25.01.2015 Views

Adaptive silvicultural systems to maintain biodiversity and ...

Adaptive silvicultural systems to maintain biodiversity and ...

Adaptive silvicultural systems to maintain biodiversity and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ADAPTIVE SILVICULTURAL<br />

SYSTEMS TO MAINTAIN<br />

BIODIVERSITY AND<br />

PRODUCTION<br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>r Lieffers<br />

Dept. of Renewable Resources<br />

University of Alberta<br />

Canada


Boreal forest of Western Canada


Objectives:<br />

Examine light in boreal mixedwood forests<br />

– ‘light bottle neck’.<br />

Importance of forestry regulations<br />

Variable Retention <strong>and</strong> its interaction with<br />

<strong>silvicultural</strong> practices.


sunflecks<br />

Light gap


Calamagrostis in deep shade<br />

Calamagrostis in a clearcut


1.2<br />

Calamagrostiscanadensis<br />

1.0<br />

20<br />

Frequency<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

15<br />

10<br />

Cover(%)<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

5<br />

0.0<br />

0<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50<br />

Lightransmitance(%)


Light Bottleneck<br />

Light over the course of st<strong>and</strong> development


LIGHT TRANSMISSION (%)<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

Boreal Aspen St<strong>and</strong>s<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140<br />

STAND AGE (YEARS)<br />

9/15/2011 9


Crown Placement in short (juvenile) <strong>and</strong> tall (mature) st<strong>and</strong>s<br />

juvenile<br />

mature


Max Crown Overlap = 0.697 – (0.02 * D30)<br />

n=60<br />

Crown overlap declines as trees become larger


8 m tall pine st<strong>and</strong>, 22 years old


20 m tall pine st<strong>and</strong>, 80+ years old<br />

crown shyness is the empty space between crowns


Crown shyness & Tree biomechanics<br />

Friction


100<br />

92 Lodgepole pine st<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

90<br />

St<strong>and</strong> Canopy Closure (%)<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

r 2 = 0.482<br />

30<br />

20<br />

4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22<br />

St<strong>and</strong> Height (m)


40 % crown closure<br />

(slender <strong>and</strong> 15 m)<br />

.


Some managed st<strong>and</strong>s deepen<br />

the ‘light bottleneck’<br />

Full s<strong>to</strong>cking of shade <strong>to</strong>lerant species


Sitka spruce plantation


Norway Spruce<br />

Loss of unders<strong>to</strong>ry vegetation<br />

9/15/2011 22


Some practices weaken the bottleneck<br />

Pine st<strong>and</strong>s in Sweden


Rich unders<strong>to</strong>ry of ericaceous shrubs <strong>and</strong> mosses


Silvicultural Regulations<br />

Large impact on forest structure<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>biodiversity</strong><br />

Often developed independently of<br />

other management goals


Free-To-Grow St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

(Competition index placed in<strong>to</strong> regulation)<br />

< Height of the<br />

conifer<br />

9/15/2011 1.78 m<br />

29


This spruce tree fails the conifer FTG st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

9/15/2011 30


Herbicides t meet Free-<strong>to</strong>-grow<br />

9/15/2011 33


Success leads <strong>to</strong> monocultures<br />

9/15/2011 35


Tended spruce plantation – extreme light bottleneck coming soon


Silviculture Regulations<br />

Uniformity of forests<br />

Lowers st<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>biodiversity</strong><br />

High costs


Variable Retention<br />

Biodiversity<br />

Coarse wood material<br />

Life boating species (green trees)


L<strong>and</strong>scape cuts – up <strong>to</strong> 500 Ha


Partial removal of aspen <strong>to</strong> protect unders<strong>to</strong>ry spruce


Unders<strong>to</strong>ry protection


Started 1998<br />

~7000 Ha<br />

Diff. levels of retention:<br />

(1, 10, 20, 50 <strong>and</strong> 75%)<br />

Diff st<strong>and</strong> types:<br />

Conifer, mixed decid.<br />

3 replicates of each.


