Success Factors in Nonprofit Mergers - Minnesota Council of ...
Success Factors in Nonprofit Mergers - Minnesota Council of ...
Success Factors in Nonprofit Mergers - Minnesota Council of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Success</strong> <strong>Factors</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong> nonpr<strong>of</strong>it mergers<br />
<strong>Factors</strong> proven to make nonpr<strong>of</strong>its mergers more likely to succeed<br />
had one organization identify an open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the executive director or CEO position as<br />
a primary reason for merg<strong>in</strong>g. None <strong>of</strong> the mergers reported that both <strong>of</strong> the merg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
organizations had an executive open<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
While executive turnover certa<strong>in</strong>ly emerges as a condition or a circumstance around<br />
which merger occurs, it is important to look at the level to which it drives or is “catalytic”<br />
<strong>in</strong> the decision to merge. Us<strong>in</strong>g the responses given to relevant questions <strong>in</strong> the key<br />
<strong>in</strong>formant <strong>in</strong>terview, it is determ<strong>in</strong>ed that the executive turnover was catalytic for 39<br />
percent <strong>of</strong> the mergers studied. This means that the executive turnover was described <strong>in</strong><br />
one <strong>of</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g contexts:<br />
• Identified as a primary reason for pursu<strong>in</strong>g the merger for at least one <strong>of</strong> the premerger<br />
organizations.<br />
• Described as the “s<strong>in</strong>gle biggest reason” <strong>of</strong> at least one <strong>of</strong> the pre-merger<br />
organizations pursu<strong>in</strong>g the merger.<br />
• The merger would not have happened if not for the executive turnover.<br />
Board-driven merger<br />
Boards <strong>of</strong> directors may drive the decision to pursue merger for a variety <strong>of</strong> reasons that<br />
may be strategic, survival motivated, or both. In 61 percent <strong>of</strong> the mergers studied, hav<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
board member from at least one <strong>of</strong> the pre-merger organizations push<strong>in</strong>g for merger was<br />
a primary reason for purs<strong>in</strong>g the merger <strong>in</strong> at least one <strong>of</strong> the pre-merger organizations.<br />
However, it does not appear that the lack <strong>of</strong> governance plays a key role because few<br />
(10%) <strong>of</strong> the mergers studied were pursued to fill open<strong>in</strong>gs on the board <strong>of</strong> directors<br />
(Figure 4).<br />
4. Percent <strong>of</strong> mergers that report primary reason for merger was board-related (N=41)<br />
Identified <strong>in</strong><br />
BOTH*<br />
Identified <strong>in</strong><br />
only ONE<br />
Identified <strong>in</strong><br />
NEITHER<br />
Had a strong board member who pushed for the merger 12% 49% 39%<br />
Identified a need for skilled board or governance<br />
leadership<br />
Had open<strong>in</strong>gs or could not fill open<strong>in</strong>gs on the board <strong>of</strong><br />
directors<br />
0% 17% 83%<br />
0% 10% 90%<br />
*Notes: For a complete explanation <strong>of</strong> how these figures were computed, see pages 9 and 10 <strong>in</strong> the methods<br />
section.<br />
For the mergers that <strong>in</strong>cluded more than two pre-merger organizations, these characteristics were identified <strong>in</strong> at<br />
least two <strong>of</strong> the organizations.<br />
<strong>Success</strong> <strong>Factors</strong> In <strong>Nonpr<strong>of</strong>it</strong> <strong>Mergers</strong> 31 MAP for <strong>Nonpr<strong>of</strong>it</strong>s & Wilder Research 2012