13.01.2015 Views

Collaborative Partnerships - Supply-Chain.Org

Collaborative Partnerships - Supply-Chain.Org

Collaborative Partnerships - Supply-Chain.Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Real World Collaboration:<br />

Back 2 Business<br />

April 22, 2002<br />

Presented By:<br />

Vince Colabello & John Trush


Global Integration<br />

Globalization of the supply chain will continue as companies seek improved<br />

sourcing options and new market opportunities<br />

Sourcing Opportunity<br />

!Source in local markets<br />

!Meet local content regulations<br />

!Consolidate and leverage global scale<br />

!Develop diversified sources of supply<br />

Market Opportunity<br />

!Build global brands<br />

!Enter emerging markets<br />

!Meet growth goals with<br />

foreign expansion<br />

2<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Many <strong>Org</strong>anizations Have Embraced <strong>Supply</strong><br />

<strong>Chain</strong> Management With Focused<br />

Improvement Efforts To Sustain Success<br />

! Building the equity of products in the marketplace<br />

! Developing alliances with key customers<br />

! Managing a synchronized low cost supply chain<br />

! Collaborating with all <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Partners<br />

H<br />

Market<br />

Driven<br />

Leadership<br />

Market<br />

Driven<br />

Leadership<br />

<strong>Supply</strong><br />

Customer<br />

<strong>Chain</strong><br />

Development<br />

Management<br />

Customer<br />

Development<br />

<strong>Supply</strong><br />

<strong>Chain</strong><br />

Management<br />

Market<br />

Share<br />

Growth<br />

Market<br />

Driven<br />

Leadership<br />

Customer<br />

Development<br />

<strong>Supply</strong><br />

<strong>Chain</strong><br />

Management<br />

L<br />

L<br />

Profitability<br />

H<br />

3<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Management<br />

Why Should I Consider B2B Collaboration<br />

Know the<br />

Customer<br />

Total<br />

Quality<br />

Management<br />

Make To<br />

Demand<br />

Quick<br />

Response<br />

Continuous<br />

Improvement<br />

Demand<br />

Communication<br />

Key<br />

Performance<br />

Indicators<br />

Reduces Costs and Cycle Times . . .<br />

Improves Product Quality . . .<br />

Improves Customer Service . . .<br />

Promotes Continuous Improvement . . .<br />

. . . Increases Competitive Advantages<br />

. . . Increases Strategic Options<br />

4<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Where Are We Today<br />

! Regional / Local Improvement Programs<br />

! Spend Analysis:<br />

– By category of goods or service<br />

– By supplier<br />

! Relationship Assessment and Initiation:<br />

– Conventional / Arm’s Length<br />

– <strong>Collaborative</strong><br />

– Strategic / Alliance<br />

5<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Shift to Strategic Plans for Global<br />

Integration and Collaboration<br />

! Growth Enablers/Competitive Advantage<br />

– Customer Service<br />

– Reduced Cycle Time<br />

– Quality<br />

! New Operating Model<br />

– Based on new competencies<br />

– Meet future customer demands<br />

– Full integration in business<br />

– Produce/link to demand<br />

! Change Management Model<br />

– New measurement system based on value<br />

– Skills development plan<br />

– Project Management<br />

Collaboration,<br />

Private Trading<br />

Networks To<br />

Sustain Savings<br />

And Value<br />

6<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


So What’s New<br />

“Strategic” Sourcing Process<br />

Charter Partnership<br />

Team<br />

Design Partnership<br />

Program<br />

Consider<br />

Global Sourcing<br />

Options<br />

Define Sourcing Strategy &<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> Process<br />

Determine Critical<br />

Components/Materials/Services<br />

Install Appropriate Key<br />

Performance Indicators<br />

Consider<br />

New Product<br />

Development<br />

Design & Implement<br />

Manufacturing<br />

Strategy<br />

Excess Capability<br />

Are Current Supplier<br />

Capabilities & Performance<br />

Adequate<br />

Inadequate Capability<br />

Consolidate/Eliminate<br />

Suppliers<br />

Adequate Capability<br />

Select Strategic Partners<br />

Initiate Qualification of of<br />

New Suppliers<br />

Jointly Establish Targets for<br />

Improvements<br />

Develop & Implement Action<br />

Plans<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

Continue<br />

Relationship<br />

Monitor Progress<br />

Can New Capabilities<br />

Support Requirements<br />

No<br />

Yes<br />

7<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Collaborative</strong> <strong>Partnerships</strong><br />

