30.12.2014 Views

View/Open - TWAS & OWSD Thesis Repository Home

View/Open - TWAS & OWSD Thesis Repository Home

View/Open - TWAS & OWSD Thesis Repository Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Three well-defined types of host-pathogen interactions occur for the P.<br />

infestans in tomato: highly compatible, partially compatible, and incompatible<br />

interactions (Gallegly and Marvel 1955). It was further observed that the moderately<br />

resistant commercial hybrids ‘Ikram’, ‘Heinz H7155’ and Alambra F 1 ’ exhibited<br />

susceptibility and the disease progress rate was higher comparing with the other<br />

genotypes. In contrast some of these varieties; ‘Ikram’ and Heinz H7155 were<br />

recorded to be moderately resistant in another study (Fiorini, 2008). This<br />

discrepancy in the type of reaction may be due to racial differences of the pathogen<br />

and structural change in the virulence genes of the pathogen or environmental<br />

factors interactions.<br />

3.1.1The analysis of variance for Y 50 , Y max and AUDPC<br />

The analysis of variance of the three disease variables Y 50 , Y max and AUDPC,<br />

showed that the great part of variation was attributed to genotypes that had highly<br />

significant differences for these traits (Table 4) whereas there were no significant<br />

differences for replicates (blocks) or between/within the plots. Analysis of variance<br />

showed highly significant differences among the genotypes indicating the<br />

occurrence of broad range of variability in the expression of resistant.<br />

It can be observed from the analysis of variance that the coefficient of<br />

variance in the case of severity at halfway epidemic (Y 50 ) had the highest value<br />

(33.16) than the other traits; severity at the end of the epidemic (Y max ) and area<br />

under disease progress curve (AUDPC). This was expected during the period of<br />

evaluation, due to the difficulty of having homogeneity of the scores over all the<br />

plants of the same treatment and at the same time, and may be attributed to the<br />

disease progress rate, that was not equal over the replicates.<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!