Debunking Human Health Risk, APPENDIX D - LBAMspray.com

More documents

Recommendations

Info

LIGHT BROWN APPLE MOTH ERADICATION PROJECT <strong>APPENDIX</strong> D DRAFT PEIR HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT This Page Intentionally Left Blank D1-4 App D_HHRA_508.doc JULY 2009
S E C T I O N D 2 Problem Formulation D2.1 PROGRAM AREA The overall Program Area is defined as all areas of the State of California that could be<strong>com</strong>e infested with LBAM, meaning approximately 57 of the 58 counties in California, excluding alpine and desert areas and Imperial County. Given this large area, the discussion is necessarily broad. D2.1.1 Program Area Location The Program Area is intended to include all portions of the state in which climatic conditions are suitable to the LBAM. The moths prefer cool areas with moderate rainfall and moderate to high relative humidity (mean temperatures of ~56ºF, ~ 29 inches rain/year and ~70 % humidity) and are unlikely to thrive in the hot, dry conditions that exist in the southern parts of California… although it may be able to establish itself in the irrigated areas (USDA 2008). In addition, LBAM have no diapause (resting) stage and can only survive in areas where it can continuously breed and where sufficient hosts are available. Thus, desert areas with sparse vegetation, including most of Imperial County and the eastern portions of San Bernardino, Riverside, Los Angeles, Kern and Inyo counties, and areas of extensive cold, including elevations above 5,000 feet in the Sierra Nevada Mountains and the eastern portions of Modoc and Lassen counties are not expected to harbor LBAM. The threat is greatest along the coast from the Oregon border to the Mexican border. LBAM is expected to survive in the central valley and foothills below 5,000 feet. As discussed in Section D2.1 of the PEIR, the immediate Program Area is located in the 13 quarantined counties of the state where infestations occur as of January 2009: Alameda, Contra Costa, San Francisco, Napa, Marin, Sonoma, Solano, San Mateo, Santa Clara, San Benito, Monterey, Santa Cruz, and Santa Barbara. The areas proposed for eradication activities cover approximately 2,000 square miles. Within the 13 counties, eradication activities would be focused in the areas with the greatest infestation problems. Specific treatment area boundaries are determined based on trapping within any infested counties within California. The detection of 2 or more moths within a 3-mile radius within a time period equal to 1 LBAM life cycle places the area within the Program Area. Small, isolated infestations will continue to be treated with twist ties containing LBAM pheromone. Small infestations near larger infested areas will be treated with the moth pheromone applied to utility poles and trees and shrubs to confuse the male moths. Medium and large infestations will be treated with the moth pheromone and permethrin applied to utility poles and street trees. See Section D2 of the PEIR for a full description of the chemical treatment alternatives. JULY 2009 App D_HHRA_508.doc D2-1
Page 1: A P P E N D I X D Human Health Risk
Page 5 and 6: Table of Contents Executive Summary
Page 7 and 8: TABLE OF CONTENTS D5.1.1 Toxicity V
Page 9 and 10: TABLE OF CONTENTS Table D3-33 Table
Page 11 and 12: TABLE OF CONTENTS Table D4-40 Table
Page 13 and 14: TABLE OF CONTENTS F I G U R E S Fig
Page 15 and 16: TABLE OF CONTENTS IARC Internationa
Page 17 and 18: Executive Summary This human health
Page 19 and 20: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The HQs for both
Page 21 and 22: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY estimates of heal
Page 23 and 24: S E C T I O N D 1 Introduction The
Page 25: SECTION D1 INTRODUCTION In screenin
Page 29 and 30: SECTION D2 PROBLEM FORMULATION Spi
Page 31 and 32: SECTION D2 PROBLEM FORMULATION D2.3
Page 33 and 34: S E C T I O N D 3 Toxicity Assessme
Page 35 and 36: SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT thro
Page 37 and 38: SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT diff
Page 39 and 40: SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT the
Page 41 and 42: SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT tran
Page 43 and 44: SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT test
Page 45 and 46: SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT mg/k
Page 47 and 48: SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT ETHY
Page 49 and 50: SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT ETHY
Page 51 and 52: SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT CHRO
Page 53 and 54: SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT OEHH
Page 55 and 56: SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT of t
Page 57 and 58: SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT Agro
Page 59 and 60: SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT Tabl
Page 61 and 62: SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT for
Page 65 and 66: SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT D3.1
Page 67 and 68: SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT d. N
Page 71 and 72: SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT anim
Page 73 and 74: SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT D3.1
Page 75 and 76: SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT In m
Page 77 and 78:
SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT rabb
Page 79 and 80:
SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT All
Page 81 and 82:
SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT This
Page 83 and 84:
SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT Tabl
Page 85 and 86:
SECTION D3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT Tabl
Page 87 and 88:
SECTION 3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT Table
Page 89 and 90:
SECTION 3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT ATSDR
Page 91 and 92:
SECTION 3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT D3.1.
Page 93 and 94:
SECTION 3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT and d
Page 95 and 96:
SECTION 3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT HERCO
Page 97 and 98:
SECTION 3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT cited
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
SECTION 3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT there
Page 103 and 104:
SECTION 3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT Subse
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
SECTION 3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT of SC
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
SECTION 3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT 5 (IS
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
SECTION 3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT appli
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
SECTION 3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT and t
Page 123 and 124:
SECTION 3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT inter
Page 125 and 126:
SECTION 3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT again
Page 127 and 128:
SECTION 3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT evide
Page 129 and 130:
SECTION 3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT Durin
Page 131 and 132:
SECTION 3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT Herna
Page 133 and 134:
SECTION 3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT with
Page 135 and 136:
SECTION 3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT In su
Page 137 and 138:
S E C T I O N D 4 Exposure Assessme
Page 139 and 140:
SECTION D4 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Assu
Page 141 and 142:
SECTION D4 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT BW =
Page 143 and 144:
SECTION D4 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT beca
Page 145 and 146:
SECTION D4 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Tabl
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
SECTION D4 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT expo
Page 153 and 154:
SECTION D4 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Figu
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
SECTION D4 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Figu
Page 165 and 166:
SECTION 4 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Table
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
SECTION D4 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT resp
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
S E C T I O N D 5 Risk Characteriza
Page 185 and 186:
SECTION D5 RISK CHARACTERIZATION to
Page 187 and 188:
SECTION D5 RISK CHARACTERIZATION Ta
Page 189 and 190:
SECTION D5 RISK CHARACTERIZATION D5
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
SECTION D5 RISK CHARACTERIZATION ba
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
SECTION D5 RISK CHARACTERIZATION th
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
SECTION D5 RISK CHARACTERIZATION ca
Page 211 and 212:
SECTION D5 RISK CHARACTERIZATION Ex
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219:
SECTION D5 RISK CHARACTERIZATION Th
Page 222 and 223:
LIGHT BROWN APPLE MOTH ERADICATION
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258:
show all

Debunking Human Health Risk, APPENDIX D - LBAMspray.com

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?