The <strong>Collaborative</strong> Vision<br />

! Recognize the importance of long-term relationships with select partners for the mutual<br />

success<br />

! Understand each other’s processes, needs and capabilities<br />

! Commit to the continuous improvement of product development, manufacturing,<br />

distribution, quality, service and communications<br />

! Provide products that consistently meet or exceed mutually agreed-upon requirements<br />

! Resolve conflicts at the lowest levels of operation with the quickest impact<br />

! Operate as a cohesive team with a focus on achieving “win-win” resolutions<br />

8<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Collaborative</strong> <strong>Partnerships</strong><br />

The partnership process shifts the way we view our specific relationships<br />

Arms Length Relationship<br />

! Price Emphasis<br />

! Many Alternatives<br />

! Functional Silos<br />

! Short-Term Buying<br />

! High Levels of Safety Stock<br />

! Expediting Due to Problems<br />

! Historical Information<br />

! Short Shipments<br />

! Inefficient Use of Capacity<br />

<strong>Collaborative</strong> Partnership<br />

! Lowest Total Systems Cost<br />

! Few “Alliance” Participants<br />

! Cross-Functional Teams<br />

! Long-Term Commitments<br />

! Compressed Cycle Times & Reduced<br />

Inventories<br />

! Anticipating Future Capabilities<br />

! “Real-Time” Information<br />

! Reliability and Customer Service Focus<br />

! Run Strategy & Synchronization<br />

9<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Collaborative</strong> <strong>Partnerships</strong><br />

Open sharing of information is critical to the partnership process<br />

Traditional Structure<br />

Partnership Structure<br />

Accounting<br />

Accounting<br />

Accounting<br />

Accounting<br />

Information<br />

Systems<br />

Sales Buying Information<br />

Systems<br />

Information<br />

Systems<br />

Information<br />

Systems<br />

Operations<br />

Operations<br />

Operations<br />

Operations<br />

Sales<br />

Buying<br />

Supplier Customer Supplier Customer<br />

The expansion of direct links is necessary to improve communication.<br />

10<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Collaborative</strong> <strong>Partnerships</strong><br />

It is important to understand the current and historic relationship to<br />

accurately assess and develop <strong>Collaborative</strong> <strong>Partnerships</strong>.<br />

! Financial stability of participants<br />

! Percentage of business (who relies on whom to be successful)<br />

! Unique technologies/expertise<br />

! Contract conditions/commitments<br />

! Ability to manage competitive pressures and changing market conditions<br />

! Capacity constraints (who has extra or needs more)<br />

! History with supplier (willingness to cooperate in the past)<br />

! Company culture<br />

! Expansion/consolidation plans<br />

Each relationship is evaluated individually.<br />

11<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Collaborative</strong> <strong>Partnerships</strong><br />

When developing partnerships, it is necessary to decide which suppliers<br />

will make the best partners.<br />

The Supplier Relationship Continuum<br />

Arms Length<br />

<strong>Collaborative</strong><br />

Strategic<br />

Class III<br />

50 - 60%<br />

Class II<br />

35 - 40%<br />

Class I<br />

5 - 10%<br />

12<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Model of Price/Cost<br />

Development vs. Relationship<br />

Characteristics Supplier Advantage Customer Advantage<br />

RELATIONSHIP<br />

Arms Length <strong>Collaborative</strong> Strategic<br />

Supplier Price Regular Inflationary Decreases Decreasing Further Decreases<br />

Increases<br />

Supplier Costs Stable Stable Decreasing Decrease<br />

(Within Range) (Within Range) (By Design)<br />

Supplier Margin Increasing Decreasing Relatively Stable Stable<br />

Relationship Adversarial Adversarial Cooperative Integrated<br />

Cost Structure Unknown Challenged But Focused on Specific Transparent<br />

Largely Unknown<br />

Cost Drivers<br />

Pricing Mechanism Competitive Threat Competitive Threat Cost Principal Targeted – Expect<br />

