.3<br />

9. Use <strong>of</strong> strong project management skills 8 57.1<br />

10. Involvement <strong>of</strong> effective external resources 7 50.0<br />

____________________________________________________________________________<br />

<strong>The</strong> Round Two survey process also addressed the open-ended responses provided by the survey<br />

participants regarding their reasoning in selecting the ERP implementation critical success factors. <strong>The</strong><br />

researcher was interested in gaining insight into the survey participants' reasoning for ranking ERP<br />

implementation critical success factors. Again, the ability to gain strong support from the senior<br />

management is listed as an important ERP implementation success criterion. Commitment to change<br />

management, User involvement and scope control, and empowering end-users were mentioned<br />

frequently in the open-ended responses.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Round Two survey also addressed ERP implementation critical success factors that exist in<br />

small or mid-sized organizations. With this question, the researcher was interested in determining if the<br />

participants believed there were significant differences between ERP implementation critical success<br />

factors in small or mid-sized organizations and large-sized organizations. As shown in ,<br />

involvement <strong>of</strong> senior management/Top management support and the use <strong>of</strong> skilled/empowered project<br />

team were chosen with 100% frequency by the survey participants.<br />

Table 5<br />

Round-Two ERP Implementation CSFs in Small or Mid-sized Organizations<br />

____________________________________________________________________________<br />

ERP in Small or Mid-Sized Organizations Total %<br />

____________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Involvement <strong>of</strong> senior management/Top management support 14 100.0<br />

2. Use <strong>of</strong> a skilled/empowered project team 14 100.0<br />

3. Effective project communication<br />

4. Commitment to business process reengineering 12 85.7<br />

5. Effective knowledge transfer to end-users 11 71.4<br />

6. Involvement <strong>of</strong> effective external resources 11 50.0<br />

7. Development <strong>of</strong> a clear vision, objectives and mission 10 71.4<br />

8. Commitment to change management 9 64.3<br />

9. User involvement and scope control 9 64.3<br />

10. Use <strong>of</strong> strong project management skills 8 57.1<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

186


____________________________________________________________________________<br />

<strong>The</strong> question in the Round One survey process asked the survey participants directly if they<br />

believed there were any differences between ERP implementation critical success factors in small or midsized<br />

versus large-sized organizations. In the Round Two survey, the survey participants were asked to<br />

review these responses and to select the five responses that most accurately reflected their viewpoints.<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> the responses appeared to indicate that the differences in ERP implementation critical success<br />

factors were largely attributable to the limited resources such as capital and personnel available to smaller<br />

organizations as compared to their larger counterparts.<br />

Conclusion and Recommendations<br />

Conclusion<br />

This study resulted in the development <strong>of</strong> two conclusions, First, while over 22 ERP<br />

implementation critical success factors were identified by the survey participants, some factors were<br />

mentioned more frequently than others. Specifically, 8 <strong>of</strong> the 22 ERP implementation CSFs identified by<br />

the study participants were mentioned on at least 70% <strong>of</strong> the returned surveys. <strong>The</strong> involvement <strong>of</strong> senior<br />

management/Top management support during ERP implementations was the most frequently mentioned<br />

CSF. <strong>The</strong> survey participants mentioned this CSF on 100% <strong>of</strong> the final round surveys. <strong>The</strong> second<br />

conclusion reached is that there does not appear to be much difference in ERP implementation CSFs as<br />

they related to small or mid-sized and large-sized organizations. When the survey participants were<br />

asked to report ERP implementation CSFs for small or mid-sized organizations, the involvement <strong>of</strong> senior<br />

management/Top management support was mentioned on 100% <strong>of</strong> the final surveys. This result was the<br />

same as when the size <strong>of</strong> the organization was not used as qualifier in the research question.<br />

Additionally, in small or mid-sized organizations, the use <strong>of</strong> skilled, empowered project team as a CSF<br />

was mentioned on 100% <strong>of</strong> the final survey responses.<br />

This study recognized the involvement <strong>of</strong> senior management and obtaining top management<br />

support during ERP implementation as a CSF. This finding is congruent with the literature reviewed on<br />

the topic <strong>of</strong> CSFs in ERP implementation.<br />

Cliffe (1999) posited that because ERP projects are very risky, senior management should manage<br />

ERP projects very closely. <strong>The</strong> comments from the survey participants were very consistent with<br />

comments gleaned from the literature pertaining to the study questions. Panelist A commented for a<br />

successful implementation, "strong direction and support from upper management" is required. Thus,<br />

there is agreement between the literature presented earlier and the results <strong>of</strong> this study regarding the<br />

involvement <strong>of</strong> senior management on ERP projects.<br />

General Recommendations<br />

<strong>The</strong> primary recommendation resulting from this study is that organizations implementing ERP<br />

should apply the lessons that the involvement <strong>of</strong> senior management be assured through all phases <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ERP implementation process. <strong>The</strong> primary role <strong>of</strong> senior management on ERP projects, in addition to<br />

leadership, may be in the establishment and measurement <strong>of</strong> project goals and objectives throughout and<br />

at the conclusion <strong>of</strong> an ERP implementation.<br />

Small or mid-sized organizations implementing ERP may do well to learn from implementers <strong>of</strong><br />

ERP in larger organizations. <strong>The</strong> research indicated that many <strong>of</strong> the ERP implementation CSFs in larger<br />

organizations are the same as those in small or mid-sized organizations. Due to resource constraints in<br />

small or mid-sized organizations as compared to larger organizations, small or mid-sized organizations<br />

may benefit from a more focused use <strong>of</strong> external resources to guide them through the complex process <strong>of</strong><br />

an ERP implementation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

187


Recommendations for Future Research<br />

<strong>The</strong> study's findings supported many <strong>of</strong> the findings uncovered in previous research. However,<br />

future researches need to focus on the steps necessary to ensure that these CSFs are understood and<br />

employed by implementing organizations. Such future research that helps to identify exactly how and to<br />

what extent senior managers should be involved in ERP implementations may be beneficial.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re have not been many studies in ERP implementations for small and mid-sized organizations.<br />

As more <strong>of</strong> these organizations attempt to implement ERP, more knowledge <strong>of</strong> implementation in smaller<br />

organizations would be beneficial.<br />

References<br />

Allen, D., Kern, T., & Havenhand, M (2002). ERP critical success factors: An exploration <strong>of</strong> the contextual<br />

factors in public sector institutions (HICSS-35'02). Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System<br />

Sciences 2002: IEEE Computer Society.<br />

Byrod, D. (2002 August). ERP market forecast and analysis, 2002-2006, and first half calendar 2002 review<br />

(27794). Retrieved September 6, 2003 from http://www.jdedwards.com<br />

Clayton, M.J. (1997). Delphi: A technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in<br />

education. Educational Psychology, 17(4), 373-387.<br />

Cliffe, S. (1999). ERP implementation. Harvard Business Review, 77(1), 16.<br />

Creswell, J.W (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.).<br />

Thousand Oaks, CA: sage.<br />

Davenport, T. H. (1998). Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review, 76(4)<br />

121-131.<br />

Dunham, R. (1998). Organizational behavior: <strong>The</strong> Delphi technique. Retrieved March 12, 2004, from<br />

http://instruction.bus.wisc.edu/obdemo/readings/deplhi.htm<br />

Gordon, T (1994). <strong>The</strong> Delphi method. Futures research methodology from the AC/UNU Millennium Project<br />

Retrieved http://www.futurovenezuela.org/-curso/5-delphui.pdf<br />

Harreld, H. (2002). Smaller businesses to drive s<strong>of</strong>tware market. Retrieved November 15, 2003 from<br />

http://www.pcworld.com<br />

Holland, C P., & Light, B. (1999). A critical success factors model for ERP implementation. IEEE S<strong>of</strong>tware, 30-<br />

36<br />

Jarrar, Y. F., Al-mudimigh, A., & Zairi M. (2000). ERP implementation critical success factors - <strong>The</strong> role and<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> business process management. ICMIT 2000.<br />

Mabert, V. A., Soni, A., & Venkataramanan, M. A. (2001). Enterprise Resource Planning: Common myths<br />

versus evolving reality. Business Horizons, 44(3) 69.<br />

Markus, M. L., Axline, S., Petire, D., & Tanis, C. (2000). Learning from adopters' Experiences with ERP:<br />

Problems encountered and success achieved. Journal <strong>of</strong> Information Technology, 15(4), 245-265<br />

McLeod, R., & Schell, G. (2001). Management information systems (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:<br />

Prentice-Hall<br />

Parr, A., & Shanks, G. (2000). A model <strong>of</strong> ERP project implementation. Journal <strong>of</strong> Information Technology,<br />

159(4), 289-303.<br />

Scott, J. E., & Vessey, I. (2002). Managing risks in enterprise systems implementations. Communications <strong>of</strong><br />

the ACM, 45(4), 74-81.<br />

Summer, M. (1999). Critical success factors in enterprise wide information management systems projects.<br />

Proceedings from the America's Conference on Information Systems (1999), http://www.aisorg.net<br />

Teltumde, A. (2000). A framework for evaluating ERP projects. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Production Research,<br />

38(17), 4507-4520.<br />

Verville, J. (2002). Critical success factors affecting the decision process for ERP s<strong>of</strong>tware. proceedings from<br />

Decision Sciences Institute 2002 Annual Meeting. Retrieved<br />

http://www.sbear.uca.edu/research/2002/dsi/papers/131.pdf<br />

Wah, L. (2000). Give ERP a chance. Management Review, 89(3), 20-24.<br />

Wee, S. (2000). Juggling toward ERP success. ERP News. Retrieved October 20, 2000 from<br />

http://www.erpworld.org/erpnews/erp904/02get.html<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

188


<strong>The</strong> Effects <strong>of</strong> Extrinsic Cues on the Relationship between Brand Image<br />

and Purchasing Intention-<br />

Evidences from Chinese Exchange Students’ Perspectives<br />

Luke Hsiao, Ming Chi, Hsiao and Jen-Ting, Sun<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Management, I-Shou University, Taiwan<br />

Keywords<br />

Brand Image, Extrinsic Cues, Chinese Students, Purchasing Intention<br />

Abstract<br />

In the 21 st century today, tea is getting more and more attention due to its healthy function with the<br />

changing <strong>of</strong> consuming structures and higher living standard. According to the Council <strong>of</strong> Agriculture <strong>of</strong> Taiwan’s<br />

research (2009), there are over 60 countries that plant tea, and there are over 160 countries that purchase and<br />

consume tea, more over, there are over 20 billion people around the world that consume tea and the number is<br />

continually growing. According to Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education in Taiwan, there are a lot <strong>of</strong> China students come for<br />

traveling and studying in a short period, and these students will be trend in the future. Base on that, this is a study<br />

<strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> extrinsic cues on the relationship between brand image and purchasing intention—evidences from<br />

Chinese exchange students’ perspectives. This study will take the exchange students from Mainland China in I-shou<br />

University as samples. <strong>The</strong> total number <strong>of</strong> the samples is 171. Based on brand image, purchasing intention, and<br />

extrinsic cues, we conducted descriptive statistics, reliability test, factor analysis, Pearson product-moment<br />

correlation coefficient analysis, scalar regression, one-way ANOVA and independent sample t test, and concluded as<br />

follows: (1) Brand image <strong>of</strong> Taiwanese tea has significantly impact on purchasing intention. (2) Extrinsic cues have<br />

significantly varieties on purchasing intention. (3) Extrinsic cues disturb significantly between brand image and<br />

purchasing intention.<br />

In addition, the study provided explanation for the results as well as its application. Further suggestions<br />

include: (1) Highlight the Quality <strong>of</strong> Taiwanese Tea and Mental Feeling after Purchasing. (2) Make the products<br />

lighter and aluminum cans as first choice. (3) Match Products with Selling Strategy.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

189


Employee Stock Ownership and Employee Psychological Ownership:<br />

<strong>The</strong> Moderating Role <strong>of</strong> Individual Characteristic<br />

Ann Lin<br />

Chang Gung University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Taiwan.<br />

Keywords:<br />

Employee stock ownership, employee psychological ownership, personality characteristics<br />

Abstract<br />

In response to the development <strong>of</strong> new economy and the need <strong>of</strong> compensation reformation, employee stock<br />

ownership was created. <strong>The</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to further understand issues on employee psychological<br />

ownership within organization that implements equity incentive compensation practice. Further, this research<br />

attempts to extensively understand the dynamic <strong>of</strong> employee ownership by investigating the psychological process<br />

involved with it. More specifically, it is the intension <strong>of</strong> this study to understand variable as individual characteristic<br />

that influence the formation <strong>of</strong> employee psychological ownership through stock incentive. <strong>The</strong> research is based on<br />

data derive from a multinational high-tech firm with all-employee stock option program. A two-step approach to<br />

structural equation modeling (Anderson & Gerbing, 1988; James, Mulaik, & Brerr, 1982) will be applied to test the<br />

hypotheses, and all analyses and estimation will implemented in LISREL 8.54.<br />

Introduction<br />

Background <strong>of</strong> the study<br />

In this new era <strong>of</strong> global competition, organizations have accelerated need and increasing<br />

pressure to improve their performance. Growing recognition on the importance <strong>of</strong> human capital relative<br />

to physical capital became a key to competitive advantage and business success. Kelso and Colleagues<br />

proposed that expending the ownership <strong>of</strong> capital was necessary to promote individual and<br />

organizational productivity in the modern industrial era where as technological developments were<br />

enhancing the value <strong>of</strong> capital and diminishing the value <strong>of</strong> labor (Kelso & Kelso, 1984). Accordingly,<br />

organizations world-wide implement strategies with the expectation that they will motivate employee<br />

and improve performance to sustain competitive advantage globally.<br />

Due to the change <strong>of</strong> this new economy, employees in many countries hold ownership stakes in<br />

the companies that they work in, and the proportion <strong>of</strong> this trend is increasing (Rousseau & Shperling<br />

2003). <strong>The</strong> ability to motivate workers and retain desired employees is also mostly influenced by<br />

compensation scheme deliberated by organization’s human resource practices. In response to the newly<br />

emerged workplace; the concepts <strong>of</strong> employee ownership were undertaken by the organizations as it<br />

provides a frame work for a nontraditional paradigm <strong>of</strong> work motivation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> idea to motivate employee though compensation has founded on the basis that worker<br />

motivation will be improved though financial participation which would eventually link compensation<br />

more closely to employee performance. Within the context <strong>of</strong> this fundamental reformation <strong>of</strong> economies<br />

and firms; the shift towards contingent compensation systems is necessary especially due to the collapse<br />

<strong>of</strong> fixed wage system. Contrasting from the traditional fix rate compensation; these alternative<br />

compensation schemes include pr<strong>of</strong>it and value added sharing, employee share ownership, and<br />

productivity gain sharing. According previous researches, financial participation measures promise to<br />

exert fundamentally positive effects at work place.<br />

In recent years, equity compensation has attracted the interest <strong>of</strong> managers, policy makers and<br />

employees. Particularly in the contemporary high-technology, knowledge-oriented firms that are greatly<br />

dependent on high-skilled workers, organizations have enforced a search for alternative ways <strong>of</strong><br />

management that encourages commitment, risk-taking, and innovation (eg., Harrison, 1983). Recent views<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

190


<strong>of</strong> organizations have shown how traditional ways <strong>of</strong> management that enforced controls can be reduced<br />

under conditions <strong>of</strong> strong goal alignment (Harrison, 1983; Walton, 1985). From Agency theory<br />

perspective, since stock incentive is risk borne by employees, employee stock ownership would align the<br />

interest <strong>of</strong> agent and principles for company growth. In this sense, employee ownership programs are<br />

thought to reconcile the mutual interest between owner and employee. Having employee as owners <strong>of</strong> the<br />

company, the relationship between employer and employee has changed. Thus, this change <strong>of</strong> ownership<br />

identity affects the way that employees think and behave like owners <strong>of</strong> a firm (Ben-Ner and Jones, 1995;<br />

Kruse and Balasi, 1997; Rousseau and Shperling, 2003; Wagner, Parker, and Christiansen, 2003). <strong>The</strong>refore,<br />

it is essential to study attributes that makes stock compensation work.<br />

Motivation <strong>of</strong> This Research<br />

Importance on issues related to compensation<br />

Human resource management is one <strong>of</strong> the domains within organizational science that deals with<br />

the whole employment relationship and all the policies, decisions and practices associated with the<br />

relationship. <strong>The</strong> main focus <strong>of</strong> this relationship between employers and employees is the compensation<br />

exchange. <strong>The</strong> reason most people work is because they depend on salary or wages to exist to live. Hence,<br />

compensation has plays a central role in the reason for employee to seek and remain in employment<br />

relationship.<br />

<strong>The</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> traditional compensation<br />

Traditionally, organization hierarchy was in the hiring process. Employees progress along well<br />

defined job ladders, wage setting determined by way <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> bureaucratic procedures and the<br />

assignment <strong>of</strong> wages to jobs rather than to personal characteristics, rewarding employees for seniority,<br />

and promotion from within. At the time, compensation practices were aim to standardized wage rates for<br />

different jobs, in order to reduce turnover and efficiently deploy labor.<br />

Since 1980’s , there have been enormous macroeconomic changes such as globalization, the<br />

movement from a manufacturing to a knowledge and service-based economy, trade liberalization,<br />

deindustrialization, decrease in unionization, the movement <strong>of</strong> production overseas, changes in<br />

technology, and changes in organizational structures and reductions in organization size, and changes in<br />

approaches to production. Due to the radical economic changes, workers with the right skills are able to<br />

move from organization to organization and not be affected through not having particular firm-specific<br />

skills. Attendant pay practices by organizations now include paying workers for their skills and<br />

productivity rather than paying for jobs. As stated in <strong>The</strong> Economist (2000), “<strong>The</strong> old social contract<br />

between employers and workers is being shredded. It is still unclear what will replace it.… This means<br />

that the old model <strong>of</strong> a career, in which an employee worked his way up the ladder in a single company,<br />

is becoming rarer”. Managers need to come up with new compensation schemes that would attract and<br />

retain those talented knowledge workers.<br />

Literature Review<br />

Employee Stock Ownership and Compensation<br />

In response to the development <strong>of</strong> new economy and the need <strong>of</strong> compensation reformation, employee<br />

stock ownership was created. Employee stock ownership is a phenomenon that has developed since the<br />

mid-1980s in most industrialized countries and in some <strong>of</strong> the emerging market economies and that has<br />

aroused a considerable interest both in scholars and practitioners (Kuvaas, 2003, pp. 193; Pendleton,<br />

Wilson, & Wright, 1998, pp. 99). <strong>The</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> employee ownership is increasingly common throughout<br />

the world and the proportion <strong>of</strong> workers hold ownership stakes in the firms is still increasing. Globally,<br />

most high technology companies provide stock options to employees. Formerly, stock compensation is<br />

most <strong>of</strong>ten associated with a limited number <strong>of</strong> senior executives at a company. A trend initiated within<br />

US from the 1990s was that technology companies <strong>of</strong>fering company stock and options to all <strong>of</strong> their<br />

employees. That is, employee ownership has been extended beyond the CEO and top management team<br />

to all employees. For the past decade more companies had also implemented broad-based stock option<br />

plans worldwide.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

191


Researches on Employee Ownership<br />

Numerous empirical research was done to provide evidence <strong>of</strong> believe and rationale to explain<br />

that employee ownership promise to exert positive effects at the work place (Wagner et al., 2003).<br />

Researches that exert with explicit theoretical base use a number <strong>of</strong> approaches. A number <strong>of</strong> studies use<br />

principal/agent theory (e.g. Blasi et al. 1996), some use socio-psychological rationales (e.g. Long 1978;<br />

Pierce, & Morgan, 1991), and several use self-selection models (e.g. Blair and Kruse 1999; Richardson and<br />

Nejad 1986).<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> studies suggested that employee ownership initiatives are associated with favorable<br />

employee attitudes, such as job satisfaction (Buchko, 1992; Long, 1978; Russell, Hochner & Perry, 1979;<br />

Tucker, Nock, & Toscano, 1989; Van Dyne & Pierce, 1993) and organization commitment (Buchko, 1992;<br />

Hammer, Landau & Stern, 1981; Rhodes and Steers, 1981; Russell et al., 1979; Tucker et al., 1989).<br />

However, other research has found no relationship between employee ownership and employee attitudes,<br />

such as job satisfaction (French & Rosenstein, 1984; Hammer et al., 1981) and organizational commitment<br />

(Long, 1982). Some research has suggested that employee ownership results in reduce employee turnover<br />

(Buchko, 1992; Rhodes and Steers, 1981) and improved organizational performance (Marsh & McAllister,<br />

1981; Rosen & Klein, 1983; Rosen & Quarrey, 1987; Wagner & Rosen, 1985). <strong>The</strong> summary are listed as<br />

follow (see Table 1 a.b.c.&d).<br />

Underlying <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Employee Ownership: Motivation and Satisfaction<br />

For as long as organizations have existed, rewards have been recognized as a major motivator <strong>of</strong><br />

employees as well as an important tool and expense for organizations. Efficiency wage theory proposes<br />

that employers can improve workforce productivity by paying wages above the opportunity cost <strong>of</strong> labor.<br />

However, although it has been suggested in past reviews, few studies have looked at how other factors<br />

interact with pay at the individual level to affect outcomes (Opsahl & Dunnette, 1966 and Welbourne &<br />

Gomez-Mejia, 1995).<br />

In this research, I propose that it is over simplifying to claim that organizations which <strong>of</strong>fer equity<br />

incentive (a form <strong>of</strong> external incentive) would automatically motivate employee. It is logical to argue that<br />

there is more to this cognitive process <strong>of</strong> forming psychological ownership belief. In this paper, it is my<br />

intension to extensively investigate the influence <strong>of</strong> individual characteristic on formation <strong>of</strong><br />

psychological ownership feeling.<br />

Further, the “three models <strong>of</strong> satisfaction” written by Klein in 1987 has been widely accepted as<br />

well-grounded approaches for distinguishing the ways employee ownership may affect attitudes (Klein,<br />

1987). <strong>The</strong> “Intrinsic Satisfaction Model” suggests that ownership itself is the critical variable in explaining<br />

the psychological impact <strong>of</strong> employee ownership. According to the “Instrumental Satisfaction Model”, EO<br />

has some attitudinal effects if it enhances the employees' rights to information and participation in<br />

decision making. Finally, the “Extrinsic Satisfaction Model” suggests that EO has positive attitudinal<br />

effects if it is financially rewarding to employees (Klein, 1987, pp. 320–321). In about 30 years <strong>of</strong> empirical<br />

research the three models <strong>of</strong> Klein have been tested in several ways with different ways <strong>of</strong> conceiving the<br />

mere ownership <strong>of</strong> stock (comparisons between employee owners and non-owners working in the same<br />

company, individual or collective levels <strong>of</strong> stock ownership...), the financial value <strong>of</strong> stock ownership<br />

(stock return, size <strong>of</strong> the company's contribution, financial value <strong>of</strong> individual ownership...) and the rights<br />

to information and participation in decision-making (perceived participation, actual voting rights...).<br />

Overall, the majority <strong>of</strong> existing evidence suggests that employee ownership may have positive attitudinal<br />

effects, while some studies found no effects or negative effects (Kaarsemaker, 2006, pp. 44). Concerning<br />

the processes by which employee ownership operates, three main conclusions may be drawn: first, stock<br />

ownership itself rarely appears to lead to major changes in individual work attitudes (Pendleton, 2001, pp.<br />

155), second, the positive effects <strong>of</strong> employee ownership seem to be related more to the capacity <strong>of</strong> such a<br />

management practice <strong>of</strong> being rewarding in terms <strong>of</strong> financial returns (extrinsic model) and rights <strong>of</strong><br />

participation (instrumental model), and third, some studies underline the importance <strong>of</strong> psychological<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

192


ownership as a moderating variable (Pierce et al., 1991, Van Dyne and Pierce, 2004 and Wagner et al.,<br />

2003).<br />

Hypothesis 1. <strong>The</strong>re is an association between employee stock ownership and psychological ownership.<br />

Psychological Ownership<br />

Feeling <strong>of</strong> ownership is a part <strong>of</strong> human condition that has a critical effect on people<br />

psychologically and physically (Pierce et al., 2001). Tannenbaum (1983) noted that, “ownership is<br />

attractive to most people… being owner is ego enhancing”. Scholars have asserted that people have an<br />

innate need to possess; and psychological ownership, describe by Pierce, Kostova and Dirks (2001),<br />

emerges as it satisfies certain human motive that are either genetic and/or social in nature.<br />

Pierce (1991) has describe psychological ownership is the psychologically experienced<br />

phenomenon in which an employee develops possessive feeling for the target. Building on Furby (1978)<br />

and Dittmar (1992), Pierce and colleagues (2001) associated feelings <strong>of</strong> possession with feelings <strong>of</strong><br />

ownership and defined psychological ownership as the state in which an individual feels that an object is<br />

experienced possessively described as “mine” or “ours”. Pierce et al. (2001) theorized that psychological<br />

ownership can be differentiated from the other constructs based on its conceptual core (possessiveness)<br />

and motivational bases. <strong>The</strong>y argue that when employee experience psychological ownership, they are<br />

able to satisfy the basic three basic needs: sense <strong>of</strong> belongingness, feeling <strong>of</strong> efficacious and self-identity.<br />

As all the basic needs described are related to personal character, it is the aim <strong>of</strong> this paper to examine<br />

individual differences in personality characteristics and human cognition influences on formation <strong>of</strong><br />

psychological ownership feeling.<br />

Individual Characteristic and Psychological Ownership<br />

Individual disposition influence in work<br />

Most researchers in organizational behavior and psychology now accept that behavior is a<br />

function <strong>of</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> the person and the environment (Lewin, 1935) to predict behavior. <strong>The</strong>reby,<br />

human behavior can be predicted by both environmental and individual dispositional capacity and<br />

fortitude to take the initiatives and responsibility to adapt to environmental influences. In the<br />

sociocognitive view, people are not just reactive organisms shaped by external events; they are selforganizing<br />

and self-regulating. That is, personal factors are very much involved in regulating one’s<br />

cognitive and behavioral exertion and executed in the transactions <strong>of</strong> everyday life. Correspondence on<br />

the cognitive theory that was discussed in the previous chapter, cognitive schemata inhabit within each<br />

person’s cognitive structures to support individual interpretation <strong>of</strong> environmental events. <strong>The</strong>refore, a<br />

particular individual tends to draw on the same personal cognitive schemata repeatedly give meaning to<br />

the events happened to the person. This personal cognitive schemata is proposed in this study to be<br />

altered by person’s personality.<br />

This section addresses a number <strong>of</strong> the major studies contributing some <strong>of</strong> the psychology<br />

background and management literature on personality traits, cognitive processes, and behaviors and will<br />

detail how the Five-factor Model <strong>of</strong> Personality should moderate between financial equity and<br />

psychological ownership feeling.<br />

Personality effect on change <strong>of</strong> Identity from Employee to Owner<br />

Past researched have also examine psychological ownership in the domain <strong>of</strong> social exchange and<br />

self-identity, especially the relationships between employee and organization that are characterized by<br />

transformations in self-identity. As employee grant financial ownership <strong>of</strong> an organization, they tend to<br />

form the feelings <strong>of</strong> ownership and engage in positive behavior driven alone with the sense <strong>of</strong><br />

responsibility. Exchange theory explains this type <strong>of</strong> transactional exchange between employee and their<br />

organization as the organization satisfies the needs <strong>of</strong> participants, who in turn reciprocates by<br />

developing feelings <strong>of</strong> ownership and a corresponding sense <strong>of</strong> responsibility. Exchange theory (Blau,<br />

1964) emphasized that people maximize gain through a series <strong>of</strong> such exchanges.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

193


Within each organization, employee each has their job role. However, everyone can have a role<br />

that corresponds to being only physically engaged but not be psychologically committed to that role. <strong>The</strong><br />

psychological manifestation comes with the conjunction <strong>of</strong> the role into one’s identity and the cognitive<br />

and emotional commitment made to the role. This idea is corresponding to the Erikson’s (1968) concept <strong>of</strong><br />

identity crisis. Specifically, people may spend some time considering and occupying roles without being<br />

psychologically committed to their roles. As part <strong>of</strong> the identity exploration process, people may try a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> roles to match with personal character such as moving from various jobs before they actually<br />

commit as part o exploration process. In this paper, I believe that employee who actually owns company<br />

stock will increase the chance and accelerate the process to choose and make cognitive and emotional<br />

commitments to their job roles. As I assume that the distinction between occupying a role and being<br />

psychologically committed to a role is important because, as the paper will carry on below, equity<br />

incentive should deliver more psychologically meaning and, therefore, result in stronger relationships to<br />

personality variables such as traits and motives than simply possessing a role. In conclusion, this research<br />

examines issue under the assumption that ownership helps people come to define themselves, express<br />

their self-identity to others, and maintain the continuity <strong>of</strong> the self across time.<br />

Brief Development <strong>of</strong> five-factor model<br />

<strong>The</strong> five factor model <strong>of</strong> personality is the end result <strong>of</strong> an analysis <strong>of</strong> trait terms. Allport and<br />

Odbert (1936) began the taxonomic effort by compiling a list <strong>of</strong> 4,500 English words form a dictionary<br />

used to represent innate personality traits that could be further applied to distinguish one human being<br />

from another.<br />

In the last two decades, a robust set <strong>of</strong> five factors has been recovered from almost every major<br />

personality inventory. Although acceptance <strong>of</strong> the classification is far from universal (e.g., Block, 1995),<br />

the robustness <strong>of</strong> structure across cultures and measures, as well as strong evidence <strong>of</strong> the heritability <strong>of</strong><br />

the traits, has led to widespread acceptance <strong>of</strong> the five-factor model among personality researchers.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Big Five traits are broad personality constructs that are manifested in more specific traits.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Five-Factor Model <strong>of</strong> Personality (commonly called the Big Five) is a descriptive<br />

representation (typology) <strong>of</strong> the five major dispositional dimensions that encompass human personality. It<br />

has been used extensively in industrial psychology as a basis to measure job-related attitudes, personorganization<br />

fit, and other personnel selection interests. Five-Factor Model <strong>of</strong> Personality is commonly<br />

accepted among personality researchers due to its robustness <strong>of</strong> structure across cultures and a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

measuring techniques.<br />

Relevance <strong>of</strong> the Big Five Model and Management Research<br />

Organizations have turned to personality experts to assist them in the early identification <strong>of</strong><br />

employees who are likely to be achievement motivated, conscientious, and stable. It is in the area <strong>of</strong><br />

personnel selection that the field <strong>of</strong> management has focused its Big Five based research. An important<br />

consideration for the field <strong>of</strong> management is that the Big Five personality dimensions are also relatively<br />

independent measures <strong>of</strong> cognitive ability (McCrae and Costa, 1987). Thus, it can be reasoned that job<br />

performance capability can be gauged by matching an applicant’s personality structure with the<br />

personality demands <strong>of</strong> a particular job.<br />

Personality and Psychological Ownership<br />

Personal values make certain objects more-or-less esteemed (Pelham, 1991). From the viewpoint<br />

<strong>of</strong> self-concept, people may strive to increase the feeling <strong>of</strong> self-worth by attempting to psychologically<br />

possess items <strong>of</strong> that important to them. As ownership is also one mean to boost self-esteem, individuals<br />

are likely to feel ownership over those objects consider to be more important to their personal value.<br />

From the beginning <strong>of</strong> interest in psychological ownership are the aspect that employee will exert<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

194


preferable organization behavior as employee perceive organization as their own; where they belong.<br />

Pierce et al. (2001) propose that when employee experience psychological ownership, they are able to<br />

satisfy the basic three basic needs: sense <strong>of</strong> belongingness, feeling <strong>of</strong> efficacious and self-identity. Pierce<br />

and his colleague (2002) have recognized that as individual is ready for psychological ownership due to<br />

the innate motives for having a place, effectance, self identity, different people will differ on this strength<br />

<strong>of</strong> motive. <strong>The</strong>y further argued that personality should have impact on this development <strong>of</strong> feelings <strong>of</strong><br />

ownership as traits will affect how an individual goes about pursuing relationships with ownership<br />

objects. However, as researchers recognized the importance to understand the psychological process and<br />

dynamic <strong>of</strong> psychological ownership, individual factor as personality characteristic was totally ignored.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re have been no studies that examine the relationship <strong>of</strong> the Five-Factor Model <strong>of</strong> Personality to<br />

psychological ownership. In this study, I expected that individual differences in personality characteristics<br />

as five factor model <strong>of</strong> personality that would to an extent influence person’s exertion on psychological<br />

ownership feelings.<br />

<strong>The</strong> personality factors comprising the Big Five are (1) Extraversion, which represents the<br />

inclination to be sociable, assertive, dynamic, and directive, (2) Agreeableness, representing the tendency<br />

to be friendly, cheerful, accommodating, and supportive, (3) Conscientiousness, comprised <strong>of</strong> two major<br />

subfactors, achievement and dependability, (4) Neuroticism, which is the tendency to exhibit poor<br />

emotional adjustment and experience disparaging effects such as fear, anxiety, and rashness, and (5)<br />

Openness to Experience, which is the propensity to be inquisitive, creative, nonconforming and<br />

independent (Judge and Cable, 1997). Each dimension is scaled from high to low with high scores being<br />

representative <strong>of</strong> the most positive aspects <strong>of</strong> the dimension’s characterization while low scores signify the<br />

reverse. However, in this research, only two <strong>of</strong> the dimension will be further examined as formation <strong>of</strong><br />

psychological ownership seem to be most related with those 2 dimensions. Those two dimensions are<br />

agreeableness and conscientiousness.<br />

Agreeableness<br />

Agreeableness suggests the dimension <strong>of</strong> personality that involves getting along with others in<br />

pleasant, satisfying relationship. Agreeable individuals are generally cooperative, courteous, flexible,<br />

forgiving, good-natured, s<strong>of</strong>thearted, tolerant and trustful or trusting (Barrick & Mount, 1993; John et al.,<br />

1988). This dimension has been previously labeled as conformity, likeability, friendliness, social<br />

conformity, etc. Digman (1990) suggests that the label Agreeable is too timid for a dimension that seems to<br />

involve the more humane aspects <strong>of</strong> humanity such as caring, nurturance, and emotional support. As to<br />

satisfied basic need <strong>of</strong> belongingness, and striving for social recognition, agreeableness should be a factor<br />

that influences individual’s formation <strong>of</strong> psychological ownership feelings.<br />

H 2:Agreeablenss as moderator between employee equity ownership and psychological ownership feelings.<br />

Conscientiousness<br />

Conscientiousness is indicated by two major facets: achievement and dependability.<br />

Conscientiousness is the trait from the five-factor model that best correlates with job performance (Barrick<br />

& Mount, 1991). Individuals who score high on the Conscientiousness dimension tend to be achievementoriented,<br />

careful, hardworking, orderly, persevering, responsible, and thorough (Barrick & Mount, 1993;<br />

John et al., 1988). <strong>The</strong>re are elements <strong>of</strong> both dependability and volition to this trait (Barrick et al., 1993;<br />

Costa & McCrae, 1992; Stewart, 1999). High conscientiousness scorers are also active planners, organized,<br />

and carry out tasks (Costa & McCrae, 1992; Stewart, 1999). People scoring high on a conscientiousness<br />

scale set goals autonomously and demonstrate high commitment to goal achievement (Barrick et. al.,<br />

1993.) To satisfied basic need <strong>of</strong> self efficacy, conscientiousness should be that factor that formation <strong>of</strong><br />

psychological ownership feelings.<br />

H 3: Conscientiousness as moderator between employee equity ownership and psychological ownership<br />

feelings.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

195


METHOD<br />

Data<br />

<strong>The</strong> Respondents for the study used for testing our hypotheses were employees <strong>of</strong> the world's<br />

largest dedicated semiconductor foundry located in Taiwan. Similar to other ‘new economy’ firms, many<br />

Taiwanese high-tech firms have launched broad-based stock incentives to motivate employee<br />

participation and collaboration (Sesil et al., 2002). <strong>The</strong> broad-based stock plans in Taiwan resemble to<br />

restricted stock plans in United States with shorter vesting periods, which are generally between three<br />

months to two years depending on recipients’ positions in the company. Employees usually have full<br />

autonomy to keep or liquidate their awarded stocks after the restricted period.<br />

Psychological ownership beliefs. <strong>The</strong> measure <strong>of</strong> psychological ownership belief is adapted from Wagner,<br />

Parker, and Christiansen’s (2003) four-item instrument. <strong>The</strong> items in this composite included: “Making the<br />

company a good investment for stockholders is important to me”, “My job performance has an impact on the<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> this company”, “I should share the benefits <strong>of</strong> this company’s financial successes”, and “I should<br />

share in the consequences <strong>of</strong> this company’s financial setbacks”. Each item is based on a Likert scale and ranged from<br />

1 to 5, where 1 represents “strongly disagree” and 5 represents “strongly agree”. <strong>The</strong> Cronbach’s alpha reliability is<br />

0.73.<br />

Ownership Feeling<br />

Ownership feeing was measured by using Pierce et al. (1992) 3-item measurement instrument.<br />

<strong>The</strong> three items measuring feeling <strong>of</strong> possession exhibited internal acceptable consistency reliability<br />

(=0.8181).<br />

Big five personality<br />

<strong>The</strong> Big Five personality traits were measured with the Mini-Maker developed by Saucier (1994)<br />

adopted from NEO-PI-R (Costa & McCrae, 1992) contains five domain scales: Neuroticism (N), Openness<br />

to experience (O), Conscientiousness (C), Agreeableness (A), and Extraversion (E). <strong>The</strong> Mini-Maker<br />

adopted a 5-point Likert scale format, ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”, to assess<br />

participants’ level <strong>of</strong> agreement with each <strong>of</strong> the 40 self-report items founded on the test (Saucier, 1994;<br />

Mooradian & Nezlek, 1996). Although the most widely used five-factor model is the 240-item NEO<br />

Personality Inventory--Revised (NEOPI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992). However, to raise our response rate,<br />

for this research, a smaller scale <strong>of</strong> 40 item developed by Saucier (1994) will be used.<br />

Data Analysis<br />

A two-step approach to structural equation modeling (Anderson & Gerbing, 1988; James, Mulaik, &<br />

Brerr, 1982) will be applied to test the hypotheses, and all analyses and estimation will implemented in<br />

LISREL 8.54. <strong>The</strong> first step is to test the measurement <strong>of</strong> the variables in the proposed model.<br />

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) should be used to test and verify the distinctiveness <strong>of</strong> the underlying<br />

constructs <strong>of</strong> the proposed variables in our study. In the second step is to use structural equation model to<br />

confirm with the theoretical model. This research will also applied a model comparison procedure to<br />

evaluate whether the theoretical model has the better overall fit than other alternative models. In addition<br />

to the theoretical model, it is estimated there may be few alternative structural models to assess the effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> changing the order <strong>of</strong> constructs, and the goodness <strong>of</strong> fit <strong>of</strong> these structure models should be then<br />

compared.<br />

References<br />

Ardrey, R. (1966). <strong>The</strong> territorial imperative: A personal inquiry into the animal origins <strong>of</strong> property and nations. New<br />

York: Dells.<br />

Beggan, J. K. (1992). On the Social Nature <strong>of</strong> Nonsocial Perception: <strong>The</strong> Mere Ownership Effect. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2):229-237.<br />

Ben-Ner, A., & Jones, D. 1995. Employee participation, ownership, and productivity: A theoretical framework.<br />

Industrial Relations, 34: 532-554.<br />

Blinder, A., Ed. 1990. Paying for Productivity. Washington DC, Brookings Institution.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

196


Bradley, k. & Nejad, A. (1989), Managing Owners: the National Freight Consortium in Perspective. Cambridge University<br />

Press, Cambridge.<br />

Brief, A. & Motowidlo, S.1986. Prosocial organizational behaviors. <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Management Review. 11:710–725.<br />

Caudron, S. 1995. Create an empowering environment. Personnel Journal. 9:28-35.<br />

Conger, J.A. 1991. Inspiring others: the language <strong>of</strong> leadership. <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Management Executive . 5: 31–45.<br />

Conger, J. A. & Kaungo, R. N. 1998. <strong>The</strong> empowerment process: Integrative <strong>The</strong>ory and Practice. <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Management Review. 13:471-482.<br />

Cooke, W. 1992. Product quality improvement through employee participation: <strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> unionization<br />

and joint union-management administration. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 46: 119-134.<br />

Dittmar, H. (1992) <strong>The</strong> Social Psychology <strong>of</strong> Material Possessions. To Have Is To Be. Harvester Wheatsheaf. New<br />

York.<br />

Duncan, N. G. 1981. Home Ownership and Social <strong>The</strong>ory. London: Croom Helm.<br />

Duncan, W. J. 2001. Stock ownership and work motivation. Organizational Dynamics, 30: 1-11.<br />

Druskat, V. U., & Pescosolido, A. T. 2002. <strong>The</strong> content <strong>of</strong> effective teamwork mental models in self-managing<br />

teams: Ownership, learning, and heedful interrelating. Human Relations, 55: 283-314.<br />

Eisenhardt, M. K. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Management Review, 14(1): 57.<br />

Harrison, R. 1983. Strategies for a new age. Human Resource Management, 22: 209-235.<br />

Ichniowski, C., Kochan, T. A., Levine, D., Olson, C., & Strauss, G. 1996. What works at work: Overview and<br />

assessment. Industrial Relations, 35: 299-333.<br />

Klein, K. J. 1987. Employee stock ownership and employees attitudes: A test <strong>of</strong> three models. Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied<br />

Psychology, 72: 319-332.<br />

Klein, k. J. 1991. A reexamination <strong>of</strong> autonomy in the light new manufacturing practices. Human Relations 44:<br />

21–38.<br />

Kruse, D. & Balasi, J. 1997. Employee Ownership, Employee Attitudes, and Firm Performance: A Review <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Evidence. NBER Working Paper No. W5277.<br />

Kubzansky, P. E., & Druskat, V. U. 1995. Psychological sense <strong>of</strong> ownership: Conceptualization and measurement.<br />

Presented at the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada, August.<br />

Lawler, E.E. 1996. From the ground up: Six principles for building the new logic corporation. San Francisco: Jossey-<br />

Bass.<br />

Levine, D., & Tyson, L. 1990. Participation, productivity and the firm's environment. In A.S. Blinder (Ed.),<br />

Paying for productivity: 183-237. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.<br />

Long, R. J. 1978. <strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> employee ownership on organization identification, job attitudes and<br />

organizational performance: Tentative framework ad empirical findings. Human Relations, 31: 29-48.<br />

Pendleton, A. 2005 Sellers or keepers Stock retentions in stock option plans Human Resource Management,<br />

44(3): 319-36.<br />

Pierce, J. L., Rubenfeld, S. A., & Morgan, S.1991. Employee ownership: A Conceptual model <strong>of</strong> process and<br />

effects. <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Management Review, 16: 121-144.<br />

Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. 2001. Toward a theory <strong>of</strong> psychological ownership in organization.<br />

<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Management Review, 26: 298-310.<br />

Pierce, J.L., Rubenfeld, S. A., & Morgan, S. 1991. Employee ownership: A conceptual model <strong>of</strong> process and<br />

effects. <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Management Review, 16: 121-144.<br />

Podsak<strong>of</strong>f, P., Ahearne, M., MacKenzie, 1997. Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> work performance. Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Psychology 82 : 262–270.<br />

Richardson, R. & Nejad, A. 1986. Employee Share Ownership Schemes in the UK -- An Evaluation. British<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Industrial Relations, 24(2): 233-244.<br />

Quarrey, M. 1986. Employee Ownership and Corporate Performance. National Centre for Employee Ownership:<br />

Arlington, Virgina.<br />

Rousseau, D. M. & Shperling, Z. 2003. Pieces <strong>of</strong> the action: Ownership and the changing employment<br />

relationship, <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Management Review, 28: 553-570.<br />

Tannenbaum, A. S. 1983. Employee-Owned Companies. Greenwich, CT: lAI Press.<br />

Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. 1990. Cognitive elements <strong>of</strong> empowerment: An “interpretive” model <strong>of</strong><br />

intrinsic task motivation. <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Management Review, 15: 666–681.<br />

Van Dyne, & Pierce, J. L. 2004. Psychological ownership and feelings <strong>of</strong> possession: Three field studies<br />

predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal <strong>of</strong> Organizational Behavior, 25: 439-459.<br />

Wagner, S. H., Parker, C. P. & Cristiansen, N. D. 2003. Employee that think and act like owners: Effects <strong>of</strong><br />

ownership beliefs and behaviors on organizational effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 56: 847-871.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

197


Adoption <strong>of</strong> Job Rotation as a Component <strong>of</strong><br />

Staff Development in Polytechnics in Ghana<br />

Patience Kwakyewa Asirifi<br />

K<strong>of</strong>oridua Polytechnic, K<strong>of</strong>oridua, Ghana<br />

Keywords<br />

Job rotation; Job design; Management commitment; Staff development; Job rotation model.<br />

Abstract<br />

Job rotation (JR) has become critically important in organizations today, especially in relatively young<br />

organizations where innovation is key and its staff have little industrial experience. It involves a systematic lateral<br />

transfer <strong>of</strong> employees within an oraganisation or to another organization in order to make him or her versatile. It is<br />

tightly linked to succession planning and a useful tool in job placement. Though it has immense benefits like reduced<br />

monotony, increased job satisfaction, etc, Management <strong>of</strong> Polytechnics in Ghana have ignored this process <strong>of</strong> human<br />

resource development to formal workshops, classroom learning and skill acquisition. As a result most employees are<br />

less enthused as there is no formal model to be adopted. This research therefore sought to assess the process in<br />

Polytechnics and developed a model that will assist Management in its implementation since relatively little research<br />

had been done on the subject. <strong>The</strong> population <strong>of</strong> ten polytechnics in Ghana was selected and six were sampled where<br />

open and close-ended questionnaire were administered. Formal and informal interviews with members <strong>of</strong> staff were<br />

also conducted to clarify information obtained from questionnaire. <strong>The</strong> research proved that employees <strong>of</strong><br />

Polytechnics were aware <strong>of</strong> JR because it was taught formally in tertiary institutions and also lacked Management<br />

commitment. This paper therefore presented Polytechnics with a model for job rotation to ensure its effective<br />

implementation.<br />

Introduction<br />

Employees <strong>of</strong> organizations are their prominent assets which must be motivated, capable and<br />

efficient and staff development is one crucial means to attaining job satisfaction. This will induce<br />

employee commitment to achievement <strong>of</strong> organizational goals. Hence job rotation which is one form <strong>of</strong><br />

on-the job training plays a pivotal role in employee development. According to research, it is the process<br />

whereby an employee is assigned not to a single and specific task but a set <strong>of</strong> tasks among which he or she<br />

rotates as with some frequency (Cosgel and Miceli, 1998). <strong>The</strong> goal <strong>of</strong> staff development according to Paul<br />

(online paper) is to train staff to meet the organization’s minimum standards. This training must be<br />

ongoing and should ensure that employees know the size and scope <strong>of</strong> their authority and responsibility,<br />

who they report to for guidance and support, and also have the tools to effectively do their jobs.<br />

<strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> staff is closely linked to the JD <strong>of</strong> the institution which is the personnel or<br />

reengineering activity <strong>of</strong> specifying the contents <strong>of</strong> the job, tools and techniques to be used, surroundings<br />

<strong>of</strong> the work and the relationship <strong>of</strong> one job to the other. Campion, Cheraskin and Michael (1994) describe<br />

JR as lateral transfers <strong>of</strong> employees between jobs. <strong>The</strong>se could be a set <strong>of</strong> tasks, or an entire job, organized<br />

to determine what, how, and the order <strong>of</strong> execution. A well designed job encourages a variety <strong>of</strong> good<br />

body positions, reasonable strength requirements, mental activity, and foster feelings <strong>of</strong> achievement and<br />

self-esteem. This addresses issues like work overload or under-load, repetitiveness, limited control over<br />

work, isolation, shift, delays in filling vacant positions, excessive working hours, and limited<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the whole job process. Liu Yinhua mentions other types <strong>of</strong> JR like daily JR for ergonomic<br />

issues and regular rotations for appointments and orientation. Various methods exist in the design <strong>of</strong> jobs<br />

which are job enlargement (JEL), job enrichment (JER) and job evaluation which are periodic in addition<br />

JR to determine the strategic worth and weight <strong>of</strong> jobs for the achievement <strong>of</strong> corporate objectives. JEL<br />

includes more or different tasks and boast interest but may or may not give employees more<br />

responsibility to motivate them. JER allows employees to assume more responsibility, accountability, and<br />

independence when learning new tasks, thus, allows for greater participation and new opportunities<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

198


Three theories <strong>of</strong> JR exist and these are employee learning, employer learning and employee<br />

motivation theories. Erikson and Ortega (2001) assert that the employee learning theory is an effective<br />

way to develop the abilities <strong>of</strong> employees. <strong>The</strong>y iterate that employees who rotate accumulate more<br />

human capital since they have a wider range <strong>of</strong> job experiences. This movement <strong>of</strong> employees from one<br />

task to another distributes group tasks as a sequential activity in the form <strong>of</strong> job assessment through<br />

discussion <strong>of</strong> process with the employees and supervisors involved for clarity, training needs analysis<br />

cutting across policies, incentives, and feedback to achieve efficiency and motivate employees. It is<br />

imperative that the process <strong>of</strong> execution and coordination <strong>of</strong> tasks are implemented on a small scale at the<br />

first instance to allow for adjustments and a continual revaluation. It is common knowledge that<br />

employees who have less industrial experience must be rotated more frequently as against the others who<br />

have more industrial experience. Champion, Cheraskin and Stevens (1994) assert that it is an effective way<br />

to develop employees abilities.<br />

<strong>The</strong> employer learning theory according to Erikson and Ortega (2001) explains that the<br />

organization learns more about its employees to identify their performances on different jobs for effective<br />

job placement and this could be achieved only through the movement <strong>of</strong> employees from one job to the<br />

other. <strong>The</strong> Polytechnic would be able to identify the abilities <strong>of</strong> staff for effective job placement and<br />

improve overall productivity. It provides information for job placement and Ortega (2001) affirms this<br />

intuition. It also states that if an organization is young, it information on jobs may not be precise, therefore<br />

JR would be the best option.<br />

<strong>The</strong> third theory, employee motivation asserts that JR makes work more interesting especially<br />

with employees who have reached the peak <strong>of</strong> their careers. Cosgel and Maceli (1999) have said that there<br />

is increase job satisfaction from performing variety <strong>of</strong> activities and this goes a long way to reduce<br />

agitations among staff.<br />

This approach in question helps in the development <strong>of</strong> competency level <strong>of</strong> staff is JR which is a<br />

crucial process in an employee quest to improve upon himself and his For example, an electrical engineer<br />

may move from fabrication to assembling plants and to circuit design section at designated times.<br />

Through this process, he is exposed to other aspects <strong>of</strong> the job and his skills are improved, thus making<br />

him more efficient and versatile but in industry today, JR is viewed as just another transfer rather than as<br />

an important tool for implementing HR strategy. It has become a ritual at best, without any focus on the<br />

outcomes achievable through a little planning and implementation effort and also a means <strong>of</strong> punishing<br />

poor performers and settling scores resulting from organizational politics, etc.<br />

Job rotation (JR) as a management development (MD) tool is not new in the development <strong>of</strong><br />

human resources (HR) <strong>of</strong> an organization but has not received much recognition from both management<br />

and staff irrespective <strong>of</strong> its immense benefits. It is observed that JR is the best way <strong>of</strong> keeping the HR from<br />

complacency and boredom <strong>of</strong> routine since it is very difficult to sustain interest in a given job for any<br />

substantial length <strong>of</strong> time. This is because human beings by nature have the tendency to outgrow their<br />

jobs through the learning and experience gained over a period <strong>of</strong> time (http;/www.alagse.com).<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, stimulating human mind through diversity <strong>of</strong> challenges is a means to developing creativity<br />

and improving institutional performance.<br />

Consequently, a well planned job rotation programme has immense positive impacts on the job<br />

satisfaction and retention <strong>of</strong> cherished HR. Whiles there is relatively little research undertaken in this area<br />

a prospective emancipatory action research study has been on-going in North West London health<br />

services for several years by Patrick Coyne, Dr. Ricky Lucock, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Buchan and Jane Ball, with the local<br />

health communities (www.nurserotation.com).<br />

It is identified to have contributed greatly to the successes <strong>of</strong> firms in Japan. An influential study<br />

by Ouchi (1981) identifies non-specialised career paths as one <strong>of</strong> the fundamental properties from which<br />

others can learn as affirmed by Appelbaum and Batt, (1994), Osterman (1994), the evidence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

199


innovative transformations at the workplace through the practice <strong>of</strong> effective JR as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

management’s commitment.<br />

It was further argued that innovations in the firms emerged consequently from JR by allowing<br />

workers to apply their knowledge <strong>of</strong> one task to the improvement <strong>of</strong> the other (Meltin M. Cosgel, Thomas<br />

J. Miceli 1994]). A well known Communal Society, the Israeli Kibbutz, practiced job rotation for years<br />

(Helman (1988), Leibenstein (1989) since the positive derivations outweighed the cost <strong>of</strong> its<br />

implementation.<br />

According to Andrews (1963), a variety in schedules is viewed as “a source <strong>of</strong> pleasure” and the<br />

frequency precludes monotony which results in low productivity. This could be done without necessarily<br />

sending the individual to another department as in some cases; but rather, to a supplier to observe how<br />

the business operates from the suppliers view point to broaden employees outlook or to a foreign<br />

organization to gain a global perspective. This allows the employee to perform diverse roles to gain a<br />

better understand <strong>of</strong> the different issues.<br />

Similarly, Campion, Chereshin and Stevens (1994) say, JR has benefits like job satisfaction and<br />

stimulation, improves ability to deal with difficulties like sabotage, backbiting and other forms <strong>of</strong><br />

resistance that come along with the implementation <strong>of</strong> change.<br />

In an era where tertiary education has become paramount and competitive, there is the need to<br />

have a well resourced staff in terms <strong>of</strong> job pr<strong>of</strong>iciency to be able to satisfy the customer base and enhance<br />

corporate image. This has made employees <strong>of</strong> Polytechnics aware <strong>of</strong> the need for development. As a<br />

result, are undergoing various forms <strong>of</strong> training whether sponsored or not and ignoring the critical<br />

practical experience and versatility <strong>of</strong> the workforce that is needed.<br />

However, there has been the realization that JR is not given the necessary attention and<br />

seriousness and is either done as a form <strong>of</strong> punishment or as stop gab during periods <strong>of</strong> shortages. It is<br />

therefore the objective <strong>of</strong> this research to access the process and develop a model for its implementation in<br />

organizations. This is critical in the career development process <strong>of</strong> every staff since it contributes greatly to<br />

their productivity.<br />

This will create the necessary awareness, boost staff interest and desire to bring about a higher<br />

level <strong>of</strong> creativity and innovation and has also designed a model make it a very effective employee<br />

development practice. As such, this research, sought to ascertain whether JR is employed in Polytechnics,<br />

its basis, level <strong>of</strong> management and staff enthusiasm and the constraints. <strong>The</strong> limitation was mainly the<br />

availability <strong>of</strong> funds and cooperation staff <strong>of</strong> sampled Polytechnics.<br />

Methodology<br />

<strong>The</strong> target population included all Polytechnics in Ghana with a sample size <strong>of</strong> six; namely<br />

Takoradi, Accra, Kumasi, Sunyani, Cape Coast and K<strong>of</strong>oridua and made up <strong>of</strong> two strata; heads <strong>of</strong><br />

department and senior staff or members in the various departments. Questionnaires, interview guides,<br />

telephone interviews and participatory observations were used to collate the data which allowed a sizable<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> information to be gathered. This was preceded with pre-testing <strong>of</strong> the questionnaire for the<br />

design, structure, and content to reduce ambiguity and ensure clarity. Statistical Package for Social<br />

Sciences SPSS was used in the processing and analysis <strong>of</strong> data and was presented by the use <strong>of</strong> frequency<br />

distribution tables and graphs.<br />

Results<br />

<strong>The</strong> respondents answered similar questions but related to rank and position in the Polytechnic.<br />

Research question one: How long have you been in this institution Respondents were asked to indicate<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

200


their length <strong>of</strong> stay in their respective Polytechnics as shown in Table 1 below.<br />

Table 1 Length <strong>of</strong> Stay in Polytechnic<br />

Length HOD STAFF<br />

Frequency Percent Frequency Percent<br />

0 – 1 yr<br />

2yrs<br />

3yrs<br />

4yrs<br />

5yrs and above<br />

Total<br />

4<br />

12<br />

24<br />

32<br />

72<br />

5.6<br />

16.7<br />

33.3<br />

44.4<br />

100.0<br />

24<br />

27<br />

43<br />

28<br />

111<br />

233<br />

10.3<br />

11.6<br />

18.5<br />

12.0<br />

47.6<br />

100.0<br />

From the table 1, it is observed that 32 (44.4%) <strong>of</strong> the HODs had stayed for 5 years and above, 24 (33.3%), 4<br />

years and 12 (16.7%), 3 years. <strong>The</strong> least stay was 1 year and below represented by 4(5.6%). For the<br />

supervised staff, 111 (47.6%), over 5 years, 28 (12.0%) and 43 (18.5%), 3 and 4 years respectively.<br />

Research question two: How long have you been at this position<br />

Table 2 shows how long the staff had remained at their current positions over the period in the<br />

Polytechnics.<br />

Table 2 Length <strong>of</strong> Time at Position<br />

YEARS HOD STAFF<br />

Frequency Percent Frequency Percent<br />

0 – 1 yr<br />

2yrs<br />

3yrs<br />

4yrs<br />

5 yrs & above<br />

Total<br />

24<br />

4<br />

8<br />

24<br />

12<br />

72<br />

33.3<br />

5.6<br />

11.1<br />

33.3<br />

16.7<br />

100.0<br />

50<br />

56<br />

47<br />

28<br />

45<br />

224<br />

22.2<br />

24.4<br />

20.9<br />

12.4<br />

20.0<br />

100.0<br />

It is observed that for HODs, 12 (16.75%) and 24 (33.3%) had been at their current positions for over 5 and<br />

4 years respectively. 24 (33.3%), a year and below, 8(11.1%) three (3) years. On the part <strong>of</strong> the supervised,<br />

50 (22.2%) and 56 (24.4), a year and below and 2 years respectively. 47 (20.9%) and 45 (20%) 3 and 5 or<br />

more years and above respectively.<br />

Research question three: Does your institution use the tool <strong>of</strong> job rotation as an essential part <strong>of</strong> job<br />

placement None <strong>of</strong> the respondents answered this question.<br />

Research question four: Does management support job rotation<br />

<strong>The</strong> respondents were asked to indicate whether management supported the process.<br />

Fig. 1 Management Support<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

201


It can be inferred from figure 1above that as many as 60 (88.2%) responded in the affirmative and 8<br />

(11.8%) responded in the negative.<br />

Research question five: Do you consider it as a form <strong>of</strong> staff development<br />

<strong>The</strong> respondents were asked whether they considered job rotation as a form <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> staff<br />

capabilities.<br />

Table 3 Form <strong>of</strong> Staff Development<br />

RESPONSE HOD STAFF<br />

Frequency Percent Frequency Percent<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

Not at all<br />

Total<br />

52<br />

8<br />

12<br />

72<br />

72.2<br />

11.1<br />

16.7<br />

100.0<br />

191<br />

15<br />

16<br />

222<br />

82<br />

6.4<br />

6.9<br />

100<br />

<strong>The</strong> table 3 above indicates that 52 (72.2%) <strong>of</strong> the HODs believe that job rotation is a form <strong>of</strong> staff<br />

development. 8 (11.1%) and 12 (16.7%) said no and not at all respectively. For the staff, 191(82%)<br />

responded in the affirmative. 15 (6.4%) and 16 (6.9%) <strong>of</strong> them said no and not at all respectively.<br />

Research question six: Have you been able to develop your subordinates through job rotation<br />

Table 4 Ability to Develop Staff<br />

Response Frequency Percent<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

Total<br />

40<br />

32<br />

72<br />

55.6<br />

44.4<br />

100.0<br />

Table 4 above shows that 40 (55.6%) <strong>of</strong> the HODs said “yes” and 32(44.4%) said “no”<br />

Research question seven: What is the level <strong>of</strong> staff enthusiasm<br />

Respondents were asked to indicate their level <strong>of</strong> enthusiasm about the process if it carried out in their<br />

respective Polytechnics.<br />

Fig 2 Level <strong>of</strong> Staff Enthusiasm<br />

From figure 2 above, 8 (12.5%) HODs said they were very enthused and enthused about the job rotation<br />

process. 32 (50%) and 16 (25%) respectively were somehow enthused and not enthused by the whole<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

202


process. On the part <strong>of</strong> the other staff, 12 (5.5%) and 62 (28.2%) were very enthused and enthused<br />

respectively. 90 (40.9%) and 56 (25.5%) were somehow enthused and not enthused about the process at all.<br />

Research question eight: Is the process competency-based<br />

This question sought to find out whether the process is competency-based.<br />

Fig. 3 Competency base<br />

Figure 3 indicates that for the HODs 16 (26.7%) responded “yes”, 6 (6.7) responded “no” and 40(66.6%)<br />

said “somehow”. <strong>The</strong> figure also reports that for the other staff, 99(45%) said “yes”, 39 (17.7%), “no” and<br />

82 (37.3%), “somehow”.<br />

Research question nine: Do you wish it to be part <strong>of</strong> your human resource strategy<br />

No response was received for this question.<br />

Research question ten: are you aware <strong>of</strong> job rotation<br />

It was expected <strong>of</strong> respondents to indicate their awareness or otherwise <strong>of</strong> job rotation.<br />

Fig. 4 Self - Awareness<br />

<strong>The</strong> figure 4 above shows that as many as 190 (81.5%) said they were aware <strong>of</strong> job rotation. 35 (15.0%) and<br />

