08.01.2015 Views

Collection Of Articles (Refuting Shia) - Enjoy Islam

Collection Of Articles (Refuting Shia) - Enjoy Islam

Collection Of Articles (Refuting Shia) - Enjoy Islam

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The final Khutba of Sheikh Hudhaithi, before his arrest.<br />

Page 6 of 17<br />

Prophet sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam himself. Abu Bakr and Umar radiallaahu anhumaa were both<br />

fathers-in-law of the Prophet sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam. Also, during the lifetime of the Prophet<br />

sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam both were his right hand men; and after his demise, it is they who had<br />

great worry feeling for the welfare of the Deen. Who else has ever been honoured with such a<br />

position and honour as was granted to these two Again, it is these two who had always<br />

participated and had been with the Prophet sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam during all the Ghazaawaat<br />

(battles). These facts are enough to refute the Shee'ah beliefs.<br />

As for Uthmaan radiallaahu anhu, he was the husband to two daughters of the Prophet sallallaahu<br />

alayhi wa sallam. It is clear that Allaah tabarak wa ta'aalaa does not choose for His Rasool<br />

sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam a son-in-law and companions except those who are the best.<br />

If the Rawaafidh (Shee'ah) are true to their claims, then could they explain why Rasoolullaah<br />

sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam did not forewarn the Ummah and clarify the alleged enmity of the<br />

Khulafaa ath-Thalaatha (ie Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthmaan radiallaahu anhum) towards <strong>Islam</strong> <br />

Their insults and curses are not limited just to the Khulafaa ath-Thalaatha but are also directed<br />

towards Ali Radiallaahu anhu. Because Ali Radiallaahu anhu himself, in Masjid Rabia, gave the oath<br />

of allegiance (bai'ah) to Abu Bakr radiallaahu anhu and also gave his daughter, Umm Kulthum,<br />

Radiallahu anha, in marriage to Umar Radiallaahu anhu. He also willingly gave the oath of<br />

allegiance (bai'ah) to Uthmaan radiallaahu anhu. Not only this, but he was actually the right hand<br />

man and a well-wisher of the Khulafaa ath-Thalaatha. So could Ali radiallaahu anhuhave chosen a<br />

kaafir as a son-in-law for himself And could Ali radiallaahu anhu have given the oath of allegiance<br />

(bai'ah) ,as he did, to a kaafir Subhaan Allaah! This indeed is a great accusation!<br />

Also, by cursing Mu'aawiya radiallaahu anhu, these Rawaafidh (Shee'ah) are actually cursing Hasan<br />

Radiallaahu anhu. Because Hasan radiallahu anhuwithdrew from, and gave up the Khilaafah to<br />

Mu'aawiya radiallaahu anhu purely for the pleasure of Allaah. Rasoolullaah sallallaahu alayhi wa<br />

sallam foretold of this in the hadeeth. So can the grandson of Rasoolullaah sallallaahu alayhi wa<br />

sallam actually have withdrawn from and left the Khilaafah in the hands of a Kaafir for him to rule<br />

over the people Subhaan Allaah! This indeed is a great accusation and insult!<br />

If the Rawaafidh say that Ali and Hasan radiallahu anhumaa were forced into doing this, then this is<br />

proof enough that these Rawaafidh have no sense whatsoever. The accusations levelled against<br />

these two honoured companions of the Prophet sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam are the worst insults<br />

ever imaginable and are beyond belief.<br />

Furthermore, how do these Rawaafidh curse and insult Umm ul Mu'mineen (mother of the Believers)<br />

A'isha radiallaahu anha when Allaah tabarak wa ta'aalaa Himself has mentioned her in the Qur'aan<br />

as the mother of the believers <br />

Allaah tabaarak wa ta'aalaa says:<br />

"The Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) is closer to the Believers than their<br />

own selves, and his wives are their (believers) mothers (as regards respect and<br />

marriage)." (al-Ahzaab, verse 6)<br />

There is no doubt whatsoever that only that person will curse and insult Umm al-Mu'mineen who<br />

does not consider her to be a mother. Because for one who does have a mother, does not curse<br />

and insult her, but loves her.<br />

How then can there be any compromise between the Ahl-us-Sunnah and the Rawaafidh when the<br />

fact is that these Rawaafidh regard the leader of dalaalah (misguidance) Khomeini as sinless and<br />

one protected from committing sins They actually admit to this (that Khomeini is sinless and<br />

protected from sinning) because they consider him to be the deputy of their own Mahdi<br />

("Muhammad son of al-Hasan al-Askari") - ( not the awaited Mahdi of Ahl-usSunnah wal Jamaa'ah).<br />

The Mahdi about whom they maintain the belief that he is presently concealed in the cave called<br />

'Samurah'.<br />

http://islamicweb.com/beliefs/cults/hudhaithi_khutbah.htm<br />

1/28/2005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!