29.12.2014 Views

International Dyestuff Industry - ColorantsHistory.Org

International Dyestuff Industry - ColorantsHistory.Org

International Dyestuff Industry - ColorantsHistory.Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

against Simpson, Maule & Nicholson to make free the arsenic acid process for aniline red,<br />

and after 1865 his business grew rapidly. This also assisted Ivan Levinstein, from Berlin,<br />

who in 1865 began the manufacture of magenta at Blackley, Manchester; Levinstein’s<br />

factory was a forerunner of the present ICI Specialties.<br />

Litigation and the outcomes of patent disputes were also spurs to new innovative activities.<br />

Since routes based on the oxidations of aniline with arsenic acid were held up in Britain<br />

(except at Nicholson’s firm) until early 1865, because of injunctions, phenol-based colors,<br />

naphthalene colors, modifications of mauve, and exploitation of Peter Griess’s discovery,<br />

what was later called the diazo reaction, were all investigated. Heinrich Caro, a German<br />

colorist at Roberts, Dale & Co. in Manchester, the main rival of Simpson, Maule & Nicholson,<br />

was instrumental in directing research that led to all these colors. [15]<br />

Heinrich Caro, colorist, chemist and technical leader, at BASF,<br />

from 1868-1888. Edelstein Collection, Hebrew University.<br />

Aniline Black<br />

Caro invented a process for mauve in 1860, whereby copper salts were used as oxidants. It<br />

became the sole competitor to Perkin’s dichromate reaction and the Manchester-made<br />

mauve was used in Lancashire and Scotland from around 1862. From the residue of the<br />

reaction, Roberts, Dale & Co. extracted a black colorant suited to cotton printing. However,<br />

in 1862 it was used only to a limited extent by printers in Britain because of the corrosive<br />

action on printing machinery. It was more widely applied on the mainland of Europe, where<br />

wooden block printing was still popular.<br />

The original discovery of aniline black was made in 1859 by John Lightfoot of Accrington,<br />

north of Manchester. He established that the direct application of aniline in the presence of<br />

an oxidizing agent to cotton, using the engraved copper plates of cylinders of printing<br />

machinery, gave a fast and brilliant black, but, again, this was not wholly satisfactory<br />

because of the corrosion problem. Lightfoot eventually patented his process early in 1863.<br />

For mainland Europe and the United States patent rights were assigned to J.J. Muller- Pack<br />

of Basle.<br />

In 1864 Charles Lauth in Paris came out with the first of the improvements that were to<br />

make aniline black printing possible with machinery. This was through the use of insoluble<br />

copper salts. For the remainder of the nineteenth century, aniline black printing and dyeing<br />

was carried out on a vast scale. [16]<br />

Alkylation and phenylation of aniline<br />

Since the Renards retained exclusive control over the production of aniline red, blue and<br />

violet, chemists in Paris and Lyon also sought out new reactions on coal tar products. In<br />

addition, the Renards, which became Societe La Fuchsine in 1864 (backed by the Credit<br />

Lyonnais bank), had problems with pollution from large scale arsenic acid oxidation (from<br />

around 1862). For these reasons, amino group hydrogens of aniline and toluidine were<br />

replaced by phenyl and alkyi groups prior to oxidation. This work, inspired by Hofmann’s<br />

publications on the constitutions of aniline colors, led to the introduction of reactions carried<br />

out at high pressures and temperatures by Poirrier in Paris (alkylation, 1866), which<br />

enabled the Renards’ patents to be circumvented. It also led to the introduction of less

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!