08.01.2015 Views

Collection Of Articles (Refuting Shia) - Enjoy Islam

Collection Of Articles (Refuting Shia) - Enjoy Islam

Collection Of Articles (Refuting Shia) - Enjoy Islam

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In Defense of Abu Huraira (RA) - A Reply to some erroneous claims<br />

Page 2 of 4<br />

(2) It should be noted that pertaining to most of the objections raised against Aboo Hurayrah, there<br />

exists a definitive defense written by the Iraqi Muslim Brotherhood scholar, 'Abdul-Mun'im Saalih al-<br />

'Alee al-'Izzee, entitled Dif'a 'an Abee Hurayrah (Baghdad: 1393/1973). In this work, al-'Izzi<br />

reviewed, page by page, over 110 classical works (most of which are in a number of volumes,<br />

extending thousands of pages) with the aim of collecting everything related to Aboo Hurayrah.<br />

With regards to the three specific objections raised against Aboo Hurayrah in the post, the response<br />

is as follows:<br />

(3) 'Umar never beated Aboo Hurayrah during the lifetime of the Prophet - - for lying<br />

against the Prophet.<br />

However, both 'Abdul-Husayn al-'Amalee (p. 268) and Abu Rayya (pp. 163, 171) report that 'Umar<br />

struck Aboo Hurayrah with a shield for relating too many hadeeth upon the Prophet - sallallahu<br />

'alaihi wa sallam - and accused him of lying. The source of this incident is not Saheeh Muslim, but<br />

rather a Shee'ee text, Sharh Nahj al-Balagha, by the Shiite Mu'tazilite Ibn Abi al-Hadid who quotes<br />

Abu Ja'far al-Iskafi. Abu Ja'far al-Iskafi is a third century, Shiite Mu'tazalite. Al-Iskafi relates this<br />

incident with no chain or authorities (sanad). And thus this is an unverified historical incident that<br />

appears centuries after the deaths of 'Umar and Aboo Hurayrah. And moreover it is found in the<br />

works of those who harbor religious animosities against Aboo Hurayrah and adverse theological<br />

positions toward the Sunna. (See: al-Mu'allamee, al-Anwaer al-Kaashifah, pp. 152-153, al-Khateeb,<br />

al-Sunnah Qabl al-Tadween, p. 457, al-'Izzee, Difaa' 'an Abee Hurayrah, p. 123)<br />

Historically, the Jahmee, Bishr al-Mareesee was perhaps the first to claim that 'Umar said that "the<br />

greatest liar among the narrators of hadeeth is Aboo Hurayrah." To this fabrication, Imam al-<br />

Darimee responded, "How could 'Umar accuse him of lying against the Messenger of Allah -<br />

- and [at the same time] place his in charge of important posts. Had [Aboo Hurayrah] been<br />

thought of by 'Umar - radiyallahu 'anhu - as [al-Mareesee] claimed, 'Umar would not have<br />

entrusted [Aboo Hurayrah] with the affairs of the Muslims, placing him in charge, time and<br />

time again."<br />

Also, ad-Darimee rhetorically asks al-Mareesee, "If you were truthful in your claim, then expose<br />

[to us] who narrated such. You will not be able to expose a trustworthy narrator." (See al-<br />

Darimi, Radd al-Imaam al-Darimee 'Uthmaan ibn Sa'eed 'alaa Bishr al-Mareesee al-'Aneed, pp.<br />

132-135.)<br />

Interestingly, al-'Izzee shows that a number of grandsons of 'Umar related hadeeth from Aboo<br />

Hurayrah from the Prophet - . Among whom: (a) Salim ibn 'Abd Allah ibn 'Umar, who in Saheeh<br />

al-Bukhaaree alone relates three hadeeth; (b) and Hafs ibn 'Asim ibn 'Umar, who in Saheeh al-<br />

Bukhaaree alone relates eleven hadeeth. al-'Izzi comments (p. 123), "Did they not hear from their<br />

fathers that their grandfather considered Aboo Hurayrah a liar"<br />

(4) ‘Aa’ishah - radiyallahu 'anha- never accused Aboo Hurayrah of lying. However, there do exist a<br />

number of incidents where she corrected Aboo Hurayrah for erring in the hadeeth he transmitted.<br />

This was not unique for Aboo Hurayrah, but rather ‘Aa’ishah corrected a number of the<br />

Companions. Imaam al-Zarkashee (794 A.H.) has gathered and commented upon all the statements<br />

wherein which ‘Aa’ishah corrected another of the Prophet's companions in his al-Ijaba li Irad ma<br />

Istadraakahu ‘Aa’ishah 'ala -Sahaabah.<br />

<strong>Of</strong> these criticisms by ‘Aa’ishah, there exists one in Saheeh Muslim (Cairo: Vol. 3, p. 137).<br />

Specifically that Aboo Hurayrah related that the individual who at dawn (fajr) is in a state of sexual<br />

defilement, he is not permitted fast. When ‘Aa’ishah and Umm Salamah were questioned regarding<br />

this they informed that the Prophet - - during the month of Ramadan would awake at dawn in a<br />

state of sexual defilement not due to a dream (i.e., due to having sexual relations) and fast. When<br />

Aboo Hurayrah was later questioned as to his source, he informed that he heard that from al-Fadl<br />

ibn 'Abbas and not the Prophet - sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam - directly.<br />

Az-Zarkashee (Cairo: p. 57) informs that the ruling delivered by Aboo Hurayrah was initially the<br />

http://islamicweb.com/beliefs/cults/defend_abuhurayrah.htm<br />

1/28/2005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!