8(3.5) <strong>of</strong> them respectively said no and not at all.<br />

Research question eleven: Are other members <strong>of</strong> staff aware<br />

Respondents were asked to assess their colleague’s awareness <strong>of</strong> the process.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

203


Fig. 5 Other Staff Awareness<br />

Figure 5 above indicates that 44 (61.1%) <strong>of</strong> the HODs said their surbodinates were aware. 8 (11.1%) and 20<br />

(27.8) <strong>of</strong> them said no and not at all. 132 (58.7%) <strong>of</strong> the other staffs said yes, 28 (12.4%), no and 65 (28.9%),<br />

not at all.<br />

Research question twelve: which tools does your institution use in selecting people for job rotation<br />

<strong>The</strong> respondents were asked to select from a list tools that were used for the selection <strong>of</strong> individuals for<br />

job rotation.<br />

Table 5 Selection Tools<br />

TOOLS HOD STAFF<br />

Freq(HOD) Percent Freq(staff) Percent<br />

Observation 24 40 89 45.6<br />

Coaching 4 6.7 32 16.4<br />

Interview 12 20 16 8.2<br />

Assessment<br />

test 4 6.7 28 14.4<br />

Others 16 26.7 30 15.4<br />

Total 60 100 195 100<br />

It is inferred from table 5 above that the response for observation is 24 (40.0%), interview 12 (20.0%) with<br />

coaching and assessment test representing 4 (6.7%) respectively. 16 (26.0%) also mentioned other tools like<br />

experience, qualification among others. For the other staff the highest mode <strong>of</strong> selection is observation<br />

89(45.6%), 32 (16.4%) and 28 (14.4%) indicated coaching and assessment test respectively. <strong>The</strong> least<br />

method used in the view <strong>of</strong> the respondents is through interview. 30(15.4%) <strong>of</strong> them also mentioned<br />

experience and qualification as some <strong>of</strong> the other tools for selection.<br />

Research question twelve: have you ever been selected<br />

This question sought to find out from the respondents if any <strong>of</strong> them had been selected to undertake job<br />

rotation in the Polytechnic or an analogous institution.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

204


Fig. 6 Personal Involvement<br />

<strong>The</strong> figure above shows that out <strong>of</strong> the 229 respondents, 80 (34.9%) <strong>of</strong> them said they have once been<br />

selected for job rotation. <strong>The</strong> remaining 149 (65.1%) responded in the negative.<br />

Research question thirteen: will you encourage your colleagues to make themselves available for the<br />

process<br />

Fig. 6 Recommendation to Others<br />

<strong>The</strong> figure 6 above shows that 19(87.6%) <strong>of</strong> the respondents indicated ‘yes” and 27(2.4%), “no”.<br />

Research question fourteen: State some benefits derived from job rotation.<br />

Few <strong>of</strong> the respondents mentioned multi-skill, reduction in boredom, among others as some benefits <strong>of</strong><br />

job rotation.<br />

Research question fifteen: What are some <strong>of</strong> the problems which have evolved from this process<br />

No response was received for this question.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Process<br />

From the afore presented results, majority <strong>of</strong> the staff had stayed in the Polytechnics for at least five years<br />

and had remained at their current positions for up to a year or four. This means that they may have<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

205


gained much experience and therefore had more control over what they do, but with little diversification<br />

and so are limited in scope. This process was however not used as condition for job placement in the<br />

Polytechnics. However, though Management support was present but it was not committed to it. As a<br />

result, it was not used effectively and for the right purposes. Respondents indicated that they considered<br />

it as a form <strong>of</strong> staff development but were not enthused about effective because management is perceived<br />

to be unfair in job placement and appointment to positions. <strong>The</strong>re was a perception that it is competency<br />

based but could not indicate whether they wanted to be part <strong>of</strong> the HR strategy. This Appalbum and Batt<br />

(1994) asserted that it is management’s involvement that makes the process effective. According to Janni<br />

(eHow member), job rotation programmes sometimes <strong>of</strong>fer customized assignment to promising<br />

employees in an effort to give them a view <strong>of</strong> the entire organization. <strong>The</strong>se assignments could rum for a<br />

year or more and sometimes vary in size and formality. Paul Nicolazzo also explains that competency<br />

based recruitment and promotional standards together with an effective staff development system helps<br />

to ensure consistency in quality and safety.<br />

Awareness<br />

Staff responses indicated that they were aware by virtue <strong>of</strong> knowledge from school but could not explain<br />

individually that it was practiced in their respective Polytechnics. This lack <strong>of</strong> participation is<br />

confounding given that rotation programs are a respected means for learning how other functions<br />

operate, and that such knowledge is essential to becoming a better business partner (Adrienne Fox, 2003).<br />

Erikson and Ortega (2001) asserts that the when employees are rotated or exposed to a number <strong>of</strong> varying<br />

jobs the more experienced they become and this supports the learning theory <strong>of</strong> job rotation.<br />

Selection<br />

Considering the responses, observation was perceived as the tool used for the process. Though none had<br />

been selected for the process but they were willing to make themselves available as well as encourage<br />

their colleague because they were aware <strong>of</strong> the immerse benefit. According to Erikson and Ortega (2001),<br />

rotation boasts employees morale in availing themselves for the process affirmed by the motivation theory<br />

<strong>of</strong> JR.<br />

Benefits<br />

According to respondents, some <strong>of</strong> the benefits gained for participating in job rotation include, multiskilled<br />

employee thus, the ability to handle different tasks. <strong>The</strong>re is also high sense <strong>of</strong> integrity, reduction<br />

in boredom, resulting self empowerment and job enhancement. All these will increase competency level <strong>of</strong><br />

staff and eventually result is efficiency and higher productivity. This is affirmed by Andrews (1963) that a<br />

variety in work schedules at the workplace is viewed tends to provide some pleasure and the frequency<br />

precludes monotony which usually results in low productivity. This is supported by the employee<br />

motivation theory that it makes work more interesting and confirmed by Cosgel and Maceli (1999) that job<br />

satisfaction reduces agitations among staff but because this process is formally absent, there are a lot <strong>of</strong><br />

staff agitations which has led to a number <strong>of</strong> strikes.<br />

Campion, Chereshin and Stevens (1994) also asserts that job rotation has numerous benefits like job<br />

satisfaction and stimulation, the organization’s ability to deal with difficulties like sabotage, backbiting<br />

and other forms <strong>of</strong> resistance that come along with the implementation <strong>of</strong> change whiles Ortega (2001)<br />

indicates it decreases the function <strong>of</strong> seeking prior information about employees who have experienced<br />

various work assignments. According to Ference, Stoner ans Warren (1077), it acts as a form <strong>of</strong> motivation<br />

for plateaued employees.<br />

Problems<br />

Much could not be identified in terms <strong>of</strong> the problems as a result <strong>of</strong> the fact that it is not carried out as a<br />

formal exercise and the few that are undertaken, staff are not well informed about them. <strong>The</strong> general<br />

perception gathered from interviews was job transfer from one department to another, not job rotation as<br />

done in most Polytechnics.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

206


From observation Management commitment to the implementation <strong>of</strong> job rotation is low especially when<br />

employees have to move to another organisation for further training. Janni (eHow member) asserts that<br />

irrespective <strong>of</strong> the fact that job rotation has immense benefits, lack <strong>of</strong> time, resources, etc, do not allow<br />

organizations to embark on this activity. According to Lin Yinhua problems in human resource<br />

management have to be faced and gradual measures put in place to mitigate their effects on both the<br />

employees and management.<br />

Conclusion<br />

It is observed from the analysis that though most staff in the various categories have knowledge on JR,<br />

they do not see the importance because few have been selected specifically to be part <strong>of</strong> this process but<br />

there were no set objectives to be measured. Also the non-existence <strong>of</strong> an HR strategy has not allowed JR<br />

to be part <strong>of</strong> as a result <strong>of</strong> management unawareness <strong>of</strong> the immense benefits like reduction in boredom<br />

and stress associated with particular jobs, creativity and innovation among staff.<br />

It was realized that the lack <strong>of</strong> management commitment was also due to lack <strong>of</strong> time and inadequate<br />

resources among others and the lack <strong>of</strong> managements understanding <strong>of</strong> the process JR and its immense<br />

benefit as asserted by the employee motivation theory <strong>of</strong> JR.<br />

Recommendation<br />

It is commended that Management and Heads <strong>of</strong> departments or Sections remain fair and firm to be able<br />

to achieve the mission <strong>of</strong> the Polytechnics with regards to adherence to set procedure to gain employee<br />

confidence. <strong>The</strong> recommendation further includes a job rotation plan outlined below:<br />

Model for job rotation<br />

For any job rotation process to be effective, there must be a model or laid down procedure to make it less<br />

cumbersome and results oriented.<br />

Fig 7 Proposed Job Rotation Model<br />

Feed back to employees after going through this process is essential to abreast themselves with their<br />

performance and also help them identify their weakness to enable them improve. <strong>The</strong> employee on the<br />

other hand must also submit reports to Management periodically as on the job rotation in order to abreast<br />

Management with difficulties to enable them monitor and evaluate the process better.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

207


Precautions:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Heads <strong>of</strong> departments and sections must also be sensitized encourage staff to give <strong>of</strong>f their best<br />

and also be able to identify potential staff.<br />

<strong>The</strong> staff who are selected must also be sensitized since it a psychological exercise.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re must be systematic.<br />

<strong>The</strong> objectives setting should be done in consultation with staff in question.<br />

NB:<br />

<strong>The</strong> staff could be sent to other organizations for further training or go on exchange programmes.<br />

References<br />

Adrienne Fox (2003). HR Magazine<br />

Andrews, E. D. (1932), Community Industries <strong>of</strong> the Shakers, <strong>The</strong> University <strong>of</strong> the State <strong>of</strong> New York: Albany,<br />

NY.<br />

Appelbaum, E. and R. Batt (1994). <strong>The</strong> New American Workplace: Transforming Work Systems in the United<br />

States, ILR Press: Ithaca, New York.<br />

Campion, M. A., L. Cheraskin, and M. Stevens (1994). Career Related Antecedents and Outcomes <strong>of</strong> Job<br />

Rotation, <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Management Journal, 37(6), 1518-42.<br />

Cosgel M, Maceli T. (1999). Job Rotation: Costs, Benefits and Stylised Facts. Journal <strong>of</strong> Institutional and<br />

<strong>The</strong>oretical Economics.<br />

Erickson Tor (200). How common are the new compensation and work practices and who adopts them<br />

Working paper 01-8, <strong>The</strong> Arhus School Business.<br />

Ference T, James S. and Warren K. E. (1977). Managing the career plateau. <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Management review,<br />

Vol.2.pp.602-12.<br />

Leibenstein, H. (1989). <strong>The</strong> Kibbutz: Motivations, Hierarchy, and Efficiency, pp. 231-243 in: H. Leibenstein<br />

(ed.), the Collected Essays <strong>of</strong> Harvey Leibenstein, Columbia University.<br />

Lin Yinhua. College <strong>of</strong> Business Administrarion, University <strong>of</strong> Fiance and Trade, Kunming, Yunnun, china,<br />

650221<br />

Metin M. C, Thomas J. Miceli, [October 1998] “Journal <strong>of</strong> Institutional and <strong>The</strong>oretical Economics”.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Economics Working Paper Series. University <strong>of</strong> Connecticut<br />

Osterman, P. (1994). How Common is Workplace Transformation and who adopts it Industrial and Labour<br />

Relations Review, 47(2), 173-88.<br />

Oetega Jaime (2001). Job rotaion as a learning mechanism. Management Science, Vol. 47, No. 10, pp.1361-1370.<br />

Ouchi, W. G. (1981). <strong>The</strong>ory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge, Addison-Wesley,<br />

MA. .<br />

ehow.com/how_4763302_effective-job-rotation-program-company.html<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

I wish to express my sincere gratitude to Mr. Kojo Haizel, HR Manager, Alisa Hotel, Rev. Paa Ekow<br />

Quaye, Head <strong>of</strong> Department, HR, Central University College and Dr. Smile Dzisi, K<strong>of</strong>oridua Polytechnic,<br />

Ghana and Dr. Joel Barimah, London College <strong>of</strong> Management Studies for their immense contribution in<br />

diverse ways.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

208


Water – <strong>The</strong> missing ingredient in real and<br />

sustained economic development<br />

Mark T Jones<br />

Park Royal College, London, UK<br />

Keywords<br />

Consumption, economic revitalisation, supply, sustainable development, water security.<br />

Abstract<br />

Access to water and water security are essential prerequisites for sustained economic development. <strong>The</strong> fact that<br />

such remittances invariably feature individuals, regions and indeed virtually whole nations that themselves are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

deemed to be on the economic margins has ensure that the issue is <strong>of</strong>ten overlooked or rarely given the prominence it<br />

deserves. When the topic is mentioned at all it is routinely assumed that it is purely an environmental matter, such a<br />

simplistic approach ignores the increasingly important role that water plays as one <strong>of</strong> the fundamentals that<br />

stimulates entrepreneurial activity. Companies rightly set store by access to a reliable source <strong>of</strong> energy, good<br />

communication and a developed infrastructure, but water seems to be taken for granted and minimal time or effort<br />

employed in guaranteeing the source <strong>of</strong> supply and implementing water conservation and management measures.<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> commoditization <strong>of</strong> water’ (World Without Water, Channel 4 documentary – 29/04/2006) would appear<br />

to raise serious questions about water management, which in turn has serious implications for security,<br />

stability and economic development.<br />

In these times <strong>of</strong> economic difficulty and signs <strong>of</strong> growing geo-political tensions there is an even greater need to<br />

explore the role water plays in stimulating economic activity. This presentation seeks to elucidate something <strong>of</strong> the<br />

reasons why it is imperative to recalibrate our thinking in this regard.<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> inter-connective nature <strong>of</strong> the global economy means that nations and entire regions are easily<br />

destabilised by both natural and man-made activity. As much as countries might try to insulate<br />

themselves from such difficulties, no country can remain immune to the ramifications <strong>of</strong> the travails <strong>of</strong><br />

others. Water is so elemental to human existence that it seems surprising that it rarely seems to factor in<br />

economic planning. Rather like the oxygen we brief there would appear to be an assumption that it will be<br />

there. Water intensive industries such as the beverage sector do take the issue seriously, although even<br />

here there are periodic tensions such as those between Coca Cola and farmers in the state <strong>of</strong> Kerala, India<br />

in 2000. <strong>The</strong> United Nations Human Development Report (2006) states that: “Every $1 spent in the (water)<br />

sector creates on average another $8 in costs averted and productivity gained.” Water as an economic driver<br />

warrants far greater analysis.<br />

Governments and economist the world over are busy exploring ways to stimulate home and inward<br />

investment. <strong>The</strong> United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) takes considerable<br />

care in publishing annual data on Foreign Direct Investment, yet until relatively recently there has been a<br />

paucity <strong>of</strong> comparable data concerning inward investment into countries from Diaspora communities and<br />

migrant workers. Economists and monetary committees the world over are currently being exercised by<br />

fear <strong>of</strong> a prolonged economic malaise, double dip recessions and the burden <strong>of</strong> mounting national and<br />

personal debt, so naturally anything that has an impact on macroeconomic indicators. With the<br />

International Organisation for Migration (IOM) having estimated the number <strong>of</strong> migrants being 200<br />

million the role they play cannot be ignored. A recent World Bank (2011): Outlook for Remittance Flows<br />

2012-14 makes startling reading, not least because it concludes that remittance flows to developing<br />

countries exceeded $350 billion in 2011. Even if as little as 10% <strong>of</strong> such a sum went into economic<br />

investment the outcome would be significant.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

209


Markets in Financial Instruments Europe Directive (MiFID):<br />

A Method <strong>of</strong> Controlling Ethical Banking.<br />

Amaia Jone Betzuen Álvarez<br />

University <strong>of</strong> the Basque Country – Universidad del País Vasco- Euskal Herriko<br />

Unibertsitatea (UBC-UPV-EHU), Spain<br />

Keywords<br />

Financial products, Mifid, Clients and Ethical banking<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>The</strong> European guideline MiFID that was transferred to the Spanish legislation by means <strong>of</strong> 47/2007 Law<br />

and 217/2008 Royal Decree regulates the services <strong>of</strong> investment made by any financial or investment institution that<br />

undertakes giving information, advising and/or selling financial products to its clients and/or potential clients, as<br />

well as the form in which the institution <strong>of</strong>fers the services <strong>of</strong> execution <strong>of</strong> operations on financial and/or investment<br />

products.<br />

<strong>The</strong> objective <strong>of</strong> this guideline is to protect the client, regulating the behavior <strong>of</strong> the financial or investment<br />

institutions. <strong>The</strong> financial or investment institutions must facilitate to the clients information on themselves, the<br />

financial services and products <strong>of</strong>fered, as well as act in the best interest <strong>of</strong> the client. <strong>The</strong> present researching work<br />

tries to expose the application <strong>of</strong> this guideline to the financial or investment institutions in Spain, considering a<br />

critical vision <strong>of</strong> the author on the basis <strong>of</strong> its pr<strong>of</strong>essional experience as a Financial Advisor in the Spanish banking<br />

sector.<br />

Introduction<br />

This article is based on the document “A consumer´s guide to MiFID. Investing in financial products”<br />

published by <strong>The</strong> Committee <strong>of</strong> European Securities Regulators (CESR). CESR is an independent<br />

Committee <strong>of</strong> European Securities Regulators <strong>of</strong> Shares Market, which undertakes the National<br />

Commission <strong>of</strong> Shares Market (NCSM).<br />

CESR has contributed to the preparation <strong>of</strong> legal texts <strong>of</strong> the MiFID and to its public spreading. One <strong>of</strong> the<br />

main objectives <strong>of</strong> CESR is to foster cooperation between its members <strong>of</strong> their core functions, including<br />

raising public awareness on financial services issues and investor information.<br />

MiFID legal text<br />

<strong>The</strong> MiFID Directive is the European legislation that harmonises in Europe the regulation <strong>of</strong> the Shares<br />

Market, the financial instruments negotiation, the financial or investment firms and the relation with its<br />

clients, and the protection to the investor.<br />

<strong>The</strong> “Markets in Financial Instruments’ Directive” is well-known by its abbreviation in English MiFID. It<br />

has been incorporated to the Spanish Law by means <strong>of</strong> Law 47/2007 <strong>of</strong> the 20 th <strong>of</strong> December, which<br />

modifies the Law <strong>of</strong> the Shares Market, and Royal Decree 217/2008, <strong>of</strong> the 15 th <strong>of</strong> February.<br />

Its origins come from the modification <strong>of</strong> Law 24/1988, <strong>of</strong> the 28 th <strong>of</strong> July, which modifies the law <strong>of</strong><br />

Shares Market and incorporates the following European Directives to the Spanish legal texts:<br />

- <strong>The</strong> Directive 2004/39/EC <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament and the Council, the 21 th <strong>of</strong> April (2004),<br />

related to financial instruments market;<br />

- <strong>The</strong> Directive 2006/73/EC <strong>of</strong> the Commission, <strong>of</strong> 10 th <strong>of</strong> August (2006), that modifies the Directive<br />

2004/39/EC <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament and the Council related to the organizational<br />

requirements and the operating conditions <strong>of</strong> the firms <strong>of</strong> investment.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

210


- <strong>The</strong> Directive 2006/49/EC <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament and the Council <strong>of</strong> the 14 th <strong>of</strong> June 2006,<br />

related to the accommodate <strong>of</strong> the investment enterprise capital.<br />

MiFID regulation’s objectives<br />

<strong>The</strong> MiFID guideline´s porpoise is to modernize the Spanish Shares Markets to adapt them to the present<br />

necessities. Necessities that, in the last few years, have experienced an important evolution, as the<br />

financial markets have increased their complexity and variety and that the investors have modified their<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile remarkably; increasing, on the one hand, its pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism and at the same time a remarkable<br />

increase in the direct access <strong>of</strong> the retail investor in the financial markets.<br />

In order to respond to these new necessities, the guideline extends the catalogue <strong>of</strong> investment services<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered by the firms and the range <strong>of</strong> negotiable financial instruments, recognising different systems or<br />

methods for the execution, etc.<br />

<strong>The</strong> guideline has the high-priority objective <strong>of</strong> reinforcing the measures <strong>of</strong> protection for the investors<br />

through Europe.<br />

Indeed, as a result <strong>of</strong> the increasingly complexity and sophistication <strong>of</strong> investment products, and the<br />

constant increase in the access <strong>of</strong> the investors to markets, the protection <strong>of</strong> the investor acquires highpriority<br />

relevance, having shown the necessity to differentiate between different types <strong>of</strong> investors based<br />

on its knowledge, etc. Thus, the Law establishes a catalogue <strong>of</strong> norms for those firms and individuals who<br />

want to <strong>of</strong>fer an investment assessment.<br />

A better protection for the investor<br />

<strong>The</strong> level <strong>of</strong> protection for any investor should be the maximum, regardless <strong>of</strong> the complexity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

financial product. That is the reason why, the new MiFID guideline enphasises the way <strong>of</strong> working <strong>of</strong> the<br />

financial firms when a client (fixed, or potential) decides to invest in a financial firms´ products.<br />

In order to improve the protection <strong>of</strong> the investor, MiFID sets some principles that will apply to the<br />

financial or investment firms when they are doing investment business with the client. <strong>The</strong>se are:<br />

‣ Get information about the client in order to know him/her as best as possible. This way, it will be<br />

possible to advise the client, <strong>of</strong>fering him/her the most suitable advising service according to<br />

his/her necessities, characteristics and objectives.<br />

‣ Having obtained the necessary data, the firm will <strong>of</strong>fer the client those products that are<br />

considered the more suitable for him/her, taking into account the knowledge and the experience<br />

he/she has, and having valued previously, the nature and risks <strong>of</strong> the financial products.<br />

‣ Provide a pr<strong>of</strong>essional advising, at any moment, which assures that the service is agreed to the<br />

knowledge, experience, objectives and financial situation <strong>of</strong> the client.<br />

MiFID, also stresses that:<br />

‣ <strong>The</strong> financial firm will have to facilitate the best information about the investment, (before, during<br />

and after) inherent risks to the product, and direct and indirect commissions and expenses <strong>of</strong> the<br />

business.<br />

‣ In addition to this, when executing the orders <strong>of</strong> the client, the financial firms will try to obtain the<br />

best result for the client.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the MiFID guideline´s porpoise is to become the client, being pr<strong>of</strong>essional or not, an active part in<br />

the process <strong>of</strong> the investment/financing business.<br />

<strong>The</strong> financial or investment organization must insist on the client in reading the information <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

thoroughly, and to demand information that could solve out any doubt with the aim <strong>of</strong> helping him/her<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

211


in taking decisions in investment/financing.<br />

We must stress that, with the aim <strong>of</strong> doing all previously said in an optimal way, the firm must know the<br />

client as best as possible to <strong>of</strong>fer him/her the best service.<br />

Despite the previous thing, in our opinion, MiFID has not covered the predicted expectations and we have<br />

detected some weaknesses in its application and development, which we will analyse throughout this<br />

article.<br />

MiFID guideline´s protection for the investor<br />

If we analyze the number <strong>of</strong> financial products owned by Spanish population, we could found a big<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> people with more or less complex products.<br />

<strong>The</strong> data would show us that a great percentage <strong>of</strong> the population has a sample <strong>of</strong> a bank account, some<br />

loan (mortgage or personal loan), a credit/debit card and perhaps, some shares, investment funds, one or<br />

more insurances (car, home, life…) and perhaps a pension plan.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> these products, that at first could be catalogued like not complex, depending on the specific<br />

characteristics they have, they could become a high complex products for an investor, and still more, if<br />

he/she is a retail investor.<br />

It is striking that the guideline is not applied to all financial products. <strong>The</strong> MiFID guideline is only applied<br />

to some <strong>of</strong> products before mentioned, considering them complex, as it is the case <strong>of</strong> shares, bonds,<br />

derivatives and units investment funds. It is not applied, to other kind <strong>of</strong> banking products like deposits<br />

or loans, nor to insurance products.<br />

In our opinion, in the Spanish market there are structured deposits or mortgages <strong>of</strong> high risk and<br />

complexity, which are <strong>of</strong>fered with a supplementary financial product or insurance (“Mortgage clips”) to<br />

safe the investor <strong>of</strong> the “interest risk” and that should be subjected to the guideline as complex products.<br />

We have successfully obtained information <strong>of</strong> different Spanish financial firms to get an evidence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

interpretation <strong>of</strong> this catalogue <strong>of</strong> complex products and have elaborated, in a summarized form, the<br />

following investment or financial product composition according to our criteria, and taking into account<br />

what MiFID says and going further than what some firms:<br />

<br />

<br />

Non-subjected products by MiFID guideline<br />

Products subjected by MiFID<br />

Complex products<br />

Non-Complex Products<br />

In a later section, we will analyse this classification with more detail according to the typology <strong>of</strong> products<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered by the financial firms.<br />

MiFID establishes the level <strong>of</strong> protection towards the client based on the complexity <strong>of</strong> products and<br />

services firms <strong>of</strong>fer and the capacity <strong>of</strong> the client to understand or assume the nature <strong>of</strong> the products and<br />

their inherent risks. According to our experience and, as already has been commented in previous<br />

sections, in the banking sector, this level <strong>of</strong> protection would must be the maximum regardless <strong>of</strong> the<br />

complexity <strong>of</strong> the product and the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the investor.<br />

In order to improve the protection <strong>of</strong> the investor, MiFID says that the client must know all the<br />

information necessary to assume or understand the risks <strong>of</strong> products and investment and/or financing<br />

business. With that objective, MiFID emphasizes and sets three obligatory basic principles when the<br />

financial firms <strong>of</strong>fer investment business:<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

212


‣ To act honestly, fairly, and pr<strong>of</strong>essionally, and in accordance with the best interests <strong>of</strong> the client.<br />

Evidently, the firm will always be in a better position than the client and therefore, in an<br />

advantageous situation. This principle tries to protect the clients when they are dealing with any<br />

type <strong>of</strong> abuse and interest conflict between both parts (firm and client).<br />

‣ To provide impartial, clear, comprehensive and not misleading information to the clients.<br />

‣ To provide the clients with products considering his/her pr<strong>of</strong>ile, necessities and personal<br />

expectations.<br />

MiFID guideline clients´ typology<br />

Another important aspect to remark in the MiFID guideline is the application <strong>of</strong> certain rules <strong>of</strong> conduct in<br />

the relations between clients and firms.<br />

With the porpoise <strong>of</strong> adjusting as best as it is possible those services and products to the features and<br />

necessities <strong>of</strong> protection <strong>of</strong> each category <strong>of</strong> investor, each client will be informed about the category in<br />

which he/she has been classified.<br />

Before providing an investment service, the firm is required to categorise their clients as a Retail client or a<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals based on their experience, knowledge <strong>of</strong> the values markets and taking into account the<br />

amounts <strong>of</strong> investments they usually make. <strong>The</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> individuals are included in the category <strong>of</strong><br />

Retail clients.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fact that a client belongs to the category <strong>of</strong> retailer, guarantees the highest level to him/her <strong>of</strong><br />

protection and forces the firm to fulfill the maximum exigencies envisaged in the MiFID guideline. All<br />

this, requires the client to provide information to the firm with a highest detail to fit the variety <strong>of</strong><br />

products to the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the investor.<br />

Those clients with the consideration <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional clients must have experience, investment knowledge<br />

and qualification necessary to make their own decisions for investment and to value any type <strong>of</strong> risk<br />

correctly. Some examples <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional clients are:<br />

a) Financial firms and corporate bodies able to operate in the financial markets that have been authorized<br />

or regulated by the States, being or not members <strong>of</strong> the European Union. Credit firms, Investment<br />

services companies, Insurance agencies, Collective Investment Managing Institutions and their societies<br />

will be included in this group among others.<br />

b) Regional States and Administrations, Public Organizations who manage the national debt, Central<br />

Banks and International and Supranational Organisms, like the World Bank, the International Monetary<br />

Fund, the European Central Bank, the European Bank <strong>of</strong> Investments and others <strong>of</strong> similar nature.<br />

c) Employers who individually fulfill, at least, two <strong>of</strong> the following conditions:<br />

- <strong>The</strong>ir assets are equal or superior to 20 million euros;<br />

- <strong>The</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> their annual volume <strong>of</strong> sales (businesses) is equal or superior to 40 million euros;<br />

- <strong>The</strong>ir own resources are equal or superior to 2 million euros.<br />

d) <strong>The</strong> institutional investors not included in letter a) whose usual activity is not to invest in shares or<br />

other financial instruments. We will include in this section, in particular, capital risks managing<br />

organizations and their societies.<br />

e) <strong>The</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> clients who ask for it, previously, and resign expressly to their treatment like Retail clients.<br />

<strong>The</strong> admission <strong>of</strong> the request and resignation will be conditioned to suitable evaluation <strong>of</strong> their experience<br />

and knowledge in relation to financial services and products made by the firm. This will imply that the<br />

client can make its own decisions <strong>of</strong> investment and understands correctly the risks <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

product.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

213


When carrying out the mentioned evaluation, the company will have to verify that at least two <strong>of</strong> the<br />

following requirements are fulfilled by the client:<br />

‣ <strong>The</strong> client has made operations <strong>of</strong> significant volume in the shares market, with a media<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> more than ten per trimester during the four previous trimesters.<br />

‣ <strong>The</strong> value <strong>of</strong> the cash and deposited shares is superior to 500,000 euros.<br />

‣ <strong>The</strong> client´s job, during at least a year, has been a pr<strong>of</strong>essional job in the financial sector that<br />

requires knowledge on the financial operations or services.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Government and, with their express rating, the Minister <strong>of</strong> Economy and Treasury Department or the<br />

National Commission <strong>of</strong> the Shares Market will be able to determine the way <strong>of</strong> estimate the magnitudes<br />

indicated in this section and to fix requirements for the procedures that the firms must follow to establish<br />

a classification <strong>of</strong> clients.<br />

Returning to the category <strong>of</strong> retailers, MiFID indicates that firms must consider a retail client all those that<br />

are not pr<strong>of</strong>essional clients.<br />

<strong>The</strong> resignation to the category <strong>of</strong> retail client will only be valid if the firm carries out a suitable evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the experience and knowledge <strong>of</strong> the client, who <strong>of</strong>fers reasonable guarantees about he/she´s abilities<br />

to make his/her own decisions about investment and to understand the risks in which he/she incurs. In<br />

that case, the financial company must warn the client clearly and in a written way, about the protection<br />

which he/she can be private <strong>of</strong>. <strong>The</strong> client must declare in a written way too, that is conscious <strong>of</strong> the<br />

consequences <strong>of</strong> his resignation to those protections.<br />

If the client wishes to accede to non-available products for retail clients or if the client wants to become a<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional client, it will have to be classified like pr<strong>of</strong>essional client. <strong>The</strong> treatment as a pr<strong>of</strong>essional client<br />

can be requested, for special service <strong>of</strong> investment or a certain operation or generally, thus resigning to<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the protection that MiFID <strong>of</strong>fers.<br />

In our opinion, this lack <strong>of</strong> information and warnings subject to the pr<strong>of</strong>essional category <strong>of</strong> clients would<br />

not have to take place in any case, and with any type <strong>of</strong> investor. In addition to this, the distinction<br />

between clients made by the own financial firm and that gives the possibility to the client to be catalogued<br />

in any group (retail clients or pr<strong>of</strong>essional clients), is at least, dangerous and hardly recommendable.<br />

Types <strong>of</strong> MiFID guideline´s benefits<br />

When a client goes to a financial firm, has the opportunity to contract several investment/financial<br />

services.<br />

<strong>The</strong> most habitual investment services <strong>of</strong> a firm and <strong>of</strong>fered in MiFID guideline are:<br />

‣ To purchase and sale <strong>of</strong> financial products. In this type <strong>of</strong> operations, it is the financial<br />

organization that transacts the orders <strong>of</strong> the client.<br />

‣ To advice in the investment and/or financing. <strong>The</strong> financial organization will be obliged to give<br />

customized recommendations about the investment.<br />

‣ Portfolios management.<br />

<strong>The</strong> financial company will be the one who manages the totality <strong>of</strong> the client´s investments. In order to be<br />

able to make all the services above indicated, the financial firm will ask the client for information about<br />

different personal aspects, such as the average education, income or job. It is an obligation for the firms to<br />

ask for that kind <strong>of</strong> information. Those data will have to be confidential between the organization and the<br />

client.<br />

<strong>The</strong> reason for such questions is to know better the client and to be able to help him/her to decide in<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

214


usiness <strong>of</strong> investment being rendered a better service. It is responsibility <strong>of</strong> the client to give or show the<br />

required information and to do it with the maximum rigor.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>of</strong>fered data must allow the firm to know the experience and knowledge, financial situation and<br />

objectives <strong>of</strong> investment <strong>of</strong> the client. <strong>The</strong> company will try to obtain successfully information about the<br />

following aspects:<br />

‣ Types <strong>of</strong> services, financial operations and instruments whereupon the client is familiarized,<br />

‣ Nature, volume and frequency <strong>of</strong> the operations on financial instruments<br />

‣ Level <strong>of</strong> education and his/her present and past job<br />

‣ Level and source <strong>of</strong> his/her periodic income<br />

‣ Possession <strong>of</strong> assets (liquid, immovable and investments)<br />

‣ Level <strong>of</strong> periodic financial commitments<br />

If the client refuses to <strong>of</strong>fer the necessary information to evaluate his/her appropriateness about a product<br />

or service to the financial company, or it provides it in a partial form, the firm will be able to do the<br />

operation, giving the client a previous warning, saying that it is not possible for the firm to determine if<br />

the product or service is correctly adapted to the client. If this information was necessary to evaluate the<br />

suitability <strong>of</strong> the product or service, when making workings <strong>of</strong> advising or portfolio management, the<br />

institution could not recommend or manage the portfolio.<br />

<strong>The</strong> financial firm should only have to <strong>of</strong>fer the client those products adapted to its pr<strong>of</strong>ile. That is why, it<br />

turns out indispensable to obtain data about the knowledge <strong>of</strong> the client and previous experience in<br />

financial markets with the purpose <strong>of</strong> making sure that the client is able to understand the nature and risk<br />

<strong>of</strong> the products that are <strong>of</strong>fered to him/her.<br />

To decide if a financial or investment product or service is adapted to the client´s pr<strong>of</strong>ile, it is necessary<br />

that the client compliments a specific questionnaire, known as: Appropriateness Test.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Appropriateness Test tries to evaluate the knowledge and the experience <strong>of</strong> the client. For that reason, it<br />

is necessary for the client to answer some questions, such as:<br />

‣ <strong>The</strong> types <strong>of</strong> products and services which the client is familiarized with.<br />

‣ <strong>The</strong> nature, frequency, volume and period which the client had operated previously in.<br />

‣ <strong>The</strong> level <strong>of</strong> education and present or previous pr<strong>of</strong>ession.<br />

If the client is a fixed client <strong>of</strong> the financial firm, the company would have part or all the required<br />

information, and it would not be necessary to request it again to him/her.<br />

<strong>The</strong> company must inform the client about the result <strong>of</strong> the Appropriateness Test. If the client does not<br />

provide the necessary information, the institution will inform him/her that he/she is not taking part in an<br />

active way in the service <strong>of</strong> investment and that the organization cannot perform that kind <strong>of</strong> duty for<br />

him/her. Even so, and as we already said, according to the guideline, the order <strong>of</strong> the client would be<br />

feasible.<br />

In our opinion, this aspect should be elaborated rigorously in the guideline with the aim <strong>of</strong> fixing correctly<br />

which are the responsibilities <strong>of</strong> the client and <strong>of</strong> the adviser/financial firm. <strong>The</strong> guideline should specify<br />

which are the specific rules to follow in case an operation is denounced in a court. Even if the guideline<br />

points out the right <strong>of</strong> the investor when contracting any type <strong>of</strong> operation regardless <strong>of</strong> the typology <strong>of</strong><br />

client in which he/she was classified and <strong>of</strong> the result obtained in the Appropriateness Test. In the case <strong>of</strong><br />

operations with a negative result in this test, and having received an efficient advising from the financial<br />

advisor, as far as we are concern, the operation and its result would have to be assumed by the client.<br />

According to the NSMC, only when the client makes the decision to contract a non-complex product, the<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

215


company will not have the obligation to make the Appropriateness Test to him/her and the order <strong>of</strong><br />

purchase will be executed. <strong>The</strong>se types <strong>of</strong> operations practiced with certain clients are known as “Only<br />

execution”.<br />

From our point <strong>of</strong> view, this type <strong>of</strong> operations could be risky and dangerous. <strong>The</strong> NSMC and the MiFID<br />

guideline established a guide to know the difference between the subjected and non-subjected financial<br />

products, and give freedom to the financial firms to catalogue their products into complex and noncomplex<br />

products. This aspect should be more rigorously specified in the regulation. Something similar<br />

happens with the obligation <strong>of</strong> the institution in making the Appropriateness Test with certain products.<br />

In particular, the NSMC classifies products into the following way:<br />

Non-subjected products to the MiFID guideline<br />

Subjected products to the MiFID guideline:<br />

Complex products:<br />

Options, futures, swaps, warrants and other derivatives<br />

Financial Contracts for differences<br />

Free investment funds<br />

Non-complex Products:<br />

Shares admitted to trading on a regulated market<br />

Money market instruments<br />

Many types <strong>of</strong> bonds<br />

Units in certain investment funds<br />

Fixed rate bonds<br />

In our point <strong>of</strong> view, the previous classification, is low precise and do not take into account most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

products managed by a financial Spanish firms.<br />

According to an analysis <strong>of</strong> financial products enumerated by different Spanish banking firms and made<br />

in our country, we have elaborated, as a summary, the following classification:<br />

<br />

Non-subjected products to the MiFID guideline: Current accounts, deposits, credit and debit cards<br />

or fixed term-deposits.<br />

In our opinion, products such as the pensions plans, savings insurances or deposits on credit with<br />

variable yield, would not be due to exclude from the guideline. We consider them a complex<br />

product to understand for the investor.<br />

<br />

Subjected products to the MiFID guideline:<br />

Complex products: products such as the subordinated debt, preferred participation, free<br />

investment funds - hedge funds-, derivatives - future, options, warrants, caps, floors-…,<br />

atypical safe financial contracts <strong>of</strong> change and options on currencies.<br />

Non-complex products: Actually, the banks usually include following products: negotiable<br />

shares, instruments <strong>of</strong> the monetary market (promissory notes, national debt, certificates<br />

mortgages, and investment funds - except Hedge Funds- and SICAVs. We understand that<br />

several existing investment funds could be catalogued like complex products in the guideline.<br />

If we now approach the institutions´ advising service, and taking into account what the guideline says,<br />

this service could only be <strong>of</strong>fered by authorized firms. This measurement tries to increase the control <strong>of</strong><br />

this activity to improve the quality <strong>of</strong> a service in investment business that the investors demand more<br />

and more.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

216


<strong>The</strong> advising in investments is an execution <strong>of</strong> customized recommendations, in a precise or continued<br />

form. <strong>The</strong> client will have to be advised and recommended about the products that better fit their personal<br />

situation. For this reason is necessary to analyse his/her knowledge and previous experience, as well as<br />

his/her objectives <strong>of</strong> investment and his/her financial situation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> set <strong>of</strong> questions that will be made to the client to obtain all the required data is known as the<br />

Suitability Test. This test tries to assure that the customized recommendations the firm does to the client<br />

consider his/her particular situation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Suitability Test could ask questions about the following private aspects:<br />

‣ <strong>The</strong> client´s previous knowledge and experience (Appropriateness Test).<br />

‣ <strong>The</strong> client´s financial situation, that could be analysed with information on:<br />

‣ <strong>The</strong> source and level <strong>of</strong> the regular income<br />

‣ His/her patrimony, including financial assets and liabilities, investments, buildings,<br />

liquidity…<br />

‣ His/her periodic expenses and payments<br />

‣ <strong>The</strong> client´s investment objectives, that could be determined with questions on:<br />

‣ <strong>The</strong> time in which the client wishes to maintain the investment<br />

‣ <strong>The</strong> client´s pr<strong>of</strong>ile and aversion or not to the risk.<br />

If the client does not provide the necessary information so that the financial company cannot evaluate<br />

properly the suitability <strong>of</strong> the products, it will not be able to advise the client correctly.<br />

In order to conclude with this section, we will analyse another common operations <strong>of</strong> a financial<br />

company: the portfolios´ management.<br />

When a client contracts his/her portfolio management with a financial company, he/she is<br />

trusting on the firm, on the product selection, on the decision <strong>of</strong> investment made by an advisor and the<br />

execution <strong>of</strong> operations in his/her name. <strong>The</strong> company would have to assure a service adapted to the<br />

knowledge and experience <strong>of</strong> the client pr<strong>of</strong>ile, his/her objectives and financial situation. <strong>The</strong>refore, a<br />

Suitability Test would also be done to carry out the appropriate information. In the same way, if the<br />

company does not have necessary information to complete the test, the service to the client will not be<br />

able to be done.<br />

In our opinion, to make a correct advising <strong>of</strong> a portfolio management, it would be very<br />

recommendable to create another type <strong>of</strong> test, different from both seen previously, that would show<br />

totally different types <strong>of</strong> portfolio management for different pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> clients.<br />

MiFID guideline´s suggestions<br />

<strong>The</strong> financial companies must facilitate the client, the information necessary to help him/her to make its<br />

decisions for investment. All the information that the client receive must be “impartial, clear and nondeceptive”<br />

about the content and the form in which it appears.<br />

In our opinion, this type <strong>of</strong> information would never have to replace the personal and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional advising <strong>of</strong> a pr<strong>of</strong>essional advisor.<br />

With the new MiFID guideline:<br />

‣ <strong>The</strong> publicity <strong>of</strong> the financial firm must be impartial, clear and not misleading.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

217


‣ <strong>The</strong> financial company will have to facilitate the data that allow him/her to verify if the<br />

institution belongs to the NSMC authorized companies allowed to sell financial products or<br />

services.<br />

‣ <strong>The</strong> company must provide the client, with the necessary details, information on the nature and<br />

supplied risks <strong>of</strong> products and services.<br />

‣ Before contracting a product or service <strong>of</strong> investment, the client will receive detailed information<br />

on the expenses, and direct and indirect costs or charges <strong>of</strong> the operation or business.<br />

‣ At the time <strong>of</strong> subscribing a contract, the company will <strong>of</strong>fer a contract to the client in which the<br />

rights and obligations <strong>of</strong> both parts are clearly written down. When the financial company <strong>of</strong>fers<br />

an advisory service <strong>of</strong> investments it will not be necessary the signature <strong>of</strong> a contract, it will be<br />

enough with the written and reliable customized recommendation.<br />

In addition to the previous one, MiFID guideline points out that, at any moment, the financial company,<br />

will avoid to harm the client solving any kind <strong>of</strong> interest´s conflicts. <strong>The</strong> institution will guard clients´<br />

investments; it will inform him/her on the guarantee funds in case <strong>of</strong> insolvency and will take care <strong>of</strong><br />

his/her claims in an appropriate and regulated way.<br />

<strong>The</strong> financial firm must be correctly organized and have at its disposal those means that allow it to fulfill<br />

their obligations and to act with “honesty, impartially, pr<strong>of</strong>essionally and in the best interest <strong>of</strong> the client”.<br />

Discussions and Conclusions<br />

First<br />

Considering the MiFID guideline the suggestions <strong>of</strong>fered by the NSMC, the criteria for the subjection or<br />

not <strong>of</strong> different financial products would have to be defined and developed in a more specific and<br />

detailed way for all the Spanish and European firms. Consequently, the distinction between complex and<br />

non-complex products would have to follow an agreed model. In the banking sector exists different kind<br />

<strong>of</strong> products that organizations have catalogued like non- complex, and whose characteristics and risks,<br />

hardly would be catalogued within that section. <strong>The</strong> freedom <strong>of</strong> the companies to make this type <strong>of</strong><br />

classification would have to be regulated rigorously.<br />

Second<br />

In a purchase and/or sale <strong>of</strong> a financial product, we see ourselves in the obligation to stress the danger in<br />

allowing the operation regardless <strong>of</strong> the result obtained in the Appropriateness Test and/or Suitability Test.<br />

An operation <strong>of</strong> high risk and with requirement <strong>of</strong> a pr<strong>of</strong>essional advising, is characterized by its<br />

complexity and if the result <strong>of</strong> it do not fulfill the expectations <strong>of</strong> the client and it is taken to court, the firm<br />

would have to be conscious and able to apply the necessary mechanisms to palliate the possible demand<br />

and defend the advisory service <strong>of</strong>fered by the advisor.<br />

Third<br />

<strong>The</strong> new guideline claims the financial or investment company to act, at any moment, with honesty,<br />

impartially, pr<strong>of</strong>essionally and in the interest <strong>of</strong> the client. In our opinion, this is hardly possible to be<br />

fulfilled, if the own company is governed under a policy <strong>of</strong> fulfilling some objectives in a pre-fixed period<br />

<strong>of</strong> time, where the commercialization <strong>of</strong> certain products and services is stimulated by means <strong>of</strong><br />

premiums on volume <strong>of</strong> sales <strong>of</strong> them. On the other hand, if the financial firm commercializes its own<br />

products or supplier´s products under incentives, it turns out complex to satisfy and to justify values as<br />

the impartiality in selling this kind <strong>of</strong> products, or giving advice about them and, fulfilling the aim <strong>of</strong> do<br />

the best work in the interest <strong>of</strong> the client.<br />

Fourth<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the habitual activities <strong>of</strong> the financial companies is the portfolios´ management. Throughout the<br />

guideline, we have been able to observe the non-existence <strong>of</strong> a specific test for the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

218


convenience and/or suitability <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> operations. To our understanding, the design <strong>of</strong> a specific<br />

test for this activity would be more than recommendable for the investors.<br />

Direction for further research<br />

One <strong>of</strong> our objectives after written this article is to focus our attention in banking ethics on financial and<br />

banking products related to the elderly, such as Life Insurances, Long Term Care Insurances, or the<br />

Reverse Mortgage.<br />

Those products are relatively young in our country and need a good regulation to be correctly<br />

sold by financial companies or advisors.<br />

References<br />

“Criterios de buenas prácticas bancarias”. Spanish Bank.<br />

www.bde.es/webbde/es/secciones/servicio/reclama/criterios.html<br />

National Share Market Comission (NSMC). www.cnmv.es and www.cnmv.es/portalinversor/<br />

Spanish guideline 2006/73/CE 10 th <strong>of</strong> August <strong>of</strong> 2006. European Union Official Register.<br />

Spanish Law 47/2007<br />

Spanish Royal Decree 217/2008<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

219


Efficiency <strong>of</strong> EC Greenhouse Gas Abatement Measures and<br />

firms in the European Union: Evidence from Plant Level<br />

Allocations and Surrendered Permits<br />

A. Gregoriou & J. V. Healy<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Hull Business School<br />

Keywords<br />

EU-ETS, Plant Level Allocations, Surrendered Permits, STAR Models.<br />

Abstract<br />

We are the first study to test for efficiency in the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU-ETS), by<br />

analysing European Commission data for annual Plant Level Allocations and Surrendered Permits. We do this by<br />

examining the properties <strong>of</strong> the misalignment between installation’s actual carbon emissions, and the allocated<br />

carbon emission permits, for each nation involved in the EU-ETS trading scheme. Using a standard linear unit root<br />

test we find evidence <strong>of</strong> non stationarity, indicating that the EU-ETS is inefficient. However, once we utilize a nonlinear<br />

mean reverting adjustment mechanism for carbon emissions relative to carbon allowances, in the form <strong>of</strong> an<br />

Exponential Smooth Transition Autoregressive Model (ESTAR), we discover that although deviations <strong>of</strong> carbon<br />

emissions from their allowances can exhibit a region <strong>of</strong> non-stationary behavior, overall they are stationary<br />

indicating successful implementation <strong>of</strong> a market led approach to carbon reduction.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

220


Corruption, democracy and tax compliance:<br />

Cross-country evidence<br />

Teymur Rahmani, Ph.D. (Correspondent Author)<br />

Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Department <strong>of</strong> Economics, University <strong>of</strong> Tehran<br />

Saman Fallahi, M.A.<br />

Ph.D. Student, Department <strong>of</strong> Economics, University <strong>of</strong> Tehran<br />

Keywords:<br />

Tax compliance, corruption, democracy<br />

Abstract<br />

Tax compliance and reduction <strong>of</strong> tax avoidance and tax evasion are important issues in the field <strong>of</strong><br />

economics in the public sector, especially in developing countries in which taxes are essential to finance the new<br />

development programs. Although there are many factors affecting tax compliance, our focus is on two main factors<br />

from the taxpayers’ viewpoint that bear the burden <strong>of</strong> taxes and are benefited from the provision <strong>of</strong> public goods by<br />

public sector; that is, democracy and corruption. Our theoretical framework emphasizes the role <strong>of</strong> corruption<br />

compared to democracy, although both higher democracy and less corruption increase the tax compliance. Our<br />

empirical findings, based on a sample <strong>of</strong> 117 countries, suggest more significant effect from corruption on the ratio <strong>of</strong><br />

taxes to GDP, controlling for the government’s size. A policy implication is the importance <strong>of</strong> the control <strong>of</strong><br />

corruption to increase tax compliance, especially in developing countries.<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> study <strong>of</strong> tax compliance is important both theoretically and empirically. In a broad sense, all<br />

public sector activities, even the implementation <strong>of</strong> monetary policy, could be described as the provision<br />

<strong>of</strong> public goods. Public goods bring about utility for all individuals. But, tax incomes are needed to finance<br />

the provision <strong>of</strong> public goods. Paying taxes decreases the utility by lowering the consumption <strong>of</strong> private<br />

goods. <strong>The</strong>refore, there is a trade<strong>of</strong>f between the consumption <strong>of</strong> public goods and private goods and<br />

consequently a tendency to comply or to avoid taxes. In a standard model <strong>of</strong> a world in which there are<br />

two goods (private and public) and perfect information with homogenous individuals and homogenous<br />

utility function, efficiency or Pareto optimality requires the equality between the marginal rate <strong>of</strong><br />

substitution and the marginal rate <strong>of</strong> transformation.<br />

If the amount <strong>of</strong> public goods that are provided by public sector is not observed, it could be<br />

inferred from information function in which two main arguments are the level <strong>of</strong> corruption and the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> democracy. Both higher level <strong>of</strong> democracy and lower level <strong>of</strong> corruption are signals <strong>of</strong> higher level <strong>of</strong><br />

the provision <strong>of</strong> public goods in the information function <strong>of</strong> individuals who do not observe the amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> public goods directly. Simultaneously, the level <strong>of</strong> corruption is more important in this information<br />

function. <strong>The</strong>refore, both the higher level <strong>of</strong> democracy and the lower level <strong>of</strong> corruption cause the<br />

individuals to have more tax compliance, but with more significant effect from corruption.<br />

To test for the importance <strong>of</strong> democracy and corruption in determining the level <strong>of</strong> tax<br />

compliance, a panel data regression <strong>of</strong> the ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP is run on some variables including an<br />

index <strong>of</strong> the kind <strong>of</strong> government (the level <strong>of</strong> democracy) and an index <strong>of</strong> corruption. Our empirical<br />

findings are in line with the theoretical analysis that emphasizes a greater impact from corruption on the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> tax compliance.<br />

<strong>The</strong> article is organized as follows. <strong>The</strong> next section provides a short review <strong>of</strong> literature. Section 3<br />

introduces the theoretical model. Section 4 discusses the data and section 5 is on empirical results. Section<br />

6 is on conclusion and policy implication.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

221


Review <strong>of</strong> literature<br />

Tax evasion, tax avoidance, tax compliance, and the public acceptance <strong>of</strong> taxation have been <strong>of</strong><br />

interest in many fields <strong>of</strong> research including public sector economics, political economy, social science,<br />

accounting, auditing, law, and psychology. <strong>The</strong>re is no doubt that more tax compliance and less tax<br />

avoidance or tax evasion could be influenced by many factors. It is clear that tax compliance and public<br />

acceptance <strong>of</strong> taxation could not be examined within any field comprehensively. Our main interest is an<br />

examination <strong>of</strong> the issue within the framework <strong>of</strong> public sector economics with a focus on the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

democracy and corruption. For this reason, we will have a short review <strong>of</strong> the related literature and<br />

especially empirical studies.<br />

Torgler (2005) analyzes the impact <strong>of</strong> direct democracy on tax morale in Switzerland by using a<br />

survey from the International Social Survey Program 1998. Since participation rights are quite different<br />

across different cantons in Switzerland, the examination reveals the effects <strong>of</strong> democracy on tax morale<br />

and tax compliance. Furthermore, the findings show a significant positive effect from direct democratic<br />

rights on tax morale and compliance. This could be interpreted as the positive effect <strong>of</strong> the higher level <strong>of</strong><br />

democracy on tax compliance. By using the similar data in three phases <strong>of</strong> the International Social Survey<br />

Program but for a panel <strong>of</strong> European countries, Bernasconi (2006) finds that very few citizens are satisfied<br />

with tax systems. Specifically, most believed that taxes on low and middle incomes are too high, and taxes<br />

on high incomes are too low. <strong>The</strong> results also indicate a strong effect <strong>of</strong> ideological values on the support<br />

for tax system and its redistributive role in democracies. In addition, the results raise questions on the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy in satisfying citizens' preferences. Hug and Sporri (2011) examine the<br />

relationship between referendums, trust, and tax evasion as a test for the effect <strong>of</strong> direct democracy on tax<br />

morale and tax evasion, especially for the countries that engaged in transition from centrally planned<br />

economies to democracy and market economies. <strong>The</strong>y find that allowing for referendums as a way <strong>of</strong><br />

implementing direct democracy strengthens the link between trust and democracy. In other words, direct<br />

democracy increases tax compliance that is highly needed for those countries.<br />

Some studies analyze the effects <strong>of</strong> democracy in determining the tax rate and tax structure.<br />

Carbonell-Nicolau and Klor (2003) examine the effect <strong>of</strong> democracy on the marginal tax rates on income.<br />

In a political system with an exogenous set <strong>of</strong> political parties and a fixed cost <strong>of</strong> running for election, they<br />

conclude that there is an increasing marginal tax rates in some Nash equilibriums, and in any strong Nash<br />

equilibrium. In other words, democracies tend to have higher tax rates. Markussen (2011) examines the<br />

relationship between redistributive taxation and the private provision <strong>of</strong> public goods in a democratic<br />

political system. He concludes that a median voter may choose a negative tax rate in order to stimulate<br />

private production <strong>of</strong> public goods even if he or she is poorer than the mean. This means that democracy<br />

does not necessarily increase the tax rates.<br />

Riahi-Belkaoui (2004) examines the relationship between tax compliance and determinants <strong>of</strong> tax<br />

morale for a sample <strong>of</strong> 30 countries. <strong>The</strong> results indicate that tax compliance is positively related to the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> economic freedom, the level <strong>of</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> the equity market and the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

competition laws, and high moral norms. Cummings et al (2009) examine the effects <strong>of</strong> tax morale on tax<br />

compliance by using art factual field experiments. <strong>The</strong>y believed that cross-cultural differences in tax<br />

compliance behavior have foundations in the institutions <strong>of</strong> tax administration and citizen assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

the quality <strong>of</strong> governance. <strong>The</strong>ir results show that observed differences in tax compliance levels persist<br />

over alternative levels <strong>of</strong> enforcement in countries with substantially different political histories and<br />

records <strong>of</strong> governance quality. Park and Hyun (2003) examine the determinants <strong>of</strong> tax compliance using<br />

experimental data for Korea. <strong>The</strong>y find that taxpayers have the same degree <strong>of</strong> compliance regardless <strong>of</strong><br />

their income levels, both the tax audit and the penalty rate are important deterrents from tax evasion but<br />

the latter is more effective, taxpayers have a strong tendency for a free-ride, and tax education is one <strong>of</strong><br />

the effective tools to induce taxpayers to comply more.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are some studies that look at the problem <strong>of</strong> tax compliance by addressing the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

222


corruption, although indirectly. Cule and Fulton (2009) analyze business culture and tax evasion. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

concluded that as tax evasion and corruption increase, they become more acceptable and their cost is<br />

lowered. More fraud committed by firms is good for bribe-taking tax inspectors and more bribe-taking<br />

inspectors are good for fraud committing firms. This is the result that Hillman (2004) emphasizes for lowincome<br />

countries in which governments need to finance public development expenditures to promote<br />

economic growth and end poverty, but corruption reduces tax revenues and makes public expenditure<br />

policies ineffective for achieving social objectives. Fjeldstad and Tungodden (2003) analyze the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

corruption on tax incomes by focusing on the effect <strong>of</strong> strengthening the bargaining power <strong>of</strong> corrupt tax<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers. <strong>The</strong>y conclude that in contrast to the belief that strengthening the bargaining power <strong>of</strong> corrupt tax<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers could reduce tax evasion and increase tax revenues, corruption could result in more tax evasion<br />

and lower tax revenues in the long run (although it could lead to more tax revenues in the short run). Fan<br />

(2006) analyzes the effect <strong>of</strong> corruption in a kleptocracy. <strong>The</strong> ruler implements anti-corruption measures<br />

including wage incentives and monitoring to discourage corrupt <strong>of</strong>ficials from rent-seeking for<br />

themselves. As a result, the leader sets an inefficiently high tax rate in order to discourage the <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />

from demanding bribes.<br />

<strong>The</strong>oretical background<br />

To examine the effect <strong>of</strong> democracy and corruption on tax compliance and tax revenues and also<br />

to test whether more democracy or less corruption is the main determinant <strong>of</strong> the incentive to comply and<br />

agree to pay taxes, a theoretical background is needed. Our theoretical model is an extension <strong>of</strong> public<br />

sector economic textbooks on the provision <strong>of</strong> public goods. It is assumed that the production and<br />

consumption <strong>of</strong> pure public goods is decided in a political economy model in which different parties <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

their plan (their proposed amount <strong>of</strong> public goods) and people vote for their programs. <strong>The</strong> winner is<br />

determined by the majority <strong>of</strong> voters. It is assumed that after the decisions are made about the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

public goods, their cost will be levied on all individuals equally on a lump sum tax basis. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is<br />

assumed that individuals reveal their preferences and willingness for the consumption <strong>of</strong> public goods<br />

and then their willingness to pay taxes to finance the production <strong>of</strong> public goods by taking part in the<br />

election. In this context, higher taxes mean higher preferences for the consumption <strong>of</strong> public goods.<br />

It is assumed that there are two goods: a private good, C, and a pure public good, G, from which<br />

individuals obtain utility. <strong>The</strong> representative individual's utility function is as follows:<br />

It is assumed that utility function is a kind <strong>of</strong> homogenous utility functions and is the same for all<br />

individuals. It is assumed that C is commonly observable and measurable but G is not directly observable.<br />

For example, it is not far from reality to assume that the representative individual does not have a clear<br />

perception <strong>of</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> the benefits that public goods such as public education, health care, and<br />

infrastructures provide for her or him. <strong>The</strong>n, it could be assumed that the representative individual infers<br />

the amount <strong>of</strong> the public goods that are provided for her or him via an information function as follows:<br />

In which, DE, is an index implying the kind <strong>of</strong> government or the level <strong>of</strong> democracy (an index <strong>of</strong><br />

the perception <strong>of</strong> the individual's taking part in the decision making about public goods) and, CO, is an<br />

index <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> corruption (an index <strong>of</strong> the quantity and quality <strong>of</strong> the public goods that are provided<br />

for her or him by the elected <strong>of</strong>ficials). It is assumed that a higher level <strong>of</strong> democracy is interpreted by the<br />

individual as an indication that the elected body considers individual's preferences more. <strong>The</strong>refore, a<br />

higher level <strong>of</strong> democracy means a higher quality and quantity <strong>of</strong> public goods. On the other hand, it is<br />

assumed that a higher level <strong>of</strong> corruption means a lower quantity and quality <strong>of</strong> public goods for a given<br />

level <strong>of</strong> taxes. It is assumed that individuals just consider the effect <strong>of</strong> corruption on the level <strong>of</strong> provision<br />

<strong>of</strong> public goods and not corruption per se. <strong>The</strong>refore, the relation (2), as the information function, implies<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

223


that a higher level <strong>of</strong> democracy and a lower level <strong>of</strong> corruption mean a higher level <strong>of</strong> the provision <strong>of</strong><br />

public goods that in turn means a higher level <strong>of</strong> utility, ceteris paribus.<br />

<strong>The</strong> general equilibrium solution <strong>of</strong> the model (which is based on the assumption that individuals<br />

reveal their preferences, an assumption that is not too strong when individuals are assumed the same<br />

with regard to their preferences) is stated as the following condition:<br />

P<br />

MRS <br />

P<br />

C<br />

G<br />

In which<br />

P<br />

P<br />

C<br />

G<br />

is the marginal rate <strong>of</strong> transformation or the slope <strong>of</strong> the production<br />

possibility curve in the point <strong>of</strong> tangency with the indifference curve or relative price <strong>of</strong> the private to<br />

public goods that is determined in the general equilibrium <strong>of</strong> the above model.<br />

<strong>The</strong> above equilibrium is also shown in the Figure 1. Initial equilibrium is shown by point E in<br />

which an indifference curve is tangent to the production possibility curve AB. <strong>The</strong> straight line OE<br />

indicates that the points with the same slope on various indifference curves are on a straight line from the<br />

origin for homogenous utility functions.<br />

(3)<br />

Figure 1<br />

Now, suppose that a decrease in the level <strong>of</strong> democracy, DE, or an increase in the level <strong>of</strong> corruption, CO,<br />

to occur. Such a change is interpreted as a reduction in the potential <strong>of</strong> the production <strong>of</strong> public goods by<br />

the representative individual. This is concluded from the information function in the relation (2). <strong>The</strong><br />

effect <strong>of</strong> the above change is shown as a counterclockwise rotation in the production possibility curve and<br />

a reduction in its intersection with the vertical axis on which the amount <strong>of</strong> public good is measured.<br />

