Janamaithri Suraksha Project - Kerala Police

More documents

Recommendations

Info

What is Community Policing The term Community Police does not refer to either a new police group or a local community group that undertakes policing work themselves. On the other hand, it envisages a method of policing by members of the police organization quite distinct from the traditional style; that seeks the cooperation of the community, understands the needs of the “community”, gives priority to the security of the “community”, and, taking into account the resources available within the “community”, attempts to streamline the activities of police personnel at local police stations to address the special problems of each community to increase their efficiency and productivity. The London Metropolitan Police was set up in London in 1830; i.e. 178 years ago. It was as a result of the determination and inspiration of Sir Robert Peel that this prime example of a modern police force, viz. London Police, came into being. During those early days, the English jestingly used to call the policemen, a curiosity at the time, by the name London Bobby! Three decades ago, the name of the Kerala Police newsletter was Kerala Bobby. This name had been selected by a senior police officer of the time, whose dream was that the Kerala Police would garner praise and glory similar to that of the London Police, in its dealings and relationship with the public. Although the newsletter was discontinued sometime in the past, the expectation that the Kerala Police will indeed change to a “Kerala Bobby” respected by the people is, even today, widely prevalent. In 1829, Sir Robert Peel presented in Parliament nine basic principles with respect to the London Police. Community Policing, which we consider as a new idea of recent origin, was accepted even then as the blueprint for the London Police. Three of these principles are presented here: 1. The effectiveness of police work depends entirely upon the ability of the police to garner the respect of the public with respect to police actions and behaviour. 2. If police are to gain the respect of the public, they must ensure the willing cooperation of the public in obeying the law. 3. The police must always remember that the Police are the public and the public are the Police. That is, Police are themselves a section of the public that draw salaries to perform duties that all citizens are expected to perform by themselves. It has been established that a policing style based on the above principles is essential for a community of free citizens; and that in spite of all the challenges thrown up by scientific and technological growth, social progress and world wars, the system has survived for 178 years. That is why, when awareness arose worldwide, that a police force modeled on the lines of an army is generally unsuitable for democratic societies, the principles underlying the London model of policing were accepted as the basis for a good policing style. When the British instituted a system of policing in India, the model chosen was not that of the London Police, but that of the Irish Armed Constabulary, instituted by the Government of England in the neighbouring country of Ireland, where British supremacy was ensured by the use of force. The main reason for this was that it was considered cheaper for Government to institute a police force rather than get police work done by the army. In this system, it was not felt necessary to have any role for citizens, their opinions or their cooperation. Traditionally, the viewpoint of the British Indian Police with respect to the cooperation of the public was: “Good if we receive it, but it is all right even otherwise”. 2
However, even after Independence, there were not many significant changes brought about in that system. In official circles, the old viewpoint about the cooperation of the public continued to hold sway. We were unsuccessful in bringing about the necessary behavioral changes or guidelines that would put into effect the principle that it is only proper that the laws passed by the people need to be enforced with the cooperation of the people themselves for their own safety. Law and Order is a basic need of the people. It is the duty of Government and the Police appointed by the Government to sub-serve this need of the people. An approach that provides security services to local communities appropriate to the circumstances and needs of the local communities, by enlisting the cooperation of the people and understanding their security needs is what is envisaged by Community Policing. Usually, the common man will go to an Indian Police Station only if there is no other alternative. Ordinarily a citizen does not like to complain to the Police about a trivial anti-social incident in the community. On the one hand, there is a nuisance caused by the anti-social element responsible for this incident, and on the other, there is a dislike to undergo the difficulties faced when complaining to the police, although this is, more often