04.01.2015 Views

Vol.4.Issue.1.October.2008 - Edgren High School EagleNet

Vol.4.Issue.1.October.2008 - Edgren High School EagleNet

Vol.4.Issue.1.October.2008 - Edgren High School EagleNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

volume 4 issue 1 Back to <strong>School</strong> Issue<br />

page 3<br />

Editorial: New <strong>School</strong> Year, New <strong>School</strong> Rules<br />

Students harbor conflicting ideas concerning the old and the new policies<br />

By Sarah Zediker and Erin Nicolai<br />

The ’08-’09 school year commenced<br />

in the midst of many changes, some<br />

not as well received as others. <strong>Edgren</strong><br />

welcomes new faculty and appreciates<br />

their fresh outlook on the way our<br />

school functions. Suggestions such<br />

as directory signs placed throughout<br />

campus, clearly visible room numbers<br />

over every door, and parking passes<br />

for individuals at the school who regularly<br />

use the lower lot have generally<br />

been acknowledged favorably.<br />

However, true to high school stereotypes,<br />

the feeling of change has inspired<br />

controversial rumors among<br />

the student body. Some proved inconsequential<br />

such as the far fetched<br />

idea that homecoming or activities<br />

associated with that tradition would<br />

be canceled. Others turned out to<br />

be more accurate than most would<br />

have liked.<br />

In particular, changes made to seminar<br />

procedure incited a negative reaction<br />

before they were even implemented.<br />

Now, with a concrete plan<br />

of change in place, grumbles sound<br />

through the halls. For those who are<br />

unclear about the new system, allow<br />

us to fi ll in the blanks. Seminar is now<br />

broken into three different sections:<br />

silent sustained reading followed by<br />

two periods reserved for students to<br />

consult with other teachers. There is a<br />

fi ve minute passing period in between<br />

each section.When students reach<br />

their destination for the 1st or 2nd seminar<br />

period, they are expected to remain<br />

under that teacher’s supervision<br />

until the next passing period.Students<br />

are only permitted in the halls duringpassing<br />

periods unless they are holding<br />

specifi c classroom passes supplied<br />

by their seminar teacher for travel to<br />

the bathroom, their locker, or other<br />

destination.<br />

Thus far, students feel strongly that these<br />

regulations are unjust, and they were not<br />

consulted before these changes were<br />

implemented. However, it is important<br />

to note that there is reason behind these<br />

seminar changes. Last year, the Advisory<br />

Council on Dependent Education (ACDE)<br />

came to <strong>Edgren</strong> to evaluate the school.<br />

While expressing satisfaction in many aspects<br />

of our school, the team found several<br />

serious faults in our seminar system.<br />

Students were found wasting time doing<br />

unproductive activities such as playing<br />

cards or loitering in the halls under the<br />

pretence that they were on their way to<br />

a teacher, restroom, or locker. Certain<br />

teachers failed to offer proper supervision<br />

by using seminar as their personal time to<br />

catch up on some sleep. This behavior<br />

was deemed incongruous with seminar’s<br />

true purpose which is to provide needed<br />

time for students to study and focus on<br />

their school work. The ACDE team cited<br />

this as a major issue, and <strong>Edgren</strong> was<br />

asked to make radical changes in order<br />

to maintain its accreditation.<br />

This is why <strong>Edgren</strong> students have been<br />

experiencing a new approach to seminar<br />

this year. While recognizing the necessity<br />

for change, the question must be asked if<br />

this is the only or indeed the best alternative<br />

to previous seminar procedure.<br />

<strong>Edgren</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> prides itself on the<br />

fact that although it is a small school in<br />

a remote location, its students rise above<br />

expectations regarding both test scores<br />

and participation in extracurricular activities.<br />

Because our student body is more<br />

limited than that of larger schools, many<br />

individuals are involved in more than one<br />

activity at a time. These enthusiastic students<br />

often carry the burden of a hectic<br />

schedule, and as a result must work hard<br />

to represent <strong>Edgren</strong> favorably in their<br />

elective activities and maintain fervor in<br />

their school work. They often put forth<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

tremendous effort to make up work as, in<br />

lieu of such a schedule, missing days of<br />

school at a time is not so uncommon.<br />

These are the individuals who value<br />

their seminar time so much, because<br />

without it, there would not be ample opportunity<br />

to see all of their teachers. Yes,<br />

students are currently able to visit two<br />

separate teachers during their seminar<br />

time; however, when faced with up to<br />

four classes to manage after traveling,<br />

two teachers in a seminar may simply<br />

be inadequate.<br />

Furthermore, not all visits can be prearranged.<br />

Oftentimes students encounter<br />

a baffl ing question while working, and<br />

need to visit a teacher right away. At<br />

other times, students need to speak with<br />

a teacher for only fi ve minutes at a time<br />

to clarify an assignment or ask a specifi c<br />

question. With the new system in place,<br />

students have to commit at least twenty<br />

minutes visiting each teacher and limit<br />

the number of teachers they visit to just<br />

two. While trying to make the seminar<br />

period more effective, these are the<br />

types of problems that could create a<br />

more frustrating system and more wasted<br />

time.<br />

Students at <strong>Edgren</strong>, while having their<br />

faults, excel in many different ways.<br />

While we appreciate the determination<br />

for improvement exhibited by faculty,<br />

we ask for lenience. Our positive attributes,<br />

and our individuality as a student<br />

body, should be taken into account<br />

when tailoring specifi c procedures like<br />

seminar. We ask that the need for structure<br />

not inhibit the equally signifi cant<br />

need for fl exibility. If we are not allowed<br />

to access all the resources at our fi ngertips,<br />

it is as if our hands have been tied<br />

and bound. True achievement can not<br />

be attained when limitations block the<br />

path to success.<br />

Response from Principal<br />

YOU HAVE SPOKEN AND WE HAVE LISTENED!<br />

By Mr. Arrington<br />

I believe that the students at <strong>Edgren</strong> are everything that you say and more. Please know that your teachers and<br />

administration believe that there are always situations that merit fl exibility to our “systems”. Though we must always<br />

have a system of accountability in place, it is our desire as well as yours to ensure that there is fl exibility afforded to<br />

those individuals and situations where improvement and highest student achievement are the motive. Please explain<br />

your needs to your seminar teacher and he/she will work with you in determining what available options will best meet<br />

those needs. We will work with you in your efforts for highest achievement whether that is something that can be covered<br />

within the guidelines of the seminar structure or you need something more fl exible.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!