21.01.2015 Views

fnh journal vol 24 - Forth Naturalist and Historian - University of Stirling

fnh journal vol 24 - Forth Naturalist and Historian - University of Stirling

fnh journal vol 24 - Forth Naturalist and Historian - University of Stirling

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26 C.J. Henty<br />

Thanks are due to S.J. Harrison for a copy <strong>of</strong> the Annual Climatological<br />

Bulletin (2000), to J. Mitchell for a copy <strong>of</strong> the L.Lomond report, to P. <strong>Stirling</strong>-<br />

Aird for data from the Raptor Study Group, <strong>and</strong> to D.M. Bryant for the results<br />

<strong>of</strong> the estuary WEBS data.<br />

It is with great sadness that I am unable to add the name <strong>of</strong> Bill<br />

Brackenridge to those that have assisted in compiling this report. Most readers<br />

will know that he was killed in a traffic accident in November (2000), whilst<br />

returning from the SOC annual conference. For many years he produced a<br />

wealth <strong>of</strong> field observations <strong>and</strong> helped, as Assistant Recorder, with assessing<br />

records <strong>and</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> reading the draft reports, more recently he wrote a section<br />

<strong>of</strong> the species accounts. His exceptionally wide knowledge <strong>of</strong> natural history<br />

showed both in his work in conservation planning <strong>and</strong> in his consistent efforts<br />

in giving talks, leading field trips, <strong>and</strong> always being ready to help people with<br />

their queries. A full obituary appeared in the June issue <strong>of</strong> Scottish Birds (Vol<br />

22, No 1).<br />

RESULTS OF THE BBS SURVEYS FOR CENTRAL REGION<br />

(Based on a comprehensive summary by NB)<br />

This year the bird report continues to make extensive use in the species<br />

accounts <strong>of</strong> results from the Breeding Birds Survey, these are in terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> occurence <strong>of</strong> a species along linear transects in several habitat<br />

types. In 2000, 29 1x1 kilometre squares were surveyed, one less than 1999.<br />

Each square is usually visited twice in spring/summer, a total <strong>of</strong> 2 km on a set<br />

route is walked per visit <strong>and</strong> all birds noted in 200 m sections; a st<strong>and</strong>ardised<br />

habitat survey is done on another visit. In the main report I have presented<br />

selected results, calculated as birds per 10 km <strong>of</strong> habitat, for the major habitats<br />

where it is likely that the birds are breeding locally. For species that are scarce<br />

– say, one or less per 10 km – results may vary erratically from year to year.<br />

Each square (sometimes half squares) <strong>and</strong> the birds noted in it have been<br />

attributed to one <strong>of</strong> four major habitats – Mountain <strong>and</strong> moorl<strong>and</strong> (=moor),<br />

Conifers (woodl<strong>and</strong> + wood/moorl<strong>and</strong> edge), Farml<strong>and</strong>, Urban/suburban.<br />

Broadleaved woodl<strong>and</strong> occurs mainly as copses in farml<strong>and</strong> whilst conifer<br />

woodl<strong>and</strong> includes both young plantations <strong>and</strong> mature woods, thus “Conifers”<br />

figures may include species <strong>of</strong> scrub <strong>and</strong> moorl<strong>and</strong> edge which are not found<br />

in mature plantations. Also, some urban squares may include bushy areas on<br />

the fringe <strong>of</strong> towns.<br />

An average <strong>of</strong> 25 species were recorded per square (excluding four squares<br />

that were visited only once <strong>and</strong> one with numbers <strong>of</strong> non-breeding gulls <strong>and</strong><br />

waders), but with great variation from five on high moorl<strong>and</strong> to 35 on mixed<br />

farml<strong>and</strong>, numbers <strong>of</strong> individuals also varied widely from 59 to 620, average<br />

318. The commonest species per habitat were: Moor – Meadow Pipit, Conifer –<br />

Chaffinch, Farml<strong>and</strong> – Starling, Urban – Starling. Species showing marked<br />

increases (40 % or greater) included Lapwing, Oystercatcher, Skylark,<br />

Whitethroat, Sedge Warbler, Starling <strong>and</strong> Goldfinch. Whinchat, Jay, Bullfinch<br />

<strong>and</strong> Siskin are now well below their long term means.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!