28.01.2015 Views

Conflict Resolution Course Guidance Manual - Wirral University ...

Conflict Resolution Course Guidance Manual - Wirral University ...

Conflict Resolution Course Guidance Manual - Wirral University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Clinical Education & Development Team<br />

Aggression Management Training<br />

National NHS Syllabus<br />

<strong>Conflict</strong> <strong>Resolution</strong> <strong>Course</strong> <strong>Guidance</strong><br />

<strong>Manual</strong>


FORWARD<br />

In April 2004 the National Health Service (NHS) launched the biggest training initiative in its history,<br />

with the aim of providing a minimum standard of training for all frontline staff (those who have contact<br />

with patients and the general public) in the recognition, prevention and management of violence,<br />

aggression and challenging behaviour.<br />

Awareness training in conflict resolution will be delivered across the NHS to approximately seven<br />

hundred thousand staff.<br />

This conflict resolution training (CRT) course has been developed in order to assist NHS staff when<br />

dealing with incidents that may have a potential for violence and aggression.<br />

It is important that NHS staff have provisions in place for a safe and secure working environment, in<br />

order to maintain excellence in standards for both personal and patient care.<br />

CRT provides staff with recognition signs and prevention measures that relate to the escalation and<br />

potential for violence and aggression.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>Wirral</strong> <strong>University</strong> Teaching Hospital (WUTH) NHS Foundation Trust’s Division of HR/OD have<br />

provided this Workbook which is now your property to keep, as such it has been designed to both<br />

compliment and assist in today’s National Syllabus <strong>Course</strong> on <strong>Conflict</strong> <strong>Resolution</strong>.<br />

Today’s course is to provide you with an understanding of the nature of workplace conflict, and the<br />

environmental and human factors that contribute to or influence it. Furthermore, the course will<br />

provide an understanding of the impacts and effects of workplace conflict on individual attitudes,<br />

behaviours and group performance both in and outside the workplace environment.<br />

You will learn how are communication patterns and responses to conflict influence our ability to<br />

resolve conflict and assist others. Through the use of communication models and the application of<br />

contemporary approaches to addressing workplace conflict you will experience how others may<br />

influence how we understand and act, and therefore ultimately how we deal with conflict.<br />

Areas are provided throughout the Workbook for you to make your own notes, should you wish to do<br />

so.<br />

The workbook contains valuable information, which you should use throughout your National Health<br />

Service career in order to assist you within your chosen workplace, in dealing with patients, visitors<br />

and also colleagues.<br />

<strong>Wirral</strong> <strong>University</strong> Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust<br />