It is clear that point E is not equilibrium anymore and the new equilibrium will be in the point <strong>of</strong><br />

tangency <strong>of</strong> an indifference curve and the new production possibility curve. Since we have assumed that<br />

utility function is homogenous, the new tangency will not be on the straight line OE, but will be in a point<br />

like E’. As is seen in the Figure 1, the amount <strong>of</strong> production and consumption <strong>of</strong> the public good is<br />

reduced and there is a substitution between the private and the public goods. In fact, the increase in the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> corruption or a decrease in the level <strong>of</strong> democracy have been like an increase in the relative price<br />

<strong>of</strong> the public good that has brought about a reduction in the willingness to the consumption <strong>of</strong> the public<br />

good.<br />

Since the willingness to the consumption <strong>of</strong> the public good has decreased, the willingness to pay<br />

taxes to finance its production has reduced, too. If we assume that there is no tax evasion, the<br />

representative individual votes for a lower level <strong>of</strong> the production <strong>of</strong> the public good and therefore a<br />

lower level <strong>of</strong> taxes. If tax evasion is possible, the level <strong>of</strong> actual taxes is lower than the level <strong>of</strong> the taxes<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

224


that is determined by the <strong>of</strong>ficials. In both cases, the ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to the income <strong>of</strong> the representative<br />

individual will be lower which is reflected in the lower ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP in reality.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, it is concluded that a lower level <strong>of</strong> democracy and a higher level <strong>of</strong> corruption, holding<br />

other things the same, will bring about a lower ratio <strong>of</strong> actual tax incomes to GDP. To analyze the relative<br />

significance <strong>of</strong> corruption and democracy on the ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP, it is assumed that the variable CO<br />

is more important than the variable DE in the information function (2). <strong>The</strong> justification for such an<br />

assumption is that democracy is just a way <strong>of</strong> the revealing <strong>of</strong> voters' preferences and willingness to pay<br />

for the provision <strong>of</strong> public goods that could be ignored by the elected body to some extent. This issue is<br />

common in countries with many political parties, especially in developing countries. On the other hand,<br />

corruption is more reflected in everyday life <strong>of</strong> people and could be a better indication <strong>of</strong> the quality and<br />

quantity <strong>of</strong> the provision <strong>of</strong> public goods. For example, the biggest democracy <strong>of</strong> the world but with an<br />

unsatisfactory level <strong>of</strong> corruption, India, does not have a good experience <strong>of</strong> economic performance and<br />

especially the provision <strong>of</strong> public goods compared to China which is not a democracy but has a better<br />

performance in the provision <strong>of</strong> public goods. <strong>The</strong>n, it could be concluded that higher level <strong>of</strong> corruption<br />

is more significant in the reduction <strong>of</strong> the ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP compared to the lower level <strong>of</strong> democracy.<br />

It must be known that the effect <strong>of</strong> democracy on the overall performance <strong>of</strong> the economy is not<br />

quite clear while the effect <strong>of</strong> corruption is more agreed upon. <strong>The</strong>oretically, it may appear that more<br />

democracy and less corruption should improve the overall performance <strong>of</strong> the economy. If the economic<br />

growth is a good indication <strong>of</strong> the overall performance <strong>of</strong> the economy, empirical findings show an<br />

adverse effect from corruption on the economic growth (for example, Mauro (1995) finds negative effect<br />

from higher level <strong>of</strong> corruption on economic growth) while the effect <strong>of</strong> democracy on the economic<br />

growth is not so clear (Tavares and Wacziarg, 2001)). Our assumption regarding stronger effect from<br />

corruption on taxes compared to democracy is in line with the above findings about the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

corruption and democracy on economic growth.<br />

Data and methodology<br />

In order to test what have been introduced in the above analysis, a static panel data regression is<br />

used. <strong>The</strong> dependent variable is the ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP, TGDP. <strong>The</strong> explanatory variables include the<br />

index <strong>of</strong> corruption, CORR, the index <strong>of</strong> the kind <strong>of</strong> government or the level <strong>of</strong> democracy, DEMOC, log<br />

<strong>of</strong> per capita GDP, PGDP, the share <strong>of</strong> agriculture sector in GDP, AGRI, the degree <strong>of</strong> openness, OPEN,<br />

the growth rate <strong>of</strong> per capita GDP, GG, the rate <strong>of</strong> inflation, INF, the ratio <strong>of</strong> government expenditures to<br />

GDP, GOV. So, the following equation is estimated:<br />

)4 (<br />

Per capita GDP is real per capita GDP in dollars and in year 2000 prices. In most empirical works<br />

on the determinants <strong>of</strong> the ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP, this variable is included and has a positive coefficient<br />

that reflects Wagner's law in public sector economics.<br />

<strong>The</strong> share <strong>of</strong> agriculture sector in GDP is usually included in empirical studies to capture the<br />

exemption <strong>of</strong> agriculture sector from paying tax. <strong>The</strong>refore a negative coefficient is expected here.<br />

<strong>The</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> openness, that is the ratio <strong>of</strong> the sum <strong>of</strong> imports and exports to GDP, is included<br />

because levying and collecting taxes on foreign trade is easier. So, we expect a positive effect for this<br />

variable because countries which are more open can collect more tax incomes on these activities.<br />

<strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> economic growth on the ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP could be theoretically ambiguous.<br />

However, it could be assumed that in a better condition <strong>of</strong> economic performance firms and individuals<br />

comply more compared with bad economic performance. Also, if taxes are progressive, higher economic<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

225


growth could increase the ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP. So, a positive coefficient is expected for this variable.<br />

<strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> inflation on the ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP is not clear. On one side, higher inflation<br />

increases inflation tax for government and decreases the need to levy conventional taxes. Also, in<br />

inflationary conditions, firms and individuals tend to evade or at least to delay paying taxes to benefit<br />

from the erosion <strong>of</strong> their real tax liabilities due to inflation. On the other hand, inflation increases tax<br />

liabilities because nominal incomes increase and taxes are usually levied on nominal incomes.<br />

<strong>The</strong> size <strong>of</strong> government or the ratio <strong>of</strong> government expenditures to GDP is included as a control<br />

variable because countries with bigger governments tend to have higher ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP on average.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, a positive effect is expected for this variable.<br />

<strong>The</strong> data for the ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP, per capita GDP and its growth rate, the share <strong>of</strong> agriculture<br />

sector in GDP, the degree <strong>of</strong> openness, the rate <strong>of</strong> inflation, and the ratio <strong>of</strong> government expenditures to<br />

GDP are from IMF and World Bank.<br />

Regarding two important variables that are the focus <strong>of</strong> this study, the data is from the following<br />

sources. For corruption two different indices have been tried. <strong>The</strong> first one is the Control <strong>of</strong> Corruption<br />

Index from World Bank which has a range between -2.5 and 2.5, with a lower level <strong>of</strong> corruption for the<br />

higher values <strong>of</strong> the index. <strong>The</strong> second one is the Freedom from Corruption index from Heritage<br />

foundation which has a range between 0 and 100, again a higher value implying less corruption. Since our<br />

theoretical analysis implies a negative effect from corruption on the ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP and since both<br />

above indices imply less corruption for higher values <strong>of</strong> the indices, a positive coefficient is expected for<br />

these indices in the regressions. For democracy and the kind <strong>of</strong> government, the data is from the study <strong>of</strong><br />

Marshall et al (2010). <strong>The</strong> index is between 0 and 10 and a higher value implies higher level <strong>of</strong> democracy<br />

and political freedom. Based on the theoretical analysis in the previous section, a positive coefficient<br />

(although not very significant) is expected for this variable. It should be added that countries with<br />

substantial changes in the kind <strong>of</strong> government (for example, countries that have been subject to coups) are<br />

excluded to get better and more reliable results.<br />

Our sample includes 117 countries and the time period under study is 1996-2010 for which data is<br />

available.<br />

Empirical results<br />

Based on the results <strong>of</strong> Fixed Effects and Hausman tests, the method <strong>of</strong> fixed effects is used in all<br />

estimated regressions. <strong>The</strong> estimated regression is summarized in Table 1 when the Control <strong>of</strong> Corruption<br />

Index is used as the proxy for the level <strong>of</strong> corruption. As it is seen in Table 1, all variables have the<br />

expected sign except the rate <strong>of</strong> inflation that its effect is not clear theoretically. <strong>The</strong>refore, this variable is<br />

excluded in the final estimation that is reported in the last column. When both per capita GDP and the<br />

share <strong>of</strong> agriculture sector in GDP are included, the latter has expected sign for its coefficient but<br />

insignificant. It could be attributed to the high correlation <strong>of</strong> these two variables (on average, countries<br />

with higher per capita GDP have lower share for the agriculture sector in GDP). When per capita GDP is<br />

excluded, the coefficient <strong>of</strong> the share <strong>of</strong> agriculture sector in GDP is negative and quite significant that is<br />

consistent with the above justification. <strong>The</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> openness has a positive and significant coefficient in<br />

all regressions, as expected. <strong>The</strong> size <strong>of</strong> government has a positive and significant coefficient that means<br />

countries with bigger government size have higher ratios <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP that is necessary to finance<br />

government expenditures. <strong>The</strong> growth rate <strong>of</strong> per capita GDP has a positive and significant coefficient<br />

that is acceptable.<br />

Both the index <strong>of</strong> democracy and the index <strong>of</strong> corruption, DEMOC and CORR, have positive<br />

coefficients. But just the latter is significant, which is consistent with our theoretical model. In other<br />

words, corruption is more important in affecting the willingness <strong>of</strong> people to pay taxes compared to<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

226


democracy. Since these two variables are not highly correlated as may be expected, both are included in<br />

the regressions.<br />

In Table 2, the estimated regressions are reported, but the index <strong>of</strong> corruption is Freedom from<br />

Corruption index from Heritage Foundation in this regressions. Again, the method <strong>of</strong> fixed effects is used,<br />

based on the Fixed Effects and Hausman tests.<br />

Again, per capita GDP has a positive and highly significant effect on the ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP that<br />

is an indication that wealthier countries have higher tax rates on average. <strong>The</strong> share <strong>of</strong> the agriculture<br />

sector in GDP has a negative coefficient in all regressions but its coefficient is only significant in the<br />

regression that per capita GDP is excluded. Per capita GDP growth has positive and significant effects in<br />

all regressions that are expected, implying that tax compliance is higher in better economic performance.<br />

<strong>The</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong> openness is positive and it is significant that is expected. <strong>The</strong> coefficient on<br />

the government size or the ratio <strong>of</strong> government expenditures to GDP is positive and significant, implying<br />

higher ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP in countries with bigger governments. Again, the rate <strong>of</strong> inflation has a<br />

negative but insignificant coefficient in all regressions, which is consistent with what we said in the<br />

previous section.<br />

Table 1. <strong>The</strong> estimated equation using Control <strong>of</strong> Corruption Index Dependent Variable is TGDP (the<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP)<br />

Explanatory<br />

Variables<br />

(1)<br />

(2)<br />

(3)<br />

(4)<br />

Control <strong>of</strong><br />

Corruption<br />

Index<br />

0.9069<br />

(1.98)**<br />

0.8071<br />

(1.84)***<br />

1.1226<br />

(2.41)*<br />

1.0165<br />

(2.24)**<br />

Type <strong>of</strong><br />

government<br />

0.0231<br />

(0.29)<br />

0.0259<br />

(0.33)<br />

0.0228<br />

(0.28)<br />

0.0306<br />

(0.39)<br />

GDP per capita<br />

3.9803<br />

(5.48)*<br />

3.9585<br />

(7.01)*<br />

<strong>The</strong> share <strong>of</strong><br />

agriculture in<br />

GDP<br />

-0.0128<br />

(-0.32)<br />

-0.1472<br />

(-4.66)*<br />

-0.1478<br />

(-4.91)*<br />

Degree <strong>of</strong><br />

openness<br />

0.0138<br />

(2.04)**<br />

0.0125<br />

(1.89)**<br />

0.0246<br />

(3.71)*<br />

0.0243<br />

(3.82)*<br />

GDP per capita<br />

growth<br />

3.9551<br />

(1.92)**<br />

4.9872<br />

(2.57)*<br />

3.8765<br />

(1.84)**<br />

3.9950<br />

(1.94)**<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Inflation<br />

0.0007<br />

(0.40)<br />

0.0005<br />

(0.29)<br />

0.0009<br />

(0.50)<br />

Government<br />

expenditure<br />

(% GDP)<br />

Method <strong>of</strong><br />

estimation<br />

0.0368<br />

(3.75)*<br />

Fixed Effect<br />

0.93<br />

0.0407<br />

(4.7)*<br />

Fixed Effect<br />

0.93<br />

0.0404<br />

(4.04)*<br />

Fixed Effect<br />

0.93<br />

0.0398<br />

(4.01)*<br />

Fixed Effect<br />

0.93<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

227


Number <strong>of</strong><br />

observations<br />

741<br />

778<br />

<strong>The</strong> numbers in parentheses are t-statistics<br />

*significant at 1%, **significant at 5%, *** significant at 10%<br />

741<br />

764<br />

Table 2. <strong>The</strong> estimated equation using Freedom from Corruption Index<br />

Dependent Variable is TGDP (the ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP)<br />

Explanatory<br />

Variables<br />

(1)<br />

(2)<br />

(3)<br />

(4)<br />

Freedom<br />

from<br />

Corruption<br />

0.01674<br />

(1.87)**<br />

0.0208<br />

(1.7)***<br />

0.0275<br />

(2.17)**<br />

0.0291<br />

(2.35)*<br />

Type <strong>of</strong><br />

government<br />

0.05782<br />

(0.73)<br />

0.0645<br />

(0.82)<br />

0.0739<br />

(0.92)<br />

0.0803<br />

(1.01)<br />

GDP per<br />

capita<br />

3.8761<br />

(5.22)*<br />

4.0262<br />

(6.91)*<br />

<strong>The</strong> share <strong>of</strong><br />

agriculture in<br />

GDP<br />

-0.0324<br />

(-0.8)<br />

-0.1608<br />

(-4.9)*<br />

-0.1588<br />

(-5.13)*<br />

Degree <strong>of</strong><br />

openness<br />

0.0130<br />

(1.84)***<br />

0.0108<br />

(1.58)<br />

0.0218<br />

(3.13)*<br />

0.0212<br />

(3.2)*<br />

GDP per<br />

capita growth<br />

4.3633<br />

(2.08)**<br />

5.3852<br />

(2.73)*<br />

4.4088<br />

(2.06)**<br />

4.5252<br />

(2.17**)<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

inflation<br />

0.0008<br />

(0.45)<br />

0.0004<br />

(0.27)<br />

0.0010<br />

(0.56)<br />

Government<br />

expenditure<br />

(% GDP)<br />

Method <strong>of</strong><br />

estimation<br />

0.0357<br />

(3.6)*<br />

Fixed Effect<br />

0.93<br />

0.0396<br />

(4.02)*<br />

Fixed Effect<br />

0.93<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

observations<br />

726<br />

763<br />

<strong>The</strong> numbers in parentheses are t-statistics<br />

* Significant at 1%, ** significant at 5%, *** significant at 10%<br />

0.0386<br />

(3.83)*<br />

Fixed Effect<br />

0.92<br />

726<br />

0.0379<br />

(3.79)*<br />

Fixed Effect<br />

0.93<br />

749<br />

Table 2 shows the same results for our two variables <strong>of</strong> interest, corruption and democracy, as those in<br />

Table 1. <strong>The</strong> coefficient on the Freedom from Corruption is positive and significant, implying that less<br />

corruption brings about more tax incomes and higher ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP. On the other hand, the kind <strong>of</strong><br />

government or the level <strong>of</strong> democracy has a positive but insignificant coefficient. This finding is consistent<br />

with our theoretical analysis; that is, the level <strong>of</strong> democracy is not too important in determining the ratio<br />

<strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP compared to the level <strong>of</strong> corruption.<br />

<strong>The</strong> empirical results in Table 1 and Table 2 show robust findings and more or less the same results<br />

for two indices that are used as proxies for the situation <strong>of</strong> corruption. Based on the above results, it could<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

228


e concluded that although both higher level <strong>of</strong> democracy and lower level <strong>of</strong> corruption cause the tax<br />

compliance and public acceptance <strong>of</strong> levying taxes to increase, it is corruption that is more important in<br />

tax compliance and tax evasion in real world<br />

Conclusion<br />

Tax compliance and lower tax evasion are important in public finance, especially in developing<br />

countries. Our attention in this study is on the standard analysis in public sector economics and the<br />

political economy <strong>of</strong> the decision making about public goods, especially on the effect <strong>of</strong> corruption and<br />

democracy in the formation <strong>of</strong> tax compliance. Our analysis uses a two goods general equilibrium<br />

regarding the amount <strong>of</strong> production and consumption <strong>of</strong> public good and therefore the willingness to pay<br />

taxes to finance it. We introduce an information function that reveal the amount <strong>of</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> public<br />

good that is not observable directly. We can infer that more democracy and less corruption increase tax<br />

compliance and willingness to pay taxes, which is reflected in higher ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP in the real<br />

world. At the same time, corruption is more important which is expected to have a greater impact.<br />

To test our theoretical contention, a panel data regression for the time period 1996-2010 including<br />

117 countries is estimated. Along with usual variables in the empirical studies concerning the<br />

determinants <strong>of</strong> the ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP, two variables are included to capture the effect <strong>of</strong> democracy<br />

and corruption on the ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP.<br />

Our empirical results show the expected effects from explanatory variables on the ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to<br />

GDP. Specifically, the results imply that less corruption brings about more tax compliance and higher<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP while the effect <strong>of</strong> higher democracy is not statistically significant. <strong>The</strong>refore,<br />

development process in developing countries requires more emphasis on the control <strong>of</strong> corruption instead<br />

<strong>of</strong> expanding democracy. However, it should be noted that democracy is perhaps a human value that may<br />

not be judged only on the basis <strong>of</strong> its economic outcomes. Also, it is expected that getting a higher level <strong>of</strong><br />

development will bring about higher level <strong>of</strong> democracy endogenously. As a policy implication, it may be<br />

better for international bodies like IMF to emphasize more on the control <strong>of</strong> corruption as a requirement<br />

for development, instead <strong>of</strong> expansion <strong>of</strong> democracy.<br />

We suggest a focus on the effect <strong>of</strong> the structure <strong>of</strong> political system and especially the number <strong>of</strong><br />

political parties on the tax compliance for further research.<br />

References|<br />

Balestrino, A.(2010). “Tax Avoidance and the Endogenous Formation <strong>of</strong> Social Norms”. <strong>The</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong> Socio-<br />

Economics 39,601-609.<br />

Bernasconi, M.(2006). “Redistributive Taxation in Democracies: Evidence on People’s Satisfaction”. European Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Political Economy 22, 809-837.<br />

Carbonell- Nicolau, O., Klor, E.F. (2003). “Representative Democracy and Marginal Rate Progressive Income<br />

Taxation”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Public Economics 87, 1137-1164.<br />

Cerqueti, R., Coppier, R. (2011). “Economic Growth, Corruption and Tax Evasion”. Economic Modeling 28, 489-<br />

500.<br />

Cerqueti, R., Coppier, R. (2009). “Tax Revenues, Fiscal Corruption and ‘Shame Costs”. Economic Modeling 26,<br />

1239-1244.<br />

Cule, M., Fulton, M. (2009). “Business Culture and Tax Evasion: Why Corruption and the Un<strong>of</strong>ficial Economy Can<br />

Persist”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Economic Behavior and Organization 72, 811-822.<br />

Cummings, R.G., Martinez-Vazquez, J., McKee, M., Torgler, B. (2009). “Tax Morale Affects Tax Compliance:<br />

Evidence from Surveys and an Artefactual Field Experiment”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Economic Behavior & Organization 70, 447-<br />

457.<br />

Fan, C.S. (2006). “Kleptocracy and Corruption”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Comparative Economics 34, 57-74.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

229


Fisman, R., Svensson, J. (2007). “Are Corruption and Taxation Really Harmful to Growth Firm Level Evidence”.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Development Economics 83, 63-75.<br />

Fjeldstad, O., Tungodden, B. (2003). Fiscal Corruption: a Vice or a Virtue Word Development 31(8), 1459-1467.<br />

Gordon, R., Li, W. (2009). “Tax Structures in Developing Countries: Many Puzzles and a Possible Explanation”.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Public Economics 93, 855-866.<br />

Gupta, R. (2008). “Tax Evasion and Financial Repression”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business 60, 517-535.<br />

Hillman, A.L. (2004). “Corruption and Public Finance: An IMF Perspective”. European Journal <strong>of</strong> Political<br />

Economy 20, 1067-1077.<br />

Hug, S., Spörri, F. (2011). “Referendums, Trust, and Tax Evasion”. European Journal <strong>of</strong> Political Economy 27, 120-<br />

131.<br />

Karlinger, L. (2009). “<strong>The</strong> Underground Economy in the late 1990s: Evading Taxes, or Evading Competition” Word<br />

Development 37(10), 1600-1611.<br />

Markussen, T. (2011). “Democracy, Redistributive Taxation and the Private Provision <strong>of</strong> Public Goods”. European<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Political Economy 27, 201-213.<br />

Marshall, M., Gurr,T., Jaggers, K. (2010). “Polity IV Project. Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions,<br />

1800-2009”. Center for Systemic Peace, Manual and Online data base.<br />

Mauro, P. (1995). “Corruption and Growth”. <strong>The</strong> Quarterly Journal <strong>of</strong> Economics 110(3), 681- 710.<br />

Park, C., Hyun, J.K. (2003). “Examining the Determinants <strong>of</strong> Tax Compliance by Experimental Data: a Case <strong>of</strong><br />

Korea”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Policy Modeling 25, 673-684.<br />

Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2004). “Relationship between Tax Compliance Internationally and Selected Determinants <strong>of</strong><br />

Tax Morale”. Journal <strong>of</strong> International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 13, 135-143.<br />

Tavares, J., Wacziarg, R. (2001). “How Democracy Affects Growth”. European Economic Review 45, 1341-1378.<br />

Torgler, B. (2005). “Tax Morale and Direct Democracy”. European Journal <strong>of</strong> Political Economy 21, 525-531.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

230


Are High Interest Loans a Debt Trap or Access to Credit<br />

Evidence from a Field Experiment <strong>of</strong> Payday Borrowers<br />

Marc Anthony Fusaro<br />

Arkansas Tech University, USA<br />

Patricia J. Cirillo<br />

Cypress Research Group, USA<br />

Keywords:<br />

Credit Access, Payday Loans, Cycle-<strong>of</strong>-Debt, Household Finance, Controlled Field Experiment,<br />

Regulation, Usury Laws<br />

Abstract<br />

Central to whether high-interest, short-term consumer credit is welfare enhancing is whether it causes a<br />

debt-trap. We test this by conducting a field experiment whereby a random sample <strong>of</strong> borrowers receive interest-free<br />

payday loans. We then track these loans and find no difference in loan repayment rates between this treatment group<br />

and a control group. This result forms strong evidence that high interest rates on short-term, low-value loans do not<br />

cause a debt-trap. <strong>The</strong> obvious implication for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the new consumer credit<br />

regulator, is that capping interest rates attempting to reduce serial borrowing will not work.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

231


<strong>The</strong> expectations <strong>of</strong> potential acquirers <strong>of</strong> real estate rights and decisions<br />

to purchase property in times <strong>of</strong> recession<br />

Bojan Grum<br />

European Law Faculty in Nova Gorica, Slovenia<br />

Darja Kobal Grum<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

Keywords<br />

Expectations, potential buyers <strong>of</strong> real estate, demographic factors, recession<br />

Abstract<br />

This study shows the results <strong>of</strong> survey conducted in Slovenia between years 2009 and 2011. <strong>The</strong> fundamental<br />

objective was to identify factors, which are critical to potential acquirers <strong>of</strong> real estate right in deciding to purchase<br />

property. <strong>The</strong> next aim was to analyze any differences between these expectations expressed in observed years and to<br />

determine whether the modern economic environment (recession) is negatively associated with these expectations.<br />

We follow the hypothesis, that differences in the expectations <strong>of</strong> potential acquirers <strong>of</strong> real estate right regardless<br />

during observed years changed, which is attributed to the occurrence <strong>of</strong> recession.<br />

<strong>The</strong> central device for measuring expectations is the questionnaire which was constructed by authors. It was<br />

answered by 1006 participants in year 2009 and 402 in year 2011. <strong>The</strong> results are still in progress but partly results<br />

showed that we could confirm the hypothesis. Results show that participants generally expressed higher expectations<br />

in year 2009 than then in year 2011, as specially reflected by younger participants. Results show differences in<br />

expectations regarding the time <strong>of</strong> purchasing their own property according to the education level. In contras to year<br />

2009, students expressed the highest expectations recording to financial and socio-economic main factors, greater<br />

autonomy and a sense <strong>of</strong> complacency.<br />

We note that it would be necessary to analyze and explore the impact <strong>of</strong> statistically significant differences <strong>of</strong><br />

potential acquirers <strong>of</strong> real estate right on the real estate market, both in spatial as well as terms <strong>of</strong> value, within the<br />

current economic environment.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

232


<strong>The</strong> Role <strong>of</strong> Micro and Small Enterprise in Employment<br />

Opportunity and Poverty Reduction in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia:<br />

<strong>The</strong> Case <strong>of</strong> Addis Ketema Sub City<br />

Moges Teshome<br />

Wageningen University, Ethiopia<br />

Keywords<br />

Micro and small Enterprise, employment opportunity, poverty line<br />

Abstract<br />

Establishing and organizing Micro and small Enterprise(MSE) is one <strong>of</strong> the strategies used by developing<br />

countries to create employments opportunities and alleviate poverty in urban centre. Addis Ababa, the capital city <strong>of</strong><br />

Ethiopia, is predominately affected by rapid rural-urban migration and population explosion that created excess<br />

labour forces above the absorption capacity <strong>of</strong> the formal sector. To curb the problems <strong>of</strong> unemployment and urban<br />

poverty, the government <strong>of</strong> Ethiopia has introduced different types <strong>of</strong> Micro and Small Enterprises package at<br />

different cities <strong>of</strong> the nation especially in Addis Ababa. <strong>The</strong> objectives <strong>of</strong> the study were to examine the personal<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> MSEs operators and investigate the role <strong>of</strong> micro and small enterprise in employment creation and<br />

poverty reduction as well as to identify the major problems <strong>of</strong> MSE practitioners. Data were collected from primary<br />

and secondary sources. Primary data were collected from sample practitioners using a structured questionnaire. In<br />

total 120 operators were interviewed. A two-stage random sampling procedure was used to select sample<br />

respondents. <strong>The</strong> study shows that MSEs are contributing for employment creation for women, illiterate and<br />

economically active society who have no means <strong>of</strong> subsistence. Moreover, the study indicates that MSEs have created<br />

an employment opportunity for the society. <strong>The</strong> study also verifies that MSEs has a great contribution for income<br />

generation, improvement in income and means <strong>of</strong> livelihood for un employed groups <strong>of</strong> the society. <strong>The</strong> study also<br />

shows that the contribution <strong>of</strong> MSEs for poverty reduction by increasing income <strong>of</strong> operators above the poverty lines.<br />

<strong>The</strong> study identifies that most <strong>of</strong> MSEs activates are highly dominated by Micro enterprise owing to small start-up<br />

capital. <strong>The</strong> study identifies that MSEs operators are highly constraints by socio-economics and institutional factors<br />

i.e., shortage <strong>of</strong> capital, shortage <strong>of</strong> credit, place <strong>of</strong> operation, raw materials including power and water supply.<br />

Moreover, MSEs activates are highly constrained by market related problems like market uncertainty, high<br />

competition and lack customer preference <strong>of</strong> the products. <strong>The</strong>refore, in order to create employment opportunity and<br />

to reduce poverty, the government should give strong emphasis for MSEs. Moreover, supportive polices like<br />

training, financing, technical and management should be taken to promote the overall development <strong>of</strong> the sector.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

233


Innovation Policy in Poland – Challenge for Intensive Growth<br />

Marek Dziura<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Keywords<br />

Innovation, economic policy, innovation strategy, R&D, growth<br />

Abstract<br />

Growth in Poland in the last two decades has been based on capital accumulation and on improving<br />

productivity driven by technological change. Endogenous growth theory shows how innovation, knowledge<br />

spillovers, and R&D are indeed key factors driving self-sustained, long-term economic growth. Growth in countries<br />

below the notional technological frontier is mainly driven by diffusion and absorption <strong>of</strong> new technologies from<br />

countries on the frontier that are new-to the-firm or new-to-the country below the frontier but not to the world.<br />

A country’s absorptive capacity is a key driver <strong>of</strong> economic growth and industrial productivity, but it<br />

requires a favorable investment climate, an educated workforce, and R&D on the part <strong>of</strong> absorbing firms. Trade<br />

flows, foreign direct investment (FDI), and labor mobility and training are important channels for firms to access<br />

technology. But technology absorption is not automatic. While R&D investment oriented to new-to-the-world<br />

innovations is predominant in economies on the technological frontier, in countries below the frontier, such as<br />

Poland, R&D principally serves the need for firms to absorb new technologies and keep up with existing global<br />

technological trends. R&D is critical for the identification, acquisition, and assimilation <strong>of</strong> new technologies and for<br />

supporting implementation on the part <strong>of</strong> the firm. Firm-level R&D does not solely contribute to innovation.<br />

For Poland to maximize benefits from any additional investments in R&D, and before attempting to meet<br />

the European Commission’s 3 percent target, policy makers ought to take a hard look at the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the current<br />

public expenditures on R&D. As figure 11 suggests, Poland classifies as a low spender with roughly 0.6 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

GDP spent on R&D, with the majority <strong>of</strong> it dedicated to basic science. Also, Poland ranks poorly among EU<br />

countries with regard to the efficiency <strong>of</strong> public expenditures, measured as a ratio <strong>of</strong> innovation and technology<br />

absorption indicators (for example, patents) to R&D.11Thus, every effort must be made to improve the efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

public spending and leverage it to increase private sector expenditures on R&D, which in Poland are around 40<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> total R&D compared to 60 percent in most OECD countries.<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> current crisis is the first <strong>of</strong> this severity to hit many countries, since they have shifted to<br />

knowledge-based service economies where investment in intangible assets is <strong>of</strong> equal importance as<br />

investment in machinery, equipment and buildings. Efforts to stimulate the economy need to both reflect<br />

the current drivers <strong>of</strong> economic growth and take advantage <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> “creative destruction” to<br />

accelerate structural shifts towards a stronger and more sustainable economic future. Innovation policies<br />

need to be adapted to current conditions both in terms <strong>of</strong> how such policies are crafted to work, but also<br />

as elements <strong>of</strong> stimulus packages that may <strong>of</strong>ten be the foundation for these medium- and long-term<br />

initiatives. Poland is developing a strategic response to the crisis focusing on two priority areas: finance,<br />

competition and governance; and restoring long-term growth. As part <strong>of</strong> this strategic response, the Polish<br />

government has analysed the likely impact <strong>of</strong> the downturn on the drivers <strong>of</strong> long term economic growth<br />

and the innovation-related items in policy responses <strong>of</strong> major countries.<br />

<strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> an innovation strategy<br />

In 2007 many governments (including Polish) called upon the OECD economic policy to develop<br />

a strategy to strengthen innovation, increasing productivity and the potential for long-term growth and<br />

development were already pressing policy objectives. Since then, the economic context has taken a<br />

dramatic turn for the worse, with the financial crisis having spread to the real economy, bringing a steep<br />

drop in growth and millions <strong>of</strong> new unemployed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

234


Today, as the crisis continues to unfold around the globe, the development <strong>of</strong> the Polish<br />

innovation strategy has taken on even greater relevance. Innovation will be one <strong>of</strong> the keys to accelerating<br />

recovery and putting countries back on a path to sustainable – and smarter – growth. Yet the crisis itself<br />

poses a number <strong>of</strong> serious risks and challenges to the innovation ecosystem. Getting the policies right is<br />

vital. Today’s exceptional economic stimulus measures represent a unique opportunity for<br />

public policy to foster innovation. By providing the incentives for innovation-related investments, and<br />

accelerating activities for which barriers may have been otherwise too high, governments can help lay the<br />

foundations for a greener economy and durable growth. If this opportunity is handled effectively,<br />

countries could be reaping the benefits for decades to come.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is an emerging view that the global economy may be at a turning point, leading to a shift in<br />

paradigm. This is indeed an era <strong>of</strong> transition. <strong>The</strong> current crisis is the latest in a series <strong>of</strong> important<br />

phenomena which continue to transform modes <strong>of</strong> production and consumption and drive the search for<br />

new and more sustainable routes to value creation. Over the past decade, globalisation and the emergence<br />

<strong>of</strong> new and diverse players have continued to accelerate, opening up new markets and opportunities, but<br />

also requiring new strategies to benefit and to stay competitive. One result has been a change in the<br />

geography <strong>of</strong> innovation, with a more complex division <strong>of</strong> labour across cities, regions and countries.<br />

Changing demographics throughout the world has also been driving the need for innovation. In such<br />

country like Poland, dealing with an ageing workforce calls for new responses, be they restructuring,<br />

migration, upgrading <strong>of</strong> skills or outsourcing.<br />

Against this backdrop <strong>of</strong> transformation, the World Bank Report: Europe 2020 Poland – Fueling<br />

Growth and Competitiveness in Poland Through Employment, Skills, and Innovation is an important step<br />

towards developing an innovation strategy for the 21st century. It examines the contribution <strong>of</strong> innovation<br />

to growth, and to addressing key global challenges such as climate change, health, food security and<br />

economic development. It takes account <strong>of</strong> the new landscape and dynamics <strong>of</strong> innovation: the important<br />

linkages between traditional and new forms <strong>of</strong> innovation; its changing geography; and the challenges <strong>of</strong><br />

governance. In examining these shifts, the report pinpoints the areas where the policy framework may<br />

need to be reassessed, or new policies and indicators developed. Specific attention is given to the<br />

foundations needed to enable innovation, including human capital, entrepreneurship, research<br />

institutions and universities, knowledge markets and infrastructure, among others. Analysis underway<br />

will result in a set <strong>of</strong> policy principles to harness innovation in the 21st century.<br />

Innovation is crucial for growth<br />

Innovation – the introduction <strong>of</strong> a new or significantly improved product (good or service),<br />

process, or method – has long been viewed as central to economic performance and social welfare, and<br />

recent empirical evidence has confirmed the links between innovation and growth.<br />

Innovation entails investment aimed at producing new knowledge and using it in various<br />

applications. It results from the interaction <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> complementary assets which include research and<br />

development (R&D), but also s<strong>of</strong>tware, human capital, design, marketing and new organisational<br />

structures – many <strong>of</strong> which are essential for reaping the productivity gains and efficiencies from new<br />

technologies. <strong>The</strong>se “intangible” assets have become strategic factors for value creation by firms. <strong>The</strong>ir<br />

role in the economy has become as important as that <strong>of</strong> tangible assets, accounting for 5 to 12% <strong>of</strong> GDP.<br />

Better accounting <strong>of</strong> the intangible capital which drives innovation is important in furthering our<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the patterns and sources <strong>of</strong> economic growth. Adding it to the standard growth<br />

accounting framework changes significantly the analysis. For example, R&D expenditures and intensity<br />

have been found to have a significant effect on per capita GDP growth. And estimates for several<br />

countries show that intangible investment more generally accounts for around 20 to 25% <strong>of</strong> labour<br />

productivity growth. Poland is working with the international research and statistical community to<br />

produce a better measure <strong>of</strong> investment in innovation and its impact at the macroeconomic level.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

235


Innovation is a “must” to meet global challenges a number <strong>of</strong> unprecedented global<br />

challenges are calling for innovation-driven solutions. Just as globalisation has made the world a<br />

“smaller” place, there is an increasing realisation that many <strong>of</strong> today’s pressing challenges know no<br />

borders and cannot be tackled by a single country – global challenges require collective responses. <strong>The</strong><br />

ability to address increasingly urgent issues such as climate change, health, food security and poverty<br />

depends on stronger innovation and new forms <strong>of</strong> international collaboration. Effective enabling<br />

mechanisms are needed, and the OECD is working to identify policies, frameworks, and governance<br />

mechanisms that can accelerate scientific and technological progress and diffuse innovation as widely as<br />

possible.<br />

Different global challenges naturally call for different approaches to support scientific and<br />

technical co-operation. Nevertheless, some common strategies are emerging. <strong>The</strong>se include greater<br />

involvement <strong>of</strong> the private sector, non-governmental and philanthropic organisations, and other<br />

stakeholders in the innovation process; building greater capacity for innovation in developing countries;<br />

devising new financing mechanisms which provide incentives for global and local innovations; and<br />

experimentation with mechanisms that enhance technology transfer to developing countries.<br />

Climate change in Poland is one <strong>of</strong> the biggest challenges <strong>of</strong> our time, and one which can only be<br />

solved collectively. Innovation can reduce the economic costs <strong>of</strong> climate change by putting economies on<br />

growth paths that are less greenhouse gas-intensive. While this requires major progress in development<br />

and deployment <strong>of</strong> key technologies, there is evidence that innovation in climate change mitigation<br />

technologies is accelerating. Better use <strong>of</strong> existing knowledge and technologies, across sectoral boundaries,<br />

also <strong>of</strong>fers important opportunities to address this and other global challenges.<br />

A wide range <strong>of</strong> policy actions will be needed to mobilise innovation to address climate change.<br />

Setting a price for carbon emissions (whether through tradable permits or a carbon tax) and the provision<br />

<strong>of</strong> targeted R&D support for mitigation technologies by governments can be particularly effective in<br />

inciting innovation in climate change mitigation technologies. <strong>The</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> eco-innovation is being<br />

applied by the Polish government as a way <strong>of</strong> meeting sustainable development objectives. More<br />

generally, in order to encourage innovation, it is important to provide a stable and long-term policy<br />

horizon for investors. This is particularly important for “breakthrough” technologies with a long planning<br />

horizon. And, in order to realize reductions in emissions in a cost-effective manner, developing countries<br />

need access to mitigation technologies and an incentive to adopt them.<br />

Innovation for development policy and innovation policy<br />

Likewise, innovation can be better mobilised to propel development and prosperity in the poorest<br />

regions <strong>of</strong> the world. In the agriculture sector in particular, innovation can be a key driver <strong>of</strong> poverty<br />

reduction in rural economies. Policies also need to provide affordable access to communications<br />

technologies, especially broadband Internet, which is vital to accessing knowledge and can trigger local<br />

innovations, boosting rural development beyond agriculture. Improving rural productivity also requires<br />

significant investments in basic infrastructure including transportation, rural energy, and irrigation. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

will be little progress without these foundations.<br />

Stimulating entrepreneurship and facilitating private sector development in developing countries<br />

should be high on the agenda, as they can promote the autonomy needed to turn opportunity into<br />

prosperity. <strong>The</strong>se are important investments, which need carefully tailored incentives and risk-sharing<br />

mechanisms supported by government. Donors can play a critical role in priority setting, but also in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> operations and implementation. To make this happen, links between development policy and<br />

innovation policy need to be established, and coherence between the two strengthened.<br />

In recent years in Poland, the notion <strong>of</strong> innovation has broadened. In particular, interest has<br />

grown in non-technological forms <strong>of</strong> innovation – for example organisational changes, marketing and<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

236


design – and their contribution to productivity growth. This interest reflects a growing appreciation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

interaction between – and complementary nature <strong>of</strong> – technological and non-technological forms,<br />

particularly in terms <strong>of</strong> wider application and adoption <strong>of</strong> innovations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> focus on non-technological innovation has been most prominent in the services sector, which<br />

now accounts for more than 70% <strong>of</strong> GDP in OECD countries. Indeed, empirical evidence shows that<br />

innovation in this sector takes different forms than in the manufacturing sector. Services firms innovate<br />

through informal R&D, the purchasing and application <strong>of</strong> existing technologies, as well as the<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> new business models.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a growing recognition that innovation encompasses a wide range <strong>of</strong> intangible activities,<br />

in addition to R&D. Efforts to improve measures <strong>of</strong> such innovative activity, or show that R&D needs to<br />

be supported by a complementary range <strong>of</strong> other investments, are still underway. Nevertheless, it is<br />

already clear that investment in intangibles is as important as tangible investments in machinery,<br />

equipment and buildings.<br />

Moreover, the understanding <strong>of</strong> the innovation “cycle” has grown. <strong>The</strong> links between policies to<br />

enhance investment in the creation and application <strong>of</strong> knowledge and new technologies, and policies that<br />

provide incentives for innovation through to the tail end <strong>of</strong> the innovation cycle, e.g. in supporting<br />

demand for innovative goods and services, are increasingly recognised.<br />

<strong>The</strong> contribution <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship to innovation is unique. Innovation <strong>of</strong>ten occurs through<br />

entrepreneurs’ exploration <strong>of</strong> new markets, ideas and opportunities. New companies are created to<br />

exploit technological or commercial opportunities which have been neglected by more established<br />

companies and bring them to market. In 2005, half <strong>of</strong> business R&D in the United States was conducted by<br />

companies that were less than 25 years old. A policy environment that fosters the startup and growth <strong>of</strong><br />

new firms is therefore critical to allow innovation to flourish.<br />

Furthermore, networked innovation processes, underpinned by the spread <strong>of</strong> broadband Internet<br />

connections, enable a much larger participation in the innovation process, opening it beyond the realm <strong>of</strong><br />

corporate R&D laboratories to users, suppliers and consumers in the public, business and non-pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

sectors. Tapping into this source <strong>of</strong> ideas <strong>of</strong>fers a potentially important new source <strong>of</strong> innovation and<br />

enhances the influence <strong>of</strong> market demand on innovation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> wider range <strong>of</strong> actors on the Polish “stage” now involved in the innovation process<br />

underscores the need to develop “s<strong>of</strong>t skills” that equip people to work in multi-disciplinary and multicultural<br />

problem-solving teams. Innovation also involves the capacity to adapt, or to retrain following the<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> radically new products and processes. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is important to ensure that educational<br />

institutions, as well as vocational education and training programmes, equip younger people and<br />

graduates with flexible and broad skill sets to accommodate the changing nature <strong>of</strong> innovation.<br />

Community engagement is also important in the uptake <strong>of</strong> innovation. In many countries, the<br />

public is demanding a role in decisions relating to the adoption <strong>of</strong> new technologies, particularly when<br />

these challenge strongly-held values. <strong>The</strong> backlash witnessed against new technologies such as genetically<br />

modified foods is just one example <strong>of</strong> the role and influence <strong>of</strong> communities. Early-stage engagement with<br />

the public can play a key role in the acceptance <strong>of</strong> innovations, and can influence the applications derived<br />

from new technologies.<br />

Drivers <strong>of</strong> public attitudes towards new technologies and innovative processes – including<br />

perceptions <strong>of</strong> risks and benefits – therefore need to be understood by technology developers and policy<br />

makers.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

237


Innovation raises challenges for policy in Poland<br />

<strong>The</strong>se and other changes in the innovation process present a challenge to existing Polish national<br />

policy frameworks, many <strong>of</strong> which remain primarily focused on strengthening public research and on<br />

providing incentives for market participants to invest in research. A shift towards fostering a wider range<br />

<strong>of</strong> innovation activities is needed. Understanding how important such new forms <strong>of</strong> innovation are, how<br />

they interact with each other, and what factors drive them is the key to developing appropriate policies.<br />

Improving the measures <strong>of</strong> innovation is critical to provide new tools for policy making and<br />

evaluation. <strong>The</strong> Polish government and the research community are working to develop a new set <strong>of</strong><br />

indicators to examine the broader notion <strong>of</strong> innovation and its link to economic performance and growth.<br />

This will require additional collection and use <strong>of</strong> internationally comparable data at the firm level, as well<br />

as a better understanding <strong>of</strong> currently unmeasured factors in the innovation process.<br />

Just as the notion <strong>of</strong> innovation has broadened, innovation processes have become more complex<br />

and interactive. <strong>The</strong> production and commercialisation <strong>of</strong> significant innovations such as the discovery <strong>of</strong><br />

the transistor, the invention <strong>of</strong> antibiotics or the introduction <strong>of</strong> organisational changes in the workplace<br />

has never been a simple or risk-free task. But there is a now a more explicit recognition that the process <strong>of</strong><br />

innovation is not merely a linear progression from scientific research to discovery, to technological<br />

improvements, to finished products and diffusion.<br />

<strong>The</strong> complexity and costs <strong>of</strong> engaging in innovation – in particular at the frontier – have risen.<br />

Increasingly, innovations are achieved through the convergence <strong>of</strong> different realms and technologies (e.g.<br />

social sciences, microelectronics, engineering and life science technologies). Such innovations promise<br />

new added value but are risky, since business models are uncertain, costs are high and new potential<br />

competitors emerge in a very fluid business environment. Thanks to decades <strong>of</strong> trade liberalisation,<br />

markets have become more globalised, opening new opportunities, as well as intensifying the level <strong>of</strong><br />

competition. Product life cycles have also shortened or are under pressure – owing to more intense and<br />

global competition and continued technological progress. This is forcing companies to innovate more<br />

quickly and develop products and services more efficiently.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se trends have had several impacts on the innovation process in Poland. First, innovators have<br />

narrowed their focus to those elements where they believe they have a competitive advantage. While<br />

science and innovation activities still tend to cluster in particular locations or around certain institutions,<br />

other regions are increasingly emerging as a hub for innovative activity.<br />

Second, confronted with intense global competition and rising R&D costs, companies are<br />

increasingly collaborating with external partners. <strong>The</strong> aim is to stay abreast <strong>of</strong> developments, expand their<br />

market reach, tap into a larger base <strong>of</strong> ideas and technology and get new products or services to market<br />

before their competitors. Suppliers and customers are among the most sought-after innovation partners.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se networks and ecosystems are increasingly global.<br />

As the practice <strong>of</strong> “open innovation” spreads, new forms <strong>of</strong> knowledge sharing and exchange<br />

between firms, individuals and institutions are growing. <strong>The</strong>se collaborations are giving rise to<br />

“knowledge markets”. Using a number <strong>of</strong> different mechanisms and platforms, buyers and sellers can<br />

pool or trade data, information, contacts and know-how. Steering markets toward innovation and<br />

attracting outside investment also depends on an effective and balanced intellectual property regime. All<br />

<strong>of</strong> these mechanisms help to enable the use, sharing, or exchange <strong>of</strong> information and knowledge.<br />

All <strong>of</strong> these developments call for individuals and institutions to adopt a more “open” and<br />

flexible approach to innovation, where collaboration and competition coexist in the innovation process.<br />

For governments, it implies a coherent and interdisciplinary set <strong>of</strong> policies to foster innovation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

238


<strong>The</strong> capacity to innovate in this dynamic environment depends on many factors, including the<br />

infrastructures and institutions that support the creation and diffusion <strong>of</strong> knowledge on the one hand, and<br />

the demand for innovation on the other. On the supply-side, this includes educational institutions that<br />

support the formation <strong>of</strong> human capital, and research institutions and universities, which play a key role<br />

in the creation and diffusion <strong>of</strong> basic knowledge.<br />

Although business funds a greater share <strong>of</strong> global R&D in comparison to government, public<br />

support for longer-term fundamental research in universities and public research organisations remains<br />

critical. It is key to developing new scientific and technological knowledge that can lead to innovations to<br />

benefit the economy and society. By nature, this type <strong>of</strong> research has a long time horizon and uncertain<br />

returns. Indeed, while business has reduced its investments in basic research over time, it continues to<br />

rely on public research for important knowledge spillovers that can trigger innovation.<br />

On the demand side, market-based institutions, consumers, and entrepreneurship and new firm<br />

creation play an important role. But capacity for innovation also relies on linking mechanisms that help<br />

match supply and demand, as well as scientific and technological infrastructure and platforms built<br />

around general purpose technologies (GPTs), such as information and communications technologies<br />

(ICTs), and especially the Internet.<br />

A new and potentially huge driver <strong>of</strong> innovation is emerging: the demand for processes and<br />

technologies to address environmental and sustainability challenges. <strong>The</strong> search for innovative responses<br />

in these areas is likely to grow sharply in the coming years, driving new investment and further<br />

exploration <strong>of</strong> resource and energy-efficient technologies, renewable energies, new business models and<br />

crosssectoral application <strong>of</strong> ICTs, biotechnologies, nanotechnologies, and others.<br />

Complex market and societal needs <strong>of</strong>ten require multidisciplinary, innovative solutions. This<br />

calls for more systemic application and diffusion <strong>of</strong> existing innovations, but also more international and<br />

interdisciplinary research and development at the technological frontier. <strong>The</strong>se developments have<br />

implications for governance, international collaboration and the mix <strong>of</strong> skills needed, as well as the costs<br />

and risks <strong>of</strong> engaging in innovative activities.<br />

Polish government not only play the role <strong>of</strong> “rule setter”, but is increasingly a central innovation<br />

actor playing within those rules. Demographic pressures, burgeoning demands, higher public<br />

expectations and ever-tighter fiscal constraints mean that the public sector is seeking innovative solutions<br />

to enhance productivity, contain costs and boost public satisfaction. <strong>The</strong> “innovation imperative” is<br />

therefore equally strong for the public sector itself. Government can also contribute to creating demand<br />

for innovation through public procurement.<br />

In this increasingly complex and shifting landscape for innovation, developing an effective<br />

governance strategy requires coordination at the local, regional, national and international levels, across a<br />

wide range <strong>of</strong> actors and government ministries – Science & Higher Education, Economy, Administration<br />

and Informatisation, Environment, Health, Foreign Affairs, Labour and Social Policy, and Education.<br />

Yet, achieving co-ordination and coherence is a difficult challenge. Coherence involves not only<br />

co-ordination <strong>of</strong> simultaneous policy actions, but also an evaluation <strong>of</strong> their possible interactions with<br />

policies aimed at other objectives. For example, supporting the growth <strong>of</strong> young dynamic firms require<br />

close co-ordination between innovation and entrepreneurship policies. Likewise, a closer integration <strong>of</strong><br />

policies fostering innovation and a cleaner environment can help guide economies towards greater<br />

sustainability. In many cases, innovation policy in Poland remains compartmentalised in different<br />

departments and agencies that face obstacles to co-operation.<br />

In developing their innovation policies, government also need to consider the need to adapt to the<br />

evolving needs <strong>of</strong> actors in the innovation process over time. Putting in place mechanisms that enable<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

239


learning and policy development can help ensure that government is effective and efficient in meeting the<br />

needs <strong>of</strong> society in the field <strong>of</strong> innovation.<br />

A new policy agenda for innovation in Poland<br />

<strong>The</strong> challenge is therefore to adjust the way innovation policies are designed and implemented to<br />

ensure they respond to the new landscape.<br />

Changes in the way we innovate; the pace <strong>of</strong> innovation; the need for better risk management<br />

tools; the pressures <strong>of</strong> globalisation, both organisational and in governance; and the growing expectations<br />

<strong>of</strong> civil society, beg the question: are the public policy instruments in use today “right” for the job And<br />

how can approaches be tailored to country specificities: the level <strong>of</strong> economic development, economic<br />

structure and institutional setting<br />

A systemic but flexible strategy is needed to enable governments, firms and individuals to<br />

harness innovation for better economic and social outcomes. Key elements <strong>of</strong> such a policy agenda<br />

include the following.<br />

Innovators in Poland today increasingly collaborate with external partners, including suppliers,<br />

customers and universities, to tap into new knowledge, expand their reach or share risks and costs. Policy<br />

can facilitate such collaboration, which is increasingly global, for example by lowering barriers to<br />

international knowledge flows and by encouraging the development <strong>of</strong> knowledge markets.<br />

Innovation today (not only in Poland) relies on networks and institutions that support the<br />

creation and diffusion <strong>of</strong> knowledge and help link the supply <strong>of</strong> innovation to the market. <strong>The</strong> Internet<br />

and related ICTs are arguably the most important platform for innovation today, enabling flows <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge and linking innovators around the world. Policy needs to ensure a competitive environment<br />

for the development <strong>of</strong> these and other technology platforms, with broad access for users. Moreover,<br />

while business accounts for the bulk <strong>of</strong> investment in innovation, government support for longer-term<br />

fundamental research remains essential in creating the seeds for future innovation.<br />

Innovation today is a global undertaking, in particular for multinational enterprises, but is built<br />

on local strengths. Drawing the benefits <strong>of</strong> the globalisation process for national and local economies<br />

requires policies that enhance the attractiveness <strong>of</strong> national and local economies for innovation, e.g. in<br />

improving frameworks conditions, strengthening universities and building local networks.<br />

In additional to traditional science and technology skills, the competencies that are needed for<br />

innovation today have widened to include management, leadership, marketing and business skills, as<br />

well as creativity and collaborative and team-working skills. Innovation today crosses borders, mixes<br />

disciplines and involves a wide range <strong>of</strong> actors. Policy makers need to ensure that education and training<br />

systems deliver the right mix <strong>of</strong> skills and competencies needed for innovation, which will require<br />

reforms in curricula, vocational training systems and adult learning.<br />

Entrepreneurs are key players in both the supply and demand for innovation. <strong>The</strong>y also help<br />

generate competitive pressures on incumbents, forcing them to innovate. Policy can foster<br />

entrepreneurship by facilitating the entry, exit and growth <strong>of</strong> firms, for example in lowering<br />

administrative and regulatory barriers, improving bankruptcy regimes and easing access to finance.<br />

Innovation can play a major part in addressing global policy challenges, such as climate change,<br />

health and food security, as well as poverty. Responding to these challenges will require global solutions<br />

and stronger international co-operation. More effective mechanisms for this collaboration, and for the<br />

diffusion <strong>of</strong> innovations as widely as possible, must be developed. Co-operation in research and the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> effective solutions are among the key actions that policy can take to address these<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

240


challenges.<br />

Polish government has a wide range <strong>of</strong> policies in place to foster innovation. Improving the<br />

design <strong>of</strong> these programmes, e.g. in using competitive processes or public-private partnerships, can help<br />

enhance their effectiveness and increase value for money. Evaluation is essential to improve policy<br />

making, and this depends on improving the availability <strong>of</strong> data and the development <strong>of</strong> indicators that<br />

reflect the complexity <strong>of</strong> the innovation process.<br />

Government is (and should be) increasingly a key player in the innovation process. New<br />

approaches and new technologies, such as e-government, can help solve problems and improve how<br />

services are delivered by increasing responsiveness and improving efficiency and transparency.<br />

<strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> innovation policies needs to be supported by conducive “framework<br />

conditions” – sound macro-economic policy, competitive markets, smart regulations, openness to<br />

international trade and foreign direct investment, a supportive tax climate and a healthy financial system.<br />

Polish government should play an important role in setting these conditions. At the same time, the<br />

challenges for innovation policy differ across countries, and policy advice will need to be tailored to the<br />

specific needs <strong>of</strong> each country.<br />

Given the importance <strong>of</strong> innovation for core policy objectives, and the broad range <strong>of</strong> policies<br />

needed to foster innovation, it is clear that innovation has become a central pillar <strong>of</strong> government policy.<br />

Political leadership in Poland in advancing the innovation policy agenda and good governance at all<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> government are therefore <strong>of</strong> key importance.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se broad principles will be developed over the coming year and complemented with detailed<br />

policy guidance that can help underpin the development and implementation <strong>of</strong> effective, whole-<strong>of</strong>government<br />

policies for innovation.<br />

Conclusion<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> its strategic response to the economic crisis and the innovation strategy, Poland is also<br />

focusing on measures to restore long-term growth. This paper shows how current economic policy<br />

(especially innovation policy) include measures directed towards investment in research and<br />

development, a modern (smart) infrastructure, education, the greening <strong>of</strong> the economy, support to<br />

innovation and to enterprises.<br />

This paper should also help setting priorities and uncovering good practices, including in the area <strong>of</strong><br />

evaluation and co-ordination <strong>of</strong> planned measures and increased international co-operation. It can also<br />

help debates on how to reconcile necessary short-term stimulus measures and plans to foster long-term<br />

economic and sustainable growth.<br />

Raising employment, improving skills, and enhancing technology absorption and innovation could<br />

help <strong>of</strong>fset the projected decline in potential growth and put Poland back on track for even higher growth<br />

rates. To achieve these goals, it would be worth to pointed out the following findings and<br />

recommendations in the area <strong>of</strong> innovation:<br />

- improve the investment climate to spur firm investments in R&D;<br />

- channel public funding to support co-inventions in addition to domestic inventions, to promote<br />

international collaboration and knowledge spillovers;<br />

- establish a system <strong>of</strong> insider privatization, that is, transfer <strong>of</strong> ownership to research and<br />

development institutions (RDIs) managers and researchers, (excluding the real estate), to<br />

complete the restructuring <strong>of</strong> commercialized RDIs and those volunteering for privatization;<br />

- reform the RDI financing system to strengthen applied research and links with the needs <strong>of</strong> Polish<br />

companies (especially small and medium enterprises) and industry.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

241


To conclude, more work will be needed to monitor the implementation and assess the impact <strong>of</strong> these<br />

economic and innovation policies in Poland.<br />

References<br />

Canning, M., M. Godfrey, and D. Holzer-Zelazewska. 2007. “Vocational Education in the New EU Member<br />

States. Enhancing Labor Market Outcomes and Fiscal Efficiency.” World Bank, Washington, DC.<br />

Cohen, M. W., and D. A. Levinthal. 1989. “Innovation and Learning: <strong>The</strong> Two Faces <strong>of</strong> R&D. Do Firms’<br />

Absorptive Capacities Matter” <strong>The</strong> Economic Journal 99 (397) (September): 569–96.<br />

Correa, P., and M. Iooty. 2010. “Impact <strong>of</strong> the Crisis on the Corporate Sector – Evidence from a Firm-level<br />

Survey.” EU-10 Regular Economic Report. World Bank, Washington, DC, April.<br />

EC (European Commission) 2010a. “Europe 2020. A European Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive<br />

Growth.” Brussels.<br />

Epstein, N., and C. Macchiarelli. 2010. “Estimating Poland’s Potential Output: A Production Function<br />

Approach.” IMF Working Paper 10/15. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, January.<br />

Griffith, R. 2000. “How Important is Business R&D for Economic Growth and Should the Government<br />

Subsidise It” IFS Briefing Notes. Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.<br />

Griffith. R., S. Redding, and J. Van Reenen. 2004. “Mapping the Two Faces <strong>of</strong> R&D: Productivity Growth in a<br />

Panel <strong>of</strong> OECD Industries.” Review <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics 86 (4): 883–95.<br />

Guellec, D., and B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie. 2004. “From R&D to Productivity Growth: Do the<br />

Institutional Settings and the Source <strong>of</strong> Funds <strong>of</strong> R&D Matter” Oxford Bulletin <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics 66 (3): 353–78.<br />

IMF. 2010. World Economic Outlook”. Washington DC, October.<br />

Jorgenson, D. W., and K. Vu. Forthcoming. “Potential Growth <strong>of</strong> the World Economy.” Journal <strong>of</strong> Policy<br />

Modelling.<br />

KPRM (Chancellery <strong>of</strong> the Prime Minister). 2009. Polska 2030. Wyzwania Rozwojowe. (Poland 2030.<br />

Development Challenges), Warsaw.<br />

Lundvall, B.-A. 2008. “Higher Education, Innovation, and Economic Development.” In Annual World Bank<br />

Conference on Development Economics 2008, Regional: Higher Education and Development, Justin Yifu Lin and Boris<br />

Pleskovic, eds. Washington, DC: World Bank.<br />

Murthi, M., and L. Sondergaard. 2010. “Skills, Not Just Diplomas: <strong>The</strong> Path for Education Reforms in ECA.”<br />

ECA Knowledge Brief. World Bank, Washington, DC.<br />

Narodowy Bank Polski-World Bank. 2009. Survey <strong>of</strong> Demand for Skills. Dataset. NBP (National Bank <strong>of</strong><br />

Poland). 2010. “Inflation Report.” Warsaw, February.<br />

OECD Experts Meeting on “Innovating Out <strong>of</strong> Poverty”, 6-7 April 2009.<br />

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) 2010. <strong>The</strong> High Cost <strong>of</strong> Low Educational<br />

Performance. An Estimation <strong>of</strong> the Long-Run Economic Impact <strong>of</strong> Improvements in PISA Outcomes. Paris: OECD.<br />

Piatkowski, M. 2009. “<strong>The</strong> Coming Golden Age <strong>of</strong> New Europe.” Central European Policy Analysis Report 24<br />

(October). Central European Policy Analysis. Washington, DC.<br />

Rapacki, R., and M. Próchniak. 2009. “<strong>The</strong> EU Enlargement and Economic Growth in the CEE New Member<br />

Countries.” European Economy, European Papers 367 (April). European Commission Directorate General Economic and<br />

Monetary Affairs, Brussels.<br />

Richter, K., and M. Krzak. 2011. “Poland: From Crisis Resilience to Robust Growth” in M. K. Nabli (ed.) <strong>The</strong><br />

Great Recession and Developing Countries. Economic Impact and Growth Prospects. World Bank, Washington, DC.<br />

Rutkowski, J. 2007. “From the Shortage <strong>of</strong> Jobs to the Shortage <strong>of</strong> Skilled Workers. Labor Markets in the EU<br />

New Member States.” Institute for the Study <strong>of</strong> Labor Discussion Paper No. 3202. Bonn.<br />

World Bank. 2010. “Program Document for a Proposed Development Policy Loan for Poland.” World Bank,<br />

Washington, DC.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

242


Structural Changes and Development <strong>of</strong> the SME Sector<br />

in Poland after EU Membership<br />

Ryszard Borowiecki &<br />

Barbara Siuta-Tokarska<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Economics and Organization <strong>of</strong> Enterprises<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Keywords<br />

