20.01.2015 Views

Surnames and a Theory of Social Mobility - University of Chicago ...

Surnames and a Theory of Social Mobility - University of Chicago ...

Surnames and a Theory of Social Mobility - University of Chicago ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

few genuine Romany they encountered, adopted a romanticized version <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Gypsy lifestyle <strong>and</strong> a creation myth <strong>of</strong> their own. 37<br />

Thus by the nineteenth century the first names <strong>of</strong> Gypsy <strong>and</strong> Traveller children<br />

were sometimes colorful. For boys favored names allegedly included such as<br />

Goliath, Belcher, Dangerfield, Gilderoy, Nelson, Neptune, <strong>and</strong> V<strong>and</strong>lo. For girls we<br />

get Britannia, Cinderella, Dotia, Gentilia, Fairnette, Freedom, Mizelli, Ocean,<br />

Reservoir, Sinfai, <strong>and</strong> Vancy. 38 Are these timeless Gypsy names, passed down by<br />

Romany forefathers<br />

Not likely. For if we look at the extensive records <strong>of</strong> baptisms in Engl<strong>and</strong> 1538-<br />

1837 we find that almost all these supposed Gypsy <strong>and</strong> Traveller surnames appear<br />

for the first time only in the late eighteenth <strong>and</strong> nineteenth centuries. Thus the first<br />

recorded Cinderella baptism was in 1798, the first Goliath 1817, the first Ocean<br />

1797, the first Freedom 1803, <strong>and</strong> the first Gilderoy 1785. This is not too surprising<br />

for Cinderella, for example, since the French tale that is the basis <strong>of</strong> the English<br />

version <strong>of</strong> the Cinderella story was first published in English in 1729.<br />

The hypothesis here would thus be that the Gypsies <strong>and</strong> Travelers <strong>of</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong><br />

now are mainly not descended from those <strong>of</strong> 1600, 1700 or 1800. For the normal<br />

process <strong>of</strong> social mobility should bring those descendants closer to the social mean.<br />

Instead there is a steady flow <strong>of</strong> people into <strong>and</strong> out <strong>of</strong> Gypsy <strong>and</strong> Traveler<br />

communities. The more economically successful members <strong>of</strong> these communities<br />

acquire permanent homes, <strong>and</strong> occupations more associated with the majority<br />

population. Because they are in no way racially distinct from the rest <strong>of</strong> the<br />

indigenous English population, <strong>and</strong> because their surnames mainly do not reveal<br />

anything <strong>of</strong> their background, they can at any time blend into the larger society. But<br />

at the same time as there is a flow <strong>of</strong> people out from this group, there will be a flow<br />

in from people on the margins <strong>of</strong> society. These entrants adopt the lifestyle <strong>and</strong><br />

mores <strong>of</strong> the Gypsies <strong>and</strong> Travelers.<br />

37 In line with this genetic testing suggests that the Irish Traveller community is <strong>of</strong> entirely<br />

Irish origin. See North et al., 2000. Further this article concludes that “ these data support<br />

that the origin <strong>of</strong> the Travellers was not a sudden event; rather a gradual formation <strong>of</strong><br />

populations.” There are not equivalent genetic studies <strong>of</strong> the origins <strong>of</strong> English Gypsies <strong>and</strong><br />

Travellers.<br />

38 These first names are from the Romany <strong>and</strong> Traveller Family History Society. Most are in<br />

later periods associated with surnames known to themselves contain many traveler families.<br />

http://website.lineone.net/~rtfhs/gypsy.html

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!