Aggression Management Training<br />

Clinical Education and Development Team<br />

Clinical Excellence<br />

HR/OD<br />

2


COURSE OBJECTIVES<br />

1. DEFINE THE COMMON CAUSES OF CONFLICT<br />

2. DESCRIBE THE TWO FORMS OF COMMUNICATION<br />

3. PROVIDE EXAMPLES OF HOW COMMUNICATION CAN BREAKDOWN<br />

4. EXPLAIN HOW COMMUNICATION MODELS CAN ASSIST IN CONFLICT RESOLUTION<br />

5. DESCRIBE PATTERNS OF BEHAVIOUR THAT MAY BE ENCOUNTERED DURING INTERARACTION<br />

6. GIVE EXAMPLES OF IMPACT FACTORS<br />

7. PROVIDE EXAMPLES OF WARNING AND DANGER SIGNS<br />

8. DESCRIBE THE USE OF A REACTIONARY GAP WHEN DEALING WITH CONFLICT<br />

9. DESCRIBE REASONABLE AND PROPORTIANATE FORCE APPLICABLE TO CONFLICT RESOLUTION<br />

10. DESCRIBE DIFFERENT METHODS FOR DEALING WITH POSSIBLE SITUATIONS OF CONFLICT<br />

CONTENTS<br />

1. LEGAL DEFINITIONS OF CONFLICT<br />

• DEFINITIONS OF VIOLENCE, AGGRESSION, CHALLENGING BEHAVIOUR<br />

AND ZERO TOLERANCE<br />

• COMMON LAW<br />

• THE CRIMINAL LAW ACT 1974<br />

• THE NHS ZERO TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN<br />

• THE NHS COUNTER FRAUD SECURITY MANAGEMENT SERVICE<br />

• THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998<br />

2. COMMUNICATION<br />

• COMPONENTS OF COMMUNICATION<br />

• HOW WE COMMUNICATE<br />

• IDENTIFYING NON VERBAL COMMUNICATION<br />

(PICTURES AND CAPTIONS TO ASSIST COURSE CANDIDATES)<br />

3. COMMUNICATION MODELS<br />

• BETARIS BOX<br />

• FIVE STEP APPEAL<br />

• LEAPS<br />

• CUDSA<br />

4. REASONS FOR COMMUNICATION FAILURE<br />

• TRANSMITTER TO RECEIVER INTERFERENCE<br />

(MODEL FOR CANDIDATES TO PROVIDE REASONS TO WHY COMMUNICATION MAY FAIL)<br />

• CULTURAL DIVERSITY<br />

• PROXEMICS (DISTANCES)<br />

• CONFLICT<br />

• PERCEPTIONS (WHO’S TO BLAME)<br />

3


5. THE CONFLICT RESOLUTION MODEL<br />

• PATTERNS OF BEHAVIOUR<br />

• IMPACT FACTORS<br />

• WARNING SIGNS<br />

• DANGER SIGNS<br />

• THE REACYIONARY GAP<br />

• REASONABLE RESPONSE OPTIONS<br />

6. SCENARIOS<br />

7. CONCLUSION<br />

8. REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING<br />

9. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

VIOLENCE - Defined as an physical act<br />

Notes<br />

LEGAL DEFINITIONS OF CONFLICT<br />

AGGRESSION - Defined as an expressed emotion<br />

Notes<br />

CHALLENGING BEHAVIOUR - Any situation that denies access to or use of normal<br />

everyday available facilities<br />

Notes<br />

ZERO TOLERANCE – non-acceptance of any form of verbal abuse, racial abuse,<br />

threatening behaviour or use of violence and or aggression.<br />

Notes<br />

4


COMMON LAW – CRIMINAL LAW<br />

COMMON LAW:<br />

Common Law is each and every individual person’s right to protect him or her from being<br />

attacked and also to act in the defence of others.<br />

In order to be seen as lawful, any force that is used in defence of an attack must be reasonable to the<br />

circumstances and proportionate to the actual or perceived threat.<br />

Circumstances may justify a person striking first in defence of an attack.<br />

Common Law also recognises people’s acceptance and use of force against each other as say a<br />

sporting contest rather than a crime.<br />

Common Law is therefore interpreted according to the following guidelines:<br />

• If force is used it must be reasonable in the circumstances.<br />

• Any force that is used must also be proportionate to the threat.<br />

• Force may be justified in the prevention of serious evil.<br />

• Force can be used in defence of self or others.<br />

Notes<br />

SECTION THREE – CRIMINAL LAW ACT 1967:<br />

“A person may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime, or in<br />

the effecting or assisting in the lawful arrest of offenders or suspected offenders or person’s<br />

unlawfully at large”<br />

Legislation on the reasonable use of force is the key facts that will be decided in each individual case<br />

were force has been used for lawful reason.<br />

Notes:<br />

5


THE NHS ZERO TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN<br />

In October of 1999 the Minister of State for Health launched the NHS Zero Tolerance<br />

Campaign in order to provide NHS staff with the knowledge and training in dealing with<br />

violence and aggression, and also to provide a multi – agency approach to dealing with<br />

offenders.<br />

Notes:<br />

THE NHS COUNTER FRAUD SECURITY MANAGEMENT SERVICE<br />

In January 2003 the House of Commons ordered a report on Protecting NHS Hospital Staff.<br />