SME sector, structural changes, functioning <strong>of</strong> enterprises.<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>The</strong> transformation process <strong>of</strong> the Polish economy, which started in the late 1980s, has initiated and caused<br />

the occurrence <strong>of</strong> numerous phenomena and structural changes in the national economy <strong>of</strong> Poland. One <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

signs <strong>of</strong> the transformation was an explosion <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship expressing itself, among others, in the emergence <strong>of</strong><br />

numerous business entities <strong>of</strong> the private sector on the economic market. By the end <strong>of</strong> 1990s, the situation in this<br />

respect stabilized and an increase in the number <strong>of</strong> new business entities did not have such an intense character any<br />

more.<br />

Poland’s accession to the European Union in 2004 is related to numerous changes in the conditionings <strong>of</strong><br />

the activities <strong>of</strong> business entities in Poland, including the SME sector enterprises and their structural changes. <strong>The</strong><br />

changes are connected, among others, with bigger opportunities within the scope <strong>of</strong> operations on new economic<br />

markets (Western European countries). On the other hand, however, they bring about certain limitations and<br />

impediments connected with it.<br />

During the whole period <strong>of</strong> the transformation, small and medium-sized enterprises have played a<br />

significant role in the development <strong>of</strong> the Polish economy and they are still its core, which is proven, among others,<br />

both by their share in the number <strong>of</strong> business entities (over 99%), and in the GDP generation (about 50%).<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, an analysis <strong>of</strong> structural changes in the SME activities in the post-accession period made in this paper and<br />

the conclusions arising from it are an important element in undertaking pro-developmental activities and the needs<br />

for prognostic analyses with reference to this sector in the context <strong>of</strong>, among others, global conditionings, the<br />

economic crisis included.<br />

Introduction<br />

Since the early-1990s, that is from the beginning <strong>of</strong> the period <strong>of</strong> system transformation from the<br />

centrally planned economy to the market economy, the small and medium-sized enterprise sector in<br />

Poland, called the SME sector, has been playing a significant role in the development <strong>of</strong> economy. First <strong>of</strong><br />

all, in the non-financial enterprise group, it has a dominating share in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP)<br />

generation and in employment, regardless <strong>of</strong> other indicators <strong>of</strong> the business entities’ activity, such as, for<br />

example, a considerable share in the foreign trade.<br />

Taking into consideration the indicated role and significance <strong>of</strong> the SME sector in the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the Polish economy, it is worth paying attention to the condition and fundamental<br />

changes which have occurred in this sector after Poland’s accession to the European Union as <strong>of</strong> 1 May<br />

2004, accounting for the influence <strong>of</strong> global conditionings related to the economic crisis on this sector.<br />

Thus, the aim <strong>of</strong> this publication is to present the main changes in the SME functioning, and to<br />

indicate the appropriate conclusions resulting from it for the opportunities for their further development.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

243


Changes in the number and the structure <strong>of</strong> the SME sector enterprises in the years<br />

2001-2010<br />

Active entities in Poland constitute as little as a half <strong>of</strong> the registered businesses. It means that for<br />

some reasons, a large part <strong>of</strong> the enterprises has not been removed from the Polish National Business<br />

Registry (e.g. because <strong>of</strong> the suspension <strong>of</strong> activity), whereas they actually do not conduct business<br />

activity, Hence, for the needs <strong>of</strong> this analysis, only active enterprises were taken into account.<br />

Table 1 presents data concerning the number and the dynamics <strong>of</strong> enterprises in Poland.<br />

Table 1. Changes in the number and the dynamics <strong>of</strong> active enterprises in Poland by their size classes in<br />

the years 2001-2010[previous year=100%]<br />

Year<br />

Enterprises in<br />

total<br />

micro<br />

(0-9 workers)<br />

small<br />

(10-49<br />

workers)<br />

including<br />

mediumsized<br />

(50-249<br />

workers)<br />

SMEs in total<br />

(0-249<br />

workers)<br />

large<br />

(>249<br />

workers)<br />

2001 1657630[93.9] 1601964[93.7] 39439 [101.1] 13419 [94.3] 1654822 [93.9] 2808 [91.4]<br />

2002 1735424<br />

[104.7]<br />

1682473[105] 37142[94.2] 13086[97.5] 1732701[104.7] 2723[97.0]<br />

2003 1709542 [98.5] 1654094[98.3] 39453[106.2] 13330[101.9] 1706877[98.5] 2665[97.9]<br />

2004 1714983<br />

[100.3]<br />

1653856[100] 44369[112.5] 14003[105] 1712229[100.3] 2754[103.3]<br />

2005 1676775 [97.8] 1615167[97.7] 44519[100.3] 14254[101.8] 1673940[97.8] 2835[102.9]<br />

2006 1714915<br />

[102.3]<br />

2007 1777076<br />

[103.6]<br />

2008 1788336<br />

[100.6]<br />

1652998[102.3] 44228[99.3] 14708[103.2] 1711934[102.3] 2981[105.1]<br />

1713194[103.6] 45184[102.2] 15452[105.1] 1773830[103.6] 3246[108.9]<br />

1714789[100.1] 54262[120.1] 16078[104.1] 1785129[100.6] 3207[98.8]<br />

2009 1673527 [93.6] 1604417[93.6] 50189[92.5] 15808[98.3] 1670414[93.6] 3113[97.1]<br />

2010 1726663<br />

[103.2]<br />

1655064[103.2] 52591[104.8] 15841[100.2] 1723496[103.2] 3167[101.7]<br />

Source: authors’ownstudybased on Borowiecki, Siuta-Tokarska (2008); Przedsibiorczo w Polsce (2011),<br />

Dziaalno przedsibiorstw niefinansowych w 2010roku (2011).<br />

What results from the analysis <strong>of</strong> the data included in Table 1 is that in the years 2001-2002,<br />

namely in the pre-accession period, there was an increase in the total number <strong>of</strong> enterprises by over 77<br />

thousand entities, mainly thanks to micro-enterprises, but a decrease in the number <strong>of</strong> business entities in<br />

that period was observed in medium-sized and large enterprises. In the following year, there was an<br />

overall drop in the number <strong>of</strong> business entities by nearly 26 thousand, micro- and large enterprises<br />

included.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

244


In the years 2004-2010, that is after Poland’s accession to the European Union, there was a slight<br />

rise in the total number <strong>of</strong> active entities, amounting to 0.68%, and in absolute numbers, 11,680 entities.<br />

However, it is worth emphasizing that it was the global economic crisis that had crucial influence on this<br />

situation, because in the years 2004 - 2007 (before the global crisis),the growth in the number <strong>of</strong> active<br />

enterprises in total was 3.6%.<br />

In 2009, the Polish economy took a heavy toll <strong>of</strong> the crisis, which expressed itself in the dynamics<br />

<strong>of</strong> the totality <strong>of</strong> active enterprises equal to 93.6% (a decline by 114,809 entities), including the biggest<br />

decrease which was observed among micro-enterprises, namely 110,372, followed by small ones: 4,073,<br />

medium sized ones: 270, and large ones: 94 entities.<br />

What results from the analysis <strong>of</strong> average value for the years 2001 - 2003 (pre-accession period)<br />

and for the years 2004 - 2007 (the first post-accession period) and 2008 -2010 (the second post -accession<br />

period) is that the dynamics <strong>of</strong> changes in the pre-accession period and in the first post-accession period<br />

within the scope <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> active business entities was on a similar level, namely over 103%, which<br />

may indicate that the fact <strong>of</strong> Poland’s accession to the European Union structures itself did not influence<br />

significantly the changes in the number <strong>of</strong> active business entities in Poland. On the other hand, in the<br />

second post-accession period the dynamics on the level <strong>of</strong> 96.6% was observed, which shows that<br />

enterprises in Poland experienced some consequences <strong>of</strong> the global economic crisis. Showing the whole<br />

period <strong>of</strong> the years 2004 - 2010 (post-accession period) comprehensively, irrespective <strong>of</strong> the fluctuations in<br />

absolute numbers in the individual years, there was generally an increase in the number <strong>of</strong> active entities<br />

from the level <strong>of</strong> 1,714,983 units in 2004 to 1,726,663 in 2010, including the SME sector enterprises from<br />

1,712,228 entities in 2004 to 1,723,496 in 2010, which should be assessed positively.<br />

Table 2 presents the structure <strong>of</strong> enterprises in Poland by their core activity and their size classes<br />

in the post-accession period, in the years 2004-2010.<br />

Table 2. <strong>The</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> enterprises in Poland by their core activity and their size classes in the postaccession<br />

period, in the years 2004-2010 (in %)<br />

Specification Industry Trade and<br />

repairs<br />

Constructi<br />

on<br />

Transport and<br />

warehousing<br />

Health care<br />

and social<br />

welfare<br />

Others<br />

2004 small 11.9 35.8 9.3 7.3 5.6 30.1<br />

medium-sized 50.2 19.3 9.4 4.6 1.4 15.1<br />

large 59.7 11.4 5.4 7,4 0.1 16.0<br />

2005 small 11.2 35.4 9.6 8.2 6.4 29.2<br />

49.8 19.7 9.4 4.5 1.4 15.2<br />

large 58.3 11.8 5.8 7.3 0.1 16.7<br />

2006 small 11.3 35.6 9.9 8.3 5.9 29.0<br />

mediumsized<br />

mediumsized<br />

49.2 19.7 9.9 4.7 1.1 15.4<br />

large 58.4 12.6 5.9 7.2 0.1 15.8<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

245


2007 small 33.1 30.1 10.1 4.7 3.4 18.6<br />

48.2 20.3 10.1 4.9 1.1 15.4<br />

large 57.1 13.3 5.7 6.9 0.5 16.5<br />

2008 small 30.5 30.1 12.3 5.2 3.1 18.8<br />

45.5 20.3 10.4 4.9 1.1 17.8<br />

large 55.2 13.9 5.2 7.1 0.6 18.0<br />

2009 small 29.7 30.3 12.7 4.7 3.8 18.8<br />

44.4 21.4 11.1 4.8 1.7 16.6<br />

large 52.7 14.2 6.0 6.5 2.0 18.6<br />

2010 small 29.1 30.4 13.1 4.6 3.6 19.2<br />

mediumsized<br />

mediumsized<br />

mediumsized<br />

mediumsized<br />

44.1 21.8 11.1 4.8 1.9 16.3<br />

large 53.2 13.3 5.6 6.3 2.2 19.4<br />

Source: Authors’ ownstudy on the basis <strong>of</strong>: Dziaalno przedsibiorstw niefinansowych w 2004 roku<br />

(2006), Dziaalno przedsibiorstw niefinansowych w 2005 roku (2007), Dziaalno przedsibiorstw<br />

niefinansowych w 2006 roku (2008), Dziaalno przedsibiorstw niefinansowych w 2007 roku (2008),<br />

Dziaalno przedsibiorstw niefinansowych w 2008 roku (2010), Dziaalno przedsibiorstw<br />

niefinansowych w 2009 roku (2011), Dziaalno przedsibiorstw niefinansowych w 2010 roku (2011).<br />

According to the data concerning active enterprises for the years 2004-2010, the total number <strong>of</strong><br />

enterprises decreased, among others, in trade and repairs by 86,141 units, in industry by 24,247 entities, in<br />

transport by 3,474 enterprises, whereas it increased, among others, in construction by 73,062 entities<br />

(Dziaalnoprzedsibiorstw, 2011).<br />

Moreover, what results from the analysis <strong>of</strong> the data included in Table 2 is that:<br />

among small enterprise, the biggest number <strong>of</strong> the conducted business activity was in trade and<br />

repairs (from 35.8% in 2004 to30.4% in 2010), then in the remaining kinds <strong>of</strong> activity (from 30.1%<br />

in 2004 to 19.2% in 2010), in industry (from 11.9% in 2004 to29.1% w 2010), and in then in<br />

construction (from 9.3% in 2004 to 13.1% in 2010) and in transport (from 7.3% in 2004 to 4.6% in<br />

2010),<br />

among medium-sized enterprises, entities conducting activity in industry had the biggest share<br />

(from 50.2% in 2004 to 44.1% in 2010), and it was followed by entities operating in trade and<br />

repairs (from 19.3% in 2004 to21.8% in 2010) and in the other kinds <strong>of</strong> activities (from 15.1% in<br />

2004 and 16.3% in 2010),as well as in construction (from 9.4% in 2004 to 11.1% in 2010). On the<br />

other hand, in transport and in health care and social welfare, the shares did not exceed 5%,<br />

in the group <strong>of</strong> large business entities, enterprises operating in industry prevailed (from 59.7% in<br />

2004 to 53.2% in 2010), and then the remaining kinds <strong>of</strong> activity followed (from 16% in 2004 to<br />

19.4% in 2010), as well as enterprises conducting activity in trade and repairs (from 11.4% in 2004<br />

to 13.3% in 2010). Among large enterprises, the percentage <strong>of</strong> construction and transport entities<br />

was between 6%-7%.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

246


Takingmicro-enterprises into account, it should be claimed that in the SME sector in Poland,<br />

entities conducting trade and service activity prevail, but alongside the growth <strong>of</strong> the size class <strong>of</strong> these<br />

entities, the share <strong>of</strong> enterprises conducting industrial activity is rising, which is to a great extent<br />

connected with their asset-capital abilities and an access to external sources <strong>of</strong> financing (the bigger the<br />

entity, the bigger chances for external financing) (Stan dostpu...2010, MP pod lup. Raport 2011).<br />

Changes in the number and the structure <strong>of</strong> people working in the SME sector<br />

enterprises<br />

Table 3 compares data concerning people working in non-financial enterprises in Poland, with special<br />

attention given to the SME sector enterprises, in the years 2004-2010.<br />

Table 3. Changes in the number and the dynamics <strong>of</strong> people working in enterprises in Poland by their size<br />

classes (in thousands) [the previous year =100%]<br />

including<br />

Year<br />

Enterprises<br />

in total<br />

micro<br />

(0-9 workers)<br />

small<br />

(10-49<br />

workers)<br />

mediumsized<br />

(50-249<br />

workers)<br />

SMEs in<br />

total<br />

(0-249<br />

workers)<br />

large<br />

(>249<br />

workers)<br />

2004 8160.7[100.3] 3383.5[99.6] 967.3[101.4] 1461.5[98.8] 5812.3[99.7] 2348.4[101.7]<br />

2005 8287.5[101.6] 3403.1[100.6] 972.0[100.5] 1494.1[102.2] 5869.2[101.0] 2418.3[103.0]<br />

2006 8556.2[103.2] 3474.6[102.1] 976.5[100.5] 1542.4[105.2] 5993.5[102.1] 2562.7[106.0]<br />

2007 8969.3[104.8] 3592.8[103.4] 1007.5[103.2] 1619.3[105.0] 6219.6[103.8] 2749.7[107.3]<br />

2008 9494.0[105.8] 3727.2[103.7] 1195.0[118.6] 1698.2[104.9] 6620.4[106.4] 2873.0[104.5]<br />

2009 8830.0[93.0] 3464.2[92.9] 1123.3[94.0] 1643.4[96.8] 6230.9[94.1] 2599.1[90.5]<br />

2010 8859.1[100.3] 3399.1[98.1] 1143.5[101.8] 1649.1[100.3] 6191.7[99.4] 2667.4[102.6]<br />

Source: Authors’ ownstudy on the basis <strong>of</strong>: Raport o stanie sektora maych i rednich przedsibiorstw...<br />

(2010), Dziaalno przedsibiorstw niefinansowych w 2009 roku (2011), Dziaalno przedsibiorstw<br />

niefinansowych w 2010 roku (2011).<br />

What results from the data included in Table 3 is that according to the indicated four classes <strong>of</strong><br />

enterprise sizes, after 2004, that is after Poland’s accession to the European Union, until 2008 inclusive, a<br />

quantitative increase in the number <strong>of</strong> people working in these entities was observed practically in all<br />

their classes. <strong>The</strong> number <strong>of</strong> people working in enterprises in total went up from 8,160.7 thousand in 2004<br />

to 9,494 thousand 2008, which is an increase by 1,333.3 thousand.<br />

We may assume that in the mentioned period the situation on the labour market in Poland<br />

improved significantly. On the one hand, an increase in the number <strong>of</strong> people working in enterprises in<br />

Poland, and on the other hand, opening labour markets in the Western European countries was the reason<br />

for which the registered unemployment rate decreased from 19% in 2004 to 9.5% in 2008. Distinct<br />

worsening in this respect was observed in the following years, which was related to the economic crisis. In<br />

2009, the number <strong>of</strong> people working in enterprises in Poland dropped to the level <strong>of</strong> 8,830 thousand and<br />

rose slightly in 2010 (at that time,the unemployment rate amounted to 12.1% in 2009 and 12.4% in 2010).<br />

Fig.1. <strong>The</strong> shares <strong>of</strong> enterprise size classes in the total number <strong>of</strong> people working in enterprises in Poland<br />

in the years 2004-2010.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

247


Source: Authors’ own study.<br />

What results from the data in Fig.1 is that:<br />

in the years 2004 - 2010, the share <strong>of</strong> people working in micro-enterprises was gradually going<br />

down in comparison with the totality <strong>of</strong> people working in non-financial enterprises from 41.5%<br />

in 2004 to 38.4% in 2010,<br />

in the years 2004-2010, the share <strong>of</strong> people working in large enterprises was rising from 28.7% in<br />

2004 to 30.1% in 2010 in relation with the enterprises in total,<br />

in the years 2004 - 2007, the share <strong>of</strong> small enterprises was gradually decreasing from 11.9% to<br />

11.2%, and then, in the years 2008-2010, the share increased from 12.6% in 2008 to12.9% in 2010,<br />

the share <strong>of</strong> medium-sized enterprises maintained at the level <strong>of</strong> about 17.9% to 18.0% in the years<br />

2004-2008, and then it grew to the level <strong>of</strong> 18.6% in the years 2009-2010.<br />

Generally, changes in the structure were not so big in the analyzed years, but to the greatest extent<br />

they referred to macro-enterprises (the difference <strong>of</strong> 3.0%), then, large entities (the difference <strong>of</strong> 2.0%),<br />

whereas to the least degree to small (1.7%) and medium-sized enterprises (0.7%).<br />

Undoubtedly, the impact <strong>of</strong> the global economic crisis, especially in the years 2009- 2010, was<br />

noticeable, and it also exerted specific influence on the changes in the number and the structure <strong>of</strong> people<br />

working in the SME sector enterprises, as well as in large enterprises.<br />

Changes in the size and financial indicators <strong>of</strong> enterprise activity in Poland with<br />

special attention given to the SME sector entities<br />

Within the framework <strong>of</strong> the financial analysis <strong>of</strong> the enterprise sector activity, apart from the<br />

size/value <strong>of</strong> certain asset-capital elements, also three basic groups <strong>of</strong> indicators are taken into<br />

consideration on the basis <strong>of</strong> which their condition is assessed.<strong>The</strong>y are the indicators <strong>of</strong>: debt and an<br />

ability <strong>of</strong> debt service, liquidity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability. Basically, an analysis <strong>of</strong> the financial values and<br />

indicators is a fast and effective method <strong>of</strong> the access to economic operations and the results <strong>of</strong> enterprise<br />

functioning (Sierpiska, Jachna 2004), which creates a base for shaping their future, considering the<br />

existing and the predicted external conditionings.<br />

Table 4 compares the data concerning short- and long-term debt <strong>of</strong> enterprises in Poland in the years<br />

2004-2010.<br />

Table 4. <strong>The</strong> value and the dynamics <strong>of</strong> short- and long-term liabilities <strong>of</strong> enterprises in Poland in the<br />

years 2004-2010 by their size classes (the previous year =100%)<br />

Year small enterprises medium-sized<br />

enterprises<br />

large enterprises Enterprises in<br />

Poland<br />

Short-term liabilities in billions <strong>of</strong> zloty(%)<br />

2004 69.5 (114.3) 99.9 (100.2) 175.9 (100.3) 345.3 (102.9)<br />

2005 66.7 (96.0) 103.0 (103.1) 194.8 (110.7) 364.6 (105.6)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

248


2006 68.6 (102.8) 118.0 (114.6) 222.2 (114.1) 408.8 (112.1)<br />

2007 77.1(112.4) 129.7 (109.9) 255.6 (115.0) 462.4 (113.1)<br />

2008 87.4 (113.4) 140.5 (108.3) 305.3 (119.4) 533.2 (115.3)<br />

2009 82.6 (94.5) 148.3 (105.6) 291.5 (70.4) 522.4 (98.0)<br />

2010 97.0 (117.4) 151.3 (102.0) 322.7 (110.7) 571.0 (109.3)<br />

Long-term liabilities in billions <strong>of</strong> zloty (%)<br />

2004 24.9 (108.7) 37.1 (85.3) 101.3 (89.1) 163.2 (90.6)<br />

2005 27.9 (112.0) 37.3 (100.5) 100.1 (98.8) 165.3 (101.3)<br />

2006 26.2 (93.9) 41.7 (111.8) 99.2 (99.1) 167.2 (101.1)<br />

2007 33.4 (127.5) 52.8 (126.6) 99.8 (100.6) 186.0 (111.2)<br />

2008 44.5 (133.2) 59.6 (112.9) 133.5 (133.8) 237.5 (127.7)<br />

2009 43.0 (96.6) 63.7 (106.9) 141.8 (106.2) 248.4 (104.6)<br />

2010 47.8 (111.2) 70.6 (110.8) 144.8 (102.1) 263.1 (105.9)<br />

Source: Authors’ own study on the basis <strong>of</strong>: Przedsibiorczo w Polsce (2011).<br />

What results from the data in Table 4 is that short-term debt (related to the ongoing operations <strong>of</strong><br />

an enterprise) in small, medium-sized and large enterprises in total in Poland constitutes over the<br />

doubleness <strong>of</strong> long-term liabilities (basically related to investment activity), and their value was generally<br />

increasing gradually over the whole analyzed period, that is 2004 - 2010 (an exception: 2009 in short-term<br />

liabilities).<br />

Total short-term liabilities <strong>of</strong> the indicated enterprise size classes increased from the level <strong>of</strong> 345.3<br />

billion zloty in 2004 to 571.0 billion zloty in 2010, that is by 225.7 billion zloty(an increase by 65.4%),<br />

whereas long-term liabilities from the level <strong>of</strong> 163.2billion zloty in 2004 to 263.1 billion zloty in 2010, that<br />

is by 99.9 billion zloty (61.2%). Taking into consideration the size classes <strong>of</strong> economic entities, short-term<br />

debt <strong>of</strong> small and medium-sized enterprises altogether rose by 46.6%, and <strong>of</strong> large ones by 83.5%, whereas<br />

in the long-term liabilities the situation was different - in small and medium-sized enterprises the total<br />

debt rose by 91%, and in large ones by 43%.<br />

<strong>The</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong> the short-term debt <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> enterprises was from 98% in 2009 to<br />

115.3% in 2008, whereas, the dynamics <strong>of</strong> long-term debt - from 90.6% in 2004 to 127.7% in 2008. With<br />

reference to small enterprises, the dynamics <strong>of</strong> short-term liabilities fluctuated from 94.5% in 2009 to<br />

117.4% in 2010r., and <strong>of</strong> long-term ones from 93.9% in 2006 to 133.2% in 2008. In medium-sized<br />

enterprises, changes in the dynamics <strong>of</strong> short-term liabilities were not so big as in case <strong>of</strong> small entities.<br />

<strong>The</strong> highest level <strong>of</strong> dynamics was reached in 2006: 114.6%, and the lowest one in 2004: 100.2%, and with<br />

reference to long-term liabilities, the lowest level <strong>of</strong> dynamics was reached in 2004: 85.3% (which, to some<br />

extent, could be connected with Poland’s accession to the EU), and the highest one in 2007: 126.6%.<br />

Generally, in the indicated two years, namely in 2004 (the period directly following Poland’s<br />

accession to the EU) and in 2009 (an impact <strong>of</strong> the global economic crisis), a decrease in short and longterm<br />

liabilities, or a decline in its growth ratewas observed.<br />

Within the framework <strong>of</strong> the analysis <strong>of</strong> the assessment <strong>of</strong> enterprises’ debt in Poland, Table 5<br />

compares data concerning the value <strong>of</strong> their debt ratio in the years 2004-2010.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

249


Table 5. Indicators characterizing the debt <strong>of</strong> enterprises in Poland by their size classes in the years 2004-<br />

2010<br />

Year small enterprises medium-sized<br />

enterprises<br />

large enterprises Enterprises in<br />

total<br />

Debt ratio (liabilities/assets)<br />

2004 0.51 0.43 0.41 0.43<br />

2005 0.48 0.42 0.39 0.41<br />

2006 0.45 0.43 0.38 0.41<br />

2007 0.44 0.41 0.37 0.39<br />

2008 0.49 0.43 0.39 0.41<br />

2009 0.45 0.43 0.38 0.40<br />

2010 0.47 0.45 0.37 0.40<br />

Liabilities/ equity<br />

2004 1.13 0.83 0.79 0.85<br />

2005 0.99 0.79 0.74 0.79<br />

2006 0.89 0.82 0.73 0.78<br />

2007 0.85 0.76 0.67 0.72<br />

2008 1.03 0.83 0.75 0.81<br />

2009 0.89 0.83 0.72 0.77<br />

2010 0.99 0.93 0.68 0.78<br />

Source: Authors’ own study on the basis <strong>of</strong>: Przedsibiorczo w Polsce (2011).<br />

Debt ratio for the enterprises in total in the years 2004-2010 stayed on the level from0.39 in 2007 to<br />

0.43 in 2004, for small entities from 0.44 in 2007 to 0.51 in 2004, for medium-sized from 0.41 in 2007 to 0.45<br />

in 2010, whereas for large ones from 0.37 in 2007 and 2010 to 0.41 in 2004.<br />

Changes in the “liabilities/equity” ratio among enterprises in total in Poland to some extent<br />

fluctuated from 0.77 in 2009 to 0.85 in 2004.In all the indicated size classes <strong>of</strong> the economic entities, the<br />

ratio did not exceed 1 in the whole period 2007-2010 (an exception in small enterprises in 2004, where the<br />

ratio value was 1.13).<strong>The</strong> debt ratio analysis shows that enterprises in Poland are in moderate debt in<br />

comparison with their asset value and equity value.<br />

To assess the financial situation <strong>of</strong> the enterprises functioning in Poland in the years 2004-2010<br />

(after Poland’ accession to the European Union), Table 6 compares data concerning liquidity ratio.<br />

Financial liquidity is an extremely important issue, necessary to keep the continuity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

implemented economic processes. It is basically understood as an ability <strong>of</strong> the enterprise to settle its<br />

current liabilities on time.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

250


Table 6. Financial liquidity ratios<strong>of</strong> enterprises in Poland by their size classes in the years 2004-2010<br />

Year small enterprises medium-sized<br />

enterprises<br />

large enterprises Enterprises in<br />

total<br />

Current ratio<br />

2004 1.14 1.32 1.37 1.31<br />

2005 1.32 1.37 1.40 1.38<br />

2006 1.45 1.40 1.41 1.41<br />

2007 1.52 1.46 1.41 1.44<br />

2008 1.48 1.49 1.34 1.40<br />

2009 1.56 1.52 1.42 1.47<br />

2010 1.59 1.53 1.45 1.49<br />

Increased liquidity ratio<br />

2004 0.80 0.93 0.98 0.93<br />

2005 0.95 0.99 1.00 0.98<br />

2006 1.02 1.00 1.02 1.01<br />

2007 1.05 1.02 0.99 1.01<br />

2008 1.02 1.03 0.94 0.98<br />

2009 1.10 1.06 1.03 1.05<br />

2010 1.16 1.07 1.06 1.08<br />

Source: Authors’ own study on the basis <strong>of</strong>: Przedsibiorczo w Polsce (2011).<br />

An analysis <strong>of</strong> the data from Table 6 shows that in the current liquidity, the level <strong>of</strong> the ratio in the<br />

enterprises in total was within 1.31 to 1.49 in the years 2004 - 2010. In small enterprises, the level <strong>of</strong> this<br />

ratio was relatively high, amounting to 1.45-1.59 in the years 2006 - 2010 (only in the first years after the<br />

accession it reached a lower value). A similar correlation was observed in medium-sized enterprises. <strong>The</strong><br />

level <strong>of</strong> the current ratio in large enterprises was relatively high, 1.40 in the years 2005 - 2010 (a decrease<br />

in liquidity only in 2008 - the ratio was 1.34). On the other hand, with reference to the increased liquidity<br />

ratio, its value above 1 was achieved in small and medium-sized enterprises in the years 2006 - 2010, but a<br />

little better situation was observed in small enterprises (ratio 1.1 and 1.16) than in medium-sized ones<br />

(ratios 1.06 and 1.07) in the years 2009-2010.<br />

On the other hand, with reference to the increased ratio, its value above 1 was achieved in small<br />

and medium-sized enterprises in the years 2006-2010, whereby,a little better situation was observed in<br />

small enterprises (ratio 1.1 and 1.16) rather than in medium-sized ones (ratio 1.06 and 1.07) in the years<br />

2009-2010.<br />

In addition to the presented indicators <strong>of</strong> enterprise activity, namely debt ratio and liquidity ratio,<br />

an important element <strong>of</strong> the analysis are also data and indicators referring to pr<strong>of</strong>itability, which reflects<br />

the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> managing an enterprise. In Table 7, the Authors compared some data concerning<br />

achieved revenues, incurred costs and obtained net financial results in enterprises in Poland.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

251


Table 7. Financial data <strong>of</strong> enterprises in Poland and the dynamics <strong>of</strong> their changes by their size classes in<br />

the years 2004-2010 (the previous year =100%)<br />

Year small enterprises medium-sized<br />

enterprises<br />

large enterprises Enterprises in<br />

total<br />

Total revenue in billions <strong>of</strong> zloty(%)<br />

2004 263.1 (116.7) 456.0 (118.1) 821.5 (115.6) 1540.6 (116.5)<br />

2005 265.9 (101.1) 464.5 (101.9) 870.2 (105.9) 1600.6 (103.9)<br />

2006 290.7 (109.3) 517.8 (111.5) 1001.8 (115.1) 1810.3 (113,1)<br />

2007 325.7 (112.0) 589.0 (113.8) 1152.9 (115.1) 2067.7 (114.2)<br />

2008 366.9 (112.6) 652.5 (110.8) 1281.5 (111.2) 2300.9 (111.3)<br />

2009 360.3 (98.2) 662.0 (101.5) 1300.3 (101.5) 2322.6 (100.9)<br />

2010 388.6 (107.9) 652.3 (98.5) 1410.7 (108.5) 2451.6 (105.6)<br />

Total costs in billions <strong>of</strong> zloty(%)<br />

2004 251.3 (118.5) 435.6 (115.2) 768.6 (111.6) 1455.6 (113.8)<br />

2005 254.0 (101.1) 446.0 (102.4) 822.4 (107.0) 1522.4 (104.6)<br />

2006 276.2 (108.7) 490.6 (110.0) 942.3 (114.6) 1709.1 (112.3)<br />

2007 305.7 (110.7) 556.4 (113.4) 1078.4 (114.4) 1940.1 (113.5)<br />

2008 348.3 (113.9) 626.9 (112.7) 1226.7 (113.8) 2201.8 (113.5)<br />

2009 342.3 (98.3) 633.6 (101.1) 1230.6 (100.3) 2206.5 (100.2)<br />

2010 366.9 (107.2) 624.9 (98.6) 1327.8 (107.9) 2319.6 (105.1)<br />

Net financial result in billions <strong>of</strong> zloty(%)<br />

2004 9.8 (104.3) 16.9 (344.9) 44.8 (350.0) 71.5 (264.8)<br />

2005 9.8 (100.0) 14.6 (86.4) 38.2 (85.3) 62.6 (87.6)<br />

2006 12.1 (123.5) 22.3 (152.7) 47.6 (124.6) 82.1 (131.2)<br />

2007 17.5 (144.6) 27.6 (123.8) 60.6 (127.3) 105.7 (128.7)<br />

2008 15.2 (86.9) 20.4 (73.9) 42.9 (70.8) 78.6 (74.4)<br />

2009 15.1 (99.3) 23.3 (114.2) 57.5 (134.0) 95.8 (121.9)<br />

2010 18.2 (120.5) 22.4 (96.1) 69.3 (120.5) 109.9 (114.7)<br />

Source: Authors’ own study on the basis <strong>of</strong>: Przedsibiorczo w Polsce (2011).<br />

In general, total revenues <strong>of</strong> enterprises in Poland in the analyzed period,2004-2010, were<br />

gradually rising (except for 2009 in small enterprises and 2010 in medium-sized entities) from 1,540.6<br />

billion zloty in 2004 to 2,451.6 billion zloty in 2010. Similar changes were observed in total costs where<br />

their value went up from 1,455.6 billion in 2004 to 2,319.6 billion zloty in 2010. It should be stressed that in<br />

comparison with the previous year (the year <strong>of</strong> Poland’s accession to the EU)the dynamics <strong>of</strong> both<br />

revenues and costs reached the highest value or one <strong>of</strong> the highest values in all size classes <strong>of</strong> enterprises,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

252


which may be interpreted as a significant effect <strong>of</strong> the influence <strong>of</strong> the accession process. <strong>The</strong> situation also<br />

refers to the net financial result achieved by these enterprises (with the exception <strong>of</strong> small enterprises,<br />

which is rather connected with their basically local market <strong>of</strong> conducting business activity). On the other<br />

hand, in the last two years, in 2009 and 2010, the dynamics <strong>of</strong> revenues and costs distinctly dropped,<br />

especially when compared to the years 2006 - 2008, which is related to the conditionings both in the<br />

domestic and the world economy (global economic crisis). It may be proven by the data concerning the<br />

share <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itable entities. Among small enterprises, this share was going up from over 74% to over 81%<br />

in the years 2004-2007, and then it went down to over 76% in 2009. (Przedsibiorczo, 2011). Similar<br />

changes concerned medium-sized enterprises (an increase from over 75% to 82.6% in the years 2004-2007,<br />

and then a decrease to 76.8% in 2009).<br />

Synthesis <strong>of</strong> the research findings<br />

1. In the period following Poland’s accession to the EU, there was a significant growth in the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> active enterprises in Poland, both the SME sector entities in the years 2006- 2008, and<br />

large enterprises in the post-accession period, which was impeded in the era <strong>of</strong> the global<br />

economic crisis, particularly in 2009. In 2010, a certain improvement was observed in the<br />

activeness <strong>of</strong> enterprises in all classes <strong>of</strong> their size, expressing itself in the number <strong>of</strong> active<br />

entities.<br />

2. In the structure <strong>of</strong> enterprises by their core activity and their size classes, tendencies <strong>of</strong> changes<br />

were observed in the years 2004 - 2010, expressing themselves in a decline in the share <strong>of</strong><br />

economic entities in industry in all size classes in favour <strong>of</strong> activities connected with trade and<br />

repairs, whereby in small and medium-sized entities the share <strong>of</strong> construction companies also<br />

went up.<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> number <strong>of</strong> people working in non-financial enterprises in total was increasing in the years<br />

2004-2008, and then it rapidly decreased in 2009. <strong>The</strong> SME share in employment in non-financial<br />

enterprises stayed on the same level and was within 71.3% in 2004 to 69.9% in 2010.<br />

4. As far as current liquidity and increased liquidity are concerned, there was generally an increase<br />

in these indicators in the years 2004 - 2010 in the indicated size classes <strong>of</strong> business entities, which<br />

should be assessed positively. It is worth emphasizing that in the analyzed period, the total debt<br />

<strong>of</strong> enterprises also rose, from the level <strong>of</strong> 508.5 billion zloty in 2004 to 834.1 billion zloty in 2010<br />

(the dynamics <strong>of</strong> 164%), whereby an increase in the short-term debt was 65.4% at that time (the<br />

biggest growth <strong>of</strong> the dynamics characterized large enterprises - over 83%, the medium-sized<br />

enterprises - over 50%, and small ones - over 39%), and the long-term was 61.2% (the biggest<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> the dynamics characterized small and medium-sized enterprises - over 90%, whereas<br />

moderately, large enterprises - over 42%).<br />

An increase in debt, particularly with reference to the smallest entities, namely macro-enterprises<br />

and small enterprises, in the situation <strong>of</strong> the turbulences occurring on the economic market may<br />

threaten their functioning and significantly influence their financial liquidity, hence, a decrease in<br />

the dynamics <strong>of</strong> debt and/or its rate in the period <strong>of</strong> the last two years among these entities<br />

should be interpreted positively. An impact <strong>of</strong> the global economic crisis is visible also with<br />

reference to the revenues and total costs <strong>of</strong> non-financial enterprises in Poland in the years 2009 -<br />

2010, including a decline in the dynamics in comparison with the previous years.<br />

References<br />

Borowiecki R., Siuta-Tokarska B. (2008), Problemy funkcjonowania i rozwoju maych i rednich przedsibiorstw w<br />

Polsce. Syntezabadaikierunkirozwoju, Difin, Warszawa.<br />

Dziaalno przedsibiorstw niefinansowych w 2004 roku (2006), the Central Central Office, Warszawa.<br />

Dziaalno przedsibiorstw niefinansowych w 2005 roku (2007), the Central Central Office, Warszawa.<br />

Dziaalno przedsibiorstw niefinansowych w 2006 roku (2008), the Central Central Office, Warszawa.<br />

Dziaalno przedsibiorstw niefinansowych w 2007 roku (2008), the Central Central Office, Warszawa.<br />

Dziaalno przedsibiorstw niefinansowych w 2008 roku (2010), the Central Central Office, Warszawa.<br />

Dziaalno przedsibiorstw niefinansowych w 2009 roku (2011), the Central Central Office, Warszawa.<br />

Dziaalno przedsibiorstw niefinansowych w 2010 roku (2011), the Central Central Office, Warszawa.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

253


MP pod lup. Raport. Europejski Program ModernizacjiPolskich Firm (2011),<br />

EuropejskiFunduszLeasingowy, European Investment Bank, Council <strong>of</strong> Europe Development Bank, European Bank<br />

for Reconstruction and Development, Warszawa.<br />

Przedsibiorczo w Polsce (2011), the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Economy, Warszawa.<br />

Sierpiska M., Jachna T. (2004), Ocena przedsibiorstwa wedug standardów wiatowych, PWN, Warszawa.<br />

Stan dostpu do finansowania zewntrznego i potrzeby MP w Polsce (2010), PARP, Warszawa.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

254


<strong>The</strong> Identification and Measurement <strong>of</strong> Financial Threat<br />

Vs. <strong>The</strong> Cases <strong>of</strong> Insolvency in the Period <strong>of</strong> Poland’s<br />

Economic Transformation<br />

Jarosaw Kaczmarek<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Economics and Organization <strong>of</strong> Enterprises<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Keywords<br />

Corporate crisis, risk management, early warning systems, insolvency<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>The</strong> contemporary economy is characterised by a turbulent business environment, a great pace <strong>of</strong> changes<br />

and their radical nature – the economy is becoming increasingly unstable. <strong>The</strong>se factors have an impact on corporate<br />

functioning. <strong>The</strong> major objectives <strong>of</strong> the undertaken measures are survival and development. <strong>The</strong> company’s survival<br />

is conditioned by its ability to anticipate and assess its market position, which implies the ability to take effective<br />

action and expand in the changing environment. Taking appropriate steps is <strong>of</strong> vital importance in the face <strong>of</strong> a<br />

threat <strong>of</strong> crisis. <strong>The</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> the dysfunctions <strong>of</strong> an economy in the environment <strong>of</strong> radical changes threatens the<br />

company’s position, increasing the likelihood <strong>of</strong> its insolvency.<br />

<strong>The</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> threats as part <strong>of</strong> the Early Warning System is based on a number <strong>of</strong> tools used in<br />

technical, economic and financial analyses as well as in statistical methods for going concern and insolvency threat<br />

predictions. <strong>The</strong> defined measures provide quantitative information related to anticipatory warning signals and<br />

perform the function <strong>of</strong> threat predictors.<br />

<strong>The</strong> commonly recognised as efficient and continuously developed measures include empirical and<br />

inductive methods – discrimination analysis (one – and multivariate models) as well as the conditional probability<br />

account (multivariate cogit models).<br />

<strong>The</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> insolvency can be analysed at three different levels: legal, economic and organizational ones.<br />

<strong>The</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> the crisis <strong>of</strong> Polish companies in 1990–2011 is based on two measures: the percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

insolvency proceedings and the degree <strong>of</strong> going concern threat. <strong>The</strong>se measures describe the concept <strong>of</strong> insolvency in<br />

its economic dimension. <strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> the conducted analysis and assessment are presented in the empirical analysis<br />

presented in this paper.<br />

Introduction<br />

Companies functioning in the environment <strong>of</strong> real economy, affected by regulation, are<br />

vulnerable to crises resulting from the impact <strong>of</strong> external factors. <strong>The</strong>se factors occur in the surrounding<br />

business environment (competitors and micro–environment) and a more remote environment <strong>of</strong><br />

macroeconomic factors. Other factors occur in the organization’s internal environment. <strong>The</strong> deteriorating<br />

conditions in this area have a negative impact on companies, leading to crises. A crisis is understood in<br />

different ways from a microeconomic perspective, depending on the particular trends and theories which<br />

deal with company operations. Generally, a crisis is an outcome <strong>of</strong> unplanned events which disturb or<br />

threaten the normal corporate functioning [Oldcorn 1996].<br />

<strong>The</strong> company’s exposure and vulnerability to threats is diversified, and it is very high in the case<br />

<strong>of</strong> Polish companies – both from the organizational and financial perspective. It results from the instability<br />

and changeability <strong>of</strong> Polish companies’ strategic potential [Zelek 2003]. In addition to that, the on–gong<br />

process <strong>of</strong> several parallel transformations in the Polish economy increases the uncertainty (the qualitative<br />

category) and risk (the quantitative category) <strong>of</strong> business operations, which is further enhanced by the<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

255


negative impact <strong>of</strong> the economic slowdown. Moreover, the area <strong>of</strong> strategic management – which is <strong>of</strong> key<br />

significance in such conditions – is neglected in most Polish companies. It increases the strategic<br />

uncertainty, leading to the domino effect [Mczyska 2011].<br />

Detection, identification and measurement <strong>of</strong> threats<br />

An integrated model for the organization’s development proposed by B. Quinn and K. Cameron<br />

stresses the fact that apart from the ability to overcome crises, a significant role is played by the ability to<br />

predict and prevent them [Quinn, Cameron 1983]. <strong>The</strong>refore, companies must develop and apply<br />

solutions which diagnose the symptoms <strong>of</strong> crises – early warning systems. <strong>The</strong>y are risk optimization<br />

tools applied as part <strong>of</strong> quantitative risk management methods [Crocford 1982]. Such tools, along with a<br />

strategic approach, play an increasingly important role in the environment <strong>of</strong> economic instability and<br />

uncertainty [Mczyska 2011]. <strong>The</strong> need for predicting threats seems unquestionable – the problem is<br />

what methods should be adopted to minimise the risk <strong>of</strong> erroneous forecasts. However, the commonly<br />

used term ”warning” is not appropriate and misleading. An act <strong>of</strong> warning can indicate both an attempt<br />

to detect threats and identify opportunities. <strong>The</strong> term “identification” seems to be a more appropriate<br />

term in this context [Cabaa 2008].<br />

<strong>The</strong> most general classification <strong>of</strong> EWS is based on a subjective criterion (who creates and for<br />

who) and an objective criterion (the choice <strong>of</strong> tools and assessment methods) [E.I. Altman, P. Narayanan<br />

1997; H.D. Platt, M.B. Platt 2002] making use <strong>of</strong> three types <strong>of</strong> information: alarm signals, deviations, weak<br />

signals (weakly structured) [H.I. Ans<strong>of</strong>f 1985].<br />

An early warning system should be considered as one <strong>of</strong> the components <strong>of</strong> the assessment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

company’s economic and financial condition; it is composed <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> in–depth analyses falling<br />

under one <strong>of</strong> the three categories: strategic, financial and technical and economic analyses (also viewed<br />

from the perspective <strong>of</strong> the decision–making process) [M. Zaleska 2002; A. Zelek 2003; Kasiewicz, Krysiak,<br />

Gogowski 2004]. It aims to detect the signs <strong>of</strong> deterioration, but it is frequently – which is not well–<br />

grounded – treated as bankruptcy prediction [Fraser, Fraser 1996].<br />

In identifying threats, EWS makes use <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> tools applied in the technical and economic<br />

analysis as well as statistical methods for predicting going concern and insolvency threats. <strong>The</strong> defined<br />

measures quantify early warning signals, performing the function <strong>of</strong> threat predictors [Lam 2003]. <strong>The</strong><br />

application <strong>of</strong> these methods can be divided into four stages which are marked by a visible increase in<br />

complexity and advanced analytical methods (applicable to chaos theory, an integrating approach and<br />

process orientation). EWS methods are usually classified from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> two criteria: the<br />

character <strong>of</strong> analysed factors and deduction methods [Rogowski 1999]. <strong>The</strong> former one is related to<br />

quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods, while the latter one applies logical and deduction as well as<br />

empirical and induction methods [Wieczerzyska 2009]. According to Zavgren, methods can be divided<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> discriminate analysis (one– and multivariate models) and the conditional probability<br />

account (multivariate models) [Zavgren 1983]. In connection with the above, this area makes use <strong>of</strong><br />

exclusively empirical and induction methods – they are considered to be useful and they are constantly<br />

developed.<br />

In the group <strong>of</strong> methods identified from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> the character <strong>of</strong> factors the most<br />

frequently applied ones include the financial ratio analysis and scoring models (with one synthetic<br />

measure) as well as multi–criterion models (quantitative and qualitative measures). Considering a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> weaknesses <strong>of</strong> single–measure analyses, other concepts may be applied including EVA (Economic<br />

Value Added), SVA (Shareholder Value Added) and MVA (Market Value Added based on the values<br />

determined on the capital market). This approach considers the main objective <strong>of</strong> corporate functioning –<br />

creating shareholder value through increasing corporate value. However, the results <strong>of</strong> research studies <strong>of</strong><br />

the Polish economy indicate the lack <strong>of</strong> statistically significant correlation between the above measures<br />

and the degree <strong>of</strong> going concern and insolvency threats [Prusak 2007; Cwynar, Cwynar 2002; Siudak 2001;<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

256


Róaski 2001].<br />

Logical and deduction methods rely on the financial analysis to assess the company’s financial<br />

standing (quantitative and qualitative assessment, hierarchical systems), but they do not provide a basis<br />

for comparative analyses [Siegel, Shim, Hartman 1995]. Empirical and induction methods do not<br />

concentrate on one company, being an example <strong>of</strong> a comparative analysis based on statistical methods (an<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> the groups <strong>of</strong> companies which are threatened and not threatened). Depending on the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> variables, these methods are referred to as one– or multivariate methods, and their main strength is<br />

their effectiveness (the ability to identify threatened and non–threatened businesses) [Antonowicz 2009].<br />

<strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> these methods in EWS is conditioned by meeting the basic requirements related to their general<br />

efficiency. <strong>The</strong> measures <strong>of</strong> effectiveness include the ability to detect threats, take action in due time,<br />

ensure testing in stable conditions and determine the critical level (moment) <strong>of</strong> threat [Bartkowiak 1997;<br />

Rogowski 1999].<br />

<strong>The</strong> strategic area relies on gap methods, consistency, excess, deficit (comparisons <strong>of</strong> the pace <strong>of</strong><br />

growth in a given industry or sector), pr<strong>of</strong>itability matrix (based on the economic concept <strong>of</strong> value added<br />

and relative market share), Argenti’s scoring model (financial and organizational areas, management<br />

efficiency, accounting, weak signals), SPACE (developed by H. Rowe, R. Mason and K. Dickel), BSC –<br />

Balanced ScoreCard (developed by R. Kaplan and D. Norton), REC – Risk Exposure Calculator (R.<br />

Simons), or a system for detecting weak signals through peripheral vision (G.S. Day and P.J.H.<br />

Schoemaker).<br />

Insolvency – a destructive effect <strong>of</strong> crisis and failure to respond<br />

An overt crisis, characterised by visible difficulties in corporate functioning, poses a threat to the<br />

company’s economic existence. It is the last phase in which crisis can be overcome through taking<br />

appropriate sanative measures, otherwise leading to insolvency. This condition usually results from a<br />

long–term financial crisis – a smoldering crisis. A crisis which is not overcome in due time inevitably leads<br />

to insolvency and bankruptcy [Zelek 2002]. More specifically, insolvency is a legal interpretation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

company’s crisis from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> insolvency and recovery laws in which the term insolvency is a<br />

key concept. In a broad sense, insolvency is an economic phenomenon resulting from the entrepreneur’s<br />

right to carry out independent activities and the acceptance <strong>of</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> losing that right, leading to<br />

corporate insolvency (insolvency sensu largo and economic distress). It can be caused by economic or<br />

financial factors, and it can be identified and assessed with the use <strong>of</strong> NPV (Net Present Value), which<br />

translates into two types <strong>of</strong> this phenomenon [Wihlborg, Gangopadhyay 2001]. Insolvency as an economic<br />

condition is referred to by some authors as bankruptcy to differentiate it from the legal term <strong>of</strong> insolvency<br />

(in Polish law), which is not always consistent with the terminology <strong>of</strong> international law. Moreover, the<br />

legal construct is a broader concept which, apart from insolvency procedures, also includes recovery<br />

measures. Its objective is to help companies recover their ability to compete on the market.<br />

Corporate insolvency is defined in different ways, and the term bankruptcy is <strong>of</strong>ten used interchangeably,<br />

being currently referred to in literatures as insolvency or distress [Prusak 2011].<br />

A. Zelek defines three main aspects <strong>of</strong> understanding the notion <strong>of</strong> insolvency: the legal aspect<br />

(insolvency resulting from the company’s failure to meet its financial obligations, court judgments and<br />

enforced satisfaction <strong>of</strong> creditors’ demands); the economic aspect (financial distress – difficulties related to<br />

payments and/or company assets); the organizational aspect (bankruptcy proceedings) [Zelek, 2003].<br />

Insolvency can also be viewed as a financial condition (lack <strong>of</strong> funds for debt servicing – closer to the legal<br />

concept) or a process (deteriorating financial results – closer to the notion <strong>of</strong> crisis) [Nahotko 2003].<br />

Moreover, deteriorating financial conditions do not necessarily imply insolvency or its inevitability.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, it is <strong>of</strong> vital importance to be able to define the moment in time when insolvency occurs.<br />

<strong>The</strong> notion and occurrence <strong>of</strong> insolvency imply a certain contradiction. On the one hand, corporate<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

257


functioning is based on the going concern principle – companies are not restricted in their activities in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> the time <strong>of</strong> their operations or the necessity or intention to cease their business activity or to<br />

considerably reduce its scope. On the other hand, a capitalist economic system accepts the possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

business failure, thus ensuring a more effective allocation <strong>of</strong> resources. J.A. Schumpeter makes a very clear<br />

statement: insolvency implies “creative destruction” – the destruction and elimination <strong>of</strong> companies<br />

which do not create value but destroy it. As a result, better conditions are created for establishing new<br />

companies [Schumpeter 1995].<br />

E. Mczyska shares the view on the inevitable failure <strong>of</strong> ineffective and unrecoverable<br />

companies, but she also recommends <strong>of</strong>fering public support to those entities which are in the condition<br />

<strong>of</strong> temporary crisis. Ineffective companies are the ones whose assets could be more pr<strong>of</strong>itable in<br />

alternative business conditions (as a result <strong>of</strong> insolvency proceedings). Effective companies, on the other<br />

hand, create greater value when they continue to carry out business operations (going concern), and they<br />

deserve external assistance [Mczyska, Zawadzki 2006].<br />

In conclusion, insolvency is closely related to, or results from corporate threats and crises. It is<br />

widely discussed in economic theories, especially those which focus on corporate operations. A. Schwartz<br />

identifies two major trends: the positive trends – they identify the correlations between corporate<br />

insolvency and other fundamental economic categories (economic growth and its dynamics, demand and<br />

supply, business cycles, etc.), and the normative trends – they seek new solutions for improving<br />

insolvency procedures, and they focus on developing rules for rationalising this phenomenon [Schwartz<br />

2005].<br />

In a broader sense, insolvency should also be viewed in its macroeconomic dimension. It refers to<br />

the insolvency <strong>of</strong> the particular nations as well as to the correlation between corporate insolvency and<br />

business cycles. According to D. Appenzeller, one <strong>of</strong> the symptoms <strong>of</strong> deteriorating macroeconomic<br />

conditions is the number <strong>of</strong> companies which file for bankruptcy. He treats it as a barometer <strong>of</strong> the<br />

soundness <strong>of</strong> an economy and government policy [Hadasik 1998]. <strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> research studies confirm<br />

a correlation between the current economic situation and the number <strong>of</strong> business failures. This correlation<br />

is much stronger in advanced economies than in developing ones due to a great number <strong>of</strong> disturbances<br />

in weaker economic systems.<br />

Methods for analysing threats to corporate functioning<br />

An analysis <strong>of</strong> corporate crises is based on two measures: the percentage <strong>of</strong> insolvency proceedings and<br />

the degree <strong>of</strong> going concern threat.<br />

<strong>The</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> threat can be referred to corporate insolvency in an economic sense – a threat to the going<br />

concern principle and insolvency threat (insolvency sensu largo). Apart from the economic approach, the<br />

legal approach can be adopted (insolvency sensu stricto), i.e. insolvency proceedings stipulated by Polish<br />

bankruptcy and recovery laws and opened by the courts <strong>of</strong> general jurisdiction against debtor companies.<br />

<strong>The</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> insolvency proceedings represents the relation between the number <strong>of</strong> such<br />

proceedings and the number <strong>of</strong> companies (calculated per 10,000 entities).<br />

An assessment <strong>of</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong> financial threats is based on the author’s financial threat and going<br />

concern threat prediction model with the use <strong>of</strong> Firth’s logistic regression. <strong>The</strong> need for developing a<br />

unique model results from the fact that the existing prediction models are not applicable due to their<br />

structural deficiencies and restricted scope <strong>of</strong> applications, especially in terms <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> training sets<br />

which do not exceed several dozen companies filing for bankruptcy. An analysis <strong>of</strong> the entire sector <strong>of</strong><br />

non–financial organizations must be based on a different research tool.<br />

In Firth’s logistic regression model likelihood function<br />

is replaced by its modification:<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

258


where represents diagonal elements <strong>of</strong> matrix , – data matrix, and W –<br />

diagonal matrix whose –th diagonal element equals . <strong>The</strong> modification <strong>of</strong><br />

equation is identical with the modification <strong>of</strong> likelihood function , where<br />

represents information matrix, while function is referred to as penalized likelihood function. <strong>The</strong><br />

above described approach, as compared with the maximum likelihood method, considerably reduces the<br />

assessment burden, while trust levels are characterised by better probabilistic properties.<br />

<strong>The</strong> research studies conducted over the period <strong>of</strong> several years on a large sample <strong>of</strong> logistic regression<br />

models (one general and 3 specific ones) lead to unique results thanks to the application <strong>of</strong> innovative<br />

specific techniques [Kaczmarek 2011]. <strong>The</strong> training set is composed <strong>of</strong> 426 insolvent companies and 1,936<br />

solvent entities (selected with the use <strong>of</strong> case–control ”1 to 5” technique), belonging to 8 basic categories <strong>of</strong><br />

PKD (the Polish Classification <strong>of</strong> Activities), including production, service and trading companies.<br />

Table 1. <strong>The</strong> construction elements <strong>of</strong> the estimated financial threat model<br />

Model formula, assessment <strong>of</strong> parameters and transformation <strong>of</strong> ratios<br />

Z 1 = (W 1 – 1,89)/1,09; W 1 – asset productivity ratio,<br />

Z 2 = (W 3 – 0,39)/0,31; W 3 – self–financing ratio,<br />

Z 3 = (W 6 – 0,47)/0,27; W 6 – short–term debt ratio,<br />

Z 4 = (W 19 – 2,94)/13,46; W 19 – asset operating pr<strong>of</strong>itability ratio.<br />

Note: model efficiency: sensitivity 82.4%, specificity 82.1%, AUC 0.894 (Area Under Curve – area under<br />

ROC curve – Receiver Operating Characteristic).<br />

Source: author’s research based on Kaczmarek (2011).<br />

<strong>The</strong> measure resulting from the application <strong>of</strong> the model – a degree <strong>of</strong> financial threat – assumes values<br />

within the range (0,100%). Higher values indicate a higher probability <strong>of</strong> insolvency in the period <strong>of</strong> one<br />

year. It facilitates a quantitative description <strong>of</strong> the scale <strong>of</strong> changes <strong>of</strong> the phenomenon <strong>of</strong> insolvency in a<br />

dynamic approach, comparing the degrees <strong>of</strong> threat in the particular categories and groups <strong>of</strong> companies.<br />

<strong>The</strong> models developed so far and described in literatures do not have such properties.<br />

A retrospective assessment <strong>of</strong> threats to corporate functioning in Poland<br />

Three distinct periods can be identified in the Polish systemic transformation with regard to the<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> insolvency proceedings. <strong>The</strong> initial period <strong>of</strong> the transformation process is characterised by<br />

a rapid increase in the number <strong>of</strong> insolvency proceedings in relation to a negative value <strong>of</strong> GDP growth<br />

rates, which was positive again in 1992, while the number <strong>of</strong> insolvencies rose steadily. Undoubtedly,<br />

such relations are due to the scope and character <strong>of</strong> changes resulting from the shift towards a new type <strong>of</strong><br />

economy.<br />

<strong>The</strong> 1993–2008 period records three cases <strong>of</strong> the occurrence <strong>of</strong> the above described regularity: GDP growth<br />

– decrease in the number <strong>of</strong> insolvency proceedings, lowered GDP growth – increase in the number <strong>of</strong><br />

insolvencies. <strong>The</strong> global crisis <strong>of</strong> 2008, resulting in an economic slowdown in Poland, disturbed the<br />

hitherto recorded regularity. Apart from an economic recovery in 2010 and 2011 (GDP growth rate<br />

changes: 3.8% and 4.3%, respectively), the percentage <strong>of</strong> insolvency proceedings increases (see Fig. 1). Q1<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

259


2012 figures indicate an increase in the absolute and relative numbers <strong>of</strong> insolvent companies in Poland.<br />

Considering the expected decrease in GDP growth rates in 2012 to the level <strong>of</strong> 2.5%, it is a pessimistic<br />

scenario for the sector <strong>of</strong> non–financial companies in Poland (the sector accounts for more than 45% <strong>of</strong><br />

GDP and nearly 53% <strong>of</strong> total value added). <strong>The</strong> negative trend is likely to change in 2014, if the GDP<br />

growth rate reaches the level <strong>of</strong> 3.2%.<br />

Figure 1. Changes in GDP and the number <strong>of</strong> insolvency proceedings in Poland in 1990–2011<br />

8.0%<br />

450<br />

400<br />

3.0%<br />

-2.0%<br />

-7.0%<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

-12.0%<br />

Changes in GDP (left axis)<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> insolvency proceedings - per 10,000 entities (right axis)<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Source: author’s research based on figures published by the Central Statistical Office, Warzawa, PontInfo<br />

Ltd. Warszawa, C<strong>of</strong>ace Poland Warszawa.<br />

<strong>The</strong> monitoring <strong>of</strong> companies from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> going concern and insolvency threats, based on<br />

the estimated models and conducted since 2007, facilitates a multidimensional national and regional<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> their condition by core business (production, trade and services), size (small, medium and<br />

large) and category <strong>of</strong> activity (PKD). <strong>The</strong> economic slowdown recorded since 2008 increases the degree <strong>of</strong><br />

corporate threats. A negative trend is recorded in service companies (a steady increase), trading<br />

companies are characterised by higher levels <strong>of</strong> fluctuations, while production companies operate in more<br />

favourable conditions (lower levels <strong>of</strong> financial threat) – see Fig. 2.<br />

Figure 2. Degree <strong>of</strong> financial threat in non–financial companies in Poland by core business from the first<br />

half <strong>of</strong> 2007 to the second half <strong>of</strong> 2011<br />

28.00%<br />

26.00%<br />

24.00%<br />

22.00%<br />

20.00%<br />

18.00%<br />

16.00%<br />

14.00%<br />

12.00%<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

260<br />

Q1-2 2007 Q3-4 2007 Q1-2 2008 Q3-4 2008 Q1-2 2009 Q3-4 2009 Q1-2 2010 Q3-4 2010 Q1-2 2011<br />

Total Production Trade Services


Source: author’s research based on figures published by the Central Statistical Office, Warzawa, PontInfo<br />

Ltd. Warszawa, C<strong>of</strong>ace Poland Warszawa.<br />

Conclusions<br />

<strong>The</strong> direct applicability <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> measures to the cases <strong>of</strong> insolvency in an economic and legal sense<br />

is conditioned by a clear identification <strong>of</strong> information conveyed by these measures. However, it does not<br />

imply that there is no correlation between the measures in question. <strong>The</strong> figures related to going concern<br />

and insolvency threats and insolvency proceedings are similar in the period from the first half <strong>of</strong> 2007 to<br />

the first half <strong>of</strong> 2011. This is another argument confirming the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the estimated model for<br />

determining the degree <strong>of</strong> corporate insolvency threat. Tests for correlation in time series for the values <strong>of</strong><br />

both measures have been conducted to assess their mutual interdependence. In the case <strong>of</strong> the logistic<br />

regression model for companies Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient stands at the level <strong>of</strong> 0.67. It<br />

implies a strong and statistically significant correlation (P


Bufford S.I., Adler De Carl L., Brooks S.B., Krieger M.S. (2001), International Insolvency, Federal Judical Center,<br />

Washington.<br />

Cabaa P. (2008), Systemy wczesnego ostrzegania w przedsibiorstwie, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w<br />

Krakowie, Kraków.<br />

Crocford G.N. (1982), <strong>The</strong> Bibiography and history <strong>of</strong> Risk management, “<strong>The</strong> Geneva Papers on Risk and<br />

