13.01.2015 Views

Collaborative Partnerships - Supply-Chain.Org

Collaborative Partnerships - Supply-Chain.Org

Collaborative Partnerships - Supply-Chain.Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Real World Collaboration:<br />

Back 2 Business<br />

April 22, 2002<br />

Presented By:<br />

Vince Colabello & John Trush


Global Integration<br />

Globalization of the supply chain will continue as companies seek improved<br />

sourcing options and new market opportunities<br />

Sourcing Opportunity<br />

!Source in local markets<br />

!Meet local content regulations<br />

!Consolidate and leverage global scale<br />

!Develop diversified sources of supply<br />

Market Opportunity<br />

!Build global brands<br />

!Enter emerging markets<br />

!Meet growth goals with<br />

foreign expansion<br />

2<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Many <strong>Org</strong>anizations Have Embraced <strong>Supply</strong><br />

<strong>Chain</strong> Management With Focused<br />

Improvement Efforts To Sustain Success<br />

! Building the equity of products in the marketplace<br />

! Developing alliances with key customers<br />

! Managing a synchronized low cost supply chain<br />

! Collaborating with all <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Partners<br />

H<br />

Market<br />

Driven<br />

Leadership<br />

Market<br />

Driven<br />

Leadership<br />

<strong>Supply</strong><br />

Customer<br />

<strong>Chain</strong><br />

Development<br />

Management<br />

Customer<br />

Development<br />

<strong>Supply</strong><br />

<strong>Chain</strong><br />

Management<br />

Market<br />

Share<br />

Growth<br />

Market<br />

Driven<br />

Leadership<br />

Customer<br />

Development<br />

<strong>Supply</strong><br />

<strong>Chain</strong><br />

Management<br />

L<br />

L<br />

Profitability<br />

H<br />

3<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Management<br />

Why Should I Consider B2B Collaboration<br />

Know the<br />

Customer<br />

Total<br />

Quality<br />

Management<br />

Make To<br />

Demand<br />

Quick<br />

Response<br />

Continuous<br />

Improvement<br />

Demand<br />

Communication<br />

Key<br />

Performance<br />

Indicators<br />

Reduces Costs and Cycle Times . . .<br />

Improves Product Quality . . .<br />

Improves Customer Service . . .<br />

Promotes Continuous Improvement . . .<br />

. . . Increases Competitive Advantages<br />

. . . Increases Strategic Options<br />

4<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Where Are We Today<br />

! Regional / Local Improvement Programs<br />

! Spend Analysis:<br />

– By category of goods or service<br />

– By supplier<br />

! Relationship Assessment and Initiation:<br />

– Conventional / Arm’s Length<br />

– <strong>Collaborative</strong><br />

– Strategic / Alliance<br />

5<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Shift to Strategic Plans for Global<br />

Integration and Collaboration<br />

! Growth Enablers/Competitive Advantage<br />

– Customer Service<br />

– Reduced Cycle Time<br />

– Quality<br />

! New Operating Model<br />

– Based on new competencies<br />

– Meet future customer demands<br />

– Full integration in business<br />

– Produce/link to demand<br />

! Change Management Model<br />

– New measurement system based on value<br />

– Skills development plan<br />

– Project Management<br />

Collaboration,<br />

Private Trading<br />

Networks To<br />

Sustain Savings<br />

And Value<br />

6<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


So What’s New<br />

“Strategic” Sourcing Process<br />

Charter Partnership<br />

Team<br />

Design Partnership<br />

Program<br />

Consider<br />

Global Sourcing<br />

Options<br />

Define Sourcing Strategy &<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> Process<br />

Determine Critical<br />

Components/Materials/Services<br />

Install Appropriate Key<br />

Performance Indicators<br />

Consider<br />

New Product<br />

Development<br />

Design & Implement<br />

Manufacturing<br />

Strategy<br />

Excess Capability<br />

Are Current Supplier<br />

Capabilities & Performance<br />

Adequate<br />

Inadequate Capability<br />

Consolidate/Eliminate<br />

Suppliers<br />

Adequate Capability<br />

Select Strategic Partners<br />

Initiate Qualification of of<br />

New Suppliers<br />

Jointly Establish Targets for<br />

Improvements<br />

Develop & Implement Action<br />

Plans<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

Continue<br />

Relationship<br />

Monitor Progress<br />

Can New Capabilities<br />

Support Requirements<br />

No<br />

Yes<br />

7<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Collaborative</strong> <strong>Partnerships</strong><br />

