Adaptive silvicultural systems to maintain biodiversity and ...
Adaptive silvicultural systems to maintain biodiversity and ...
Adaptive silvicultural systems to maintain biodiversity and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ADAPTIVE SILVICULTURAL<br />
SYSTEMS TO MAINTAIN<br />
BIODIVERSITY AND<br />
PRODUCTION<br />
Vic<strong>to</strong>r Lieffers<br />
Dept. of Renewable Resources<br />
University of Alberta<br />
Canada
Boreal forest of Western Canada
Objectives:<br />
Examine light in boreal mixedwood forests<br />
– ‘light bottle neck’.<br />
Importance of forestry regulations<br />
Variable Retention <strong>and</strong> its interaction with<br />
<strong>silvicultural</strong> practices.
sunflecks<br />
Light gap
Calamagrostis in deep shade<br />
Calamagrostis in a clearcut
1.2<br />
Calamagrostiscanadensis<br />
1.0<br />
20<br />
Frequency<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
15<br />
10<br />
Cover(%)<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
5<br />
0.0<br />
0<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50<br />
Lightransmitance(%)
Light Bottleneck<br />
Light over the course of st<strong>and</strong> development
LIGHT TRANSMISSION (%)<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
Boreal Aspen St<strong>and</strong>s<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140<br />
STAND AGE (YEARS)<br />
9/15/2011 9
Crown Placement in short (juvenile) <strong>and</strong> tall (mature) st<strong>and</strong>s<br />
juvenile<br />
mature
Max Crown Overlap = 0.697 – (0.02 * D30)<br />
n=60<br />
Crown overlap declines as trees become larger
8 m tall pine st<strong>and</strong>, 22 years old
20 m tall pine st<strong>and</strong>, 80+ years old<br />
crown shyness is the empty space between crowns
Crown shyness & Tree biomechanics<br />
Friction
100<br />
92 Lodgepole pine st<strong>and</strong>s.<br />
90<br />
St<strong>and</strong> Canopy Closure (%)<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
r 2 = 0.482<br />
30<br />
20<br />
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22<br />
St<strong>and</strong> Height (m)
40 % crown closure<br />
(slender <strong>and</strong> 15 m)<br />
.
Some managed st<strong>and</strong>s deepen<br />
the ‘light bottleneck’<br />
Full s<strong>to</strong>cking of shade <strong>to</strong>lerant species
Sitka spruce plantation
Norway Spruce<br />
Loss of unders<strong>to</strong>ry vegetation<br />
9/15/2011 22
Some practices weaken the bottleneck<br />
Pine st<strong>and</strong>s in Sweden
Rich unders<strong>to</strong>ry of ericaceous shrubs <strong>and</strong> mosses
Silvicultural Regulations<br />
Large impact on forest structure<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>biodiversity</strong><br />
Often developed independently of<br />
other management goals
Free-To-Grow St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
(Competition index placed in<strong>to</strong> regulation)<br />
< Height of the<br />
conifer<br />
9/15/2011 1.78 m<br />
29
This spruce tree fails the conifer FTG st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
9/15/2011 30
Herbicides t meet Free-<strong>to</strong>-grow<br />
9/15/2011 33
Success leads <strong>to</strong> monocultures<br />
9/15/2011 35
Tended spruce plantation – extreme light bottleneck coming soon
Silviculture Regulations<br />
Uniformity of forests<br />
Lowers st<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>biodiversity</strong><br />
High costs
Variable Retention<br />
Biodiversity<br />
Coarse wood material<br />
Life boating species (green trees)
L<strong>and</strong>scape cuts – up <strong>to</strong> 500 Ha
Partial removal of aspen <strong>to</strong> protect unders<strong>to</strong>ry spruce
Unders<strong>to</strong>ry protection
Started 1998<br />
~7000 Ha<br />
Diff. levels of retention:<br />
(1, 10, 20, 50 <strong>and</strong> 75%)<br />
Diff st<strong>and</strong> types:<br />
Conifer, mixed decid.<br />
3 replicates of each.