Insurance”, vol. 7.<br />

Cwynar A., Cwynar W. (2002), Zarzdzanie wartoci spóki kapitaowej. Koncepcje, systemy, narzdzia,<br />

FRRwP, Warszawa.<br />

Day S.G., Schoemaker P.J.H. (2006), Peripheral Vision. Detecting Weak Signals That Will Make or Break Your<br />

Company, HBS Press, Boston.<br />

Ellis J., Williams D. (1997), Strategia przedsibiorstwa a analiza finansowa. Pozycja na rynku kapitaowym,<br />

FRRwP, Warszawa.<br />

Fraser D.R., Fraser L.M. (1996), Ocena wyników dziaalnoci banku komercyjnego, Zwizek Banków<br />

Polskich, Warszawa.<br />

Hadasik D. (1998), Upado przedsibiorstw w Polsce i metody jej prognozowania, Zeszyty Naukowe no.<br />

153, Akademia Ekonomiczna w Poznaniu, Pozna.<br />

Hozer J. (1996), Poszukiwanie norm proporcji gospodarczych, „Przegld Statystyczny”, vol. 1–2.<br />

Kaczmarek J. (2011), Przedsibiorstwa w okresie kryzysu. Retrospektywna analiza zmian stopnia zagroenia,<br />

„Przegld Organizacji”, vol. 10.<br />

Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. (2001), Strategiczna karta wyników, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.<br />

Kasiewicz S., Krysiak Z., Gogowski W., Metody badania przedsibiorstw zagroonych upadoci, [In:]<br />

Appenzeller D. (ed.) (2004), Upado przedsibiorstw w Polsce w latach 1990–2003: teoria i praktyka, Zeszyty<br />

Naukowe no. 49, Akademia Ekonomiczna w Poznaniu, Pozna.<br />

Komiski A.K., Piotrowski W. (eds.) (1996), Zarzdzanie. Teoria i praktyka, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN,<br />

Warszawa.<br />

Krupski R. (1993), Metody i organizacja planowania strategicznego w przedsibiorstwie, Ossolineum,<br />

Wrocaw.<br />

Lam J. (2003), Ten Predictions for risk management, “<strong>The</strong> RMA Journal”, vol. 5.<br />

Mczyska E. (ed.) (2010), Meandry upadoci przedsibiorstw. Klska czy druga szansa, SGH, Warszawa.<br />

Mczyska E., Upado przedsibiorstw w kontekcie ekonomii kryzysu, [In:] Morawska S. (ed.) (2011),<br />

Zarzdzanie przedsibiorstwem w kryzysie, SGH, Warszawa.<br />

Mczyska E., Zawadzki M. (2006), Dyskryminacyjne modele predykcji bankructwa przedsibiorstw,<br />

Ekonomista”, vol. 2.<br />

Nahotko S. (2003), Zarzdzanie przedsibiorstwem w warunkach upadoci, AJG, Bydgoszcz.<br />

Nogalski B., Marcinkiewicz H. (2004), Zarzdzanie antykryzysowe przedsibiorstwem. Pokona kryzys i<br />

wygra, Difin, Warszawa.<br />

Obój K. (1993), Strategia sukcesu firmy, PWE, Warszawa.<br />

Oldcorn R. (1996), Management: A fresh Approach, Palgrave MacMillan Publishers, London.<br />

Platt H.D., Platt M.B. (2002), Predicting Corporate Financial Distress: Reflection on Choice–Based Sample<br />

Bias, “Journal <strong>of</strong> Economics and Finance”, vol. 26<br />

Prusak B. (2011), Ekonomiczna analiza upadoci przedsibiorstw. Ujcie midzynarodowe, CeDeWu,<br />

Warszawa.<br />

Prusak B. (ed.) (2007), Ekonomiczne i prawne aspekty upadoci przedsibiorstw, Difin, Warszawa.<br />

Quinn B., Cameron K. (1983), Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria <strong>of</strong> Effectiveness: Some<br />

Preliminary Evidence, “Management Science”, vol. 1.<br />

Rogowski W. (1999), Moliwoci wczesnego rozpoznania symptomów zagroenia zdolnoci patniczej<br />

przedsibiorstwa, „Bank i Kredyt”, vol. 6.<br />

Róaski J. (2001), Ewolucja metod bankowej oceny sytuacji ekonomiczno–finansowej przedsibiorstwa w<br />

nowoczesnej gospodarce rynkowej, „Przegld Organizacji”, vol. 10.<br />

Schumpeter J.A. (1995), Kapitalizm. Socjalizm. Demokracja, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.<br />

Schwartz A. (2005), Normative <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Business Bankruptcy, “Virginia Law Rewiev”, vol. 91.<br />

Siegel J.G., Shim J.K., Hartman S.W. (1995), Przewodnik po finansach, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN,<br />

Warszawa.<br />

Simons R. (2005), Czy wiesz jak due ryzyko ukryte jest w twojej firmie, „HBR Polska”, vol. 26.<br />

Siudak M. (2001), Zarzdzanie wartoci przedsibiorstwa, Politechnika Warszawska, Warszawa.<br />

Stabrya A. (2000), Zarzdzanie strategiczne w teorii i praktyce firmy, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN,<br />

Warszawa.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

262


Stpie P., Strk T., Analiza ksztatowania si procesów upadociowych w polskiej gospodarce lat<br />

dziewidziesitych, [In:] Zarzecki D. (ed.) (2002), Zarzdzanie Finansami. Klasyczne zasady – nowoczesne<br />

narzdzia, Uniwersytet Szczeciski, Szczecin.<br />

Virgos M., Schmit E. (1996), Report on the Convention on Insolvency Proceedings, EEC Council, Brussels.<br />

Wieczerzyska B. (2009), Kryzys w przedsibiorstwie, CeDeWu, Warszawa.<br />

Wihlborg C., Gangopadhyay S. (2001), Infrastructure Requirements in the Area <strong>of</strong> Bankruptcy Law,<br />

“Working Papers”, vol. 1–9, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Zaleska M. (2002), Identyfikacja ryzyka upadoci przedsibiorstwa i banku. Systemy wczesnego<br />

ostrzegania, Difin, Warszawa.<br />

Zavgren C. (1983), <strong>The</strong> Prediction <strong>of</strong> Corporate Failure: <strong>The</strong> State <strong>of</strong> Art, “Journal <strong>of</strong> Accounting Literature”,<br />

vol. 2.<br />

Zelek A. (2002), Wczesna identyfikacja kryzysu ucieczk od bankructwa, „Przegld Organizacji”, vol. 2.<br />

Zelek A. (2003), Zarzdzanie kryzysem w przedsibiorstwie – perspektywa strategiczna, IOiZwP Orgmasz,<br />

Warszawa.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

263


Challenges <strong>of</strong> Sustainability and Urgan<br />

Development in Nigeria:<br />

Reviewing the Millenium Development Goals<br />

Gladys Ann Owobu<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Urban and Regional Planning<br />

Esan South East LGA, Edo State<br />

Keywords<br />

Urbanisation, global challenge, erective environmental consciousness, planning and development.<br />

Abstract<br />

Sustainable urbanization is a global challenge. Rapid urban expansion without effective environmental<br />

consciousness means that in virtually every urban center, a substantial proportion <strong>of</strong> the population is at risk from<br />

natural and human-induced environmental hazards.<br />

This paper examines some <strong>of</strong> the challenges <strong>of</strong> urbanization and sustainable development in Nigeria. An<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> the nation’s implementation <strong>of</strong> the United Nations Millennium Development goals is done. <strong>The</strong> paper<br />

examines the goals pertaining to poverty alleviation and environmental sustainability and their application in<br />

Nigerian urban centers.<br />

It was discovered that none <strong>of</strong> the identified goals or targets has been adequately addressed. <strong>The</strong>refore, the<br />

Nigerian City is far from achieving Sustainable Development. <strong>The</strong> paper concludes by recommending some urban<br />

planning strategies for achieving sustainable urban development.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

264


Incentives to encourage Socio-environmental<br />

Responsible Corporate Actions: Willingness to<br />

Pay for Non-use value <strong>of</strong> land – Case <strong>of</strong> Backpackers<br />

in Fiji<br />

Filipo Tokalau<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Economics, University <strong>of</strong> the South Pacific,<br />

Suva, Fiji Islands<br />

Keywords<br />

Land conflict, traditional societies, willingness to pay, communal use <strong>of</strong> land, backpacker tourism,<br />

sustainability<br />

Abstract<br />

Land conflict is a perennial problem <strong>of</strong> development in Fiji. I-taukeis or Indigenous Fijians perceive land in<br />

its entirety so they tend to expect more than just the payment to the economic or direct values <strong>of</strong> land. This study<br />

examined the extent to which backpackers were willing to pay (WTP) for the communal use <strong>of</strong> land and in doing so<br />

tended to vindicate that this type <strong>of</strong> tourists can also be socially responsible to improving the welfare <strong>of</strong> I-taukeis<br />

especially in tourism-related businesses. Using a Mixed approach technique, the paper study found that a relatively<br />

high proportion <strong>of</strong> backpackers were willing to pay for the communal use <strong>of</strong> land because they perceive it as<br />

important to landowners welfare. <strong>The</strong> paper suggested that in the long term, WTP can provide a basis for<br />

economically analyzing the use <strong>of</strong> passive values <strong>of</strong> environmental tourism resources which could facilitate the<br />

industry’s growth and performance. In the interim, the study suggested that WTP for communal land use could also<br />

alleviate potential land-related problems. In that regard it was considered that WTP would be an incentive to<br />

encouraging socio-environmental responsible corporate actions towards business and development in Fiji. <strong>The</strong> study<br />

had wider implications for land-scarce traditional economies in developing countries <strong>of</strong> the South Pacific and<br />

elsewhere where this resource is owned as a communal resource.<br />

.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

265


Testing the Export-led Growth Hypothesis for Sub Saharan<br />

Africa Countries (SSA). A Panel Data Analysis<br />

Francis Atsu & Samuel Adams<br />

Ghana Institute <strong>of</strong> Management and Public Administration, Ghana<br />

Extended Abstract<br />

In the global economy, there is the perception that an economy exposed to international trade has the<br />

opportunity to benefit from consumer markets, new technologies, FDI and consequently overall economic growth<br />

(Araujo and Soares, 2011). Indeed, many economists claim that trade liberalization that leads to export expansion<br />

promotes growth (Krueger, 1978; Balassa, 1978; Feder, 1983). It is not surprising that the success <strong>of</strong> many Asian<br />

economies especially China has been attributed to an export-led strategy.<br />

Economic theories indicate that the beneficial effects <strong>of</strong> trade occur through both static and dynamic gains<br />

(Thirlwal, 2000). <strong>The</strong> static gains occur through the reallocation <strong>of</strong> resources from one sector to the other as<br />

increased specialization based on comparative advantage takes place as explained by the classical trade theories <strong>of</strong><br />

Adam Smith, Ricardo, and Hescher and Ohlin. <strong>The</strong>se trade creation gains, according to Thirlwal are once-for-all.<br />

<strong>The</strong> dynamic gains, on the other hand, are associated with externalities related to exports, for example, the influx <strong>of</strong><br />

FDI, new technology diffusion and transfer, and higher productivity levels associated with economies <strong>of</strong> scale, which<br />

continually shifts outward the production possibility frontier (Thirlwal, 2000; Agosin, Alvarez, and Bravo-Ortega,<br />

2011). This paradigm is part <strong>of</strong> a consensus among economists about the benefits <strong>of</strong> economic openness, which has<br />

been used to justify globalization (Palley, 2011). <strong>The</strong> claim is that trade encourages technology diffusion and<br />

knowledge spillovers that contribute to faster productivity growth as suggested by the modern and new trade<br />

theories (Grossman and Helpman, 1999; Helman and Krugman, 1985). Empirically, while some studies report that<br />

export promote economic growth (Shiok et al., 2011; Bbaale and Mutenyo, 2011; Galimberti, 2009), others suggest<br />

that it is growth that rather causes export exports (Nushiwat, 2008; Bahmani-Oskooee et al, 2005; Reppas and<br />

Christopoulos ,2005)<br />

and some studies also indicate no relationship exports and economic growth (Pazim, 2009; Palley, 2011; Mishra,<br />

2010)<br />

<strong>The</strong> discussion above suggests that the export growth relationship is an empirical one and most studies have<br />

not considered the threshold effects <strong>of</strong> exports on economic growth Africa. Consequently, this paper adds to empirical<br />

literature by investigating the export-led growth hypothesis and threshold effects <strong>of</strong> exports on economic growth for<br />

selected Sub Saharan Africa (SSA) countries. <strong>The</strong> paper uses the Arellano and Bond(1991) difference (AB) and<br />

Arellano and Bover (1995)/Blundell and Bond(1998) system (BB) generalized methods <strong>of</strong> moments (GMM) as panel<br />

dynamic estimation techniques to study the long-run dynamics among exports growth and real output growth over<br />

the period <strong>of</strong> 1970–2010.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

266


Cross Country Analysis <strong>of</strong> GCC Economic Risk<br />

Hassan Mounir El-Sady,<br />

Gulf University for Science and Technology, Kuwait<br />

Vasilya Sultanova,<br />

Australian College <strong>of</strong> Kuwait, Kuwait<br />

Keywords<br />

GCC, Country Risk, Economic Risk Analysis.<br />

Abstract<br />

In literature, Gulf Cooperation Council’s (GCC) economies are classified as Oil & Gas economy with the<br />

same macroeconomics drivers. This paper provides the first empirical analysis <strong>of</strong> the GCC economies to explore the<br />

drivers <strong>of</strong> each GCC country economic risk and how they differ from one GCC country to another. It examines and<br />

compares the GCC country economic risk in a cross sectional analysis methodology over the period <strong>of</strong> January 2000<br />

to December 2011. <strong>The</strong> six GCC countries; Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Saudi Arabia (KSA), Kuwait, United Arab <strong>of</strong> Emirates<br />

(UAE), Qatar, Sultanate <strong>of</strong> Oman, and Bahrain are included in the study.<br />

Results reveal that Kuwait and UAE, in term <strong>of</strong> economic risk, are the safe land for local and international<br />

investment to be allocated in GCC due to their very high rating and stability <strong>of</strong> economic risk in comparison to other<br />

GCC countries. Results also reveal that KSA, Qatar and Bahrain are considered to be countries with instable<br />

country economic risk in comparison to other GCC countries. Findings also disclose that each GCC country is a<br />

unique case in term <strong>of</strong> its drives <strong>of</strong> economic risk. Results indicated that while KSA’s economic risk is driven by<br />

budget balance as percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP, Kuwait’s economic risk is driven by real GDP growth, and UAE’s economic<br />

risk is driven by GDP per Head <strong>of</strong> Population; Qatar, Oman, and Bahrain economic risk are driven by current<br />

account as percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP.<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> macro drivers <strong>of</strong> country risk received extensive interest <strong>of</strong> researchers reflecting a major<br />

concern <strong>of</strong> country risk. This growing body <strong>of</strong> literature did not show enough interest to study GCC<br />

country risk. Also, the international economic society is dealing with GCC countries as one Oil & Gas<br />

economy with the same trends. <strong>The</strong> neglected efforts to explore the drivers <strong>of</strong> GCC country economic risk<br />

and its subcomponents <strong>of</strong> macroeconomic factors did not attract enough international capital to be<br />

allocated in the GCC. In contrast, GCC’s capital is increasingly allocated overseas.<br />

<strong>The</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> this paper is to provide the first extensive empirical analysis <strong>of</strong> the drivers <strong>of</strong> GCC<br />

country economic risk which has been neglected in literature, except KSA. It is designed to investigate the<br />

macroeconomic drivers <strong>of</strong> each GCC country economic risk. Results from this study can assist both<br />

international and local investors to allocate their capital in GCC by providing them a list <strong>of</strong> the important<br />

and volatile macroeconomic factors that drive each specific GCC country economic risk. Also, GCC’s<br />

policy makers can benefit from the attempt <strong>of</strong> this study to highlight the drivers <strong>of</strong> GCC’s economic<br />

system that discourage international and/or local capital from being allocated in GCC and negatively<br />

influence the country investment pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />

We argue that economic risk is driven differently across GCC countries. To prove this argument,<br />

time series analysis is applied to explore and indicate the impact <strong>of</strong> macroeconomic factors on each GCC<br />

country economic risk. <strong>The</strong>se relationships will be investigated utilizing the Ordinary Lest Squared (OLS)<br />

estimator on predetermined macroeconomic factors. <strong>The</strong> study is carried out over the period <strong>of</strong> January<br />

2000 to December 2011 and capitalizes on the monthly published reports by the International Country<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

267


Risk Guide (ICRG) <strong>of</strong> the Political Risk Services Inc. (PRS), the World Bank. This study includes all GCC<br />

countries: KSA, Kuwait, UAE, Qatar, Sultanate <strong>of</strong> Oman, and Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Bahrain.<br />

This paper is organized as follows. First part contains an introduction to the study. Literature<br />

review <strong>of</strong> country risk and its impact on capital markets in developed and emerging markets will be<br />

provided in the second part. Third part intents to set the problem definition, objectives, dependent,<br />

independent variables, and methodology. Analysis and discussion <strong>of</strong> the findings will be presented in the<br />

fourth part. Finally, fifth part is to conclude the study and to provide recommendations to policy makers<br />

and investors. Limitations and further researches related to this study will also be highlighted in the last<br />

part.<br />

Literature Review<br />

In their study, Vij and Kapoor (2007) investigated whether the economic, political and social<br />

cultural factors have any effect on the Indian risk rating. Results show that the country risk in India is<br />

driven by economic factors more than by the political risk. Vij and Kapoor (2007) indicated that different<br />

investors do invest in the Indian capital market for its low political risk. Examining the magnitude <strong>of</strong><br />

political, financial, and economic risk and their components on a portfolio and direct investment<br />

decisions, El-Sady et al. (2003 A, B, C) pointed out that country risk measures are correlated with equity<br />

returns and capital allocation in emerging markets more than in developed markets. <strong>The</strong> developed<br />

model by Clark and Tunaru (2001) that measures the impact <strong>of</strong> country political risk on investment shows<br />

the ability to price country political risk. While the study <strong>of</strong> Flannery and Protopapadakis (2001) pointed<br />

out that markets risk and return, therefore allocation <strong>of</strong> capital are driven by economic risk. Examining the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> country’s macroeconomic factors on the capital market return, Diamonte et al. (1996) shows that<br />

political risk plays more important roles in emerging markets as a driver <strong>of</strong> capital markets returns than it<br />

does in developed markets. Investigating the drivers <strong>of</strong> country risk and capital market development, El-<br />

Sady et al. (2009) results show that country economic, financial, and political risk play crucial roles in<br />

driving specific country risk.<br />

In a multiple factors model, Vij (2005) investigated the effect <strong>of</strong> political and economic factors on<br />

its country rating and found that country economic and political risk serve as good indicators <strong>of</strong> country<br />

risk rating. El-Sady et al. (2003, B) provide strong evidences that country economic and political risk drive<br />

Latin America emerging markets risk and return. This evidence was also supported by El-Sady et al. (2003,<br />

A), results show that Middle East and Africa emerging markets risk are driven by different<br />

subcomponents <strong>of</strong> their countries economic, political, and financial risk. <strong>The</strong> investigation <strong>of</strong> Chen et al.<br />

(2005) for the relation between political risk and emerging markets risk revealed that political risk has<br />

important rules in explaining emerging markets’ risk. Within the context <strong>of</strong> developed markets, El-Sady et<br />

al. (2003, C) proved the impact <strong>of</strong> country risk on developed markets risk and return. Susan (2008) claimed<br />

that country risk have received poor track record <strong>of</strong> investigation before the financial crises.<br />

Clark and Radu (2001), Khoury (2003), and Dar-Hsin et al. (2005) examined the relationship<br />

between country macro drivers <strong>of</strong> risk and capital allocation, they found that country risk can be used to<br />

assist investors in their selection <strong>of</strong> countries for international capital allocation. <strong>The</strong> relationship between<br />

the country risk and country return in emerging and developed markets was examined by Diamonte et al.<br />

(1996), Harvey (2004), Vij (2005), and Hsin et al. (2005). All mentioned studies provide evidences <strong>of</strong> strong<br />

relationship between country macro drivers <strong>of</strong> risk and country return. <strong>The</strong> relationship between return<br />

and country financial risk was verified by Harvey (2004), and Hoti (2004). Country economic risk is found<br />

to have a predictive power in the studies <strong>of</strong> Flannery and Protopapadakis (2001), Harvey (2004), Hoti<br />

(2004), and Vij (2005).<br />

As shown in literature review, GCC countries’ risk analysis did not receive attention in literature.<br />

Only the study <strong>of</strong> Onour (2007) investigated the short and long-term drivers <strong>of</strong> GCC capital markets’<br />

return volatility. It shows that the change in the oil price has its way to influence major macroeconomic<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

268


indicators that influence GCC stock markets return. <strong>The</strong>refore, this study considered to be the first in<br />

literature to investigate empirically the drivers <strong>of</strong> GCC country economic risk to give an insight to<br />

international, regional, and local investors when they allocate their capital worldwide. Also, it put a<br />

roadmap for GCC’s policy makers to improve their economies’ attractiveness.<br />

Methodology and Data<br />

This paper investigates empirically the drivers <strong>of</strong> each GCC country economic risk to explore<br />

whether it is formed differently by macroeconomic factors, or not. It argues that there is a causal<br />

relationship between country economic risk and its macroeconomic factors. <strong>The</strong> independent variables<br />

that serve the purpose <strong>of</strong> this study are macroeconomic factors. <strong>The</strong>se factors are; GDP per Head <strong>of</strong><br />

Population (GDP/HP), Real GDP Growth (RGDPG), Annual Inflation Rate (AI), Budget Balance as a<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP (BB), Current Account as a Percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP (CA/GDP).<br />

<strong>The</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to provide an empirical analysis <strong>of</strong> country economic risk rating <strong>of</strong> all<br />

GCC’s members. Time series analysis will be utilized for a comparative assessment <strong>of</strong> ICRG’s economic<br />

ratings regarding GCC countries. Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) analysis is used to examine the<br />

relationship between each GCC country economic risk and its sub-macroeconomic factors using monthly<br />

rating for the period January 2000 – December 2011 provided by the ICRG. Measures are ex-ante measures<br />

since it is reasonable to expect that they could have impact on the country economic risk and the capital<br />

market.<br />

This paper hypothesizes to answer the following major question: “Is country economic risk driven<br />

by different macroeconomic factors across the GCC” <strong>The</strong> null hypothesis (H 0) and alternative hypothesis<br />

(H a) are stated as follows:<br />

H 0: GCC country economic risk cannot be explained differently across the GCC by its specific submacroeconomic<br />

factors.<br />

H a: GCC country economic risk can be explained differently across the GCC by its specific submacroeconomic<br />

factors.<br />

Also, this paper assumes that there is a causality relationship between GCC country economic risk<br />

and its sub-macroeconomic factors. <strong>The</strong> H 0 and H a are stated as follows:<br />

H 0: <strong>The</strong>re is no causal relationship between GCC country’s economic risk and its sub-macroeconomic<br />

factors.<br />

H a: <strong>The</strong>re is a causal relationship between GCC country’s economic risk and its sub-macroeconomic<br />

factors.<br />

We argue that GCC country economic risk can be explained differently across GCC countries<br />

based on their sub-macroeconomic factors. Also, we argue that there is a causality relationship between<br />

GCC country economic risk and its sub-macroeconomic factors.<br />

<strong>The</strong> model examines the impacts <strong>of</strong> five sources <strong>of</strong> economic risk, GDP/HP, RGDPG, AI, BB, and<br />

CA/GDP. In the model: each GCC country economic risk is a function <strong>of</strong> its sub-macroeconomic factors.<br />

Firstly, I assume that Country Economic Risk (CER) is a function <strong>of</strong> its sub- macroeconomic factors<br />

expressed by equation (1):<br />

Secondly, the causality relationship between CER and its sub- macroeconomic factors expressed by the<br />

following equation (2)<br />

(1)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

269<br />

(2)


Where is a standardized vector <strong>of</strong> country economic risk at time , is a<br />

standardized vector <strong>of</strong> country GDP per Head <strong>of</strong> Population,<br />

is a standardized vectors <strong>of</strong><br />

country Real GDP Growth, is a standardized vectors <strong>of</strong> country Annual Inflation, is a<br />

standardized vector <strong>of</strong> country Budget Balance as Percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP, is a standardized<br />

vector <strong>of</strong> country Current Account as Percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP, represent the parameters <strong>of</strong> the model, and<br />

is a random error term. <strong>The</strong> standardized vector value is , where is a vector <strong>of</strong> observed<br />

values, is a vector <strong>of</strong> mean values, and is a vector <strong>of</strong> standard deviations.<br />

According to equation (2), all independent variables in the model's right side are non-random<br />

variables, except the error ( ) term which assumed to follow a normal distribution with zero mean and<br />

constant variance ( 2 ), while is a dependent variable with the same normal distribution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

random error term ( ), variance ( 2 ), and the following mean:<br />

It is assumed by the model that there is no correlation between the error ( ) term. <strong>The</strong> model<br />

represented by equation (2) is to explore the covariance between GCC country economic risk and its submacroeconomic<br />

factors.<br />

Descriptive Data Analysis<br />

According to ICRG rating systems, for any macroeconomic factors with 00.00%-49.5% <strong>of</strong> any<br />

factor’s maximum points is considered as very high risk, 50.00%-59.50% is considered as high risk,<br />

60.00%-69.50% is considered as moderate risk, 70.00%-79.50% is considered as low risk, and 80.00%-100%<br />

is considered as very low risk. Tables (1) to (6) provide the descriptive statistics <strong>of</strong> each GCC country’s<br />

economic risk.<br />

Table (1) discloses the drivers <strong>of</strong> Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Saudi Arabia (KSA) economic system. It is ranked<br />

with very low economic risk rating on average as measured by the mean <strong>of</strong> 43.18 points (86.3%). KSA’s<br />

Std. deviation <strong>of</strong> economic risk is very high and counts for 4.31 points <strong>of</strong> expected value for the country<br />

economic risk. <strong>The</strong> high Std. deviation is explained by the range <strong>of</strong> 14 points between the minimum <strong>of</strong><br />

34.5 and highest <strong>of</strong> 48.5 points. <strong>The</strong> very high Std. deviation <strong>of</strong> KSA’s economic risk is driven by the high<br />

volatility <strong>of</strong> KSA’s budget balance as percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP (BB) and current account as percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />

(CA/GDP) with 2.02 points and 1.7531 points respectively. CA/GDP and BB have the highest ranges<br />

among the rest <strong>of</strong> the factors that compose KSA’s economic risk with 5.5 points range for both <strong>of</strong> them.<br />

Also, over the study period and in term <strong>of</strong> KSA’s mean economic risk rating, annual inflation (AI) and<br />

GDP per head <strong>of</strong> population show moderate risk with mean rating percentage <strong>of</strong> 65.32% and 68.27%<br />

respectively, driving KSA’s economic risk rating down.<br />

Also, table (1) shows that GDP per head <strong>of</strong> population (GDPG/HP) and annual inflation (AI)<br />

contribute onto the stability <strong>of</strong> KSA economic system since they have the minimum volatility measured by<br />

the Std. deviation <strong>of</strong> 0.1901 and 0.5330 points among other economic risk factors. It is interesting to point<br />

out that the low Std. deviation <strong>of</strong> KSA’s GDP/HP and AI are driven by the low and stable rating points<br />

with the narrowest range <strong>of</strong> 0.50 points <strong>of</strong> all sub-macroeconomic factors, but not by high rating points <strong>of</strong><br />

these two sub-macroeconomic factors.<br />

(3)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

270


Table (1): Descriptive Statistics <strong>of</strong> Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Saudi Arabia’s Economic Risk.<br />

Macroeconomic<br />

Factors<br />

Rating<br />

(Points)<br />

Range<br />

(Points)<br />

Min.<br />

(Points)<br />

Max.<br />

(Points)<br />

Mean<br />

(Points)<br />

Mean<br />

(In %)<br />

Std.<br />

Deviation<br />

CER 50 14.00 34.50 48.50 43.19 86.38% 4.31<br />

GDP/HP 5 0.50 3.00 3.50 3.41 68.27% 0.19<br />

GDPG 10 4.00 6.00 10.00 8.14 81.44% 1.17<br />

AI 15 0.50 9.50 10.00 9.80 65.32% 0.53<br />

BB 10 5.50 4.50 10.00 8.24 82.36% 2.02<br />

CA/GDP 15 5.50 9.50 15.00 13.60 90.64% 1.75<br />

Source: Author calculation based on published data by ICRG for the period Jan. 2000 to Dec. 2011.<br />

For the State <strong>of</strong> Kuwait, table (2) reveal that Kuwait has a stable economic risk with Std. deviation<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1.83 points. This stability is driven by the high minimum rate <strong>of</strong> 42.5 points (85%), which disclose that<br />

Kuwait was enjoying a very stable economic system with a very low economic risk over the study period.<br />

<strong>The</strong> mean <strong>of</strong> the economic risk rating counts for 46.40 points (92.8%) allows Kuwait to be in the category<br />

<strong>of</strong> very low economic risk. This stability <strong>of</strong> Kuwait economic system resulted in high rating and very low<br />

economic risk is driven meanly by current account as a percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP with zero Std. deviation, where<br />

Kuwait enjoy a very liquid economy with huge surplus. Also, GDP/HP, AI, and BB with Std. deviation <strong>of</strong><br />

0.32, 0.42, and 0.58 points respectively play major roles in positioning Kuwait economic risk as a very low<br />

risk.<br />

Although Kuwait is assigned a very low economic risk, it has a major volatility fluctuating issue<br />

where GDPG has a Std. deviation <strong>of</strong> 1.32868 points with minimum rating points <strong>of</strong> 5.00 (50%). <strong>The</strong> stable<br />

high annual inflation (AI) contribute positively to the stability <strong>of</strong> Kuwait economic risk with its very low<br />

Std. deviation <strong>of</strong> 0.42 points, but negatively to the economic risk rating with mean <strong>of</strong> 9.39 (62.63%) which<br />

categorize the AI as moderate risk.<br />

Table (2): Descriptive Statistics <strong>of</strong> Kuwait’s Economic Risk.<br />

Macroeconomic<br />

Factors<br />

Rating<br />

(Points)<br />

Range<br />

(Points)<br />

Min.<br />

(Points)<br />

Max.<br />

(Points)<br />

Mean<br />

(Points)<br />

Mean<br />

(In %)<br />

Std.<br />

Deviation<br />

CER 50 7.00 42.50 49.50 46.40 92.81% 1.83<br />

GDP/HP 5 1.00 4.00 5.00 4.29 85.77% 0.32<br />

GDPG 10 5.00 5.00 10.00 8.14 81.44% 1.33<br />

AI 15 2.00 8.00 10.00 9.39 62.63% 0.42<br />

BB 10 1.50 8.50 10.00 9.58 95.77% 0.58<br />

CA/GDP 15 0.00 15.00 15.00 15.0 100% 0.00<br />

Source: Author calculation based on published data by ICRG for the period Jan. 2000 to Dec. 2011.<br />

Descriptive statistics reported in table (3) disclose the steadiness <strong>of</strong> United Arab Emirates (UAE)<br />

economic system with its very low Std. deviation <strong>of</strong> 1.35457 points and mean <strong>of</strong> 45.74 points (91.48%).<br />

<strong>The</strong>se results rank UAE as one <strong>of</strong> the countries with very low economic risk. <strong>The</strong> very low economic risk<br />

<strong>of</strong> UAE was driven by the CA/GDP and GDPG with mean <strong>of</strong> 14.6 points (97.34%) and 9.15 points<br />

(91.49%) respectively, followed by BB and GDP/HP with mean <strong>of</strong> 8.49 points (84.90%) and 4.19 points<br />

(83.85%) respectively. In contrast, annual inflation (AI), as shown in table (3) contribute negatively to the<br />

stability <strong>of</strong> UAE’s economic system and economic risk rating with its high Std. deviation <strong>of</strong> 1.8 points and<br />

low mean rating points <strong>of</strong> 8.49 <strong>of</strong> 15 points (58.01%).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

271


Table (3): Descriptive Statistics <strong>of</strong> United Arab Emirates’ Economic Risk.<br />

Macroeconomic<br />

Factors<br />

Rating<br />

(Points)<br />

Range<br />

(Points)<br />

Min.<br />

(Points)<br />

Max.<br />

(Points)<br />

Mean<br />

(Points)<br />

Mean<br />

(In %)<br />

Std.<br />

Deviation<br />

CER 50 6.00 35.50 41.50 45.74 91.48% 1.35<br />

GDP/HP 5 0.50 4.50 5.00 4.19 83.85% 0.17<br />

GDPG 10 3.00 7.00 10.00 9.15 91.49% 0.88<br />

AI 15 6.00 5.50 11.50 8.70 58.01% 1.80<br />

BB 10 2.50 7.50 10.00 8.49 84.90% 1.04<br />

CA/GDP 15 4.00 11.00 15.00 14.60 97.34% 0.88<br />

Source: Author calculation based on published data by ICRG for the period Jan. 2000 to Dec. 2011.<br />

As shown in table (4), Qatar can be classified as a country with instable economic system. <strong>The</strong><br />

economic risk rates <strong>of</strong> 48 points as maximum, 34.5 points as minimum, and 13.5 points as range resulted<br />

into the very high Std. deviation <strong>of</strong> 5.27875 points. Thus, this would categorize Qatar as a country with<br />

unstable economic system.<br />

Table (4) indicates that Qatar is within the range <strong>of</strong> very low economic risk with its mean <strong>of</strong> 44.13<br />

points (88.27%). This high rating for Qatar economic risk, showing very low economic risk, is driven by<br />

GDP/HP and GDPG <strong>of</strong> 98.56% and 92.60% respectively. This result is supported by the fact that over the<br />

last decade, Qatar is classified as one <strong>of</strong> the top world economies with the highest GDP/HP and GDPG.<br />

Still, Qatar has a major volatility issue as noted in table (4). <strong>The</strong> volatility <strong>of</strong> Qatar economic risk is driven<br />

by the CA/GDP which shows Qatari economy as illiquid economy. <strong>The</strong> high and stable AI is another<br />

issue <strong>of</strong> concern that contribute positively to the stability <strong>of</strong> Qatar economic risk with its low Std.<br />

deviation <strong>of</strong> 0.85 points, but negatively to Qatar economic risk rating with its mean <strong>of</strong> 59.47% as source <strong>of</strong><br />

high risk.<br />

Table (4): Descriptive Statistics <strong>of</strong> Qatar’s Economic Risk.<br />

Macroeconomic<br />

Factors<br />

Rating<br />

(Points)<br />

Range<br />

(Points)<br />

Min.<br />

(Points)<br />

Max.<br />

(Points)<br />

Mean<br />

(Points)<br />

Mean<br />

(In %)<br />

Std.<br />

Deviation<br />

CER 50 13.50 34.50 48.00 44.13 88.27% 5.28<br />

GDP/HP 5 0.50 4.50 5.00 4.93 98.56% 0.18<br />

GDPG 10 2.50 7.50 10.00 9.26 92.60% 0.83<br />

AI 15 2.50 7.50 10.00 8.92 59.47% 0.85<br />

BB 10 2.00 8.00 10.00 8.37 83.65% 0.78<br />

CA/GDP 15 10.00 5.00 15.00 12.46 83.08% 4.21<br />

Source: Author calculation based on published data by ICRG for the period Jan. 2000 to Dec. 2011.<br />

According to table (5), Sultanate <strong>of</strong> Oman (Oman) enjoys a very low economic risk with mean <strong>of</strong><br />

43.27 points (86.56%). This high rating is driven meanly by CA/GDP and GDPG with mean <strong>of</strong> 13.11<br />

points (87.43%) and 8.95 points (89.59%) respectively. Although CA/GDP is the main driver <strong>of</strong> high rank<br />

<strong>of</strong> Oman’s risk rating with its mean <strong>of</strong> 13.11 points (87.43%), it is considered to be the main driver <strong>of</strong><br />

Oman economic system instability with its Std. deviation <strong>of</strong> 1.79 points.<br />

Also and as shown in table (5), although GDP/HP and AI contribute to the stability <strong>of</strong> Oman<br />

economic system as explained by their very low Std. deviation <strong>of</strong> 0.23 and 0.47 points respectively. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

effect negatively Oman economic risk rating as a result <strong>of</strong> their low mean <strong>of</strong> 62.88% and 65.22%,<br />

respectively.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

272


Table (5): Descriptive Statistics <strong>of</strong> Sultanate <strong>of</strong> Oman’s Economic Risk.<br />

Macroeconomic<br />

Factors<br />

Rating<br />

(Points)<br />

Range<br />

(Points)<br />

Min.<br />

(Points)<br />

Max.<br />

(Points)<br />

Mean<br />

(Points)<br />

Mean<br />

(In %)<br />

Std.<br />

Deviation<br />

CER 50 8.00 39.00 47.00 43.2788 86.56% 2.56359<br />

GDP/HP 5 0.50 3.00 3.50 3.1442 62.88% 0.22762<br />

GDPG 10 3.00 7.00 10.00 8.9596 89.60% 0.84469<br />

AI 15 2.00 8.00 10.00 9.7837 65.22% 0.46616<br />

BB 10 3.50 6.50 10.00 8.3269 83.27% 0.90245<br />

CA/GDP 15 5.00 10.00 15.00 13.1145 87.43% 1.79259<br />

Source: Author calculation based on published data by ICRG for the period Jan. 2000 to Dec. 2011.<br />

Table (6) discloses that Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Bahrain economy was showing steady growth over the study<br />

period with high mean <strong>of</strong> 9.17 points (91.68%) and low Std. deviation <strong>of</strong> 0.29 points. Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Bahrain<br />

economy is ranked as one <strong>of</strong> the economies with very low risk on average as measured by the mean <strong>of</strong><br />

41.42 points (82.84%).<br />

Table (6) shows that Bahrain enjoys very low economic risk with its mean <strong>of</strong> 41.4183 points<br />

(82.84%). This very high rating, showing very low economic risk, is driven by GDPG <strong>of</strong> 9.17 points<br />

(91.68%). <strong>The</strong> macroeconomic factors <strong>of</strong> CA/GDP, GDP/CA, and BB fall in the range <strong>of</strong> moderate<br />

economic risk with their average points <strong>of</strong> 11.99 (79.94%), 3.59 (71.83%), and 7.06 (70.58%) respectively.<br />

Also, table (6) shows that GDPG/HP, GDP, and AI contribute onto the stability <strong>of</strong> Bahrain’s economic<br />

system since they have the minimum volatility measured by the Std. deviation <strong>of</strong> 0.35, 0.29, and 0.21<br />

points among other economic risk factors.<br />

Table 6: Descriptive Statistics <strong>of</strong> Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Bahrain’s Economic Risk.<br />

Macroeconomic<br />

Factors<br />

Rating<br />

(Points)<br />

Range<br />

(Points)<br />

Min.<br />

(Points)<br />

Max.<br />

(Points)<br />

Mean<br />

(Points)<br />

Mean<br />

(In %)<br />

Std.<br />

Deviation<br />

CER 50 12.50 37.00 49.50 41.42 82.84% 4.56<br />

GDP/HP 5 1.50 3.50 5.00 3.59 71.83% 0.35<br />

GDPG 10 1.00 9.00 10.00 9.17 91.68% 0.29<br />

AI 15 0.50 9.50 10.00 9.61 64.07% 0.21<br />

BB 10 4.50 5.50 10.00 7.06 70.58% 1.85<br />

CA/GDP 15 5.50 9.50 15.00 11.99 79.94% 2.35<br />

Source: Author calculation based on published data by ICRG for the period Jan. 2000 to Dec. 2011.<br />

Reported results by tables (1) through (6) conclude that GCC countries enjoy very low economic<br />

risk. Kuwait is showing its safe economic environment with the highest rating <strong>of</strong> 46.40 points (92.81%)<br />

among other GCC countries. Kuwait is followed by UAE, Sultanate <strong>of</strong> Oman, Qatar, KSA, and Kingdom<br />

<strong>of</strong> Bahrain with mean rating <strong>of</strong> 45.74 points (91.48%), 44.13 points (88.27%), 43.27 points (86.56%), 43.18<br />

points (86.38%), and 41.41 points (82.84%) respectively. In term <strong>of</strong> economic system stability, UAE is the<br />

most stable GCC economy with low Std. deviation <strong>of</strong> 1.35 points followed by Kuwait, Sultanate <strong>of</strong> Oman,<br />

KSA, Bahrain, and Qatar with Std. deviation <strong>of</strong> 1.83, 2.56, 4.3109, 4.56, and 5.27 points respectively.<br />

Tables (1) to (6) evidence that GCC country risk is driven differently by its sub-macroeconomic<br />

factors. It is evidenced that the very low economic risk <strong>of</strong> Kuwait, KSA, and UAE is driven by CA/GDP,<br />

by GDP/HP in Qatar, and by GDPG in Sultanate <strong>of</strong> Oman and Bahrain. <strong>The</strong> common macroeconomic<br />

factor that drives GCC economic risk is annual inflation (AI) which found to be the main driver <strong>of</strong> all GCC<br />

country economic risk with its low rates. This explained by the fact that all GCC economies are pegged to<br />

US dollar, therefore GCC inflation is imported through exchange rate. It is shown by tables (1) to (6) that<br />

while KSA and Bahrain economic system instability are driven by BB, the economic system instability <strong>of</strong><br />

Kuwait is driven by GDPG, by GDP/HP in UAE, and by CA/GDP in Qatar and Sultanate <strong>of</strong> Oman as<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

273


measured by Std. deviation.<br />

In conclusion, shown results in tables (1) to (6) leads us to reject the null hypothesis that “GCC<br />

country economic risk cannot be explained differently across the GCC by its specific sub-macroeconomic<br />

factors” since they are explained and driven differently.<br />

Summary and Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Empirical Results<br />

In modelling the relationship between country economic risk and its components’ coefficients <strong>of</strong><br />

equation (2) is estimated for each <strong>of</strong> the GCC countries and reported in table (7).<br />

Table (7) reports the results <strong>of</strong> the OLS estimation for the GCC counters’ economic risk. <strong>The</strong><br />

results in all the cases show a positive and significant relationship between country economic risk and its<br />

sub-macroeconomic factors <strong>of</strong> GDP/HP, RGDPG, AI, BB, and CA/GDP. All results are significant at the<br />

1% significance level. Moreover, we capitalized on the analysis <strong>of</strong> variance (ANOVA) to test the adequacy<br />

<strong>of</strong> the model and to indicate the largest explanatory variables among independent variables.<br />

Table (7): GCC Countries’ OLS Economic Risk Estimates<br />

GDP/HP GDPG AI BB CA/GDP<br />

Panel (A): 0.1934*** 0.3977*** 0.1434*** 0.7643*** 0.6562***<br />

KSA Seq. SS 15.62 22.27 15.35 32.20 33.16<br />

P-Value 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />

Panel (B): 0.1728*** 0.7244*** 0.2268*** 0.3149*** N/A<br />

Kuwait Seq. SS 21.54 66.36 9.36 5.74 N/A<br />

P 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 N/A<br />

Panel (C): 0.9711*** 0.113*** 0.1464*** 0.1281*** 0.1528***<br />

UAE Seq. SS 99.59 1.25 0.01 0.91 0.597<br />

P 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />

Panel (D): 0.0334*** 0.1573*** 0.1608*** 0.1471*** 0.7976***<br />

Qatar Seq. SS 54.81 22.75 1.81 13.13 10.51<br />

P 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />

Panel (E): 0.0888*** 0.3295*** 0.1818*** 0.3520*** 0.6993***<br />

Oman Seq. SS 2.67 40.27 1.78 22.67 35.61<br />

P 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />

Panel (F):<br />

Bahrain<br />

0.0775*** 0.0641*** 0.0457*** 0.4046*** 0.5149***<br />

Seq. SS 18.83 73.41 0.15 2.14 8.47<br />

P 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />

*** Refers to the 1% significance level.<br />

<strong>The</strong> results for KSA reported in panel (A) <strong>of</strong> table (7) show that economic risk has a significant<br />

positive relationship with CA/GDP which can explain 33.16% <strong>of</strong> KSA’s economic risk. It is followed by<br />

BB and GDPG which can explain 32.20% and 22.27% <strong>of</strong> the Kingdom’s economic risk. Although GDP/HP<br />

and AI have positive and significant relationship with KSA’s economic risk, they can explain only 15.62%<br />

and 15.32% <strong>of</strong> the KSA’s economic risk respectively.<br />

Also, results reported in panel (A) <strong>of</strong> table (7) indicate that a one unit increases in BB and<br />

CA/GDP will improve the country economic risk rating by 76.43% and 65.62% <strong>of</strong> that unit respectively,<br />

while a one unit increase in GDPG, GDP/HP, and AI will increase the economic risk rating by 39.77%,<br />

19.34%, and 14.34% <strong>of</strong> that unit respectively. Moreover, the results indicate that the most influencing<br />

source <strong>of</strong> the KSA’s economic risk is CA/GDP, followed by BB, GDPG, GDP/HP and AI.<br />

Table (7) panel (B) reports the results <strong>of</strong> the OLS estimation for Kuwait’s economic risk. It reveals<br />

that Kuwait economic risk has a significant positive relationship with GDPG which explains 66.36% <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

274


Kuwait’s economic risk. It is followed by GDP/HP which can explain 21.54% <strong>of</strong> Kuwait’s economic risk.<br />

AI and BB have significant, but less positive relationship with Kuwait’s economic risk; they can explain<br />

only 9.36% and 5.74% <strong>of</strong> Kuwait’s economic risk respectively. Reported results in panel (A) <strong>of</strong> table (7)<br />

state that one unit increases in GDPG will improve Kuwait’s economic risk rating by 72.44% <strong>of</strong> that unit,<br />

while a one unit increase in BB, AI, and GDP/HP will increase the economic risk rating by 31.49%,<br />

22.68%, and 17.28% <strong>of</strong> that unit respectively. In term <strong>of</strong> the most influencing source <strong>of</strong> the Kuwait’s<br />

economic risk, results indicate that GDPG which explains 66.36% <strong>of</strong> Kuwait economic risk is the most<br />

influencing factor followed by GDP/HP which explains 21.54%, AI which explains 9.36%, and BB which<br />

explains 5.74% <strong>of</strong> Kuwait’s economic risk. For CA/GDP, the model did not show any significant<br />

relationship with the Kuwait economic risk since it is constant over the study period with zero Std.<br />

deviation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> UAE reported in table (7) panel (C) show that UAE’s economic risk has a significant<br />

positive relationship with GDPG/HP, GDPG, AI, BB, and CA/GDP. Results indicate that GDP/HP is the<br />

main driver <strong>of</strong> UAE’s economic risk where one unit increases in GDPG/HP will advance UAE’s economic<br />

risk rating by 97.11% <strong>of</strong> that unit. GDPG, AI, BB, and CA/GDP are less important in advancing UAE’s<br />

economic risk rating where one unit increase for any <strong>of</strong> them will improve the economic risk rating by<br />

11.3%, 14.64%, 12.81%, and 15.28% <strong>of</strong> that unit respectively. Results indicate that the most influencing<br />

source <strong>of</strong> UAE’s economic risk is GDPG/HP which explains 99.59% <strong>of</strong> UAE’s economic risk.<br />

Qatar’s results reported in Table (7) panel (D) show a significant positive relationship between<br />

Qatar’s economic risk and its sub-macroeconomic factors. Results reveal that GDP/HP has the highest<br />

explanatory power <strong>of</strong> all Qatar’s macroeconomic factors; it can explain 54.81% <strong>of</strong> Qatar’s economic risk.<br />

<strong>The</strong> GDPG has moderate explanatory power for Qatar’s economic risk; it can explain 22.75% <strong>of</strong> it. BB and<br />

CA/GDP have low explanatory power; they can explain 13.13% and 10.51%, respectively, <strong>of</strong> Qatar’s<br />

economic risk. Reported results in panel (D) <strong>of</strong> table (7) clarify that a one unit increases in Qatar’s<br />

CA/GDP will advance the country economic risk rating by 79.76% <strong>of</strong> that unit, while one unit increase in<br />

GDPG, AI, and BB will improve the economic risk rating by 15.73%, 16.08%, and 14.71%, respectively, <strong>of</strong><br />

that unit. Furthermore, results in panel (D) <strong>of</strong> table (7) indicate that the most influencing source <strong>of</strong> Qatar’s<br />

economic risk is GDP/HP which explains 54.81%, followed by GDPG which explains 22.75%, BB which<br />

explains 13.13%, CA/GDP which explain 10.51% <strong>of</strong> Qatar’s economic risk.<br />

It is shown in table (7) panel (E) that Oman’s economic risk has a significant positive relationship<br />

with GDP/HP, GDPD, AI, BB, and CA/GDP. <strong>The</strong> results suggest that one unit increases in CA/GDP will<br />

improve Oman’s economic risk rating by 69.93% <strong>of</strong> that unit, while a one unit increase in BB, GDP/HP,<br />

AI, and GDP/HP will improve the economic risk rating by 35.20%, 32.95%, 18.18%, and 8.88% <strong>of</strong> that unit<br />

respectively. In term <strong>of</strong> the most influencing source <strong>of</strong> the Oman’s economic risk, results indicate that<br />

GDPG which explains 40.27% <strong>of</strong> Kuwait economic risk is the most influencing factor followed by<br />

CA/GDP which explains 35.61%, and BB which explains 22.67%. GDP/HP and AI have the lowest<br />

influencing source <strong>of</strong> the Oman’s economic risk which can explain only 2.67% and 1.78%, respectively, <strong>of</strong><br />

Oman’s economic risk.<br />

Panel (F) <strong>of</strong> table (7) shows that Bahrain’s economic risk has a significant positive relationship<br />

with GDPG/HP, GDPG, AI, BB, and CA/GDP. Results indicate that CA/GDP and BB are the main<br />

drivers <strong>of</strong> Bahrain’s economic risk where one unit increases in CA/GDP and BB will advance Bahrain’s<br />

economic risk rating by 51.49% and 40.46%, respectively, <strong>of</strong> that unit. GDPG/HP, GDPG, and AI are less<br />

important in advancing Bahrain’s economic risk rating where one unit increase for any <strong>of</strong> them will<br />

improve the economic risk rating by only 7.75%, 6.41%, and 4.57% <strong>of</strong> that unit respectively. Results<br />

indicate that Bahrain’s economic risk is highly influenced by CA/GDP and BB which can drive 51.49%<br />

and 40.46%, respectively, <strong>of</strong> Bahrain’s economic risk.<br />

<strong>The</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> variance (ANOVA) reported in table (8) show that, at any level <strong>of</strong> significance, one<br />

can conclude that economic risk <strong>of</strong> all GCC countries is driven differently by the five sub-macroeconomic<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

275


factors included in the study.<br />

Table (8): GCC ANOVA Analysis<br />

Country Source DF SS MS F-value P-value<br />

KSA Regression 5 132.041 5.760 3.25202E+1 0.000<br />

Residual 132 0.002 0.000<br />

Total 127 132.043<br />

Kuwait Regression 5 132.000 5.750 2.73103E+1 0.000<br />

Residual 132 0.000 0.000 2<br />

Total 127 132.000<br />

UAE Regression 5 132.000 5.750 6.74427E+1 0.000<br />

Residual 132 0.000 0.000<br />

Total 127 132.000<br />

Qatar Regression 5 132.000 5.750 3.80450E+1 0.000<br />

Residual 132 0.000 0.000<br />

Total 127 132.000<br />

Oman Regression 5 132.000 5.750 3.33507E+1 0.000<br />

Residual 132 0.000 0.000<br />

Total 127 132.000<br />

Bahrain Regression 5 132.000 5.750 7.77423E+1 0.000<br />

Residual 132 0.000 0.000<br />

Total 127 132.000<br />

Discussion and Conclusions:<br />

This paper provides the first analysis <strong>of</strong> GCC country economic risk. <strong>The</strong> study utilized time<br />

series analysis technique using SPSS to calculate the range, minimum, maximum, mean and Std. deviation<br />

for each GCC country covering the period <strong>of</strong> January 2000 to December 2011. <strong>The</strong> OLS estimator is used to<br />

study the behaviour <strong>of</strong> the macroeconomic drivers <strong>of</strong> each GCC country’s economic risk. <strong>The</strong> source <strong>of</strong><br />

data provided in the analysis is the International Country Risk Guide that <strong>of</strong>fers quantitative measures for<br />

each GCC country economic risk assessment on monthly basis. <strong>The</strong> study was structured to answer two<br />

major questions in that regard, first one about the ability <strong>of</strong> each GCC’s country sub-macroeconomic<br />

factors to explain the country specific economic risk. <strong>The</strong> second major question was to explore the casual<br />

relationship between each GCC country economic and GDP per Head <strong>of</strong> Population (GDP/HP), Real<br />

GDP Growth (RGDPG), Annual Inflation (AI), Budget Balance as Percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP (BB), and Current<br />

Account as percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP (CC/GDP).<br />

<strong>The</strong> descriptive analysis shows that null hypotheses are rejected, which means that country<br />

economic risk formed differently form one GCC country to another in mean and Std. deviation as well as<br />

minimum, maximum and range, results also shows that economic risk in GCC countries is driven by<br />

different sub-macroeconomic factors from one country to another. <strong>The</strong> highest rating <strong>of</strong> country economic<br />

risk was given to Kuwait by the ICRG which position Kuwait as a first choice for capital allocation in<br />

GCC. Results show that Kuwait has the highest economic risk rating, lowest economic risk, <strong>of</strong> 46.40 points<br />

(92.81%). In Regards to KSA, the largest GCC economy player, results indicate that it is not a safe home to<br />

allocate investment among other GCC countries since it has the second worst economic risk before<br />

Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Bahrain.<br />

In conclusion, the null hypotheses which stated that there is no causal relationship between GCC<br />

country’s economic risk and its sub-macroeconomic GDP/HP, RGDPG, AI, BB, and CC/GDP is rejected.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, one can say that there is a positive and significant causality relationship between GCC<br />

country’s economic risk and its sub-macroeconomic factors. <strong>The</strong>se findings give the country risk analysts<br />

the opportunity to predict GCC country’s economic risk through its components and to know which<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

276


subcomponents <strong>of</strong> GCC’s economic risk is more investigated for early prediction <strong>of</strong> GCC’s economic risk.<br />

Also, reported results explore that GCC country’s economic risk is driven differently from one<br />

country to another. Results indicated that while KSA’s economic risk is driven by BB, Kuwait’s economic<br />

risk is driven by GDPG, and UAE’s economic risk is driven by GDP/HP; Qatar, Oman, and Bahrain<br />

economic risk are driven by CC/GDP.<br />

Research Limitation and Direction for Further Research<br />

This paper planned to examine the macro-relationship between GCC’s country economic and its<br />

Sub-macroeconomic factors, but not designed to include micro or related industries variables in the<br />

prediction model.<br />

Further research can examine the following; (1) the causal relationship between GCC’s composite<br />

risk and its specific country economic, financial and political risk, (2) the predictive power <strong>of</strong> country<br />

economic, financial and political risk <strong>of</strong> market return, (3) examine the linearity and nonlinearity <strong>of</strong><br />

country composite, economic, financial and political risk in GCC, (4) the relationship between country risk<br />

and stock market capitalization and turn over, (5) the relationship between country risk and financial<br />

system creditworthiness, and others.<br />

References<br />

Chen, Dar-Hsin , Bin, Feng-Shun and Chen, Chun-Da (2005). <strong>The</strong> Impacts <strong>of</strong> Political Events on Foreign<br />

Institutional Investors and Stock Returns: Emerging Market Evidence from Taiwan. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Business, 10<br />

(2).<br />

Clark, Ephraim and Radu Tunaru (2001). Emerging market investing with Political risk. Multinational<br />

Financial Journal, 5 (3) 155-173.<br />

Dar-Hsin Chen, Feng-Shun Bin, and Chun-Da Chen (2005). <strong>The</strong> Impacts <strong>of</strong> Political Events on Foreign<br />

Institutional Investors and Stock Returns: Emerging Market Evidence from Taiwan. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Business,<br />

(10) 165-188.<br />

Diamonte, Robin, Liew, John M. and Stevens, Ross L., (1996). Political risk in emerging and developed<br />

markets. Financial Analysts Journal, 52 (3) 9-12.<br />

El-Sady, Hassan M., M. Kabir Hassan, Neal c. Maroney, and Ahmed Telfah, A. (2003). Country Risk and<br />

Stock Market Volatility, Predictability, and Diversification in the Middle East and Africa. Economic System, (27) 63-82.<br />

El-Sady, Hassan M., M. Kabir Hassan, and Oscar Varela, B. (2003). International Country Risk Guide's<br />

Country Risk Rating and Emerging Markets' Performance in Latin America. Journal <strong>of</strong> Emerging Markets, (8) 14-46.<br />

El-Sady, Hassan Mounir, M. Kabir Hassan and William Sackley. C. (2003). <strong>The</strong> Role <strong>of</strong> Political, Financial and<br />

Economic Risk in Governing Volatility and Returns Predictability in Developed Equity Markets. International Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Applied Business & Economic Research, 1 (2) 117-136.<br />

El-Sady, Hassan Mounir (2009). <strong>The</strong> Impact <strong>of</strong> Country Financial, Economic, and Political Risk on its<br />

Creditworthiness and Stock Market Development: Cross Sectional Analysis. Arab Journal <strong>of</strong> Administrative Sciences, 16<br />

(3) 343-381.<br />

Hoti, Suhejla and McAleer, Michael (2004). An Empirical Assessment <strong>of</strong> Country Risk Ratings and<br />

Associated Models. Journal <strong>of</strong> Economic Surveys, 18 (4) 539-588.<br />

Khoury, Sarkis Joseph (2003). Country Risk and International Portfolio Diversification for the Individual<br />

Investor. Financial Services Review, (12) 73-93.<br />

Onour, Ibrahim A. Ahmed (2007). Impact <strong>of</strong> Oil Price Volatility on Gulf Cooperation Council Stock Markets'<br />

Return. OPEC Review, 31 (3) 171-189.<br />

Flannery, Mark J. and Protopapadakis, Aris, (2001). Macroeconomic Factors Do Influence Aggregate Stock<br />

Returns. Review <strong>of</strong> Financial Study, 15 (3) 751-782.<br />

Susan K. Schroeder (2008). <strong>The</strong> Underpinnings <strong>of</strong> Country Risk Assessment. Journal <strong>of</strong> Economic Surveys, 22<br />

(3) 498-535.<br />

Vij Madhu and Kapoor M. C. (2007). Country Risk Analysis A Case Study <strong>of</strong> India. Journal <strong>of</strong> Management<br />

Research, 7 (2) 87-102<br />

Vij Madhu (2005). <strong>The</strong> Determinants <strong>of</strong> Country Risk Analysis An Empirical Approach. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Management Research, 5 (1) 20-31.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

277


How to transfer knowledge to your work<br />

Wen-Hui Mico Yang & Yen-Ting Tim Lin<br />

Hsiuping University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Taiwan<br />

Cho-Pu Vincent Lin<br />

St. John's University, Taiwan<br />

Keywords<br />

Learning performance, transfer <strong>of</strong> training, e-learning, banking industry<br />

Abstract<br />

Recently, e-learning is becoming a real alternative to traditional classroom learning. Against this<br />

backdrop, many banks in Taiwan are now interested in methods <strong>of</strong> improving the efficiency <strong>of</strong> their e-<br />

learning-based training systems. In practice, it is believed that the ultimate purpose <strong>of</strong> e-learning is not<br />

only to reduce costs, but also to drive business results. <strong>The</strong> best benefit is that training can be in any place<br />

and at any time. Employees keep working as usual, but also take training courses during or after work.<br />

However, no matter how good the training courses are, the result is most important.<br />

Besides, along with the development <strong>of</strong> technologies and a concomitant change in learners’<br />

attitudes, the evaluation <strong>of</strong> training efficacy has moved beyond the traditional assessing <strong>of</strong> trainees’<br />

learning performance to examining the application <strong>of</strong> learning results in these same trainees’ day-to-day,<br />

post-training task performance.<br />

<strong>The</strong> quantitative methods employed revealed the extent <strong>of</strong> learning performance influence on<br />

trainees’ transfer <strong>of</strong> training in business training. Through structural equation modeling (SEM), the result<br />

showed a positive relationship between learning performance and transfer <strong>of</strong> training. <strong>The</strong> present study<br />

prioritizes the two factors: satisfaction and learning effectiveness, in that order. <strong>The</strong>refore, satisfaction is a<br />

most influential factor <strong>of</strong> trainees’ learning performance.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

278


Enterprise Development<br />

under Globalization and the New Economy Conditions<br />

Andrzej Jaki<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Economics and Organization <strong>of</strong> Enterprises<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Keywords<br />

Enterprise development, globalization, new economy, enterprise management.<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>The</strong> market economies <strong>of</strong> the end <strong>of</strong> the 20 th and the beginning <strong>of</strong> the 21 st centuries have been marked with<br />

significant reordering <strong>of</strong> business priorities, being fairly visible in e.g. reorientation <strong>of</strong> enterprise strategies, the ways<br />