The <strong>Collaborative</strong> Vision<br />

! Recognize the importance of long-term relationships with select partners for the mutual<br />

success<br />

! Understand each other’s processes, needs and capabilities<br />

! Commit to the continuous improvement of product development, manufacturing,<br />

distribution, quality, service and communications<br />

! Provide products that consistently meet or exceed mutually agreed-upon requirements<br />

! Resolve conflicts at the lowest levels of operation with the quickest impact<br />

! Operate as a cohesive team with a focus on achieving “win-win” resolutions<br />

8<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Collaborative</strong> <strong>Partnerships</strong><br />

The partnership process shifts the way we view our specific relationships<br />

Arms Length Relationship<br />

! Price Emphasis<br />

! Many Alternatives<br />

! Functional Silos<br />

! Short-Term Buying<br />

! High Levels of Safety Stock<br />

! Expediting Due to Problems<br />

! Historical Information<br />

! Short Shipments<br />

! Inefficient Use of Capacity<br />

<strong>Collaborative</strong> Partnership<br />

! Lowest Total Systems Cost<br />

! Few “Alliance” Participants<br />

! Cross-Functional Teams<br />

! Long-Term Commitments<br />

! Compressed Cycle Times & Reduced<br />

Inventories<br />

! Anticipating Future Capabilities<br />

! “Real-Time” Information<br />

! Reliability and Customer Service Focus<br />

! Run Strategy & Synchronization<br />

9<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Collaborative</strong> <strong>Partnerships</strong><br />

Open sharing of information is critical to the partnership process<br />

Traditional Structure<br />

Partnership Structure<br />

Accounting<br />

Accounting<br />

Accounting<br />

Accounting<br />

Information<br />

Systems<br />

Sales Buying Information<br />

Systems<br />

Information<br />

Systems<br />

Information<br />

Systems<br />

Operations<br />

Operations<br />

Operations<br />

Operations<br />

Sales<br />

Buying<br />

Supplier Customer Supplier Customer<br />

The expansion of direct links is necessary to improve communication.<br />

10<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Collaborative</strong> <strong>Partnerships</strong><br />

It is important to understand the current and historic relationship to<br />

accurately assess and develop <strong>Collaborative</strong> <strong>Partnerships</strong>.<br />

! Financial stability of participants<br />

! Percentage of business (who relies on whom to be successful)<br />

! Unique technologies/expertise<br />

! Contract conditions/commitments<br />

! Ability to manage competitive pressures and changing market conditions<br />

! Capacity constraints (who has extra or needs more)<br />

! History with supplier (willingness to cooperate in the past)<br />

! Company culture<br />

! Expansion/consolidation plans<br />

Each relationship is evaluated individually.<br />

11<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Collaborative</strong> <strong>Partnerships</strong><br />

When developing partnerships, it is necessary to decide which suppliers<br />

will make the best partners.<br />

The Supplier Relationship Continuum<br />

Arms Length<br />

<strong>Collaborative</strong><br />

Strategic<br />

Class III<br />

50 - 60%<br />

Class II<br />

35 - 40%<br />

Class I<br />

5 - 10%<br />

12<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Model of Price/Cost<br />

Development vs. Relationship<br />

Characteristics Supplier Advantage Customer Advantage<br />

RELATIONSHIP<br />

Arms Length <strong>Collaborative</strong> Strategic<br />

Supplier Price Regular Inflationary Decreases Decreasing Further Decreases<br />

Increases<br />

Supplier Costs Stable Stable Decreasing Decrease<br />

(Within Range) (Within Range) (By Design)<br />

Supplier Margin Increasing Decreasing Relatively Stable Stable<br />

Relationship Adversarial Adversarial Cooperative Integrated<br />

Cost Structure Unknown Challenged But Focused on Specific Transparent<br />

Largely Unknown<br />

Cost Drivers<br />

Pricing Mechanism Competitive Threat Competitive Threat Cost Principal Targeted – Expect<br />

