12Facilitating Ongoing Civil Justice Review and Reform
12Facilitating Ongoing Civil Justice Review and Reform
12Facilitating Ongoing Civil Justice Review and Reform
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Gleeson Murray, ‘State of the Judicature’ (Speech delivered at the<br />
Australian Legal Convention, Canberra, 10 October 1999)<br />
Gleeson, Murray, ‘The State of the Judicature’ (Paper presented at the<br />
‘13th Commonwealth Law Conference’, Melbourne, 17 April 2003)<br />
Gleeson, Murray, ‘Are the Professions Worth Keeping’ (Paper presented<br />
at the ‘Greek-Australian International Legal <strong>and</strong> Medical Conference’,<br />
Kos, Greece, 31 May 1999)<br />
Gleeson, Murray, ‘The Future of <strong>Civil</strong> Litigation – Adjudication or Dispute<br />
Resolution’ (Paper presented at the ‘ALTA Conference’, Dunedin, 7 July<br />
1998)<br />
Gleeson, Murray, ‘Individualised <strong>Justice</strong> - The Holy Grail’ (1995) 69<br />
Australian Law Journal 421<br />
Gleeson, Murray, ‘Judicial Accountability’ (Paper presented at the ‘Courts<br />
in a Representative Democracy’, Canberra, 13 November 1994)<br />
Goldschmid, Robert, Discussion Paper: Major Themes of <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Justice</strong><br />
<strong>Reform</strong> (<strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Justice</strong> <strong>Reform</strong> Working Group [British Columbia], 2006)<br />
Golvan, George, ‘Innovative Hybrid Dispute Resolution Processes’ (Paper<br />
presented at the ‘Victorian Bar Continuing Legal Education Program’,<br />
Melbourne, 25 September 2007)<br />
Goriely, Tamara, Moorhead, Richard <strong>and</strong> Abrams, Pamela, More <strong>Civil</strong><br />
<strong>Justice</strong> The Impact of the Woolf <strong>Reform</strong>s on Pre-Action Behaviour,<br />
Research Study 43 (Law Society <strong>and</strong> <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Justice</strong> Council, 2002)<br />
Gourlay, David, ‘Access or Excess: Interim Costs in Okanagan’ (2005) 63<br />
University of Toronto Faculty of Law <strong>Review</strong> 111<br />
Government Legal Services, Department of <strong>Justice</strong> [Victoria], Annual<br />
Report to Attorney General 2004-2005 (2006)<br />
Government Legal Services, Department of <strong>Justice</strong> [Victoria], Annual<br />
Report to Attorney General 2003–2004 (2005)<br />
Government Legal Services, Department of <strong>Justice</strong> [Victoria], Annual<br />
Report to Attorney General 2002-2003 (2003)<br />
Green, Guy, ‘The Rationale <strong>and</strong> Some Aspects of Judicial Independence’<br />
(1985) 59 Australian Law Journal 135<br />
Groves, Matthew <strong>and</strong> Smyth, Russell, ‘A Century of Judicial Style:<br />
Changing Patterns in Judgment Writing on the High Court 1903–2001’<br />
(2004) 32 Federal Law <strong>Review</strong> 255<br />
Hamilton, John, ‘Containment of Costs: Litigation <strong>and</strong> Arbitration’ (Paper<br />
presented at the ‘IAMA Conference’, Adelaide, 1–3 June 2007)<br />
Hamilton, John, ‘The New Procedure: Nuts <strong>and</strong> Bolts for Judicial Officers’<br />
(Paper presented at the ‘Judicial Commission of NSW’, Sydney, 16<br />
August 2005)<br />
Hamilton, John, ‘The NSW <strong>Civil</strong> Procedure Bill 2004 <strong>and</strong> the Uniform<br />
<strong>Civil</strong> Procedure Rules: An Introduction’ (Paper presented at the ‘22nd<br />
Australian Institute for Judicial Administration Annual Conference<br />
‘Proportionality—Cost-Effective <strong>Justice</strong>’’, Sydney, 17–19 September<br />
2004)<br />
Hann, Robert <strong>and</strong> Baar, Carl, Evaluation of the Ontario M<strong>and</strong>atory<br />
Mediation Program (Rule 24.1): Final Report—The First 23 Months<br />
(Robert Hann <strong>and</strong> Associates Ltd, 2001)<br />
Hann, Robert <strong>and</strong> Baar, Carl, Evaluation of the Ontario M<strong>and</strong>atory<br />
