Real World Coaching Evaluation: Tools for coaching insight - CIPD
Real World Coaching Evaluation: Tools for coaching insight - CIPD
Real World Coaching Evaluation: Tools for coaching insight - CIPD
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Real</strong> <strong>World</strong> <strong>Coaching</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong>: <strong>Tools</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>coaching</strong> <strong>insight</strong><br />
The RAM thinking tool <strong>for</strong> <strong>coaching</strong> evaluation<br />
Item Description Measures<br />
R<br />
Scoping<br />
Relevance of <strong>coaching</strong><br />
context with business<br />
relationships and<br />
outline expectations<br />
specified<br />
Records of assignments,<br />
statements of expectations,<br />
costings etc <strong>for</strong> <strong>coaching</strong> inputs<br />
A<br />
Contracting<br />
Relationships and levels<br />
Records of chemistry meetings<br />
etc with data<br />
Relationships and parties<br />
specified<br />
Learning<br />
Skills, capabilities,<br />
knowledge etc<br />
Self and manager assessment<br />
based on scaling<br />
Application<br />
Evidence of change<br />
(motivation, application,<br />
agreeableness etc)<br />
360, appraisal, surveys etc<br />
M<br />
Business<br />
Results<br />
Key indicators related to<br />
area in which <strong>coaching</strong><br />
relationship is based<br />
KPIs with appropriate<br />
sensitivities and probabilities<br />
ROI (where<br />
appropriate)<br />
Monetary costs and<br />
benefits of programme<br />
with appropriate<br />
adjustments<br />
(%) benefits (adjusted) – costs<br />
costs<br />
Intangibles
The <strong>coaching</strong> context spidergram<br />
Business<br />
priorities<br />
Degree of<br />
sponsorship<br />
Organisation<br />
culture<br />
Available<br />
resources<br />
<strong>Coaching</strong><br />
context<br />
<strong>Coaching</strong><br />
purpose<br />
Perception of<br />
<strong>coaching</strong><br />
Learning and<br />
development<br />
climate<br />
Context issue Level Improvement Actions<br />
Degree of sponsorship<br />
Business priorities<br />
Organisation culture<br />
<strong>Coaching</strong> purpose<br />
Learning and<br />
development climate<br />
Perception of <strong>coaching</strong><br />
Available resource
Make or buy matrix <strong>for</strong> <strong>coaching</strong><br />
High level <strong>coaching</strong> audit<br />
Internal <strong>coaching</strong> skills<br />
audit<br />
External <strong>coaching</strong> cost<br />
exercise<br />
Compare the two<br />
All<br />
All internally delivered<br />
All line manager<br />
delivered<br />
What to do<br />
Who are doing what/<br />
external levels of staff/<br />
departments/number of<br />
hours/nature of previous<br />
procurement broad costs<br />
and benefits if known<br />
Develop a questionnaire<br />
on <strong>coaching</strong> skills and<br />
levels using tools to help<br />
assess internal <strong>coaching</strong><br />
capability<br />
Look at the nature of<br />
current <strong>coaching</strong><br />
provision and ‘scenario’<br />
plan <strong>for</strong> alternative<br />
model of provision<br />
<strong>Coaching</strong> Capability<br />
review<br />
Capability development<br />
ratios<br />
Capability development<br />
paths<br />
Actions arising<br />
Develop register of <strong>coaching</strong><br />
assignments, hours allocated<br />
and costs/benefits<br />
Develop a ‘capability statement’<br />
of internal <strong>coaching</strong><br />
Consider various resourcing<br />
scenarios<br />
Calculate % internal and<br />
external, assignment by source.<br />
Have line of sight of costs<br />
Scope costs of internal<br />
coverage with supervision<br />
Develop pathways <strong>for</strong> cohort of<br />
HP LM coaches towards further<br />
development using CATSE<br />
models of per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>coaching</strong>
Conversation Capture Tool<br />
This tool helps you to capture some of the data from <strong>coaching</strong> conversations so that you can turn it into usable<br />
data and <strong>insight</strong>. By scoring you are taking the assessment of both the individual and the coach, as well as that of<br />
anyone else involved in <strong>coaching</strong> who wishes to monitor progress. Though the scoring is subjective it is based on<br />
judgement, and coaches should be prepared to use this type of conversation/process capture tool or some other<br />
structure to introduce supportive challenge into <strong>coaching</strong> conversations.<br />
Most <strong>coaching</strong> conversations, however they are conducted and whatever models or methods are used, have a<br />
structure which describes phases of awareness, goal setting/ commitment and action/resolve. We can use data to<br />
work out both a scale and an indicator, as the table below, with examples of scoring and comments, shows.<br />
PHASES AND<br />
RATINGS<br />
4 3 2 1<br />
Preparation,<br />
readiness and<br />
diligence<br />
Fully prepared, having<br />
used and reflected<br />
upon exercises and<br />
suggestions, ready to<br />
use <strong>insight</strong>s<br />
Somewhat prepared,<br />
recalling past<br />
conversation and<br />
showing some<br />
evidence of reflection,<br />
use of exercises etc.<br />
Pretty unprepared,<br />
improvising and<br />
‘winging it’, showing<br />
little evidence of being<br />
ready<br />
Unprepared, no<br />
evidence of readiness<br />
or diligence<br />
RATING 3<br />
Awareness,<br />
engagement and<br />
responsibility <strong>for</strong><br />
change<br />
Fully aware and<br />
responsible, knowing<br />
exactly what issues<br />
need to be addressed<br />
Fairly aware and<br />
responsible, knowing<br />
to a large extent what<br />
issues need to be<br />
addressed<br />
Partly aware and<br />
responsible, knowing<br />
to some extent which<br />
issues need to be<br />
addressed but with an<br />
absence of focus<br />
Hardly aware and<br />
reluctant, showing<br />
poor awareness and<br />
low or no<br />
responsibility.<br />
RATING 3<br />
Goal setting and<br />
commitment<br />
level<br />
Powerful commitment<br />
with goal attainment<br />
key in behaviour<br />
Reasonable<br />
commitment with<br />
goal attainment<br />
figuring highly in<br />
behaviour<br />
Weak or deluded<br />
commitment with<br />
goal attainment not<br />
figuring or<br />
intermittently figuring<br />
in behaviour<br />
No commitment,<br />
acute procrastination<br />
with goal attainment<br />
not figuring in<br />
behaviour<br />
RATING 2<br />
Options/solutions<br />
considered<br />
Multiple rich options<br />
explored<br />
Many options<br />
explored<br />
Limited options<br />
explored<br />
Few or no options<br />
explored<br />
RATING 2<br />
Resolve and<br />
Action<br />
Powerful resolve and<br />
firm action<br />
RATING 3<br />
Good resolve and<br />
some action<br />
Limited resolve and<br />
intermittent action<br />
No resolve and no<br />
action<br />
SCORE<br />
13/20<br />
Prepared and partly aware <strong>for</strong> session with evidence of awareness of and responsibility <strong>for</strong> issues<br />
(give examples) but some absence of focus (on x, y). However, when goals specified some evidence<br />
of commitment to (goal x, y). Evidence that many options were explored (e.g.) and though there<br />
was firm resolve action has been intermittent.<br />
Other notes and comments<br />
Highest score 20<br />
Good score 15<br />
Average score 10<br />
Poor score 5