<strong>of</strong> defining and ranking its objectives, as well as in establishing new criteria and principles <strong>of</strong> assessing enterprises’<br />

functioning and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> their development. <strong>The</strong> end <strong>of</strong> the 20 th century brought about quite new means <strong>of</strong><br />

measuring the competitiveness on the international market, as dictated by the advancing globalization <strong>of</strong> practically<br />

all spheres <strong>of</strong> life. In consequence, national economies started to be more interdependent, thus forming the global<br />

economic system. Thinking and acting globally would not be possible without radical changes in the sphere <strong>of</strong><br />

communications and the information flow, including the development <strong>of</strong> information technologies and the advent <strong>of</strong><br />

the Internet. <strong>The</strong> growing importance <strong>of</strong> the new economy, together with changes in the role <strong>of</strong> particular enterprise<br />

economic resources, has confirmed that, despite the fundamental and fixed business rules, the 21 st century<br />

enterprises must be aware <strong>of</strong> new challenges which significantly influence the creation <strong>of</strong> developmental<br />

opportunities for enterprises and the occurrence <strong>of</strong> threats within this scope. For only the proper understanding <strong>of</strong><br />

the essence <strong>of</strong> such changes and adapting enterprises’ operations to make them fit will allow, in the long run,<br />

development and successful competing on globalizing markets to take place.<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> market economies <strong>of</strong> the end <strong>of</strong> the 20 th and the beginning <strong>of</strong> the 21 st centuries have been<br />

marked with significant reordering <strong>of</strong> business priorities, being fairly visible in e.g. reorientation <strong>of</strong><br />

enterprise strategies, the ways <strong>of</strong> defining and ranking its objectives, as well as in establishing new criteria<br />

and principles <strong>of</strong> assessing enterprises’ functioning and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> their development. Radical<br />

changes have also been observed as far as competitiveness rules on the global market are concerned,<br />

where clear borderlines between the interweaving branches can no longer be seen. <strong>The</strong> traditional system<br />

<strong>of</strong> branches is currently overturned and new hybrid branches are emerging. <strong>The</strong>y integrate the products<br />

<strong>of</strong> traditional, so far, distinct branches which had their own separate markets and integrated value chains<br />

(Obój 2002). In these circumstances the evolutionary process <strong>of</strong> new business rules appears to be<br />

something natural, a simple consequence <strong>of</strong> developing new branches, accelerating creativity, adopting<br />

technological innovations, and <strong>of</strong> the omnipresent information technology revolution. In consequence, it<br />

leads to the development <strong>of</strong> new means <strong>of</strong> communication and an increase in the significance <strong>of</strong> intangible<br />

assets in the operations <strong>of</strong> enterprises, which is nowadays characteristic for so-called new economy<br />

constituting in its essence another stage <strong>of</strong> historical economic development, following the industrial<br />

revolution and the scientific and technical revolution. It is accompanied by the processes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

progressing globalization and internalization <strong>of</strong> economic activity.<br />

<strong>The</strong> enterprise development and objectives <strong>of</strong> its operations<br />

Survival and development are the most common objectives <strong>of</strong> enterprise operation, the former<br />

being, so to speak, the necessary condition to achieve other, more or less clearly defined aims.<br />

Nonetheless, the enterprise sole striving for existence against turbulent changes <strong>of</strong> the environment and<br />

growing competition might, in fact, result in its gradual decline. Taking the long view, an enterprise<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

279


should focus on the development, the aim <strong>of</strong> which be a kind <strong>of</strong> secondary enterprise management<br />

(Wdzki 2003). For it sounds logical to say that while aiming at survival, the enterprise should also aim at<br />

its development (Marcinkowska 2000).<br />

<strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> an enterprise development, as diverse as different are the aspects <strong>of</strong> its functioning,<br />

may also be materialised through meeting the demands <strong>of</strong> particular interest groups - owners, managers,<br />

creditors, co-operators, competitors, local communities and the state. In this context the concept <strong>of</strong>,<br />

among others, “stakeholders” has been conceived, viewing business as an integral part <strong>of</strong> a society in place<br />

<strong>of</strong> isolated, purely academic domain <strong>of</strong> economics. <strong>The</strong> stakeholders’ expectations are naturally<br />

diversified, as shown in the Table 1.<br />

Table 1. Enterprises’ stakeholders and their objectives<br />

Stakeholders<br />

Objectives<br />

Owners maximization <strong>of</strong> the enterprise value<br />

dividends<br />

Managers remuneration<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>it sharing<br />

other benefits<br />

Employees remuneration<br />

other benefits<br />

employment guarantee<br />

Creditors repayment <strong>of</strong> loan with interests<br />

attractiveness <strong>of</strong> an investment<br />

Co-operators cheap and regular delivery (recipients)<br />

expensive and regular purchases<br />

(suppliers)<br />

meeting needs<br />

Competitors increasing the market<br />

Local communities revenues from taxes and charges<br />

guarantee for the future<br />

supporting education, culture and<br />

recreation<br />

natural environment protection<br />

<strong>The</strong> state revenues from taxes and charges<br />

common wealth<br />

Source: own study based on: (Marcinkowska 2000) and (Wdzki 2003).<br />

<strong>The</strong> shareholders’ objectives, as diversified above, may lead to the conclusion that taking into<br />

consideration and balancing individual objectives <strong>of</strong> different groups are barely possible. Yet, it should be<br />

strongly emphasised that creating and increasing an enterprise value do not stand in contradiction to<br />

other groups’ interests – value increased for owners does not have to be built up at the cost <strong>of</strong> all other<br />

shareholders. Quite the reverse, the financial success <strong>of</strong> owners sets the conditions favourable for the<br />

remaining parties to benefit from the value growth. It is thus the efficient enterprises that provide new job<br />

vacancies and financial incentives for employees, pay higher taxes and which are reliable and desirable<br />

clients <strong>of</strong> banks, as well as good contractors for co-operators. On this account, building up the enterprise<br />

value is currently viewed as the most universal and thorough criterion to measure the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> a<br />

given enterprise performance, and when taken as the primary objective, makes the capital owners<br />

maximise their pr<strong>of</strong>its in the most comprehensive manner.<br />

In effect, the long term enterprise functioning depends on financial interactions within all people<br />

and subjects related to the enterprise. Thus accordingly, a universal model <strong>of</strong> building up the enterprise<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

280


value should be based on balancing various aims <strong>of</strong> different interest groups, naturally by using suitably<br />

chosen instruments. <strong>The</strong> instruments should be selected resultant <strong>of</strong> the analysis <strong>of</strong> specific stakeholders’<br />

different motivations and the possibility <strong>of</strong> correlating them (McTaggart, Kontes & Mankins 1994).<br />

<strong>The</strong> necessity <strong>of</strong> establishing effective relationships between enterprises’ owners and managers, as<br />

well as with their other interest groups, led to the controlling system <strong>of</strong> the enterprise operations to be set<br />

up. <strong>The</strong> control kept by stakeholders is currently termed “corporate governance” for, on the one hand, it<br />

provides proprietary control while on the other one, it creates the mechanism <strong>of</strong> integrating its individual<br />

stakeholders.<br />

<strong>The</strong> analysis so far has proven that looking at the enterprise functioning and objectives from the owner’s<br />

point <strong>of</strong> view highlights the financial model <strong>of</strong> the enterprise, characterised by its major financial<br />

objective, that is, maximisation <strong>of</strong> its value. A systemic model, in turn, agrees with the concept <strong>of</strong> meeting<br />

the aims <strong>of</strong> all interest groups, and is based on a relatively autonomous system, thus dependant on<br />

external, market-related factors (contractors, local communities), and on the formal and legal<br />

infrastructure (the state) (Bochenski 1987). Revealing the close connection between the enterprise<br />

functioning and objectives, and its immediate environment may help to advance a thesis about a<br />

considerable social responsibility on the part <strong>of</strong> the enterprise. This responsibility can be examined in four<br />

different dimensions concurrently, i.e. economic (aiming at an enterprise growth), ethical (considering the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> an enterprise functioning viewed from the social norms perspective), sociological (creating new<br />

job and staff training) and ecological (considering possible side effects <strong>of</strong> an enterprise operation)<br />

(Adamczyk 2009).<br />

Globalization processes and the enterprises’ functioning<br />

<strong>The</strong> end <strong>of</strong> the 20 th century brought about quite a new means <strong>of</strong> measuring the competitiveness on<br />

the international market, as dictated by the advancing globalization <strong>of</strong> practically all spheres <strong>of</strong> life – from<br />

economics, law and politics, to patterns <strong>of</strong> consumerism and culture. In consequence, national economies<br />

started to be more interdependent thus forming the global economic system (Rojek 2012). Growing<br />

openness <strong>of</strong> the national economies together with developing unprecedented capital world-wide links<br />

changed trading, which has ceased to be international and begun to resemble more regional one, within<br />

the triad <strong>of</strong> the European Union, North America and Asia-Pacific markets, hosting subsidiaries, divisions<br />

and sister companies <strong>of</strong> large international firms (Komiski 1999). This triad has gathered roughly 90%<br />

<strong>of</strong> high value-added production and trade <strong>of</strong> all goods and services (Obój 2002). For the crucial feature <strong>of</strong><br />

the globally functioning enterprise is flexibility and the ability to relocate its resources quickly, the<br />

products <strong>of</strong> the given enterprise are no longer limited to a local market, but can be marketed everywhere.<br />

Globalization, associated with supranational view <strong>of</strong> the social, economic and political processes,<br />

as well as with growing penetrability <strong>of</strong> borders <strong>of</strong> any kind, appears to be the predominant way <strong>of</strong><br />

thinking and functioning for the 21 st century economies (Borowiecki 2011). <strong>The</strong> origin and foundation <strong>of</strong><br />

globalization can be traced back to the diversified processes whose fragmentary effects essentially<br />

constituted the causative factors and driving forces <strong>of</strong> the globalization, as presented in Table 2.<br />

Table 2. <strong>The</strong> globalization origins and their effects<br />

Globalization origins<br />

Fragmentary effects<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> processes or deregulation, increase <strong>of</strong> external and internal competition,<br />

liberalisation, deetatization and rising demands in the realm <strong>of</strong> efficient<br />

privatization <strong>of</strong> economies<br />

management<br />

2. Increasing openness <strong>of</strong> economies and facilitating cash flow,<br />

abolition <strong>of</strong> tariffs<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> capital mobility<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> direct foreign investments,<br />

establishing foreign capital liaisons,<br />

setting up transnational corporations,<br />

providing more possibilities <strong>of</strong> multiplying capital,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

281


growing investors’ demands<br />

3. Intensifying the processes <strong>of</strong> mergers dominating role <strong>of</strong> institutional investors in<br />

and takeovers<br />

ownership structures <strong>of</strong> enterprises<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> change in man’s role in an the increasing importance <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital,<br />

enterprise functioning<br />

formulating and advancing the concept <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge management.<br />

5. <strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> information accelerating the flow <strong>of</strong> goods and cash,<br />

engineering and technologies extending and accelerating information access.<br />

Source: own study based on: (Dziura & Kaczmarek 2003), (Flejterski & Wahl 2003), (Penc 2003) and<br />

(Perechuda (ed.) 2005).<br />

Besides general origins and determinants <strong>of</strong> globalization presented in Table 2, there are also<br />

cultural, psychological and political, increasingly important, idiosyncratic aspects, peculiar to different<br />

countries and regions. For this instance, in post-communist countries all actions directed at releasing the<br />

market mechanism to make it freely influential, and at creating the conditions for entrepreneurship to be<br />

developed both domestically and abroad, found a particularly fertile ground and keen supporters<br />

(Kozu-Cielak 2005).<br />

Thinking and acting globally would never be possible if not for far-reaching innovations in the<br />

realm <strong>of</strong> communication and information exchange, including information technologies and the Internet.<br />

<strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> information and computer technologies and engineering has fostered the products’<br />

and capital’s quicker flow, enhancing the quality, quantity and the access to the information as such.<br />

Consequently, the communication on the line: enterprise – investor or, in other words, enterprise –<br />

owner, has been largely facilitated and new standards have been set, raising new possibilities in the<br />

realm <strong>of</strong> competitive advantage as derived from knowledge management systems and recent information<br />

technology achievements. For it is knowledge, regarded as a distinct enterprise asset, that constitutes the<br />

primary source <strong>of</strong> competitive advantage on the field <strong>of</strong> the 21 st century economy. What is more, skills<br />

acquired by employees, during their pr<strong>of</strong>essional careers rather than in the process <strong>of</strong> school education,<br />

may be viewed as a unique production factor (Dobija 2003). Through well managed knowledge an<br />

enterprise may raise its competitiveness and set the conditions to make the knowledge its market value as<br />

well.<br />

<strong>The</strong> proper interconnection <strong>of</strong> the information technology achievements, the modern production<br />

and distribution, and knowledge management systems helps to develop, on a massive scale, customized<br />

customer service aimed at almost perfect meeting <strong>of</strong> customers’ expectations. Furthermore, it results in<br />

optimising reserves, effective use <strong>of</strong> employees’ forces and economic reserves <strong>of</strong> enterprises <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

scattered around the world.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> new economy” – information revolution<br />

<strong>The</strong> growing significance <strong>of</strong> intangible enterprise assets, such as knowledge and intellectual<br />

property, was crucial for the coinage <strong>of</strong> the term “the new economy”, closely related to the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> new telecommunications media, the Internet and the advancing processes <strong>of</strong> globalization. F. Krawiec,<br />

in his thorough description <strong>of</strong> the new economy features, repeats after some American authors who state<br />

that “the new economy <strong>of</strong> the turn <strong>of</strong> the 20 th and 21 st centuries is the economy which derives from<br />

changes produced by responding to the application <strong>of</strong> technological innovations and new business<br />

practices, and to growing global competitiveness – the changes aiming at considerable and stable<br />

productivity growth” (Krawiec 2005). <strong>The</strong> new economy, understood this way, is in fact a further step in<br />

the history <strong>of</strong> economic development, placed after the eras <strong>of</strong> the industrial and scientific, and<br />

technological revolutions. <strong>The</strong> unprecedented dynamics <strong>of</strong> economic development, as observed in many<br />

countries is, in the first place, the effect <strong>of</strong> human studying and employing their inventions and thus<br />

making many physical reserves more and more obsolete (Krawiec 2005).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

282


<strong>The</strong> absolute indicator <strong>of</strong> the new economy enterprises’ development is the Internet, which, on the<br />

one hand, has enabled the free global communication and quick flow <strong>of</strong> information with an easy access<br />

to it, on the other hand, started to be the business and source <strong>of</strong> income for enterprises in itself. Hence a<br />

whole lot <strong>of</strong> the Internet-service firms, companies operating in “e-business” or “e-trade” sectors, online<br />

banks, and even some universities which <strong>of</strong>fer education through “e-learning”. <strong>The</strong> Internet logic, based<br />

on unrestrained, standardised and affordable connections, makes the distance between its users barely<br />

significant. <strong>The</strong> Internet facilitates coordination <strong>of</strong> all types <strong>of</strong> logistic chains, which not only enables to<br />

lower costs, <strong>of</strong>fering cheaper products, but also makes the logistic systems even more reliable and capable<br />

<strong>of</strong> meeting individual needs <strong>of</strong> particular customers (Obój 2002).<br />

<strong>The</strong> immediate effects <strong>of</strong> developing and popularising the Internet also pertain to the growth <strong>of</strong><br />

competitiveness, since it <strong>of</strong>fers great possibilities <strong>of</strong> the information access, extensive infiltration <strong>of</strong><br />

recipient and supplier markets, allowing to carry out suitable analyses. <strong>The</strong> Internet has become the motor<br />

<strong>of</strong> globalization, revealing its essence not only in simple crossing the borders, developing international<br />

trade or growing importance <strong>of</strong> transnational corporations, but also in breaking the bonds <strong>of</strong> material,<br />

financial and information flows.<br />

Enterprise management under globalization<br />

<strong>The</strong> globalization <strong>of</strong> markets, products, technologies, legal regulations and organisational culture<br />

requires a different approach to the enterprise management, enterprise objectives and strategies, as well as<br />

to information bases employed to assess the enterprise functioning. Thus the processes <strong>of</strong> globalization<br />

produce new challenges for enterprises to be efficiently managed in the changed environment. <strong>The</strong><br />

increasing activity <strong>of</strong> the owners <strong>of</strong> global enterprises has caused more emphasis to be put upon the<br />

enterprise effectiveness. Perceived as financial pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>of</strong> the owners, and in the present external and<br />

internal conditions, the effectiveness can be accomplished only through appropriate management tools<br />

and instruments.<br />

<strong>The</strong> proprietary control is effective when it generates considerable pr<strong>of</strong>its from ownership right.<br />

<strong>The</strong> interactions between enterprises and their owners vary, depending primarily on ownership types,<br />

which in turn, imply different sorts <strong>of</strong> interdependence between enterprises’ owners and their managers.<br />

<strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> enterprises in this context has been related to the following processes:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

separating ownership from enterprise management, that is abandoning a classic model <strong>of</strong><br />

privately-owned enterprise (Rappaport 1986);<br />

dominating ownership structures <strong>of</strong> enterprises by so called “new owners”, that is<br />

institutional investors, such as: banks, investment funds, retirement funds, insurance funds<br />

and venture capitals (Pernsteiner (ed.) 2001);<br />

advancing internationalisation <strong>of</strong> business activities, closely related to the processes <strong>of</strong><br />

globalization (Borowiecki 2011).<br />

In these circumstances, a type <strong>of</strong> an enterprise, as derived from the classification <strong>of</strong> an ownership<br />

title, an owner, the enterprise autonomy and its objectives, is, apart from a legal form, the crucial element<br />

<strong>of</strong> the enterprise management. <strong>The</strong> economic development processes and changes in conditions<br />

determining enterprises’ functioning have evolved, throughout many years, new types and varieties <strong>of</strong><br />

ownership, as presented in Table 3.<br />

Table 3. <strong>The</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> types and determinants <strong>of</strong> the enterprise’s ownership<br />

Ownership type<br />

Determinants<br />

Classic privately-owned enterprise <strong>The</strong> correlation <strong>of</strong> ownership and management –<br />

entrepreneurial capitalism<br />

Non-standard privately-owned enterprise Separating ownership from management –<br />

managerial capitalism<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

283


Non-standard privately-owned enterprise Separating ownership from management, the<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> institutional enterprise owners –<br />

investor capitalism<br />

Semiprivate enterprise<br />

<strong>The</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> the state or local government in<br />

the enterprise ownership structures, creating<br />

collective enterprises and employees-stock<br />

companies – central - and self-government<br />

capitalism.<br />

Non-standard privately-owned enterprise Separating ownership from management,<br />

politicising private enterprises, growing influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> external stakeholders – stakeholders capitalism<br />

(economy)<br />

Non-standard privately-owned enterprise Separating ownership from management,<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> transnational corporations – global<br />

investor capitalism.<br />

Source: own study.<br />

As it transpires from the above table, globalization processes have marked the evolution <strong>of</strong><br />

various types <strong>of</strong> the enterprise ownership, introducing a new category, that is one <strong>of</strong> “global investor<br />

capitalism”.<br />

<strong>The</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> ownership demonstrated above, show that effective<br />

management <strong>of</strong> enterprises requires suitably applied instruments, depending on a specific type, in order<br />

to achieve the objectives and improve proprietary control. <strong>The</strong> instruments cover:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

creating the system <strong>of</strong> active Corporate Governance, including proprietary supervision;<br />

implementing the concept <strong>of</strong> Value Based Management;<br />

creating motivation systems, related to the processes <strong>of</strong> increasing enterprise value;<br />

employing a variety <strong>of</strong> tools for assessing enterprise functioning, among others through the<br />

prism <strong>of</strong> creating its value.<br />

<strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> tools <strong>of</strong> the enterprise effectiveness assesment<br />

In the new economy circumstances the enterprises’ development may be accomplished only if<br />

tangible assets, i.e. information, modern technologies, organisational solutions, and intellectual capital are<br />

successfully exploited. Hence the necessity <strong>of</strong> employing new measuring tools for effectiveness<br />

assessment. Together with suitably utilized accounting and market information, they would allow<br />

measuring the processes <strong>of</strong> the enterprise value creation by referring to factors, very <strong>of</strong>ten ignored in<br />

traditional systems <strong>of</strong> financial reporting.<br />

Financial reporting, being the primary source <strong>of</strong> accounting information, is the product <strong>of</strong><br />

bookkeeping and the final phase <strong>of</strong> the financial accountancy cycle. <strong>The</strong> financial report is drawn on the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> numerical information taken from account books <strong>of</strong> a given enterprise which illustrate both its<br />

capital and assets, as well as financial results <strong>of</strong> its operations. It goes without saying that the financial<br />

depiction <strong>of</strong> the enterprise, as based on information rendered in the financial report, reflects the<br />

accountancy procedures deriving from the legally binding law regulations. Nonetheless, despite the law<br />

regulations evolving and complying with entrepreneurial changes, the accounting information, as an<br />

element <strong>of</strong> the management process, is highly insufficient. To complete a thorough and objective<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> the enterprise effectiveness value creation activities, the market information is necessary,<br />

giving on the one hand, the proper view <strong>of</strong> the enterprise from the capital market’s perspective, on the<br />

other, revealing macroeconomic conditionings. <strong>The</strong> market information comprises the information on<br />

forming the enterprise market value, as well as the information on interest rates which are the parameters<br />

<strong>of</strong> the management process and the enterprise value creation assessment processes. By this reason, the<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

284


proper evaluation <strong>of</strong> the enterprise effectiveness may be enriched by out-balance-sheet factors, which very<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten have an essential, if not decisive effect upon the pace creating its value.<br />

Employing various out-balance-sheet information in the enterprise management has also largely<br />

influenced the evolution <strong>of</strong> financial analysis system, that is one <strong>of</strong> the management tools. For from the<br />

historical perspective, the system <strong>of</strong> enterprise functioning assessment has steadily progressed, also as far<br />

as paradigms <strong>of</strong> the value-measuring and the information used during the assessment are concerned<br />

(Ehrbar 1998). <strong>The</strong> changes have consisted in reducing the role <strong>of</strong> tools and measures based on financial<br />

and accounting quantities for the benefit <strong>of</strong> measures deriving from market quantities, more promptly<br />

reflecting the processes <strong>of</strong> the enterprise value creation. And since it has been proved that analyses and<br />

assessments employing the measures solely based on classic accountancy rules are rather unreliable and<br />

highly inadequate (Stewart 1991), the market information has obviously been ranked higher. Table 4<br />

depicts the above mentioned evolution <strong>of</strong> the measures employed in assessing the enterprise effectiveness.<br />

Other conventional time intervals presented in this table (1920s, 1970s, etc.) show the development <strong>of</strong><br />

effectiveness and the scope <strong>of</strong> information necessary to be used by indicating new assessment tools that<br />

were started to be commonly used in a given time interval.<br />

Table 4. <strong>The</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> the enterprise effectiveness assessment<br />

Years Tools <strong>of</strong> the enterprise<br />

Scope <strong>of</strong> information<br />

effectiveness assessment<br />

1920s Du Pont model<br />

Book information<br />

ROI<br />

1970s EPS Book information<br />

P/E<br />

Market information – financial<br />

Book information<br />

1980s ROE<br />

Book information<br />

ROA<br />

CF<br />

Tobin’s Q<br />

Market information – financial<br />

Book information<br />

1990s EBITDA Book information<br />

CFROI<br />

TSR<br />

Market information – financial and non-financial<br />

Book information<br />

BSC<br />

EVA<br />

MVA<br />

2000s VCI<br />

VA/IC<br />

Market information – financial and non-financial<br />

Book information<br />

ROI – return on investment,<br />

EPS – earnings per share,<br />

P/E – price-earnings ratio,<br />

ROE – return on equity,<br />

ROA – return on assets,<br />

CF – cash flow,<br />

EVA – economic value added,<br />

MVA – market value added,<br />

EBITDA – earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation,<br />

CFROI – cash flow return on investment,<br />

TSR – total shareholder return,<br />

BSC – balanced scorecard,<br />

VCI – value creation index,<br />

VA/IC – value added <strong>of</strong> the intellectual capital.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

285


Source: own study.<br />

Conclusions<br />

<strong>The</strong> processes <strong>of</strong> globalization and the popularization <strong>of</strong> the achievements <strong>of</strong> the new economy<br />

have posed new challenges to enterprises and created new opportunities for their development. Evolving<br />

types <strong>of</strong> enterprise ownership, changes in the character <strong>of</strong> their owners and in relations between them and<br />

executives managing enterprises, with the simultaneous strive <strong>of</strong> the owners at exercising power, are the<br />

reason for which efficient management leading to the realization <strong>of</strong> the goals formulated at the beginning<br />

requires the use <strong>of</strong> adequate methods and and instruments. An accompanying increase in the significance<br />

<strong>of</strong> the new economy, and a related change in the role od individual kinds <strong>of</strong> economic resources <strong>of</strong> an<br />

enterprise prove that, regardless <strong>of</strong> the awareness <strong>of</strong> new challenges posed to them by changes<br />

undergoing in their environment, it is necessary for enterprises to adjust to fundamental and invariable<br />

rules <strong>of</strong> conducting business. <strong>The</strong> rules are inherently related to an appropriate definition <strong>of</strong> business and<br />

conditionings <strong>of</strong> conducting it, a necessity to generate pr<strong>of</strong>it and maintain balanced cash flow, as well as a<br />

need to use human potential properly. Following the mentioned rules is a necessary condition for the<br />

effective enterprise development, and through it, for the effective multiplication <strong>of</strong> its market value.<br />

References<br />

Adamczyk J. (2009), Spoeczna odpowiedzialno przedsibiorstw. Teoria i praktyka, PWE, Warszawa.<br />

Bochenski J. (1987), Zur Philosophie der industriellen Unternehmung, Bank H<strong>of</strong>fman AG, Zurich.<br />

Borowiecki R. (2011), Change Management in a Company in the Times <strong>of</strong> Globalization. [in:] Borowiecki R.<br />

& Jaki A. (ed.), Global and Regional Challenges for the 21 st Century Economy. Studies from Economics and<br />

Management, Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics – Foundation <strong>of</strong> the Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Cracow.<br />

Dobija D. (2003), Pomiar i sprawozdawczo kapitau intelektualnego przedsibiorstwa, Wyd. WSZiP im. L.<br />

Komiskiego, Warszawa.<br />

Dziura M. & Kaczmarek J. (2003), Globalizacja gospodarki a nowe tendencje zarzdzania przedsibiorstwem.<br />

[in:] Borowiecki R. & Kwieciski M. (ed.), Informacja w zarzdzaniu przedsibiorstwem. Pozyskiwanie,<br />

wykorzystanie i ochrona (wybrane problemy teorii i praktyki), Kantor Wydawniczy Zakamycze, Kraków.<br />

Ehrbar A. (1998), EVA – <strong>The</strong> Real Key to Creating Wealth, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.<br />

Flejterski S. & Wahl P.T. (2003), Ekonomia globalna. Synteza, Difin, Warszawa.<br />

Kozu-Cielak G. (2005), Efektywno w gospodarce globalnej - korporacje transnarodowe, ”Prace<br />

Naukowe AE”, vol. 1061, Wrocaw.<br />

Komiski A.K. (1999), Zarzdzanie midzynarodowe. Konkurencja w klasie wiatowej, PWE, Warszawa.<br />

Krawiec F. (2005), Transformacja firmy w nowej gospodarce. Koncepcje, strategie, struktury i technologie w<br />

zarzdzaniu, Difin, Warszawa.<br />

Marcinkowska M. (2000), Ksztatowanie wartoci firmy, Wyd. Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.<br />

McTaggart J.M., Kontes P.W. & Mankis M.C. (1994), <strong>The</strong> Value Imperative. Managing for Superior<br />

Shareholder Returns, <strong>The</strong> Free Press, New York.<br />

Obój K. (2002), Tworzywo skutecznych strategii. Na styku starych i nowych regu konkurencji. PWE,<br />

Warszawa.<br />

Penc J. (2003), Zarzdzanie w warunkach globalizacji, Difin, Warszawa.<br />

Perechuda K. (ed.) (2005), Zarzdzanie wiedz w przedsibiorstwie, Wyd. Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.<br />

Pernsteiner H. (ed.) (2001), Wertmanagement. Ein Instrument zur Steigerung des Unternehmenswertes,<br />

Linde Verlag, Wien.<br />

Rappaport A. (1986), Creating Shareholder Value. <strong>The</strong> New Standard for Business Performance, Free Press,<br />

New York.<br />

Rojek T. (2012), <strong>The</strong> Pro-Value Concept <strong>of</strong> Enterprise Development. [in:] Kaczmarek J. & Rojek T. (ed.),<br />

Dilemmas <strong>of</strong> the Contemporary Economy Facing Global Changes, Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics – Foundation <strong>of</strong><br />

the Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Cracow.<br />

Steward, III, G.B. (1991), <strong>The</strong> Quest for Value. A Guide for Senior Managers, Harper Business, New York.<br />

Wdzki D. (2003), Strategie pynnoci finansowej przedsibiorstwa, Oficyna Wydawnicza, Kraków.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

286


Innovations in Enterprise Development Strategy<br />

Tomasz Rojek, PhD<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Keywords<br />

Innovations, enterprise development, goals <strong>of</strong> enterprise activity, strategy <strong>of</strong> development, development<br />

management.<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>The</strong> environment <strong>of</strong> enterprises functioning in the market economy, through changes constantly undergoing<br />

in it, keeps managing units in the state <strong>of</strong> constant stress and readiness to react to the effects <strong>of</strong> these changes.<br />

Sensitization <strong>of</strong> an enterprise to changes may be very diverse and complex. It basically depends on the power <strong>of</strong> these<br />

changes, the position <strong>of</strong> an enterprise on the market and the implemented strategy based on a vision <strong>of</strong> the future<br />

which explains the sense <strong>of</strong> the changes and sets directions for its activity. As a result, entities functioning in the<br />

market economy, regardless <strong>of</strong> their size or the industry in which they operate, ownership forms or the way they are<br />

organized, should undertake developmental ventures as a way <strong>of</strong> flexible adaptation to market conditions.<br />

Thus, developmental strategies <strong>of</strong> enterprises are closely connected with innovative and research and<br />

development activities <strong>of</strong> the state, its sectors, they also serve the realization <strong>of</strong> certain social and economic goals<br />

significant for the country and the society. Enterprise developmental activities consist in works related to a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> scientific, technical, organizational, financial and commercial activities whose aim is to develop and implement<br />

new or significantly improved products and processes. Some <strong>of</strong> these activities are developmental in themselves,<br />

whereas others may not contain an element <strong>of</strong> novelty but are necessary to develop and implement innovations.<br />

Developmental activity may be conducted by the enterprise itself on its own premises, or it may consist in acquiring<br />

goods, services or knowledge from external sources. Achieving competitive advantage is performed not only through<br />

achieving specific features <strong>of</strong> a qualitative or quantitative character but <strong>of</strong>ten by establishing cooperation, even<br />

between competitors, which involves various institutions, bringing about faster and more effective exchange <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge and contributing to an improvement <strong>of</strong> the competitive position <strong>of</strong> all interested parties.<br />

Thus, the paper will present innovations as one <strong>of</strong> the basic determinants <strong>of</strong> enterprise development with the<br />

consideration paid to their kinds, as well as results and barriers to their implementation. <strong>The</strong>n, the role, goals and the<br />

exemplification <strong>of</strong> innovations in enterprise development strategy will be presented.<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> environment <strong>of</strong> enterprises functioning in the market economy, through changes constantly<br />

undergoing in it, keeps managing units in the state <strong>of</strong> constant stress and readiness to react to the effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> these changes. Sensitization <strong>of</strong> an enterprise to changes may be very diverse and complex. It basically<br />

depends on the power <strong>of</strong> these changes, the position <strong>of</strong> an enterprise on the market and the implemented<br />

strategy based on a vision <strong>of</strong> the future which explains the sense <strong>of</strong> the changes and sets directions for its<br />

activity. As a result, entities functioning in the market economy, regardless <strong>of</strong> their size or the industry in<br />

which they operate, ownership forms or the way they are organized, should undertake developmental<br />

ventures as a way <strong>of</strong> flexible adaptation to market conditions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> an enterprise also results from internal conditionings, natural needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

enterprise itself. Every economic unit which comes into existence with a view to its development, tries not<br />

only to keep its existence as long as possible, but it aims at constant development and an increase in its<br />

size and structure <strong>of</strong> its activity. Thus, enterprise development arises both from external conditionings<br />

related to a necessity to meet newer and newer challenges <strong>of</strong> the environment, and from its natural,<br />

internal needs. <strong>The</strong>se two areas, integrally linked to each other, constantly push the enterprise to develop<br />

from the very first moment <strong>of</strong> its establishment, as well as to the permanent process <strong>of</strong> development<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

287


management.<br />

Enterprise development management consists in prolonging the period <strong>of</strong> positive changes<br />

undergoing in the enterprise and shortening the time <strong>of</strong> negative changes or its complete elimination.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, it is activity which always depends on the specificity <strong>of</strong> the situation in which the organization<br />

currently is, on the strengths and weaknesses possessed by it, and on chances and threats, and<br />

possibilities to avoid them.<br />

Enterprise development is a complex process <strong>of</strong> changes. It is shaped by conditionings which,<br />

partly, create a set <strong>of</strong> determinants <strong>of</strong> enterprise development. In most general terms, they may be defined<br />

as instruments, objects or processes designating (determining) the development <strong>of</strong> an enterprise and<br />

influencing the development directly or indirectly. At present, innovations, being a significant element <strong>of</strong><br />

competitive struggle and the fundamental component <strong>of</strong> the strategy <strong>of</strong> well-managed enterprises, the<br />

ones which take both <strong>of</strong>fensive actions consisting in entering new markets, and defensive actions<br />

protecting them against the threat from potential and real competitors, are considered one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fundamental determinants <strong>of</strong> enterprise development. Developmental strategies <strong>of</strong> such enterprises<br />

characterize with so-called innovative dynamism which is understood as opening to novelty, constant<br />

search for new ideas, concepts and solutions, followed by their implementation.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, developmental strategies <strong>of</strong> enterprises are closely connected with innovative, as well<br />

as research and development activities <strong>of</strong> the state, its sectors, they also serve the implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

certain social and economic aims, which are important to the state and the society. <strong>The</strong> developmental<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> an enterprise are made <strong>of</strong> works connected with a number <strong>of</strong> scientific, technical,<br />

organizational, financial, and commercial activities whose aim is to develop and implement new or<br />

significantly improved products and processes. Some <strong>of</strong> these activities are developmental in themselves,<br />

whereas others may not contain an element <strong>of</strong> novelty but are necessary to develop and implement<br />

innovations. Developmental activities may be conducted by the enterprise itself on its own premises, or it<br />

may consist in acquiring goods, services or knowledge from external sources. Gaining competitive<br />

advantage is performed not only through achieving specific features <strong>of</strong> qualitative or quantitative<br />

character, but <strong>of</strong>ten by establishing cooperation, even between competitors, which involves various<br />

institutions, bringing about faster and more effective exchange <strong>of</strong> knowledge and contributing to an<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> the competitive position <strong>of</strong> all interested entities. <strong>The</strong>n, transfer <strong>of</strong> knowledge takes place,<br />

networks <strong>of</strong> connections form, which strengthen mutual cooperation contributing to the growth <strong>of</strong><br />

competitiveness and innovativeness <strong>of</strong> enterprises. Thus, an interest <strong>of</strong> contemporary enterprises in<br />

innovations is a consequence <strong>of</strong> treating knowledge as a factor <strong>of</strong> enterprise development. Enterprise<br />

development should be realized taking into consideration success factors shaped on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge possessed and developed by the enterprise. While implementing the assumptions <strong>of</strong><br />

development special attention should be paid to intellectual capital including knowledge, experience<br />

used, organizational technologies, relations with a costumer, pr<strong>of</strong>essional skills. This capital is identified<br />

with knowledge capital. Knowledge-based management, comprising innovation, information and human<br />

capital management is a source <strong>of</strong> permanent and distinguishing competitive advantage on individual<br />

stages <strong>of</strong> its development, it is focused on long-term development through the processes <strong>of</strong> creation,<br />

codification and transfer <strong>of</strong> knowledge.<br />

Development in the hierarchy <strong>of</strong> enterprise goals<br />

Survival and development continue to be the most general objectives <strong>of</strong> enterprise activity. <strong>The</strong><br />

first <strong>of</strong> these objectives is in a sense a prerequisite for the implementation <strong>of</strong> others, more or less minutely<br />

formulated goals. However, the very existence <strong>of</strong> the enterprise, operating in the conditions <strong>of</strong> turbulent<br />

changes <strong>of</strong> the environment and increasing competition, would result de facto in its slow languishment<br />

(Marcinkowska 2000). <strong>The</strong>refore, taking into consideration a long-standing perspective, it must aim at<br />

development and this strive constitutes a kind <strong>of</strong> a secondary goal <strong>of</strong> enterprise management (Wdzki<br />

2003). Thus, it is logical to say that while fulfilling the aim <strong>of</strong> survival, an enterprise must also be<br />

development-oriented (Marcinkowska 2000). Nowadays, not only an increase in the significance and<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

288


influence <strong>of</strong> shareholders and other stakeholders on enterprises is visible, but also a necessity to ensure<br />

agreeable coexistence and permanent balance among various interests <strong>of</strong> individuals, groups,<br />

organizations, local and central administrative bodies may be noticed.<br />

Traditionally, development was identified with the size <strong>of</strong> an enterprise, resources <strong>of</strong> its factors <strong>of</strong><br />

production, the size <strong>of</strong> production, etc. Requirements <strong>of</strong> the market are the reason for which development<br />

is perceived through qualitative changes, expressed in the changes in enterprise structure and its<br />

effectiveness. It is a process <strong>of</strong> transformations, changes, passing to states, forms which are more complex<br />

or more perfect in some respects. In a broader context, development is also a process <strong>of</strong> the transformation<br />

<strong>of</strong> economic, social, political and mental structures which cannot be performed in a short time (Jakubów<br />

1999).<br />

A necessity <strong>of</strong> enterprise development is first <strong>of</strong> all imposed by external conditionings. Flexible<br />

adaptation to changes undergoing in the environment <strong>of</strong> the enterprise gives grounds for its systematic<br />

development understood as a continuous and far-reaching process. An organization’s survival and<br />

development requires undertaking numerous procedures and measures enabling the maintenance <strong>of</strong><br />

long-term consistency between activities <strong>of</strong> the organization and the environment in which it has to<br />

function (Brózda 2007). <strong>The</strong> enterprise is focused on satisfying the needs <strong>of</strong> the environment, and these<br />

become more and more sublime and difficult to meet (Gabrusewicz 1996). In order to adapt to the<br />

changing environment, it has to develop all the time. By decreasing an ability <strong>of</strong> the enterprise to win<br />

resources it needs (human, material, financial ones), or to manufacture and launch its products or services,<br />

every factor <strong>of</strong> the environment becomes an obstructing factor, and at the same time it is a power<br />

triggering certain change influencing the way <strong>of</strong> conducting business and managing the enterprise (Penc<br />

1999). <strong>The</strong>se factors are the reason for which it is necessary to look for most efficient methods and tools <strong>of</strong><br />

enterprise functioning in order to increase its competitive advantage which could grow as much as the<br />

enterprise would be more efficient than its competitors and as much it would satisfy social needs. In other<br />

words, the competitive position <strong>of</strong> the enterprise, its effectiveness depends on the environment. Thus, all<br />

the external factors impose certain changes which may be additionally stimulated by internal causes.<br />

From this perspective, enterprise development is interpreted as a process <strong>of</strong> broadly understood<br />

qualitative changes, discussed from the holistic (comprehensive, global) point <strong>of</strong> view. <strong>The</strong> process runs<br />

over a specific period <strong>of</strong> time and may have purposeful or random, progressive or retrograde,<br />

autonomous or forced, continuous or leap character. Changes <strong>of</strong> qualitative character, identified with<br />

enterprise development, are simultaneously accompanied by an increase in the number <strong>of</strong> assets<br />

possessed by the enterprise, as a result <strong>of</strong> which the scale <strong>of</strong> the activity conducted by it should increase,<br />

and so should its value. Alongside the process <strong>of</strong> enterprise development, the growth <strong>of</strong> its abilities to<br />

influence the external environment should also proceed. Hence, the notion <strong>of</strong> enterprise development<br />

should be broadened by “changes in the systems <strong>of</strong> enterprise and (controllable) environment, ensuring<br />

the achievement and maintenance (as well as an increase) <strong>of</strong> competitive advantage to the enterprise”<br />

(Piercionek 1996). It should be accompanied by the growth (or at least keeping the existing) market<br />

shares, as well as the diversification <strong>of</strong> the structure <strong>of</strong> the conducted activity because the development <strong>of</strong><br />

an organizational system is understood not only in the categories <strong>of</strong> an increase in the efficiency <strong>of</strong> its<br />

functioning but also in the preservative aspect, thus, retaining the existing efficiency in the changing<br />

conditions (Brózda 2001). It is not only a disclosure <strong>of</strong> potential abilities lying in the enterprise but also a<br />

change <strong>of</strong> states resulting from an inability to keep the existing way <strong>of</strong> functioning<br />

(Blauberg/Sadowski/Judin 1973).<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, development as a guiding goal <strong>of</strong> an enterprise whose need results from natural<br />

internal strives <strong>of</strong> every enterprise, as well as from objective external conditionings, consists in<br />

intentionally and purposefully oriented internal changes <strong>of</strong> the enterprise, substantially transforming its<br />

structure, methods and results <strong>of</strong> operations and brings clearly defined, structured and measurable<br />

effects. <strong>The</strong>y may concern both its parts and the whole <strong>of</strong> it, occur in all areas, namely implemented goals,<br />

structure, technology, and refer to the human factor.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

289


<strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> innovation in enterprise development<br />

<strong>The</strong> changes undergoing in the environment, which were mentioned before, are the reason for<br />

which contemporary enterprises face new reality, challenges and uncertainty because there is constant<br />

pressure on the introduction <strong>of</strong> new solutions in all spheres <strong>of</strong> activity: production, technology,<br />

marketing, finance, etc. Thus, flexible reaction to the appearing external changes requires constant<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> changes and innovations modifying or transforming the enterprise’s character and nature,<br />

destroying the existing order and introducing new solutions enabling to perform its functions for the<br />

environment better.<br />

Enterprises in the market economy function under the influence <strong>of</strong> two fundamental powers,<br />

namely: market, whose needs they try to meet through marketing, and technical progress, which enables<br />

the fulfillment <strong>of</strong> future needs in a more effective way. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is possible to say that contemporary<br />

business entities perform two functions: marketing and innovations, which are developed simultaneously<br />

but with the use <strong>of</strong> separate strategies and instruments. Mostly due to capital limitations, the majority <strong>of</strong><br />

enterprises concentrate their efforts on marketing and neglect innovations, disregarding the fact that the<br />

fulfillment <strong>of</strong> the survival and development goal requires constant improvement <strong>of</strong> goods, technological<br />

processes and the organization <strong>of</strong> production, which boils down to the search for innovative solutions and<br />

their later implementation. Development requires working out strategies <strong>of</strong> promoting innovations and<br />

creating favourable psychosocial climate and an efficient stimulation system for them. <strong>The</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> such a<br />

strategy <strong>of</strong>ten leads to lowering competitiveness and discontinuing development. On the other hand,<br />

conducting structured innovative policy in an enterprise enables to <strong>of</strong>fer customers products which are<br />

better, more technologically advanced, and equipped in new functionalities. Moreover, innovativeness<br />

allows to provide new services which are more and more adjusted to individual needs and expectations <strong>of</strong><br />

the recipients. Such actions directly translate into benefits the enterprise may derive from the introduced<br />

changes (Kalinowski 2008).<br />

To sum up, innovations understood as changes made purposefully, consisting in the replacement<br />

<strong>of</strong> the existing structures with others, assessed positively in view <strong>of</strong> the criteria <strong>of</strong> a given organization<br />

and constituting its development, is an inherent element <strong>of</strong> its development strategy. <strong>The</strong>y may adopt the<br />

following forms:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Improvement and development <strong>of</strong> the currently manufactured goods and services,<br />

Adaptation and development <strong>of</strong> the applied production processes,<br />

Improvement <strong>of</strong> the organization <strong>of</strong> work, production, management and marketing,<br />

Introduction <strong>of</strong> state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art technologies and production methods,<br />

Introduction <strong>of</strong> new products based on state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art technologies,<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> a new source <strong>of</strong> raw materials, materials or half-products,<br />

Opening a new market.<br />

<strong>The</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> innovation processes, depending on various criteria and conditionings,<br />

may be done with the use <strong>of</strong> a few most popular innovation strategies:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Offensive strategy – concerns enterprises creating conditions which encourage to develop new<br />

solutions and their fast market implementation. <strong>The</strong> strategy is related to high risk but at the same<br />

time may bring a lot <strong>of</strong> benefits. It requires the creation <strong>of</strong> a research and development<br />

department with high potential <strong>of</strong> innovativeness, good marketing system and effective<br />

production system.<br />

Defensive strategy– implies low level <strong>of</strong> risk and beneficial results. Enterprises which apply it do<br />

not incur a risk <strong>of</strong> losses related to innovative activity, they try to reduce production costs and<br />

supply substitutes <strong>of</strong> new products to the market.<br />

Strategy <strong>of</strong> purchasing licence – enables to make pr<strong>of</strong>its by purchasing technological licences <strong>of</strong><br />

other companies, which significantly reduces expenses on research and development.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

290


Strategy <strong>of</strong> entering a niche – aims at avoiding direct contact with competition. It consists in an<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> leaders existing on the market, defining their strengths and weaknesses, defining<br />

market gaps, and innovative activities focused on these gaps.<br />

Market creation strategy – is based on the dynamic segmentation <strong>of</strong> the market and conducting<br />

activity on new or young markets, with small competition, which creates convenient conditions to<br />

become their leader.<br />

Independent strategy – consists in the constant modernization <strong>of</strong> the product, the growth <strong>of</strong> its<br />

market share, without deep observation <strong>of</strong> competition within this scope. It is a typical long-term<br />

strategy.<br />

Strategy <strong>of</strong> winning specialists – is based on typical brain drain, consisting in finding and<br />

employing specialists from a given industry, which promotes the company’s own innovations<br />

and dilutes the innovative potential <strong>of</strong> the competition.<br />

Strategy <strong>of</strong> winning companies – aims at the development <strong>of</strong> innovations via mergers and<br />

takeovers, as well as strategic alliances with entities <strong>of</strong> high innovativeness.<br />

An analysis <strong>of</strong> the above strategies shows that a lot <strong>of</strong> introduced innovations should bring effects<br />

not only referring to the product itself, but mostly related to the functioning <strong>of</strong> enterprises in the market<br />

environment. Among them we could mention, among others, winning new recipients, an improvement in<br />

the relations with customers, building an innovative image <strong>of</strong> the company, as well as limiting harmful<br />

impact on the environment. One <strong>of</strong> the beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> innovations are also employees. Benefits they may<br />

derive from the introduced changes include, among others, an improvement <strong>of</strong> work conditions and<br />

safety, and an improvement <strong>of</strong> skills and the level <strong>of</strong> motivation. <strong>The</strong> listed benefits very <strong>of</strong>ten occur<br />

jointly, as a synergy effect <strong>of</strong> various innovative processes implemented in the enterprise (Kalinowski<br />

2008).<br />

Measurable results an organization may achieve through introduced changes <strong>of</strong> innovative<br />

character are the reason for which such activities are more and more strongly emphasized in enterprise<br />

strategies. In the literature on the subject we may even come across the notion <strong>of</strong> strategic innovativeness<br />

(Bate/Johnston 2003; Amidon 2003; Kotler/Keller 2006). It is used with reference to innovative enterprises<br />

whose strategy and management system is focused on constant introduction <strong>of</strong> innovations, as well as on<br />

the maximization <strong>of</strong> benefits coming from them. Such as enterprise (Jasiski 1992):<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

conducts a wide range <strong>of</strong> research and development works (or purchases new products or<br />

technologies),<br />

allocates high financial expenditure to such activity,<br />

systematically implements new scientific and technical solutions,<br />

constantly introduces innovations to the market.<br />

In order to characterize an innovative enterprise in more details, we may use a set <strong>of</strong> criteria, both<br />

quantitative and qualitative ones, which express its nature better. <strong>The</strong> most important ones include:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

an ability to generate innovations permanently,<br />

creativity in developing new products and technologies,<br />

an ability to create knowledge and use it in innovative activities,<br />

an ability to forecast the future, strategic thinking,<br />

cooperation with customers, recognition <strong>of</strong> their current and future needs,<br />

flexibility in adaptation activities to changes in the environment,<br />

possessing a team <strong>of</strong> innovators implementing enterprise strategic goals.<br />

Innovative enterprise, characterizing with the qualities mentioned above, are also supported by<br />

the governments <strong>of</strong> the European Union countries. Encouragement to establish such enterprises is an<br />

important element <strong>of</strong> the Lisbon Strategy due to the fact that enterprises which are innovation-oriented<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

291


are a source <strong>of</strong> modern products and technologies, and a good example for other entities in the field <strong>of</strong><br />

generating technical and technological progress and creating new workplaces (ótowski/Batorowicz<br />

2004). Qualities supported by the European Union and referring to innovative enterprises are the<br />

following:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

the production pr<strong>of</strong>ile, the choice and the content <strong>of</strong> an innovative company’s strategy is strongly<br />

influenced by the personality <strong>of</strong> the entrepreneur (owner) and his personal qualities, such as:<br />

creativity, an ability to predict the future, competition in action, a skill to manage a team,<br />

striving at the specialization and standing out from the competition is a significant factor which<br />

shapes an innovative firm,<br />

innovative companies are trying to find place for themselves in the market or product niche and<br />

then they care about the strengthening their competitive advantage,<br />

in spite <strong>of</strong> achieving good results, innovative companies do not interrupt research and<br />

development activities, constantly generate new products and develop new technologies.<br />

To sum up the examination made so far, we can claim that innovative processes, accompanied by<br />

a properly chosen strategy, are one <strong>of</strong> the basic factors <strong>of</strong> enterprise development. First <strong>of</strong> all, it results<br />

from their essence and pro-developmental character. It is worth mentioning here that while discussing the<br />

role <strong>of</strong> innovations in enterprise development, not only technological but also organizational, ecological,<br />

economic and social progress should be taken into account.<br />

<strong>The</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> implementing innovations in an enterprise<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the characteristic and at the same time significant qualities <strong>of</strong> innovative processes is their<br />

high level <strong>of</strong> risk. Managing innovative activity is a constant process <strong>of</strong> taking decisions, and these are<br />

rarely taken in the conditions <strong>of</strong> absolute certainty, having gathered all necessary information and data,<br />

and having fully identified future effects and consequences. Most <strong>of</strong>ten, it is necessary to assume the<br />

probability <strong>of</strong> the occurrence <strong>of</strong> factors which may have influence on the implementation <strong>of</strong> innovative<br />

activities and their final effects. <strong>The</strong> high risk level <strong>of</strong> innovations is influenced by the necessity to incur<br />

considerable costs and high percentage <strong>of</strong> failures during the implementation <strong>of</strong> new solutions. High<br />

expenditure on research and development, designing, building prototypes, testing, marketing research are<br />

incurred before the product is launched, and in many cases the developed concepts <strong>of</strong> new products do<br />

not even reach the commercialization stage. It means that the product whose development ended<br />

successfully and has been implemented to the market must ensure the return not only on the costs <strong>of</strong> its<br />

development, but also the expenditure spent on many other unsuccessful ideas.<br />

Risk is most <strong>of</strong>ten defined as a danger <strong>of</strong> making a loss, a possibility <strong>of</strong> the occurrence <strong>of</strong> an<br />

unfavourable event or not achieving an aim. It may be also defined as a situation in which it is not<br />

possible to predict future conditions <strong>of</strong> managing for sure but the probability <strong>of</strong> their occurrence is<br />

known. <strong>The</strong>refore, enterprises have a possibility to assess risk, the probability <strong>of</strong> the occurrence <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

threats, but also, partially, to control them. We may distinguish so-called systematic risk, referring to all<br />

entities and independent on them (e.g. natural disasters, weather conditions, inflation and<br />

unemployment, interest rate levels), but also so-called specific risk which may be at least partially<br />

controlled (related, for example, to the way <strong>of</strong> managing the enterprise, its financial liquidity, adopted<br />

strategy <strong>of</strong> innovative activity, etc.<br />

<strong>The</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> innovative activity must be discussed from two points <strong>of</strong> view. Firstly, the probability<br />

<strong>of</strong> the occurrence <strong>of</strong> threats, secondly, the effects this occurrence may bring, influence it may exert within<br />

the framework <strong>of</strong> the conducted innovative process. Most dangerous are the threats which have strong<br />

potential impact on the effects <strong>of</strong> the conducted works and at the same time, high probability <strong>of</strong> occurring.<br />

Also the factors whose probability <strong>of</strong> occurrence is low but if they do occur, negative consequences will be<br />

serious and may be considered dangerous for the enterprise. On the other hand, less attention may be<br />

paid to the risks whose consequences are small, and the probability <strong>of</strong> occurrence is small.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

292


In the process <strong>of</strong> innovative project risk management, we may distinguish the following steps<br />

(Butryn 2010):<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Identification <strong>of</strong> threats occurring in a given project,<br />

Defining probabilities <strong>of</strong> the occurrence <strong>of</strong> individual threats,<br />

Assessing the consequences <strong>of</strong> the threat occurrence,<br />

Establishing priorities for the identification <strong>of</strong> threats,<br />

Determining an action plan aiming at the minimizing the probability <strong>of</strong> the occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

threats and minimizing consequences.<br />

Risk identification consists in specifying what events may have negative impact on the project,<br />

that is defining potential sources <strong>of</strong> risk. <strong>The</strong> prepared list <strong>of</strong> sources should be exhaustive, that is include<br />

all potential risky events, regardless <strong>of</strong> frequency and probability <strong>of</strong> their occurrence, it should also be<br />

systematically updated throughout the whole duration <strong>of</strong> the project. Among the sources <strong>of</strong> risk,<br />

significant for the conducted innovative activities, we may distinguish (Pomykalski 2001):<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Micro level - risk resulting from the enterprise activity, which includes: organizational risk<br />

(innovation management strategy, the choice <strong>of</strong> structures and adequate procedures,<br />

permeability <strong>of</strong> innovation flow channels, etc.), marketing risk (the choice <strong>of</strong> proper<br />

marketing strategies <strong>of</strong> creating and introducing innovations), production risk (localization <strong>of</strong><br />

production, expenditures on research and development, the selection <strong>of</strong> technology, the<br />

choice <strong>of</strong> the suppliers <strong>of</strong> raw materials and possible subcontractors, stock management, etc.),<br />

financial risk (liquidity control, the choice <strong>of</strong> capital structure, finance management, etc.),<br />

personnel management risk (the choice <strong>of</strong> staff, employee training, the choice <strong>of</strong> the systems<br />

<strong>of</strong> motivating and rewarding, etc.), the risk <strong>of</strong> the investment’s pr<strong>of</strong>itability;<br />

Intermediate level - market risk which includes: economic situation in a given industry, the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> competition, the barriers to enter the market, the ways <strong>of</strong> winning and retaining the<br />

existing customers;<br />

Macro level - the risk which is a result <strong>of</strong> macroeconomic and global conditionings: the<br />

economic situation in a given country, the economic situation <strong>of</strong> the world economy,<br />

changeability <strong>of</strong> exchange rates, tax regulations, customs regulations, changeability <strong>of</strong> interest<br />

rates, political conditionings, global development, the flow <strong>of</strong> technologies, etc.<br />

Another significant typology <strong>of</strong> risk is the classification <strong>of</strong> its sources with regard to the<br />

consequences which risk implies in the innovation process. Within its framework, we can distinguish<br />

technical and production, market and economic risk. Innovation may turn out to be ineffective<br />

technologically, (when a new product does not comply with standards, does not meet expectations<br />

concerning quality, cost and production time, productivity level, etc.), may not win market approval<br />

(when it does not meet expectations <strong>of</strong> potential buyers), can also become a cause <strong>of</strong> financial losses <strong>of</strong> the<br />

enterprise (when it does not achieve the planned levels <strong>of</strong> sales pr<strong>of</strong>itability).<br />

Another step in the process <strong>of</strong> innovation risk management, following the identification <strong>of</strong><br />

potential threats, is the quantification <strong>of</strong> risk, namely the quantitative expression <strong>of</strong> its probability and<br />

potential consequences. Since the attempts <strong>of</strong> such assessments concern future events and are made in the<br />

situation <strong>of</strong> limited access to some, reliable information, and are exposed to distortions through subjective<br />

assessments <strong>of</strong> threats, the results <strong>of</strong> risk quantification must be treated with proper caution. <strong>The</strong>y are not<br />

accurate and reliable calculations <strong>of</strong> losses possible to be made, but only certain bases to divide threats<br />

into significant ones, that is the ones the attention should be paid to and proper measures <strong>of</strong> reaction may<br />

be prepared, and insignificant ones, which can be ignored or accepted. For the needs <strong>of</strong> risk quantification,<br />

basically mathematical and statistical assessment <strong>of</strong> probability, as well as computer tools <strong>of</strong> risk analysis<br />

are used (Monte Carlo method, scenario analyses, sensitivity analyses).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

293


An effect <strong>of</strong> risk quantification is presenting it with respect to value in the form <strong>of</strong> so-called<br />

expected monetary value being a product <strong>of</strong> two variables: probability <strong>of</strong> the occurrence an event and the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> the result - a loss which will be caused if the risky event occurs. <strong>The</strong> calculations become then the<br />

starting point to perform categorization and hierarchization <strong>of</strong> risk, establishing priorities for actions<br />

preventing risk and building so-called decision tree presenting possible paths and interactions among<br />

decisions and the probability <strong>of</strong> events occurring parallely or sequentionally (Butryn 2010).<br />

<strong>The</strong> target element <strong>of</strong> innovation risk management is establishing the ways <strong>of</strong> reaction to<br />

indentified and assessed risks. <strong>The</strong> reaction methods can be closed in three basic categories (Butryn 2010):<br />

Avoidance - elimination <strong>of</strong> specific risk, usually by eliminating its cause (e.g. by acquiring<br />

ready solutions or commissioning part <strong>of</strong> developmental works to another entity);<br />

Alleviation - lowering the expected monetary value via reducing the probability <strong>of</strong> occurrence<br />

(e.g. the application <strong>of</strong> a known technology or a proven supplier), or lowering the value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

results evoked by the occurrence <strong>of</strong> a risky event (e.g. via creating proper reserves, applying<br />

adequate provisions in contracts or taking out an insurance policy);<br />

Acceptance – which may be passive (it is the acceptance <strong>of</strong> the occurrence <strong>of</strong> a threat with low<br />

level <strong>of</strong> significance, whose influence on the effects <strong>of</strong> the innovative process is not<br />

significant), or active (consists in developing an action plan in case <strong>of</strong> the occurrence <strong>of</strong> events<br />

threatening the project, preparing alternative strategies).<br />

In spite <strong>of</strong> presenting various risks related to the innovation process in this part <strong>of</strong> the paper, as a<br />

summary it is necessary, however, to refer to Peter Drucker’s thought that truly risky behaviour <strong>of</strong> an<br />

enterprise is not the implementation <strong>of</strong> innovative activities but the resignation from conducting them,<br />

leading in further perspective to the permanent loss <strong>of</strong> competitiveness.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Dynamically developing economy forces enterprises to introduce changes which superficially or<br />

deeply modify the enterprise. <strong>The</strong>y may be adjusting solutions, easy to introduce and not too expensive,<br />

but these may be also comprehensive actions which transform the whole organization, which require<br />

involving all forces and means. Changes may also be slow or fast. <strong>The</strong> first ones do not destroy the<br />

enterprise’s balance and are easier to control, but they characterize with smaller effectiveness. On the<br />

other hand, fast changes disturb the balance <strong>of</strong> the organization’s functioning, require bigger outlay,<br />

strengthen resistance <strong>of</strong> the employees but they enable quicker improvement <strong>of</strong> the situation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

company and strengthening its competitive position.<br />

Today, new techniques and technologies constantly appear, and competition is intensifying. In<br />

this situation, an enterprise which does not introduce changes or reacts too slowly to events taking place<br />

in the environment may have problems with the survival on the market, but it certainly cannot develop.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, at present, innovations are one <strong>of</strong> the key factors <strong>of</strong> enterprise development, as well as an<br />

element <strong>of</strong> its competitiveness. Owing to innovations, there is the improvement and modernization <strong>of</strong><br />

manufacturing processes, an increase in productivity, efficiency and quality <strong>of</strong> work, the growth <strong>of</strong><br />

general efficiency and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> operation, the improvement <strong>of</strong> the organization and methods <strong>of</strong><br />

work, liquidation <strong>of</strong> barriers and activation <strong>of</strong> resources, improvement <strong>of</strong> safety and working conditions,<br />

replacement <strong>of</strong> human labour as a result <strong>of</strong> better organization and higher performance based on richer<br />

and more modern technical equipment; an increase in export abilities, etc. (Grudzewski/Hejduk 2001).<br />

Thus, innovation management, inscribed directly in enterprise development strategy, plays an<br />

important role. It consists in introducing broadly understood changes (innovations), primarily in all<br />

critical areas <strong>of</strong> enterprise activity focused on its development. <strong>The</strong>refore, the future aim <strong>of</strong> contemporary<br />

management is creating an environment which will stimulate innovations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

294


References<br />

Amidon D.M. (2003), <strong>The</strong> Innovation Superhighway: Harnessing Intellectual Capital for Sustainable<br />

Collaborative Advantage, Elsevier Science, Woburn.<br />

Bate J.D., Johnston R.E. (2003), <strong>The</strong> Power <strong>of</strong> Strategy Innovation, Amacom, New York.<br />

Blauberg I.W., Sadowski W.N., Judin E.G. (1973), Koncepcje systemowe we wspóczesnej nauce, (in:)<br />

Problemy metodologii bada systemowych, translated by E. Kaparisi, PWN, Warszawa.<br />

Brózda J. (2001), Terminologiczna konwencja rozwoju przedsibiorstwa, (in:) Zarzdzanie wartoci<br />

przedsibiorstwa w warunkach globalizacji, edited by E. Urbaczyk, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu<br />

Szczeciskiego, Szczecin.<br />

Brózda J. (2007), Racjonalno dziaania via rozwój przedsibiorstwa, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu<br />