One cutting cell
Coarse woody debris
Coarse woody material<br />
Needed for beetles,<br />
mosses,<br />
snails, slugs
Tree Survival<br />
How long do the green trees live
50<br />
Aspen 5 years<br />
67/20/15<br />
53/13/12 A<br />
A<br />
Aspen 10 years<br />
40<br />
30<br />
53/14/2<br />
A 67/16/2<br />
A<br />
79/13/8<br />
B<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ing Dead<br />
Fallen Dead<br />
Death:<br />
Cumulative Mortality (%)<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
50<br />
40<br />
79/8/3<br />
B<br />
110/6/1<br />
B<br />
Spruce 5 years<br />
262/24/2<br />
B<br />
Spruce 10 years<br />
110/11/10 262/35/17<br />
B B<br />
Big trees<br />
Small live<br />
crowns<br />
30<br />
20<br />
85/7/11<br />
A<br />
58/4/5<br />
AB<br />
85/10/15<br />
58/5/11 A<br />
A<br />
121/5/15<br />
B<br />
10<br />
0<br />
155/3/7<br />
121/5/3<br />
270/9/2<br />
BC 155/3/1<br />
C<br />
270/4/1<br />
C<br />
CD<br />
D<br />
10 20 50 75 100 10 20 50 75 100<br />
Retention Intensity (%)
Spruce tends <strong>to</strong> blow down
Expect continued elevated mortality.
Aspen regeneration
Aspen regeneration at 8 years
Spruce Regeneration
Compartment 932<br />
Block H<br />
Seed Trees<br />
Red lines are transects<br />
Evaluated
% S<strong>to</strong>cking<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
D XX CC UC<br />
C C<br />
C C<br />
CD<br />
XX<br />
CX<br />
U C<br />
UCU<br />
X<br />
CUUU<br />
UX<br />
X C<br />
DX<br />
CU<br />
U<br />
UC<br />
U UX<br />
U<br />
DXX<br />
D X<br />
DU<br />
XX<br />
C<br />
X<br />
Clear Cut<br />
D<br />
C<br />
X<br />
U<br />
Chapman - Richards Curve<br />
Deciduous<br />
Conifer<br />
Mixedwood<br />
Deciduous Dominated - Conifer unders<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
S<strong>to</strong>cking on<br />
each transect<br />
0<br />
D D X<br />
100<br />
C<br />
C<br />
C C C<br />
10%<br />
D X<br />
C<br />
C<br />
20%<br />
80<br />
X<br />
UU<br />
UC<br />
X<br />
X XUX<br />
X<br />
C<br />
U<br />
C<br />
U U<br />
X C C X<br />
U X XXX<br />
CX<br />
C<br />
C<br />
% S<strong>to</strong>cking<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
D X UC<br />
X<br />
U C UX<br />
C<br />
D DU<br />
X C<br />
X C UD<br />
U<br />
D<br />
U<br />
UC<br />
X<br />
U<br />
X<br />
DD CU<br />
UU U C<br />
D U CUX<br />
X X<br />
DD C<br />
U<br />
X U<br />
D<br />
U UX<br />
U<br />
D<br />
CC<br />
U D<br />
C XX<br />
C<br />
X<br />
X<br />
C<br />
0<br />
DD<br />
DX XCC<br />
U<br />
D<br />
CC U<br />
100<br />
D<br />
C<br />
50%<br />
75%<br />
80<br />
D<br />
U<br />
U<br />
D<br />
U<br />
UC<br />
C<br />
CX<br />
X<br />
C<br />
U<br />
U<br />
X<br />
X<br />
% S<strong>to</strong>cking<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
X<br />
D D<br />
D<br />
X<br />
D XU<br />
DDD<br />
DU<br />
C<br />
UU<br />
U<br />
D U C<br />
X<br />
U X<br />
U<br />
C X<br />
XC<br />
C<br />
C<br />
X<br />
C<br />
CX<br />
C<br />
X<br />
X<br />
C<br />
DC<br />
C<br />
D<br />
DU<br />
DX<br />
D DU<br />
C<br />
D<br />
UD<br />
U X X<br />
DU<br />
DUUU<br />
D C<br />
DU<br />
C X D<br />
X<br />
C X<br />
X X<br />
X<br />
C<br />
X C<br />
XXC<br />
C C<br />
C C C<br />
0<br />
DD DX<br />
X<br />
UC<br />
DU UD<br />
C<br />
X<br />
X<br />
X<br />
0 50 100 150 200 250 300<br />
Seed Trees ha -1<br />
0 50 100 150 200 250 300<br />
Seed Trees ha -1
Best reg.<br />
Trails<br />
Clearcuts.
Linking Silviculture <strong>to</strong><br />
Biodiversity<br />
Longterm effects of manipulating<br />
s<strong>to</strong>cking<br />
Silvicultural regulations are critical<br />
Variable Retention
Thank you<br />
Canfor, DMI, NCEsfm, NSERC<br />
(EMEND core crew, CFS, Summer Students)<br />
John Spence, Jan Volney Kevin Solaik, Simon<br />
L<strong>and</strong>hausser, Ken Stadt, Heather Fish.<br />
J<br />
Can. J. For. Res. 40: 1821–1832<br />
For. Ecol. Manage. 259: 383-389<br />
For. Ecol. Manage. 255: 3744-3749<br />
J. Appl. Ecol. Submitted
Thank you