(1985). Levine's Atlas of Corporate Interlocks. Connections ... - INSNA
(1985). Levine's Atlas of Corporate Interlocks. Connections ... - INSNA
(1985). Levine's Atlas of Corporate Interlocks. Connections ... - INSNA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1 1 1<br />
J . Clyde Mitchell (Nuffield College, Oxford)<br />
SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS IN GREAT BRITAIN<br />
Introduction<br />
The phenomenal increase <strong>of</strong> interest in formal methods <strong>of</strong> social network analysis in<br />
the last decade in North America has apparently not been paralleled in Great Britain .<br />
ironically the initial impetus for the use <strong>of</strong> the notion <strong>of</strong> the social network in the<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> sociological as against social psychological data arose in Britain in the<br />
1950's but the formalization <strong>of</strong> analytical procedures could only come about when the<br />
procedures based originally on graph theory could be incorporated in computer programs .<br />
In the United States the stimulus for the development <strong>of</strong> both the mathematical bases for<br />
network analyses and the production <strong>of</strong> computer programs to execute analyses in respect <strong>of</strong><br />
them, came from the work <strong>of</strong> the sociometrists . It is however only since the 1970's that<br />
Computer programs have become generally available for network analysis -- a reflection<br />
perhaps <strong>of</strong> the widespread provision <strong>of</strong> computing facilities in universities after that<br />
date . Both the leading journal i.n the field (SOCIAL NETWORKS) and the house journal <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>INSNA</strong>, the International Network <strong>of</strong> Social Network Analysts (CONNECTIONS) currently carry<br />
notices <strong>of</strong> new programs available for network analysis .<br />
The extent to which interest in social networks exists in Britain as against in<br />
particular in North America is reflected in the'membership <strong>of</strong> the International Network <strong>of</strong><br />
Social Network Analysts . In the most recent issue containing the directory <strong>of</strong> members<br />
Spring 1984) the percentage <strong>of</strong> members coming from North America is 83 whereas that from<br />
Great Britain is only 5 percent . Clearly membership to an organization <strong>of</strong> this kind is<br />
only a crude indicator <strong>of</strong> the interest but the disparity between 83 and 5 is sufficiently<br />
great to confirm the subjective impressions that those <strong>of</strong> us in Britain active in social<br />
network analysis have been aware <strong>of</strong> for some time .<br />
We can only speculate about why there should he this disparity <strong>of</strong> interest . One<br />
possible reason is that information about what can he achieved using network analysis<br />
programs is not easily available in Great Britain . At present, for example, there seems<br />
to be no single register <strong>of</strong> network analysis programs available to potential users in<br />
Britain . As a contribution to the beginning <strong>of</strong> such a register I append in an Appendix a<br />
listing <strong>of</strong> some programs for network analysis that Pr<strong>of</strong> Coxon and I are aware <strong>of</strong>' . These<br />
are available to users in Britain through the university computer communications network<br />
system .JANET) .<br />
It. was with considerations <strong>of</strong> this kind that Pr<strong>of</strong> A .P .M . Coxon at Cardiff, and I at.<br />
Oxford, both <strong>of</strong> whom have been long interested in network analysis, decided that it would<br />
be worthwhile to bring together people who have been working on the formal analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
networks and some <strong>of</strong> those whose main interest was substantive in order to exchange<br />
information about existing programs and procedures and to discover where needs most.<br />
urgently lie .<br />
At the outset we were confronted with difficulties since no list . <strong>of</strong> persons<br />
interested in network analysis was available to us in Britain . We had in effect to<br />
generate such a list . from our own contacts . This list, inevitably, was only partially<br />
complete . Coxon and I decided that there were likely to be two rather different audiences<br />
in a meeting <strong>of</strong> this kind and that accordingly we should arrange for two sessions with<br />
rather different emphases . The first would be essentially a 'work in progress' session<br />
necessarily rather technical in character . This session would be concerned with<br />
theoretical work which was likely to have some application in the future . We expected<br />
that those with methodological interests or applied interests would dominate in this<br />
session . A second session would be designed to cater for those interested mainly in<br />
substantive issues but who may be interested in learning about ways <strong>of</strong> analysing social<br />
network data . We tried to arrange for examples <strong>of</strong> analyses using currently available<br />
programs to tie presented in this session . We applied to the ESRC and were given a small<br />
grant to enable us to mount a workshop at which these aims could be effected .<br />
The Social Networks Workshop_ Nuffield College . 2 June 1984<br />
A workshop was duly arranged . Between 18 and 26 people attended the sessions .<br />
In the 'work in progress' session in the morning the following papers were delivered :<br />
J . CLYDE MITCHELL (Nuffield, Oxford) . "Monte Carlo Runs <strong>of</strong> some Blocking Measures" .<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the unresolved problems in one <strong>of</strong> the popular methods <strong>of</strong> network analysis--<br />
i .e . <strong>of</strong> block--modelling whereby a set <strong>of</strong> elements are partitioned into subsets which share<br />
patterns <strong>of</strong> relationships with other elements in the set as against those in other