DIGITAL SOURCE COMPONENTS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
go to: Contents | Feature | On The Horizon | DACs | CD Players | Music Servers | Integrated Amps with DACs | Portable | Our Top Picks<br />
EQUIPMENT review - Light Harmonic Da Vinci<br />
ist. It’s a fascinating effect and is especially<br />
clear with the Da Vinci, and another something I<br />
hadn’t noticed before. Again, neat.<br />
Okay, after detail and depth, I tend to look<br />
for bass “authority.” For whatever reason, my<br />
experience with high-res-capable DACs has<br />
been dominated by a sense of litheness in<br />
the presentation. It’s as if the tonal balance<br />
is anchored a bit high. A great deal of listener<br />
attention gets focused on sonic aspects like<br />
“air” and “detail,” which is generally a rather<br />
pleasing effect, but doesn’t necessarily mean<br />
baby’s got back. So, I reached for another track<br />
from Chris Jones’ Roadhouses and Automobiles.<br />
“No Sanctuary Here” enjoyed a year or two as<br />
the Most Overplayed Song At An Audio Show,<br />
due in no small part to the ominousness of the<br />
bass track. It is, in a word, Big. Like, that’sa-thunderstorm-and-we’re-never-going-toreach-shelter-in-time<br />
Big. Played back on big<br />
speakers in a big room it’ll shake the walls and<br />
everything between, which is probably why it<br />
was so popular—it’ll stop show traffic out in<br />
the hallway, for sure. Anyway, I’ve found that<br />
many supposedly full-range loudspeakers don’t<br />
handle the track with equal aplomb, so I like<br />
to use it when Looking For Mr. Big Bass. What<br />
I’m listening for is a deep, satisfying sense of<br />
harmonic rightness, of pitch definition, of…<br />
okay, you know what I really want It’s fear,<br />
plain and simple. If the sound doesn’t make<br />
me dive for the floor screeching “holy crap,”<br />
it isn’t right. It’s also not enough to sketch<br />
that tone, I want speed, precision, and decay,<br />
but perhaps most importantly, I want fullness<br />
and continuity, and they are rare. So, assuming<br />
the speakers can go there, the question is, will<br />
this DAC Thelma-and-Louise me right off the<br />
cliff and into an audio abyss, or will there be<br />
some kind of last second slide just short of<br />
the danger zone The Berkeley Audio Alpha<br />
DAC does this zone particularly well, and quite<br />
frankly, it was the reason I bought it. The Da<br />
Vinci also gets this particular aspect “right,”<br />
but with a slightly different take. Namely,<br />
there’s the sense that there’s nothing to catch<br />
you as you dive off the background into forever.<br />
Thank you, Inky.<br />
Tracking bass speed and PRAT took me to<br />
Jem’s Finally Woken and “Come On Closer.” A<br />
sexy track, this, where the bass line is frontand-center<br />
and climbs and dives throughout<br />
the tune. Another one for testing the limits<br />
of a loudspeaker or setup, it’s a matter of<br />
continuity and roundness to the notes as<br />
they drop like cannonballs onto a suddenly<br />
trampoline-like soundstage. With the backdrop<br />
the Da Vinci knitted out of the void, tracking<br />
the bass was an athletic exercise, arresting<br />
and explosive and altogether addicting.<br />
Reference Recordings has a reputation<br />
for great recordings, and the Minnesota<br />
Orchestra’s performance of Rachmaninoff’s<br />
Symphonic Dances is dynamic and complex<br />
in just the right way to short-sheet a digital<br />
converter. I’ve heard this piece quite a lot<br />
in 24-bit/176kHz high-resolution PCM; it’s<br />
included on the HRx Sampler that’s available<br />
from Reference Recordings that came with<br />
the Berkeley DAC. The piece begins softly; the<br />
temptation will be to crank it up early, which<br />
makes the crescendos even more entertaining,<br />
the sudden climbs so stark and unexpected<br />
that my dog fled in a mixture of terror and<br />
outrage and led to another argument with my<br />
wife over “proper listening levels” and whether<br />
or not I’d be allowed to have the remote<br />
back. Whoops. But the Deep Space Da Vinci’s<br />
backdrop sets a really involving stage and<br />
tensions mounted swiftly as the woodwinds<br />
and strings began to struggle with each other,<br />
battling for supremacy, instead of battling for<br />
audibility. And even with the lightning crash of<br />
cymbals and the thunderbolt of the timpani,<br />
you had depth, placement, and delineation.<br />
This is the most coherent rendition I’ve heard<br />
of this piece, and played back at appropriate<br />
volume (i.e., loud), even a diehard classical<br />
skeptic (that would be me) was thrilled.<br />
Note to self: Play demos when the kids are<br />
in school not when they’re in bed.<br />
There are those who would call the Da Vinci<br />
“very analog.” I’m not sure I’m one of them, as<br />
Great Big Bass on a vinyl system is even more<br />
problematic than it is for a DAC. So, no, the Da<br />
Vinci is not analog-like. It’s better than that.<br />
But, that said, there’s an ease to the sound<br />
that is entirely non-fatiguing. Not to say that<br />
it’s in any way treble-challenged, but tracks do<br />
not tend to go brittle when bad—bad recordings<br />
stay that way, which is to say, Adele’s 21 still<br />
sounds horribly compressed, even with the<br />
Da Vinci’s Duet Engine sorting it out (more<br />
below). But what I mean is that it doesn’t<br />
sound worse. Some DACs, when fed crap, tend<br />
to either smooth out the hard edges or use<br />
them as an excuse to start swinging bags of<br />
broken glass at your ears. The Da Vinci does<br />
neither—compression sounds like what it is,<br />
which is “a horrible tragedy.” Here, vinyl tends<br />
to do better, as whatever travesties usually<br />
visited on a recording destined for silver discs<br />
and/or iTunes tend to not be visited on the<br />
vinyl version.<br />
Again and again, I was tempted and taunted<br />
about the volume—a little voice kept saying,<br />
“Maybe you should turn it up.” My wife loved<br />
that part. Ahem. But the grain-free view on<br />
the music was as transparent as I’ve been able<br />
to achieve at home, and that view was fully<br />
as three-dimensional as the source material<br />
allowed. I can’t be faulted for throwing myself<br />
headfirst into such waters, now can I Volume<br />
restrictions be damned! Ha HA!<br />
Tonally, I found the Da Vinci to have a<br />
balanced presentation as no particular part<br />
of the sonic tapestry stands out. The bass is<br />
exemplary, and there is no tonal shift upward<br />
or downward that would mark the designer<br />
as overly celebrating some favored portion<br />
of the audio band. On the whole, the DAC’s<br />
presentation is unremarkably excellent and<br />
nothing feels out of place; it’s all of a piece.<br />
Organic. Which makes isolating its signature<br />
something of a nightmare, but there it is.<br />
I’d say that it was, in a word, musical, but I’m<br />
pretty sure that’s another one of those damned<br />
clichés, so let’s just settle on “awesome.”<br />
Technical Bits<br />
This DAC is almost annoyingly stuffed full of<br />
audio wizardry, but one thing you won’t find is<br />
any digital upsampling or oversampling. Why<br />
not Well, it’s simple: Light Harmonic couldn’t<br />
get that kind of design to come close enough<br />
to the sound of an analog front end. Bitperfect<br />
protection and preservation led the<br />
company to a shunt-regulated resistor-ladder<br />
51 Buyer's Guide to Digital Source Components 2014 www.theabsolutesound.com<br />
previous page<br />
NEXT page