Thank you to Larrie & Diane Grenz! - The ALS Association Greater ...
Thank you to Larrie & Diane Grenz! - The ALS Association Greater ...
Thank you to Larrie & Diane Grenz! - The ALS Association Greater ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Advocacy and Public Policy<br />
PAGE 9<br />
Advocacy and Public Policy—<br />
Senate Committee Approves $6 Million for the <strong>ALS</strong> Registry<br />
Great news! <strong>The</strong> Senate Appropriations Committee has voted <strong>to</strong> provide<br />
an additional $6 million for the <strong>ALS</strong> Registry in 2012!! <strong>The</strong><br />
funding will allow the Registry <strong>to</strong> continue <strong>to</strong> identify cases of <strong>ALS</strong><br />
across the country, collect additional information about the disease<br />
and expand exciting projects such as adding a bioreposi<strong>to</strong>ry and <strong>to</strong>ols<br />
<strong>to</strong> help people with <strong>ALS</strong> learn about and enroll in clinical trials.<br />
This is a tremendous vic<strong>to</strong>ry for every person with <strong>ALS</strong>. It is a clear<br />
sign that Congress recognizes the critical role the Registry can play in<br />
the fight <strong>to</strong> find the cause, treatment and cure for <strong>ALS</strong>. It also is clear<br />
that <strong>ALS</strong> is a priority for the Senate. <strong>The</strong> Committee reduced funding,<br />
or eliminated it entirely, for most other health care programs. In fact,<br />
funding for the entire Department of Health and Human Services was<br />
reduced. Yet, the Senate maintained strong support for the Registry<br />
by keeping funding at the current level.<br />
David Buchannan, P<strong>ALS</strong>, Dan Lungren,<br />
Amy Sugimo<strong>to</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> full Senate still must vote on the Department of Health and Human<br />
Services Appropriations bill that includes the Registry funding,<br />
and the House Appropriations Committee also must vote on their version<br />
of the bill. <strong>The</strong>refore, there are a number of steps remaining in the legislative process before we can declare vic<strong>to</strong>ry this year.<br />
We will keep <strong>you</strong> updated on the latest news and let <strong>you</strong> know when <strong>you</strong>r outreach <strong>to</strong> Congress is needed. <strong>Thank</strong> <strong>you</strong>!<br />
Protect Your Children with Maximum Credi<strong>to</strong>r and Divorce Protection—<br />
An irrevocable trust set up by someone other than the beneficiary provides ultimate credi<strong>to</strong>r protection. With divorce rate soaring, and an increase<br />
in lawsuits, credi<strong>to</strong>r protection should be a very important objective for clients who prepare an estate plan. Generally, a Gran<strong>to</strong>r of a trust can decide<br />
who may receive the benefit of the trust assets, and under what circumstances assets may be distributed. Property distributed outright <strong>to</strong> a<br />
trust beneficiary is subject <strong>to</strong> credi<strong>to</strong>rs’ claims. Property passed in trust may be protected.<br />
“I want my children <strong>to</strong> get one-third at age 25, one-third at age 30, and the final third at age 35.” STOP!! Don’t do it! This distribution scheme does<br />
not take in<strong>to</strong> account that many of our beneficiaries will at some point in life, be sued or divorce. When assets are distributed, they are unshielded<br />
from the safety-net of the trust and exposed <strong>to</strong> credi<strong>to</strong>rs and soon-<strong>to</strong>-be ex-spouses.<br />
An Estate Planning At<strong>to</strong>rney is able <strong>to</strong> draft a trust <strong>to</strong> protect trust beneficiaries, such as surviving spouses and children, from credi<strong>to</strong>rs and divorcing<br />
spouses. This means that when <strong>you</strong> die, and <strong>you</strong>r spouse remarries, the assests <strong>you</strong> left in trust are protected and directed <strong>to</strong> <strong>you</strong>r beneficiaries<br />
of choice.<br />
Beneficiaries may even serve as the trustee of Support trusts. This way, they are able <strong>to</strong> use the trust assets for nearly any reason, but still have<br />
protection from credi<strong>to</strong>rs. Language of the trust is careful <strong>to</strong> limit distributions of both trust income and principal <strong>to</strong> reasons such as health, education,<br />
maintenance, and support. Further, the trust directs the trustee not <strong>to</strong> distribute assets <strong>to</strong> the beneficiary’s estate, his credi<strong>to</strong>rs, or credi<strong>to</strong>rs of<br />
his estate. This language keeps the trust out of the beneficiaries’ estate for estate tax purposes as well as provides credi<strong>to</strong>r protection. Discretionary<br />
Trusts, which give an independent trustee complete discretion over distributions, provide the best credi<strong>to</strong>r and divorce protection. Trusts drafted<br />
with manda<strong>to</strong>ry distributions are inadequate. Forced trust distributions unnecessarily expose <strong>you</strong>r beneficiaries <strong>to</strong> credi<strong>to</strong>rs and divorce. Support<br />
Trusts do a better job, and Discretionary Trusts offer maximum protection against credi<strong>to</strong>rs and divorce.<br />
This article is based on an article written by Steven J. Oshins in<br />
November 2008.<br />
Dustin MacFarane, At<strong>to</strong>ney<br />
Health Care Estate Planning<br />
www.MacFarlaneLegal.com<br />
Bob Scrivano<br />
www.AssetsandAging.com<br />
800-999-8007