Interview with David Baltimore - Caltech Oral Histories
Interview with David Baltimore - Caltech Oral Histories
Interview with David Baltimore - Caltech Oral Histories
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Baltimore</strong>-76<br />
a biology school, in spite of the fact that from the time that [Thomas Hunt] Morgan came here in<br />
1928, <strong>Caltech</strong> was the center of genetic biology almost in the world.<br />
LIPPINCOTT: Yes. [George Wells] Beadle and people like that.<br />
BALTIMORE: Beadle, and Delbrück.<br />
LIPPINCOTT: And Norman Horowitz.<br />
BALTIMORE: And Norman Horowitz, and others. It was an extraordinary place—first in nonmolecular<br />
genetics and then, <strong>with</strong> the structure of DNA, in molecular genetics.<br />
LIPPINCOTT: And Lee [Leroy E.] Hood and his machines.<br />
BALTIMORE: Yes. That moves you away from pure genetics to something more biochemical.<br />
His first machines were protein-sequencing machines, which were very important, both from a<br />
genetic point of view and from a physiologic point of view.<br />
LIPPINCOTT: So that must have excited you. You weren’t coming to a biological wasteland<br />
from MIT.<br />
BALTIMORE: Oh, no! I felt like I was coming to the place that really held the flame of biology.<br />
I was a little disappointed, in a way, that some of those characteristics—the very central role of<br />
<strong>Caltech</strong> in biology—were very much in the past.<br />
LIPPINCOTT: Do you think it fell down a bit<br />
BALTIMORE: Well, it certainly fell down a lot, but it’s not entirely <strong>Caltech</strong>’s fault. At the time<br />
when <strong>Caltech</strong> was the central place in biology, there was almost no one else doing it—doing<br />
molecular biology.<br />
LIPPINCOTT: Is this back in the days of Beadle you’re talking about