12Facilitating Ongoing Civil Justice Review and Reform

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Bibliography Kakalik, James, et al, An Evaluation of Mediation and Early Neutral Evaluation Under the Civil Justice Reform Act (RAND Institute for Civil Justice, 1996) Karras, Maria, et al, On the Edge of Justice: The Legal Needs of People with a Mental Illness in NSW: Volume 4 (Law and Justice Foundation of New South Wales, 2006) Kenny, Susan, ‘Interveners and Amici Curiae in the High Court’ (1998) 20 Adelaide Law Review 159 Kirby, Michael, ‘Reasons for Judgment: ‘Always Permissible, Usually Desirable and Often Obligatory’’ (1994) 12 Australian Bar Review 1 Kitto, Frank, ‘Why Write Judgments’ (1992) 66 Australian Law Journal 787 Land and Environment Court, Land and Environment eCourt—User’s Manual (2002) Landerkin, Hugh, ‘Judges as Mediators: What’s the Problem with Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada’ (2003) 82(2) Canadian Bar Review 249 Latimer, Paul, Hocken, Michael and Marsden, Stephen, ‘Legal Representation in Australia before Tribunals, Committees and other Bodies’ (2007) 14(2) Murdoch University eLaw Journal 122. Law Council of Australia, Erosion of Legal Representation in the Australian Justice System (2004) Law Council of Australia, Litigation Funding: Standing Committee of Attorneys-General (Canberra, 2006) Law Council of Australia Federal Court Liaison Committee, Final Report in Relation to Possible Innovations to Case Management (2006) Law Institute of Victoria, Guidelines for Co-operation Between Doctors and Lawyers (last modified 22 March, 2005). Law and Justice Foundation of New South Wales, Quantitative Legal Needs Survey Bega Valley (Pilot) (2003) Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong, Conditional Fees, Consultation Paper (2005) Law Reform Commission of Victoria, Access to the Law: Restrictions on Legal Practice, Report 47 (1992) Law Reform Commission of Victoria, Access to the Law: Restrictions on Legal Practice, Discussion Paper 23 (1991) Law Reform Commission of Western Australia, Review of the Criminal and Civil Justice System in Western Australia: Final Report, Project 92 (1999) Law Reform Commission of Western Australia, Discovery—Should Whistle Blowers Stop the Train of Inquiry, Consultation Paper, Review of the Criminal and Civil Justice System in Western Australia, Project 92 (1999) Law Reform Committee, Parliament of Victoria, Alternative Dispute Resolution Discussion Paper (2007) Law Reform Committee of South Australia, Thirty-Sixth Report of the Law Reform Committee of South Australia Relating to Class Actions (1977) Law Society of Alberta, Code of Professional Conduct (2007) Law Society of New South Wales, Guidelines for Solicitors Dealing with Self-Represented Parties (2006) Law Society of New South Wales, Self-Represented Litigants: Position Paper (2002) Lee, Stephen, ‘The State As Model Litigant’ (Paper presented at the ‘Victorian Government Solicitor’s Office Lunchtime Seminar Series’, Melbourne, 28 September 2006) Lee, Stephen, ‘The State as Model Litigant - Fact, Fiction, Fallacy or Fantasy’ (Paper presented at the ‘VGSO Lunchtime Seminar’, Melbourne, 24 June 2004) Legal Costs Working Group [Ireland], Report of the Legal Costs Working Group (2005) Legal Fees Review Panel, Legal Costs in New South Wales (2005) Legg, Michael, ‘The United States Deposition—Time for Adoption in Australian Civil Procedure’ (2007) 31 Melbourne University Law Review 146 Lerman, Lisa, ‘Lying to Clients’ (1990) 138 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 659 Lester, Grant, ‘The Vexatious Litigant’ (2005) 17(3) Judicial Officers Bulletin 17 Lester, Grant and Smith, Simon, ‘Inventor, Entrepreneur, Rascal, Crank or Querulent: Australia’s Vexatious Litigant Sanction 75 Years On’ (2006) 13 Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 1 Lewis, Paul, ‘Views from the Lighthouse’ (2005) 16 Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal 288 LexisNexis Butterworths, Australian Corporations Law Principles and Practice, at January, 2008. LexisNexis Butterworths, [Williams] Civil Procedure—Victoria, at January 2008 LexisNexis Butterworths, Ford’s Principles on Corporation Law at 25 February 2008 Liberty (National Council for Civil Liberties) [UK], Litigating the Public Interest: Report of the Working Group on Facilitating Public Interest Litigation (2006) Limbury, Alan, ‘Making Med-Arb Work’ (July 2007) ADR Reporter 14 