20.01.2015 Views

Surnames and a Theory of Social Mobility - University of Chicago ...

Surnames and a Theory of Social Mobility - University of Chicago ...

Surnames and a Theory of Social Mobility - University of Chicago ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

achievements <strong>of</strong> Ashkenazi Jews could just be the result <strong>of</strong> strong selecting for<br />

innate abilities from an ancestral population that was average in its characteristics.<br />

Evidence for the role just <strong>of</strong> selective affinity with minority populations can also<br />

potentially explain the emergence <strong>of</strong> Christians, Jews, <strong>and</strong> Parsis as elites within<br />

many Muslim societies. This mechanism is laid out for Egypt in an interesting study<br />

<strong>of</strong> Coptic Christians by Mohammed Saleh. 31 All Muslim societies had two<br />

characteristics. First, subject populations were not typically forced to convert to<br />

Islam. Muslim societies were, from their inception, tolerant <strong>of</strong> religious minorities. 32<br />

But non-Muslim minorities, under Islamic law, were subject to a head tax (on adult<br />

males) called the Jizya(h), which was a fee for permission to practice another religion,<br />

<strong>and</strong> designed as an inducement for them to convert.<br />

The head tax was sometimes levied at variable rates. Thus Abu Yusuf, the chief<br />

justice <strong>of</strong> Baghdad in the eighth century, in his treatise on Tazation <strong>and</strong> Public<br />

Finance, Kitab al-Kharaj, noted that the Jizya should be 48 dirhams for the richest<br />

men, 24 for those <strong>of</strong> moderate wealth, <strong>and</strong> 12 for craftsmen <strong>and</strong> laborers. But this<br />

would still imply that the tax was much more burdensome on the poorest, laborers,<br />

than on wealthier members <strong>of</strong> religious minorities. 33<br />

Saleh shows how in Egypt, Coptic Christians who formed the vast majority <strong>of</strong><br />

Egyptian society on the eve <strong>of</strong> the Arab Muslim conquest, selectively converted to<br />

Islam in the centuries following the Arab conquest <strong>of</strong> 641 AD. He finds evidence<br />

that under the pressure <strong>of</strong> the poll tax on non-Muslims, the poorest <strong>of</strong> the Copts<br />

were much more likely to convert. Saleh is able to show that the conversion rate was<br />

greater in areas where heavier taxes were imposed. Also in areas where the<br />

conversions were the greatest, the remaining Coptic population was more elite by the<br />

nineteenth century. From being a group under the Byzantine Empire which had the<br />

lowest status in the society, after the Jews <strong>and</strong> upper class Greek speaking Greek<br />

Orthodox Christians, the Copts joined these two other minorities as the elites <strong>of</strong> the<br />

new Muslim Egypt. In the nineteenth century both in urban <strong>and</strong> rural areas Copts<br />

had higher occupational status than Muslims, despite being a political minority.<br />

31 Saleh, 2012.<br />

32 Though once someone converted, or was born Muslim, conversion to another religion<br />

was forbidden, <strong>and</strong> punishable by death.<br />

33 Muslims had their own taxes to pay under Islamic Law, though these were generally, by<br />

design, less burdensome than the Jizya.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!