Szczeciskiego No. 446, Prace Instytutu Ekonomiki i Organizacji Przedsibiorstw No. 49, Szczecin.<br />

Butryn W. (2010), Zarzdzanie ryzykiem w dziaalnoci innowacyjnej, „Innowacje”, No. 28,<br />

www.imik.wip.pw.edu.pl/innowacje28.<br />

Gabrusewicz W. (1996), Restrukturyzacja jako podstawa rozwoju przedsibiorstwa, (in:) Restrukturyzacja<br />

w procesie przeksztace i rozwoju przedsibiorstw, edited by R. Borowiecki, Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

– TNOiK, Kraków.<br />

Grudzewski W., Hejduk I. (2001), Projektowanie systemów zarzdzania, Difin, Warszawa.<br />

Jakubów L. (1999), Spoeczne uwarunkowania rozwoju polskich przedsibiorstw, (in:) Wyzwania rozwojowe<br />

a restrukturyzacja przedsibiorstw, edited by R. Borowiecki, Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics – TNOiK,<br />

Warszawa – Kraków.<br />

Jasiski A.H. (1992), Przedsibiorstwo innowacyjne na rynku, KiW, Warszawa.<br />

Kalinowski T.B. (2008), Korzyci z wprowadzania innowacji, „Problemy jakoci” 09/2008.<br />

Knap-Stefaniuk A. (2012), Innowacje a konkurencyjno przedsibiorstw, http://www.wszpou.edu.pl/biuletyn/strona=biul_innowac&nr=7&p=.<br />

Kotler P., Keller K.L. (2006), Marketing Management, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.<br />

Marcinkowska M. (2000), Ksztatowanie wartoci firmy, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.<br />

Penc J. (1999), Innowacje i zmiany w firmie. Transformacja i sterowanie rozwojem przedsibiorstwa, Zasady<br />

dziaania, warunki sukcesu, Agencja Wydawnicza „Placet”, Warszawa.<br />

Piercionek Z. (1996), Strategie rozwoju firmy, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.<br />

Pomykalski A. (2001), Zarzdzanie innowacjami, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.<br />

Wdzki D. (2003), Strategie pynnoci finansowej przedsibiorstwa, Oficyna Ekonomiczna, Kraków.<br />

ótowski T., Batorowicz B. (2004), Wyzwanie wspólnotowej polityki innowacyjnej, (in:) Rola<br />

polskiej nauki we wzrocie innowacyjnoci gospodarki, edited by E. Oko - Horodyska, PTE, Warszawa.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

295


Research <strong>of</strong> Influencing Factors for Usage <strong>of</strong><br />

Facebook Willingness -A Case Study on College<br />

Students in the Tamsui Area<br />

Cho-Pu Vincent Lin<br />

St. John’s University, Taiwan<br />

Yen-Ting Tim Lin & Wen-Hui Mico Yang<br />

Hsiuping University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Taiwan<br />

Keywords<br />

Facebook; entertainment; technologies; fans page; Tamsui area; usage willingness<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>The</strong> rise <strong>of</strong> social networking websites in recent rise has aroused the discussion among the society. Social<br />

networking websites not only enable people to connect with friends, but also can conduct various studies. For<br />

example, people can create events, conduct a “Human Flesh Search”, and so on. Furthermore, people are able to open<br />

up new relationships on the internet. This study discusses the influencing factors to the usage <strong>of</strong> Facebook<br />

willingness among college students in the Tamsui area. By statistical results, the six variables in this study<br />

(relationships, privacy, entertainment, technologies, fans page and community loyalty) were verified as the most<br />

important factors affecting the influencing for the usage <strong>of</strong> Facebook willingness among college students in the<br />

Tamsui area. It was shown that three variables (relationships, privacy and community loyalty) had a positive<br />

influence to the usage <strong>of</strong> Facebook to college students in the Tamsui area, which completely matched with the<br />

discovery discussed in literature. However, the remaining three variables (entertainment, technologies and fans<br />

page) showed to greatly differ with literature, which conversely had a negative influence to the usage <strong>of</strong> Facebook<br />

among the subjects in this study; these three variables were therefore studied with in-depth analysis in this research.<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> Research and Motives<br />

Background <strong>of</strong> research and motive<br />

With the advance <strong>of</strong> technology, we are currently in a new era where computers and mobile<br />

phones are readily accessed to the internet. Social networking websites are shown to further stand out on<br />

the internet, which as Facebook ranked second in the number <strong>of</strong> registered users among the world,<br />

reaching more than 600 million. One <strong>of</strong> the reasons for the incredible and rapid growth is because it is<br />

simple to register and easy to use. <strong>The</strong> huge influence is as described in the media, where “it’s<br />

population size would make it the third largest country, after China and India”. <strong>The</strong> founder, Mark<br />

Zuckerberg, has even been named Time magazine’s “Person <strong>of</strong> the Year” for 2010; the film <strong>The</strong> Social<br />

Network was also made which portrays the phenomenon, making Facebook sweeping the whole globe.<br />

Facebook’s capability to bring up major topics enhanced its commercial value, making itself unaffected by<br />

the times <strong>of</strong> economic downturns.<br />

<strong>The</strong> internet has shortened the distances among people. Social networking websites increase the<br />

interactions <strong>of</strong> people and maintains the relationships in society. New friends are also made via social<br />

networking websites. Facebook is based on interpersonal interactions, which the games, fan groups, blogs<br />

and sharing <strong>of</strong> photos enable users to know others even better. Users use this function to connect social<br />

development and maintain the relationship with others (Ellison et al, 2007). Facebook has successfully<br />

captured the hearts <strong>of</strong> users and is currently the most popular social networking website.<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> Research<br />

This study uses the influencing factors to the usage <strong>of</strong> Facebook willingness to analyze the factors <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

296


Facebook usage among college students to understand the features <strong>of</strong> social networking websites and the<br />

reasons which may affect users. <strong>The</strong> subjects chosen for this research were college students within the<br />

Tamsui area. <strong>The</strong> main purposes <strong>of</strong> this study are described as follow:<br />

a. To explore and discuss the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the social networking website, Facebook.<br />

b. To find the possible factors which perhaps may affect the willingness <strong>of</strong> using Facebook.<br />

This study verifies if these factors shall affect and increase the willingness among college students in<br />

the Tamsui area <strong>of</strong> using Facebook; it also serves as reference to the operators <strong>of</strong> social networking<br />

websites.<br />

Literature Review<br />

<strong>The</strong> Effect <strong>of</strong> Relationships to usage <strong>of</strong> Facebook Willingness<br />

<strong>The</strong> most direct influence to interactions is how people get along with others. In past social<br />

sciences research, analysis showed that the relations between friends shall mutually affect their behavior<br />

and thinking, resulting into many similarities (Granovetter, 1973; Kandel, 1978; vanDuijn et al, 2003).<br />

Facebook uses this mutually influence pattern and focuses on target groups. Facebook announced it now<br />

has over 300 million users worldwide. <strong>The</strong> number <strong>of</strong> people who signed up for Facebook in Taiwan has<br />

already exceeded 2.23 million just within the past several years (updated to September 7, 2009), and<br />

continuously growing by an average <strong>of</strong> 200,000~300,000 persons per week (Huang et al., 2009). <strong>The</strong> data<br />

published by Insight Xplorer showed that Facebook has successfully surpassed Taiwan’s originally largest<br />

social networking website, “Wretch”, just within a short period <strong>of</strong> four months and become the second<br />

largest website in Taiwan since June 2009 (Google ranks first). Many users indicated that Facebook helped<br />

them reconnect with past friends. <strong>The</strong> application programs used in Facebook are not innovative<br />

technologies but rather emphasizes on the concepts <strong>of</strong> “simple to use”, “connecting” and “share”; the<br />

games and updates enable people to interact with friends, which increase discussion topics and bring<br />

people closer (Shih, 2010). <strong>The</strong> relations are not only established among the virtual world <strong>of</strong> the internet,<br />

but also are combined to realistic life. Besides being an online interactive website, Facebook also becomes<br />

a media for relationships when <strong>of</strong>fline.<br />

Effect on Privacy<br />

Facebook extremely holds the personal information <strong>of</strong> its users with great importance. Through<br />

platforms, users can authorize their information and be sent to various application programs. Facebook<br />

designed a series <strong>of</strong> privacy control options, allowing users to set who can the messages they posted.<br />

People do not have to worry messages are revealed. This suitable level <strong>of</strong> information disclosure enables<br />

easy interaction.<br />

Based on the above literature, this study considers that privacy can evaluate the willingness <strong>of</strong><br />

using Facebook among college students in the Tamsui area.<br />

Entertainment<br />

<strong>The</strong> powerful links and interactive functions <strong>of</strong> Facebook aroused a popularity wave in Taiwan<br />

during the summer <strong>of</strong> 2009. <strong>The</strong> number <strong>of</strong> registered users greatly increased. This was because the games<br />

are entertaining; making people who already know each other can have even more interaction. <strong>The</strong><br />

Facebook games naturally become the motive <strong>of</strong> many people becoming users. As it is able to connect<br />

friends and leave messages, friends invited other friends and eventually led to signing up.<br />

<strong>The</strong> motive to sign up because <strong>of</strong> games was evident in Taiwan, which the number <strong>of</strong> users in<br />

Taiwan grew from several hundred thousands to more than 5 million in five months, from July to<br />

November, 2009. <strong>The</strong> start <strong>of</strong> this was quite interesting, however. Among the thousands <strong>of</strong> applications,<br />

“Happy Farm” was extremely popular. As internet friends awaits the fun in “planting crops” and<br />

“stealing crops”, the interaction among friends increased further. Friends invite unsigned friends to play,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

297


which naturally increased the number <strong>of</strong> users and formed a madness <strong>of</strong> becoming “farmers and planting<br />

crops”. Furthermore, the game was designed where the number <strong>of</strong> friends shall directly affect the score<br />

and rewards. This had therefore encouraged users to increase friends, to add strangers, and friends <strong>of</strong><br />

friends. As a result, the friend list not only included a list <strong>of</strong> original friends, but also included people one<br />

done not know <strong>of</strong>fline.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore from the above literature, this study considers that entertainment can evaluate the<br />

willingness <strong>of</strong> using Facebook among college students in the Tamsui area.<br />

Technical Information and New Products Development<br />

With the internet network and information, the advances in media technology and popularity,<br />

and the continuous improvement <strong>of</strong> online/<strong>of</strong>fline network access technology, the goal is to achieve<br />

instant messaging. <strong>The</strong> priorities include: mobile wireless access technology and wired broadband access<br />

technology.<br />

Safko & Brake (2009) suggested social networking websites, such as Facebook, have seem to<br />

possess media characteristics, and can therefore be called as group media; though multimedia, users<br />

interact with others by conservation. <strong>The</strong> content produced from social networking websites is the<br />

exchange <strong>of</strong> news or information. Users can not only control the information content but also can<br />

determine the flow and influence <strong>of</strong> the information. Shih (2009) further indicated that technological<br />

innovation has promoted the internet from the function <strong>of</strong> websites to users lead interpersonal network<br />

contact. <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> social networking websites becomes organizing, filtering, contacting and integrating<br />

the online social graph. <strong>The</strong>refore, group media relates to how users capture and use information to<br />

display oneself and social recognition, rather than receiving and using innovative technology; the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

group media to users is <strong>of</strong> privacy and personal rather than the capture <strong>of</strong> information or the capabilities<br />

in technology. Shih considered that group media converted the power and control pattern <strong>of</strong> technology;<br />

group media not only enhanced the energy among the voices <strong>of</strong> users, it also given users to practice and<br />

create a self-identified control (Shih 2009).<br />

For the aspect in new products development, in May, 2007, Facebook announced the plan to lets<br />

users post free classified ads, known as “Facebook Marketing”. Holzner (2009) considered that Facebook<br />

provided an even better marketing environment, also indicating that compared to the relatively chaotic<br />

and non-order environment as in “MySpace”, Facebook provide users to make friend and group network<br />

contact. Users not only can maintain contact with friends, observe their friends’ events, it becomes a series<br />

connection among the society to form cohesiveness in groups. According to the 2011 bulletin by Visa, the<br />

survey results among e-commerce consumers in 2010 showed that six items show rapid growth in the<br />

electronic commerce market which consumers enthusiastically purchase online, where among these 6<br />

markets about 87% <strong>of</strong> the respondents mentioned they purchased products and services online in the past<br />

year; with an annual network consumption <strong>of</strong> USD 2,086 in average.<br />

According to the ComScore report by ARROO in regards to Facebook in the Asia Pacific, the total<br />

time on Facebook by users in this September was 22 billion and 577 million minutes, or about 376.28<br />

million hours. Although the total time used in countries all reflect a growing trend, the growth status is<br />

not necessarily the same. Taiwan had the highest growth percentage rate reaching to 986.81%, whereas<br />

Indonesia was the lowest and only had 21.18% growth.<br />

Fans Page<br />

Holzner (2009) proposed the attitude and view <strong>of</strong> exchange platforms, and found out that 40% <strong>of</strong><br />

the consumers agreed to the description that “Facebook is an excellent channel to obtain related<br />

information <strong>of</strong> a company and its products”.<br />

According to a Rosetta, an interactive marketing agency, in January 2010, in a study <strong>of</strong> 100 brands,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

298


59 had Facebook pages. According to Facebook, it hosts about 1.6 million active pages today operated by<br />

more than 700 thousands <strong>of</strong> companies and groups. <strong>The</strong>se fans pages regularly update new information to<br />

fans so that no boundaries (zero distance) are between the fans and the company or group.<br />

<strong>The</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> Taiwanese internet users interacting with their favorite brands via Facebook fan<br />

pages reached to 33.3% high. In addition, they like to join fan pages which provide information for their<br />

daily lives. <strong>The</strong> primary reasons <strong>of</strong> joining fan pages were because <strong>of</strong> the “search”, “connect”, “and<br />

“cohesive” abilities, which users generally agree to be the most attractive things. Surveys indicated that<br />

people will go online to search information before purchasing, especially for travel, hardware<br />

information, buying clothes or for other consuming actions; further on, half <strong>of</strong> them shall go online and<br />

share information <strong>of</strong> the brand after purchasing (Shih, 2010).<br />

According to the well-known internet marketing and trend knowledge expert, Sun Chuan-hsiung,<br />

in 2009, the creation <strong>of</strong> fan pages on one hand attracts the attention <strong>of</strong> general internet users, while on the<br />

other hand use the group concept as basis to expand business. Brand operators can increase the<br />

interaction with people on the internet, and also enhance the scale <strong>of</strong> the brand and product in the internet<br />

to the group. Sun considers fans pages have the following properties:<br />

1. Taiwan currently has more than 6.5 million members. <strong>The</strong> additional support by games and unique<br />

qualities, fan pages increase the time users stay online time and access frequency each day. This<br />

increases the usage and dependency for Facebook.<br />

2. Facebook requires using use a real name to login. <strong>The</strong>refore individuals hold the responsibility<br />

when posting messages which reduce the possibility <strong>of</strong> malicious messages and attacks by users.<br />

3. Complete group function. Operating the interface is based on a group concept as the start point. As<br />

different groups have their own requirements, fan pages are managed and developed according to<br />

a group’s characteristics.<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> function <strong>of</strong> Facebook’s wall has eventually become well-developed and convenient, which<br />

today also includes a micro-blog function, discussion threads, friend or fan posting function, and<br />

instant messaging response. This also showed to benefit businesses for operating and managing<br />

groups.<br />

5. When fans pages are business-oriented, it shall greatly benefit the internet for integrating and<br />

marketing. <strong>The</strong> support for Facebook developing application programming interface (API) enables<br />

businesses to develop many customized marketing programs and events according to their own<br />

needs, or write helpful and unique applications and games for the marketing events. When group<br />

members participate in the brand events, increase interaction, and have a common marketing goal,<br />

the implementation <strong>of</strong> different marketing plans can be planned according to different groups.<br />

6. <strong>The</strong> fans window can display a company’s website or blog. When users browse the page or blog,<br />

they can add it as a fans page through the window, making it easy to expand potential groups.<br />

7. While integrating Facebook Connect with the websites <strong>of</strong> businesses, users can user their Facebook<br />

account to login to the website members system. This can increases the possibility <strong>of</strong> users using<br />

the resources <strong>of</strong> a business website.<br />

From above, fans page have many positive effects to business operators. Fans page shall be<br />

comprehensively developed with even more mature and multi-directional applications technology.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, this study considers that fans page can evaluate the willingness <strong>of</strong> using Facebook among<br />

college students in the Tamsui area.<br />

Community Loyalty<br />

In the traditional consumer behavioral theory, Wu (2006) described that “brand loyalty” refers to<br />

the degree <strong>of</strong> awareness and preference to the brand, which a consumer consistently purchases the same<br />

brand or service. Day (1969) suggested that customer loyalty is the continuous behavior <strong>of</strong> the customer<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

299


purchasing a certain product. Furthermore, Jones and Sasse proposed that the loyalty from the user is<br />

reflected by behavior in three patterns. <strong>The</strong> first one is repurchasing willingness, which refers to the<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> consumers willing to repurchase a product or service. <strong>The</strong> willingness <strong>of</strong> purchasing becomes a<br />

strong indicator for future behavior. <strong>The</strong> second is initial behavior, indicating that repurchasing behavior<br />

has been actually conducted. <strong>The</strong> last one is secondary behavior, which refers to the behavior where<br />

consumers actively recommend toward friends or family (Shih, 2008).<br />

Summary<br />

By summarizing the above literature, the study variables in this research are listed as follow:<br />

research variables<br />

dependent degree <strong>of</strong> Facebook usage<br />

variable<br />

independent relationships<br />

variable 1<br />

independent privacy<br />

variable 2<br />

independent entertainment<br />

variable 3<br />

independent technologies<br />

variable 4<br />

independent fans page<br />

variable 5<br />

independent community loyalty<br />

variable 6<br />

Method <strong>of</strong> Research<br />

Research Procedure<br />

<strong>The</strong> research procedures in this study are mainly divided into nine steps, as shown in Figure3-1.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first step was to determine the research direction from an interested theme, which was then inspired<br />

by research background and motivation to collect data and discussion <strong>of</strong> associated literature. <strong>The</strong><br />

discussion <strong>of</strong> literature then determined the purpose <strong>of</strong> research, which then became the basis to create a<br />

research framework, establish the research hypothesis and methods for data analysis. <strong>The</strong> follow-up steps<br />

then included questionnaire design, distribute and collect the questionnaires. After the questionnaires<br />

were returned, data compilation and analysis were conducted. <strong>The</strong> results from the analysis were<br />

discussed with an overall relation view, and finally conclusions and suggestions were given according to<br />

our analysis and discussed results.<br />

Determine research theme<br />

Literature review<br />

Determine research variables and subjects<br />

Questionnaire design<br />

Collect distributed questionnaires<br />

SPSS analysis<br />

Results<br />

Conclusions and suggestions<br />

Figure 3-1 Research process flow chart<br />

Data collection<br />

Research Design<br />

Research Subjects and Sample Size<br />

This study used college students in the Tamsui area as research subjects. Four colleges are located within<br />

the area, which are St. John’s University, Tamkang University, Aletheia University, Taipei College <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

300


Marine Technology and Commerce (TCMT), respectively. <strong>The</strong> sample distribution in this was according<br />

to the percentage <strong>of</strong> students among the four schools. <strong>The</strong> subjects were not specifically selected by their<br />

major, class year and gender. <strong>The</strong> expected return <strong>of</strong> valid questionnaires was 200.<br />

Table 3-1 Questionnaire return distribution<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> College Number <strong>of</strong><br />

students<br />

Percentage<br />

from total<br />

Tamkang University appr. 28, 000 58.5 (%) 117<br />

Aletheia University appr. 9, 500 20 (%) 40<br />

St. John’s University appr. 7, 500 16.5 (5%) 33<br />

Expected valid<br />

questionnaire return<br />

Taipei College <strong>of</strong><br />

appr. 2, 500 5 (%) 10<br />

Marine Technology<br />

and Commerce<br />

(TCMT)<br />

Total appr. 47, 500 100 (%) 200<br />

Sampling<br />

This study used convenience sampling to distribute the questionnaires. <strong>The</strong> respondents by<br />

random choice were asked to fill the questionnaire. <strong>The</strong> questionnaires were distributed at the main gate<br />

and side gate <strong>of</strong> the four schools. This was because they are the locations were students must walk by<br />

when they attend or leave classes. It is also considered to be crowded locations. <strong>The</strong> questionnaires were<br />

distributed randomly.<br />

Data Analysis<br />

After conducting the research, all returned data were carefully examined to remove any invalid<br />

questionnaire information. <strong>The</strong> data were then coded and input into a computer. <strong>The</strong> statistical processing<br />

and analysis was performed by SPSS15.0 for Windows. <strong>The</strong> method <strong>of</strong> data analysis was divided into two<br />

parts: <strong>The</strong> first part was reliability analysis. In order to confirm the accuracy <strong>of</strong> our research results,<br />

reliability analysis was performed to the questionnaire scale using Cronbach’s to check if the<br />

participants and questionnaire content show consistency. <strong>The</strong> second part was multiple regression<br />

analysis, used to explain the influential degrees <strong>of</strong> the 6 independent variables toward the dependent<br />

variable.<br />

Questionnaire Content<br />

<strong>The</strong> study first referred to associated research from literature as basis to develop the research<br />

framework and design the questionnaire. <strong>The</strong> questionnaire is divided into four categories, including the<br />

usage status <strong>of</strong> Facebook, survey <strong>of</strong> willingness in using Facebook, the influencing factors to the usage if<br />

Facebook willingness, and personal basic information<br />

Results<br />

Questionnaire Results<br />

<strong>The</strong> questionnaires in this study were distributed by four waves, having a total return <strong>of</strong> 205<br />

answered copies. Every time when returned the questionnaires were first checked <strong>of</strong> validness before<br />

coded. A total <strong>of</strong> 12 invalid questionnaires were removed, and the total return <strong>of</strong> valid questionnaires was<br />

193. <strong>The</strong> following sections shall describe the various statistical analysis used in this study.<br />

Reliability Analysis<br />

This study used Cronbach's value as the standard for measuring the reliability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

questionnaires. <strong>The</strong> results are given in Tables 4-1 and 4-2. <strong>The</strong> reliability coefficient, value, for all <strong>of</strong> the<br />

questions (44 total) in the questionnaire was 0.746. This indicates that the results have middle consistency.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

301


Table 4-1 Case Processing Summary<br />

N %<br />

Cases Valid 180 93.3<br />

Excluded (a) 13 6.7<br />

Total 193 100.0<br />

Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.<br />

Table 4-2 Reliability Statistics<br />

Cronbach's Alpha<br />

N <strong>of</strong> Items<br />

.746 44<br />

Multiple regression analysis<br />

This study used multiple regression to analyze the influence <strong>of</strong> the 6 independent variables<br />

(relationships, privacy, entertainment, technologies, fans page and community loyalty) toward the<br />

dependent variable (usage <strong>of</strong> Facebook willingness). <strong>The</strong> purpose was to verify the research hypothesis<br />

below:<br />

Hp: “<strong>The</strong> six variables (relationships, privacy, entertainment, technologies, fans page and<br />

community loyalty) are the most important factors for affecting the willingness <strong>of</strong> Facebook among<br />

college students in the Tamsui area”<br />

Results from multiple regression analysis show (Tables 4-3~4-5) that the model was suitable (F<br />

value = 4.939, p value =.000), where the adjusted R square (R2) value was 0.119. This indicated that R2 in<br />

the model was 11.9%. As for the variables validness from the perspective <strong>of</strong> the t value, three out <strong>of</strong> the six<br />

independent variables reached significance, which were relationships, privacy and community loyalty; the<br />

remaining three failed to reach significance. As for the influential degree <strong>of</strong> the variables, from the beta<br />

value it was shown that the greatest factor to affect the willingness <strong>of</strong> using Facebook among college<br />

students in the Tamsui area was “community loyalty” (Beta=0.204). <strong>The</strong> multiple regression equation for<br />

the model is:<br />

Y (usage <strong>of</strong> Facebook willingness) = 0.168X (relationships) + 0.209X (privacy) – 0.029X (entertainment) – 0.085X (technologies) – 0.1X<br />

(fans page) + 0.204X (community loyalty) + e i.<br />

Table 4-3 General Model: Model Summary<br />

Std. Error<br />

R Adjusted<br />

Model R<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

Square R Square<br />

Estimate<br />

Change Statistics<br />

R<br />

Square<br />

Change<br />

F Change df1 df2<br />

Sig. F<br />

Change<br />

1 .386 (a) .149 .119 .82582 .149 4.939 6 169 .000<br />

Predictors (Constants): relationships, privacy, entertainment, technologies, fans page, community loyalty.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

302


Table 4-4 General Model: ANOVA<br />

Model Sum <strong>of</strong> Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.<br />

1 Regression 20.212 6 3.369 4.939 .000 (a)<br />

Residual 115.255 169 .682<br />

Total 135.467 175<br />

• Predictors (Constants): relationships, privacy, entertainment, technologies, fans page, community<br />

loyalty.<br />

• Dependent variable: <strong>The</strong> usage <strong>of</strong> Facebook<br />

Table 4-5 General Model: Coefficients<br />

Unstandardized Standardized<br />

Collinearity<br />

Model<br />

Coefficients<br />

Coefficients t Sig. Statistics<br />

Std.<br />

Tolerance<br />

B Error Beta<br />

1 (Constant) 2.513 .852 2.950 .004<br />

Relationships .251 .124 .168 2.022 .045 .727<br />

Privacy .320 .121 .029 2.651 .009 .807<br />

Entertainment -.044 .120 -.029 -.369 .713 .801<br />

Technologies -.125 .111 -.085 -1.130 .260 .883<br />

Fans page -.207 .157 -.100 -1.322 .188 .874<br />

Community loyalty .387 .149 .204 2.598 .010 .815<br />

• Dependent Variable: <strong>The</strong> usage <strong>of</strong> Facebook<br />

Results and Suggestions<br />

<strong>The</strong> statistical results in Chapter 4 verified the 6 variables in this study (relationships, privacy,<br />

entertainment, technologies, fans page and community loyalty) were the most important factors for affecting<br />

the willingness <strong>of</strong> using Facebook among college students in the Tamsui area. Among them, 3 variables<br />

(relationships, privacy and community loyalty) had a positive effect to the willingness <strong>of</strong> using Facebook<br />

among college students in the Tamsui area, which completely corresponds to the findings in the literature.<br />

However, the other three variables (entertainment, technologies and fans page) on the other hand differed<br />

from the literature, and conversely showed to have a negative effect. As a result, these three variables<br />

were given an in-depth analysis in this study.<br />

Entertainment<br />

According to the discussion in literature, there are many reasons why Facebook is very popular in<br />

Taiwan. One <strong>of</strong> the reasons is that Facebook has many fun games. In 2009, the rise <strong>of</strong> the extremely<br />

popular “Happy Farm” game in Taiwan led to users increasing their relationships while planting and<br />

stealing crops. <strong>The</strong>se games are usually designed where the number <strong>of</strong> friends shall directly affect the<br />

score and rewards. This encourages players who wanted to get high scores to continuously invite friends<br />

regardless he/she is a friend <strong>of</strong> friends or even a stranger. <strong>The</strong>refore the assumption in this study is quite<br />

reasonable, which the entertainment games provide shall increase the willingness <strong>of</strong> using Facebook<br />

among college students in the Tamsui area. However, according to our statistical results, it was found that<br />

“entertainment” shall conversely have a negative effect to the usage <strong>of</strong> Facebook willingness among<br />

college students in the Tamsui area.<br />

Although Facebook games are appealing, it can also cause worries to users in regards <strong>of</strong> privacy.<br />

According to research, even though Facebook users had the highest privacy setting, they are considered as<br />

invisible once game applications were installed. Not only were all information recorded in the personal<br />

account were collected, including friends list, date <strong>of</strong> birth and so on, but also friends were affected and<br />

may even danger the security <strong>of</strong> the individual’s internet banking account. A true case has proved that<br />

Facebook games applications will seriously invade users’ privacy. One example is the once-popular City<br />

Ville. <strong>The</strong> total players worldwide exceeded 95 million persons, which in average 1 out <strong>of</strong> every 7 users<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

303


played the game. In 2010 news spread that the company <strong>of</strong> the game, Zynga, collected the personal<br />

information <strong>of</strong> the players and transferred to a third party. Based on these findings, this study reasonably<br />

surmised that Facebook entertainment and privacy are fundamentally in conflict. Based on worries in<br />

privacy, college students in the Tamsui area shall conversely not increase their willingness <strong>of</strong> using<br />

Facebook because <strong>of</strong> the numerous fun games. This assumption supports with the statistical results in this<br />

study.<br />

Technologies<br />

Meanwhile, results from this study also showed that the “technologies” used by Facebook will<br />

also reduce the willingness <strong>of</strong> using Facebook among college students in the Tamsui area. This result<br />

differs from discussions in the literature. In September 2011, Facebook’s update <strong>of</strong> page display was<br />

expected to receive praise by users but rather received numerous negative criticisms. Some users even<br />

thought that the new display was overcrowded and too complicated. What was worse was that an analyst<br />

indicated that the new version design enabled Facebook to collect even more information or likes <strong>of</strong> users,<br />

making it easier to perform one-to-one marketing. This discovery was similar to the “entertainment”<br />

variable, which would conversely reduce the usage <strong>of</strong> Facebook willingness among college students in the<br />

Tamsui area. <strong>The</strong> reason was same – privacy protection. Whether Facebook claimed that the new version<br />

or new function is to bring more convenience to users, it cannot be denied that the latest technologies<br />

represent that Facebook will have more opportunities to collect personal information from users.<br />

This was the very important discovery in our research: “entertainment”, “technologies” and<br />

“privacy” are in conflict. In accordance to this research, based on college students in the Tamsui area,<br />

users shall place “privacy” as the first priority when evaluating these factors.<br />

Fans page<br />

According to the discussion in literature, the fans page function in Facebook is an effective<br />

channel to communicate with online users. Facebook users are able to obtain brand messages by fans<br />

page, which are more accurate than the information from Google or other search engines. In specific,<br />

Facebook fans page also enables users to have high interaction with their favored brands. <strong>The</strong>refore this<br />

study reasonably predicts that fans page shall increase the usage <strong>of</strong> Facebook to college students in the<br />

Tamsui area.<br />

However, our statistical results indicated that the effect <strong>of</strong> fans page to the usage <strong>of</strong> Facebook by<br />

college students in the Tamsui region was negative. <strong>The</strong> reason may likely be that among the numerous<br />

fans pages, most are created by business groups, which the messages are mainly <strong>of</strong>:<br />

1. Latest updates <strong>of</strong> the company<br />

2. Product promotion messages<br />

3. Public service/charity activities<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore based on our statistical results, this study reasonably surmised that when users found out that<br />

businesses spread company-related messages or promoting events though fans page to achieve<br />

commercial interest, the willingness <strong>of</strong> receiving messages shall decrease. On the contrary, when fans<br />

page post news less related to the company but rather issue information related to our lives, new fashion<br />

or interesting articles, users have a higher acceptance as there are no sense <strong>of</strong> advertising.<br />

References<br />

Ellison, Nicole B., Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe (2007), “<strong>The</strong> Benefits <strong>of</strong> Facebook „Friends: Social Capital and<br />

College Students Use <strong>of</strong> Online Social Network Sites,” Journal <strong>of</strong> Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4),<br />

article 1. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html.<br />

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). <strong>The</strong> Strength <strong>of</strong> Weak Ties. <strong>The</strong> American Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

304


Holzner, Steven (2009), Facebook Marketing: Leverage Social Media to Grow Your Business. Indianapolis, IN: Que<br />

Publishing.<br />

Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, Selection, and Socialization in Adolescent<br />

Friendships. <strong>The</strong> American Journal <strong>of</strong> Sociology, 84(2), 427-436.<br />

Van Duijn, M. A. J., Zeggelink, E. P. H., Huisman, M., Stokman, F. N., & Wasseur, F.<br />

W. (2003). Evolution <strong>of</strong> sociology freshmen into a friendship network. <strong>The</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong> Mathematical Sociology,<br />

27(2), 153 - 191.<br />

Shih, Clara (2009), <strong>The</strong> Facebook Era: Tapping Online Social Networks to Build Better Products, Reach New<br />

Audiences, and Sell More Stuff. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.<br />

Safko, Lo and David K. Brake (2009), <strong>The</strong> Social Media Bible: Tactics, Tools & Strategies for Business Success.<br />

Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

305


Scientific Advance and Perceptions about the<br />

Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Democracy in MENA<br />

Hoda Abd El Hamid Ali<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Economics and International Trade<br />

Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt<br />

Keywords<br />

Democracy. MENA Region. Scientific and Technological Development. World Values Survey. Economic<br />

Development<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>The</strong> study employs individual- level data on more than 6000 individuals from three countries in the MENA<br />

region to investigate the extent to which an individual's own perception about the importance <strong>of</strong> giving scientific<br />

and technological development in the near future impact their perceptions <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy and it<br />

reduces the desire for a rouge leader. We find a positive and strong relation between the perceptions regarding the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> scientific and technological development, and the perceptions regarding the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy<br />

in the whole region. <strong>The</strong> evidence <strong>of</strong> such relationship is much stronger in low democratic countries like Egypt, and<br />

Morocco than in a higher democratic countries like Turkey. People's beliefs about the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy as a<br />

system <strong>of</strong> governance are also shaped by more income equality, economic prosperity, and the level and satisfaction<br />

with household income especially in countries with low levels <strong>of</strong> democracy. <strong>The</strong> results suggest that there should be<br />

more emphasis on scientific and technological development in the near future in order to have a effective democracy<br />

in the low democratic countries in the region.<br />

Introduction<br />

Perhaps one <strong>of</strong> the most robust and enduring empirical findings <strong>of</strong> post-World War two social<br />

sciences is the existence <strong>of</strong> a strong positive relationship between economic development and<br />

democratization.<br />

Economists are increasingly interested in the analysis <strong>of</strong> the political determinants <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

development after the pioneering work by Robert Barro (1996) that explores the causal linkages between<br />

long- run economic performance and features <strong>of</strong> government policy and institutions. <strong>The</strong> potential impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> economic development on the extent <strong>of</strong> democracy is an equally important research question, and<br />

whether an increase in income <strong>of</strong> a country causes its democracy to improve has been a subject <strong>of</strong> recent<br />

debate.<br />

Barro(1999) finds that the propensity for democracy rises with per capita GDP. Despite the lack <strong>of</strong><br />

clear predictions from theoretical models, the cross-country evidence examined in Barro (1999) confirms<br />

that the Lipset/Aristotle hypothesis is a strong empirical regularity. In particular, increases in various<br />

measures <strong>of</strong> the standard <strong>of</strong> living forecast a gradual rise in democracy. Similarly, Barro's version <strong>of</strong> the<br />

modernization thesis stresses the role <strong>of</strong> education and, to a lesser extent, urbanization, widespread<br />

education thus emerges as a necessary condition for democracy.<br />

<strong>The</strong> calls for democracy in some countries in the MENA region have made some authors reject<br />

Huntingtonk's argument on the incompatibility <strong>of</strong> Islam and democracy for dead. Others have,<br />

particularly declared Lipset's classic modernization argument in relation with the Tunisian revolution,<br />

pointing to the relatively higher income level and the size <strong>of</strong> the middle class in that country. Revolutions<br />

in Libya, Syria and Yemen at their calls for democracy surprise many observers and political scientists,<br />

and questioned the sincerity <strong>of</strong> such calls regarding the future prospects <strong>of</strong> democratization efforts.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

306


This paper aims to contribute to the literature on the determinants <strong>of</strong> democracy in MENA region.<br />

As the recent waves <strong>of</strong> revolutions and revolutionary attempts in this region have not only been<br />

important political events, they have also re-sparked old academic debates.<br />

<strong>The</strong> study employs individual- level rather than country level data; however, it differs from<br />

previous work in an important way, the paper investigates the extent to which an individual’s own<br />

opinion about the importance <strong>of</strong> giving more emphasis on scientific and technological development in the<br />

near future makes him/her more likely to reveal the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy in his/her country.<br />

Specifically, an increase in overall scientific advance may increase the individual’s subjective probability<br />

<strong>of</strong> future prosperity & development, and increase in the level <strong>of</strong> per capita income in a country, and<br />

therefore it would increase his/her expected future utility. This could in turn influence his/her propensity<br />

for satisfaction with democracy as a system <strong>of</strong> governance.<br />

Model<br />

<strong>The</strong> Basic model can be specified as follows:<br />

D ict = ict + S&TA ict + X ict + Y ict + ict,<br />

Where:<br />

D ict, measures individual i's propensity for happiness with democratic efficiency who lives in country c,<br />

and surveyed in year t. It is observed to be equal to 1 when individual strongly or absolutely agrees that it<br />

is important for him or her to live in a democratic country, and zero otherwise.<br />

When D ict > 0 so that (D ict=1) = Prob ( ict + S&TD ict + X ict + Y ict + ict> 0). If the error term ict is<br />

normally distributed, then the result is a standard single-equation probit specification.<br />

ic, Differences across individuals with respect to their general attributes towards democracy. Larger<br />

values indicate higher baseline propensity for dissatisfaction with democracy, this could be caused by<br />

differences in cultural, historical, and institutional differences between countries.<br />

S&TA ict, measures individual i's propensity for happiness with scientific & technological development,<br />

who lives in country c, and surveyed in year t. It is observed to be equal to 1 when he/ or she agrees or<br />

strongly agrees that it is good to have more emphasis scientific and technological advance in the near<br />

future.<br />

X ict, stands for personal attributes <strong>of</strong> the individual, such as, gender, employment, marital status, the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> children, religion, the level <strong>of</strong> education, and the level &satisfaction with personal income.<br />

Y ict , stands for individual i's beliefs towards the importance <strong>of</strong> some characteristics <strong>of</strong> democracy such as<br />

income equality, and economic prosperity who lives in country c, and surveyed in year t. It is observed to<br />

be equal to 1 when he/ or she strongly or absolutely agrees that it is important to have income equality,<br />

and economic prosperity.<br />

Data<br />

<strong>The</strong> primary data obtained from the (2005-2008) wave <strong>of</strong> the World Values Survey (WVS). We use micro<br />

data on 6000 individuals from three countries in the MENA region (Egypt, Morocco, and Turkey) 1 , to<br />

investigate the extent to which personal's judgment regarding the importance <strong>of</strong> scientific and<br />

technological development impact their perceptions <strong>of</strong> the efficiency <strong>of</strong> democracy.<br />

Policy Implications<br />

<strong>The</strong> results underline the importance <strong>of</strong> science and technology to policy makers in developing countries,<br />

especially in MENA region, as nowadays some <strong>of</strong> these countries are struggling and in their ongoing<br />

movements towards democracy. We also find that not only scientific advance and technological<br />

development are very important for the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy; there are other important<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

307


determinants <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy as household income, income equality, and income<br />

prosperity.<br />

<strong>The</strong> paper proceeds as follows: section one introduces the introduction <strong>of</strong> the study, a literature review <strong>of</strong><br />

the impact <strong>of</strong> science and technology on democracy and the other determinants <strong>of</strong> democracy will be<br />

discussed in section two, Section three deals with the specification <strong>of</strong> the model and results <strong>of</strong> estimation,<br />

and finally section four gives the summary and conclusions <strong>of</strong> the study.<br />

Literature Review<br />

As noted above, the literature on determinants <strong>of</strong> democracy is large, and points to a vast set <strong>of</strong><br />

quite different potential explanatory factors. We do not take aim to review the entire literature, but rather<br />

focus on some particularly important proposed explanatory factors and debates from the literature.<br />

Economic factors are among the most studied potential determinants <strong>of</strong> democracy. <strong>The</strong>re are<br />

two main open questions in the debate on the relationship between economic development and<br />

democratic institutions. One is whether or not countries become democratic only at higher levels <strong>of</strong> per<br />

capita income, and the second is whether or not democracy enhances economic development, captured by<br />

per capita GDP growth. 2<br />

On both questions there are disagreements amongst scholars. Most observers would agree that<br />

richer countries are democracies, as argued by Lipset (1959) famously argued that a high GDP per capita<br />

increased the probability <strong>of</strong> a country being democratic, and several later studies corroborated this result.<br />

Barro(1999), finds that the propensity for democracy rises with per capita GDP by using a panel data <strong>of</strong><br />

over 100 countries from 1960 to 1995. Minier (2001) shows that an increase in per capita GDP is associated<br />

with an enhanced demand for democracy. Papaioannou and Siourounis(2008) report that economic<br />

development is a key factor determining the intensity <strong>of</strong> democratic reforms in a country.<br />

However, Acemoglu, et al. (2008) find insignificant impact <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> income on democracy by<br />

adding country fixed effects in repeated cross- country regressions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> modernization literature and other contributions point to a set <strong>of</strong> variables related to<br />

economic development, other than income level, that may be <strong>of</strong> particular relevance for democracy. First,<br />

as emphasized by Lipset (1959, pp.83-84) a high level <strong>of</strong> education and an enlarged middle class are key<br />

elements to democracy; see also Almond & Verba (1963), and Diamound (1992).<br />

Second, Industrialization and the transformation <strong>of</strong> a country from an agrarian to a<br />

manufacturing and trading one, generates social differentiation, as specified by Rueschemeyer, et al.<br />

(1992). Other potentially important modernization variables are related to communications infrastructure,<br />

which allows for rapid diffusion <strong>of</strong> ideas and information across and within borders, perhaps enhancing<br />

the prospects <strong>of</strong> democracy as noted by Diamond (2008).<br />

Also short-term economic fluctuations may impact movements against existing undemocratic<br />

regimes that experienced a decreasing GDP per capita in the previous year were much more likely to fall<br />

than those experiencing positive economic growth, see for example Przeworski et al.(1996).<br />

Income inequality may also affect regime change and stability, for example Boix (2003), argues<br />

that a decrease in economic inequality leads to a higher probability <strong>of</strong> democratization, since the rich will<br />

have less to lose from taxation in relatively equal societies. However, a low degree <strong>of</strong> inequality may also<br />

reduce the likelihood <strong>of</strong> democratization, as the poor are less eager to fight for democracy as they have<br />

little to gain economically from democratization. Acemoglu and Robinson (2000) find that in unequal<br />

societies on the other hand, the poor have much to gain from democratization, and the rich are not able to<br />

credibly commit to redistribution in the future under dictatorship. Houle (2009) finds no clear effect <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

308


inequality on the probability <strong>of</strong> democratization, and finds evidence indicating that low inequality<br />

stabilizes existing democracies.<br />

Altindag et al. (2010), find that personal joblessness experience translates into negative opinions<br />

about the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy; they also find evidence that people's beliefs about the effectiveness<br />

<strong>of</strong> democracy as a system <strong>of</strong> governance are also shaped by the unemployment rate in countries with low<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> democracy.<br />

Despite the lack <strong>of</strong> clear predictions from the theoretical models <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

conditions on the extent <strong>of</strong> democracy especially scientific advance as a measure <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

development and modernization, the present analysis by using micro data on more than 6000 individuals<br />

from three countries in MENA region ( Turkey, Morocco, and Egypt), for which data are available, we<br />

analyze the extent to which individuals' perception <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> scientific advance and<br />

technological development affect their perceptions <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy .<br />

Also different types <strong>of</strong> non-economic factors have been put forth as important determinants <strong>of</strong><br />

democracy. One group <strong>of</strong> explanations are related to particular values, or other cultural traits, having<br />

important impact on democratization as specified by Almond and Verba (1963), and more recently by<br />

Inglehart and Welzel(2006). Huntington (1996) argues that Islamic, and Catholicism countries are less<br />

susceptible to democracy compared with Protestantism, also Treisman (2000) show that in religions such<br />

as Protestantism religion, there may be stronger emphasis on monitoring potential abuses <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />

than in more traditional religions such as Islam or Catholicism.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ethnic fractionalization structure <strong>of</strong> a country may also impact the country's regime type.<br />

Lijphart (1999) emphasizes that various types <strong>of</strong> heterogeneity in the population, among them ethnic,<br />

linguistic and religious heterogeneity, is an importation determinant <strong>of</strong> the design <strong>of</strong> political institutions<br />

and regime type.<br />

Model Description and Estimation<br />

Descriptive statistics are provided in Table 1. <strong>The</strong> two dependent variables are democracy is<br />

important for the economy, and Rogue Leader is bad for governing the economy. Democracy is important<br />

for the economy takes the value <strong>of</strong> 1 if the respondent strongly or absolutely agrees with the statement<br />

that" It is important to live in a country that is governed democratically", and zero if the respondent<br />

disagrees or strongly disagrees. Rouge Leader is bad takes the value <strong>of</strong> 1 if the respondent indicated that<br />

"Having a strong leader who does not have to bother with parliament and elections" is very bad or fairly<br />

bad; and zero if the respondent replied that such a leader is good or very good.<br />

Scientific Advance: takes the value <strong>of</strong> 1 if the respondent agrees with the statement that "it is good<br />

to have more emphasis on the development <strong>of</strong> technology in the near future", and zero if the respondent<br />

replied that he /she doesn't mind with such development or it is bad.<br />

Income: takes the value <strong>of</strong> 1 if the respondent earns a middle or high income, this is if he/she<br />

codes from five (moderate decile) to ten (highest decile), and zero otherwise. <strong>The</strong> study uses also another<br />

indicator to estimate the impact <strong>of</strong> income which is the satisfaction with income position, which takes the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> 1 if the individual strongly or absolutely, satisfied with his/her financial position, and zero<br />

otherwise.<br />

Education Level: Low Education takes the value <strong>of</strong> 1 if the person has completed at most<br />

elementary education, but has not completed a technical or vocational training, and zero otherwise,<br />

Middle Education takes the value <strong>of</strong> 1 if the individual completed the secondary education but has not<br />

completed the tertiary education, and it is zero otherwise. <strong>The</strong> indicator variable High Education is equal<br />

to 1 if the respondent has a university degree, or some university-level education, without degree, and<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

309


zero otherwise.<br />

Economic Fluctuations: takes the value <strong>of</strong> 1 if the respondent strongly or absolutely agrees that<br />

"<strong>The</strong> economy is prospering" is an essential characteristic <strong>of</strong> democracy, and zero otherwise.<br />

Income Equality: takes the value <strong>of</strong> 1 if the respondent strongly or absolutely agrees that<br />

"Governments tax the rich and subsidize the poor" is an essential characteristic <strong>of</strong> democracy, and zero<br />

otherwise.<br />

Family characteristics <strong>of</strong> the individuals are captured by dummies for martial status, sex, and the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> children. Specifically, we categorized individuals into three groups according to their martial<br />

status: Single, Married, and Divorced/Widowed, where Divorced/Widowed includes those who are<br />

separated. <strong>The</strong> study uses dummy variable for female, and male. similarly, we use dummy variable for<br />

those who have children.<br />

Jobless: takes the value <strong>of</strong> 1 if the respondent is unemployed, and zero otherwise.<br />

Religion: religion is a major part <strong>of</strong> culture; the study uses dummy variables for Islam, and Eastern<br />

Orthodoxy & Catholic religions. As the recent waves <strong>of</strong> revolutions and revolutionary attempts in the<br />

region in which most <strong>of</strong> its citizens are Muslims or Orthodox and Catholics.<br />

Table 1 Summary Statistics and Description<br />

Variable Description Mean std<br />

Dev<br />

Democracy is important = 1 if the individual strongly or absolutely 0.93 0. 259<br />

For the economy<br />

agrees that it is important to live<br />

in a country that is governed<br />

democratically<br />

Rogue Leader is Bad for<br />

Governing he economy<br />

= 1 if the individual strongly or absolutely 0.74 0.439<br />

agrees that a strong leader who does not<br />

have to bother with parliament and elections<br />

is bad or very bad for governing<br />

the country<br />

Scientific and = 1 if the individual strongly or absolutely 0.78 0.417<br />

Technological advance agrees that there should be<br />

more emphasis On the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> technology<br />

Male Dummy for Males. 0.55 0.497<br />

Female Dummy for Females 0.45 0.497<br />

Income =1 if the individual strongly or absolutely 0.34 0.473<br />

Satisfied with his /or her<br />

financial situation<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

310


Medium and<br />

High income Dummy for medium and high income. 0.20 0.402<br />

Economic<br />

Fluctuations =1 if the individual strongly or absolutely 0.86 0.347<br />

agrees that to have democracy in<br />

any economy it should be prospering<br />

Income<br />

equality =1 If the individual strongly or absolutely 0.78 0.413<br />

agrees that to have democracy in<br />

any economy the government should tax<br />

the rich and subsidize the poor<br />

Single =1 if the individual is single 0.22 0.414<br />

Married =1 if the individual is married or living 0.69 0.463<br />

together with a partner<br />

Divorced =1 if the individual is divorced or widowed 0.09 0.286<br />

Having<br />

Children Dummy for one or more children 0.78 0.417<br />

Low Education =1 if the individual hasn't completed or fully 0.52 0.500<br />

completed elementary education or hasn't<br />

adequately completed secondary school<br />

Middle Education =1 if the individual has completed secondary school<br />

But not tertiary 0.34 0.474<br />

High Education =1 if the individual has completed tertiary 0.14 0.346<br />

education in full or in part<br />

Unemployment =1 if the individual is unemployed. 0.47 0.499<br />

Muslim =1 if the individual is Muslim 0.97 0.183<br />

Orthodox or<br />

Catholic<br />

=1 if the individual is Orthodox<br />

Or Catholic 0.00 0.042<br />

-Sources <strong>of</strong> the variables used are from the World Values Survey wave (2005-2008).<br />

- Numbers <strong>of</strong> non-missing observations for the dependent variables "Democracy is important", "Rogue<br />

Leader is bad" are 4844, and 4685, respectively.<br />

Results:<br />

Table 2 displays the marginal effect obtained from estimation <strong>of</strong> eq.1 using probit regression, standard<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

311


errors are reported in parentheses.<br />

Column (1) reports the results <strong>of</strong> the model where the dependent variable is whether the respondent<br />

believes that democracy is important for governing the economy. <strong>The</strong> second column displays the results<br />

<strong>of</strong> the model where the dependent variable is whether the respondent believes that a strong leader who<br />

does not bother with parliament and elections is bad or very bad for the country.<br />

Column (1) demonstrates that if the individual aggress that it is good to have more emphasis on the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> technology in the near future is associated with about a 17 percentage point increase in<br />

the propensity to declare that democracy is important for the economy. Similarly, column 2 shows that if<br />

the individual aggress that it is good to have more emphasis on the development <strong>of</strong> technology in the near<br />

future is associated with about a 31 percentage point increase in the propensity to declare that a rogue<br />

leader is bad or very bad for managing the country. Consistent with our expectations, the coefficients <strong>of</strong><br />

scientific advance in the two models are estimated to be positive and highly significant, indicating that<br />

perceptions about the importance <strong>of</strong> scientific advance and technological development have a positive,<br />

and strong impact on perceptions <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy.<br />

Individuals who are strongly or absolutely satisfied with their financial position are from almost<br />

11(model 2) to 37(model 1) percentage points likely to reveal positive feelings towards the efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

democracy, the coefficients <strong>of</strong> the satisfaction with financial position are positive and significant in the<br />

two models. Also individuals who earn middle or high income are from almost 1 (model 2) to 19(model 1)<br />

percentage points likely to reveal positive feelings towards the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy, coefficients in<br />

the two models are also positive and significant.<br />

Individuals who are strongly or absolutely agree that the government should tax the rich and<br />

subsidize the poor is important to have democracy in a country display positive feelings towards the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy, coefficients are almost 12 percentage points in the two models and they are<br />

also significant .<br />

<strong>The</strong> same is true for individuals who are strongly or absolutely agree that it is important for the<br />

economy to be prospering to have democracy display positive feelings towards democracy, coefficients<br />

are positive and range from 8 to 65 percentage points , the coefficient for this variable is only highly<br />

significant in the first model.<br />

Education <strong>of</strong> the individuals has a significantly negative impact on the propensity to have<br />

positive feeling towards democracy. Specifically, those who completed secondary school or attend college<br />

are about 16 to 40 percentage points less likely to disagree that democracies are important for the<br />

economy in comparison to those who have elementary school education or less, thus all coefficients <strong>of</strong><br />

education are negative and significant, they are highly significant for low education individuals.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is interesting result obtained from the Islamic, Catholism &, and Orthodoxy religions, the<br />

study finds a negative and low significant feelings <strong>of</strong> Muslims , but positive and low significant feelings <strong>of</strong><br />

Catholics and orthodox towards democracy, and this may contradict with Huntington (1996), and<br />

Treisman (2000), as they argues that Islamic, and Catholicism countries are less susceptible to democracy<br />

compared with Protestantism.<br />

Being single or married is correlated with negative and significant feelings toward democracy; the<br />

same is true for males, divorced, and unemployed, or having children but without a significant impact.<br />

<strong>The</strong> coefficients <strong>of</strong> higher education and female are equal to zero in the two models. As will be discussed<br />

below their impact will not change direction if the models are estimated for each country.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

312


Table 2: Influence <strong>of</strong> Scientific Advance on perceptions about performance <strong>of</strong> Democracy<br />

Democracy is Rogue<br />

important for Leader is bad<br />

the economy<br />

Scientific Advance<br />

Single<br />

Married<br />

Divorced<br />

Having Children<br />

Satisfaction with Financial<br />

position<br />

Income Equality<br />

Economic prosperity<br />

0.171***<br />

(0.064)<br />

-3.443***<br />

(0.173)<br />

-3.262***<br />

(0.106)<br />

-3.110<br />

(000)<br />

-0.130<br />

(0.133)<br />

0.374***<br />

(0.073)<br />

0.123*<br />

(0.068)<br />

0.651***<br />

(0.069)<br />

0.307***<br />

(0.046)<br />

-5.959***<br />

(0.110)<br />

-6.181***<br />

(0.070)<br />

-6.253<br />

(000)<br />

-0.019<br />

(0.083)<br />

0.106**<br />

(0.046)<br />

0.122*<br />

(0.049)<br />

0.081<br />

(0.058)<br />

Muslim<br />

Catholic & Orthodox<br />

Male<br />

Low Education<br />

Middle Education<br />

Jobless<br />

Middle and High Income<br />

-1.382*<br />

(0.641)<br />

1.321*<br />

(0.609)<br />

-0.108<br />

(0.069)<br />

-0.472***<br />

(0.124)<br />

-0.402***<br />

(0.123)<br />

-0.106<br />

(0.069)<br />

(0.191)*<br />

(0.078)<br />

0.450<br />

(0.299)<br />

0.409<br />

(0.299)<br />

-0.048<br />

(0.047)<br />

-0.266***<br />

(0.070)<br />

-0.156*<br />

(0.069)<br />

-0.035<br />

(0.047)<br />

0.097*<br />

(0.054)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

313


<strong>The</strong> dependent variables, listed at the top <strong>of</strong> rows 1 and 2, take the value <strong>of</strong> 1 if the individual<br />

strongly or absolutely agrees that democracy is important for governing the economy, and a strong leader<br />

is bad or very bad to manage the country respectively. <strong>The</strong> descriptions <strong>of</strong> the other variables are<br />

presented in Table 1. indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively. Standards errors are<br />

reported in parentheses.<br />

It is plausible that the impact <strong>of</strong> individuals' perceptions towards the importance <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />

advance and technological development on their beliefs about the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy is different<br />

in countries with high levels <strong>of</strong> democracy in comparison to countries with a lower level <strong>of</strong> democracy.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, we estimated the models separately for countries with high levels <strong>of</strong> democracy countries<br />

(Turkey), and for countries that have a lower level <strong>of</strong> democracy (Egypt, and Morocco). <strong>The</strong> results are<br />

presented in Tables from (3-5).<br />

As Expected there are differences in the results that are obtained from high level <strong>of</strong> democracy<br />

(Turkey), and countries with low levels <strong>of</strong> democracy (Egypt, and Morocco) with respect to the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

scientific advance. Scientific Advance has a positive and strong impact on the feelings toward democracy<br />

for people in countries where the level <strong>of</strong> democracy is low (Tables4, and 5). While the scientific and<br />

technological development has a positive and weak (or even negative) impact on people's feelings<br />

towards the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy in countries where the level <strong>of</strong> democracy is higher (Turkey).<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are also interesting contrasts between the results obtained from the two groups <strong>of</strong> countries.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Islamic religion has almost a positive impact on the feelings towards the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy<br />

for people in the countries with low levels <strong>of</strong> democracy; it has a weak positive impact in Egypt, while it<br />

has some negative impact on people's beliefs toward democracy in Turkey. <strong>The</strong> Catholism religion has a<br />

negative and insignificant impact on people's beliefs towards democracy in the two groups <strong>of</strong> countries.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are some commonalities in the results obtained from education <strong>of</strong> the individuals in the two<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> countries which has a significantly negative impact on the propensity to have positive feeling<br />

towards democracy, we only find a positive and strong impact <strong>of</strong> middle and low education on the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy in Turkey (model 2). <strong>The</strong> same commonalities could be found with respect to<br />

being single or married which is correlated with negative and significant feelings toward democracy; the<br />

same is true for those being divorced, and unemployed, or having children but without a significant<br />

impact.<br />

Individuals who are Satisfied with their financial position , and those who earn middle or high<br />

income have positive and strong beliefs towards the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy in low level <strong>of</strong> democracy<br />

countries (Egypt, and Morocco). <strong>The</strong> impact is similar in Turkey but it is slightly weaker. <strong>The</strong> same result<br />

is found with respect to income equality and economic prosperity, more specifically in Egypt, and<br />

Morocco people strongly agree that the government should tax the rich and subsidies the poor is an<br />

important characteristic <strong>of</strong> democracy; they also agree that the economic prosperity is an important<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> democracy more than in Turkey.<br />

This means that in countries with low level <strong>of</strong> democracy, positive feelings towards the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy can only be achieved with an increase in scientific and technological<br />

development, with more income equality, economic prosperity, and increase in household income in<br />

comparison to countries with higher level <strong>of</strong> democracy in the region.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

314


Table 3: Influence <strong>of</strong> Scientific Advance on perceptions about performance <strong>of</strong> Democracy in Turkey<br />

Democracy is Rogue<br />

important for Leader is bad<br />

the economy<br />

Scientific Advance<br />

0.316*<br />

(0.132)<br />

-0.012<br />

(0.090)<br />

Single<br />

Married<br />

Divorced<br />

Having Children<br />

Satisfaction with Financial<br />

position<br />

-3.318***<br />

(0.380)<br />

-3.315***<br />

(0.272)<br />

-3.6-7<br />

(000)<br />

-0.083<br />

(0.265)<br />

0.371**<br />

(0.140)<br />

-5.949***<br />

(0.259)<br />

-5.989***<br />

(0.209)<br />

-6.016<br />

(000)<br />

0.068<br />

(0.157)<br />

0.084<br />

(0.083)<br />

Income Equality<br />

0.150<br />

(0.133)<br />

0.289**<br />

(0.089)<br />

Economic prosperity<br />

0.790***<br />

(0.143)<br />

-0.344**<br />

(0.122)<br />

Muslim<br />

Catholic & Orthodox<br />

Male<br />

Low Education<br />

Middle Education<br />

Jobless<br />

Middle and High Income<br />

-4.110<br />

(000)<br />

000<br />

(000)<br />

0.191<br />

(0.148)<br />

-0.527*<br />

(0.0.284))<br />

-0.550*<br />

(0.123)<br />

-0.182<br />

(0.156)<br />

-0.276<br />

(0.170)<br />

0.335<br />

(0.367)<br />

000<br />

(000)<br />

-0.0.153*<br />

(0.090)<br />

0.381**<br />

(0.143)<br />

0.392**<br />

(0.132)<br />

-0.240*<br />

(0.095)<br />

0.110<br />

(0.108)<br />

Observations<br />

1215<br />

1073<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

315


<strong>The</strong> dependent variables, listed at the top <strong>of</strong> rows 1 and 2, take the value <strong>of</strong> 1 if the individual strongly or<br />

absolutely agrees that democracy is important for governing the economy, and a strong leader is bad or<br />

very bad to manage the country respectively. <strong>The</strong> descriptions <strong>of</strong> the other variables are presented in<br />

Table 1. ***, **,* indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively. Standards errors are<br />

reported in parentheses.<br />

Table 4: Influence <strong>of</strong> Scientific Advance on perceptions about performance <strong>of</strong> Democracy in Egypt<br />

Democracy is Rogue<br />

important for Leader is bad<br />

the economy<br />

Scientific Advance<br />

0.092*<br />

(0.087)<br />

0.376***<br />

(0.065)<br />

Single<br />

Married<br />

Divorced<br />

Having Children<br />

Satisfaction with Financial<br />

position<br />

Income Equality<br />

Economic prosperity<br />

Muslim<br />

Catholic & Orthodox<br />

Male<br />

Low Education<br />

Middle Education<br />

Jobless<br />

-3.98*<br />

(0.216)<br />

-0.137<br />

(0.123)<br />

000<br />

(000)<br />

-0.078<br />

(0.162)<br />

0.333***<br />

(0.096)<br />

0.249**<br />

(0.097)<br />

0.593***<br />

(0.097)<br />

0.024*<br />

(0.012)<br />

000<br />

(000)<br />

0.095<br />

(0.101)<br />

-0.467***<br />

(0.0.284))<br />

-0.411**<br />

(0.146)<br />

-0.082<br />

(0.103)<br />

-0.012<br />

(0.165)<br />

0.073<br />

(0.087)<br />

000<br />

(000)<br />

-0.205*<br />

(0.122)<br />

0.167*<br />

(0.069)<br />

0.204**<br />

(0.078)<br />

0.267***<br />

(0.080)<br />

0.009<br />

(0.007)<br />

000<br />

(000)<br />

0.0094<br />

(0.007)<br />

-0.138<br />

(0.100)<br />

-0.063<br />

(0. 097)<br />

-0.007<br />

(0.076)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

316


Middle and High Income<br />

Observations<br />

0.061<br />

(0.546)<br />

2966<br />

0.112<br />

(0.080)<br />

2923<br />

<strong>The</strong> dependent variables, listed at the top <strong>of</strong> rows 1 and 2, take the value <strong>of</strong> 1 if the individual<br />

strongly or absolutely agrees that democracy is important for governing the economy, and a strong leader<br />

is bad or very bad to manage the country respectively. <strong>The</strong> descriptions <strong>of</strong> the other variables are<br />

presented in Table 1. indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively. Standards errors are<br />

reported in parentheses.<br />

Table 5: Influence <strong>of</strong> Scientific Advance on perceptions about performance <strong>of</strong> Democracy in Morocco<br />