The National Audit Office were commissioned to carry out the report, The N.A.O. produced the report<br />

on the 24 th March 2003.<br />

It states:<br />

“From April 2003, the new Counter Fraud and Security Management Service, which was established<br />

as a Special Health Authority in January 2003, will take over responsibility for all policy and<br />

operational matters relating to the management of security in the NHS including leading the work on<br />

reducing violence and aggression against NHS staff”<br />

The C.F.S.M.S. policy guidelines state that all NHS Trusts should:<br />

“Take a more strategic approach to induction and other Aggression Management training, based on<br />

an annual training need analysis for all clinical and support staff”<br />

Notes:<br />

6


THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998<br />

Human Rights describe workplace violence as:<br />

“Any incident where staff are abused, threatened or assaulted in circumstances related to their<br />

work”<br />

“This can involve an explicit (direct) or implicit (unspoken) challenge to a person’s safety, well-being<br />

or health”<br />

Notes:<br />

COMPONENTS OF COMMUNICATION<br />

7%<br />

NVC's<br />

Vocals<br />

Spoken Word<br />

8%<br />

55%<br />

NOTES:<br />

7


COMMUNICATION<br />

COMMUNICATION<br />

NON – VERBAL<br />

(BODY LANGUAGE)<br />

VERBAL<br />

(SPOKEN)<br />

NON - VERBAL COMMUNICATION (NVC)<br />

Signals that each person sends through use of body language that is interpreted above spoken<br />

words by one another<br />

Notes:<br />

IDENTIFYING NON – VERBAL COMMUNICATION<br />

I’m not angry<br />

or aggressive<br />

Comments:<br />

I’m listening<br />

and I agree<br />

Comments:<br />

8


I’m interested,<br />

I want to help<br />

Comments:<br />

I’m fine I’m<br />

not worried<br />

Comments:<br />

BETARIS BOX<br />

MY My ATTITUDE Attitude My<br />

YOUR BEHAVIOUR<br />

MY BEHAVIOUR<br />

YOUR ATTITUDE<br />

Your attitude or emotions if perceived by another to be hostile will be displayed in your behaviour.<br />

This will affect the attitude or emotions of the person you are communicating with, the affect will be<br />

noticeable through their behaviour.<br />

This will then further affect your attitude and behaviour and so on.<br />

You must recognise this cycle and take responsibility for breaking it in order to move forward with<br />

communication.<br />

Notes:<br />

9


FIVE STEP APPEAL<br />

A mediation system that can be used when a person’s resistance persists or increases during<br />

communication<br />

STEP ONE - SIMPLE APPEAL<br />

Notes:<br />

STEP TWO - REASONED APPEAL<br />

Notes:<br />

STEP THREE – PERSONAL APPEAL<br />

Notes:<br />

STEP FOUR - PRACTICAL APPEAL<br />

Notes:<br />

STEP FIVE – FINAL APPEAL<br />

Notes:<br />

10


LEAPS<br />

When applied in an appropriate manner the LEAPS communication model will provide a useful and<br />

professional aid to resolving differing situations of conflict within the working environment.<br />

Notes:<br />

L<br />

Notes:<br />

E<br />

Notes:<br />

A<br />

Notes:<br />

P<br />

Notes:<br />

S<br />

11


CUDSA<br />

CUDSA is a communication model that has been specifically designed for dealing with conflict<br />

Notes<br />

C<br />

Notes<br />

U<br />

Notes<br />

D<br />

Notes<br />

S<br />

Notes<br />

A<br />

12


REASONS FOR COMMUNICATION FAILURE<br />

BODY POSTURE-Aggressive Stance, Facial Expression<br />

VOICE- Tone, Volume<br />

COMMUNICATION- Lack of Information (waiting times), Technical Terminology, Language<br />