Limbury, Alan, ‘Med-Arb, Arb-Med, Neg-Arb and ODR’ (Paper presented at the ‘NSW Chapter of the Institute of Arbitrators and Mediators Australia’, Sydney, 3 August 2005) Lindgren, Kevin E, ‘Class Actions and Access to Justice’ (Paper presented at the ‘International Class Actions Conference 2007’, Sydney, 25–26 October 2007) Lindgren, Kevin, ‘Harmonisation of Rules of Court in Australia’ (Paper presented at the ‘22nd Australian Institute for Judicial Administration Annual Conference ‘Proportionality—Cost-Effective Justice’’, Sydney, 17–19 September 2004) Lindsay, Geoff (ed), The Handbook: Thomson’s Guide to Civil Procedure in NSW (Lawbook Co, 2005) Lord Chancellor’s Department [UK], Court-Based ADR Initiatives for Non- Family Civil Disputes: The Commercial Court and the Court of Appeal 1/02 (2002) Luntz, Harold, Assessment of Damages for Personal Injury and Death (4th ed) (Butterworths, 2002) MacEwen, Bruce, Milton, Regan and Ribstein, Larry, ‘Law Firms, Ethics and Equity Capital’ (2008) 21(1) Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 61 Mack, Kathy, Court Referral to ADR: Criteria and Research (Australian Institute of Judicial Administration and the National Alternative Dispute Resolution Advisory Council, 2003) 748 Victorian Law Reform Commission - Civil Justice Review: Report
Mackie, Karl, Are Lawyers Falling short in Mediation (2006) Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution [UK] at 12 March 2008 Magistrates’ Court of Victoria, Annual Report 2006–07 (2007) Magistrates’ Court of Victoria, Annual Report 2005–06 (2006) Maltby, Lewis, Private Justice: Employment Arbitration and Civil Rights, The National Workrights Institute [US] at 25 March 2008 Manitoba Law Reform Commission, Costs Awards in Civil Litigation, Report No 111 (2005) Marcus, Richard, ‘Putting American Procedural Exceptionalism into a Globalized Context’ (2005) 55 American Journal of Comparative Law 709 Marcus, Richard, ‘Reassessing the Magnetic Pull of Megacases on Procedure’ (2001) 51 DePaul Law Review 457 Mark, Steve, ‘The Corporatisation of Law Firms—Conflicts of Interests for Publicly Listed Law Firms’ (Paper presented at the ‘Australian Lawyers Alliance National Conference 2007’, Hobart, 13 October 2007) Mark, Steve, ‘Notes on the Listing of Law Firms in New South Wales and on the Incorporation of Law Firms’ (Paper presented at the ‘Joint NOBC, APRL and ABA Centre for Professional Responsibility Panel entitled “Brave New World: The Changing Face of Law Firms and the Practice of Law from a Professional Responsibility Perspective”’, San Francisco, 10 August 2007) Mark, Steve, ‘Analysing Alternatives to Time-Based Billing and the Australian Legal Market’ (Paper presented at the ‘Finance Essentials for Practice Management Conference’, Sydney, 18 July 2007) Marks, Kenneth, ‘The Interventionist Court and Procedure ‘ (1992) 18 Monash University Law Review 1 Martin, Wayne, ‘Access to Justice: A Human Right in Principle, Policy and Practice in Western Australia’ (Paper presented at the ‘John Huelin Memorial Human Rights Day Lecture’, Perth, 10 December 2006) Martin, Wayne, ‘Access to Justice—The Media, The Courts and The Public Record’ (Paper presented at the ‘Australian Press Council Public Address’, 22 March 2007) Martin, Wayne, ‘Opening Address’ (Paper presented at the ‘National Legal Aid Best Practice Conference’, Fremantle, 31 May 2007) Martin, Wayne, ‘Judicial Appointments and Judicial Independence’ (Paper presented at a Law Council of Australia Conference on Rule of Law: The Challenges of a Changing World, Brisbane, 31 August 2007) Mason, Sir Anthony, ‘Interveners and Amici Curiae in the High Court: A Comment’ (1998) 20 Adelaide Law Review 173 Matthews, Paul and Malek, Hodge, Disclosure (3rd ed) (Sweet & Maxwell, 2007) Maxwell, Chris, ‘A New Approch to Civil Appeals’ (Paper presented at the ‘Victorian Bar (Continuing Legal Education Program)’, 23 October 2006) McAllister, Gillian and Altobelli, Tom, Pro Bono Legal Services in Western Sydney (University of Western Sydney, 2005) McClellan, Peter, ‘Concurrent Expert Evidence’ (Paper presented at the ‘Medicine and Law Conference’, Melbourne, 29 November 2007) McClellan, Peter, ‘Contemporary Challenges for the Justice System - Expert Evidence’ (Paper presented at the ‘Australian Lawyers’ Alliance Medical Law Conference’, 20 July 2007) McClellan, Peter, ‘The New Rules’ (Paper presented at the ‘Expert Witness Institute of Australia and The University of Sydney Faculty of Law