Officials Protest 'Secret' Plan to Close LICH - Brooklyn Daily Eagle

Review and Comment
‘Stand Your Ground’ Laws
Should be Challenged
It didn’t take long. Three days after a jury found George Zimmerman not
guilty in the murder of Trayvon Martin, the Justice Department said it will take
a “hard look” at a new type of self-defense law known as “stand your ground.”
Florida and nearly two dozen other states have passed such laws since
2005 in a campaign led by the National Rifle Association. The laws get rid
of an old legal doctrine that anyone confronted by a dangerous person has
a “duty to retreat” rather than shoot. And the laws provide greater legal leniency
toward killers who claim they acted out of fear of harm or death.
That’s one reason Florida officials hesitated in arresting Mr. Zimmerman.
He wasn’t charged until 44 days after the shooting. And even though
his legal defense relied on a traditional self-defense argument rather than
Florida’s Stand Your Ground law, the judge’s instructions to the jury specifically
mentioned the law’s provision.
While it is doubtful a Justice Department probe can make a legal challenge
against the state laws, the federal scrutiny is needed. Homicide rates
have risen 7 to 9 percent in states with stand-your-ground laws compared
with other states, according to a 2012 Texas A&M study. And findings by
Georgia State University “raise serious doubts against the argument that
Stand Your Ground laws make [the] public safer.”
The laws “senselessly expand the concept of self-defense,” Attorney
General Eric Holder said Tuesday. They “try to fix something that was never
broken” and have “victimized too many who are innocent.”
In addition to the Justice probe, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights began
an investigation last May to see if stand-your-ground laws encourage racial
killings. A study published by the Urban Institute found more homicides were
likely to be deemed justified in states with stand-your-ground laws than in other
states, while shootings of blacks by whites “were likely to go unpunished.”
But the main reason to challenge these laws is that they reverse the
course of history. The rise of civilization has relied in large part on humans
handing over the control and use of violence for protection and defense to
the government. Societies built on moral codes that tell individuals “thou
shall not kill” have proved to be more long-lasting. At a deeper level, they reflect
an expanding respect for life, not just for family or nation, but for all.
Stand-your-ground laws give too much authority back to individuals to
decide the places or circumstances in which they can use violence. Many
people have only a vague understanding of the laws’ legal distinctions or
are able to assess the probability of harm being done to them. Other people
may purposely kill off a harmless opponent, claiming a threat was imminent
and with little risk of being charged.
“When you make it easier for people to use deadly force, you get more
of it,” said Mark Hoekstra, an associate professor of economics at Texas
A&M University and the lead author of the 2012 study, which found these
laws cause an additional 500 to 700 homicides each year.
The popularity of the laws reflects growing distrust or lack of faith in government.
“Lynchings, riots, civil disobedience and vigilantism are all expressions
of individual or collective action that reject both legal norms and the
authority of state actors,” writes Columbia University law professor Jeffrey
Fagan. If that is the case, then America’s political system needs urgent repair.
Laws that make it easier to shoot first and ask questions later are not a hallmark
of human progress. At a practical level, they seem to increase homicides,
not stem them. For that reason alone, states with the laws have a duty to retreat.
—The Christian Science Monitor’s Editorial Board
Is published daily except Saturdays, Sundays and Federal Holidays
by Everything Brooklyn Media, LLC (USPS 971380), located at
16 Court Street, Suite 1208, Brooklyn, NY 11241. Subscription price
is $130 per year, $65 for six months. Periodicals Postage paid
at Brooklyn, NY. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to
Brooklyn Daily Eagle, Circulation Office, 16 Court Street, Suite 1208,
Brooklyn, NY 11241. Telephone: 718-643-9099, ext. 103 Fax: 718-858-3291.
Publisher - J.D. Hasty: jdh@BrooklynEagle.com
Managing Editor - Raanan Geberer: news@BrooklynEagle.com
Legal Editor - Charisma Miller, Esq.: charisma@BrooklynEagle.com
Features Editor - Samantha Samel: sam@BrooklynEagle.com
Sports Editor - John Torenli: sports@BrooklynEagle.com
Community Editor - Mary Frost: mary@BrooklynEagle.com
Religion Editor - Francesca N. Tate: francesca@BrooklynEagle.com
Consulting Editor - Chuck Otey: coteyesq@aol.com
Consulting Editor - Sam Howe: samhowe@BrooklynEagle.com
4 • Brooklyn Daily Eagle • Friday, July 19, 2013