Differences, Stereotyping<br />

ENVIRONMENT- Boredom – TV, Magazines, Literature, Under High Levels of Stress, Background<br />

Noise, Exposed to Strange Environments, Affected by Alcohol/Drugs, Experiencing Pain. An<br />

Enjoyment for Confrontation, Subject to Rapid Mood Swings, A History of Mental Disorder.<br />

The itemised list is not exhaustive and each individual situation may present differing problems when<br />

attempting to effect communication.<br />

Understanding what situations may lead to communication failure will assist in the prevention of the<br />

recognised causes of potential conflict.<br />

Notes:<br />

TRANSMITTER TO RECEIVER INTERFERENCE<br />

During verbal or non- – verbal communication interference can take place between the person who<br />

receives the message, and the person who is sending or transmitting the message.<br />

MESSAGE<br />

TRANSMITTER<br />

RECEIVER<br />

MESSAGE<br />

Use the box below to list the various forms of interference that may prevent a transmitter message<br />

from being correctly received:<br />

Notes:<br />

13


CULTURAL DIVERSITY<br />

The diversity within cultures is noticeable through the use of body language perceptions. Some<br />

cultures will avoid direct eye contact as an individual sign of respect, while other cultures may<br />

perceive this action as conflicting with anything verbal and therefore see the person as untruthful.<br />

In some cultures the invasion of an individual’s personal space by a stranger would be viewed as a<br />

totally inappropriate action, while other cultures would find it totally acceptable.<br />

In greeting a person some cultures will place a kiss on the cheek followed by an embrace of the<br />

person, while in other cultures a nod of the head or handshake would be viewed as appropriate.<br />

Body language can therefore be perceived as different from that which is actually spoken or intended<br />

to be said.<br />

Use the box to provide examples:<br />

Notes:<br />

PROXEMICS - DISTANCES<br />

Distances are used to allow us time to think and react, in certain conditions it would be natural for us<br />

to allow some people closer, while we will keep others at a distance.<br />

Performing your role within the working environment can be the exception to the above rule as<br />

conditions dictate that we maintain close proximity in order to provide quality care or carry out a<br />

necessary procedure.<br />

INTIMATE ZONE<br />

CLOSE FAMILY - PARTNER<br />

LESS THAN 18 INCHES<br />

PERSONAL ZONE<br />

FRIENDS AND COLLEAGUES<br />

18 INCHES TO 4 FOOT<br />

SOCIAL ZONE<br />

ALL OTHER PEOPLE<br />

4 FOOT TO 12 FOOT<br />

14


Notes:<br />

CONFLICT<br />

It must be stressed that there is no singular 'right response' for any given situation. The decisions of<br />

each and every person at an incident are governed by their individual perception at that time, as each<br />

person may perceive the person's behaviour in a different way.<br />

Because of the differing factors in relation to the behaviour of the person, each involved individual<br />

may perceive the risk or threat to be either higher or lower than that of colleagues. The differing<br />

physical abilities of each person involved in an incident will also have an impact on individual actions.<br />

Therefore, the same set of circumstances may be met in many different individually perceived ways.<br />

The aspects of communication that we have so far covered provide recognition of the different<br />

elements of conflict and the knowledge required in order to avoid escalation of conflict, however,<br />

when communication appears to be failing a person should consider other appropriate response<br />

options within personal limitations and requirements.<br />

Provide a list of other appropriate response options:<br />

Notes:<br />

PERCEPTIONS - WHO'S TO BLAME<br />

Anne had been involved for three months with the voluntary drug support team, although Anne was<br />

new to the work and unqualified she enjoyed it and wanted to be well regarded by the rest of the<br />

team. The team was allocated to cover a large run down housing estate where unemployment,<br />

violence, and drug abuse were common problems.<br />

Tom, an experienced voluntary worker had himself been brought up in a similar disadvantaged<br />

