Success Factors in Nonprofit Mergers - Minnesota Council of ...
Success Factors in Nonprofit Mergers - Minnesota Council of ...
Success Factors in Nonprofit Mergers - Minnesota Council of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Success</strong> <strong>Factors</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong> nonpr<strong>of</strong>it mergers<br />
<strong>Factors</strong> proven to make nonpr<strong>of</strong>its mergers more likely to succeed<br />
by the desire to ga<strong>in</strong> greater f<strong>in</strong>ancial viability or solvency for one or more <strong>of</strong> the merg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
organizations. Although far fewer organizations reported that they struggled to make<br />
payroll prior to merger (15%) or needed to use a l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> credit to susta<strong>in</strong> daily operations<br />
prior to merger (7%), the vast majority <strong>of</strong> organizations sought to improve their f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />
circumstances through merger.<br />
It is important to note that this study sample <strong>in</strong>cludes only completed mergers, and<br />
therefore likely underrepresents the number <strong>of</strong> organizations that may explore merger<br />
only when f<strong>in</strong>ancial circumstances become desperate. It is likely that organizations<br />
need a reasonable level <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial stability go<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to a merger <strong>in</strong> order to be viewed<br />
as a reasonable and worthwhile partner by another organization. Respondents<br />
represent<strong>in</strong>g 16 <strong>of</strong> the merged organizations <strong>in</strong> this sample provided narrative comments<br />
that suggested that at least one <strong>of</strong> the pre-merger organizations would have needed to<br />
close or significantly restructure if they had not been successful <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g a suitable<br />
merger partner.<br />
With the lack <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources and options to get f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources to<br />
susta<strong>in</strong> our operations, we would have had to close. The realization was that<br />
we couldn’t make it f<strong>in</strong>ancially without some other partner. –Board <strong>of</strong> directors<br />
or governance<br />
We were go<strong>in</strong>g to go broke and either shut the doors or significantly cut<br />
and restructure programm<strong>in</strong>g. It was a survival issue. –Board <strong>of</strong> directors or<br />
governance<br />
While other organizations were less desperate, fiscal soundness was still typically<br />
a concern.<br />
I th<strong>in</strong>k it was concerns about the f<strong>in</strong>ancial future <strong>of</strong> the organization. We<br />
were solid at the time, but look<strong>in</strong>g forward, we were concerned. –Executive<br />
leadership<br />
To be able to build a strong foundation for long term susta<strong>in</strong>ability. I th<strong>in</strong>k<br />
some <strong>of</strong> the economic pressures brought them to the table, but once they<br />
started hav<strong>in</strong>g the conversations, they found there were benefits. They really<br />
felt that they wanted to be as strong as possible. They went <strong>in</strong>to this with a<br />
long term vision for growth and susta<strong>in</strong>ability. –Consultant<br />
It was the opportunity to expand services with another organization that was<br />
well thought <strong>of</strong> and had very good services. They had some healthy f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />
reserves. –Executive leadership<br />
<strong>Success</strong> <strong>Factors</strong> In <strong>Nonpr<strong>of</strong>it</strong> <strong>Mergers</strong> 29 MAP for <strong>Nonpr<strong>of</strong>it</strong>s & Wilder Research 2012