German Humanitarian Aid Abroad - Channel Research

More documents

Recommendations

Info

o 2007: <strong>Humanitarian</strong> assistance in Pader and Kitgum Districts (distribution of nonfood items, water supply, latrines) (AA, 530,000 euros) o 2009: Improvement of potable water supply and food in conflict-affected communities, Kitgum and Lamwo Districts (BMZ, 500,000 euros) Selection criteria: projects funded by the AA and BMZ, implementing partner is a relatively big NGO, water and food security/agriculture sector, one completed and one on-going project, Central Northern cluster • Deutsches Rotes Kreuz (DRK): three food security and WASH (water, sanitation and hygiene) projects in Oyam District o 2007 Reconstruction, potable water, health for former IDPs, Northern Oyam District (BMZ, 400,000 euros) o 2009 Food security measures for returnees and former IDPs, Oyam District (BMZ, 380,000 euros, without budget increases in 2010) o 2009 Potable water and sanitation for returnees and IDPs, Oyam District (BMZ, 360,000 euros, without budget increases in 2010) Selection criteria: projects funded by the BMZ, implementing partner is a relatively big NGO, various sectors (reconstruction, potable water, health, sanitation, food security), projects directly addressing the target group, 2009 projects partly build on experiences with similar previous projects, one completed and two on-going project, Central Northern cluster • Welthungerhilfe: one project in North-eastern Uganda (Karamoja Region) o 2009: Food security, reduction of violent conflicts, Moroto and Nakapiripiti Districts (BMZ, 765,700 euros, without budget increases in 2010) Selection criteria: project funded by the BMZ, implementing partner is a relatively big NGO, various sectors (food security, conflict reduction), project directly addressing the target group, project partly builds on experiences with similar previous projects in other regions of Uganda, on-going project, North-eastern cluster • GTZ: one project in North-eastern Uganda (Karamoja Region) o 2009; Food security and strengthening of peaceful conflict management, Moroto District (BMZ, 1,000,000 euros, without budget increases in 2010) taking also into consideration the food aid component (proposed in 2010) Selection criteria: project funded by the BMZ, implementing partner is an implementing organisation of the bilateral development cooperation, various sectors (food security, peaceful conflict management), project directly addressing the target group, project partly builds on experiences with a similar previous project in another region of Uganda, on-going project, North-eastern cluster • UNHCR: one project 18 , contributions to one refugee operation 17 17 Based on comments received to the Draft Inception Report and additional discussions with BMZ (Divisions 401 and 120), the decision was made to replace the initially proposed (already completed) projects by these ongoing project(s). 6
o 2007: Emergency assistance to Congolese (Democratic Republic of Congo, DRC) asylum seekers and refugees in South-west Uganda (AA, 500,000 euros) Selection criteria: project funded by the AA, implementing partner is an IO, various sectors (food security, peaceful conflict management), project directly addressing the target group, project partly builds on experiences with a similar previous project in another region of Uganda, completed project (no field visit foreseen for IO projects) • WFP: two projects, contributions to two Protracted Relief and Rehabilitation Operations (PRROs) o 2007: PRRO 10121.1: 1,776 MT maize (BMZ, 500,000 euros) o 2008: PRRO 10121.2: 1,534 MT maize (BMZ, 500,000 euros) Selection criteria: projects funded by the BMZ, implementing partner is an IO, one sector (food aid), project directly addressing the target groups, completed projects (no field visit foreseen for IO projects) 1.2.3 Field mission and evaluation team Preparations of this case study evaluation started in May 2010. The field mission to Uganda took place during the period 13 June to 3 July 2010 (including travel times). The project visits outside Kampala took place from 18 June to 27 June. The detailed programme of the evaluation is presented in Annex 2. The evaluation was conducted by two members of the core team (Dr Lioba Weingärtner, team leader, and Thomas Hoerz, co-team leader). The local consultant was Ronald Kitanda. 