housing estate. Tom prided himself on his ability to 'tough out' even the most difficult, confrontational<br />

situations, having been a team leader since the project had started he always encouraged his team<br />

to adopt the same attitude as himself when dealing with confrontation.<br />

Phil was a known long-term drug user. His behaviour had, over the years led to his removal from a<br />

number of GP' lists, given his use of violence and intimidation to get his own way. Following another<br />

recent incident over a drugs prescription, Phil was again in danger of being struck off from a surgery<br />

practice by the GP.<br />

15


Worried about his imminent lack of support, Jane, the Community Psychiatric Nurse, who covered<br />

the practice, wrote a brief note referring him to the Drug Support Team.<br />

Upon receiving the note, Tom asked Anne to take the referral.<br />

Prior to making a home visit, Anne casually mentioned the referral to her colleague Steve, Who<br />

incidentally knew the family well, laughing; Steve suggested that she might find the visit a 'lively one!'<br />

Having no information, which suggested particular difficulties and not wanting to appear anxious or<br />

over concerned, Anne said nothing.<br />

During the interview Phil became evasive about many aspects of his social history.<br />

Concerned to undertake a competent first assessment, Anne persisted in her questioning although<br />

Phil was clearly becoming agitated.<br />

As Anne continued to question Phil, he became increasingly verbally abusive until, losing control<br />

completely he picked up a large glass ashtray, and with considerable force struck Anne across the<br />

face with it.<br />

WHO IS TO BLAME <br />

THE CONFLICT RESOLUTION MODEL<br />

PERSON’S<br />

BEHAVIOUR<br />

IMPACT<br />

FACTORS<br />

REASONABLE<br />

RESPONSE<br />

OPTIONS<br />

RESPONSE<br />

OPTIONS<br />

16


PATTERNS OF BEHAVIOUR<br />

This is a list showing a scale of possible behaviours that may be encountered during conflict.<br />

A. Compliant behaviour<br />

‣ The person is confrontational but complies with requests.<br />

B. Verbal with gestures<br />

‣ The person refuses to comply verbally or by their body language.<br />

C. Passive behaviour<br />

‣ The person sits or stands and will not move.<br />

D. Active behaviour<br />

‣ The person pulls or pushes but makes no attempt to strike out.<br />

E. Aggressive behaviour<br />

‣ The person physically attacks the member of staff.<br />

F. Serious or Aggravated behaviour<br />

‣ The person commits an assault, which presents the possibility of serious injury or death.<br />

‣ This resistance may include the use of weapons.<br />

‣ The person offending may exhibit these behaviours in a progressive pattern.<br />

‣ It is not unusual for a person to jump several stages in the scale if the occasion demands it.<br />

‣<br />

Notes:<br />

IMPACT FACTORS<br />

The following is a list of possible Impact Factors:<br />

• Relative sex, age, size of member of staff and person<br />

• Relative strength of member of staff and person<br />

• Relative skill level of member of staff and person<br />

• Exhaustion or Injury<br />

• Number of people involved<br />

17


• Special knowledge<br />

• Alcohol or Drugs<br />

• Mental state<br />

• Weapons<br />

• Perceived imminent danger<br />

• Being in a position of perceived disadvantage<br />

• Perception on obtaining help or assistance<br />

Notes:<br />

WARNING SIGNS<br />

As a general rule people who are going to attack another person engage in actions known as<br />

'Ritualised Combat'.<br />

This may be because they fear being injured themselves.<br />

Identifying these non-verbal signals may give staff a significant advantage.<br />

They are:<br />

♦ Direct prolonged eye contact<br />

♦ Changed facial colour<br />

♦ Head held back<br />

♦ Maximises height by standing tall<br />

♦ Kicking the ground<br />

♦ Exaggerated movements near you especially with the hands<br />

♦ Accelerated breathing rate<br />

♦ Abrupt stopping and starting of nervous behaviour such as tapping of fingers<br />

