15.01.2015 Views

Chapter 11: Sprinkle Irrigation - NRCS Irrigation ToolBox Home Page

Chapter 11: Sprinkle Irrigation - NRCS Irrigation ToolBox Home Page

Chapter 11: Sprinkle Irrigation - NRCS Irrigation ToolBox Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Alfalfa<br />

453 X 50 X 4.3 = 609<br />

Q =<br />

10 X 16<br />

Total for July = 898 gpm<br />

Although only two of the three crops are being<br />

irrigated, the maximum capacity requirement of<br />

the system is in July.<br />

The quality of most water is good enough that no<br />

extra system capacity is required for leaching during<br />

the peak use period. Leaching requirements can<br />

usually be adequately satisfied before and after the<br />

peak use-period.<br />

If highly saline irrigation water is to be used on<br />

salt sensitive crops (when the conductivity of the irrigation<br />

water is more than half the allowable conductivity<br />

of the drainage water), it is advisable to<br />

provide a portion of the annual leaching requirement<br />

at each irrigation. Thus, the system capacity<br />

should be increased by an amount equal to the annual<br />

leaching requirement divided by the number of<br />

irrigations per year. The procedure for determining<br />

leaching requirements is presented in Technical Release<br />

No. 21.<br />

It is not wise to irrigate under extremely windy<br />

conditions, because of poor uniformity and excessive<br />

drift and evaporation losses. This is especially<br />

true with periodic-move systems on low infiltration<br />

soils that require low application rates. When these<br />

conditions exist, system capacities must be increased<br />

proportionately to offset the reduced number<br />

of sprinkling hours per day.<br />

In water-short areas, it is sometimes practical to<br />

purposely underirrigate to conserve water at the expense<br />

of some reduction in potential yields. Yields<br />

per unit of water applied often are optimum with<br />

system capacities about 20 percent lower than are<br />

specified for conventional periodic-move systems in<br />

the same area. Underirrigation is best achieved by<br />

using a longer interval between irrigations than is<br />

normally recommended for optimum yields.<br />

Fixed Systems<br />

Fixed systems can be used for ordinary irrigation,<br />

high frequency irrigation, crop cooling, and frost<br />

protection. Special consideration is required when<br />

estimating the system capacity required by each of<br />

these uses. All fixed systems are ideal for applying<br />

water-soluble fertilizers and other chemicals.<br />

Ordhary <strong>Irrigation</strong>*- Some fixed syeterns are installed<br />

irl permanent crops, and relatively long irrigation<br />

intervals are used. The capacity of such systems<br />

can be 5 to 10 percent less than conventional<br />

periodic-move systems in the same area because<br />

there is no down time during lateral moves. The capacity<br />

should be sufficient to apply the peak "net"<br />

crop water requirements for low frequency (1- or 2-<br />

week interval) irrigations when the system is operated<br />

on a 24-hr day, 7-day week bssis. These syatems<br />

may be used to apply ferkilizers and other<br />

chemicals and can be controlled by hand valves.<br />

High Frequency.-If the system is designed to<br />

apply irrigations once or twice a day to control soil<br />

temperatures and to hold the soil moisture content<br />

within a narrow band, a greater system capacity is<br />

required. The net system capacity should be increased<br />

hy 10 to 20 percent over a conveiltiond<br />

periodic-move system because the crop will dways<br />

be consuming water at the peak potential evapotranspiration<br />

rate. By contrast, under lower fr9-<br />

quency irrigation, as the soil moisture decreases the<br />

consumptive use rate falls below the peak pdtential<br />

rate. A major purpose for such a system is to keep<br />

the crop performing at a peak rate to incresse quelity<br />

and yield. Clearly, crops that do not respond<br />

favorably to uniform high soil moisture conditi~~s<br />

are not particularly good candidates for solid set<br />

systems. High frequency systems can be hand<br />

valve operated. However, automatic valve systems<br />

can be used to apply fertilizers and chemicals.<br />

Crop Cooling.-Very high frequency systems<br />

used for foliar cooling must have antomatic valving,<br />

use high qudity water, and have uy: to double the<br />

capacity of ordinary high frequency systems. Foliar<br />

cooling systems are sequenced so that the leaves<br />

ate kept wet. Water is applied until the leaf surfaces<br />

are saturated, shut off untii they are nearly<br />

dry, then reapplied. This generally requires having<br />

<strong>11</strong>4 to <strong>11</strong>6 of the systam in operation simultaneously<br />

and cycling the system once every 15 to 40 min depending<br />

on system capacity, crop size, and climatic<br />

conditions. For example, a system for ccoling trees<br />

might be operated 6 ou!: of every 30 min so that <strong>11</strong>5<br />

of the area is being sprinkled at any one time,<br />

Foliar cooling systems must have sufficient capacity<br />

to satisfy the evaporation demand on a minuteby-minute<br />

basis throughout the peak use hours during<br />

the peak use days. To accori~plish this, the system<br />

capacity must be 1.5 to 2.5 times as great as is<br />

required for a conventional periodic-move system.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!