Book of abstracts - British Neuroscience Association
Book of abstracts - British Neuroscience Association
Book of abstracts - British Neuroscience Association
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5.03<br />
Constitutively active Ras and dominant negative MEK1 improve<br />
functional recovery following C4 dorsal hemisection in mice<br />
Makwana M (1), Anderson P N (2), Hristova M(1), Zbarsky V (1), Miller<br />
F D (3), Kaplan D (3), Heumann R (4), Raivich G (1,2)<br />
1. Centre for Perinatal Brain Protection and Repair, Dept <strong>of</strong> Obstetrics<br />
& Gynaecology, University College London, UK, 2. Dept <strong>of</strong> Anatomy,<br />
University College London,UK, 3. Univ <strong>of</strong> Toronto, Sick Children<br />
Hospital, Toronto, Canada, 4. Dept <strong>of</strong> Neurobiochemistry, Ruhr-<br />
University Bochum, Germany,<br />
The extracellular-signal-regulated-kinase cascade is important in<br />
neuronal survival and plasticity. To determine the function <strong>of</strong> neuronal<br />
Ras and MEK in axonal regeneration, we generated constitutively<br />
active Ras (Ras+), dominant-negative MEK1 (MEK1dn) and<br />
Ras+xMEK1dn double mutant (DM) transgenic mice. Studies in these<br />
mutants have shown extensive collateral sprouting <strong>of</strong> corticospinal<br />
tract (CST) axons, rostral to the lesion in the grey and white matter on<br />
the ipsilateral side in Ras+, MEK1dn and DM animals compared with<br />
wild-type (WT) controls. Rearing and grid-walk tests were used to test<br />
functional recovery over a period <strong>of</strong> 28 days following a unilateral left<br />
dorsal hemisection (DH) at C4, followed by labelling <strong>of</strong> the CST with<br />
biotinylated dextran amine to assess the sprouting response. Ras+<br />
and MEK1dn groups performed significantly better in left forepaw use<br />
than WT in the rearing test at day 14 (35.0%±9.0%; 45.0%±7.0%<br />
versus 9.0%±5.0%; mean±SEM respectively; **p