THIS IS NOT AN EXHAUSTIVE LIST.<br />

In addition to the above behaviour the person may indicate that they perceive a particular member of<br />

staff as being the problem, they will then direct any aggression toward that person.<br />

This is known as 'Personal Identification' or personalisation of anger.<br />

When this personal identification takes place it is usually a strong indication that the person may be<br />

approaching the point of violence.<br />

At this point staff should manage and maintain the 'Reactionary Gap'.<br />

The 'reactionary gap' is the distance from the extremity of the member of staff's reach to the extremity<br />

of the person's reach<br />

18


DANGER SIGNS<br />

As the word danger implies the signs listed here have a much higher impact potential than the<br />

warning signs.<br />

WHEN THESE SIGNS OCCUR, ATTACK MAY BE IMMINENT, THEREFORE POSITIVE ACTION<br />

IS CRUCIAL IN ORDER TO AVOID OR REDUCE THE RISK OF INJURY.<br />

Neglecting or ignoring these signs MAY place a person at a serious disadvantage.<br />

They are:<br />

Fists clenching/unclenching<br />

Changed facial colour<br />

Lips tightening over teeth<br />

Head dropping forward to protect throat<br />

Eyebrows dropping to protect eyes<br />

Hands moving to above the waist<br />

Shoulders tensing<br />

Stance changing to side on or fighting stance<br />

Glancing at intended target areas<br />

Lowering of entire body before launching an attack<br />

THERE MAY BE OTHER SIGNS.<br />

On witnessing these signs staff may opt for the following positive option:<br />

‣ Disengaging in order to establish an effective reactionary gap.<br />

The option may have both positive and negative aspects and the choice must be made on your<br />

individual perceptions of the most appropriate response, taking into account all of the circumstances.<br />

Notes:<br />

REACTIONARY GAP<br />

The distance we should use when dealing with conflict.<br />

The distance between the extremity of your reach and the extremity of an aggressor’s reach<br />

Notes:<br />

19


REASONABLE RESPONSE OPTION<br />

Maintain self-control and:<br />

Signal non aggressions<br />

Request behaviour to stop<br />

Be assertive<br />

Use tactical communication<br />

Remind the aggressor what they have to lose<br />

Use diversionary techniques<br />

Hands On - as a last resort<br />

Notes:<br />

SCENARIOS<br />

The aspects of communication that we have so far covered provide recognition of the different<br />

elements of conflict and the knowledge required in order to avoid escalation of conflict, however,<br />

when communication appears to be failing a person should consider other appropriate response<br />

options within personal limitations and requirements.<br />

Provide a list of other appropriate response options:<br />

Notes:<br />

SECONDARY CARE NHS ACUTE TRUSTS<br />

A patient arrives by ambulance to Accident and Emergency and is placed in a cubicle for treatment to<br />

take place, when a group of friends arrive and demand to see him; they surround a member of staff<br />

and begin shouting.<br />

Notes:<br />

20


Upon arriving for duty, you see two male youths outside the entrance you must use to get to Accident<br />

and Emergency.<br />

As you get closer you notice that both males are bleeding from facial injuries, and that one male is<br />

verbally abusing people as they try to get past him into the department.<br />

Notes:<br />

A patient who has waited two hours to see a doctor has approached a colleague and wants to know<br />

how much longer he will have to wait.<br />

The patient claims that he is being victimised, and deliberately left to wait by your colleague due to an<br />

earlier encounter in which the conversation became heated, your colleague is offended by the<br />

patient’s attitude and reacts by aggressively arguing back.<br />

Notes:<br />

A concerned father has gone to park his car after dropping both his wife and ill daughter off at the<br />

entrance to Accident and Emergency.<br />

Mother and daughter are told to take a seat in the waiting area and do so; they are immediately<br />

harassed by a group of three teenage males.<br />

The father arrives, angry to see his wife and daughter upset he say’s that if know one will do anything<br />

about it then he will and threatens the teenagers with violence, they immediately respond by taunting<br />

him.<br />

Notes:<br />

AMBULANCE TRUSTS<br />

You arrive at a road traffic accident and having checked all those involved, you start to treat an<br />

elderly female who is sat in the driving seat of one of the vehicles involved.<br />