One cutting cell


Coarse woody debris


Coarse woody material<br />

Needed for beetles,<br />

mosses,<br />

snails, slugs


Tree Survival<br />

How long do the green trees live


50<br />

Aspen 5 years<br />

67/20/15<br />

53/13/12 A<br />

A<br />

Aspen 10 years<br />

40<br />

30<br />

53/14/2<br />

A 67/16/2<br />

A<br />

79/13/8<br />

B<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ing Dead<br />

Fallen Dead<br />

Death:<br />

Cumulative Mortality (%)<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

50<br />

40<br />

79/8/3<br />

B<br />

110/6/1<br />

B<br />

Spruce 5 years<br />

262/24/2<br />

B<br />

Spruce 10 years<br />

110/11/10 262/35/17<br />

B B<br />

Big trees<br />

Small live<br />

crowns<br />

30<br />

20<br />

85/7/11<br />

A<br />

58/4/5<br />

AB<br />

85/10/15<br />

58/5/11 A<br />

A<br />

121/5/15<br />

B<br />

10<br />

0<br />

155/3/7<br />

121/5/3<br />

270/9/2<br />

BC 155/3/1<br />

C<br />

270/4/1<br />

C<br />

CD<br />

D<br />

10 20 50 75 100 10 20 50 75 100<br />

Retention Intensity (%)


Spruce tends <strong>to</strong> blow down


Expect continued elevated mortality.


Aspen regeneration


Aspen regeneration at 8 years


Spruce Regeneration


Compartment 932<br />

Block H<br />

Seed Trees<br />

Red lines are transects<br />

Evaluated


% S<strong>to</strong>cking<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

D XX CC UC<br />

C C<br />

C C<br />

CD<br />

XX<br />

CX<br />

U C<br />

UCU<br />

X<br />

CUUU<br />

UX<br />

X C<br />

DX<br />

CU<br />

U<br />

UC<br />

U UX<br />

U<br />

DXX<br />

D X<br />

DU<br />

XX<br />

C<br />

X<br />

Clear Cut<br />

D<br />

C<br />

X<br />

U<br />

Chapman - Richards Curve<br />

Deciduous<br />

Conifer<br />

Mixedwood<br />

Deciduous Dominated - Conifer unders<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

S<strong>to</strong>cking on<br />

each transect<br />

0<br />

D D X<br />

100<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C C C<br />

10%<br />

D X<br />

C<br />

C<br />

20%<br />

80<br />

X<br />

UU<br />

UC<br />

X<br />

X XUX<br />

X<br />

C<br />

U<br />

C<br />

U U<br />

X C C X<br />

U X XXX<br />

CX<br />

C<br />

C<br />

% S<strong>to</strong>cking<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

D X UC<br />

X<br />

U C UX<br />

C<br />

D DU<br />

X C<br />

X C UD<br />

U<br />

D<br />

U<br />

UC<br />

X<br />

U<br />

X<br />

DD CU<br />

UU U C<br />

D U CUX<br />

X X<br />

DD C<br />

U<br />

X U<br />

D<br />

U UX<br />

U<br />

D<br />

CC<br />

U D<br />

C XX<br />

C<br />

X<br />

X<br />

C<br />

0<br />

DD<br />

DX XCC<br />

U<br />

D<br />

CC U<br />

100<br />

D<br />

C<br />

50%<br />

75%<br />

80<br />

D<br />

U<br />

U<br />

D<br />

U<br />

UC<br />

C<br />

CX<br />

X<br />

C<br />

U<br />

U<br />

X<br />

X<br />

% S<strong>to</strong>cking<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

X<br />

D D<br />

D<br />

X<br />

D XU<br />

DDD<br />

DU<br />

C<br />

UU<br />

U<br />

D U C<br />

X<br />

U X<br />

U<br />

C X<br />

XC<br />

C<br />

C<br />

X<br />

C<br />

CX<br />

C<br />

X<br />

X<br />

C<br />

DC<br />

C<br />

D<br />

DU<br />

DX<br />

D DU<br />

C<br />

D<br />

UD<br />

U X X<br />

DU<br />

DUUU<br />

D C<br />

DU<br />

C X D<br />

X<br />

C X<br />

X X<br />

X<br />

C<br />

X C<br />

XXC<br />

C C<br />

C C C<br />

0<br />

DD DX<br />

X<br />

UC<br />

DU UD<br />

C<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250 300<br />

Seed Trees ha -1<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250 300<br />

Seed Trees ha -1


Best reg.<br />

Trails<br />

Clearcuts.


Linking Silviculture <strong>to</strong><br />

Biodiversity<br />

Longterm effects of manipulating<br />

s<strong>to</strong>cking<br />

Silvicultural regulations are critical<br />

Variable Retention


Thank you<br />

Canfor, DMI, NCEsfm, NSERC<br />

(EMEND core crew, CFS, Summer Students)<br />

John Spence, Jan Volney Kevin Solaik, Simon<br />

L<strong>and</strong>hausser, Ken Stadt, Heather Fish.<br />

J<br />

Can. J. For. Res. 40: 1821–1832<br />

For. Ecol. Manage. 259: 383-389<br />

For. Ecol. Manage. 255: 3744-3749<br />

J. Appl. Ecol. Submitted


Thank you

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!