02.01.2015 Views

Positive Energy: how renewable electricity can transform ... - WWF UK

Positive Energy: how renewable electricity can transform ... - WWF UK

Positive Energy: how renewable electricity can transform ... - WWF UK

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Resources and generation mix<br />

Having established demand scenarios, GL GH assessed the <strong>UK</strong>’s ‘practicable’<br />

<strong>renewable</strong>s resource – the maximum amount of <strong>renewable</strong> resources available to the<br />

country, drawing on estimates from the Department of <strong>Energy</strong> and Climate Change<br />

(DECC) and the CCC. They then took into account anticipated technical developments,<br />

public acceptance, and build rates to come up with estimates for the ‘available’<br />

<strong>renewable</strong> resource in 2030.<br />

Figure 2: Annual<br />

<strong>renewable</strong> <strong>electricity</strong><br />

resources assumed<br />

available in the <strong>UK</strong> in<br />

2030 (TWh) 19, 20 .<br />

COMPARISON OF PRACTICABLE AND AVAILABLE RENEWABLE RESOURCES ASSUMED AVAILABLE IN 2030<br />

Practicable resource<br />

Available resource<br />

0 500 1000 1500<br />

TWh<br />

Offshore wind<br />

Onshore wind<br />

Tidal stream<br />

Tidal Range<br />

Hydro<br />

Solar PV<br />

Wave<br />

Geothermal<br />

Biomass<br />

In all of GL GH’s scenarios, the <strong>renewable</strong> energy generation needed to meet demand<br />

(maximum 425 TWh in 2030 under the central demand scenario) is signifi<strong>can</strong>tly less<br />

than both the practicable and the available resource estimates s<strong>how</strong>n in figure two.<br />

GL GH assumes that it will not be economic to build <strong>renewable</strong> energy capacity to meet<br />

more than the <strong>UK</strong>’s peak demand plus that of our existing interconnector capacity with<br />

other countries. This is based on the premise that building excess <strong>renewable</strong> capacity<br />

would mean that at times of high <strong>electricity</strong> production from <strong>renewable</strong> energy sources<br />

(‘peak output’) or low demand, there would be no market for the surplus <strong>electricity</strong>. In<br />

reality, it is unlikely that all <strong>renewable</strong> generators will reach their maximum production<br />

levels simultaneously, given that wind speeds vary around the country. Future<br />

developments in the EU <strong>electricity</strong> market may give the <strong>UK</strong> an opportunity to profitably<br />

export surplus <strong>renewable</strong> <strong>electricity</strong>, enabling an even higher deployment of <strong>renewable</strong>s<br />

in the <strong>UK</strong>. This is assumed to be the case in the stretch scenario, the implications of<br />

which are discussed in chapter three.<br />

<strong>WWF</strong>-<strong>UK</strong> 2011 <strong>Positive</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> page 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!