15% to 40%<br />

Improvements<br />

The goal is to select the appropriate Collaboration Partners.<br />

13<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Strategic Supplier <strong>Partnerships</strong><br />

Factors that would influence a company to enter a strategic partnership:<br />

! Critical material or service - strategic importance to the business<br />

! Creates a competitive advantage<br />

! Leading edge technology<br />

! Willingness to jointly develop<br />

! High dollar/volume items<br />

! Potential for significant rewards<br />

! Strategic defense<br />

! New product introduction<br />

! Expanded resource base<br />

! Market volatility - availability of materials<br />

A partnership needs to be flexible to meet business shifts, new<br />

requirements and other changes.<br />

14<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Collaborative</strong> <strong>Partnerships</strong><br />

What do Most Suppliers Want<br />

! “Just tell me what you really want to the best of your knowledge”<br />

– Short-term<br />

– Long-term<br />

– Specify variation and certainty of projections<br />

! More business volume<br />

! The “right of first refusal” for new products<br />

! Longer-term commitments<br />

! A well-defined formal relationship<br />

Each supplier has specific individual needs.<br />

15<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Collaborative</strong> <strong>Partnerships</strong><br />

Regardless of the approach selected,<strong>Collaborative</strong> Partners will have many<br />

shared benefits<br />

! Improved capacity utilization<br />

! Increased process reliability<br />

! Reduced inventories<br />

! Reduced cycle times<br />

! Increased flexibility<br />

! Increased customer service<br />

! Shared innovation/technology<br />

! Reduced total system costs<br />

Implementation of identified opportunities will create new strategic options.<br />

16<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Collaborative</strong> <strong>Partnerships</strong><br />

“Best” suppliers can clearly distinguish themselves from other<br />

suppliers by using Collaboration as a:<br />

! Growth Enabler<br />

– Selection of strategic customers (that meet your criteria)<br />

– Focus on long term success through growth<br />

– Institutionalize linkages with key customer organizations<br />

– Realize global opportunities to partner (NAFTA, ECU, etc.)<br />

! Competitive Advantage<br />

– Understand the new operating model<br />

– Put competencies in place<br />

– Recognized as the supplier of choice<br />

– The “Right of First Refusal” on future products<br />

! Change Management Model for Flexibility<br />

– New measurement system based on value<br />

– Continuous process to identify and implement opportunities<br />

– Skills development plan<br />

Focused action is needed to capitalize on this window of opportunity<br />

17<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


For One Company, the Anticipated<br />

Benefits of Collaboration Include:<br />

! Developing a common approach to identifying and documenting reliability and<br />

synchronization.<br />

! Eliminating process inefficiencies that lead to increased costs to either xxxx or their<br />

suppliers.<br />

! Identifying opportunities for suppliers to reduce costs and free up additional capacity.<br />

! Identifying opportunities for xxxx to reduce combined supply inventory and improve<br />

cash management.<br />

! Developing a process for jointly improving capability and sharing benefits.<br />

! Optimizing specification requirements to reflect supplier capabilities.<br />

! Involving supplier at the early stages of new product development.<br />

! Accelerating response and correction of problems and issues.<br />

! Increasing yield and reducing downtime due to shared information and data.<br />

18<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholders Impact Survey<br />

Impacts Questionnaire<br />

1. Are you a member of any E-Hubs<br />

– If you are not involved with any E-Hubs, what are your reasons for not participating<br />

– If yes, how many and to what extent<br />

– To what level are you involved in content management, catalogues, transaction<br />

processing<br />

2. What is the cost to you for participating in an E-Hub<br />

– Initial hook up<br />

– Ongoing (basis)<br />

3. Is your level of business through E-Hubs significant<br />

– Number of customers<br />

– % of Sales<br />

19<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholders Impact Survey<br />

Impacts Questionnaire<br />

4. Do you anticipate that Collaboration through E-Hubs and Supplier Relationship<br />

Management ( SRM ) will increase or decrease<br />

5. To what extent is the use of e-Commerce part of your business strategy,<br />

business plan and budget<br />

6. What is the level of effort/readiness needed to support e Commerce in your<br />

organization<br />

– Technology<br />

– Process<br />

– Skill sets<br />

7. What factors will most influence the expansion rate of E-Hubs in your industry<br />

20<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholders Impact Survey<br />

