29.12.2014 Views

THE BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT REVIEW - The Academy of ...

THE BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT REVIEW - The Academy of ...

THE BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT REVIEW - The Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Management and Organizational Sustainability Tool (MOST), this is a participatory assessment process<br />

for identifying an organization’s management needs and making concrete plans for improvement. <strong>The</strong><br />

MOST tool brings out the basic gaps at the periphery and actually identifies the organizational systems<br />

that needs to be strengthened, that is why the team has to go further in administering the Board<br />

governance assessment tool to illuminate specific gaps in governance practices.<br />

<strong>The</strong> third step is the design <strong>of</strong> intervention, basically the results from the assessment informs the<br />

design <strong>of</strong> intervention. This guides the team on what needs to be addressed, the area <strong>of</strong> focus for<br />

strengthening and what type <strong>of</strong> intervention will be appropriate. For some organizations, it could be just<br />

providing technical assistance in form <strong>of</strong> coaching and mentoring while for some it could be training in<br />

workshop setting or both. We could even go further in providing technical assistance in developing<br />

governance/guidance documents and support in governance enhancement plans. This stage <strong>of</strong> designing<br />

intervention is really critical because a whole lot <strong>of</strong> factors and determinants need to be considered for<br />

example, the Board composition, in terms <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> literacy, mental models, and priorities.<br />

Simultaneously, the variable the capacity building team wants to change is key.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fourth step is the actual implementation <strong>of</strong> the intervention depending on what is most<br />

appropriate for the organization. <strong>The</strong> team mostly utilized training in a workshop setting and makes it<br />

participatory and really interactive, with a shift from the traditional training program which places so<br />

much emphasis on theories, to a program designed specially to have a real life impact on the participants<br />

with an eye on the beneficiaries, that is the organization and the community at large. It involves learning,<br />

reflecting and practicing what they have learnt. Information from the first visit gives the facilitator some<br />

sort <strong>of</strong> internal connection to the standards and operations <strong>of</strong> the organization and helps in linking their<br />

mission, vision, values and goals to the training, and from experience, it has made the training climate<br />

relaxing and intriguing. . A Standard <strong>of</strong> ethics manual for Board operations was adapted and used during<br />

the trainings. This document is designed to support the effective functioning <strong>of</strong> non-pr<strong>of</strong>it boards by<br />

recommending specific best practices, which are designed to guide board members and staff leaders <strong>of</strong><br />

every non -pr<strong>of</strong>it organization as they work to improve their own operations, it also enables the board and<br />

staff leaders <strong>of</strong> every organization to examine these principles carefully and determine how best they<br />

should be applied to their own operations. At the end <strong>of</strong> the trainings, the Board develops an action plan<br />

or Board work plan to close identified governance gaps within the organizations .This forms the Board<br />

calendar that guides Board activities and timelines for a year or six months (also depends on what the<br />

organization wants).<br />

<strong>The</strong> fifth step is basically following up with the action plans developed and providing feedback<br />

on how responsive they are in its implementation. Technical assistance is provided to support the Board<br />

on areas that they might be facing challenges. This is a continuous process until the governance system is<br />

really functional, both financially and programmatically. At this point, they are left to sustain the<br />

intervention themselves. (<strong>The</strong> PLAN –Health Project calls this “weaning <strong>of</strong>f”)<br />

Board governance training methodology/process<br />

<strong>The</strong> Business & Management Review, Vol.2 Number 2, July 2012<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!