15% to 40%<br />

Improvements<br />

The goal is to select the appropriate Collaboration Partners.<br />

13<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Strategic Supplier <strong>Partnerships</strong><br />

Factors that would influence a company to enter a strategic partnership:<br />

! Critical material or service - strategic importance to the business<br />

! Creates a competitive advantage<br />

! Leading edge technology<br />

! Willingness to jointly develop<br />

! High dollar/volume items<br />

! Potential for significant rewards<br />

! Strategic defense<br />

! New product introduction<br />

! Expanded resource base<br />

! Market volatility - availability of materials<br />

A partnership needs to be flexible to meet business shifts, new<br />

requirements and other changes.<br />

14<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Collaborative</strong> <strong>Partnerships</strong><br />

What do Most Suppliers Want<br />

! “Just tell me what you really want to the best of your knowledge”<br />

– Short-term<br />

– Long-term<br />

– Specify variation and certainty of projections<br />

! More business volume<br />

! The “right of first refusal” for new products<br />

! Longer-term commitments<br />

! A well-defined formal relationship<br />

Each supplier has specific individual needs.<br />

15<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Collaborative</strong> <strong>Partnerships</strong><br />

Regardless of the approach selected,<strong>Collaborative</strong> Partners will have many<br />

shared benefits<br />

! Improved capacity utilization<br />

! Increased process reliability<br />

! Reduced inventories<br />

! Reduced cycle times<br />

! Increased flexibility<br />

! Increased customer service<br />

! Shared innovation/technology<br />

! Reduced total system costs<br />

Implementation of identified opportunities will create new strategic options.<br />

16<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Collaborative</strong> <strong>Partnerships</strong><br />

“Best” suppliers can clearly distinguish themselves from other<br />

suppliers by using Collaboration as a:<br />

! Growth Enabler<br />

– Selection of strategic customers (that meet your criteria)<br />

– Focus on long term success through growth<br />

– Institutionalize linkages with key customer organizations<br />

– Realize global opportunities to partner (NAFTA, ECU, etc.)<br />

! Competitive Advantage<br />

– Understand the new operating model<br />

– Put competencies in place<br />

– Recognized as the supplier of choice<br />

– The “Right of First Refusal” on future products<br />

! Change Management Model for Flexibility<br />

– New measurement system based on value<br />

– Continuous process to identify and implement opportunities<br />

– Skills development plan<br />

Focused action is needed to capitalize on this window of opportunity<br />

17<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


For One Company, the Anticipated<br />

Benefits of Collaboration Include:<br />

! Developing a common approach to identifying and documenting reliability and<br />

synchronization.<br />

! Eliminating process inefficiencies that lead to increased costs to either xxxx or their<br />

suppliers.<br />

! Identifying opportunities for suppliers to reduce costs and free up additional capacity.<br />

! Identifying opportunities for xxxx to reduce combined supply inventory and improve<br />

cash management.<br />

! Developing a process for jointly improving capability and sharing benefits.<br />

! Optimizing specification requirements to reflect supplier capabilities.<br />

! Involving supplier at the early stages of new product development.<br />

! Accelerating response and correction of problems and issues.<br />

! Increasing yield and reducing downtime due to shared information and data.<br />

18<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholders Impact Survey<br />

Impacts Questionnaire<br />

1. Are you a member of any E-Hubs<br />

– If you are not involved with any E-Hubs, what are your reasons for not participating<br />

– If yes, how many and to what extent<br />

– To what level are you involved in content management, catalogues, transaction<br />

processing<br />

2. What is the cost to you for participating in an E-Hub<br />

– Initial hook up<br />

– Ongoing (basis)<br />

3. Is your level of business through E-Hubs significant<br />

– Number of customers<br />

– % of Sales<br />

19<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholders Impact Survey<br />

Impacts Questionnaire<br />

4. Do you anticipate that Collaboration through E-Hubs and Supplier Relationship<br />

Management ( SRM ) will increase or decrease<br />

5. To what extent is the use of e-Commerce part of your business strategy,<br />

business plan and budget<br />

6. What is the level of effort/readiness needed to support e Commerce in your<br />

organization<br />

– Technology<br />

– Process<br />

– Skill sets<br />

7. What factors will most influence the expansion rate of E-Hubs in your industry<br />

20<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholders Impact Survey<br />