Impacts Questionnaire<br />

8. How/what should Customers developing E-Hubs do to benefit suppliers<br />

– Longer term commitments<br />

– Defined formal relationship<br />

– Cost elimination agreements<br />

– Faster more accurate payments<br />

– Value added Services<br />

– Increased volume with Current customer base<br />

– Participation in New products<br />

– Other<br />

9. What are the advantages of being a member<br />

10. What are the major disadvantages to a supplier<br />

11. How can these disadvantages best be minimized or eliminated<br />

21<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholders Impact Survey<br />

! Surveyed a cross section of suppliers about Collaboration and participation in<br />

an E-Hub:<br />

– Level of understanding<br />

– Perceived value<br />

– Readiness for collaboration<br />

! We contacted 50+ companies and received responses as follows:<br />

– 7 companies that supply direct materials<br />

– 7 companies that supply services<br />

– 3 companies that supply indirect materials<br />

– 3 companies that supplied multiple material types and are consolidated above<br />

22<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholder Impact Survey<br />

Impacts Survey<br />

! All the suppliers' had a reasonable understanding of the benefits and challenges of<br />

Collaboration with a Customer through an E-Hub and the majority of the response were<br />

positive and optimistic. As anticipated there were a variety of opinions regarding the<br />

perceived value and benefits to the suppliers, ranging from negative to extremely<br />

positive. The suppliers expressed varying levels of readiness.<br />

! The responses from suppliers were similar to responses that we have received when<br />

surveying suppliers of exchanges and suppliers with buying consortiums. There was a<br />

consistent theme within the following three categories:<br />

– Direct Materials<br />

– Services<br />

– Indirect Materials<br />

23<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholders Impact Survey<br />

Impacts Survey<br />

Direct material suppliers<br />

! The response in this category was mixed. With the exception Chemicals and High<br />

Tech suppliers, these suppliers did not perceive significant benefits and were only<br />

moderately receptive to <strong>Collaborative</strong> E-Hubs.<br />

– Not currently involved with significant Collaboration<br />

– Not major focus in their Business plans<br />

– Would reluctantly participate only if required by their customers<br />

– Did not appreciate the value of collaborative planning<br />

– Preferred EDI and point to point communications<br />

– Perceived significant increases in the pressure on profits and margin reductions<br />

– Not actively preparing for changes to adopt Technology, Process or Skill sets<br />

24<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholders Impact Survey<br />

Impacts Survey<br />

Services<br />

! These companies were involved in providing services such as consulting, staffing,<br />

travel, and technical support. While there was some variation in their responses, as a<br />

group, these suppliers were positive about Collaboration and in most cases in the early<br />

implementation phase but actively planning and moving to significant expansion in their<br />

B2B business activities.<br />

– E-Business is a priority focus in their Business plan<br />

– Actively involved in promoting e-business with customers and suppliers<br />

– Anticipate major benefits<br />

– Most common concerns are:<br />

» Having to work through technology requirements<br />

» Less personal relationships<br />

» In early states of planning for changes in technology, process and skill sets<br />

25<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholders Impact Survey<br />

Impacts Survey<br />

Indirect Materials<br />

! As a group these suppliers were the leading companies in adopting and implementing<br />

B2B and are the most advanced in Collaboration/SRM understanding and readiness.<br />

They had already experienced proven results, which were a significant contributor to<br />

their revenue.<br />

– Leaders in e-Procurement<br />

– Significant portion of their business is currently conducted via e-procurement<br />

– Currently obtaining major benefits such as increased sales<br />

– Most common concern was that an E-Hub would not provide the same quality of<br />

information as their current systems.<br />

26<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholders Impact Survey<br />

Impacts Survey<br />

Summary of Supplier Benefits<br />

! Based on prior Supplier surveys the top five desires of Suppliers are:<br />

1. An increase in the amount of business<br />

2. A better knowledge and understanding of the certainty and variability of the<br />

information provided by customers<br />

3. The right of first refusal of new business<br />

4. Long term commitments (except in the case of volatile commodities)<br />

5. Defined formal partnerships<br />

27<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholders Impact Survey<br />