Democracy is Rogue<br />

important for Leader is bad<br />

the economy<br />

Scientific Advance<br />

0.243*<br />

(0.145)<br />

0.372***<br />

(0.116)<br />

Single<br />

Married<br />

Divorced<br />

Having Children<br />

Satisfaction with Financial<br />

position<br />

Income Equality<br />

Economic prosperity<br />

-1.619*<br />

(0.687)<br />

-0.711*<br />

(0.344)<br />

000<br />

(000)<br />

-0.954<br />

(0.597)<br />

0.444*<br />

(0.236)<br />

0.111**<br />

(0.156)<br />

0.641***<br />

(0.162)<br />

0.233<br />

(0.360)<br />

0.149<br />

(0.0.192)<br />

000<br />

(000)<br />

-0.076<br />

(0.299)<br />

0.198<br />

(0.171)<br />

0.263**<br />

(0.216)<br />

0.551***<br />

(0.153)<br />

Muslim<br />

Catholic & Orthodox<br />

Male<br />

Low Education<br />

3.071<br />

(4.365)<br />

-3.013<br />

(4.250)<br />

0.052<br />

(0.142)<br />

-5.361***<br />

(0.187)<br />

7.596<br />

(000)<br />

-7.179<br />

(000)<br />

0.034<br />

(0.111)<br />

-0.348<br />

(0.279)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

317


Middle Education<br />

Jobless<br />

Middle and High Income<br />

Observations<br />

-5.147<br />

(000)<br />

-0.060<br />

(0.219)<br />

0.047<br />

(0.162)<br />

665<br />

-0.212<br />

(0.291)<br />

-0.189<br />

(0.168)<br />

0.560***<br />

(0.130)<br />

691<br />

<strong>The</strong> dependent variables, listed at the top <strong>of</strong> rows 1 and 2, take the value <strong>of</strong> 1 if the individual<br />

strongly or absolutely agrees that democracy is important for governing the economy, and a strong leader<br />

is bad or very bad to manage the country respectively. <strong>The</strong> descriptions <strong>of</strong> the other variables are<br />

presented in Table 1. ***, **,* indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively. Standards<br />

errors are reported in parentheses.<br />

Summary and Conclusions<br />

This paper employs micro data on more than 6000 individuals from three countries in the MENA<br />

region to investigate the relationship between personal perceptions <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> scientific and<br />

technological development and personal perceptions towards the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy.<br />

We find a positive and strong relation between the perceptions regarding the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

scientific and technological development, and the perceptions regarding the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy in<br />

the whole region. <strong>The</strong> evidence <strong>of</strong> such relationship is much stronger in low democratic countries like<br />

Egypt, and Morocco than in a higher democratic countries like Turkey.<br />

Given the research that indicates a strong impact <strong>of</strong> modernization and economic development on<br />

democracy, it is important to identify the determinants <strong>of</strong> democratization. <strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> this paper<br />

suggest that the beliefs about the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy in the region as a system <strong>of</strong> governance are<br />

shaped by scientific advance, and technological development. This in turn implies that in low level <strong>of</strong><br />

democracy countries like in Egypt and Morocco, there should be more emphasis on scientific and<br />

technological development in the near future in order to have an effective democratic system. We also<br />

find other important determinants <strong>of</strong> democracy in the region such as income equality, economic<br />

prosperity, and income.<br />

References<br />

Acemoglu D, Robinson J (2000) Why did the west extend the franchise Democracy, inequality, and growth<br />

in historical perspective. Quarterly Journal <strong>of</strong> Economics 115:1167-99<br />

Acemoglu D, Johnson S , Robinson J, Yared P (2008) Income and democracy. American Economic Review 98(3): 808-<br />

42.<br />

Almond G, Verba S (1963) <strong>The</strong> Civic Culture : Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton:<br />

Princeton University Press.<br />

Altindag D, Mocan N ( 2010) Joblessness and perceptions about the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> democracy. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Labor Res 31:99-123.<br />

Barro R (1996) Democracy and growth. Journal <strong>of</strong> Economic Growth 1(1): 1-27.<br />

Barro R (1999) Determinants <strong>of</strong> democracy. Journal <strong>of</strong> Political Economics 107(S6):S158-S183.<br />

Boix C (2003) Democracy and redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />

Diamond L(1992)Economic development and democracy reconsideration. American Behavioral Scientist<br />

35(4): 450-99.<br />

Diamond L (2008) <strong>The</strong> sprit <strong>of</strong> democracy. New York: Times Books.<br />

Houle C (2009) Inequality and democracy: why inequality harms consolidation but does not affect<br />

democratization. World Politics 61(4):589-622.<br />

Huntington S (1996) <strong>The</strong> clash <strong>of</strong> civilization and the remarking <strong>of</strong> world order. New York: Simon& Schuster.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

318


Inglehart R, Welzel C (2006) Modernization, cultural change and democracy . <strong>The</strong> Human Development<br />

Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />

Lijphart A (1999) Patterns <strong>of</strong> democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.<br />

Lipset S (1959) Some social requisites <strong>of</strong> democracy: economic development and political legitimacy.<br />

American Political Science Review 53(1):69-105.<br />

Minier J (2001) Is democracy a normal good Evidence from democratic movements. South Economic Journal<br />

67(4):996-1009.<br />

Papaioannou E, Siourounis G (2008) Economic and social factors driving the third wave <strong>of</strong> democratization.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Comp Economics 36(3):365-87.<br />

Prezworski A, Alvarez M, Cheibub J, Limongi F (1996) What makes democracy endue Democracy 7(1): 39-<br />

55.<br />

Rueschemeyer D,Stephens E, Stephens J (1992) Capitalist development and democracy. Chicago. IL:<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Chicago Press.<br />

Treisman D (2000) <strong>The</strong> causes <strong>of</strong> corruption: a cross- national study. Journal <strong>of</strong> Public Economics 76(3): 399-<br />

457.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

319


What explains innovative outcomes at the start-up stage<br />

Masatoshi Kato<br />

Kwansei Gakuin University, Japan<br />

Hiroyuki Okamuro<br />

Hitotsubashi University, Japan<br />

Yuji Honjo<br />

Chuo University, Japan<br />

Keywords<br />

Start-up, Founder, Human capital, R&D, Innovation outcome.<br />

Abstract<br />

This paper explores the determinants <strong>of</strong> innovative outcomes at the start-up stage. Using a sample from an<br />

original questionnaire survey in Japan, we examine whether R&D cooperation affects innovative outcomes <strong>of</strong><br />

start-up firms. We provide evidence that innovative outcomes are positively associated with R&D cooperation.<br />

Also, it is found that founders’ human capital affects R&D cooperation. <strong>The</strong>se findings suggest that founders’<br />

human capital plays a role in innovative outcomes through R&D cooperation, which would indicate the<br />

indirect effects <strong>of</strong> founders’ human capital on innovative outcomes.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

320


Does Vice Pay A Traditional Investigation<br />

<strong>of</strong> “Irresponsible” Investing<br />

Greg M. Richey<br />

California State University, San Bernardino<br />

Keyword<br />

Vice Fund, VICEX, S&P 500 Index, sin funds, sin stocks<br />

Abstract<br />

This paper examines the risk and return characteristics <strong>of</strong> the Vice Fund, a mutual fund that invests in socially<br />

“irresponsible” corporations that partake in the sales <strong>of</strong> alcohol, tobacco and firearms. First <strong>of</strong> all, I use the traditional<br />

Sharpe, Treynor and Jensen measures to evaluate the Vice Fund compared to its benchmark, the S&P 500. Secondly,<br />

I apply an indication <strong>of</strong> downside risk to the Vice Fund to test the volatility and performance during market<br />

corrections. Using a different data set, I find my results are similar to those <strong>of</strong> other studies that focus on the Vice<br />

Fund and sin investing in general. That is, sin investing can perform better than the S&P 500 on a risk-adjusted<br />

basis.<br />

Introduction<br />

In the seminal paper on finance theory, Markowitz (1952) finds that the optimal portfolio is<br />

constructed by exclusively considering assets based on a combination <strong>of</strong> risk and return, without<br />

considering where the elements <strong>of</strong> risk and return originate. Since Markowitz, corporate finance theory<br />

has evolved to consider social norms, psychological biases, and other factors to measure risk and return in<br />

order to earn abnormal returns and “beat” the market. As a result, from Markowitz to Sharpe to Fama &<br />

French to Shleifer & Vishny, finance theory has expanded to consider every element possible in portfolio<br />

construction. One <strong>of</strong> the latest additions has been the emergence <strong>of</strong> Socially Responsible Investing (SRI),<br />

whereby investors construct portfolios <strong>of</strong> firms that do not engage in the production <strong>of</strong> tobacco, alcohol,<br />

or gaming activities. On the contrary, an even newer class <strong>of</strong> investing has emerged—“vice investing.”<br />

This market strategy entails a direct contrast to Socially Responsible Investing by investing heavily in the<br />

“Sin Triumvirate” <strong>of</strong> tobacco, alcohol, and gambling. Investors hope the cash flows and defensive nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> these industries provide risk-adjusted abnormal returns when compared to a benchmark. One<br />

drawback <strong>of</strong> vice investing is the lack <strong>of</strong> mutual funds and hedge funds that employ investing in sinrelated<br />

industries as a dominant strategy <strong>of</strong> investor focus. In fact, only one such mutual fund, the Vice<br />

Fund (VICEX), fits the bill <strong>of</strong> a true investment dedicated to sin industries.<br />

This article compares the traditional performance measures <strong>of</strong> the Vice Fund, a mutual fund that<br />

invests in “sin” related industries such as alcohol, tobacco, and gaming to those <strong>of</strong> the S&P 500, an index<br />

<strong>of</strong> the five hundred largest U.S. based firms. I begin analyzing the Vice Fund with the traditional<br />

performance measures <strong>of</strong> Sharpe, Treynor and Jensen. However, since these measures 1) are appropriate<br />

when the means and variances are normally distributed and 2) insist the portfolio returns can be<br />

characterized by the mean and the variance <strong>of</strong> the return distribution and 3) consider investors care only<br />

about the mean and the variance <strong>of</strong> the return distribution a la classical finance theory, further analysis<br />

requires considering return distributions containing “fat tails” and “skewness.” Basically, time-series<br />

asset returns are rarely normally distributed. As a result, I will use the Lower Partial Moment (Baillie and<br />

DeGenarro (1990)) as an alternative risk-measurement technique to capture the downside risk and<br />

compute the Sortino ratio <strong>of</strong> the Vice Fund, following Beer, Estes, and Munte (2011), who use the<br />

aforementioned technique on Socially Responsible Funds.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

321


<strong>The</strong> remainder <strong>of</strong> this article is organized as follows: Section 2 provides a literature review.<br />

Section 3 describes the data and methodology. <strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> the estimations are presented in Section 4.<br />

Finally, Section 5 provides concluding remarks.<br />

Literature Review<br />

Although an abundance <strong>of</strong> literature exists on specialty mutual funds such as Socially Responsible<br />

Investments, the amount <strong>of</strong> literature dedicated to “Sin Investing” remains limited in both quantity and<br />

theoretical relevance. In fact, all <strong>of</strong> the articles dedicated to the market performance <strong>of</strong> sin stocks reflect an<br />

empirical approach or borrow a market theory and apply it to the realm <strong>of</strong> sin investing. In many regards<br />

considered the seminal paper, authored by Chong, Her and Phillips (2006) the scholars use the traditional<br />

performance measures to evaluate the Vice Fund and then apply a generalized autoregressive conditional<br />

heteroskedacticity (GARCH (1, 1)) model. <strong>The</strong> authors found the Vice Fund outperformed the Domini<br />

Social Equity Fund (the benchmark for socially responsible investing) over a three-year period from 2002-<br />

2005.<br />

Other researchers have built on Chong, Her, and Phillips with various results. Hong and<br />

Kacperczyk (2008) use data from 1965-2004 and find sin stocks outperform their benchmarks by up to 30<br />

basis points per month. <strong>The</strong>y found no systematic relationship between sin stock returns and the<br />

association <strong>of</strong> litigation risk, which states sin stocks generate a higher return to compensate investors for<br />

the risk <strong>of</strong> the firms being sued. Hong and Kacperczyk also concluded that sin stocks are underpriced due<br />

to neglect by institutional investors who lean on the side <strong>of</strong> Socially Responsible Investing. Moreover, they<br />

find the defensive nature rests in the addictive nature <strong>of</strong> the products produced by sin industries. Goodall<br />

(1994) focused on gaming stocks and found that these stocks are more sensitive to market downturns than<br />

to upswings in the stock market. This seems plausible and follows Kahneman and Tversky’s Prospect<br />

<strong>The</strong>ory, which states that investors are more sensitive to losses that they are to gains.<br />

Salaber (2009) found that sin stocks earn an excess return relative to the overall market, but that<br />

the excess return disappears when sin stocks are compared to a portfolio <strong>of</strong> stocks with similar defensive<br />

characteristics. Furthermore, Salaber concludes that sin stocks outperform during market downturns but<br />

underperform during market upswings. Fabozzi, Ma, and Oliphant (2008) concluded that sin stocks<br />

outperform the market in terms <strong>of</strong> both magnitude and frequency. <strong>The</strong>y identify the main reason for the<br />

outperformance <strong>of</strong> sin stocks lies in not abiding to or upholding implicit or explicit costly social standards.<br />

Finally, Areal, Cortez and Silva (2010) use data from 1993-2009 and find the “irresponsible fund”<br />

outperforms the market when volatility is low, but underperforms the benchmark during high-volatility<br />

regimes. <strong>The</strong>y attribute the results to changing risk throughout the period. <strong>The</strong>y conclude the<br />

“irresponsible fund” exhibits a higher level <strong>of</strong> systematic risk (beta) in low volatility regimes, a lower level<br />

<strong>of</strong> systematic risk in high volatility regimes, and deserves further research.<br />

Data & Methodology<br />

Using weekly data from September 2002 to June 2012, I compare the Vice fund with its<br />

benchmark, the S&P 500. I chose the Vice Fund to represent “sin investing” since it is still the only mutual<br />

fund that exclusively invests in sin industries and to defer from the temptations <strong>of</strong> data mining.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Vice Fund (ticker: VICEX) was launched on August 30, 2002, and has an investor focus that<br />

concentrates on “growth <strong>of</strong> capital.” Management emphasizes dividend-paying companies with positive<br />

cash flows, adequate debt-service coverage (TIE ratio), and avoids firms with financial “red flags,” large<br />

pension obligations, and recurring write-<strong>of</strong>fs. However, the prospectus states that the Vice Fund primarily<br />

invests in the tobacco, alcohol, gaming and defense industries so the fund has more exposure to<br />

unsystematic risk than a diversified mutual fund does. Also, the fund invests in foreign firms, which<br />

contain political, social, and currency exchange risks not present in domestic securities. For clarity, Table 1<br />

lists the firms held in the portfolio.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

322


TABLE 1- VICE FUND PORTFOLIO<br />

SECURITY<br />

ALTRI GROUP<br />

ANHEUSER BUSCH INBEV SA/NV<br />

ANHEUSER BUSCH INB<br />

BOEING<br />

BRITISH AMERN TOB PLC<br />

BROWN FORMAN<br />

CARLSBERG<br />

CHURCHILL DOWNS<br />

COMPANHIA DE BEBIDAS DAS AMERS<br />

CONSTELLATION BRANDS<br />

DIAGEO PLC<br />

GALAXY ENTERTAINMENT<br />

GENERAL DYNAMICS<br />

HEINEKEN NV<br />

HONEYWELL INT<br />

IMPERIAL TOBACCO<br />

INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY<br />

L-3 COMMUNICATIONS<br />

LADBROKES<br />

LAS VEGAS SANDS<br />

LOCKHEED MARTIN<br />

LORILLARD<br />

MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL<br />

MOLSON COORS BREWING<br />

NORTHROP GRUMMAN<br />

PENN NATL. GAMING<br />

PERNOD RICARD<br />

PHILLIP MORRIS INTL.<br />

RAY<strong>THE</strong>ON<br />

REYNOLDS AMERICAN<br />

ROCKWELL COLLINS<br />

ROLLS ROYCE HOLDINGS<br />

SABMILLER<br />

SANDS CHINA LTD<br />

UNITED TECHNOLOGIES<br />

WYNN MACAU<br />

WYNN RESORTS<br />

Table 2 presents the summary statistics <strong>of</strong> the Vice Fund and the S&P 500 over the sample period.<br />

<strong>The</strong> weekly data over the multi-year sample period yield a sample size <strong>of</strong> 508 observations. <strong>The</strong> table<br />

shows the mean return <strong>of</strong> the Vice Fund is higher than that <strong>of</strong> the S&P 500, and its standard deviation was<br />

also smaller over the sample size. <strong>The</strong>se summary statistics give the first glimpse that indicate that the<br />

performance ratios will show a higher risk-adjusted return for the Vice Fund over its benchmark.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

323


TABLE 2 - SUMMARY OF DATA<br />

VICEX S&P 500<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> Obs. 508 508<br />

Mean 0.0013746 0.0008606<br />

Maximum 0.1540329 0.113559<br />

Minimum -0.1866511 -0.2008375<br />

Standard Deviation 0.0243237 0.0264051<br />

FIGURE 1<br />

Growth <strong>of</strong> the Vice Fund Over the Sample Period<br />

Figure 1 shows the performance <strong>of</strong> the Vice Fund from September 2002 to June 2012. Obviously, the<br />

series lacks stationarity and has a unit root, so I construct the rate <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> the weekly returns by ln(P t<br />

– P t-1) where P t represents the closing price at time t and P t-1 represents the weekly closing price from the<br />

prior week. <strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> the weekly Vice Fund returns, which appear stationary, are shown in figure 2<br />

below. I confirm the stationarity by conducting an augmented Dickey-Fuller test and the resulting Z-<br />

statistic yields -14.406, so I can reject the null hypothesis <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> a unit root and accept the<br />

alternative hypothesis that the series is stationary.<br />

FIGURE 2<br />

-.2 -.1<br />

x<br />

0<br />

.1 .2<br />

5<br />

10 15 20 25<br />

2002w1 2004w1 2006w1 2008w1 2010w1 2012w1<br />

t<br />

Weekly Return Distributions <strong>of</strong> the Vice Fund<br />

2002w1 2004w1 2006w1 2008w1 2010w1 2012w1<br />

t<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

324


Performance Measures:<br />

Sharpe Ratio<br />

<strong>The</strong> Sharpe Ratio (1966) is calculated by subtracting the risk-free rate (90-day U.S. T-Bills) from the<br />

fund considered and then dividing the difference by the standard deviation <strong>of</strong> the fund under<br />

investigation. <strong>The</strong> Sharpe Ratio is illustrated by formula (1) as follows:<br />

Sharpe Ratio = (r v,j – r f) / (r v,j) (1)<br />

Where r v,j and r f denote the continuously compounded weekly returns <strong>of</strong> Vice Fund v and the<br />

continuously compounded return <strong>of</strong> the 90-day U.S. treasury bills (the risk-free rate <strong>of</strong> return)<br />

respectively. (r v,j) represents the standard deviation <strong>of</strong> the Vice Fund over the sample period. A higher<br />

Sharpe Ratio provides an indication <strong>of</strong> superior performance whereas a lower Sharpe Ratio is indicative <strong>of</strong><br />

subpar performance in comparison to a benchmark.<br />

Treynor Ratio<br />

Developed by Jack Treynor, the Treynor Ratio (1966) uses systematic risk as opposed to total risk<br />

and is calculated by subtracting the risk-free rate (90-day U.S. T-Bills) from the fund considered and then<br />

dividing the difference by the beta coefficient <strong>of</strong> the fund under investigation. <strong>The</strong> Treynor Ratio is<br />

illustrated by formula (2) as follows:<br />

Treynor Ratio = (r v,j – r f) / (r v,j) (2)<br />

Where r v,j and r f denote the continuously compounded weekly returns <strong>of</strong> Vice Fund v and the<br />

continuously compounded return <strong>of</strong> the 90-day U.S. treasury bills (the risk-free rate <strong>of</strong> return)<br />

respectively. (r v,j) represents the systematic risk <strong>of</strong> the Vice Fund over the sample period. Like the Sharpe<br />

Ratio, a greater Treynor Ratio provides an indication <strong>of</strong> superior performance whereas a lower Treynor<br />

Ratio is indicative <strong>of</strong> subpar performance when compared to a benchmark.<br />

Jensen’s Alpha<br />

Developed by Michael Jensen (1968) to assess the performance <strong>of</strong> mutual fund managers, Jensen’s<br />

alpha is a performance measure based on the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) that uses beta as a<br />

measure <strong>of</strong> risk and assumes asset returns are driven by their degree <strong>of</strong> systematic risk (Sharpe, 1964).<br />

Jensen suggests that a fund’s financial performance can be approximated by its systematic return<br />

component unexplained by the overall market portfolio return. With the S&P 500 as a proxy for the<br />

market portfolio and a bench mark for the Vice Fund, Jensen’s Alpha can be described as follows:<br />

r v,j = v + [r f + l,v (r m,j-r f)] + v,t (3)<br />

Where r v,j and r m,j denote the continuously compounded weekly returns <strong>of</strong> Vice Fund v and the market<br />

portfolio in excess <strong>of</strong> the continuously compounded return <strong>of</strong> the 90-day U.S. treasury bills (the risk-free<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> return) at time t. <strong>The</strong> coefficient l,v represents the fund’s systematic risk <strong>of</strong> being exposed to the<br />

return <strong>of</strong> the market portfolio during the sample period. v,t represents a random disturbance term.<br />

Lower Partial Moment<br />

<strong>The</strong> traditional measures <strong>of</strong> Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen assume that investors have a concave<br />

utility function whereas in reality, investors are concerned about earning less than expected, but not<br />

concerned about earning more than expected. In order to capture the downside volatility, an alternative<br />

measure <strong>of</strong> risk, the Lower Partial Movement (LPM) used by (Kahneman and Tversky (1979), and Thaler<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

325


(1993)) can capture the non-standard utility preference that investors possess when considering security<br />

returns. <strong>The</strong> Lower Partial Movement can be computed by:<br />

LPMv(BEN, k) = [E(BEN –r v) k | BEN > r v] 1/k (4)<br />

Where BEN represents the benchmark used (in our case, the S&P 500), k represents the sensitivity to<br />

extreme downside returns, and I create dummy variable to use only the observations where the S&P 500<br />

outperforms the Vice Fund to focus on downside risk. This will be computed by following the semistandard<br />

deviation (SSD) version <strong>of</strong> the Lower Partial Moment, which uses a derived CAPM to introduce<br />

the risk measurement SSD in order to show a semi-covariance with the market portfolio (Beer et al.<br />

(2011)). I apply the SSD case to the Lower Partial Moment equation to obtain:<br />

SSD = LPMv(r f,2) = [E(r f –r v) k | BEN > r v] 1/k (5)<br />

Following Hogan and Warren (1972), I apply the SSD derived CAPM to the traditional performance<br />

measures above to obtain the Treynor (SSD), the Jensen Alpha (SSD), and the Sortino ratio, which uses the<br />

SSD in the denominator as opposed to Sharpe’s use <strong>of</strong> standard deviation.<br />

Treynor Ratio (SSD) = (r v,j – r f) / SSD (6)<br />

Jensen’s Alpha (SSD): r v,j = v + ( SSD r m,j) + v,t (7)<br />

Sortino Ratio = (r v,j – r f) / SSD (8)<br />

1. RESULTS<br />

<strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> the performance measures are presented in Table 3. Results<br />

show the Vice Fund outperforms the S&P 500 in all <strong>of</strong> the traditional performance measures as well as the<br />

adjusted measures to account for downside risk. <strong>The</strong> latter measures (SSD) help confirm the fund’s<br />

objectives <strong>of</strong> being defensive and focusing on dividends and cash flows to minimize losses during market<br />

corrections and recessions. Interestingly enough, none <strong>of</strong> the articles researched on the topic <strong>of</strong> sin<br />

investing focused on the elasticities <strong>of</strong> the products or services included in the investment objectives. Also,<br />

the returns computed do not account for the Vice Fund’s hefty annual gross expense ratio <strong>of</strong> 1,59%,<br />

whereas the typical expense ratio for a standard S&P 500 Index fund <strong>of</strong>fered at most discount brokerages<br />

averages around 0.25% on an annual basis. This could be topic for further consideration as investors need<br />

to focus on an asset’s real returns (after fees, taxes, inflation, etc.) more so than its nominal returns.<br />

TABLE 3<br />

Fund Sharpe Treynor Jensen’s<br />

Alpha<br />

Sortino<br />

Treynor<br />

(SSD)<br />

Jensen<br />

(SSD)<br />

VICEX 0.801017 0.030307 0.000583 0.21576 0.030304 0.87938<br />

S&P 500 0.249887 0.006598 0.000000 0.000324 0.006595 0.00000<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

326


Implications and Conclusions<br />

This paper used the traditional performance measures to analyze the Vice Fund, the only known<br />

mutual fund to have a preponderance <strong>of</strong> investments in “sin” related industries. Using the Lower Partial<br />

Moment Measure to account <strong>of</strong> downside risk, I was able to test the defensive industry nature <strong>of</strong> the Vice<br />

Fund. My results are similar to those <strong>of</strong> Chong et al. (2006) and Hoepner & Zeume (2009) in terms <strong>of</strong> sin<br />

funds containing a positive Jensen’s alpha, indicating an abnormal return for the given level <strong>of</strong> systematic<br />

risk. However, more research needs to be undertaken to examine different types and sizes <strong>of</strong> beta<br />

coefficients’ effect on sin funds. Hoepner & Zeume’s (2009) as well as Salaber’s (2008) work appear to be<br />

solid candidates for the foundation <strong>of</strong> a theoretical perspective on sin investing to catch up with that <strong>of</strong><br />

Socially Responsible Investing.<br />

In addition, as culture changes and the social, economic, and political climate becomes more politically<br />

correct, we may see more industries added to expand the “Sin Triumvirate.” This would also serve to<br />

reduce the main disadvantage <strong>of</strong> sin investing—that it possesses a greater amount <strong>of</strong> risk than a typical<br />

mutual fund because <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> diversification.<br />

In conclusion, modern portfolio theory generally considers diversification to occur with about<br />

forty randomly selected securities across all industries. Even though the Vice Fund, and sin investing in<br />

general do not provide enough diversification to provide investors with a complete portfolio strategy,<br />

they deserve to be part <strong>of</strong> an investor’s portfolio considerations, at least for the abnormal risk-adjusted<br />

historical returns generated.<br />

References<br />

Areal, Nelson, Maria Ceu Cortez and Florinda Silva, “Investing in Mutual Funds: Does it Pay to be a Sinner or<br />

a Saint in Times <strong>of</strong> Crisis” Working Paper, 2010.<br />

Baillie, R.T. and R.P. DeGenarro, “Stock Returns and Volatility”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial and Quantitative Analysis,<br />

25 (2), 1990, 203-214.<br />

Bawa, V. and E. Lindenberg, “Capital Market Equilibrium in a Mean Lower Partial Moment Framework”,<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial Economics, 5, 1977, 189-200.<br />

Beer, Francisca M., James P. Estes, and Hisar J. Munte, “<strong>The</strong> Performance <strong>of</strong> Faith and Ethical Investment<br />

Products: An Empirical Investigation <strong>of</strong> the last Decade”, Journal <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business and Economics, 30, 2011,<br />

101-124.<br />

Chong, James, Monica Her and G. Michael Phillips, “To Sin or not to Sin Now That’s the Question”, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Asset Management, Vol. 6, no. 6, 2006, 406-417.<br />

Fabozzi, Frank J., K.C. Ma, and Becky Oliphant, “Sin Stock Returns”, <strong>The</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong> Portfolio Management, Vol.<br />

35, (1), 2008, 82-94.<br />

Fama, E., and French, K., “Industry Costs <strong>of</strong> Equity”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial Economics, Vol. 43, (2), 1997, 153-193.<br />

Goodall, Leonard, “Market Behavior <strong>of</strong> Gaming Stocks: an Analysis <strong>of</strong> the First Twenty Years.” Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Gambling Studies10, 4, 1994, 323-337.<br />

Hoepner, Andreas G.F. and Stefan Zeume, “<strong>The</strong> Dark Enemy <strong>of</strong> Responsible Mutual Funds: Does the Vice<br />

Fund Offer More Financial Virtue” (http://ssrn.com/abstract=1485846).<br />

Hogan, W. and J. Warren, “Computation <strong>of</strong> the Efficient Boundary in the E-S Portfolio Selection Model”,<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 7, 1972, 1881-1896.<br />

Jensen, Michael C., “<strong>The</strong> Performance <strong>of</strong> Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Finance, 23(2),<br />

1968, 389-416.<br />

Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky, “Prospect <strong>The</strong>ory: An Analysis <strong>of</strong> Decision under Risk”, Econometrica,<br />

Vol. 47, 2, 1979, 263-292.<br />

Lintner, J., “<strong>The</strong> Valuation <strong>of</strong> Risk Assets and the Selection <strong>of</strong> Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital<br />

Budgets”, Review <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics, 47, 1965, 13-37.<br />

Markowitz, Harry, “Portfolio Selection”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Finance, 7, 1, 1952, 77-91.<br />

Salaber, Julie, “Sin Stock Returns over the Business Cycle”, Working Paper, Université Paris-Dauphine, 2007.<br />

Sharpe, William, “Capital Asset Prices: A <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Capital Market Equilibrium Under Conditions <strong>of</strong> Risk”,<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Finance, 19, 1964, 425-442.<br />

Sharpe, William, “Mutual Fund Performance”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Business, 39, 1, 1966, 119-138.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

327


Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.W., “Corruption”, <strong>The</strong> Quarterly Journal <strong>of</strong> Economics, Vol. 108, (3), 1993, 599-617.<br />

Sortino, F., and L. Price, “Performance Measurement in a Downside Risk Framework”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Investing, 3,<br />

1994, 59-65.<br />

Thaler, Richard, “Advances in Behavioral Finance”, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1993.<br />

Treynor, Jack L., “How to Rate the Management <strong>of</strong> Investment Funds”, Harvard Business Review, 43, 1966, 63–<br />

75.<br />

VICE FUND, “Prospectus”, www. Vicefund.com<br />

Mr. Greg Richey is a Lecturer <strong>of</strong> Finance at California State University, San Bernardino. He teaches accounting,<br />

financial planning, corporate finance, and investments. He is in the Ph.D. program in Global Commerce and Finance<br />

at Claremont Graduate University’s School <strong>of</strong> Politics and Economics.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

328


Corporate Governance and Business Conference (CGBC)<br />

19-20 th July 2012<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Authors & Institution Represented<br />

Author’s Name<br />

Institution, Country<br />

Anisa Ari Amunega<br />

Management Sciences for Health, Nigeria<br />

Sandra Osanmor<br />

Management Sciences for Health, Nigeria<br />

Abubakar Kurfi<br />

Management Sciences for Health, Nigeria<br />

Shital Jhunjhunwala<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Public Enterprise, India<br />

R.K Mishra<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Public Enterprise, India<br />

Tomasz Rojek<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Nousheen Tariq Bhutta<br />

International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan<br />

Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah<br />

International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan<br />

Mridula Sahay<br />

Amrita School <strong>of</strong> Business, Amrita Nagar, India<br />

Shiva Kumar<br />

Amrita School <strong>of</strong> Business, Amrita Nagar, India<br />

N. Ata Atabey Selcuk University, Turkey<br />

Huseyin Cetin<br />

Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey<br />

Puan Yatim<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Kebangsaan, Malaysia<br />

Sheikh Abdur Rahim<br />

Daffodil International University, Bangladesh<br />

Sal AmirKhalkhali<br />

Saint Mary`s University, Halifax, Canada<br />

Atul Dar<br />

Saint Mary`s University, Halifax, Canada<br />

David M Chapinski<br />

Rutgers University, Newark, USA<br />

Olawale Ajai<br />

Lagos Business School, Nigeria<br />

Patricia Miller Selvy<br />

Bellarmine University, USA<br />

Rasheed Olajide Alao<br />

Adeyemi College <strong>of</strong> Education, Ondo, Nigeria<br />

Andrzei Tomasz Jaki<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Marek Dziura<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Ryszard Borowiecki<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Barbara Siuta-Tokarska<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Jarosaw Kaczmarek<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Murat Arici<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Philosophy, Konya N.E University, Turkey<br />

Ayan Chattopadhya<br />

IISWBM (aafiliated to Calcutta University), Kolkata, India<br />

Arpita Banerjee Chattopadhya Budge-Budge College (affiliated to Calcutta University), India.<br />

M. Ravindar Reddy School <strong>of</strong> Management, National Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, India<br />

Chandrajeet Kumar<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Management, National Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, India<br />

Palto Ranjan Datta<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Hertfordshire, UK<br />

Weiping Liu<br />

Eastern Connecticut State University, USA<br />

Priyanka Kulkarni<br />

MIT CoE, Centre for Management Studies & Research, Pune, India<br />

Arun Mokashi<br />

MIT CoE, Centre for Management Studies & Research, Pune, India<br />

Nattawadee Korsakul<br />

Feng Chia University, Taiwan<br />

Ruey-FaLIN<br />

Feng Chia University, Taiwan<br />

Nattharuja Korsakul<br />

Feng Chia University, Taiwan<br />

Lindu Zhao<br />

Southeast University, Nanjing, China<br />

Olagunju Adebayo<br />

Redeemer`s University, Nigeria<br />

Olawale Ajai<br />

Lagos Business School, Pan African University, Lagos, Nigeria.<br />

Oluwa Temitope Mariam<br />

Redeemer`s University, Nigeria<br />

Mirza Ashfaq Ahmed<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Gujrat, Pakistan<br />

Suleman Aziz Lodhi<br />

Lahore Leads University, Pakistan<br />

Ogunbanwo Olabashi<br />

Nigeria<br />

Faridah Ismaila Mohammed UK<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

329


Corporate Governance and Business Conference (CGBC)<br />

19-20 th July 2012<br />

Index<br />

Name/Affilication/Country<br />

Anisa Ari Amunega<br />

Management Sciences for Health, Nigeria<br />

Sandra Osammer<br />

Management Sciences for Health, Nigeria<br />

Ochannya Iyaji<br />

Management Sciences for Health, Nigeria<br />

Shital Jhunjhunwala<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Public Enterprise, India<br />

R.K Mishra<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Public Enterprise, India<br />

Tomasz Rojek<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Nousheen Tariq Bhutta<br />

International Islamic University, Pakistan<br />

Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah<br />

International Islamic University, Pakistan<br />

Mridula Sahay<br />

Amrita School <strong>of</strong> Business, India<br />

Shiva Kumar<br />

Amrita School <strong>of</strong> Business, Amrita Nagar, India<br />

N. Ata Atabey<br />

Selcuk University, Turkey<br />

Huseyin Cetin<br />

Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey<br />

Puan Yatim<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Kebangsaan, Malaysia<br />

Sheikh Abdur Rahim<br />

Daffodil International University, Bangladesh<br />

Sal AmirKhalkhali<br />

Saint Mary`s University, Halifax, Canada<br />

Atul Dar<br />

Saint Mary`s University, Halifax, Canada<br />

David M Chapinski<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Public Affairs and Administration,<br />

Rutgers University, Newark, USA<br />

Olawale Ajai<br />

Lagos Business School, Nigeria<br />

Patricia Miller Selvy<br />

Bellarmine University, USA<br />

Rasheed Olajide Alao<br />

Adeyemi College <strong>of</strong> Education, Ondo, Nigeria<br />

Andrzei Tomasz Jaki<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Topic<br />

Board Governance Development: A Strategy for Systems<br />

Strengthening and Sustainability<br />

Board Governance Development: A Strategy for Systems<br />

Strengthening and Sustainability<br />

Board Governance Development: A Strategy for Systems<br />

Strengthening and Sustainability<br />

Are Singapore Boards Global<br />

Are Singapore Boards Global<br />

Corporate Governance in the Value Based management<br />

Concept<br />

Investors` Reaction to the Implementation <strong>of</strong> Corporate<br />

Governance Mechanisms<br />

Investors` Reaction to the Implementation <strong>of</strong> Corporate<br />

Governance Mechanisms<br />

Corporate Governance in Public Sector Banks-Tapping<br />

the Bee Hive<br />

Corporate Governance in Public Sector Banks-Tapping<br />

the Bee Hive<br />

Financial Reporting Standards as a Tool in Order to<br />

Ensure Corporate Transparency: <strong>The</strong> Case <strong>of</strong> Turkey<br />

Financial Reporting Standards as a Tool in Order to<br />

Ensure Corporate Transparency: <strong>The</strong> Case <strong>of</strong> Turkey<br />

Boardroom Pay, Performance and Corporate Governance<br />

in Malaysia<br />

An Analysis <strong>of</strong> Performance Appraisal Systems <strong>of</strong><br />

Merchantile bank Limited<br />

On the Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Quality Regulation: Some<br />

Empirical Results<br />

On the Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Quality Regulation: Some<br />

Empirical Results<br />

Compliance Versus Volatility <strong>of</strong> Performance in 2012,<br />

Corporate Influence in Bureaucratic Systems. Where<br />

Should the Focus for America lay Most<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>it Creation, Intra and Inter-generational Equity:<br />

Need for New Company Law<br />

Exposing MBA Students to Corporate Governance<br />

A Panel Cointegration Approach to FDI and Growth in<br />

Africa: Evidences from ECOWAS, ECCAS, UMA, EAC<br />

and SADC Regions<br />

Risk in the Enterprise Value Creation<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

330


Marek Dziura<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Ryszard Borowiecki<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Jarosxaw Kagzmarek<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Murat Arici<br />

Konya N.E University, Turkey<br />

Ayan Chattopadhya<br />

IISWBM (aafiliated to Calcutta University),<br />

Kolkata, India<br />

Arpita Banerjee Chattopadhya<br />

Budge-Budge College (affiliated to Calcutta<br />

University), India<br />

Rabindar Reddy<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Management, National Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Technology, India<br />

Chandrajeet Kumar<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Management, National Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Technology, India<br />

Palto Ranjan Datta<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Hertfordshire, UK<br />

Weiping Liu<br />

Eastern Connecticut State University, USA<br />

Priyanka Kulkarni<br />

MIT CoE, Centre for Management Studies and<br />

Research, Pune, India<br />

Arun Mokashi<br />

MIT CoE, Centre for Management Studies and<br />

Research, Pune, India<br />

Lindu Zhao<br />

Southeast University, Nanjing, China<br />

Technology Systems for Sustainable Development in<br />

Poland<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> Causes and Consequences <strong>of</strong> the Global<br />

Economics Crisis –Poland`s Perspective<br />

<strong>The</strong> Disharmonies, Dilemmas and Effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Transformation <strong>of</strong> the Polish Economy<br />

Low Economic Awareness and Its Consequences: <strong>The</strong><br />

Case <strong>of</strong> Turkey<br />

Ranking Indian States on Social Welfare &<br />

developmental Status in Globalisation Era using a<br />

MCDM Approach<br />

Ranking Indian States on Social Welfare &<br />

developmental Status in Globalisation Era using a<br />

MCDM Approach<br />

Creating Consumer Based Brand Equity in Indian Sport<br />

Shoe Market<br />

Creating Consumer Based Brand Equity in Indian Sport<br />

Shoe Market<br />

A Conceptual Framework <strong>of</strong> Customer Retention<br />

Strategy (CRS)<br />

Reward or Penalty Inter-temporal Pricing <strong>of</strong><br />

Decentralized Channel Supply Chain Under<br />

Asymmetric information Condition<br />

Succession Planning in Management Institutes: A<br />

critical Study<br />

Succession Planning in Management Institutes: A<br />

critical Study<br />

Reward or Penalty Inter-temporal Pricing <strong>of</strong><br />

Decentralized Channel Supply Chain Under<br />

Asymmetric information Condition<br />

Cultural Intelligence as Core Competency to<br />

Employability<br />

Cultural Intelligence as Core Competency to<br />

Employability<br />

Ruey-FaLIN<br />

FengChia University, Taiwan<br />

Nattawadee Korsakul<br />

FengChia University, Taiwan<br />

Nattharuja Korsakul, FengChia University, Taiwan Cultural Intelligence as Core Competency to<br />

Employability<br />

Olagunju Adebayo<br />

Corporate Governance and Performance <strong>of</strong><br />

Redeemer`s University, Nigeria<br />

Commercial Banks in Nigeria<br />

Olawale Ajai<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>it creation, intra and inter-generational Equity:<br />

Pan African University, Lagos, Nigeria,<br />

Need for New Company Law<br />

Oluwa Temitope Mariam<br />

Corporate Governance and Performance <strong>of</strong><br />

Redeemer`s University, Nigeria<br />

Commercial Banks in Nigeria<br />

Mirza Ashfaq Ahmed<br />

Opinion-Leading Role <strong>of</strong> Politically Aware Consumer<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Gujrat, Pakistan<br />

Suleman Aziz Lodhi<br />

Opinion-Leading Role <strong>of</strong> Politically Aware Consumer<br />

Lahore Leads University, Pakistan<br />

Ogunbanwo Olabashi<br />

Observer<br />

Faridah Ismaila Mohammed<br />

Observer<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

331


International Conference on Business & Economic Development (ICBED)<br />

23-24 th July 2012<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Authors & Institution Represented<br />

Author’s Name<br />

Yen-Ting Tim Lin<br />

Wen-Hui Mico Yang<br />

Cho-Pu Vincent Lin<br />

Jungki Lee<br />

Wenyu Do<br />

Majed Sultan Abu Ashwan<br />

Bojana Milic<br />

Ljubica Dudjac<br />

Leposava Grubic-Nesic<br />

Palto Ranjan Datta<br />

Ashru Bairagee<br />

Yeong Real Kim<br />

Luke Hsiao<br />

Ming Chi Hsiao<br />

Jen-Ting Sun<br />

Ann Linn<br />

Patience Kwakyewa Asirifi<br />

Mark T Jones<br />

Amina Jone betzuen Alvarez<br />

Jerome V Healy<br />

Teymur Rahmani<br />

Salman Falahi<br />

Marc Anthony Fusaro<br />

Darja Kobal Grum<br />

Bojan Grum<br />

Moges Teshome<br />

Marek Dziura<br />

Ryszard Boroweiecki<br />

Jaroslaw Kaczmarek<br />

Owobu Gladys Ann<br />

Filipo Tokalau<br />

Wen-Hui Mico Yang<br />

Yen-Ting Tim Lin<br />

Cho-Pu Vincent Lin<br />

Tomasz Rojeck<br />

Cho-Pu Vincent Lin<br />

Yen-Ting Lin<br />

Wen-Hui Mico yang<br />

Hoda Abd El hamid Ali<br />

Masatoshi kato<br />

Xiaojun Quan<br />

Wenyin Liu<br />

Institution, Country<br />

Hsiuping University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Taiwan<br />

Hsiuping University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Taiwan<br />

St. John` University, Taiwan<br />

Korea University, South Korea<br />

City University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, China<br />

King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Novi Sad, Serbia<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Novi Sad, Serbia<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Novi Sad, Serbia<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Hertfordshire, UK<br />

<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business & Retail Management, UK<br />

Chungbuk national University, South Korea<br />

I-Shou University, Taiwan<br />

I-Shou University, Taiwan<br />

I-Shou University, Taiwan<br />

Chang Gung Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

K<strong>of</strong>oridua Polytechnic, K<strong>of</strong>oridua, Ghana<br />

Park Royal College, London, UK<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Basque, Spain<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Hull Business School, UK<br />

University Tehran, Iran<br />

University Tehran, Iran<br />

Arkansas Tech University, USA<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Ljublijana, Slovenia<br />

European Law faculty in Nova Gorcia, Slovenia<br />

Addis Ababa, Ethiopia<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Urban and Regional Planning, Nigeria<br />

University <strong>of</strong> South Pacific, Fiji island<br />

Hsiuping University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Taiwan<br />

Hsiuping University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Taiwan<br />

St. John` University, Taiwan<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

St. John` University, Taiwan<br />

Hsiuping University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Taiwan<br />

Hsiuping University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Taiwan<br />

Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, Japan<br />

City University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, China<br />

City University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, China<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

332


A. Gregoriou University <strong>of</strong> Hull Business School, UK<br />

Barbara Siuta-Tokarska<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Francis Atsu<br />

Ghana Institute <strong>of</strong> Management and Public Administration<br />

(GIMPA), ACCRA, Ghana<br />

Samuel Adams<br />

Ghana Institute <strong>of</strong> Management and Public Administration<br />

(GIMPA), ACCRA, Ghana<br />

Hassan Mounir El-Sady<br />

Gulf University for Science and Technology, Kuwait<br />

Vasilya Sultanova<br />

Australian College <strong>of</strong> Kuwait, Kuwait<br />

Greg M. Richey<br />

California State University, San Bernardino, USA<br />

Patricia J. Cirillo<br />

Cypress Research Group, USA<br />

Andrzei Jaki<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Hiroyuki Okamuro<br />

Hitotsubashi University, Japan<br />

Yuji Honjo<br />

Chuo University, Japan<br />

Abayomi Nafisatu Bosede<br />

Baby and You Store, Nigeria<br />

Kevin Griffin<br />

University College Dublin, Ireland<br />

Khan Penn Ackuog<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Business and Law, London, UK<br />

Mohammed Rehab Al Nomani USA<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

333


International Conference on Business & Economic Development (ICBED)<br />

23-24 th July 2012<br />

Index<br />

Name/Affilication/Country<br />

Yen-Ting Tim Lin<br />

Hsiuping University <strong>of</strong> Science and<br />

Technology, Taiwan<br />

Wen-Hui Mico Yang<br />

Hsiuping University <strong>of</strong> Science and<br />

Technology, Taiwan<br />

Cho-Pu Vincent Lin<br />

St. John` University, Taiwan<br />

Jungki Lee<br />

Korea University, South Korea<br />

Wenyu Do<br />

City University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, China<br />

Majed Sultan Abu Ashwan<br />

King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia<br />

Bojana Milic<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Novi Sad, Serbia<br />

Ljubica Dudjac<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Novi Sad, Serbia<br />

Leposava Grubic-Nesic<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Novi Sad, Serbia<br />

Palto Ranjan Datta<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Hertfordshire, UK<br />

Ashru Bairagee<br />

<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business & Retail Management,<br />

UK<br />

Yeong Real Kim<br />

Chungbuk national University, South Korea<br />

Luke Hsiao<br />

I-Shou University, Taiwan<br />

Ming Chi Hsiao<br />

I-Shou University, Taiwan<br />

Jen-Ting Sun<br />

I-Shou University, Taiwan<br />

Ann Linn<br />

Chang Gung Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

Patience Kwakyewa Asirifi<br />

K<strong>of</strong>oridua Polytechnic, K<strong>of</strong>oridua, Ghana<br />

Mark T Jones<br />

Topic<br />

How Does Employee satisfaction Impact Information Flow<br />

during order fulfillment process<br />

How Does Employee satisfaction Impact Information Flow<br />

during order fulfillment process<br />

How Does Employee satisfaction Impact Information Flow<br />

during order fulfillment process<br />

An Exploration <strong>of</strong> Consumer Misbehaviours and their<br />

influences on Retail stores: An Application <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong><br />

Justice<br />

How Do Online Consumer Review Sentiments affect E-<br />

commerce sales A Text Mining Analysis<br />

Geographic Distribution <strong>of</strong> Population and Labor Force in<br />

Saudi Arabia<br />

<strong>The</strong> Relationship Between Leadership and Learning<br />

Organisation: A Review <strong>of</strong> the Literature and Research<br />

Proposal<br />

<strong>The</strong> Relationship Between Leadership and Learning<br />

Organisation: A Review <strong>of</strong> the Literature and Research<br />

Proposal<br />

<strong>The</strong> Relationship Between Leadership and Learning<br />

Organisation: A Review <strong>of</strong> the Literature and Research<br />

Proposal<br />

Relationship Marketing: Towards a Definition<br />

Relationship Marketing: Towards a Definition<br />

ERP System Implementation CSFs for Korean Organisations:<br />

A Delphi study<br />

<strong>The</strong> Effects <strong>of</strong> Extrinsic Cues on the Relationship Between<br />

Brand Image and Purchasing Intention-Evidences from Chinese<br />

Exchabge Students` Perspective<br />

<strong>The</strong> Effects <strong>of</strong> Extrinsic Cues on the Relationship Between<br />

Brand Image and Purchasing Intention-Evidences from Chinese<br />

Exchabge Students` Perspective<br />

<strong>The</strong> Effects <strong>of</strong> Extrinsic Cues on the Relationship Between<br />

Brand Image and Purchasing Intention-Evidences from Chinese<br />

Exchabge Students` Perspective<br />

Employee Stock ownership and Employee Psychological<br />

ownership: <strong>The</strong> Moderating Role <strong>of</strong> Individual<br />

Characteristics<br />

Adoption <strong>of</strong> Job Rotation as a Component <strong>of</strong> Staff Development<br />

in Polytechnics In Ghana<br />

Water – <strong>The</strong> missing ingredient in real and sustained<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

334


Park Royal College, London, UK<br />

Amina Jone betzuen Alvarez<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Basque, Spain<br />

Jerome V Healy<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Hull Business School, UK<br />

Teymur Rahmani<br />

University Tehran, Iran<br />

Salman Falahi<br />

University Tehran, Iran<br />

Marc Anthony Fusaro<br />

Arkansas Tech University, USA<br />

Darja Kobal Grum<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Ljublijana, Slovenia<br />

Bojan Grum<br />

European Law faculty in Nova Gorcia,<br />

Slovenia<br />

Moges Teshome<br />

Marek Dziura<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Ryszard Boroweiecki<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Jaroslaw Kaczmarek<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Owobu Gladys Ann<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Urban and Regional Planning,<br />

Nigeria<br />

Filipo Tokalau<br />

University <strong>of</strong> South Pacific, Fiji island<br />

Wen-Hui Mico Yang<br />

Hsiuping University <strong>of</strong> Science and<br />

Technology, Taiwan<br />

Yen-Ting Tim Lin<br />

Hsiuping University <strong>of</strong> Science and<br />

Technology, Taiwan<br />

Cho-Pu Vincent Lin<br />

St. John` University, Taiwan<br />

Tomasz Rojeck<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Cho-Pu Vincent Lin<br />

St. John` University, Taiwan<br />

economic development<br />

Markets in Financial Instruments Europe Directive (MIFID):<br />

A method <strong>of</strong> controlling Ethical Banking<br />

Efficiency <strong>of</strong> EC Greenhouse Gas Abatement Measures<br />

and Firms in the European Union: Evidence from plant<br />

level allocations and surrendered permits<br />

Corruption, Democracy and Tax Compliance: Cross-country<br />

Evidence<br />

Corruption, Democracy and Tax Compliance: Cross-country<br />

Evidence<br />

Are High Interest Loans a Debt Trap or Access to Credit<br />

Evidence from a Field Experiement <strong>of</strong> Payday Borrowers<br />

<strong>The</strong> Expectations <strong>of</strong> Potential Acquirers <strong>of</strong> Real estate rights<br />

and decisions to Purchase property in times <strong>of</strong> Recesion<br />

<strong>The</strong> Expectations <strong>of</strong> Potential Acquirers <strong>of</strong> Real estate rights<br />

and decisions to Purchase property in times <strong>of</strong> Recesion<br />

<strong>The</strong> Role <strong>of</strong> Micro and Small Enterprise in Employment<br />

Opportunity and Poverty reduction in addis Ababa, Ethiopia:<br />

<strong>The</strong> Case <strong>of</strong> Addis ketema Sub City<br />

Innovation Policy in Poland – Challenge for Intensive Growth<br />

Innovation, Knowledge Creation and Technology Policy in the<br />

European Union<br />

Innovation, Knowledge Creation and Technology Policy in the<br />

European Union<br />

Challenges <strong>of</strong> Sustainability and Urban Development in<br />

Nigeria: Reviewing the Millenium Development Goals<br />

Incentives to Encourage Social Environmental Responsible<br />

Corporate Actions: Willingness to pay for non-use value <strong>of</strong><br />

Land-Case <strong>of</strong> Backpackers in Fiji<br />

How to Transfer Knowledge to your work<br />

How to Transfer Knowledge to your work<br />

How to Transfer Knowledge to your work<br />

Corporate Governance in the value based management Concept<br />

Research <strong>of</strong> Influencing Factors for Usage <strong>of</strong> Facebook<br />

Willingness-A case Study on College Students in the Tamsui<br />

Area<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

335


Yen-Ting Lin<br />

Hsiuping University <strong>of</strong> Science and<br />

Technology, Taiwan<br />

Wen-Hui Mico yang<br />

Hsiuping University <strong>of</strong> Science and<br />

Technology, Taiwan<br />

Hoda Abd El hamid Ali<br />

Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt<br />

Masatoshi kato<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Kwansei Gakuin<br />

University, Japan<br />

Xiaojun Quan<br />

City University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, China<br />

Wenyin Liu<br />

City University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, China<br />

A. Gregoriou<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Hull Business School, UK<br />

Barbara Siuta-Tokarska<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Hiroyuki Okamuro<br />

Hitotsubashi University, Japan<br />

Yuji Honjo<br />

Chuo University, Japan<br />

Francis Atsu<br />

Ghana Institute <strong>of</strong> Management and Public<br />

Administration (GIMPA), ACCRA, Ghana<br />

Samuel Adams<br />

Ghana Institute <strong>of</strong> Management and Public<br />

Administration (GIMPA), ACCRA, Ghana<br />

Hassan Mounir El-Sady<br />

Gulf University for Science and Technology,<br />

Kuwait<br />

Vasilya Sultanova<br />

Australian College <strong>of</strong> Kuwait, Kuwait<br />

Greg M. Richey<br />

California State University, San Bernardino,<br />

USA<br />

Patricia J. Cirillo<br />

Cypress Research Group, USA<br />

Andrzei Jaki<br />

Cracow University <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland<br />

Abayomi Nafisatu Bosede<br />

Baby and You Store, Nigeria<br />

Research <strong>of</strong> Influencing Factors for Usage <strong>of</strong> Facebook<br />

Willingness-A case Study on College Students in the Tamsui<br />

Area<br />

Research <strong>of</strong> Influencing Factors for Usage <strong>of</strong> Facebook<br />

Willingness-A case Study on College Students in the Tamsui<br />

Area<br />

Scientific Advance and Perceptions about the Effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

Democracy in MENA<br />

What Explains Innovative Outcomes at the Start Up Stage<br />

How Do Online Consumer Review Sentiments affect E-<br />

commerce sales A Text Mining Analysis<br />

How Do Online Consumer Review Sentiments affect E-<br />

commerce sales A Text Mining Analysis<br />

Efficiency <strong>of</strong> EC Greenhouse Gas Abatement Measures<br />

and Firms in the European Union: Evidence from plant<br />

level allocations and surrendered permits<br />

Structural Changes and Development <strong>of</strong> the SME Sector in<br />

Poland after EU Membership<br />

What Explains Innovative Outcomes at the Start Up Stage<br />

What Explains Innovative Outcomes at the Start Up Stage<br />

Testing the Export-led Growth Hypothesis for Sub Saharan<br />

Africa Countries(SSA). A Panel Data Analysis<br />

Testing the Export-led Growth Hypothesis for Sub Saharan<br />

Africa Countries(SSA). A Panel Data Analysis<br />

Cross Country Analysis <strong>of</strong> GCC Economic Risk<br />

Cross Country Analysis <strong>of</strong> GCC Economic Risk<br />

Does Vice Pay A Traditional Investigation <strong>of</strong> “Irresponsible”<br />

Investing<br />

Are High Interest Loans a Debt Trap or Access to Credit<br />

Evidence from a Field Experiement <strong>of</strong> Payday Borrowers<br />

Enterprise Development under Globalisation and the New<br />

Economy Conditions<br />

Observer<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

336


Kevin Griffin<br />

University College Dublin, Ireland<br />

Khan Penn Ackuog<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Business and Law, London, UK<br />

Mohammed Rehab Al Nomani<br />

USA<br />

Angela Clare Ferdinandy<br />

Angela Ferdinandy, Australia<br />

Margaret Jane Randell-Smith<br />

Angela Ferdinandy, Australia<br />

Observer<br />

Observer<br />

Observer<br />

Observer<br />

Observer<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

337


Call for Paper<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Business & Retail Management Research<br />

ISSN (Print) 1751-8202<br />

<strong>The</strong> JBRMR, a scholarly and refereed journal, provides an authoritative source <strong>of</strong> information for<br />

scholars, academicians, and pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in the fields <strong>of</strong> business and retail management and is<br />

publicised twice a year. <strong>The</strong> journal promotes the advancement, understanding, and practice <strong>of</strong><br />

business & retail management. It is peer reviewed and is the main research platform <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong><br />

<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business & Retail Management (ABRM). Scholars across borders are encouraged in<br />

advancing the frontiers <strong>of</strong> management education, particularly in the area <strong>of</strong> retail trade.<br />

Contributions should therefore be <strong>of</strong> interest to scholars, practitioners and researchers in<br />

management in both developed and developing countries targeting a worldwide readership<br />

through both print and electronic medium.<br />

Although broad in coverage, the following areas are indicative and nurture the interests <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academy</strong> with a “retail” underpinning:<br />

» Business Ethics and Legal Issues<br />

» Business Environment<br />

» Business Policies, Strategies, and Performance<br />

» Business and Retail Research<br />

» Business Security and Privacy Issues<br />

» Consumer Behaviour<br />

» Emerging Advances in Business and its Applications<br />

» Innovation and Product Development<br />

» International Business Issues<br />

» Management and Retail Marketing<br />

» Marketing Management and Strategies<br />

» Relationship Management<br />

» Risk Management<br />

» Retail Management and Communication<br />

» New Venture Start-up<br />

» Retail Buying<br />

» MIS and Retail Management<br />

» Demographics and Retail Business<br />

» HRM and Retail Business<br />

» Innovation in Retail Management<br />

» Law and Management<br />

Preference will be given to papers which are conceptually and analytically strong and have<br />

empirical relevance. All papers will be reviewed according to the Journal’s criterion. <strong>The</strong><br />

Journal’s website is www.jbrmr.com. For further information please call: Dr P.R. Datta on<br />

+44(0)20 3620 6524 or write to him (editor@abrmr.com).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

338


COMING SOON!<br />

International Journal <strong>of</strong> Business and Economic Development (IJBED)<br />

Aim & Objectives<br />

IJBED is a peer reviewed journal and is a research publication platform for international<br />

scholars. <strong>The</strong>ir research can be in any aspect <strong>of</strong> business and economic development covering<br />

the interests <strong>of</strong> developed and emerging countries alike. <strong>The</strong> Journal seeks to reach a worldwide<br />

readership through both print and electronic media. <strong>The</strong> main aims <strong>of</strong> the Journal will be to:<br />

<br />

Publish high quality and scholarly empirical based research papers, case studies,<br />

reviews in all aspect <strong>of</strong> business, management and commerce with theoretical<br />

underpinnings.<br />

Offer academics, practitioners and researchers the possibility <strong>of</strong> having in depth<br />

knowledge and understanding <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> business and management practices and.<br />

Create a forum for the advancement <strong>of</strong> business and economic development research.<br />

Target audience: Academics, practitioners and researchers the possibility <strong>of</strong> having in depth<br />

knowledge and understanding <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> business and management practices, and<br />

students <strong>of</strong> management, Doctoral students in particular wishing to publish their research.<br />

Coverage:<br />

‣General marketing, retailing<br />

‣E-commerce<br />

‣Management information<br />

‣Development economics<br />

‣Micro finance<br />

‣Industrial economics<br />

‣International business<br />

‣Globalisation and corporate governance<br />

‣Human resource management<br />

‣Competitive strategy<br />

‣Information system<br />

‣Knowledge management and it`s practice<br />

‣Organisational behaviour<br />

‣Corporate finance and management accounting<br />

‣Entrepreneurship and small business, infrastructure studies, etc.<br />

Registration: One author: £295, Two Authors: £345 and Three authors: £375<br />

Upon acceptance <strong>of</strong> a paper the publication fees must be paid in full within 2 weeks<br />

IJBED will be published in February and June/July annually.<br />

For further detail please visit: http://abrmr.com/<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

339


Call for Papers for the forthcoming conferences:<br />

ITARC-London, 2012<br />

5-6 th November 2012<br />

3 rd International Trade and Academic Research Conferences<br />

ICIRM – Dubai 2013<br />

February 2013<br />

2 nd International Conference on Investment & Retail Management<br />

ROGE – Paris 2013<br />

April 2013<br />

3 rd International Conference on the Restructuring<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Global Economy<br />

CGBC – London 2013<br />

June 2013<br />

3 rd Corporate Governance and Business Conference<br />

ICBED – Las Vegas 2013<br />

August 2013<br />

2 nd International Conference on Business and Economic Development<br />

Authors are invited to submit original research papers, case studies, review, work in progress<br />

reports, abstracts, students’ papers or research propels within the broad scope <strong>of</strong> each<br />

conference. All papers should be pr<strong>of</strong>essionally pro<strong>of</strong>read prior to submission.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se conferences will be jointly organised by the <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business & Retail<br />

Management, and Journal <strong>of</strong> Business & Retail Management Research.<br />

For further detail please visit: www.abrmr.com<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

340

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!