Impacts Questionnaire<br />

8. How/what should Customers developing E-Hubs do to benefit suppliers<br />

– Longer term commitments<br />

– Defined formal relationship<br />

– Cost elimination agreements<br />

– Faster more accurate payments<br />

– Value added Services<br />

– Increased volume with Current customer base<br />

– Participation in New products<br />

– Other<br />

9. What are the advantages of being a member<br />

10. What are the major disadvantages to a supplier<br />

11. How can these disadvantages best be minimized or eliminated<br />

21<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholders Impact Survey<br />

! Surveyed a cross section of suppliers about Collaboration and participation in<br />

an E-Hub:<br />

– Level of understanding<br />

– Perceived value<br />

– Readiness for collaboration<br />

! We contacted 50+ companies and received responses as follows:<br />

– 7 companies that supply direct materials<br />

– 7 companies that supply services<br />

– 3 companies that supply indirect materials<br />

– 3 companies that supplied multiple material types and are consolidated above<br />

22<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholder Impact Survey<br />

Impacts Survey<br />

! All the suppliers' had a reasonable understanding of the benefits and challenges of<br />

Collaboration with a Customer through an E-Hub and the majority of the response were<br />

positive and optimistic. As anticipated there were a variety of opinions regarding the<br />

perceived value and benefits to the suppliers, ranging from negative to extremely<br />

positive. The suppliers expressed varying levels of readiness.<br />

! The responses from suppliers were similar to responses that we have received when<br />

surveying suppliers of exchanges and suppliers with buying consortiums. There was a<br />

consistent theme within the following three categories:<br />

– Direct Materials<br />

– Services<br />

– Indirect Materials<br />

23<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholders Impact Survey<br />

Impacts Survey<br />

Direct material suppliers<br />

! The response in this category was mixed. With the exception Chemicals and High<br />

Tech suppliers, these suppliers did not perceive significant benefits and were only<br />

moderately receptive to <strong>Collaborative</strong> E-Hubs.<br />

– Not currently involved with significant Collaboration<br />

– Not major focus in their Business plans<br />

– Would reluctantly participate only if required by their customers<br />

– Did not appreciate the value of collaborative planning<br />

– Preferred EDI and point to point communications<br />

– Perceived significant increases in the pressure on profits and margin reductions<br />

– Not actively preparing for changes to adopt Technology, Process or Skill sets<br />

24<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholders Impact Survey<br />

Impacts Survey<br />

Services<br />

! These companies were involved in providing services such as consulting, staffing,<br />

travel, and technical support. While there was some variation in their responses, as a<br />

group, these suppliers were positive about Collaboration and in most cases in the early<br />

implementation phase but actively planning and moving to significant expansion in their<br />

B2B business activities.<br />

– E-Business is a priority focus in their Business plan<br />

– Actively involved in promoting e-business with customers and suppliers<br />

– Anticipate major benefits<br />

– Most common concerns are:<br />

» Having to work through technology requirements<br />

» Less personal relationships<br />

» In early states of planning for changes in technology, process and skill sets<br />

25<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholders Impact Survey<br />

Impacts Survey<br />

Indirect Materials<br />

! As a group these suppliers were the leading companies in adopting and implementing<br />

B2B and are the most advanced in Collaboration/SRM understanding and readiness.<br />

They had already experienced proven results, which were a significant contributor to<br />

their revenue.<br />

– Leaders in e-Procurement<br />

– Significant portion of their business is currently conducted via e-procurement<br />

– Currently obtaining major benefits such as increased sales<br />

– Most common concern was that an E-Hub would not provide the same quality of<br />

information as their current systems.<br />

26<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholders Impact Survey<br />

Impacts Survey<br />

Summary of Supplier Benefits<br />

! Based on prior Supplier surveys the top five desires of Suppliers are:<br />

1. An increase in the amount of business<br />

2. A better knowledge and understanding of the certainty and variability of the<br />

information provided by customers<br />

3. The right of first refusal of new business<br />

4. Long term commitments (except in the case of volatile commodities)<br />

5. Defined formal partnerships<br />

27<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Supplier Stakeholders Impact Survey<br />