A younger female demands that you stop what you are doing and that you see to her friend in<br />

another vehicle, she then attacks the elderly driver shouting that it was her fault in the first place.<br />

Notes:<br />

21


A GP has called you to an elderly couple’s house to take a patient to hospital.<br />

The husband is crying and refuses to listen to the doctor’s explanation that his wife needs urgent<br />

medical care.<br />

The husband stands between you and the patient with a raised walking stick and demands that you<br />

leave.<br />

Note:<br />

You arrive outside a nightclub following an anonymous phone call, to find a man with severe head<br />

injuries, a group of drunken friends don’t see the serious of his condition and claim he just needs to<br />

sleep of the beer that he has drank.<br />

One friend seems prepared to listen, but the others refuse to allow you to take him to hospital and tell<br />

you to leave, your colleague goes to the ambulance and calls control.<br />

The group surrounds you and become offensive and verbally aggressive.<br />

Notes<br />

Having just escorted a patient into hospital, you are returning alone to your vehicle at the main<br />

entrance when you see a female searching inside the parked ambulance.<br />

As you approach she turns to face you and you see she is holding a knife, she demands to know<br />

where the drugs are kept and threatens self harm if you don’t tell her.<br />

Notes:<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

‣ We have looked at how to recognise the different ways in which people may communicate.<br />

‣ We have learnt how to recognise different warning and danger signals and what they mean.<br />

‣ We have learnt about different communication models and methods to know when to use<br />

them.<br />

‣ We have looked at the importance of how different impact factors can affect behaviour.<br />

22


‣ We have studied distances and how they should be applied when dealing with conflict.<br />

‣ We have discussed the law as it applies to reasonable and proportionate force.<br />

‣ We have learnt to recognise that no two incident will be the same and will therefore be viewed<br />

differently by each person involved.<br />

WUTH NHS Foundation Trust thank you for your participation in today’s course, and sincerely hope<br />

that you benefit from all the elements of what has been examined regarding conflict resolution.<br />

Should you have any comments regarding this course or wish to participate in further aggression<br />

management training, please contact:<br />

Joe McLaughlin LSMS<br />

Aggression Management Training<br />

Clinical Education and Development Team<br />

Clinical Excellence<br />

Division of HR/OD<br />

Clinical Skills Centre<br />

Arrowe Park Hospital<br />

Upton<br />

Ext. 2779. Bleep 4471<br />

REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING<br />

• Criminal Law Act 1967 - Section 3: (1)<br />

• Molan’s “Criminal/Common Law” - 10 Edition (1996/97)<br />

• Baillie, D. “Practice” – Human Rights Act 1998<br />

• CFSMS “A professional approach to managing security in the NHS”<br />

• NAO “A safer place to work”<br />

• Centrex Trainers Development Programme<br />

• Argyle, M. “Bodily Communication” - Methuen (1975)<br />

• Birdwhistell, R.L. “Human Communication”<br />

• Clayton, P. “Body Language at Work” – Hamlyn (2002)<br />

• Hall, E.T. “Silent Language and Proxemics” – Doubleday (1954)<br />

• Axtell, R. “Gestures: Do’s and Taboos of Body Language” – John Wiley<br />

•<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

On behalf of <strong>Wirral</strong> <strong>University</strong> Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust the course instructor both<br />

acknowledges and thanks Christopher McCarthy from Merseyside Police for all his respected advice<br />

and gratefully received assistance with the personal development of aggression management<br />

training.<br />

Joe McLaughlin<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!