09.01.2015 Views

Combined Sewer System Long Term Control Plan - DC Water

Combined Sewer System Long Term Control Plan - DC Water

Combined Sewer System Long Term Control Plan - DC Water

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Selection of Final LTCP<br />

Rate) treatment facility at BPWWTP. A dedicated force main would be constructed from the<br />

proposed tunnel dewatering pumping station at Poplar Point to the high rate facility. The tunnel<br />

contents would be dewatered through the high rate facility, disinfected, dechlorinated and discharged.<br />

During wet weather events, it was envisioned that the new high rate facility would be used in place of<br />

the existing excess flow treatment system at BPWWTP, and would treat up to 350 mgd of excess<br />

flow during rain events. This would provide a higher quality effluent than the existing excess flow<br />

treatment system. Figure 11-6 presents the major components of the expanded plan.<br />

11.3.6 Alternatives Based on Zero Overflows in the Period 1988-1990<br />

An alternative was developed to provide zero overflows in each of the three analysis years. Due to<br />

the large CSO storage volumes required, it was not feasible to simply increase the diameter of the<br />

tunnels proposed in the Draft LTCP. Instead, it was necessary to extend the tunnels as follows:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Anacostia – extend the Anacostia tunnel from Poplar Point to BPWWTP<br />

Potomac – Extend the Potomac tunnel from the Potomac Pumping Station to connect with the<br />

Anacostia Tunnel near Main and O Street Pumping Stations<br />

Piney Branch- Delete the Piney Branch storage tunnel proposed in the Draft LTCP. Instead,<br />

extend the Anacostia tunnel along Florida Avenue up to Piney Branch to capture this<br />

overflow.<br />

Blue Plains – construct a 350 mgd high rate treatment facility and a central tunnel dewatering<br />

pump station at the plant. Dewater the tunnels through the high rate facility.<br />

11.3.7 Alternatives Sized for 5-Year 24-Hour Storm<br />

This alternative was sized for the 5-year 24-hour storm. The tunnels were configured as above for<br />

the zero overflow in three years option. Due to the large storage volume required, it was not feasible<br />

to capture all of the CSO in the tunnel. Instead, the first 773 mg is captured in the tunnel and the<br />

remainder is conveyed by the tunnel to Blue Plains where it treated by a 1,725 mgd sedimentation/<br />

disinfection facility.<br />

Figure 11-7 presents the major components of plans based on zero overflows in 1988-1990 and based<br />

on the 5-year 24-hour storm. A summary of the alternatives is included in Table 11-12.<br />

\\Gh-wash\eng 1160\LTCP\LTCP Final\Sec 11.doc 11-22 FINAL - July 2002

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!