29.01.2015 Views

Thank you to Larrie & Diane Grenz! - The ALS Association Greater ...

Thank you to Larrie & Diane Grenz! - The ALS Association Greater ...

Thank you to Larrie & Diane Grenz! - The ALS Association Greater ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Advocacy and Public Policy<br />

PAGE 9<br />

Advocacy and Public Policy—<br />

Senate Committee Approves $6 Million for the <strong>ALS</strong> Registry<br />

Great news! <strong>The</strong> Senate Appropriations Committee has voted <strong>to</strong> provide<br />

an additional $6 million for the <strong>ALS</strong> Registry in 2012!! <strong>The</strong><br />

funding will allow the Registry <strong>to</strong> continue <strong>to</strong> identify cases of <strong>ALS</strong><br />

across the country, collect additional information about the disease<br />

and expand exciting projects such as adding a bioreposi<strong>to</strong>ry and <strong>to</strong>ols<br />

<strong>to</strong> help people with <strong>ALS</strong> learn about and enroll in clinical trials.<br />

This is a tremendous vic<strong>to</strong>ry for every person with <strong>ALS</strong>. It is a clear<br />

sign that Congress recognizes the critical role the Registry can play in<br />

the fight <strong>to</strong> find the cause, treatment and cure for <strong>ALS</strong>. It also is clear<br />

that <strong>ALS</strong> is a priority for the Senate. <strong>The</strong> Committee reduced funding,<br />

or eliminated it entirely, for most other health care programs. In fact,<br />

funding for the entire Department of Health and Human Services was<br />

reduced. Yet, the Senate maintained strong support for the Registry<br />

by keeping funding at the current level.<br />

David Buchannan, P<strong>ALS</strong>, Dan Lungren,<br />

Amy Sugimo<strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> full Senate still must vote on the Department of Health and Human<br />

Services Appropriations bill that includes the Registry funding,<br />

and the House Appropriations Committee also must vote on their version<br />

of the bill. <strong>The</strong>refore, there are a number of steps remaining in the legislative process before we can declare vic<strong>to</strong>ry this year.<br />

We will keep <strong>you</strong> updated on the latest news and let <strong>you</strong> know when <strong>you</strong>r outreach <strong>to</strong> Congress is needed. <strong>Thank</strong> <strong>you</strong>!<br />

Protect Your Children with Maximum Credi<strong>to</strong>r and Divorce Protection—<br />

An irrevocable trust set up by someone other than the beneficiary provides ultimate credi<strong>to</strong>r protection. With divorce rate soaring, and an increase<br />

in lawsuits, credi<strong>to</strong>r protection should be a very important objective for clients who prepare an estate plan. Generally, a Gran<strong>to</strong>r of a trust can decide<br />

who may receive the benefit of the trust assets, and under what circumstances assets may be distributed. Property distributed outright <strong>to</strong> a<br />

trust beneficiary is subject <strong>to</strong> credi<strong>to</strong>rs’ claims. Property passed in trust may be protected.<br />

“I want my children <strong>to</strong> get one-third at age 25, one-third at age 30, and the final third at age 35.” STOP!! Don’t do it! This distribution scheme does<br />

not take in<strong>to</strong> account that many of our beneficiaries will at some point in life, be sued or divorce. When assets are distributed, they are unshielded<br />

from the safety-net of the trust and exposed <strong>to</strong> credi<strong>to</strong>rs and soon-<strong>to</strong>-be ex-spouses.<br />

An Estate Planning At<strong>to</strong>rney is able <strong>to</strong> draft a trust <strong>to</strong> protect trust beneficiaries, such as surviving spouses and children, from credi<strong>to</strong>rs and divorcing<br />

spouses. This means that when <strong>you</strong> die, and <strong>you</strong>r spouse remarries, the assests <strong>you</strong> left in trust are protected and directed <strong>to</strong> <strong>you</strong>r beneficiaries<br />

of choice.<br />

Beneficiaries may even serve as the trustee of Support trusts. This way, they are able <strong>to</strong> use the trust assets for nearly any reason, but still have<br />

protection from credi<strong>to</strong>rs. Language of the trust is careful <strong>to</strong> limit distributions of both trust income and principal <strong>to</strong> reasons such as health, education,<br />

maintenance, and support. Further, the trust directs the trustee not <strong>to</strong> distribute assets <strong>to</strong> the beneficiary’s estate, his credi<strong>to</strong>rs, or credi<strong>to</strong>rs of<br />

his estate. This language keeps the trust out of the beneficiaries’ estate for estate tax purposes as well as provides credi<strong>to</strong>r protection. Discretionary<br />

Trusts, which give an independent trustee complete discretion over distributions, provide the best credi<strong>to</strong>r and divorce protection. Trusts drafted<br />

with manda<strong>to</strong>ry distributions are inadequate. Forced trust distributions unnecessarily expose <strong>you</strong>r beneficiaries <strong>to</strong> credi<strong>to</strong>rs and divorce. Support<br />

Trusts do a better job, and Discretionary Trusts offer maximum protection against credi<strong>to</strong>rs and divorce.<br />

This article is based on an article written by Steven J. Oshins in<br />

November 2008.<br />

Dustin MacFarane, At<strong>to</strong>ney<br />

Health Care Estate Planning<br />

www.MacFarlaneLegal.com<br />

Bob Scrivano<br />

www.AssetsandAging.com<br />

800-999-8007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!