Interview with David Baltimore - Caltech Oral Histories
Interview with David Baltimore - Caltech Oral Histories
Interview with David Baltimore - Caltech Oral Histories
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Baltimore</strong>-63<br />
and I co-chaired that. Shelly was at Tufts; he was a clinical infectious-disease guy, and I came<br />
from basic science.<br />
LIPPINCOTT: What did the NAS charge this committee <strong>with</strong> doing<br />
BALTIMORE: Developing a national strategy to respond to the AIDS epidemic. To make a<br />
judgment about how serious it was, give some sort of prognosis for what was going to happen in<br />
the world, and what is it that we needed in order to minimize the devastation. And we wrote a<br />
report. It was—may still be to this day—the best-selling report the National Academy’s ever<br />
had. It was done as a joint NAS-IOM [Institute of Medicine] report. The IOM and NAS had<br />
gotten together to sponsor this report and had used their own money for it, which gave us total<br />
independence. We didn’t have to answer to anybody. Usually they get government support, but<br />
they knew in this case that they didn’t want the government controlling the report. So we wrote<br />
this report, called Confronting AIDS, which came out in ’86, and we called in there for a $1<br />
billion research program. Now, $1 billion in those days was big money; nobody ever talked<br />
billions. And it was my doing. One day in committee discussion— We met under a very tight<br />
schedule. We had a great group of people; Howard Temin was one of them. And I came into<br />
one of the latter committee meetings, and I said, “Look, we have to recommend a number for a<br />
research program, and I’m going to suggest that that be $1 billion, because that’s a nice round<br />
number.” There was no way to derive the number. You could say, you know, you needed $100<br />
million for this, and $100 million for that, but fundamentally you might as well add it all up to $1<br />
billion. And everybody agreed to that, so we called for $1 billion, and of course that was the<br />
headline. We had a $1 billion research program on the books <strong>with</strong>in about three years.<br />
LIPPINCOTT: Was this federal money<br />
BALTIMORE: This was federal money, yes. The federal government actually did respond to that.<br />
So the report was widely read.<br />
LIPPINCOTT: The work was spread over different institutions, I guess