Janamaithri Suraksha Project - Kerala Police
Janamaithri Suraksha Project - Kerala Police
Janamaithri Suraksha Project - Kerala Police
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
of sampling the respondents were chosen keeping gender representation and the interest to share<br />
the experience in view. In the process total respondents came to 119 out of which 42 were female<br />
and 77 were male representing different age and rank. Senior officers were six in number with one<br />
female officer who happened to be Inspector General of police and State level Nodal Officer,<br />
<strong>Janamaithri</strong> <strong>Suraksha</strong> <strong>Project</strong> (JSP). The qualitative techniques for the purpose of collection of<br />
primary data included Field ethnography, In-depth Interviews, Focus Group Discussion, Observation<br />
and Case Study. The researcher used his knowledge and wisdom to collect the data himself<br />
unassisted. The author collected secondary data from IIM Bangalore Library, BPR&D Library, New<br />
Delhi, <strong>Kerala</strong> State <strong>Police</strong> Head Quarters Library, Thriruananthapuram, <strong>Kerala</strong> State <strong>Police</strong> Academy<br />
Library, Thriruananthapuram and Odisha State <strong>Police</strong> Head Quarters, Cuttack. The data analysis<br />
aimed at developing a theory or model by developing and linking categories, otherwise known as<br />
conceptualisation, as the outcome of the research. The model approach for qualitative data analysis<br />
has been adopted following Hutter-Hennink’s Qualitative Research Pyramid (2011). After the<br />
collection of data, the author undertook the task of analyzing them. At this stage, the raw data was<br />
condensed into the manageable groups by coding them to necessary categories. The journey of<br />
JSP as a policy process has been divided into three stages and accordingly the categories or the<br />
parameters were consolidated under three major heads: pre-implementation dynamics, implementation<br />
phase and the impact phase. The policy parameters or categories under different phases<br />
of CP intervention after the deductive and inductive elements of analysis have been conceptualized.<br />
Pre-implementation Dynamics and Implementation Phase have seven parameters each and<br />
the Impact Phase comprises of six parameters which are as follows;<br />
I. Pre-implementation Dynamics<br />
a) Political will<br />
b) Misconceptions in Public mind<br />
c) Predecessor-successor syndrome<br />
d) Developing Trust-Community empowerment<br />
e) Engaging stake holders<br />
f) Resource Planning, Capacity Building and Training Needs<br />
g) Publicity and propaganda<br />
II. Implementation Phase<br />
a) Formulation of Standard Operating Procedures-POs and GOs<br />
b) From Pilot <strong>Project</strong> to State-wide Implementation<br />
c) Hand-holding<br />
d) Standardization of Service Delivery Strategy<br />
e) Resource Augmentation<br />
f) Monitoring, Control and Feedback<br />
g) Political Acceptance<br />
III. Impact Phase<br />
a) Decentralization-partnership<br />
b) Overall Heightened Sense of Security<br />
c) Security for the vulnerable sections<br />
d) <strong>Police</strong> mediation in availing basic services<br />
e) Empowerment of constabulary<br />
f) Institutionalization<br />
7