10.11.2012 Views

2010AWARDS & AnnuAL REVIEW - PERE

2010AWARDS & AnnuAL REVIEW - PERE

2010AWARDS & AnnuAL REVIEW - PERE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(L to R) Bernard Phang and Peter Pereira Gray<br />

The 2010 investment model<br />

with fundraising as difficult as it was in 2009, picking<br />

the correct investment vehicle was the topic du jour<br />

at <strong>PERE</strong>’s annual conference in london<br />

As LPs and GPs alike looked to the future, many wondered exactly what real<br />

estate investment structures would work best: traditional commingled funds,<br />

club deals, separate accounts or direct investing. The answer, it turned out, depended<br />

upon who was asked.<br />

Keynote speaker Bruce Flatt, chief executive officer of Brookfield Asset Management,<br />

said the Toronto-based firm’s investment club – the Brookfield Real<br />

Estate Turnaround Consortium – was a product of 2009’s dire fundraising environment.<br />

With many investors “retrenching and worrying about issues they<br />

had in their [existing] funds”, Brookfield decided to “try something different,”<br />

he explained, adding that the opportunities earmarked for the club would “never<br />

fit a [traditional fund].”<br />

Later, in a break from traditional panels, <strong>PERE</strong> also staged its popular “Big<br />

Debate.” Volker Wiederrich of advisory firm Swisslake and Keith Breslauer of<br />

Patron Capital argued in support of fund investments, while Claus Stenbaek of<br />

Keyhaven Capital Partners and Jos Short of Internos Real Estate opposed them.<br />

<strong>PERE</strong> FORuM | EuROPE<br />

Bruce Flatt<br />

Ted Leary<br />

Claus Stenbaek Volker Wiederrich

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!