Conference’, Sydney, 16 April 2007) McCowan, Charles and Fayard, Calvin, ‘Class Actions in the Gulf South and Beyond: Louisiana Complex Litigation’ (2006) 80 Tulane Law Review 1905 McDougall, Robert, ‘Expert Evidence’ (Paper presented at the ‘Institute of Arbitrators and Mediators Australia’, Sydney, 13 February 2004) Macfarlane, Julie, The Emerging Phenomenon of Collaborative Family Law (CFL): A Qualitative Study of CFL Cases (Department of Justice [Canada], 2005) McGarvie, R E, ‘Judicial Responsibility for the Operation of the Court System ‘ (1989) 63 Australian Law Journal 79 McLachlin, Beverly, ‘The Challenges We Face’ (Paper presented at the ‘Empire Club of Canada’, Toronto, 8 March 2007) McSweeny, Michael, ‘Immunity from Suit of Expert Witnesses’ (2002) 22 Australian Bar Review 131 Menocal, Armando, ‘Proposed Guidelines for Cy Pres Distribution’ (1998) 37 The Judges’ Journal 22 Middleton, Sir Peter, Report to the Lord Chancellor [Review of Civil Justice] (Department for Constitutional Affairs [UK], 1997) Ministry of Justice [UK], Pre-Action Protocol for the Resolution of Clinical Disputes (1999) Minus, Derek, ‘Innovative Hybrid Processes—Mediation-Arbitration’ (Paper presented at the ‘Victorian Bar Continuing Legal Education Program’, Melbourne, 25 September 2007) Monichino, Albert, ‘Recent Developments in Expert Evidence - Lessons for Victoria’ (Paper presented at the ‘Litigation and Dispute Resolution Conference 2007’, Melbourne, 27–29 March 2007) Moore, Michael, ‘Judges as Mediators: A Chapter III Prohibition or Accommodation’ (2003) 14 Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal 188 Morabito, Vince, ‘Class Actions Instituted only for the Benefit of the Clients of the Class Representative’s Solicitors’ (2007) 29 Sydney Law Review 5 Morabito, Vince, ‘Group Litigation in Australia - “Desperately Seeking” Effective Class Action Regimes’ (Paper presented at the ‘National Report for Australia Prepared for The Globalisation of Class Actions Conference’, Oxford University, December 2007) Morabito, Vince, ‘The Federal Court of Australia’s Power to Terminate Properly Instituted Class Actions’ (2004) 42(3) Osgoode Hall Law Journal 473 Morabito, Vince, ‘Class Actions Against Multiple Respondents’ (2002) 20(2) Federal Law Review 295 Morris, Stuart, ‘Getting Real About Expert Evidence’ (Paper presented at the ‘National Environment Law Association Limited 2005 National Conference’, Canberra, 13-15 July 2005) Morris, Stuart, ‘VCAT Practices and Procedures: Recent Developments’ (Paper presented at the ‘Launching of the 2nd edition of Pizer’s Annotated VCAT Act’, Melbourne, 20 July 2004) Morris, Stuart, ‘Civil Litigation: VCAT and the Courts’ (Paper presented at the ‘Advanced Civil Litigation Seminar Series 2004’, Melbourne, 15 April 2004) Mulheron, Rachael, The Modern Cy-près Doctrine: Applications & Implications (UCL Press, 2006) 749
Page 1 and 2:
2 695 Chapter 12 Facilitating Ongoi
Page 3 and 4: 1. INTRODUCTION ‘Managing justice
Page 5 and 6: In Harris v Caladine Justice Toohey
Page 7 and 8: Court Rules 1992. They are the culm
Page 9 and 10: Advantages 3.1 Production of a ‘m
Page 11 and 12: (4) The Lord Chancellor may reimbur
Page 13 and 14: 3. SUBMISSIONS AND CONSULTATIONS 3.
Page 15 and 16: (b) The learning in relation to the
Page 17 and 18: Although it would be desirable in p
Page 19 and 20: (1) The Judges of the Court […] m
Page 21 and 22: 5. ISSUES FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION
Page 23 and 24: One submission cautioned against pl
Page 25 and 26: Background An amicus curiae offers
Page 27 and 28: Penovic recommended that the commis
Page 29 and 30: Other concerns raised in the submis
Page 31 and 32: Ms Crowe indicated that the matter
Page 33 and 34: The Consumer Action Law Centre reco
Page 35 and 36: 254 • providing a right to a jury
Page 37 and 38: Appendices 731
Page 39 and 40: CONSULTATION PARTICIPANTS DATE 32 T
Page 41 and 42: Appendix 2: Submissions Consultatio
Page 43 and 44: Appendix 2: Submissions Draft Expos
Page 45 and 46: Appendix 3: Events Attended NO EVEN
Page 47 and 48: Glossary 1 Terminologyamicus curiae
Page 49 and 50: Bibliography Abel, Richard, English
Page 51 and 52: Chief Justice’s Working Party on
Page 53: Gleeson Murray, ‘State of the Jud
Page 57 and 58: 34 Conference in the Land and Envir
Page 59: Tucker, Philip, ‘Judges as Mediat
show all

12Facilitating Ongoing Civil Justice Review and Reform

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?