Impacts Survey Summary<br />

No. Of<br />

Companies<br />

Category<br />

Benefit<br />

to Supplier<br />

Readiness<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

Direct<br />

Direct<br />

Direct<br />

Direct<br />

Direct<br />

Direct<br />

Direct<br />

Indirect<br />

Indirect<br />

Indirect<br />

Service<br />

Service<br />

Service<br />

Service<br />

Service<br />

Service<br />

Service<br />

H<br />

M<br />

M<br />

M<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

M<br />

M<br />

M<br />

H<br />

M<br />

M<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

M<br />

H<br />

M<br />

M<br />

H<br />

L<br />

Conclusion: Suppliers perceive value through Collaboration, however, supplier<br />

readiness assessments and education process will be required<br />

28<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


The <strong>Collaborative</strong> Landscape<br />

e-Fulfillment<br />

<strong>Collaborative</strong> supply<br />

chain/production planning<br />

Retail<br />

Customer Care<br />

(demand data, customer data visibility)<br />

e-Procurement<br />

(on-line supply catalogue, on-line selection,<br />

e-auction/marketplace)<br />

B2B<br />

Procurement<br />

Manufacturing<br />

Company<br />

Internal<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Marketing<br />

Sales<br />

B2C<br />

On-line order management<br />

(real-time ATP, e-shipment notification, order tracking)<br />

Logistics<br />

Customer Service<br />

<strong>Collaborative</strong> Product<br />

Commerce<br />

(<strong>Collaborative</strong> design, product data management)<br />

Distribution<br />

e-Logistics<br />

(<strong>Collaborative</strong> planning, supply chain management,<br />

capacity and cost optimization)<br />

Vendor (co-) managed<br />

inventory<br />

29<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Horizontal Services<br />

