5.2.2 Planar Andronov-Hopf bifurcation
5.2.2 Planar Andronov-Hopf bifurcation
5.2.2 Planar Andronov-Hopf bifurcation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
146 CHAPTER 5. LOCAL BIFURCATION THEORY<br />
The matrix in the left-hand-side is nonsingular near <strong>Hopf</strong> <strong>bifurcation</strong>, since its determinant<br />
is equal to<br />
(9ω 2 + µ 2 )(ω 2 + µ 2 ) 2 ,<br />
which reduces to 9ω0 6 > 0 at α = 0. Thus, for any given quadratic coefficients<br />
a ij , b ij in (5.29), one can find from (5.31) g ij , h ij with i, j = 0, 1, 2, i + j = 2, such<br />
that system (5.30) will have no quadratic terms for all sufficiently small |α|. This is<br />
equivalent to Lemma 5.2. Clearly, the complex notation is simpler. ♦<br />
Lemma 5.3 The equation<br />
ż = λz + g 30<br />
6 z3 + g 21<br />
2 z2¯z + g 12<br />
2 z¯z2 + g 03<br />
6 ¯z3 + O(|z| 4 ),<br />
where λ = λ(α) = µ(α) + iω(α), µ(0) = 0, ω(0) = ω 0 > 0, and g ij = g ij (α), can be<br />
transformed by an invertible parameter-dependent change of complex coordinate<br />
z = w + h 30<br />
6 w3 + h 21<br />
2 w2 ¯w + h 12<br />
2 w ¯w2 + h 03<br />
6 ¯w3 ,<br />
for all sufficiently small |α|, into an equation with only one cubic term:<br />
where c 1 = c 1 (α).<br />
Proof:<br />
The inverse transformation is<br />
ẇ = λw + c 1 w 2 ¯w + O(|w| 4 ),<br />
Therefore,<br />
w = z − h 30<br />
6 z3 − h 21<br />
2 z2¯z − h 12<br />
2 z¯z2 − h 03<br />
6 ¯z3 + O(|z| 4 ).<br />
ẇ = ż − h 30<br />
2 z2 ż − h 21<br />
2 (2z¯zż + z2 ˙¯z) − h 12<br />
2 (ż¯z2 + 2z¯z ˙¯z) − h 03<br />
2 ¯z2 ˙¯z + · · ·<br />
(<br />
g30<br />
= λz +<br />
6 − λh ) (<br />
30<br />
z 3 g21<br />
+<br />
2 2 − λh 21 − ¯λh )<br />
21<br />
z 2¯z 2<br />
+<br />
(<br />
g12<br />
2 − λh )<br />
12<br />
−<br />
2<br />
¯λh 12 z¯z 2 +<br />
(<br />
g03<br />
6 − ¯λh 03<br />
2<br />
)<br />
¯z 3 + · · ·<br />
= λw + 1 6 (g 30 − 2λh 30 )w 3 + 1 2 (g 21 − (λ + ¯λ)h 21 )w 2 ¯w<br />
+ 1 2 (g 12 − 2¯λh 12 )w ¯w 2 + 1 6 (g 03 + (λ − 3¯λ)h 03 ) ¯w 3 + O(|w| 4 ).<br />
Thus, by setting<br />
h 30 = g 30<br />
2λ , h 12 = g 12<br />
2¯λ , h 03 = g 03<br />
3¯λ − λ ,<br />
we can annihilate all cubic terms in the resulting equation except the w 2 ¯w -term,<br />
which we have to treat separately. The substitutions are valid since all the involved<br />
denominators are nonzero for all sufficiently small |α|.