Mediation Program (Rule24.1): Executive Summary <strong>and</strong><br />
Recommendations: Submitted to <strong>Civil</strong> Rules Committee: Evaluation<br />
Committee for the M<strong>and</strong>atory Mediation Pilot Project (Queen’s Printer,<br />
2001)<br />
Hanycz, Colleen, ‘More Access to Less <strong>Justice</strong>: Efficiency, Proportionality<br />
<strong>and</strong> Costs in Canadian <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Justice</strong> <strong>Reform</strong> ‘ (2008) 27(1) <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Justice</strong><br />
Quarterly 98<br />
Hayne, Kenneth, ‘The Vanishing Trial’ (Paper presented at the ‘Supreme<br />
<strong>and</strong> Federal Courts Judges Conference’, Sydney, 23 January 2008)<br />
Heerey, Peter, ‘Some Lessons From Santos’ (1994) Australian Lawyer 24<br />
Hensler, Deborah, ‘Private Litigation as (a Form of) Governance’ (Paper<br />
presented at the ‘Melbourne University School of Law’, August 2007)<br />
Hensler, Deborah, ‘What We Know <strong>and</strong> Don’t Know About Court-<br />
Administered Arbitration’ (1986) 69 Judicature 270<br />
Heydon, J D, Cross on Evidence (6th ed) (Butterworths, Sydney, 2000)<br />
Higgins, Ruth, ‘The Equitable Doctrine of Cy-Près <strong>and</strong> Consumer<br />
Protection’ (2002) The Trade Practices <strong>Review</strong>, at 10<br />
December 2007<br />
Hogan, Vincent, A Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Personal Injuries<br />
Assessment Board (Personal Injuries Assessment Board, 2006)<br />
Human Rights Committee, United Nations, General Comment 32, Article<br />
14: Right to Equality before Courts <strong>and</strong> Tribunals <strong>and</strong> to a Fair Trial, UN<br />
Doc CCPR/C/GC/32 (2007)<br />
Hurst, Peter, ‘Going Round in Circles’ (2006) 25 <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Justice</strong> Quarterly<br />
546<br />
IMF (Australia) Ltd, Litigation Funding for Consumers of <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Justice</strong><br />
System Services (2006)<br />
Insurance Ombudsman Service, Insurance Ombudsman Service Terms of<br />
Reference (at 1 June 2007)<br />
Insurance Ombudsman Service, IOS Annual <strong>Review</strong> 2006<br />
Ipp, David, ‘Lawyers’ Duties to the Court’ (1998) 114 Law Quarterly<br />
<strong>Review</strong> 63<br />
Ipp, David, ‘Judicial Intervention in the Trial Process’ (1995) 69 Australian<br />
Law Journal 365<br />
Ipp, David, ‘<strong>Reform</strong>s to the Adversarial Process in <strong>Civil</strong> Litigation – Part I’<br />
(1995) 69 Australian Law Journal 705<br />
Ipp, David, ‘<strong>Reform</strong>s to the Adversarial Process in <strong>Civil</strong> Litigation - Part II’<br />
(1995) 69 (10) Australian Law Journal 790<br />
Ipsos Australia Pty Ltd, Dispute Resolution in Victoria: Community Survey<br />
2007 (Department of <strong>Justice</strong> [Victoria], 2007)<br />
Jacob, Joseph, <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Justice</strong> in the Age of Human Rights (Ashgate<br />
Publishing, 2007)<br />
Jacobs, Paul, ‘A Recent Comparative History of M<strong>and</strong>atory Mediation<br />
vs Voluntary Mediation in Ontario, Canada’ (April 2005) Mediation<br />
Newsletter at 19 March 2008<br />
Johnson, Adam <strong>and</strong> McIntosh, Maura, New Technologies <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Civil</strong><br />
Litigation Process: Report for Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Wales (Osgoode Hall Law<br />
School, York University, 2007)<br />
Joseph, Gregory, et al (eds), Moore’s Federal Practice (Matthew Bender,<br />
2006)<br />
Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts, Model<br />
Self-Help Pilot Program: A Report to the Legislature (2005)<br />
Judiciary of Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Wales, Report <strong>and</strong> Recommendations of the<br />
Commercial Court Long Trials Working Party (2007)<br />
747