1.2.4 Evaluation products of the case study Uganda According to the ToR and additional agreements with the commissioners, the following products of the pilot case study were and are to be delivered: • Inception Report (English), including the consolidated portfolio of the <strong>German</strong> humanitarian assistance in Uganda (June 2010); • PowerPoint presentations for the briefing workshop at the beginning of the field mission and the debriefing workshop at the end of the field mission, both in Kampala (June 2010); • Debriefing Note of the pilot study (see Annex 6) (12 July 2010); • Pilot Case Study Report (in English language) taking into consideration comments to the draft by the reference group, WFP and DRK (May 2011); • As the Uganda case study was selected as a pilot study: a Lessons Learnt Paper, instructing the additional case studies of the evaluation (28 July 2010). 18 Even though no project of the UNHCR-BMZ partnership programme is listed in the portfolio analysis (they are not reported on a country basis in the data base of BMZ, Div. 401), the team will take the partnership programme into consideration when analysing the AA and BMZ funded Uganda operations of UNHCR. 7
Page 1: JOINT EVALUATION The German Humanit
Page 4 and 5: Acknowledgements The pilot case stu
Page 6 and 7: 4.3.2 Other efficiency consideratio
Page 8 and 9: Abbreviations and acronyms AA AA VN
Page 10 and 11: IDMC IDP(s) IFPRI IFRC INCAF InWEnt
Page 12 and 13: xii
Page 14 and 15: methods and instruments was used by
Page 16 and 17: financing channels/implementing par
Page 18 and 19: Strategic recommendations (Uganda c
Page 20 and 21: oriented emergency and transitional
Page 22 and 23: • Debriefing Workshop: This works
Page 26 and 27: 1.2.5 Challenges, limitations of th
Page 28 and 29: country's economy. Uganda’s consi
Page 30 and 31: years, these families might well be
Page 32 and 33: disarmament than to the development
Page 34 and 35: Good to very good pasture condition
Page 36 and 37: 3. The humanitarian response to the
Page 38 and 39: through core funding to OCHA’s op
Page 40 and 41: for emergency responses and the BMZ
Page 42 and 43: (DKH), HELP e.V., Malteser, Welthun
Page 44 and 45: Figure 2: Intervention logic of Ger
Page 46 and 47: sustainable manner, or support of r
Page 48 and 49: available in few large cities, serv
Page 50 and 51: In all of Northern Uganda, but nota
Page 52 and 53: examples of quantitative reporting
Page 54 and 55: can be considered as important pull
Page 56 and 57: to additional capacities if needs a
Page 58 and 59: GTZ: GTZ has the capacity, know-how
Page 60 and 61: exception to this is the animal hea
Page 62 and 63: 4.5 Sustainability/connectedness Bu
Page 64 and 65: are still operational. Many resourc
Page 66 and 67: support in the water sector aims at
Page 68 and 69: • Context analyses and needs asse
Page 70 and 71: information sharing to joint planni
Page 72 and 73: 6.1 Strategic recommendations 6.1.1
Page 74 and 75:
• Actively search for potential p
Page 76 and 77:
Annex 1: Terms of Reference (ToR) -
Page 78 and 79:
primarily on the basis of reports a
Page 80 and 81:
• Were there any negative effects
Page 82 and 83:
analysis (including the role of oth
Page 84 and 85:
5. Evaluation products • Desk rep
Page 86 and 87:
Date Location Activity 25.06.2010 M
Page 88 and 89:
Key issues/ evaluation criteria Eva
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Key issues/ evaluation criteria 3.
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Annex 4: Maps DRK: Water supply, hy
Page 108 and 109:
Annex 5: Resource persons contacted
Page 110 and 111:
commissioned by GTZ /RUWAS, Kampala
Page 112 and 113:
1. Course of the field mission The
Page 114 and 115:
mailing list of the security briefi
Page 116 and 117:
Annex 7: Overview of project case s
Page 118 and 119:
field Date of beginning of interven
Page 120 and 121:
Praktiken sowie ihre Ernährungssic
Page 122 and 123:
Jinja), Jugendliche ohne Ausbildung
Page 124 and 125:
LRRD considerations Considerations
Page 126 and 127:
Objective(s) and intervention logic
Page 128 and 129:
Annex 8: Chronology of humanitarian
Page 130 and 131:
2005 and before 2006 2007 2008 2009
Page 132 and 133:
Humanitarian responses 2005 and bef
Page 134 and 135:
Table A9.2: Regional differences in
Page 136 and 137:
Table A10: IDP Population, June 201
Page 138 and 139:
Year Donor 2005 AA Implementing par
Page 140 and 141:
Year Donor 2007 BMZ Implementing pa
Page 142 and 143:
Year Donor Implementing partner/ fi
Page 144 and 145:
Annex 12: Additional portfolio in U
Page 146 and 147:
128
Page 148 and 149:
Goal Humanity Impact Impartiality I
Page 150 and 151:
132
Page 152 and 153:
FEWS NET (2010): Uganda Food Securi
show all

German Humanitarian Aid Abroad - Channel Research

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?