Impacts Survey Summary<br />

No. Of<br />

Companies<br />

Category<br />

Benefit<br />

to Supplier<br />

Readiness<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

Direct<br />

Direct<br />

Direct<br />

Direct<br />

Direct<br />

Direct<br />

Direct<br />

Indirect<br />

Indirect<br />

Indirect<br />

Service<br />

Service<br />

Service<br />

Service<br />

Service<br />

Service<br />

Service<br />

H<br />

M<br />

M<br />

M<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

M<br />

M<br />

M<br />

H<br />

M<br />

M<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

M<br />

H<br />

M<br />

M<br />

H<br />

L<br />

Conclusion: Suppliers perceive value through Collaboration, however, supplier<br />

readiness assessments and education process will be required<br />

28<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


The <strong>Collaborative</strong> Landscape<br />

e-Fulfillment<br />

<strong>Collaborative</strong> supply<br />

chain/production planning<br />

Retail<br />

Customer Care<br />

(demand data, customer data visibility)<br />

e-Procurement<br />

(on-line supply catalogue, on-line selection,<br />

e-auction/marketplace)<br />

B2B<br />

Procurement<br />

Manufacturing<br />

Company<br />

Internal<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Marketing<br />

Sales<br />

B2C<br />

On-line order management<br />

(real-time ATP, e-shipment notification, order tracking)<br />

Logistics<br />

Customer Service<br />

<strong>Collaborative</strong> Product<br />

Commerce<br />

(<strong>Collaborative</strong> design, product data management)<br />

Distribution<br />

e-Logistics<br />

(<strong>Collaborative</strong> planning, supply chain management,<br />

capacity and cost optimization)<br />

Vendor (co-) managed<br />

inventory<br />

29<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Horizontal Services<br />

