21.01.2015 Views

Asphalt Review - Feb/March 2013 - Australian Asphalt Pavement ...

Asphalt Review - Feb/March 2013 - Australian Asphalt Pavement ...

Asphalt Review - Feb/March 2013 - Australian Asphalt Pavement ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ASPHALT REVIEW<br />

Temporary public access is always required and on this project<br />

they will be established to a high standard of surfacing to accommodate<br />

disabled persons, elderly and those with need for wheeled walkers<br />

and prams. The new public access paths have been well delineated<br />

and signed.<br />

High security type fencing has been deployed on site to better<br />

contain and separate the public from road construction plant and<br />

vehicles. This is more effective than para-webbing or bunting flags in<br />

the containment of pedestrians and is less prone to weather damage.<br />

Public walkway on right behind security fence<br />

A motorised wheel chair passes over the temporary walkway without difficulty – the<br />

surfacing will be further sealed.<br />

The safety challenge presented by work near<br />

overhead and underground services<br />

Most utility services are placed in the road reserves and contact with<br />

underground and overhead utility services was far too frequent in past<br />

years during road construction and similar works.<br />

Activities which have shown the potential to strike services include:<br />

• Excavation works with excavators or backhoes;<br />

• Scraping or grading works;<br />

• Pile and post driving;<br />

• Coring and geotechnical studies;<br />

• Auger works; and<br />

• Steel pickets<br />

It was also common practice prior to 2004 to use plant such as<br />

excavators and backhoes to probe for underground services, often with<br />

predictable negative consequences and damage to services.<br />

VicRoads worked with our contractors in the major projects area<br />

to identify controls and best practice approaches in the civil road<br />

construction area, applying the WorkSafe Framework and Supporting<br />

Publications as the foundation guidelines.<br />

The VicRoads Worksite Safety Newsletter and Safety Alerts were used to<br />

communicate identified best practices for the benefit of the construction<br />

industry and this has significantly eliminated contacts as a result.<br />

Individual behaviour remains the major cause of incidents and this<br />

presents a major challenge.<br />

What was evident during the development of the WorkSafe<br />

Framework was the significant dependence on behavioural controls<br />

in this area. Under the hierarchy of safety controls, behavioural or<br />

administrative controls are clearly the least reliable and effective.<br />

However, higher level controls need to be practical and available in<br />

construction equipment to remove our reliance on human behaviour.<br />

For overhead electrical assets the WorkSafe Handbook for Using<br />

Earthmoving Equipment near Overhead Electrical Assets describes the<br />

hierarchy of controls and gives examples applicable to this equipment<br />

which is frequently involved in contacts with overhead services.<br />

Elimination of the risk through relocation of services prior to road<br />

construction work commencing is now frequently used, but does<br />

require cooperation by the relevant asset owner. Isolation of services is<br />

also used where practical, particularly where works could intrude into<br />

the No Go Zone for overhead electrical services.<br />

There have been innovations in the engineering control areas with<br />

respect to height limiters of excavators which show promise, but may<br />

require a different approach to the task if they cannot reach high<br />

enough to load trucks directly.<br />

Underground service contact incidents have been more prevalent<br />

than overhead services in VicRoads’ experience although both have<br />

significantly reduced in general.<br />

Actions required by contractors to<br />

comply with WorkSafe Framework<br />

The best practice approach to excavation work must follow the<br />

WorkSafe Framework for Undertaking Work near Overhead and<br />

Underground Assets. Industry standards for construction works have<br />

not yet been agreed so in the interim the best practice approach as<br />

detailed in the WorkSafe Framework must be followed or exceeded.<br />

Contractors’ documented safe working procedures must reflect the safe<br />

systems of work specified in the WorkSafe Framework. These detailed<br />

procedures must clearly describe how the system of work will comply with<br />

the WorkSafe Framework and include as-constructed drawings rather than<br />

schematics when possible or a larger size plan that is easy to read.<br />

Permits to Excavate are now commonly required by the principal<br />

contractors to ensure that all safety procedures have been<br />

implemented prior to the works commencing. The procedures should<br />

include requirements to:<br />

• Dial before You Dig;<br />

• “Prove” the location of services using appropriate non-destructive<br />

excavation technology;<br />

• Positively mark the services locations when they have been positively<br />

“proved”;<br />

• Record new locations when services are relocated for future<br />

reference;<br />

• Not permit machines to work closer than the distances listed in the<br />

WorkSafe Framework unless permission has been given by the asset<br />

owner;<br />

• Not assume services are laid in a straight line or that the depth will<br />

be consistent;<br />

• Undertake non-destructive proving excavation if some services are<br />

not traceable;<br />

28 ROADS FEB/MARCH <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!