than not, based only on hearsay. It is not surprising, therefore, that one feels, It is better to suffer silently, let me not bother. However, this approach only increases the power and confidence of the said anti-social. It is only when the anti-social graduates to a goonda that he comes to the attention of the Police. By this time, however, using the money he has earned through his activities, he has already developed an influential network of supporters. Even if by any chance, police are enabled to take any action against him, the common man is afraid to be a witness against him. Thus, on one side, doubts about the Police, and on the other, a fear of the goonda. As a result, the citizen is effectively denied the rights conferred on him by the legal system in a democracy. At the same time, due to the fear of the citizens in coming forward as witnesses, the criminal gets the protection of the very same legal system! If this situation continues, the people will lose their faith in the democratic legal system as well as in the police. At least once in a while, they will hope for a good and all-powerful protector, and a police that readily delivers instant justice. Only if police stations evolve into establishments where citizens can enter without fear can we create a police organization that has the trust of the people. For this to happen, keep all the people in fear, by this, all the criminals in the community will also be afraid; thus no one will commit crimes - this thought must be removed both from the police as well as from the community. If everyone fears the police, poor victims will hesitate to complain. Witnesses will not cooperate. Police will not receive information from the public. On the other hand, if people see the police as friends, with the cooperation of the good people that constitute a majority in the community, the criminal elements, which form only a small percentage, can be controlled, and the laws enforced effectively. The total number of people who get arrested in one year in Kerala is about 1,50,000. Of this, the great majority are drivers who get involved in traffic accidents, and people who commit criminal acts on the spur of the moment. Those who get arrested for theft, robbery, goonda acts, etc. comprise only a very small percentage. The work of police to control these criminal elements, that come to less than ten thousand, will be much easier if the cooperation of the other 330 lakhs who are law-abiding citizens is enlisted. Faith in the legal system will increase. Rather than enforcing the law by making both the good and bad elements afraid of the police, it is better to counter the activities of the criminal elements with the cooperation of the 99.9% people who are, in general, law- abiding. In every locality, opportunities must be created to enable people to put forward their needs to the police as well as to encourage people to interact with the police. The feeling that police are 3
Page 1 and 2: P\ssa{Xn kpc£m ]≤Xn Janamaithri
Page 3: THIRUVANCHOOR RADHAKRISHNAN MINISTE
Page 7 and 8: From the Editor’s Desk Janamaithr
Page 9: Contents I. Milestones in Implement
Page 14 and 15: their friends must be developed in
Page 16 and 17: under the patronage of the UDF gove
Page 18 and 19: A consolidated Focus Group Discussi
Page 20 and 21: d) Developing Trust- Community empo
Page 22 and 23: d) Service Delivery Strategies and
Page 24 and 25: Context is the circumstances in whi
Page 26 and 27: the public, predecessor-successor s
Page 28 and 29: initiate much needed augmentation o
Page 30 and 31: Janamaithri Suraksha Project Commun
Page 32 and 33: house officer everyday. Women polic
Page 34 and 35: ing together various voluntary grou
Page 36 and 37: In Calicut city, where the basic in
Page 38 and 39: • In Thodupuzha (Idukki district)
Page 40 and 41: By getting to know every nook and c
Page 42 and 43: Act was passed by the State Legisla
Page 44 and 45: Unfortunately though, like the Sami
Page 46 and 47: assessments are done in consultatio
Page 48 and 49: 9. Psychological counseling for vic
Page 50 and 51: atmosphere. 41% remarked that JSP h
Page 52 and 53: Report on Refresher Training to Bea
Page 54 and 55: REDUCTION OF CRIMES IN JANAMAITHRI
Page 56 and 57: EXPERIENCES OF JANAMAITHRI BEAT OFF
Page 58 and 59: C.D.Thomas Member, Janamaithri Sami
Page 60 and 61: Scenes from Programmes of Janamaith
Page 62 and 63:
Scenes from Programmes of Janamaith
Page 64 and 65:
The Hindu 05˛- -12˛2012 The Hindu
Page 67 and 68:
Government Orders GOVERNMENT OF KER
Page 69 and 70:
GOVERNMENT OF KERALA Abstract Home
Page 71 and 72:
By order of the Governor, K.K.RAMAN
Page 73 and 74:
for the effective implementation of
Page 75 and 76:
Disputes between individuals or gro
Page 77 and 78:
4. A Beat Officer should be a role
Page 79 and 80:
District Phase-I Phase-II Phase-III
Page 81 and 82:
JANAMAITHRI-PLAN FUNDS ALLOTMENT DE
Page 83 and 84:
II. Janamaithri Kendrams To popular
show all

Janamaithri Suraksha Project - Kerala Police

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?