28.01.2015 Views

CHAPTER III. ELECTROGRAVIMETRY AND COULOMETRY I ...

CHAPTER III. ELECTROGRAVIMETRY AND COULOMETRY I ...

CHAPTER III. ELECTROGRAVIMETRY AND COULOMETRY I ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Reference electrode - maintain a constant potential irrespective of changes in<br />

current.<br />

Counter (auxiliary) electrode - to complete the electrochemical cell but its potential<br />

is rarely of interest.<br />

ii/. Amperostatic Coulometry (Controlled-Current Coulometry)<br />

FIGURE 3-7. “Bard” Fig. 10.4.1 (p. 385).<br />

When applied current < limiting current, current efficiency = 100%<br />

When applied current > limiting current, current efficiency < 100%<br />

The selectivity is poorer than the controlled potential method.<br />

iii/. Coulometric Titrations<br />

Employs a titrant that is electrolytically generated by a constant current, i.e.,<br />

unstable reagents such as Ag 2+ , Cu + , Mn 3+ , and Ti 3+ can be generated and used in a<br />

single vessel.<br />

FIGURE 3-8. “Harris” Fig. 17-9 (p. 382).<br />

Some external means must be used to determine the end-point of the reaction, e.g.,<br />

visual indicators, potentiometry, amperometry, and photometry.<br />

e.g., 2Br − → Br 2 + 2e<br />

H 2 C=CH 2 + Br 2 → H 2 BrCCBrH 2<br />

iv/. Applications<br />

a) Neutralization, Precipitation, and Complex-Formation Titrations<br />

TABLE 3-9. “Skoog” Table 21-1 (p. 529).<br />

b) Oxidation/Reduction Titrations<br />

TABLE 3-10. “Skoog” Table 21-2 (p. 530).<br />

v/. Comparison of Coulometric and Volumetric Titrations<br />

Advantages:<br />

a) Absolute technique needing no standard solution - minimizes errors in<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!