Collaboration Models<br />

e-Hub Trade Exchanges Marketplace<br />

Indirect<br />

Suppliers<br />

Companies<br />

Company A<br />

eMarket<br />

Intermediary<br />

Company<br />

A<br />

Company<br />

B<br />

Company<br />

A<br />

Company<br />

C<br />

Company A<br />

Company<br />

B<br />

Company<br />

C<br />

Direct<br />

Suppliers<br />

Model Type<br />

Company<br />

Centric<br />

Industry<br />

Vertical Indirect<br />

Industry Vertical<br />

Direct and<br />

Indirect<br />

Vertical<br />

Exchange<br />

Meta-Market<br />

Characteristics<br />

All suppliers (or<br />

customers) to<br />

Company A are<br />

linked with<br />

Company A and,<br />

where applicable,<br />

each other<br />

Groups of buyers<br />

with common<br />

interests align to<br />

gain leverage<br />

Community<br />

forms around<br />

common exchange<br />

of direct and<br />

indirect goods<br />

“Platform” built for<br />

eBusiness within a<br />

vertical market<br />

enhancing processes<br />

across the value chain<br />

Multiple companies<br />

integrate processing<br />

leveraging buying,<br />

selling, and crossindustry<br />

horizontal<br />

services<br />

30<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


The Three Dimensions of <strong>Collaborative</strong><br />

Evolution<br />

Integration<br />

Browser-to-browser ERP-to-ERP APS-to-APS<br />

Buyer<br />

Richness<br />

Market<br />

Seller<br />

!Supplier and Buyer ERPs not linked<br />

!No information visibility<br />

!<strong>Supply</strong> chain efficiencies minimal<br />

Indirect Materials Procurement<br />

Buyer<br />

Market<br />

Seller<br />

!Many supply chain efficiencies<br />

!Some information visibility<br />

Indirect Materials + Value Added<br />

Services (Logistics, Credit/Finance,<br />

Insurance etc.)<br />

Buyer<br />

Seller<br />

Market<br />

!Machine-to-machine integration<br />

!<strong>Supply</strong> chain optimization<br />

!Complete information visibility<br />

Indirect Materials + Expanded<br />

Breadth of Value Added Services +<br />

Direct Materials Procurement<br />

!Scope limited to MRO goods<br />

!No direct materials or value-added services<br />

Reach<br />

Fragmented Company-Centric/Vertical<br />

Procurement Alliances<br />

!MRO goods and some value added services<br />

Industry Vertical<br />

Procurement Community<br />

!Complete suite of materials and services<br />

Pan-industry metamarket<br />

HR<br />

Benefits<br />

Logistics<br />

MRO<br />

Marketing<br />

Oil & Gas<br />

Auto<br />

Telecom<br />

High Tech<br />

!Single e-Hub or multiple anchor-led E-Markets<br />

within an industry sector<br />

!Consolidation of E-Markets within an industry<br />

sector into one procurement community<br />

!Meshing of several industry procurement<br />

communities to leverage cross-industry efficiencies<br />

31<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Optimization<br />

Optimizing an individual business or optimizing a network of businesses for<br />

competitive advantage<br />

Private Trading Networks (e-Hub)<br />

VALUE CHAIN OPTIMIZATION<br />

Procure<br />

Produce<br />

Products<br />

Manage<br />

Logistics<br />

Forecast<br />

Demand<br />

! Independently manages hundreds of supplier<br />

relationships<br />

! Builds upon its own market power and<br />

infrastructure<br />

! Customer and market access limited by front<br />

office organizational capacity<br />

! Optimizes its own supply chain<br />

! Procurement through automated processes<br />

E-Markets and Trade Exchanges<br />

NETWORK OPTIMIZATION<br />

Company<br />

A<br />

Company<br />

B<br />

Company<br />

D<br />

Company Company<br />

G E<br />

Company C<br />

F<br />

Company<br />

! Communities of similar businesses jointly<br />

manage suppliers<br />

! Leverage the market power and<br />

infrastructure of many<br />

! Accesses customers through established<br />

networks<br />

! Optimize a market supply chain vs. an<br />

individual supply chain<br />

! Automated end-to-end e-Procurement<br />

solutions (requisition to payment)<br />

32<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Key Questions Regarding Collaboration<br />

Strategy Development<br />

! Priorities<br />

– Which of my existing initiatives will be affected<br />

! Benefits<br />

– Will Collaboration really reduce process and material costs<br />

! Readiness<br />

– Is my organization ready to participate in Collaboration <br />

! Quantity<br />

– Will I have to use multiple E-Market/models Which ones<br />

! Timing<br />

– Is Collaboration really ready for prime time<br />

! Value<br />

– How do I extract value from an investment in Collaboration<br />

! Strategy<br />

– What do our customers expect Could we do something to get started<br />

33<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Key Technology Infrastructure Questions<br />

! Hardware<br />

– Which architectural platforms will I use<br />

! Middleware/Network<br />

– How will those platforms be integrated<br />

! Firewall/Connectivity<br />

– How will those platforms be connected to the E-Hub Other exchanges<br />

! Security/Authorization<br />

– How will I maintain security Who will validate and authorize<br />

! Database/Reporting<br />

– Where does my data reside, how do I access it, and how long do I keep it<br />

! Costs<br />

– ASP model: capital expenditure vs. subscription expenses<br />

! Adapters/Interfaces/Browsers<br />

– Will I integrate with ERP or legacy systems, or just use a browser<br />

34<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Summary<br />

Operationally<br />

Financially<br />

Technologically<br />

Impact<br />

Imperative<br />

B2B is not just about buying pencils and paper online<br />

It is about supply chain integration, cross-company collaboration and<br />

market efficiency<br />

B2B is not about big dot.com market caps<br />

It is about creating significant value through greater supply chain<br />

efficiency and optimization<br />

B2B <strong>Collaborative</strong> Hubs not built with simple “plug and<br />

play” technologies<br />

They are about Legacy System integration with complex, cutting<br />

edge technology<br />

B2B E-Business is not a passing fad<br />

It is part of a fundamental shift to an enterprise focused business<br />

model or a network focused business model<br />

Collaboration is fundamentally reshaping each industry<br />

Now is the time to develop your B2B strategy<br />

35<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Questions<br />

For additional information contact:<br />

Vince Colabello<br />

(404) 697-4504<br />

or<br />

John Trush<br />

(973) 236-5520<br />

36<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!