21.01.2015 Views

Asphalt Review - Feb/March 2013 - Australian Asphalt Pavement ...

Asphalt Review - Feb/March 2013 - Australian Asphalt Pavement ...

Asphalt Review - Feb/March 2013 - Australian Asphalt Pavement ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ASPHALT REVIEW<br />

Roadwork Safety –<br />

Innovation and<br />

Future Directions<br />

The following paper is an abridged version of a presentation to AAPA’s 15th Road Construction<br />

and Surfacing Health and Safety Conference, in Melbourne during 2012. It highlights the<br />

experience of Michael Rose in roadwork safety in Victoria; however, the information contained<br />

in it is relevant across the whole of Australia. In particular it highlights the hierarchy of controls.<br />

This recognises that the behaviour of roadworkers and passing motorists is the primary risk on<br />

worksites. Physical separation (elimination of the risk) is therefore the most effective strategy and<br />

is top of the hierarchy of control.<br />

By Michael Rose CFSIA RSP Aust, Manager Project Safety, VicRoads Major Projects.<br />

Introduction – evolution and innovation<br />

of safety controls at VicRoads<br />

This paper provides an overview of the evolution and innovation in<br />

roadwork safety at VicRoads over the past decade, and highlights the<br />

current safety challenges still facing our industry.<br />

Prior to the introduction of the Worksite Safety–Traffic Management<br />

Code of Practice (2004 version) there were eight fatalities reported<br />

in Victoria for works on or adjacent to traffic over a 26-month period,<br />

including three on VicRoads works. There have been no fatalities since<br />

the Code was introduced on VicRoads major projects.<br />

The development of the hierarchy of safety controls for worksite<br />

traffic management and the classification of work on or adjacent to<br />

roads used by traffic as high risk work under Occupational Health<br />

and Safety (OHS) legislation for all classes of road have been major<br />

contributing factors to the safety improvements. Despite this good work<br />

we have not yet achieved zero injuries or fatalities in all areas.<br />

Major road projects are frequently faced with up to 16 classified<br />

high risk construction work activities. However, the activities involving<br />

mobile plant operation within work zones was demonstrated during<br />

2011 to be our highest risk area with at least five fatalities around<br />

Australia.<br />

The Hierarchy of Safety Controls for Roadwork<br />

The Hierarchy of Safety Controls for Worksite Traffic Management was<br />

first introduced by VicRoads in 2005 via the Worksite Safety–Traffic<br />

Management Code of Practice (2004 version). At the same time, the<br />

OHS Act 2004 was introduced mandating the hierarchy of controls<br />

approach through the defined concept of Ensuring Health and Safety<br />

(OHS Act, Section 20).<br />

The introduction of the OHS Regulations in 2007 further reinforced<br />

that works on or adjacent to roads used by traffic is a high risk activity<br />

for construction work. It also established the statutory obligation to<br />

eliminate the traffic hazard where reasonably practicable or reduce the<br />

risks by following the established hierarchy of safety controls.<br />

The hierarchy of controls may be described as:<br />

1. Elimination;<br />

2. Substitution;<br />

3. Isolation;<br />

4. Engineering;<br />

5. Administrative;<br />

6. Personal protective equipment; and<br />

7. A combination of controls<br />

The WorkSafe Test of Reasonably Practicable<br />

The OHS Act 2004 Section 20 requires hazards be eliminated, so far as<br />

reasonably practicable, or reduced via the hierarchy of safety controls,<br />

so far as is reasonably practicable. The WorkSafe test for practicability<br />

requires the following factors to be considered.<br />

• How likely is it that there will be some harm;<br />

• How serious could the consequences be;<br />

• What do, or should, you know about the hazard and ways of<br />

eliminating or reducing it<br />

• Are suitable ways to eliminate or reduce the hazard or risk available;<br />

and<br />

• How much will it cost to eliminate or reduce the hazard or risk (This<br />

is not a defence at law and needs to be balanced against the duty of<br />

care for workers with a presumption in favour of health and safety.<br />

Therefore cost is not as a credible reason against deployment).<br />

Evolution of practices in traffic<br />

management safety in Victoria<br />

The following describes evolved practices in traffic management<br />

safety in Victoria since 2006, using the hierarchy of traffic controls and<br />

commencing with the most effective and reliable controls:<br />

a. Elimination of Hazard - Road Closure to Eliminate the Traffic Hazard<br />

Full or partial road closure is the highest level control used. Road<br />

closures should be well communicated in advance to the public<br />

to reduce inconvenience. Road closures also facilitate increased<br />

productivity with reduction in construction times due to the removal of<br />

traffic and the unrestricted access provided.<br />

24 ROADS FEB/MARCH <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!