Collaboration Models<br />

e-Hub Trade Exchanges Marketplace<br />

Indirect<br />

Suppliers<br />

Companies<br />

Company A<br />

eMarket<br />

Intermediary<br />

Company<br />

A<br />

Company<br />

B<br />

Company<br />

A<br />

Company<br />

C<br />

Company A<br />

Company<br />

B<br />

Company<br />

C<br />

Direct<br />

Suppliers<br />

Model Type<br />

Company<br />

Centric<br />

Industry<br />

Vertical Indirect<br />

Industry Vertical<br />

Direct and<br />

Indirect<br />

Vertical<br />

Exchange<br />

Meta-Market<br />

Characteristics<br />

All suppliers (or<br />

customers) to<br />

Company A are<br />

linked with<br />

Company A and,<br />

where applicable,<br />

each other<br />

Groups of buyers<br />

with common<br />

interests align to<br />

gain leverage<br />

Community<br />

forms around<br />

common exchange<br />

of direct and<br />

indirect goods<br />

“Platform” built for<br />

eBusiness within a<br />

vertical market<br />

enhancing processes<br />

across the value chain<br />

Multiple companies<br />

integrate processing<br />

leveraging buying,<br />

selling, and crossindustry<br />

horizontal<br />

services<br />

30<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


The Three Dimensions of <strong>Collaborative</strong><br />

Evolution<br />

Integration<br />

Browser-to-browser ERP-to-ERP APS-to-APS<br />

Buyer<br />

Richness<br />

Market<br />

Seller<br />

!Supplier and Buyer ERPs not linked<br />

!No information visibility<br />

!<strong>Supply</strong> chain efficiencies minimal<br />

Indirect Materials Procurement<br />

Buyer<br />

Market<br />

Seller<br />

!Many supply chain efficiencies<br />

!Some information visibility<br />

Indirect Materials + Value Added<br />

Services (Logistics, Credit/Finance,<br />

Insurance etc.)<br />

Buyer<br />

Seller<br />

Market<br />

!Machine-to-machine integration<br />

!<strong>Supply</strong> chain optimization<br />

!Complete information visibility<br />

Indirect Materials + Expanded<br />

Breadth of Value Added Services +<br />

Direct Materials Procurement<br />

!Scope limited to MRO goods<br />

!No direct materials or value-added services<br />

Reach<br />

Fragmented Company-Centric/Vertical<br />

Procurement Alliances<br />

!MRO goods and some value added services<br />

Industry Vertical<br />

Procurement Community<br />

!Complete suite of materials and services<br />

Pan-industry metamarket<br />

HR<br />

Benefits<br />

Logistics<br />

MRO<br />

Marketing<br />

Oil & Gas<br />

Auto<br />

Telecom<br />

High Tech<br />

!Single e-Hub or multiple anchor-led E-Markets<br />

within an industry sector<br />

!Consolidation of E-Markets within an industry<br />

sector into one procurement community<br />

!Meshing of several industry procurement<br />

communities to leverage cross-industry efficiencies<br />

31<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Optimization<br />

Optimizing an individual business or optimizing a network of businesses for<br />

competitive advantage<br />

Private Trading Networks (e-Hub)<br />

VALUE CHAIN OPTIMIZATION<br />

Procure<br />

Produce<br />

Products<br />

Manage<br />

Logistics<br />

Forecast<br />

Demand<br />

! Independently manages hundreds of supplier<br />

relationships<br />

! Builds upon its own market power and<br />

infrastructure<br />

! Customer and market access limited by front<br />

office organizational capacity<br />

! Optimizes its own supply chain<br />

! Procurement through automated processes<br />

E-Markets and Trade Exchanges<br />

NETWORK OPTIMIZATION<br />

Company<br />

A<br />

Company<br />

B<br />

Company<br />

D<br />

Company Company<br />

G E<br />

Company C<br />

F<br />

Company<br />

! Communities of similar businesses jointly<br />

manage suppliers<br />

! Leverage the market power and<br />

infrastructure of many<br />

! Accesses customers through established<br />

networks<br />

! Optimize a market supply chain vs. an<br />

individual supply chain<br />

! Automated end-to-end e-Procurement<br />

solutions (requisition to payment)<br />

32<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Key Questions Regarding Collaboration<br />

Strategy Development<br />

! Priorities<br />

– Which of my existing initiatives will be affected<br />

! Benefits<br />

– Will Collaboration really reduce process and material costs<br />

! Readiness<br />

– Is my organization ready to participate in Collaboration <br />

! Quantity<br />

– Will I have to use multiple E-Market/models Which ones<br />

! Timing<br />

– Is Collaboration really ready for prime time<br />

! Value<br />

– How do I extract value from an investment in Collaboration<br />

! Strategy<br />

– What do our customers expect Could we do something to get started<br />

33<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Key Technology Infrastructure Questions<br />

! Hardware<br />

– Which architectural platforms will I use<br />

! Middleware/Network<br />

– How will those platforms be integrated<br />

! Firewall/Connectivity<br />

– How will those platforms be connected to the E-Hub Other exchanges<br />

! Security/Authorization<br />

– How will I maintain security Who will validate and authorize<br />

! Database/Reporting<br />

– Where does my data reside, how do I access it, and how long do I keep it<br />

! Costs<br />

– ASP model: capital expenditure vs. subscription expenses<br />

! Adapters/Interfaces/Browsers<br />

– Will I integrate with ERP or legacy systems, or just use a browser<br />

34<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Summary<br />

Operationally<br />

Financially<br />

Technologically<br />

Impact<br />

Imperative<br />

B2B is not just about buying pencils and paper online<br />

It is about supply chain integration, cross-company collaboration and<br />

market efficiency<br />

B2B is not about big dot.com market caps<br />

It is about creating significant value through greater supply chain<br />

efficiency and optimization<br />

B2B <strong>Collaborative</strong> Hubs not built with simple “plug and<br />

play” technologies<br />

They are about Legacy System integration with complex, cutting<br />

edge technology<br />

B2B E-Business is not a passing fad<br />

It is part of a fundamental shift to an enterprise focused business<br />

model or a network focused business model<br />

Collaboration is fundamentally reshaping each industry<br />

Now is the time to develop your B2B strategy<br />

35<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved


Questions<br />

For additional information contact:<br />

Vince Colabello<br />

(404) 697-4504<br />

or<br />

John Trush<br />

(973) 236-5520<br />

36<br />

© 2002 PricewaterhouseCoopers, all rights reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!