29.01.2015 Views

2009 Accountability Report - Aiken Technical College

2009 Accountability Report - Aiken Technical College

2009 Accountability Report - Aiken Technical College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

19<br />

assessment process that identifies needed change; selects a direction for the <strong>College</strong>; communicates that<br />

direction to its personnel; provides the mechanism to develop appropriate courses of action; allocates needed<br />

resources to ensure success; and evaluates results. The results of these evaluations are used to continuously<br />

improve the <strong>College</strong>’s educational programs, services and operations.<br />

ATC employs a multi-faceted approach to planning, budgeting, and evaluation processes through a<br />

comprehensive Institutional Effectiveness model. This approach includes four major components: the<br />

development of the <strong>College</strong>’s vision, mission and institutional values; the development and implementation of<br />

strategic and operational (annual) plans; outcomes-oriented research, assessment and evaluation; and a process<br />

for continuous improvement at all levels within the institution. ATC views Institutional Effectiveness as a<br />

catalyst for facilitating positive change and continuous improvement in the <strong>College</strong>’s programs, services, and<br />

operations. This requires planning and evaluation processes at all levels of the administrative and academic<br />

enterprise that identifies needed change, selects direction for the <strong>College</strong>, communicates that direction to its<br />

personnel, provides a mechanism to develop appropriate courses of action, allocates resources to ensure<br />

success, evaluates results, and uses those results to seek continuous improvement.<br />

The <strong>College</strong> utilizes a participative structure that includes the governing board, executive leadership, faculty,<br />

staff, students, educational partners, state system central office, business and industry leaders, and community<br />

leaders to ensure a representative, forward-looking, and fact-based quality of input. External stakeholders

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!