Vol.4.Issue.1.October.2008 - Edgren High School EagleNet
Vol.4.Issue.1.October.2008 - Edgren High School EagleNet
Vol.4.Issue.1.October.2008 - Edgren High School EagleNet
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
volume 4 issue 1 Back to <strong>School</strong> Issue<br />
page 3<br />
Editorial: New <strong>School</strong> Year, New <strong>School</strong> Rules<br />
Students harbor conflicting ideas concerning the old and the new policies<br />
By Sarah Zediker and Erin Nicolai<br />
The ’08-’09 school year commenced<br />
in the midst of many changes, some<br />
not as well received as others. <strong>Edgren</strong><br />
welcomes new faculty and appreciates<br />
their fresh outlook on the way our<br />
school functions. Suggestions such<br />
as directory signs placed throughout<br />
campus, clearly visible room numbers<br />
over every door, and parking passes<br />
for individuals at the school who regularly<br />
use the lower lot have generally<br />
been acknowledged favorably.<br />
However, true to high school stereotypes,<br />
the feeling of change has inspired<br />
controversial rumors among<br />
the student body. Some proved inconsequential<br />
such as the far fetched<br />
idea that homecoming or activities<br />
associated with that tradition would<br />
be canceled. Others turned out to<br />
be more accurate than most would<br />
have liked.<br />
In particular, changes made to seminar<br />
procedure incited a negative reaction<br />
before they were even implemented.<br />
Now, with a concrete plan<br />
of change in place, grumbles sound<br />
through the halls. For those who are<br />
unclear about the new system, allow<br />
us to fi ll in the blanks. Seminar is now<br />
broken into three different sections:<br />
silent sustained reading followed by<br />
two periods reserved for students to<br />
consult with other teachers. There is a<br />
fi ve minute passing period in between<br />
each section.When students reach<br />
their destination for the 1st or 2nd seminar<br />
period, they are expected to remain<br />
under that teacher’s supervision<br />
until the next passing period.Students<br />
are only permitted in the halls duringpassing<br />
periods unless they are holding<br />
specifi c classroom passes supplied<br />
by their seminar teacher for travel to<br />
the bathroom, their locker, or other<br />
destination.<br />
Thus far, students feel strongly that these<br />
regulations are unjust, and they were not<br />
consulted before these changes were<br />
implemented. However, it is important<br />
to note that there is reason behind these<br />
seminar changes. Last year, the Advisory<br />
Council on Dependent Education (ACDE)<br />
came to <strong>Edgren</strong> to evaluate the school.<br />
While expressing satisfaction in many aspects<br />
of our school, the team found several<br />
serious faults in our seminar system.<br />
Students were found wasting time doing<br />
unproductive activities such as playing<br />
cards or loitering in the halls under the<br />
pretence that they were on their way to<br />
a teacher, restroom, or locker. Certain<br />
teachers failed to offer proper supervision<br />
by using seminar as their personal time to<br />
catch up on some sleep. This behavior<br />
was deemed incongruous with seminar’s<br />
true purpose which is to provide needed<br />
time for students to study and focus on<br />
their school work. The ACDE team cited<br />
this as a major issue, and <strong>Edgren</strong> was<br />
asked to make radical changes in order<br />
to maintain its accreditation.<br />
This is why <strong>Edgren</strong> students have been<br />
experiencing a new approach to seminar<br />
this year. While recognizing the necessity<br />
for change, the question must be asked if<br />
this is the only or indeed the best alternative<br />
to previous seminar procedure.<br />
<strong>Edgren</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>School</strong> prides itself on the<br />
fact that although it is a small school in<br />
a remote location, its students rise above<br />
expectations regarding both test scores<br />
and participation in extracurricular activities.<br />
Because our student body is more<br />
limited than that of larger schools, many<br />
individuals are involved in more than one<br />
activity at a time. These enthusiastic students<br />
often carry the burden of a hectic<br />
schedule, and as a result must work hard<br />
to represent <strong>Edgren</strong> favorably in their<br />
elective activities and maintain fervor in<br />
their school work. They often put forth<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
tremendous effort to make up work as, in<br />
lieu of such a schedule, missing days of<br />
school at a time is not so uncommon.<br />
These are the individuals who value<br />
their seminar time so much, because<br />
without it, there would not be ample opportunity<br />
to see all of their teachers. Yes,<br />
students are currently able to visit two<br />
separate teachers during their seminar<br />
time; however, when faced with up to<br />
four classes to manage after traveling,<br />
two teachers in a seminar may simply<br />
be inadequate.<br />
Furthermore, not all visits can be prearranged.<br />
Oftentimes students encounter<br />
a baffl ing question while working, and<br />
need to visit a teacher right away. At<br />
other times, students need to speak with<br />
a teacher for only fi ve minutes at a time<br />
to clarify an assignment or ask a specifi c<br />
question. With the new system in place,<br />
students have to commit at least twenty<br />
minutes visiting each teacher and limit<br />
the number of teachers they visit to just<br />
two. While trying to make the seminar<br />
period more effective, these are the<br />
types of problems that could create a<br />
more frustrating system and more wasted<br />
time.<br />
Students at <strong>Edgren</strong>, while having their<br />
faults, excel in many different ways.<br />
While we appreciate the determination<br />
for improvement exhibited by faculty,<br />
we ask for lenience. Our positive attributes,<br />
and our individuality as a student<br />
body, should be taken into account<br />
when tailoring specifi c procedures like<br />
seminar. We ask that the need for structure<br />
not inhibit the equally signifi cant<br />
need for fl exibility. If we are not allowed<br />
to access all the resources at our fi ngertips,<br />
it is as if our hands have been tied<br />
and bound. True achievement can not<br />
be attained when limitations block the<br />
path to success.<br />
Response from Principal<br />
YOU HAVE SPOKEN AND WE HAVE LISTENED!<br />
By Mr. Arrington<br />
I believe that the students at <strong>Edgren</strong> are everything that you say and more. Please know that your teachers and<br />
administration believe that there are always situations that merit fl exibility to our “systems”. Though we must always<br />
have a system of accountability in place, it is our desire as well as yours to ensure that there is fl exibility afforded to<br />
those individuals and situations where improvement and highest student achievement are the motive. Please explain<br />
your needs to your seminar teacher and he/she will work with you in determining what available options will best meet<br />
those needs. We will work with you in your efforts for highest achievement whether that is something that can be covered<br />
within the guidelines of the seminar structure or you need something more fl exible.